Posts Tagged ‘sedevacantism’

The March to Hell is Gay

It is almost impossible for a secular person to even begin to understand what has happened to this planet and its people over the last few hundred years.

The two main reasons are:

1. The change is very gradual over time so that one generation merely complains about the previous one or the latest one but, also due to family ties, no doubt, doesn’t really take up arms, metaphorically or literally, to return things to a more Just, more True, more Beautiful and Good state of affairs.

2. The primary motive is imputed to mere human foibles and weaknesses, which is correct as far as it goes, but ignores the primary motivator and movers behind the human element. Absent this point, it becomes truly impossible to see the issue as it really stands, and therefore, quite naturally, also impossible to fix or even marginally improve, both individually as well as socially. That motive force, I ask you, especially if you are an atheist, or agnostic, or lukewarm Churchian, to bear with me a moment, and for the sake of pure intellectual thought experiment, assume for a moment that what you read next is simply correct, and run the model in your head, seeing how it would apply. If you do this exercise honestly, you may well be stunned into realising that the model answers more questions and situations than you could possibly have suspected. And that, logically, means the model is superior to anything you’ve used up to now. So here it is: the motive force behind all the degradation and corruption of our present situation derives from demons. Demons and their ruler, Satan. Spiritual entities that have various powers and abilities to interact with the material world also directly in mostly rare occurrences, but whose primary means of achieving their aims is to influence, subtly, nefariously, indirectly, and fuel the flaws, sinful nature and weaknesses and cowardice that is present in every human being.

I ask you to keep this model in mind, whether you believe it or not, as you read the rest of this post, and then, after, note for a few days how it models the world. If you do, you may find your way, eventually, to the real Church Militant; but for now, let us merely observe the last few thousand years of human history and note the arc of human virtue and its counterpart, human weakness, sin, or outright evil.

Before Christ, the best of humanity could probably be found in the Roman Empire or the Greek classical times. Even so, life was decidedly brutal. While men certainly exhibited a level of concepts of honour and valour, including the ability and will to commit suicide rater than lose dignity, similarly to later Japanese Samurai, it was also true that certain practices of the day were abhorrently vicious. Rape, murder for entertainment, enslavement of defeated enemies and so on were all normal occurrences of the day. While the Spartans certainly were formidable warriors, their brutality even with their own people was similarly legendary. Defective children were abandoned to the elements because they would not make healthy warriors or healthy birthers of same.

Their gods were fickle, dangerous and used human beings as set pieces in their Olympian squabbles. Truly their influence was really demonic, and as far as catholic thought goes, that is precisely what they were. The “Gods” in the Old Testament, that the one supreme God chastises for their tragic and evil non-compliance with leading humanity in a good way, is noted in Genesis as well as the Psalms. Their legendary offspring, the titans or nephilim were also deemed to be not only giants, but also unquestionably corrupt beyond redemption.

After Christ, the viciousness of the Roman Empire, along with its utter degeneracy began to collapse and gradually humanity was elevated into a level of scientific method, beauty, art, human behaviour and charity for your neighbour that has been unsurpassed in human History. And this happened most and most rapidly in those areas that were Catholic. Despite the unending lies of the fomenters of the “enlightenment”, the so-called “Dark Ages” were anything but. Had the psychotic pedophile and demon inspired “Prophet” of Islam not started a vile, murderous, rape-and-pillage oriented religion, who knows to what heights this planet would have reached? Are you even aware that hundreds of years ago Catholic theologians contemplated aliens, invented the actual, real, functional scientific method and dragged humanity out of Barbarism into what is in fact, the Risorgimento, the rising from metaphorical (and often literal) death and the murky waters of demon-filled “life”.

If you are not familiar with this history, allow me to suggest for your four books. If you actually read all of these, I promise that your perspective on the past is going to shift drastically.

In order then:

  1. The Four Witnesses
  2. Bearing False Witness
  3. God’s Battallions
  4. The Crusades – I have read thousands of books, this might be my top one. Certainly it’s in the top 5. But reading the other three above first will heighten the appreciation and enjoyment you will get from this one.

Bonus book: The Great Siege 1565

If you take the time to just read even just one or two of those books, you might well note the dramatic shift in attitude to life, honour, duty, valour, courage and so on.

In today’s world, feminism has been injected into every so-called “modern” culture, and throughout human history, what has happened to societies that had rule by women imposed on them? Without exception, transgenderism, homosexuality and child sexual abuse become rampant. The brutality of Ancient Rome or Ancient Greece was in large part required in order to prevent the depredations of competing tribes of peoples from murdering, raping and enslaving your own people. But the degeneracy that quickly results from effiminating mankind is a special kind of chaotic hell that has only viciousness at it heart, and that turned against the most defenceless member son society: Children.

Being raised a few hundred years ago meant you certainly had a hard time of it from the start. If poor and of peasant stock, you had to work hard daily to simply survive. If born wealthy and of noble stock, you were trained to be a warrior and take part in wars from a young age, to defend your lands, your peasants and your King, or whichever noble higher up the ladder you aligned with. But in Catholic creation, the nobility had a duty to protect his charges and by and large, noblemen were men that had the respect of their people because when called to it they did not hesitate to go into battle for the right reasons. This parallel reality of the noble warrior is, paradoxically, better known to Westerners from the Japanese counter-part of Samurai, while they ignore their own history of even more charitable and equally courageous men within their own ancestry.

Now, why do you think you are not being made familiar with such history? With eh type of men and attitudes that existed for centuries? With the way a boy was raised or disciplined a few hundred years ago?

Today the mere idea of a spanking for a child is seen almost as some kind of abuse. And in fairness, those parents who do still install corporal punishment around the world, often, because absent a proper moral, ethical and logical foundation based in Catholic principles, do so out of mere rage or frustration, or without a real understanding of the role of such an act in respect of your own child.

The imperative is to raise your children as “friends” and to ensure the poor darlings know just how special they are, regardless of their lack of manners, lack of ability to focus, lack of ability to read a room, lack of ability to not just be little narcissistic imps. And they becomes such little terrors, not because they are born bad, quite the contrary, children are fundamentally born with an awesome capacity to be logical and make very logical conclusions from their observations. They do this instinctively and in keeping with their natural sex. Boys will tend to be more direct and simple, girls will tend to be more circumspect and devious in their ways. While a boy may simply ask for something that he knows is not really good for him, say eating all the chocolate he can before getting sick from it, a girl will try to get in your good graces before pulling at those emotional strings.

There is a reason why fathers tend to be more forgiving of their daughters than of their sons. Mostly because as men, they want and know the importance of their sons being able to be strong when required, compassionate but also just, and to be able to overcome whatever difficulty they encounter mostly on their own, because life will often throw that at them. But faced with their daughter saying pretty please and giving a hearty smile and a hug, strong men falter. Similarly, while their mothers will not be fooled by their endearing ways, they will often let a son get away with more, because after all, he is their little prince, and damn the world.

And such balance is good and healthy.

But if you listen to the metrosexualised working couples on a diet of TV and Netflix, with their children in government schools, who are barely aware of what their own children are exposed to daily, you will tend to think that such concepts are bigotry made flesh and evil, evil, evil. And gay couples who want to purchase small children to pretend to play at “family” are jus as healthy and normal as any heterosexual couple who produces their children the “old fashioned” (normal, proper and correct) way, by procreating them with each other. Never mind the statistical reality of what child sexual abuse in homosexual “couples” looks like. Because after all, math is racist! Or something.

So teaching your children to farm, to hunt, to shoot, to defend themselves, to reason, to do logic, to know their ancestry and traditions, to learn about the “rituals” of Catholicism and what they mean and what they are and the benefits they bring to everyday life, oh, no, no, no, that would be some troglodyte regression to cave-times.

Which is why the average “parent” injects their children with weird foreign substances that demonstrably cause more harm than good, as anyone that, like me, used to think vaccines were good… until I actually read up on their history, the “science” behind them, the actual ingredients and more importantly than all of it, the real motivations for them by the people who imposed them on us all.

The Genetic Serums passed off as “vaccines” for the last 3 years certainly got me to take note of what the “good” vaccines, which went from 5 or 6 to 30 in my lifetime alone, in many countries, actually are. What is in them and what they actually do or don’t do. If you take the time to research these things yourself, any normal person of normal intelligence that is not ideologically invested in a false narrative, but is instead simply after the truth, will be unlikely to ever inject themselves, or especially their children, with any of them.

Certainly those they would take would be a far reduced number and subject to control processes they can vet themselves with total transparency.

BUT WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? VACCINES? DEMONS? GAY PEOPLE? PEDOPHILES? YOU’RE AL OVER THE PLACE!

No, I am not. If it seems that way to you, it’s because each of these things, from your secular or at best Churchman model of the world is not linked. Each is a separate issue. Their causalities and determinants and originators are separate and disparate. But are they? Are they really? If you bother to take the time to examine these things, even from a secular perspective, it becomes difficult to avoid noticing certain linking factors.

The overwhelming presence of people that have huge financial impact. The overwhelming presence of a certain tribal group’s over representation in the entertainment, mass media and banking activities. The overwhelmingly mass-murderous and anti-European ideologies of these same people.

And if and when you do notice these things, you may be tempted to revisit history from only some 80 years ago and what and how certain groups that have since been defined as the most evil humans to ever have lived came to the conclusions they did and to act as they did. And how those acts may not be precisely what you have been told they were. At least not in a large number of cases. And maths, once again, becomes very bigoted if you apply it objectively to certain events of the Second World War.

You might begin to wonder why a certain tribe is protected from criticism legally in an increasing number of countries in the world, while that same tribe can do the very things that are illegal to do or say against them to pretty much the entire Caucasoid/European people.

And if you do notice all of these things, from a secular perspective, and you connect the dots, always from a secular perspective, the reaction that may well derive could be a secular solution. Perhaps even a final solution to the issue. And reaching such a final solution, you might be likely, to, in the event that such an unlikely event were to take place, follow a fiery leader with practical, if somewhat distasteful, final solutions.

And that would still play into the demonic world’s scheme of things.

While you certainly have the God-given right to assemble with whom you like, and to exclude whom you like from your company, and while they may pass laws to try and regulate your God-given rights, you can always bypass them. Because ultimately, if it comes down to being regulated as to how and when you breathe near whom, well, mass revolution and rivers of blood let it become then, because some fates are worse than mere death.

But from a secular perspective, that is really the only options. Submit to a totally tyrannical slavery of mind and body unprecedented in the entirety of Human history, or, armed rebellion and a politician hanging from every lamppost, overpass and tall enough tree.

It’s a Satanic gambit and while one option is marginally preferable to the other, neither is ideal.

IF, however, you understand the hidden, the intentionally occult, the “ridiculed” —by those intentionally trying to deceive, or those ignorant and maleducated enough to buy into the deceiver’s lies— concept of the demonic forces at work in this world; the fact that we are under the Dominion of Satan, that we are, literally, if on the side of God, special operatives waaaayy behind enemy lines, and that is why our Church is called the Church Militant, then, your duty, your mission, becomes extremely clear and relatively simple.

Which is not to say it becomes easy. But it is simple. Simple to understand. Simple to know in the marrow of your bones. Acting on it becomes easier not because the actions are easy, but because the distinct and deep understanding that it is the right path, makes the difficulties on that path much easier to bear.

It also becomes obvious that the work you need to do is, in this order:

  1. First of all on yourself. To know the Truth and live it. Ultimately, this means to know God. And ultimately, however absurd the proposition may sound to you now (it certainly would have seemed absolutely absurd to me eleven years ago) that the best model of God, His will, and how to best fit into the world, is the Catholic model (sedevacantist, obviously since what most people assume is the “Catholic Church ” is in reality the very hub of one of the portals to Hell, manned and populated by Satanists, freemasons and pedophiles, none of which are valid clergy being as they are not even valid Catholics).
  2. To lead others, first of all your spouse and family, to the Truth, and living it.
  3. In doing 1 and 2 above, ensure the safety, security, cohesion, education, intelligence, truth, beauty and loyalty, of your own family first and foremost. The family YOU and your wife create, not necessarily the one you were born into, though, if that is good and doable, so much the better.
  4. To lead by example, and begin to influence others around you to your ways. To begin to form a community of like-minded people.
  5. Reject, totally and absolutely, all of the following:
    • Anything and everything related to Vatican II.
    • All and every Novus Ordo “Cleric” they are not Catholics, they are not validly ordained, and in the unlikely event that they were in the past, they have been heretics for some 60 years or more, like Vigano. And heretics are to be shunned by all. Even should they repent, they are to spend the rest of their days in penitence secluded in a monastery, with authority to preach or expound their thoughts on precisely no one.
    • Anything and everything offered to you by globohomo world.
    • The false narratives presented to you on:
      • Feminism.
      • Toxic Masculinity.
      • Anything “gender”. It’s called sex. Gender is for grammar.
      • And there are only two sexes: male and female.
      • Equality. No two humans are equal, not even twins.
        • No culture is equivalent to another.
        • No ethnicity is equivalent to another.
        • No system of laws and rules is equivalent to another.
        • No religion is equivalent to another.
      • Tolerance. Tolerating evil is evil. It is not good.
      • Moral relativity. No. Wrong is wrong and right is right.
        • Justice is not complicated. If you think it is read On Natural Law, or the Science of Justice, by Lysander Spooner. It is 8 pages of A4 printed and is all the law and all the politics any honest person will ever need.
        • A world without Justice is a world in which Love cannot exist, only perversion.
        • “Social Justice” is not Justice, but the inversion of it.
      • Violence. While certainly violence is never optimal, from a Catholic point of view, it is, absolutely, at times, necessary. Such is the state of things in a fallen world, if we are to preserve Justice and Love. This is why Catholics absolutely believe in the death penalty, and always have. human dignity demands it. (When I say Catholics, I always mean the real ones, Sedevacantists, not fake “Catholic” Churchians that do not reject completely all of the Novus Ordo lies).
      • The LGBTQ agenda. Educate yourself on things like the incidence of violence in homosexual relationships, the incidence of childhood sexual abuse in those presenting as homosexual, the incidence of the perpetrators of child sexual abuse among homosexuals, as well as various other things, such as the incidence of horrific diseases brought on by their lifestyle, or their overall personality disorders beyond the obvious ones.
    • Reject absolutely the very concept of Truth Relativity. Objective truth exists and is a foundational concept of reality. Regardless of whether you personally are able to know what the highest truth of any given situation or event is, an objective, absolute position exists.

If you do this work, you will find that those texts discussing the way people lived, believed and acted a few hundred years ago, suddenly make a whole lot of sense and that your life is immensely improved by re-learning some basic principles of virtue, courage and perseverance in the face of a demonically inspired world.

Once again, this is not to say your life will necessarily become “easier” in practical terms, but it will absolutely become far more beautiful and significant, and that is a prize worth having a little discomfort for. After all, all the great achievements involved sacrifice. it is the very quality that makes us admire the achievement! And how much better an achievement to have begun the creation of a community dedicated to Truth, Family, Courage and the ability and will to resist the demonic processes and practices now so diffuse into the world.

Once you reclaim the ability to think, move and above all, ACT like a man, instead of some feminised version of one, and understand the judicious use of reason, and of all your other faculties, to achieve success, not by mere brute force, but by use of your intellect as required and to overcome the devious even at their own game if need be, in service of God, Truth, Beauty and the human virtues of the best of humanity, then, life truly becomes worthwhile living.

And remember how to define success:

To create a powerful, strong, family, with powerful, strong bonds and excellent values of the main virtues of honour, honesty (but learn to deceive the deceivers too) right action, justice, truth and beauty. And to not only resist the temptations and moral decay and degeneration of the worldly all around you, but lead others to salvation by example and create the tide that will reverse and overcome the evil and the deceitful in ways neither you nor I could even imagine, but that, when you follow God’s Will, appear to happen spontaneously in very unexpected ways.

And real success is to pass on a legacy to your children so they continue to build on what you started, never relenting, never allowing tolerance for evil to creep in, and never to become so soft that squashing the snake heads as soon as they appear ever becomes too distasteful for them.

I for one am doing my part. I hope you are doing yours, and that one day, we see each other from across the way and recognise: Ah. There is another brave soul who stood when it counted and held his shield next to mine, even if I may not have know it.

No related posts.

By G | 18 March 2023 | Posted in Catholicism, Christianity, Fighting SJWs, Freemasons, Increasing Happiness, Medical Science, Sedeprivationism, Social Commentary, The Enemy Within

The Creed – Battle Royale Theology Remix

Now, as you all know by now, if you read here at all, the nickname given to me by others: The Kurgan, applies not only because of my happy-go-lucky and sunny disposition, but also for my intolerance of heretics. We all know: There can only be One (True Church).

What started as some kind of internet bumfight between theological retards, Jimbob and Owen Benjamin, has grown, as an avalanche started by their simultaneous thundering fart, to include the questioning of the very nature of the Trinity by scores of autists across the web.

And prompted Vox Day to clarify his position, as he has often been (incorrectly) accused of denying the Trinity.

The resulting discussion from Vox’s post on SG actually had some interesting commentary (as well as also the “thoughts” of various drooling retards).

So… although the topic is of very little interest to me personally, since my position is pretty ironclad, I thought it might be interesting to others, or at least entertaining. And perhaps they might find some historical background, or some logical thinking related to it, or, ultimately, my personal position, useful.

In that vain hope then, allow me to quote The Creed as the (real, Sedevacantist) Catholic Church currently has it:

Credo

Credo in Deum Patrem omnipoténtem, Creatórem caeli et terra; et in Jesum Christum, Filium ejus únicum, Dóminum nostrum, qui concéptus est de Spiritu Sancto, natus ex Maria Virgine, passus sub Póntio Piláto, crucifixus, mórtuus et sepúltus; descéndit ad inferos; tértia die resurréxit a mórtuis; ascéndit ad caelos, sedet ad déxteram Dei Patris omnipoténtis; inde ventúrus est judicáre vivos et mórtuos. Credo in Spíritum Sanctum, sanctum Ecclésiam cathólicam, sanctórum communionem, remissiónem peccatórum, carnis resurrectiónem, vitam aetérnam. Amen.

Which, translated into English for you heathens, heretics and schismatic is:

I believe in God, the Father Almighty, Creator of heaven and earth; and in Jesus Christ his only begotten Son, our Lord, who was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary, He suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died and was buried; He descended into hell; on the third day he resurrected from the dead; He ascended into heaven, and is seated at the right hand of God the Father; He will return to judge the living and the dead. I believe in the Holy Spirit, the holy catholic Church, the Communion of Saints, the remission of sins, the resurrection of the flesh and life everlasting. Amen.

And that, of course, is the only Creed you need or should care about, since it is the one of the One, Holy, Apostolic, Catholic Church, which, I remind you, is infallible and will remain with us until the return of our Lord The Christ.

However… let me now take you through the various iterations and why this is so.

Beginning with Vox’s preferred credo, which he clarified is the one of the “Faith of the 150 Holy Fathers” also known as the Nicene Creed, of 325 AD, but which I believe he clarified (and I hope he corrects me if I got this wrong) meant the first version, as used by St. Cyril who was a catechist in 345 AD, and is also known as the Jerusalem Creed because this is where St. Cyril taught.

There are two forms of this. The first, a very abbreviated form used for the baptism of a new convert:

I believe in the Father, and in the Son, and in the Holy Ghost,
and in one baptism of repentance for the remission of sins.

And the second one, which was used when they made their vows of renunciation and faith before the whole congregation, in other words, when they were essentially confirmed as adult members of the Church.

It reads as follows:

We believe in one God the Father Almighty, maker of heaven and earth,  and of all things visible and invisible. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of God, begotten of His Father, very God, before all worlds, by whom all things were made, and was incarnate, and was made man, was crucified and was buried, and rose again the third day, and ascended into heaven, and sat at the right hand of the Father, and is coming in glory to judge the quick and the dead, whose kingdom shall have no end. And in one Holy Ghost, the Paraclete, who spake in the prophets, and in one baptism of repentance for the remission of sins, and in one Holy Catholic Church, and in the resurrection of the flesh, and in the life eternal.

Given that the second one was the one recited formally by the baptised adult (or at least of age of reason), it is obvious that the first is a condensed version just identifying the most important points, and the second one is a more complete version. That in and of itself already makes it clear that a so-called “revision” of the Creed, is acceptable; because it is not a revision or corruption, but merely a more complete and detailed version of the first one. So in principle, the one used by the Catholic Church is perfectly fine.

But far be it from me to deprive you of the thrill of a larger internet bunfight about theology. In essence then, what, if any, is the difference between the Credo I subscribe to and the one Vox subscribes to?

I posit it is very little. Let’s see them side by side and concept by concept with some commentary by yours truly. Always keeping in mind, I am not a priest or Bishop, merely a layman that submits to the infallible magisterium of Holy, Catholic, Mother Church.

Jerusalem Creed Catholic Church (Sedevacantist) CreedNotes
We believe in one God the Father Almighty, maker of heaven and earth,  I believe in God, the Father Almighty, Creator of heaven and earth; 1
  
and of all things visible and invisible.   2
    
And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of God, begotten of His Father,  and in Jesus Christ his only begotten Son, our Lord, 3
    
very God, before all worlds, by whom all things were made,  who was conceived by the Holy Spirit, 4
    
and was incarnate, and was made man,  born of the Virgin Mary, 5
    
was crucified and was buried,  He suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died and was buried; 6
    
  He descended into hell; 7
    
and rose again the third day,  on the third day he resurrected from the dead; 8
    
and ascended into heaven, and sat at the right hand of the Father, He ascended into heaven, and is seated at the right hand of God the Father; 9
    
 and is coming in glory to judge the quick and the dead,  He will return to judge the living and the dead. 10
    
whose kingdom shall have no end.   11
    
And in one Holy Ghost, the Paraclete, who spake in the prophets,  I believe in the Holy Spirit, 12
    
and in one baptism of repentance for the remission of sins,   13
    
and in one Holy Catholic Church,  the holy catholic Church, 14
    
  the Communion of Saints, 15
    
  the remission of sins, 16
    
and in the resurrection of the flesh,  the resurrection of the flesh 17
    
and in the life eternal. and life everlasting. 18
  
  Amen.19

And here is my commentary then, see the note number above for reference.

  1. I see no relevant difference. We/I is ultimately irrelevant since each person professes it anyway at an individual level. If you must have an autistic take it might be that Catholics do not presume to speak for anyone but themselves when professing faith.
  2. I see no relevant difference. Heaven and Earth assumes the entirety of creation in Catholic Dogma.
  3. No relevant difference.
  4. Here the appears to be a difference. The Jerusalem Creed focuses on the nature of God, the Catholic one states that Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit (which in Catholic Dogma is still one of the three entities of God, so, ultimately, no difference that I can see as relevant).
  5. No appreciable difference with reference to Jesus, but, an important omission in the Jerusalem Creed in that Mary is not mentioned at all. One might assume this is rather irrelevant since we all know Mary gave birth to Jesus and that He was Conceived by God (whether you want to limit that to God the Father or expressly state by the Holy Spirit, is, again, to my mind, quite immaterial since they are both aspects of God). The more obvious omission refers to Mary’s virginity. Which really should not be in question anyway, since every Christian for well over one and a half millennia has known that Mary was a Virgin while pregnant with Jesus. So, as far as any reasonable man goes, there is no appreciable difference. Some retarded person might however, infer that Mary was not necessarily a virgin, I suppose. I doubt this is Vox Day’s position.
  6. No appreciable difference, although we Catholic remember better who did what and when (especially since our prayer for the Mass includes the guilt of the Jews).
  7. A difference. Apparently, according to the Jerusalem Creed, Jesus either did not descend into Hell, or it was not worth mentioning, which I find rather a large omission.
  8. No real difference but the Catholic version is more precise.
  9. No real difference.
  10. No real difference.
  11. No real difference since the eternity of God’s Kingdom is assumed in Catholic Dogma, but the Jerusalem Credo is more detailed.
  12. No real difference, although the Jerusalem Credo specifies at least one of the functions of the Holy Spirit in more detail. The word Paraclete is from the Greek Parakletos and can generally be translated as Comforter or Counsellor, or one who stays or is called to be beside another. In essence it is clarifying that the Holy Spirit spoke through the prophets. With which the Catholic Church has no argument.
  13. No real difference. The Catholic Church Dogma is that there is only one baptism and it does remit all sins committed before it.
  14. No difference.
  15. A difference. This could potentially be quite a big one, if one is abysmally ignorant of Church history. In the first instance it could be interpreted as not requiring Holy Mass. However, as I said, anyone even remotely familiar with Church history will know that the Holy Mass was performed from the earliest times, with full concept of transubstantiation and so on. In the second instance, again, one abysmally ignorant of Church history might assume that there is no communion between a Christian that is alive and one that is dead. This is, the general error that Protestants make, (almost invariably ignorant of history in general, never mind Church history): Assuming that Catholics “pray” or “worship” dead people. The reality is that for a Catholic, as was the case for all Christians for well over one and a half millennia, it was always understood that the dead remain “alive” to us, whether in purgatory or in heaven and we can ask intercession from them, as you do of your friends when you say “please pray for me”. Which of course, applies to the Hail Mary prayer and many others. It is not a worship of Mary, it is an asking of her to pray for us sinners. That’s all. In this respect then, the omission from the Jerusalem Credo I think can lead to error, although, in fairness, at the time, this would have been omitted in the same way that one might omit saying water is wet. It was obvious to all. Then autists and gnostics came along, so, as the Church does from time to time, it specifies for all what has already always been the case anyway. And does so only to clarify for the laziest and most credulous, what devout Catholics have always known and done to begin with.
  16. No real difference. Although it can be interpreted as being one. See point 13 above. The autist might, however, conclude, as the retarded Protestants do that the remission (forgiveness) of sins, as mentioned in the Jerusalem Credo means all sins, past, present and future. Which is, of course, the retarded take. The Catholic Credo, by placing it here makes it more clear that sins can be remitted/forgiven. The implication being that even after baptism, new sins one might commit, can be forgiven (not WILL BE, but CAN be). So in a sense the Catholic version is more precise.
  17. No difference.
  18. No difference.
  19. A (presumed) difference. I presume this to be on the same level as point 15. It seems to not be expressly stated in the Jerusalem Credo because it was probably spoken out aloud anyway and everyone knew it. And makes no real difference to the theology either way.

This then, to my mind, puts to rest the appreciable differences that I might have with Vox’s theology, and to sum up, what are they, as far as I can see?

The bolded portions, at first glance.

I have not asked Vox his position, as I wanted to write this first, and then let him comment on it if he choses to, so any assumptions I may make on his behalf are subject to correction, and if he lets me know where I may have made a wrong one, I’ll be sure to let you know and update.

Right then, on point number 5: There are potentially up to three issues:

  1. I do not assume Vox takes the position that Mary was not a virgin before the birth of Jesus.
  2. I think he may take the position that she was not perpetually a virgin after the birth of Jesus, which is a Catholic dogma. Given he has not had a Catholic upbringing, as far as I know, I assume he would rely on his own relatively reasonable (at first impact anyway) assumption that once a woman has given birth she is no longer a virgin from a physical perspective. Even if this were the case, the Catholic Church, when referring to Mary’s perpetual virginity means that she never had sexual relations with anyone, even after the birth of Jesus, and that’s what matters. I do not know whether he subscribes to the idea that Mary did later have sexual relations with her husband Joseph after the birth of Christ. Possibly he might, if he is relying on the erroneous assumption that the man referred to as the “brother” of Jesus, called James, was an actual sibling of Jesus, rather than merely one of his ardent followers.
  3. Anyone familiar with the details of priesthood, and things like the rituals required before entering the tabernacle, the death of anyone touching the ark of the covenant or indeed other things set aside for God, would understand that Mary, having been made a pure vessel for the incarnation of Jesus, was obviously set aside for God, and no man in his right mind would have dared trying to have sex with her. This is the position the Catholic dogma takes ultimately. In either case, at a practical level, I do not see that it makes any difference in how a man might go about his day-to-day life as a Christian. Possibly, the heretical view might lead one to be slightly less appreciative of the contribution to Christianity of women, in their role as mothers or of sexually pure brides and so on. In other words, if one was to err on the side of caution, the Catholic position would be the better one to side with.

On point number 7: I doubt Vox believes Jesus did not descend into Hell, but I suppose he might. Even if he does, I don’t see how that would affect his day-to-day actions or belief system. It would be an error as far as the Catholic Church goes, but I fail to see the consequences of it at a practical level. At a spiritual level, of course, having such an erroneous belief would diminish the work done by our Lord for those souls that remained in purgatory or limbo until he freed them, as well as diminish His power and ability to do, go and act as He deems required.

On Point number 15: Here may be the only real differences. I am not sure what Vox’s views on the need for Holy Mass, transubstantiation and the communion of (dead) Saints. As he is of a generically Protestant non-denomination, I assume he probably does not subscribe to transubstantiation. I assume he believes there is a need for going to Church, though I am ignorant of what aspects of what passes for Holy Mass in Catholic Churches is replaced by any specific beliefs Vox may have in this regard.

Overall then, I would sum the possible differences between Vox and myself, as far as our theology goes are probably limited to transubstantiation, the need for confession and it being a sacrament, an item that is not even mentioned specifically in the credo of either side (though it is implied within the context of Catholicism, by point number 16), and the possibility of asking for intercessionary prayer from the departed, including Mary.

Potentially, at a stretch, we might even guess at some unspecified difference of opinion or view of maybe women or mothers in general because of his Protestant leanings versus my Catholic ones, but frankly, I doubt it. And if there is, I doubt it would be very significant in practical terms. Lastly, and this only from a very brief conversation I had with him on the matter a few years ago, I believe that he may take the position that the Holy Spirit is an aspect of God (I am not sure whether he means from God the Father only, like the Eastern “Orthodox” do, or from both God the Father and Jesus the Son) that He sends to us, rather than a “third person” as such as is generally conceived by most people who call themselves Christians.

Adendum: A commenter helpfully referenced this post from 2013 which sheds more light on Vox’s position. To summarise it then, he questions the change from the original Nicean Credo regarding the position of the Holy Spirit. My understanding is that he does not equate the Holy Spirit with having the same quality of Godhood as Jesus or God the Father. Specifically, he objects to the description of the Holy Spirit being as “the giver of life” since life was already present and eternal as the result of Jesus’ arriving before the Holy Spirit (I assume here that Vox means that those who believed in Jesus as the Messiah even before Jesus was baptised were already given life eternal). Interestingly, Vox seems to also hold that the Holy Spirit must be able to proceed from both the Father and the Son. I am not certain, however, since he also, reasonably enough, states that God the Father and Jesus the Son cannot be wholly and totally interchangeable at all times, but he does not specify if he thinks the Holy Spirit precedes only from the father. I do not think that the position that Jesus and God the Father are both God, yet not exactly interchangeable at all times and in all ways is heretical. the very fact there is a distinction means there are differences. Similarly, being Catholic, it makes sense to me that the Holy Spirit proceeds from both the Father and the Son, as is, in any case, made quite clear in the Bible. As for Vox’s contention that the Holy Spirit is later raised to a status that is quasi identical to Jesus and God the Father, I honestly abstain from having an opinion on the matter. I don’t see it changes anything one way or the other how this aspect is viewed, and personally, do not even see that it makes a difference if the Holy Spirit is the third part of the Triune God as Vox interprets it or as he assumes the Catholic Church interprets it. I mean… it is literally a mystery, so I find the quibbling over it to be a complete waste of time in practical terms, and at most, a personal point of curiosity as to how another human being might perceive it, as observing such things often can give us new insights.

On this last point, I am not sure if it even makes a difference even at a dogmatic level in Catholic thought. I mean, I know that the Holy Spirit is presented as the third part of the triune God, but as to the exact specifics of the nature of the Holy Spirit, I really and truly believe such speculation is well above my ability or even concern to know. I am perfectly happy to submit to infallible Church dogma, whatever it may be, on the matter. And honestly, I cannot see that in practical terms as far as the way Vox may or may not act it makes any difference at all. For all I know such a belief may well land him in Hell, but I honestly have no knowledge of that, nor understanding of why, and more importantly, no concern at all to find out. As I said, like the great philosopher Harry Callahan, I know my limitations and am perfectly happy to take the dogmatic position of the Catholic Church on this subject.

So, that takes care of the view Vox has of the Trinty.

Now for the others…

This is a much simpler issue.

Owen Benjamin’s take on the Trinity has, without any doubt, been utterly, completely blasphemous, since he compared the relationship between God the father and Jesus the Son as a homosexual liaison with the Holy Spirit as the ejaculate. And no, I don’t for one second accept the cowardly excuse that he was “only joking.” Let me put it this way: Jean Parisot de Valette, who eventually became the leader of the knights of Malta and was possibly the man who single-handedly might have been most responsible for Islam not putting the whole of Europe to the fire and the sword, once beat a lay member of the order of Knights nearly to death. Allegedly for blasphemy. For which he did four months in prison. I see nothing wrong with that. Nothing at all. And in fact, if nearly killing a man for blasphemy was requiring of four months in the hole (it was literally a hole in the ground in which food and water were lowered to the prisoner) that seems about right to me. And if such laws were implemented across the civilised world, we would soon return to a saner, cleaner, more respectful and kind world.

In short, Owen’s take is absolutely retarded, blasphemous in the extreme, and he had best keep such an idiotic idea to himself. Especially is he’s ever near an actual Catholic who might have a temperament similar to good old de Valette.

It does need to be stated that if Owen holds such a belief, which I charitably doubt, or even just whatever belief allowed him to make such an absurd and blasphemous statement, it is quite clear he has a disordered mind, and that, at a rather obviously deep level of degeneracy to even come up with such imagery. Which, if what I am told about his streams by others is even only partially accurate, would also be obvious since apparently he spends a goodly part of his hours long streams referencing homosexual acts, male genitalia, or ejaculation, in graphic detail. Clearly, not the sign of a healthy mind.

But in any case, no one that made the comments he made concerning the Trinity can ever be taken to be a Christian of any kind, not even of some random version of absurd Churchianity like Mormonism. We can therefore only define Owen as a complete heretic (assuming he was ever validly baptised, which I don’t know). And if he was not validly baptised, then he is simply some kind of deranged non-denominational heathen or pagan. In short, we need not concern ourselves with his take on any aspect of christianity, theology, or frankly, much of anything else, since it is wholly irrelevant.

Whatever Jimbob’s take on the trinity is, I have no clue, as I have never watched any of his videos or read anything from him except the odd cartoon he draws, of which, I am not a fan. I just don’t like the look, but that’s a matter of taste and of no consequence. I really do not know anything at all about his view of the Trinity, but I am led to believe that Jimbob considers himself and Eastern “Orthodox” if this is the case, and if he holds the classic views of that schismatic sect, then the most likely difference he would have with me is that being as the schematic “Orthodox” don’t read their Bible very well, he assumes the Holy Spirit proceeds from the father alone, when it is quite clear that the Holy Spirit proceeds from both if one can read in normal human context. In any case, if this is the extent of the discrepancy between us, it is, again, of rather little consequence at a practical level and I doubt would lead Jimbob to act in any specifically degenerate fashion. As I said before, it might lead him to Hell spiritually, but as to the details of the how or why, beyond the fact it goes against Catholic Dogma, I do not profess, nor care, to know, I am happy to simply submit to the Catholic Church’s view on this.

Conclusion

So there we have it ladies and gentlemen. The only interest I have in this whole topic would be Vox’s specific views, and that purely on a personal level, because I find him interesting and his views usually present facets of reality I might not have considered before. From a personal theological perspective however, whatever Vox’s views might be in their detail, it is extremely unlikely to change my own. It might, possibly, add some level of detail or nuance though, I might not have considered before, and as such, it could be interesting.

The views of Jimbob and Owen on the Trinity (or pretty much anything else) are completely uninteresting and utterly irrelevant to me in the extreme. As are pretty much anyone else’s, unless I find your takes on a number of topics and your level of intellectual thought experiments to be engaging.

I now take my leave of what, no doubt, will be further fuel to the Internet Trinity Bumfight Dumpster Fire of 2023.

No related posts.

By G | 3 March 2023 | Posted in Catholicism, Christianity, Sedeprivationism, Social Commentary

A Clarification on Lent

My take on Lent is that while one might argue about Fish on Fridays, and so on, ultimately, the point of Lent is three-fold.

  1. Giving a correct sense of reverence, respect, remembrance and proper honouring of our Lord’s harsh path through this Earth.
  2. Fasting, as with most mortifications of the flesh, inspires a deeper sense of the numinous, a better understanding of prayer and so on. A chosen “hardship” invariably is one that produces results easier and in a better fashion, generally speaking than a God-sent one (especially if you’ve ignored all signs he may have sent before).
  3. It teaches you discipline, over a period that is more than a day or two.

These are all useful things, however, I am also very aware of the passage in Romans 14:14

“I know, and am confident in the Lord Jesus, that nothing is unclean of itself; but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him it is unclean.”

I have not followed Lent pretty much at all, with some small temporary exceptions, however, throughout my life, I have taken periods where I would not touch a specific thing. Like no sugar, or no alcohol, or no coffee, or whatever. Sometimes these were related to food/drink as a general health boost, although I never really suffered from anything that would need me to make such choices. It was primarily a result of my martial arts training and me wanting to discipline my mind in things other than mere training and fighting, and since eating and drinking are pretty instinctual, I decided to take time to experiment. I at times went up to six months without drinking any alcoholic drink, or touching anything sugary, and so on. It is a good practice to do.

I have also done water only fasts for several days and complete fasts for up to 48 hours (no water or anything else) while going about my day in a normal manner. All these practices make you more aware of the spiritual in some way or other, though they might be difficult for some people who are not used to it and obviously, as always, you are responsible for your own actions. Don’t go doing some weird fast that ruins your health and blame it on me or having read this blog.

So I take Lent in that spirit. My last post might not be perfect from a Lent point of view, especially of a priest of a layman that knows his stuff, but it is a first approach for me, and given that generally I tend to favour meat, since grains and so on often are not ideal for me, it should be an interesting test for me to undergo.

I posted the Idiot’s Guide to Lent precisely so that people who are not familiar with it can maybe tag along and try it in a similar fashion.

Anyway, that’s my take.

Enjoy the next 40 days of tiny, self-chosen, privation.

No related posts.

By G | 19 February 2023 | Posted in Social Commentary

The Idiot’s Guide to Lent

As I have explained many times, I am an earnest Catholic, but not a particularly good one.

I tend to focus on the big picture: Who is and is not valid clergy, who is and is not part of the actual real Catholic Church (Sedevacantists) and who is not (all the Novus Orco), but one should really try to live and act as per proper Catholic principles.

WARNING: I am not a priest and this idiot’s guide is primarily for myself.

Lent this year runs from Ash Wednesday 22nd February 2023 and ends on Thursday, April 6 with evening mass on Holy Thursday.

Consulting the Code of Canon Law of 1917 then, we have codes 1250 to 1254 which in essence state the following:

Abstinence = no meat or soups made of meat but eggs, milk and other condiments, even if made from animals are ok.

Fasting = only one meal a day but also allows a little bit of food in the morning and evening but in essence it is traditional that these two smaller meals combined do not comprise enough food to form a full meal.

Every Friday = Abstinence

Ash Wednesday (22nd February 2023) = Abstinence and Fast

Every Friday and Saturday in Lent = Abstinence and Fast

All other days of Lent = Fast only

If you can eat meat on a day, you can also eat fish on the same meal/day

These rules do not apply strictly to labourers that work physically during the day (farmers, stonemasons and so on), or Pregnant or breastfeeding women or children under the age of 7 or people over 60 years of age.

Personally, I am not altogether clear if fish is allowed on Fridays or not. I believe it was allowed for many years before Vatican II, and I do have farm-work to do, so the rules I am going to follow are as follows:

Ash Wednesday – 22nd February 2023: No meat or soups made of it. One meal with possibly small amounts morning and evening

23-24/2/2023: One Meal with possibly small meals morning and evening

Friday 25/2/2023: One Meal with possibly small meals morning and evening, no meat, but I will allow fish if I worked in the field

Saturday 25/2/2023: One Meal with possibly small meals morning and evening, no meat, but I will allow fish if I worked in the field

Sunday 26/2/2023: One Meal with possibly small meals morning and evening

27 Feb to Mar 2: One Meal with possibly small meals morning and evening

Mar 3-4: One Meal with possibly small meals morning and evening, no meat, but I will allow fish if I worked in the field

Mar 5-9: One Meal with possibly small meals morning and evening

Mar 10-11: One Meal with possibly small meals morning and evening, no meat, but I will allow fish if I worked in the field

Mar 12-16: One Meal with possibly small meals morning and evening

Mar 17-18: One Meal with possibly small meals morning and evening, no meat, but I will allow fish if I worked in the field

Mar 19-23: One Meal with possibly small meals morning and evening

Mar 24-25: One Meal with possibly small meals morning and evening, no meat, but I will allow fish if I worked in the field

Mar 26-30: One Meal with possibly small meals morning and evening

Mar 31 to Apr 1: One Meal with possibly small meals morning and evening, no meat, but I will allow fish if I worked in the field

Apr 2-6: One Meal with possibly small meals morning and evening

I am also going to:

  • Learn the Lord’s Prayer in Latin
  • Learn the Credo in Latin
  • Recite them both daily
  • Do my best to do some Rosary daily

That’s about it.

I am sure this list is missing out a lot of important things, but if I can stick to it it will be a first attempt for me at keeping Lent “properly” so I am putting it out there for all the other wild donkeys (see BELIEVE! for the reference to wild donkeys.)

For those who want to follow along, feel free to post a comment or let me know how you get on.

No related posts.

By G | 18 February 2023 | Posted in Social Commentary

Why PUAs suck. And always have sucked.

Bear with me a minute, (or 30, this is long. Impossibly so for most millennials) because in order to really drive this point home, it is necessary to understand the origins of the problem, which are far-removed enough from the rotting fruit that most never even have a clue about it.

Have you ever read any G.K. Chesterton? If you have, you’ll be familiar with his style of presenting some preposterous thing in one phrase, and then, go on in a few paragraphs to prove his point in an undeniable fashion. The man was absolutely brilliant at it and I often say that had I come across his writings in my twenties instead of after I was already a Catholic, I may have become one a lot sooner.

Now, I am no Chesterton, not by a very, very long shot, as anyone that has read my Believe! will be able to attest, nevertheless, that little book has resulted in over a hundred people converting to proper Catholicism (Sedevacantism), so, while I am but a butcher to Chesterton’s refined sushi preparations, I must serve a purpose too.

And the title of this post is going to be a bit of a “preposterous” or at least “well, you’re totally wrong” proposition for a lot of the people that might stumble across this.

Especially the zombie army of complete fuckwits like Andrew Tate. So. As I said: bear with me a minute. And no, this will not be some long, drawn out, moralistic diatribe with Bible verses scattered throughout. This is going to be as close to engineering as human social “science” gets. And as anyone who knows what engineering is will know, engineering is the only science that really matters or makes a difference in worldly matters. And much like a gun, it can be used in a destructive or mechanistic way, or guided by a higher intent of purpose and produce spiritually and humanly uplifting effects.

So let us begin.

The aim of every PUA (Pick-Up Artist — in case you have just come out of a cave in Afghanistan after hiding for 20 years) is essentially, at least initially, to be able to have sex with (in theory) as many beautiful women as possible. In reality, in many cases, those who try to learn from supposed PUAs, would be very happy to just get any sex at all. And in a few cases, the prospective “student” merely wants to be able to meet a girl he likes and be able to get her in bed and fall in love and live happily ever after.

Right. So let’s deal with the usual objections first.

1. Is it true that having sex with lots of women makes you a better man.

In order to know, we’d first have to define “better” so let’s do that by the usual and most common factors those interested in PUA activity would say “better” means.

  • Make you more able to communicate with everyone in general and women in particular.
  • Make you more likely or able to get any specific woman you are interested in to get intimate with you.
  • Make you generally more socially aware and raise your general status in the common parlance of the world as we generally find it today.
  • As a result of the above, generally increase your likelihood of being able to secure a better job, better prospects in general and so on.

The answer to the above is yes. Yes it does.

Reminder: Note I asked if having sex with lots of women does that. Not paying a bunch of money to a PUA. It’s a very important distinction, so remember it.

2. Can any of the things PUAs say/tell you/teach you/ increase your chances of having sex with some women.

Sure. It’s certainly possible anyway. They also could irretrievably damage your perception of reality in a way that is so fundamental it is akin to setting you up for a life of misery.

The reality is that most PUAs are wannabe tryhards. I have peculiar interests, one of which is cults and cults of personality, (remind me to tell you about my experiences with Dianetics, [scientology], Amma the hugging saint, Tony Robbins, a number of his wannabe clones, the Novus Orco “catholic church” and so on) which I enjoy breaking, making fun of and generally exposing for the fraudulent snake-oil sellers it involves. PUAs are borderline types in this realm, so I turned my baleful eye on them a long time ago. I will pick one PUAk as a relatively typical example. At one point, one of the most prolific producers of PUAs books, courses, and seminars was a guy who called himself Mehow. Which might have been his real name, as I think he was of Polish ancestry (I know, I know! If he’s Polish it’s no wonder he’s retarded right? But hey, chalk this up as another nail in the coffin of “all humans are just one race, human”, ok?).

Here is a glowing review of him apparently, though he seems to have disappeared in the last few years. Sounds great if you’re after that number 1 stuff above, right?

Well, I probably should have screen shotted it all way back when, in 2009 or so, because it was all information that he himself provided, on various of his own platforms, though no one had really taken the time to actually look at what he said and put it together. The facts are that by his own admission, he had spent 10 years partying hard with daddy’s money, to the tune of $500,000, been trained by supposedly the best Pick-Up Artists in the world, and become a PUA guru himself, in order to have sex with… drum roll please… “about 30-40 women” which probably means 25 or so.

Now, as I pointed out back then, if this is the level of “skill” of a top PUA, most women really have nothing to fear from them in terms of losing their virtue to these irresistible ladies men!

Wealthy fathers on the other hand, may want to teach basic economics to their incel sons.

Ok then, but still, if you find a “good” PUA, and do get good at having sex with lots of women, you too admit you get all that good stuff at point 1 above, right? So it’s all good!

Well, actually no. As I wrote a long time ago, I had been with a lot of women before anyone even mentioned PUAs or The Game to me. In fact, it was precisely because my friends, and people at the gym I trained with, saw me leaving with a different pretty woman each week, that they told me about it. A friend literally gave me a copy of the book and said: “You should have a chapter in here. Or maybe a whole book.”

So, my perspective of PUAs was from the top of the mountain, looking down on these peasants in the rice fields scrambling about to get some, and then scrambling about some more to try and sell their “skills” to each other.

As I wrote almost 15 years or so ago:

By the time that I discovered anything about PUAs I had developed quite happily on my own into a man more than capable to satisfy his curiosity of women. This was a fortunate thing because it allowed me a perspective on PUAs and their techniques that was free of being sucked into the promise of alluring women falling at my feet almost as if by magic. To a degree, I already had this power (insofar as it can be had let’s say) so I could look into and study and evaluate the information with eyes already filled of my own experiences. To sum up PUAs briefly is difficult, however I will try. Initially, most of these guys are frustrated geeks that have broken down social interactions between naturally successful ladies’ men and attractive women. They then practice these routines like social robots and begin to have some success at obtaining sex with these plastic techniques. As their confidence grows they refine the techniques and become more adept at luring an ever increasing series of women to their beds. The more daring then continue into experimenting with multiple partners at a time as well as multiple girlfriends at a time. Some openly, others secretly. By and large though, certain truths remain evident. Even if successful at having multiple sex partners most of these individuals are still what I would consider socially inept people. They may have achieved an ability at obtaining sex from women but that per se does not make them good people necessarily. Or likeable. Or happy. Furthermore, the level of hyperbole in this community is rather extreme; especially when you consider that many of the so called Pick-Up Gurus sell products that supposedly will increase a man’s ability to bed stunningly beautiful women.

 

Keep in mind this was my perspective long before I had any remote hint of Christianity in my world view.

My perception of PUAs has not improved over time either.

The key negative here is not even their wish or attempts at getting laid, but rather, the phrase “social robots”.

While it is understandable that when first attempting some intimidating social interaction one might rely on some repetitive approach, the fact is that a very large number of these would-be Casanovas, end up making “approach routines” and so on their way of relating to the world. Yes, the female world, but really the world at large. They read a Tim Ferris book and then assume all of life is about “hacks”. Then they get into NLP which is a “hack” of proper hypnosis created by a cocaine fiend that either shot and killed his then girlfriend at the time himself, or was responsible for it anyway.

That’s right, Richard Bandler is not quite the great guy you might have imagined.

So the really nefarious aspect of PUAs both those who “teach it”, and those who practice it, os the mechanisation of humanity.

It’s like the series upload. You just order your sex like you do deliveroo and that’s that.

Honestly, it is more dehumanising than actual prostitution. But the real issue, is that the problems this sort of interaction creates are far-reaching and affect pretty much everything in society in a negative way.

And this is where we now get to the crux of the PUAs suck statement.

The entire PUA phenomenon is not really the origin of what we might want to call social degradation, but rather, a reaction to it.

As, indeed, was my own exploring, and wading through different women in quick succession without any precise aim beyond that of “finding the right one” in the most general of terms. Again, quoting myself from early 2010:

 

The underground world of PUAs was first exposed by Neill Strauss’ book The Game. As someone interested in all aspects of hypnosis I did look into this community as I will look just about anywhere if it will increase my knowledge base and help me to be more effective in my work. Fortunately for me, somewhat contemporaneously to my study of hypnosis I was also undergoing some drastic life changes in all areas of my life. One of these was my intimate relationships. I had divorced and then had two relationships one after the other which were both extremely intense one very beautiful until its unfortunate and somewhat inevitable end, the other extremely stressful and painful yet coloured with flashes of beauty and power so intense they literally changed my views of radical aspects of my philosophies. As a result, after this, I gave myself to a sort of uninhibited search for some deeper meaning in intimate relationships.

 

I begun a period of my life that was almost scientific in its detachment and approach yet also extremely intimate and self-revealing. I had more intimate encounters in a few months than I had had in the previous 10 years. I also (counter-intuitively to what most men that behave this way do) was extremely direct and honest with the women involved. I never lied to any of them and I always made it clear how I felt (and more importantly didn’t feel) towards them. With only a few exceptions no one was really hurt emotionally and even when this occurred occasionally it was never anything very serious, merely a little bruised ego either for them or for me. Some of these women —all of whom I am grateful to by the way and for whom I did genuinely care though I may not have been in love with any of them— I only saw once. Some I spent a little time with; all were intelligent, capable women in their own right and they were from all walks of life. They ranged in age, cultures, backgrounds, languages they spoke and of course all other details, yet I could not help but notice that for the most part they were all quite beautiful not only to me but to most men. Every one of these women would be considered a great ‘catch’ by the very vast majority of men.

 

And to be honest it surprised me. I had never considered myself particularly good looking and certainly not a socially skilled person. I am extremely individualistic, never required much social approval and the very concept of peer pressure was as foreign to me throughout my formative years as was evident the absence of girlfriends.

 

On examining my past I realised for the first time that apparently through luck or chance or some factor I could not identify, though relatively few in number up to that point, I had always been with beautiful looking women. And those I had fallen in love with were without exception well above any kind of norm (in looks, character and mind). I began to actually experiment with this and became more and more selective. Pretty soon I discovered a sense of things that I think few men really achieve in their life. A sense of self-confidence that I didn’t even know I was missing to begin with that can really only come from being validated by women we value. Undoubtedly some people reading this will consider me a misogynist chauvinist pig. I do not consider myself so, and in fact I love women. Nor, unbelievably as it may sound to some, am I a polygamist by nature.

 

My nature is monogamous. As long as I find the one, and as long as she’s always earning it (and me for her obviously) I seek nothing more than one woman. This period of my life though helped me to realise that. And I am eternally grateful to every woman I have ever had the good fortune to spend any time with. Without women, truly life would have no purpose I think. If it were possible for men to exist without women we would still live in trees and caves.

 

Which man would do anything more than club some food to death and find a relatively warm place to sleep if it weren’t for women?

 

Everything that was ever created, invented, built, reached for, designed, fought for…as the French say (but perhaps differently than they mean!): Cherchéz la femme. Behind everything that man ever did…there is somewhere a woman or the thought of her.

 

My reaction was due to the eventual collapse of a relationship that had lasted 13 years, though I was never married, then the collapse of my first marriage, which lasted only 4 years and then 2 more relationships of even shorter duration. These four relationships were the only ones that had mattered to me on a rather deeper level, with whatever liaisons happened in between them being essentially distractions or errors.

In a society that values people, individuals and life in general, in short, in a properly Catholic society, it is extremely likely that I would have remained with my first serious relationship for life. At least in part, and probably a very large part of it, the reason that 13 year old relationship eventually collapsed was probably due to the subtle but persistent infiltration of unhealthy, worldly infiltrations into what would otherwise have been a lifelong relationship.

The destroyed concept of marriage and family created by my boomer generation parents was common to all of generation X. As was the “natural” idea of abortion rather than having a child at “too young” an age. The utter secularisation of life as a whole, with the total absence of any higher spiritual direction whatever, the only purpose of life seemingly to be exclusively the satanic idea of “being happy”, led to a life that you were being told in every possible way should limit itself to, having as much material possessions as you could, avoid having children altogether because they got in the way of you having “a life”. A life that was supposedly dedicated to essentially the constant pursuit of material distractions and hedonistic pleasures. Frankly, it is only my “noble pagan” ancestral roots that saved me in some ways. Having been raised in a family tradition that still respected concepts like honesty, honour, keeping your word, a sense of natural and simple justice, permitted me to completely sidestep many of the pitfalls that lay there for so many of my generation and perhaps even more so for those that followed.

I never touched any drugs, never even got drunk once in fact. And my being involved in the budo philosophy of Japanese Karate-do from an early age meant I had a peculiar mix of agnostic zen philosophy with aspects of Shintoist if not reverence, at least historical respect for my ancestors, despite not knowing very much about them until relatively later in life.

We were also the first generation that became exposed to pornography to a degree that was unprecedented since Roman orgy times, and went well beyond the dirty magazines and hippie “free-love” of the boomer generation. While they had couched perversion and degeneracy as some deluded fantasy of being free of “jealousy” and “possessiveness”, by the time we were coming of age, it had already devolved into the idea that having as much sex as possible with as many people as possible was the “normal” way of life.

But consider for a moment, what the “rewards” of such an existence would be.

  • The absence of children as the pivotal part of family, because they get in the way of your hedonistic lifestyle.
  • The absence of relationships that endure hardships together because united by any higher purpose beside each part “being happy” and that individualistically within the “relationship”. The very concept that any relationship that had that as foundation could last beyond a few years at most is absurd.
  • Sex as a point-scoring status badge of sorts.
  • Emphasis on the ephemeral aspects of materialism: travel for travel’s sake, with no real deep penetration of cultures or geography beyond the required status symbol passport stamp and digital photo album (later to be displayed publicly online); owning of property and vehicles as further status badges if your success; wealth as proof of your superior intellect and ability, regardless of any other moral considerations.

I mean, think about it, bombarded by this message constantly, your own parent’s generation committed to these very same “ideals” with the narcissistic compulsion only the boomer generation ever managed to have, even if you “achieved” all of the supposed benchmarks of “success” this lifestyle supposedly promised, what would you be left with?

At best a healthy property portfolio with no one to leave it to besides the lawyers and ex-wives, as you descended into unglamorous old age alone and spiritually hollow.

And despite this, as well as being the most aborted generation, many GenXers managed to raise some form of families. Of course the carnage was spectacular. Divorces, abortions, and the pursuit of narcissistic, degenerate, selfishly hedonistic “happiness”, absent of any spiritual or moral rudder, was what surrounded us as we raised ourselves mostly, and these were the “values” we were exposed to constantly. It’s a miracle any of us managed to reproduce and retain a semblance of family at all.

Of course divorce, and abortion, and chasing smoke dragons, and drugs to numb the existential void, caught almost all of us to some degree or other. And for a generation already drastically reduced by being killed before we were born, then mostly stomped down and limited by our own parent’s generation in multiple ways, we did pretty well at surviving and overcoming and even reversing a few of the trends here and there in individual cases and small pockets of guerrilla resistance. Particularly given how thoroughly the truth of the spiritual aspects of life were hidden from us.

The boomers were (and remain) so desperate to remain unaware of their own spiritual and moral abyss, that they ridiculed, destroyed, discarded, disgraced, devalued, hid, and avoided, any meaningful confrontation with the numinous. With the reality of existence that truly forms the foundation of any true purpose. With any aspect of catering to the soul instead of the flesh. The boomers rejected what the silents couldn’t hold on to, we GenXers were not even aware something had existed there, for the most part.

The idea of a True Catholic Mass being meaningful, true, beautiful or even merely useful, was as foreign to us as the idea that some quaint pagan ritual to long-dead Gods might serve any purpose other than historical curiosity of a people that was obviously primitively superstitious and disappeared long ago; probably precisely because they wasted time and energy on such meaningless rituals.

And yet. If you look around now, it is mostly GenXers rallying the flag of Sedevacantism, and already beginning to pass that torch to generation Zyklon, which are our historical continuation, much as the millennials are that of the boomers.

Wait, what?

Allow me to recap. That historical aside was to give you a sense of why and how my generation was steered onto rocks instead of the meaningful life journey of marriage until death, children, family, tradition, real worship of God and respectful obedience to His laws as best as we can, creating truly meaningful lives (and thus happy in the only way that matters) rather than “hollywood happy” ones.

My personal story is a reflection of what a very few of my generation managed to do: I went full circle, and by luck or divine intervention, had the peculiar attribute of a persistence that almost none of my generational peers had any right to have. What was the point of never giving up when you had no real purpose to fight for? My adopted samurai code kept me away from drugs and a certain level of moral corruption, which did not, however, extend to sexual relations with women. In that respect, my descent into libertine ways was to a certain extent inevitable, given my intense nature, insatiable curiosity, and explorer’s heart.

But once again, if that becomes the totality of your life, what are you left with at the end of it?

It was that very conscious thought that led me initially at least partially out of it.

I distinctly recall the precise moment. I was alone at home, in an apartment I loved and that, incidentally, my eventual future wife had found for me. Lying on the orange couch that had come with the place, on a Saturday I think, having binge-watched a couple or three episodes of NCIS, I consciously considered my life. I was 39 years old, had travelled to many places, had essentially given up on trying to make any meaningful long term relationship work, I was limiting myself to having them last until the woman in question either irritated me or I got bored of her, and had rotated through a few cycles of getting a bunch of women under me in quick succession, then getting rid of all of them for a week or two, then starting the cycle again but with a somewhat “improved” version of the women-merry-go-round. Better read, prettier, dirtier in bed, or whatever the attribute, or set of attributes I got interested in that month.

I contemplated my future and thought about the different paths it could go. It was obvious to me by now that I could spend the rest of my life as I had been doing for the last few years and I could go to my grave with a constant change of woman on my arm, and that comparatively speaking —in spite of whatever my age or eventual decrepitude and wrinkles would be— such women would always be younger than me and prettier than most men would get a chance to be with long term, never mind temporarily more or less at will.

The appeal of that sort of future was essentially limited to the frisson of a new woman lifting herself partially off your bed as you gently slide down her knickers for the first time.

The intensity of a new body under you intent to please you or you pleasing her in ways she had not yet experienced. It’s thrilling. Intoxicating. I suppose, perhaps, there is a kinship to a kind of drug maybe. I wouldn’t know, I never did drugs, but the addiction to the ephemeral might be similar. It’s the kind if life where soon, familiarity could begin to breed contempt instead of a deepening love.

Where the normal, terrene, aspects of humanity become irritations and inspire contempt, instead of charity, forgiveness and a contemplation of our own weaknesses and errors; a practice that the boomers we were raised by avoided like vermin fleeing fire.

What can one be left with, living such a life, at say, age 99, looking back while cuddling your shotgun, your cognac and your memories, on your rocking chair?

The melancholy of remembering (assuming your brain didn’t go to shit by then) the fleeting sensation of how this or that woman’s foot felt on your calf as she orgasmed under you?

The erotic smell or taste of another?

The beautiful sunsets over an exclusive beach you shared with the one you had a few months with?

And who other than yourself to even remember these things with? Or even tell them to? And of what use would they be to anyone? Or of what interest, other than possibly morbid fascination with degeneracy?

So I thought about the alternative. Find a woman I could tolerate long term and have children and raise a family with. I was not naïve about the hardships that would entail. Including the putting up with the woman, since I had been through enough of them to know that, like all human beings, they all will irritate you in some ways or others. And the complications of raising a child, how it affects every aspect of your life, work, travel. I was not naïve any of those aspects of it. But thinking about it with cold reason, it was obvious that all those efforts would be worth it.

What I was naïve about however, was actual, full-blown narcissists. In a society that expects and enforces proper courtship, such creatures would be more likely to die alone. But, like the devil, in modern society, actual narcissists of the full blown variety were considered a somewhat mythological creature. At least back in 2008 or so they were. And to me they may as well have been werewolves. Creatures that didn’t actually exist. I was aware of evil people and of extremely selfish, manipulative and unethical ones. I had dealt with them more than most. But I was not prepared to imagine that a quasi-mythical creature, which is really more a shapeshifter at will than just a poor werewolf, who is a mere lunatic after all, could insinuate itself in my life.

The “methods of measurement” I had evolved were not really designed to sift for narcissists. They covered:

  • Looks – I had to be physically attracted to a high degree to get interested for a potential long term situation
  • Sex – plentiful and varied
  • IQ – they had to at least be able to understand some of the things that interested me once explained. At least in general terms. And be able to hold at least some level of conversation concerning philosophy (of life as lived, not the esoteric writings of some German incel like Schopenhauer)
  • Their attraction to me – If they weren’t interested to a certain level, then I lost interest in them pretty quickly too.
  • Some generic quasi-moral rules of ethics that at least mostly aligned with my own.

Well, let me tell you, that list does not, in any way sift for narcissists. In reality, as far as functional marriages are concerned, while a mutual attraction is certainly ideal, it is not even necessary. Neither is the sex or, necessarily, the IQ. But their character and ethics are pretty fundamental.

Today’s superficial ways have seen to it that as long as you have painted over your crappy moral fibre with enough glossy nail polish, sexy underwear, porn-star bedroom etiquette, and CNN or Fox News sound bytes  (to cater to left or right leanings) your abyss of the soul is not even noticed, much less criticised. 

Yes, it is true, that after such an experience, and in part also thanks to my previous encounters with women of all types, eventually, after I went through all that hell, and came out the other side, I found and ended up with what I believe will be my wife until we drop dead. Hopefully a very long time from now. But the difference is that instead of having adult children starting out in life, I now have children that I hope will get married early and make babies pretty much immediately after doing so, in the hope I get to be a grandfather before I drop dead. 

I do not regret any aspect of my life. It’s certainly been a hell of a ride so far and has no indications it will be any less interesting going forward, but it is probably true that in a society that had the values that Catholic society had a few hundred years ago, I probably would have married and had a lifetime with hat first girl I was with for 13 years. We would have had a bunch of children and be comfortable enough now to be able to retire in some semblance of peace.

It does happen to be true that I also believe I am much better able to appreciate the joys of life now than I would have been in that alternate history, and I think I am happier too and with a woman I certainly feel is perfectly matched to me, so overall, I ended up in a better place that will certainly keep me busy (and entertained too, both good and bad) until I eventually do join my ancestors in the afterlife. 

So What’s The SOLUTION then Kimosabe?

Patience grasshopper. First, understand where we are:

  • I have identified the issue is the mechanisation of human interactions.
  • I have shown some of the errors, pitfalls and ultimately nihilistic and generation-ending future this way of life produces.
  • The “benefits” such a lifestyle provides would absolutely not be positives or even required in an ordered, Catholic society.

But before I show you the solutions, you need to understand the real root of the problem. And that is the secularisation of society. That happened because of Protestantism. Protestantism is literally nothing less than the rebellion against God first done by Lucifer the so-called Lightbringer. 

I have covered this before and in various degrees of detail. But the point remains relatively simple. Protestantism brought in the disordering of relations between the sexes. It started with the introduction of contraception, which changed the dynamic of marriage. From the primary purpose being to create, nurture and raise a family, to having sex for fun.

Think about that. 

Serioulsy. Think about it. 

Try to imagine what the world would be like if not only you, but everyone around you, thought of marriage as a situation in which you remain with that person for life, no matter what, and create and raise children together (as long as you are physically able to). How would that life be? 

Well, we had that. For quite a long time. Now that attitude is seen as “backward”, unjust to women, socially irresponsible, and endangering the planet.

Before contraception was accepted by Protestant branches, the very idea of divorce was considered quite scandalous throughout Western Civilisation. After it, divorce naturally became commonplace.

It is perfectly logical of course, when the primary function of having sex become personal enjoyment, instead of family creation, with the bonus of personal enjoyment, then, sex becomes just one of the many things that has to be “perfect” in order to fill in the relevant box-ticking list that one must curate in order to “be happy”.

After contraception and fault-free divorce on demand, the very act of getting pregnant is a misfortune, something that will prevent you from doing what you want when you want, with anyone you want. So you begin to murder babies. And today we have “ex-spurts” trying to make it legal to kill babies up to 2 year olds. Mostly it started with this piece of shit in human form.

Contraception took a while to be “socially acceptable” thanks to the strength that even a declining morality within the greater Catholic Church had instilled in Western man. It took some 400 years from 1521 to get contraception to be more widespread. And it took until 1958 for the Papacy to be taken over right up to the present day, by Satanic freemasons. 

But here we are. Add in ubiquitous pornography and degeneracy of every kind, such as the current “transgender” movement, aimed specifically at children by the usual LGBTQPedo types and is it any wonder we have a generally sociopathic undercurrent to human relations in 2023.

So, here FINALLY are the solutions.

If you have read all that and got to this point, it is probable you’re not a millennial. Maybe a Zyklon with reading skills, which is rare enough but not unheard of. So it is only fair that I point out that this is not Boomer-type “advice” of the “don’t do as I did, but do as I say” variety. Nor is it of the same Boomer type that is more akin to “I did it when it was cool, and I *am* cooler, but don’t YOU do it, you’re not cool enough to pull it off.”

No. This is the kind of advice from someone that has come through the fire and miraculously is not just alive, but has a happy ending. 

In essence what I am telling you is:

“Don’t believe the bullshit of Hollywood son!”

“You have to fuck your way through an army of whores, gold-diggers and idiots to just begin to understand that porn stars don’t make the best mothers!”

It’s not so much “don’t be a criminal, because crime doesn’t pay,” type of Bible-thumping advice. It’s more of a “you get ass-raped in prison,” reality check.

And criminals go to jail. Almost all of them in the long run.

Ok, fine! as my three year old says, while stamping his foot. But then what do I do?

Learn. Educate yourself about proper Catholicism. That was the society that created the best situation for humanity, so learn what they did and how and why. And believe me when I say that what you think you know of Catholicism has, in fact, almost nothing to do with it.

Find out what Sedevacantism is and why it exists. 

Understand what relationships are from that perspective and what they look like.

If you can read Italian (or French) you can certainly get into the extreme detail of it by reading this book.

Understand above all, what is the lie concerning familiarity with many women. I said above that having had lots of sexual interactions can result in an increased ability in having such encounters, obviously, but also that it had other “benefits” of status among your equally brainwashed peers and so on, and by extension in relation to your general life prospects. Sure, but it does that in the context of a fallen world.

My personal sense of self-worth or ability to achieve certain things in life, was never tied to the number of women I had been with. When I stated that:

Pretty soon I discovered a sense of things that I think few men really achieve in their life. A sense of self-confidence that I didn’t even know I was missing to begin with that can really only come from being validated by women we value.

I was referring to my ability with women. I never had doubts about my abilities on other aspects of life, be it work, politics, skills or whatever. The self-confidence with women was merely a confirmation (by these women) that my abilities in general tallied with my own view of them. 

I assure you that my intensity at any job I undertook, confrontation I faced, or difficulty in life, was in no way affected by how many women I had been with other than very tangentially. Because they had been with me (those whose encounters were of a duration that permitted it) and seen other aspects of my life, they had confirmed their noticing of such abilities by, in a sense, giving themselves to me, at times at least, also in a secondary relation to those abilities. 

For example, if you’re a millionaire, some women will get sexual with you because of your money. And in that sense it “confirms” you have money. It was never my case, but I had such “confirmation” based on other aspects of my abilities, often in cases that were not even conscious for the women. It doesn’t matter at all —consciously anyway— to most women, if you are a good martial artist, or painter, or poet (assuming the talent isn’t related to wealth), and yet, talented men will tend to attract more women. It’s a natural selection thing, but undeniably, after enough interactions, a pattern of “merit” of various skills could be derived by the number of women who took notice.

In short, being with lots of women only means you will feel you are able to get with lots of women. And while that skill may give you an ego boost, if you are rational, you will realise that if that ego-boost got you to a better job, say, it was not because you banged a dozen girl in a week. And consequently you will also realise that since you can manipulate your own internal ego-sensations, you can get the ego-boost at will.

I for example, have almost never been rejected after a face-to-face job interview, and it had absolutely nothing to do with my sexual prowess, I assure you.

Learn courtship. And no, it doesn’t matter if the woman doesn’t know anything about it or is not used to it. And no, courtship is not bringing flowers and being totally chaste and so on. Sure, it can encompass those things, for a girl that understands such gestures rather than expects them as a tribute to her superficial beauty. It means taking the time to get to know the character of this woman you are interested in. And being able to recognise Red Flags. Which are not necessarily the ones popular culture tells you they are. A man that stands his ground, morally, intellectually or physically, today is labelled some kind of aggressive bully, intolerant, backward, and so on. Society does not supposedly approve of a straight white male that tells you to fuck right off when you try to push your SJW agenda on him, or worse, his children. But guess what, women worth marrying, even if they might deny it from their upset mouths, or believe that no, no, no, they don’t want a “brute” of that sort, inevitably, deep down, ultimately, want to surrender to such a man.

I honestly would have to think hard to count how many supposed feminists, discovered they really enjoyed discarding the feminist card completely once in the bedroom, and then pretty much never picked it up again. Feminism is the female equivalent of sexual frustration rage that people like Elliot Rodger have. 

The male incel rage is: If I can’t get any of the pretty girls, then no one will! I’ll kill you all!

The female incel rage is: If I can’t get any of the deeply hormonally satisfying sexual relationships I want, then no woman ever shall enjoy sex again with anyone!

Well that’s a lot of time investment but where’s your proof?! (aka provide peer reviewed source).

Ok, my internet autist friend. Read more. See what Catholic cities, lives and lifestyles were in the 1600s, or the 1700, or the 1800. Learn who invented the actual scientific method. Learn who the greatest astronomers and scientists were in most of human history.

And if the past is not evidence enough, know that as of 2023, I know of at least 3 or 4 couples that have got engaged to be married as a direct result of reading at least Believe! and maybe event RTCC, but at any rate, of learning about Catholicism. I know of more that got married. And of at least a couple of people that have potentially avoided suiciding themselves because of learning about these things.

Beyond that, if you are hellbent on drowning your soul and future in pussy, there’s not much I can do, or even want to do, to dissuade you. If god has given us free will, who am I to try to force you away from the path to hell you are choosing?

All I can do is tell you of my walk along that route and why I think it’s a very bad idea in the end. I not only survived, but I got uncommonly lucky, and I say luck because I know who I am talking to here, people that either are, or were, or aspire to be, as I was, some kind of fearless pussy-hunter, and I don’t want to be so presumptuous to ascribe God’s grace to me to the extent that He clearly Has done so. Not because He has not, but because I don’t want you getting the idea that I think I deserve it. 

I know I don’t and didn’t deserve it. But God permitted me to have it anyways, and even better than I thought it could be. Of course, there are hardships too, but man, am I glad for these hardships as opposed to the alternatives that I would have faced in that life of headlong hedonism.

So I hope you have read this all, young man. And I hope you take the advice and use it to avoid all the pitfalls and traps that delayed and snared me, and make the future for you and your children one where the Klaus Schwabs and globohomo pedo-satanists of the world have their DNA eradicated forever.

And if you’re not all that young anymore, then I hope you are in time still. You can be, and yes, sometimes it’s up to God, but buddy, trust me, if you’re in your late 40s or even 50s, you still can get it all. Which is not to say you don’t need to move your ass, you do, because as my Grandmother always said: “Aiutati e il ciel t’aiuta.” 

Help yourself and heaven helps you.

But it’s still all doable.

Yesterday I spoke to a guy I used to know some 20 years ago and that I did some security/bodyguard/close protection/hello-sir-can-interest-you-in-some-fairness-karma-and-justice kind of stuff. We are the same age. He has 7 children (he started earlier than me, the weakling, so I only have 5) the youngest being 7 months old. And trust me when I say that he had very few redeeming human qualities. Having been who I was, I can say that without any malice.

If he can, and I can, so can you.

And in case you’re wondering, no, he’s not Catholic. But he is religious, and believes in his culture and his people’s traditions, and in fact moved back to his ancestral land, as, in a sense, have I. Well, I haven’t taken the Most Serene Republic of Venice back yet, but you know, give it time, I may do it just yet.

And if you are a Boomer, and managed to read this all without spitting at the screen about how your g-g-generation was the best ever, and how we GenXrs should just have lifted ourselves from our bootstraps, like you did, and all that, then do what you can to help your sons, or theirs, or a total stranger if it comes to it. I mean, hey, if you’re short of ideas, you can always donate to my project here at The Kurganate. 

Or like my own father did, help your son/s daughters own property/land/a business that they can develop and pass on to their children and so in in turn. Remember that most wealthy people are so because of generational wealth being passed down.

My ancestors were adventurers, explorers and handy with swords and guns and some with politics, but they also squandered their fortunes in some cases and made them and passed it on in others, but I plan, as best I can, to pass it all on. And to raise wolves. Good, strong, ethical, Catholic wolves, but wolves nonetheless.

I hope you do too.

 

No related posts.

By G | 15 February 2023 | Posted in Catholicism, CE 1, CE 2, CE 5, Christianity, Fighting SJWs, Increasing Happiness, Relationships, Relationships, Sedeprivationism, Social Commentary, Stupid PUAs

The Rabbit Hole of Symbolism for the Satanists in the Vatican

If you really want to grasp some of the levels of symbolism the Satanists currently residing in the Vatican indulge in, you should read this long and detailed post.

Personally, once I have determined beyond any doubt whatever that a certain situation is of a given nature, I no longer need to delve into it, but I know that many need repeated and regular reminders of even incontrovertible facts, so such a post may be required.

You will note I no longer really post about the Covid Scamdemic, or the fact that Freemasonic pedophiles, Satanists and homosexuals, none of which are in any way Catholic, now inhabit the Vatican and have done so starting in 1958, or the fact that the Nordstream was destroyed by covert military action of the USA, or that globohomo wants to kill and enslave you and yours. Mostly I try to focus on the positive aspect, which in large part is simply: Ok, where do we go from here so that we win?

The things of primary importance I have laid out in my four part series earlier on this blog (use the search me button on the right sidebar) and can be summed up in 4 concepts:

Spirit/Mind

Geogrpahy

Community

Politics

These are the things that interest me, because these are the things that will determine the future.

The spiritual part is the most important because only people with an absolutely unshakeable belief will be able to endure and overcome even insurmountable odds. History has shown us an infinite number of times when a smaller, less equipped force has prevailed, survived and even won against foes that were better armed, better supplied and far more numerous. And if you are a Bible reading man, then you know that in the End Times, only a very few will hold the faith, all else will break, fold and fall away.

You can’t hold if your faith is based on quicksand, lies and false assumptions. This is why I insist on Catholicism (Sedevacantist only). It has an unbroken 2,000 year history that no other religion can match.

They are not only responsible for the best systems of civilised society, science and art of any other belief system on Earth, but they alone are the ones who hold an unbroken line of Apostolic succession from Jesus to the present day Sedevacantist Bishops. The Eastern “Orthodox” cannot claim this, in fact even their top Metropolitan has recently been admitted to have been a KGB plant all along. In case anyone who ever paid attention for a second could doubt it. The Catholic Church has survived all sorts of assaults, from the Arian heresy, which saw almost every Bishop bar one (famously) and perhaps a few others (unknown) and 97 to 99% of the laity buy into it, before the course was reversed back to truth, to today, where for more than 6 decades, the Vatican has had an impostor fake Pope and the Novus Ordo “clergy” are all knowing deceivers and Freemasons and Satanists (but I repeat myself). From the few Catholics hiding in the catacombs to have Holy Mass, in the time of Nero to today, we always, inevitably, rise again.

And unlike the Eastern “Orthodox” Catholics have always had effective warriors and saints in their midst that repealed the attacks of murderous Islam, of false prophets of gnostic origin, of infiltrations of deceivers of all kinds. Always, despite corrupt and degenerate Popes, Bishops and Priests, the Infallible Magisterium of the Church not only survived, but was finally immortalised forever into one, infallible, precise, document, the Code of Canon Law of 1917.Which is the most vetted document ever produced on Earth, having had tens of thousands of documents consulted for both its production as well as the verification that none of the rules contradicted each other nor invalidated any of the Papal encyclicals over a period of almost 2,000 years. Beyond the Code of Canon Law, are only the Papal encyclicals produced by the valid Popes up to and including Pious XII, the last valid Pope who died on the 9th October 1958 and since which, we have only had the heresy of Vatican II and its creators (Roncalli and Montini) and promoters and promulgators, Luciani, Wojtyla, Ratzinger and Bergolgio and all their fake and invalidly “ordained” “Priests”, “Bishops” and “Cardinals”.

What better time to become a proper Catholic, drawing on the historical strength, truth, perseverance and faith of our ancestors, who protected Christendom from all predators? What a glorious time, to be counted among the few, the faithful, the believers.

Do you not get that sense of brothers in arms at war? That sense expressed rather well in the film 300, when the Spartans say they will fight in the shade, hiding under their shields while the sky is darkened by the number of arrows raining down on them, and the Spartans, looking at each other from under their shield, laugh. That’s right degenerates, World Economic Forum Satanists, haters of Christ and truth and beauty and life, servants of he whose name is Legion: Do your worst. We are not given to a spirit of fear, and we will be the most ferocious zealots you ever encountered in the history of zealots. We will not take a single step back. We will build large families and communities of zealots and we will rebuild and create and refute and refuse all your lies, temptations, degeneracy and pomp.

So begin there, friend. Begin with spirit, for it guides everything else. I too was a heathen with no God. I wrote a short book for those who are like I was, so you can see I am not some Bible-thumper that was born into it. No. I came to being a Catholic, a real one, which means a Sedevacantist, by the Grace of God, Truth and Seeking it. And you can too.

So begin there, become one of us. And help us save humanity from the imps that serve the Eternal Enemy.

No related posts.

By G | 8 February 2023 | Posted in Social Commentary

How to really take on and beat clown world for real

Part 4 – Synergy and Politics

Hopefully you have read Parts 1 to 3 before this one. They are immediately below this post in reverse order.

Although I am perfectly aware that most people do not have the things described in parts 1 to 3 below in order, let us continue to assume you do, or will in the not too distant future. We do this, not to be unrealistic dreamers, but because before you embark on your best survival and then thriving strategy, it’s best to think things through.

As I said in part 3, even if you have all those things in order, it does not guarantee a win against the forces of evil that are lining up against all of us in a very real manner. Ultimately, as Lysander Spooner stated very clearly a couple of hundred years ago or so, government is merely the agglomeration of the violent thugs who then insist on their monopoly on the use of force. In short, when things get bad enough, you will have to deal with a government or powerful entities supposedly representing your “democratic” government, using force on you.

This force, is unlikely, in most cases, to be the squad of jack-booted thugs coming to inject you and your children with genetic serum against your will. If that was the case, the armed resistance would be swift, violent, and widespread. So, no, the force used against you will be a creeping and oppressive, python-like slow asphyxiation.

They will raise taxes and costs for everyday things like travel, eggs, real meat products, and so on. They will legislate absurd rules requiring you to inject your livestock with their prescribed “antibiotics” —which technically they will be, since from the latin, anti-biotic means anti-living things— They will feed you ever more genetically modified foods and sterilising components. The recent results of chickens no longer laying eggs at all for months as a result of a feed that is widely used in the USA is just the beginning. The will continue to spray chemtrails of whatever sorts and with no oversight. They will continue to police your thinking and expressions online and in real life. They will legislate away your gas stoves, your firearms, your ability to grow and sell your own food and so on. And it will all be done with the excuse of it all being for your own good. And with total media compliance to ensure the 98% of the retarded and zombified population not only complies, but becomes a sort of “angry mob” hellbent on making you comply too. Because grandma. Or the children. Or climate change. Or the poor Jews. Or, or, or. And then also and, and, and.

Even if you live in a small community of like-minded individuals, unless you have the run of the little village you live in, eventually, big government will come to you too.

So. Like it or not, and believe me, I certainly do NOT like it, you and your friends need to get involved in local politics. You need to infiltrate the local city council. You need to put one of yours as the town mayor and the town sheriff or police commissioner, or whatever the equivalent is where you live. You need to get the whole village to be politically as under your control as possible. And you need to begin making such inroads as soon as you can. Make friends with the locals and then with the local officials. Sound them out for their ideologies in a very gentle, careful and measured manner. Get your friends to do the same.

Remember in part 3 when I said you should drop mind-seeds? And so should your friends? That is actually how you change the perception of people from a real grass-roots movement. If a normie gets the same sort of message in different ways from four different people in the course of a few days, they begin to view that message as the prevailing truth. And if that message gets reinforced periodically by other people over the next few weeks and months, then that normie will take a position either for or against it.

In order of importance, you should, as best you can, begin to ensure as many people as possible in your little town are aware of:

  1. The total unreliability of the mass media
  2. Best if you can demonstrate not just unreliability but active, evil, lying with intent.
  3. Discover who is still a pureblood in your area in gentle and non-confrontational fashion and remember that these people are more likely aware of the disinformation and lies they have been subjected to.
  4. Discover the process to get yourself or like-minded friends to begin working in and taking positions in the local political landscape. Try to place people in municipal offices, home owner associations and so on. This takes time, but begin to work towards it as soon as possible.
  5. Discover what people in your area are most concerned about and fan those flames with a view to improving conditions for them and yourself as well as to position yourself in a way that you can be elected for such policies.
  6. If you can’t influence politics directly, get into the local infrastructure, whether it is main employers, co-operatives, unions, academia, whatever has an interaction with the local town council, and begin to infiltrate it.

This absolutely needs to be planned and the core people planning it should meet face to face to discuss things without any electronic equipment in any kind of vicinity, preferably. Not because you’re doing anything illegal, but to avoid your intent being railroaded and infiltrated by the ever-listening enemy. And if you think you would not be listened to and acted against, think again. And you should absolutely be sure to have only the core, usually no more than a handful of people, know all the parts and intents. The outer layer should know in generic terms that you want to take over, say, the mayor’s office to improve condition X and Y, but they do not need to be aware of the deeper purposes of your planned take over.

You get the idea. Participate in town council meetings, show your face, be positive and helpful and friendly to all and in the meantime gather information and begin your planned take over.

Now for some warnings as to the entire process.

1. It’s all too hard, too long and too unlikely. I don’t even like politics!

Buckle up. No sane human being likes politics. it’ s the purview of liars, parasites and grifters. No one likes going in a sewer either, but if you want indoor plumbing, someone, somewhere, at some time, has to do it. Step up.

It is not too hard, and does not take nearly as long as you think. What it does take, is action. Relentless, gradual, patient, thought-out, flexible, resilient, and continuous action.

And above all, this requires the thing I said was absolutely fundamental in part 1. Your steel mind. Your invincible will. Because they are both rooted in love of God and your family and you know you are doing it for the truth, justice and beauty in life and the freedom of your children down the line.

Never, ever overestimate how “difficult” something will be. And if you are likely prone to do so (most people are) start anyway. Knowing nothing, and continuing on relentlessly regardless. Let your ignorance of the obstacles you will encounter be your strength, as it allows you to deal with them one at a time, as they pop up, thus avoiding the need to try and think about all of them at once and be overwhelmed by the seemingly impossible task.

Step, after step, after step. The biggest enemy is not reality, but rather your own mind. Your own weakness of spirit. Your own depression. Your own tiredness. Your own lack of belief and lack of courage. THAT is your enemy.

Life, the objective world around you is not the problem. But the scum-beings in your way? They WANT you to be afraid, scared, feeling helpless and unable to do anything. Have you seen how the Klus Schawbs of the world react to a normal person asking them a simple question face-to-face? They flee in panic. They are not just incapable, but they are terrified of dealing with any actual confrontation face to face.

You’re going to let the dweeb that should have been shoved in a locker in high-school tell you what you can eat, and when? What transgender ideology your children are to believe? And probably even what kind of sex, if any, or with whom, and of which biological sex you can or should have it with? Is that who you are? You’re going to let them put insects in your food, and genetic serums and other poisons in your tap water, force you to use their green-energy (that doesn’t work anyway), own nothing and be their chip-implanted, drug-addled and drug-diseased puppet because it’s too hard to infiltrate local politics?

Really?

Well, it’s up to you, of course.

2. But I don’t know where to even start!

That’s a lie. I told you. Read Parts 1 to 3 and this part 4 and you now know exactly what to do.

“Oh but I don’t know all the details…!”

Well, butter-cup… figure it the fuck out. You learn by doing, not sitting on your ass. So get it wrong a few times, or a hundred, but get at it. You didn’t wake up one day and suddenly knew how to walk. You fell over thousands of times before you learnt how to walk, and then run, and jump, and maybe even do Parkour. So get off your ass and start. And start by feeding your brain and body better food.

3. Yeah ok, it all makes sense, but I am single, broke and have no friends.

What part of get off your ass and start is hard to understand? Start at part 1. If you have accomplished very little in your life, it is undoubtedly because you need to fix up the issue discussed in Part 1. You might also be young and not started any kind of work yet, so begin. Even if you’re still in high school, find a way to make some money and save it. Apprentice, learn a trade, get your parents to help you finance your new skill, whether it’s wood-working (very useful) plumbing, electrical work, metal-work or whatever. Get some hands-on experience, especially if you’re young.

First get your head right, second, get some kind of work and make some kind of money and begin to acquire assets. If you are young and broke and the money you can save is very little, think in terms of “bug-out” scenario more than permanent city-state fortress in the mountains. You can still scout the closest area to you that might be suitable to invest in later. Decide which country might be best if the one you are in is not suited to your needs. Most places you can make work, and only a few are really something I would advise against.

The UK is possibly the worst in terms of mind-control and globohomo agenda and it does not even have many rural areas to speak of. And if there are some god-forsaken spots, it is mostly because they have absolutely terrible weather and bad prospects. Hence God-forsaken. And yet, even there, people are trying to find ways. And probably are. Places like Monaco or Luxembourg are also probably not ideal, but if you live there, chances are you already own property elsewhere or could do so easily.

North America is an absolute shit-show, be it the USA or Canada, but… they are vast places and you can probably find an out of the way rural village that you can visit first and try and gauge for the possibility of it becoming a suitable city-state in the eventual economic collapse that is surely coming at some point, the real zombie-apocalypse, or the unleashing of 87,000 IRS agents and FEMA paratroopers to take you to the camps. Or whatever. And at least in the USA you can buy pretty much whatever firearms you want, in plenty of gun shops around the country. Unless you are a criminal. In that case apparently you need to buy them out of the back of a boot in a shady alley from a guy called Tyrone or Vito. Or so the films tell me.

The point is, it is never too late or too early to begin the work of selecting what way you want your mind to work and where you want to live.

Those two things matter most. The making friends is a skill. And if you have no social skills because you were abused sexually as a child, beaten, kept in a cage until social services moved you to horrible foster care and so on, I feel for you. Sure, your starting point is rougher than most. But you still, just need to get up buddy. Life is a lot like a fight. The guy who keeps getting up, who keeps fighting, who doesn’t stop, it’s true, very occasionally he might die. But…at least he dies with honour, and in most cases, the most stubborn, unwilling to quit guy, eventually, wins. And most things in life are not as harsh as an actual real fight to the death, so just get up. Again, and again, and again, and again, and again, no matter how many times you fall down. And build on your successes, however tiny. And if you lose it all, just begin again. Relentless. Become with an invincible mind. It is the most absolutely vital component in all of this. In all of life, really.

Most people overestimate what they can do in a year and underestimate what they can do in three or five years. Begin. Work. Build up your resources and your skills and toughen your mind and learn to enjoy the process. It’s not possible to grit your teeth constantly without a break. The taught bow snaps. You need to learn to smile and have fun, even when your nose is broken and you are spilling blood everywhere with each punch you throw and you’re still getting hit, but you’re fighting back. Smiling, and even laughing through the blood spatter. Foster this attitude.

4. But I am not even a Pureblood! I took the serum!

I’m sorry for you. Really I am, but it’s done now, carry on, try to do your best. Research what you can do to improve your chances, and if you are going to reproduce, my advice would be to do so with someone else that is also vaxxed but seems healthy. I say that, because there are a percentage of people that will survive regardless of the injected poison. Some of you may even mutate into new kinds of humanoids that can exist with this stuff in your bloodstream. It might not be ideal, but life always finds a way. If you have not read the book (not the film, the book) Jurassic Park, by Michael Crichton, then do so. It will, if nothing else, provide you with a very real glimmer of hope, if you realise you’re basically the dinosaurs.

Even mutated you can be useful. You might find the way to heal any of the vaxx intended damage, or help others avoid it. I can’t be sure what your path looks like because it is very different from the one I chose, and am advocating for, but I know you can still be on the side of truth, justice and beauty even if you were fooled by the evil scum that convinced you that taking the genetic serum was good for you.

5. It’s all just too depressing, I can’t go on.

Seriously, if this is your attitude, then I can guarantee you are not a believer in the Christian God, and certainly not in the real Christian God, which is the Catholic one. You’re primarily an agnostic-atheist type and ultimately a materialist. Alright then, listen up, because in my most depressed time of being an atheist, as a teenager, I came up with a very simple solution. If you do not believe in an after-life, fine. Don’t worry about it. No one gets out alive, so your time will come. Now stop being a pussy and carry on. At least work against the forces of evil. What else you got going anyway? Life is horrible, total shit, and then you die, right? Fine. Then make it count, and stop being a faggot.

6. I don’t have enough money to…

No one does. Especially if you didn’t sell your soul for fame and fortune. But consider this:

  • A few hundred years ago people built their own homes. They didn’t have power tools.
  • You really don’t need a lot of fancy stuff. Even if you put convenience first, as long as you don’t care about status, you certainly can get by with relatively inexpensive tools and equipment.
  • Where there is a will there is a way is not just a cliché for no reason. Do try to keep it legal though. Or at the very least Just.
  • Changing your initial expectations is usually a good idea. Sure, it would be nice to have a 20 room villa on a 100 hectares of good land. But you might actually enjoy a 5 room home on a couple of hectares of forested land in the right place more. Alternatively, it might be better to buy a smaller but decent piece of land in a good location with the right to build on it what you want, and do so now, rather than try and save and wait for a better property with a house on it that might never come, because the financial collapse wipes out the digital money you have in the bank before you can convert it to a property.

7. Ok, ok, but I really, really, really, hate politics, and I don’t have the time and…

Listen buddy, whoever you are, I am almost certain you don’t hate politics even half as much as I do. And you probably are not past the half-century mark with 5 children all under 12. So, if I can contemplate local politics, so can you. In fact, you should become my loyal serf, move close to me and begin the process of becoming mayor in my stead, because frankly, it’s almost certain you have more time on your hands than I do. Stop being under the delusion that someone else will fix things for you. No one will. You gotta fix them yourself. You. You gotta become the mayor. The Chief of Police. The tenured professor at the local university. And if you can’t then you need to become the assistant to the mayor, so you can eventually manoeuvre your friend Bob into the mayor spot. And so on.

They took over by infiltration, blackmail and patient subterfuge. We just need a little patience and some subterfuge. We don’t even need the blackmail and the backhanders. Probably.

Because we’re better, faster, smarter and precisely because we are sane.

We don’t want their job.

But they are forcing us to take it. So take it and make it good. Win.

Because like it or not, whether today or ten years from now, we are in a fight. And if you try to sleep-walk your way through it, you will fail. More importantly, your children and their children will have horrific lives. And in a fight, unlike the bullshit they tell you, “taking part” is not the important thing. Winning is.

And I have absolutely no intention of letting the globalist scum win.

None.

And I hope you see it the same way. So go out there and win.

8. Ok, so now I am mayor, now what? my power is severely limited…

Really? You got this far and this is your thought process? I sure hope not, but just in case (and maybe you’re just already mayor and have a sudden bolt of lightning strike you and it made you one of the good guys. Ok then…): Organise.

Get the important movers and shakers involved. See what the possibilities of your little community becoming totally independent from the state are. LOGISTICALLY first of all. Worry about the politics later.

Foster independence. Promote individual businesses and works. Give the little guy as many breaks as possible. Fine, tax, or get some other help from the lefty crowd and big business as you can, by whatever means works. Do whatever you can to promote homogenous ideology and ethnicity. Get as much money from the main government as possible and then direct it to building infrastructure with people at its head that promotes its independence from the state down the line. They want green power right? So get a fat hand-out for it and see what you can do about making your little town as energy independent as possible

Including by funding alternate technologies (which exist) but will probably get you killed if you try to bring them to a global audience. Nevertheless, if you have individual inventors find a way to produce a bit of power that just isn’t mainstream and you can put a nice windmill nearby or a solar panel next to it. Hey, it can’t be helped if your wind and solar work just a whole lot better than everyone else’s. You local electrician is just that good.

Think big and act small and gradually. This is the way to get where you want to eventually be.

Organise a local militia. Whether this is possible in your country, like in the USA, or whether you need to go about it slightly differently, like say, organising a gun-range day for the locals, or whatever, find a way to begin to organise the citizens in their preferred ways and in ways that promote their skills and talents, all with a view to becoming an independent, low taxes, high benefits, locals supporting, little town.

9. Spread your wings.

Become friendly with the commander of the nearest military base and police stations. Visit them often and gauge where you are with the leaders there. Coups happen and we are entering a time when the only certainty is that uncertainty looms. Economic collapse, energetic collapse, political collapse, balkanisation, civil war, international war, all these things are on the bingo card on some level or other, so be prepared, make allies as best you can and fortify your positions, mentally, spiritually, socially and physically. Remember, your objective here is to win. For your family, your children and your friends and loved ones and also for total strangers that are on your side and on the side of God, Truth, Justice and Beauty.

10. Above all: Enjoy the ride.

We all have to do things we don’t enjoy in life. As the Russians say: It’s best to do these things well and joyfully, happily. Because if not, you still have to do them, and you’ll also be in a bad mood while you do them.

I truly hope this four part series has been helpful. And that in due course, I will hear, see and meet those of you who have used this advice and gone on to build places and communities that can not only survive the globohomo assault on all of us, but in due course, push back and remake the world into one that is free entirely of these satanic, pedophile, parasites.

And remember: Deus Vult means God wills it/God wants it.

It can apply to your actions specifically (if you’re arrogant enough to believe you know what God wants precisely and is using you specifically to get it done).

But, more likely in my opinion, is that, even if you do not know the specifics of how, why, when, or where, your deep intent to do good, to struggle against evil in every way possible, to create and build a better community, one person at a time and a really honest, honourable, society, free of the vile parasites which have infested our civic life from birth, I truly believe, the more you put yourself to this task, the more God does, indeed will it and want it. So:

Deus Vult, Brothers! CHARGE!

No related posts.

By G | 29 January 2023 | Posted in Social Commentary

You are either an idiot or completely ignorant on the subject if you believe…

1. That 9/11 was the result of islamic terrorists flying planes into buildings and not done by people linked to Mossad.

2. That mRNA genetic serums are vaccines.

3. That mRNA genetic serums are not going to alter your DNA; and that of any children you may have after it.

4. That Epstein killed himself.

5. That Epstein was not a Mossad asset used to blackmail a bunch of pedophiles into doing whatever Epstein/Israel wanted them to do.

6. That John Podesta just happened to have pedophile/satanic symbols on his hands and similar reference in his emails by coincidence.

7. That Hillary and Bill Clinton are not responsible for multiple Arkanicides.

8. That Barry Sotero (Obama) was born in the USA, is not gay and is not muslim.

9. That the USA was not founded by freemasons with freemasonic principles from the start.

10. That freemasons are not satanists and knowingly so at the higher echelons.

11. That child sacrifice in satanic rituals is not happening at very high levels of government/s and billionaire gatherings.

12. That the Bilderberger group and Skull and Crossbones and the the Carbonari and Freemasonry and the Illuminati and the “freethinkers” and the Rosicrucians and the Novus ordo fake Popes and their fake Bishops, fake Cardinals and fake Priests are not all just different versions of the servants whose names are legion, of the Prince of the Air.

13. That all versions of “Christianity” will bring you salvation.

14. That the American government as well as many (most) others has never done terrible, deadly experiments on ita own citizens.

15. That evil, sadistic, pedophiles cannot possibly exist and be active at all levels of government, the judiciary and especially the entertainment industry, primarily in the USA but also the UK, Belgium, France, and many other countries.

16. That climate change is killing people of “suddenly” instead of it being the result of the mRNA genetic serums.

17. That the damage done by the genetic serums, the whole COVID “pandemic” and the incoming economic collapse was not all pre-planned years in advance.

18. That the intention to depopulate the planet is just a paranoid “conspiracy theory”.

19. That Covid was not studied, created and elements of that research patented in a laboratory.

20. That JFK was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald.

21. That Hitler died in a bunker in Berlin by suicide.

22. That the destruction and murder of the royal houses of Europe was not an organised, intentional ploy by the same forces that eventually infiltrated the Catholic Church and created Vatican II and placed heretics, non-catholics and Satanists on the Papal throne since 1958.

23. That Joe Biden was legitimately elected by the democratic process of voting in the USA.

24. That the Talmud does not permit sex with little children.

25. That Talmudic Judaism hates the Catholic Church (the real one, not the Novus Ordo fake “Catholics”) and has been behind every attack on it from the time of Jesus to today.

No related posts.

By G | 13 September 2022 | Posted in Social Commentary

The Errors of Bp. Sanborn

Despite what many detractors think of me, the reality is that the title of this post is being extremely charitable. I am assuming error where Bp. Sanborn himself refers to the VAERS results and states that (paraphrasing) “we don’t even know if the adverse reactions are related to the vaccines” That is PRECISELY wrong. The VAERS site exists specifically for listing adverse reactions within a certain period of vaccination. But perhaps you are one of the utter morons that believes that 108 professional athletes collapsing on live television in the field of games like soccer, basketball, etc etc in the last few months, something that has NEVER happened before in the entire history of television, is —as the newspapers would have you believe— just “coincidence”. If you are that limited in your powers of observation, then perhaps, you might actually believe that all the sudden deaths from Cardiac Infarctions, Pulmonary and Brain Embolisms, and other noted side effects directly related to what is known as the “clot-shot” are not related to the non-vaccine, genetic experimental Pfizer, AstroZeneca, etc “Covid-19” injections at all. You may of course, also believe that there is no correlation between you walking in the rain without an umbrella and getting wet.

But let’s start at the beginning.

UPDATE: As it turns out, the ACTUAL Numbers of people who have already died from the Covid Deathshots are a conservative 300,000 in the USA Alone. Watch this video interview between Joseph Mercola And Steve Kirsch. There are not two yahoos on the internet. Steve has spent approximately 6 million US dollars to ensure the science done on the Covid fake Vaccines is correct and he USED to be a strong advocate FOR them. But like any honest man, when confronted with the truth he corrected his erroneous position. It’s a VERY interesting video and not a second of it is boring. I strongly suggest you watch it to understand what is really going on.

The Video in question from Bp. Sanborn is on Youtube here, and I have saved a copy just in case. It’s 34 minutes long and I will time stamp the more relevant portions. Before all this however, let me begin with one glaring omission. Bp. Sanborn states it is not a mortal sin to get “vaccinated” with these clot shots, yet he never addresses or mentions in any way the fact that tissues from murdered babies has been used in the creation of these demonic injections.

The sophist media and pharmaceutical companies make a big deal of the fact that (according to them, if you are inclined to believe them) there are no actual murdered baby cells in the clot-shots themselves. Great news, right? Well… not so fast… every single one of the non-vaccine clot-shots have been created thanks to “research” done and developed using murdered baby cells and tissues. So… it’s like saying…

“Hey, when you eat a McDonald’s burger… There is no murdered baby meat in them at all! None! Great right? And oh, yeah, we figured out how to make burgers by creating all the “research” using murdered babies to cook a bunch of meat until we came up with the burger shape to fit our buns. But it’s all just cow meat now, honest!”

And here is an archived page that explains a bit more about that.

Now, even given the example above, would it be a mortal sin to eat one of those “all cow” burgers? Or take the “no baby parts, honest!” clot shot? I’m no Bishop, and no Priest, just a simple layman, but here is my take:

If one is wholly ignorant of the entire process, when one has the ability to find out at their fingertips, then one is at the very least guilty of sloth.

You’re going to inject yourself, or worse, your children, with something that has NEVER been tested in humans, and that when tested on animals resulted in 100% death of all the animals after the 4th or 5th “booster” shot, (I forget the exact details, except I think it was on Gibbons) but you’re not going to learn ANYTHING about it? When the internet exists?

I suppose that’s ok, if you’re some barely literate person in some country with little or no access to the internet and so on. I am not saying that such levels of ignorance don’t or can’t legitimately exist. I am saying if you have access to the Internet and an IQ about 100, and you DO NOT find out for yourself what is in the things and where they come from, then you are guilty of sloth. At the very least.

Secondly, if you ARE aware of the murdered baby “research”, again, I am not a Bishop, or a Priest, but I, personally will have nothing to do with anything that I am aware of comes from doing any research on murdered babies. I just can’t see myself facing Jesus one day and saying, “Yeah well, *I* didn’t murder them myself, and you know, they were already dead and the research had been done, so it was kinda fine, right? Wouldn’t want to waste it…” But maybe you’re comfortable with it.

My question here for Bp. Sanborn is: Why do you not address this issue at all?

Now to the points he DOES mention, which I feel are grave errors.

  • Right from the start he states that he did not want to comment at all because he felt the issue was political. I find this astonishing for at least two important reasons.
    • Firstly, by this very admission he is clearly recognising that the entire Covid clot-shot circus is POLITICAL and has nothing to do with health, yours, mine or anyone else, and therefore is, by default a MORAL issue, which leads directly to the second point,
    • If it is political, how can you not comment on it, given it literally affects people’s lives and they may be confused about their moral and theological obligations concerning this POLITICAL issue being forced on the whole of humanity? At the very least it looks like cowardice to me.
  • At about 1m 25s he states: We clergy are not competent to make scientific judgements.
    • In the first place, this is again, a matter of sloth. You don’t have to be a scientist to use your God-given reason and ability to read and count to figure out quite a lot really.
    • In the second place, while I accept him at his word that he may well not be competent in the field of general science or even the specific field related to the vaccines, that is a failing of his own. Not one I feel he should be criticised for, let me be clear, but it most certainly does NOT apply to ALL clergy. I personally know priests that studied biochemical engineering before becoming priests. And some of us laymen are very well qualified to be able to interpret, understand and even correct so-called scientific data.
    • Thirdly and even more importantly, if Bishop Sanborn is not able to even verify for himself if the scientific method has even been applied at all regarding these clot-shots and the entire circus around them, then I seriously question whether he has the ability to do basic logic at all, and my personal opinion concerning listening to much of anything he says on that basis would be extremely seriously compromised thereafter.
  • At 2m 15s he states: We have no authority to declare the vaccine sinful. He goes on to state that a declaration of that nature would pertain only to the Holy See (which, being currently absent a valid Pope, is therefore a moot point). Again, I find this to be not just astonishing, but utterly wrong.
    • In the first place, ANY clergy, and in fact ANY layman, for that matter that has the mental capacity to do the work involved in finding out the details of something, has the right to personally and as his or her conscience dictates, decide for themselves what is or is not sinful, but they absolutely also have the right to tell their brethren what they have concluded. Of course, from a layman, this holds no imposition on other laymen, but if from a valid Priest or Bishop, and they have done the relevant work, why on Earth would they not be able to tell you what is or is not a mortal sin? That is the entire point of their existence! Bishop Sanborn is in absolute error when he states that pronouncing something a mortal sin or not is a jurisdictional issue! Canon Law is very clear on this. During an Interregnum, it is true that the clergy has no jurisdictional authority, and this affects many things, but it does NOT affect a clergyman’s duty to point out issues that are clear in divine law. It would be like saying that because there is no Pope a Priest cannot say that cutting off the left leg of 3 year olds to fit them with a robotic exoskeleton leg that will “benefit them later in life” is fine. Why do I pick such a weird example? Because it is something new, never tried or done before and supposedly all for “our benefit”. But I assure you, doing such a monstrous thing would offend God and absolutely be a mortal sin. And I for one, fully believe and agree with that clergy that states that using murdered babies to do ANYTHING with it, is a mortal sin.
    • In the second place, if you refuse to agree that using murdered babies to create ANYTHING is a mortal sin, then please go ahead and show your working out. Bishop Sanborn has not done so at all.
    • What Bishop Sanborn is doing here is essentially taking the position that whether or not using murdered baby parts to create something down the line that does NOT contain murdered baby parts directly is or is not a sin is something only the Pope can decide. I suppose it could be a complicated legalistic argument for some. One might discover for example that say aspirin was originally invented thanks to the use of murdered babies and now after decades that aspirin is produced without any dead babies whatsoever, and most of us have no idea how aspirin came about anyway, are we committing mortal sin if we take an aspirin? But the point is that this is happening NOW. It is not some decades old thing. The dead baby parts may be from 1973 in some cases, but again, we KNOW this NOW. I wasn’t around when aspirin got invented and it had been around for a long time when I was born and did not use any baby parts at all at least since then. This is not the case here. So, if you are inclined to be on the “it’s all cow burgers now” team, I suppose you could agree with Bishop Sanborn that it is a “mystery” for the present time. Well, guess what the Church strongly advises you to do if something is suspect: HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. In fact, the entire Cassiciacum theory, which states that the current fake Popes are Popes only materially but not spiritually, by that very reasoning makes it absolutely clear you are to treat the current impostors as completely invalid Popes even if you might choose to not call them heretics. So even in the classical Sedeprivationist thesis Bishop Sanborn by his very existence KNOWS we are to absolutely avoid anything that is suspect. And anything coming from murdered babies absolutely fills that minimum barrier of being at least suspect! So to put this point down to “error” is truly stretching my charity to its very limits, and frankly, somewhere beyond it.
  • From 4m in he states that all that the clergy can do is present the moral rules that exist (as per the existing infallible magisterium of the Church). Great! I agree! So please do that. What, EXACTLY is the Catholic position for using murdered baby parts to build something that supposedly later benefits us even when we stop using the murdered baby parts to physically put it together? Because I’m fairly sure even a dumb layman like me has got that one figured out correctly. So why is Bp. Sanborn NOT doing his duty here? I am genuinely curious. I’d like to know. Because the answer can only be one of the following:
    • Invincible ignorance. He has not taken the time, is not capable of, does not have the mental, or moral, or both, requisite faculties to investigate the issue or even be aware of it. I personally find this possibility absolutely unlikely, but, if this is the case, then it is worrying in the extreme that this person is a Bishop and that anyone listens to him.
    • Sloth. Despite feeling entitled to make this video Bp. Sanborn has not bothered to investigate the matter at all and is completely unaware of the murdered baby issue. Again, I find this at the very least unlikely and in any case, if this is the case, again, absolutely worrying. I don’t want any of my Bishops to be slothful, sloppy and arrogant to this extent.
    • Complicity. I again find this likelihood absurdly unlikely. I cannot believe that Bishop Sanborn, whatever his human failings, would knowingly be on board with the likes of Bill Gates and his cohort of demoniacs to achieve the ends of the elite.
    • Personal Ego. This, unfortunately, from past occurrences, and in fact, even just more recent events I have blogged about in detail here, I do find most likely. That is, if I had to bet on it, and I would not like to, but if I did, my bet would be that Bishop Sanborn is somewhat himself caught up in the narrative, might be a little fearful of death himself (God only knows why, as Catholics are not prone to fear of death, but I suppose he may have plans to do much more than he has done (and he has done a lot, no doubt)) and being of boomer age, is susceptible to boomer ways of thinking and believing, it is only human of course, nevertheless, this would be all in the service of error and not Catholicism.

The point of leaving the faithful in something of a limbo regarding the murdered baby parts in the creation of the non-vaccine genetic experiments is not one that Bishop Sanborn himself misunderstands. He wrote on his blog a lengthy entry clearly pointing out that either one believes the Pope is legitimate or he believes he is not, but in either case “opinions” is not the correct path in theology. His post is here. The point here is clearly that in theological matters, “opinionism” and indeed opinions themselves, are irrelevant. The only thing that matters is the dogma of the Church and in this case a clergyman (or even a layman if none other will do it) needs and should point out the correct rules concerning such a matter. Currently however, Bishop Sanborn has remained silent on the matter of the murdered babies. Certainly in the video being discussed. If and when he expresses his official stand on it, I may well require to correct this entry when I become aware of it. And of course, if it needs to be revised, I will absolutely revise it, as charitably as possible.

  • At about 7 minutes in he is asked his personal opinion and he states that he does NOT think it is a mortal sin to take it, and that in his view it all boils down to one (and only one) question, and that being how much do you trust the “medical science” involved.
    • I put “medical science” in inverted commas because I want to be clear, first of all, of the point that this is NOT the only question at all, as the four points above demonstrate, there is the murdered babies part, which Bp. Sanborn avoids entirely.
    • But in the second place, while I have great trust in the scientific method when it is correctly applied, I can state with absolute certainty that the scientific method has not come within a light year’s distance of anything the media or the politicians have presented us with concerning covid.
    • THAT is scientifically absolutely demonstrable to a level of certainty that approaches something more certain than the sun rising in the East tomorrow morning. So if Bishop Sanborn thinks the clown show that has been presented to us for two years now is “medical science” then I have to absolutely be clear that anything this man says from here on is something I am absolutely unlikely to pay any attention to, because someone so absolutely devoid of the most basic ability to do logic, has no business whatsoever leading souls at all.
  • At 8m25seconds or so he states that in comparison to the number of people that have taken it, the adverse reactions are a minuscule portion. Here I will give Bishop Sanborn the benefit of the doubt and assume that due to his boomer sensibilities he simply takes the mass media numbers at face value without having bothered to do any checks himself. This benefit of the doubt however does reinforce a staggering level of lack of preparedness, logic and willingness to do the work when considering the importance of the topic. Nevertheless, let’s look at the perpetrators’ OWN NUMBERS. Even according to them, over 30,000 people have died of it. Here is an archived link to some official figures.
    • Keep in mind the MSM has lied to you about literally everything, so why would this be any different, but even so, these are based on VAERS (official Vaccination Adverse Reaction) numbers. Here is the thing though: Not all patients fill in an adverse reaction forms, especially since there is in any case no recourse because all the big Pharma are completely immune from any fault if you die like flies from it. So what’s the point? But even more interesting, even if you DO report it, the doctor in question has no obligation to pass it on. In short, it has been known for decades that VAERS data is from 10 to 100 TIMES under reported. Which in real numbers means that from 300,000 to 3,000,000 people have died of the clot-shot. And some 10 to 100 MILLION are likely having some adverse reaction to it, many of them life-threatening and permanent.
    • I think most people now know personally someone or multiple someones or are related to people who have died or been permanently damaged from the clot-shots. I personally know of two so far and I am not counting friends of friends etc. These numbers are going to keep being impossible to hide in the coming months and years, especially for the booster takers.
  • He states that the VAERS numbers, show it has a very, very low incidence of death or serious injury, wait… so… he IS aware of the numbers as reported above then? Or is he just parroting what the MSM tells him on TV? But even more astonishing, he says that we don’t know the VAERS numbers are even related to the actual (non) Vaccines. I mean… that is the WHOLE POINT OF VAERS. It tracks adverse reactions from vaccines! It not only is directly related to the non-vaccines, it was created for the very purpose of monitoring such adverse reactions and keeping track of them. Once again, I will put this down to invincible boomerism, but that’s not a good thing, whichever way you slice it.
  • At 9m 50s or so, after discussing vaccines and his own experience of taking the polio vaccine he repeats that this is Nothing new at least twice. This is a gross error. First of all, the current clot-shots are NOT vaccines, have never been vaccines and never will be. In fact, they went and changed the definition of Vaccine in online dictionaries because people started to become aware that this is GENETIC MODIFICATION shots. And for those of you that think that mRNA doesn’t change or affect your DNA, look, let me make it simple: Unless you understand the actual biochemistry involved, be silent. And secondly, it makes your body produce spike proteins according to the people that produce this monstrosity. Yes, it DOES change you at a fundamental cellular level and there is a reason that it does that. It’s designed to. There is even beginning to be some evidence that clot-shot babies, that is, babies born to people who took the clot shot and somehow survived both the pregnancy as well as the birth and did not have one of the many, many, many spontaneous abortions that the clot shot induces, seem to be of a different type of human altogether; with physical abilities that take place much sooner than normal babies. A development that generally means stronger physical specimens but with comparatively lowered IQs. There are also several reports of graphene, and other parasites possibly of an artificial nature in the clot shots, but even if you ignore totally all the let’s say more fringe parts of this story (but with plenty of evidence), the simple fact remains that these clot shots are NOT vaccines. So this IS something new. Something completely new, untested and global in scale. Furthermore, while presenting himself as technically incompetent to discuss vaccines, here he speaks authoritatively on them? That is in itself a contradiction.
  • at about 14m he begins to answer a question relating to the Cassiciacum theory and states that sedevacantists have a problem if they state that the seat is empty of any kind of legitimate Pope because they then have to account for how there could be a break in the dogmatic position of the Church that there has to be, and I quote: “An unbroken succession of hierarchy, that is Popes and Bishops, from the time of St. Peter until the end of the world.” Once more, I am stunned at the theological error here. First of all it is clearly NOT Catholic dogma that there has to be an UNBROKEN SUCCESSION (of Popes) because if that were the case, then the Church would have ended immediately after the death of St. Peter, before the next Pope was chosen. It is TRUE that there needs to be an unbroken hierarchy, but this is preserved by the living Bishops EVERY TIME A POPE DIES. And they keep this hierarchy in place, in a sort of jurisdictional emergency mode, until a new Pope is elected, REGARDLESS OF HOW LONG THAT TAKES. While this is the LONGEST period without a valid Pope the Church has ever experienced, it is not the ONLY time the Church existed without any Pope at all. There have been periods of a few years before that had no Pope at all on the seat. And there were approximately equal length periods as the current one, of some seven decades, when one could hardly be sure WHO was the real Pope because up to three at a time claimed the spot and it was only resolved after their deaths in many cases. Plus, we have had over 40 antipopes before 1958, so his theological rhetoric is just plain wrong on the facts. The unbroken succession of hierarchy continues to exist right now and Bishop Sanborn is part of it. As long as a single Bishop exists, as St. Irenaus pointed out, there is the Church. And we have more than just Bishop Sanborn. Which frankly, given these grave errors, is a relief.
  • He goes on to state hardly a minute later that the notorious, public heretics occupying the Vatican have no authority within the Catholic Church but have legitimate titles to hold those positions. This is once again, a glaring error of huge proportions. Canon 188 part 4 is very clear on the point: ANY office, of a public, notorious heretic is lost by the very fact that they act as a public notorious heretic. And you can’t be more public and notorious than the fake Popes and fake Bishops promoting Vatican II heresy for the last 60 plus years since the documents are supposed to be for all mankind. Add to that that MANY of these vermin were exposed as actual Freemasons by Mino Pecorelli and others (Mino paid with his life for it) and the troublesome fact that Freemasons cannot be Catholic, and it really doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that the Sedevacantist position is correct and that the original Sedeprivationist thesis, put forward by fr. Gerard de Lauriers was a charitable way to permit some still honest Catholic clergy of the time that may have resided in the Vatican to try and make amends. To hold to such a theory now in the hope that a confirmed aider and abettor of pedophiles, actual pedophiles themselves, cocaine snorting homosexuals who perform orgies with each other, or some other foul Satanist, “converts” and fixes the Novus Orco dumpster fire, is frankly, not just absurd, because it is, but it is, once again NON-CANONICAL. Even IF such vile creatures did, genuinely repent and convert; by canonic law, as clearly detailed in the ex-cathedra pronouncement of Cum-Ex Apostolato Officio of Pope Paul the IV they are to have authority over NO ONE, and spend the rest of their days in seclusion in perpetual repentance and penance. And the Code of Canon Law of 1917, the only valid code in existence for catholics, clearly refers to it:
    • The Latin version of the Code definitely lists Cum ex… in its footnotes, also recorded by Peter Cardinal Gasparri’s in his Fontes (sources). This is true not only for Can. 188§4 but also for several other Canons dealing with heresy, (Codex Iuris Canonici, Peter Cardinal Gasparri, Newman Press, 1957.) The Code lists Cum ex… as a source not only for Can. 188§4, but also for Canons 167§3, 2264, 2314, 2316 and 2317.
  • The error here in theology is monstrous. It literally puts people who believe this totally illogical stance in the position of being at the mercy of pedophiles, homosexuals, freemasons and satanists, hoping that they “convert” and then, AGAINST INFALLIBLE CATHOLIC DOGMA, go on to lead the Church back to health. It is not just absurd, it is literally impossible. Even if God were to save and cleanse the souls of every single satanist in the Vatican and make them repent, by DIVINE LAW, they would NOT be permitted to lead anyone or anything. Sequestered for life in a monastery in perpetual penance does not mean, become a fully legitimate Bishop or Pope able to lead the masses back to real Catholicism. And this is IMMUTABLE and perpetual law. Infallible law at that. So, once again, the error here is of catastrophic proportions.

This takes us to not quite half-way of the entire video, but I believe I can rest my case here, as none of these points get resolved, fixed or addressed in any way that can be considered exculpatory later on.

So, while Bishop Sanborn remains a valid Bishop to date, his errors of theology and morals are gigantic and a Catholic should not and cannot remain silent in the face of them. Remaining silent when clergy goes on a merry ride to Hell in a sledge of broken theology that contradicts canon law at every turn is how we got here in the first place.

I was not around in 1958, but I assure you, there is no way in Hell that I will keep silent when clergy are acting improperly, teaching in error and ignoring the infallible magisterium of the Church, whatever their reasons, be it ignorance, sloth, stupidity, giant egos, personal power, or even power for “the greater good” or, God-forbid, actual complicity with the enemies of God, our Lord and the Church, I will speak out, and tell them to their face if need be.

As God is my witness.

And I pray in earnest that may He see to it I never, ever, falter in this regard as long as I draw breath, and then after too.

No related posts.

By G | 29 November 2021 | Posted in Social Commentary

Church of Power vs Church of Piety?

So Bp. Sanborn has made this video, which is short enough and to the point enough I suggest you watch it if you are at all interested in the Catholic Church and the Sedeprivationist vs Sedevacantist positions and why both are valid and Catholic. The Video is here.

The Newsletter from Bp. Dolan he is responding to is here. And the part that offended and was read out by Bp. Sanborn in on the third page on the left hand side.

Now some ground rules and truths:

  1. I have some direct experience and knowledge of Bp. Sanborn and his behaviours, both public and private.
  2. I have no knowledge or experience whatsoever of Bp. Dolan and the only behaviours I am privy to at this point in time is the newsletter referenced above. This will naturally tend to give Bp. Dolan somewhat of an advantage in my view of the disagreement/s that may exist between these two men and that, as far as I can tell and as far as the video by Bp. Sanborn himself seems to indicate are being made PUBLIC, by Bp. Sanborn himself, not by Bp. Dolan. If this is indeed the case, as I suspect, then this alone in and of itself is a strike against Bp. Sanborn, but I reiterate that as I have no more context other than the single newsletter referenced above, I may be in ignorance of other potentially public communications that Bp. Dolan may have made that are more specific than the ones present in the newsletter.
  3. I am a layman. Normally, in pious times of the Church’s light shining across the globe powerfully, my opinion would be merely one that would be discussed among other Catholic friends as we argue amicably for this or that perspective, not to hear the sound of our own voices mind you, but to find the closest way to the absolute Truth that we can, by prodding each other’s brains, as good friends and good Catholics should. However, given the confused, confusing and ever present snakes of deception pretending to be Catholics while trying to lead souls to Hell (see for example my exposé on the Freemason Milo, the charlatans, EM Jones, Taylor Marshall, Church Militant and their Opus Dei sponsors) it is incumbent upon every Catholic man to stand firmly against any such practices or deceivers or deceptions. In this case, I want to make it clear that as far as I am concerned:
    1. BOTH Bp. Sanborn and Bp. Dolan are VALID Catholic Bishops. As such they are princes of the Church. And as such a modicum of respect for their courage and position is due.
    2. That said, they are both human beings and as such, inevitably both will have their flaws, as, of course, do I and no doubt mine are far more profound and numerous, nevertheless, my shall we say rather debased position does give me some advantage in a few respects, firstly, I fear no man, nor any man’s judgement, I submit and subject myself wholly and totally only to the Judgement and Will of God the Father, Our Lord Jesus Christ the Son and the Holy Spirit. I may and I do, submit to the requests, observations, judgements, edicts etcetera, etcetera, of VALID Catholic Clergy that is:
      1. Validly ordained and in good standing with the infallible magisterium of the Church as presented in the Code of Canon Law of 1917.
      2. Issuing such pronouncements in accordance with same.
      3. Issuing such pronouncements in accordance with my own conscience once I have carefully examined it to ensure it is not my ego, pride or other human flaw impeding me to obey such pronouncements.
    3. It is a scandal and a shame if these two men cannot put their differences aside and regardless of their personal opinions, permit each other to work together against the enemies of the Church. I would therefore implore them to BOTH make a public statement of tacit support for all the LICIT efforts made by the other party towards increasing the reach of the remaining Catholic Church and saving souls, and to keep their personal misgivings of one another private and if possible to resolve them in private too.
    4. Given the times, anyone sufficiently learned in the matter should point out errors, but to keep these private if possible and make them public only when necessary. In this specific instance, I am undoubtedly skirting the edge of the abyss, but for whatever reason, it seems I live there, on that edge and always have, I pray, that whatever failing I do in this, God forgives me. Whatever my errors may be they are, in this, I am quite sure, not of pride or ego, but of genuine wish for all Catholics and all would-be Catholics, to rise up as a wave of light against ALL the current darkness. That all said, do not, for one second, hesitate to think that I will tell you exactly where to go, if you think I was kidding about point n.2 above. Critique all you like, but if it is not licit, expect both barrels. To the face. Twice over. It is not a time for pussy-footing around as Catholics.

Now to the video and newsletter. First the “offending” part of the newsletter, here it is quoted below (7 minutes in):

Friday’s St. Martin I suffered exile and a miserable death rather than accept the heresy of only one will in Christ. It sounds obscure to most, doubtless, but we must hold the whole Catholic Faith without compromise. Even the best today want to make us believe that bad though he be, Bergoglio is the validly elected pope, and that the Novus Ordo, One World Church, is identical with the Catholic Church. That’s a theological error, and savors of heresy. As we honor the anniversaries of our churches, we remember that there is only one Church, the unchanged Catholic Church. If people would only understand this truth, so much confusion would be dis-
sipated, so much peace—though at a price!—would ensue.

Well, taken on its own, as I specified above, I am doing, I see absolutely nothing wrong with hat paragraph.

Now, it may be that the “best” in question IS directed specifically at Bp. Sanborn and the sedeprivationist position in general, but if that is the case, I certainly cannot say that from this newsletter or this paragraph at all. And unless it is specified elsewhere, someone self-identifying with those “best” would, by their OWN choice, be falling in precisely that category as described by Bp. Dolan.

There is, however, a principle of distinction between Sedeprivationism and Sedevacantism that absolutely needs explaining and precision if we are to understand things properly.

Sede vs Sede?

The Sedevacantists essentially state that the current occupiers of the Holy See, from fake Pope John the XXIII (henceforth known only as Roncalli) to today are not Popes in any way, shape or form. In fact, they are not even Catholic, being public, notorious heretics, so have absolutely zero standing in the Catholic Church, they are impostors, fakes, Freemasons and Satanists (I repeat myself) and as such deserve only our contempt. It is the position I too hold, though I call myself a Sedeprivationist, the reason for which I explain below.

The Sedeprivationist hold with the Cassiciacum theory produced by Father Gerard de Lauriers. It is available in the original only in French by a publication that will not allow reproduction of it. I have read it (yes I read French quite well, thank you) and in a nutshell it states that the fake Popes could be assumed to have been validly elected as Popes in a material sense, but not in a spiritual sense and especially given their behaviour as public notorious heretics, they could not be considered legitimate or valid Popes nor obeyed as such. This position was not unreasonable at the time it was formulated because the takeover of the Vatican by Freemasons was for many (especially laymen but also some pious clergy) so sudden that one dared not initially believe almost the entire Church had been converged to heresy and handed over to a bunch of heretics (and in fact much worse, never-were-Catholic, Satanists). Using the principle of charity and benefit of the doubt, Father De Lauriers, who was an outstanding theologian proposed that even IF the Popes had been validly elected, by supposedly valid Cardinals and so on, their behaviour precluded them from being actual Popes. It was a charitable, pious, best case scenario thesis that in my opinion hoped to reconcile, correct and bring the Church back together. Unfortunately, the rot was so deep and the very weapon used by the enemy is our good natures in order to get inside our guard to stab us, that the thesis, in hindsight, was clearly over-charitable. And given what we NOW know about the entire process, the level of Freemasonic infiltration etc it is patently obvious that the Sedevacantist position is the correct one (if you do not know, read my book Reclaiming The Catholic Church, which unlike the fake Catholic Taylor Marshall’s book Infiltration I wrote myself and has actual verifiable facts in it). There is one tiny aspect that the Sedevacantist position ignores however, and that is that the Chair, technically speaking is NOT empty (which is what sede vacante means). It is filled by an impostor PREVENTING it being filled licitly and validly. Hence my slightly subversive use of the word Sedeprivationist. I do this for two reasons:

  1. The sedevacantist position is undoubtedly correct.
  2. The charity of Fr. De Lauriers should be lauded, if, at times, ignored. Particularly by people like me and my brothers in arms against lies, deception and Satan’s little helpers. My current position is that if we could get rid of all the fake clergy we also got rid of 100 genuine men that aspired to be real Catholic Priests and were merely deceived, well, so be it. God will sort them out. Leave all retards behind. We will cross that bridge and burn it, so we can only march forward. People like me are the tip of the spear. We will make errors. We may seem at times uncharitable or cruel. We are neither, and although we may well be thought of as a necessary evil, without men like us, Christendom would have been swallowed by the hordes of enemies long ago. So… God must at least in some way, deem us necessary, since I count people like Bohemand, Tancredi, Jean Parisot le Vallete and so on among our number, and pray I can only measure up to those men. YET, in the name of tempering our fiery natures, it is good to remember (for better times at least) that Piety, Humility and Charity are great virtues, and only Courage bridges those three with the ones of Fortitude, Justice and Reason. And those who operate on the first three are generally better men than those who operate in the latter three. So I use the term yes to co-opt it, but also to remember its founder as the honourable and charitable way to do things, being always higher in intent than our own, more practical ways.

Now that you know these things, let us move to the video of Bp. Sanborn.

What Bp. Sanborn gets right

  1. Bp. Sanborn is absolutely right concerning the differences between Sedeprivationist and Sedevacantists being essentially irrelevant in terms of taking the Church forward. There is indeed no higher authority to decide between them, and the errors of one or the other position when compared to ultimate truth must be for every man to decide for himself. Given the history we know, the details we know, the facts we have to hand, personally, I have zero doubt that the sedevacantist position is closer to correct. Nevertheless, the Priest who baptised me and was there for my confirmation and marriage and has been outstanding to our family is a Sedeprivationist, and we have indeed discussed this very topic at some length. I absolutely respect his position, his advice and his counsel and I have no doubt he is one of the best human beings I have ever had the good fortune to encounter. Undoubtedly a much better man than I am. Even so, I disagree with him on his position and he has stated that my technical position is correct. It cannot be assailed, but for his ultimate devotion to charity. And make no mistake that this priest is “soft” in any way. He is not. The point is that he is a priest of piety. Possibly one of the very few who would rather die than break the confessional seal as an example.
  2. Bp. Sanborn is correct that Sedes of either name should and do work together and that their theological disagreement is not one that should cause strife or division. We both agree the fake Popes are fake. One is more charitable to the way they got there, the other is more logical. Given the current situation, there is simply no logical way that Bergoglio or Ratzinger can even be considered Catholic at all. In fact the Sedeprivationist position is that you should absolutely treat these people all as heretics, their only difference is that they say that charity should prevent you from stating it outright. I interpret it as basically the whole “we are too polite for that”. Well, I am not. My behaviour is roughly the equivalent of at a prestigious gala of famous dignitaries, some guy charging in, calling out one of the guests of honour as a disgusting pedophile, dunking him in the punch-bowl and dragging his semi-conscious body out by dragging and kicking him to the exit where he goes on to curb-stomp him. It’s not pretty. It’s not polite. But… if you’re one of the kids he raped, or one of the further ones he was going to rape if no one stopped him, I absolutely believe, it is necessary. And if I were a spectator, I would simply stop a waiter and ask that a new punch bowl is brought on and can they please cover up the blood splatter, before continuing my conversation before I could sneak off to congratulate the “barbarian” for his style and efficiency.

3. But that’s me and my weaknesses, and we are here to try to reconcile differences. And in that respect Bp. Sanborn is also correct in his closing argument when he says that there should not be trouble made.

4. He is right that the usurpers are using the structures of the Catholic Church to promote their heresy, but it is not just heresy and error they are promoting, they are, in fact, ushering in, Satanism, which is a religion and a very old one, so while technically it is not a new religion, Bp. Sanborn is, however, being too charitable in simply saying or believing that the Novus Orcians are simply promoting heresy, as if it was just a big, bad mistake. It’s not a mistake. It’s intentional and malignant with evil intent at that. So, TECHNICALLY right about Novus Orco not being a NEW religion, but it is pointless to say that, since it is certainly NOT Catholicism either, but its most ancient enemy.

What Sanborn gets wrong

  1. BUT he also says that (about not making trouble) after making a very public and very specific accusation video, based, from what he himself presents in the video, heresay (that may well be true, but is not public as far as I can tell from the video. I heard…He said…or…this guy told me…is the definition of heresay) and one newsletter that has zero direct attacks. Does this mean Bp. Dolan has not made public attacks? I don’t know. I haven’t looked and I probably will not. But based on Sanborn’s own video it is not looking good for Sanborn.
  2. On Bp. Dolan calling Covid cowards “girls” for bowing to the worldly laws instead of doing their priestly duty on the further point of Bp. Dolan not offering money for doing it to pay for eventual lawyers or bail. Errr… sorry, you are a Priest! You have CHOSEN to devote your life to God and sacrifice yourself to the world for the sake of the realm of God. If you need to go to jail, by all means try to avoid it, escape, lie to the worldly authorities (it is NOT a sin to do so when necessary, Jesus Himself lied to the Pharisees after all), do the Holy Mass in secret, whatever, but to bend to the worldly will as a Priest and claim you did it to avoid some jail time? Really? You dishonour the very frock you wear. It’s like a cop saying he will not enter a school with an active shooter because he is scared he might get shot! It’s your JOB! MOVE YOUR ASS! Unlike soldiers, cops and Priests don’t get drafted, they chose it. So, no. Bp. Dolan is 100% correct and he SHOULD shame such cowardly Priests. Rightfully. We need direct, in your face, face in the punchbowl truth these days.
  3. He states that Bp. Dolan is accusing him and his seminarians of holding the position that Bergoglio is a validly elected Pope. And in the very next sentence he states that Bergoglio is a validly elected Pope and thus a Pope elect but that he is not Pope. At the very least Bp. Sanborn here does a poor job of explaining what I explained above in the Sede vs Sede section. I am not even sure most Sedeprivationist hold that Bergoglio WAS (even potentially) validly elected at this point in time, but it was the POTENTIAL position of the original theory of Cassiciacum. In other words that even IF the (fake) Pope HAD been validly elected, it would only be a valid MATERIAL (Worldly) election and NOT a Spiritual election, necessary to make one the Vicar of Christ on Earth. It is, a rather rarefied, super-abundantly charitable theological theory. And it was this back then already in the late 1960s. To hold it today is to my view absolutely in error. BUT, technically it IS the Sedeprivationist position. Now… IF Bp. Dolan then went on to MISREPRESENT the situation by further saying that the Sedeprivationist hold Bergoglio to actually be a valid Pope to all effects, then THAT is indeed a lie. But if all he said is that the Sedeprivationist hold the Bergoglio to be validly elected MATERIALLY ONLY. Then he was perfectly correct. And if, as I suspect, Bp. Dolan did not clarify the position, then, well, we can perhaps accuse him of being a little less charitable, a little bit more “pragmatic” in his fire and brimstone in order to avoid confusion, but we can’t fully call him an outright liar. The Cassiciacum position was ALWAYS a very fragile, ethereal thing and frankly, while we should pay homage to Fr. De Lauriers, it is time to move on and reclaim the Church.
  4. Bp. Sanborn makes the comparison between thugs who have hijacked a car to describe the Novus Orco clergy and pointedly calls them Heretics. Yet he refutes the point that the Novus Orco Church is a different Church from the Catholic Church. This is patently false. While he hides of the fact that the usurpers are using the infrastructure of the Catholic Church, just like a car thief has now taken use of your car, it is obvious that:
    1. The car/Church does NOT belong to them
    2. The uses they are putting it to are not only NOT legitimate and criminal, they are in DIRECT opposition to the licit uses YOU, the rightful owner were putting it to. The analogy would be you going to take your pregnant wife to the hospital so she can give birth, getting the car hijacked and the thugs using it to drive to the hospital to murder newborn babies while they leave you by the side of the road. It’s all well and good for you to say that the car is the same car, (the Cathedrals too are indeed still the same, as is all the worldly structures of the Church) it is, but the purposes, intent, use and drivers of it are in direct opposition to everything that car/Church was meant to do. You can hardly say it is not a “New” Church. Physically the structures remain the same, but they have been defiled, they are being used to perpetuate crimes against should and bodies and pervert the truth. The Novus Orco are NOT Catholic. Their religion is NOT Catholicism. There is literally no point at all to not call them out as a fake, new, different religion, because that is what the Novus Orco is.

Arguable Either Way

  1. Assuming it is true that Bp. Dolan characterised the Sedeprivationist position as a tentacle of the Novus Orco Church, and let’s for argument sake ALSO assume it was a PUBLIC statement, which, in fairness, I think is assuming quite a lot. It sounds to me as if the statement by Bp. Dolan may have been made in private conversation, in which case, my explanation here would have even more weight. An argument can be made, that by this continued excess of charity and not simply labelling public notorious heretics as such publicly, the Sedeprivationist faction is unwittingly (and unwillingly) helping the Satanists to continue their wearing of the Church structures like a snakeskin for their demon-infested Church of Moloch that it really is. IF this was the intent, then the characterisation might be unfortunate or lead one to perhaps rushed conclusions, especially if taken out of context, either about Sedeprivationist or about Bp. Dolan, or both. Nevertheless, it has a certain sound logic to it. And, if we are going to be charitable, as Sedeprivationist indeed are, then, surely, this interpretation would be the more correct one.
  2. Ok about the fake “Old Catholic Church” having failed, true, but it is also a fact that these people were intentionally trying to destroy Catholicism and Bp. Sanborn states it clearly himself. The Freemasons/Carbonari/Satanists did this intentionally to take over these structures so as to fool the masses. So how can you say that the present usurpers are not a “new” Religion that is separate from Catholicism? It seems pedantic and irrelevant.

Bp. Sanborns Questions:

Q1. When did this Novus Orco Church begin?

A1. Worldly, on the 28th October 1958 when Roncalli was invalidly elected false Pope John XXIII. Spiritually, when Satan and his third of the host were driven from heaven. Simple. Not sure why he is unaware or pretends to be.

Q2. Was Bp. Dolan not part of the NO originally?

A2. Let’s assume yes and the answer will follow below.

Q3. Was Bp. Dolan not ordained by Archbishop Lefebvre?

A3. I believe he was. Fuller answer below.

Q4. Was Bp. Dolan not part of the SSPX which had as its stated purpose the reconciliation with the NO Church?

A4. I believe he was. Fuller Answer below.

Q5. When did you (Bp. Dolan) make a public abjuration from the NO Church? And here Bp. Sanborn states that as Bp. Dolan says the NO is a separate Church, a public adjuration must be made as if one were previously a Lutheran say. It is a kind of twisted logic and if it were valid then one could accuse Bp. Sanborn, by the same logic of actually BEING a Novus Orco Church guy. Here, I believe, we see the crux of the matter and I think it boils down to something neither side has mentioned and possibly that neither side understands consciously. Here it is, the Answer to the above questions:

A2,3,4 and 5. Being ordained by a man who was trying to navigate the absolute carnage of the Vatican II era while trying to preserve what he thought he could salvage or repair of the Catholic Church is not a sin. Nor is the ordination invalid. Bishop Lefebvre was indeed in error in trying to reconcile with what in all likelihood he had either not recognised as, or didn’t want to believe were Satanists within the very church he loved. But being in error does not make you a heretic. It does not prevent you from validly ordaining Priests other Bishops in good faith. Nor does being validly ordained by such a man and you yourself genuinely believing you are doing your best to navigate the same storm make you a heretic. merely in error. And we all are to some degree or other. Importantly though, like Bp. Sanborn, Bp. Dolan corrected his errors and eventually left the now essentially logically bankrupt SSPX.

As a result of the above, there is absolutely no need for an abjuration, because one never stopped being Catholic. Never belonged to the Church of Satan that the impostors clearly belong to. So there is no need to say you don’t belong to it!

Let me make an analogy that is easier to understand. If a bunch of Nazis decide to wear US army uniforms and infiltrate the trenches of the US Army and start murdering American soldiers in their sleep, are they now US Soldiers? NO. Clearly not. And if a US soldier in the trenches calls these Nazis out and says they are not Americans but Nazis in disguise, and belong to a different army, is he wrong? Does he now have to swear that he has no allegiance to the US Army because THE OTHER GUYS ARE WEARING THE SAME UNIFORM?!? It’s idiotic and ridiculous. Of course not. He is a US soldier and has to abjure or swear fealty to no one he hasn’t already done so. And he is doing his duty by calling out the impostors as belonging to the enemy army and NOT the US army. Simple. Again, I want to be charitable but Bp. Sanborn is not, I believe, stupid, so this, to me, stinks of sophistry.

Bp. Sanborn further embroils himself in deception when he asks who lifted the presumed excommunication of Bp. Dolan since he was originally “Novus Ordo” and this according to Bp. Dolan is a different Church. But this is an inversion. To return to the soldier analogy. Bp. Dolan never took off his uniform. He always was a US Soldier (Catholic) and if the leadership of his Army now tell him to shell his own positions and he does, in ignorance, in obedience, in essentially innocence, he is NOT at fault. Especially since, once he realises that his superiors are in reality Nazi spies in disguise as US soldiers, he stops following their fake orders, raises the alarm and calls them out as enemies. There is not guilt he has to expiate. There is no “nazi loyalty” he ever gave to the impostors. IF he did anything wrong he did it in honest error and by being fooled. He certainly does NOT need to once again swear loyalty to the US army. Whenever left. The other guys infiltrated into it. His conscience is clear. As it should be. In short, I think it is a deceptive and disingenuous question, a straw man. The same applies to deceived Novus Orco lay people who then become Sedes.

But it gets worse. He asks who now has the right to lift the excommunication of all those NO priests who have not yet refuted the V2 NO fake Church. The answer of course is no one and the answer as to whom, if any are potentially t least valid clergy, the answer is almost certainly none. The reason is simple.

  1. Most of them were NOT ordained by valid clergy.
  2. Most of them were not ordained validly. (1 and 2 here are two different things).
  3. Of the tiny proportion left that we might assume have been somehow validly ordained, these must be exceedingly old and therefore utterly aware of the heresy of Vatican II yet have remained silent for decades. Case in point: “Archbishop” Vigano. Such people, are by definition, public, notorious heretics in word and deed. They promulgated the V2 heresies for decades and as such fall foul of Canon 188.4. They are public notorious heretics and indeed there is no one who can forgive them their heresy, but even if there were, their lot would be t spend the rest of their lives in secluded penance with authority over no one.

In conclusion then, even if there WERE any valid NO priests that could potentially become forgiven or be assumed to be Catholic, their lot is to have authority over no one, and hence are completely irrelevant to the future of the Church. This is a good thing, because it precludes the infiltration of any of these supposed “Catholics” into the actual, growing, resurgent, real, Catholic Church.

Conclusions

Bishop Sanborn is certainly a valid Catholic Bishop, nevertheless he is a Bishop of Power, as Rodney Stark labels such people. He is interested in the material aspects of the Church. He wants to “win” so to speak, by having more seminarians, more Churches, more laypeople contributing money to more structures being built and so on.

I do not know personally, and I am not accusing Bp. Sanborn of doing or being this way for personal gain. For all I know he may be, but I absolutely and without reservation give him the benefit of the doubt in this as I always did from the beginning. In fact, I’ll go a step further and state categorically that from my perspective, such clergy are, at times, required. The worldly aspects of Church buildings, funds for seminarians and resident priests and so on are realities of the world, and someone pushing to get these things is required and useful. Often such men can get corrupted by the power they wield. They can become gluttonous, or proud, dictatorial, revered in their cult of personality, and I have reason to suspect that certainly Bishop Sanborn has at least some of these flaws to whatever degree or other. As, I remind you, we all have flaws. That said, his errors will tend towards those that in ancient times were labelled as the avarice, gluttony and so on of the proud, power-hungry, worldly Popes.

I do not know Bp. Dolan at all, and never interacted with him, but judging from his tone and assuming the things Bp. Sanborn said about him in the video are true, it sounds to me that Bp. Dolan is more a puritan sort, which we may refer to as belonging more to the Church of Piety. The errors of such clergy tend to be either excessive charity (which got us where we are today) or, sometimes, a zeal bordering on Donates where if anything or anyone has the tiniest flaw then they are expelled for heresy.

In short, if these men are Power vs Piety, they will invariably disagree and nothing good can come of it. So I hope they put it all behind themselves and move on in a positive manner. Some form of public reconciliation, however superficial, would firstly demonstrate both men are willing to submit their ego to a higher need and secondly, for that very reason, be welcome by all Catholics I believe.

No related posts.

By G | 16 November 2021 | Posted in Social Commentary

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks