Positive Western Nepotism

As a hardcore Catholic, I am sometimes faced with Catholics that question/disapprove/critique my ways of achieving effective results.

Which is perfectly fine. These are usually genuine friends that want some further clarity on my various approaches to different issues, whether public or private.

One concept that I think only Catholics of the Warrior caste can appreciate, is the perfectly valid use of the enemy’s own distasteful tactics against them.

If you wish only to read about the effective ways to combat our enemies, then you may wish to skip the philosophy of it immediately below and jump to the Positive Nepotism heading further down.

***

Before I proceed to explain in more detail what this amounts to, it may be necessary to first define a few concepts or terms, so as to hopefully curb the erroneous enthusiasm of various keyboard warriors.

As far as I am concerned, in order of Spiritual Hierarchy, from top to bottom the situation is thus:

1. Catholic Saints
2. Catholic Martyrs
3. Catholic Clergy
4. Catholic Laypeople
5. Catholic Warriors

In terms of Worldly Practical utility/necessity however, the order is thus:

1. Catholic Clergy (and Saints too) – Both are required for continuity Saints Historically, Clergy for present day continuation of the Church, which at a practical level is the most important point.
2. Catholic Warriors – Someone HAS to fight off the enemy hordes. Be it intellectually, spiritually, or physically. Without a defence, the Church could be ultimately destroyed. While we know this will not happen fully (at least until End Times) it is our duty to hold the line.
3. Catholic Martyrs – They can inspire others, but unless there is also some steel in front and behind them too, the martyrs will mostly just be assumed to be anachronistic fools (say similar to the Amish).
4. Catholic Laypeople – Although they are the largest group, for which the others all essentially try to do their best, in terms of practical works, while they do keep the general community going, be they bakers, or office workers, it can be considered that they are mostly the users of Catholicism rather than the builders of it.

Catholics with my kind of mental disposition then are somewhat unusual, as they are the bottom of the spiritual pile, but second in the worldly ways of our fallen world. And even then, the ones of my kind are a mixed bag, usually composed of people that were not Catholic at all, until some event or life path took them to the truth, at which point, they use all the skills they learnt in the secular world, to fight the enemies of God.

In shorthand I say that people like me, would be akin to a long-time mercenary that has suddenly become Catholic. He’s going to be more adept at fighting than those who were raised like good Catholics from the start.

To those who say that people like me are “bad Catholics”, I don’t bother to argue the point, they may well be right. And if Jean Parisot de Valette is not in Heaven, then, well, I guess neither will I, because I think he should be, and he too, acted in ways that might have been questionable, or shocking to his own knights, even when his actions undoubtedly helped to keep the Islamic invaders out of Malta and hence out of Europe. Of course, Valette did far more than I am ever likely to do, since I think an argument could be made that he is single-handedly perhaps the man most responsible for seeing to it Christendom continued to exist after 1565.

But the point is that in using tactics that were thought of as being undignified for a Catholic, de Valette demoralised the Muslims. When the enemy had tortured to death a few captured knights and sent their crucified bodies on the sea for the defenders to see, de Valette ordered all the muslim prisoners be brought up, he then decapitated them and fired their heads out of cannons into the enemy encampments. There are two things to note here, from a tactical perspective:

1. He matched their apparent savagery, but only apparently, because being decapitated is much preferable to being tortured to death.
2. Rhetorically he hit them harder since in the Islamic belief system, a lack of proper burial is a serious issue, which is nowhere near as much of an issue for a Catholic.

Let us now turn to practical concerns for use here on Earth in our times.

Positive Nepotism

The enemies of truth, God, and beauty have achieved various very powerful positions by essentially four primary methods:

1. Secrecy and subterfuge
2. Infiltration and nepotism
3. Financial monopoly
4. Application of Force

As Catholics we tend to avoid secrecy and subterfuge, however, there are historical precedents, since during the period of Roman Emperor Nero, Catholics met in secret in the catacombs and used the fish symbol as a kind of shorthand to recognise each other. While we are not being crucified and set on fire as primitive streetlights (yet), we are certainly being arrested for things like silently praying near abortion clinics while disrupting no one, (UK) and other such insane laws are being passed like ensuring white heterosexual men get longer and harsher prison sentences (new official policy of the UK) than any of the “minorities” (which are actually a global majority) we evil white men supposedly oppress by simply existing. So, while we do not yet need to act in total secrecy, there is no reason to boast too much (unless you are that way inclined, like a few people might be at this here blog… *cough* me *cough* ).

We certainly do not have financial monopoly over the planet, that is something the enemies of Christ have definitely achieved very well.

Nor do we have any kind of very good way to respond to force, especially if state sponsored. Of course, each individual can do so in order to defend themselves, their loved ones or innocents, but the likely consequences are bound to be harsh or terminal. Which is not necessarily reason not to respond with force when faced with force. I mean, if you’re going to be killed anyway, may as well take some of the bastards with you.

But where we CAN absolutely shine, is in positive nepotism.

Nor does it have to be limited to only hardcore Catholics.

That is the avenue I am taking with regard to the Kurganate , but the parameters can be far broader for many other things.

For example, I will absolutely favour competent, heterosexual, white men, over other people if giving out work or favours. And in turn I have been the positive recipient of a similar treatment by other men that are as sick of Clown World as I am or more.

This attitude has the potential to spread faster than any legislation or other barrier than can be placed against it. And then even if laws are passed to outlaw the practice, they can be circumvented by an almost infinite number of ways. This is a tactic the enemy used against us for decades, but they are mostly inefficient and ineffective freaks.

Supporting, giving work, and help, and real world benefits to the European Natives above the various DIE “victims” and creating networks of such people will produce positive results at a speed you will hardly believe.

So get to it.

And if you become a Crusader-like hardcore proper Catholic on the way (1958 Sedevacantist) all the better. Just remember that 600 or so of them kept 40,000 muslims at bay for over a year. And they retained the lands of the Outremer that the schismatic Eastern “Orthodox” let fall into Muslim hands protected for 2 centuries before the cost, along with he constant betrayals by the Eos became too much to bear and they had to retreat back to mainland Europe.

We have a LONG and dignified history of beating impossible odds.

So… study the history of Catholicism properly. Educate yourself on the FACTS , not the lies , and then… consider joining us , and if not, at least consider lending a hand, moral or financial support, or your efforts, however these might be expressed.

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Even if you are 100% secular, and in no way believe in non physical entities, this post should resonate somewhat, as it does with anyone objectively rational.

The baseline premise I start from is that the human experience is much reduced and in fact rendered inhumane by ignoring all those subtleties and nuances that make life worth living. The genuine smile or laughter of a small child, your loved ones giving you a heartfelt hug, the moment you catch the reflection of dawn sunlight on a snowy mountaintop, the few minutes of serene respite you get during a coffee break, and the meaningful smile you get from a pretty stranger. The happy coincidence of missing a deadline but it working out for the best for both you and the other parties involved.

In other words, life is not a series of checkboxes to tick off, human beings are not robots, and life on Earth is about a lot more than merely being as efficient as possible at doing our job and maximising our profit margins.

If you agree with me on this point, which could be expanded almost endlessly with ever more refined and detailed descriptions of the nuances of life, then the rest of this post should suffice to demonstrate how AI is essentially the gradual (but ever-increasing in speed, extent, and depth) moving directly away from the very essence of what makes us human, and towards a mechanisation that inevitably makes us less human, less healthy, and ultimately less stable.

In the original Matrix film, there is a scene were agent Smith explains that the machines had created a perfect world for humans to be plugged into, where they all had wonderful and perfect lives as far as their minds were concerned, and yet, that situation made lose “entire fields” of harvested humans.

Why? Well, those of us who believe in the human soul and free will think it’s because you cannot long imprison our essence. Its very nature rebels against the unnatural and artificial version of “perfection” and “order” that is ultimately reductive, stifling, and degenerative in the broader human sense.

If you are a teleologist you might invoke entropy of systems, and if you are an atheist you might invoke a God you supposedly don’t believe in that is just cruel.

This was a comment left on the OG blog by one Andrew Harrison:

I’ve always thought of art as being the synthesis of consciousness through media, therefore as AI is not conscious by this definition what it produces is not art. If you disagree with my definition then most of that which follows may be dismissed as something of a strawman argument I concede.

Furthermore, Human consciousness is the only kind we know of so far that can produce art, animals have some level of consciousness but do not produce art, and whilst in theory an intelligent alien, whether extra terrestrial or crypto terrestrial species might, and whilst some claim contact has already occurred, it isn’t yet publicly acknowledged and so remains no more than a speculative possibility as yet.

In summary AI is not just a tool in the artists hands because it replace his or her consciousness in the production of the work, to a greater or lesser extent, unlike an instrument or paint brush it actually manifests a part of the work, despite needing prompts in and editing out, nevertheless it is replacing part of the artist’s conscious creation of the work and therefore degrades the value of anything which may be created.

Finally the potential for extra dimensional intelligence to interfere with the creative process through the digital media is a further complication which however theoretical should also be considered.

Mr. Harrison concisely expressed the point very well, and finished off with the point that extra-dimensional intelligences may also be able to affect the result.

Whether true or not, there have been consistent rumours, some indicated by supposedly actual scientists, that the people working at and with CERN, are in fact in contact with entities from other realms of existence. In fact, though it is only a fiction point for my fantasy/noir/horror Inferos Vortex series of novellas, (the first two are out already, the third will be out later this year) it is what inspired them.

Other commenters too have made their understanding explicit:

While other worry about the public discourse, for reasons I honestly don’t understand or even see as existing.

Which then turns (as any serious philosophical debate eventually must) theological.

And indeed goes down interesting avenues of thought.

And that IS the point. People DO need to think about this stuff, and not just think on it but take action according to what they think is best for themselves and their lived ones and humanity as a whole.

Most people have absolutely no idea of the level of absurdity, delusion, lies, and control they are subjected to by people who at best believe that human beings are no better than farm animals to be herded, fleeced and used, and at worst truly hate them with a demonic level of contempt.

Take for example the point I have been making for some 4 years by actively working towards it, and have known since I was a young teenager, that is:

The entire FIAT money thing is a giant, absurdity bubble and delusion which puts the lie to literally the entire banking/finance system and consequently the very concept of taxation, and, by extension, almost the entirety of the functions of government and the related justice system. Listen to this brief video by the president of El Salvador Nayib Bukele.

So what is the logical response to that? There can be only one: work towards whatever it takes to become independent of FIAT money.

Easy? No.

Doable? I absolutely know it is. Why? Because humanity did not FIAT money for almost the entirety of its existence on this planet.

And no, it does not mean reverting to the stone age either, but that is material for a longer post, or series of posts, which I will get to. For now, realise the points of this post, and ponder them:

1. AI is a further mechanisation of humanity.
2. So was the Industrial Revolution and the Protestant “work ethic”.
3. Protestantism was the secularising (and thus reduction to materialism) of actual Christianity (i.e. Catholicism).
4. The corruption, frauds, and evil men that did (always) inhabit Catholicism (and always will) is not a reason to reject Catholic Dogma (which is correct, true, and good, and has consistently produced better human societies than any other ideology of philosophy ever devised or tried). It is only a reason to reject and eject such men, as actual Catholics do concerning the ENTIRE Novus Ordo fake “Catholic” Church of the heretic Popes of Vatican II.
5. FIAT money is a scam, a delusion, a trap to keep you in chains stringer and more effective than actual iron chains

I shall return with more on the consequences of becoming independent of FIAT money soon.

Share

Subscribe

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

It’s the same title but the opposite take.

Vox’s take is here.

I disagree with him on several levels.

And since I know there will be digital ringside hecklers, no, disagreement doesn’t mean the other person is hated or disrespected. In fact, between intelligent people, disagreement can result in at least one of them, and sometimes both, refining their thinking to achieve better approximations of reality as it is, since after all, we all see through a glass darkly.

So what are my disagreements?

Let us go through them in order.

It is not true that every writer has copied the styles of other writers.

The current debate about AI in which many writers are engaging is, for the most part, an entirely false one. The truth is that even the most highly-regarded writers, particularly in the SF/F field, have always engaged in highly-imitative practices, not merely limited to the various plots, characters, and worlds, but even the literary styles of other authors. And they have done so intentionally; ironically, the better the writer, the more often they have engaged in these imitative practices.

He goes on to quote an admission to this by Roger Zelazny, but…

1. I don’t consider Roger Zelazny to be a great writer. In fact I have never thought much of his writing or stories.
2. The writers I do admire are for the most part not very well known. Zachary Mason is one, and ironically his debut novel is an astonishing one The Lost Books of the Odyssey. Ironically, this novel is something like 50 summarised pieces or versions of the Odyssey. So you could say it is a hyper-imitation of Homer. Yet I simply do not buy the premise Vox relies on, even if Mason can certainly fit the mould strictly speaking.
3. Tolkien is another and I don’t think he copied anyone’s style.
4. Dan Simmons either.

But above all, it is not my personal experience, and while I know it would be easy to criticise me by saying I am not a great writer, I do have over a million words in published format, and while certainly many writers may have influenced me, there is none whom I have intentionally tried to emulate in any way in any of my books. And I simply do not think anyone worthy of being called a decent writer would really do that other than as a kind of divertimento .

Sure, it might be subjective and even harder to quantify objectively with writers, but just like I do not consider everyone who ever put brush to canvas a painter, or everyone who moulded something out of rock or metal a sculptor, I do not consider every writer an artist.

And when it comes to art, a Michelangelo or a Tintoretto or a Frank Frazetta or Boris Vallejo can be thought of as artists. The retarded frauds of “post-modernism” (the CIA funded uglification of beauty) who tape a banana to a wall on the other hand, cannot be.

But Vox makes his position clear:

But in my opinion, it is absolutely and only the end result that matters; literally no one cares that William Shakespeare merely revised the plays originally written by Lord Thomas North instead of penning them from scratch.

It is a secularist and materialist position. One I share only in the principle, but not at all in its ingredients.

Vox makes a Protestant cake. And while the consumers of it probably can’t tell the difference, it lacks soul. It lacks the je ne sais quoi of humanity.

You could train an AI to read all of the collected works of Philip K. Dick and het it to write you a short story in his style, and it would probably be very good. And maybe PKD too would be astonished by it; but I doubt he would like it. He probably would prefer if a madman like me came along and broke the AI trying to impersonate him.

Vox’s argument is basically that if the machine can fool the readers then why not?

It’s utilitarian, sure, but is it the same as the organic? No.

And it is not so for Vox either.

If it were, he would take his theological musings to a digital AI version of Jesus.

I mean, why not, right? All we have about Jesus after all is only all the words he said that were noted down and what people have written about Him. So why not? The result is all that matters right?

No. It isn’t.

You reading this know it too.

I have never agreed with the statement that the ends do jot justify the means. It’s yet another nonsensical Anglo-based idea like the absurdity of “free speech” ever having existed anywhere on Earth. Any Venetian child knows such a thing is straight up utopic nonsense.

The ends ALWAYS justify the means, at least if you are not retarded. Why? Because anyone of at least what *I* consider normal intelligence, will factor in ALL the costs of the “means”; including emotional costs.

AI has no humanity, and no matter how you spin it, there is something important about that.

The main “hook” of AI is that it flatters the user.

It’s the magic mirror on the wall that tells you every morning that YOU, yes YOU, are the prettiest of all the princesses, and the smartest person in the room too!

And AI will continue to help diminish the humanity of human beings, much as the “Protestant work ethic” has done.

So I agree that the end result is what counts.

Because if it lacks the human part of the artist, then it is not art at all, merely a mechanism to mechanise you.

Personally at least, I will continue to greet everyone I meet as I find them; enjoy their flaws as they get to help me remember that we are all fallen, and flawed, and weak.

AI is not the answer.

Share

Subscribe

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

You can feel however you want about it, but the reality is that propaganda works. The so-called “entertainment industry” —which in reality is mostly run by the same types that pushed degeneracy to unheard of levels in Germany in the Weimar years— is DESIGNED to reduce, destroy and remove shame while boosting pride for degeneracy.

The point is that once you have access to all sorts of pornography at the tips of your fingers, the average person will first become enthralled and mesmerised, then desensitised and requiring a bigger “fix” in order to achieve the same initial “high”.

The process is identical to drug addiction and results in the same end result: the eventual degradation, degeneration, and dissolution of the personality into a general amorphous zombie-like semblance of a human being.

Here is a question for you:

If you can ONLY live in either a world where 50% of ALL women have an onlyfans,

OR

a world where the images below (paintings for lingerie ads from the 1950s) is the closest thing to pornography that exists,

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

You can feel however you want about it, but the reality is that propaganda works. The so-called “entertainment industry” —which in reality is mostly run by the same types that pushed degeneracy to unheard of levels in Germany in the Weimar years— is DESIGNED to reduce, destroy and remove shame while boosting pride for degeneracy.

The point is that once you have access to all sorts of pornography at the tips of your fingers, the average person will first become enthralled and mesmerised, then desensitised and requiring a bigger “fix” in order to achieve the same initial “high”.

The process is identical to drug addiction and results in the same end result: the eventual degradation, degeneration, and dissolution of the personality into a general amorphous zombie-like semblance of a human being.

Here is a question for you:

If you can ONLY live in either a world where 50% of ALL women have an onlyfans,

OR

a world where the images below (paintings for lingerie ads from the 1950s) is the closest thing to pornography that exists,

Which world do you pick?

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

There is a concentrated effort that has magnified a few thousand-fold recently, to keep you stressed, anxious and not thinking straight. In a word, to keep you in a semi-constant state of fear.

The reason is simple. When you are in that state, you are:

• More susceptible to suggestion
• Your immune system is weakened
• Your energy level is lowered and thus consequently you have a reduced ability to
  • Take decisive, positive actions
  • Counter the general apathy
  • Eat healthily or take ANY positive action instead to begin to change habits.

Consequently this puts you in a vicious cycle of:

• Spending more time passively in front of the TV
• Believing the crap steaming out of it
• Eating and acting unhealthily
• Which all make you less motivated, more apathetic and overall unhealthy.

As to WHY the powers that be want you that way… well… if you STILL think the puppet masters want what’s best for you after 5 years of them trying (and mostly succeeding) in injecting you with a mass-murder/infertility/DNA altering genetic serum under the guise of it being a “vaccine”, then it’s likely you’re beyond the purpose of this blog in general.

And if you ARE vaxxed and starting to regret it now that even the mass media and the official medical establishment is admitting to the things we “conspiracy theorists” have known for 30 years, well, I do my best to give you some helpful advice on things that seem to help at the OG blog here .

The Solution

The solution is as always the same: deal with REALITY as it is in YOUR IMMEDIATE SURROUNDINGS.

Why? Because:

1. Everything not happening directly in front of you may well be a lie. More-so if reported by the national news as being “reality”.
2. Even if it happens to be real, how does the misery/danger/depressing thing that happens thousands of kilometres away from you ACTUALLY affect you? Other than causing a release of depressed chemicals in your brain? If it weren’t for your addiction to nonsense news you wouldn’t even know about it and could enjoy your day.

I had never watched TV news after CNN became a thing, because the ridiculous hyperbole was already annoying, but I stopped reading newspapers in 2008 as an experiment for one month. I have never returned to the habit of reading them, and guess what:

• I am not missing anything relevant of ANY importance on a global scale
• It has become absolutely obvious that 100% of the “scary thing that is about to happen imminently” is nonsense.
  • There will NOT be a nuclear war in Europe
  • Yes mass immigration is a problem but average citizens are starting to fight back in countries that are (not yet) completely converged. The UK is indeed a lost cause as the native population has surrendered their children to the rape gangs by the tens of thousands, but places like Italy a fake Novus Ordo “priest” who had sexually abused two girls and got ten years in prison was found shot dead two days after his release. The alleged perpetrator/s were originally arrested with smoking gun nearby apparently, but… were released on a “technicality” on appeal. Messing with children in the South of Europe is still likely to get you a short trip to a marsh.
• Russia will not invade Europe. But if they did, it might be an improvement on the current puppets pretending to be elected by their citizens.

And so on.

In other words all the BIG issues are just a distraction from the REAL issues, which in the main are:

• Poison in your water and food
• Poison in your “medicines”
• Poison in your Tell-a-lie-vision programmes (yes all of them, yes including “entertainment”)
• Increasing costs and taxes and controls on everyday activities

The plan is not to have the military march you to a concentration camp. The plan is to make the concentration camp be your own mind.

Many years ago when I went on a trip to Albania , I saw a building with a giant acronym on the top F.E.A.R. It was funny at the time, but it sort of reminds me that the joke is real. They are manufacturing a bunch of fear for you to become as pliable, malleable, and non-resisting to whatever evil they impose on you.

Ignore their lies and build your own realm. Your own food, clean water, energy production, and community of people willing to fight is necessary to protect your freedom and clean-living ways based in REALITY instead of the pedovore agenda.

Remember, F.E.A.R. Can mean many things, but mostly it’s one of these three:

• Forget Everything And Run
• False Evidence Appearing Real
• Face Everything And Rise

Pick one.

Share

Subscribe

Join the chat

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

There has been a generic rise online of accusations of intolerance directed at Sedevacantists. This also tends to get added to the accusation of interfighting schisms and so on. Both of these accusations are a false equivalence and essentially “fake news”.

First of all, one should always be intolerant of falsity and lies. And it doesn’t matter if that means you get accused of “intolerance”.

That’s like saying if the entire world says 2 and 2 is 5 you should just go along with it. No. That is simply cowardice.

I get accused of being an antisemite for pointing out the things Israel and the Jews in general believe, control and do around the world and in Gaza in particular right now. Do I care? Not at all, because the truth is the truth.

But it is also a useful metric. Anyone that makes such an accusation can immediately be summarily ignored from that point on. Either they are shills, liars, or too stupid to check information they are fed for themselves to verify it. And who needs shills, liars or idiots in their life? I certainly do my best to avoid them at all times!

So that is the first benefit of holding to the truth uncompromisingly. You may be less popular with the NPC masses, but the friends you do make and keep are real people.

There is a reason that men come to see my farm and help me on it from around the world, and we remain good friends after even if they do not become neighbours.

Secondly, with regard to sedevacantism, that is, REAL catholicism the attacks are relentless, as they have always been against the real Catholic Church, both internal and external. That’s precisely because Catholicism IS the truth. So trying to present us as crazy dancing dervishes is exactly how the Satanists operate. They blame you of their own sins.

The “divisions” in Sedevacantism are for the most part fake news as well.

The usual strategy is to present any/all/a mixture of Sedevacantist and not as “Traditional Catholics”. Which of course is nonsense.

So let me clarify things in a very simple way. Catholics are divided into two categories: clergy and laypeople. And it is VERY simple to know who IS a Catholic and who is not.

With laypeopl e, if they are ignorant of their own religion, of its history, of the infiltration since the 1700s, of the heresies of Vatican II and its Freemasonic antipopes then even if they are fooled into terrible error and believe the Novus Orco Freemasonic clergy are Catholics, this tragic error does not make rhem heretics. They remain considered Catholic. Mistaken, in error, wrong, ignorant, fooled, deceived and so on, but Catholic nonetheless.

On the other hand, someone that has been presented with all the evidence, and refuses to engage with it logically and with reason must become at least suspect of being either invincibly ignorant (that is, too stupid and lacking in basic intelligence and common sense to be considered a capable or even normal person), or possibly a shill or gatekeeper, that is people paid or otherwise engaged in deception with regard to presenting actual Catholicism.

While many such characters operate as semi-famous laypeople, it is easy enough to see through them if you are actually at least familiar with actual Catholicism, and in due course they tend to expose themselves. Some notable examples featured on my OG blog (just type their names in the search me link on the right sidebar at the OG blog) are:

• Milo Yankmypoleus (financed by Jewish family originally to be a “Catholic” gatekeeper, and also worked with Church Militant (see below) Milo was exposed by yours truly as a Freemason)
• Emo Jones (financed by the same guy who finances Opus Dei (think Novus Ordo version of Scientology), Church militant (see below)
• Tay-Tay Marshall (I believe same financier, and badly ghost written books about the Church infiltration, but in any case he was Protestant pastor/charlatan and now he switched the grift to Novus Orco “Catholic”
• Michelle Voris (Top Man of Church Militant who became bottom man since re-exposed as continuing to be a flaming homosexual propositioning young men in his “congregation”)

So that explains the laypeople.

The clergy is even easier. Any supposed “Catholic” cleric who does not specifically and clearly:

• Reject the entirety of Vatican II as heresy
• Reject every fake “Pope” including all of them from Roncalli to Bergoglio.
• Reject the “new” invalid, mass
• Reject the entirety of the illogical “Recognise and Resist” crowd (SSPX etc)
• Refuse to link the name of any of the fake “Popes” with the Holy Mass

Then, you can comfortably assume they are impostors, frauds, Satanists or Freemasons. A FEW might be utterly ignorant and fooled into somehow going through one of the hives of homosexuality and pederastry pretending to be seminaries without suspecting anything. And if that’s the case, would you trust such a person to somehow point you in the right direction with respect to matters theological?

Well, even if you were so inclined, you cannot, because NONE of these guys are validly ordained anyway, so they are NOT actual Clergy. In fact, it is highly, highly, highly doubtful any of them are Catholic at all. It would be like saying an engineer is a valid engineer if he can’t do multiplication. With a calculator.

Right.

Now we got that cleared up, what is left?

Actual Catholic Clergy, normally referred to as 1958 Sedevacantists (when the last valid Pope died: Pope Pious XII), and the laypeople that see it this way too. Not because of any personal view, but because that is the absolute and undeniably correct position according to Catholic dogma and our infallible Magisterium, which was all encoded in the Code of Canon Law of 1917 by Popes Pious X and Benedict XV.

Now, regardless of if you believe as we Catholics do or not, the fact is that either we are right or we are not. If we are not, well, we are just like all the other religions: wrong.

However there is no other religion that has achieved even a fragment of the good Catholicism has achieved, so you’d have to explain how and why a loving God would not give us a way to know how to behave if we sought it in earnest.

On the other hand, if we are right, and our religion models reality as we find it better than any other, then, there is absolutely NOTHING positive to be gained by mixing the Truth of our position with any adulterated or inferior view.

For some reason, however, this perfectly logical position is labelled as evil, bad, double-plus ungood.

But if you KNOW 2+2 is 4, saying anything different is a lie. And this is the same principle.

People can get as offended as they like, but reality will NOT change to accommodate them.

• Trannies are NOT a different sex than what they were born with.
• “Gender” is a word used purely to describe the fact that Romantic Languages (French, Italian, Spanish, etc) have masculine and feminine words, it has NOTHING to do with the sexual preferences of people, and using it that way is an intentional perversion of the language on purpose to try and confuse the average zombie/NPC. Whatever sexual perversion/fetish you have, it’s your own thing and usually the result of mental illness. There are people sexually attracted to var exhausts. And no, they are not normal either.
• Human IQ os a thing, as are time-based preferences.
• Cultures and religions are NOT all equivalent or as pleasant and “nice” as each other.
• Diversity is NOT a strength.
• Men and women are not and never will be equal.
• Free speech has never existed anywhere on Earth, and never will as a social “thing”, it MIGHT exist between you and a close friend, with no recording devices nearby and the kitchen door closed!
• And on, and on, and on.

Above all, the top virtue of being intolerant (of lies, liars, and deception in all its forms), is that you will probably have few close friends, but the ones you have will be the kind who mostly love the truth.

And there are only two types of people on this planet:

• Those who love the truth,
• Everyone else.

Be the right type.

Life is simply better that way (not easier, but definitely of superior quality).

Share

Subscribe

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I mean, if you trust anything a doctor says blindly, without checking, researching and questioning them in some depth, at this point, you basically deserve whatever happens to you.

I used to do this regularly on those rare occasions I did go to a doctor before the staged mass murder by generic serum of 2020-2024, but since then I have become decidedly inquisitorial with doctors. The ones that give me the standard narrative are summarily and permanently dismissed.

One recently tried to “argue” from “authority”, citing the “science” and her “qualifications”. My reply was that I was not a doctor but I could read and I worked with numbers for over 40 years, and science was just numbers. Statistics to be precise and she should read the link I provided on a study done on 40,000 children over ten years and reproduced in other ways that demonstrated that unvaccinated children got ill far less than vaccinated ones.

She had no response. They never do when you go full dialectic on them.

But now look at this little video on cholesterol.

And don’t believe it on blind faith, go on, research it a bit. Then wolf down a half-dozen eggs and a huge stack of bacon.

Share

Subscribe

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

See the brave leader-ette of the EU tell you YOU are a pedophile.

Here is an extract from the Talmud at these archived pages 54a and 54b here: https://archive.is/2lojg where you should in particular read footnotes 24, 25 and 26, and page 55a and 55b here: https://archive.is/VWHM8 . Where on page 55b it clearly states a girl that is 3 years and a day old is assumed to be able to be acquired into “marriage” by being raped by an adult; since supposedly women are sexually mature at age 3 and a day according to the wisdom of the Talmud. These are official English translations of the Talmud Sanhedrin in Chapter VII, done by H. Freedman under the editorship of Rabbi I. Epstein.

And here some screenshots in case the archive gets “disappeared”.

So, European man, are your values the values of the Talmud?

Because mine sure as Hell are not.

And the money laundering fraudster robot-old-barbie can only be speaking for herself.

Share

Subscribe

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

If/when you become aware of how corrupt everything on this planet is and how many lies you believed were true for most of your life, you might, become despondent… if you are weak, or have no time (because you need to slave away every minute of the day just to survive) and have no critical thinking capacity left due to the ever shortening attention span courtesy of smartphones etc.

But if you stay the course, you find out who is behind almost all the worst aspects of life on Earth today.

And when you do, even when presented with undeniable facts, it will still take you some time to really digest it. Only then, will you be able to see it.

And here is the thing: once you see it, once you have satisfied yourself of the uncomfortable truth about who runs things, and how, you will then realise: they have very little power of you. Even if they can jail and kill you (they will in any case, if they can!) you will not have anywhere near as the level of anxiety and fear as you might have had before.

They are really a kind of mental parasite, except less pleasant, and less obvious than the invasion of the body snatchers aliens were.

That will be hard enough to do:

See the world and the people who run it as it really os and how they really are.

The next step is even harder to do:

Realising the ultimate aim (and power) that directs the world’s globalist agenda, does not originate with anyone human, but rather with the evil spirit of Malice that affects every aspect of life on Earth.

But as they say, the greatest lie of the devil, is to have made people believe he doesn’t exist.

After all… no one fights what “doesn’t exist”, right?

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here