They can never help but out themselves. Usually with a comment like this, supposedly “edgy-sarcastic”, but in reality the usual signalling to each other.
And the answer is no, because associating with, covering for and joining with pedophiles is unforgivable. As if being a Satanist in transparent disguise was not enough.
Aside from the fact that your favourite Freemason is currently literally trying to normalise cannibalism —in the usual Freemasonic way of pretending to be “edgy”, which frankly, is a bit disappointing coming from Milo. So 2016. We’d expect better from the leader of the Freemasonic wing tasked with leading young men of fighting age astray— we must contend with the usual level of stunning hypocrisy of the Freemasons. I mean, yeah, we know, Satanists lie, but it’s the level of bald-faced-in-your-face level of lies that is so blatant most normal human beings just blink and their brain pretends that no, no, surely it cannot be, too obvious. But that’s just what it is. They think you are a dumb, ruminant. A cow in a field. Oblivious to their machinations and laughing at you about it.
So here it is. First, the casual “edgy” cannibalism (which by the way is simply pinched from the Netflix series of Hannibal, so not even original. Which series is, of course, also laden with homoerotica fetishism, cannibalism is a known sexual deviancy of homosexuals of a certain Dahmer type).
But that’s just a by-the-by noticing of his day-to-day task of perverting, fetishising, and normalising absolute deviancy.
He is also, trying VERY hard to pretend he is NOT a Freemason right now, you see. The reality is that these little posts and my continuing Chinese water torture trickling out and exposing of his Freemasonic credentials, intent and work, IS slowly but inexorably, as these things do, gaining traction. It is unlikely it will be directly credited to me, but I don’t care about that. I care about the results, and the more this deceiver is exposed and more people become aware of it, the better. I don’t care how it happens or who takes credit for it. As long as the enemy encampments are exposed, destroyed and the Earth they were in salted, it’s all good.
So what better way than to prove how non-masonic he is than piling it on to one of the “luminaries” that, if my Freemason radar has anything to go by, is currently having to go through a bit of a humiliation ritual himself (though he’s the type that probably enjoys these)? That’s right, Milo the totally non-Freemason ex-gay good boy, exposing the evil “doctor” Fauci.
See? Milo exposing Freemasonry right? I mean, it’s true, you can’t do that by coincidence, I agree.
So… Can you explain all these coincidences Milo?
And… Milo… what’s that round your eye? Do tell us.
That’s quite the set of coincidences. Right up there with Monkeys on typewriters writing Shakespeare.*
BUT DON’T WORRY!
Milo is like… TOTALLY reformed. Like To-OOOTS. Totally. Yeah man. Super-straight “Catholic” now. You can just tell, can’t you?
I mean, come ON! What’s more Christian that a few “jolts up the ass” for your elders? You know, good “Catholic” Elders. Maybe like Gary “Michael” Voris, also ex-gay, totally super-straight “Catholic”. He’s bound to enjoy a few jolts up the ass now and then, and Milo is there to help.
Seriously, those of you who STILL can’t see that the fake, Bergoglian, Church of Moloch is a wide road to hell pretending to be the “Catholic” Church, are probably beyond help. It’s Sedeprivationism (aka CATHOLIC!) or GTFO. Forever.
*It can’t be done by the way, there is not time enough in the Universe since the Big Bang to even do a paragraph of Shakespeare that way. Seriously. Do the math.
Milo wrote the article archived here, on September 9th and posted about it on his telegram channel multiple times. More so than anything else I have seen him do in the last few months. Wonder why? well…allow me to take it to pieces, one scalpel cut at the time.
Keep in mind that the whole theme of this entire post is to show how Milo is a freemason whose job it is to keep those who are waking up, beginning to question reality, the fake “Catholic” Church and all the satanic crap going on, from seeing clearly and, eventually, after doing their own research, coming to the only sane conclusion: Catholicism. Which means Sede (Privationist or Vacantist) because anyone and everyone linked to Vatican II is literally a satanic freemason, most likely gay and most likely a pedophile.
But Milo is not a Ben Shapiro or a Jonah Goldberg, or a Jordan Peterson, he is going after the shrinking hardcore of actual people still mostly able to do logic who may not be able to see it all but know instinctively that the narratives are complete bullshit. And in PARTICULAR, he is trying to dissuade, young, able-bodied men. Straight ones at that, but because young, still tolerant of a homosexual and especially an “ex” homosexual who supposedly threw his “sodomy stone” engagement ring worth 150,000 USD into the sea. Titanic-style. Riiiiight.
But it works to an extent, and young, straight, disillusioned (but still fighting) men is his target audience. Because if even a few of them become objectively convinced, crusading Catholics… weeeeellll… that is how historical reversals have been done throughout human history. Thanks to a small but completely dedicated bunch of zealots.
Think the 300 of Leonidas.
Or better yet, the 600 Catholic Knight of Malta in 1565.
THOSE are the types Milo is tasked with gatekeeping. And if he offends a few thousand fence-sitters or “right-wingers” who in any case are action-shy, well, no real harm done.
So let us look at his latest offering, hoping no child sacrifice ritual was involved in its writing.
He titles it:
WHY I WELCOME THE COVID TYRANNY
Right there in the title, using counter-intuitive juxtaposition of ideas he plans to draw his young readers in with the natural curiosity such a title would generate in the slightly more naive than yours truly. It’s not his best work though, it does have that Jonah Goldberg/David French/Ben Shapiro-ish quality of “the Republican case for why being sodomised is manly and right for the right” kinda feel doesn’t it? But let us continue. His words in fat bold, mine in fit, normal-sized font.
I keep getting panicky texts from right-leaning friends about Australia, a country whose COVID restrictions have become cartoonishly severe.
I doubt this very much. If he does they are not friends, and most likely his texts are from his handlers complaining about why there was a blip in his traction lately. But I admit, this is mostly just speculation on my part. I’ll keep it to a minimum from now on though.
Australia used to be an independent country, but it is now something akin to a vassal state, since the Chinese bought off its politicians and acquired controlling interests in all its infrastructure and major corporations.
Nice way to blame the Chinese. No Soros or Gates foundations involved at all. No Australian politicians mentioning live on air the New World Order with impunity. Nope. It’s the slant-eyed Chinese, nothing to do with any other tribe that Milo may belong to of course, no sir.
Western liberal democratic values are being replaced by child-snatching and a totalitarian surveillance state that is testing the limits of what the global European diaspora will endure.
Nice touch there at the end; Global European Diaspora. Should be capitalised really. Not a subtle way to make all the “fellow white people” of Europe sympathise with that other, small-hat wearing “Diaspora” of people Milo is a tribe member of. Not at all. Surely not. Just a word-coincidence. Besides we have all those shared Judeo (Talmudic, child rape is ok as long as they are 3 years old or less)-Christian (Fake Catholic, no, no, you can rape kids of ANY age, it’s fine) values.
Thousands of Australian children were recently grabbed from their parents, rounded up in a giant sports stadium and forcibly vaccinated.
Not quite correct. I am told by several actual Australians that as far as they are aware most parents dropped their kids off there themselves. So, not quite the child-snatching it was supposedly reported as.
If you think that’s scary, there will shortly be a smartphone app in Southern Australia — compulsory for all citizens — that will randomly ping people and demand that they prove they are in the location they’re supposed to be. If you don’t reply within 15 minutes, the police will be dispatched to issue fines, and probably custodial sentences for repeat offenders. “What if they do it here?” my Republican friends are asking. “Are they the test case? Are we next? Would we even resist?”
Admittedly it does look like Australia is the test-bed for the Satanic deep states running things, and it is probable that once they see Australians doing what Australians always do, bend to their knees, mouth wide open and hands behind their back with not even a gag reflex in sight, they will justifiably think the rest of the world will follow suit.
The thing is, I just can’t get upset about it. Because the fact of the tyranny doesn’t scare me — only that the wrong people are in charge.
Right. No, not really, it doesn’t scare you too much, because like in RPG games like Call of Chthulu, you, being a lieutenant of the satanic forces, expect to be eaten last-ish.
And it occurs to me that the global police state currently in deployment could be a powerful force for good.
Pay attention young nationalists of every type! This is the whole point! Don’t you worry about anything at all. The tyranny is good! Because soon YOU will be wielding it. Seriously, that is his whole shtick.
Now, let’s leave aside for a minute that only psychopaths actually WANT any such tyrannical things in place. Personally I am very happy putting all the freaks like Milo in a camp, but it would be a fairly big camp, and they would be left to their own devices to do as they please. I’m thinking Australia can fit them all in and is already mostly populated by his sort anyway.
But as I say, let’s leave aside the absurdity of his premise, or the possibility of me becoming world Emperor and for a brief period actively enforcing a few things that would get rid of Satanists for a very loooooong time.
Let’s see HOW he thinks this wonderful, wonderful technology of tyranny will come to fall in YOUR hands, comrade, yes YOU!
With all your crusading instincts, hate for the LGBT-Pedo agenda, lies, fake “vaccines” that are genetic “therapy” and all the rest of it. And don’t forget to hate the Chinese through it all by the way, because in any case, even if you DO become emperor, with about 2 billions of the little fuckers, you’re hardly going to create any “holocaust” that makes a difference, but it gives you an outlet for your rage right? A safe outlet, you see. Not looking at any other tribe of devious infiltrators…nope, nope. Stop right there. Let’s just see HOW you get to be tyrant ok? All will be well then!
We just need different people running it, which, if you look at history, now seems more likely than unlikely, as populations the world over begin to crave populist, nationalist right-wing governments run by charismatic strongmen. It seems to me only a matter of time before the tools “globohomo” has created fall into the wrong hands. Our hands.
Right. By magic. Just magically, the same forces that made the United States of America, the most powerful Super-nation on Earth become a banana republic whose elections made Zimbabwean ones look free, fair and carefully vetted by impartial observers, are just gonna take over the planet then hand YOU the rains. Of course. Logical. Obvious. Why, you must be dumb if you missed it!
Democracy isn’t quite dead yet,
Really? Hahhahahahaah oh, so we will be voting out the satanic pedophile elite that were all elbow deep up Epstein’s backside before he didn’t kill himself? Of course. Of course. Slap your own head. HOW, oh HOW did you miss it? We’ll just vote Trump back in. In August. With a time machine, and then the power rangers will win. With Grrrrll power ™. Sure. Obvious. We really are so dumb for missing it.
and the electorate is fed up with conventional politics.
You mean a few of the retards are starting to suspect PERHAPS CNN isn’t telling the WHOLE truth? Why say it is not so!
In America, particularly, there’s a sort of late-1920s-Germany feel to a lot of the right-wing discussions online.
Utter bullshit, but he’s trying to make a parallel between Weimar Germany whose economy was in shreds to present day America in the hope it is leading the few neo-nazis, Alt-retards, as well as more sane, erudite and potentially good men who still have a spine and testicles attached (I don’t consider the neo-nazi alt retards as possessing either) to think that a new “Hitler” is the solution. And that it will actually happen.
Might they do the unthinkable and vote in someone truly toxic? I mean that as a compliment; I’m thinking of an unashamedly Christian, family-values semi-dictator type.
Oh, you mean like Trump? With the time machine? Or maybe Jimmy Swaggart? More your style that, Milo.
The sort of person the media imagines Donald Trump and Viktor Orbán to be, but in real life. Someone blissfully untroubled by the howls of pain from heretics hanging from city hall, and with just the right amount of Inquisition spirit.
This is the funniest and most unbelievable fan fiction I have read in some time. The premise is so absurd it could not be made into a film because no audience is stupid enough to even buy the premise that voting someone actually Christian into office is even a long-shot at this point.
And then, once you have a smartphone infrastructure that can demand responses within 15 minutes to ensure COVID compliance, how hard is it to repurpose that for more virtuous ends?
This is like those articles that try to convince you that as a straight young male, giving your male friend a blowjob doesn’t make you gay at all. It’s just a bit of stress relief. So, to recap. Submit to the anal swabs with facial recognition in place because automagically, soon, a little bit after your 15,000th anal penetration for Covid-19 purposes, YOU will own the technology and then YOU can anal swab everyone else. Right. As the rest of this piece, it’s entirely obvious, logical and above-all based in how the real world works, right? you can see that, right? Anyone? Right?
Especially when America’s most ferocious feminists are leaning into social conservatism all by themselves. If you don’t believe me that authoritarian tendencies are ideologically promiscuous and easily untethered from their original belief systems, consider the feminist reaction to Texas’ new abortion law.
Ah yes! Let’s take the reaction of Alyssa Milano, to not being able to abort more babies as the normal effect of society and how things go when she says she will no longer have sex with men to fight the ban on abortions. See, ye of little faith, the logic… steel trap mind right there buddy. See Milo the saviour, comes to the rescue. Don’t you worry about a thing. Feminists will give you the tyrannical power.
(Please bend while you read, anal swab testing is required every 5 minutes. Just relax please.)
In response to a viral Twitter inquiry this week from someone called “Erie Siobhan is Vaxxed to the Max” who asked, “What advice would you give to young women in Texas right now?” a respondent wrote, “If it looks like a guy is going to rape you, just shoot him. It’s easier and cheaper than an abortion, and Texans seem okay with that form of ‘protection.'” Congratulations, sweetheart, you now understand why people want guns. I speak for all conservatives when I say we are totally comfortable with you shooting a rapist’s nuts off or capping him in the knee.
Look at that! Manly! See? Milo loves guns and the second amendment and makes fun of dumb feminists! Aha! Totally straight, ex-gay, not Freemason Milo is on our side. And teamed up with totally straight, ex-gay, Gary Voris to show you the way to the real (fake) “Catholic” Church, broseph. The “Catholic” Church that is not gay or pedophilic at all even if Bergoglio has protected priests who have raped 30 little girls aged 10 or less while having AIDS from so much as being defrocked. Go on, suck off your broseph friend, that’s not gay at all. It’s Milo-level Catholic! It’s edgy, don’t you know?! Just like Milo! Go for it!
Androgynous imbecile Rachel Maddow, pontificating on the same subject, stumbled into accidental genius on her MSNBC show when she produced the novel idea of financial consequences for men who knock women up. “If they make abortions illegal,” she intoned, “they should make it illegal for men to desert women after getting them pregnant. If women can’t back out of pregnancies, men shouldn’t be able to either.” Well done, dear! You just invented marriage.
This line by the way is about 6 years old, but it’s fine, it’s just Milo flashing his Totally-Straight-Manly-Catholic Credentials ™
Best of all was the Reddit user “walrusgambit,” from whose screen name a body mass index of 35 or more can be inferred: “Starting today I refuse to have sex with men. As a person with no control over my reproductive organs, I simply cannot safely engage in sex with men. #IWillNotHaveSex #NoAbortionNoSex.” Conservatives everywhere will be weeping tears of joy today at this outbreak of chastity. Poor liberals. They can’t seem to catch a break.
Milo makes fun of feminists. Yay! So brave. Much Catholic. Crusade next year in Constantinople. #Add-your-edgy-meme-here.
I’ve heard it said that American conservatism is liberalism driving the speed limit. But there are no brakes on this new right-wing strain of frustrated feminist.
AND DON’T YOU FORGET IT STRAIGHT MAN WITH A POSSIBLE POTENTIAL TWINKLE OF ACTUAL CATHOLICISM IN HIS EYE! Your “Tyranny ™” will be handed to you by Feminists! Because like natural enemies, it’s what they do! Logic! Mullet! #Look-at-my-hair
If it were up to me, children born out of wedlock would be put into foster care and the mothers sent to nunneries.
Except he’s also been railing against deadbeat dad Fed-rique Tarrio and supporting the single mom who was left with the child. So, yeah, outright lie right there. And don’t get me wrong, it’s good for that woman to get some cash, but it’s also a pretty cheap way for Milo to score GOOD GUY POINTS ™. #compassionate-hardcore-catholic-(ex-gay)-with-a-heart-of-gold.
By the looks of things, today’s Left isn’t far behind me. They’re starting to sound positively reactionary. And that is why, as I watch our Western liberal democracies slide into tyranny, I’m not gripped with horror, but rather with excitement.
Well sure, you will enjoy the horror while thinking you’ll be eaten last. But…yeah…even in Call of Chthulu, there are sometimes these pesky investigators (accused of insanity, often enough) who sometimes just screw up ALL you molochian plans even when you are a well-funded agent of some demonic entity like Freemasonry.
The ugly truth about human nature is that schoolmarms, scolds and petty administrative tyrants — mostly women, obviously — don’t really care what they’re enforcing. They just want to enforce.
AHA! See? It will be one easy swop from enforcing Covid-19 Plandemic suicide gene-therapy to enforcing Catholic Dogma in government and burning pedophiles at the stake! #one-simple-trick!
The trick is to replace the godless tyrannies of fascism and communism with a pious theocracy of the kind that is being discussed in right-wing Catholic intellectual circles.
Good God. He ACTUALLY wrote “The Trick”. I swear on all that is holy to me I wrote the paragraph above this one before I wrote #one-simple-trick!
Milo, buddy, you used to be wittier than this. What happened? Lack of ganging orgies got you down while you pretend to be “Catholic”?
But let us get to the “Catholic” “Intellectual” Circles.
He means here his peeps. Gary “call-me-(Saint)-Michael” Voris, E(mo) Jones, Taylor “Tay-Tay” Marshall, and the others funded by the same Supernumerary (Marc Brammer) of Opus Dei. The equivalent to “Intellectual-Dark-Web” that was supposed to reign in Republicans and right-wingers of every type, like Shapiro, Petersen, Golberg, French and other molluscs dredged up from R’Yleh.
Fake Catholics, Talmudic Jews, Meth addicted pathological liars and so on. Good guys all of course, Milo says so. And you know he probes deep and often with his investigative journalism.
Snobs have been scoffing at Thomas Crean’s thrilling book Integralism ever since it came out, as though it’s utterly inconceivable that we might reorganize society according to the strictures of the Catholic Catechism.
Oh, I may have to look up this latest addition to the “Catholic” “Intellectual” Circle when I have time to notice him, but so far, the only thing I am sure of, is that these people, are indeed, in a circle. What they are doing to, and with, each other in that circle, I’ll leave for you to imagine.
But that, mutatis mutandis, is precisely what is already being done for us by the global elites. Once the mechanisms of authoritarian control are in place, they will be nigh-on impossible to remove. And guess what: Subjected to Weimar levels of elite decadence, people choose fascist remedies over communist ones every time.
Oh, man. Again. I wrote the bit about Weimar parallels up above before seeing he had to spell it out here. Seriously, I think Milo has washed up as a writer.
Socialist regimes have to be installed by force. Hitler was voted in. I’m not a Hitler fan, obviously, I’m just saying! All we want is traditional family values, kiddy-fiddling clergy dunked in hydrofluoric acid and maybe some snazzy uniforms. Is it so much to ask?
So join me, friends, in praying earnestly and eagerly for the future I know we all want — a future that’s closer than it might seem and which, by God’s grace, will resemble Gilead from The Handmaid’s Tale, only with less kindness shown to unruly women. Gilead, wrongly maligned by critics for decades as a hellish misogynistic dystopia, is, in fact, the most perfect vision of the ideal society yet imaged by a novelist. I dream of a land where no matter your race, sex or disordered sexuality, you will be put to death equally for blaspheming Jesus Christ.
If you’ve ever read the book (which I will not blame you for not doing because it is painful drivel to read) it will become quite clear that Freemason Milo here is paying lip service to what is most likely another Freemason who hated Catholicism with the burning fires of Hell.
Rejoice! For the New Holy Roman Empire is surely nigh! Our enemies are already building it for us — they just don’t know it yet. Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, we can have a ruthlessly intolerant theocracy, with feminist heads on pikes on the castle ramparts and pedophiles castrated live on national TV every Sunday straight after Latin High Mass, if we want it badly enough.
Sure. Because the Feminists and Pedophiles in charge will just hand it to you after the next free and fair democratic vote. And no amount of militarised police action in your face with rubber bullets or live rounds can stop it! See? #Simples!
(A note to the doubting and/or terrified architects of Weimerica: We do want it. We really, really do.)
No. YOU want it, Milo. Because tyranny, enforcing a religion by death or the threat of it, is the exact OPPOSITE of Catholicism. But Freemasons, being Satanists, prefer the way of Islam for conversion, clearly. The profoundly ignorant take of a “Catholic” tyranny demonstrates Milo not only knows little of Catholicism beyond what he needs to use to fake you into thinking he knows something about it. More importantly, he fully expects YOU to be so ignorant of it that you don’t see the glaring galaxy-wide holes in his “argument”. And to be fair… he may be right about that last part.
Pick up a Catechism of Trent, boy.
I can’t figure out what everyone’s so upset about. We all agree that limp-wristed Western democracies have been tried and found wanting. Now we have a chance to replace them with something better. Why aren’t you all more excited?
Because your lie is a lie Milo. But don’t worry. There will probably BE an uprising at some point. Whether it will be enough or not, time will tell, but either way, WE win in the end. Because we know how the story ultimately ends. And you, whether you will be eaten last or not, you WILL be eaten. We may die horribly, but none of US are going to be eaten by our master.
Mr. Yiannopoulos welcomes correspondence from readers. He can be reached at [email protected].
Well, they SAY he does, so it must be true. So I sent him a link to this blog post. I eagerly await his response. I’m not holding my breath though.
A lot of people are getting all excited and clapping their hands, much like trained seals, at the supposed conversion to Catholicism of Britney Spears, the hoped for imminent one of Shiea LaBeouf, who is in the middle of acting in a film about Padre Pio, and of course there is the flamboyant “coming closer to God” of supposedly already Catholic, ex-sodomite Milo Yiannopoulous. Milo has joined forces with Gary “Michael” Voris of Church Militant, another supposed ex-sodomite, and now does quite a bit of writing and promoting of their agenda just by virtue of the fact that with Milo come large numbers of followers. And he’s been positively *glowing* about Britney; and threw a sideways uplift to Shiea. What a revival of Catholicism right? What a magnet for all the young people to join it too! Yay! (Insert trained seal clapping like an evangelist here).
I, however, have good reason to believe Milo is a Freemason and works for the enemy. And the score of pictures and screen-captures at the end of this post and his reaction to the questions on them, tend to be more than just mere circumstantial evidence.
A foolish Satanist or at the very least supporter of Vicar of pedopjiles on Earth Bergoglio foolishly stuck his head above the parapet and I noticed. Enjoy.
As usual his words in black and mine in blood-splattered red.
At some time, we have all encountered a sedevacantist — if not in person, at least online. I won’t bore you with the theology of the sedevacantism except to say they hold that a heretic cannot be pope, with the most common strain affirming that Pius XII was the last legitimate pope (although I did once come across one who believed that Pius V was the last legitimate pope).
I see, so you admit right from the start that you will avoid the actual reasons that Catholics remain Catholics and instead project your own Satanic leading of others into error directly from the title of this drivel throughout the rest of it. Got it. Let us begin the rhetoric war then, silly Hellish Padawan of Novus Orco and let us see how you fare against Lord Kurgan.
Oftentimes, sedevacantists lived through the turbulent times after Vatican II or are the children of those who did.
Neither applies here and in my experience most remaining actual Catholics are simply people like me: those who still have the almost lost skill of reading comprehension.
They know either first- or second-hand of the terrible persecution of orthodoxy and suppression of the Tridentine Mass. They often fought valiantly against the heresies constantly flowing from the Vatican and were maltreated by many local bishops and priests.
Again, none of these things apply. I rejected the Novus Orco impostors out of pure instinct at age 7. My only “error” was believing these “priests” were in fact Catholics. They presented themselves as such, they had usurped the buildings and other worldly trappings of material goods of the Catholics, so I was fooled by their pretending to be Catholics, but certainly not by much of anything else since their theology was so badly flawed as to be obviously evil even to my 7 year old self.
Many know their faith very well and can easily explain the errors of liberalism, modernism, and countless other heresies. In all respects but one, they are orthodox Catholics.
So, just to recap, we are correct on every point and you can’t and won’t argue against them (because you would have your head handed to you in seconds) but you have the one true silver bullet against Catholics coming right up… (cue spectacular rhetoric fail coming up)…
The one error of sedevacantism is essentially pride. They raise their opinion over that of the Church when judging that the pope is a formal and manifest heretic, while we know that the Church teaches that the First See is judged by no man.
Ahh, yes, that old Canard. Truly, nothing new with you Satanists is there? Once again, your despicable projection is obvious. Catholics to NOT sin of pride in being Catholics, we, in fact, follow the Magisterium of the Church which very clearly tells us that notorious, public heretics are not Catholics, do not speak for the Church, have nothing of relevance to say about Catholicism and that anyone who receives them as Catholics in turn ALSO becomes a heretic. This is all clear and obvious to anyone who, as I previously mentioned has the lost art of basic reading comprehension and reads the Code of Canon Law, particularly code 188 part 4 of the code (of 1917, the only valid code of Catholic Canon Law, the Satanic non-Catholics like this imp here produced a fake one in 1983, but as they are not Catholics of any kind it has no bearing on truth or reality or Catholicism). For the uninitiated, you merely need to read Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio on which much of the Canon Law for canon 188 part 4 is based.
As an aside, you don’t NEED to know what any doctor of the Church said in detail by the way, nor try to interpret it, because the Code of 1917 did that. And no, it does not require Canon lawyers to interpret it for you, poor peasant, because it is written on the principles of Roman Law. Not fake, loophole filled Anglo-Saxon Lawyerspeak. And in any case, the commission that was set up to interpret it already did that job and since it was published the code had one minor revision of one code (1099) in over 40 years and for the last decade or so nothing at all was changed and in all likelihood over 14,000 documents were consulted to ensure no part of the Code contradicted any part of Catholic dogma divine or Church law. So, yeah… reading comprehension. We Catholics dote on it. And reason. And logic. Because that is one of the Dogmas by the way, we use reason and logic and our God-given ability to study and know objective truth, not lies like your father teaches you and your kind.
But what about Luciferianism?
Well, you are the expert there, go on…
With the crisis in the Church since Vatican II, many comparisons have been drawn with the Arian crisis of the 4thcentury, when the majority of the Church’s bishops fell into the heresy of Arianism. There are four parallels that can be drawn between the Arian crisis and the crisis in the Church today. There are, as Michael Davies noted, the heroic Athanasius, Hilary, and Eusebius of Vercelli (not to be confused with the ecclesiastical historian Eusebius of Caesarea or the leading Arian heretic Eusebius of Nicomedia, Eusebius seemingly being a popular name among 4th-century mothers) who are types of the heroic clerics such as Archbishop Lefebvre,
Lefebvre ultimately belonged to the R&R class, so he’s was not Catholic either from that moment on.
Recognise (the antipope as pope) and yet “resist” his underlings is, of course, not logical, objective, reasonable, or, frankly, sane. It is based on nothing more than womanish emotions marinaded in a fake worship of “tradition” and pomp instead of truth and logic and objective reality.
Bishop de Castro Mayer, and other orthodox priests who suffered persecution for their defense of the Faith. There are also the diabolical prelates such as Arius, Saturninus, and Eusebius of Nicomedia, who resemble those infiltrators who infected the Church prior to the Second Vatican Council and sowed the seeds of doctrinal and liturgical destruction (think de Lubac, Congar, Rahner etc.). Then there are the orthodox princes of the Church who, knowing the truth, succumb to outside pressures and outwardly join the ranks of the victorious heretics, much like Pope Liberius.
So…wait, you admit there were infiltrators. You admit Vatican II is replete with heresy and heretics, you admit all this and yet, somehow, those who do all this and point it all out backed up by the MAGISTERIUM OF THE CHURCH (which is what Canon Law is), logic, reason and facts, somehow are the Luciferians? Truly your inversion of roles between us is the usual stunning bold-faced lie your kind subsists on.
Finally, there are those who can see the errors of heretics for what they are and take a heroic stand against them; however, they succumb to their own pride and employ schism to fight heresy.
Ah, so we are heroes who… succumb. You pathetic wormling. You’re not really worthy of a Kurgan inquisition. You have nothing. We are not heroes, just Catholics. And while no doubt some of us will become heroic in their persecution, as martyrs or warriors, as the case may be, it’s not anything a Satanist like you could possibly understand, comment on or know anything about. We are Catholics, you are not. You wouldn’t understand.
It is this final parallel in which we can see the Luciferianism within the sedevacantist movement. There is the remarkable similarity between today’s sedevacantists and a group of schismatics who were spawned during the Arian crisis: the Luciferians.
Oh let’s see what utter reversal of any shred of truth you come up with now wormling.
The Luciferians were less nefarious than their name implies.
Can’t help throw a little shade to your fellow Satanist names eh? Here is a hint: No actual Catholic would refer to themselves by such a name. Ever. In any age.
Rather than being devil-worshipers, they were simply followers of the schismatic Bishop Lucifer of Cagliari. (The interesting naming trends of 4th-century mothers continues — what mother looks at her newborn son and thinks, “He looks like a Lucifer”?) Nothing much is known about Lucifer’s origin, save that he was born at some time in the early 4th century.
Riiiiight…I’m SURE that was his given name at birth by his mommy. What utter nonsense. At most his name MIGHT have been Lucius, which was at least a Latin name, and if it got changed to Luciferus, it doesn’t take a genius to figure out why wormling. You really must do better in your efforts. Not that he is more intelligent or anything, but you should perhaps think of apprenticing under John Salza, who is verbose, long-winded, and easily demonstrated to be a Satanic liar and he is a self-admitted Freemason, so no real struggle to expose, but at least he presents more of a fake argument than this drivel. I’m sure for merely a few sexual favours of the Satanic kind he may well take you on as an understudy. At this rate you’ll not even reach the 9th Circle of Hell, you’ll be relegated to one of the outer and upper layers of torment for your pathetic efforts.
Those familiar with Church history will know that during the Arian crisis, the greater number of bishops had fallen into the Arian and semi-Arian heresies.
Most Catholics know of St. Athanasius’s heroic defence of orthodoxy during the crisis, but few will know of his good friend and stalwart defender of the faith, Lucifer of Cagliari. At the egregious Council of Tyre, Athanasius was condemned and exiled, and Pope Liberius wished to defend him by calling a new Council at Milan to resolve the Arian Crisis. Liberius chose Lucifer as his representative at this council, which was convened in 355 A.D. At the council, Lucifer spoke strongly in favor of St. Athanasius and the Homoousion doctrine (which holds Christ is consubstantial with the Father) and convinced many bishops, including Dionysius of Milan, to support the orthodox cause. Sadly, however, the Arian bishops retained their majority, and with the support of the Arian Emperor Constantius, they confirmed their heretical Homoiousion positions (which holds that Christ is only of a similar substance to the Father); flogged the orthodox prelates; and exiled many, including Lucifer.
Another great blow to orthodoxy was dealt in 357 A.D., when Pope Liberius succumbed to the great pressure of Emperor Constantius; signed the formula of Hosius, which denied the Homoousion doctrine; and excommunicated Athanasius.
In his wonderful work History of the Catholic Church, Fr. Mourett described Lucifer as “an impetuous orthodox bishop.” In 360, Lucifer advocated shunning dealings with Arian heretics in De non consentiendo cum haereticis and compared Emperor Constantius with the idolatrous kings of Israel in De regibus apostaticis. At no stage throughout the crisis did Lucifer succumb to heresy; however, he certainly gave in to imprudence. Finally, after many more trials and tribulations too long to expound upon, Athanasius, Lucifer, and the orthodox prelates were restored, and a council was convened in Alexandria to finally resolve the Arian crisis.
At the Council of Alexandria, which did largely resolve the Arian crisis, the holy fathers deemed that all of those priests and bishops who had worked with the Arians and sided with them in various councils, but who had not publicly professed the heresy of Arianism, could retain their offices and sees within the Church. It further declared that those who publicly renounced their heresy could return to communion with the Holy Catholic Church. This was too much for the “impetuous” Lucifer. He had fought the good fight since the very beginning, was ridiculed, and suffered terrible persecution for the Faith. He had been a loyal servant to his pontiff, Liberius, but even his friend Liberius had abandoned the orthodox Homoousion proposition under pressure. Along with Saints Hillary, Athanasius, and Eusebius, and a handful of others, he was at one time one of the last orthodox prelates in the entire Church.
Seeing the Arians and semi-Arians he had fought against at Milan and elsewhere rehabilitated was too much for his pride to swallow. How could they, who had been at enmity with Christ and His Church, be returned to their sees and positions of power above him, when he, a valiant defender of orthodoxy and veteran of the underground Church, still fought the good fight?
Lucifer turned against his former friend Athanasius and decried the measures taken to restore the repentant Arians. Pope Liberius ratified the decisions of the council, but he was a heretic. He had signed the heretical formula of Hosius, which had rejected the Homoousion doctrine. He had not been condemned as a heretic, but he was a heretic nonetheless, and heretics are to be shunned. Lucifer declared that heretics — even repentant heretics — could not hold ecclesiastical offices, and he proceeded to condemn Liberius, Athanasius, and all the bishops of the Church who would not support him.
And if the above description of things is true (I haven’t bothered to check because my time is limited, but it is irrelevant because my knowledge on matters of what is heresy and who is a heretic is rather exhaustive) then Lucifer (which I assume was really Lucius and thus re-named by your own kind of people) was 100% correct. A former heretic can only be reconciled with the Church insofar as he retires to a monastery with authority over no-one and spends the rest of his days in penance. Again, this is Catholic Dogma that remains unchanged throughout history and is of course spelt out in Cum-Ex Apostolatus Officio.
He abandoned the Church and retired to Sardinia with his followers, who took up the name “Luciferians.” There Lucifer would live out the remainder of his life separated from communion with the pope, Athanasius, and the Church. The once great defender of orthodoxy died in schism.
No, he clearly didn’t if your account is at all correct.
When one is tempted to reject the pope and all the bishops of the Church due to the heresy and scandal they constantly promote, remember the example of St. Athanasius, who always fought to remain in communion even with the heretic Pope Liberius.
Moderates are what God will spit out, remember. While a possible passage of power may require such “compromises” in the first place they are illegitimate compromises and dogmatically in error and in the second, they rarely ever result in an actual transfer of power from the corrupt to the non-corrupt. In fact, they merely tend to provide deeper cover for the most corrupt of all.
When you recognize and resist the pope, you are in communion with St. Athanasius, but when you reject and resist him, you are in communion with Lucifer.
Absolute nonsense. Let me write that in correct English as it actually is:
When you recognise a demonstrable persistent and unrepentant never-was-Catholic as legitimate “Pope” you are in communion with Satan and his henchmen and we like that. When you reject such persons as legitimate “Pope” you are in Communion with the remnant of the Catholic Church.
Writer’s note: I have an uncle whose misfortune it is that I bear his name (we’ll call him “Michael Massey the Greater”). Consequently, when I have written on sedevacantism in the past, a concerned sedevacantist wishing to send me his…ahem…constructive feedback thoroughly confused my dear uncle by sending him a voluminous tract in “refutation” of “his” essay. Suffice it to say, to avoid any confusion, please address any criticisms to Michael Massey the Lesser, and leave poor Uncle Mick alone.
Consider yourself addressed Mickey the Lesser.
Oh, and don’t bother to respond, since your own attack was pure rhetoric and intentional lies, I have zero interest in anything other than further exposing you. You are a supporter of a known paedophile promoter and protector and associate of child traffickers, the vicar of Paedophiles on Earth, Bergoglio, so you know where you fall in the hierarchy of people I sincerely hope get what’s coming to them in this life and the next.
For those readers who are still figuring things out, my latest book here, covers all the objections to Catholicism (Sedeprivationism) in exhaustive and irrefutable detail and since it is written in my usual brutal style, I am told that as well as informative it is also entertaining.
As I had a post on Catholic grifters, liars and so on and a new book coming soon on the actual Satanists that run the Novus Orco due out later this month, it’s only fair I take my two handed sword to a Protestant Churchian next.
Lest it be said I am uncharitable allow me first of all to state that my personal impression is that White is, at least mostly, simply obstinately stupid and probably not a completely knowing deceiver and grifter like the three stooges I discussed here.
White responded to a tweet by James Fox Higgins with a video that I will now dissect below. Here however was the offending tweet by James.
And here is the start of White’s response, which carries on from the linked timestamp below of about 30min in to at least 1:05 before I stopped watching. To be fair the first 5 minutes or so from about 00:30 to 00:35 he just waffles on about how he’s been defending Sola scriptura for 30 years and yet how almost no one, Protestants included, use the term correctly. Cue speTHial reasons why his definition is super SpeTHial. Which is essentially an appeal to his own completely inexistent authority. So he’s been advocating for a completely idiotic idea for 3 decades without learning anything about the idiocy of it. Not a great start.
Here is a link to the roughly 00:30 start of his response.
My own video response for those allergic to reading is here.
And for those who prefer the written format as I do, here are my notes so there is no dodging of anything later.
1. White Defines Sola Scriptura (SS) as only scripture (the Bible) as being “God breathed”. Which according to him is therefore almost as if God Himself had spoken it and this is a higher quality and inerrant aspect that nothing else has.
Counter: What I would like to know is:
A) who defined what the Bible is actually composed of? In other words which books it is made up of exactly that are “God breathed” only? As far as I know White doesn’t tell us but there is a clue as he states that scripture took 1500 years to be put together (at about 39:30 or so). So presumably he is telling us that all those guys who sat around and put the Bible together about 300 years after Jesus ascended, using letters, parts of oral tradition, various books etc etc basically had done a sloppy job until the Fat German with lust for nuns in his heart came along and “fixed” the Bible. Which until then and for the previous 1200 years obviously had “non-God breathed” writings in it polluting it all up.
B) how do you know when the final editing is completed? I mean, if we had to wait for that beer swigging, sweary, “if the wife is not willing (to have sex) use the maid” German to put the finishing touches, how do we know that a flamboyantly gay transvestite who will decide that all of Paul’s vile, vile, comments on sodomites are ALSO just apocrypha like the letter from James that squarely rejects the other idiotic idea of Protestantism, Sola Fides?
I mean that’s why Martin the nun-banging “monk” decided James was not “canon” after all and all those poor martyrs of the previous 1500 years just had it wrong don’t you know.
And who’s to say Kaytlin with a y, (formerly Bruce with the deuce) will not further educate us on the benefits of being a raging sodomite and how all references to the opposite of that were just apocrypha too?
2. At about 38:30 or so – White states that the enemies degrade scripture precisely so it can then be attacked as all just non-God breathed stuff.
Counter: A bit of projection going on there, since changing the supposedly infallible Bible is precisely what Luther did as item 1 on his list really. Especially since the Latin translation of the original Hebrew (Old testament) and Greek (New testament) known as the Vulgate is a better translation than the Protestant KJV which used manuscripts for the Old Testament that had been edited by literal pharisees who rejected Christ (the modern day “Jews” which are Talmudic Jews since original Jews that actually followed their religion became Christians).
And the Catholic Bible certainly hasn’t changed or been edited at all, so… who exactly is degrading things here?
3. At about 40:30 he makes probably the most hilarious hypocritical statement of the decade, accusing non-Protestants of just inserting their own ideas into the Bible and all of them just having their own views instead of God’s.
Counter: Hahahahahahaha. I mean really. That’s the whole point of Protestantism! Everyone to interpret for themselves! Literally interpreth as thou will is the only law of Protestantism.
Catholicism has dogmatic principles and beliefs that are explicitly stated. You can’t be Catholic if you reject any of those dogmatic positions. It is literally the opposite of what he is saying. It is Protestants who make it up to suit their needs, not Catholics, who literally have a book of all the canon laws and dogmatic catechisms all set out in writing. Unified. One Church. One approved Dogma. Not 40,000 and counting.
4. He almost outdoes himself at about 41:30 though when he states that you can’t degrade part of the Bible to make any part of it lower or less “God Breathed” than any other part.
Counter: You know except for the book of James…. and… the other “apocrypha” that made Martin look foolish. That had to be degraded in the first place. Except that wasn’t *akkkshually* degrading the Bible that had existed in the same form for 1200 years, not really, because Martin, like Mohammed really, was just another perfectly good and proper prophet that had to fix the Bible and decide better for everyone what God really meant.
5. At about 42:30 White says that papal infallibility is an example of this “adding in stuff by the reader” and that it happened 150 years ago and is claimed by the Catholics as part of oral tradition.
Counter: This is just flat out wrong and due to either stupendous ignorance and complete lack of even 30 seconds research on google, or just plain outright lying. I’ll assume the first to be nice about it. (Which however means the man is extremely stupid since he speaks authoritatively on things he has literally not even bothered to google for 10 seconds and which any half competent Catholic knows off the bat). The writings of the first 700 years of Christianity ALL described the Bishop of Rome as having Primacy over the other Patriarchates. See the writings of Clement of Rome(~91-101A.D), Cyprus of Carthage (~200-258 A.D.), Pope Leo I, Hormisdas and Agatho (~681 A.D.), to mention a few. Furthermore, Papal infallibility was formally invoked by the Franciscan Pierre de Jean Olivi (1248-1298) when he was worried that a future fake pope (antipope) would strip the Franciscans of their rights. Papal infallibility meant that a future Pope could not undo what a previous Pope had already done. This was highlighted by Olivi, but had in any case always been assumed and used throughout the history of the Church, just like when the Code of Canon Law of 1917 was put together all it did was to formalise in one place the rules the Church has always had. And for those saying but… but… Papal Primacy is not Papal infallibility, you’re not thinking things through, or possibly you are also very ignorant of Catholic Dogma.
Catholic dogmatic positions:
1. The Magisterium of the Church and thus the Church is infallible because of the supernatural protection it enjoys due to the promise of Jesus to always be with his Church. Since Jesus is infallible, His protection means the Church too will be infallible even though at the end only a tiny remnant of the faithful will remain. Nor does this mean the Church will not have bad, flawed, and very fallible men in it. In fact it is assumed all of them are.
2. The Magisterium is headed by the Pope.
3. The Bishop of Rome ALWAYS settled tied votes and disputes between the other Bishops (primacy) and since the Church is infallible and the Pope is the head of it, he also has to be infallible when making dogmatic official (ex cathedra) pronouncements.
In any case Papal infallibility derives from the Bible, primarily Matthew 16:18-19.
6. He then makes the most hypocritical statement of the last ten years at about 43:40 when he states that, well, you can’t have “new” revelation like Papal infallibility (he lies about papal infallibility being new as explained above but that aside…) because it wasn’t taught for the first 1000 years of the church… (it was, as explained above, but let’s leave that aside too…)
Counter: So… you CANNOT have new revelation that wasn’t taught for the previous 1000 years but… you can have *new, super-improved* MARTIN revelation another 500 years AFTER that! Like divorce and banging nuns being A-OK! The hypocrisy…. it just boggles the mind.
7. And lastly at about 1:05 White literally says that Ratzinger is wrong as can be but is still a brilliant theologian. Because he was the head of the modern Inquisition.
Counter: Aside from the fact that Ratzinger is no more Catholic or a theologian of any sort except perhaps of Moloch-ism than Bergoglio is, White is clearly Impressed by titles. Saying Ratzinger is completely wrong yet brilliant at his ONE JOB. Is basically like saying that a pilot that crashes a perfectly functioning plane right on his first flight during standard take off with no adverse weather is nevertheless a brilliant pilot. Of course, given White’s demonstrated sub-normal intelligence, he may very well make such a statement, all while fancying himself a very good judge of piloting ability for the last 30 years!
David Dunning and Justin Kruger should probably present him with a plaque or something.
CONCLUSION
What we can conclude from this is quite categorically a graphical illustration of the level of clarity of thought and reason present in the usual Protestant theologian. Behold:
Milo Knows.
They can never help but out themselves. Usually with a comment like this, supposedly “edgy-sarcastic”, but in reality the usual signalling to each other.
And the answer is no, because associating with, covering for and joining with pedophiles is unforgivable. As if being a Satanist in transparent disguise was not enough.
You might be interested in the following posts:
By G | 19 September 2021 | Posted in Social Commentary