Archery Post n. 11 – Improving accuracy

I fired twice today:

• First lot – 20 metres distance, 15 out of 18 hits.
• Second Lot – 20 metres distance 10 out of 15 hits.
• Total arrows fired so far: 131

Observations:

• Both times, my first shot missed high. I still tend to overestimate arrow drop.
• The second lot I was trying to use part of the riser as a gross way to aim, so it’s natural my accuracy fell somewhat.

Lessons learnt:

1. Retaining a calm mind remains without shadow of a doubt the MOST important aspect of shooting accurately. It’s really quite surprising how much this is the case. For some reason I think archery makes this fundamental aspect of really any endeavour, become highlighted in a way that I can’t recall being quite the same in anything else aside from long range shooting.
2. Using some kind of aiming device is certainly going to improve accuracy, especially in the short term. However, I have some doubts:
   1. While it will undoubtedly improve accuracy in the beginning, I wonder if it also closes off some doors to instinctive or parasympathetic nervous system methods of aiming which would be far more accurate in the long term (Systema principles).
   2. I did experience a mild form of this when I simply abandoned any thought of trying to use the riser to aim and instead simply tried to “feel” my way to hitting the target and came pretty close a couple of times to hit the small 4” disk in the centre of the cardboard box.
   As a result I have not yet decided if to begin using a bow-sight, but if I do it will be a very simple and probably home made one. My boy, unlike my wife’s has no pre-drilled hole or available place for the insertion of a bow sight, so it would be more a matter of marking the riser somehow. However, I also find the action of consciously using the riser to aim to be somewhat “artificial” and unnatural in terms of how I tend to shoot the bow, so I’m sure if I will be adding any kind of measuring/sight type of adaptation to the bow.

Finally, at least one other reader may soon be getting into this rather pleasant activity. I sent him a list of the things I got, so as to save another newbie the errors I made from the start.

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Read this in case you missed it . And notice how in each case the central issue was the one that the ticket was offered for.

“We’ll give you a bunch of money if only you do (or stop doing) this one absolutely truthful thing, and help everyone else stop noticing too.”

I have been subjected to that approach a few times in my life already, which I turned down, but I do wonder if I start not just naming the Jew, but also talking about abortion, the Iron Guard, Banking and the Rotshchilds’ Bank of International Settlement as well as the absurdity of FIAT (debt based) “money” and how it “works”.

I mean if they offer me a smallish armada of anti-gravity space-ships, a large-ish crew I can handpick myself, possibly a couple or three lightsabers, and a few tons of gold, I mean… I could be enticed to just… you know, leave Earth and go exploring the Galaxy with my tribe of Venetian Catholic Zealots.

Well, I put it out there. Now I wait…

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I’m not really sure why, but I think men are better at cooking in cast iron pans , and I would guess pots too.

It’s an odd thing.

We did replace all our cancer giving cookware with cast iron a while back. I’d wanted to do it for a while and then we saw a film: Dark Waters that basically despite being a film drove the point home in a way that saw to it none of us will eat out of a coated anything ever again.

All we have now are cast iron pans and stainless steel pots. The next thing we are replacing is pretty much plastic containers of any kind, moving to glass only.

Anyway, my point is that I have never been one of these guys that enjoys cooking.

When I was single in London, at around Christmas time I’d invite all the random people I knew who didn’t have family around, and usually a pretty girl or three, for a dinner. The deal was I’d cook one dish, and everyone else would being something and do the washing up.

Pretty low effort since I usually just got a big roast, seasoned it, sealed it in a pan, then shoved it in the oven for a few hours on a low temperature.

And it’s not as if I can’t cook, I’m actually fairly capable. It’s rather that for the most part cooking feels a bit like wasted time. I could be doing something either more productive or more fun. For the most part food for me is akin to fuel. So as long as it’s relatively healthy it makes little difference what I eat.

But I noticed there is a kind of… perhaps primitive impulse, that seems to take over if I’m camping, usually on my own. If there are others with me, there will often be someone that actively becomes engaged with the cooking aspect. And if there are women in the group, they tend to take over that function, especially if the men carried most of the heavy stuff on a hike and so on.

On my own, I don’t mind making the fire, heating or cooking the food and taking my time to do it right. I guess it might be a function of necessity. At home, and in the modern world, everything is so easy and “ready made” in most respects that it feels as there is no necessity, only convenience.

But out there, you need to eat and do all the things to do so. Get the wood, prepare the food, light a fire, tend to it and the food, and then, eat in peace and silence, usually contemplating a beautiful view, and weather permitting, sleeping under the stars.

At home, for some reason, cooking in cast iron pans gives a sense of things that is slightly similar.

So far it only applies to breakfast for the most part, and I think maybe part of it is the nature of the tool. You need to use enough oil or butter or grease. You need to periodically re-season your pans. They are heavy. You clean them without using soaps and detergents. You leave them hanging with a thin layer of oil.

It’s kind of technical in a way. A bit like the tractor. Solid machine that will serve you for decades, but you have to take the time to maintain it properly. Or a gun. Same thing.

I think there is something inherently masculine about cooking in cast iron pans.

And of course, I also think, at least insofar as those things we are willing to cook ourselves in them, we are better at it than women. In fairness though, all the famous chefs are male too. Or if you prefer, the pans are heavy and you kind of have to get the grease/butter/oil to food ratio just right. You know, technical stuff.

Even if it is just shoving some bacon in it, stirring up some eggs in a bowl and then adding them in when the bacon has reached the right almost-finished cooking point, and finishing that off together with the eggs while the coffee is brewing.

The finished product looks a mess, but it’s actually very tasty. Something even the wife —who I have learnt is affected more by the appearance of food than she likes to admit even to herself— has come to appreciate.

Anyway, now you know one of my little quirks.

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

So… my stated objectives for my archery (which I estimated would take at least 1,000 shots) are:

Primary

70% hits (7 out of 10) at a target that is basically no more than 40cm wide and maybe 60cm tall (approximate human torso size) at 50 metres.

Secondary

40% hits at 20 metres of a 4” target and 60-70% of a 6” target.

Tertiary

40% hits at a human sized target out to 100 metres.

Specification: I wanted to use a recurve bow only (no compound bows) and if possible without any fancy attachments etc, beyond possibly (still thinking about it) some simple aiming sight.

I came up with these goals based on absolutely ZERO knowledge of anything related to archery, and based solely on what I imagined would be a decent level of ability for someone that is not going to have the time to become semi-pro at it or dedicate more than a causal hobbit amount of time to it.

Today, for the first time, I tried to find out how realistic or absurd my idea is and I discovered the following:

In order to qualify for the olympics men need to score a minimum of 630 out of a possible 720 points by firing 72 arrows at a FITA target at 70 metres.

The size of the target is below.

I’m not sure what the box on the right is, but that seems to me more a human sized target given it’s just under 40 cm wide and the height being 1.22 metres covers most of what you might hit of an average sized standing human if you include the head and neck (though they are smaller than a foot across) at the top, and upper part of the legs at the bottom.

Anyway, you will see that there are 10 rings from outermost to innermost, and starting out at value 1 for the outermost ring and 10 for the smallest circle in the middle (thick line, the thin inner line is just a demarcation, but you don’t get any more points as far as I can tell.

That inner circle (thick line) is 12.2 cm across, and worth 10 points. If you hit that 72 out of 72 times you get 720 points.

To qualify for the Olympics you need to hit on average mostly the 9 ring (9 x 72 = 648).

If you hit the 8 ring all the time, you only score 576, which is 54 points short.

Now, the 8 ring (inclusive of the 9 and ten rings within it) is only 36.6 cm across, which tallies rather well with the width of a human torso.

Hitting that 100% of the time, 72 times in a row, at 70 metres does not make you qualify for the olympics unless you also score some 9s and 10s. In fact even if you hit 48 number 8 rings, and 24 number 9 rings, you’re still only at 600 points which also means you don’t qualify. To qualify without hitting any 10 point ring you need to hit 54 times the 9 rings and 18 eight rings.

Since 18 is 33% of 54, this is close to a 70% hit rate of the 9 ring, which is only 24.4 cm across. But that’s at 70 metres.

And I didn’t know this but the recurve bow is the one used for the Olympics.

So… while a 70% hit rate at 50 metres for a target about 40cm across and 60 cm tall is definitely decent, it’s not Olympic level. Not by quite a long shot.

And getting 40% hits out to 100 metres is definitely a long term goal, especially outside of(wind and other things being a factor), and probably quite a bit more ambitious than the primary goal, but probably also doable, if more at the peak of what I could probably achieve without becoming obsessive.

Why didn’t I check this stuff before firing the bow 98 times you ask?

Well, mostly because I have found throughout my life that what people told me was near-impossible, was generally really quite possible. And while I agree it was near impossible for them, in all likelihood, we are not all built the same. There are plenty of things that might well be impossible for me that could be relatively easy for someone else, and I have trained myself from a very young age to believe that if one other human could do a skill to a certain degree, then it must be possible for me to do it at least to a decent level if I apply myself. And generally, I have never found that to be untrue.

So I shall continue on my archery quest and see how it goes.

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

3 out of six in the first 6 shots. the first one was high and helped me calibrate. the other 2 were narrow misses.

Second lot of six, 2 are in, one is a VERY narrow miss, and 2 are not terrible misses, only the top left is demonstrably out by too much.

Lessons Learnt:

1. The feather fletchings are definitely a marked improvement.
2. I am starting to learn to better judge the eyeballing of how to aim (without using any kind of sights/aiming tool, etc). I still occasionally shoot too high, assuming arrow drop will be more than it actually is.
3. I do catch my left forearm with the bowstring, but it’s not that bad an irritant even though it does leave a mark even through a hoodie I was wearing. Image below is just a bit over an hour after I fired the bow bandits only a tiny bit red. I do have an arm protecting thing, but forgot to put it on and its not really the right size for me anyway.

   

   I’m now about 10% of the shots I gave myself to be able to hit a human sized target 70% of the time at 50 metres, and I can see that it’s probably an ambitious goal, but I think doable. I may need to get some kind of aiming tool to add to the bow though. The other aim of 40% hits out to 100 metres will be a very long term goal and possibly near “impossible” to achieve in year one or even two. Depending on how often and how serious I get, I think it’s achievable anyway, but definitely more of a long term goal. Lastly, the 40% hits at 20 metres on a 4” target and 60-70% hits on a 6” target I need to check on now, and perhaps I should focus on these aims first as I am currently firing at about 36m distance. Getting more accurate at a closer distance and then pulling back gradually would make sense with guns, and I don’t think it’s different with anything else. Feel free to let me know if these posts on archery bore the crap out of you. It won’t stop me posting them, but part of why I label them is so you can skip them if they do. Subscribe now Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

So on literal day one of the New And Improved Censorship and Tracking of Dissidents of Substack , this guy had some of his posts blocked.

At least for readers from UK.

Now, I have no idea why people seem to be oblivious to the machinations of the Talmudians and their paid for, blackmailed, owned goyim servants, but it is tiring seeing them act like the equivalent of the proverbial lemmings every time.

I predicted substack was just another trap long before I started using it, and explained it does not mean I wouldn’t use it. What it did and does mean is that I would not RELY on it.

See the link up there at the top on the right? Go to it, that’s my original blog you should bookmark and go to for any posts of mine that might get blocked, or when I stop using this one, or when it gets rug-pulled.

The point is NOTHING online is “free” anymore. First you need to pay for it, and secondly, even if you pick a place that does host your stuff free from interference or you set up your own server or whatever, they will tend to route traffic away from you, and unless you already have an organic army of people that:

A) literally go to your blog manually by themselves by following a link or bookmark they made themselves, and,

B) individually, organically, also send their friends and others your posts/bookmarks so as to spread the word,

then you will simply remain hidden under a digital rock no one knows exists.

If you also made your living from this, you suddenly become very careful about WHAT you say and about WHOM.

But because the human spirit eventually has a reaction, the Talmudians will allow useful idiots and paid grifters to act as pressure release valves.

The Tommy Robinsons playing at super nationalist English defender of truth is sponsored by skull-cap wearing Talmudians that he will never say a bad word about. The Milo Yannopaulus, and Gary Voris Fagtolicism, the Emo Jones and Taylor Marshall Novus Orco grifters, all paid from the same Opus Day enmeshed millionaire.

It’s Mossad, CIA, and Rotshchild funding from fifteen different shell companies, shills and other servants of Satan all the way down.

How to Fight Back

I have written about this at some length at the OG blog, but perhaps I should try and recall my perspective before I had the undeniable realisation that God is best explained by (1958 Sedevacantist) Catholicism.

I didn’t have any particular animosity towards Jews or their religion, being ignorant of both and broadly speaking having bought into the narrative of the six million holocaustianity narrative.

Then I worked with some of them. As a bodyguard for a family of Orthodox Jews that had apparently a lot of money.

Within a short period of time it became clear to me that whatever they were up to, my feeling on it was that it was unethical to the point that I removed myself from their employ, despite it only being a sense I had, without any actual evidence to back it up. And despite the fact that the money was good and I had no other alternative income at the time.

Less than two months later they were front page news, having skipped the country with 65 million Rands of other people’s money, having played out their Ponzi scheme, and mostly on other Jews by the way.

Before that I had seen already how American politics was dictated by Israel, but hadn’t really thought much of it either way.

Then a guy I trained with, in casual conversation said there had never been gas chambers in the concentration camps of WWII.

And I thought that was wrong and misinformed and offensive to say. So I set out to do some research to prove him wrong. And… well… if you are too, offended at such a suggestion, I suggest you do some research yourself too.

Then it turns out the number of people that died at Auschwitz went officially from 4 million Jews to 2 million in early 1990s to less than a million people total today “most of them Jewish”.

In fact no historian, including Jewish ones, says the real figure was 6 million anymore.

A figure of the holocaust that by the way was touted by Jews as having happened even before WWII. And which pales in comparison to the 4 to 40 million Jews the Romans supposedly killed . Back when there wasn’t 40 million people living in the entire middle east. And coincidentally there was a bit less than 4 million Jews in Europe just before WWII, so it’s weird how 6 million of them died in the camps.

Anyway… then you look at WHO finances transgenderism, open borders, and complete sexual degeneracy. And yeah… there is just a tad of “overrepresentation” there too.

Then you start to ask yourself what exactly IS Fiat money? How does it work? Where does it originate from? And then you really realise how the world works.

And then you look up what the Bank of International Settlement is and you realise:

Oh. It IS the whole planet they control.

So then you read up on their religion …

And at this point you might despair that all is lost. But you really should not.

Because you see, all of it is dependant on two things:

First of all and above all: your compliance.

And secondly: your reliance on fiat money.

There is no EASY way to escape the second one, you have to build your own everything, starting with clean food and water. But there is a LOT more you can do about the first one.

The only obstacle is your own mind and your generational induced fear.

On my post on the African way of civil disobedience of yesterday, a reader, from the UK no less, confessed they never paid a single fine, council tax, etc. And the only time he got “screwed over” was when he tried to go legit and got a mortgage.

Which despite having filed all the fines and other bills in the wastebasket, he was approved for.

It’s a clown world even more than you or I suspect. They rule by fear for 99% of it and the occasional assassination to make sure that fear stays alive.

You just have to make your mind up, as Gichin Funakoshi said in his seminal work on Karate-Do: “even if it be 10,000 enemies, I go.” To fight them. Once you have that mindset you will discover two things:

1. They are mostly a paper tiger.
2. You will gather like-minded people to you and they will look to you for leadership.

I know how absurd that sounds.

And I also know it’s true. Because I have lived it multiple times in different countries and on different situations.

So, friend, the burden of not being an NPC is entirely on you and you alone. You will not “find” other to follow or to lead, until you first stop being a background level peasant, and go equip yourself and start acting like a Player Character with justice and truth as his weapons.

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

If there is one overarching fact that anyone that has spent time in Africa agrees on, it’s that the control systems that are imposed on first world countries, simply collapse or at best work only in the most gross, corrupt and schizophrenic ways.

Why?

Low-tech my friend. Low tech.

They make digital cash but you only use physical cash and make a scene and become difficult every time you go someplace that says they can’t take cash. And you keep going there regularly. As if it had all been changed for your benefit the day before.

You ignore all civil requests for bureaucratic issues like fines, etc etc. In first world countries countries, if you own little to nothing, you can’t end up in jail for not following civil orders, only criminal ones. And if all goes wrong, eh… don’t worry, be happy… and file for bankruptcy.

Yes, of course, if you have built up assets, have a family, and so on, all of this is scary and not good advice. In fact it is not good advice for anyone, but… if you’re a single zoomer stacking shelves and with little to nothing, making sure your assets are stashed somewhere and are portable, and divesting yourself of any burdens, might be the route to go. Obviously, staying on the right side of the of the law is good, but in cases, such as this one , becoming an absolutely obstructionist bastard in every possible way, is the minimum requirement. Whether you are actually Burke or his friends, or a total stranger that has had enough of these bootlicking judges doing their puppet-masters’ bidding.

The low-tech civil disorder way is effective and long-term, has destabilised the most powerful army in the world every time. Consider that the Americans eventually had their ass handed to them in Korea, Vietnam, Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, and now Ukraine by proxy too and the Yemeni Houtis, armed with a few drones and what compared tot he US Navy amounts to bicycle propelled torpedoes, has effectively chased off a US aircraft carrier and caused billions of dollars of damage and lost revenue to those they are warring against.

And anyone that has lived in Africa knows very well that the highest tech solutions, will inevitably fail spectacularly against a population who simply doesn’t care.

So… just a thought.

Why go to war. Just sit on your ass and let the enemy “win” and take you over. And let them lose soldiers every time one of them gets drunk in a bar, or thinks everything is gonna be fine now. You can’t win against an enemy whose home you have invaded if he decides to never give up.

And the technology they rely on is nowhere near as fail-safe as they want you to believe either.

Again, just saying… you know, in case advanced aliens try to take over Earth…

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

With a small hat-tip to Vox, because it was his blog that put me onto this article: Urban Bugmen and AI Model Collapse: A Unified Theory

It’s a very interesting article, that makes the rather intelligent point that regardless of whether you look at AI created iterations of the very same data, or human models of reality, or social models tried over historical ages by humanity, what happens in each case, is an entropic collapse.

It is a sort of natural degradation, or “weathering” if you like, of all networked structures. And it applies to human brains developing (he makes the excellent point concerning the retardation of Millennials, that in all honesty, rings a deep bell of truth to me):

The proposed thesis is that neural-network systems, which include AI models, human minds, larger human cultures, and our individual furry little friends, all train on available data. When a child stubs his wee little toe on an errant stone and starts screaming as if he’d caught himself on fire, that’s data he just received and which will be added to his model of reality. The same goes for climbing a tree, playing a video game, watching a YouTube video, sitting in a chair, eating that yucky green salad, etc. The child’s mind (or rather, subsections of his brain) are neural networks that behave similarly to AI neural networks ¹² .

The citation is to an article discussing how AI systems are NOT general purpose, and how they more closely resemble individual regions of a brain, not a brain.

People use new data as training data to model the outside world, particularly when we are children. In the same way that AI models become delusional and hallucinate when too much AI-generated data is in the training dataset, humans also become delusional when too much human-generated data is in their training dataset.

This is why milennial midwits can’t understand reality unless you figure out a way to reference Harry Potter when trying to make a point ¹³ .

His theory is very coherent, references multiple separate data sets and in my opinion makes perfect sense, as well a fits very well into my 56 years of observation while on this planet.

Every model is imperfect and when you begin to use that model as a guide, some errors are introduced, if the model is unable to process those gaps/errors/lacunae between the model and reality as a re-iteration of the ORIGINAL model iteration, but instead they get assimilated into it for the NEXT iteration of the model, eventual collapse of the model, and hence its utility and viability, is absolutely inevitable.

On this basis then, I considered that the longest-lasting model that has remained essentially unchanged in nature, and that has simply taken on any “gaps” or “errors” or “lacunae” of meaning, knowledge, and so on and then inserted them back into the ORIGINAL model of reality —rather than simply carry on with the error becoming part of the model, and so eventually degrading it— and that has absolutely lasted the longest of any other model, in actual, real, historical, human society, is Catholicism.

The Roman Empire lasted about 800 years. Which is not even half the duration of Catholicism. Catholicism is now essentially only a few years away from having lasted 2,000 years exactly. The much glorified British Empire lasted only a fraction of even the Roman Empire, and the American one less than that.

There are a number of interesting things to keep in mind concerning this:

• Despite the lamentations of drooling retards of the Protestant variety, Catholicism has remained unchanged since its inception in terms of Dogma. Some of the Dogma was refined and expanded upon, (as described above) as more nuanced or particularised questions gradually came to the fore; or —more often— as attempts at infiltration, insertion of heresy, and lies became attacks against which the Church needed to respond to by returning to the origins and expanding on those details that remain essentially unchanged and true to all who have a half-functioning brain, but that required further precise detailing in order to ward off the very real attempt at inserting real error. This is important because it is simultaneously both a model that remains essentially unchanged and that answers entropic-attacks by re-referencing the original model in further (but still original, so not new) detail. It is really the only model I am aware of that does that as a routine.
• While Catholicism absolutely took some hits in its history:
  • The Arian heresy “converted” almost ALL the bishops of the time to it.
  • The Albigensian heresies similarly had taken quite a strong hold.
  • Islam ferociously attacked it for centuries (and still does).
  • Judaism has been working tirelessly for the same 2,000 years to destroy it (and has had a lot of success over the last 100 years or so).
  • The schism of 1054 halved the size of the real Church, and the rabid idiocy of Protestantism some 500 years later has resulted in the almost total globalisation of the secularisation of Christianity (Catholicism) as a cultural veneer over the 40,000 plus denominations/cults that have eroded marriage and family to sex-as sport, children as clumps of cells to be aborted so as not to spoil the sex-fun, divorce being the norm, and large family being considered a blight on climate change instead of a blessing from God.
  • Two or even Three possible “Popes” over a period of some 70 years.
  • Literally no one on the Throne of Peter for a couple or three years in a row.
  • And now, no real Pope or clergy anywhere even in the vicinity of the Vatican since 1958, with only a remnant of valid clergy (and no valid Pope) still being Catholic and the enormous mass of the laity being almost all fooled into believing the Satanic Novus Ordo “religion” is Catholicism proper, when in reality, only 1958 Sedevacantism of the Totalist variety is.
  the fact remains that not only did Catholicism survive ALL of these attacks, but even after attacks that would absolutely be unsurvivable by any other human institution, be it an Empire, a Kingdom, a cultural norm, or a religion, Catholicism inevitably, and against all reasonableness, expectations and statistical odds, came back out of the ashes stronger, and unchanged.
• You may argue that Hinduism or Shintoism or Buddhism are also long-standing religions, but I would say to you that none of them have survived unchanged in their dogma, except Catholicism. Hindus no longer burn their wives alive on the death of the husband. Shintoism is —like the Buddhism from which it derives— more of a philosophical perspective with a sometimes more or less strong belief in ancestors overlooking us and/or reincarnation, but has no strict moral code written down as Catholicism does. Nevertheless there are a couple of things that MAY be considered similarly:
  • Islam, has been fairly consistent since it’s inception, but with it institutionalised pederastry, treatment of women as chattel, and conversion by force as well as violent, rapey, practices as part of its dogma, I think it is not difficult to see that while it is a “viable” religion, it is one that is in opposition to Catholicism, as indeed is Islam’s cousin and elder brother:
  • Judaism; which of course also has pederastry as a non-crime, the killing of or stealing from non-jews as not a crime and so on and so forth.
  The point being made here being that, aside Catholicism, the only other religion/ideology/or empire that has lasted actually longer is the generic, and multi-faceted one of the Lord of this World: Lucifer. Whether it took on the form of Aztec rituals of butchering thousands of living men, women, and children to their Sun God, the marrying of their own sisters of the Egyptian Pharaohs, the burning alive of babies of the Phoenecians/Pharisees/Carthagenians, the current Freemasons and their paedophelia, embedded in every government on Earth, pretty much, or the current genocidal, child-murdering, child-trafficking, child-organ harvesting, and prisoner-raping Talmudians of the occupied territories of Palestine, Satanism is the only religion that is both older and that survives essentially unchanged in its dogma (though its expressions are, appropriately, Legion).
• The fruits: Catholicism has undoubtedly increased the general beauty, health, wealth and above all HUMANITY and respect for every individual than any other religion bar none. There literally is nothing even remotely close to it. Even today, some 60 years after the evisceration of Catholicism proper, in remote villages of ex-Catholic countries, unmolested by third-worlders or foreigners, the vestiges of Catholic culture means you can sleep with your doors open and no one will enter your home to rob it. Strangers greet each other on the streets of their village and everyone looks out for each other to varying degrees. By comparison, theft in Arab countries is policed by cutting off limbs and heads. One might argue that perhaps the Chinese empire lasted quite long, but did it materially, spiritually and intellectually improve life for the average Chinaman or woman? Even if you found a way to argue for this in the positive (I think you’d have to employ a deep level of dishonesty to do so in any case) there is simply no way you can compare it against Catholicism in anything other than an absolutely negative light.

Because of all of the above (and many more points you can get into extreme-level of detail about that would make any autist proud) it is simply a fact that, regardless of the hits it has, does, and is currently taking, the core remnant of Catholicism has two very distinct features that cannot be found in any other model:

1. It continues to survive and eventually thrive UNCHANGED in its core dogma, which is also all written down, so can’t be argued otherwise (the Code of Canon Law of 1917 collated ALL of Catholic dogma and rules in one tome, and reviewing Catholic history based on them it becomes clear that Catholicism has remained essentially unchanged, despite, of course, the ever-present corrupt humans that can and do infest it from time to time in all ages), despite unending attacks on it from all sides, all sources, and all intentions.
2. When the codes of behaviour of it are followed it results in the best possible societies that humanity has ever managed to produce on this planet since humans arrived on it. Producing more liberty, honesty, beauty, art, loving families and communities than any other system in the entire history of mankind.

That’s a fairly strong indication that Catholicism absolutely models reality better than any other system that anyone has come up with. And despite its presently much reduced number of proponents, 1 I have have no doubt, that the supernatural protection Catholicism enjoys (from our Lord’s promise to always be with us) will see to it that it will in due course, thrive again.

You can argue on the basis of your emotional reactions to this (which is no argument at all, of course), but if you look at the facts simply as they are, it becomes impossible to not see that Catholicism is the only thing that humans ever “came up with” 2 that truly models reality accurately, and continues to do so after two millennia, producing awesome results when used and followed.

What you do with this undeniable proof now is up to you of course, after all, Catholicism does tell us two things:

1. No one goes to Hell other than by their own free-will made choices, and,
2. Most people will indeed end up in Hell. That road is wide and well-travelled. The true path is hard and narrow.

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

So I got this in the mail today:

Hello,

We wanted to give you a quick heads-up that in order to comply with new UK government requirements under the Online Safety Act , Substack is introducing age verification steps for those in the UK. Readers can still browse Substack without verifying, but some posts and features may be hidden or limited.

Here’s what to know:

• Your connection with your subscribers won’t change. The way you publish content for your audience remains the same. If any content is flagged as potentially harmful, subscribers who have not already completed the age verification process will see a notice explaining that age verification is required before viewing it, either on the website or in the Substack app. Your email list, publishing process, and relationship with your readers are not affected.
• Paid subscribers are already verified. Anyone with a credit card on file (for example, paid subscribers) is already considered verified—no extra steps are needed.
• Many readers are already verified. Because all online platforms must implement age verification in your country, some users may have already completed this through Stripe or Persona and won’t need to do it again.
• Your data is private. The verification process is secure and handled by trusted providers like Stripe and Persona.

We’re complying with the Online Safety Act and are working to make this transition as smooth as possible for everyone. Please visit our policy page for more information on how the Online Safety Act may impact your content.

You can check your verification status here . If you’d like to encourage your subscribers in the UK to verify their age and avoid any interruptions, you can share the following message:

The UK’s Online Safety Act is requiring platforms like Substack to introduce age verification for readers.

Verifying your age helps unlock the full Substack experience. It’s optional, but if you don’t verify, you may see some posts hidden or have limited access to features like Chat, DMs, and livestreams.

The process is secure and handled by trusted providers like Stripe and Persona.

To avoid any interruptions in seeing the great stuff on Substack, make sure you verify your age. For details on how to verify your age, or if you have questions, please visit Substack’s support page .

Thanks for everything you do to help make Substack the home for great culture,

Standards and Enforcement @ Substack

© 2025 Substack Inc.
548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104

Which is basically all so if Kier Starmer is, say as a hypothetical example, caught on video sodomizing children, as I say, you know, as a random hypothetical example, and you try to write about it on Substack, you will be banned/shadowbanned (already happening here anyway) and then you will have some very serious lesbians in uniform coming to your door to arrest you if you tried to read about it, never mind if you posted the content. In that case, it’s Pollsmoor Prison for you. At least until they can extradite you to Guantanamo for having criticised the hairstyle, or (gasp) the nose profile! of the mass-murdering, genocidal pervert known as Bubbling cretin, Netanyahou, and thus confirming yourself as an antisemite, worse than Hitler v 14.0 (or is it 15.0, I lose tracks of how much worse than Hitler we all are now).

SO… since I am not in the UK, and still get shadow-banned and only increase subs from people forwarding my posts and telling friends about the blog, I strongly suggest you subscribe/bookmark the ORIGINAL blog , which was state hacked by the Yankees for talking a bit too much about Is-real-hell and their denizens in the USA government, back in October of last year.

Fortunately, We had contingencies in place and you can read all about how nefarious the attack/infiltration was at the OG blog by doing a search for keywords using the search me function.

Every post I have here on Substack is also mirrored there so you will not lose anything, but when this Substack inevitably gets rug-pulled ( something I predicted before my blog was hacked and I had to temporarily/semi-permanently get to Substack while the blog got rebuilt and hardened a bit).

The fact is if you read the post linked to immediately above, you will see that I predicted precisely what Substack would end up becoming/being. It doesn’t even matter if this was the original intent from the start (I think it obvious it is/was) because the end result is the same.

So…

I know, I know, Substack is easier to navigate, you have it on your app, blah, blah, well, do yourself the strenuous effort of bookmarking my OG blog on your brainwashing device, and at least go to the OG blog when this one inevitably gets verboten for too much truth-telling. Besides, at the OG blog you can get hypnotised into MY cult of personality better, and I assure you it’s a lot more fun that Starmer’s Stalinist wet dream.

I mean, come on, even if mine were a deranged sex cult, designed to make your wives my concubines and you my slave, you surely agree that you’d prefer them all to be railed by me than Starmer.

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

This article on the “elite” is fascinating for a number of reasons. And if I had not been investigating my own family line in conjunction with concepts like Vox’s SSH , 1 I would probably too have mostly dismissed it as “water being wet” because obviously the progeny of the ultra-wealthy will be more represented for generations.

The interesting thing however is that the article points out that even after social purges specifically directed at these people, with full confiscation of rights, property and wealth, within a generation, that is, the grandchildren of the affected class tend to have clawed their way back up the ladder.

There are clearly too many variables to point to a single one as being predominant, however, as epigenetics seems to at least have been proven statistically, 2 it makes sense that certain attitudes, and ways of being would be passed down not just verbally and culturally as well as from the perspective of specific family traditions or beliefs, but also from a genetic perspective.

Furthermore, there at least two separate indicators of this that would be related; IQ, which has been demonstrated to mostly be genetically determined, and morphic resonance, which despite initial outcry by supposed “scientists” has been demonstrated and replicated in various laboratory experiments around the world.

My own personal interest in this matter came from noticing (again long before I came across Vox and his SSH) that my family line, as far back as it’s possible to find any information (beyond my own grandparents whom I met and knew well in all four cases and their direct stories concerning my great-grand-parents along with a few photographs), every time they appear in various historical narratives, tend to stand out for being of a rather iconoclastic, counter-to trend types, with a definite leaning towards bellicose resolution of differences, as well as what might be an almost obsessive trend for travelling to far away lands and exploring anything as yet undiscovered. In short, almost pathological Scout traits.

Subscribe now

Share

The fact that by any objective metrics, my own father, paternal grandfather and by all accounts, also both great-grandfathers from the patrilineal line were clearly of this bent, I thought was statistical very unlikely unless some genetic factor was involved. Researching as best as possible, the rest of the family line, we first appear as returning from the Crusades, when Europe was retreating from the Outremer, after holding it against Muslims and backstabbing Eastern “Orthodox” for some 200 years. They were returning via Albania to Southern Italy.

This means even prior to this time, someone from that line decided to either GO on the crusades, or was born in the Outremer and carried on doing what Crusaders in that day did out there. So either a typical Scout decision, or the result of being born to a Scout type.

Either way, when Europe could no longer finance what was essentially an occupying army surrounded by hostiles, the Crusaders had to retreat. After first offering all the fortifications they had built over two centuries to the Eastern “Orthodox” —who they had come to rescue (some 40 years after their schism by the way) and then been consistently betrayed at every turn— and the Orthodox predictably refusing to defend their own lands, the Catholics returned to Europe.

On the way back, my family landed in a region of Italy that had been in a feud amongst four or five families for literally the entire duration of the crusades. So they promptly beat the crap out of everyone and pacified the region. As a result to this they were made into nobility and given the Tower of St. Susanna. Their noble titles were later raised (after a handsome payment) to the first born sons being Marqueses in perpetuity. However, it appears that there are two branches of the family, a gold one, which until a short time ago retained ownership of the tower of St. Sunna before donating it as a museum, who also retained the noble titles, and a second, silver branch, with a slightly different heraldic shield, which travelled North and settled (inasmuch as they settled anywhere) in Venice. Apparently this branch had somewhere along the line lost the noble title, because it was reinstated, but only as Patrizi, the lowest rank of nobility as a result of their prowess, courage under fire and valiant efforts in the War of Candia. Considering the Venetians lost that war, it must have been quite the exploits as back then it certainly was not usual for people on the losing side to receive noble titles. They also worked as consiglieri and various other trades, but certainly had men-at-arms as pretty much their go-to trade.

Despite this, they apparently had enough sense of honour or at least loyalty to not be considered ruffians, pirates, or generally vicious, but simply honourable warriors that it would be best to leave alone. And they have always had a tendency to if not completely ignore all sort of authority, at least have enough disregard for them to not let it affect their general life trajectories.

Some eight centuries of a certain attitude making multiple appearances large enough to warrant noting in history and heraldry books indicates to me it’s a trend. And that is leaving out my great-grand-father from my paternal grandmother’s side who was some freak of nature all on his own.

But every story I was told about my ancestors (by people who had known them in life) indicates a secondary perspective, and it is that they tended to marry to women that were at least crazy enough to mostly go along with their husband’s anti-hierarchical tendencies. And once again, looking back as far as I can, the women from which I descent were rather unusual too.

I think I am fairly objective about this and am under no illusions of grandeur because of it, but it has certainly been interesting to take stock of the fact that perhaps, there are trends in family lines, as I am sure there must be after all.

The fact these appear to be not just limited to physical aspects but also social ones is less intuitive than most would imagine though.

That all said, if you come from a long line of degenerate thieving murderers, do not despair, ultimately our free will is what governs the larger part of our destiny, and recall that God can use even evil as a force that ultimately produces good. Your God (?) given talents can certainly be put-to use for good, regardless of what bad gene you may have inherited them from.

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here