Midwit is a brilliant term, first coined by Vox Day, and it is a very useful word, as it describes those people who are of above average intelligence but far from as smart as they think. They are a scourge on the planet. While actual idiots are certainly a blight on the planet, compared to the midwit, they are pretty predictable and relatively harmless. The midwit is the kind of idiot that goes around telling people that he’s looked at the $cience! And the best thing for everyone to do is take a genetic serum that has been demonstrated to result in severe illness and death in animal and human trials long before 2020. In reality they never looked at any science at all. They, at most, did some fake statistics based on media provided and totally unfounded numbers, and then, miraculously, come up with a result that would “indicate” the best path is to do what the TV tells you.
Why do I say they do fake statistics?
Because if they actually used the numbers from the media, they would get the results I got, which were more than an order of magnitude worse!
So, since I made that error and initially assumed covid could be a planet killer, how come I never took the jab? Because, unlike Scott, I actually did look at the science, and I kept my eyes open and eventually the fact that the media was giving totally fake numbers became obvious too.
In short, I actually did what Scott claims he did, but in fact didn’t do at all.
I simply observed and initially did some analysis on dodgy, unverified data, getting the danger of covid wrong by a factor of 40 times, but also looked at factual —-established years before data and information—- on the mRNA work.
The data on the mRNA genetic serums would have made the taking of the clot shots a no-go even if the initial totally wrong 40%+ mortality rate figures I came up with were right!
But… by simply continuing to observe both the media and the world around me, long before the clot shots became available, it was clear that the numbers the media was giving were fake and inflated. And all this is not me backwards rationalising, like Scott does, because as you will see from the dates and links to my videos below, it is all documented.
The midwit is the kind of cretin that tells you that the Twin Towers definitely came down as a result of 2 planes hitting them instead of placed explosives by Israeli agents that were even photographed doing “work” in the building weeks prior. And he will tell this to someone who did his civil engineering thesis on controlled demolitions, without the midwit ever having even read up on what a bending moment is. He looks at you like a deer in headlights when you ask him what he thinks brought building 7 down at freefall speed when no planes hit it. Apparently he doesn’t even know of building 7. But he still thinks he’s right. And he’ll tell you it’s because of his superior intellect. It isn’t. He comes to “his” conclusions by watching TV. And being swayed by his emotions. That’s it. That’s all he does. All his verbiage is just backwards rationalising his precious feelings.
Midwits are truly a blight on those of us that actually are a couple of standard deviations above them in the brain department. Imagine, if you will, being told by an actual retarded person, how everything works, and not just them believing it, but most of the people around them sort of going along with them too, because… well… they are just so confident, and smart… they must be right. If it was a one-off you might humour him, or just ignore it. But when these cretins help set policies and influence a lot of people into really stupid paths, well… Then people like me, might delight in exposing them for what they really are.
And what they are, above all, is really stupid.
Yes, I know. The definition is that they are of above average “intelligence”, but really we should say IQ. I consider intelligence the ability to achieve not only the desired and optimal results more often than not, but also the objectively better results. A high IQ certainly helps, but not as much as you might think.
An 85 IQ guy who goes to his manual labour job regularly, takes care of his wife and children well and lovingly, and acts well towards them, is, to my mind, more successful than the millionaire celebrity with 120 IQ that overdoses on opioids because he’s so unhappy with his life.
And here, we have the perfect example of a stupid, and deceitful midwit. And that’s really the key thing. It’s the lies. The clear, obvious, ego-driven lies that really make people like me despise the Scott Adam types of midwits.
You can’t really fault a person for being literally stupid. It’s a genetic thing. You wouldn’t blame a dog for not being able to drive a car. It’s not like he can help it.
Midwits on the other hand, CAN help it. Or rather, they could. If they weren’t entitled, arrogant, hypocrites that think they know better than everyone else while really they are just emoting machines with a backwards-rationalising bullshit producer for a mouth.
Now, I actually have no problem with apparently arrogant assholes who are actually right about what they speak (down) to you about. I impersonate one quite often myself. But you see, the key thing here is the being actually right. Which the stupid midwits almost never are. They are not apparently arrogant. They are actually arrogant. In short, they think they can, when they really can’t. And they will die rather than admit their limitations.
Literally.
Scott, as the entire internet knows by now, was essentially pro-vax and took the clot shots —-supposedly after some very smart calculations—- to “travel” to Greece and Bora-Bora.
My personal opinion is that he took them because he thought if he took her to Bora-Bora, his then wife might actually let him insert his dick in her like maybe a couple of times while they were on the island. But judging from her subsequent divorce, I think the only one to get pricked by Scott was Scott himself.
Eventually, the overwhelming evidence, which is now finally trickling even in the mainstream media, forced Scott to admit he had made the wrong decision. But… in true arrogant midwit fashion, he keeps insisting that he made the right choice based on the “data” that was available then and that the people who did not take a genetic serum relabelled as a “vaccine” did so out of sheer dumb luck.
He is, of course, lying. Desperately. To try and salvage his now genetically modified ego. To prevent his real rage at having taken the shots so he could give some shots and then not getting to give them to his satisfaction. And then the trophy gold-digger getting her shots from someone else.
But above all, being so duped and having been made to look like an idiot by people he considers below his station in life. That’s what really burns him. Him, the great Scott Adams, the millionaire, the cartoon guy, he jabbed himself with a toxic poison that was obvious to anyone with two brain cells was bad for you. And those Neanderthals that should just buy his books and cartoons and admire him didn’t take it. Oh the gall! How dare they!
Look at his twitter feed. you can practically smell the acidic rage in his replies.
He keeps going on about “the data” and how no one could know “the data” was bad, and his analysis was flawless but still led him to the wrong choice, while we supposed peasants just flipped a coin and turned out “lucky”.
Let’s look into that a little bit, ok Scott? And let’s ignore all the obvious signs, the propaganda, and so on. Let’s even ignore the fact that if you KNOW the data can’t be trusted, then, why on Earth would you even use it? It’s retarded. And we KNOW the data couldn’t be trusted, because there was zero foundation to anything the talking heads said. It was just a slow shouting “drink this liquid in this cup! It’s GOOD for you!” That’s it, right?
Well, no. Not at all, because mRNA technology is not exactly new. They have been trying this shit for decades. And we KNEW this wasn’t a vaccine, but a genetic serum shot. And what did we know about mRNA technology when it was tested on animals for this very purpose of “vaccination”? Well, in a word: disaster.
Instead of me rehashing my own research, allow me to present the work of Christian Elliot, because he did a far better job of presenting the information in idiot proof format early on.
The link above is to a PDF that formats better but it has a link there to the original site and the date on that is 15 April 2021, see screenshot below.
The red flags from the mass media alone by the time the clot shots came around were so obvious to me that it meant I assumed most intelligent people knew it was a complete lie, and I did mention the animal studies to my friends and family, but, as we now know, midwits like Scott did no research at all and instead went ahead and bought the kool-aid from the TV.
The work of mr Elliot parallels my own thought process. Why would you ever inject yourself with something the company that produces it is free from any liability for? Especially given who the companies involved are and what their track record is. And all for a “pandemic” where your chance to die from it is really low unless you’re already with one foot in the grave?
And did it matter if the death rates were much higher? No. It did not, because as you can see in this video I did, on 25th February 2020 when there was no real data on the real numbers, I had already figured out that Covid was absolutely a bioweapon.
But later on 12th March 2020, when we were just at the beginning of the lie, I took the Italian numbers as valid and got the scenario completely wrong. I assumed a death rate of some 40% at the time and an overall one that in my best optimistic guess was likely to be over 10% so, you could say I should have been rushing to get a vaccine as soon as it was announced. But if you go to minute 23 or so of that video, you will see that I mention the idea first presented to me by my wife that if and when a vaccine was going to be introduced they would try to make it compulsory. So, given my theory at the time:
1) It was a bio weapon
2) It could have a mortality of over 40%
According to Scott, I would have been lining up to take the clot shot.
So why would I not have? Why didn’t I? Did I really flip a coin?
Because despite this initial data, which turned out to be bad data right? It was exactly the kind of inference the people pushing for the vaccine wanted me to have, after all.
However, despite it, the data point that really mattered here to me was that it was a bioengineered weapon. Which is why I mentioned it in subsequent videos too. I was sure of that. Why? Because the actual science on it told me so. From years before, with names and coronavirus patents too.
Which meant, if it was a bioweapon, some way to be immune from it must exist. Because the people launching it would have a way to survive it. But it also meant that there was an intent to kill a lot of people in a subterfugeous way.
But by May of 2020 I had realised my numbers for worse case scenario were bad and had corrected and admitted my error. And it was now clear you couldn’t trust the supposed “expert” numbers on anything.
This is all long before anything about “vaccines” came out, and it shows a clear logical progression of conservative thinking, showing how the very fact we all had bad data on the numbers is not ultimately relevant to whether you would take the clot shot or not if you were actually capable of logical thinking.
When the genetic serums started being pushed, by then we absolutely knew the numbers being given to us were unreliable. Which means you would not consider them at all in your equation.
Which brings me back to what you would consider, and these are the hard facts, as listed in mr Elliot’s list, which I link to here again.
Pivotal amongst these points for me was the animal trials and the Antibody Dependant Enhancement (ADE) also known as Vaccine Enhanced Disease (VED). That’s sort of a clue in the name there, you see, Scott?
Because this was the main issue in all the trials with mRNA vaccines, and was a permanent issue.
One point that I do not see on Elliot’s list, but that I was aware of through my own research and study of mRNA technology, was also that these fake “vaccines” would permanently alter your DNA. Of course we were told this was not possible, and of course, it has since been demonstrated to be exactly what happens.
On those two data points alone, it was absolutely clear I would not be injecting that crap into my body. Especially given that by then it was clear at least to some extent, (by inference and multiple data points) that the numbers of deaths due to covid was clearly a vastly inflated lie. Something I had already corrected for a year earlier!
So why on Earth would you inject yourself with something that tends to result in destruction of your immune system and changing your DNA, both permanently, to protect yourself from a diseases that has less than 1% chance of killing you in the worst case?
Well you would do that only if you were an idiot.
Or to be more precise, a pussy-starved idiot that thinks he’s smarter than everyone else and does it mostly for the pussy. That’s my take.
And to begin to appreciate just how crushing it is for these people to finally and demonstrably be proved wrong, keep in mind that Scott is now also on record, as of a few weeks ago, that his life, including his health, is now so bad that unless something drastic changes (he gets more pussy is my guess) he will commit suicide in one year.
These people are hollow.
Completely hollow and they tend to eventually reap the reward of their totally unfounded egos.
The blow that brings them low is something most of them tend to not survive well at all. Their ego, even crushed, usually remains too large for them to genuinely accept their error and admit it. If they could do that, their twisted little souls would at least gain some measure of peace, for humility, is really the beginning of wisdom.
Unfortunately, most of them, continue spiralling in a deathroll of shouty sarcasm and bitterness, as can be evidenced by Scott’s twitter account.
Midwit is such a useful label, shorter and sharper then “well educated idiot”.
[…] initially (like me) you would ultimately correct those and make sound choices, then you may want to read this longish post, the data stuff happens about half-way down but the rest of it may be instructive […]
[…] initially (like me) you would ultimately correct those and make sound choices, then you may want to read this longish post, the data stuff happens about half-way down but the rest of it may be instructive […]