There has been a generic rise online of accusations of intolerance directed at Sedevacantists. This also tends to get added to the accusation of interfighting schisms and so on. Both of these accusations are a false equivalence and essentially “fake news”.
First of all, one should always be intolerant of falsity and lies. And it doesn’t matter if that means you get accused of “intolerance”.
That’s like saying if the entire world says 2 and 2 is 5 you should just go along with it. No. That is simply cowardice.
I get accused of being an antisemite for pointing out the things Israel and the Jews in general believe, control and do around the world and in Gaza in particular right now. Do I care? Not at all, because the truth is the truth.
But it is also a useful metric. Anyone that makes such an accusation can immediately be summarily ignored from that point on. Either they are shills, liars, or too stupid to check information they are fed for themselves to verify it. And who needs shills, liars or idiots in their life? I certainly do my best to avoid them at all times!
So that is the first benefit of holding to the truth uncompromisingly. You may be less popular with the NPC masses, but the friends you do make and keep are real people.
There is a reason that men come to see my farm and help me on it from around the world, and we remain good friends after even if they do not become neighbours.
Secondly, with regard to sedevacantism, that is, REAL catholicism the attacks are relentless, as they have always been against the real Catholic Church, both internal and external. That’s precisely because Catholicism IS the truth. So trying to present us as crazy dancing dervishes is exactly how the Satanists operate. They blame you of their own sins.
The “divisions” in Sedevacantism are for the most part fake news as well.
The usual strategy is to present any/all/a mixture of Sedevacantist and not as “Traditional Catholics”. Which of course is nonsense.
So let me clarify things in a very simple way. Catholics are divided into two categories: clergy and laypeople. And it is VERY simple to know who IS a Catholic and who is not.
With laypeopl e, if they are ignorant of their own religion, of its history, of the infiltration since the 1700s, of the heresies of Vatican II and its Freemasonic antipopes then even if they are fooled into terrible error and believe the Novus Orco Freemasonic clergy are Catholics, this tragic error does not make rhem heretics. They remain considered Catholic. Mistaken, in error, wrong, ignorant, fooled, deceived and so on, but Catholic nonetheless.
On the other hand, someone that has been presented with all the evidence, and refuses to engage with it logically and with reason must become at least suspect of being either invincibly ignorant (that is, too stupid and lacking in basic intelligence and common sense to be considered a capable or even normal person), or possibly a shill or gatekeeper, that is people paid or otherwise engaged in deception with regard to presenting actual Catholicism.
While many such characters operate as semi-famous laypeople, it is easy enough to see through them if you are actually at least familiar with actual Catholicism, and in due course they tend to expose themselves. Some notable examples featured on my OG blog (just type their names in the search me link on the right sidebar at the OG blog) are:
- Milo Yankmypoleus (financed by Jewish family originally to be a “Catholic” gatekeeper, and also worked with Church Militant (see below) Milo was exposed by yours truly as a Freemason)
- Emo Jones (financed by the same guy who finances Opus Dei (think Novus Ordo version of Scientology), Church militant (see below)
- Tay-Tay Marshall (I believe same financier, and badly ghost written books about the Church infiltration, but in any case he was Protestant pastor/charlatan and now he switched the grift to Novus Orco “Catholic”
- Michelle Voris (Top Man of Church Militant who became bottom man since re-exposed as continuing to be a flaming homosexual propositioning young men in his “congregation”)
So that explains the laypeople.
The clergy is even easier. Any supposed “Catholic” cleric who does not specifically and clearly:
- Reject the entirety of Vatican II as heresy
- Reject every fake “Pope” including all of them from Roncalli to Bergoglio.
- Reject the “new” invalid, mass
- Reject the entirety of the illogical “Recognise and Resist” crowd (SSPX etc)
- Refuse to link the name of any of the fake “Popes” with the Holy Mass
Then, you can comfortably assume they are impostors, frauds, Satanists or Freemasons. A FEW might be utterly ignorant and fooled into somehow going through one of the hives of homosexuality and pederastry pretending to be seminaries without suspecting anything. And if that’s the case, would you trust such a person to somehow point you in the right direction with respect to matters theological?
Well, even if you were so inclined, you cannot, because NONE of these guys are validly ordained anyway, so they are NOT actual Clergy. In fact, it is highly, highly, highly doubtful any of them are Catholic at all. It would be like saying an engineer is a valid engineer if he can’t do multiplication. With a calculator.
Right.
Now we got that cleared up, what is left?
Actual Catholic Clergy, normally referred to as 1958 Sedevacantists (when the last valid Pope died: Pope Pious XII), and the laypeople that see it this way too. Not because of any personal view, but because that is the absolute and undeniably correct position according to Catholic dogma and our infallible Magisterium, which was all encoded in the Code of Canon Law of 1917 by Popes Pious X and Benedict XV.
Now, regardless of if you believe as we Catholics do or not, the fact is that either we are right or we are not. If we are not, well, we are just like all the other religions: wrong.
However there is no other religion that has achieved even a fragment of the good Catholicism has achieved, so you’d have to explain how and why a loving God would not give us a way to know how to behave if we sought it in earnest.
On the other hand, if we are right, and our religion models reality as we find it better than any other, then, there is absolutely NOTHING positive to be gained by mixing the Truth of our position with any adulterated or inferior view.
For some reason, however, this perfectly logical position is labelled as evil, bad, double-plus ungood.
But if you KNOW 2+2 is 4, saying anything different is a lie. And this is the same principle.
People can get as offended as they like, but reality will NOT change to accommodate them.
- Trannies are NOT a different sex than what they were born with.
- “Gender” is a word used purely to describe the fact that Romantic Languages (French, Italian, Spanish, etc) have masculine and feminine words, it has NOTHING to do with the sexual preferences of people, and using it that way is an intentional perversion of the language on purpose to try and confuse the average zombie/NPC. Whatever sexual perversion/fetish you have, it’s your own thing and usually the result of mental illness. There are people sexually attracted to var exhausts. And no, they are not normal either.
- Human IQ os a thing, as are time-based preferences.
- Cultures and religions are NOT all equivalent or as pleasant and “nice” as each other.
- Diversity is NOT a strength.
- Men and women are not and never will be equal.
- Free speech has never existed anywhere on Earth, and never will as a social “thing”, it MIGHT exist between you and a close friend, with no recording devices nearby and the kitchen door closed!
- And on, and on, and on.
Above all, the top virtue of being intolerant (of lies, liars, and deception in all its forms), is that you will probably have few close friends, but the ones you have will be the kind who mostly love the truth.
And there are only two types of people on this planet:
- Those who love the truth,
- Everyone else.
Be the right type.
Life is simply better that way (not easier, but definitely of superior quality).
This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here
