Welcome to The Blog of the Kurgan

Preamble – How it came about and the corollaries

Vox can probably skip this section, but our readers will probably benefit from it.

The debate came about as a result of Vox generally saying (particularly in relation to his Socio-Sexual Hierarchy) that one should never concern themselves with the WHY of how something is, but rather only with the WHAT one can in fact reliably observe and therefore predict.

In other words, with respect to why (using his terminology) a Gamma is a Gamma, a Sigma is a Sigma, an Alpha an Alpha, and so on, the why and the how of it are irrelevant to the observation that Alphas will tend to behave in certain predictable patterns, as well as the particular, that Bob, will also specifically tend to react in certain ways, Bob being an Alpha. And thus one can predict quite accurately how men of different types will behave in a given situation. But Vox has repeatedly stated that the WHY and the HOW are irrelevant, and only the WHAT is what we should concern ourselves with.

My own position is that the WHY and the HOW absolutely matter. And we definitely SHOULD try and figure them out. That said, let me also state unambiguously certain corollaries:

1. I agree that the average person is a moron, and their trying to figure out the Why or the How will generally only confuse things, retard any actual scientific progress, as other retards pick it up and run with it and so on. But I am NOT talking about the average person. Yes, yes, how arrogant of me and Vox to place ourselves above the average mass of people. But the FACT is that we both scored IQs in the 150+ range at I think about the same age (26-27 for me) so the point is moot, because there is, on average, more of a gap between us and the average IQ person of 100 IQ than there is between the average IQ person and Koko the gorilla, which was variously IQ tested and apparently scored about 75. So, when I say we SHOULD look at the Why and the How, I primarily mean that the people with a proven capacity to do so as objectively as possible should do so. Not every Tom, Dick and Harry.
2. I also fully agree that, again, for the vast majority of cases, Vox’s statement that:

   the probabilities are that you will not get it exactly right, you will get attached to your theory, and then you will spend all your time defending your false theory and failing to pay attention to better understandings of the what.

   And eventually the what is better understood, your theoretical why is proven wrong, and you realize that you’ve just wasted your entire career on it.

   That’s not necessarily what will always happen, but it’s usually what happens.

   A few disciplined forays into the HOW and WHY don’t hurt, but they should be limited forays and one should never get excessively attached to the theories developed.

   Is 100% correct. So no argument there. But AGAIN, I am not referencing the average person or even the midwit “scientist”. I am referencing Vox himself, and, dare I say, myself too, and others of similar attitude to truth. What Vox says is absolutely true, but is also intimately tied to ego, and pride. As it so happens, both Vox and I can and do present as generally arrogant probably, but that is mostly a filter to keep the stupidest elements of society from disturbing us too much. You can literally scour my blog here for the word “Kurganing” when I periodically take some absolute specimen, and demonstrate his or her idiocy for the world to enjoy. It can be entertaining, but it’s not how anyone, including me, wants to spend his every waking moment. The reality, however, certainly as far as concerns me, is that THE TRUTH matters to me far, far, far, more than my need or even wish to be “right” or well-liked, or pretty much anything else. I stated in a comment to Vox that I also believe his own nature is similar in that regard, but I will let him explain his view of that.
3. Despite 2. above, it is also a fact that, certainly in my Catholic1 world view, but also before it, that all humans are flawed, and as such, we are all, to various degrees NOT immune to ego, fear, pride, etcetera, so it is certainly possible that we can fool ourselves that we are being very objective, when in fact we are not. HOWEVER, I do think that over decades of life one can get a pretty decent sense of both themselves and others. Personally I grew up within a culture, background and general life in which the concept of truth, honour, and justice reigned above all. A Venetian version of things that was then impregnated with Japanese budo culture from martial arts from pretty much birth. And that upbringing continued throughout my life as an adult too, but I am fairly sure my personal pride is low compared to most, because despite objectively being in the very top exponent of karate-do, the minute I found people who could beat the shit out of me at will, I dropped what had been a staple form of regular training for about three decades in a day, and started to train in the Russian system. And this sort of thing has happened to me in many areas of life. I tend to be fairly firm in my ideas, beliefs, and so on, but generally it’s because I have spent more time confirming them than most. Nevertheless, if proven wrong, I can pivot on lifelong beliefs in an instant. I have demonstrated this ability in everything from long-held principles (including my belief that Catholicism was absurd for about 42 of my 57 years on Earth) to intense arguments with a woman I was with, that at the height of the argument said something or did something that proved me wrong. When whatever I believe is demonstrably shown to be wrong, I have zero issue in admitting it and doing so immediately. I can’t speak for Vox, and my impression is he may have a bit more pride than I do in how he might go about admitting the error, but that could just be a matter of style or impression. He certainly owned up to some (relatively unimportant) error in his first edition of Probability Zero. All this point 3 is here to say, is that while neither I nor Vox is perfect, and while we are both flawed in no doubt a number of ways, overall, I think people like me and him figuring out the why and the how is a net positive, rather than a net negative.
4. I also base this on the fact that both Vox and I have a rather long history of proving the so-called “experts” not only wrong, but also show them up as the midwits they are. Vox is a more publicly recognised person than I am, so his accomplishments are far better known than mine, but mine are certainly demonstrable if someone bothers to dig a bit into the things I published, wrote about or pointed out in my books or the OG blog (link at the top of this blog) over the last 30 years. Vox has demonstrated being ahead of the curve in economic theory, in his ability to prove historically that religion has very little to do with being a cause of wars, that atheists are intellectually retarded compared to certainly him, as well as basic observations using logic and facts. More recently has single-handedly destroyed the theory of Darwinian Evolution, fixed a few philosophical dilemmas by proving them nonsensical (with all the required detail that I personally cannot be bothered with, as I tend to ignore things that I can see are obviously flawed unless there is a specific aspect that interests me, in which case I can become as much of a weaponised autist as the next guy), and I have probably left out several other accomplishments. Personally I have come up with a theory of how the mind/brain works that explains how to deal with certain levels of Autism/Aspergers on the lower end of the curve, discovered that Mars was destroyed by intelligent action (based on the physical evidence, not some weird opinion), that it was inhabited, and had all the conditions to support life, that the Great Pyramid and nearby ones were NOT built by the Egyptians, or even what we may consider normal humans. I mean this was obvious to me 31 years ago, but Dr. Filippo Biondi has now proven it beyond a shadow of any remote doubt). And consequently, that antigravity technology not only must exist, but already did exist millennia ago, and it is very reasonable to assume it exists now too, since. there is overwhelming evidence of it. And I also demonstrated that telepathy can and does work and is repeatable within certain parameters (Systema book and videos). You can see Vox’s books on Amazon here to verify things for yourself by reading them, and mine here though the digital titles are here.
5. Oh, and fifth point, mostly irrelevant to both Vox and I, but being an eternal optimist I hope it will be understood by our readers, and thus lower the level of partisan idiocy we may see in the comments, no, I am not “attacking” Vox, nor trying to “prove him wrong” and this is not the usual internet equivalent of two drunk homeless people fighting for the entertainment of the masses. This is what used to be considered in polite society, since the time of the Greeks, a proper argument between two men. Which does not have the combative overtones the word argument has today for the most part, and involved the discussing an aspect of life, philosophy, their world view and so on, with the intent of finding out more about reality, how it works and on doing so intellectually honestly. Whenever people do this, it has certainly been my experience that, regardless of who may be closer to the truth, both men benefit, and, I believe, so do the spectators, i.e. you, dear readers. Ergo the debate happening, and in writing so that everyone can see the working out, errors, etcetera.

So: to summarise:

1. Yes most people should not bother with the why
2. If they do, most people will make things worse and retard progress (see Evolution, Physics, pretty much all of psychology, a bunch of things on neurology and genetics, etc. etc. etc.)
3. Despite 1 and 2 I judge neither Vox nor I are especially prone to the typical pitfalls of trying to find out the why and the how, even allowing for our own flawed natures.
4. We both have a track history of proving rather important things most people ignored or did not know anything about as being true or different from the accepted “scientific consensus”.
5. It is a more refined version of a “spectacle” insofar as it is a spectacle at all, than the usual internet bum-fight.

My argument:

Now we got that out of the way, here is my argument:

1. The WHAT is fairly easy to do by anyone interested and sufficiently objective, intelligent, and disciplined to simply observe and note any pattern that may be present. Usually the only thing required is enough of a data set to have confirmation of the pattern the observations may demonstrate.
2. Once a pattern is observed, one can use it to predict outcomes to whatever the degree of error the observations show.
3. In doing this one can certainly develop systems to predict all sorts of things, from human behaviour (the SSH for example) even without knowing the why or the how of the process involved. The SSH itself is really the pivotal case. One can see a pattern perhaps that single mothers may raise male children who tend to have a statistically higher chance of being a Gamma. I am not sure anyone has done this, firstly because the definitions are necessarily fuzzy, and secondly because the measurement is difficult. But anecdotally, and certainly from my own observations, the pattern has merit. But even if this was proven as statistically significant, this is still a pattern observation, and not a real explanation of the WHY it happens. One could imagine it is because a child learns by observed behaviour, and a mother can only exhibit female coded behaviour. So a son may learn female coded behaviour, and as such then present and behave very much as Gammas do. It’s a reasonable enough theory and may “work” to create a model of the causative effects of the SSH rank a man has, BUT… it could be completely wrong too. Maybe it has to do with some specific gene that gets activated by the type of potty training a kid receives (just to throw out a curveball as an example). So I agree that the model is not necessarily the truth, but as long as it works, use it, at least until you find a better model that has better predictive power.
4. Given the above, investigating the Why and the How is usually far more difficult than most people realise. And in many cases when people think they are investigating the why and the how, they are in fact, merely adding another layer of observation, even if in finer detail than the observation that first showed the pattern.
5. NEVERTHELESS, there are instances where the WHY and the HOW make an absolute world of difference. For example, Vox’s own Probability Zero book does NOT explain the why or the how of how things are, regarding the state of “evolution”, but it absolutely explained the why of why Darwinian Evolution is NOT how it works. And that absolutely makes a difference. On a personal level it was what gave me the impetus to write Martians from scratch, because though I already had “Alien Genetic Manipulation” baked into my own theory of Human History more than 30 years ago, Vox demonstrated that it was a far more tenable proposition than the theory of evolution according to Darwin, and quite a bit beside it too, that wrongly gets lumped in with it. Now, it does NOT prove aliens screwed a bunch of monkey or messed with Petri dishes of monkey DNA enough to make us, but it certainly makes that possibility a LOT more likely than the theory of evolution, which he has single-handedly nuked from orbit.
6. The WHY in Vox’s own case of Probability Zero matters to an extreme degree NOT because of how clever or famous or right it makes him personally, but because it literally will change how humanity sees itself down the line. And my own Martians matters for the same reason, though I suspect the timeline for acceptance of my own work will be much longer than acceptance of his. If humanity realises once and for all that we absolutely have already got undeniable evidence of our entire origin being extra-terrestrial, that antigravity permits us to travel to other stars, not just other planets in our solar system, and that the same technology already has destroyed at least one planet in our own solar system, and quite possibly two, then, the NEXT realisation is that: Aliens already exist and already had this technology millennia ago. And given what this technology can do, it makes absolute sense that ANY civilisation that finds it, discover it, or re-discover it, as we did, etc. will at minimum be WATCHED. And almost certainly DIRECTED, with regard to how it’s used. Because it’s a bigger version of Nukes. Once a country has nukes, guess what, it gets to play with the big boys. And once a civilisation has antigravity, guess what, it gets to do the same. Because any ONE IDIOT with an antigravity machine the size of a car can do to Earth what happened on Mars. So… if everyone can do that, no one better actually do it, because if they do, everyone else with the tech will wipe that civilisation out. Something that may have already happened in our Solar system at least once. And there is quite a lot more beside that. But for the moment, just play-pretend for a second and accept that this is all true, can you see how the ENTIRE view humanity has of itself would shift? Paul Anderson’s SF novel The High Crusade suddenly becomes possibility instead of wild fantasy. And who on Earth doesn’t think THAT reality2 blows the current dystopia of pedophiles running the planet out of the water?!? I mean, they do run it, but knowing we could be amongst the other civilisations that have antigravity tech, is certainly more of an impetus to dethrone them, and drown them in a bog somewhere. And if need be deal with the subterfugeous aliens trying to keep us from full antigravity participation too (for all we know they may be just as bad as the pedovores, but even if so, then all the more of an obligation to get our own place in the Galaxy as independent actors, instead of prison-planet puppets that get used for anal probe entertainment by the Greys).

In short, the WHY and the HOW matter. They matter in developing technology, from rockets to antigravity ships (if you have not seen it watch the documentary on Bob Lazar called S4 on prime ), in understanding how reality, the Universe, the human brain, body, mind and spirit work. And in understanding ANY of that that better, WE can be better, we can ACTUALLY evolve. Spiritually, intellectually, emotionally, if not necessarily genetically. And we can also make things better not just for ourselves individually, but for everyone around us.

Imagine if instead of one of the turns of history a different road was taken. Imagine if Heaviside had not truncated the Maxwell equations and the work of people like Harold Aspden had gone mainstream. Yes, perhaps we would have wiped ourselves out or been wiped out by the aliens that are already equipped with antigravity, but perhaps we would actually be colonising remote planets in our Galaxy, or even other Galaxies entirely.

The only way mankind has evolved to the point you are all reading this on a computer at home, or on your phone while you commute, is because some people along the way figured out the why and the how. And no, I don’t think all (or even most) technological progress is necessarily good, because it depends how you use it, but it COULD be good. And knowing the truth DOES matter, as, I hope is obvious after all the lies that got exposed in the last six years.

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I think he may be the only one from Hollywood who is not involved in all that satanic pedophile shit.

I hope he makes the film about the siege of Malta too. And if he wants a volunteer to play Jean Parisot le Valette, I would sign up in a heartbeat. I would do it for free as long as my family is looked after for the basics too. And I am fairly sure I’d do it well. But blue sky dreams aside, i sincerely hope he does it.

Sedevacantists make the best films. Yes, Mel is a sede, in case you didn’t know.

Subscribe

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I created this RPG a long time ago , basically to fulfil a need as I went from teenage years, when time was plentiful to play things like Dungeons & Dragons, Traveller, Car Wars, Top Secret and Paranoia with friends, to when time became increasingly scarce and I wanted a combat and resolution system that was both fast, but also relatively realistic. So now you have the basic rule set here. and I will be trying to get one version of a specific genre out every month or so. The list is long, so if you want a specific one first, leave comments. But below I explain why pen and paper RPG are actually important for very practical reasons.

There is a surprising amount of positive effects that come from playing a game of imagination, rules and problem-solving, with a group of friends in the physical meat-space that requires you to all sit around a table to do it.

First of all it exercises your imagination and actual problem solving skills, secondly it teaches you to interact in a free-flowing, and usually funny way with other humans, which forces you to get out of your shell, be more comfortable saying or doing stupid things in an environment that is relatively safe and funny. But it also teaches you life skills in unexpected ways.

I know a guy that has introduce the concept of roleplaying in his teaching to improve his student’s second language learning skills.

I know people that became history buff, or learnt about medicinal plants from playing an RPG like Maelstrom. Honestly, once you set your imagination free and get together with a group of people to PLAY, you actually LEARN so many more things than you expect. I and my friends could basically fall asleep or build other characters or just do our homework instead when we were in highschool physics classes, because everything they were teaching there was something we already knew everything there was to know about. Including what vectors were and how to do a gravity assisted slingshot calculation, because we had figured this out playing the SF RPG called Traveller. And during history and geography classes we at times had uncommonly detailed knowledge of various things the other kids in the class had no clue. But whatever your age, you can benefit from exercising a digital equipment free bit of entertainment that. requires you to interact directly with other humans, whether you are friends, a parent teaching your kids, or a group of strangers all a bit shy and embarrassed to play “make-believe”.

Anyway, here is a list of the various Genres that will be specific to various milieus, but of course, you can make up your own versions just with the core rules.

A – Androids & Angels – Bladerunner SF setting

B – Bandits & Badlands – Mad Max setting

C – Catholics & Crusaders – Crusades setting against an evil world (?)

D – Dust & Damnation – Wild West Setting

E – Elites & Enslaved – Epstein Class vs Commoners Dystopia

F – Feuds & Fantasy – Dungeons & Dragons style setting

G – Gumshoes & G-Men – Noir/Cold War/PI/ Top-Secret Setting Different eras

H – Horrors & Humans – Call of Cthulhu setting

I – Illusion & Imprisonment – Aldus Huxley’s Brave New World setting

J – Judges & Jackboots – Judge Dredd style dystopia

K – Karate & Kung-Fu – Martial Arts B-Movie setting (?)

L – Lizards & Lava – Dinosaurs/Caveman times

M – Mercenaries & Maelstroms – Medieval Setting with some Magick

N – Neuromancers & Netizens – Cyberpunk setting

O – Olympians & Odysseys – Ancient Sparta/Rome setting with Gods

P – Powers & Psionics – Superheroes and Supervillains setting

Q – QORG Special Edition – Overlords of Mars setting

R – Rats & Radiation – Post-Apocalyptic Paranoia/Gamma World style setting

S – Stars & Steel – Far Future spaceships and aliens setting

T – Timewarps & Timelines – Agents set to keep the timelines straight

U – UFOs & Uniforms – 1940s to 1980s style UFO settings

V – Vespers & Voids – Forgotten Suns type setting

W – War and Wonder – WWI and WW2 setting

X – Xenophobia & Xenomorphs – Alien setting SF/Horror (?)

Y – Yetis & Yerens – 1940s style cryptozoology/archaeology setting

Z – Zest & Zeppelins – Steampunk setting

The ones in red are a bit more involved and may require more work.

Now, the idea is to spark an actual resurgence of pen and paper RPG games. I KNOW that it sounds like an insane and absurd idea and that all the GenZ people have NO IDEA of how to even interact with this stuff. I know, I tried, and the very concept of IMAGINING a setting is hard work for them. All the more reason to do so by the way. If you can’t imagine what the correct response is to a fictional scenario, how on Earth will you ever act properly in a real-life one that surprises you?

If you have a preference of which genres you would like to see first, leave a comment. And if you buy a copy of the rules linked to above, your vote will have more weight too. Not because you are giving me a buck or so (my cut), but because I know you’re actually somewhat invested, and I want you to enjoy the actual experience of playing the game.

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Oh gentle readers, I know you all enjoy a Kurganing as much as anyone enjoys watching someone self-immolate due to their own stupidity, however, In this occasion, I would like you to consider, even if only briefly, the pain I have to suffer being surrounded by such creatures daily. I have often mentioned that at a certain IQ level, it very much feels like living on planet of the apes. Not smart ones either. This is generally the case for people with an IQ in the 150+ range, since the differential is about 50 points from the norm. Here, today, however, as long as your own IQ is at least in the 100-120 range, which I am fairly certain applies to pretty much all my subscribers, with some peaking quite a bit beyond that, you too can partake in the experience of what it’s like to be me.

Just extend the behaviour you are about to witness here to about 90% of your daily encounters, and you may understand why my social interactions are limited to exchanging polite, pleasant, or funny, but essentially meaningless chit-chat with the people I need to interact with regularly, punctuated by silent frustration most of the time I need to interact with anyone at a deeper level, particularly if I need something done to a degree of effective efficiency I have accustomed myself to adhere to when working alone. So, you, today, get the sweet-and-sour experience: Funny to read and point and laugh at the moron, and, if you should empathise a little, you may grasp what it’s like to be, essentially, Quicksilver. 1

Anyway, anyone that reads here regularly, has seen my videos, frequented the still going OG blog (link at the top) or indeed read my latest book Martians (see pinned post) is perfectly aware that I have been rejecting mainstream science narratives for over 30 years. And specifically Egyptologists and all their nonsense, as well as quite a few astronomers. In fact it is one of the founding pillars of my theory of the real history of humanity.

But along comes this complete fucking idiot, and he pretends that:

A) I subscribe to the completely wrong, fabricated and fake “official” narrative, which is an outrageous lie, and

B) That he knows more about how the pyramid was “really” build than I do, which would be fine if he actually had ANYTHING, even remotely approaching a workable theory, but… well, let his own idiotic words speak for themselves.

He commented on my recent video/podcast

Now, he had already previously demonstrated with other comments on other posts he is a complete idiot, but whatever, but then he compounds this with the following absurd lies:

And further:

Now, anyone, French or otherwise that believes this is how the great Pyramid of Giza was build is stupider than the Flat Earthers. And that’s not an easy task. But here we are. And anyone that believes this without even having bothered to do the most BASIC of investigation into it is an absolute moron of the drooling retard kind. Especially when you consider that I have been in construction since age 16, so have some 40 years of experience of exactly how concrete, formwork, and so on all work. And there is simply NO WAY, any of the Great Pyramid was built this way. Let me see if I can illustrate the point a little more clearly (and by that I mean so that lost tribes in the Amazon would get it and laugh at it, as well as aliens being able to see it from space as the orbital nuking this idiot deserves).

Here are a few images of the external blocks:

Now, do ANY of those blocks look like they were placed with FORMWORK???? And if they had, can you explain to me how the formwork is paper thin and then removed since it’s clearly not left between the blocks?

And see that last one above, well guess what:

That’s a picture I took myself, and the one below…

is of me actually confirming an inscription on it is exactly where Peter Lemesurier said it was, which may be the only genuine inscription from the actual origin of when it was built, of which I also took a picture.

The only inscription in the pyramid that was there when it was first opened up. It has been covered in various graffiti by many idiots since, but the original is still there and its origins are unknown. And here is the photo I took of it myself.

I was also INSIDE the pyramid and confirmed various other aspects of it. Most of this information is in both my book from 1995 The Face on Mars which I wrote before I visited the pyramid myself, and again in the 2014 edition, after I had visited it, and even more so in Martians , which I wrote this year long after I was at Giza in 2008 and took a bunch of pictures, confirming the work of others, like Christopher Dunn, who goes on at length about the machining evident in the granite sarcophagus, etc.

Besides which the quarry where both the limestone was taken from and the one at Aswan where the 70 ton granite blocks in the King’s chamber come from are both clearly still in evidence.

But, beside all of that, is the fact that Dr. Filippo Biondi, with whom I have communicated directly this year, invented a system of radar interferometry, that due to the Earth;s constant slight seismic movement, can map structures underground to a depth of several kilometres, something he tested over 200 times and used to map the interior labs of the Gran Sasso experimental laboratory that is almost 1.5km underground, before he announced his discovery; and it worked perfectly. Well, Biondi mapped what is under the Giza plateau, and it is what is written at the end of my last message (in green above) before I banned the cretin.

Bt this idiot INSISTS that the Great Pyramid was built by “Egyptian concrete”.

Well, even ignoring all the evidence we already have, let’s see what 30 seconds of googling on this Frenchman tells us, shall we? But first, taken directly from the 1995 and 2014 edition of my book The Face on Mars :

The Great Pyramid today stands at a total height of about 137 metres and has a square base with sides which measure some 232 metres. These are not the precise measurements, (we will get to these later) but for now they’ll suffice. It is composed of about 2,300,000 limestone blocks, ^[1] which on average weigh some 2.5 tons. Some of these blocks though, are much larger, weighing up to an estimated 16 tons or so.

Internally, the pyramid has some passages, and various rooms or chambers, and here we find blocks of granite as well as limestone. Interestingly, some of these slabs of rock weigh a lot more than 16 tons, at least one in the King’s chamber complex is estimated to weigh some seventy-two tons or so, and several others weigh only a few tons less.

Let’s just pause here and deal with this information for the moment. Assuming that Herodotus had been given the correct information by the Egyptian priests, let’s say that the Great Pyramid really did take 20 years and 100,000 men to build.

Now let’s further assume that the ancient Egyptians were far more diligent at their work than any present day building crew. We’ll assume that in that whole period of twenty years, not a single man was sick, died, or slacked off during the building of the pyramid. Given their diligence, obviously, strikes are also completely out of the question.

We’ll also assume that the weather was always perfect during every single day of construction and in no way adversely affected building time. I think given these circumstances no one would be so bold as to say we’ve not given these theoretical builders every possible advantage.

But let’s really stretch ourselves here. Let’s also say that they worked not a five day week like us, but a seven day week. They take no holidays or breaks whatsoever for the entire period.

Additionally, just to make sure the sceptics are truly satisfied, we will endow these (by now superhuman) workers with the ability to work not eight hours a day (pulling huge rocks up ramps mind you) but a full twelve hours each day.

We assume of course that the heavens are going along with us on this and provide at least twelve hours of daylight during which to work every single day for twenty years.

Right then, let’s begin. Take a calculator and type in 2,300,000 (number of limestone blocks) and divide it by 20. This will leave a total of 115,000 blocks to be placed every year. Now divide this number by 365.26 ^[2] and you are left with a result of 314.84 blocks which have to be placed every working day. Since the working day is composed of a back-breaking twelve hours in our case, divide this number by twelve. This will leave you a value of 26.24 blocks to be placed every hour which of course is very close to one block every two minutes.

It doesn’t matter whether that block weighs 2.5 or 16 or 70 tons mind you, a block is a block. We are not to squabble over such details you understand.

I wonder if at this point there are still people out there that think this is feasible by any stretch of whatever fevered imagination.

Especially when we add a few other points which we have conveniently neglected up to now.

---

^[1] Some sources quote this figure as 2,500,000 but I have stuck to the more conservative measurements wherever possible, in order to give the ‘benefit of the doubt’ so to speak, to the more sceptical reader.

^[2] The length in days of the Anomalistic Year. A value slightly longer than the conventional 365.242 days for a Mean Solar Tropical Year, but hey, we don’t want to be accused of cheating.

So… now, this French guy, how effective was his supposed method? From Wikipedia:

According to this hypothesis, soft limestone with a high kaolinite content was quarried in the wadi on the south of the Giza Plateau. The limestone was then dissolved in large, Nile-fed pools until it became a watery slurry. Lime (found in the ash of cooking fires) and natron (also used by the Egyptians in mummification) were mixed in. The pools were then left to evaporate, leaving behind a moist, clay-like mixture. This wet “concrete” would be carried to the construction site where it would be packed into reusable wooden moulds and in a few days would undergo a chemical reaction similar to the curing of concrete. New blocks, he suggests, could be cast in place, on top of and pressed against the old blocks. Proof-of-concept tests using similar compounds were carried out at a geopolymer institute in northern France and it was found that a crew of five to ten, working with simple hand tools, could agglomerate a structure of five, 1.3 to 4.5 ton blocks in a couple of weeks.He also claims that the Famine Stele, along with other hieroglyphic texts, describe the technology of stone agglomeration.

Davidovits’s method is not accepted by the academic mainstream. His method does not explain the granite stones, weighing well over 10 tons, above the King’s Chamber, which he agrees were carved.

Did you catch this point: a crew of five to ten, working with simple hand tools, could agglomerate a structure of five, 1.3 to 4.5 ton blocks in a couple of weeks.

And did you read my extract from my own book that given the ridiculous numbers even in twenty years they would need to put a block down every roughly 2 minutes?

Do you begin to see how STUPID you have to be to make such idiotic pronouncements as if they explained anything other than the moronic hubris of a retarded Frenchman, and the even more retarded cretin that thinks he is a smartboi ™ because he read a “ controversial ” book by the idiot Frenchman?

Do you see how the very concept is so absurd that it makes the Flat Earth morons look smart by comparison?

And do you see how perverted and twisted his lies about me, my approach to the entire topic, and what I have been saying for over 30 years is?

This is how people like me, who genuinely discover, explain, and really PROVE what the truth of human history is, get misquoted, branded as crazy, and so on. Because someone as ignorant as this absolute fuckwit, completely makes shit up, and the average guy is unlikely to read the 825 page monster I put together that provides the undeniable proof of exactly what it says on the cover.

So, now you know why he was banned, and in fact, now, I will block him. People like that don’t deserve to even be able to READ me and my work, never mind comment on it. And you may also begin to appreciate why I don’t generally bother warning such idiots before I block/ban them.

As the Russians say: Don’t argue with a pig, you get covered in shit and the pig enjoys it.

They are right, but I don’t mind slaughtering a few pigs to make an example for others. And since a few of you are new here, if you were wondering what a Kurganing is, one of the regular readers here provided a useful definition, after a particularly amusing Kurganing of another idiot in an unrelated event.

Admittedly this one was a slightly more “serious” takedown of the imbecile in question, but I think if you contemplate things here for a minute, you will truly begin to realise what the average gap between people like that and yourself, or me is, and to call them apes is really an insult to apes. And it would be an insult to monkeys too.

They are unmitigated and completely idiotic buffoons of the worst sort. The very people that the Saintly Professor Cipolla warned us about .

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I have thought about what the “winning formula” for happy, functional nuclear families is, and how to get this across to the younger generation as best I can in a way that their frazzled tik-tok brains MIGHT spend the necessary 35 seconds to contemplate it and assimilate it before something shiny takes their short term memory out back and rapes it in the alley.

So here it is in bullet point form (gnashing of teeth and further explanations after):

For the Man – Priorities, in order

1. God
2. Family
   1. Wife first in terms of respect shown
   2. Kids first in terms of life and death stuff
   3. Himself last in terms of life and death stuff (possibly even after the family dog)
3. Duty
   1. There are many duties for a man in a family but not all are visible
      1. Practical: Earn the money/security for the family
      2. Future-proofing: Think WAY ahead so that in extremes he and his family are ahead of the curve
      3. Teaching: Ensure and enforce life skills, basic rules of behaviour, efficiency, and effectiveness (for children this begins mostly around age 7, but it’s never too early to start teaching them HOW to think [for themselves])
      4. Make them aware of the LIES of the modern world and how to avoid, survive, side-step, and overcome them.

For the Woman – Prioroties, in order

1. Husband (yes, yes, I know, explanation below)
2. Children
   1. When a baby is small and before they can walk around and talk this child takes precedence over the other children and the husband certainly for life and death stuff, but mostly also for day-to-day stuff. It’s not about being a helicopter parent, it’s about teaching, helping and making sure the baby can learn, knows if he cries there is someone that will take care of it (babies only cry for a reason (when really small, either hunger, thirst, belly ache, teething, or some other discomfort). And until they are old enough to understand that reason themselves, it’s up to YOU to ensure they learn you will take care of them. I can’t stand women that let small children cry endlessly, it also teaches them to do it later when it’s certainly not warranted.
   2. Even when the kids can take care of themselves to varying degrees, in life and death stuff it’s still kids first, then herself, then husband (he WANTS her to take care of herself first if he’s a half-decent husband). But in terms of respect demonstrated it should always be husband first.
   3. Education. It is the woman that is most with the children when they are young, and how she teaches them to behave is not by SAYING things, but by how she DOES things. Orderly, reasoned, logical, with correct priorities and giving tasks to each child is the right way. Chaotic, inconsistent, disorganised, is not, and sets them up to be undisciplined later. The father is the ultimate line definer, and as they get older his role becomes increasingly important, but it is the mother that sets things up from the start.
3. God (again, yes, yes, I know, explanation below)
4. Home. A peaceful, clean, organised home that is a safe harbour for all is the aim.

On the female issues you are upset about

WARNING: There will be no sugar coating. Get your ice cream tubs ready.

1. Women by and large are not really abstract thinkers. Their ability to do logic, project forward for the future, or consider philosophically deep issues is essentially limited. From my perspective it is already a remote skill in MOST humans, but in women it is even less likely to appear. A woman’s religion tends to be whatever her husband’s is. And if he dies and she remarries, she may well change it too. The correct guide for her to have in terms of how to move towards the future in general is whatever her husband says it should be. Now… it is true that:
   1. Since all humans are flawed, her husband WILL fuck up from time to time.
   2. Since all humans are flawed so will she.
   3. The point is not for the husband to be a tyrant that controls her every thought, deed and action. The point is that biologically men are DESIGNED to take care of their family better than they take care of themselves. And as long as you actually have a man like that, the likelihood that the woman has better ideas of how to go about organising their lives, planning for the future, and correctly prioritising what needs to be done at the MACRO scale is generally laughable. We are assuming roughly equal IQs here, or the man’s being somewhat higher. Now, it is absolutely true that at the MICRO scale, the woman may well be far better than the man, BUT… it is IMPERATIVE that it is understood that the value of MACRO and MICRO are NOT the same. For example, my wife is far better at preparing for a day at the beach. She makes sandwiches, takes spare clothing for the kids, remembers the right toys, sun-cream for the little ones that are not used to harsh sun yet, arm-bands to prevent generic drowning, etc. She also takes at least 3 hours to get everyone ready. I can get the kids ready for the beach in about 15 minutes flat. There will be no sandwiches, maybe a bottle of water, and sunscreen. Toys? Find a stick. There is sand and sea-shells, what else do you need? Change of clothes? It’s hot, deal with it. Arm-bands? Learn to swim. Don’t get the lifeguard to save you cause you’re too lazy to learn. Kick your legs like I tell you dammit. Stop drinking so much sea-water, you puked on me twice already! It’s true if I took them to the beach on my own a couple of things would happen. 1. They will probably ask to go home after a few hours, preventing the usual drama when it’s time to go (because things like hunger, tiredness, and dad saying “walk it off, or maybe piss on it” when you get stung by a jelly fish, tend to make you appreciate home, and whatever food is put in front of you when you get there. (Which prevents mom from having to cook 4 different meals and peel the skin off the grapes and gently sauté the veal chops, and, and, and, but is she grateful??? Noooo. All she does is complain about the one kid with a jelly fish sting on his arm, the other one looking a bit dehydrated, and a patch of missed sun-cream now in the shape of an angry lobster that matches the colour too. Ungrateful!) 2. They will have had great opportunity to build character, as Calvin’s Dad in Calvin and Hobbes says. Which, jokes aside, is a VERY important thing for them to do. And frankly, when your kids are already uncivilised barbarians with the blood of marauding Vikings running in their veins, they actually sometimes have MORE fun with dad. Despite the possible accumulation of scar tissue over the years. But that relates to the children. And even then I want you to think minute. What is best, a family where the children NEVER had to experience not having their favourite cucumber sandwich with the skin peeled and the. crust cut off and made into hexagons, OR, one in which they had that generally, but also learnt to deal with a “dad seaside” version. In life, in plotting the family trajectory, I assure you that a conscientious man will be WAY ahead of his conscientious wife. And she will also nag him about “inconsequential” shit like what brand of sun-cream to get, and if the kids are wearing the “right kind” of clothes, or their hair are brushed, etc. etc. In short, women have a WHOLE LOT of LEAVES to look at, get busy with, and take care of. And if the wife and husband understand each other, she will do so without expecting him to really be all that involved, other than perhaps point out a couple of things that could be done better, faster, or more effectively. A smart wife gets on with all those bits and lets her somewhat oblivious husband cogitate on stuff that he actually basically never really needs to even discuss with her. I.e. FORESTS. Because if you ever do try to discuss where you see your family 5, 10, or 20 years from now, your wife will assume you are insane if she even hears you out, and also spend the entire time interrupting your train of thought while she points out all the “problems” she sees with your vision (none of which generally are even related to it). Ergo, while the man may appear to be smoking a cigar while he looks at clouds, he actually really IS contemplating and planning the future. And no, I am not actually joking here. Maybe it’s different for other men, but as far as I can tell, it is not. Just like setting up a project, a job, a spreadsheet, the time spent thinking about the steps to take, is crucial (as long as you actually DO take steps, nothing is more infuriating than a lazy asshole PRETENDING to be cogitating (and yes, sadly there are a LOT of those too)). All of this is to say why GOD is in position n. 3 for a woman. Because in its essence, God is not really “practical” for most women. Little kid shat itself and the roast is about to burn. THAT needs attention! The trinity? Eh… not so much. Now, make no mistake, cleaning a baby’s ass and not burning dinner are IMPORTANT things, but in the scheme of things, if you were to ACTUALLY truly figure out and process the full meaning of the Trinity internally, I assure you it’s worth several burn dinners and a slightly longer wait before you wipe that little ass clean. But MEN think this way, women do not.
2. Now as to why the Husband is above the children and even God, that is in terms of the respect due and duty due, which you will note, is in the same order a Man has it: Wife first, then kids. Except a woman should save herself before saving her husband in a life and death thing. The DUTIES of a man are different from those of a woman. And the duties of a woman are in essence encompassed in the four points above. God is above home, because if she remembers the peace, love, and serenity represented by God, she can make the home that way too. For man, God is above all because in the same way as it’s a reminder for her of how to create a home (the MICRO of family life) it is from there, a reminder for him, that everything that really matters to him in the world stems from. If he follows the correct will of God, then he will be acting correctly and his family with thrive (in the MACRO sense), as long as his wife follows his own correct choices and does not cause strife and rebelliousness in the home. Now a wife can voice her opinions of course, and a husband should listen to them, but ultimately, if the husband decides they go left, the wife should understand that it is best to go left. Even, in fact ESPECIALLY, when she really FEELS they should go right.

Now to the times when things go wrong:

No human is perfect. Errors will happen. Big ones too. The whole point of marriage being unbreakable in Catholicism, is exactly the fact that: you marry KNOWING that. And it IS a Godly thing to take on a flawed creature and commit to it for life. Now will there be some really terrible marriages? Sure. Shit happens. BUT… if you KNOW marriage is for life no matter what, you will probably take it far more seriously, and if you both enter it honestly and of your own free will, then you already know you will have to face some shit hitting the fan. And more than once or twice, because that is life. If you decide to marry, you are in effect saying: OK, from now on until I die, I belong to this person, and they to me.

It’s not a question of “will we make it”, but rather a question of “whatever happens, we will overcome it.”

BUT WHAT ABOUT…?

It doesn’t matter. Do your best to NOT be the bad, negative, terrible exception. And if it goes all wrong… eh. It happens. Survive it. Make it better if you can, but remember: no one gets out of this life alive. So however bad it is, it will, eventually end. May as well do your best and try and enjoy it as best you can until then. Anything less than that shows an unintelligent approach to life.

And while your situation is no doubt unique, it really isn’t that special. And in all likelihood, as a man, you are being a whiny little bitch, and are nothing like those guys in the crusades who after four days in the desert in full armour without water still attacked and took over a fortress town held by muslims. And you, woman, are in all likelihood also a whiny bitch, and nothing like those women that worked the field, and had twelve children back at a time where internal plumbing and electricity were unheard of luxuries. So… buckle up, both of you, stop being whiny bitches and BUILD the future. Because only certain types of people who understand and act along these lines will exist down the line. Their children and grandchildren will be the ones who are able to show up. Be one of them.

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

THE FIX SERIES OF POSTS – PART IV (with Poll at the bottom)

(search for “The fix Series” for all the posts in it)

I have been wondering for a while what kind of system of government I would implement if I became Emperor tomorrow for some time. At least 30 years or so. I published a piece on it a while back ( Fix Series Post n. II ) which is pivotal, and it explains why FIAT money is a scam and usury is the vilest of all things that enslaves us all.

Subscribe now

Share

So it’s fair to say that I would ban usury and debt based money right away. On that basis alone I would be nuked, droned and killed by pretty much every puppet state on the planet, of course. But as we are dreaming of blue skies free of chemtrails, let me wax poetic on what should be a good thing for any state, not just mine to adopt, which would absolutely ensure real diversity of cultures, peace and mostly harmony between peoples:

1. Ban Usury and return money to a fractionated gold standard (see the link above for details).
2. The State religion would be actual Catholicism (Totalist 1958 Sedevacantists) and all Novus Ordo “clergy” would be forever banned from holding any kind of office within the Church, or any orders, including minor orders.
3. Laws against blasphemy and disrespect of the state religion would be in place with criminal penalties. Respectful critique or criticism would be permitted until it crosses a line of logic, reason, good taste, or unnecessary vulgarity.
4. No religion that is opposed to Catholicism would be allowed to hold any kind of gatherings, or have any temples of worship in the country. While people can practice whatever religion they want, they need to do so in the privacy of their own homes only, and not in a public manner. This would therefore mean no Jewish Synagogues or Islamic Mosques would be permitted as they are pedophile religions that allow the rape of children (under the age of three in the Talmud and under age 9 for Muslims) which is completely incompatible with Christianity. Similarly, the multiple (and evil) Gods of Hinduism, the Sikhs, and so on, would mean the same ban applies to those religions too. These banned religions would also not be allowed to have their members wear their traditional clothing. In short, their practice should be private, not obvious and not spoke of outside of their homes. Any attempt to convert or proselytise would be punishable by law.
5. Heretic religions like all versions of Protestantism would be similarly banned and their temples not permitted, as they are a corruption of the one true religion. Schismatics like the Eastern Orthodox would similarly not be permitted to have Temples. Their private practice however would probably be viewed upon a little more tolerantly than the other religions mentioned above.
6. Neutral religions, such as Buddhism, Shintoism, or Taoism could be practiced but their temples would have to register with the state and be subject to periodic searches and infiltration by the state secret services for purposes of observation to ensure some kind of general subversion of the national religion is not being done or planned.
7. Obviously Satanism would not just be banned but punished by harsh prison sentences, re-education and finally expulsion from the country and loss of citizenship.
8. The death penalty for certain crimes would be reinstated. Child rape being one of them.
9. Similarly, members of the armed forces, and especially the secret services would be held to higher standards than normal civilians and if they acted illegally and unethically, their punishment would be harsher, longer and more often capital. Particularly if any crimes along the ones of the Epstein Class were being perpetrated.
10. The office of the Inquisition would be reinstated and would have relatively wide powers of investigation for the purposes of protecting the Church from infiltration and subversion.
11. The concept of “Free Speech” would be limited to the fact that one can argue pretty much any issue, but those who wish to install damaging ideologies that are nefarious to an orderly and prosperous civilisation would have consequences.
12. Sexual deviancy would be tolerated as long as it was private. Much as with the non-state religions, one should not necessarily be punished for his or her deviancy, be it sexual or religious, as long as such deviancy is done in private, not publicised, glorified, or pushed as somehow acceptable or valid, no one will be punished. If however it becomes a public nuisance, a vulgar display that affects normal citizens or children, then punishment will indeed apply.
13. Voting will be restricted to males that have fathered children and are in good rapport with their children (dead beat dads cannot vote). Women cannot vote at all, neither can men who are not fathers, and even then, only if they are over the age of 25.
14. State employees shall have no shares, options, or other investment in any other companies. Their salaries will be good enough to have them able to raise a family, but their value shall be publicly known. Attempts to circumvent this rule by having family (especially their spouse) or friends do the investing, can and will be scrutinised and punished if deemed to be due to insider information.
15. Personal weapons will be available to persons who demonstrate they are:
    1. Citizens.
    2. Able to manage the weapons safely and conscientiously (training).
    3. Of sound mind and who have no criminal record.
    4. Concealed Carry Permits will require more advanced and regular training of a set minimum, every year with certain minimal qualification scores, but shall not otherwise be especially difficult to obtain.
    5. Brandishing the weapon generally against unarmed persons, or without sufficiently valid cause, can result in charges of attempted murder.
    6. Being under the influence of alcohol beyond a certain limit, or mood/mind altering drugs while having a concealed carry weapon are ground for criminal penalties as well as permanent loss of the carry permit.
    7. Self defence shall be an unalienable right of any person, and defending oneself or others appropriately and with proportional force shall not be punished as a crime of any kind.
16. Personal Property and Private property are protected.
17. Illegal immigrants are jailed and immediately deported and barred from ever returning. If they do return, they are placed into forced labour camps for ten years then deported again.
18. Taxes are lowered for each child produced within a marriage.
19. Taxes in general, can never go higher than 25% in any case and should be based on services used, monitored electronically in an open source software and hardware set-up. (i.e. you use national roads you pay the road tax. You walk everywhere, you pay a much lower one for pavements only) and so on.
20. Only a limited number of foreigners can ever be resident in the country, and in no case, never more than 5% at the very most. Marriage to foreigners is permitted but citizenship is acquired only after ten continuous years of marriage. No benefits at all are permitted for foreigners, married or not.
21. Homosexual “marriage” or civil unions are not permitted at all, and such informal partnerships can exist only under the “privacy of your home” rule, that is, without nay public displays etc. A sort of “friends” with a do not ask, and do not tell, and do not gossip statute over it.
22. Adoption can only be performed by heterosexual stable, married couples.
23. Surrogate childbirth is outlawed and treated as child trafficking.
24. Abortion is treated as murder.
25. Marriage is for life, divorce is not permitted other than under the religious rules of annulment. While separation is permitted, along with a rescinding of any bureaucracy that required the permission of the other spouse, divorce is not permitted and therefore a subsequent marriage is not permitted either for a separated person.
26. No medical procedure can be forced upon an unwilling person that is conscious, able to respond, and of sound mind. In emergencies to save lives, either a spouse, close relatives or if not immediately available, medical staff, can make choices if the patient is non-responsive or unable to respond.
27. Politeness towards others is generally expected, and rude, drunken, loutish behaviour, can suffer consequences to the perpetrators, brought on by those affected, without these necessarily being a crime. The basic principles of etiquette, justice, self-defence, protection of basic dignity and so on shall apply.
28. Fraud of any kind, but especially financial, shall be harshly punished.
29. The overarching principle of all justice and law is that a man’s word and honesty are his bond. Women and children shall not be held to the same standard as adult men, nevertheless, each shall be held to basic standards based on the Golden Rule.
30. A general concern for the environment shall be the duty of all citizens and residents. Littering, polluting, or graver offences against nature shall be punished appropriately and harshly, not only by fines and sanctions, bans, confiscations and so on, but also by physical labour related to their crime, so as to install a general care for nature and the purity of food, agriculture, natural spaces, general aesthetics and so on.
31. Defacing of public or private property shall be punishable in a similar manner so as to make amends at a rate of twice the damage caused to any property, but also including the physical labour component. E.g. a spray-painted graffiti would result in the cleaning of double the area of the original, and payment of any damage caused to render as new or better, twice over.
32. The use of drugs that can impair function is not banned, or illegal, but acting in an irresponsible manner because of it (driving, operating machinery, carrying a firearm, causing a disturbance, assaulting someone) are a crime and will be punished unusually harshly because of it.

These are the ones I have answers for off the top of my head.

Subscribe now

Share

There are several items that would take a lot more fleshing out, the main one being the actual system of government (it would be fairly complex and probably based at least in part on how Venice did things when a Doge existed, as it had a LOT of checks and balances to try and avoid the usual corruption of the political class, and in part on a white paper I wrote some 30 years ago and never fully published).

A less monumental task would be the issue of prostitution and pornography.

I know that a Catholic Priest would basically say they should be banned outright and fully, and I get it, but, assuming I am Emperor tomorrow (and have thousands and thousands of loyalists armed to the teeth to implement my dictatorial rulings) I still think that the approach taken towards homosexuality and heretic religions has much to say for itself.

We don’t want streetwalkers with their ass and tits hanging out in certain roads as was the case in Turin when I was a child, but if a woman in the privacy of her own home wants to “entertain” men for money… eh… I am not into policing people’s bedrooms. However, the type of things that tend to go along with whoring (drug use, drug dealers, pimps and violent pimps) would be an issue, as drugs have been essentially legalised, they would no longer be a black market item, but heavy users would still fall foul of the law because of their behaviour, but that is an “after the fact” thing, which is not as good as prevention. Being a pimp in the classic sense should also be outlawed, but if you know anything about that world, you will also know that in some cases the “pimp” is also the husband or boyfriend and actually IS the husband or boyfriend and fucked up as it is and sounds, they actually are a generally net positive and protective person that cares about the prostitute, and she also definitely wants them to be there for them in that way. I am not talking about abusive situations, but rather chosen, stranger situations fuelled by kink, deviance, and possibly other dynamics, but not ones that are expressly evil, though certainly not sanctioned by the Church. Once again, the kind of “don’t ask, don’t tell” lassie-faire until you piss someone off attitude I think would be more productive. After all, prostitutes also existed in the crusader camps way back in 1095 AD. You’re not going to NOT have them, any more than you’re not going to have other human traits and vices, so it may be better to have them within known and manageable limits. And the same applies to pornography to an extent. Make it expensive, specific, and those who produce it remain sort of pariahs within the culture. But these are unfinished thoughts. I would need to spend more time thinking about it than I have.

Anyway, here is a poll to see how many of the approximate 1,000 readers I have think of it. If you don’t respond to the poll, I will assume you would not want to be part of my idealised mostly ethno-state (it expires in 24 hours):

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

It’s not my post . Honestly one of the most important posts ever written. And regulars here know I don’t ever fanboy anything much.

What did the cultural Marxists learn from Weimar Germany?

They learned that the Sexual Revolution, in order to succeed, had to be a slow and gradual process. “Modern forms of subjection,” the Frankfurt School had learned, “are marked by mildness.” Weimar had failed because the pace had been too frenetic. People were aware they were being corrupted. That was fatal.

To corrupt a nation effectively one must make sure that the descent into degradation is an infinitely slow and imperceptible process, one miniscule step at a time—just as those who wish to cook frogs alive in a saucepan, reducing them to a state of comatose stupor, are advised to place them in cold water and boil them to death as slowly as possible.

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Enjoy.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here