It is now something like 4 years after the original debate and as always, time demonstrated that I was in fact right and everything the man said was nonsense or a lie.
I recently received this comment on YouTube which reminded me of the debate again, which is now, here, with all the commentary from me to give the full context, while the originals have all been memory-holed and disappeared. I wonder why, eh?
I’m at about minute 36 of your video, where you’ve read out the various canons and shown that they bear no relation to what Jay claims they are speaking about. I am struck by this because a few years ago I was watching his series on Tragedy and Hope, with a copy of the book in hand, same edition as Jay’s. He was summarising it page by page, citing where he was, and yet I found that his ‘summary’ bore no relation what so ever to the pages he was referencing. I don’t know why he was doing this, but it was very strange.
Interestingly enough, the comment itself has now apparently disappeared from YouTube, which has been behaving increasingly bizarrely. So I will not mention the man’s full name other than to say that if Stephen wants to get in touch and make his full name public so I am not accused of making things up, he can do so. In any case, it may be he deleted the comment himself not to receive the usual barrage from the dyer-bots, which can indeed be quite annoying.
At any rate, if you are into autistic theological debates interspaced with entertaining ridiculing of deceivers, you may wish to get some popcorn and go see it here.
The Kurgan tells no lies; it was indeed I who wrote the comment. I have a small Youtube channel of my own and caught the scent of Dyerbots gathering in the distance, so I erased my words before the trolls could come aknocking and stink up the joint. But I’m glad our host had time to see the post.
Yes, I understand the vajaydrierbots can be annoying.