Posts Tagged ‘catholicism’

A Clarification on Lent

My take on Lent is that while one might argue about Fish on Fridays, and so on, ultimately, the point of Lent is three-fold.

  1. Giving a correct sense of reverence, respect, remembrance and proper honouring of our Lord’s harsh path through this Earth.
  2. Fasting, as with most mortifications of the flesh, inspires a deeper sense of the numinous, a better understanding of prayer and so on. A chosen “hardship” invariably is one that produces results easier and in a better fashion, generally speaking than a God-sent one (especially if you’ve ignored all signs he may have sent before).
  3. It teaches you discipline, over a period that is more than a day or two.

These are all useful things, however, I am also very aware of the passage in Romans 14:14

“I know, and am confident in the Lord Jesus, that nothing is unclean of itself; but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him it is unclean.”

I have not followed Lent pretty much at all, with some small temporary exceptions, however, throughout my life, I have taken periods where I would not touch a specific thing. Like no sugar, or no alcohol, or no coffee, or whatever. Sometimes these were related to food/drink as a general health boost, although I never really suffered from anything that would need me to make such choices. It was primarily a result of my martial arts training and me wanting to discipline my mind in things other than mere training and fighting, and since eating and drinking are pretty instinctual, I decided to take time to experiment. I at times went up to six months without drinking any alcoholic drink, or touching anything sugary, and so on. It is a good practice to do.

I have also done water only fasts for several days and complete fasts for up to 48 hours (no water or anything else) while going about my day in a normal manner. All these practices make you more aware of the spiritual in some way or other, though they might be difficult for some people who are not used to it and obviously, as always, you are responsible for your own actions. Don’t go doing some weird fast that ruins your health and blame it on me or having read this blog.

So I take Lent in that spirit. My last post might not be perfect from a Lent point of view, especially of a priest of a layman that knows his stuff, but it is a first approach for me, and given that generally I tend to favour meat, since grains and so on often are not ideal for me, it should be an interesting test for me to undergo.

I posted the Idiot’s Guide to Lent precisely so that people who are not familiar with it can maybe tag along and try it in a similar fashion.

Anyway, that’s my take.

Enjoy the next 40 days of tiny, self-chosen, privation.

No related posts.

By G | 19 February 2023 | Posted in Social Commentary

The Rabbit Hole of Symbolism for the Satanists in the Vatican

If you really want to grasp some of the levels of symbolism the Satanists currently residing in the Vatican indulge in, you should read this long and detailed post.

Personally, once I have determined beyond any doubt whatever that a certain situation is of a given nature, I no longer need to delve into it, but I know that many need repeated and regular reminders of even incontrovertible facts, so such a post may be required.

You will note I no longer really post about the Covid Scamdemic, or the fact that Freemasonic pedophiles, Satanists and homosexuals, none of which are in any way Catholic, now inhabit the Vatican and have done so starting in 1958, or the fact that the Nordstream was destroyed by covert military action of the USA, or that globohomo wants to kill and enslave you and yours. Mostly I try to focus on the positive aspect, which in large part is simply: Ok, where do we go from here so that we win?

The things of primary importance I have laid out in my four part series earlier on this blog (use the search me button on the right sidebar) and can be summed up in 4 concepts:

Spirit/Mind

Geogrpahy

Community

Politics

These are the things that interest me, because these are the things that will determine the future.

The spiritual part is the most important because only people with an absolutely unshakeable belief will be able to endure and overcome even insurmountable odds. History has shown us an infinite number of times when a smaller, less equipped force has prevailed, survived and even won against foes that were better armed, better supplied and far more numerous. And if you are a Bible reading man, then you know that in the End Times, only a very few will hold the faith, all else will break, fold and fall away.

You can’t hold if your faith is based on quicksand, lies and false assumptions. This is why I insist on Catholicism (Sedevacantist only). It has an unbroken 2,000 year history that no other religion can match.

They are not only responsible for the best systems of civilised society, science and art of any other belief system on Earth, but they alone are the ones who hold an unbroken line of Apostolic succession from Jesus to the present day Sedevacantist Bishops. The Eastern “Orthodox” cannot claim this, in fact even their top Metropolitan has recently been admitted to have been a KGB plant all along. In case anyone who ever paid attention for a second could doubt it. The Catholic Church has survived all sorts of assaults, from the Arian heresy, which saw almost every Bishop bar one (famously) and perhaps a few others (unknown) and 97 to 99% of the laity buy into it, before the course was reversed back to truth, to today, where for more than 6 decades, the Vatican has had an impostor fake Pope and the Novus Ordo “clergy” are all knowing deceivers and Freemasons and Satanists (but I repeat myself). From the few Catholics hiding in the catacombs to have Holy Mass, in the time of Nero to today, we always, inevitably, rise again.

And unlike the Eastern “Orthodox” Catholics have always had effective warriors and saints in their midst that repealed the attacks of murderous Islam, of false prophets of gnostic origin, of infiltrations of deceivers of all kinds. Always, despite corrupt and degenerate Popes, Bishops and Priests, the Infallible Magisterium of the Church not only survived, but was finally immortalised forever into one, infallible, precise, document, the Code of Canon Law of 1917.Which is the most vetted document ever produced on Earth, having had tens of thousands of documents consulted for both its production as well as the verification that none of the rules contradicted each other nor invalidated any of the Papal encyclicals over a period of almost 2,000 years. Beyond the Code of Canon Law, are only the Papal encyclicals produced by the valid Popes up to and including Pious XII, the last valid Pope who died on the 9th October 1958 and since which, we have only had the heresy of Vatican II and its creators (Roncalli and Montini) and promoters and promulgators, Luciani, Wojtyla, Ratzinger and Bergolgio and all their fake and invalidly “ordained” “Priests”, “Bishops” and “Cardinals”.

What better time to become a proper Catholic, drawing on the historical strength, truth, perseverance and faith of our ancestors, who protected Christendom from all predators? What a glorious time, to be counted among the few, the faithful, the believers.

Do you not get that sense of brothers in arms at war? That sense expressed rather well in the film 300, when the Spartans say they will fight in the shade, hiding under their shields while the sky is darkened by the number of arrows raining down on them, and the Spartans, looking at each other from under their shield, laugh. That’s right degenerates, World Economic Forum Satanists, haters of Christ and truth and beauty and life, servants of he whose name is Legion: Do your worst. We are not given to a spirit of fear, and we will be the most ferocious zealots you ever encountered in the history of zealots. We will not take a single step back. We will build large families and communities of zealots and we will rebuild and create and refute and refuse all your lies, temptations, degeneracy and pomp.

So begin there, friend. Begin with spirit, for it guides everything else. I too was a heathen with no God. I wrote a short book for those who are like I was, so you can see I am not some Bible-thumper that was born into it. No. I came to being a Catholic, a real one, which means a Sedevacantist, by the Grace of God, Truth and Seeking it. And you can too.

So begin there, become one of us. And help us save humanity from the imps that serve the Eternal Enemy.

No related posts.

By G | 8 February 2023 | Posted in Social Commentary

How to really take on and beat clown world for real

Part 3 – Family, Friends and Acquaintances

Alright, so I expect most people will have sort of skip-read Parts 1 and 2 and may tend to skip read this part 3 too, thinking that they already know most of the points I made. I assure you, most people reading this don’t know where it’s going, and for the most part, don’t understand the implications of Part 1 and 2 that have been written so far. I hope, that they will all begin to make more sense here and a lot more sense in part 4. So much so, that you might want to go back and read the previous posts.

For the sake of argument, let’s assume you have got your spiritual aspects right, which means you have an iron-clad mind and very tough mental strength, and that you also have picked for yourself, bought, and paid off in full, the ideal piece of land, in the right part, of the right country for you.

I know this is absolutely NOT the case for almost everyone reading this, but play along with me and let’s assume you have already got, or could get, those first pivotal two parts. Let us now look at how it affects things from the most intimate of social aspects to the outer circles of mere acquaintances.

Family

There are two types of family. The one you were born into, and the one you will make. For the most part, the one you were born into determines where you came from, a large chunk of what your character and personality are like, the most important aspect of which is what you found in part 1 of this series. It also, mostly, will have determined to an extent or other where you are now and what resources or lack of them you have. The important thing to realise, however, is that regardless of the handicaps you have been handed down, where you end up, who you become, and how you decide to live your life, is almost entirely up to you. I personally have known people that came from horrific situations that made lives for themselves that would not be thought possible by most people.

More important is the family you will, or want to, or have already made. And in large part, again, this will depend on where you are with respect to the points discussed in Part 1. Hopefully you are starting to grasp why Part 1 is the foundation of everything.

If you are a nihilistic atheist, or even just a doubtful agnostic, it is unlikely that you will be aiming to have seven children. The more materialistically and hedonistically you’re inclined, the less likely you are to want to bring children into the world. Realise that this is by design. There are very powerful people and forces at work for many decades, that have a long-term interest in ensuring that the population growth of everyone overall drops, but most of all, of European-descent Christians. And Catholics in particular. The reasons why are somewhat beyond the scope of these essays, so you will have to figure this out for yourself, or ignore it at your peril, but it remains a fact, whether you like it or not, whether you assume it’s paranoid, delusional, or most likely of all, “anti-semitic”. The closer you are to having a real Catholic spiritual base, and therefor, invincible spirit of mind, the more likely you are to be wanting to have, and actually make, as many children as you can. After all, Catholicism does not permit divorce, or contraception, and the main purpose of marriage in Catholicism is to create, love and raise good Catholic children. And whether you like it or not, the future belongs to those who show up for it. If you are not making babies, your line will end with you.

Of course, you want to provide as best you can for your family, but I assure you, that if my wife and I somehow manage to feed our five children and ourselves daily, with very little income to speak of, and with what is essentially as yet a non-productive farm that has lain fallow for years, then you’ll probably manage too. Having been both an atheist and an agnostic, well into my thirties, I was fairly sure I never wanted children. The world sucked, people are idiots, life is pain, and why on Earth would I want to inflict that on a poor innocent child of mine? That is how I thought and therefore, although I did look for one woman to share my life with, When that didn’t work out after my best and repeated efforts, several times in a row, I simply decided to not bother, and I then spent some years just going through a number of women. In most cases, I didn’t even bother trying to have any long term relationships anymore, as soon as the woman in question irritated me beyond a certain point, I simply moved on. After a few years of this, I realised that I could spend the rest of my days this way, or try a new challenge. I was in my late thirties by then, and only after I passed 40 did I think it might make sense to have and raise a child. While I had developed a certain skill at being with women that appealed to me from a physical point of view and even found a few that I could get along with intellectually, my first choice of woman to procreate with turned out to be spectacularly the wrong choice. After that exploded in my face in one of the worse possible ways, it was then that I had a true Road to Damascus moment that changed my life-long Zen-Agnosticism into something far stronger and more personal, though, it did take a few years to evolve into it. After four years of intense study of Christianity and Catholicism in particular, and once I had changed my whole perspective on the spiritual aspect of life, against all possible statistical odds you might think of, I ended up finding that woman that I had essentially no longer even assumed was possible to find. A thought I had as certain for several years at this point. And yet, here was the miracle.

We got baptised together, and I then married for the third time, but the first and only time in Church as a Catholic. We are now 3 children later in only 5 years of marriage. And not only am I not concerned about the terribleness of the world, but rather, I will be doing my utmost to ensure my children have the best possible chance to thrive, in whatever world awaits us all.

Part of that process includes writing this series, because the higher the number of people that agree with me, and the more of those people live near me, the more they create similar situations wherever they are in the world, the more likely that my children, and theirs, will grow up free and happy; instead of chip-implanted, insect-eating, wage and sex slaves of the psychopathic satanists that meet in Davos regularly.

So that’s just presenting you the limits of the frame with respect to family: From lone-wolf, monk-like, ascetic, to large family Catholic patriarch.

As they say, take your pick. You can still do good wherever you are on this spectrum.

But assuming you plan to have children, then, understand that you really need to try your best to have the top level choice from part 1 and a distant, but very important second, the best situation you can muster from part 2. It is certainly easier to achieve those things as a single man or a young couple, quickly and “good enough”, than with 3 or 4 small children to care for. After all, a single guy can live in a tent for a year or so while he builds or restores a smallish cabin, then makes it bigger to accomodate a family. Doing that in winter with small children would be foolish at best if not downright irresponsible.

But the point is, if you are NOT going to have children, then at best you are a “helper” but you are not a “builder” of the future. Your contributions may be great and awesome and absolutely necessary, and there is certainly a huge sacrifice in that, priests do this, and it is absolutely noble, but then be at peace with that choice and know this is who you are and choose to be.

If you do choose to have a family, then, it is important that you understand and have —as best you can and above all— the mental and spiritual determination to do the best you possibly can for your family in a joyful and tireless fashion, with the best possible life partner that who understands that this is for life, until death do you part. After which, the next most important thing is like-minded (old) family, as long as they are supportive and on the same page, and your friends.

Friends

As the old car sticker I used to love said: Friends help you move. Real Friends help you move bodies.

Over the last three years I think we have all had the opportunity to better appreciate that saying. You want the kind of friends that would help you move bodies, not just the ones that are happy being your friends while things are good, but the ones willing to dig a foxhole next to you. The more such people you can surround yourself with —within walking distance of each other’s homes ideally— the better. And such relationships are naturally easier to form in small rural settings. And contrary to popular belief, can be formed from scratch, as long as you know how to fit in there. Which once again, goes to you picking your spot as per part 2 well.

Interlude on Geography (Part 2 element)

This, of course, brings up a point that perhaps many younger people, with a dream of exotic travel, might not appreciate. If you are born into one of these small rural communities, you may already have pretty much everything you need right at your doorstep. Giving it all up for some hedonistic wish to travel and see exotic places, might not, in fact, be all it’s cracked up to be. Personally I come from a long line of explorers, and fighters, our family roots are traceable to the crusaders returning from the Holy Land in the Outremer, and being Venetians, perhaps it’s in our DNA to have been travellers and explorers from a very young age as far back as I can find of the history of my ancestors.

I have indeed travelled most of the world, and seen many countries and places, and vastly different cultures, but as a result, I was able to set aside the wealth to purchase a property only rather late in life, and then only with the help of my father. Had I spent my twenties and thirties saving prudently and investing, I could probably simply retire in a similar property as I own now, with passive income from other properties. But I did not live that way. I am lucky, in that I lived as both grasshopper for a time and yet had enough brain, luck and help, to morph into an older and battle-scarred ant later in life. But most people will not, and cannot, have such a life. By any definition, I am an outlier, and while I certainly don’t regret my life, please trust me, it is not for most people. You need to be able to survive life-crushing blows on a regular basis, be both talented and lucky, and it is a very hard way to live. In such a life, not only do you exist with no guarantees of the future, but rather with mostly only the certainty that all you have before you is the unknown, usually no safety net to speak of, and most steps are bad ones. Like running through a forest blindfolded.

Keep in mind just two data points of my own life:

I am 53 years old and have moved home 54 times. I have started from zero multiple times, losing both material possessions and any roots I may have had in a place more times than I ever thought about in detail.

I have been married and divorced twice, with one child in the middle of that second one, and then I finally married a third and, as far as I am concerned, final time, at age 48 and had three more children since, while moving into a rather run-down property 2 years ago.

If you think you can keep that sort of pace going throughout your life, think again. I don’t say this in any way as some way to present myself as “better” or more capable than anyone else. I say it as a real warning to those unfortunates that share my mix of real curiosity and general lack of fear. It’s a combination that invariably will get you in big, big, trouble. The upside is that you usually don’t have any chance to get bored. But then, neither do people getting shelled while in trench warfare. Or, as some would say, fools rush in, where angels fear to tread.

Forgive this long aside, but I wanted to try to give a bit of realism to younger people romanticising the life of “adventure”. Adventure is usually defined as an unplanned for disaster, that if you’re lucky, you survive. And even if you do, for the most part, all you’ll have to show for it are some scars and retrospectively funny stories. If you’re really lucky, you might get to tell a few of those stories to your grandchildren and then only when they are very little, before your final long sleep. But even that is not sure at all.

End of interlude on Geography (Part 2 element)

While in certain settings and for a few more years to come, you might be fine as a lone wolf, or even a lone family, hidden in the forested mountains of some rural spot, sooner or later, if the wolves come to your door, you’re not going to fare well. Regardless of the original intent and nature those wolves, you will be an outsider to them with no links to them. They will have no incentives to take care of you or your family.

Like it or not, however much the average humans may feel to you as the apes in planet of the apes, you need to have enough friends to give you a better overall chance, to both your family as well as theirs. And this can only happen if there is a coherent group of you. And the best coherent groups tend to have the same spiritual foundation. It is true that you can get a smallish group composed of a zealous Catholic, an honourable heathen with samurai ethics, and a hardcore schismatic Orthodox, to work well and co-operatively for years even under tough conditions, but they will be far easier to fragment than a cohesive group that is composed of only one of those three ideologies and philosophies. Friends can and do mutate from one ideology to another if they see benefit to it. We are personally aware and to one extent or other, “responsible” (the glory is always only of God, we merely act as His instruments at times, I think) for the conversion, engagement and marriage of more than a couple of people. And they in turn, I am sure will be responsible for further conversions. Sedevacantism by the way is growing very fast, and the acceleration seems to be if not exponential, at least far more than linear. And you have the added advantage of knowing that real Catholicism has an unbroken history of two millennia of being able to create, defend, and expand, the best communities for human beings that has ever been produced on Earth.

Supposing you have managed to have a good spiritual and hence mental foundation, a good physical and geographical situation, have a good family and even a few like-minded friends all living next door to you. Are you now secure from the zombie, SHTF, apocalypse, end-of-the-world scenario?

In a word, no. But you’re a lot likely to fare better than most.

But the title of this series if how to beat clown world for real right? Right.

And I do not aim to be hyperbolising or bullshitting you.

I mean that for real. Now, clown world can and does come at you in multiple ways. And it’s time we take a look at a few of these and why parts 1 to 3 reduce your exposure to the attacks from clown world, but it will be only in part 4 that you will begin to see how to actually be able to push back against clown world. Before we look at the ways clown world comes at you, we need to examine that border between you and clown world.

Acquaintances

The truth is that you don’t really know who your acquaintances really are until the proverbial, really does hit the fan. Here is a few interesting historical points for you.

In most sudden and violent revolutions throughout history, people went from perfectly friendly neighbours to people that would kill your whole family. Because they had a different ethnicity, a different religion, or a different political ideology from you. And sometimes just because they were assholes. And these things happened overnight. Moderate Muslim neighbours suddenly killed your children. Happy-go-lucky dope-heads suddenly rape your wife and murder you for cash and booze.

It happens. Humans are nasty monkeys when there is no one with a big stick to enforce the rules. Now, if you have a decent family, preferably a large one, and have solid friends, then even in most apocalyptic of scenarios, you’re going to probably fare ok. But sadly for some of us, the zombie apocalypse is not the most likely scenario. The most likely scenario is what is happening now:

They tax you from the air you breathe to everything else. They imprison you for thought crime. They poison your feed and your water, and introduce poisons in your food source. GMOs are everywhere, and trading in heirloom seeds is becoming more difficult than trafficking in drugs apparently. They want to outlaw wood stoves and gas stoves. They want you to eat insects and meat made from plastic. This is how they grind you down, and even if you are an off grid, super prepared family, surrounded by a dozen like-minded families and a hundred close-by friends, ultimately, you are still, from a military point of view, a dot on the landscape. You will be isolated and in time ground down over a decade or two.

Acquaintances are to be considered the generic NPCs (Non Player Characters) of the game of life. Drop mind-seeds, be polite and helpful, educate gently, and sound them out for ideology, religious convictions and so on, and begin to categorise where they would fit in a SHTF scenario. Make your core group of friends aware of potential allies and potential enemies, and have them follow up on your own positive seed-dropping and helpfulness to potential or actual allies and seeds of, fear, uncertainty and doubt, (FUD) to your potential enemies.

Learn to influence the acquaintances so they eventually take a stand. Remember, even Jesus said that those who are not with him are against Him. And nothing has changed here. Learn to at least have a general sense of who would fall where in an eventual SHTF scenario.

In part 4 we will bring all the last 3 parts together, and hopefully you will then see why this is the best way to ensure victory, regardless of what clown world, homoglobo narratives, and bankers’ efforts and force gets applied against you. But I really hope you read and internalise and appreciate parts 1 to 3 first, and then maybe go over them again once you read part 4 tomorrow, to appreciate why I have produced them in this order. Going from step to step, gradually, logically, to tie it all together in a final part 4, coming tomorrow sometime, where hopefully you begin to see you can only achieve these things by in fact taking these steps.

No related posts.

By G | 28 January 2023 | Posted in Social Commentary

You are either an idiot or completely ignorant on the subject if you believe…

1. That 9/11 was the result of islamic terrorists flying planes into buildings and not done by people linked to Mossad.

2. That mRNA genetic serums are vaccines.

3. That mRNA genetic serums are not going to alter your DNA; and that of any children you may have after it.

4. That Epstein killed himself.

5. That Epstein was not a Mossad asset used to blackmail a bunch of pedophiles into doing whatever Epstein/Israel wanted them to do.

6. That John Podesta just happened to have pedophile/satanic symbols on his hands and similar reference in his emails by coincidence.

7. That Hillary and Bill Clinton are not responsible for multiple Arkanicides.

8. That Barry Sotero (Obama) was born in the USA, is not gay and is not muslim.

9. That the USA was not founded by freemasons with freemasonic principles from the start.

10. That freemasons are not satanists and knowingly so at the higher echelons.

11. That child sacrifice in satanic rituals is not happening at very high levels of government/s and billionaire gatherings.

12. That the Bilderberger group and Skull and Crossbones and the the Carbonari and Freemasonry and the Illuminati and the “freethinkers” and the Rosicrucians and the Novus ordo fake Popes and their fake Bishops, fake Cardinals and fake Priests are not all just different versions of the servants whose names are legion, of the Prince of the Air.

13. That all versions of “Christianity” will bring you salvation.

14. That the American government as well as many (most) others has never done terrible, deadly experiments on ita own citizens.

15. That evil, sadistic, pedophiles cannot possibly exist and be active at all levels of government, the judiciary and especially the entertainment industry, primarily in the USA but also the UK, Belgium, France, and many other countries.

16. That climate change is killing people of “suddenly” instead of it being the result of the mRNA genetic serums.

17. That the damage done by the genetic serums, the whole COVID “pandemic” and the incoming economic collapse was not all pre-planned years in advance.

18. That the intention to depopulate the planet is just a paranoid “conspiracy theory”.

19. That Covid was not studied, created and elements of that research patented in a laboratory.

20. That JFK was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald.

21. That Hitler died in a bunker in Berlin by suicide.

22. That the destruction and murder of the royal houses of Europe was not an organised, intentional ploy by the same forces that eventually infiltrated the Catholic Church and created Vatican II and placed heretics, non-catholics and Satanists on the Papal throne since 1958.

23. That Joe Biden was legitimately elected by the democratic process of voting in the USA.

24. That the Talmud does not permit sex with little children.

25. That Talmudic Judaism hates the Catholic Church (the real one, not the Novus Ordo fake “Catholics”) and has been behind every attack on it from the time of Jesus to today.

No related posts.

By G | 13 September 2022 | Posted in Social Commentary

Church of Power vs Church of Piety?

So Bp. Sanborn has made this video, which is short enough and to the point enough I suggest you watch it if you are at all interested in the Catholic Church and the Sedeprivationist vs Sedevacantist positions and why both are valid and Catholic. The Video is here.

The Newsletter from Bp. Dolan he is responding to is here. And the part that offended and was read out by Bp. Sanborn in on the third page on the left hand side.

Now some ground rules and truths:

  1. I have some direct experience and knowledge of Bp. Sanborn and his behaviours, both public and private.
  2. I have no knowledge or experience whatsoever of Bp. Dolan and the only behaviours I am privy to at this point in time is the newsletter referenced above. This will naturally tend to give Bp. Dolan somewhat of an advantage in my view of the disagreement/s that may exist between these two men and that, as far as I can tell and as far as the video by Bp. Sanborn himself seems to indicate are being made PUBLIC, by Bp. Sanborn himself, not by Bp. Dolan. If this is indeed the case, as I suspect, then this alone in and of itself is a strike against Bp. Sanborn, but I reiterate that as I have no more context other than the single newsletter referenced above, I may be in ignorance of other potentially public communications that Bp. Dolan may have made that are more specific than the ones present in the newsletter.
  3. I am a layman. Normally, in pious times of the Church’s light shining across the globe powerfully, my opinion would be merely one that would be discussed among other Catholic friends as we argue amicably for this or that perspective, not to hear the sound of our own voices mind you, but to find the closest way to the absolute Truth that we can, by prodding each other’s brains, as good friends and good Catholics should. However, given the confused, confusing and ever present snakes of deception pretending to be Catholics while trying to lead souls to Hell (see for example my exposé on the Freemason Milo, the charlatans, EM Jones, Taylor Marshall, Church Militant and their Opus Dei sponsors) it is incumbent upon every Catholic man to stand firmly against any such practices or deceivers or deceptions. In this case, I want to make it clear that as far as I am concerned:
    1. BOTH Bp. Sanborn and Bp. Dolan are VALID Catholic Bishops. As such they are princes of the Church. And as such a modicum of respect for their courage and position is due.
    2. That said, they are both human beings and as such, inevitably both will have their flaws, as, of course, do I and no doubt mine are far more profound and numerous, nevertheless, my shall we say rather debased position does give me some advantage in a few respects, firstly, I fear no man, nor any man’s judgement, I submit and subject myself wholly and totally only to the Judgement and Will of God the Father, Our Lord Jesus Christ the Son and the Holy Spirit. I may and I do, submit to the requests, observations, judgements, edicts etcetera, etcetera, of VALID Catholic Clergy that is:
      1. Validly ordained and in good standing with the infallible magisterium of the Church as presented in the Code of Canon Law of 1917.
      2. Issuing such pronouncements in accordance with same.
      3. Issuing such pronouncements in accordance with my own conscience once I have carefully examined it to ensure it is not my ego, pride or other human flaw impeding me to obey such pronouncements.
    3. It is a scandal and a shame if these two men cannot put their differences aside and regardless of their personal opinions, permit each other to work together against the enemies of the Church. I would therefore implore them to BOTH make a public statement of tacit support for all the LICIT efforts made by the other party towards increasing the reach of the remaining Catholic Church and saving souls, and to keep their personal misgivings of one another private and if possible to resolve them in private too.
    4. Given the times, anyone sufficiently learned in the matter should point out errors, but to keep these private if possible and make them public only when necessary. In this specific instance, I am undoubtedly skirting the edge of the abyss, but for whatever reason, it seems I live there, on that edge and always have, I pray, that whatever failing I do in this, God forgives me. Whatever my errors may be they are, in this, I am quite sure, not of pride or ego, but of genuine wish for all Catholics and all would-be Catholics, to rise up as a wave of light against ALL the current darkness. That all said, do not, for one second, hesitate to think that I will tell you exactly where to go, if you think I was kidding about point n.2 above. Critique all you like, but if it is not licit, expect both barrels. To the face. Twice over. It is not a time for pussy-footing around as Catholics.

Now to the video and newsletter. First the “offending” part of the newsletter, here it is quoted below (7 minutes in):

Friday’s St. Martin I suffered exile and a miserable death rather than accept the heresy of only one will in Christ. It sounds obscure to most, doubtless, but we must hold the whole Catholic Faith without compromise. Even the best today want to make us believe that bad though he be, Bergoglio is the validly elected pope, and that the Novus Ordo, One World Church, is identical with the Catholic Church. That’s a theological error, and savors of heresy. As we honor the anniversaries of our churches, we remember that there is only one Church, the unchanged Catholic Church. If people would only understand this truth, so much confusion would be dis-
sipated, so much peace—though at a price!—would ensue.

Well, taken on its own, as I specified above, I am doing, I see absolutely nothing wrong with hat paragraph.

Now, it may be that the “best” in question IS directed specifically at Bp. Sanborn and the sedeprivationist position in general, but if that is the case, I certainly cannot say that from this newsletter or this paragraph at all. And unless it is specified elsewhere, someone self-identifying with those “best” would, by their OWN choice, be falling in precisely that category as described by Bp. Dolan.

There is, however, a principle of distinction between Sedeprivationism and Sedevacantism that absolutely needs explaining and precision if we are to understand things properly.

Sede vs Sede?

The Sedevacantists essentially state that the current occupiers of the Holy See, from fake Pope John the XXIII (henceforth known only as Roncalli) to today are not Popes in any way, shape or form. In fact, they are not even Catholic, being public, notorious heretics, so have absolutely zero standing in the Catholic Church, they are impostors, fakes, Freemasons and Satanists (I repeat myself) and as such deserve only our contempt. It is the position I too hold, though I call myself a Sedeprivationist, the reason for which I explain below.

The Sedeprivationist hold with the Cassiciacum theory produced by Father Gerard de Lauriers. It is available in the original only in French by a publication that will not allow reproduction of it. I have read it (yes I read French quite well, thank you) and in a nutshell it states that the fake Popes could be assumed to have been validly elected as Popes in a material sense, but not in a spiritual sense and especially given their behaviour as public notorious heretics, they could not be considered legitimate or valid Popes nor obeyed as such. This position was not unreasonable at the time it was formulated because the takeover of the Vatican by Freemasons was for many (especially laymen but also some pious clergy) so sudden that one dared not initially believe almost the entire Church had been converged to heresy and handed over to a bunch of heretics (and in fact much worse, never-were-Catholic, Satanists). Using the principle of charity and benefit of the doubt, Father De Lauriers, who was an outstanding theologian proposed that even IF the Popes had been validly elected, by supposedly valid Cardinals and so on, their behaviour precluded them from being actual Popes. It was a charitable, pious, best case scenario thesis that in my opinion hoped to reconcile, correct and bring the Church back together. Unfortunately, the rot was so deep and the very weapon used by the enemy is our good natures in order to get inside our guard to stab us, that the thesis, in hindsight, was clearly over-charitable. And given what we NOW know about the entire process, the level of Freemasonic infiltration etc it is patently obvious that the Sedevacantist position is the correct one (if you do not know, read my book Reclaiming The Catholic Church, which unlike the fake Catholic Taylor Marshall’s book Infiltration I wrote myself and has actual verifiable facts in it). There is one tiny aspect that the Sedevacantist position ignores however, and that is that the Chair, technically speaking is NOT empty (which is what sede vacante means). It is filled by an impostor PREVENTING it being filled licitly and validly. Hence my slightly subversive use of the word Sedeprivationist. I do this for two reasons:

  1. The sedevacantist position is undoubtedly correct.
  2. The charity of Fr. De Lauriers should be lauded, if, at times, ignored. Particularly by people like me and my brothers in arms against lies, deception and Satan’s little helpers. My current position is that if we could get rid of all the fake clergy we also got rid of 100 genuine men that aspired to be real Catholic Priests and were merely deceived, well, so be it. God will sort them out. Leave all retards behind. We will cross that bridge and burn it, so we can only march forward. People like me are the tip of the spear. We will make errors. We may seem at times uncharitable or cruel. We are neither, and although we may well be thought of as a necessary evil, without men like us, Christendom would have been swallowed by the hordes of enemies long ago. So… God must at least in some way, deem us necessary, since I count people like Bohemand, Tancredi, Jean Parisot le Vallete and so on among our number, and pray I can only measure up to those men. YET, in the name of tempering our fiery natures, it is good to remember (for better times at least) that Piety, Humility and Charity are great virtues, and only Courage bridges those three with the ones of Fortitude, Justice and Reason. And those who operate on the first three are generally better men than those who operate in the latter three. So I use the term yes to co-opt it, but also to remember its founder as the honourable and charitable way to do things, being always higher in intent than our own, more practical ways.

Now that you know these things, let us move to the video of Bp. Sanborn.

What Bp. Sanborn gets right

  1. Bp. Sanborn is absolutely right concerning the differences between Sedeprivationist and Sedevacantists being essentially irrelevant in terms of taking the Church forward. There is indeed no higher authority to decide between them, and the errors of one or the other position when compared to ultimate truth must be for every man to decide for himself. Given the history we know, the details we know, the facts we have to hand, personally, I have zero doubt that the sedevacantist position is closer to correct. Nevertheless, the Priest who baptised me and was there for my confirmation and marriage and has been outstanding to our family is a Sedeprivationist, and we have indeed discussed this very topic at some length. I absolutely respect his position, his advice and his counsel and I have no doubt he is one of the best human beings I have ever had the good fortune to encounter. Undoubtedly a much better man than I am. Even so, I disagree with him on his position and he has stated that my technical position is correct. It cannot be assailed, but for his ultimate devotion to charity. And make no mistake that this priest is “soft” in any way. He is not. The point is that he is a priest of piety. Possibly one of the very few who would rather die than break the confessional seal as an example.
  2. Bp. Sanborn is correct that Sedes of either name should and do work together and that their theological disagreement is not one that should cause strife or division. We both agree the fake Popes are fake. One is more charitable to the way they got there, the other is more logical. Given the current situation, there is simply no logical way that Bergoglio or Ratzinger can even be considered Catholic at all. In fact the Sedeprivationist position is that you should absolutely treat these people all as heretics, their only difference is that they say that charity should prevent you from stating it outright. I interpret it as basically the whole “we are too polite for that”. Well, I am not. My behaviour is roughly the equivalent of at a prestigious gala of famous dignitaries, some guy charging in, calling out one of the guests of honour as a disgusting pedophile, dunking him in the punch-bowl and dragging his semi-conscious body out by dragging and kicking him to the exit where he goes on to curb-stomp him. It’s not pretty. It’s not polite. But… if you’re one of the kids he raped, or one of the further ones he was going to rape if no one stopped him, I absolutely believe, it is necessary. And if I were a spectator, I would simply stop a waiter and ask that a new punch bowl is brought on and can they please cover up the blood splatter, before continuing my conversation before I could sneak off to congratulate the “barbarian” for his style and efficiency.

3. But that’s me and my weaknesses, and we are here to try to reconcile differences. And in that respect Bp. Sanborn is also correct in his closing argument when he says that there should not be trouble made.

4. He is right that the usurpers are using the structures of the Catholic Church to promote their heresy, but it is not just heresy and error they are promoting, they are, in fact, ushering in, Satanism, which is a religion and a very old one, so while technically it is not a new religion, Bp. Sanborn is, however, being too charitable in simply saying or believing that the Novus Orcians are simply promoting heresy, as if it was just a big, bad mistake. It’s not a mistake. It’s intentional and malignant with evil intent at that. So, TECHNICALLY right about Novus Orco not being a NEW religion, but it is pointless to say that, since it is certainly NOT Catholicism either, but its most ancient enemy.

What Sanborn gets wrong

  1. BUT he also says that (about not making trouble) after making a very public and very specific accusation video, based, from what he himself presents in the video, heresay (that may well be true, but is not public as far as I can tell from the video. I heard…He said…or…this guy told me…is the definition of heresay) and one newsletter that has zero direct attacks. Does this mean Bp. Dolan has not made public attacks? I don’t know. I haven’t looked and I probably will not. But based on Sanborn’s own video it is not looking good for Sanborn.
  2. On Bp. Dolan calling Covid cowards “girls” for bowing to the worldly laws instead of doing their priestly duty on the further point of Bp. Dolan not offering money for doing it to pay for eventual lawyers or bail. Errr… sorry, you are a Priest! You have CHOSEN to devote your life to God and sacrifice yourself to the world for the sake of the realm of God. If you need to go to jail, by all means try to avoid it, escape, lie to the worldly authorities (it is NOT a sin to do so when necessary, Jesus Himself lied to the Pharisees after all), do the Holy Mass in secret, whatever, but to bend to the worldly will as a Priest and claim you did it to avoid some jail time? Really? You dishonour the very frock you wear. It’s like a cop saying he will not enter a school with an active shooter because he is scared he might get shot! It’s your JOB! MOVE YOUR ASS! Unlike soldiers, cops and Priests don’t get drafted, they chose it. So, no. Bp. Dolan is 100% correct and he SHOULD shame such cowardly Priests. Rightfully. We need direct, in your face, face in the punchbowl truth these days.
  3. He states that Bp. Dolan is accusing him and his seminarians of holding the position that Bergoglio is a validly elected Pope. And in the very next sentence he states that Bergoglio is a validly elected Pope and thus a Pope elect but that he is not Pope. At the very least Bp. Sanborn here does a poor job of explaining what I explained above in the Sede vs Sede section. I am not even sure most Sedeprivationist hold that Bergoglio WAS (even potentially) validly elected at this point in time, but it was the POTENTIAL position of the original theory of Cassiciacum. In other words that even IF the (fake) Pope HAD been validly elected, it would only be a valid MATERIAL (Worldly) election and NOT a Spiritual election, necessary to make one the Vicar of Christ on Earth. It is, a rather rarefied, super-abundantly charitable theological theory. And it was this back then already in the late 1960s. To hold it today is to my view absolutely in error. BUT, technically it IS the Sedeprivationist position. Now… IF Bp. Dolan then went on to MISREPRESENT the situation by further saying that the Sedeprivationist hold Bergoglio to actually be a valid Pope to all effects, then THAT is indeed a lie. But if all he said is that the Sedeprivationist hold the Bergoglio to be validly elected MATERIALLY ONLY. Then he was perfectly correct. And if, as I suspect, Bp. Dolan did not clarify the position, then, well, we can perhaps accuse him of being a little less charitable, a little bit more “pragmatic” in his fire and brimstone in order to avoid confusion, but we can’t fully call him an outright liar. The Cassiciacum position was ALWAYS a very fragile, ethereal thing and frankly, while we should pay homage to Fr. De Lauriers, it is time to move on and reclaim the Church.
  4. Bp. Sanborn makes the comparison between thugs who have hijacked a car to describe the Novus Orco clergy and pointedly calls them Heretics. Yet he refutes the point that the Novus Orco Church is a different Church from the Catholic Church. This is patently false. While he hides of the fact that the usurpers are using the infrastructure of the Catholic Church, just like a car thief has now taken use of your car, it is obvious that:
    1. The car/Church does NOT belong to them
    2. The uses they are putting it to are not only NOT legitimate and criminal, they are in DIRECT opposition to the licit uses YOU, the rightful owner were putting it to. The analogy would be you going to take your pregnant wife to the hospital so she can give birth, getting the car hijacked and the thugs using it to drive to the hospital to murder newborn babies while they leave you by the side of the road. It’s all well and good for you to say that the car is the same car, (the Cathedrals too are indeed still the same, as is all the worldly structures of the Church) it is, but the purposes, intent, use and drivers of it are in direct opposition to everything that car/Church was meant to do. You can hardly say it is not a “New” Church. Physically the structures remain the same, but they have been defiled, they are being used to perpetuate crimes against should and bodies and pervert the truth. The Novus Orco are NOT Catholic. Their religion is NOT Catholicism. There is literally no point at all to not call them out as a fake, new, different religion, because that is what the Novus Orco is.

Arguable Either Way

  1. Assuming it is true that Bp. Dolan characterised the Sedeprivationist position as a tentacle of the Novus Orco Church, and let’s for argument sake ALSO assume it was a PUBLIC statement, which, in fairness, I think is assuming quite a lot. It sounds to me as if the statement by Bp. Dolan may have been made in private conversation, in which case, my explanation here would have even more weight. An argument can be made, that by this continued excess of charity and not simply labelling public notorious heretics as such publicly, the Sedeprivationist faction is unwittingly (and unwillingly) helping the Satanists to continue their wearing of the Church structures like a snakeskin for their demon-infested Church of Moloch that it really is. IF this was the intent, then the characterisation might be unfortunate or lead one to perhaps rushed conclusions, especially if taken out of context, either about Sedeprivationist or about Bp. Dolan, or both. Nevertheless, it has a certain sound logic to it. And, if we are going to be charitable, as Sedeprivationist indeed are, then, surely, this interpretation would be the more correct one.
  2. Ok about the fake “Old Catholic Church” having failed, true, but it is also a fact that these people were intentionally trying to destroy Catholicism and Bp. Sanborn states it clearly himself. The Freemasons/Carbonari/Satanists did this intentionally to take over these structures so as to fool the masses. So how can you say that the present usurpers are not a “new” Religion that is separate from Catholicism? It seems pedantic and irrelevant.

Bp. Sanborns Questions:

Q1. When did this Novus Orco Church begin?

A1. Worldly, on the 28th October 1958 when Roncalli was invalidly elected false Pope John XXIII. Spiritually, when Satan and his third of the host were driven from heaven. Simple. Not sure why he is unaware or pretends to be.

Q2. Was Bp. Dolan not part of the NO originally?

A2. Let’s assume yes and the answer will follow below.

Q3. Was Bp. Dolan not ordained by Archbishop Lefebvre?

A3. I believe he was. Fuller answer below.

Q4. Was Bp. Dolan not part of the SSPX which had as its stated purpose the reconciliation with the NO Church?

A4. I believe he was. Fuller Answer below.

Q5. When did you (Bp. Dolan) make a public abjuration from the NO Church? And here Bp. Sanborn states that as Bp. Dolan says the NO is a separate Church, a public adjuration must be made as if one were previously a Lutheran say. It is a kind of twisted logic and if it were valid then one could accuse Bp. Sanborn, by the same logic of actually BEING a Novus Orco Church guy. Here, I believe, we see the crux of the matter and I think it boils down to something neither side has mentioned and possibly that neither side understands consciously. Here it is, the Answer to the above questions:

A2,3,4 and 5. Being ordained by a man who was trying to navigate the absolute carnage of the Vatican II era while trying to preserve what he thought he could salvage or repair of the Catholic Church is not a sin. Nor is the ordination invalid. Bishop Lefebvre was indeed in error in trying to reconcile with what in all likelihood he had either not recognised as, or didn’t want to believe were Satanists within the very church he loved. But being in error does not make you a heretic. It does not prevent you from validly ordaining Priests other Bishops in good faith. Nor does being validly ordained by such a man and you yourself genuinely believing you are doing your best to navigate the same storm make you a heretic. merely in error. And we all are to some degree or other. Importantly though, like Bp. Sanborn, Bp. Dolan corrected his errors and eventually left the now essentially logically bankrupt SSPX.

As a result of the above, there is absolutely no need for an abjuration, because one never stopped being Catholic. Never belonged to the Church of Satan that the impostors clearly belong to. So there is no need to say you don’t belong to it!

Let me make an analogy that is easier to understand. If a bunch of Nazis decide to wear US army uniforms and infiltrate the trenches of the US Army and start murdering American soldiers in their sleep, are they now US Soldiers? NO. Clearly not. And if a US soldier in the trenches calls these Nazis out and says they are not Americans but Nazis in disguise, and belong to a different army, is he wrong? Does he now have to swear that he has no allegiance to the US Army because THE OTHER GUYS ARE WEARING THE SAME UNIFORM?!? It’s idiotic and ridiculous. Of course not. He is a US soldier and has to abjure or swear fealty to no one he hasn’t already done so. And he is doing his duty by calling out the impostors as belonging to the enemy army and NOT the US army. Simple. Again, I want to be charitable but Bp. Sanborn is not, I believe, stupid, so this, to me, stinks of sophistry.

Bp. Sanborn further embroils himself in deception when he asks who lifted the presumed excommunication of Bp. Dolan since he was originally “Novus Ordo” and this according to Bp. Dolan is a different Church. But this is an inversion. To return to the soldier analogy. Bp. Dolan never took off his uniform. He always was a US Soldier (Catholic) and if the leadership of his Army now tell him to shell his own positions and he does, in ignorance, in obedience, in essentially innocence, he is NOT at fault. Especially since, once he realises that his superiors are in reality Nazi spies in disguise as US soldiers, he stops following their fake orders, raises the alarm and calls them out as enemies. There is not guilt he has to expiate. There is no “nazi loyalty” he ever gave to the impostors. IF he did anything wrong he did it in honest error and by being fooled. He certainly does NOT need to once again swear loyalty to the US army. Whenever left. The other guys infiltrated into it. His conscience is clear. As it should be. In short, I think it is a deceptive and disingenuous question, a straw man. The same applies to deceived Novus Orco lay people who then become Sedes.

But it gets worse. He asks who now has the right to lift the excommunication of all those NO priests who have not yet refuted the V2 NO fake Church. The answer of course is no one and the answer as to whom, if any are potentially t least valid clergy, the answer is almost certainly none. The reason is simple.

  1. Most of them were NOT ordained by valid clergy.
  2. Most of them were not ordained validly. (1 and 2 here are two different things).
  3. Of the tiny proportion left that we might assume have been somehow validly ordained, these must be exceedingly old and therefore utterly aware of the heresy of Vatican II yet have remained silent for decades. Case in point: “Archbishop” Vigano. Such people, are by definition, public, notorious heretics in word and deed. They promulgated the V2 heresies for decades and as such fall foul of Canon 188.4. They are public notorious heretics and indeed there is no one who can forgive them their heresy, but even if there were, their lot would be t spend the rest of their lives in secluded penance with authority over no one.

In conclusion then, even if there WERE any valid NO priests that could potentially become forgiven or be assumed to be Catholic, their lot is to have authority over no one, and hence are completely irrelevant to the future of the Church. This is a good thing, because it precludes the infiltration of any of these supposed “Catholics” into the actual, growing, resurgent, real, Catholic Church.

Conclusions

Bishop Sanborn is certainly a valid Catholic Bishop, nevertheless he is a Bishop of Power, as Rodney Stark labels such people. He is interested in the material aspects of the Church. He wants to “win” so to speak, by having more seminarians, more Churches, more laypeople contributing money to more structures being built and so on.

I do not know personally, and I am not accusing Bp. Sanborn of doing or being this way for personal gain. For all I know he may be, but I absolutely and without reservation give him the benefit of the doubt in this as I always did from the beginning. In fact, I’ll go a step further and state categorically that from my perspective, such clergy are, at times, required. The worldly aspects of Church buildings, funds for seminarians and resident priests and so on are realities of the world, and someone pushing to get these things is required and useful. Often such men can get corrupted by the power they wield. They can become gluttonous, or proud, dictatorial, revered in their cult of personality, and I have reason to suspect that certainly Bishop Sanborn has at least some of these flaws to whatever degree or other. As, I remind you, we all have flaws. That said, his errors will tend towards those that in ancient times were labelled as the avarice, gluttony and so on of the proud, power-hungry, worldly Popes.

I do not know Bp. Dolan at all, and never interacted with him, but judging from his tone and assuming the things Bp. Sanborn said about him in the video are true, it sounds to me that Bp. Dolan is more a puritan sort, which we may refer to as belonging more to the Church of Piety. The errors of such clergy tend to be either excessive charity (which got us where we are today) or, sometimes, a zeal bordering on Donates where if anything or anyone has the tiniest flaw then they are expelled for heresy.

In short, if these men are Power vs Piety, they will invariably disagree and nothing good can come of it. So I hope they put it all behind themselves and move on in a positive manner. Some form of public reconciliation, however superficial, would firstly demonstrate both men are willing to submit their ego to a higher need and secondly, for that very reason, be welcome by all Catholics I believe.

No related posts.

By G | 16 November 2021 | Posted in Social Commentary

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks