Or a million for that matter, because the village idiots keep reproducing.
Allow me to introduce Ken.
Ken is one of the mouth-breathing retards who thinks he can “git me” with his tenuous grasp of metaphysics, Christianity, basic logic and special needs level of reading comprehension.
He thought he would post a wise and deep comment about “the Filioque” without even bothering to understand that word, where it comes from, what it signifies, or why it even exists.
Kind of like the equally stupid and drooling flat Earth cretins who hang on to the word “firmament” (from the freemason Bible intentionally mistranslated in over 33,000 places under the commission of flamboyantly gay King who also started the Freemason Temples in their current Satanic form, which is why the oh so revered KJV “Bible” is also known as the Freemason Bible (Satanist Bible, right, sounds like a good version to you)).
Just as the people who one truly hopes COULD walk off the edge, continue to think the word “firmament” for reasons best known to themselves means “giant bubble of glass that holds back an infinite ocean” without EVER bothering to find out what the word was in the original text nor what it meant. because if they did, they would find it means “the expanse”. You know, just like the Sci-Fi series of the same name all set in… (drum roll please) SPACE! In short, the very word the flat-brained idiots hang on to literally means sky in Hebrew.
Here, we have another version of what is basically a. lemur, trying to come to grips with the reading skills a normal six year old has mastered, enter (is it, could it be… “master” Ken, but of theology instead of bullshido?!) Let us begin dissecting this parasitic hanger-on:
The filioque is not so simple, because that phrase in the creed comes straight out of the gospel of John, and the gospel doesn’t have the filioque in it:
Right there, ladies and gentlemen, with that single first sentence, this moron has disqualified himself. Because he thinks (like all Protestant thinkers do, in grayscale at best) that the word Filioque is somehow MAGICAL! And if it’s not spelt in America-huh-n English like JE-AASUS spoke it, then you must REJECT the unholy pagan rites of Kath-hole-icism.
We will show below that the word is merely a CONCEPT. But we can’t expect Ken to understand things like abstract concepts. He clearly is one of those people who can’t even imagine an apple, never mind a concept.
% “When the Helper comes, whom I will send to you
% from the Father, that is the Spirit of truth
% who proceeds from the Father,
% He will testify about Me” John 15:26
Even the Douay-Rheims doesn’t have the filioque:
% But when the Paraclete cometh, whom I will send you
% from the Father, the Spirit of truth,
% who proceedeth from the Father,
% he shall give testimony of me. John 15:26
Note the second thing that proves he is absolutely retarded: That word that Jesus says: *I* or in full context “whom I will send you”.
Let’s do this at the pre-primary school level for Ken, shall we children?
Who sends it? Jesus does!
Where does it come from? The Father!
But who sends it? The Son!
YAY!!! Now clap your hands and take your blank and go lie down for a little nap after that exhausting use of brain cells, eh Ken?
The easiest thing for the various council fathers to do is to stick with scripture. To change the creed would require extraordinarily good arguments.
And here it is LADIES AND GENTLEMEN! In case you were wondering when it would make its appearance, here it is, the full blown special retardation that only Protestants can ever conjure up! Sola Scripture! Except, well, it isn’t what he believes it to be, is it. Because we literally just did look at the scripture, and guess what, it really quite clearly says the Holy Spirit comes from the father THROUGH the Son. So… yeah… you see why I use the word retarded so much when discussing Protestants who also would pretend to be faux-Orthos, because, oh, yeah, the Orthos too think that Sola Scriptura is completely retarded just as much as the Catholics know it is. But we’ll not tell Ken that, eh? He might cry.
Instead of providing those arguments, Rome has agreed to allow the eastern Catholics, and the Orthodox when they re-unite, to keep the creed as they have always known it.
There is no reunification, you special breed of incestuos experiment. But if there ver were to be, it would be under the One, True, Holy and Apostolic Catholic Church and its edicts and dogmas.
Now let’s look at how dumb Ken was to even comment on my blog.
How difficult would it have been to at least TRY to grasp the situation before shooting his retarded mouth off?
Second result on duck duck go if you type Filioque brings up this, which even though is Novus Ordo based, (so beware) is actually quite correct, because it is such a basic and simple and obvious thing that even the impostors of the Novus Ordo see no point in belabouring it.
The Western Church commonly uses a version of the Nicene creed which has the Latin word filioque (“and the Son”) added after the declaration that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father. Scripture reveals that the Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son. The external relationships of the persons of the Trinity mirror their internal relationships. Just as the Father externally sent the Son into the world in time, the Son internally proceeds from the Father in the Trinity. Just as the Spirit is externally sent into the world by the Son as well as the Father (John 15:26, Acts 2:33), he internally proceeds from both Father and Son in the Trinity. This is why the Spirit is referred to as the Spirit of the Son (Gal. 4:6) and not just the Spirit of the Father (Matt. 10:20).
The quotations below show that the early Church Fathers, both Latin and Greek, recognized the same thing, saying that the Spirit proceeds “from the Father and the Son” or “from the Father through the Son.”
These expressions mean the same thing because everything the Son has is from the Father. The proceeding of the Spirit from the Son is something the Son himself received from the Father. The procession of the Spirit is therefore ultimately rooted in the Father but goes through the Son. However, some Eastern Orthodox insist that to equate “through the Son” with “from the Son” is a departure from the true faith.
The expression “from the Father through the Son” is accepted by many Eastern Orthodox. This, in fact, led to a reunion of the Eastern Orthodox with the Catholic Church in 1439 at the Council of Florence. Unfortunately, the union did not last. In the 1450s (just decades before the Protestant Reformation), the Eastern Orthodox left the Church again under pressure from the Muslims, who had just conquered them and who insisted they renounce their union with the Western Church (lest Western Christians come to their aid militarily).
So let’s take a little look at Acts 2:33, shall we?
But let’s read it in context too, shall we, instead of doing the Prottie select a random text to twist it at will dance.
31 Foreseeing this, he spoke of the resurrection of Christ. For neither was he left in hell, neither did his flesh see corruption.
32 This Jesus hath God raised again, whereof all we are witnesses.
33 Being exalted therefore by the right hand of God, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath poured forth this which you see and hear.
34 For David ascended not into heaven; but he himself said: The Lord said to my Lord, sit thou on my right hand,
35 Until I make thy enemies thy footstool.
36 Therefore let all the house of Israel know most certainly, that God hath made both Lord and Christ, this same Jesus, whom you have crucified.
37 Now when they had heard these things, they had compunction in their heart, and said to Peter, and to the rest of the apostles: What shall we do, men and brethren?
38 But Peter said to them: Do penance, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ, for the remission of your sins: and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
Oh, so, this passage refers to Jesus again, receiving the Holy Ghost and then pouring it out to the others, just as… He said in… GASP! John 15:26! WOW! Will you look at that? it corresponds perfectly! It’s almost like MAGIC. If only you can read at the second grade level!
But wait, it’s not just one (or ok, two) simple trick, there is MORE!
(Perhaps I should use more fonts colours here and some more exclamation marks, so as to keep the brain damaged Protestants that are used to swallowing only adverts and soundbites into their atrophied brains more “engaged”? – let me know!)
We have Galatians 4:6 too! And again, maybe let’s read it in a bit of context eh? Like Catholics do, not like mouth-breathing retards like Ken PRETEND to (he can’t read, he obviously just repeats things he was told by rote).
6 And because you are sons, God hath sent the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying: Abba, Father.
7 Therefore now he is not a servant, but a son. And if a son, an heir also through God.
So… uh… what Spirit is it that God the Father might possibly send to the people? Oh, wait… the Spirit of his Son. So… what Spirit could that possibly be? Some other Spirt, that is NOT the Holy Spirit? Wait, have we got it wrong all this time? Is there really TWO Spirits, the Holy Spirit and then another mysterious unnamed one? Which doesn’t appear anywhere else and is not named in the passage that proves the Trinity beyond any doubt? Well, Ken apparently must believe this, but anyone that can read does not. Because clearly what is being referenced here is the Holy Spirit, and lo and behold, once again, it proceeds from the Father at minimum THROUGH the son, because a very strong argument can also be made that if the Father sends them the Spirit OF the Son, then that spirit is an intrinsic part of Jesus (as it is, being it’s the Holy Spirit) and as such proceeds from him too.
And does Matthew 10:20 contradict anything? Nope, It just says that the spirit of the Father will speak through you. There is no contradiction here. If he had stated the Spirit of Christ instead of The Father, it would have been the same, given that the Trinity is all three of them. It was obviously just a normal sentence spoken as anyone would. He could have said the spirit of God and left it at that too. It makes no difference and is certainly nothing to hang on to as if Matthew had some how EXCLUDED Jesus specifically. In short, it is the usual Protestant nonsense of people trying to find some Calvinistic absolutism and getting it retiredly wrong.
And finally, one last point, note that the Orthos, once again, AGREED with the Catholics and rejoined them over 400 years after their schism and repeated betrayal and murder of many of the Catholics who came to help them despite the fact they were already schismatics for 40 years.
And then, once again, they put their tail between their legs and did as the Muslims told them to do. Not exactly what real believers in Christ would act, is it?
So there you have it Ken. And he has the honour of having forced me to add a whole new category to the topics on this blog, though they have featured many times, Ken prompted the addition of the topic: Retards.
Probably about the only thing he will ever achieve in life, if his reading comprehension is anything to go by.
