He uses the Argumentum ad Infinitum right from the start (I detail this strategy of the deceivers starting on page 288 of RTCC) with a lot of pointless and useless details about the other 7 parts of canon 188, trying to fool you into believing they are all identical. They are obviously not. Becoming a heretic (188.4) means you vacate your office in every sense. Taking up an incompatible post within the same legitimate Church as a legitimate cleric (188.3) clearly only vacates the wordly aspects of the office. So you can ignore most of the text, but I have highlighted below the gems of his nonsensical position, which is all that is required to show him up for the deceiver, and idiot, that he is.
Let us quote him here as the highlighted parts:
1 – If you are an apostate, heretic, or schismatic, you are excommunicated. This penalty is called a censure, and happens automatically, at the time of offense. Kurgan is correct about this. What’s important to realize is this takes place in the internal forum, as this is a spiritual separation from the Church.
No, it doesn’t not when the individual in question makes his heresy PUBLIC and NOTORIOUS, which, yeah… when you publish a heretical document intended for literally every human being to know and see, it counts. And that is what the V2 docs are.
Then he goes on to lie by quoting this point:
2 – Unless they respect warnings, they are deprived of benefice, dignity, pension, office, or other duty that they have in the Church, they are declared infamous, and [if] clerics, with the warning being repeated, [they are] are deposed;
And saying this about it:
2 – Once again, we see that you are given a warning (if you have not publicly defected from the Faith) before your offices are declared to be vacated. It’s not the the Bishop is removing you, but that you have removed yourself. You have resigned, you haven’t been fired.
He is, of course lying, because he tries to say that part 3 of the commentary he is referring to says…uh…the OPPOSITE OF WHAT IT SAYS:
3 – If they give their names to non-Catholic sects or publicly adhere [to them], they are by that fact infamous, and with due regard for the prescription of Canon 188.4, clerics, the previous warnings having been useless, are degraded.
See that part 3?
It clearly states that if a public, notorious heretic gives his name to a heretic sect, or in any case publicly act as such, they are, by that fact alone INFAMOUS, and, here is the important part: APART FROM THE PRESCRIPTION OF CANON 188.4 WHICH MUST BE TAKEN INTO DUE REGARD, if these apostates have ignored the previous warnings (warnings that DO NOT APPLY TO Canon 188.4 because… see below) they are then degraded.
What does canon 188.4 say? WITHOUT ANY DECLARATION AND BY THE FACT (The action) ITSELF They therefore vacate their office, and despite his feeble and fake protestations, that INCLUDES ALL CLERICAL STATUS FOR HERETICS.
And they are public and NOTORIOUS heretics remember?
He then tries (with abysmal stupidity) to gloss over the fact that these are notorious and public heretics for all to see, thus:
The crime of apostasy, heresy, or schism must be exteriorly manifested either in words, writings, or acts which betray defection from the Christian Church, denial of some article of faith, or separation from the unity of the Church according to canon 2195.1; because merely internal apostasy, heresy, or schism do not belong to the external forum and therefore are not intended here. From merely internal transgressions, even though they be grievously sinful, any confessor may absolve.
Heresy must be externally manifested to be covered by canon law. Therefore, merely remaining silent concerning possible heresy in the Vatican 2 documents is not covered. The kurgan needs to believe that silence (in reference to the documents of Vatican 2) equates with one being guilty of heresy. This is not the case in canon law, or in any law. Kurgan needs this to be true in order to wave his heresy wand and call almost all clergy heretical.
We have already seen the fake Popes are notorious and public, but clearly this likely Freemasonic fake Catholic is trying to say people like him who have remained silent on V2 cannot be called public and notorious. Once again, a lie. Because he has not remained silent. Not just on SG and here, but all over where he walks and breathes, he continues to spout the heresies of V2 as though they were Catholic Dogma. They are not, they are of Moloch, as is this impostor, and that makes him public and notorious too.
I wish this would resolve the matter once and for all, but as we know, The Prince of Darkness is really the Prince of the Gammas, so this worm will turn in his hole until the next time. And no doubt, my hammer will be there again.
In response to the idiotic and deceitful “PadreGeo”
In case you are new here, you may want to get a sense of this vermin from an earlier post here:https://www.thekurganblog.com/exposing-the-fake-clergy-of-the-novus-orco
As usual is too cowardly to use his real name, but he tried to come to the rescue of his fellow freemason Milo (3 posts, the first one here: https://www.thekurganblog.com/milo-yiannopoulous-gatekeeper-to-the-puppet-starlets-of-catholicism-with-pictures)
His nonsensical and self-defeating “attack” on me is here
(Archived because these vermin tend to memory hole things.):
https://archive.is/807uH
He uses the Argumentum ad Infinitum right from the start (I detail this strategy of the deceivers starting on page 288 of RTCC) with a lot of pointless and useless details about the other 7 parts of canon 188, trying to fool you into believing they are all identical. They are obviously not. Becoming a heretic (188.4) means you vacate your office in every sense. Taking up an incompatible post within the same legitimate Church as a legitimate cleric (188.3) clearly only vacates the wordly aspects of the office. So you can ignore most of the text, but I have highlighted below the gems of his nonsensical position, which is all that is required to show him up for the deceiver, and idiot, that he is.
Let us quote him here as the highlighted parts:
No, it doesn’t not when the individual in question makes his heresy PUBLIC and NOTORIOUS, which, yeah… when you publish a heretical document intended for literally every human being to know and see, it counts. And that is what the V2 docs are.
Then he goes on to lie by quoting this point:
And saying this about it:
He is, of course lying, because he tries to say that part 3 of the commentary he is referring to says…uh…the OPPOSITE OF WHAT IT SAYS:
See that part 3?
It clearly states that if a public, notorious heretic gives his name to a heretic sect, or in any case publicly act as such, they are, by that fact alone INFAMOUS, and, here is the important part: APART FROM THE PRESCRIPTION OF CANON 188.4 WHICH MUST BE TAKEN INTO DUE REGARD, if these apostates have ignored the previous warnings (warnings that DO NOT APPLY TO Canon 188.4 because… see below) they are then degraded.
What does canon 188.4 say? WITHOUT ANY DECLARATION AND BY THE FACT (The action) ITSELF They therefore vacate their office, and despite his feeble and fake protestations, that INCLUDES ALL CLERICAL STATUS FOR HERETICS.
And they are public and NOTORIOUS heretics remember?
He then tries (with abysmal stupidity) to gloss over the fact that these are notorious and public heretics for all to see, thus:
We have already seen the fake Popes are notorious and public, but clearly this likely Freemasonic fake Catholic is trying to say people like him who have remained silent on V2 cannot be called public and notorious. Once again, a lie. Because he has not remained silent. Not just on SG and here, but all over where he walks and breathes, he continues to spout the heresies of V2 as though they were Catholic Dogma. They are not, they are of Moloch, as is this impostor, and that makes him public and notorious too.
I wish this would resolve the matter once and for all, but as we know, The Prince of Darkness is really the Prince of the Gammas, so this worm will turn in his hole until the next time. And no doubt, my hammer will be there again.
No related posts.
This entry was posted in Social Commentary. RSS 2.0 feed.