Archive for the ‘Retards’ Category

The Most Important Book I Ever Read

For some years now, I have toyed with making some kind of list of the ten most important or enjoyable books I have read (different lists) but it has been very hard, mostly because I could easily extend both lists to 20 or 30, and partly because many books I (most) have been lost to moves and unfortunate storage choices by my relatives when I left them in their care.

Nevertheless, I recently posted on the Best book I ever read. But that was my attempt at mixing what I thought was important with what I enjoyed. By the same token, my own books, The Face on Mars could be of the same category, if for very different reasons. While Reclaiming the Catholic Church – The True History of Vatican II and the Visible Remnant of the Real Catholic Church now that the Vatican is a Pederast Infested Hive of Impostors, to my mind, would be important, but probably not as fun to read (still way ahead of any book on theology I read to date though).

Believe! On the other hand was a short book and to the point, with references, and relatively entertaining too, and it probably had far more of an impact than the detailed deep dive that Reclaiming had. Certainly I didn’t expect whole families to convert to Catholic Sedevacantism as regularly and as frequently as that little book seemed to have inspired. So one could say it was a useful book.

By the above metrics then, I hope to explain why I consider this book, freely available at the link, to be the most important I ever read.

Carlo Cipolla was obviously a brilliant man, but his book, THE BASIC LAWS OF HUMAN STUPIDITY is truly ground-breaking.

He encapsulated in both hilarious yet perfectly accurate scientific notation, just how human stupidity presents itself in observable reality.

As he mentions in his own first edition of the book.

In fact, the publisher’s note alone is worth reproducing in full:

PUBLISHER’S NOTE

Originally written in English, The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity was published for the first time in 1976 in a numbered and private edition bearing the unlikely imprint of “Mad Millers.”

The author believed that his short essay could be fully appreciated only in the language in which it had been written. He consequently long declined any proposal to have it translated. Only in 1988 did he accept the idea of its publication in an Italian version as part of the volume titled Allegro ma non troppo, together with the essay Pepper, Wine (and Wool) as the Dynamic Factors of the Social and Economic Development of the Middle Ages, also originally written in English and published privately by Mad Millers for Christmas 1973.

Allegro ma non troppo has been a bestseller both in Italy and in all the countries where translated versions have appeared. Yet, with an irony that the author of these laws would have appreciated, it has never been published in the language in which it was first written.

Thus, more than a quarter of a century since the publication of Allegro ma non troppo, this in fact is the first edition that makes The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity available in its original version.

The private edition of 1976 was preceded by the following publisher’s note written by the author himself:

The Mad Millers printed only a limited number of copies of this book, which addresses itself not to stupid people but to those who on occasion have to deal with such people. To add that none of those who will receive this book can possibly fall in area of the basic graph (figure 1) is therefore a work of supererogation. Nevertheless, like most works of supererogation, it is better done than left undone. For, as the Chinese philosopher said: “Erudition is the source of universal wisdom: but that does not prevent it from being an occasional cause of misunderstanding between friends.”

Supererogation means to do more than is required (especially in a work). So Cipolla is saying that although it should be obvious that stupid people will not be the ones reading it or making use of it, it is best to state it, even if it should be obvious, and he (politely in my opinion) states that this is necessary even among “erudite” friends, in order to avoid misunderstanding.

Now you know why I have rather long-run-on sentences and verbose paragraphs to make relatively simple points. I could make them in a sentence, but then… the “erudites” who grasp the full meaning would be a tiny number indeed!

I also agree that though he was Italian, the work is really best appreciated in English, which is how he wrote it. I find the same is true of much of my own work. The English language is perfectly technical and lends itself far better to technical explanations, scientific work, and precise language. We Lagos tend to lose something in translation in the written word if we can’t add a look, a hand gesture, or both. And the number of people who can write in technically excellent Italian are probably down to a half dozen. those who can appreciate it may ten or so.

At any rate, you really need to read this short book the Professor left for the non-stupid.

The planet is fast approaching a critical mass of stupidity that may well result in the extinction of the human race, or at least, of that part of it that makes life on this planet marginally tolerable despite the teeming waves of idiots we are constantly surrounded by.

Mostly, this is because of a corollary I would like to add to his Fifth Law of Human Stupidity.

A STUPID PERSON IS THE MOST DANGEROUS TYPE OF PERSON. A STUPID PERSON IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN A BANDIT.

Professor Cipolla himself already understood the inevitable result of the relationship between stupid people and power (in the political and force-projection sense), as he wrote finally at the end of the fifth law:

In a country that is moving downhill, the fraction of stupid people is still equal to σ; however, in the remaining population one notices among those in power an alarming proliferation of the bandits with overtones of stupidity (subarea BS of quadrant in figure 3) and among those not in power an equally alarming growth in the number of helpless individuals (area in the basic graph, figure 1). Such change in the composition of the non-stupid population inevitably strengthens the destructive power of the σ fraction and makes decline a certainty. And the country goes to Hell.

Given the current state of affairs however, it is important to spell this out in even simpler terms:

The Bandits use the Stupid to weaponise them against any attempt (by the Intelligent) of removing them from power.

It may be the natural (or Divinely Ordained) order of things that humanity is indeed to go extinct, as some giant Universe 25 experiment with mice, be that as it may, surely, as a member of the Intelligent group, it behoves us to do whatever we can to ensure the continuation of at least our part of humanity, as best we can.

Aside the fact that humans are not mice, and that the Universe 25 narrative played very much in the depopulationist boomer agenda espoused by the culprits of the recent mass-murder event called COVID, with its related fake “vaccines” that are really murderous genetic serums, there is also the fact that if intelligent humans organise and come together, their effect on the planet is far more impactful than the masses of idiots that inevitably get in our way to derail plans and efforts, as they invariably do.

In short, the book Cipolla wrote is extremely important because it formally recognises a fundamental issue that humanity has to face in order to survive the next stage of human advancement: The increasing and intentional stupidification of the human race by a few bandits orchestrating it.

Only a concerted effort by organised intelligent people can counter this global phenomenon.

Which, of course, is why I started trying to build up a Sedevacantist Catholic Community in a remote village in Italy. While my wife and I, despite our rather advanced age for it, certainly did not shirking our duty of making a bunch of children.

It is heartening to see that other sedevacantist couples, younger and therefore likely to produce many more children, are trying to do the same in their own ways in various places around the world.

The independent cell-nature of the Sede Catholics, coupled with absolutely shared dogmatic values, is a strong combination for weathering all sorts of nefarious events and plots by the Bandits; and historically too, no one has been quite as successful at rising from the supposed ashes of their religion.

So we are on good ground.

Go read Professor Cipolla’s Magnum Opus. It is truly wonderful and important.

The Continuing Lies of Jay Dyer

Jay Dyer, once again makes things up, relating to the ecumenical council of Constance.

He contention is that the Council of Constance “ruled” who was the real Pope during the period in which there were three Popes (two of which were fake). This is absolute nonsense and of course, yet another lie.

He says this in this mostly boring and irrelevant podcast from about 2 hours and 10 or 11 minutes or so and carries on until about 2 hours and 30 minutes. He repeatedly says that the council of Constance resolved the issue.

This is absolutely and completely a lie.

What happened is that the three Popes were convened to this council originally by the fake Antipope John XXIII, who was pushed to do so by the Emperor. So nothing happening here except them basically saying: “We gotta sort this out.” As a result of this investigation John XXIII was going to be investigated for scandalous conduct so he ran away. In the meantime, the two remaining possible “Popes” Gregory XII and Benedict XIII came to an agreement which was that Gregory XII would be accepted as the one true Pope and instead of being deposed (as were the other two, for being antipopes) he would resign and a new and valid Pope (from the Roman see, would be elected). So that’s what happened.

In essence the one true Pope, Gregory XII resolved the issue. Not the Council.

This is typical of Jay, he just lies, makes straw man “arguments” and completely makes things up. As I demonstrated on my video of our debate, he literally makes quotes up from various documents they supposedly come from, and refers to others that are completely unrelated to the topic at hand.

As I said right from the start, the man is a liar and an intellectual pigmy. All you need to do is go read the documents he quotes and take them in proper context, because he of course will quote mine and try and twist black into being white and vice versa.

You can read the whole detail of what happened here.

In short, it was NOT the council that decided anything, but Gregory XII, the one true pope that for the good of the Church proposed the solution that everyone agreed with and everyone agreed he had the full authority to make this decision and that all of his appointments were in fact the only ones that would be valid, since he was the real pope.

Gregory XII sent to Constance as his representatives his protector Carlo Malatesta, the Lord of Rimini, and the Dominican cardinal, John Domenici—to Constance indeed, but not to the General Council assembled there by the authority, and in the name, of John XXIII. The envoys’ commission was to the emperor Sigismund, presiding over the various bishops and prelates whom his zeal to restore peace to the Church had brought together. To these envoys—and to Malatesta in the first place—Gregory gave authority to convoke as a General Council—to convoke and not to recognise—these assembled bishops and prelates ; [4] and by a second bull [5] he empowered Malatesta to resign to this General Council in his name.

The emperor, the bishops and prelates consented and accepted the role Gregory assigned. And so, on July 4, 1415. Sigismund, clad in the royal robes, left the throne he had occupied in the previous sessions for a throne placed before the altar, as for the president of the assembly. Gregory’s two legates sat by his side facing the bishops. The bull was read commissioning Malatesta and Domenici to convoke the council and to authorise whatever it should do for the restoration of unity and the extirpation of the schism—with Gregory’s explicit condition that there should be no mention of Baldassare Cossa, [6] with his reminder that from his very election he had pledged himself to resign if by so doing he could truly advance the good work of unity, and his assertion that the papal dignity is truly his as the canonically elected successor of Urban VI.

Malatesta then delegated his fellow envoy, the cardinal John Domenici, to pronounce the formal operative words of convocation [7] ; and the assembly—but in its own way—accepted to be thus convoked, authorised and confirmed in the name “of that lord who in his own obedience is called Gregory XII” [8]. The council next declared that all canonical censures imposed by reason of the schism were lifted, and the bull was read by which Gregory authorised Malatesta to make the act of abdication [9] and promised to consider as ratum gratum et firmum, and forever irrevocable, whatever Malatesta, as his proxy, should perform. The envoy asked the council whether they would prefer the resignation immediately, or that it should be delayed until Peter de Luna’s decision was known. The council preferred the present moment. It ratified all Gregory XII’s acts, received his cardinals as cardinals, promised that his officers should keep their posts and declared that if Gregory was barred from re-election as pope, this was only for the peace of the Church, and not from any personal unworthiness. Then the great renunciation was made [10], ” …. renuncio et cedo …. et resigno …. in hac sacrosancta synodo et universali concilio, sanctam Romanam et universalem eccleciam repraesentante” and the council accepted it [11], but again as made “on the part of that lord who in his own obedience was called Gregory XII”. The Te Deum was sung and a new summons drawn up calling upon Peter de Luna to yield to the council’s authority.

The work of Pisa was now almost undone, and by this council which, in origin, was a continuation of Pisa. It had suppressed the Pisan pope whom Pisa, with biting words, had rejected as a schismatic and no pope.”

Phillip Hughes,  A History of the Church, p. 289-291

All it takes to catch Dyer out in his lies is to actually refer to the documents and events he intentionally lies about and misrepresents.

It’s just like all the fake nonsense “scientists” and “historians” do, when, like “journalists” they give a bunch of “references”. No one ever bothers to look them up. I you do, you will find they literally list the very proof of their own lies.

The Bitterness of the Hags

Today, on SG, a brief and rather comical event reminded me that it is important for men, especially married ones with children, should be aware of the bitter, wall-smashed hags that will orbit their happy family with the evil intent to destroy it, merely to satisfy their Satanic ego.

The “argument” started because one such fat, very much post-wall hag, took exception to my simple statement that the reason we are in the current situation Church wise, is essentially because we stopped running heretics through with swords, as St. Luis suggested we should.

The point was made as a rhetorical corrective to a gentleman that had admitted giving people who do not deserve it (because they are deceivers and liars) the benefit of some charity. In this specific case, he was referring to the known liar and demonstrable deceiver, Jay Dyer, on which you can simply avail yourself of this 3 hour long proof (which I tried to make entertaining too) if you care enough to do so.

Being retarded, stupid, and thinking she now “had me on the ropes” She promptly rushed to make the accusation I was calling for the murder of protestants. It’s about the level of intellect you expect to deal with when it comes to these creatures. She of course did no such thing and her lies and idiocy was promptly and correctly nuked by one of the mods, which is as it should be on that platform.

There is now the minor issue of explaining for any wandering retards why my comment is not the advocacy for murder of non-Catholics, which I will address now, because as always, I am a kind and charitable person that hopes some of these absolute morons will be struck by lightning and grow 50 IQ points to put them in “normal range”, but please keep in mind this is not the point of this post. It’s a distraction from it.

The Catholic Church, as part of its unchanged dogma throughout its existence has ALWAYS made it clear that you are not to convert anyone by force, nor is it acceptable to try and kill people that disagree with Catholicism. HOWEVER, and there is a however, an important one. A Buddhist or a Muslim, or an Agnostic or even an Atheist going about minding their business is one thing, but a HERETIC, is quite another. A Heretic, by definition, is someone that professes, promotes and promulgate falsehoods about Catholicism. To make it personal, because morons only think on the solipsistic level, it’s one think if someone goes around thinking you are an assholes and has all sorts of wrong ideas about you. It’s another if they start accusing you falsely of being a wife-beater or a cheating slut that lies to her husband about her affairs and so on. In the first instance, you can absolutely ignore the person, and even be unaware of their ideas and existence. In the second, they are now a lying scumbag that needs to be punished for their lies.

Now, let’s take another example. Closer to the point. I absolutely do NOT like Islam or Judaism as religions, they are demonstrably pedophelic in nature along with many other issues I have with them, but I do not lie about their belief systems or activities. I simply document them and explain why I do not like them.

Heretics on the other hand, demonstrably lie and make false accusations about Catholicism. This is not difficult to see, verify or understand, In fact anyone honest can do so. Including convinced Protestants like Rodney Stark who wrote a whole book on some of the major lies that Protestants have been telling about Catholicism, in his excellent book, Bearing False Witness.

In what was Catholic Christendom, blasphemy laws were in effect for a long time, and it has been only to the detriment of civilisation that the Freemasonic infiltrations have removed most such laws from most countries (Italy still has some). The point being that there absolutely should be a severe punishment for defamation and calumny against a religion. Especially when ALL the rules of such a religion, ALL the dogmas of it, are set down in writing, in plain, simple, logical ways to understand according to Roman Law. Catholicism fulfils all of these criteria.

Protestantism does not, because the entirety of their only rule is basically “Interpreth as thou will”, which is absolutely a Satanic standard. Different denomination among their 40,000 ones (to be generous, because in reality since each one of them can and does interpet as they want it’s more like 900 million denominations, one per person) will tell you they so do have a standard, and promptly disagree with each other within minutes of you asking them to define it clearly, even among their own supposed congregation.

Again, making an analogy, I do not subscribe to Islam, I think it is a Satanic inspired religion and the best of the Muslims are simply seriously deceived people, like the Novus Ordo “Catholics”, but all that said, if I ever get hit by lightning and decide to visit Saudi Arabia, I will educate myself on their rules and laws and will follow them for my duration of the visit. And if I break any of them, I fully expect to be punished according to their laws, including having my head cut off if it reaches that point. This is really not difficult to understand.

If the relevant punishments for blasphemy in the Catholic Christendom had been fully retained in their most severe form, I am absolutely certain that the Novus Ordo Satanic Cult would not have been able to cause as much damage to Catholicism as it has. Again, this is not hard to understand, and really should not require the above 7 paragraphs to grasp, but retards gonna retard, and as I said, I am charitable. But all the above is beside the point.

In this specific case, while I chuckled at the seething chubby, I wondered, how does one of these creatures devolve to this level? As a natural scientist, I am curious about all sorts of weird and disgusting animals and life cycles, and while I readily admit that the study of strange insects is far more interesting and entertaining, the pondering of how the post-wall hags of fatness come to be, is probably more relevant to general human happiness.

If we can reduce their number or get rid of them entirely, the world can only become better. And for the retards, no, it is not a suggestion we gas them en masse, no matter how hypothetically entertaining the idea might be, but rather, the hope is that if we can discover the main mechanism by which these disgusting and unpleasant noxious beasts form, we may be able to prevent them from forming from na early age. Of course, the existing ones are beyond help, short of truly divine intervention on a grand scale, so this is not in the hope of “healing” these parasitic, oxygen thieves and noxious creatures, but merely to study and understand their undead “life cycle”.

Of course, brutal feminism must be at the core, as readers here will know, feminism is a terrible and pestilential thing introduced for the very purpose of destroying the nuclear family, and its evils are broad and deep and devastating, so we know that much.

Secondly, these creatures are generally unpleasant to look at as well, which inevitably results in their being mostly shunned by all but the most desperate of men, and as any man that has lived on Earth for a sufficient time while rooted in reality, the absence of both sex in general, as well as real affection renders women practically toxic and insane. It does it to men too, but in a less socially destructive way, aside the occasional mass shooting. the damage the post-wall toxic fattie does to society is subtler but far more extensive and pervasive and constant.

Like vampires, they perpetuate the lies of feminism at every opportunity, modulating it from soft whispers to strident squealing depending on their target. But this is just their permanent radiation. they also infiltrate families, usually by the pretence of being a “kind and loving” aunt, family friend, grandma, mother-in-law, and so on, whose only aim is to “help” and “improve” the targeted family unit. They inevitably do this by essentially becoming the homunculus on the shoulder of the wife and mother of the household and then proceed to metaphorically shit in their ear and brain in a Chinese water torture fashion. Gossiping, maligning, subtly at first and more directly later, the husband, the wife’s life and situation (which is inevitably never her choice but the oppressive enforcement of it by her evil husband, and so on and on, and on). She will malign and “correct” things to your wife and children without hesitation.

Women being social creatures, if your wife is not an uncommonly strong-minded and logical person, it is quite common that this noxious and sulphuric stench, seeps gradually into their brains until they come out with one or more of the various feminist narratives as being wholly true or even remotely applicable to them. Suddenly, from being a happy wife and mother they will gradually go to becoming a weakened, self-doubting, unhappy, “oppressed” woman at the “mercy” of an “overbearing”, “possessive”, “narcissistic” and “controlling”, “gaslighting”, evil husband. While the entire truth of the matter is that life is hard and shit happens, and you should just get down to it and get on with it while supporting each other as husband and wife against all the lies, slings and arrows the entire world sends your way pretty much constantly. And within your fortress of a marriage, make it as happy and content and loving as you can, while you keep making the moat around it deeper and shark-infested, and firing your cannons of truth at all the attempting invaders.

But what drives these human wreckage to do this? Invariably, without a single exception, it is because their own lives are so absolutely miserable. And in the truest foundational aspect of feminism, they will do everything they can, to reduce every woman, and especially married ones with children, to their own miserable, single or post-wall and post-divorce, misery.

And for that there is no excuse. Such creatures invariably also decry their own past victim status, whether it is real or imagined, as if it were some kind of excuse for their own toxic behaviour, but it never is.

I have known personally both men and women that were raped as children and did not become bitter, destructive human beings. Quite the contrary in fact. And I have known personally people that suffered horrible things. One of the kindest women I got to spend a little time with revealed she had been not only abused in childhood, but also gang-raped, stabbed and left for dead. She still had the stab scars on her body. Terrible things happen to all of us on some level and certainly some are far worse than others, but they are never an excuse for your own shitty behaviour. We do have free will (despite what protestant Calvinists necessarily believe if they could o any logic whatsoever and understood the consequences of their much loved “predestination”), so ultimately, how we behave, is on us.

Whatever their reasons, such creatures will never accept the factual reality that Catholic patriarchal society has created the best possible situation for human beings than any other religion or culture ever has on planet Earth. While you can criticise individuals and even (valid) Popes throughout the history of Catholicism, you simply cannot avoid the fact that following its infallible laws and dogma, created and creates, the best possible situation human beings have ever experienced. It’s not even close to ANY other religion or ideology. There simply is no comparison. Not in duration in terms of time, nor in terms of artistic, architectural, but most important of all, sociological achievements that are truly positive, and not just “progressive” which is now essentially code for Satanic.

And in case you doubt it, please understand the original “debate” on SG was prompted by a meme that Vox, who is NOT a Catholic, shared on his blog that nevertheless makes the point succinctly and utterly unavoidably. I reproduce it here below for your own contemplation in light of the above.

American Naivety

I have often made it clear that I consider Americans to be among the most naive of people. Usually in less than flattering terms. But it is not a hatred for Americans themselves, that prompts this. In the main, as with every country, there are trends, though America is so vast that it has multiple regional variations, an overall view of Americans is that they are friendly, superficial, somewhat artificial, think America and Americans are the best at everything, and they are very, very, naive.

Their naivety is by design from inception so it’s to a certain extent not their fault, and to be expected, because it was baked in from the very start if their fake nation, built by Satanic design by Freemasons.

Nevertheless, their “innocence” and arrogance, particularly given the last few years of unveiling of the curtains behind which the goblins that run the USA has happened, is irritating.

Their silly and absurd beliefs in utter mythologies such as free speech, or the power of the constitution and so on are truly mystifying.

Vox recently posted about The Law, and how it is not being respected by Clown World, but the astonishing thing is that anyone even needs this explained at all. A normal 7 year old in Italy absolutely understands that some words can get you killed, that no piece of paper or supposed law is worth the paper it’s written on, and so on.

I think most normal people around the world understand this.

Adherence to any kind of legal system is only contingent on one thing, and always has been, and always will be:

The people with the ability to use force the most, make the rules. It has always been this way and always will be.

The case of the Brazilian judge is also a case in point. If a man with a gun got into that Judge’s house and put it to his head, with a request for X to have unfettered access to Brazilian citizens but also the bank accounts of that specific judge, within minutes that would be granted.

I really don’t understand what is so difficult for anyone, including Americans, to grasp about the concept. The ONLY law that exists is that which can be ENFORCED. And the benign or noxious nature of it is fully dependant on the character of those with the power to do the enforcing.

That’s it. That is all the law that ever can exist for human beings.

Which is why a morality based religion based in fact is necessary for a society to flourish.

And of all the religions that have ever existed, only Catholicism has resulted in the overwhelmingly positive aspects of human progress. While other societies based on other religions did happen, none of them are even remotely comparable in terms of quality of life to the societies that had been created by Catholicism.

Sedevacantism is the only reasoned and logical choice.

Torba Still Doesn’t Get It

Leaving aside all the various evidence that Torba is probably not at all what he presents himself or his platform Gab to be, even if you were to simply take him at his word, his grasp of human nature, as well as geopolitics is naive at best.

In his latest round of request for financial support for Gab he says:

Consider this: many people have no issue paying $150 a month for a cable bill to watch the fake news media, but they balk at the idea of spending $10 a month to support platforms like Gab. They’ll readily drop $10 every morning on coffee that they could make at home for pennies, without a second thought. This inconsistency in our priorities is baffling and must change if we want free speech online to survive. Please consider supporting our efforts by making a donation, upgrading your Gab account to GabPRO, or purchasing merchandise from the Gab Shop. It’s time to rewire our brains and recognize that if we’re not paying for the product, we become the product ourselves. We must collectively support free speech platforms by building a patronage network, just as we would support any other vital service or cause we believe in.

And a little later:

To build a strong patronage network, it’s crucial to foster a sense of community and shared values among supporters of free speech. This can be achieved through regular communication, transparent financial reporting, and the creation of exclusive content or experiences for patrons. By nurturing a sense of belonging and investment in the success of free speech platforms, we can create a loyal and dedicated base of supporters who are committed to the long-term sustainability of the free speech wing of the internet.

Ending with:

Free speech is not free, and it’s up to all of us to ensure its survival. By recognizing the true costs of running social networks, reevaluating our priorities, and forming a robust free speech patronage network, we can safeguard one of our most precious rights and foster a healthier, more open digital landscape for generations to come.

There are at least three major structural flaws with pretty much everything he says. Any ONE of which is enough to render what he says moot. But let us look at each in turn:

First – The culture of Free is not an accident

It was created by mostly intelligence agencies to gather information on the users, but more importantly, by the people behind the intelligence agencies in order to not just gather information, but confirm psychological aspects of human nature in an input/response feedback loop. At least at first. Very quickly it then moved to:

Input —> to produce desired response

feedback loop that has since been studied, perfected and refined.

And as we have seen thanks to the first openly murderous and information-free test run they set up years earlier and ran essentially openly with minimal cover for the outrageous lies they were selling, the average person has as much discernment, individual thought, independence and ability to reason on their own as the average garden petunia. Right to the point of injecting themselves, and worse, their children, with a genetic serum whose 30 year old attempts have never resulted in anything but catastrophic results in every animal trial ever done.

So… right off the bat, the problem you have in an appeal to reason is that both professor Cipolla (there are always more idiots than you think there are) and Vox Day (Most People Are Idiots) are absolutely right. Which means the people who even can reason is minimal.

But even the few who might have been able to reason have essentially been brainwashed into apathy over a period of decades. It takes an uncommon state of being to be relatively immune to this kind of neuro-psychological manipulation. So the pool of actively and genuinely independent thinkers is even smaller than you think.

Second – Neither is the atomisation of culture

Torba goes on to mention “community” while having no clue as to what actually forms one, or keeps one alive. Again, this state of affairs of no one any longer having any experience of what community really means is not something that came about by accident.

The infiltration and destruction of every culture that has ever produced anything positive has been a long and studied effort by the same people mentioned above that has been going on for much longer. Their primary target has been religion of course, because that is the real glue of a community. If you are one of the few capable of individual and original thought based on the evidence before you, you will note that the one religion that has brought the most elevation of humanity above all has been Catholicism, which was finally deeply infiltrated from 1958 on and has nearly collapsed after Vatican II, the only remnant left of it being Sedevacantists (i.e. actual Catholics). You will also note that this assault on community (the Church) has been ongoing for centuries and that the shadow version of it, Protestantism has the atomisation baked right into it, since every single person is supposedly able to interpret the entire edifice of Christianity on their own based on false histories told to them since childhood. Don’t forget, the ONLY rule of Protestantism is that each man, woman or child can and should interpret anything in the Bible by themselves. There is a reason why the devil smiles at the 40,000 denominations of heresy Protestantism has resulted in.

Aside Protestantism, every other infection of humanity with parasitical ideologies invented in the last couple of hundred and fifty years or so (not coincidentally from about the formation of the first Freemason country in the world and the official start of the Illuminati) is designed to atomise people due to a delusion/illusion of “freedom” and “democracy” and destroy the traditional, patriarchal, nuclear family that has been responsible for every single advancement of culture and humanity in real human terms (as opposed to national GDP). Charlemagne had set up the concept of nobility being placed where they were by God, but mot as with previous Pagan rulers such as the Egyptians, Japanese or even Ancient Romans, who tried to Deify their rulers, but more as an “accident” of Fate or inscrutable mysteries of God’s mind. A nobleman was to be a servant of God and thus also the protector of the Church and protector of his lands and people. But this was by no means guaranteed, because as any Catholic knows, all men are flawed. The point was not that a nobleman was appointed by God so people must necessarily assume he is good and Godly. The point was: God put him there; now let’s see if he is going to do that position any justice.

The Church being the Spiritual guide, nobility being the material/practical protectors of it from outside enemies in times of war, and hopefully noble guardians and protectors of commoners in time of peace. That is where the whole concept of chivalry comes from: Catholicism. And no, it was not about pedastalising women like the fake “pastors” of Protestantism do today, nor relegating them to second class citizens fit only for sex and rearing of children as again, Protestants did do, and also accused Catholicism of doing. No. Women had and have their proper and unique position as cherished daughters, wives and mothers, to be safeguarded, protected and loved, and doing so lovingly means also leading and taking care of the hardships the world invariably throws at you.

A lasting community can only exist in the context of reality. When that reality is based on purely material concerns the community does not last beyond a few generations at most. Without a basis deeply embedded in a Spiritual truth, no community survives.

The Zen/Buddhism stoicism of the Samurai or the Chinese has truth in it, to the extent that “chop wood carry water” is true. You need to do what you need to do to live. So do it and get on with it. And you may as well enjoy it as best you can.

Judaism/Phariseeism is deeply rooted in serving the Prince of this world, who is very real, and as a result, they have been “successful” at taking almost total control of the financial aspects of how the entire planet is run.

But no religion has been as beneficial for human beings as Catholicism. Don’t take my word for it. Do an objective comparison. Assuming you are one of the dozen or so people left that can actually be mostly objective.

Protestantism instead has been the relentless secularisation of Christianity (i.e. Catholicism) with the most devastating consequence being the allowing of divorce. Which leads to sex before marriage. Which leads to contraception. Which leads to abortion (murder) so as to not interrupt the “pleasure” of fucking for fun, instead of uniting as one to create a family with children.

But Torba understands none of these things, having been raised in the heretic soup that is Protestantism and liberalism, with a flamingly gay brother to boot, how can he? Assuming, of course he is not actually intentionally working as yet another gatekeeper.

Third – the Money

Just on the first two points you now realise you are surrounded by unthinking morons that have been trained since birth to only care about themselves and their stupidest, most selfish, petty, idiotic concerns of the moment at all times.

Now realise that not only is the entire gigantic amounts of money that gets regularly given to sell-outs, shills and puppets of the controllers behind the known bankers and “movers and shakers” in the hands of the controllers, and as such they can fund or bankrupt whoever they decide literally at will.

But even more importantly, and never understood by the masses —yet it was something as a four year old I realised even if I did not fully grasp the implications of it— the ENTIRE construct of Fiat money is completely arbitrary, fake and made up, and is totally controlled by the people who create such thing as the Bank of International Settlement (BIS). Look it up. I also talked about it before. So, while you struggle to eke out a living, the freemason down the street is provided with millions. But even if you manage to make “your own” money, it doesn’t matter, because the whole concept of the entire creation and supply of it is in their hands.

Until you become free of the need for fiat money, you will always be at the mercy of the creators of it. And if you try to set up a system to bypass it, they will immediately kill you. See Gaddafi etc.

The Connection

These three points are intimately linked. It is not a coincidence that the Satanic Pedophiles that run the world on the basis of literally controlling the very concept of money and its creation out of thin air, also worship the enemy of Humanity and have worked tirelessly for two thousand years to prevent the truth and good that a Catholic world would represent, and for a brief period nearly did even as it overcame assault after assault of the centuries.

It is not a coincidence that the same people orchestrated the destruction of every royal house in Europe, (except the fully freemasonic British one) because they represented the protectors of the Church and a natural hierarchy humans respond to.

It is not a coincidence that the same people caused WWI, the Bolshevik revolution, and WWII and the same people created COVID and its related mass murder factories.

It is not a coincidence the same people caused the Ukraine war and the current genocide in Gaza.

They are all the same people spread out over centuries, retaining generational control. And the ONLY opposition they EVER faced was by Catholic Western men. No wonder they spent all that time infiltrating it for centuries. And no wonder that today, Sedevacantist are the most maligned of all “Christians”; because any false “Christianity” will do, but not the real and only existing one: real Catholicism as it has always been from the time of Jesus.

Fourth Bonus Point – Free Speech always was a myth

Only a people as naive and innocent (due to masterful brainwashing by the usual suspects) could ever believe something so absurd as “free speech”. Even as a child it took me only seconds when I first encountered the concept to ridicule it.

Speech has never been free and never will be. Ever.

Given all the above, it is absolutely clear, that even if Torba were legitimate, which is questionable at best, he has zero understanding of what makes for a lasting counter to the global Satanists.

St. Benedict on the other hand did.

Of course, if you were raised like Torba you will not have any clue why retiring to desertic hills to build monasteries one at a time helped change the world, while asking for money online to fund your “free speech” will probably not.

The truth is not difficult to understand or see, but you do need to be objective as much as possible to even begin to be able to reason, and you can’t see the truth if you can hardly reason your way past not injecting a deadly poison into your body because some talking head on TV tells you to.

And of course, if that truth makes you too upset to notice the other things I am saying… well… what can I say, other than: enjoy your offended.

You “teach” with that bigoted attitude?

It is a shock, I am sure you all realise, to see that “Iggy” who clearly works at NIC EDU, which is The North Idaho College of Education would use such horrific language to respond to me on this post.

I mean the Transphobia and mysoginy just drip off that comment. How can a real College of higher education in the USA reconcile having such an obvious hater of women in all their forms on their staff?

I mean, I suppose they may have a few impostors filled with hate towards ALL women, sneak in precisely so as to probably harass and downgrade female students, but the even more horrifying thing is that I wrote privately to the university, using their official email and everything, and… NO RESPONSE!

This what I sent them:

Hello, I wanted to make you aware, that a person using the email [email protected] Has tried to post the following comment on my blog (see attachment).Now, my blog is certainly not politically correct, but no is forced to read there or comment on it. If they do, their comments will be made public at my leisure and pleasure, and while I know nothing about your institution, I wanted to make you aware of how this person comports themselves in public while using your email addresses. Below is a screen capture of the comment. I am currently keeping the issue private on my blog, but if I do not receive a response within 24 hours on what action has been taken (if any) against Iggy, I will then make the comment public and add my commentary.
I personally am constantly exposed to sunlight as my blog is of course public, and I think everyone else should own their actions and comments in public too.
I leave it to you how to deal with this individual. All my best, G.

On the 19th of August, so I have given them ten times more than the time I said. And since there was no response, I have to, for the sake of education, women, trans-women, and justice in general, make the world aware of what kind of person works there. I am sure you all agree that sunlight is best for all. Feel free to help the North Idaho College of Education come to the right choice concerning this individual.

Here are their contact details. I used Cardinal Contact, [email protected] but since I got no response from there, perhaps some of the other addresses are best to make the people in charge aware of things.

Or maybe there is an “Iggy” in their staff

I am sure we are all concerned citizens and want to do the right thing.

Zelensky of Ukraine, about to go the way of Zelensky of Adam

Adam Piggott had his pig, which he named Zelensky, slaughtered a few months ago, and it looks like the West is finally about ready to do the same.

From Simplicius’ Substack:

Press Bureau of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service:

➡️Ukraine is slowly but surely turning into a “black hole” of Europe. The head of the Kiev regime has moved to feverish actions, since he is mainly concerned with preserving his own position of power, which has been shaken since the expiration of his presidential term on May 20.

➡️Discontent with Zelensky is growing in the American elite. In both the Democratic and Republican parties, the voices of those who doubt the targeted spending of billions of dollars of military aid that Kiev receives are becoming increasingly loud. Zelensky is taking crazy steps that threaten to escalate far beyond Ukraine.

➡️Replacing Zelensky, according to the United States, will allow the West to better prepare for negotiations with Russia on a settlement. Former Ukrainian Interior Minister Arsen Avakov is currently being considered as a suitable candidate. The Americans consider Avakov’s strengths to be his continuing contacts with the leaders of European countries. The US has already been instructed to work out a scenario for Avakov’s rise to power in Kiev; the issue is being discussed with Tymoshenko, Poroshenko and the Servant of the People deputies.

Some last sundry items: 

Not a joke: Germany has finally issued an arrest warrant to a man named Volodomyr Z. for the attack on Nord Stream: 

https://news.sky.com/story/germany-issues-arrest-warrant-for-ukrainian-diver-who-played-part-in-nord-stream-explosions-13196799

From the Sky News article above: 

Poland has confirmed that it had received a European arrest warrant for a Ukrainian man from German authorities related to the attack on Nord Stream gas pipelines.

Police believe the man, last known to have lived in Poland, was one of the divers who allegedly planted explosive devices on pipelines running from Russia to Germany under the Baltic Sea in September 2022, according to German media.

The surreal part is that there is not a single peep from German government or society as to the question of how it’s possible they’re militarily backing a country which carried out the worst economic terrorist act in German history unto them. 

Aside the rather “coincidental” name of the “saboteur” the last sentence is very telling of how Clown World “operates”.

The left hand always reaching for the butt of the right hand, which is trying to insert the left hand into it. In short, it is so stupid, fundamentally broken, and retarded, that a child could do better.

The Americans blow up the Nord Strem pipelines. Everyone pretends to believe the idiotic idea that in today’s perennially monitored prison planet, we can’t figure out who did it, despite ONE American journalist actually still having his own testicles and spelling it out, with plenty of evidence. Then, when the cocaine-fuelled gay dwarf in Ukraine has run out of any potential usefulness in the gigantic money-laundering operation, it’s time to blame it on… well, him. Or you know, someone with the same name, anyway, because who cares, he just needs to die. He’s not even an “elected” president anymore, even by Clown World, “we make the votes up” standards; he is literally now an illegal despot with no mandate whatsoever, including from his puppet-master.

As I have said before, Putin should get some special ops guys to keep Zelensky alive as long as possible. Russia could not have asked for a better “leader” of the Western follies. He is completely ineffective in all areas, except begging and subtracting billions and all sorts of armaments and equipment from the West, before essentially throwing it away under Russia Artillery fire. He is single-handedly reducing the economies of Europe and the effectiveness of the by now transgender, gay, feminised American military to a pink shadow of its former self. All while accumulating unrecoverable losses on every front in Ukraine itself.

The (((elites))) running things will remove him soon enough, I believe. They tried to blow Trump’s brains out on live TV, and Zelensky is arguably causing them a much bigger problem to the bottom line, but perhaps more importantly, if he lives, he can become a source of the most revelational aspects of how Globohomo elites run things.

A quiet retirement in exile will not do, because Zelensky has proven himself time and again, to be the most unreliable, backstabbing freak that has been seen as a public figure since… I don’t know… Charlie Manson, maybe?

So, my prediction is that Zelensky will not die of old age. It will be blamed on the Russians, no doubt, and everyone will have to pretend to be sad, maybe even riot a bit, you know in solidarity with that Fentanyl Fiend, George Floyd. Snorting felons of a feather and all that.

Truly the burning glow from my porch has never looked this entertaining.

Challenge for the Naysayers

Statement: Catholicism has been the best civilisation humanity has ever experienced.

Go ahead and try and disprove that.

Some baseline issues to consider:

  • Catholicism is considered to be the religion that started (depending on your view of things) sometime between the year 0 and 34 AD, since the life, death and resurrection of Christ is the pivotal and foundational aspect of Catholicism (Christianity).
  • All other versions of “Christianity”, be it any of the 40,000+ versions of Protestantism, Eastern “Orthodoxy”, and including all Novus Ordo “Catholicism” are mere perversions of actual Catholicism, which is the only Christianity that ever has existed or ever can exist, since God is not likely to produce thousands of false and dead ends.
  • Catholicism in its best exterior-known fashion was absolutely infiltrated over roughly two centuries and ultimately almost completely converged to active Satanism by 1958 when Angelo Roncalli became the first of the currently unbroken line of Antipopes. Effectively this means that the Catholic Church has been greatly reduced and has been living in an Interregnum (between royal realms) since 1958. A condition that happens every time a Pope dies before another valid Pope is elected. It is an unusual situation but not entirely unprecedented since there have been periods of up to 70 years where is was very difficult to know which Pope was the real Pope since up to three of them laid claim to the throne of Peter and resolving who were the antipopes happened generally after they were dead, and there has also been a period of at least two years without anyone at all on the See of Peter too. The conclusion of all this is that the only Catholicism left is that espoused by Sedevacantists (ie those Catholics left who recognise that Vatican II and all things related to it are anything but Catholic, and continue to follow Catholicism as it always was and has been encoded in the Pio-Benedictine Code of Canon Law of 1917).

On that basis, I challenge anyone to find a civilisation in the entirety of human history that was superior for human beings than Catholicism.

So far I have been presented with only two possible alternatives, both absurd.

  1. An unspecified antediluvian civilisation (Eg Atlantis, Lemuria, etc.) Considering I literally wrote The Face on Mars in which I essentially proved that such a civilisation not only existed, but likely was responsible for the destruction of certainly one, and possibly two planets in our solar system and then continued to have a war here, on our planet, the idea that such people were technologically more advanced certainly follows, but that they were a superior civilisation, is laughable. Certainly by the way I measure a civilisation anyway, which is not limited to mere technological capacity. And which should be obvious to anyone not mentally deficient: Destroying a couple of planets and then continuing a generational war between the few survivors on a third planet doesn’t exactly inspire one with confidence in such a people’s concepts of mercy, charity, humanity, and so on.
  1. An equally unspecified pre-Christian people. This smelt rather badly of some Pagan LARPing nonsense, since the “pre-christian” people in question were intentionally left unspecified. Possibly because I have been rather clear in making fun of people that pretend that their supposed Viking ancestors were “superior” in civilisation/religion/belief system to Catholics. Which is hilarious for a large number of reasons, but I’ll identify only three. First of all, the barbaric, vicious and rape-oriented “civilisation” of the Vikings was absolutely a fucking horror show that modern people barely have any concept of, and secondly, because that’s just based on the little that we have left about their practices we are absolutely sure of, because a bunch of the other things that they believed or engaged in remains lost to the fact that they never bothered to write any of it down, preserve it or even bother to continue perpetrating it. But personally, and most hilariously of all for me, is the fact that my own ancestors absolutely were from those genetic people. The Franks and Normans that formed overwhelmingly the largest part of the first Crusade (1095 AD) were the descendants of the very Vikings that up to a couple of centuries earlier (about 900 AD) raided and murdered many Catholic monasteries and monks. In order to stop this, the Catholics offered them lands and space to protect themselves from their raids, on the understanding that they would fight off their kinsmen who wanted to continue raiding. And over time, all of these people converted to Christianity, without losing their talent for battle. My own family line can directly be traced back to the returning Crusaders when the Outremer was essentially beginning to be overwhelmed after a couple of centuries of occupation with no help at all from the “Orthodox” Easterners who had asked for Catholic help to begin with, and with ever increasing costs borne by Catholic Europe alone, and increasing numbers of belligerent Muslims. The returning crusaders with my surname came to Italy via present day Albania, quashed a feud that had been ongoing for 200 years, then split into two branches, one that remained in the south; the Golden branch, since the King of Sicily had made them Marquis (as well as all future first-born sons), and a Silver one (wilder explorers) who went further north to Venice and took part in the war of Candia were they were again rewarded for military bravery and given a perpetual noble title of Patricians (the lowest of Nobles). So, if anyone at all knows anything about such people, it really is me, and no, the Vikings absolutely were NOT in any way, shape or form a superior “civilisation” to Catholicism. In fact it is questionable if one should even consider them a civilisation at all. And pretty much the same goes for any other ancient culture, Spartan, Athenian, Roman, all were far from pleasant societies than anyone alive today normally imagines. Nor can we say the Chinese dynasties, or the Imperial Japanese ones were superior civilisations. The Chinese were far more numerous sure, but in terms of conditions of life for the average Chinese? It’s laughable.

In conclusion, the only “attacks” that will be forthcoming will be from:

Boomer tier ‘Muricans saying “We went to the Moon!” No, you didn’t the Nazis did it for you, and no, you didn’t really go anywhere near the way you think you did. And in any case, Protestantism has only and purely been the secularisation of Christianity (Catholicism) which has got us to where it is today, with their transgender Bishops, 40,000 plus “demon-nimations” and one rule to rule them all: “Interpreth as thou will!”. The rampant Clown World face of the West currently is Protestantism writ large. It is the “acceptance” and “tolerance” for the demonic, which is, of course, the very intent of the founders of America, since it was financed and created by Freemasons with funds from the French Revolution and the same Freemasonic Mottos of Equality, Fraternity (brotherhood of man) and Liberty, which all translate ultimately to “Do as thou wilt shall be the whole of the law”. And since Protestants are absolutely ignorant of anything even remotely Christian, let me spell out that that law is literally the one Satanic Law, as espoused by Alistair Crowley.

Ignorant Eastern “Orthodox”, who will claim they are the true keepers of the faith, while trying to avoid the fact they are as split as the Protestants, with no visible head, their Churches segregated by nationality, but the final nail in their coffin being that they neither spread, the gospel anywhere close to how much the Catholics did, but rather, they stagnated, and secondly, their achievements in terms of humane evolution remained similarly stagnant, as did their art and philosophy. They didn’t create the scientific method, abolish slavery or change much of anything for the better. Catholics did.

Randoms. These can range from people who will try to pretend they are knowledgeable of Japanese civilisation, or Tibetan ones say, while missing the main point that even if we accepted the premise that Shintoism and the Samurai age was superior to Catholicism (it was not, but it certainly has a level of aesthetic appeal), or that Tibetan monasteries were the pinnacle of civilisation (they were and are not, and anyway the Chinks have taken them out) it remains a tiny fraction of the level and number of effects that Catholicism created on Earth when compared to these alternatives. The random brainwashed Protestants left bleating in the dark really have nothing meaningful to say. The so-called “Protestant work ethic” together with the Industrial Revolution, which can be placed under Protestant “achievements” is merely a mechanisation of human beings and ultimately does not actually produce the best quality of work, though it does produce large quantity of it while mostly dehumanising the people in it, reducing them to cogs in the giant machine dedicated to “profit”. And obviously all the evils that Protestantism has allowed to become “normal” by “tolerating” them remain too. Finally, pedophilic religions like Islam or Judaism are clearly inferior religions and systems of belief, one essentially still relegated to little more than desert nomads in terms of technology, ability and discovery, since all they have is taken or paid for and produced by Westerners, and the other hyper-focussed on enslaving the rest of humanity while turning a profit, in case their proclivities for raping children wasn’t enough.

I would certainly welcome anyone cogent, and dealing solely in dialectic, that would be willing to debate the fact that Catholicism is without question the best system for human beings that humanity has ever come up with, but so far the only two people that I thought might make a reasoned argument have either declined outright (Andrew Wilson – Eastern Orthodox), or stated that they may at some distant future date, possibly engage the topic with me (Vox Day – Protestant). And so far, I haven’t really come across anyone, on or offline that might have the intellectual capacity to hold up their end in an honest intellectual debate. Perhaps I should try to get a hold of William Lane Craig.

Commenters feel free to have a go, but respect the blog rules.

Andrew Torba’s Comment

Although Gab took a sharp downturn in usage when Torba decided to fully monetise Gab, it’s still one of the few places where a certain liberty of speech, especially political speech was permitted to an extent that while not approaching the 1990s, came close.

Today he advised people to not post anything even remotely hinting at a violent response in the face of the Trump assassination, which is about the limit any platform online simply cannot cross nowadays, but what I found interesting is that he made a comment that for the first time reflects what I have been doing and telling others to do for about two decades. And since two decades is about the time it takes for a lot of what I see as obvious to start to become accepted fact, I am hoping with some actual real hope for once, that the tide might actually be about to turn on the whole freakshow that is Clown World and their insane degeneracy, LGBTPedo agenda, “antifascism”, communist hive-think, nonsensical feminism, destruction of logic, knowledge of objective reality, demonisation of men in general and white, heterosexual males in particular.

Here is his comment. I have a couple of comments on it and a TL;DR version in my own words at the bottom.

After tonight’s events I have come to the realization that I no longer want any association whatsoever with any liberals. None. Not in the community, not at church, not anywhere. The reasons for this decision are rooted in the belief that being around these people poses a threat to our sanity, safety, and families. First and foremost, the constant bombardment of liberal ideologies and beliefs has become a source of mental and emotional exhaustion. The never-ending debates, the constant need to defend our values, and the relentless pressure to conform to their worldview have taken a toll on our mental well-being. These people are insane and in associating with them we allow their madness to infect us.  The safety of our families and communities is at risk when we associate with liberals. The liberal narrative often promotes a sense of victimhood, division, and chaos, which leads to violent protests, property destruction, and even physical harm to those who dare to oppose their views as we witnessed tonight. We must prioritize the safety and well-being of our loved ones by distancing ourselves from those who subscribe to such destructive ideologies. Get and stay far away from these people. 

He’s right broadly speaking, and I understand his reticence to host any incitements to violence on his platform, but there are two points of actual objective, factual, observable reality he’s missing and a third even more important one without which nothing will change, and they are these:

First: Retreating from these people is NOT the answer. It’s what the general population of not yet insane people have been doing for seven decades in a row. Enough. Fuck retreating. Make THEM retreat, and get back into whatever closet or rock they crawled out of. Be in their face. Stop tolerating their nonsense. No, homosexuality is not normal. No, it will not be taught to me or my children as being normal. It is unnatural, deviant, degenerate behaviour that carries extremely high health risks and is associate with extremely elevated incidence of child sexual abuse, rape and molestation. And I don’t give a flying solitary fuck if that upsets you. You can get upset about the sun rising in the East too and I don’t give a fuck about that upsetting you any more than the other facts I just stated. It’s how reality works. Deal with it. Your mental illness is not my problem and trying to make it so will not go well with you.

The same applies to EVERY one of their bullshit agendas. I don’t want my country, culture, religion, nation or people to be overrun by foreigners that not only have a different culture, religion and nation, but who are demonstrably, statistically, a net threat to my people. No, I don’t need to “respect” your pedophile religion, and fake “gods” and fake “messiah”. Go believe that shit in your own place and don’t expect me to pretend your fake religion is “equivalent” to mine, when mine created the best situation humanity has ever seen on Earth and yours has done no such thing but in fact is demonstrably a net negative when compared to mine. And no, I don’t give a shit if you think that makes me “racist” or a “bigot”. In fact I am. I absolutely discriminate against people incapable of facing and loving the truth above their own personal opinions based in selfishness, ego, cowardice, and intentional evil. The colour of your skin matters very little to me, except I have had a tendency to find slightly cappuccino coloured pretty girls more sexually enticing, perhaps, on average, but then I am not exactly a “bigot” in that regard either, since I have appreciated all sorts of diversity in the females of the species. All of which are moot points now since I am happily married and Catholic. The point is that my “racism/bigotry” is reserved for the shitty nature of your inability to face reality as it is, your capacity or lack thereof to act as a civilised human being; not only when everything is good, but also when things are less than ideal; and your overall level of virtues I appreciate, like honesty, courage, directness, patience, loyalty and so on, and your personal philosophy and belief systems and/or religion. And if your religion says fucking kids is fine, then fuck you, and fuck your religion; and that means Judaism and Islam. It’s in your books so stop pretending it’s not.

Feminism is toxic. The Patriarchy is good and what has built anything worthwhile on this Earth and Catholicism (not Novus Orcianism) is the one, true, holy religion on Earth. And while I will not hate you for not understanding that last point, as I missed it myself for most of my life, thanks to lies we are all raised under, and would have continued to miss it but for God’s Grace, I certainly understand the conviction of someone that thinks Catholicism is fake, gay and retarded. I was one of you. I can only suggest you read The Crusades, which is flawlessly historically accurate and now available easily in digital format here. I don’t think any man that is not, gay, fake and retarded can read what those men were like and what they did without getting an overwhelming sense of respect for them.

The whole point of this first point is simply this: No. retreating is NOT the way. Pushing back, directly, unequivocally, loudly, and unambiguously and unapologetically is the way.

Second: While I do not like or advocate for needless violence, I have always, and will always, advocate for self-defence. These people have been making you retreat psychologically, emotionally, intellectually and now physically, by violence and the threat of violence. I am supposed to let a predatory pedophile twerk in front of my toddler children but if I call you a fag, I can go to jail? Well, guess what: fuck you. I’ll call you a fag and physically remove you from anywhere near my children if I see you acting that way. And wake up: no one is voting these people out of the positions of power over you that they gained by subterfuge, bribery, fraud and murder. Do you really think the Clintons didn’t have a bunch of people killed? It was public knowledge in the early 1990s, now it’s “expected”. You think the war in Ukraine is not about money, power and control as well as intentional genocide? Or that the genocide in Gaza is not? Go see a few of the telegram channels that show you what the Jewish people and soldiers of Israel are doing to children in Palestine. And their mothers and fathers who have been labelled as a whole people as worthy of total elimination by standing politicians in Israel.

You think your vote is going to stop Bill Gates and Soros and WEF Klaus Schwabs and the other billionaire mentally ill degenerates from pumping chemtrails, mRNA, nanobots and 5G towers all around you? You think the people who run and own the Bank for International Settlement will not use every trick in the book to enslave you, including mass murder on a global scale? Because if you still believe you live on a fair planet based on some fiction called “democracy” then you really are too stupid to convince you of anything meaningful.

The only thing that will remove such people from the equation is force. The fact you have barely begun to understand how they have been intentionally poisoning you and your children for almost a century while destroying, infiltrating and corrupting anything that stood in their way (primarily the Catholic Church with its dogmas and nobility as its enforcing and defending arm), doesn’t mean they have not been attacking you. They have. You’re only starting to see it a bit now. When you realise 9/11 did not at all happen the way you have been told on TV, even when it literally did not play out as they are telling you in front of your own eyes, like announcing building seven too has collapsed while it’s still standing behind the live broadcaster, and hasn’t been hit by any plane at all. Or the entire Covid, genetic serums, and 5G genocidal scam. Or pretty much ALL vaccines, even the “real” ones, from the very start, being actually anything but good for you.

They have been trying to cripple, enslave, and murder you for generations. Self-defence is just fine. Which of course means identifying the real culprits and perpetrators as well as defending yourself in the immediate situation you may find yourself in. Violence to defend yourself from violence is fine. So learn to protect yourself and put things in their proper perspective.

Third: And this is really the key point. While you must, absolutely, push back on every level, vote in local elections, put yourself forward as a candidate, change things from the people you associate with to the local PTA or Home Owners Association board, all the way to the local council, professors in academia and so on, as well as absolutely defend yourself and your loved ones from any physical or violent attacks of force against you, you should not get bogged down in this so much that you lose sight of the real enemy. And while you may not be able to get to the real puppet masters directly, you can certainly get to their fifth puppets a few times removed.

Replace that woke teacher. Get a new sane mayor. Stop tolerating that degenerate freak that is a friend of a friend or even a family member. It’s simply time for you to make a choice. Reality or lies. Truth or fake. No, there is no way, ever, that a man can get “preganant”. Yes, there are ONLY two sexes. No, “gender” does not define the “sexuality” or rather sexual preference, of any living thing, it’s a word used in grammar to differentiate words, in romantic languages for example, that have feminine or masculine gender. Like il gatto (the cat) is masculine but la gatta (the [female] cat) is feminine. But also la tavola (the table) and la macchina (the car) are feminine, so it’s not limited to the sex of an animal. Again, this follows from point one and two above: push back in all the dimensions required, but never lose sight of who, specifically, both collectively and individually down to the specific person, has pushed for, financed, and legislated for, the current level of insanity; and who they have oppressed, murdered, cancelled, ruined emotionally, financially and physically. And as soon as you are able to, remove them from their positions and bring them to account for their crimes against humanity.

Succinctly then, the TL;DR is this:

1. Push back

2. Violence in self-defence is just fine

3. Know with specificity and precision who the masterminds are when it comes to your enemies.

None of these three points are controversial or difficult to understand, so stop being, or pretending to be, shocked. Man up and carry on.

There is, indeed, always one.

Or a million for that matter, because the village idiots keep reproducing.

Allow me to introduce Ken.

Ken is one of the mouth-breathing retards who thinks he can “git me” with his tenuous grasp of metaphysics, Christianity, basic logic and special needs level of reading comprehension.

He thought he would post a wise and deep comment about “the Filioque” without even bothering to understand that word, where it comes from, what it signifies, or why it even exists.

Kind of like the equally stupid and drooling flat Earth cretins who hang on to the word “firmament” (from the freemason Bible intentionally mistranslated in over 33,000 places under the commission of flamboyantly gay King who also started the Freemason Temples in their current Satanic form, which is why the oh so revered KJV “Bible” is also known as the Freemason Bible (Satanist Bible, right, sounds like a good version to you)).

Just as the people who one truly hopes COULD walk off the edge, continue to think the word “firmament” for reasons best known to themselves means “giant bubble of glass that holds back an infinite ocean” without EVER bothering to find out what the word was in the original text nor what it meant. because if they did, they would find it means “the expanse”. You know, just like the Sci-Fi series of the same name all set in… (drum roll please) SPACE! In short, the very word the flat-brained idiots hang on to literally means sky in Hebrew.

Here, we have another version of what is basically a. lemur, trying to come to grips with the reading skills a normal six year old has mastered, enter (is it, could it be… “master” Ken, but of theology instead of bullshido?!) Let us begin dissecting this parasitic hanger-on:

The filioque is not so simple, because that phrase in the creed comes straight out of the gospel of John, and the gospel doesn’t have the filioque in it:

Right there, ladies and gentlemen, with that single first sentence, this moron has disqualified himself. Because he thinks (like all Protestant thinkers do, in grayscale at best) that the word Filioque is somehow MAGICAL! And if it’s not spelt in America-huh-n English like JE-AASUS spoke it, then you must REJECT the unholy pagan rites of Kath-hole-icism.

We will show below that the word is merely a CONCEPT. But we can’t expect Ken to understand things like abstract concepts. He clearly is one of those people who can’t even imagine an apple, never mind a concept.

% “When the Helper comes, whom I will send to you
% from the Father, that is the Spirit of truth
% who proceeds from the Father,
% He will testify about Me” John 15:26

Even the Douay-Rheims doesn’t have the filioque:

% But when the Paraclete cometh, whom I will send you
% from the Father, the Spirit of truth,
% who proceedeth from the Father,
% he shall give testimony of me. John 15:26

Note the second thing that proves he is absolutely retarded: That word that Jesus says: *I* or in full context “whom I will send you”.

Let’s do this at the pre-primary school level for Ken, shall we children?

Who sends it? Jesus does!

Where does it come from? The Father!

But who sends it? The Son!

YAY!!! Now clap your hands and take your blank and go lie down for a little nap after that exhausting use of brain cells, eh Ken?

The easiest thing for the various council fathers to do is to stick with scripture. To change the creed would require extraordinarily good arguments.

And here it is LADIES AND GENTLEMEN! In case you were wondering when it would make its appearance, here it is, the full blown special retardation that only Protestants can ever conjure up! Sola Scripture! Except, well, it isn’t what he believes it to be, is it. Because we literally just did look at the scripture, and guess what, it really quite clearly says the Holy Spirit comes from the father THROUGH the Son. So… yeah… you see why I use the word retarded so much when discussing Protestants who also would pretend to be faux-Orthos, because, oh, yeah, the Orthos too think that Sola Scriptura is completely retarded just as much as the Catholics know it is. But we’ll not tell Ken that, eh? He might cry.

Instead of providing those arguments, Rome has agreed to allow the eastern Catholics, and the Orthodox when they re-unite, to keep the creed as they have always known it.

There is no reunification, you special breed of incestuos experiment. But if there ver were to be, it would be under the One, True, Holy and Apostolic Catholic Church and its edicts and dogmas.

Now let’s look at how dumb Ken was to even comment on my blog.

How difficult would it have been to at least TRY to grasp the situation before shooting his retarded mouth off?

Second result on duck duck go if you type Filioque brings up this, which even though is Novus Ordo based, (so beware) is actually quite correct, because it is such a basic and simple and obvious thing that even the impostors of the Novus Ordo see no point in belabouring it.

The Western Church commonly uses a version of the Nicene creed which has the Latin word filioque (“and the Son”) added after the declaration that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father. Scripture reveals that the Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son. The external relationships of the persons of the Trinity mirror their internal relationships. Just as the Father externally sent the Son into the world in time, the Son internally proceeds from the Father in the Trinity. Just as the Spirit is externally sent into the world by the Son as well as the Father (John 15:26, Acts 2:33), he internally proceeds from both Father and Son in the Trinity. This is why the Spirit is referred to as the Spirit of the Son (Gal. 4:6) and not just the Spirit of the Father (Matt. 10:20).

The quotations below show that the early Church Fathers, both Latin and Greek, recognized the same thing, saying that the Spirit proceeds “from the Father and the Son” or “from the Father through the Son.”

These expressions mean the same thing because everything the Son has is from the Father. The proceeding of the Spirit from the Son is something the Son himself received from the Father. The procession of the Spirit is therefore ultimately rooted in the Father but goes through the Son. However, some Eastern Orthodox insist that to equate “through the Son” with “from the Son” is a departure from the true faith.

The expression “from the Father through the Son” is accepted by many Eastern Orthodox. This, in fact, led to a reunion of the Eastern Orthodox with the Catholic Church in 1439 at the Council of Florence. Unfortunately, the union did not last. In the 1450s (just decades before the Protestant Reformation), the Eastern Orthodox left the Church again under pressure from the Muslims, who had just conquered them and who insisted they renounce their union with the Western Church (lest Western Christians come to their aid militarily).

So let’s take a little look at Acts 2:33, shall we?

But let’s read it in context too, shall we, instead of doing the Prottie select a random text to twist it at will dance.

31 Foreseeing this, he spoke of the resurrection of Christ. For neither was he left in hell, neither did his flesh see corruption.

32 This Jesus hath God raised again, whereof all we are witnesses.

33 Being exalted therefore by the right hand of God, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath poured forth this which you see and hear.

34 For David ascended not into heaven; but he himself said: The Lord said to my Lord, sit thou on my right hand,

35 Until I make thy enemies thy footstool.

36 Therefore let all the house of Israel know most certainly, that God hath made both Lord and Christ, this same Jesus, whom you have crucified.

37 Now when they had heard these things, they had compunction in their heart, and said to Peter, and to the rest of the apostles: What shall we do, men and brethren?

38 But Peter said to them: Do penance, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ, for the remission of your sins: and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

Oh, so, this passage refers to Jesus again, receiving the Holy Ghost and then pouring it out to the others, just as… He said in… GASP! John 15:26! WOW! Will you look at that? it corresponds perfectly! It’s almost like MAGIC. If only you can read at the second grade level!

But wait, it’s not just one (or ok, two) simple trick, there is MORE!

(Perhaps I should use more fonts colours here and some more exclamation marks, so as to keep the brain damaged Protestants that are used to swallowing only adverts and soundbites into their atrophied brains more “engaged”? – let me know!)

We have Galatians 4:6 too! And again, maybe let’s read it in a bit of context eh? Like Catholics do, not like mouth-breathing retards like Ken PRETEND to (he can’t read, he obviously just repeats things he was told by rote).

And because you are sons, God hath sent the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying: Abba, Father.

Therefore now he is not a servant, but a son. And if a son, an heir also through God.

So… uh… what Spirit is it that God the Father might possibly send to the people? Oh, wait… the Spirit of his Son. So… what Spirit could that possibly be? Some other Spirt, that is NOT the Holy Spirit? Wait, have we got it wrong all this time? Is there really TWO Spirits, the Holy Spirit and then another mysterious unnamed one? Which doesn’t appear anywhere else and is not named in the passage that proves the Trinity beyond any doubt? Well, Ken apparently must believe this, but anyone that can read does not. Because clearly what is being referenced here is the Holy Spirit, and lo and behold, once again, it proceeds from the Father at minimum THROUGH the son, because a very strong argument can also be made that if the Father sends them the Spirit OF the Son, then that spirit is an intrinsic part of Jesus (as it is, being it’s the Holy Spirit) and as such proceeds from him too.

And does Matthew 10:20 contradict anything? Nope, It just says that the spirit of the Father will speak through you. There is no contradiction here. If he had stated the Spirit of Christ instead of The Father, it would have been the same, given that the Trinity is all three of them. It was obviously just a normal sentence spoken as anyone would. He could have said the spirit of God and left it at that too. It makes no difference and is certainly nothing to hang on to as if Matthew had some how EXCLUDED Jesus specifically. In short, it is the usual Protestant nonsense of people trying to find some Calvinistic absolutism and getting it retiredly wrong.

And finally, one last point, note that the Orthos, once again, AGREED with the Catholics and rejoined them over 400 years after their schism and repeated betrayal and murder of many of the Catholics who came to help them despite the fact they were already schismatics for 40 years.

And then, once again, they put their tail between their legs and did as the Muslims told them to do. Not exactly what real believers in Christ would act, is it?

So there you have it Ken. And he has the honour of having forced me to add a whole new category to the topics on this blog, though they have featured many times, Ken prompted the addition of the topic: Retards.

Probably about the only thing he will ever achieve in life, if his reading comprehension is anything to go by.

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks