Part 3 – Family, Friends and Acquaintances
Alright, so I expect most people will have sort of skip-read Parts 1 and 2 and may tend to skip read this part 3 too, thinking that they already know most of the points I made. I assure you, most people reading this don’t know where it’s going, and for the most part, don’t understand the implications of Part 1 and 2 that have been written so far. I hope, that they will all begin to make more sense here and a lot more sense in part 4. So much so, that you might want to go back and read the previous posts.
For the sake of argument, let’s assume you have got your spiritual aspects right, which means you have an iron-clad mind and very tough mental strength, and that you also have picked for yourself, bought, and paid off in full, the ideal piece of land, in the right part, of the right country for you.
I know this is absolutely NOT the case for almost everyone reading this, but play along with me and let’s assume you have already got, or could get, those first pivotal two parts. Let us now look at how it affects things from the most intimate of social aspects to the outer circles of mere acquaintances.
Family
There are two types of family. The one you were born into, and the one you will make. For the most part, the one you were born into determines where you came from, a large chunk of what your character and personality are like, the most important aspect of which is what you found in part 1 of this series. It also, mostly, will have determined to an extent or other where you are now and what resources or lack of them you have. The important thing to realise, however, is that regardless of the handicaps you have been handed down, where you end up, who you become, and how you decide to live your life, is almost entirely up to you. I personally have known people that came from horrific situations that made lives for themselves that would not be thought possible by most people.
More important is the family you will, or want to, or have already made. And in large part, again, this will depend on where you are with respect to the points discussed in Part 1. Hopefully you are starting to grasp why Part 1 is the foundation of everything.
If you are a nihilistic atheist, or even just a doubtful agnostic, it is unlikely that you will be aiming to have seven children. The more materialistically and hedonistically you’re inclined, the less likely you are to want to bring children into the world. Realise that this is by design. There are very powerful people and forces at work for many decades, that have a long-term interest in ensuring that the population growth of everyone overall drops, but most of all, of European-descent Christians. And Catholics in particular. The reasons why are somewhat beyond the scope of these essays, so you will have to figure this out for yourself, or ignore it at your peril, but it remains a fact, whether you like it or not, whether you assume it’s paranoid, delusional, or most likely of all, “anti-semitic”. The closer you are to having a real Catholic spiritual base, and therefor, invincible spirit of mind, the more likely you are to be wanting to have, and actually make, as many children as you can. After all, Catholicism does not permit divorce, or contraception, and the main purpose of marriage in Catholicism is to create, love and raise good Catholic children. And whether you like it or not, the future belongs to those who show up for it. If you are not making babies, your line will end with you.
Of course, you want to provide as best you can for your family, but I assure you, that if my wife and I somehow manage to feed our five children and ourselves daily, with very little income to speak of, and with what is essentially as yet a non-productive farm that has lain fallow for years, then you’ll probably manage too. Having been both an atheist and an agnostic, well into my thirties, I was fairly sure I never wanted children. The world sucked, people are idiots, life is pain, and why on Earth would I want to inflict that on a poor innocent child of mine? That is how I thought and therefore, although I did look for one woman to share my life with, When that didn’t work out after my best and repeated efforts, several times in a row, I simply decided to not bother, and I then spent some years just going through a number of women. In most cases, I didn’t even bother trying to have any long term relationships anymore, as soon as the woman in question irritated me beyond a certain point, I simply moved on. After a few years of this, I realised that I could spend the rest of my days this way, or try a new challenge. I was in my late thirties by then, and only after I passed 40 did I think it might make sense to have and raise a child. While I had developed a certain skill at being with women that appealed to me from a physical point of view and even found a few that I could get along with intellectually, my first choice of woman to procreate with turned out to be spectacularly the wrong choice. After that exploded in my face in one of the worse possible ways, it was then that I had a true Road to Damascus moment that changed my life-long Zen-Agnosticism into something far stronger and more personal, though, it did take a few years to evolve into it. After four years of intense study of Christianity and Catholicism in particular, and once I had changed my whole perspective on the spiritual aspect of life, against all possible statistical odds you might think of, I ended up finding that woman that I had essentially no longer even assumed was possible to find. A thought I had as certain for several years at this point. And yet, here was the miracle.
We got baptised together, and I then married for the third time, but the first and only time in Church as a Catholic. We are now 3 children later in only 5 years of marriage. And not only am I not concerned about the terribleness of the world, but rather, I will be doing my utmost to ensure my children have the best possible chance to thrive, in whatever world awaits us all.
Part of that process includes writing this series, because the higher the number of people that agree with me, and the more of those people live near me, the more they create similar situations wherever they are in the world, the more likely that my children, and theirs, will grow up free and happy; instead of chip-implanted, insect-eating, wage and sex slaves of the psychopathic satanists that meet in Davos regularly.
So that’s just presenting you the limits of the frame with respect to family: From lone-wolf, monk-like, ascetic, to large family Catholic patriarch.
As they say, take your pick. You can still do good wherever you are on this spectrum.
But assuming you plan to have children, then, understand that you really need to try your best to have the top level choice from part 1 and a distant, but very important second, the best situation you can muster from part 2. It is certainly easier to achieve those things as a single man or a young couple, quickly and “good enough”, than with 3 or 4 small children to care for. After all, a single guy can live in a tent for a year or so while he builds or restores a smallish cabin, then makes it bigger to accomodate a family. Doing that in winter with small children would be foolish at best if not downright irresponsible.
But the point is, if you are NOT going to have children, then at best you are a “helper” but you are not a “builder” of the future. Your contributions may be great and awesome and absolutely necessary, and there is certainly a huge sacrifice in that, priests do this, and it is absolutely noble, but then be at peace with that choice and know this is who you are and choose to be.
If you do choose to have a family, then, it is important that you understand and have —as best you can and above all— the mental and spiritual determination to do the best you possibly can for your family in a joyful and tireless fashion, with the best possible life partner that who understands that this is for life, until death do you part. After which, the next most important thing is like-minded (old) family, as long as they are supportive and on the same page, and your friends.
Friends
As the old car sticker I used to love said: Friends help you move. Real Friends help you move bodies.
Over the last three years I think we have all had the opportunity to better appreciate that saying. You want the kind of friends that would help you move bodies, not just the ones that are happy being your friends while things are good, but the ones willing to dig a foxhole next to you. The more such people you can surround yourself with —within walking distance of each other’s homes ideally— the better. And such relationships are naturally easier to form in small rural settings. And contrary to popular belief, can be formed from scratch, as long as you know how to fit in there. Which once again, goes to you picking your spot as per part 2 well.
Interlude on Geography (Part 2 element)
This, of course, brings up a point that perhaps many younger people, with a dream of exotic travel, might not appreciate. If you are born into one of these small rural communities, you may already have pretty much everything you need right at your doorstep. Giving it all up for some hedonistic wish to travel and see exotic places, might not, in fact, be all it’s cracked up to be. Personally I come from a long line of explorers, and fighters, our family roots are traceable to the crusaders returning from the Holy Land in the Outremer, and being Venetians, perhaps it’s in our DNA to have been travellers and explorers from a very young age as far back as I can find of the history of my ancestors.
I have indeed travelled most of the world, and seen many countries and places, and vastly different cultures, but as a result, I was able to set aside the wealth to purchase a property only rather late in life, and then only with the help of my father. Had I spent my twenties and thirties saving prudently and investing, I could probably simply retire in a similar property as I own now, with passive income from other properties. But I did not live that way. I am lucky, in that I lived as both grasshopper for a time and yet had enough brain, luck and help, to morph into an older and battle-scarred ant later in life. But most people will not, and cannot, have such a life. By any definition, I am an outlier, and while I certainly don’t regret my life, please trust me, it is not for most people. You need to be able to survive life-crushing blows on a regular basis, be both talented and lucky, and it is a very hard way to live. In such a life, not only do you exist with no guarantees of the future, but rather with mostly only the certainty that all you have before you is the unknown, usually no safety net to speak of, and most steps are bad ones. Like running through a forest blindfolded.
Keep in mind just two data points of my own life:
I am 53 years old and have moved home 54 times. I have started from zero multiple times, losing both material possessions and any roots I may have had in a place more times than I ever thought about in detail.
I have been married and divorced twice, with one child in the middle of that second one, and then I finally married a third and, as far as I am concerned, final time, at age 48 and had three more children since, while moving into a rather run-down property 2 years ago.
If you think you can keep that sort of pace going throughout your life, think again. I don’t say this in any way as some way to present myself as “better” or more capable than anyone else. I say it as a real warning to those unfortunates that share my mix of real curiosity and general lack of fear. It’s a combination that invariably will get you in big, big, trouble. The upside is that you usually don’t have any chance to get bored. But then, neither do people getting shelled while in trench warfare. Or, as some would say, fools rush in, where angels fear to tread.
Forgive this long aside, but I wanted to try to give a bit of realism to younger people romanticising the life of “adventure”. Adventure is usually defined as an unplanned for disaster, that if you’re lucky, you survive. And even if you do, for the most part, all you’ll have to show for it are some scars and retrospectively funny stories. If you’re really lucky, you might get to tell a few of those stories to your grandchildren and then only when they are very little, before your final long sleep. But even that is not sure at all.
End of interlude on Geography (Part 2 element)
While in certain settings and for a few more years to come, you might be fine as a lone wolf, or even a lone family, hidden in the forested mountains of some rural spot, sooner or later, if the wolves come to your door, you’re not going to fare well. Regardless of the original intent and nature those wolves, you will be an outsider to them with no links to them. They will have no incentives to take care of you or your family.
Like it or not, however much the average humans may feel to you as the apes in planet of the apes, you need to have enough friends to give you a better overall chance, to both your family as well as theirs. And this can only happen if there is a coherent group of you. And the best coherent groups tend to have the same spiritual foundation. It is true that you can get a smallish group composed of a zealous Catholic, an honourable heathen with samurai ethics, and a hardcore schismatic Orthodox, to work well and co-operatively for years even under tough conditions, but they will be far easier to fragment than a cohesive group that is composed of only one of those three ideologies and philosophies. Friends can and do mutate from one ideology to another if they see benefit to it. We are personally aware and to one extent or other, “responsible” (the glory is always only of God, we merely act as His instruments at times, I think) for the conversion, engagement and marriage of more than a couple of people. And they in turn, I am sure will be responsible for further conversions. Sedevacantism by the way is growing very fast, and the acceleration seems to be if not exponential, at least far more than linear. And you have the added advantage of knowing that real Catholicism has an unbroken history of two millennia of being able to create, defend, and expand, the best communities for human beings that has ever been produced on Earth.
Supposing you have managed to have a good spiritual and hence mental foundation, a good physical and geographical situation, have a good family and even a few like-minded friends all living next door to you. Are you now secure from the zombie, SHTF, apocalypse, end-of-the-world scenario?
In a word, no. But you’re a lot likely to fare better than most.
But the title of this series if how to beat clown world for real right? Right.
And I do not aim to be hyperbolising or bullshitting you.
I mean that for real. Now, clown world can and does come at you in multiple ways. And it’s time we take a look at a few of these and why parts 1 to 3 reduce your exposure to the attacks from clown world, but it will be only in part 4 that you will begin to see how to actually be able to push back against clown world. Before we look at the ways clown world comes at you, we need to examine that border between you and clown world.
Acquaintances
The truth is that you don’t really know who your acquaintances really are until the proverbial, really does hit the fan. Here is a few interesting historical points for you.
In most sudden and violent revolutions throughout history, people went from perfectly friendly neighbours to people that would kill your whole family. Because they had a different ethnicity, a different religion, or a different political ideology from you. And sometimes just because they were assholes. And these things happened overnight. Moderate Muslim neighbours suddenly killed your children. Happy-go-lucky dope-heads suddenly rape your wife and murder you for cash and booze.
It happens. Humans are nasty monkeys when there is no one with a big stick to enforce the rules. Now, if you have a decent family, preferably a large one, and have solid friends, then even in most apocalyptic of scenarios, you’re going to probably fare ok. But sadly for some of us, the zombie apocalypse is not the most likely scenario. The most likely scenario is what is happening now:
They tax you from the air you breathe to everything else. They imprison you for thought crime. They poison your feed and your water, and introduce poisons in your food source. GMOs are everywhere, and trading in heirloom seeds is becoming more difficult than trafficking in drugs apparently. They want to outlaw wood stoves and gas stoves. They want you to eat insects and meat made from plastic. This is how they grind you down, and even if you are an off grid, super prepared family, surrounded by a dozen like-minded families and a hundred close-by friends, ultimately, you are still, from a military point of view, a dot on the landscape. You will be isolated and in time ground down over a decade or two.
Acquaintances are to be considered the generic NPCs (Non Player Characters) of the game of life. Drop mind-seeds, be polite and helpful, educate gently, and sound them out for ideology, religious convictions and so on, and begin to categorise where they would fit in a SHTF scenario. Make your core group of friends aware of potential allies and potential enemies, and have them follow up on your own positive seed-dropping and helpfulness to potential or actual allies and seeds of, fear, uncertainty and doubt, (FUD) to your potential enemies.
Learn to influence the acquaintances so they eventually take a stand. Remember, even Jesus said that those who are not with him are against Him. And nothing has changed here. Learn to at least have a general sense of who would fall where in an eventual SHTF scenario.
In part 4 we will bring all the last 3 parts together, and hopefully you will then see why this is the best way to ensure victory, regardless of what clown world, homoglobo narratives, and bankers’ efforts and force gets applied against you. But I really hope you read and internalise and appreciate parts 1 to 3 first, and then maybe go over them again once you read part 4 tomorrow, to appreciate why I have produced them in this order. Going from step to step, gradually, logically, to tie it all together in a final part 4, coming tomorrow sometime, where hopefully you begin to see you can only achieve these things by in fact taking these steps.
Protestantism is Satanic
Which is not to say that every protestant is some kind of devil worshipper. In fact most are probably “good” people who believe themselves to be Christians. After all, if you are told from birth you are (fill in blank here), and given we now know 98% of people don’t even question the government, it stands to reason they would believe they are (fill in the blank).
See this video and try to understand that this is not “oh, just another church cucking” this is the absolutely inevitable result of Protestantism.
I will explain why in a way you probably have never come across before below the video.
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMYG3qce8
There are multiple ways to point out the obvious Satanry of Protestantism, but almost none of them break the brainwashing that they have been subjected to.
Rivers of ink have been written proving that the lies Protestants have been taught about Catholicism are complete fabrications. Including by non-catholics not all of which converted but yet saw that Catholicism has been lied about for 5 centuries.
Equal or more amounts of ink have been put down to show that the 40,000 interpretations of the “Bible” are absolutely wrong, infantile, historically ignorant and so on.
It has been pointed out that their “top Bible” was the intentionally corrupted translation of an already pharisee corrupted version, ordered by an openly gay king who literally started the masonic (satanic) temples.
It has been demonstrated that it was Protestantism that first permitted divorce, then sex before marriage obviously becomes normalised, and sex for sport inevitably leads to abortion on demand. “Oh but not MY Church/sect/family…” shut up. America is a baby murdering factory that puts the FAKE numbers of the holohoax to shame, never mind the real ones. And America is predominantly a Protestant country.
But do any of these facts change the mind of a Protestant. Very rarely. And then usually only after years when they actually begin to read some patristic texts.
I even tried to show Protestants their absurd sects are absurd by the simplest of logic. After all, if Luther ripping out parts of the Bible finally “fixed it” how can you ever say that the Bible alone is all you need? First of all, the Bible itself was put together by TRADITION. And if the Bible that served Christianity perfectly well for over 1000 years needed “fixing” by a fat German of Jewish descent that had a fetish for raping maids and banging nuns, and who committed suicide, then I posit to you it couldn’t have been the “right” Bible and for all we know, when Bruce Jenner decides to rip some more out of it and interpret it so trannies are God’s chosen people, well… show me EXACTLY how you will be able to differentiate between Bruce’s “God-breathed” and Martin’s “God-breathed”. You won’t be able to, of course, because both versions are and would be only Satan-Farted.
And here is a picture for those of you allergic to reading (though it’s doubtful you got this far if you are, but maybe the colours attracted you.)
And keep in mind that Apostolic succession simply does NOT exist in ANY Protestant denomination. Not a single one. And it’s extremely doubtful if it exists at all in the supposedly “Orthodox” world, since in Russia and Greece, the metropolitans were essentially political plants of the KGB as one of the top Metropolitans recently admitted. Furthermore, they have their own schisms too, which invalidated the whole concept of “one body” as found IN THE BIBLE, not as invented by some bitter protestant.
But do any of these facts convince? Not often. What about all of them together? Well, they usually don’t sit through 1/10 of the information presented here before they try to think of objections.
But here is the thing:
Protestantism is absolutely shallow. It is fickle. It is ephemeral. Anyone can interpret anything the way they want. It literally has no rules except:
and
2. Jesus is the King of Kings. Well, even Demons know this.
It is not even a childish religion it is a religion for retarded toddlers.
Protestantism has only created degeneracy, weird Puritanism, divorce, destruction of the family, abortions and fuelled the flames of bitter feminism due to having relegated women to second class men-with-tits who must obey.
Catholicism has created the most advanced, humane and just civilisations in human history, the highest forms of art and engineering, love and respect for beauty, truth, honesty and helping your neighbour.
And Catholicism is DEEP. Roman law is an adult legal system, perfectly suited for messy, disagreeable, complicated human. It is deep because it is simple yet penetrating and cognisant of human nature. Anglo-saxon laws, and even worse, American laws, are a barbaric artificiality imposed on human beings as if they were machines in comparison.
Human beings are NOT robots, and allowances for specific circumstances should ALWAYS be aired out and considered. And discarded when they are absolutely in the wrong, or irrelevant, but used and listened to when they are very relevant.
Even murder is not always murder.
The spur of the moment robbery gone bad that kills a little old lady for stealing her pension, should get the death penalty. While the well-thought out, planned and executed homicide of a child rapist, in my view at least, deserves a medal and a small pension for life. You may disagree with my take, but don’t tell me that the two are equally guilty. They are not.
The Rules of Catholic Dogma and how to apply them are ALL enshrined in one document, the Pio-Bendictine Code of Canon Law of 1917.
If you read it and you consider what a society that follows these dogmatic rules would look like, you will see it can only create a great and wonderful civilisation with almost no crime.
The point is, in its very superficiality and paradoxical rigid flexibility (the main rule being you can make up your own rules, and don’t let anyone tell you otherwise!) Protestantism ultimately stands for nothing. It has no lasting values. while the Catholic `Church dogma has remained unchanged for almost two millennia. Sure, from time to time they refined a concept or expounded another, but the divine dogmas remain unchanged. The rules to manage worldly affairs certainly changed but that is not to say the old ways are invalid, in fact, in many cases, the old ways show how Sedevacantism always was the correct position to take when faced with a fake Pope, or one that was or became a heretic.
How can you possibly believe in a Church that is fallible? Does your version of Jesus lie? Produce fallible Church dogma? Or agrees that everyone should have their own “truth”? Including Bruce Jenner?
Catholic priests and Bishops and Popes even have always been only flawed human beings, but the church itself has endured all of these and the rules of the Church, as presented by the magisterium of the Church, in the form of the compiled Canon Laws, is indeed infallible and has stood the test of time. Not because Catholics are flawless or Popes infallible (they are only infallible when valid, pronouncing ex-cathedra, and then only because GOD ensures their infallibility, as per His promise, not because any Pope ever was perfect or infallible in se.
But such concepts are generally “too much” for the average protestant, brought up on a diet of soy for breakfast, lunch and dinner, presented with a succulent steak, or a boiled lobster, or even just a salad with pomegranate and orange in it, recoils in shock. His simple-minded palate cannot even imagine such rich textures and flavours and tradition and history and objective fact built on objective fact so that the very methods of science were invented by Catholics. He wants to deny such things even exist or were ever true.
“NEWTON!” He shouts almost like an atheist would retardedly shout “DARWIN!” Forgetting that Newton was an anti-trinitarian, wrote far more on religion in a heretical perspective than he ever did on physics and that about 30 years of his life were spend on occult alchemy.
While the anonymous 14th Century monk that wrote The Cloud of Unknowing, almost certainly touches on far more penetrating truths about God and Christianity than Newton did. And the original free version online in Middle English is delightful (if you are clear on the language, the modern version linked to above is useful to read alongside it).
And yet, even with this barrage of starting points to investigate, the average Protestant will simply dismiss them all out of hand and assume he’s right anyway.
Do you see now, why the Catholics thought it worse for pagans to be “educated” by Protestant “missionaries” about “Christianity” than if they were left to their own devices?
Being completely wrong on something you are ignorant of, you have a better chance that your God-given conscience leads you correctly, or, that conversely (or jointly) due to invincible ignorance, God takes mercy on you.
But a fake version of the truth, a corrupted, half-truth wrapped in poisonous lies, that will lead you to your death. The lies baked in as you learn them make you lazy and spoon-feed and you never bother to investigate them yourself. This is human nature. We have seen it.
98% of people would euthanise themselves instead of take the time to research something that they are supposed to inject themselves with because the government or the TV told them to do it. Why would they ever bother to question the absurd nonsense of Protestantism as it is fed to them from childhood?
THIS is why Protestantism is Satanic. Exactly like the Mutagenic Serum shots, it is designed to fool you and lead you to eternal Hell.
However uncomfortable this idea may make you, I put it to you that it is an infinitesimally tiny dot of absolute inconsequence when compared to eternity in Hell because you believed in something so utterly retarded as “Sola Scripture” and “Once saved always saved”.
So I hope you take heed.
No related posts.
By G | 13 April 2023 | Posted in Catholicism, Christianity, Sedeprivationism, Social Commentary, The Enemy Within