James Fox Higgins of Rational Rise TV recently had an interview with EM Jones, the supposedly famous “Catholic”.
I had met Jones briefly in Indiana where I directly asked him if he thought Bergoglio was Pope, to which he replied that yes he was.
At which point I said I completely disagreed with him. He asked “Well, what are we gonna do about it? Are we going to argue about it?”
I replied with a simple “No.”
It was perfectly clear from that very moment on to me that Mr. Jones fell squarely in that camp I call “impostors” using broad strokes as I do.
Yes, yes, there is a difference between someone who actively worships Satan in full consciousness while pretending to be a Priest or Pope of Catholicism, as many of the Novus Orco servants of Moloch, pederasts and perverts do, and a boomer who desperately wants to remain relevant and make an extra buck or ten while whoring his books to the masses and thus not wanting to upset the deep slumber of the cradle “Catholic” masses.
Sure. But he is just as much a liar as the next impostor, fake Catholic, never was a Christian of any kind boomer Churchian. And it is good to expose these people for what they are.
So I asked my question, which was:
Why does he not respect the code of 1917 and thus consider the promoters of V2 heretics who vacated their office as per canon 188 part 4?
His “response” was far better than I had hoped I would get and very interesting.
His reply “who am I to judge” being a repeat of Bergoglio’s own reply when asked about OBVIOUS, CATEGORICAL, DOGMATIC sin that has always been sin within the Catholic Church from the very start.
In other words he:
- PRETENDS that there is anything for him to judge (there isn’t the magisterium of the church has already passed judgment on it. The point is why does he not acknowledge this judgement?)
- He PRETENDS not to know that it is the duty of every Catholic to point out absolute heresy (which in this case is absolute because already ruled upon by the magisterium of the Church)
- He ultimately avoids the question by in essence revealing himself to have no defence and knowing he is a fake Catholic.
It’s really a better result than I hoped for.
Look at his face when he hears the whole question. He knows he is cornered and has nowhere to go. He not only was exposed, but he knows he was too.
It happens at 1 hour 1 minute and 30 seconds in here:
And if you’re wondering how I know that EM Jones is purely a fame seeker, well…
I’ll let you draw your own conclusions from his face
I have felt EM Jones was a bit off since I first heard an interview with him and Owen. The more and more I learn about him the more my suspicion of him is confirmed. Keep up the good fight!
EMJ was always a fraud. All you need to know about a “Catholic” is whether they think Bergoglio is Pope. If yes, they are either liars or completely ignorant of Catholicism and brought up indoctrinated to believe lies. It really is that simple.
I do believe you were vindicated last week:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WIVIELIQLXUr/
He’s losing credibility among many this week. Even among those who’ve worked for him.
Let me know when you catch up to my arguments for sedeprivationism