Welcome to The Blog of the Kurgan

My understanding of the human mind and how it works, without any false modesty, is far beyond what even supposed experts in the field are aware of.

This is because of a fortuitous and rather unique blend of skills has come together in three aspects that all shed an incredible amount of insight into the human psyche individually, but when combined reach a level of synergistic understanding that is superior to any I have yet encountered in pretty much anyone else from doctors to hypnotists or therapists.

The blend is due to:

Martial arts – which reshapes your psyche through forcing your body to undergo various actions, and also allows your body to perform certain feats you may have thought impossible by adjusting your mental perspective.

Hypnosis Skill – in order to be a good hypnotist you really need to grasp mastery of various things, among which the use of language, empathy, observation, and various other perceptual modes of both receiving as well as transmitting information.

Research – having been a voracious reader since early childhood, I have consumed a lot of material in spheres of knowledge that while initially might seem unrelated, are in fact connective and synergistically linked to the understanding of the human mind. These topics include physics (and astronomy within it), neurology, (some emphasis on Asperger’s and autism), elements of genetics and more specifically the work of McCraty, Garajev and Aspden but also Burkhardt Heim and Kozyrev. Incidentally, on that basis, it’s why I don’t rate Chris Langan’s CTMU theory at all. It really says nothing new and couches it in neologisms for the purpose of obscurantism to look more “mysterious” or “difficult to understand because I’m so smart”.

Blending those three skills together has given me insights into how human minds work at both the individual as well as the general or group level that no one I am aware of has published yet. Though some have alluded to pieces of it here and there, in neurology works mostly, it seems none have combined all the parts I have as of yet. You can get a taste of it in this article on the mind I wrote a while back, but today I want to explain a phenomenon that is rather pervasive and to which honestly, no one has found a real answer, and it is this:

How pornography gets used to push various political agendas and what to do about it.

Explaining the first part is easy enough and most people should be able to follow the concepts I will mention here below, but no one has yet found an effective method to counter this sort of brainwashing. I may, however, have done so, which is what I will explain at the end, though it is first necessary to understand the issue of how pornography is being used to brainwash you properly, for the solution to it to work.

How it Works: Part I – The Neurology

In essence, any habit is the result of repetition and the formation of an imprint in your brainmap to one extent or other. The habit of using a fork in your left hand for example is a subtle one that will form over the years so that as an adult, if you’re right handed, you will generally use a fork with your left hand. And a certain level of brainmap will be formed to be predisposed to a certain degree to use the fork in your left when using both fork and knife. This type of behaviour forms gently over time and mostly as a result of almost entirely unconscious mechanisms rooted almost entirely on repetition.

Other habits however, can and do form with a different mechanism: fetishes.

A strong or very strong emotional event can result in the formation of a type of trauma that the mind the unconsciously seeks out for mostly one of two reasons:

An unconscious desire to repeat the trauma in such a way that it becomes “accepted” or “healed” in a way that is deemed “safe” by the unconscious, or, a semi-conscious desire to repeat the pleasure experienced by the emotionally significant event.

In the first instance is broadly speaking the reason as to why people who suffered a certain type of trauma as children from one or both of their primary caretakers or parents can go through life ending up in relationships with people that repeat that same traumatic pattern of behaviour to some degree or other.

In the second instance, you have the root of addiction and fetishising behaviour.

Every human being of normal neurology is wired this way, so your conscious dismissal of any of the above as not being applicable to you is only self-deception.

The best anyone can achieve is a conscious awareness of their brainmap patterns of their most habitual behaviours and a conscious adjusting of them towards behaviours that are generally positive or at least not destructive to self-or others.

Incidentally, this way in which the mind works is why sexual abuse of children is such a horrific trauma, that usually has some effects that last decades or even a whole lifetime. Sex and sexual urges, sexual emotions and their related intensity are so strong that usually the first sexual experiences immediately form what is known as a SEE: Significant Emotional Event.

The traumatic experience of a rape at a young age, prior to any normalised sexual experience, perhaps compounded by something like incest, causes a massive SEE in the victim, tied to extremely powerful aspects of the human condition, since sex is literally linked to our survival as a species, and as such is wired in well below any conscious aspects of our psyche.

This is why homosexual rape of children often leads to homosexual behaviour in the victim later in life, as well as an increased propensity for sexually molesting children, as statistics on this matter have consistently demonstrated around the world for many decades.

There is a reason that in Catholic dogma, regardless of your appreciation of the Christian religion or not, it is stated that the devil snares the most souls through “the sins of the flesh”.

The sexual impulse is literally driven by the most fundamental part of our brain, right down to whatever primeval, protozoic level of regression of humanity, or even life in general you assume might be at our origin. Every living organism has this instinct for procreation.

It is therefore a virtual certainty that if you can link certain types of behaviour to the sexual impulse, regardless of how twisted, there is a good chance that it becomes a compulsive activity on the part of the target.

How it Works: Part II – The Political element of it

It is unfortunately necessary to delve into some graphic explanations of how the fact that your neurology is hard-wired to the sexual impulse affects behaviour. A few examples can be used as a general way to explain the concept, but the list is essentially endless. We will be focusing on the political element of these subversive behaviours, so that the connection is easy to see.

Example 1: It has been demonstrated, even if not widely discussed that being subjected to sexual abuse consistently over time, can rewire your sexual preference. I have read personal stories as well as some clinical reports on the effects of rape on males within the prison system. particularly of repeated rape on a subject over the time of his incarceration. These men, usually due to being physically weaker, get used as sexual release by other inmates, usually forcibly and often with injuries. over time, since the rapes will happen regardless, these men acquiesce to reduce the physical damage they suffer. after months or years of this behaviour, even when they are released from prison, they often cannot have normal heterosexual relations anymore and they can only become aroused physically by being penetrated, sometimes exclusively by other men, all while still being in internal anguish about it.

Example 2: As various types of pornography get consumed, just as with all addictions, the necessary stimulus to get the relevant release of brain chemicals that make the addiction initially pleasant need to be increased as the body adapts to the original stimulus and requires higher doses of transgression to achieve the same chemical release of hormones that produce the pleasing effect. Over time, this will tend to lead people to increasingly extreme versions of pornography. Eventually, straightforward heterosexual coupling between a man and woman will not suffice and increasingly perverse mutations of the sex act will be indulged into. Eventually, even the heterosexual barrier may begin to be breached, until finally the target can only receive the same “high” only from increasingly disordered aspects of sex. While example 1 above is easier to understand given the very physical and “in the flesh” effects that are forced on someone, in a sense, the same is true of just viewing pornography too, as a person becomes increasingly desensitised and reaches for more intense transgressions. In order to stimulate the same effect of pleasure, their own imagination, out of control in the chase for ever stronger emotions, in order to provide the dopamine, serotonin and whatever other chemical in the brain causes the sought for pleasure sensation, effectively “brutalises” their own nervous system to the point that their imaginations will even begin to implant thoughts that normally or “in reality” or “in the flesh” such people would not normally have thought of ever doing. over time, however, this dependency can and often will, eventually lead down the path of beginning to “experiment” in reality to chase the imagined taboo that gives them the chemical hit their brain is addicted to.

Example 3: While the above examples are pretty direct and obvious, it is the subtler versions of the degeneration of sensitivity to pornographic imagery that is most pervasive. Just like using the fork with your left hand is something almost no one ever thinks about consciously as a formed habit, the constant exposure to half-naked and scantily clad women, all chasing the idealised supermodel look, will tend to reduce both men and women to normalising the look, and subsequently the behaviours that go along with the constantly propagandised issue of how “hot” people behave with each other at every opportunity they get. The normalisation of homosexual sex scenes in almost every film and series on Netflix for example means that when some of those intrusive thoughts from pornography over-use start to show up, they are already to some extent normalised in wider society. A walk on any beach in Italy in summer today, would have resulted in almost the entire female population of the beach to be arrested a mere 70 years ago. Many bathing costumes today leave really nothing to the imagination, and in so doing, degrade the “thrill” one might have got from simply kissing, or beginning to undress with a prospective romantic partner. The idea of a lifelong companion with which to raise children has already been replaced with the idea of a “hot” person that fulfils our sexual and financial and social desires, mostly also in terms of external validation rather than internal validation. In fact, the very concept of being an internally validated and motivated person is so taboo to the powers that wants to control humanity, that they are literally banning the very concept of it. This is why such terms as “toxic masculinity” were invented, and other words, like “Sigma” are currently being “banned” in schools. Since Sigma is the very definition of a man that ignores the pervasive social order in favour of his own ideas, ideals and aims. In other words, the epitome of a self-validated and motivated person, instead of one moulded by social expectations and social validation, which are external and far less under his ability to control.

Given the above examples and understanding of the related neurology, it now becomes easier to see how pornography in general is designed to reduce the ability of human beings to form nuclear families.

The primary instinct to procreate is perverted into a purely hedonistic and selfish act, discarding the original nature-driven imperative fo the continuation of the species to pair-bond for life and raise multiple children. In that regard then, we can even identify specific “branches” of this agenda, in everything from “normal” TV shows and adverts, all the way to the type of pornography that is being produced and provided for free around the world. A short bullet-point list should suffice.

• Increasing Homosexuality – Reducing resistance to unnatural sexual activity
• Increasing group sex pornography – Reducing modesty at all levels. Allowing sex to become an almost public activity.
• Increasing interracial sex pornography – Activating a certain element of the taboo that is exciting on the one hand, because at an instinctual level our biology responds to this from the evolutionary perspective of “an other” being interacted with in a way that biologically has been “forbidden” for most of the tribal existence of human beings, while being normalised on the other hand in everyday social aspect, since any kind of racism or perception of it is considered unacceptable today. The net effect is also of creating a “blended” people that have no real solid connection to any ancestral history, and who absent this are also more easily driven to accept current social narratives.
• Increasing pornography in general – Reduces resistance to sexual immorality in general
• Increasing pornography of multiple men with one woman and/or the storyline of adulterous women copulating with men outside of their marriage or primary relationship – Reduces the general resistance by women to behave in such ways, and in men against accepting such behaviour from women. Leading to swinging, cuckoldry and so on, which of course, reduce the viability of nuclear families.

The Effects

In a concise format, the effect tis ultimately one of reducing the very bedrock of functional societies: The traditional nuclear family where the man and woman stay together for their entire lives and work through whatever marital difficulties, regardless of their nature.

The fact is that even if a person might be peripherally aware of these issues, if they are addicted to these various forms of pornography, it is likely that they will affect their actual trajectory in life. Making them that much less likely to form functional and stable nuclear families.

The Solution

There are various ways in which people, young men in particular, have or are trying to overcome these issues. I have probably been contacted for help in this area by young men, usually through a combination of hypnosis and conversation more than any other issue. Which should speak volumes since in general, more or less normally heterosexual men are extremely resistant to wanting to discus the topic of masturbation with other men. And yet, enough of them feel this is an issue that is important —even if they are not necessarily aware of all the details I may have identified in this post— that they overcome this sense of shame and guilt, enough to get in touch and try reach a healthier state of mind.

Hypnosis and discussing the issue and the triggers of it can be helpful of course. Other methods like forced aversion therapy and so on, tend to often not be as useful and in fact can lead to other issues, some making the situation worse than the original problem.

In my opinion, the solution ultimately comes from the usual source: a very deep sense of self-knowledge, rooted in what we really are, and also what we really are committed to becoming. That alone, however, relies primarily on the conscious willpower of an individual, and this aspect of life has been one of the main targets for destruction by the people of the Lie for millennia, but at a pace that is like achieving faster than light travel in the last 70 years or so.

What I have found helps most of all is a full realisation that your specific addiction, is not exclusively your own doing. Of course, you certainly made the decisions and took the misguided actions that led you to whatever level of addiction, disordered sexuality or damaged ability to pair-bond for life you are at, but… it was a trap laid out for you.

It is an intentional and conscious plan to affect you that way. To make you the slave of whatever sexual gratification and consequential ability to be a proper father (or mother, as the case may be) and husband (or wife) for life.

The specific traps laid out for men in this regard (generally more visual and direct) differ from the ones laid out for women (generally subtler and not directly obviously linked to sex), but make no mistake that the objective is the total destruction of the nuclear family and the stable society composed of nuclear families achieves.

And specifically, the thing that is aimed at being destroyed most of all is the European style nuclear family that was made the primary constituent of society by the Catholic Church.

You may not like it, but it remains a fact that only the Catholic Church made it clear that marriage was for life, divorce never an option, and the purpose of it was the creation of children, and therefore the very concept of contraception was an abomination, to say nothing of the mass murder that we have today as a result of abortion.

Hopefully, as a result of this post you may now be not just somewhat aware of the fact that these traps are created for you on purpose, but you might finally have begun to become laser-focused on the reality of this agenda.

As to WHY there is such an agenda, and by WHOM it is put in place, that is a topic we will need to address in a future post in a generic sense, and in several subsequent posts in the more detailed version.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I had a very interesting exchange with a friend regarding Roman Law, and an equally insightful question by a reader that was posted in all humility. I had already thought of writing on this, since it has become absolutely clear that the average person, especially if English-speaking, has got not only no clue, but also no direct experience of the intrinsic superiority of Roman Law when compared to any other legal system found on Earth; ever.

It sounds like a fantastic boast doesn’t it? Well it is not, and hopeless though the attempt is when dealing with people who are only swayed by their emotions, and not the objective facts, I hop to at least help those who can reason, to see something that they probably have been unaware of, and which, in fairness, has been kept from them by the same forces that would love to have you believe a man can get pregnant.

Allow me to share the conversation I had, as I hope you find it a good starting point to begin to see the issue. I’m the writing in the green bubbles.

* Side note, for those of you that think I am a horrible racist of some kind, please note it extends to my own fellow supposed countrymen, the wops. In reality, of course, I am not Italian at all, being Venetian, and we Venetians are not wops. Of course. The correct slur for us is Dagos. Don’t say I don’t teach you guys something cool every day.

As I have been telling you all since at least 2011 officially, which is when my book on the Russian Martial System I trained and taught for several years came out, the baseline bedrock principle for any man is simply what the oracle at Delphi said millennia ago already: Man – Know Thyself.

Which I modified slightly to: Know (for) Yourself.

Meaning, both know yourself and also find things out for yourself. Don’t take my word for anything, go ahead and check. And check other stuff you took for granted since you were born. My suggestion is start looking into the Catholic Church’s REAL beliefs prior to 1958 and then compare them to Vatican II.

Then if you want to flex your veracity radar, look into the origins of WWI and even more so WWII. And a LOT of the “accepted truth” of what actually happened in that war and who did what to whom.

But for now let me continue sharing the conversation I had with my friend.

There was one more message from me here where I stated that over time, Protestantism shifted from a few (serious) doctrinal errors, all the way to the demonic nonsense it is today, with transgender “Bishops”, 40,000 denominations, and Atheist Lesbians pretending to be Priests, and more abominations and blasphemies of Christianity than you can shake a stick at.

Now, without the background I have with my friend, you might be more inclined to think I am just some zealot shouting at clouds that Catholicism is the best and only true Christianity because I am some unhinged and brainwashed Catholic.

Well… those of you who know me and my story would be aware that I had rejected Catholicism from about age 7 to age 42 entirely and it was only a Road to Damascus moment that made me aware God was real and God was Love, but NOT that God was necessarily best seen through the lens of Catholicism. What my metaphorical fall from the horse did was make me aware that God was definitely best described by the Christian tradition, but which one of those it was took a little longer. I shifted from Deism quickly to general Christianity, discarding Protestantism because it is simply utterly nonsensical and illogical from top to bottom and have no credibility at all to anyone who is not brainwashed into it from birth or mentally handicapped. Literally children can figure it out that Protestantism is nonsense, so that was discarded in a matter of hours. Originally I thought Easter “Orthodoxy” might be the closest to the truth. It didn’t seem as filled with pedophiles and weak “men” as “Catholicism” even if the theology of it was weak and a lot of things that could be reasoned out were swept under the carpet of “It’s a Mystery”.

In fact, only Catholicism seemed to provide the most logical, sensible and accurate facts, though there were obvious flaws. And I could not reconcile these until I read the Code of Canon Law of 1917 and came across Canon 188 part 4. At that point I realised that what most people think is the Catholic Church is no such thing. It is an impostor Church that has usurped the real one almost entirely and deprived us of a valid Pope since 1958. Realising I could not be the only one to have figured this out from first principles, I started to look online for anything related to Canon 188 part 4. And it was then I discovered Sedevacantism.

Since then I studied obsessively (as I tend to do when I find something worthwhile) and publish two books on the topic of Catholicism Vs. Everything else.

BELIEVE! REAL CHRISTIANITY TAKING CHRISTENDOM BACK: A Reply to the Pederast Infested Vatican, the Churchians of All Denominations and a Manual for Atheists, Agnostics and Would-be Pagans , is a short book that only takes a couple of hours to read, is written in a style unlike any theology book you have ever read (as you may have guessed from the title) and has helped a LOT of people into returning to proper Catholicism. From Atheist to Agnostics and Protestants and Novus Ordo “Catholics”, entire families have now started attending Churches that are actually Catholic. Which you can find here: luxvera.org

RECLAIMING THE CATHOLIC CHURCH: The True History of Vatican II and the Visible Remnant of the Real Catholic Church now that the Vatican is a Pederast Infested Hive of Impostors, on the other hand is some 530 pages of detailed information that explains exactly why the Novus Ordo “Church” is really a Satanic sect pretending to be Catholic, takes you through in detail, all of the heresies of Vatican II and how it came about, and answers literally every single objection that has ever been raised about Sedevacantism, so that the sophists and liars that keep talking such nonsense in the hope of confusing people have nothing left that has not been demonstrated to be a false issue.

Despite this, I keep encountering genuine people, intelligent people, that still seem to be stumped by some of the lies that keep getting promulgated by the sophists, the liars and the enemies of truth.

It is only recently that I realise that the root of this is not, as I had assumed just due to stupidity (though, let’s never forget Professor Cipolla, who in my view should be sanctified!). It was mostly due to people’s learned helplessness when it comes to doing correct logic in the context of human affairs.

And I realise now a couple of things:

1. It is the rare person raised in Anglo-Zeitgeist that has any experience in performing good logic in relation to human beings and their behaviours. The emphasis is on systems. More specifically, the mechanising systems of the Industrial Revolution. The Anglos are better at measuring the efficiency of human beings as if they were cogs in a machine. Production statistics, efficiency of work. Profit margins. The logic of commerce and systems to facilitate and maximise that commerce are all “superior” to the average abilities in those fields you find in countries that were nominally Catholic (Italy, Spain, Portugal, most of South America). The “logic” of the Anglos is depersonalised and not good at all at correctly evaluating human affairs beyond those related to the material world of commerce, profit and mechanising of human beings.
2. The ignorance of the origins of Roman Law and its evolution is pervasive. Even most supposed Catholics are unaware of it, however, Catholics (even the flawed ones that are nominally Novus Ordo) have the momentum of Catholicism for a couple of millennia behind them that has permeated their culture and thus they have instinctively understood some elements of logic as it applies to human being and their interactions with each other in a way that remains generally more human-centric, that is, more favourably in service of human beings instead of the profit motive, or the work efficiency motive, or the materialistic motives.
3. The further lack of knowledge whatsoever of the terrible degradation of Roman Catholic Law into the abomination that is Anglo-Saxon Law, with its obsession on presents modifying the law in the future, is so deep that the average Anglo literally cannot understand what is being said when I point out that Roman Law is based on Principle but that the details of each case are treated uniquely for each case, and the outcomes can be very different even if superficially the cases may look very similar to an external observer. The classic example being that in that abomination of “law” that is the American legal system, people often innocent of a crime will still plead guilty to a lesser charge in order to avoid a trial that has prescribe sentences if found guilty of the charge. Roman Law does not work that way. The situation is investigated and the punishment is doled out depending on the finds of that investigation. Not all robberies are equal, not all murders are either.
4. The Death penalty is dogmatic under Catholicism. Certain crimes absolutely deserve capital punishment, and despite the fact that the secular and freemasonic powers of the current world order have mostly done away with this almost all over the world, the fact remains that logically and humanely, it is simply a matter of justice and human dignity that demands the death penalty must remain a law under certain circumstances.

Aside the specifics of the penal or civil code, allow me then to now show you a pertinent question from a very humble reader:

Sacrificial Lamb

12 hrs ago

I have a question. How should I go about learning about Roman Contract Law? What books should I read? I’ve never studied law before.

[focus on learning the basic principles of logic instead]

I also just acquired a 1929 Douay-Rheims Bible. I’ve only skimmed it, but I’m already seeing subtle differences between this and the 1960 New Catholic Edition of the Holy Bible that I have read. I’ve never read the KJV Bible.

[Given the KJV is the Freemason Bible, that’s a good thing]

I now also have a physical copy of the 1917 Pio-Benedictine Code of Canon Law, but I don’t quite know what to do with it. I’ve only skimmed it. Do I read it?

[Yes. Do. It’s interesting. And when you see how various Codes interact with each other it will become clearer too]

Do I memorize it?

[If you can do that you’re some freak of nature, and I don’t think it’s necessary, but good luck.]

Is the purpose of the book to help us understand Vatican I (pre-Vatican II) Church administration?

[No. The purpose of it is to have ALL the rules and regulations of Catholicism in ONE book, instead of scattered all over various Papal Encyclicals, pronouncements, reasoning of the patristic fathers of the Church or its Saints and Doctors, and so on. Using this code, any situation that may present itself is covered either in positive definition or in the negative absence of it. So for example, there is no maximum time that an interregnum can last, because there is no such limit specified in the Code anywhere. Of course, reading the Code gives you an insight into how Catholicism works, what its rules are, and if you read up on the references too, this becomes even clearer. In this way you will indeed learn the various processes of the rules required foe the running of the Church, but such rules are not divine law and can change, while other rules are rooted in divine law and will never change. For example you can’ become a Catholic by being forced to convert.]

How do the contents of the book affect the lives of ordinary Sedevacantist Catholics?

[They are the rules both the clergy and laypeople, each in their own capacity and within their constraints as either clergy or layman, should live by.]

Or how do the contents of the 1917 Pio-Benedictine Code of Canon Law affect people who do not belong to any specific denomination, but are just searching for truth? [Well, if you are searching for truth, genuinely and honestly, eventually you will find it. Which means eventually you will end up becoming a Sedevacantist Catholic.]

And let me also try to answer it here in a more general sense too.

Learning about Roman Law is probably best done by learning about the Roman codex that was added to and grew over time and learning about the Roman Empire. While this is definitely Roman Law, it was yet quite far from anything I would define as “the best system on Earth”. While Rome remained pagan, the laws they had could be very brutal and even unfair. There was also different rules for Roman Citizens and foreigners. This is why St. Paul, for example, who was a Roman citizen, was decapitated when he was martyred, while St. Peter was crucified (upside down by his own request). Once you are familiar with he concept of how the Romans came to have these set of laws, you need to then immerse yourself in how Catholicism went from 11 scared men to essentially conquering the Roman Empire. Once Catholicism entered the fray, Roman Law changed. The rules that the Romans had did begin on principle and then went to detail, but Catholicism added the humanity, grace, mercy, wisdom, truth and justice that are the foundation of Catholicism to the rules.

Each human being became intrinsically of equal value, regardless of citizenship or ethnicity or much of anything else. It can clearly be seen, for example, in the Papal Encyclical Cum Ex Apostolato Officio, that a heretic was to be shunned and treated as such regardless of if he were the Pope himself (which would no longer be a Pope once he became a heretic, of course), and Emperor, or the lowest janitor.

God does not differentiate on your crime or punishment based on your social status, and neither does the Church or Catholic infused Roman Law.

When I say “Roman Law” I really mean Catholic Roman Law, because I am referring to Roman Law under Catholicism.

In this respect then Catholic Roman Law is what I define as the absolute best system for governing human beings as well as giving them a set of rules and guidelines that is without question the most comprehensively just system of laws and social guidelines for dealing with the flawed humans we are that humanity has ever come up with. There simply is not anything that even comes close in any other system that has ever been tried by human beings on Earth.

Catholic Roman Law is without question the most just system of rules ever devised, precisely because it is ultimately founded on the Divine principles of Catholic dogma and hence as close as humans can get to God’s will.

Throughout the Bible, you see God’s judgements are not like Anglo-Saxon Laws. While there are absolutes (for example, touching the ark of the covenant results in instadeath) the judgement and punishment for apparently similar crimes is unique to each situation. David had a good man, Uriah, be placed in such a position that he would be killed in battle, which happened, just so he could take the man’s wife, Bathsheba. A traitorous, deceitful, murdering, sneaky bastard of a thing to do, without question. [Samuel 2:11].

Yet, David is also described as a man who was after God’s own heart [Acts 13:22].

And he clearly was not punished as would perhaps have been another man who had behaved as David did with Bathsheba. The point her sis not to get lost in the weeds of theological interpretation of these passages in the Old Testament, but rather, to understand that each situation is unique when dealing with human beings and as such the correct, logical, fair and just way to deal with them MUST BE, to begin with principles, but to study each case and judge each situation on its merits.

Anglo-laws still pay SOME lip-service to this under the guise of extenuating circumstances, but it is a far cry from the actual process of using logic and reason based in Divine order to come to the correct justice for people.

Of course, no system is free from possible corruption, abuse or error, given all human beings are flawed, but in principle at least, Roman Law is the best we have.

Take the example of two murderers. One gets condemned to death, the other gets a few months in prison, or perhaps just an admonition. How can this be?

Let’s say one murderer beats an old man to death in order to steal his pension, while the other murderer beats to death an old man who had raped his toddler son.

The method of the murder is the same. And let’s say also the level of premeditation is the same. Both men lay in wait for their victim so as to perpetuate the murder.

What are they actually guilty of? Is it the same in both instances? An Anglo reader, even if possessed of an instinctive sense of justice will say the second man had “extenuating circumstances” but is unlikely to be able to justify a lesser punishment for the father of the toddler on sound logical and legal grounds. It’ mostly just a “feeling”, right?

A Catholic that has any basic knowledge of Roman Law, on the other hand will be able to instantly see the issue.

Man number one perpetrated a homicide that was absolutely premeditated, and was done out of pure malice. Even if one might say you can’t be CERTAIN of the intent to murder since whether he MEANT to kill the old man or not, his violent actions resulted in the death of the man, the point is immaterial. Once you cross the line of breaking the law and then something goes horribly wrong, like you kill a guy by “accident” when you only meant to injure or cripple him, it really doesn’t matter in an instance like this, because the initial act was premeditated and unlawful. You have taken a life and capital punishment absolutely applies.

Now let’s look at man number two, what is he actually guilty of? Is it murder? Actually, no. The old man that raped his toddler son would in any case have been put to death. That is the appropriate punishment for such an act. So the father is not really guilty of murder, since the old man really signed his own death warrant by his actions. However, the father intentionally and premeditatedly, denied the due process of law by taking the law in his own hands. He is guilty of a crime that can be labelled in different ways but we could call it “Perverting the course of justice.” It would be a bad thing in general for people to get the idea they can simply mete out the punishment that is due or that would be due under a proper process of law. Primarily because people are pretty dumb and emotional creatures and have little capacity to be objective and fair when they are hurt deeply.

So the father of the boy does need to be punished if for no other reason so that the other citizens realise that becoming a vigilante is generally a bad idea for society in general. The fiction here is that this assumes that any system of law would actually deliver perfect justice in each case. Which is probably why the father of the boy took this action. but that in itself is not reason enough to excuse his actions.

So now it depends on the evidence that the old man definitely would have been put to death for his crime. But let’s say that there is video of the old man’s crime as well as reliable witnesses and this is now beyond any doubt.

Next we need to look at how the father killed the guy. was it one punch to the head and the old man fell and died? Or did the father kidnap the old man, put him in a cellar and beat him to death over three days using a rubber hose as a whip?

If it was the first, he might get away with a caution if I was judge. Because fully cognisant that the law can be imperfect, but given the overwhelming evidence of the crime the old man did, I’d understand the father’s wish to ensure that the right punishment was meted out. And since we can’t be CERTAIN he meant to kill the old man, that one punch and done could be ruled an accident. And the “crime” of vigilantism, understood as pretty negligible in the scheme of things. And a light or even absent sentence sends a message to the wider community too. Yeah the law is imperfect sometimes…. and we’re likely to make sure it’s MORE imperfect when you rape little kids.

On the other hand, if he’d kept the old man in a cellar for three days, this complicates things. The “crime” of taking the law into his own hands and thus shall we say “besmirching” the law, is more grievous. So he must be punished for that. And probably have some kind of psychiatric evaluation too. Because doing that kind of thing is not really normal for MOST people. Though it is perfectly normal for a few types of people. So I wold not want to label such a man as mentally unhealthy, but I would prescribe some kind of therapy that would have zero bearing on his sentence and not be able to be used in the future to add to any further crimes he may commit under the guise that he is “unbalanced”. In short, it would be mandated purely for his own benefit and be sealed sessions the contents of which would remain only between him and the therapist (or priest, which I would consider an adequate alternative if the man was Catholic). Aside that, I would also mandate some community service for say six months, in a capacity that would bring him into contact with some physical work as well as helping a sector of the population that needs it.

The reasoning would be that he influenced society negatively by his extreme for of vigilantism, but no one would be made better by him rotting in jail for six months. Instead with mandated therapy he might get some help or at least get a few thoughts off his chest in safety, and his community service would counter-balance any negative effects on society he caused, by providing a net positive.

By describing this hypothetical in some detail, I hope to have shown that the concept is based on reason and logic, not emotions or vague legalistic loopholes that are really just flawed in terms of justice and logic.

In brief then remember, when it comes to human beings (and not just in relation to crime and punishment) reason, logic and the application of it on the basis of principle being imperative, but details and circumstances leading to the conclusions that are available under that overarching principle is the way to be.

If you know yourself, are honest, and can do logic, then Roman Catholic Law will come naturally to you. If any one of those ingredients is shaky, then it will not.

I truly hope this post helps at least a few of you to get the idea.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Look, don’t get me wrong, I have nothing per se against Americans in general. Each nation has their good and bad sides, but the Americans have the unenviable “first” of being a nation that was created by Freemasons, both internally (the various “founding fathers” and presidents up to the present day) and externally (the money for the rebellion came from France, bankrupting it and getting the King and his consort behaved for listening to the “advice” of their closest advisors.

And being vastly wealthy, and with a system of legality that is absolutely Satanic, with a mere veneer of “law and order” it is only natural that the average American is completely oblivious of the financial origins of their war of independence, of the fact Freemasons are actually Satanists, not “brotherhood of man good guys”, and that they are fed a constant drip of lies in the media and poison in their food and medical “care”.

My previous post wasn’t really even about Catholicism, but rather the very CONCEPT of humane, correct, logica, just , justice. And of course the morons all felt they had found the cart to attack with flaming idiocy while they ululated insanity and loserman vibes.

So they got banned permanently. I’m not a big warning guy, or ask questions first type. And the couple of comments that were not banned and remain leave the impression of there having been serious head trauma in both those authors’ pasts.

It’s amusing because the commenters literally demonstrate they have no idea what the point of the post is. They ass-u-me that it’s me just saying Catholics are better than everyone else, and it isn’t that at all. In this case I was simply saying the CONCEPT and the REALITY of how Roman Law works is BETTER that the concept and reality of pretty much all other systems we have tried under the sun.

So let me be clear, that is what I was saying.

I will now here add, that since Roman Law is indeed the supreme legal system for Human beings, the Catholic Church, naturally, adapted it and improved the original version from the Pagan Romans, adding in a few concepts of baseline logic the Romans had anyway but were more clearly evidenced in Catholicism, given that Divine Law if perfectly logical. And this, among the fact that the religion is true, DOES make Catholicism infinitely superior to Protestantism, of which Vatican II Novus Ordo heretical fake “Church” is just the latest iteration of the endless ruin and Satanism that anything that pretends to be “the One True Religion” inevitably is, since —like with my nickname— there can be only one.

And your “denominationless denomination” number 38,792 is just not it.

And now we can wait for the seething comments of those too stupid to read and understand that they will be banned without a second’s hesitation if you blaspheme, make strawman attacks, or lie about what was said, or just troll moronically. Disagree all you like, but DO YOUR HOMEWORK. If you make an “argument” that has already been debunked for a few centuries and then you don’t even know read the proof of that in the post itself and make some idiotic comment like “Catholics worship Mary”, well… Sayonara sunshine!

I hope I have been clear. You’re not getting banned here because it’s an eco chamber. You get banned here because you acted like an irredeemable idiot.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

In my recent video chat with Peter of Two-Cities Podcast, I was correctly chastised by a viewer because I tended to interrupt Peter and go on a bit about this or that principle of Catholic dogma. This was not based on my ego, etc, as can be seen in other interviews where I am happy to let the other person answer at length and I don’t interrupt at all. I was aware while doing the livestream that this was happening, but my intent was to prevent Peter from going too far down an erroneous rabbit hole.

That is, for example, there is quite a common idea in “traditional” circles of Catholicism that if you no longer have valid Cardinals you can’t vote a Pope in. This stems from the fact that in the Code of Canon Law it states various things about Cardinals being able to vote in a new Pope etc.

The typical Anglo-Saxon mind, marinated in Anglo-Saxon version of legalese, interpret this to say if you have no Cardinals you have no ability to vote in a Pope.

In this instance, the error is one of doctrine and dogma. If you are not aware that the rules concerning Cardinals are merely ecclesiastical rules, that is, rules for the smooth running of the Church as a whole, in other words, human rules, and you assume that all rules in Canon Law have equal weight, then you will not understand that Ecclesiastical or human rules can change, but they can never invalidate Divine dogma or rules. And since in the past people who were not even ordained priests voted in a Pope, and since the office of the Pope is a Divinely instituted office, it can never disappear, it also means whatever rule applied in the past must necessarily still be valid (because the truth does not change), it means you absolutely to NOT need Cardinals, not 72 of them, or whatever the number now is supposed to be, to vote in a valid Pope. The rule applies only if everything else is in order, but since it is very far from that, and no one of the Novus Ordo “Church” clergy is even Catholic, and since the past cannot invalidate the future (and vice-versa) it is logically clear in Roman Law that no, you do not need Cardinals.

It is a simpler, more human, and perfectly logical system of law. Unlike the anglo-Saxon perversions of it, where case law becomes “new law”.

In Anglo-Saxon thinking, if you now have a rule you need 72 Cardinals under age 80 to vote in a Pope, and you only have 71 left, or, as is the case now, none, then “AW MAH GAWD!” it means a Pope can never be elected again and the Church has defected because the office of the Papacy has no hope of ever being filled again.

If, on the other hand, you understand logic and reason, you are used to thinking in terms of Roman Law, and so you realise that if in the year 300 sixteen peasants of which only 8 were priests and 2 were bishops, voted in a valid Pope, well…your not having any Cardinals today is not that big a deal. I mean, it is… in that clearly something tragic has happened (and it has: Vatican II and the fake Popes that created it and promulgate it), but it by no means implies the Church has defected.

This approach to thinking pervades almost every sphere of life and results in either a higher level of mechanisation of human beings, going from Roman Law to say English Law, to, the truly Satanic, American Legal System. Or, a more human-centred and divinely inspired system of legal system and thus social order among men, going from: Satanic bureaucracy no human mind can possibly comprehend in any part of its totality (American Legal System), to a slightly better system that is still intrinsically unfair and geared to protect the wealthy and a certain class of person (English Common Law), to an actually logical and reasonable system that while encompassing the ultimate punishment (death penalty) it also recognises the uniqueness of each human specific legal or illegal interaction, the details of which ultimately make a big difference.

In Roman Law, for example, there is the concept of silent assent.

If I tell you that X is or should happen and that requires you to do Y, and you keep silent, that means you agreed you must do Y.

This concept is enough to send English people and Indians, scurrying for the caves in the hills.

Roman Law is truly the most divinely inspired of legal systems on Earth, because it is based on principles, but makes allowances for the unique details of each case.

Pondering this would do away with a LOT of the chaotic confusion many people seem to have concerning what is “fair” or “just”, as well as understand the rules of Catholic dogma in a far superior fashion.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I have mentioned many times before how Freemasons play both sides of the coin. They have the crazies on the “left” and the “good guys” on the right. And a few “good guys in the middle” because you never know, the coin may end on edge.

Ask yourself: Who can massacre men, women and children with impunity for months or even years on end and no one in the mass media talks about it?

Who has laws passed that make it so one can’t even assert historical facts without falling afoul of criminal prosecution in many countries?

Who is it not allowed that you criticise as a group?

As the old joke goes, if you notice bunch of Italian criminals you call them mafia.

If you notice a bunch of blacks or latinos being criminals you call them gangbangers.

If you notice a bunch of Jews being criminals, then you’re an antisemitic racist.

Educate yourself on what the Jewish religion says about non-jews and how Jews are to treat them. Or how they think about sex with children under the age of 3.

I am disturbed by people who assume that we should tolerate even the most foul, evil and disgusting practices. And my question is simple: Why?

Why should anyone tolerate child rapists or killers?

Why should anyone tolerate predatory banking practices designed to cripple the poor that are essentially and fundamentally unjust?

Why should usury be tolerated?

Why should we accept that a small group of people has the power to create fiat money out of thin air and put entire governments and most of humanity in debt to them for it?

Why should you tolerate anything http is fundamentally unjust, evil, or both?

And if there is no answer to that, or rather, no real answer, no valid answer, and if those perpetrating such crimes have removed themselves from normal society behind layers upon layers of deception, defence, and various rings of armed men willing to enforce the will of their masters regardless of how twisted it may be, how are you to fight them?

The answers are simple too.

No one should tolerate any of it, of course.

And secondly, if you cannot directly address the issue, refuse to participate in any of their sick games, including the need for fiat money. That, of course sounds insane and impossible at first. But only because you have been conditioned to think so for your entire life. Did the Red Indias of America have fiat money? No.

“But they were free and we are not!” You right say. Yes. Perhaps, but they were nearly rendered extinct because they did not see the issues facing them and react appropriately. Do you think the natives of Sentinel island have fiat money? No.

“Yes but they are savages!” You say. Yes, but they are free and you are not.

So you cannot envision how to survive and even thrive, or to create a community near you that reduces their need for reliance on fiat money at all? Nothing? The Sentinel Island “savages” have got you beat? Really?

Think to yourself: What would happen if a solar flare suddenly wiped out all the digital equipment on Earth? It would be chaos and people would start murdering each other in the street for food. Who would not be doing that? Who would have enough to stand a good chance of surviving and fighting off marauding bands of starving and crazed people?

The ones who prepared for such eventualities already.

Whatever that means… be one of those guys. Because otherwise you’re only going to be a zombie attacking their communities, or a drone-slave for the oligarchs, and yes, far more than you already are.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Vox makes an extremely important point in this post .

It really is the case that in the roughly 35 years I read newspapers, every single time that any article that I actually knew the details of, not once was the truth of the matter actually reported. Some of these stories were front page news too. What can I say, I’ve had an interesting life.

The point remains the same: consider EVERYTHING you see reported on mainstream media as if it was being shouted at you by that one kid in class that is a complete drama queen AND a pathological liar AND a tragic fantasist. Then add skepticism.

The same goes for anything even remotely resembling “settled science” I wrote here about the reality that no vaccine, none, and not just in the US, has ever gone under any scientific safety procedures.

But it goes well beyond this. It applies to history too. History you are “sure and certain about” because it was inculcated into you at a very young age. Now, even before you make ANY generic assumptions, just consider for a moment if only two of those things I mention might be very different from what you have been told. For example, the idea that antigravity technology doesn’t exist (it does) and say, the ending of WW2 (to say nothing of its actual causes and reality of events during it).

Just on those two points, my Overlords of Mars trilogy , collated in one book, Nazi Moon , becomes quite a bit more interesting than just cool science fiction.

But aside my writing, please, for the love of all that is good, your own health and even more so that of your children, do yourself a favour and take the key advice I gave everyone in another of my books Systema: The Russian Martial System , and that is:

know (for) yourself.

There really is no substitute.

You think vaccines (any of them) are safe and effective? Fine, go look for the tests done on it. The hard data, not what was “reported” by some journalist in some magazine or newspaper about it. The clinical studies with the numbers and methodologies in them. You won’t find any. Because none were ever made. In Italy for example you will find that the minister of health, in a big show of telling everyone they would order safety tests to be done on vaccines, to prove their safety once and for all, in 1992, has done no such thing.

In fact, in Italy they made, thanks to an evil bitch called Lorenzin, on the usual orders from the USA, about ten vaccines “compulsory” for children to attend school. Which, of course is illegal, and if you don’t have them done, they fine you. After which your child just goes to school without vaccine and fine paid.

Which is NOT the way to handle it. The way to handle it is to write to the health services when you get the letter and ask them for the vaccine safety tests the government said would be done. After that they leave you alone.

You see? It’s all a sick game of trying to make you kill yourself by taking their lies as truth. And it plays out in pretty much every field you care to look at, but especially so in two important fields: health/pharmaceuticals/medicines and food.

Oh, and of course on the reasons for war(s) and the “reality” and “fairness” of fiat money. That last one really is a doozy once you look into it properly.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

It’s a simple but genial plan (even if I say so myself).

Every nation should adopt this policy.

The leader of a nation and his closest advisers, alongside the most highly placed CEOs of financial institutions, both private and state controlled, and their children aged 18+, both male and female, automatically get drafted as front-line troops in ANY war that is declared between their nation and any another.

While they are away fighting, from a random pool of volunteers that have to have the right attributes (minimum IQ, general sanity etc) replacements are selected at random by an open lottery done with analogue means with independent oversight from randomly selected commoners (like jury duty). If they continue to perpetuate the war for more than 3 months, they get to become the new troops and a new bunch is randomly selected to replace them.

Anyone trying to dodge the draft by any invalid means (fleeing the country, etc) is sentenced to death by firing squad.

Potentially we can also extend this to anyone with a a net worth of 1 billion dollars plus. I mean you need more troops out there, it’s WAR after all.

And let’s dress them all in primary colours so each side can easily see who the enemy is. Besides, it makes it more fun and colourful for everyone.

If the every nation on Earth did that, how many actual wars do you think we’d have on Earth?

Go ahead and spread the word, just be good and give attribution eh? I want that Nobel peace prize money!

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Russian Warship with hypersonic missiles goes for a training exercise in the English Channel. Nonchalantly, while whistling to itself.

A Russian navy warship equipped with Zircon hypersonic cruise missiles, has recently conducted counter-terrorism drills in the English channel and is now carrying out missions in the Atlantic Ocean., according to Russian news agencies.

The Northern Fleet ship, Admiral Golovko, engaged in exercises simulating drone attacks from air and sea as part of its training.

The vessel is capable of reaching speeds several times the speed of sound and a range of up to 900 km, poses a significant challenge to defence systems.

This deployment marks the Admiral Golovko’s first long-distance mission since joining the Russian Navy in December 2023. The ship departed from its northern base on 2 November.

Now, in case your geography is a little sketchy, the English Channel is that bit of water between the UK and France. It’s not exactly a very wide stretch of water. A guy I used to work with has crossed it 9 different times. By swimming.

And playing around with hypersonic missiles there means you are within about 100km of London and 200km of Paris, so you could land a nuke on London in less than a minute and one in Paris in about a minute and a half. If you use the “slow” Hypersonic missiles. If they use an Avangard it’s about 12 seconds, and under 30 seconds for Paris.

Now, you may think, as I do, that this is just a friendly warning, and it probably is, but it’s basically the equivalent of drawing a loaded firearm in your “colleague’s” house and waving it at his face, purportedly to show him how easily you can draw it and get it ready while pointing at his head. It’s the kind of “friendly warning” no one does without very good reason, and almost certainly without the willingness to go to the next step if the message is not dutifully (and quickly) received.

Don’t get me wrong, I still think almost all the politicians of the planet are scum, but if Putin gives a bunch of captive governments, like my own, at least a chance to escape the diaspora “Americans” that run the USA a little bit, and maybe send all the US military bases back to the USA (where all sane US citizens actually would prefer they are), more power to him.

Of course, it would all just be so much easier if everything was done by a system closer to the intent of what the guy who wrote Assassination Politics came up with decades ago (and for which his life was practically ruined). Of course, it was a more innocent time back then, and we didn’t realise quite how pervasive the deep state was, (well, some of us did, but we were called “crazy conspiracy theorists”) that system today would just make it easier to have only puppets in place.

If there was a system in place that saw to it that any warmongers had to be on the front-line, dressed in bright red, how many wars do you think would be waged?

If any of the banksters and their minions that pull the strings of politicians all just had to be formed into an armed front-line battalion in case of ANY war, regardless of the supposed cause? How many wars do you think there would be then?

We could literally have peace on Earth by seeing to it that the higher up the ladder of corporate or state finance you are, as well as the higher up the ladder of political leadership you are, you automatically get drafted into any conflict your nation enters into. And a small percentage also gets drafted into any secret/special/black-ops that happen. Penalty for dodging the draft? Execution by firing squad.

Let’s call it the Kurgan’s Peace Plan for the World. I’ll post on it next.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I have been reading James Wharram’s autobiography People of the Sea (the second one, really, his first book was titled Two girls, two Catamarans ).

In it he describes his life and his… obsession seems too strong a word for the kind of guy I think he was, but certainly shall we say, lifelong interest, in sailing and, I think, being free.

It is a common enough sensation in those of us with an explorer’s heart. When I was 16, I wanted to get a yacht and just sail the world, maybe trading stuff from one port to another. Visiting exotic places in far away lands, seeing lands and people I was curious about, but also, for me at least, that mystic pull of the Ocean. There is something of the divine, and of the terrifying; the ancient, and fickle Gods of Odysseus,  but also the glorious beauty of God in the Ocean.

I moved to Cape Town with all my possessions in one car aged 19 to get away from my father mostly, but also because of the Ocean. On the day I left home for good, I received the most incredible letter from my grandfather, with whom I used to write. I had told him I was leaving home in a previous letter. I wish I still had that letter, but my family, every one of them, from my brother, mother and father, were never very good at keeping my possessions, even when I specifically left instructions to please care for this or that thing. Girlfriends and wives too, now I think of it. Present wife excepted. So my mother threw it out.

But I still remember his neat handwriting and the words. Telling me he lost his father at 19 and left to another city to make his way, and he had no doubts I would do well, too, saying at 19 I was like a young lion, forging ahead.

I loved that man. Still do. And one day I look forward to seeing him again.

Maybe it’s genetic. We are Venetians after all, and all my children love the Ocean.

I never did get to buy a yacht and travel around the world that way, but I certainly did travel a lot anyway. On planes mostly. And I have seen a fair amount of it all.

I understand the pull towards the unknown.

In my twenties and thirties and even up to forty, before I had a daughter, I would have jumped at the chance to travel to Mars. Risks and all.

And even now, if you told me I could have my family on a little antigravity ship… I would be tearing around the Galaxy to check everything out.

But I think now… what life would I have had on that yacht?

James Wharram wrote how he did his first Atlantic crossing, in a catamaran of his own design that he built himself, with two girls, with whom he was obviously having a sexual relationship. He had a child with one woman, who however committed suicide shortly afterwards. Apparently as a result of some long-standing trauma from the horrors she had seen in the second world war in Germany.

In this book, People of the Sea, which I am not even half-way through, he has already described how he made his living selling his boat designs and how he and five women build a much larger boat, Tahini . And it is fairly clear he also had a sexual relationship with all five women.

Aside the morality for a moment (we’ll return to it, it’s the main point of this post) you have to admire the man in some way. He essentially almost singlehandedly brought to life an old —but new in the West— style of sailboat, the catamaran, and took on a life that is without a doubt fraught with emotional tests few men can survive, and a real level of danger. He also sailed home-made boats in storms with an all female crew, which is nearly as trying as juggling a sexual relationship with four of five women in the confines of a yacht at sea.

Most secular guys would probably give a limb to live like that.

Maybe I would have wanted that life too if I had got the yacht, I certainly always had it as a go-to, that I would have liked a 70 foot Trimaran with an all female crew of masseuse trained supermodels, but in reality… I mean, I am certain that as a young guy with zero knowledge of any religion aside my basic zen-agnostic-stoicism blend, there is no way I would not have enjoyed the experience or at least delved into it deeply… but… reflecting on my life and the debauched side of it that I certainly experienced even if it did not involve all-female crews… I have to say that such an existence seems to me to be really quite lonely.

No, it’s not a typo.

I mean lonely.

Perhaps not if you don’t know anything else though, it’s hard to say.

I have certainly juggled multiple women at a time, and though it was not on a yacht and they were not with each other in the same space and the same time as with me —it was more of a rotating door type thing although they were aware of each other— the point was simply that I was passing the time. I was simply distracting myself from the monotony of life and pretty much everything in it.

It got to the point that I actually got tired of it. I remember the day precisely and it was a fully conscious decision. I had been in blissful solitude at home, doing nothing much, binge watching NCIS, and in a self-reflecting mood I realised that I was aware that I could have carried on into old age never settling on just one woman. I knew even if I lived to a hundred I would never be missing female company if I wanted it. But the very nature of the rotating door of faces, bodies, intimacies, got so that the thrill of a new body, or new initial rush, new sexual explorations, became… well… what they always were. Just a distraction. Like consuming tiktok videos instead of reading a good book. Or playing solitaire or candy crush on your phone instead of doing something —anything— better.

And so I thought I’d try getting married (again) and having children. And of course, my method for selecting a (second) wife was predicated on my experience, so… it had quite a bit to do with the sex side of things, the external look, and the agreeability.

All of which was a rather superficial perspective on things and for which, I ignored definite hints of red flags. Because hey, no one is perfect right… so yeah…

That went spectacularly wrong and the only good thing of it was my daughter, who after her first birthday I missed the next eight years of, but now she has been living with me for three years, and I can’t ever have that time back, but still, she is here, she chose it, and made it happen too, which is pretty incredible, but in that in-between time, I also married again, and my daughter was one of the only people I told it to at the time. There wasn’t anyone else really in my daily life that mattered that much. Or hers I guess. We went away and got married in Belgium, with two strangers as our witnesses in a Church in a smallish town.

Then I had more children, but also my life with my third (and final!) wife has been pretty intense from the start. 7 years later it feels both as if we just met a few months ago and also as if we’d been together 20 years.

It’s only with reflection and appreciation of intangibles that you realise things that are hard to put into words.

For example:

Is my life harder, less comfortable and less free now? Yes. Absolutely.

Do I miss my more comfortable, more free, much easier life of before? No. Not at all. The only thing I miss of it is the money I was making then compared to now, and I also know getting back up there is harder given the far more onerous and static things I have to deal with. But the only real concern I have is for the chance to give my children enough opportunities to at least give them a decent start in life, though, the way things are going, maybe reading the wind, knowing about ballistics, and how to make a fire in the wild, might be as good as it gets.

And I’d like my wife to feel more comfortable, but hey, she too has (more grudgingly than me I think) understood that there are more important things. But women do tend to have a tendency to look at the past with melancholy more than men. Pillars of salt and all that.

While the best approach of course is to neither live in the past nor the future, but live right here and make it as good as you can, because the past is gone and the future is not written yet, no matter what you might imagine.

Anyway, as I work in the olive grove, trying to do the job on my own that usually a team of men would do, back aching, my elbow acting up again, and my deviated septum making breathing more difficult than it should be, I also find myself contemplating life and what matters.

Children matter.

Family matters (not always the one you were born into, especially if you had boomer parents!)

Marriage matters.

The latest iphone does not.

In fact even phones in general may not matter that much.

TV DEFINITELY does not matter.

Reading good books does.

Logic and reason matter.

The natural rhythm of life, of nature, of seasons and plants and animals matters (and we are busy destroying it, but not like they tell you. Chemtrails matter. Climate change does not. HAARP matters. Electric cars matter only in that they are impossible on a global scale and terrible for any kind of non-polluting concept.

Being free to THINK whatever you want matters.

Offending stupid people doesn’t (I mean they may kill you for it, it’s probable even, but those fucking NPCs really don’t matter anyway).

Not having another human decide what you can eat, think, watch, do, believe, explore or look into matters.

Justice matters. Laws that don’t serve justice don’t matter.

Honesty matters.

Dishonest people matter; they make everything worse.

Your health matters.

Love matters. Actual Love, not the horse-trading “you be nice to me so I can be nice to you” most people do.

Sacrifice matters.

Beauty matters.

Beauty is the most subtle and possibly the closest to the divine of all virtues.

And in this ongoing and infinite list of thoughts of what matters and what does not…

Does having sex with five different women at will, like in a harem —presumably a happy one in which no jealousy exists even, however utopic that sounds— matter?

As an experience? Perhaps… but compared to what?

Compared to not having sex at all? Sure, then I’d say it does matter.

Compared to having a wife and children and a happy family? No. No, it doesn’t matter at all.

And so I started to sense, not just think or intellectualise about being married and having children. Which is what most men do today. Especially younger men. Intellectualise, I mean.

They may say they want a proper wife and marriage and children, but it is a little bit like a young boy, having read about the Illiad, wanting to find, make, or have a bronze armour and a Hoplon shield and plumed bronze helmets to go to war for the attentions of the mythical Helen.

It sounds good, or cool, or right. But it’s really just an intellectual thing.

Now I have lived it a few years, and I look back at myself when I was 16, alone in a small room in Stratford-Upon-Avon, thinking about life and how I had ended up in England to study because of a friend being there, far from my family and siblings… and pondering what it all meant and what made sense… the feeling was the same. I really was always just after one girl that would fit with me.

The monologue voiceover the character played by Sean Penn in the film The Thin Red Line, does at the end of the film resonated with me deeply as a 20-something year old. It was pretty much how I had always thought. Still is in a way, except…

We, my generation, were raised in a completely deracinated, degenerated society, composed of our baby boomer parents, that if we survived their abortions of us, basically shat in everything that came before them and taught you only their way and that only their absurdly egotistical philosophies were good and real and true. All else was lies and bad.

And now I know better. A whole LOT better. And mine is not second-hand information.

I went to dig and find out the truth myself. Like a man obsessed, because in truth I am. Always have been.

I understand Wharram’s wish to explore, to be free… but above all, I wish to know the highest truth it is possible to know.

Wharram may have looked at the stars to navigate, and his women for their varied characters and ways to love.

But even if I were sailing, and looking at stars to navigate, part of me would still wonder about those planets far away, and the space between the stars, the vast enormity of it, and how it would feel to sail there… in that eternal emptiness punctuated by beauty so vast…

And I have known plenty of women, beautiful and sexy and interesting and varied and kind or cruel and everything in between, but ultimately, I only need and want one. And a lifetime might just be enough to explore really and truly every part of her, and her of me, and see, in the thrill and the danger and the excitement and the fear and the alarm and the reckoning and ultimately the love, of it all, of her, of me, of us, if we can reach that point of unity, that blends us so, that even the words of the Bible are not enough to really give a sense of it… the “one flesh” it mentions marriage is… but how many actually experience it?

Men and women have died looking for it.

They all spend their life waiting for it.

Hoping it really exists and finds them.

And then, even when it does, if it’s too uncomfortable, or unexpected, or it hurts, or is too much, they run away from it and lie to themselves about what it was.

But I ask you, reader, what kind of life is it if you are not seeking that at the very least? However imperfectly and weakly and frightened you might be, what else could possibly matter more when compared to that?

I put it to you, that ultimately, it really is true:

Love conquers all.

And for me at least, that entails a depth of intimacy that goes well beyond the sexual, though, of course, it cannot exist either without it. And I just don’t see you can have that with multiple women at once.

I know you can have a thrill, a sensation of excitement, like a rollercoaster ride that is really fun. Sure. But that doesn’t compare to a rally through a continent or three.

And while the rally through a continent or three is almost guaranteed to have some pain, sweat and tears in it, which do you think will mean more to you at the end of it?

A rollercoaster ride, or even an endless sequence of them, or that rally across deserts, snow, rain, forest and jungles, cities and highways, and everything in between?

I know I cannot explain to you the beauty of marriage.

Hell, I been married three times and I’m only just figuring it out, but I can try. I must try.

Because the entire world around you is lying to you.

Podcasts like whatever , and even supposed religionists like Andrew Wilson and his wife, even if they claim to be fighting “for” “traditional values” (whatever that is), are really all presenting the undertone of marriage being a terrible idea.

Because laws, and secular powers, and feminism and, and, and…

Well, you know what? Marriage to the wrong person really IS a terrible idea! (Insert 1990s, badge with written on it “Ask me How!”)

Marriage to the right person?

It’s tough. It can really suck some days.

It may make you ponder if life is just one cruel joke some days. Yeah. That’s marriage to the right person. But you know what? When those days pass, you also have days where you realise the truth of things, the truth of what actually matters in life, really matters…

…and then you’ll want to fall to your knees to thank God because you feel the Grace he has given you might be some mistake, bad accounting by St.Peter, or something.

And you look at your children and know they will cause you endless pain in their lives. But they also will make you cry with how much you love them and their unique, awesome, and funny souls.

So, I know maybe you have been listening to that fake: Andrew Tate; and you think fast cars and a harem is what life’s about; or maybe another fake, some “Pastor” from a heretic pretend-church, telling you some screwed up puritan version of what a marriage should look like; but listen, at the most crude: reproduction serves the continuation of humanity.

But if there is no higher truth, no higher love, then why bother, right?

On the other hand… if there is a God, then marriage and making children and raising them as best you can is the point.

The entire point.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Don’t take my word for it. Consider this:

Having been called a liar by Anthony Fauci for saying that “not one of the 72 vaccines mandated for children has ever been safety tested”, RFK Jr. sued Fauci. After a year of stonewalling, Fauci’s lawyers admitted that RFK Jr. had been right all along. “There’s no downstream liability, there’s no front-end safety testing… and there’s no marketing and advertising costs, because the federal government is ordering 78 million school kids to take that vaccine every year. What better product could you have? And so there was a gold rush to add all these new vaccines to the schedule… because if you get onto that schedule, it’s a billion dollars a year for your company. So we got all of these new vaccines, 72 shots, 16 vaccines… And that year, 1989, we saw an explosion in chronic disease in American children… ADHD, sleep disorders, language delays, ASD, autism, Tourette’s syndrome, ticks, narcolepsy. Autism went from one in 10,000 in my generation… to one in every 34 kids today.” RFK Jr.

The same applies to Italy and I believe Germany. In fact, I am pretty sure (but not certain) that this applies to pretty much every vaccine ever created.

But… but… surely they are good for us anyway?

Wait… think about that thought, if you are so deeply brainwashed you actually had it:

You mean that injecting your child 72 times with random shit that has never been tested for safety is ok with you?

But that’s not all. Have you any idea the kind of ingredients vaccines have?

Well, unless you hurried up to get some information on this BEFORE Covid you may be out of luck trying to find anything now. Google or duckduck go have absolutely memory holed any studies or comprehensive lists of ingredients found in the “common” or “good” vaccines. Never mind the covid genetic serums which are not and never have been vaccines. They are DNA altering genetic serums that have been done and studied on animals for about 30 years, with inevitably bad results for the poor animals they tested this stuff on.

The excuse you will find on any remaining sites that even admit things like formaldehyde and aluminium and a bunch of other toxic crap is inside vaccines, ranging from aborted baby cells to shark liver, yes, I am not kidding, is that they are at “safe levels” they are at low enough levels that (presumably by magic) they absolutely do NOT cause cancer, or any other bad thing. Because you know, there is this magic line, on one side of which you can get that crap injected into you and it’s perfectly fine. You only get the cancer/myocarditis/turbo-alien-dna/whatever bad effects if you go over that line!

Right. Of course.

And if you believe that, I want to ask you, what is a good amount of raw sewage you want in your ice cream?

I mean, come on, just a gas-fart-sized little spray of raw sewage along with your macadamia nuts on the sundae? No? A tiny little thimbleful well blended? Still no? What are you, some kind of anti-scientist!

And that is basically the story.

And you know what else? No one can (yet) force you, in the West at least, to have anything injected into your body or your children’s bodies against your will.

I mean, sure they can fire you from your job, refuse you entry to all sorts of places, and fine you (more fool you if you pay any such fine) for not injecting yourself with some autist-death-serum, but they can’t actually physically hold you or your children down and jab you.

And if they ever start doing that, then you’d be fully entitled to jab them back and first, with your toxic heavy metal of choice. They might make it “illegal” by then, but then, wearing glasses was a death penalty under the communism of Pol Pot too. If you choose the “law” above Justice, then you’re not anyone I want to know.

And if you are unsure what Justice is, then, please, for the love of God, read these few pages . They are literally a few pages of A4 if you print them, less than 10, from memory.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here