Thanks to a little exposé of Milo I did yesterday, here, there has been a rather instant level of response, including on his telegram chat. Milo himself posted a link to the post, with the clear intent of pretending it was so insignificant it didn’t bother him at all. He did this though, only after someone posted a link to it in one of his chats, so it could be said his hand was forced and he took the only possible route he can take denial and attempts to pass the information off as “laughable”. No actual response to the facts presented in any way, shape or form, as you will see.
It has been interesting to note the reaction from Milo, because he’s been far from his usually composed self. While Milo has fielded all sorts of “attacks”, even on live TV, with aplomb, I have never seen him quite this at a loss for coherent response other than denial, avoidance, subterfuge and outright censorship of the topic. But before I get to him and his own reactions, allow me a small pleasure in exposing the retards he has working for him.
The funny part is that his own moderators didn’t exactly help the situation when they made attempts (predicted in the original post I wrote), to cast me as some poor desperate “gamma” seeking Milo’s attention. An attention that was not forthcoming because obviously I am just some nobody and he is… well… Milo: International Sodomite; or maybe Milo: International Ex-Sodomite now Pretend-Catholic. Or something.
This was such a predictable accusation that I prepared for it. Mostly because I was sure the morons who would launch it did not pay attention to the fact that while I initially approached Milo, he was VERY receptive to reading RTCC and so on, emailing me back pretty instantly. It was only after he received the book, and I assume realised “this guy is not for sale”, that he then went “I’m too International-(Ex?)Sodomite-busy for you” silent.
And yes, there have been attempts to buy my Catholicism by so-called “Trad-Cats” and no I have not mentioned them publicly, but I have recorded them and turned them down repeatedly.
Anyone with an ounce of sense would have figured it out but not this idiot:
Paddy and I have had a few run-ins before, mostly because I called him on his bullshit, and probably because he also forgot where he planted his potatoes or something, but even without knowing about Milo’s email reaction (see further below), it should have been obvious from the instant reaction to the post that Milo was not QUITE as busy as he wanted to appear, and judging by the liberal use of the ban hammer in that chat, not as nonchalant either.
A few of the bans:
Some of the bans were so instant and the comment made deleted so fast that not even the loyal Sodalitium types keeping tabs on Milo got a chance to screencapture them. One in particular committed the evil sin of simply writing:
“How is he wrong?”
That was an instaban and the comment deleted immediately. No dissension was permitted at all and anyone questioning Milo on the obvious Freemasonic signalling was silenced faster than Stalin deleted people from photographs.
What was his supposed reason? Here:
IT’S BAD FAITH QUESTIONS GUYS!
Right. Except they are questions he has NEVER answered. Never even TRIED to answer. There is only one response to them and it’s always the same. Ban, silence, eject.
Except wee-eelll… when it’s persistent little old me doing the asking then he does the only defence he has left if one assumes he is actually guilty.
Think about it, assume he is a full-blown Freemason intent on deceiving the small percentage of the population that is no longer fooled by Ben Shapiro or Jordan Peterson, but in their quest for truth, God and a real Church is still on the fence about Emo Jones maybe, or thinking Church Militant are actual Catholics and not funded by Opus Dei hook line and sinker. If you make that assumption then Milo has no options left except to feign my facts are unimportant rumblings of some attention seeker, far too inept or relevant to even merit a response by our flamboyant, worldly, newly chocolate-dick free “Catholic” hero. Right.
And why is that? Because do you know what the punishment for being exposed as a confirmed Freemason is? Do you know about their code of silence despite all their signalling? They signal because they think of us as dumb sheep and cows that will do nothing, understand nothing and be led to slaughter by them. Yet… the only penalty for revealing the Freemason secrets is death. And death by some rather gruesome means. Don’t take my word for it. Google is not your friend, but it can still dig up some stuff on this.
So here is my take: Milo always was controlled opposition. He was the pied piper to the young ones. The Millennials yes, but more importantly the Zyklons. His rebellious, flamboyant and apparently disrespectful nature was captivating to young disaffected people who wanted to burn it all down. And he fooled a great many of us. Me included for a time, though I was early on to say that he would crash and burn or amount to nothing and eventually fade into obscurity long before his pedo-scandal from the Joe Rogan interview. So what happened?
He upset his masters in some way. Which is why he was burnt down and had to suffer humiliation. Keep in mind that Milo was funded by some of the same people who backed supposedly “right-wing” things like Parler. Then that money was taken away. And after the due process of Freemasonic ritual humiliation and “renewal” (he literally has it in his bio, mockingly: Ex-Gay, good boy) he is being given another shot at it.
By teaming up with the other supposedly also Ex-Sodomite Gary Voris (Who tries to go by Michael and who started up a business called St. Michael with Opus Dei cash, not freakily narcissistic at all, of course).
So now, some bastard Sedeprivationist who can’t be bought is exposing him. Right at the start of his new venture. What do you think his lords and masters will do about that if it gets traction?
In a way, this explanation may save him. Perhaps it will even increase the funds they pump into him. Because if he was found with his throat slit and his entrails pulled out (the penalty for breaking the oath), it might be a tad suspicious, so if instead they bury him in cash and boost him even more, maybe I will just be drowned out by the noise and the ruminant cows will still flock to the fake “Catholicism” that leads to the same pit of Hell of the other fake religions.
Or he might just get a heart attack from covid. It’s hard to say with the servants of the one-eyed “shepherd”.
And anyway, I’m just some unimportant “gamma” not worth responding to right? Except oh…ooops…note the times on these emails.
Cool, Calm and Collected Milo… or maybe not quite
And, it wasn’t really a “forwarding service” that I delivered the book to. And even if it had been it would not take months to get to him. The “forwarding service” (a lady called Kathleen) also summarily ignored perfectly polite emails concerning the book which she had not done at all before its arrival, which she confirmed.
No replies at all to perfectly polite emails but instant replies to these ones. Literally not even a minute after I sent the first one the reply arrived. And the rest followed in rapid succession.
Not sus at all.
Just perfectly non-Freemasonic behaviour through and through.
Totally straight stuff.
Tags: catholicism, freemason, freemasonry, milo, sedeprivationism, sedevacantist, Yiannopoulous
[…] Yiannopoulous as a Freemason. Something he denies unconvincingly given the evidence provided here, here and […]