Welcome to The Blog of the Kurgan

To one extent or other, we have all been infected by that vicious Boomer malady of thinking children are essentially a net “negative” in life. I know a LOT of GenXers were raised in that nonsense. I sure was. And it took me a while to wake myself out of it. Children were seen as a burden, a ball-and chain in the road of life. An expense that would cripple your life. Something that would limit or remove your hedonistic holidays, your sexcapades of the swinging 60s and 70s and some of the 80s.

Children, in short, were the worst kind of lumbering baggage.

And if THAT didn’t put you off having them, because hey, maybe you think children are cool and great and loving and lovable and funny and your duty to have and protect and teach how to navigate the world? Well then there was the faux-empathy.

Look at the state of the world! Nostradamus predicted we will all die in nuclear war in 1986! Ok, well, maybe it was 1987. No? Yeah well, look, it’s like early 1990s now and the Soviet Union is collapsing now so nuclear war is certain. And Iran. No? Well, Y2K bug will wipe out all the computers and then the alien invasion Nostradamus predicted…

You get the idea.

And climate change. But also, greed, and consumerism (which they absolutely both pushed (still do) and revel in (still do)) and you young people are just lazy and not making enough money in all the industries we have closed off access to, and the feminism we pushed so you need two incomes just to survive, and the globalism we pushed so you no longer even KNOW about your culture, and your job can be done cheaper (if infinitely worse) by a foreigner that will happily get paid half what you do because compared to where he comes from it’s still paradise.

So, yeah. I was more leaning on the side of: “My God this planet is completely filled with stupid people, why would I want to foster that on an innocent soul just to propagate my DNA?”

In a secular world-view, it’s not really too wrong. In fact, I wrote another post on marriage that ties into this one, maybe I should have posted that one first, but it was on my phone. I’ll get to it. Read them together.

I mean it is basically a nihilistic/atheistic view, though I was more Zen-Agnostic with no fear of permanent-death if that was the way it would be. It was only later in life, but long before I became a Catholic, that I figured all the Boomerisms (and there were a lot of them, and they all stacked) were nonsense and lies. I couldn’t necessarily argue every point on secular terms (not because I could not intellectually, but because I didn’t need to, I could sense the error-stack) but I simply knew it was nonsense. So I had one child.

And some of the worst fears materialised pretty fast about her life and what it might become shortly after she was born and parentally abducted by her mother to Brazil.

But that experience also led me to a Road to Damascus Moment without which I would not be a believer. I truly think really hard-headed people get road to Damascus moments because they are too dense to see things any other way. I certainly know plenty of intese and smart young men who became Sedes (proper Catholics) based on pure reasoning their way there. Not me. I had to crash and burn before God must have thought: “Yup. This one is definitely retarded. He ain’t gonna figure it out. Alright son, here I am for a few moments. You get it now?”

At which point, just like Saul/Paul, you feel like the absolute stupid bastard you have been and then you try to pick yourself up and become a little less of a stupid bastard.

After that, I did not think I would even have a long term meaningful relationship anymore, much less marriage and children. I distinctly recall when I figured out by reading Ephasians and suddenly it all clicked, what marriage was supposed to be. And how in one way it was really sort of close to how I used to think about it as a little kid, and how very, very, very far I had strayed, and how many women and how much life I had been through, and how now, because of it all I was light-years away, Galaxies away, from what that marriage might be. It was an impossible thing for me to ever know or see or be part of. I was so far I didn’t even feel too bad about it. The concept of a real marriage was so obviously out of my reach that pining over it would be like crying because you will never see a T-Rex in the flesh.

And yet, four years later I was getting married. In a proper Catholic Church, (i.e. a sedevacantist Church, not a Vatican II Satanic Sect one) as a baptised Catholic.

And three years after that my first daughter came to live with me and has been here for three years. And she has another four siblings now.

Because once I got married as a Catholic, which means, once I had already understood what a real marriage was, and then became an actual person that by choice commits to a life in which that sacrament of marriage is understood as such, and after that actually entered into such a marriage, then, the having children is the obvious, good, great, wonderful, whole absolute major point of marriage. Though it is not the only one, of course, but it is the absolute mainstay of it.

Neither my wife nor I ever had any religious upbringing. So when we first met, some ten years and a bit before we actually seriously got together, if we had remained together then, as she put it once, there is a good chance one of us would have murdered the other. Sometimes of course, that may still be the case, but that’s acceptable. After all, as Catholics we certainly can’t divorce. And it is to the death… so…

But in reality, whatever ups and downs all marriages have, and if like me and her you find your One, that somehow you just know in your soul is it, either from the first time you lay eyes on them, or because you just can’t quit them, even when you really think you want to, and are brave or foolish enough to marry them, and they you, and you are both as intense as each other, well… I have written on this before… a lot of those marriages may end up in homicide, or worse, a thousand ships from Greece, and ten years of many men killing each other. But if they do not, they tend to be the ones songs and stories are written about that last millennia. And sometimes, of course even the bad ones get written about, like those Achaeans and Myrmidons and Trojans.

But… if and when you get past your fires and flares, and find the right balance, the one thing you cannot deny to each other, is that your children are a gift. They are the most awesome thing ever, and all the boomer lies and the destruction they did, the wasteland of lies they left before us, dissolves like the bad dream and time-thief it was.

If Catholicism had remained uncorrupted by the freemasons, if England had remained Catholic instead of deviate from it by the theological hit-man and nun-fornicator Luther and the serial-wife-killer Henry, and yet she and I had met at the ages we originally did, I wonder how many more children we might have.

It is pointless to speculate and neither of us is melancholic by nature, but even so, if you think about it, how many souls have the boomers delayed or denied?

Vox Day recently wrote an article about how at least this reduced the numbers of those who bought into the boomer lies, and that is a good thing. I understand his sentiment, but by and large, the people reproducing at high rates, other than those who like my wife and I do so with clear intentionality, which generally stems from a deep understanding or at least belief in your religion, do not tend to be exactly the people who might be able to maintain, never mind create a civilised society.

The Boomer death-knell of babies was rung primarily in the West. The supposedly uncivilised third worlders were never fed it to the same extent, and if they were, they were too “uncivilised” and too “ignorant” to pay it any heed. And good for them; but all that said, it does not make their offspring and their progeny any more capable of maintaining the complex civilisations built by the West for a people of a different background, culture and mentality.

I don’t disagree that if you talk about INTENTIONALITY, then those who chose to ignore the Boomers are certainly more fit to have around, but I think precious few people intentionally rejected the Boomer-Doomer attitudes. At least that is what I saw in the general population of the West that was secularised.

And yes, it’s true that the Boomer lies are all starting to finally crumble, young people are becoming Sedevacantist Catholics in droves. My friends tell me it’s happening all over too, not just locally. Our Churches keep filling up with young people with a bunch of children. Which means all the other lies, about religion, Catholicism in particular, as well as about having children and so on, are indeed failing. The News, the only altar at which Boomers believed religiously is dead too. One hopes “entertainment” also dies and has a rebirth in more sane avenues. And a lot of the “technology” and “efficiency” is also starting to show cracks.

Maybe, just maybe, those of us that have seen that wasteland of lies begin to crack, may yet produce enough offspring to create City States of people that are just advanced enough to defend themselves from the vampires that now run things, while being also just “uncivilised” enough to keep having a lot of children. And starting young to do so.

In just three families of Catholics we know perfectly we have… I lost count. It was 15 children a while back, but I think maybe two or three more are either on the way or here already. And none of these are especially young couples. mostly they are Genders like me. The Zoomer couples I know though… all three of them have a baby within a year of marriage. And I don’t think any of them will stop. Give it 20 years, and if we move near each other there will be hundreds of us.

And I promise you, whatever “burden” a child may be in practical terms, it is nothing compared to the joy and love they bring. That’s true even when things go spectacularly wrong, but do try to do things in the right order, unlike people like me:

Get Catholic. Get Baptised. Get Confirmed. THEN Get married (to a Catholic too!) and THEN have a bunch of children.

And make sure you’re a proper Catholic, not one of those poor, fooled Vatican II laypeople who neve bothered to learn what Catholicism is and what Vatican II is.

Obligatory plug for my books on what Catholicism is: Go here and read Believe! or Reclaiming the Catholic Church. If you want it in paper format the link for Amazon is there in the description of each too.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

It has been the umpteenth verification of Professor Cipolla’s First Law of human stupidity, to see the reaction to the Trump “victory”.

Even supposedly erudite and intelligent Americans have been high-fiving electronically all over the internet and backslapping themselves on how great things will be. Even when they say they know it’s all huffing Hopium, they still do it.

Because they are brainwashed.

Look, I’m sorry to tell you, but this is how things stand:

• Pedovores and the Rothschilds and their kind (Soros, Gates, Bourla, etc) run things.
• Trump isn’t going to change that.
• America is a Freemason Country run from diaspora and actual Israelis.
• America is the greatest exporter of spiritual degeneracy and filth the planet has ever seen.
• Extremely evil and twisted people are at the top of things, particularly anyone originating from the World Economic Forum, which covers most of the Western politicians, and… quite a few of the Eastern ones too.
• Freemasons always play both sides of the coin to ensure their victory.

Or let me put it to you in picture format you may appreciate more.

and also:

There are literal little children being blow to bits and starved to death as well as dying of thirst by Israel and no one says anything about it at all.

In Italy a beekeper who has a honey stand at a local market had a sign that only said:

Stop Bombing Gaza. Stop War.

Someone complained and the Carabinieri asked him to remove the sign. He refused. they wrote him up for a 430 Euro fine. It was voided later, but you get the point.

Trump has been vociferously supportive of the mass-murderer and convicted criminal, by the International Criminal Court, Benji Netanyahu.

No one cares.

You can excuse it to yourself however you want, but the reality is it’s just like those adverts about starving Africans in the 1980s. You just switch the advert off and move on. And after all, what can you do about it beside vote for the lesser evil as it appears to you?

Well, you could build up a community of like-minded people. You could begin trying to become totally independent of FIAT money somehow. You could teach your children about the kind of hypocritical pond scum that floats to the top of most of politics. The lies you were told about almost all the history you have been taught in school.

Or you could continue sitting on your ever-expanding posterior and do nothing besides binge-watch TV and eat some plastic, flavoured as almost food. Sure. it’s your prerogative. You know what I find even dumber than that last option though?

Cheering on thinking Trump will save America.

He will not. But he may have given it another four years of breathing space.

If I were you I’d get busy on that “craaaaazzzyy” Idea only conspiracy theorists that have been right 30 years in a row have, of getting out of the city, building a community, stock up on ways to fend for yourself in terms of water, food, fuel and energy, and don’t forget the ammo for the weapons to ensure you can hold on to what’s yours or help one of those community guys you are friends with keep his.

I know, I know, my ideas are so far out there. Like telling people thirty years ago that every single phonically and email they sent was recorded. Or twenty years ago that their TV station was doing it too now. Or that antigravity technology has existed since WWII (built by Germans first), and also a lot longer before that. Or that there used to be an ocean on Mars, which there was, which means it couldn’t have had a 7 millibar atmosphere, which means it had to have a temperature that was higher than freezing, and that its geology tells us it had oxygen, and that giant face and nearby buildings, not to mention the now thousands of “strange” images that are also “touched up” before release, still also get through with anomalies, or the stuff on the Moon that has been going on since before 1969… oh but why bother. it’s just my crazy ideas right?

So go on and cheer Trump, or Kameltoe Harris, I mean, I know she failed at becoming president of the USA, but Bergoglio is getting on, maybe she can replace him as “Pope” of the “Catholic Church”.

I just have one question: If it’s all bullshit. If it’s all a pack of lies and we really are being run by pedovores and banisters (but I repeat myself). If things like the Bank of International Settlement really is some monstrous thing created by monstrous creatures, if the scam Werner von Braun told us about in the 1970s that has so far played out perfectly really is the playbook (asteroids next then fake alien invasion, though they seem to be skipping the asteroid threat right now) if I happen to be right about most of it… Then, my question is:

What are YOU going to do about it?

Are you depressed? Are you in denial?

Are you too scared and unused to thinking for yourself you have no idea WHAT to do?

Are you just going to carry on as normal, hoping everyone else will too, just like they do on Wall Street even though they all know it’s a giant Ponzi scheme and will crash eventually?

I’m just curious, stranger. Whatcha gonna do?

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Again, please understand, I like Adam, he is a good friend and even if he is Australian, I am not “having a go” at his list. I am merely discussing it (in my usual brutal and direct fashion to save time, and because I have this intro already and what more do you want, a salve for your fragile feelings?).

Furthermore, his list of 28 traits seems to be from around 2016, so I expect a LOT of these will have changed or been upgraded, at least in his mind, if not his blog.

The TL;DR version is simply this:

All a man needs to do in life is: Know (for) Himself.

I explained this in more depth in my book on the Russian Martial System I practiced then taught for years: Systema.

In essence it’s the oldest, simplest, and most complete instruction for any man so as to become a complete and best version of himself. Above all: Know Yourself.

I merely improved upon it a little by adding the bracketed (for) in between the two words. The point of this was because aside from knowing yourself at the very core, you also need to test and figure things out for yourself before you can really be sure about anything. Of course, some things we all take for granted, the Sun rising in the East and 2+2=4 kind of stuff, but if you have any doubt at all… investigate. Seek the highest objective truth in all things. In other words, Know for yourself.

By bracketing the (for) I allow for both versions.

And that, is really all you need.

Now, if you wish my take on Adam’s 28 things that he recons you need to be a “real man” or a modern man (why that should differ from an ancient man is nowhere explained) 1 here you are:

1. Moderate in the physical world is fine, moderate in spirit is not. Be an absolute zealot in the truth. Will you make mistakes? Certainly. Try to avoid life-altering ones. But moderate in dealing with the evil, deceitful, liars of this world? No.
2. Shaving: I agree. Leaving aside any Deniro stuff (he’s an insufferable lib in real life who avoided any investigation into an alleged incident with a minor decades ago) and with the corollary that this applies to a man that has social duties (like work in an office) but it in no way forms part of his core. Men that are actually men don’t stress overmuch on this stuff. And if you turn up at their home or their hobby away from people unnanounced you may find him unshaven and in his underpants while he takes a spanner to his car or weighs the powder for his ammo on a little scale by hand. Because 1. if you’re going to be a moderate in the physical, that hardly means being picture perfect 24/7, now, does it?
3. This just falls under the generic label of don’t be a pussy or a faggot. No need to “never say sorry”. Say it when it is correct to do so. Tell everyone to fuck off when it’s not. This is so simple, that I wonder why anyone has to spell it out. Like all of these things, the one and only thing you really need to do is simply to know yourself.
4. Agree. Do some form of sport ideally.  I value aerobic exercise above mere strength,  so I disagree with Adam’s take on it. But I come from a long martial arts background, and I can tell you that without exception, the easiest people to defeat are body builders. And more often than you believe, years of antigravity exercises (pushups, squats, chinups etc) will make you actually stronger than people who lift weights at the gym.
5. Bullshit. A man will drink whatever, whenever, if he wants to, and not have a single second worrying about the absurd and superficial concept of uncorking a bottle of wine as some fucking male rite of passage. Without exception, the best men I have known would drink the most refined champagne or the cheapest boxed wine with the same approach. And not care at all if they found the box wine agreed with them more. Pondering such superficial nonsense is the mark of someone that feels he needs to masquerade as a “real man”.
6. See 5.
7. While apparently this has some truth to it, in reality, this falls under the generic rule that a man does what he wants and goes where he wants. Pretty much regardless of anything else beyond his personal (and necessarily well-defined, because: know yourself) ethics. I have met plenty of people who travelled a lot and yet remained unmitigated faggots, and men who lived all their life in the place they were born who were undoubtedly men. Travel, as with the number of women you have bedded can, give you a broader perspective on life in general and maybe open your eyes to some truth about the human conditions, but it can also lull you into a false sense of accomplishment. Or worse, lead you into thinking that the traveling, or the sex, in se makes you “cooler”, or better. Furthermore, Travel as, when, and how, YOU see fit. There is something to learn from travelling alone as there is to doing so with friends, relatives, or even people you dislike. Travelling in se is not the thing. As always, your living through it and learning your own limits, behaviours, interactions, and thoughts, is. Limiting it to travelling solo is an artificially sterilised version of life.
8. Generally agree with caveats. Some professions require a degree to be practiced, like being a surgeon, or an engineer, so if you are set on one of those, you probably need to get a degree. Can’t argue with that, it’s math. And notwithstanding the fact I never much followed this sound advice, it is sound advice and it should be learnt at a young age.
9. Can’t argue with that, it’s math. And notwithstanding the fact I never much followed this sound advice, it is sound advice and it should be learnt at a young age.
10. Confidence can ONLY come from… you guessed it… KNOWING YOURSELF. If you do, it doesn’t matter what others think or say. Ultimately confidence is simply a superb knowledge of self and of being successful at being as you want to be and continuing to do so more often over time reinforces that self-knowledge and corrects it as required.
11. Well… again, knowing yourself necessarily means spending at least some time alone.
12. Well, that’s just normal humans in general surely. Only ruminants and feral beasts eat with their mouth open. This needs to be said?
13. Again… this is basic stuff. Can I cook? Yes. Do I care to cook myself 5 star meals? No. I have more important things to worry about, though yes, eating healthily matters, but when I lived alone I basically ate octopus, bresaola, the occasional fish and sometimes a tub of 1kg of natural yoghurt and some lard. And water. I don’t think I switched the stove on once a week, other than for an occasional steak or stew. Cooking for others can be a rare thing and then it’s different, maybe some guys like cooking. Good for them. Is it an essential? No. It’s just a basic thing, like you should be aware of how to use a gun, a knife, and change a tire. Nothing special about it.
14. Meh. It depends. Being offended at personal slights is pointless. But sometimes, teaching an ignorant boor a lesson is a charitable act.
15. Again, I don’t see reading books as anything very different from breathing air. Anyone that is not actually illiterate (in which case he should learn how to become literate) or a complete moron, should read books. His addendum that it is the seeking of knowledge and not the reading in se that is important, is… again, obvious. And of course it all starts (and ends) with knowledge of…? Yup. Yourself.
16. I can’t even imagine contemplating the contemplation of recycling or not as being an essential quality for being a man. Or, excuse me, a “modern man”. What? Who cares?
17. I’m afraid I (again) simply cannot relate. I hate shopping for clothes for myself. If I were a millionaire I’d have some guy that can tell measures with a look build me the kind of clothes I’d like to wear. My wife might leave me, but I know I would look awesome. I have a suit that cost over a grand and was tailor made and I have suits bought of the rack and a couple that were sized. I have expensive dress shoes and random torn sneakers. Currently I don’t think I have a pair of jeans that isn’t ripped or stained somewhere, because I have worked on my farm for the last 3 years. I suppose it’s good generic advice to buy the best clothes you can. My contention has been that unless you turn up in your underpants at a cocktail party that is formal dress, you can mostly get by anyway. And in fact, if you did turn up at a cocktail party in your underpants, play it just right and you may become the star of the evening. In my twenties I regularly used to get asked where I bought this or that shirt (by men! And no, not gay ones either) because I like “different” ones, but I never had any idea of what store it came from, and the thought my clothing was there to compete against other mens’ clothing simply never occurred to me. I just bought what I liked. Or, rather, more often, getting dragged to shops by whatever woman I was with at the time, I’d point to something and ask if she could just please guess my size so I don’t have to waste more time trying it on.
18. Eh. Depends, but generally I agree. I left home at age 16 for school and basically never went back. But of course, if you are taking care of your dying father or something, different story. But yeah, as a rule, make your own way.
19. This falls directly under the label of knowing yourself. The deeper you dig, the more you will discover things you want to change, and then, so you should.
20. Sure. Get a second, third and fourth opinion too. Then ignore everyone and make up your own mind. That is what I do and what I advise my children to do.
21. In the simplest, crudest, most distilled form —which also explains why I basically say PUAs are mostly useless frauds— so-called “game” is just being a man. Who Knows Himself, has chosen to be how he is and acts accordingly. Pretty much any man that does that will have “game” as long as he deals with reality and not some internal delusion (which you won’t do if… yup… you Know Yourself).
22. The general thought here is that you should not be a slave to technology, with which I agree.
23. Yup. And getting on with it, is just being a man.
24. Not being in a serious relationship with any woman you don’t plan to marry within six months was in essence how I started out. And in fairness, I never remained in any relationship that I didn’t think at least had the potential to become lifelong for more than a very brief period of time that expressly was understood to be mostly for mutual entertainment. So In general I agree, despite from the outside my life looking very little like this at first glance.
25. Bullshit. With an explanation for the braindead: If something warrants me crying, I will cry. I don’t give a tiny shit about what anyone thinks of it. To date, not a single person has dared to say I was “weak” or whatever synonym one might use for that, because of it. Admittedly I don’t cry often, it’s relatively rare, and as you get older, things that hurt still don’t make you cry, but again, this obsession with the external and superficial “look” is such faggotry. I have zero problem crying for something that touches me deep enough. In my old (and eventually to be resuscitated blog) I wrote about how hearing a song while I was dancing (well spinning her around anyway) while holding my one year old daughter, when I actually heard and understood the lyrics, got to me all of a sudden (for reasons I explained then). No one was there other than my wife, but even if the room had been filled with Marlboro Men and the Camel guy from the cigarette pack, not a single one of them would have dared poke fun in a nasty way, because they would be crying next, while trying to re-swallow their balls back down to where they were before I kicked them. The point is not that man should never cry. It’s just that if you cry like and for the same reasons a woman, a little girl or little boy might, well… then there you are.
26. Generally my approach is that a father should teach his children to at least understand when they are to PRETEND to be civilised. And to not get caught if and when they behave as God and their (hopefully mostly good) true nature intended.
27. Life being unfair is common knowledge to everyone that is not an NPC above age 7, surely? This needs to be spelt out? For whom? To whom is this list even directed?!
28. Aside my current mission to form a Catholic (Sede) community that becomes self-sufficient enough to survive and overcome clown world and provide a haven for our children in the future, I have to admit that I have moved through life primarily if not alone, certainly on my own terms and without undue concern what anyone else thought of it. I always had good friends within a short time of moving to a new place, but again, that is just because if you know yourself, you recognise other men that know themselves too. And when one of these is of a similar mind, you quickly can become very good friends. Of course, having good friends is good. But I can go weeks without seeing another man and think nothing of it. Nor do I think I, for myself, necessarily need a group of men to associate with. I did, for years, I trained and taught karate and Systema over decades, so of course I had friends and other men to bounce thoughts off of, but I never saw this as any specific thing I went after, it was just a byproduct of my interests.

So that is my take on each of his takes, but lest you get the idea I am just taking potshots at Adam, I am not. I am only saying that almost 10 years later, and a divorce behind him, Adam has probably distilled a lot of those thoughts, and it is good to help each other “purify” our philosophies between friends.

As I said, my own philosophy is really very simple and was put in specific writing back in 2011, though I’d held it since my teenage years. And the greeks knew it too, since the saying still survives at Delphi, where I visited, almost by accident, in Greece.

Know Yourself.

A really decent review on a book I have not read.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I had an interesting comment, probably from a confused millennial type that wanted to know if any part of Islam, specifically the “controlling women with lash and gun” was anything I ever saw as positive.

It is a sign of the times that such a stupid question even dares be asked, and even more troubling that the people asking it have no idea of what they are even saying.

It is an “understandable” (if you’re really ignorant and too lazy or stupid to educate yourself) reaction to the current zeitgeist of the world, but not for anyone that is not an NPC.

The basic premise underlying such a thought is that “Christianity” has become weak and effeminate. But here people are (as usual) simply not using words correctly.

Christianity remains unchanged from the time of Christ and its men are no less virile and its women no less feminine than they were two thousand years ago. But of course that only applies to actual Christians.

Protestants are NOT Christians.

Muslims are NOT Christians.

Hindus are NOT Christians.

Eastern Orthodox ARE Christians, but schismatics, so in mortal error.

Novus Ordo “clergy” are NOT Christian.

Novus Ordo laypeople ARE Christian but in terrible error due to sloth (they are so ignorant of their own religion they believe that the Novus Ordo Vatican II sect is Catholic, instead of what it actually is: Satanic)

The ONLY properly Christian people are Catholics. It was always this way. Since the very beginning, it was always stated, from Jesus and the Apostles on, that either you are in the Catholic Church, or you are out of it and hence out of salvation.

And today, the ONLY Actually correct Catholics left are Sedevacantist of the 1958 timeline that are totalists. That is, those Catholics that are aware (and aware of the reasons why) there has been no valid pope since Pope Pius XII died.

Those who are 2023 Sedevacantists, who think Ratzinger was a valid Pope are just like the other Vatican II “Catholics” in terrible error and thus in peril of their souls.

But if you go and look at any actual Catholic (Sedevacantist) family, you will find men that are men and women that are women, and no need for lash or gun, because each sex is perfectly happy to do their role and perform their duties accordingly.

And you also find a LOT of children. Because Catholics do not use contraception and do not divorce.

You may not like it, and the Protestants screech like banshees when you tell them, but only Christians are actually Christians. And the only Christians are Sedevacantist Catholics today. Catholics have always been the ONLY Christians.

And just because yourself something doesn’t mean you are. I could call myself an African Pigmy as much as I like, but I will never be one. And you can call yourself a “Christian” as much as you like, but until you get properly baptised as a 1958 Sedevacantist Catholic (aka Catholic), and accept the infallible magisterium of the Church and all of Catholic dogma, you are only an impostor, a Churchian pretending to be something you are not.

You can get as angry or as dismissive as you like. You can shout whatever names you want at me, but it will not change the facts.

And if instead you were actually a proper man that is NOT feminised by the Churchian zeitgeist, you would take up the trouble of reading up on Church history, discover that yes, it was Catholics, with Popes, transubstantiation, Holy Mass, and all the sacraments of Holy Mother Church that put the Bible together. And it was Catholics that were always the only Christians and translated the original documents of the Bible from primary sources, while the German monk with a penchant for having sex with nuns and raping the maid, CHANGED the Bible and then created 40,000 sects of individualistic “my interpretation is the only real Churchianity” nonsense. And you would have to concede that the only possible real Christianity that could ever have existed MUST have been there from the start, and the ONLY Christianity that was there from the start and did not deviate from the truth, and apostolic succession is and always has been Catholicism.

But you are probably just a seething protestant and you probably will not look into this, because it’s too much for the emotionally underdeveloped to take on adult themes concerning anything of any importance.

And from the heavens, professor Cipolla looks down on us and smiles melancholically.

They should really make that man a Saint once we get a real Pope again.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

My post on the Trump Victory was met on Social Galactic and a few mails I got, by the usual band of retarded binary thinkers, that somehow read that I said Trump was part of the Deep State Swamp.

So, allow me to explain this using short words, short sentences and videos for the illiterate and comprehension impaired. Let’s start with a video

Are you getting it yet?

And to be clear, I did not say Trump is part of the swamp. Not that I am saying he definitely is not part of it either. The point is that Trump is NOT the God-Emperor everyone hoped he was.

Was Trump good in 2016? Yes, he definitely was better than any other President the USA had that I am aware of, and certainly in living memory, but he does not have the constitution to do what needs to be done. the 2020 election was stolen, ayone that can do math and isn’t a zombie knows this. And if you are president and you can definitely see you were robbed by the Deep state after 4 years of being in power two things, at a minimum can be said:

1. You certainly did not drain the swamp in those 4 years (and we know this since some of his closest advisors were clearly enemies of Trump and of the American people and the world in general).
2. You don’t have the required killer instinct to do what needs doing.

And the puppet masters who actually RULE and RUN the Swamp and therefore the entire West, have not changed or been disenfranchised in any meaningful way. Are you unaware that highly placed members of the Italian government have testified in court that the Dominion machines perpetrated the fraud for 2020 but also that generally there are some 55 countries around the world whose elections are being manipulated by the same swamp creatures that installed complete puppets like Shit-water in Canada (Turd-eau, from the French)?

Are you STILL unaware of the Bank of International Settlement is, who owns and runs it and what it actually does, can do, and does?

Are you still so absolutely brainwashed that you think you are going to vote your way out of this?

Voting matter precisely because of what I said in the Trump Wins post a couple of days ago: If the lesser evil wins, (or the in any case non Inquisition like candidate) it gives you more time to prepare and set things up. In the case of America, Trump is good for Americans, it kicks the inevitable collapse of that country down the road a bit, maybe even 4 years. But it’s bad for the rest of the World, because America is the originator of the most concentrated Satanic rubbish of anywhere on the planet, and the longer it lasts, the longer the Satanic grip on the West lasts. Not a surprise since it was a Freemason (Satanist) created country to begin with, and has been run by Freemasons on Freemason rules pretty much since the war of independence that was funded by Freemasons in France that ruined the French monarchy doing it laying the blame for the bankruptcy of the country at Louis and Antoniette’s necks. Literally.

So… I hope you get it.

Do I hope Trump cleans house this time around, driven by an Elon Musk that has also turned on his masters because of his Trannified son? Sure. Do I hope Trump learnt his lesson and gets rid of the pedovores running things and the Banksters at the Fed, the Fed itself and even the illegal income taxes? Sure. Will it happen?

Short of a literal miracle and multiple road to Damascus events happening to some key people in his administration, as well as Trump himself… Not a chance in hell.

And that’s all I’m saying.

Keep building your communities, keep preparing, and keep understanding that th baseline of everything is spiritual. You can’t build a long-lasting community if it is not founded on real spiritual realities. And only one of those has stood the test of time: Catholicism and today that is found only in Sedevacantist Catholicism, because the Novus Ordo version is just another iteration of Freemasonic Satanrty.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

TLDR Version – As Mao put it, all politics comes out of the barrel of a gun.

Every Venetian child above the age of five knows this, so it’s not exactly a revelation to me or anyone of normal intelligence, but there are some slightly less well-known aspects that make a huge difference.

Last night I had a chat with a very interesting gentleman who may also soon be moving to Italy and possibly to join our Sede community. he has an interesting background and (like most real humans) might be somewhat of an unexpected Sedevacantist, but that’s not the point. The point is that when I moved here 3 years ago and said I would form a Kurganate of Sedevacantists that are co-ordinated, helpful to each other, all have a REAL and deep belief in actual Catholicism, 1 and over time would form a viable communityt hat had the power and capacity to resist clown world, many may have thought I was some kind of insane weirdo intent on becoming a cult leader. 2

This is par for the course, because everyone has been trained for some 80 years to be docile, to assume anyone trying to get organised for the common good is a con-man or a grifter (because MANY are) and even when, like me, I ask nothing of people who want to form part of this community other than their sincerity in their faith, because we have found that people who have initially “good intentions” but are NOT Catholic and have no intent in becoming proper Catholics, inevitably, end up being a net negative. We have tested this multiple times in the last 5 years, even before we moved to Italy, and although I blogged about this at my original blog at gfilotto.com (temporarily down as we resolve the major hack that was done on it by US state actors, which is in itself a good indicator I was over the target), the simple reality is that if you want a community that is absolutely resilient to Clown World it needs to have, at a bare minimum as a foundation, a common religious faith.

Catholicism (again, the real one, not the pedo-commie-Bergoglio version) has got two thousand years of constant proof that not only it is resilient, but it continues to remain even when more than 90% of it fails, like it has done today with the usurpation of Vatican II, or it did during the Arian Heresy, when 99% of all clergy became heretic.

In short, Catholicism is true and the only real Christianity that has ever existed, but even if you don’t believe that, and you think your personal cult of Protestantism number 7,942 is the “real” Christianity, or your weird pagan Wicca belief is, the point is that until you have a COHERENT religious (spiritual) underpinning, nothing you do will last beyond your generation, at best. This was all explained in a multi-part series I was writing at the old blog (don’t worry, it WILL come back) called Theoretical Models of Society (TMOS). This is the cliff notes version. Anyway, at a minimum you NEED a coherent spiritual underpinning that is homogenous. Which is why Protestantism will never produce long-term effective results. Its very nature is atomised individualism.

Catholicism respects the individual in absolute terms, but within the context of the broader principle of what it means to be a human being, which is why Catholicism is always far more subtle, nuanced and deep than any brand of Protestantsim, yet has always been unwavering in its dogmatic belief in, absolutes, like, for example, the death penalty for certain crimes, or the duty of any Catholic man to protect the innocents, his family or himself, including by pre-emptively acting first. In short, if an intruder breaks into your home, you don’t have to wait for him to first shoot at you, rape your wife or murder your children. You can turn his head into a pink cloud long before he does those things. And of course, afterwards, you really should say a Hail Mary over his headless corpse, and of course, given the laws today, that are a far cry from anything resembling justice, you will almost certainly be subjected to severe consequences by the secular powers, but from a Catholic perspective, you’re in the right.

Let me quickly reiterate in very summarised form what you really need to resist Clown World successfully even if it gets nasty (as it almost certainly will in the next few years/decades):

1. Community – You can’t fight the whole of Clown World alone. Not even if you’re Batman. But a community means several things:
   1. It must be coherent3 and this necessarily implies a very strong shared belief system that goes to the very core of the members of this community. Personally I have worked and had friends for years in things like armed close protection, martial arts and so on, and NOTHING even came close to the coherence, loyalty and deep, mutual respect, I have found between proper Catholics (i.e. Sedevacantists).
   2. It must be numerous enough to make some difference.
   3. It must be self-sufficient and independent of Clown World at the very practical level. This in turn implies many things, such as:
      1. Clean Water
      2. Clean food production
      3. Available energy/fuel
      4. Available medicine, surgery, dentistry
      5. Ability to defend your property, family and community
      6. Ultimately, the real ultimate freedom is to be able to be independent of Fiat money. This is not easy and anyone that has tried to do this on a global scale was murdered for it, but within a relatively “small” (but big enough to matter) community if you grow your own food and have your own community members providing essential services, the reality is that even if money disappeared, you would still be able to survive, which is a net impossibility for 99.999% of the planet’s inhabitants.
2. The ability to defend yourself – Ultimately this means weapons, and the willingness to use them in self-defence. Most people have no idea how effective even a small group is when they are armed. There is the story of the Bundy Standoff. Bundy, a rancher who had the support of a community of cowboys and when the federal government turned up with eight car-fulls of armed federal agents, they found themselves facing several dozen armed cowboys with rifles and handguns in they hands, peacefully observing. The Feds got back in their cars and left. There is the sort of one man who had an altercation with a policeman or state trooper over some dispute of his not having either a gun or his car licence I forget, anyway, the fight got physical and the man bit the officer, then got away in his car and retired to his ranch, which was family owned and composed of 20-30 adult family members too. The forces of supposed law and order were told in no uncertain terms that any attempt to enter the property to arrest this man would me met with firepower. The man did not leave his ranch for decades, but no one went to arrest him either, and I believe ultimately he was pardoned some decades later. The point is that no one wants to be the tip of the spear that gets blown away from either side of whatever conflict you may be on.

A substacker I only just started reading , but that seems to be one of the more astute writers, made this point very clear, and I want to copy it here:

See : Mosca’s Law — hostile organized minorities always end up dominating in Liberal societies.

Zelensky actually turned on his own oligarch sponsor (Kholomoisky) and ran him out of power. Since then, he hasn’t been able to make friendly with any of the other gangs in Ukraine or Donbass (or Russia). Zelensky doesn’t seem to have anyone in his corner outside of his own cabinet in Ukraine that I know of. Usually, this kind of a situation leads to an overthrow by a coup or a “populist” revolution or forced elections that the incumbent is guaranteed to lose. But, because Zelensky has a foreign backer that is sending over huge amounts of money, Zelensky and his team have enough money coming in that they can continue to outbid the competition for the loyalty of key people in the country. In Ukraine’s case, we are talking about the secret police and the military and the armed paramilitary gangs bankrolled by oligarchs.

This is how all power politics works. Power politics is perennial. Take the time to study it instead of debating who gets to pee and poo in what toilet.

Now, of course, you don’t want to be weird and end up as Waco 2.0, but the point is that organised groups that are able to defend themselves tend to get left alone longer and when powerful and large enough tend to also be able to self-determine eventually. This is ideally all done peacefully, but human history is replete with examples where eventually that peacefulness comes to an end. The world is divided into three types of people:

Those who want to rule over you.

Those who want to be left alone.

Everyone else (they will follow whoever wins the fight).

The sad reality is that in order to be left alone, you have to have enough firepower to be too much of a hassle to be ruled over. and in order to do that you need to be a large enough group of people, and in order to do THAT, you probably have to rule over some people.

Sad as that vicious circle of Hell is on this broken Earth, a Catholic domain is the most objectively just, fair and ultimately free (within the confines of Catholic dogma) than any other system humans have come up with to date.

“But muh Capitalism!” You say?

No buddy. Capitalism, Communism, whatever -ism that is not deeply rooted in life-and-death level of importance spiritual underpinnings, will collapse as soon as violent and forceful pressure is brought to bear on it. The Capitalist will abandon his profit margins to escape the Gulag and the firing squad. So will the Communist abandon his Socialist agenda, and the Churchian his “Jesus is my boyfriend” lukewarm belief system. You know who you won’t bend? A priest that is willing to be killed rather than break the sacramental seal of confession. A Catholic that would rather be tortured to death than renounce Christ. And no, your local Baptist “Pastor” or Methodist, or Seventh day adventist, or mormon, isn’r going to choose the firing squad over his personal version of “Jesus in his heart”. And even if he did, his 200 followers would not.

Catholics on the other hand, have been standing shoulder to shoulder, choosing to be eaten by lions, crucified and set on fire, be decapitated, and fight to the death when outnumbered over 100:1 (and win! Multiple times!) since the very time of Christ on Earth. The lukewarm Churchian’s calling themselves “Catholics” are simply fooled ignorants of the Novus Ordo sect that has been masquerading as Catholicism since 1958, but actual Catholics, to not retreat an inch.

And yes, we are peaceful. We don’t mean to start any revolution or war. Until we need to because you will not leave us alone.

Catholics suffered the predations of Islam for nearly 400 years before they responded with he first Crusade, then they shoved the Muslims back to their original spawning areas and removed them from Europe and kept them out for the next 900 years. Only now are the (((usual suspects))), starting a new kind of invasion by use of their favourite shock troops, the Muslims and Africans whose illegal and unfettered immigration they fund with infinite money created out of thin air.

While also brainwashing you 24/7 that while it is perfectly acceptable for you to be proud to be X, as long as X is anything but anyone of caucasian European descent, it is totally unacceptable for you to want your national language, culture and people to remain as they are instead of blended with people of completely different ethnicities, religions and cultures. Especially since such “blending” has NEVER worked, throughout human history. You know what happens? Extinction. Genocide. Mass removal of people. Just ask the Cheyenne of America, the Ainu of Japan, all the people that no longer exist that Genghis Kan took exception to.

It doesn’t matter if you are a nice guy or not. It doesn’t matter if you are peaceful or not. When things get ugly, and sooner or later they always do, 4 your skin colour will be your uniform, whether you like it or not. So will your ultimate deeply held absolute belief. if that is Catholicism, even in the midst of horrors, you will still be able to retain some semblance of humanity. If it is not, your agnosticism, atheism, random paganism and so on, will either be forced to shift to actual Catholicism but a road to Damascus event, or, you will revert to the most base, animalistic, me-first survival instinct of beasts trapped in a corner.

So, regardless of if you agree with my Crusader-like sentiments or not, whatever your belief system is, the formula remains the same, you need to find people that are on the same page and get together with them.

Oh… and we Catholics will also outbreed you. Just saying.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I did a bad thing…. I clicked on a random YT video. I admit it, I needed a break from what I was researching and doing and I did this. Like a fat person just gobbling up a cake by “mistake”. Nevertheless, it was informative, and possibly very helpful for young men in the West.

Here is the video:

Now, is there a chance you get divorce raped by a Russian hottie, or Filippina, one or whatever? Sure. Are there golddiggers outside of the USA and/or the West? Absolutely.

But, as the rest of the world has long-since seen Americans in general as arrogant, loud, ignorant, and fat (hey don’t shoot the messenger) I guarantee you that they have a generally even lower opinion of American women. And this video is a perfect example of why.

It’s 17 minutes or so and really worth watching if you are a young guy that is depressed about the dating pool in your Ununited States of Israel America.

The Filippina Pea wrecks this Yankee something brutal and absolutely deserved, it’s entertaining to watch just for that.

However, it also highlights the stupefying hypocrisy of the white girl in the video. An OF whore ragging on men who actually leave their countries to look for a better type of woman, that is, a woman that actually still behaves like one.

If this is truly indicative of your average 20-something US female, and not just the perception fomented by social media, then, if I were a 20-something American man, I certainly would either move to the rural South, where apparently there are at least a few hotties that can drive 4x4s, shoot a gun and still be very female, or I would emigrate.

In a way it could be said I did that too, though I was living outside of Italy from a young age, as I travelled around the world, I noted that while a certain type of loyalty could be expected from the average Italian woman, they also, to my mind anyway, seemed like ball-breaking, relentless, naggers.

To some extent, it’s a generic female trait anyway, but I found it to be more pronounced in Italian women, and as it’s one of the things I can’t stand, I can count on two hands the number of Italian women I entered into any kind of relationship with, but only one of those was in any way a long-term one. In fact, as far potential for long term relationships go, women from Eastern Europe definitely had the advantage in my dating life. Followed by South American, then UK and South African.

On reflection, and with the benefit of hindsight, while the South American women were definitely fun, their temperament is not exactly ideal for stability; it’s a bit like nitroglycerin, it’s kinda fun when it blows up… if it happens in the right context… and potentially deadly if it does it out of context.

East block women are probably the most reliably stable… and I say that with he usual warning that no woman is really ever stable, they are all crazy, of course, so we’re just talking about relative stability. East block women are more like C4. If they detonate it will be under precise conditions you can usually predict well in advance.

The South African ones are probably peculiar to people who have lived there as it’s quite a blend of femininity and practicality that is culturally not that common, perhaps they approach the Southern girls of the USA in this respect, which can be an acquired taste.

As for the English women, in truth they are among the ones I tended to avoid like the plague, because while all nationalities have various generic traits, both negative and positive, in general, the English women were so frustrated by their weak men that they tended to be blusterous, arrogant, crude, feminist in their external outlook (even if docile and feminine behind closed doors) and kind of trashily easy. Nevertheless, if you find an English woman that has somehow avoided the broad zeitgeist of their almost female dominated and frustrated nation, they are actually really quite feminine, as well as generally far more logical than most women. And this is a very attractive combination. But it is exceedingly rare, and the culture of Britain certainly does NOT promote it in any way; in fact the entire zeitgeist of the UK is designed to stamp this out as viciously as possible. A true pity, because just as the English gentleman is an extinct species, so too, they are trying to do away completely with the Heroine-like English Rose.

I only dallied with one American woman, and it was certainly not going to be for a serious or committed relationship, and I simply can’t even fathom, even just in my imagination, how I could possibly be with one. While the fantasy of the Southern Belle that is a mix of trashy, hot, dignified, practical and capable is appealing, in reality, I think in all likelihood even those will have an undercurrent of wokeism that would be intolerable. Maybe they exist, but like the English Rose, I would bet they are few and far between.

So, young American, if you are male, and since Putin is offering refugee status to Westerners wanting to escape Clown World, you could probably do worse than picking up some Pimsleur Russian (best language courses I ever found and cheap now), learning how to speak it, and moving to the East.

Will it be easy? No.

Is it guaranteed you will find a devoted supermodel wife? Please… stop hallucinating. If you suffer from such delusions as guaranteed anything in life, read this .

At any rate, the point is, don’t let anyone tell you that you have to put up with more insanity than you can willingly tollerate. Or any feminism at all.

I predicted already in my late teens that the next step in human evolution will be those men and women who choose to be able to do logic better than most of our ancestors, and who at the same time embrace their maleness unforgivingly for men, and their femininity unashamedly and happily for women.

All the rest are just NPCs at best and crazed flying monkeys with diseases at worst.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Adam posts less frequently than I do but his pieces can be interesting. And by interesting, of course, I mean, upside down. I mean he is Australian…

In any case, it is one of life’s joys to be able to discuss things with a friend in terms of proper argument and correct philosophy, which has nothing to do with losers like Nietzsche and Schopenhauer and so on.

His most recent piece is on forgiveness and worth a read .

But I do not generally agree with him. I think Adam often makes statements that are too broad and generic, a left-over of the Protestant Anglo-Saxon vibe all English speakers (well, ok, pretend-English speakers) are unfortunately subjected to, which tends to reduce all thinking to overtones of binaries.

Adam quotes theLord’s prayer Our father, but I think he comes to the wrong conclusion about forgiveness.

Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us.

That second part? It’s not there for no reason.

If the edict was to simply forgive everyone then it would say that: Forgive everyone for everything, always.

Well, not even God does that.

God does not forgive the unrepentant sinners.

Can a pedophile enter Heaven? Yes… IF he actually truly repents (and as far as I’m concerned that is purely between him and God and at best I can only help arrange the meeting by seeing to it the laws are quickly changed back to burning them at the stake). But absent that repentance, then no. They cannot.

There is a further corollary.

Those who trespass against others.

So let me categorise the levels of forgiveness or non-forgiveness.

Trespasses against you personally. Repentant or unrepentant. Most of these can be forgiven I think. It is certainly possible to forgive people who do this and do not repent for it. I know I have done so at least. I think in this regard, it may be the case that you should try to forgive these kind of things. It may not always be possible, but when it is not, I would guesstimate that the flaw is in us as fallible human beings, not doctrinally.

Trespass against others. Repentant. I think technically, these should be forgiven, but since we:

a) are not God so we cannot know for certain the heart of the guilty, and,

b) certain crimes require punishment regardless,

our forgiveness should be assumed, just as their repentance is assumed, but the full punishment for the transgression must be paid for in whatever way is appropriate, be it punishment for a crime, a simple apology, etc. etc. and willingly, —eagerly, so, even— by the perpetrator. In other words, the transgressor acts and behaves as if he repented and we treat him as if he has. But this is all external forum stuff. Only God really knows if they truly repent, but in any case, as Catholics, we should not hold hatred in our heart for such people, though, of course, caution is permitted. Once again, we can see this reflected in the repentant heretic. A heretic clergyman may repent and it will be accepted, but he will never agin hold authority over anyone.

Trespass against others. Unrepentant. This is the category I feel we theologically cannot forgive. It is absolutely logical and of course, in keeping with Church doctrine. We do not allow heretics to carry on as if they are not heretics, after all. In fact it is our duty to keep them away from decent people and deprive them of all natural human kindness. The logic is the same for unrepentant trespassers. Justice demands they remain unforgiven until they make amends.

So, once again, it is important that as a Catholic, you really need to exercise that kilo or so of soft grey matter in your skull. God put it there for a reason, and it’s not to imitate a warm bowl of tapioca. It’s to figure things out logically, and sensibly, with reason and directed by the principles of divine law, which in human terms is really perhaps best exemplified in Roman Law, which differs vastly from the Anglo-Saxon twists and abominations that have done to it.

Principle first, then details modify the effect of the law on the transgressor. And past cases have zero impact on current ones.

So, sure, say a Hail Mary over the corpses of your enemies, but don’t worry about being kind to them while they live and continue to be unrepentant. And in closing, I am sure the Crusaders did pray Adam, for forgiveness of their sins, no doubt, and forgiveness of the people who trespassed against them personally, I am sure, but also for victory over the unrepentant pagans, and Satan-inspired heathens they fought against.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I really don’t care much either way, and Adam Piggott has a very interesting take on the US elections, but as things stand now, and by my understanding of basic math, Trump is basically guaranteed to win. See the map below.

I am really just posting that for posterity, in case there is yet another attempot at a steal. I don’t mean the one in 2020. I mean that even this time around, in the early hours of the morning, there was yet again an attempt at the steal again, but this time it went like this (so far):

Nothing says they won’t pretend to flip a bunch of states over the next 3-4 weeks of course, but if either PA or GA come in for Trump before then, then the game is up. And even if BOTH of those flip back to Democrat, Kameltoe Harridan still doesn’t have 270, so they would still need to flip some of the red states that have not yet closed polling.

That all said, I think Adam had a valid point, which is that while Trump is undoubtedly better for Americans than Kameltoe, for the rest of the world this may not be the case. A more stable America means that the Satanism that is exported from the (((diaspora))) that runs the USA will continue for longer. The Harridan-PedoWaltz combination is of course a nuclear fire of incompetence, fraud, blackmail and deep state trash, and could potentially start WWIII with nukes as opposed to the limited genetic serums, bureaucracy and taxes to death and limited wars we have experienced for the last 4 years, but, it would certainly destroy America a lot faster and once it gets so bad internally, the rest of the world could more easily shrug off the tentacles that the First Freemasonic Country on Earth has spread throughout the globe as per direction of its middle-Eastern master.

US military bases in Europe may actually get sent back to the US, which would be awesome.

Of course, the average American is mostly innocent of the things their vicious and foreign ruled government does, and them turning out en masse for Trump is what I too would do is I were American. It’s not going to save the USA because Donald is not the kind of guy to actually properly clean house, that takes a guy like Putin, who has no qualms about taking out enemies, but even if he did that, Trump has certainly signalled his utmost support for Israel. Whether that is a ploy to get in and then flip the script, remains to be seen, and it would be awesome if it were, but I’m not holding my breath.

Anyway… if maths is a thing, Trump has won.

If blatant skulduggery done in broad daylight has the upper hand, Kameltoe Harridan will win.

Either way, I got a tractor to ride and brambles to churn.

Have a nice day, fellow humans.

UPDATE: Seconds after I posted this another state (WI) flipped, so Trump has already won… if math is a thing. But if the Demonrats find another 10 million votes over the next week or so I would not be very surprised either, so we really need to wait until all voting is stopped in all the states.

UPDATE II: I forgot to say, you must still be very impressed with the level of fraud the Kameltoe Harridan “campaign” has achieved. In my view, they have managed to fake and produce millions of votes for someone that probably didn’t get even 10% of the actual votes. Then again, I am a wild optimist and I keep forgetting Professor Cipolla’s first law of human stupidity, so maybe it’s more than 10%, but I would seriously doubt she actually got more than 30-40% of the votes, at the very most, that they say she got. That’s some considerable way north of 30 million fake votes they must have “snuck in”. Even so, it shows that while we may be on the cusp, if enough actual human bodies show up, we can still make some kind of difference.

I really hope humans across the globe are learning this and learning to ignore the mainstream media and taking a view to making the laws change so that burning pedophiles at the stake is the way to deal with them once again.

And this time around, no lukewarm Inquisition like Torquemada did.

Make me Grand Inquisitor of the Holy Catholic Church and give me a few thousand good men to lead, and I will cleanse the pedos from their thrones of power with a passion that would make Alexander the Great and Genghis Khan envious. And I’ll start right in the Vatican first.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

A recent long thread on Vox Day’s Social Galactic demonstrated in real time, one of my personal heroes of science — Professor Carlo Cipolla — was absolutely correct when he stated that:

The first basic law of human stupidity asserts without ambiguity that:

Always and inevitably everyone underestimates the number of stupid individuals in circulation.

At first, the statement sounds trivial, vague and horribly ungenerous. Closer scrutiny will however reveal its realistic veracity. No matter how high are one’s estimates of human stupidity, one is repeatedly and recurrently startled by the fact that:

a) people whom one had once judged rational and intelligent turn out to be unashamedly stupid.

b) day after day, with unceasing monotony, one is harassed in one’s activities by stupid individuals who appear suddenly and unexpectedly in the most inconvenient places and at the most improbable moments.

Both condition a) and b) were amply fulfilled on this thread. This will be an autist level length post with the vain hope of showing (the few people who can read for longer than 10 minutes without losing their place or straining their finger and drooling) the insanity of protestantism for the Nth time.

By the end of this you will see Protestants denying any rules at all, including probably baptism are required for salvation.

Don’t believe me? Read on. The Protestants will be in bold, I will be in mild standard text, others in Italics.

***

The display of completely absent logic, reasoning, or even just basic common sense was astonishing. The emoting and appeals to nothing other than people’s own egos when confronted with objective facts was truly stunning.

As SG recently added a rule that informally was originally going to be labelled as “The Kurgan Rule” to, erhm, curb yours truly from exposing people’s stupidity to the entire world, (as I did regularly on my currently off-line blog) 1 this post will, as per the rule, leave the people in question’s identifiers anonymous. But to give a sense of the level of absolute idiocy presented, I will reproduce a few of the types of things seen when it started out well-enough, with this comment, which clearly was inflammatory:

To which appeared a superficially reasonable response by a Protestant was made:

I wouldn’t be too confident about that. The Orthodox Church is looking a lot healthier than the Roman Catholic Church at the moment.

Just fight the satanics no matter what they call themselves. It’s no harder for them to call themselves “Catholics” than anything else.

After all, the Novus Orco “clergy” are indeed Satanists, Freemasons, Pedophiles, and none of them are even Catholic, never mind valid clergy. As for the fooled laypeople that are Novus Ordo, or the occasional genuine Novus Orco “priest” that really thinks the Vatican II sect is actually Catholic, they are simply fooled ignorants, guilty of sloth for not actually educating themselves about Catholicism, their professed religion, supposedly.

But nominally, such people are considered actual Catholics. In error, certainly, but at least until they read about Sedevacantism and then ignore it, not necessarily one attributable to them. If they have read this far though, and don’t bother to read up on what Sedevacantism is, and why we have not had a valid Pope since 1958, or why Vatican II is complete heresy, they then are guilty of the sin of sloth.

As I said in the thread, you may THINK you are a Catholic, but if you have no idea what the basic tenets of Catholicism are, and were always, before 1958; if you have no idea what the Code of Canon Law of 1917 is, or why it is of paramount importance; if you have never read the 16 Vatican II documents and compared them with Catholic dogma and understood why 15 of those 16 documents are replete with heresy; then, I ask: how can you actually consider yourself Catholic?

It would be as if I, armed with a cyclist’s shoes and a golfer’s club, wandered onto a basketball court and pretended to be called an NBA player. Without having a single clue as to what the rules of basketball are. Yes, I may have been fooled. Yes, someone perhaps told me that was the correct attire for being an NBA player and all I had to do was show up at court, but am I not responsible for educating myself too? And certainly after someone points out the errors?

This is why I wrote Believe and Reclaiming the Catholic Church and why now hundreds of people have converted, or returned to real Catholicism. The same Catholicism that launched the Crusades and protected Christendom at the siege of Malta with feats of heroism that have remained unmatched for close to a thousand years.

So, ok, fair enough, the average person probably thinks Bergolgio and his Satanic Imps are what “Catholicism” is, even if almost anyone on SG knows better by now, given the barrage of Sedevacantist truth that has been revealed in that place.

The thread then had this comment:

And structures and hierarchies are subverted. Look, it’s not an accident that dogmatic Protestants, Catholics, Orthodox, and atheists all behave in a similar matter. You’re all binary thinkers who put too much faith into human dogma, which is why you all keep making the same type of mistakes over and over again over the course of the centuries.

This is why the Bible talks about the importance of the Holy Spirit and listening to “the still, small voice” rather than “obey the law perfectly or else”. There are many excellent aspects to Roman Catholicism. I have a high regard for it. But it is still a human institution run by men with many rules invented by men, and therefore, like everything else on this planet, fallible and susceptible to subversion.

to which I replied with:

And this is the first time I have a quote from [REDACTED] I can wholly disagree with. With some corollaries.

1. what 99% of people think is the Catholic Church is no such thing. It is a hive of Satanic impostors and has been ruled by same since 1958. The devil, as they say is in the details, and most people, and especially Protestants, have been so utterly dumbed down in matters of history, doctrine and so on that getting them to pay attention for 10 minutes is too hard, never mind them actually looking into it and understanding what a Sedevacantist Catholic is (i.e. an actual Catholic). [REDACTED] gets irritated when people don’t understand what “progeny” means in the US constitution, and that’s even simpler to grasp than basic Catholic dogma (though not by much). So I relate.
2. I believe he understands the difference
3. but I think he writes for the masses.

Continuing from the comment above… the disagreement is that I absolutely believe the Catholic Church (now found only in Sedevacantist clergy and laypeople) was not created by men at all, but by Christ. And its dogmatic principles, are infallible because of it. The fact that:

1. Again, people are mostly idiots and so are incapable of following, reading and understanding the subtleties of Catholic dogma, so they reduce it, simplify it and corrupt it endlessly (which by the way is why and how Protestantism took such a hold, it is a ridiculous oversimplification of the Catholic reality it spawned from in horribly mutated form).
2. Church dogma is divided between unchanging divine laws and mutable human ones.
3. The Satanist that are impersonating the clergy of the Catholic Church intentionally lie, corrupt, and twist everything, and have done so for 250 years in a concentrated effort to destroy the Church.
4. Bad men exist and always will in even the real Church.

in no way invalidates Church infallibility.

You do, of course, need to SEEK. And more than just a little bit perfunctorily. And we all know reading is hard and logic burns the brains and basic comprehension is like violence to the weak, and so on and on. But just like your average peasant 300 years ago, or your average knight 500 years ago was a man that would do things that would break most men today after a week, the same degradation of thinking, logic, faith and cogent thought has occurred. So the present state of affairs is as it is. Reminiscent of the Radioactive Wastelands of the Cursed Earth of 2000 AD comics.

Lastly, of course, the fake “Catholic Church” known as Novus Ordo (Orco by me) is an absolutely Satanic thing which is why I wrote Reclaiming the Catholic Church. And it comes as no surprise they traffic in children, refugees, and whatever other thing Satanists get up to. But, properly speaking they are not Catholic at all.
Just as if I call you a cannibal pigmy and then accuse you of doing the things evil cannibal pigmies do, you are no more at fault than I am for you thinking I am a Novus Orco “Catholic”.

And by now, I think almost everyone on SG knows the divergence between an actual Catholic (Sede) and a Satanist wearing a Popehat.

Yes it was a wall of text, but I always try to ensure I am not leaving out too many dots to connect, as I often do this without meaning to, as many things I find obvious appear to be opaque to many.

Anyway, my wall of text was responded to thusly:

“Actual Catholicism is not anything like what you have been taught to think it is.”
Neither is true Protestantism.

To which I replied:

pity is no one ever will know what “true Protestantism” is. Because it’s whatever each individual wants it to be. The Dogma and rules of catholicism on the other hand have all been written down for 2000 years and then also compiled and encoded in one document. No other religion can say that. And no other religion can claim those rules not only work, but have worked every time they were followed, for 2 millennia.

And now the retardation began, and soon it grew to an avalanche.

Every religion thinks it has real wisdom cornered. Instead, Christ asked us to treat all those who believe in Him as brothers. Since no man can see into another’s heart, He created that test and boundary. Belief in Him. It’s not complicated.

Which had to be trolled with dialectic objectivity of inescapable quality by me:

two questions:

1. Do demons believe in Jesus Christ being…uh..you know…Jesus Christ?
2. See a problem with your statement yet?

the response from the person who said it wasn’t complicated? Pure retardation of distilled quality:

Absolutely not. Demons NEVER willingly admit they believe in Christ until they are cornered & outed as the enemy. Thank you for asking that question!

Astonishing stupidity, straw-manning and false humility in two short sentences. Who said women can’t multi-task?

The point of course is not whether demons ADMIT it, but rather whether they believe it and know it . To which the answer, of course, is a resounding yes. Which once again proves beyond a doubt that Protestants have the exact same standard to be a Christian as Demons do. Demons believe Christ is in fact who He says He is. If that were enough to bring you to Heaven, then Demons would be in Heaven too. And yes, this isn’t complicated. Not even for a child. But it is apparently way beyond a Protestant’s capacity to do basic logic.

Then a few attempts at reason by more reasonable people:

One thing I’ve not quite understood about Protestantism…
Many claim that the rules of Catholicism are complicated.

But you believe that The Bible… the densest and most significant work in creation with multiple layers of inter-related meaning, inspired by the words of God Himself, originally written in multiple ancient languages, can be picked-up by the average person, and without any authority to help you interpret it, has a meaning which is pretty straight-forward for the average person to pickup and understand?

And another:

Institutions of men are fallible in the sense that they are subject to corruption and confusion, but not that they are necessarily corrupt or confused.

The retard chimes back in:

Perhaps your concept of God is too small. He wrote it for everybody. That being said, every Christian church has leaders and experts to go to for help and clarification. Both points co-exist: Bible is for everybody, experts r welcome.

And so she then gets promptly and politely owned.

But here is the obvious problem… it demonstrably isn’t written in such a way that everyone will reach the same, essential conclusions about it. That’s why you can take “experts” from dozens of different Protestant denominations – people who have done a truly impressive level of study – and these various people will give not only different, but truly incompatible versions of what the Bible really means and how we should truly be good Christians.

I suppose for a Protestant this answer may seem crude, but to us Catholics when the question has been: “what is the simple criteria”? The answer has always been: look for the Church of Christ and following the teaching of the authorities that He established.

Rejoining with my earlier comment, I get accused of doing something I absolutely did not do, using my own quote, which note, has air-quotes on it for all to see:

no one ever will know what “true Protestantism” is.

That’s because there is no such thing. We know what a Methodist is. We know what a Baptist is. But all you’re offering there is meaningless rhetoric.

“No one will ever know what a true animal is, because a tiger is different than a duck.”

And of course I replied to that:

I didn’t come up with the meaningless phrase “true Protestantism”. [RETARDED PROTESTANT] did. Which is why I put it in inverted commas. I’m not the one coming up with meaningless rhetoric. Protestants are.
The point being that between the 40,000 denominations there is no agreement whatever as to what a “christian” even is.
There are about 800 million Protestants and as many versions of “Christianity” from them, which logically means their religion (whichever of the 800 million versions you pick) simply cannot be the salvific version of anything. If it were then everyone gets saved, which from an actual Christian perspective (or even just basic justice) is nonsensical.
Fake Catholicism is just as bad of course.
Actual Catholicism and actual Catholics on the other hand have a very clear, simple enough to follow religion with very clear rules that have consistently made life better for any society that adopted them.

Which ended that little side-thread apparently, but here are some others that went from mild to truly astonishing:

“if you don’t know what the code of Canon Law of 1917 is, if you have never read the 16 documents of Vatican II and if you don’t know why these two things matter, along with some basic tenets of your purported faith, then why do you think you actually ARE Catholic?”

Christianity is not knowing the details of the Law. Neither the thief on the cross nor the Ethiopian knew any of those things, and I doubt very much that Jesus will deny either of them.

I understand the sentiment. The basic premise being that it is obviously not necessary to read the entirety of the Code of Canon Law to be a decent Catholic. Which is true. But that is the case as long as you accept the infallible magisterium of the church. 2

If you do not, or if you want to understand WHY the Church has this or that rule, then there is certainly enough information and logic and reason, based on Roman Law, the most complete, fair and just system of laws for humans ever devised, 3 for you to research it to your heart’s content. This would require reading the Bible, or also the Code of canon Law of 1917 or even the references in it that lead directly to one or more of the documents or papal encyclicals that the Catholic Church has archived as part of the infallible magisterium of the Church.

In short, if you accept the rules, fine, just do as you are told by a decent priest or bishop and you don’t even have to know how to read. Knowing the Credo, Ave Maria, Our Father, maybe the Gloria, and attending the sacraments of Baptism, Holy Mass, Confession, Confirmation, Marriage, last rites, and Holy Orders where relevant, is all that millions and millions of illiterate peasants throughout the ages required, and they formed perfectly decent societies.

As for the comment on the thief on the Cross and the Ethiopian, again, Catholicism has detailed reasons for this. Because once again: Reason and logic. The Thief on the Cross going to heaven without having been baptised is accepted under the concept of baptism by desire, which is that exceedingly rare occasion whereby a person who truly did want to become catholic, dies before having the chance to be baptised. not because he stopped for a beer or a week on holiday to suntan, but because he literally dies before he gets to it. Catholics understand that there is an external appearance to things and an internal intent, of which only God knows the truth. And the thief on the cross, because Jesus explicitly said so, is proof that the internal forum, if truly earnest and true, can make one achieve salvation. And the Ethiopian of course actually received instruction by Phillip before choosing to be baptised, so not even really applicable. The point remains the same: It’s not necessary to be a doctor of the Church to be a good Catholic.

But to go from this to saying that no rules at all are required for salvation, is, of course, idiotic.

And yet… as we will see… prevalent among protestants. Behold:

“These disagreements range from the nature of Christ Himself, to the rules for attaining or losing salvation, to the exact nature and cure for sin, to how we as Christians should regard ourselves as a community.”

None of those things are essentials. Either Jesus will deny you on the day or he will not. That’s the only essential.

It’s a silly sentence.

It’s like saying: Whether you follow the rules of the road or not is not essential. On the day you will either get a fine or not.

Duh.

And what, pray tell, might get you fined? Oh, oh, I know! How about NOT FOLLOWING THE RULES?

This is really not difficult.

Well. Unless you’re a Protestant apparently. The Catholic interlocutor replied:

but will all due respect, that wasn’t my argument. I didn’t make an appeal to the need for everyone to be right about everything.

The argument is that there is demonstrable and consistent disagreement about the essentials. You have claimed that the list of doctrines I gave are non-essential, but whether they are essential parts of belief or not is itself therefore something that Christians disagree about.

You then claimed, “Either Jesus will deny you on the day or he will not. That’s the only essential.”, but is it not essential for us to know what we need to believe or do so that He will accept us?

For example, with the exception of cases in which it is genuinely impossible, is it necessary for a Christian to receive water baptism?

The astonishing response from a different but very retarded Protestant?

“but is it not essential for us to know what we need to believe or do so that He will accept us?”
Answer: NOPE.

So, we have final proof here that Protestants literally believe that all you need to do to be saved is:

1. Believe in Jesus Christ (demons do so as well)
2. Do whatever you want. No rules at all need be followed, known or understood. (Again, do as thou will shall be all of the law. Satanic.)

And more:

“You then claimed, “Either Jesus will deny you on the day or he will not. That’s the only essential.”, but is it not essential for us to know what we need to believe or do so that He will accept us?

Obviously not. The Bible specifically states that many who believe they were Christians who did what they were told will be rejected. Matthew 7:22-23.

Let’s look at Matthew 7:22-23 shall we?

²² Many will say to me in that day: Lord, Lord, have not we prophesied in thy name, and cast out devils in thy name, and done many miracles in thy name?

²³ And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, you that work iniquity.

Apparently, Protestants are too dense to even imagine this may apply precisely to them. Because you know… they profess to be Christians, but don’t actually follow any of the rules of it?

Such an astonishing display of complete lack of reasoning capacity can only mean that either:

1. Protestants are genuinely so brainwashed, or stupid and arrogant as to believe literally no rules need apply to them other than to have the same level of “belief” as demons do, or,
2. They are like Muslims, and believe Allah will do whatever he will do, for reasons completely unfathomable to anyone but himself, and he will condemn/save who he will, for totally inscrutable reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with your behaviour on Earth at all.

Either way it a pretty bold move to assert that no rules at all apply to your membership for Christianity, not to say, so retarded as to actually stun you for a moment with the abject stupidity of it.

I truly wonder what possible reason Protestants think may apply to those who Jesus rejects, if not their simply not doing as per his Will in order to be saved.

Which, you know, might include just a little bit more than saying “I believe Jesus is Jesus”.

Is baptism even required to be a Christian, according to Protestants?

For example, with the exception of cases in which it is genuinely impossible, is it necessary for a Christian to receive water baptism?

I doubt it. But I don’t pretend to actually know.

Apparently not! Although he does admit he is not 100% sure.

Appeals to the Bible (you know, their sola scripture that they changed and never put together to begin with?) were ignored:

As far as water baptism goes, it’s commanded by Christ, St. Peter, Phillip, and the whole Early Church. Simple.

Once again, selectively quoting of a random Bible verse that may as well read: Protestants will be rejected, is used as “proof” that no rules are required for salvation, but quotes that specifically state baptism is required only get a “probably not actually required” comment.

Protestantism: Perhaps the best proof of professor Cipolla’s First Law of Human Stupidity (and the other four too) you can find anywhere.

***

So that’s what level of reason and logic we may have to work with when helping any Protestant see some basic facts and logic. It’s a pretty tiny sliver of a hint, of a shadow of a gap, by which one might, with enormous luck or divine Grace, begin to try and shine some light, or basic common sense into the gap. It’s possible because I personally know various protestants that have (after many such lengthy threads on various social media or discussions in person, or reading one of my books) come round and declared themselves properly Catholic.

One such quite touching and awesome example is by this gentleman, who if anyone had hurdles to conversion, he definitely had, his Protestant Pastor father having been killed by militant Muslims before he was born. And yet, guided by logic, reason and divine Grace, he has made the shift.

I told you this was gonna be long, but I hope it was at least entertaining, and with a bit of Divine Grace, who knows, maybe even helpful.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here