Archive for the ‘The Enemy Within’ Category

Violence is Always the Answer

I have used this phrase since early teenage years, usually in a semi-humorous fashion, but the reality is that if it is funny in any given context, it’s primarily because it’s essentially true on so many levels.

When human beings come to an impasse, whether individual, tribal, national or international, the final way to resolve it, always boils down to violence. And whoever can more successfully do it to the other party, invariably wins.

You pay your taxes, regardless with if you agree with them or not, because otherwise force will be exerted on you.

You comply with the law, generally speaking, regardless of whether it is a just or unjust law, because not doing so has the consequence of some measure of force being used on you.

Another phrase I always used from a tender age, is that the order of financial importance of wealth is as follows:

Fiat money < silver < gold < lead < lead with a copper jacket

When the SHTF, the most valuable thing you can have, is a way to shoot back at those who would harm you. And when the SHTF, all your charm, good looks, good intentions, and monetary or even gold-ingot wealth, will be worth absolutely nothing compared to a full metal jacketed round travelling at say 1 km or about 3000 feet per second.

You may THINK that we are too civilised for the world to re-descend to this level of barbarity, but if so, you clearly are not a student of history; or human nature for that matter.

30 years ago Yugoslavia was carpet bombed by the USA and genocides were being attempted by various factions. Two years ago, the war between Russia and the puppet master of the USA and NATO began and is still ongoing, with hundreds of thousands if not a million or more killed and up to 20 million people displaced. While the Russian military tries very hard to avoid injuring civilians, the Ukrainian forces have intentionally murdered around 14,000 people in the Donbass since 2014 with sustained bombardment and military and terrorist actions.

Gaza since October of last year is being destroyed systematically by the Israeli politicians, and the IDF. To the point that even a puppet-guided International Criminal Court, which has the entire power of approximately one butt-cheek when you make a loud fart, has declared Netanyahu a war criminal.

The recent spate of assassinations of any political leader who did not toe the line, and the threat to the Georgian PM is showing that even the shadowy creatures that run the world are getting panicky and wanting to force things to go a certain way, except they may not, and at that point, you will begin to see the violence spread. Political parties will begin to crack. In some places politicians will be more afraid of their own people than the long, shady hand of the destroyer. And in others the inverse will be true. Remain calm and observe, and you will begin to sense when they are planning to have violence carry the day.

One thing normal people have absolutely no idea about at all is that at the vertices of power (high level bankers, lawyers, politicians, oligarchs, etc.) ALL business is conducted under blackmail, violence or the threat of violence.

The running joke that if you know too much about the Clintons you end up dead is a “joke” in the sense that it gets applied to things like the death of Harambe, but the reality of it is brutally factual. And so it goes at every level beyond a certain one that is for the “commoners”. Basically, unless you are a multi-millionaire (and even then you’re small fry really unless you piss off some people) you really only have to worry about getting whacked if you:

a) Are a pain in the ass that exposes them somehow. This could be in general or specifically.

b) You stumble across some very uncomfortable truth/facts/technology.

But I guarantee you that at Elon Musk level of money (which is still absolutely trivial when compared to the wealth of creatures like the Rothschilds, etc) the threat of dying of a sudden accident/lone gunman/generic “suddenly” possibly brought on by “climate change” is a day-to-day consideration. How do I know? It’s amazing what you get to know/see if you work in security for extremely wealthy people. And it’s also why I have always respected ALL my non-disclosure agreements that I have ever had in place. In part it is also why I stopped that work, because once you become exposed to certain realities, it becomes really difficult to try and hold to a “noble” samurai code of simply being the hired muscle there to protect the client and that’s that. No matter how “ignorant” you want to stay, it is inevitable that if you are not a complete moron (which is generally not a good thing if the people who want you to be willing and able to catch bullets for them in an emergency and also drop bodies for them) it is inevitable that you become aware of certain things. At which point, on the ever-wise Roman Law basis of silence being equivalent to assent, (regardless of you having given, and respecting, your word on the silence) your continued presence becomes complicity.

This is why the Catholic dogmatic position of being peaceful until you can’t be anymore, because you need to defend yourself or others from violence, is really the best one to adopt. It is considerably harder to label a group, people or individual as some nefarious violent monster when they don’t start anything. Not that this has ever prevented the vermin that runs things from doing so anyway, especially when you note that almost every major war required some false-flag event* in order to foment the masses into actual war. Egged on and funded by the interested parties, so as to “demonstrate” in the public square and change the normie’s perception of reality.

Remember that it has been demonstrated time and again that a normal person will begin to do irrational actions if people around them start taking these irrational actions as though they were normal. From the Milgram experiments to the expiriments with chimps, cold water and a banana at the top of a pile of boxes, to people standing up in a doctor’s room every time a beep sounds, and on, and on, and on.

That “genius” of the ex Italian PM Matteo Renzi, even mentioned it in an interview that even if what you say is a lie or false, as long as you keep repeating it, eventually people will buy it. He doesn’t even have the excuse of dementia, like Biden, reading the quiet part aloud, he is simply (in my opinion) a complete moron. But in any case, the moron is right, in short, the vast majority of people are also, complete, absolute, mouth-breathing rteards, incapable of having an original thought or making a purely objective, logical, reasoned and mathematically sound evaluation of what is playing out before them if their life depended on it. And if you think I am exaggerating, go ahead and explain to me why a majority of people took an experimental genetic serum that has been demonstrated to never work and in fact eventually kill all the animals that had the procedure done to them repeatedly. And has had these results for over 30 years.

And if your excuse is that:

“They had no choice.”

“No one knew…”

“They trusted the government…”

“They had different data available…”

“They wanted to go on holiday/travel/continue working”

Then, you, friend, are one of those mouth-breathing retards, because absolutely NOTHING, including armed soldiers threatening to execute me, would ever get me to inject myself with that shit, because it is the clear intent of the parasites that want to rule us that they first mean to kill off at least seven and a half out of eight of us, before enslaving the remainder. And if they want to kill me, well, I am sure they can, but they will have to work a little harder at it than just getting me to eject the death serum myself.

And just for the record, I am perfectly healthy, never had an even remote history of any heart disease in my entire family line, nor anything else really, we tend to live long lives too, my grand-aunts both lived to over a 100, my grandad had broken his hip in a fall but reached 92 and my other grandad reached I think 87 but he had liver cancer that went on for a while. The only grandmother that died young was killed by a surgeon screwing up a medical procedure. And I have absolutely ZERO intent of ever committing suicide, especially since as a Catholic, I simply never would, no matter what. Not have I ever taken any drugs of any kind, so it’s gonna be hard to make me “OD” other than by direct lead/copper-jacket poisoning.

My point, ultimately, is that I hope, even if you might have been a normie all your life, and a pacifist in general, realise that this is NOT how the world works, nor has it ever been so, nor will it ever be so.

The only difference is that they have got so good at getting you to hamstring yourself and being a good little slave, that you don’t even realise you are a prisoner and a slave and the very idea of “rebelling” or breaking free never even enters your head.

It is why I explain that it is not enough for you to become as self-sufficient as possible in terms of food, water and energy. You literally have to become independent of fiat money. Your approach to life, and preferably to put in place before the financial crash that is looming ever closer, should be: If the money in my bank account disappears tomorrow and is never ever coming back, how will I survive?

Then move towards that.

And if and even before, you get there, keep in mind most people will NOT have prepared for this and many will simply want to just “take yours”.

You starting to see what I mean yet?

Violence is always the answer. The evil bastards trying to murder you, rape your children and enslave any survivors have always not just known it but acted on it. It’s time you understood this and took the required steps to protect yourself and your loved ones and your community.

*Or at least green-flag event, as Vox labelled it. That is allowed to happen if not directly executed by the supposed “victims”, as the October 7th “Hamas” assault clearly was. And remember that Hamas was created by the CIA and Mossad (they have admitted this in various occasions, so not really in dispute)

Just another Cohen-cidence

Yukos owns some 20% of Russian oil.

Interesting isnโ€™t it. And explains a little of why the world is supposed to hate Russia.

The Questionable Agency of Women

I do not know much at all about this Andrew guy debating the woman, I saw (or rather, mostly listened to) over an hour of this podcast he did with a feminist and from first impression he seems to be very cogent, and to give credit to the woman, she is at least trying to respond to his dialectic commentary and reasoning. That is, she is, doing her best, I believe, to reply to his clear logic with actual logic.

What you see here is basically an honest woman being faced with her own solipsism.

Her retreats to rhetoric or “feelings” are generally curbed and although he sometimes has to reframe the question a few times, when she eventually grasps it she tries to answer it honestly. This in and of itself is exceedingly rare, so I have to give her absolute credit for it. In fact, after I wrote this I watched a bit more, and Andrew too gives her the same credit at around 1 hour and 27 minutes.

If feminists could actually do logic and debate honestly, this would be a typical outcome.

Which brings me to the point I wanted to make, which will drive the average woman absolutely batshit insane with apoplexy at my “misogyny”, but which in reality is fully based in the natural patriarchal instinct to wish to protect women in general from their own characteristically irrational tendencies.

I am usually too busy to listen to anything of this length, but I managed to hear about an hour and a half of it, and I will try to hear the rest as I can, but he makes a LOT of very cogent, interesting points that are very fundamental level stuff. Right from the start, he manages to make her understand that everything relates ultimately to force, and although he doesn’t quite get her to understand his point about moral relativism, it is not through lack of trying, and on her part, it becomes quite clear that she simply does not have the intellectual capacity to:

a) keep up with him and fully grasp what he is saying, and

b) either have reasoned out her positions beforehand, or be able to reason them out on the fly.

I fairness to her, she does, honestly reason quite a few of them out on the fly, so she is honestly trying to do that, but the fact she even had to resort to this means she had never really considered these basic questions to begin with, which again, does not put her in a glowing light intellectually speaking.

AND YET… she has performed overwhelmingly better than 99% of feminists I have ever seen trying to stand their ground. I may put her, roughly speaking on a similar footing with Camille Paglia, who is still a trainwreck, but as far as feminists go, she’s not as terrible as the overwhelming majority. This girl is still young, so I sincerely hope there is some time for her to undo some of the indoctrination she clearly has taken on board (as have all of us at some point in our lives).

Now to my point, which is this:

I think this debate, and even this rather polite, intelligent and well-intentioned woman, are strong evidence of the fact that women simply are not, generally speaking able or capable of even understanding the fundamental aspects of civilisation, and that, is ultimately the reason they cannot be entrusted with really any aspect of it beyond those that they are naturally built for, which is child-rearing and taking care of their home in a symbiotic, intimate, and loving relationship with their husbands.

The simple fact is that this young woman, who has not thought about such basic things as the pill affecting birth rates and abortion being anti-natalist, gets to “vote” (not really, none of us do, but we’re looking at the logic of things, not the brutal reality of the nefarious shit going on on top of the lack of logic too). She clearly has no real objective right to do so. She is ignorant and unschooled on such basic things that her vote can only be a vote for chaos, ultimately. And notice how she has zero comment or comeback to the very real point that women were not allowed to vote on a referendum of if they should be allowed a vote, because the overwhelming majority of them were against it because they then understood that to give the women a vote would reduce them to second tier “men” while totally removing their moral benefits that they had purely as a result of being a woman.

If you can follow the logic, this in and of itself also makes it abundantly clear that liberalism, and the eternal pursuit of unlimited freedom, is absolutely Satanic and can ONLY bring to desolation and destruction for all.

It also highlights that the ONLY morality that exists and that can exist is one that derives from divine concepts and laws. If there is no God at all, then all concepts of morality are null and void and all actions are morally equivalent. At best you can define them as preferences, but you have no basis whatever to claim a moral imperative.

The problem then is only, if there is a God, WHICH religion best approximates His will?

And when you get to this point, taking a very high view that encompasses as long a period of history as possible is absolutely vital. The fruits borne by any given religion should give an indication is it is overall good or bad for humanity as a whole, and thus help make it more obvious to you which religion is based in reality, and which is a pack of comfortable lies for other ends.

If you look at all the main world religions, with this broad perspective, it become obvious at a glance that Catholicism is far superior to all other examples. You might disagree, but you can only do so if you are historically ignorant and going on your “feelings”, and are less capable than the woman in that podcast to simply take a look and be honest about things. I’ll give you a primer in comparatives:

Catholicism

  • Ended slavery
  • Ended women being chattel
  • Made marriage permanent until death
  • Made the primary purpose of marriage the production and raising of children
  • Has the golden rule of treating others as you would like to be treated
  • Has the dogma of loving your neighbour and being peaceful and honest to all until or unless they act badly towards you first
  • Even then, it has the dogma of the possibility of redemption and forgiveness (not obviating punishment for transgressions though)
  • It essentially created the real scientific method
  • It dogmatically refers to its dogma and rules as requiring to be in line with reason and logic at all turns and has only a very few accepted mysteries (the trinity for example being one of them)
  • It fosters honesty and admission of faults (confession) on a regular basis, which instills an overall betterment for everyone at large
  • It is a dogmatic principle of Catholicism that defence of yourself or innocents is your duty, and this can include pre-emptive action (the concepts of Self-defence and Just War are part of Catholic dogma)
  • It has absolute respect for justice and hence a dogmatic acceptance and need for the death penalty for certain crimes
  • Children are viewed as a blessing and all life held as sacred (which is absolutely NOT a contradiction with the point immediately above. Because the minute you treat life as chattel, then you get treated as same)
  • It fostered the greatest evolution of art, beauty, honesty, and promotion of all the virtues of justice, love, charity, courage, fortitude and beauty, and justly condemned the sins of pride, avarice, greed, sloth, lust, gluttony, and envy
  • It promotes the veneration of saints, which in turn promotes an understanding and appreciation as well as a remembrance of historical reality and events, both in the good and bad aspects
  • It promotes the respectful treatment of women while understanding that they are not equal to men, nor is this reason to mistreat them

It probably only requires looking at that list to realise no other religion compares to it, and it’s far from complete. As for the negatives that can be attributed to men who professed to be members of it, similar negatives can be seen and counted in all religions by men who profess to belong to that specific religion.

There also a lot of demonstrable lies that have been stated about Catholicism by its enemies that anyone who actually bothers to try and verify will become aware of. In fact, even convinced NON-Catholics who are honest admit this, notably, historian Rodney Stark in his book Bearing False Witness, or perhaps his book named Reformation Myths, though I have not read that one, so am not certain. But Stark has always been an honest historian, even admitting his own faults if his research had not been done properly in later works, which is far more than can be said about most historians.

A sad truth about Catholicism however is that it was absolutely infiltrated fro the last 250 years or so, culminating in its almost total destruction and inversion, which from 1958 onwards has seen only false Popes on the throne of Peter and false Novus Ordo clergy pretending to be Catholics that have fooled the vast majority of would-be Catholics. The only actual Catholic Clergy left (both Bishops and Priests) are Sedevacantist ones, and the only Catholics actually following the religion in any way accurately are sedevacantists, which are a small fraction of nominal Novus ordo “Catholics”, although their numbers are growing very fast as people begin to realise the truth of this situation.

Islam and Judaism

I lump them together for a very simple reasons, aside from the many, many, many, questionable dogmas of it, I think two will suffice to point out why these cannot be any good:

  1. Both these religions say it’s ok to deceive, cheat or even kill people who are not members of it, and it is perfectly fine to pretend to be their friend, but in fact be lying to them until you are powerful enough to impose your will on them.
  2. Both religions accept child rape as normal and nothing to be punished or even considered a crime.

Hinduism, Shintoism and Buddhism

Although quite different in details, these all share some essential features and common origins. The principle of reincarnation being key and Buddhism essentially being an offshoot of the more generic Hinduism, and Shintoism clearly also having Buddhist/Taoist influences.

Hinduism is clearly the worst of the lot as it imposes the concept of caste systems, which one can hardly move out of as a person born in India. The panopticon of so many gods and goddesses which resemble quite a bit all the human failings that we also saw in the Ancient Greek and Roman pantheons make this religion little more than the idolisation of anything from cows, to rats, to false idols and quite possibly demons. It has some roots in historical realities that took place long ago, but the process of “Chinese telephone” that played out over the ages has reduced it to a fantastic nonsensical bunch of disjointed fables.

Shintoism and Buddhism tend to be at least generally pacifist and their belief in reincarnation and veneration of ancestors is not at terrible odds with Christianity, but it is a far less complete guide to life and has far less morality in it than Catholicism. The overall attempt at achieving a total absence of desire is also the pursuit of permanent death, though some Buddhists will deny this, ultimately, that is what Nirvana means. And that kind of mindset is not exactly conducive to a particular virtue of caring for others, your extended family (besides elders holding a position of authority) or any other specific virtues, though overall Shintoist and Buddhists tend to be far more reliable than Hindus, who are not compelled to be honest at all.

Zen Buddhism and Taoism

Is a more separate aspect, of buddhism, and could be considered more a philosophy than a religion, being somewhat similar to stoicism, although ultimately more positive than stoicism. It concentrates on doing the best you can at any given moment, in any given situation. The general concept is also relatively pacifistic in nature, but able to respond with violence when or if threatened.

Protestantism

This is a degradation and secularisation of Christianity (Catholicism) and is wholly responsible for only almost entirely negative results, to wit:

  • The adoption of contraceptive
  • The permission of divorce
  • Which directly leads to sex before marriage
  • Which directly leads to sex mainly for fun instead of daily for procreation
  • Which directly leads to seeing children as a burden
  • Which directly leads to abortion
  • The extended and continuing “progressive” agenda of liberalism
  • Which leads to the adoption of a veneer of “Christianity” that has “personal interpretation” as the only rule
  • Which leads to the over 40,000 “denominations” of watered down, irrational and nonsensical versions of faux-christianity
  • Has been directly responsible for placing emotions above reason, a total inversion of actual Christian (Catholic) dogma, which is no surprise given that its original creator Luther stated that “Reason is the whore of the devil” and in fact, generally speaking, Protestants are indoctrinated in their false religion to the extent thatchy are literally incapable of changing their mind based on objective facts that contradict their emotional comfort zones, similarly to Muslims in this regard, appeals to logic fall on deaf ears.
  • The acceptance, eventual request for “equality” and “recognition” and ultimately forced “celebration” of deviant sexual behaviour and mental illness, like homosexuality and transgenderism respectively.
  • The shielding and “protecting” of Israel and the jewish masters that run the USA as being their “greatest ally” whilst denying the reality of the Talmudic Jewish religion, which have been brilliantly and concisely described by Rob Unz, himself a Jew, here: The Jewish Plot to Enslave Humanity.

Eastern “Orthodoxy”

Among all the religions described, Eastern “Orthodox” are the closest to Catholicism, diverging mostly on a few rarefied theological principles of little practical consequence and the main one being the rejection of the Pope as supreme leader of Christianity, which is a ridiculous reason since Popes existed for all the 1021 years previous to their schism, and were accepted by all as the supreme leaders. Something that was in any case affirmed and even reaffirmed multiple times, including a few hundred years after the schism. But overall their fruits are not as grand or positive as Catholicism, primarily also because they are essentially an insular religion that has strong national identities. Greek “Orthodox” are not in much of any kind of “communion” with Russian “Orthodox”, which in turn are not in much communion with Romanian “Orthodox” or Lithuanian “Orthodox”, and so on. So:

  • Their influence and spreading of the gospel has been weak, and their defence of Christianity abysmal when confronting the Muslims,
  • with whom they ganged up to try and kill the very Catholics that came to their aid some 41 years AFTER the schism. Betraying and murdering the Catholics three crusades in a row and then bitching and crying to this day when the fourth crusade sacked Constantinople (and did so in a relatively mild way, by the way).
  • They also failed to secure their own lands that had been taken over by the Muslims and when after 200 years the Catholics who protected those lands with contributions from Europe could no longer afford to do so refused to take ownership of all the fortified structured the Catholics had built for them and let those lands descent into Islam.
  • And today they are “in communion” with the fake “Catholics” who are actually Freemasons and Satanists (but I repeat myself), led by Arch-heretic and probably never-was-Catholic fake Pope Bergoglio, making them not just schismatics but also heretics too.

Despite all this, the Orthos are the closest to modelling reality AFTER the remaining Catholics.

Paganism

This is just a LARP (Live Action Role Playing Game) With occasional Cos-play aspects (People who get dressed up as fictional comic book characters at fantasy conventions). No one actually “believes” in Odin, or Freya, or Apollo, or Zeus, or Quetzalcoatl, or Cit-Bolon-Tum, they just pretend to. No one would give up their life rather than denounce one of these fake “Gods”, while hundreds of thousands if not millions have become martyrs for Christ over the last two millennia.

Returning to the baseline point

If you are wondering how we went from a podcast on feminism to the differences between religions, then I’d say it’s safe to assume that you have not been able to follow the logical thread and I advise you to go back and review it, but the overriding point is that since religion (as a model of objective reality) is the only way that morality can be defined in a way that is valid (assuming there is a God) then looking at the religions of the world is paramount in order to understand which one is best and:

  1. Best models reality, and
  2. Produces the best result for humanity at large

And if you think that Catholicism too is invalid, as are all the other religions (and Catholicism expressly states this, all other religions are false) then you have to note that the ABSENCE of any religion, including even ones like Islam has invariably resulted in massive degradation and mass murder. The Atheists of communism are responsible for over 100 million murders in just the last century alone. In short, the BEST thing that has ever happened to humanity at large, and by a HUGE margin, id Catholicism, and absolutely every aspect of human history demonstartes it in aces all the way.

So… in that context, women have a role that is pretty clearly understood, and is frankly better than any other system, including the current one that has ever existed on this Earth.

In Catholicism women are:

  • Protected (including from their own irrationality and wild emotions)
  • Cherished
  • Accommodated inasmuch as a man is generally able to, so as to make their life as easy and comfortable as possible
  • Shielded from the general ugliness of the world as much as a man is generally able to do so
  • Treated with respect

Commensurate with these benefits also come various duties, which generally speaking are:

  • Accepting the fact that generally speaking (and if they have been wise in their choice of husband) their husband, though an imperfect human being will do whatever he does PRIMARILY to benefit his family, his children and his wife and himself, in THAT order.
  • Accepting the fact that being generally more practical and given their instinct to place their family before themselves, absent a quite large gap in IQ where the woman is considerably smarter and wiser, a man will tend to mostly make good decisions for their shared future and while this will not always be the case, a good husband will also listen to a wife’s concerns if she has valid ones.
  • Accept that generally speaking, she should overall be more in charge of the day to day running of the household and the raising of children, particularly in their early years.
  • Be a positive, nurturing, supportive and respectful mate to her husband.

It does not mean a woman cannot work if she has that inclination, but surely, as a general rule, no role, no job, is more important than being a mother, and given this consideration, all other concepts of work or career become subjugate to it.

In essence, Catholicism recognises what has been demonstrated in the podcast I refer to at the start, that essentially, women are less capable of making important decisions and follow through with corresponding action for the benefit of civilisation as a whole than men are and this difference is notable, important and enough to determine if a civilisation thrives or dies.

Just as you would not want children to run industry, government or the military, neither should women. And just as you wouldn’t want children to be able to vote (because they would be fooled by literally every nonsensical scam and lie that politicians would tell them) neither should women, and essentially for the same reasons. They are not really equipped to have thought the issues through and be able to consider the ramifications, nor are they as capable at implementing any of the necessary systems that civilisation requires, from enforcing law and order to constructing nuclear power plants, and no, the rare exceptions of women who might be capable to, do not exist in any meaningful numbers and do not, as a whole, have any meaningful impact on the greater society at large. Which is not to say they do not exist and should not be celebrated when they do produce some meaningful contribution. St. Joan of Arc being one of many examples one could mention. But every one Joan of Arc, we have a hundred or a thousand St. Pauls or St Adrianus, or even just non-saint Jean-Parisot Le Vallette, or Nikola Tesla.

You might not LIKE the conclusions I describe here, but I think it is really quite impossible to dispute them. And as such, it makes far more sense to accept them and work sensibly towards working together to create a far more Catholic world than we have now.

Assassins Creed IRL

๐—›๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜† ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—จ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐—น ๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜† ๐—œ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ?

๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐Ÿณ๐˜๐—ต: Fake news about an assassination attempt against Saudi Crown Prince.

๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฏ๐˜๐—ต: Turkish President ErdoฤŸan holds emergency meeting following warning of possible military coup.

๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฑ๐˜๐—ต: Assassination attempt on Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico.

๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฒ๐˜๐—ต: Citizen arrested for threatening to assassinate Serbian President Vuฤiฤ‡.

๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿต๐˜๐—ต: Saudi Arabiaโ€™s King Salman hospitalized for second time in four weeks.

๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿต๐˜๐—ต: Helicopter crash involving Iranian President Raisi and Foreign Minister Amir-Abdollahian.

What do they all have in common?

And what about all the leaders who were against the whole Covid scam and WHO new rules etc etc who didnโ€™t make the news in a big way but who, if you paid attention went against the globohomo narrative of enslavement of humanity pretty hard?

Letโ€™s take a look at them:

You still think youโ€™re not in WWIII?

You still think this is all just some kind of antisemitic โ€œconspiracy theory?โ€œ

And keep in mind that Rob Unz is himself Jewish, before you go accusing him of being some kind of Nazi.

You still think they are not satanically after your children?

You still think the laws being put in place are for your benefit?

And you still think you are too smart, educated and objective for propaganda to have an effect on you? If so, then tell me, why does the words and image below give you such a sense of discomfort just to read silently to yourself, much less speak them aloud to your friends and family, never mind acquaintances?

And why is this labelled as โ€œwhite supremacyโ€ and no one bats an eyelid at it being labelled that way?

Are you not curious at all as to why romance is supposedly wrong and evil and racist? Or why loving your nation is also wrong and evil and racist? Or why printing stickers that say โ€œItโ€™s ok to be whiteโ€ gets you two years in jail in the UK?

Or why the image below on its own is also supposedly evil, wrong and racist to the point that you avoid putting it on your social media because you will be labelled as some evil, vile, racist, white supremacist?

You wouldnโ€™t post that image above on your curated social network that would be seen by your employer, but you are not affected by propaganda?

Right.

You are in a war. You have been in one all your life, as have all of us, itโ€™s just been too subtle and poisoning you a little at a time for you to notice until now. Now, for the first time, you can begin to see a little. And if you use that ability to notice things more objectively than you have for your entire life you just might begin to notice that this war has been intensifying greatly over the last 100 years. Itโ€™s the timespan that is slow and long that makes it hard to see things properly, which brings to the fore the concept that who is behind it all, is more than a mere human mind. And while certainly there are humans running things with a long term view of things, like the Rothschilds, and they are driven by a multi-generational religious belief in their ultimate destiny to rule over you with an iron fist, there is a far superior intelligence behind them that truly does hate humanity. In any case, whether you are able to see the larger religious/spiritual pattern or not, the human one and its perpetrators and victims should at least begin to be obvious to anyone with even a modicum of objective observation skills.

Iโ€™ll leave you with this video of a few minutes that gives you a historical perspective that is never discussed.

The Rothschild Banking Dynasty fomented war and assassination attempts on four presidents in order to create the Federal Reserve Bank. The Rothschild family began the War of 1812 because Congress failed to renew a 20-year charter for their Central Bank as well as how the ensuing debt of the war forced Congress to renew the charter.

Hopefully Cold fury and Western Rifle Shooters pick this one up to, and you too reader, maybe are becoming less afraid to share a link to this post with some people.

Because awareness that you are, and have been, and will continue to be, in a war of attrition being fought against you by people who hide in shadows is the first and most necessary step required for you to have a chance at reverting all of it. Which can be done in literal days once a critical mass of conscious awareness and popular will is achieved. And the faster and quickest and more sudden the shift, the less painful and bloody and traumatic it will ultimately be. So consider these things and help make others of your nation aware of them. And get over the idea of being labelled a โ€œracistโ€ by people who want to exterminate your entire genetic line.

Some Hypersonic Speculation

In case you werenโ€™t aware, several things have happened recently:

  • Slovakian PM Robert Fico was shot after he basically refused to take the (((USA/NATO))) side of the conflict in Ukraine and stated clearly he was against the Davos Satanists in essence.
  • The Satanist in the Vatican pretending to be Pope has said he, and only he can make any judgements on apparitions, supernatural events, or aliens happening.
  • This appeared in the sky in Japan:

  • This appeared in the skyi in Spain/Portugal

  • This is happening:

  • And the President of Iran Ebrahim Raisi just got swatted out of the sky is likely dead from a helicopter crash.

Blending all of that together with my Nazi conspiracy theories (If you have read my Overlords of Mars series you know, if not, click on the Overlords of Mars icon on the left sidebar, or even better, buy my book Nazi Moon, either at my E-Store or on Amazon) I am now going to put out a list of quite unlikely/weird scenarios, but given what the weirdness bingo card for 2024 looks like so far, who knows, I may get a couple right.

So here are the possible outcomes of all this in no specific order and all of them just my wild opinions and speculations:

  • Since the Clowns running the West are whacking Russian allies like Fico and Resi, Russia will start whacking Clown World allies. Except that they are all so incompetent and useless that itโ€™s strategically better for Russia to just continue letting the usual criminals carry on at their posts, since they are destroying any kind of military competence the West might have once had against Russia.
  • Nazi bases in Antarctica will finally be partially exposed by Russia, and either to cover it up, or to progress the agenda mentioned by Wernher Von Braun, a fake alien invasion will finally be staged. Possibly also a faked second coming, which Bergoglio and his Satanists will โ€œvalidateโ€ only for this light and show phenomena to be โ€œacceptedโ€ as the real second coming of Jesus in order to gain control over any believers. They would so this with a project bluebeam scheme.
  • Iran bombs Tel Aviv. Other Arab states join in, the Jewish Elite rejoice as they finally slaughter the perfect red bulls, AND get their real Holocaust as the burnt offering required for their prophecy of the Messiah (our Antichrist) to come to take power is fulfilled.
  • The Antarctic treaty was signed by the USSR which has since dissolved so, technically, Russia cannot be held to it. There is a precedent set, because Finland had an agreement it would not arm with certain missile weapons in a treaty also signed by the USSR, and then went ahead and armed anyway because the treaty was with the USSR and not Russia. Soโ€ฆ even by international law, Russia could have an argument for doing whatever it wants in Antarctica. The resulting potential exposure might prompt Clown World to start the Von Braun exposed plot of the fake alien invasion, but actual real aliens might exist (there is overwhelming evidence this is likely) and take the opportunity to push their own agenda too concerning the human race.
  • The actual Biblical End Times may be arriving. Which should not be a concern for actual Christians, of which we absolutely know there will be only a handful left by the tine of the second coming of Christ. So Sedevacantism is looking increasingly like being the real Christianity par exellance, and the only one that might ensure actual salvation IF adhered to, since in Catholicism (and logic and basic reason) the concept of once saved always saved is nonsensical.
  • Some European nations may actually begin to see armed citizen rebellions aimed at overthrowing the current puppets of the (((American))) controllers. Any hardcore nationalists that stamp out the worst aspects of corruption, campaign on a platform of repatriating every single foreigner, and institute common sense self-defence laws and reinstate basic principles of law and order aligned with these common, normal, and universal human principles, will have land-slide victories, but armed rebellion will likely still be the only way they come to power since the foreign powers that currently rule the USA and Europe are not going to permit power to change as a mere result of โ€œvotingโ€; especially since actual results of voting are completely subverted.

So thatโ€™s my hypersonic speculations for the month of May.

Why Protestantism is the Destruction of the West

Andrew Torba has written his regular newsletter, which you can see as a blog post here.

In it he laments the various issues that are ensuring the American population, along with the European one, are falling (and have been for a long time) below replacement value.

He does this by mentioning the issues, while apparently being totally oblivious of how any of these issues became issues in the first place, and what the root cause of all of them was and is.

Itโ€™s really quite astonishing. But I think it can be useful to look at this peculiar blindness of his as a starting point to show with a certain level of clarity and obviousness what the baseline issues are originating from, and how, specifically, in each case, this can be demonstrated to have massive evidence for the fact that, at root, all of these issues have the starting point of the Protestant rebellion against the Catholic Church.

Now, if you are a Protestant, irritating as you may find me and my perspectives, I sincerely hope you settle down, muster as much objective consideration for the rest of this post as you can, and consider it calmly and objectively. And if some of my rhetoric infuriates you, pay attention to that, and notice which bits do so the most (these are where your biggest logical hurdles and fallacies are going to be found), then let them go and try, for the sake of argument at least, to imagine they are true and correct anyway (they are, my rhetoric is so unpleasant for people because it invariably is laced with painful truth).

And then see if you canโ€™t understand my points from a birdโ€™s eye view, instead of taking it personally against you as a person, the people who taught you to be a Protestant that you care about, and so on.

Being as Torba is a Protestant himself, and being that Protestants, like solipsistic women, only backwards rationalise any reality in the past that factually makes them responsible for anything, instead of facing the facts squarely on, he seems to think this situation is totally divorced from anything to do with Protestantism. In fact he blindly points out the issues while completely oblivious to the reasons of why, how and when these things became issues.

It really is a kind of perspective of extreme selfishness or self-centeredness to the point of being oblivious of the destruction one leaves in oneโ€™s wake. Any damage done is just some magical thing that just happens on its own and is always fully justifiable in just such a way (by some magic) that means it is never, ever, ever, that personโ€™s fault.

What a selfish, stupid, spoilt brat, or a woman (men too, but they generally are more consciously aware than women in this regard) would do on an individual level, Protestants do on a massive social level that covers the last five centuries.

So allow me now to quote Torba from his post and comment on each point in some detail. If you are able to divorce your personal feelings on each issue, and note the broad historical facts in each case, I think you will see that what I say about Protestantism is not just true, but that on some level, you have always known it, because the plastic, veneer feel of the disconnect between the entire Protestant mish-mash chaos non-structure of it, has never married properly to the deep sense of culture, tradition, history and ancestors that created and protected Christendom from the time of Jesus, to:

  • The formation of Benedictine monasteries,
  • The crusades, and the 200 years they held the Outremer while being attacked by both Muslims and the Eastern schismatics they came to the aid of (after they had already split themselves off from the One True Church),
  • The rebellion against Godโ€™s Church, under the guise of it being a Protestation against the corrupt men within it, which have always been there, but who never changed the truth of the Church,
  • The siege of Malta and the Catholic knights that defended it from the consequent destruction of Christendom as a whole if Malta had fallen,
  • The gradual, intentional and devastating infiltration of the Church by freemasons (illuminati, satanists, carbonari, etc their name is legion), communists, homosexuals and pedophiles, starting in earnest in the late 1770, alongside the planned and executed destruction of every European royal house; because since the time of Charlemagne, the nobility had been associated with being the protectors of the Church, that is, the physical and worldly protectors of the Church (the guys who fight, as all nobles who took part in the crusades did) and they had to be broken before the Church could be damaged meaningfully from within,
  • The noticing of this by various Popes, culminating in Pope Pious X who started the putting together of the code of canon law of 1917, an amazing document that reviewed tens of thousands of documents written over the last two millennia, in order to ensure there was no conflict, contradiction or logical fallacy among them all, so they could be summarised as the essence of Catholic dogma in one volume, which was completed and promulgated by Pope Benedict the XV in 1917 and stood the test of time from then, through to the death of the last valid Pope, Pious XII, and even beyond it, as the Satanists finally took the throne of Peter in 1958, and have held it since, yet the True Church remains, as does the impenetrable fortress of the Code of 1917, and the last remnant of faithful Bishops and Priests that retain Catholicism as their faith, and not the false, Satanic version of โ€œCatholicismโ€ espoused by the promulgators of Vatican II and its manifest heresies in the form of the deceitful Novus Ordo fake “Church”.

The simple fact is that on some level, every protestant senses that deep down, no matter how genuine their wish to be one with God the Father, Christ the Son, and the Holy Spirit, the entire history of their supposed religion is littered with disconnects and logical fallacies that simply cannot be reconciled. And deep down, they sense too, that one cannot simply be united with Christ by merely saying he is. There are rules. There always were from the start, and they do not change. But I have mentioned the historical perspective starting from the beginning, many times before, and few are willing to take that journey. So today, we will do something different. We will take Torbaโ€™s newsletter and dissect the issues he mentions and see how and where they came from in the first place.

You Need To Be Babymaxxing: A Call to Action for Christians A disturbing trend has been emerging over the past few decades: the birth rate of every US state, along with the birth rate in most western nations, has dipped below the replacement population level. This has sparked widespread concern and fear, as this demographic shift could have catastrophic consequences for the long-term survival of some of the worldโ€™s most prosperous and influential societies and people groups.

And what might have led to that catastrophic drop in birth rate, when third world Africans, Indians and others keep producing children despite conditions most Westerners can’t even imagine, much less are able to take on in their own lives? Let’s ponder it a bit, shall we?

The root causes of this demographic decline are complex and multifaceted, but there are a few key factors that stand out. First and foremost: the rise of secularism and individualism has led to a decreased emphasis on traditional family values and a growing number of people choosing not to have children. Our culture of atomized individualism in the West has transformed so many into self-centered and selfish monsters.

So… the increase of secularism, individualism and atomisation of society. Where, O WHERE might such an idea come from? Could it possibly have ANYTHING at all to do with going from a global religion that was prevalent throughout the entire West and even much of the East (though slightly perverted and erroneous there) to CHANGING that religion to be… what was it oh yeah…

  • Individualistic (every man interprets the Bible (which was changed from the original used for 1200 years) as he sees fit.)
  • Schismatic at its very root. We now have over 40,000 versions of Protestantism, but even then each of these is really only a shadowy illusion of coherence, because in truth EVERY Protestant feels entitled to be his own Pope, Bishop and Priest and interpret the Bible, and Christianity as a whole, (including the ancient traditions he is usually abysmally ignorant of) as he sees fit, which is why Protestants will change Church like normal people change socks. They are not Churches at all, just lose coalitions where you pick and choose the bits that suit you. What do you think the effect of that is on society as a whole? Might be just a tad atomising? Just a smidge of secularisation creeping in? You think? How would that play out over 500 years?

Additionally, the increasing cost of living and the pressure to pursue higher education and career success have made it more difficult for many couples to afford to have large families. Itโ€™s tough, but not impossible, to have a large family when the economy is so rigged against you doing so. Making it happen requires a lot of self-sacrifice and a reevaluation of your priorities.

No lie there, but where does this incessant need to have a “career” and prioritising work come from? Well, let’s see, historically where can we trace this sudden absolute importance of WORK over LIFE? What’s that, I hear? The Industrial Revolution? Right. I agree. Which was taught to me in school as a young boy as this marvel of British Engineering and know-how and just an overall great thing for the advancement of humanity. Except… no one mentioned the social consequences. They all presented the creation of trains and railways and machinery as all positive technological advancements while completely ignoring whether:

  • They actually were positive overall for humanity, or
  • Regardless of that, what social conditions did the much vaunted “Protestant Work Ethic” actually entail in day-to-day activities and family dynamics?
  • What priorities do you think you need to have to come up with the Industrial Revolution in terms of valuing your family time and your work time? What effects on general human interactions do you think are going to be more prevalent? Would a general disconnect from other human beings being seen as other human beings you necessarily relate to, regardless of personal differences, purely on the basis of the reality in front of you that they too are human beings, be useful to foster a general perception of other people being seen more as potential cogs in the machinery of “society” than actual human beings? The deeper implication of this are manifold and absolutely fundamental. A perfect example of this, which is an extreme case, in order to highlight the difference, is that if a Protestant mind were to say, be forced into a war of strife against invading foreigners, he would execute it more or less in cold blood for the most part as a negative but necessary thing. A Catholic would execute it with quite a different frame of mind. Alongside the same practical need, the Catholic would further be driven in his righteous rage that such an event has become necessary as a result of the other side refusing to act like reasonable human beings. So their extermination is not just a necessity for practical purposes, but also a necessity from an educational and spiritual perspective. A Protestant cuts a tree down because it’s in the way. A Catholic evaluates if the tree is noxious, in which case he will dig it up from the roots and burn it, or merely in the way, in which case he will endeavour to dig it up from the roots and replant it somewhere appropriate. It is a MASSIVE psychological difference and affects every aspect of your attitude towards life and all its challenges.

Finally, the widespread availability of birth control and abortion has enabled people to easily prevent pregnancies and terminate them when they do occur, further exacerbating the problem. We are making great strides on banning abortion in many states across the nation, but decades of damage has already been done.

And where did that magical birth control come from? Oh wait, the pill was invented by a Jewish guy. Just a coincidence I am sure, regardless of the fact that Jews (Talmudic Pharisees) have hated the Catholic Church from the start and have tried to destroy it at every turn including their deep infiltration of it over centuries and the Protestantisation of it with Vatican II in which they were instrumental in forming.

But what about the adoption of it? Which kind of people adopted birth control in this form? Not Catholics. Even today, some 66 years after the throne of Peter was usurped by Satanists, the momentum of the real Catholicism that still exists (though crumbling rapidly in the Novus Ordo fake Church) makes it nigh on impossible for the fake Pope Bergoglio to say it’s ok to use. It was Protestants in their legion of denominations that began to accept socially the concept of divorce in the first place. An event that was forbidden by the Catholic Church and only permitted in the sense of an annulment, which has very specific rules to be granted.

But if divorce becomes acceptable, then the entire concept of marriage becomes a store-bought idea, no longer a sacrament for life. And once you accept marriage as a kind of diploma you can buy in a store, well, you should be able to switch diplomas at will if one loses its lustre. And since it might go wrong, it only makes sense to take it for a test run first. Which means sex before marriage. Which could end up with babies with a person you’re just taking out for a test ride! I mean they have a nice body, or maybe are rich, or whatever, so you want to see if you’re “compatible” in terms of orgasms per month, you know, like miles per gallon and so on. So of course you need some baby making prevention thing!

And then it’s a short step from treating sex as a test run for marriage to making it just for fun. I mean sex is really a LOT of fun. Like a lot, lot. Like it messes with you brain and body chemistry level of great fun. So why wouldn’t you want to get addicted to this natural rush that doesn’t even require drugs, and is better than all the rushes you get from a drug anyway, if you practice it enough to really get good at it? Well, of course sex would go from being a test ride for marriage to a sport. And once sex is for fun, the last thing you want is a baby with someone you can’t even have a decent conversation with, but oh my God are they awesome at the orgasms per mile, or whatever the measure was, right?

So, “naturally” the next thing that happens if a baby does come into the equation… and marriage is not a sacrament anymore as a dedication to bringing in new life (that is what marriage is for, making children, I know, it’s a shock, but seriously, look it up historically, sport-fucking doesn’t feature at all. Not even a little bit), well, what else are you gonna do, other than kill that baby, since it’s a nuisance. And so we have gone in a few short steps from allowing divorce –> sex before marriage –> sex for fun –> contraception –> baby killing.

And remind yourself, which secularisation of Christianity movement did that? You can’t blame Catholicism for it. Even the fake “Catholic” Church to date at least can’t advocate for contraception (they will in due course, no doubt, because Satanists are gonna Satanist).

While there is undoubtedly a lot of fear-mongering surrounding this issue, it is not without merit. If the current trend continues it could lead to a significant decline in the population of some of the worldโ€™s most prosperous and influential nations, which would have far-reaching consequences for global stability and economic growth.

Note that Torba’s first concern is global stability and economic growth. The ever present and Jewish –> Protestant belief in their true God, the almighty dollar. Profit, wealth. An amorphous “stability” of people and lands so far removed from us you will never see them even once in your life. There is a reason why America is called the great Satan by the Arab world, and while their religion is demonic too, they are not entirely wrong, which is what I tried to explain as gently as possible here.

More importantly it would also represent a tragic loss for the unique cultures, traditions, and values that have been cultivated by these societies over centuries.

Again, while he is not wrong, the point is not that any one specific culture or tradition is really all that relevant in the scheme of things, UNLESS, that tradition and culture also happens to be the best, surest, most tried and tested true and real approximation of how reality actually works as God intended. Then it’s kinda like… ALL IMPORTANT. So, despite your specific and particular distaste for Catholicism, which is based on nothing but lies about what it is, perpetrated down the centuries that you never bothered to look up yourself and the same sense of things passed on to you by your relatives and people you loved, who were just as ignorant of the truth (or more) as you are and they too believed the lies and inaccuracies, you should really make an effort to educate yourself on these things and figure them out by yourself.

Christians are called to be fruitful and multiply (Genesis 1:28). We need to be babymaxxing. This commandment is not just a suggestion or a personal preference, but an essential part of our mission to spread the Gospel and disciple the nations. By having large families and raising our children to be faithful, God-fearing people we can ensure the continued growth and prosperity of our communities and the preservation of our shared values and traditions.

Sounds good? Sure. But it’s a plastic American commercial. “Buy this product, it looks good, it makes you look cool and it’s needed!”

Tell me Andrew, with SPECIFICITY:

  • Continued growth and prosperity for your communities. Exactly WHAT and HOW do you mean this? What do you think will happen if people have a lot of children with only a vague sense of community brought on by a generic, amorphous, non-specific, “belief in X” that has no set rules, no set tradition, no set reality.
  • What “community” are you referring to, PRECISELY. Are the Methodists gonna get along with the Mormons, and the Mormons with the Seventh Day Adventists, and they with the Amish, and they with the Anabaptists, and they with the Baptists, and they with the Lutherans, and they with the Calvinists, and they with the lesbian “bishops” of whatever “Church” that is, and they with the transgender “bishop” that was in the news of another faction and they with…(repeat for 40,000 iterations). Is that the “community” you refer to? Those people all gonna band together under the banner of “Christ” are they? I think not. I think the entire history of America, and all Protestant nations, has shown such people will band together only under the banner of the (previously) might dollar, or German mark, or Pound Stirling. And then only until it profits them. And any true believers in the mix will get stampeded in the overall melee. It’s hard enough to have a community when they actually ARE all Catholics, but it does work and it has for many centuries. It has never worked in any protestant country other than to create more government, more regulation, and a perpetual chase for profit.

Moreover, by focusing on our own households and prioritizing the growth of our families, we can counteract the destructive influence of our enemies, most of whom do not have children of their own. As their ideas and ideologies die with them, our faith and values will continue to thrive, passed down from generation to generation through the strong bonds of family and community.

What faith and values and traditions would those be? The ones that did not manage to survive other than as a thinly veiled veneer of false honesty, respectability and dignity to cover over the perpetual search for profit, worldly fame and fortune? The one that has not managed to keep trannies from claiming the “right” to get “married” in your protestant “Churches” and have “pregnant men” as part of the “accepted reality”?

And before you say “Oh but that doesn’t happen in MY denomination number 38,792!” Stop and think for 5 seconds, what the Hell you’re actually saying and how you are missing the ENTIRE point of what Christianity and being part of the ACTUAL “body of Christ” means and how and where your illogical, historical clown-world “religion”, came to be.

So, what can we do to address this crisis and fulfill our divine calling as Christians?

Well, you can start by actually becoming actual Christians, to begin with, which means the ONLY denomination of Christianity that has always been there from the start: Catholicism. And which today exists ONLY in Sedevacantist Catholicism, aka Catholicism, since the buildings, property, wealth and outer garments of Catholicism have all been usurped, infiltrated and corrupted by the Satanists pretending to be “Catholics” that now infest the Vatican and everyone remotely connected with Novus Ordo heresies.

Here are a few practical steps we can take:

Embrace the concept of โ€œbabymaxxingโ€: This means prioritizing the growth of our families and actively seeking to have as many children as possible. It may require making sacrifices and reevaluating our priorities, but the rewards will be immeasurable.

Support and encourage other Christian families in their efforts to have children: This can take many forms, from offering emotional support and guidance to providing material assistance, such as helping with childcare or contributing to the financial costs of raising a large family.

Advocate for policies that support large families: This can include lobbying for tax breaks and other financial incentives for families with multiple children, as well as pushing for educational and healthcare policies that make it easier for parents to raise large families.

Promote a culture of life: This means working to end the scourge of abortion and advocating for the sanctity of human life at all stages, from conception to natural death.

These are all good suggestions, but completely doomed to fail is they are not founded on a solid bedrock of being connected to truth and reality, and that means, a religion that is itself based in truth and reality. Anything that is a watered down version of the original, with literally tens of thousands of roads down false paths, simply cannot stand the test of time. It has never worked in ANY human endeavour, much less in the experience of mankind other than by the enforcing of it by brutal methods and force, be it Islam or communism. The ONLY philosophy that has thrived and done so entirely voluntarily, is Catholicism, which imposes force ONLY on its declared enemies, and even then, usually only after patiently trying to dissuade them from their evil paths of attack.

Educate and disciple our children: It is not enough to simply have many children; we must also ensure that they are raised in the fear and knowledge of the Lord, instilling in them the values and principles that will enable them to carry on our faith and traditions for generations to come.

Name me ONE Protestant denomination that has lasted unchanged and retained anything even resembling a constant tradition and heritage without multiple schisms for even just 100 years. It doesn’t exist. Not a single one. The Catholic Church has remained steadfast and its rules and dogma unchanged for almost precisely 2000 years.

The demographic crisis facing the world today is a serious and urgent challenge that demands our immediate attention and action. Christians have a unique responsibility to confront this issue head-on and work tirelessly to ensure the continued growth and prosperity of our communities and the preservation of our shared values and traditions. By embracing the concept of โ€œbabymaxxingโ€ and focusing on our own households, we can secure the future of our faith and our people and leave a lasting legacy for generations to come.

Not really. Doing so within the context of a properly Catholic community (that is, sedevacantist) has a chance of succeeding because historically Catholicism has risen from the ashes many times, as it will continue to do, because it IS the real Christianity and Jesus promised us He will be with us to the End. Pretending or play-acting that role in a fake “Christian” denomination will only last barely the duration of one human lifetime IF the parties in question happen to have a real personal affinity, that is obviously totally absent from any group of people beyond a couple of families that get on with each other. Catholic communities are not held together by the ephemeral characters of any of its constituents, but by a shared absolute belief in God that transcends petty personal and human failings, of which we are ALL riddled with.

Babymaxxing is not just a personal decision, but a collective responsibility that requires the support and encouragement of the entire Christian community. It may involve making sacrifices and reevaluating our priorities, but the rewards will be worth it.

No group that is not tied together by a bond of religious belief that goes far deeper than mere words and appearances will ever give anything even remotely resembling the kind of helping hand they will inevitably secure for their own family above others. Even among Catholic families this is still an issue, though one that is absolutely muted to a huge extent. I have absolute certainty that if I or any other of the Catholic families we know suddenly won a billion dollars at the lotto, or even just a few million, ALL the Catholic families near them would benefit too. I for one would literally buy houses and land in other people’s names to have them and their children as neighbours, but I am NOT the only one by far. Any one of the people in our Sedevacantist community would act the same, I am certain of it, and this was never the case in any other “community” I was ever a part of, be it people I trained for decades in martial arts with, people I worked as an armed security professional with, and literally risked my life alongside theirs, nor even childhood friends. The bond created by a true religion is of a quality and nature you simply have no experience of until you are in it. And it does not happen as a result of any of the 40,000 Protestant denominations. It might happens between a few families and even then will not last beyond the second generation, but it has been demonstrated to exist and work and remain in Catholic communities even some 100 years after the basic infiltration of the Church was already complete.

All of the chips are on the table with this issue. Those who take it seriously will inherit the future by default as their continued growth and reproduction will ensure the long-term survival and prosperity of their communities, cultures, and values. While the rest of the world struggles with declining birth rates and the threat of extinction-level events, Christians can take comfort in the knowledge that our faith and values will continue to thrive, passed down from generation to generation through the strong bonds of family and community.

No Andrew. The reality is that all groups that are not homogeneously coherent, that is, all the varied Protestant denominations, will gradually be chewed down by the wolves at their edges, and continue to degrade and become diluted generation after generation until they are assimilated by the globular mass that is the entire plan of those who have been putting it in place for literally millennia.

Get married. Babymax. Get to Church. We are going to win.

The advice is sound, but not just any pretend, clown-costumed, “Church” will do. Only the real one will make a difference, as it always has throughout history. And while ULTIMATE victory is assured, no one, not even Jesus knows that day or hour of when that will come, only God the Father. So, the concept of you seeing this victory in YOUR lifetime is iffy at best, so best to not worry about it and get busy building the impregnable, un-infiltratable, ready to throw out anyone not part of it, community that is the only one to have overcome everything from the Roman Empire to the Arian heresy, and who, in time, will also triumph over the present desolation of the real Church, were only Sedevacantists are left to carry the faith.

Andrew Torba
CEO, Gab.com
Christ is King

All perfectly normalโ€ฆ

WARNING: DO NOT SCROLL DOWN AND READ THIS POST UNLESS YOU HAVE A STRONG STOMACH

Seriously, not kidding.

What you will be unable to unsee if you continue is the behaviour of your average lefty homosexual politician.

The first a Spanish councilor who had to resign as a result of hisโ€ฆ predilections.

The other is a German candidate for the FDP party.

Below that is an orthodox Jewish Rabbi praising the Azov neo-Nazi unit in Ukraine (in Ukrainian language), but heโ€™s Jewish and a Rabbi so itโ€™s fine if he praises Nazis, but if others do it in Europe they go to jail for it.

And we round off with what your betters who lead you voted as a shining example of what your typical migrant can become if only we give him a chance!

This is the West.

This is what your leaders and governments are promoting.

St. Putin deliver us. Because if this is the alternative, the sweet release of nuclear fire will be welcomed.

Seriously, donโ€™t do it. You canโ€™t unsee any of it once you look.

Weaponizing the Chickens

Yes, ladies and gentlemen, strap yourselves in for the probable next manufactured scamdemic. If it isn’t going to be the thing that kills children by having them bleed from their eyes, ears and other orifices, they will blame the sneezing of chickens for the next bioweapon attack on you.

Former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield warned last week on NewsNation:

I’m obviously most worried about bird flu. Right now, it takes five amino acid changes for it to be effectively infecting humans. That’s a pretty heavy species barrier – but this virus is already in 26 mammal species, as you most recently saw cattle. But in the laboratory, I could make it highly infectious for humans in just months.” 

Redfield continued:ย 

That’s the real threat. That’s the real biosecurity threat that these university labs are doing bio-experiments that are intentionally modifying viruses – and I think bird flu is going to be the cause of the Great Pandemic – where they’re teaching these viruses to be more infectious for humans.” 

Here’s Redfield’s interview:

A Clarification on Nazism

Due to my writing on the Nazi regime of a fictionalised situation, as presented in my overlords of Mars series, culminating in the full trilogy currently available only under the single title Nazi Moon, as well as my continuing observations of the Talmudic religion, Jewish Leaders of the state of Israel and even Jewish behaviour in general, some readers have assumed and ascribed positions to me that I do not hold. In order to be absolutely clear on the matter, allow me then to state my position in very simple (but hopefully not simplified) terms.

1. No human being is precluded salvation other than by choice, as Catholic dogma clearly states. We all have free will and we all are able to know in our heart the order of the Universe because it is written in every grain of sand and every sunset and sunrise. Even lost tribes of indigenous people who have never heard the name of Jesus have a possibility (vanishingly small though it is) of being saved by a merciful God.

2. No human being is guaranteed salvation, not even after conversion. The idea of once saved always saved is an illogical nonsense only a people so historically and logically incapable as Protestants have been trained to be could possibly hold in their poorly functioning minds.

3. In my opinion, in the eyes of God, the soul of any human being has equal importance and He hopes and wishes for every one of us to be saved, but forcing it would invalidate free will, so ultimately, the choice is down to us, and if we seek the truth, by His Grace, He will see to it we find it eventually. Only extremely hard headed idiots like myself need a Road to Damascus event to show us the Way, for most, simple logic and observation is enough to lead to the ultimate truth of Catholicism. I console myself with the fact that even the Apostles were among the ones who had a hard head, Thomas being my favourite Apostle.

4. With regard to Nazism specifically, my position is precisely the one the Church held as per the Papal Encyclical of Pope Pious XI which in part reads:

8. Whoever exalts race, or the people, or the State, or a particular form of State, or the depositories of power, or any other fundamental value of the human community – however necessary and honorable be their function in worldly things – whoever raises these notions above their standard value and divinizes them to an idolatrous level, distorts and perverts an order of the world planned and created by God; he is far from the true faith in God and from the concept of life which that faith upholds. 

9. Beware, Venerable Brethren, of that growing abuse, in speech as in writing, of the name of God as though it were a meaningless label, to be affixed to any creation, more or less arbitrary, of human speculation. Use your influence on the Faithful, that they refuse to yield to this aberration. Our God is the Personal God, supernatural, omnipotent, infinitely perfect, one in the Trinity of Persons, tri-personal in the unity of divine essence, the Creator of all existence. Lord, King and ultimate Consummator of the history of the world, who will not, and cannot, tolerate a rival God by His side. 

10. This God, this Sovereign Master, has issued commandments whose value is independent of time and space, country and race. As God’s sun shines on every human face so His law knows neither privilege nor exception. Rulers and subjects, crowned and uncrowned, rich and poor are equally subject to His word. From the fullness of the Creators’ right there naturally arises the fullness of His right to be obeyed by individuals and communities, whoever they are. This obedience permeates all branches of activity in which moral values claim harmony with the law of God, and pervades all integration of the ever-changing laws of man into the immutable laws of God. 

11. None but superficial minds could stumble into concepts of a national God, of a national religion; or attempt to lock within the frontiers of a single people, within the narrow limits of a single race, God, the Creator of the universe, King and Legislator of all nations before whose immensity they are “as a drop of a bucket” (Isaiah xI, 15). 

12. The Bishops of the Church of Christ, “ordained in the things that appertain to God (Heb. v, 1) must watch that pernicious errors of this sort, and consequent practices more pernicious still, shall not gain a footing among their flock. It is part of their sacred obligations to do whatever is in their power to enforce respect for, and obedience to, the commandments of God, as these are the necessary foundation of all private life and public morality; to see that the rights of His Divine Majesty, His name and His word be not profaned; to put a stop to the blasphemies, which, in words and pictures, are multiplying like the sands of the desert; to encounter the obstinacy and provocations of those who deny, despise and hate God, by the never-failing reparatory prayers of the Faithful, hourly rising like incense to the All-Highest and staying His vengeance. 

13. We thank you, Venerable Brethren, your priests and Faithful, who have persisted in their Christian duty and in the defense of God’s rights in the teeth of an aggressive paganism. Our gratitude, warmer still and admiring, goes out to those who, in fulfillment of their duty, have been deemed worthy of sacrifice and suffering for the love of God. 

14. No faith in God can for long survive pure and unalloyed without the support of faith in Christ. “No one knoweth who the Son is, but the Father: and who the Father is, but the Son and to whom the Son will reveal Him” (Luke x. 22). “Now this is eternal life: That they may know thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou has sent” (John xvii. 3). Nobody, therefore, can say: “I believe in God, and that is enough religion for me,” for the Savior’s words brook no evasion: “Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father. He that confesseth the Son hath the Father also” (1John ii. 23). 

15. In Jesus Christ, Son of God made Man, there shone the plentitude of divine revelation. “God, who at sundry times and in divers manners, spoke in times past to the fathers by the prophets last of all, in these days hath spoken to us by His Son” (Heb. i. 1). The sacred books of the Old Testament are exclusively the word of God, and constitute a substantial part of his revelation; they are penetrated by a subdued light, harmonizing with the slow development of revelation, the dawn of the bright day of the redemption. As should be expected in historical and didactic books, they reflect in many particulars the imperfection, the weakness and sinfulness of man. But side by side with innumerable touches of greatness and nobleness, they also record the story of the chosen people, bearers of the Revelation and the Promise, repeatedly straying from God and turning to the world. Eyes not blinded by prejudice or passion will see in this prevarication, as reported by the Biblical history, the luminous splendor of the divine light revealing the saving plan which finally triumphs over every fault and sin. It is precisely in the twilight of this background that one perceives the striking perspective of the divine tutorship of salvation, as it warms, admonishes, strikes, raises and beautifies its elect. Nothing but ignorance and pride could blind one to the treasures hoarded in the Old Testament.

I held this position in essence even before I read the Papal Encyclical for the first time today, although, while familiar with many other aspects of Nazism, my disinterest in Catholicism prior to my conversion was such that I did not care about the relations the Church had with Nazism.

Keep in mind that encyclical was written in 1937. But even before I was Catholic, I have always had a very strong preference for Justice and Truth above all else, so my position was never really far from the actual Catholic Church, which today is to be found only in Sedevacantism, and of which not a shred remains in the Vatican or the impostors of the Novus Orco satanic sect.

I hope this clarifies the situation.

The Nazi reaction to the usual financial skulldrugery, sexual degeneracy and perversion, destruction of basic principles of Christian truth and justice the Jews invariably indulge in was certainly understandable and to some extent even justified, but to assume that Adolf Hitler was some kind of saint, or the Nazis a pure and righteous people without sin is as absurd as thinking every Jew under the sun is an evil monster deserving of death.

Broadly speaking, generalities, like clichรฉs, are based in factual truth and if I say that generally speaking the Jews are an underhanded, sneaky people with principles of philosophy that diverge immensely from Catholic concepts of honour, truth, justice and reality, it is an undeniable fact.

Just as true is the fact that, generally speaking, the Germans of the WWII era were a people so desperate for leadership, and an ingrained sense of following orders and hierarchical authority that they would blindly march into behaviours more commensurate with sociopaths than normal human beings.

Is every Jew a monster? Was every Nazi one?

No. I am certain that in each camp some outstanding examples of human courage and honesty existed. Who, precisely, they might have been, only God knows for sure.

But are Jews today a dominant force for almost all that is wrong in the current dystopian global landscape? Absolutely, yes. Though I need to specify that the string pulling is done by an exceedingly small faction within the Jewish realm, and those within that subset have no problem at all subjecting even other Jews to the same (if not worse) genocidal pressures they envision for the rest of us; as prescribed by their Satanic religion after all, since a sacrifice of their own people, a literal Holocaust, is required before the emergence of their โ€œMessiahโ€, that is, the Antichrist of our Catholic religion.

In case you were not aware

A friend sent me a link to an interesting blog that has some rather rare finds concerning freemasonry and their origins.

While Freemasonry as we find it today (i.e. Satanism) was founded by the rampantly homosexual British King James, the same who had the KJV โ€œBibleโ€ put together, also (and more accurately) known as the Freemasonic Bible, since it has 33,000 errors of translation and worked to minimise the actual Christian dogmas as well as the presence of Mary in it, the roots of Freemasonry which are also the same as those of the Illuminati, Carbonari and so on, are rather interesting.

Enjoy these two posts in particular, you can read each image better by clicking on it.

First name of the Masons

The โ€œScottishโ€ Rite

And he has an even more interesting post on some of the origins of Vatican II. I covered the infiltration of the Church in order to have Vatican II happen in some detail in my own book, RTCC, but this specific piece is one I had not come across before.

The fake conversion of the V2 intruders

Itโ€™s quite astonishing with what fervour and tenacity the Christ killers have gone after Catholicism specifically since the very start, which should be no surprise given that they are the spiritual descendants of the very same Christ killers who saw to it Christ would be crucified.

This page was disappeared as apparently so was the old blog, but the wayback machine still has a copy.

On Malachi Martin.

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks