Social Commentary « The Kurgan Blog

Giuseppe Filotto Logo

Special Operations & Exploration

Archive for the ‘Social Commentary’ Category

Given the “scary cover” of Nazi Moon, which is the collection of the first three books of rhe Overlords of Mars Series (as well as the first iteration of the cover for book 1 of that series – Overlords of Mars : Inception) and my author’s notes in the first two book being clearly anti-nazi, while the author’s notes in the third book might be seen (by people who can’t read for comprehension) as being pro-nazi, I figured it was time to clarify my position with regards to “the Nazis” and Hitler himself.

I think to a great extent, Vox Day already covered a lot of the ground on the why of my own views in his own clarification post here.

Being as unlike Hitler I actually am a devout Catholic (which also means I am a 1958 Sedevacantist, as these are the only actual Catholics left), Hitler’s and the Nazis in general, Pagan New Religion that they wanted to be based on racial lines and use to completely eradicate Catholicism (Christianity is Catholicism and vice-versa, all else is just heretic Churchianity, as anyone capable of reading and interested enough in looking at actual Church History and the Bible can conclude if they are objective and not already brainwashed a priori) is obviously not anything I agree with.

That is enough to make me clearly anti-Nazi ideologically.

Which does not mean I will also pretend certain realities about that period of history will be ignored or swept under the carpet just because they happen to align with “Nazism” in a more general sense.

For example, I absolutely do NOT believe 6 million Jews were gassed to death in concentration camps. But then, no one else does either, including holocaust historians in Israel.

Was there a persecution of Jews? Sure. And if you want to call it a holocaust, knock yourself out. But if you want me to feel especially bad specifically for the Jews, you may not want to be holding your breath. At least not until after everyone acknowledges publicly that “the Jews” —in the general sense just as “the Nazis” is used— have been responsible for far more human misery and death than any other ethnic tribe or religion on the face of the Earth since the beginning of recorded history.

Marxism and communism are both Jewish ideologies, the invention of the contraceptive pill was done by a Jew (1) as was the general attitude towards abortion, promoted by Sanger and today abortion being claimed by prominent Hollywood Jews as part of their religion.

The Bolsheviks (Jews) killed more nominally Christian Europeans than did the Second World War.

Jews caused holocausts of Palestinians (doing it today) and Lebanese with horrific crimes that simply go ignored by the mainstream narrative and their involvement in pernicious practices of usury, financial deceit and the literally absurd invention of fiat money and how it is operated by private enterprise run by powerful Jewish families, is again, a topic that is as forbidden to speak about as it is of whether gas chambers to gas people ever did or even could exist in Auschwitz and other concentration camps.

In short, the attitude that Jews are the most victims that were ever victimised as a people and deserving of some special treatment because of it is not only something that I don’t subscribe to in any way and never will, it is also an outright lie that inverts the truth that as a people, Jews, their ideologies and general practices in their host nations have undoubtedly caused more death and misery than any other people.

In fact, the intentional murder by forced marches, starvation, exposure and outright murder of German civilians after the second world war os multiples of times higher than the total number of Jews killed in it. The Morgenthau plan, which was “officially” abandoned, got actually put into practice by de facto behaviour of the allied forces against the defeated Germans. It is estimated something like ten million Germans were murdered this way, while the best estimates of the total number of murdered Jews, which ranges from 300,000 to 500,000. Certainly a tragedy, and we are happy to call it a holocaust if that is what the laws force us to do, but let us also then call out the multiple holocausts the Jews caused against the Germans, the Ukrainians and the Russians.

And let us also look with more care into the financial reasons that started, financed and caused the first and second world wars. Work that Antony Sutton has already done in three volumes, none of which have been found in error.

Just like none of the work of David Irving , who was a renowned historian for many years, before he looked into the Jewish holocaust and started to report back on his findings. After that Mr. Irving was publicly made a spectacle of and his work intentionally destroyed by the UK police. His vilification was total and people like me who had no real idea or interest in the details at the time just saw his picture plastered on the front page of various papers for being some callous, evil, neo-nazi denier of the holocaust. And as most did not have today’s awareness of the fact that almost all the mass media is also controlled by Jewish interests, and in any case is filled with the worst sort of liars from too to bottom, everyone just assumed Mr. Irving was indeed just some crazy vicious racist/holocaust-denier.

But Mr. Irving did not deny the Jewish Holocaust. He simply demonstrated the real extent of it in ways that were irrefutable even if not especially new. In fact, the entire Jewish Holocaust scenario began to appear in the 1960s. Before then, no one even discussed it. Including the people who had physically seen and even liberated some of the concentration camps. There was no outcry about gas chambers masquerading as showers in the immediate aftermath of the end of WWII.

Aside all that, there is another aspect of the Nazis that has to be acknowledged as being objectively superior to everyone else at the time: their technology.

The Nazis rediscovered the principles of antigravity and invented stealth technology as well as various devices to power their submarines far in advance of anything the allied had, and using different principles of physics,

They also invented the first jet engines and various other “wonder weapons” such as, for example, the foo fighters, some kind of smallish floating ball or disc that essentially acted as an advanced predatory arial mines against incoming enemy aircraft.

They had various ideas and concepts, some repugnant in character, others neutral, that in any event are absolutely noteworthy. As is Hitler’s implementation of various financial methodologies, and removal of various corrupt Jewish officials who had inserted themselves into the government.

In short, no, I do not subscribe to Nazi ideology, but I don’t subscribe to American or Israeli ideology either.

1. From wikipedia:

Pincus remained interested in mammalian reproduction systems and began to research infertility.^[6] In 1951, Margaret Sanger met Pincus at a dinner hosted by Abraham Stone, the director of the Margaret Sanger Research Bureau and medical director and vice president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA), and procured a small grant from the PPFA for Pincus to begin hormonal contraceptive research. Pincus, along with Min Chueh Chang, confirmed earlier research that progesterone would act as an inhibitor to ovulation.

In 1952, Sanger told her friend Katharine McCormick about Pincus and Chang’s research. Frustrated by PPFA’s meager interest and support, McCormick and Sanger met with Pincus in 1953 to dramatically expand the scope of the research with a 50-fold increase in funding from McCormick. Pincus was interested by Sanger’s work with impoverished women with histories of many pregnancies. Sanger indirectly influenced him to create a successful contraceptive to prevent unwanted pregnancies.^[6]

By G | 6 January 2025 | Posted in Social Commentary

Nationalism is the Truth

Vox Day has written one of the most important pieces of writing he has ever done here.

I absolutely suggest everyone reads it in full.

It is not just important, it is fundamental to understanding of reality on this planet and how the evil servants of Satan want to invert it.

Even so, Vox continues to make a fundamental error with regard to the one saving Grace that does exist on our fallen world: Christianity.

It is a bit of cognitive dissonance he exhibits that is hard to understand. Especially since it is directly analogous to the very concept of Nationalism he clearly understands so well and in which he refers to the relevant documents relating to the American Constitution.

If paper “Americans” are not actually Americans —and I agree they are not, even if it is somewhat arguable that there is any specific homogenous people that are American, as such, even if you allow for say such a concept as he does, I think there is a good argument to be made that Southrons are different genuine Americans from Yankee, and both are different genuine Americans from Redskins. So at minimum there are at least three different genuine Americans that can be considered such from native (birthright) principles— then there can be no argument that Protestants are in any way Christians; and this is even clearer, since the documentation regarding it is even clearer and untroubled by any genetic complexities, as it is based purely on adherence to the dogmatic principles that are all set down in writing.

Every single shade of Protestantism deviated ferociously from the only Christianity that had ever existed, complete with transubstantiation in the mass, Popes and so on, that is Catholicism.

The one exception people cling to, the so-called Eastern “Orthodox” are clearly schismatics motivated by subterfuge and political power as well as historical duplicitous turncoats that backstabbed the very Catholics that came to save them, repeatedly, even almost half a century after their schisms.

Nor do ANY of their theological claims to “orthodoxy” stand up to scrutiny based in actual Biblical fact.

Just as Novus Orco impostor clergy pretends to be Catholic, the Sarah Hoyts of America pretend to be American. And just as anyone who does not follow and believe the original dogma of the infallible magisterium of the Catholic Church, embodied in the Code of Canon Law of 1917 —which means it’s all available for perusal by anyone who cares to do so— has no claim to Christianity; no one who is not a legitimate progeny of one of the three branches of Americans mentioned above has any claim to America as their nation.

I have an opinion to explain Vox’s apparent rejection of actual Catholicism, which may or may not be correct, but as I have proposed a discussion on this before and it has been most likely politely rejected for at least a decade, I can only go on this so far, and it is thus:

Vox has an issue with any human authority over him. Which I understand and mostly agree with him on it, though I have no ego about it when that authority makes sense in order to achieve greater objectives and the “leader” is competent, or when —as is the case in the Church— that authority is derived by the “leader” (priest or bishop) adhering to divine law and doing their job with regard to imposing whatever such derived authority on me. I think Vox has an issue in both these regards I don’t have.

Secondly, I think he identifies his Christianity far more in that way that Catholicism would qualify as the internal forum than the external forum. That is, God knows our hearts fully and there is SOME scope for that internal state to give some leeway in terms of who may or may not be saved. Again, I have no real issue with this stance, but the point for me (and for logic in genera) is that the external forum, that is that aspect of your practice of religion that you exhibit publicly, absolutely matters because it helps to construct the social fabric that produces a more, or less, pious and believing society.

In short, because most people are NPCs, it is incumbent upon us to do our best to also follow the rules and apply ourselves to presenting ourselves as obedient Catholics (obedient to God first and foremost, and to his LEGITIMATE and VALID representatives on Earth that act and believe legitimately and validly).

To do so helps others see us and those who do so as the correct way to behave and encourages more Catholic behaviour, which historically has demonstrated itself to be the most beneficial overall behaviour that humanity has ever indulged in.

I make this post not as any sort of accusation to Vox, he will most likely not respond to my thoughts here anyway, but rather to make the position with respect to actual Christianity clear.

If you don’t believe paper Americans are actual Americans, you have no legitimate basis for believing anyone other than 1958 Sedevacantists (ie Catholics) are Christians, and everyone else is just a Churchian.

By G | 4 January 2025 | Posted in Catholicism, Christianity, Sedevacantism, Social Commentary

The Uncivilised Man

A recent conversation with the wife highlighted something I have always known but probably assumed wasn’t as prevalent even with people you are close with. Possibly because in the family I grew up in this was understood as I understand it. And our lives and some of the work my father, myself and my brother all did independently of each other also confirmed this reality:

Violence is a normal part of life on Earth. So learning about it and how and when it is required to be applied and when it is not just right, but even necessary to do so, was simply something we learned in the normal course of life, like maybe other kids learn to go to football practice or learn to ride a bicycle and understand sometimes you’re likely to fall and so on.

In polite society (which really is a nice way of saying the mollified, metrosexual, “all violence is bad” generic faggotry that has been promoted, pushed and inserted into every narrative ever since the end of WWII) the idea you may have to resort to violence is seen mostly as some barbaric act of fate and bad luck, and certainly not anything you ever could or should do in cold blood.

Some may even agree that certain people need killing, as the saying goes, but like most “civilised” meat eaters would balk at the idea of butchering their own meat from a living animal, most of these people would either not be able to go through with it, or would be (and probably remain) traumatised by the act of taking a human life, no matter how justified.

As a hypothetical, a guy who rapes children, if you had the opportunity to kill him with absolute certainty that you never suffer any legal consequences for it, how many would actually be able to pull the trigger themselves? And if you want to add another layer to it: then go on to have lunch normally 15 minutes later?

And of those people who could do that, and not be traumatised (i.e. have the lunch), the overwhelming majority would be men. Mostly men that have had experience with killing and/or combat. Maybe soldiers or hunters. And of course, a few sociopaths.

Even under justified conditions, say the defence of your loved ones, modern western society tends to view the use of violence by private citizens as a basically illegal and dangerous thing that should be the exclusive monopoly of the government.

But not too long ago in terms of historical perspective, a man caught stealing or poaching from another man’s farm, was liable to get killed for it if he was caught. And frankly, while it might be a bit extreme even if it were legal, to blast say the truffle thieves I have encountered, you can see that if the law was that I was in my right to so, that would very quickly put a stop to truffle thieving. At least after the first dead body for thieving. And I doubt it would need more than one of them to get the point across.

Now you might think that this is wrong and doesn’t work, but it is you that is wrong. Places like Singapore and Saudi Arabia, that have the death penalty, and severe penalties for theft (like cutting off one hand for the first offence) have almost none of the crimes that get punished severely. In fact even littering is a non event in Singapore, because the penalty for it is a hefty fine and a couple of weeks of humiliation in public for it.

You might not like the fact, but the fact is that human beings respond very readily to pain. Some 40 years of martial arts experience has made this fact as solid in its truth as any engineering reality. One even more reliable that gravity.

And if the West is to ever be salvaged or recover from the onslaught of uncivilised third worlders that between Christmas and New Year have killed hundreds of people around the world, from the muslim stabber in Rimini here in Italy (shot dead by the carabinieri) to the various attacks and mass murders in the USA, Berlin, and many other places, mostly ignored intentionally by the presstitutes pretending to report the news (with apologies to street whores on crack, who compared to mass media journalists are paragons of virtue), it is not going to be sone by voting or even the “powers” of “government” [the illegal, illegitimate, bought and paid for puppets of the (((Americans)))]. It will happen only and because of organised, normal men who retained the capacity to do violence when required.

The mass of culture-clashing invaders, be they “legal” or not, aided and abetted by a completely inverted and corrupted legal system, is intentionally creating conditions of lawlessness, rape, general crime, and murder that are unheard of in the original native population of the various countries.

The natural reaction at some point will be to push back, at which point those doing so will be killed/shot/jailed/vilified by the lackeys of the puppets pretending to be legitimate governments.

So in fact, the very first people that would need to be removed, even before the immigrants, would be those who intentionally created these conditions with the idea of starting precisely the kind of race riots that will eventually erupt.

The puppet-masters must be target n.1.

Only then will the puppets then be next in line to lose their positions.

And only thirdly would it become necessary to repatriate the immigrants to the fourth generation, which at that point might even be accomplished calmly and non-violently for the most part.

Those immigrants permitted to stay would have to ideally number a total of less than 2% or so of the native population, and even then have conditions they need to remain under, being immediately deported (at minimum) for breaking them (such as being convicted of any crime and so on).

Any country doing that, decoupling from the USA and its (((masters))) who also did away with all international banking cartels, reduced all taxes to no more than 10% of income total, put all government budgets and government employee salaries online for all the public to see (and possibly vote on) and issued its own, usury-free and gold and silver backed currency, would quickly become a paradise on Earth.

Which is why every single leader who tried to do that suddenly found themselves on the receiving end of the “American” war machine.

But now is the time for smaller countries beside Russia to “break free”. And if you can just do some of it, the rest will follow. They can’t put out EVERY fire this time.

Yes the game is rigged and it’s rigged against you.

Yes you are financially very limited and they are not.

But ultimately, they are weak little cowards hiding behind layers of bureaucracy, obfuscation, subterfuge, and shadows. Because they are basically human cockroaches, the light of truth burns them.

So spread the word and share this post. The Uncivilised Man is going to be required on some levels if any Western cultures are to survive.

By G | 2 January 2025 | Posted in Billionaire Pedophiles, Clown World, Mass Murderers, On War And Civil Unrest, Social Commentary, The Enemy Within, The Jews

Once more on James Wharram

I wrote briefly about James before as a possible way to escape Clown World for those less burdened by many children perhaps.

I have not had enough time to yet finish his second book, People of the Sea, but am a good 2/3 of the way through it and am genuinely fascinated by the man. Had I known of him earlier, while I still lived in England, I would probably have tried to meet him and have a conversation. Something now impossible as he left this Earth on 14 December 2021.

It is hard to know how I would have reacted to him in person. On the one hand I get the sense he was a man that had absolutely no doubts about his way of doing things, regardless of what anyone else thought, which I relate to very well, and he also seems to have been comfortable with the ocean, something that I, though not a sailor, always have been too. For me, mostly as a form of relaxing solitude. These are the sides of him I relate to. But on the other hand there are sides of him I am curious about. Not so much his rather hedonistic aspect of having multiple female lovers live and work together, though I am sure that fascinates many men.

The reality of that aspect is not one that fascinates me very much. I have had many lovers and at times some of these women knew of each other, but ultimately I am an intense person in a way I suspect is very different from how James was.

The ever-shifting dynamics of female emotions, and multiple females at that, tend to affect me perhaps more than they should, as my ability to sense the mood of others is elevated enough it invariably has some influence on me. Not in the sense that it diverts me from my chosen path, but rather in the sense that it acts as a kind of unpleasant background noise when it is in dissonance with my own rather calm and ever-forward looking natural state of being.

Two, three, or five women at a time in a confined space like a sailing catamaran could quickly devolve into a floating hell from which the only escape would be to tie the main anchor to your neck while seeking the blissful silence of death in the depths of the Ocean.

Probably too my own intensity in this regard would be at fault. I could never really be with a woman half-heartedly, even when the encounters were brief and temporary. After all, the whole point for me was to experience that person as deeply as I could in the moment, ephemeral or even inconsequential as it might be in the long term. And that tends to cause a reaction in the women too, and in the other women who inevitably end up in some kind of competition for such attention.

But in some way I sense this ability of James to juggle multiple women at once in a way that clearly was not superficial —at least from what I can gather from a book— since after all, he had children with at least two of them and long relationships with several, is tied —or at least related to— his ability to immerse himself also in customs of pacific islanders, and what he refers to as “Arts and Craft” types that helped him build various ships over the years.

Once again, the thought of spending weeks, months and years with random strangers of rather eccentric types and backgrounds —which I uncharitably think of as a kind of kumbaya unwashed hippies— sends a shiver up my spine.

None of this is a judgement on James Wharram, but rather merely a springboard on which I ponder my own character and try to compare it, to see what I might learn, if anything. For this reason I would genuinely have loved to spend some hours talking with him and getting a sense of him directly.

Whatever one might think of his character, there is absolutely no denying that he was a unique and uniquely talented individual. With a knack for meeting, attracting and becoming partnered with similarly uniquely talented women too.

I wonder at his ability to commune with groups of people from very different walks of life, because I too have this quality, but it seems to me, perhaps wrongly, he had a better ability to remain embroiled with them for longer periods and in more confined spaces. Something I doubt I could do for very extended periods of time.

It makes me wonder, at what abilities I may need to learn and gain proficiencies in, if I am, indeed, ultimately, to succeed at creating the greater Kurganate I have set out to do.

But then I also am pre-selecting the people I am interested in attracting because I have already determined they need to be 1958 Sedevacantists, preferably with a good understanding of the first Crusade and the Siege of Malta for their inspiration regarding being a good Catholic, for this to work.

There is also an undercurrent of the boomer years and zeitgeist that existed in the 1960s and 1970s and generic optimism of the 1980s that possibly made his unusual life both easier in certain ways and also harder in others, but that is pretty much as most men have it anyway.

What shines through most for me is the absence of the levels of bureaucracy, nickel and diming, permits and regulations, that he could mostly operate under.

Another aspect is the extreme bravery that perhaps is best described as the foolishness of youth that later matures into courage that was exhibited by all his lifelong female companions. As well as the fact that all of them, James included, absolutely give me the certain impression of essentially being good, open, friendly and reliable people.

Human beings are all nasty, brutish, weak, selfish beasts, even the best of us, but between our flaws and weaknesses and fears and egos, there are genuine moments of light and joy and love and bravery and goodness that simply reveal also the spark of the divine in us. And I have the absolute sense that James Wharram and “his women” all would have been people I could see that aspect of humanity in them that makes us redeemable.

I see and recognise his quasi-pagan ways in my own attitude for most of my life before my conversion experience to Crusader style pre-Vatican II Catholicism, a conversion I would have ridiculed as impossible even one day before the 3rd of March 2013.

And I wonder how I might have seen his views in say 2020 when I was already a baptised Catholic and he was still alive and I imagine from his writing at least, in possession of all his faculties.

Again, not as a judgment on him, but rather a perspective on me.

It makes me wonder… what if I had managed to get my yacht in my early 20s and started sailing and lived a life close to what he did?

And I am reminded of a time when I was 19 I think, and went for a week to Durban to do a sailing course. I slept on the boat to save money, which was an option, enjoyed the skipper, who was a grizzled old man that took the usual “liking” to me that men who are men in their own right often took with me when they were older, which is to say, be impressed by my ability (I was the only one who did not take motion sickness medication who managed to keep his lunch in his stomach, and that only by watching what the skipper did, which was to let the waves move him instead of fight them) and at the same time get frustrated by my overreaching. In the exercise on rescuing a man fallen overboard, I got the shortest time… but I did so by arriving at the lifesaver that had been cast overboard at such speed that even when the sail was dropped and the boat came right up to the lifesaver so it could be plucked out by hand without even needing the pole to hook it, the skipper blew up at me.

Doing that manoeuvre that way in a storm was likely to crush the man overboard’s skull if the waves and the boat’s speed and sudden stop did not align perfectly. But we weren’t in a storm. And it was a lifesaver doughnut, not a living person. And I did the best time. But I kept quiet. He was the skipper and he was trying to educate me. And I had had various injuries and my nose broken by various karate instructors, on whom I inspired similar sentiments. As the Japanese say:

“The nail that sticks out gets hammered.”

I enjoyed the week of sailing and I had taken that course because I wanted to learn to skipper in preparation for eventually finding a way to get a yacht and be free of most of the rest of the world.

But there were two events I still recall from that week. One was a film I went to see one evening, about the dictatorship in Chile, with Jeremy Irons and a beautiful young woman who is raped then killed by some random soldier. It was, I recognise now, propaganda designed to make Pinochet “the bad guy” when in effect he probably saved millions of Chileans from utter misery and death.

The other was an encounter at a local pub I went to on another evening, that being in a port was frequented by sailors. I struck up a conversation with a Frenchman, and he told me about his boat and how it didn’t take much money to do what I wanted to do. He had bought a boat in pretty bad “used” condition and worked on it for a year or so to get it ship shape. I don’t recall the exact type of boat, it wasn’t very big, but had two masts, he had travelled the world with it, and a woman, for eight years. Then, a couple of months earlier, the woman had enough, and left him. Somewhere in India I think, to fly back home to France and I suppose her family. He was still clearly distraught. As he drank another beer, to my then teetotaller juice or water, or whatever it was, he gradually became more melancholic and sad.

I still think about that Frenchman on rare occasions, and hope he found peace somewhere with someone.

But it also made me wonder. What would a life aboard be like? Yes I wanted freedom, from rules, people and humans in general, and considering I grew up mostly wild in rural areas around the world, it might give you an indication of just how misanthropic I am, and how much I enjoy the “authority” of people dumber, slower, and less accomplished as human beings in every way than I am, which basically means pretty much all governments on our planet currently, and absolutely and totally with respect to the pedovores that run them.

The life of endless adventure is one some men aspire to and can live. I know I have that in me and my own life is pretty much testament to it. But it is not that I was alone so much because I necessarily enjoyed it, as my mother had once assumed at around that time (but then it was obvious to me from age 2 onward that woman had and has never understood the remotest part of me or how I function). I spent a lot of time alone because the alternative was to spend it surrounded by idiots.

I know that sounds unkind, but it really was the case. Imagine, if you will, that your options in life was to retreat in a life mostly of solitude, or be perennially surrounded by mongoloids. As well-meaning and harmless as they might be, try to imagine how it would be to have them constantly around doing mongoloid things and talking mongoloid talks and discussing things on their mongoloid level.

And yes, again, I know how arrogant it sounds to probably most of you reading, but with an IQ that averaged at 155, the distance between me and the nominally average person of 100 IQ is greater than the one of the average person and a 65 IQ mentally handicapped person by a whole standard deviation.

I didn’t know or care about IQ then, but the distance in mental ability, interests, and so on was simply unavoidable. Part of the idea of sailing the seven seas was that in doing so I might meet and learn from cool people in far away lands and maybe even end up with that hot girl that would look really awesome in a swimming costume in some Caribbean island setting.

But the Frenchman made me think.

The lure of adventure for a man is natural, but for a woman… eventually their purpose in nature is to make children, and even if I found one willing and able to give birth at sea and homeschool them on the boat as we travelled the world… was that the kind of father I saw myself as?

It’s not that it would be a bad childhood for my children, or even unhappy for the woman; but…

what… ultimately… would be the point of such a life? How many ports and cultures and miles and miles and miles of ocean can you sail before it all starts to seem aimless?

I used to play Traveller a lot as a teenager, and even now, the idea of having a spaceship you can use to go explore weird new worlds and trade with alien species is something I would immediately say yes to. And I know every one of my children except possibly my eldest would too. And my wife. She probably would come along because the kids would convince her, but she likely would have a nervous breakdown.

The idea of a yacht was a kind of analogy for that.

Sail away. Meet new people, possibly frolic with hot exotic women, even if they didn’t have blue skin and came from another planet. That was the general idea. But then what?

I have in any case travelled a lot and met many different people and cultures; and spent enough time with many different women too. And yet, my perspective on this from when I was age 19 was still correct. I am glad I did it as otherwise I would have remained unsatisfied in the wondering of it, but my life was never about the travelling per se. That was just incidental. I went where my curious heart led me. That’s all.

So, the life of James Wharram seems to me to be almost a window into what one of my possible lives could have been. It is interesting to look through that window and think about it. But my sense of it, which I am sure is only because I am on this side of the window, is that such a life would have been just that much lonelier. Perhaps not by much, but by enough to probably be a bit more than I would have liked.

And I wonder what James would tell me if he were still here, sitting across from me with whatever his drink of choice might have been, be it an English tea or something else.

I suspect he might tell me that he was one of the most free and least lonely men that ever lived, having the love and companionship of multiple women simultaneously and adventure rarely had by anyone today alive. And I would keep quiet and listen.

And while imagining and pondering, I nevertheless do not envy nor begrudge the man anything. Because I think it is a trait of at least some men, of which I am one, that they do not experience such emotions. They are emotions that are the children of ambitions and lives unfulfilled and failures to launch. I have failed many times at many things. And I have not yet achieved but a fraction of what I want to, and honestly, unless dementia takes me, it is utterly impossible I ever will achieve even a quarter of what I would like to do, given infinite money and other resources. But the point is I have never stood still and stagnated. Sometimes I struggle in quicksand for a while, but eventually I drag myself out of it and carry on at my usual speed again. Besides, which adventuring hero of pulp fiction does not have a regular close call with quicksand?

So I read and think about James Wharram and his life and am glad for him and his having written it down. And of course for Hanneke Boon and Ruth and the other women and friends of his that made his story possible.

Wherever you may be James, I hope you have tropical waters and fair winds.

By G | 30 December 2024 | Posted in Increasing Happiness, Relationships, Social Commentary, The Crusades - Iron Men and Saints Vol. 1

There are only two types of men

Those who have a line; and hold it.

And those who do not.

Now, a man’s line may vary somewhat over time, as life and experience gradually (or occasionally suddenly) make him aware of things he did not know, errors of judgement, or lies he has unwittingly believed.

But in essence, a man that has a line will hold the line regardless of where and when he is.

It’s the difference between someone willing to die for an ideal and those who are not.

While neither type of man is guaranteed to be ethical, there is a difference between them in that even if amoral, those who have a line are reliable at least as it concerns that line, while the others are not.

Historically such men, with a line, will tend to become the leaders of disaffected groups in any unjust society, and organise other men of this same type into an irregular “army” to take care of the many injustices and the corrupt, supposedly “elected”, leaders, and their nefarious minimums.

In many cases, such men started what later became known as criminal organisations, be it the mafia, triads, or yakuza, but in origin, starting from the “bandits” of Southern Italy, these were local men with the capacity, acumen and courage to do violence upon their and their people’s enemies, in direct response to injustices perpetrated on them.

Over time, such men, absent a moral imperative that they must believe in themselves at a profound level, will eventually, and inevitably, become corrupted, and if not them, their sons and grandsons will. Because once you cross the line of being willing to go against the “law” (however unjust it may be) in order to serve the greater good of “justice” from a human perspective, you will quickly realise that the “law” of the/any government, is no more and no less than the imposition of whatever rules by the use or threat of physical force. And who of us can’t do better than government work? So if you were to succeed at imposing your will on (initially) the government, how long would it be before you decide that you can impose it on whoever/everyone?

Did you know that Pablo Escobar had tried to become part of the government of Colombia? And while his “business” was brutal, and it is not politically viable to say so, are you certain that had he succeeded his rule would have been worse for the locals than the current government of Colombia? Because I for one don’t have enough relevant and verified information to be sure either way.

I do know, however, that someone like Pinochet was (and continued to be) vilified for having taken over Chile by force, and having stopped communism there by making some 3,000 people disappear, and having some other 30,000 or so escape that country. Bad guy right?

Except that in every single example we have from history of communist regimes coming to power, not only are millions of people displaced, but often millions are murdered, and certainly NEVER less than many tens of thousands.

Given these two alternatives, it seems obvious that Pinochet should be considered a heroic figure. But that does not suit the narrative of the people that run this planet.

Just like it does not suit their narrative for you to know a few choice bits of information, such as:

How fiat money actually works
How fiat money actually came about
Why usury used to be completely illegal in Catholic (and other countries)
How and why usury is not required at all for a functioning society and is in fact detrimental to it
How and why the royal houses of Europe were systematically destroyed over time
What is the real story behind Vatican II and who instigated and implemented it and how long they took to get there
What is actual Catholic dogma compared to what they tell you it is in the Novus Ordo, post Vatican II fake and impostor “Church”
Why it matters, and why as a result we can honestly say the only Catholics left are 1958 sedevacantists
What the dogmatic rules of Judaism are
Who is pushing the globohomo agenda of homosexuality being taught in primary schools, transgenderism and all manner of sexual “education” at ever younger ages, and how it is being financed
What the Universal Commercial Code countries are “required” to have and why and how it came about
What the real reasons that WWI was started and fought, who the instigators of it were and how they did it and why.
As above for World War II
As above for the “Enlightenment” and the French revolution
As above for the funding and real reasons behind the American revolution and later the American civil war
Who runs the largest operations of child rape, trafficking, murder cannibalism and literal harvesting of adrenochrome from these children
How the above child raping and murdering people also run and blackmail various participants and install them into positions of power around the world
The real origins of things like the World Economic Forum, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberger group, the various secret societies from the Freemasons, skull and crossbones, the Carbonari, Rosicrucians, Golden Dawn and on and on, and how they are all connected by a thread leading invariably to a specific group of people
Why and how all of these things are connected

Because once you find out all of the above and connect them, you will realise at minimum two things:

1. This planet is run and operates on basically lies, at almost all levels of functionality. The entire thing is so absurdly run on false premises that are built on nothing but lies to an extent that most human beings simply are not mentally equipped to handle without feeling absolutely overwhelmed by despair.

2. The actual real history of Catholicism and its real actual dogmatic teachings is the one story about how and why this planet works as it does that not only makes sense, but fits all the available evidence we have, AND models reality so well it can be used to predict how certain things will go both in the small and individual scale as well as the large and global one, to a degree that no other theory or ideology comes even close.

I lived with realisation n. 1 above from the age of 26 to 43 without having realisation n. 2. And yet, I did not despair at all. That alone makes me rather uncommon. Then from age 43 to 47 I investigated realisation n. 2 obsessively to make sure that, absurd as it had seemed to me for my whole life, this realisation n. 2 was in fact true.

If you do this, you also become aware that Catholicism is the only philosophy and religion that has warned us about all the evil people involved in the lies and demonic shit mentioned in that partial bullet-point list above. Which tends to perk your ears up.

Then you realise it is also the only religion that upheld the required use of violence against evil which is innate and intrinsic to every even partially decent human being that ever lived.

That is, in Catholicism, the use of violence to protect yourself or others (and especially innocents) from evil is not just permitted, it is in fact considered the duty of every lay Catholic. The only other alternative is to choose martyrdom for yourself; that is, the consciously allowing yourself to be imprisoned, tortured, and/or killed in the name of justice and our Lord Jesus Christ.

Those are the only two acceptable ways to deal with evil for a Catholic.

At which point you realise why the same people that perpetrate all the evil on this Earth spent literally centuries to infiltrate and subvert Catholicism, culminating in the creation of the fake “Catholic Church” that has had only fake “Popes” promoting its destruction since 28th October 1958.

Catholics, Catholicism and the Catholic Church have and has been the ONLY effective force on Earth that has ever managed to resist the evil that occurs on this planet and for a time at least reduce it enough to create the best living conditions humanity has ever had in its entire history.

And the means of victory remain fully at our disposal, despite the massive blow that Vatican II was.

There remain more real Catholics today on Earth (Sedevacantists) than were ever present in Rome and our planet during the persecutions of Emperor Nero. And we have far better communication lines open and far more valid priests and Bishops than used to be around back then. As well as fully functional Church services.

Most important of all, because our battle is NOT primarily fought in the physical plane, our numbers are NOT a deciding factor in the fight. Rather our convictions, prayer and internal emotional and spiritual state is far more relevant.

Of course this does not invalidate the physical, which remains an undeniable, real, and important part of life (and as long as we inhabit the material world will remain so), but it does invert the order of importance:

The spiritual/mental/faith based part of the fight is in my estimation at least 80% of the fight, with the physical being 20% at most. And most of that 20% is in things like simply putting in the physical effort to do what is required, be it showing up at work, doing what needs doing, learning what needs learning and taking effective, regular, constant action towards the goals that will result in the maximum human freedom and good, which ultimately comes down to:

1. Creating communities of people that understand all of the above, and decide to band together to:

A) become self-sufficient in all things, from clean water and food to medical, energy and defence.

B) take over local government and instilling actual Catholicism at all levels

2. Defending 1. above against all enemies by all means available

3. If and when it becomes necessary to do so, use force to defend yourself and your community from evil doers who would use force on you and yours.

If you do a really good job of 1 and 2 by non-violent means, 3 may never be required, but in any case, it is best to have the capacity for 3, because on this Earth, the only real rights you have, are the ones you have sufficient force to be able to protect.

If you have read and digested all of this post correctly, you may now have come to an overall conclusion, which is that there are three types of men, rather than only two:

1. Those who do not have a line and hold it.

2. Those who do and have no ethical basis that is based in justice and goodness.

3. Those who do and do.

And if you have been paying attention, the first on that list are not men who count, at least not in my eyes and I think, not so much in the eyes of God either.

So what you have left are men who are Catholic, and men who are not. So… just two types of men.

Not all Catholics are always good and not all non-Catholics are bad, but broadly speaking one type will create societies that are wholesome, honest, safe and good, and the other type will inevitably, eventually, descend into degeneracy.

You might not see it now. I certainly didn’t see it for decades even after I figured out the first half of it, which for most people is actually the hardest one to see, so I understand if you think I am just yet another confused zealot screaming “Jeeeeaaasssuss is da waaaay!” Like some Bible-thumping retard, of which, unfortunately, this planet if absolutely filled. Such creatures are a mixture of frauds, con-men, cowards, heretics, intentional deceivers, liars, Satanists and a large number of powerfully ignorant and lazy masses too brainwashed, stunned, stupefied and inflamed with bad health to be able to reason their way out of a parking lot.

I, dear reader, am none of those things, and yet I was deceived and as a result remained ignorant of the truth for at least nearly 2 decades more than necessary. But I had not the benefit of anyone doing what I am doing here now, which is to lay out in plain and straightforward fashion, all the pieces of the puzzle before you. Your only task at this point is to decide if you will at minimum take the time to see if these pieces I present to you are valid or not. I certainly am not asking you to “just believe me”. Quite the contrary. I have always advocated (even when I did not know that it was a dogmatic Catholic principle) that every man must absolutely know and make up his mind for himself.

But even that requires you at least investigate the concepts and bullet points I laid out before you, and while yes, some of those points can potentially take months of study to figure out, I assure you it is but a small fraction of the time it takes you to figure them all out without anyone pointing them out as the essential pieces of the puzzle that they are.

So, all that is left for you to do now is decide how lazy or not you are, and hence decide if to look into the pieces or not.

That is, assuming you’re not already brainwashed enough to not even consider doing so because you have already been predisposed to assume some part, or most of what I say is itself a lie, and if that is the case, I can easily guess which part you have been “inoculated” against: Catholicism.

At any rate, it is what it is, and you will do as you will. My task here —insofar as any can be construed in the form of a blog post— is done.

Godspeed and good fortune to you.

By G | 30 December 2024 | Posted in Catholicism, Clown World, Heretics, Impostors and Frauds, Sedevacantism, Social Commentary, The Enemy Within, The Jews, Zombie Apocalypse

It’s a Big Swamp

Even those who were ardent Trump supporters (and I was too in a limited fashion, because if nothing else Trump helped expose the fake media to the average normie in a way that is now hard for anyone to deny) are finally realising that it’s all part of one big swamp, and neither side of it is on your side.

What has become absolutely obvious is that like it or not, accept it or not, pretend to go along with the politically correct narrative they have been running for 80 years or not, “The Jews” control this planet. Primarily through the creation of a completely absurd system of fiat money that they have managed to fool the entire world into using for now over 100 years. Which when coupled with usury, a practice that used to be outlawed by Catholics for centuries, becomes truly a tool of enslavement for the whole of humanity.

But they also massively influence and own the mass media and the “entertainment” branch of film and TV media (read propaganda machine) and therefore the general zeitgeist of the planet too.

Which is why they can mass murder Palestinian civilians including babies and children and literally steal their organs for sale, along with now expanding “their” territory in to Syria while genociding the remaining population of Gaza without anyone but the Houtis of Yemen doing anything about it, or even talking about it, and why Benjamin Netanyahu, an absolute war criminal if any ever existed, can also still travel around with impunity or any fear of censure.

More people are waking to this reality daily, but still not anywhere near as many as should before anything can change.

What very few people realise, is that there are two factions of Jews at the top of the pyramid of power and while they are in competition with each other, neither of them is on your side.

I believe the Chabad Lubavitch sect are supposed to be the more “Orthodox” ones, which perhaps means they follow the Talmud idea of “sex with children” (i.e. pedophilic rape) who are under age 3 not being a crime, more zealously, given the level of verified sexual child abuse in their ranks.

The other side is more the liberal atheist types that are rampantly for transgenderism, homosexuality, and every form of degenerate sexual practice involving children especially. Of course, both sides are predominantly for all that stuff being fostered on us gentiles first and foremost.

And of course no one at all will tell you that the reason the second world war was fought, was because Hitler had decoupled Germany from the Rothschild banking system, and brought Weimar Germany back from the total degeneracy that had been fostered on it after the first world war. Nor will they tell you that the books the Nazis were burning were the ones on transgender theories and the beginnings of discussing things like sex changes, which today we have being applied to underage children even without parental consent.

No one will explain either that the motivating forces behind the eventual collapse and often outright murder of the various European Royal houses was performed by the Jewish inspired Freemasons, Illuminati, Carbonari and the other multitude of names that the various secretive Satanic sects go by.

The only religion that has ever called them out for what they are and stood against them, throughout human history, has been Catholicism, though all people sooner or later become aware of their modus operandi, and invariably try to exile them from their land. After all, if you get kicked out of 110 countries and over 1000 times, including from before the time of Christ, as is recorded in at least some of the Roman writings from 55 BC, perhaps, the problem is really you, and not everyone else.

But today, to criticise a Jew, or worse The Jews, collectively, is social suicide.

So, although many are becoming aware, none yet dare speak out publicly. And of course, the same goes for any other undesirable group of people as long as they are not caucasian.

It’s just “not done” nowadays, to call Indians from India an ethnicity that, from a European perspective, is composed wholly of pathological liars. Or that the average IQ of an African is at least one standard deviation lower than that of the average Caucasian. Or that the IQ of the average Japanese is at least 5 points more than the one of the average European.

No, no, all these things are unmentionable subjects, and that is why the swamp will remain, and eventually infest everyone’s lives, because it’s already here and has been for ages, all that has changed is that now it is simply becoming more obvious.

So… don’t put your faith in any saviours beyond Christ. All others are just false prophets; yes even if they happen to be saying the thing you want to hear and maybe even actually doing some of them.

No one is coming to save you. Not Trump, nor any other politicos. You got to save yourself.

So start building up those self-sufficient communities ASAP.

By G | 27 December 2024 | Posted in Billionaire Pedophiles, Freemasons, Social Commentary, The Jews, Zombie Apocalypse

The Coming Ice Age and Reflecting on Great Men

I have been predicting this (by using science that is actually backed up by observation, instead of political narratives) on this blog, since at least November 2021, as I wrote then:

The only model of global weather patterns and “climate change” that has been something like 97-98% accurate for the last 30 years is a Russian model that is based on the Sun’s activity. For context, the last ice-age only 2 of the Sun’s magnetic fields had gone out of phase. This time it’s all 4. You keep believing in global warming if you want, you special child in a yellow bus, you, but I strongly suggest you buy an extra jumper this Christmas.

But of course, my prediction of potential pole shift has been exactly on track since 1995, as explained in the original version of The Face on Mars.

I tell you, honestly, if meritocracy was ever a thing on this planet my ideas and concepts would have already catapulted me into riches and fame my children would not be able to spend in their lifetime. But then again, throughout human history, while occasionally the men that figured out really important stuff or did important things do get eventually some post-humous fame, most remain anonymous and unknown in their own lifetime. Tesla, Leonidas, Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and others may have been as close as it gets to getting known for their genius while they lived. People like Harold Aspden, Nikolai Alexandrovich Kozyrev, Burkhardt Heim, and the half dozen or so that were plagiarised by the sexually incestuous, child abandoning, fraud called Albert Einstein, will for most people remain unknowns.

I suspect I will suffer a similar fate, perhaps the stuff I write about now will be seen in the future as “prescient” or “ahead of its time” but in any case I doubt it can ever be allowed to “spread” other than by literal word of mouth of the small pockets of literate people who still read books of some substance.

My grandfather, who was born in 1907, when I saw him one of the last times, in the late 1990s, asked me what The Face on Mars was about. I spent about 2 hours talking to him about the concepts in it and how they all tied together. He interrupted only a few times to ask pertinent questions that I was working towards anyway. At the end of it he asked me how the book was doing. I told him I had managed to sell enough of them by going physically to bookshops and doing signings outside their doors for a day just before Christmas to put a sizeable deposit on a piece of bare land up the West Coast a hundred or so kilometres from Cape Town, in South Africa.

He asked me if it had been picked up by major book distributors. I told him no, despite it having appeared briefly on CNN and a few TV programmes in the USA and UK and on radio in South Africa.

He nodded sagely and said: “That’s what I thought. You were born too early. They might understand this stuff about 200 years from now.”

While most people might feel frustrated by such a view (and from time to time it does bother me a little, but not anywhere near as much as anyone assumes, and in a way that is quite different from the way anyone expects) I was genuinely flattered. My grandfather, who as time passes has grown in my estimation of a man I loved and respected already when he was alive, had not only understood everything I spoke of, anticipated some of it as I was telling him, but given his life experience, had truly grasped its essence in the wider context of the human experience. If I had any regrets it would be of not having said thank you to him for those words. Then again, the Filotto men have never been overly demonstrative with each other. Not for lack of feeling, passion, or some misguided view of propriety; it’s just that we sense things and know. Words often reduce instead of edify.

Anyway, in case you were fooled by the constant idiotic nonsense of “global warming”, I hope that you are finally realising that the most likely future is a very frigid one.

Don’t take my word for it. Look up those links and research that now 35 year old model of weather on Earth modelled on the Sun’s activity (memory-holed though it seems to be after a cursory search) and as always: Know (for) Yourself.

PS: Yes, I realise by the title of this post and what I wrote, that I seem to be placing myself in the ranks of “great men”, but that is not the intent at all. My generally quasi autistic lack of concern about social status simply tends to not process things as most people do, which often results in misunderstandings based on the average normie ego. My point in this post was not about my “greatness” but rather about the overall importance of ideas ahead of their time, and while yes, I had more than a few such ideas, I do not (yet) consider myself in the same category as the men I mentioned, and only time, and probably other people’s eventual objective opinions will determine where I fall in the hierarchy of men who had figured out some relevant things. Probably after I reach the end of my life anyway, so it’s not something I give much importance to either way.

By G | 27 December 2024 | Posted in Actual Science, Face on Mars, Social Commentary, Systema

IRL beats everything

This Christmas I was rather remiss with messaging people and wishing them a Happy Christmas and New Year. Mostly because I focused on doing the things that needed doing for my family to have a relaxed time over the holidays.

On Christmas day we basically didn’t even get out of out PJs and just watched the kids go nuts with their presents, which thanks to my wife was a literal mountain of odds and ends. She also got me some nice tops and colognes.

She wanted to go crazy with Christmas dinner but I finally managed to break through the usual female delusion that whatever they imagine is reality —the five small crazy people running around the house helped of course— they tend to break through most self-inflicted delusions of blissful parenting, and she finally realised no one cared for a specific Christmas dinner as she envisioned it, and everyone was happier just chilling out and eating random stuff and pigging out on panettone and biscuits. Including her since she did not have to stress herself out making an elaborate dinner.

The point of all this is that with our phones mostly ignored and just normal, in real life stuff going on, it was really quite awesome.

My eldest daughter taught the 4 and 5 year old to play the card game go fish. The littlest one (she’s just turned 2) got a baby Yoda stuffed toy that she absolutely loves, because she has been addicted to watching the Mandalorian. She literally likes it more than anyone else except maybe the little viking, but even he does not follow the plot as much as she does.

I even managed to read a couple of pages of one of the books that has been on my bedside for the last six months.

But above all, this time has driven home deeply how artificial most of our lives have become.

We are not meant to spend 8-13 hours a day sitting at a desk shuffling electrons from one spreadsheet and email to another poor bastard in some other office doing the same. And even if you are earning millions, which most people in that situation are absolutely not, you can’t enjoy it really. So you may have the nice house and the big cars, and the two week holiday in Bora-Bora, but IF you have children, they are being raised by strangers and you see them less than those strangers do. They are spending hours and hours and hours a day being indoctrinated in ways you don’t even realise are control mechanisms. Like for example, if one kid keeps bugging you and shoving you, and you punch them right in the mouth, that now means you’re a bad kid. Which of course is complete bullshit. And when they are small what do they really learn? What do they really need? They need to be able to rear, write and do math well.

All the rest they can learn faster and deeper at home and without any of the nonsense. You can certainly interest any kid in the Roman empire, or the real history of Christianity, or the (real) reasons for WWI and WWII along with the politically acceptable version to skate by the zombies that still outnumber us.

All while showing them also how to drive a tractor, recognise different plants and animals, teaching them how to track and hunt, cook, keep house, use a spreadsheet to keep track of things, figure out how to survey a piece of land, deal with things like bills and figuring out stuff they never teach you in school. Especially things related to alternative energy sources and so on, as well as classical physics and chemistry. Certainly everything taught at elementary school can be better done at home by any reasonably educated parent that is working as a farmer at home, all while playing/working at the daily things that you need to do on any farm.

And is farm life hard? It sure is.

It’s certainly not for anyone wanting an easy life without physical effort, and it certainly isn’t the idyllic and easy life that pretend-homesteaders on YouTube would have you believe. Especially the ones who in reality have other income which is actually what they really live on.

Even the ones that are not flat out lying about how they live, what they grow and where their food come from, can, inadvertently and unintentionally, give a false impression to people who simply have no concept of how life works when you are really trying to live off the land as your main source of income.

Despite all this, if you plan a little ahead, it is without a doubt a more satisfying way to live than most.

The main issues are to reduce any recurring costs, which means things like land taxes (in the USA at least), electricity and water bills, any recurring services like phones or internet costs, petrol, gas, diesel, and of course the basics of food.

After that, even if you did have enough space and know-how to raise animals, say some chickens and a couple of pigs for butchering and say a few goats too, the maintenance to keep them fed, alive, and protected from predators is not nothing.

And the food you might grow is dependent on the weather and many other factors that are often out of your control.

The ideal situation is you having the property with no debt, some regular income that hopefully is from passive income, and enough savings to tide you over while you learn how to make yourself more self-sufficient. Even then, emergencies or sudden injuries or illness can wipe out your safety margin quite instantly.

These are all realities you need to face and some of them that you didn’t consider will hit you too. And keep in mind that in my professional opinion, being a farmer is at least as dangerous as being a full time martial arts student or instructor in terms of potential injuries, and more dangerous than being a professional bodyguard.

Despite all this, if you manage to make yourself self-sufficient and essentially able to survive even in the event of the proverbial zombie apocalypse, you will be part of a new kind of “elite”, that is, people who no longer need to rely on the conventional dictates of those who run this world through fiat money, bureaucracy, blackmail and force.

The plan is to become immune from the pressure of fiat money first (hopefully you are immune from blackmail as long as you’re not a child rapist on film like many so-called hollywood “stars”), then organise to take over the local bureaucracy so you become immune from rules that you can avoid or countermand officially (or the other way around, whichever you can do first) which is why settling in small hamlets out if the way and populated by like-minded people is step one.

Eventually, if you are successful, force too will be brought to bear on your community, so plan ahead and remember that a smaller but determined force with skin in the game almost always can resist a larger force that is mandated by people and reasons that are completely disconnected from the people on the ground supposed to execute them.

So, yes, real life is “harder” than living online and being a wage slave. But really… is it?

Only you can answer that question, and ultimately it answers the question as to wether you are the type that prefers a gilded cage over your own freedom.

And just like on the dojo floor, all your words and social media posts mean absolutely nothing when compared to the physical reality of your actions. Or lack thereof.

As usual, the point is always the same: Know Yourself.

And if you are a wage-slave type, just admit it and stop lying to yourself.

And if you are not, nothing they do will be able to keep you down anyway, so my posts will hopefully just save you time and effort in terms of what to prepare for and what to avoid.

May God show you the way.

By G | 26 December 2024 | Posted in Clown World, Farming Life, Social Commentary

Blog Topics
- Categories

Blog Archives

My Position on the Nazis

Books I Wrote

Shop

Special Operations & Exploration

Archive for the ‘Social Commentary’ Category

Blog Topics

Blog Archives

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks

My Position on the Nazis

Archive for the ‘Social Commentary’ Category

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.Website maintained by IT monks

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks