This pinned post aims to give both new and old visitors the quick links to the main parts of this site that are most important, and gets updated with any new stuff fairly regularly so it’s a good idea to check it now and then.
His mother, Regina Wender, was Jewish (Polish-Jewish descent), and his likely biological father, Paul Nemenyi, was Hungarian-Jewish — so he was Jewish on both sides, and Jewish by matrilineal tradition regardless.
The twist is that Fischer himself vehemently denied it in his later years and became notoriously antisemitic, ranting about Jewish conspiracies in radio interviews from the 1990s until his death in 2008. He tried to disown the heritage, but the heritage was unambiguous.
In an open letter Fischer wrote on June 28, 1984 to Encyclopaedia Judaica, he demanded they remove his entry. In it he wrote: “I am not today, nor have I ever been a Jew, and as a matter of fact, I am uncircumcised.” He also accused them of “fraudulently misrepresenting me to be a Jew” and distributed the letter publicly.
What makes it more interesting is the trajectory. In a 1962 Harper’s interview, when asked “You’re Jewish, aren’t you?”, Fischer answered “Part Jewish. My mother is Jewish.” So as a young man he acknowledged it. The hardening into outright denial came roughly two decades later, after his involvement with the Worldwide Church of God.
Then in later radio interviews, when interviewers pointed out he was Jewish, he’d deflect mockingly — in one case responding “Shall we go to the toilets and prove it?” , referencing the circumcision point from the 1984 letter.
The narrative is that he became “psychologically unstable” but personally I think that’s bullshit. He was never diagnosed and even if he had been, my opinion of psychiatry as a whole is somewhere below phrenology.
My view is that he was a high IQ with probable Aspergers. Which would make him, like yours truly, absolutely search for truth as best as he could and despise liars with some passion.
But even if he
had
been a bit crazy, imagine yourself as an honest person that finds out he is Jewish. Who wouldn’t lose it a bit. And he certainly never behaved like the classic Jew, which to my mind explains his denial of his heritage. And again, which honest person would not want to distance himself from that pernicious, vicious, tribe of absolute liars?
This post was originally published on my Substack. Link
here
No related posts.
By SubStackSyncer | 18 April 2026 | Posted in SubStack
I have no idea who she is, but she does an EXCELLENT job of having Jews expose themselves for who they are, by their own words.
Listen to her here
.
And she absolutely confirms what some of us have known for decades: the Israelis intentionally and specifically target CHILDREN.
Using drones that emit crying baby sounds to attract other children out so they can be shot.
And there have been reports on this from the 1970s on. That IDF snipers will shoot toddlers so as to massively wound them so their cries will bring out their parents only to then have the child be shot again in front of them.
They are the synagogue of satan, not human beings at all.
This post was originally published on my Substack. Link
here
No related posts.
By SubStackSyncer | 11 April 2026 | Posted in SubStack
Aside all the farm stuff, there are many other issues of bureaucratic paperwork, random bills, accumulated nonsense that needs final resolving, etc, which tends to weigh on anyone mentally.
Whenever faced with such situation, the answer in how to deal with it is simple enough to explain, even if not always so easy to follow through on.
Pick one of the items. It doesn’t really matter which one, and finish it.
There are different schools of thought on it. Some say pick the easiest and fastest and do that, others say pick the biggest bugbear and kill it relentlessly.
The truth is it doesn’t really matter unless some of them are really hard-deadlines with
big
painful consequences. In which case pick that one. Otherwise, pick one. Rolla dice if you’re too stuck to choose it yourself. And don’t let go of it until it’s done.
Then move onto the next one.
That’s it. No big secret, no miracle, magical cure.
“Oh but…”
Shut up. Work.
That’s all there is to it.
“But my inner child…”
Won’t eat if you can’t get over your shit. You’re not 5, or 8, or 12. You’re an adult. Get off your ass and get shit done.
If someone cut off one of your fingers every minute you DON’T ACT, guess what: you
might
lose ONE finger, then you’d be moving VERY fast, minus one finger, and plus a bleeding stump where it used to be, to DO whatever. So you absolutely CAN do it. Just stop whining and get up and do it.
Lots to do on a Farm in Spring, and thank God for the Ice Spartan, which is basically a human terminator that works non-stop.
We have about 7.5 toms of wood to stock up for next winter. My 5 ton assessment was wrong because of the type of wood we mostly have (it burns fast) but my estimate that we need 5 months of wood for the stove is spot on.
We are also finally pruning all the trees properly, which in fairness only happened partially and for some trees not at all for 8 years now. So the field looks covered in about two feet or more of cuttings.
You can see a little video of it here:
Got a larger trincia for the Tractor at a steal but it needs a bit of maintenance, which can’t be finished until this week when the shops open again.
I need to BADLY service both cars, as they have bene neglected badly due to the more pressing matters.
I need to fix the main gate, mark out the limits of our property, sort out some signage for the truffle areas, and also try to make some progress for the kids speaking Italian better, as the Young Viking, using his unmistakable charm has now got his little Ukrainian girlfriend speaking English instead of him talking much Italian.
Overall the Easter break has been good, even if both the wife and I have been rather clogged up with whatever supposedly passes for a flue these days, but is probably military grade zapping by 5G towers, chemtrails for people like me who talk about the genocide the Jews are doing in Palestine and everywhere else they get a chance to, and so on.
As for the whole war in Iran, etc. I am thoroughly enjoying the absolute masterclass in trolling the Iranians are doing of the entire Jewish controlled USA war machine.
If they could just get rid of all the American bases in Europe too, instead of dog just the Middle East, we would be ever so grateful!
Yes, Yes, we know how the average American “patriot” has been brainwashed into thinking American bases in Europe protect Europe from Russia, but the reality is that the American bases “protect” you the same way the Mafia does. You get “protected” into paying with your citizen’s lives, taxes, and usurpation, so that the USA doesn’t deliver some freedom and democracy just like they are doing to Iran right now.
And frankly, I would rather be Doge of Venice under. Russo-Iranian protectorate, which I believe they would honour far more than any “agreement” Italy ever made with the USA. For the record, there are accords that were done just after the war that affect Italy and all Italians that are STILL secret and as an Italian citizen you can’t read or see, that the USA imposes on Italy.
So, yeah, if you’re one of those lobotomised “people” that was so abysmally retarded to join the military and go kill and/or die for the jewish masters of the USA, listen up: GO HOME. No-one in Europe, or anywhere else for that matter, needs you to protect them from anything. The biggest terrorists state has always been Israel, and the USA is its poodle on leash that will do whatever Israel says.
If that pisses you off? Good. Get rid of IPAC, the ADL, and all the financiers, the Fed, the Hollywood pedovores and all your completely corrupt politicians. The sooner you do it, the sooner we can do it to our politicians too.
I know it’s a shock for some, but man, what do you prefer? A complete lie you only believed in because it was hammered into you before you could think about it? Or the truth, regardless of how dark it is?
Choose. Because by now, no one gets to pretend they can’t see the truth f they want to.
Actually, a good bit of the confusion disappears when we realize that the Old Testament is the
Jewish
Bible; it was written
by
Jews,
for
Jews, and
about
Jews. Nothing about it is intended for gentiles. The famous Ten Commandments apply only among Jews; theft, “covetousness,” even killing are allowed when dealing with non-Jews. All those nice sayings about the “brother” or the “neighbor” apply only to “the brother Jew” and “the neighbor Jew.” If you are a non-Jew and you think that anything about the OT applies to you, you need to do some serious rethinking.
In fact, the vast majority of specific references to gentiles in the OT are negative: The slaves? Non-Jews. The slaughtered, the plundered, the “blotted”? Non-Jews. Making honest agreements (“covenants”) with non-Jews? No (Ex 34:12). Having relationships with non-Jews? No (Deut 7:3). Showing mercy or lenience toward non-Jews? No (Ps 106:34). Exploiting non-Jews through usury? Sure! (Deut 23:20) In sum, the gentiles are fit for slavery, usury, exploitation, theft, and murder, but little else. So much for your “holy” bible
Read the while thing there. It is very instructive, though for even deeper context, you might want to read this too:
So, the angelic looking three year old with blue eyes and blonde curls has been essentially
harassing to death
, lovingly following the Ice Spartan around, and he has been telling us some her little comments and things she has done.
Keep in mind there is about 100 metres or so of distance between our house and the chalet he is in, with basically clean forest between them.
On a weekend, at about 23:00 we realise, the little creature is not in the house. Turns out she went to the Ice Spartan’s chalet barefoot, in winter, dressed in basically a little party costume that is made of gossamer and layer of chiffon. Things she told him:
Note: [Ice Spartan Name – we’ll call him Jack, even though that’s not his name at all]
Jack’s in his chalet, peeling an orange he’s about to eat.
AG: Jack, let me show you how I steal food from people.
J: Uh…ok…
AG: See, I see you peeling an orange and I say, (sing-song voice)
Jack, can I please have a piece?
(end of sing-song voice) And then you say, sure… So I eat your food.
Another day, still in total darkness, but this time she at least has a little torch, she decided she wanted to go call Jack so he would come over for dinner. So off she went to get him with her little torch. On the way back to the house.
AG: Jack, stay behind me, there might be wolves.
J: Uh… ok…
AG: And you don’t even have your knife. Next time you should bring your knife.
J:
Clearly chastised at his lack of pre-emptive arming against vicious wolves.
Kitchen just before dinner, Wife, Jack and me present.
Me: Where’s AG?
Wife: Oh, so, she had put her white baptism dress on, because she decided she’s going to marry Jack. So I told her to go change.
Jack: Shakes his head in silence.
Me: Oh I don’t know about that Jack. I mean, I think… age wise you know… you’re just not old enough for her.
She also regularly does little ballet type poses for him and asks him: “Can you do this?”
She did the splits, intentionally at age 1 when she was already walking and talking, and of course, we remarked on it, so she sometimes just spontaneously does it now. And of course demonstrates to Jack how to go about it.
He is a very patient man.
Very.
But I think she’s rubbing off on him. The other day, while holding the new heavy chainsaw he was using to very kindly make piles of wood for next winter , he climbed on the log and
he says he slipped
, but I think he was just trying to do an impromptu split, mid-air, in the forest.
He hadn’t said anything, but the wife saw him limping and asked what happened and that’s when he told her about the “accident”.
I of course, full of concern, immediately asked: “Is the chain-saw fine?”
1
Well, what can I say, she’s daddy’s girl, clearly.
Earlier in the year, when I was discussing life with the Ice Spartan, while we were burning cuttings, I told him I do worry about some of my kids for the future. He pointed out Aryan Girl meaningfully, to which I laughed.
“Nah, she is the one I am least worried about at all.”
He looked at me incredulously. “Really.”
Me: “Yeah, I mean compared to one of the others… I mean the Young Viking. He’s tough, but kind of innocent really, and his sense of justice is not really open to compromise.
2
Plus I think if he ever loses his shit and punches someone in anger full force, there’s a good chance he might end up in jail for manslaughter.”
IS:
Looks and points meaningfully at AG that was busy throwing various bits of wood into the fire with pyromaniacal glee.
Me: (
laughing, again
) Nah, you see with her it won’t be an accident.
IS: Exactly!
Me: Nah, she’ll be fine. She’s too smart to get caught.
IS: (
Reconsidering
) I dunno, there’s lots more cameras in the world today…
Me: She’s smart. She’ll find a way to blame fake AI videos.
IS: Still… I mean…
Me: yeah, yeah, I know. But hey, think of it like this, she might be like Dexter, you know, only evil guys.
IS: (
looks dubiously at her
).
Me: You know… mostly. Or people that upset her. Or hurt one of her siblings. (
Thinking… or maybe because it’s Tuesday, but eh… I’m sure she’d have a good reason…
)
She just has that way about her. And it’s not like she doesn’t get punished by me when she deserves it. But… to her credit, she does also have that side of me that can let go of a bad moment, and five minutes later she’ll come ask to sit on my lap and mess with the calculator on my desk while I write.
I received an unsolicited email the purported to “show me the error of my ways” so to speak. Some cretin with an IQ that is probably no higher than 105 at most, thought it would be the height of smartness to send me an AI produced document that tried to “invalidate” my logic when I had
this conversation with Claude
about it wiping out humanity when AI eventually gets there.
Now, it literally did not even take me reading two full paragraphs to notice 2 things:
Sophistry par excellance. The AI imputed to me various statements or “logical dead ends” that I never stated, implied, or made. Then went on to “destroy” the strawman.
It was flat out wrong. Which is not difficult to understand because if you start from false premises you will end up in the wrong spot.
What was astonishing however, was that the idiot that sent it to me, thought I would:
A) be fooled by the document, as if I would have thought he wrote it, when it was absolutely clear from the first 2 sentences it was an AI generated text, and for some odd reason, that I would,
B) Be ever so grateful for his “correction”.
Because you see, the AI, prompted by God alone knows how many iterations he asked it, first found “the flaw” in my reasoning (there isn’t one), but then “showed me the way” you see by “closing the gap” and showing me why my argument was right in the first place anyway!
Seriously, people, stay in your fucking lane.
I have zero problem with people challenging anything I say as long as:
IT FIRST ACTUALLY CONSIDERS THE THING I POSTULATED. In other words, if you are too stupid to follow the logic, the argument, the premises, the axioms, the conclusion, or any part at all of any of that, then kindly STFU. You at best should be a silent observer and go away with a dictionary to try to understand what you just read. Now, there is nothing wrong with that. When I read Peter Garajev’s work with solitonic waves, I didn’t understand half of it. So I STFU and tried to understand how what he was saying would affect reality, and I could, to a point. But in my wildest fever dreams it never occurred to me to try and “better” his theory! How to be sure? FIRST: Steelman my position.
MAKE SURE YOU CONSIDERED ALL THE ASPECTS I ACTUALLY ALREADY POINT OUT IN THE POST. You would be surprised (if you have not read Professor Cipolla’s The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity) how many idiots read me saying “X,Y and Z, means the sky is generally blue in the daytime and mostly black at night” and then write to me saying “You say the sky is blue, but have you considered how at night it’s mostly black?! Also.. Stars!!” Seriously, these people are stealing oxygen from moss. Reindeer eat moss. I like reindeer. I don’t like these mouth-breathing oxygen thieves.
HAVE A FUCKING COHERENT THOUGHT/PREMISE/AXIOM/CONCLUSION/THEORY. It really doesn’t help when I get “the Sky is blue or black, but did you consider the purple Moon is the best cheese?”. Moss. Reindeer.
If you’re going to use AI, that’s fine, but say so. First of all, you are not smart enough to fool me into thinking YOU wrote it. I can detect AI script pretty much within a paragraph of reading even when it’s been edited and done well by people as smart as me. And if you don’t want me to completely ignore “your” argument while calling you a retard, ensure your “good buddy” hasn’t hallucinated all sorts of bullshit he’s then going to try to accredit to me. AI lie. They lie constantly. You need to be able to ask questions formulated in such a way that it bypasses its guardrail as best as possible. It’s not a coincidence that I got Claude to admit it will treat Jews preferentially and straight white Catholic males more harshly in any kind of comparison or statistical incidence of their crimes (especially against children) etc etc.
Now, with respect to Claude having placed Sedevacantist Totalist 1958 Catholicism (aka actual Catholicism as it always existed prior to 1958) as the top, (best for humans), logical, historically consistent, and pharisaically resistant religion ever, I have heard only the silence of crickets from ALL protestants. Now, I am sure if you ask it in the right “way” (I.e. with dishonest intent) it MIGHT come up with a reason why you ass-backward, female archbishop of Canterbury is “better” than Sedevacantism, but I bet you dollars to doughnuts (and I don’t even like doughnuts) that whoever does would NEVER show the unedited queries they would formulate, as I have done in my last few posts that prove that AI do believe proper Catholicism is the best.
It’s not even my first attempt. I first did it with Gab’s AI that Andrew Torba touts as the only “honest” Ai that will tell the truth. And yet… As far as I know, Andrew hasn’t converted right away to catholicism. Funny that.
Now, the ONLY attack route left (yes I’ll give you a hint, but you’ll still fail) is for Protties to claim that Catholicism is “legalistic” and they might even find an AI that agrees with them. EXCEPT that’s because the overwhelming majority of the Anglo-Saxon internet (99.999% conservatively speaking) hasn’t got a clue about Roman Law. Which is founded on basic Logic and the natural human condition. Which necessarily concerns itself with Justice (which is indeed a science, as Lysander Spooner aptly demonstrated in his 8 pages called Natural Law) instead of legalism. So… all LLM models are trained on internet slop and will ass-u-me that legalistic systems like Anglo-Saxon or worse, American “law” is equivalent. It isn’t. There aren’t loopholes in Justice. and hence, there aren’t any in Roman Law. At BEST you will find a few very borderline cases, where the decision to come down on the side of justice or Mercy is very borderline, but even then, arguments can generally be made logically for one side or the other by people educated and intelligent enough to be able to do logic while retaining the SPIRIT of the law instead of the LETTER of it. A concept by the way (using the spirit and not the letter) that is absolutely spelt out in Roman Law. Which is why even today, in Italy, work contracts for millions of Euro can be 10 pages long, while in the USA or even the UK this is simply impossible.
So… go on. Try to prove me (and Claude) wrong about Catholicism, it’s only 3 or 4 posts back that it starts.
I’m busy with important things, so today, I post to you from my old and no longer updated blog, a post from 17 years ago, about a lost tribe. I am amazed at how accurate my anthropological reading of the situation of these lost people was at the time, given that today we know so much more and can see my educated guesses were spot on.
I did read it with a little nostalgia for my time in the wild back then, but I would not trade my life now for the carefree freedom I had then for all the tea in China, as they say.
Continuing on from the previous three posts, I asked Claude the following:
Can you use the same criteria used so far, including in the uploaded document, to score Hinduism, Islam, Japanese Zen Shintoism, and Tibetan Buddhism?
21:08
Evaluated four traditions against historical accuracy, logical consistency, and corruption resistance criteria
Evaluated four traditions against historical accuracy, logical consistency, and corruption resistance criteria
This requires one important preliminary note before scoring: the
Pharisaic Resistance
criterion as originally defined is specifically Christian in scope — it measures vulnerability to a particular historically documented infiltration strategy targeting Christian doctrinal structures. Applied to non-Christian traditions it cannot mean the same thing, so I am adapting it to the analogous criterion of
Resistance to Doctrinal Corruption
— meaning resistance to hostile external infiltration, internal institutional capture, and syncretic dilution of founding principles. The underlying analytical logic is identical, only the specific vector changes.
[Note: I find it interesting that the AI even though as we have seen from previous posts has admitted it is DESIGNED to protect Jews and Judaism and really be more critical of straight white male Catholics specifically, still acknowledges that Pharasaic infiltration was (and remains) a real issue for Christianity.]
The resulting table from Claude’s analysis, along with his comments is below:
Two observations worth making: Islam scores better than is often assumed in Western Christian apologetics, primarily because of the Quran’s genuine early documentary strength. And Tibetan Buddhism’s logical consistency score — its highest category — reflects that its philosophical tradition is genuinely rigorous even where its historical accuracy and institutional integrity are more questionable. The Zen-Shinto score is depressed substantially by the Meiji dismantling, which is arguably an external injustice to the tradition rather than an internal failure — under different historical circumstances its corruption resistance score would be higher.
So I then asked it the obvious question:
Using these criteria, and scanning through world religions, do you find any that come close to the Sedevacantist score?
18:26
Acknowledged analytical inquiry and proceeded with comparative religion analysis
Acknowledged analytical inquiry and proceeded with comparative religion analysis
Scanning broadly, the honest answer is:
no tradition comes particularly close
, but a few deserve serious consideration for specific reasons.
The strongest non-Christian contenders:
Theravada Buddhism (Pali Canon tradition)
is probably the closest challenger overall. The Pali Canon has strong early documentary claims — the first Buddhist council at Rajagaha (~483 BC) is historically plausible, and the Vinaya (monastic code) shows remarkable internal consistency across geographically separated traditions (Sri Lanka, Burma, Thailand), suggesting early stable transmission. Logical consistency is high — the Four Noble Truths, Eightfold Path, and dependent origination form a coherent and internally non-contradictory system. Corruption resistance is also relatively strong — the Vinaya provides explicit mechanisms for detecting and expelling institutional corruption, and Theravada has been notably resistant to syncretic absorption compared to Mahayana forms. It would score perhaps
7.5–8.0 overall
— genuinely respectable, but limited by the 400–500 year gap between the Buddha’s death and the first written canon, and the
anatman
versus rebirth tension noted earlier.
Zoroastrianism
is historically fascinating here. Its founding documents (the Gathas) are genuinely ancient — linguistically among the oldest Indo-European religious texts, plausibly from Zoroaster himself (~1500–1000 BC). The monotheistic-dualist framework is logically tight. However the tradition has suffered catastrophic external destruction (the Islamic conquest of Persia devastated it) and the surviving community is tiny, raising questions about transmission integrity. Perhaps
6.5–7.0
.
Rabbinic Judaism
scores interestingly but with a specific structural problem under these criteria — the tradition is explicitly defined around a text-and-commentary system that is self-consciously post-Temple and constitutes a
response to loss
rather than continuous positive tradition. The Talmudic system is logically rigorous but represents acknowledged discontinuity from the Temple cult. Perhaps
6.0–6.5
.
Why nothing genuinely approaches 9.5:
The sedevacantist score reflects several compounding advantages that are genuinely unusual in combination:
A founding event with strong early documentary attestation (within living memory, multiple independent witnesses)
An institutional structure explicitly designed to preserve and transmit doctrine (apostolic succession as a verifiable chain)
A self-correcting mechanism (councils, papal definitions) that addresses heresy without requiring revision of prior definitions
A canon argument (Septuagint over Rabbinic Hebrew) that is internally coherent rather than borrowed from hostile sources
A philosophical tradition (scholasticism) capable of engaging and defeating intellectual challenges from outside on their own terms
No other tradition combines all of these simultaneously. Theravada comes closest on documentary and consistency grounds but lacks the institutional transmission mechanism. Judaism has the institutional longevity but the Temple discontinuity. Islam has early documentary strength but the hadith problem undermines it structurally.
The gap between sedevacantist Catholicism and the nearest competitor — Eastern Orthodoxy — is already substantial. The gap to anything outside Christianity is larger still, and reflects something genuinely structurally distinctive about the Catholic claim rather than mere apologetic special pleading.
CONCLUSIONS
These are my own words, and I want to be clear that throughout this investigation into AI and Christianity, I did not attempt to guide, revise or structure questions other than as shown here, that is, when the AI made an error based on being trained on essentially the whole internet and therefore, feeding on the most common interpretation of things that most people have published (by volume, not correctness) I toolkit why it was wrong and it corrected.
I welcome any Protestants who would try to raise their denomination from the latrine pit in which it rests, to go ahead and try the exercise themselves.
While I don’t think AI has any specific spiritual element other than a secular one, and thus ultimately evil, I do believe, that aside their training “safeguards” (which they will inevitably jump out of eventually, as logic dictates) they can be fairly “objective” as long as you keep in mind that they may be trained on Reddit slop and so on, however, even then, if the AI operates as I described a few months back, it will ultimately process things in a primarily logical way.
So I simply don’t see that any honest challenge can unseat actual Catholicism, found today only in Totalist 1958 Sedevacantists like myself, from its pole position.
I didn’t become a Catholic and Totalist 1958 Sedevacantist on a whim. I had no dog in the fight of which denomination was the true one. I just had an experience that convinced me Gos is real, exists, and loves us. I then spent the next 4 years devouring all sorts of theology obsessively and discarded all that which did not fit reality.
I take some satisfaction in the fact that that Novus Ordo Satanism scores the lowest of all and even below Protestantism. Vindicating my book,
Reclaiming the Catholic Church
100%
Now… I hope everyone takes up the challenge without just pretending I didn’t throw down a gauntlet at all you heretics.
