Archive for the ‘Impostors and Frauds’ Category

Blackpilling Gnostics – Bruce Charlton Edition. Again.

Blackpilling deceivers, gnostics, and sophists need to be ignored. At least until we can change the laws back to outlawing them, ostracising them from civilised society, and in the worst cases make their nightmares come true by burning them at the stake.

My friend Adam posted a very nice, polite, well-reasoned missive for the indefatigable Ann Bernhardt, basically asking her a slightly different take on the question I have been asking her for years now.

My version: Ann, show me where in Canon Law it states there is a limit of duration to an interregnum.

Adam’s take: Ann, ALL of these “Cardinals” are demonstrable demon worshippers. And when Bergoglio kicks the bucket THEY will be “electing” the next “Pope”. Can you see why I am using inverted commas and why we 1958 Sedevacantists are correct and not you, laughably wrong 2023 sedevacantist?

But Ann will not respond to either of us, I am certain.

I know, I know, to you non-Catholics, and therefore non-Christians, this all sounds like the Baptist joke about the guy who’s gonna jump from a bridge.

But that’s only because you’re an ignorant heathen, a pretend-Christian of some rebellious Protestant denomination, or you simply never got round to reading the Patristic fathers, the history of Christianity, or the Bible. Take your pick, it doesn’t matter, because the point of this post is simply to show in the clear light of day, what a sophist, deceiver, and mollusc Bruce Charlton is, and why anyone sane will ignore pretty much anything he has to say.

I first came across Bruce because of an admittedly brilliant little pamphlet he wrote (free on the internet) called Addicted to Distraction. It really is good and you don’t need to be in any way religious to enjoy it.

That said, pretty much everything else after that has been a steaming pile of Gnosticism, spiritual deviancy, and sophistry.

For reasons only known to himself, (or perhaps the demons riding him) Bruce decided that the best thing he could do to Adam’s post was discourage anyone from being a proper Catholic. i.e. a Sedevacantist.

Interesting; since Bruce has professed for some time that he feels the closest thing he is Christianity-wise, is to a Mormon.

I thought he’d misspelt Moron (as I think Mormons have too) but he repeated it quite a lot a while back. Now, far be it from me to criticise anyone who believes Joseph Smith wasn’t a complete sex perverted charlatan who made the whole idiotic thing up, including there being golden sheets of words written by an Angel called Moroni (there’s a hint here, honest!) that he put inside a box and that only he, and he alone, could read, and then only with a seer stone inside his tuba hat, but no one else was allowed to see the sheets and the “translated” Angelic words were noted down by a scribe on the other side of a screen from Smith who “read them” using his special tuba hat. And that was how the Book of Mormon, and his fucking everyone’s wife, and the entire Moronic/Mormonic religion came about.

If you think I am having a fever-dream-hallucination, you are wrong, that insanity is literally how Mormonism came about. Yes. I know, it makes the Scientologists with their Xemu seem a LOT more plausible.

But yeah, when THAT guy starts telling people to NOT be proper Catholics… well… light him up is what I’m gonna do, so here it is. And here is Bruce’s first Gnostic comment.

bruce g charlton 1 day ago

@Adam – One difficulty of going back to Vatican II is logistical, given the importance given to a valid apostolic succession. Because most of what has happened in the RC church all over the world over the past half-century would be utterly invalidated.

Indeed, so large and complex is this problem, that it seems (obviously!) utterly impossible to unpick the valid from the invalid – and spiritually almost lethal even to try.

In other words, I am sure that a strict and logical legalism – even if completely honest and rigorously applied – cannot extricate the RCC from the mess that it now inhabits. Therefore, that legalistic approach to the problem is doomed to fail, and therefore should not be embarked-upon.

But that does Not mean the task is impossible, merely that a legalistic approach cannot accomplish the task.

I am sure that insofar as Roman Catholics are motivated to live in accordance with God’s will; then ways will be found in practice to “short circuit” these problems – and these ways will be clear and simple, and known in their hearts to be valid, by those Roman Catholics of genuine good will.

Thus will a part of the Roman Catholic survive and thrive – to the benefit of all.

But the strictly legalistic approach would (will) need to be let-go at some point; or else it will block what is necessary and good.

I wasn’t the first one to get a shot back at him…

 Reply to  bruce g charlton 1 day ago

That’s not the way this works. All that happened over the last several decades is in fact invalid and it can and must be recognized as such. Catholicism is not Romantic Christianity.

But I think mine was more balanced, fair and complete:

 Reply to  bruce g charlton 1 day ago

Bruce, you whiny, gnostic, coward.
Crawl back under the retarded rock of Moroni you climbed out from under.
You literally stated that the absurd cult of Mormonism is the closest you come to Christianity, and here you are, once again, trying to dissuade anyone from even thinking about sedevacantism; aka actual Catholicism, which is thriving and expanding daily and makes perfect sense since what happened with V2 is really simple enough an honest ten year old can understand it. But not deceivers like you. Just like you ran away from the truth I forced your nose into at my blog (you deleted my replies on yours) run along now, sede blogs are not places for spineless Brits like you.

If you think that didn’t explain too much, you’re right, but that’s because me and Bruce have had this out before, so if you need more information, you might start here for generics on Sedevacantism, or buy one of my books Believe! (short) or Reclaiming the Catholic Church (long).

If instead you want to read up on Bruce and me, knock yourself out, here. I started to call him out over a year ago.

Bruce ignored my comment, of course, but felt the need to keep making random sophistry up. Which is such bullshit I just need to break it up and comment on it.

Problems don’t go away just because they are unacknowledged; and the worst real problems are those due to unacknowledged metaphysical assumptions.

No, Bruce, the worst problem is intentional, lying deceivers like you trying to lead souls to Hell by lying to them.

One such is that the bottom line essence of Roman Catholicism is legalistic in nature – i.e. that the legal aspects trump all other considerations.

No Bruce. The Bottom Line of Catholicism is that it is the TRUTH. And the Truth cannot be lied about, changed, made different or perverted. Legalism, as YOU use it is simply subterfuge, lies, and twisting the truth. What the Church does is not “legalism” Bruce, it’s defending the factual, inerrant, infallible, eternal TRUTH. Yes, your very Nemesis, the thing that sends you scurrying like a cockroach for shadows and sophistry. You would not know this, being what you are, but you see Bruce, honest men will NEVER flex or bend or break before creatures of shadow like you. Nope. We will look at the truth and point it out, and call you out for the deceiving liar you are.

Until That is recognized as an assumption, and that assumption compared with other possible assumptions, then discussion cannot proceed beyond primary school playground verbal scraps (yawn…).

Yawn away you little runt. There is nothing assumed in Catholicism. It is reasoned, thought out, proven, checked against scripture and tradition and divine dogma, and reality. And because Jesus instituted the Church on Earth, and he is not a liar, the Church too, despite being filled with flawed men, remains infallible in its Magisterial teachings. Yes, even after there has been no valid Pope since 1958. Because Jesus promised he would be with us until the end times, and so it is. Real Priests and real Bishops continue to exist. Just nowhere in the Vatican. None within the Novus Ordo Satanic impostor religion pretending to be Catholicism. But as it always did, the Church continues to exist.

If discussion gets trapped by unexamined legalistic assumptions that contain necessarilydestructive consequences, then it will be Roman Catholicism that suffers.

There is no legalistic assumption, only undeniable fact and reality. There is nothing destructive in Catholicism. And in case you are wondering, yes, burning heretics at the stake is salutary and civilisational, as history has proven time and again, not destructive. Not even for the heretic, since contemplating his own burning flesh gives him time to ponder his errors and possibly repent, thus entering Purgatory and eventually Salvation too.

This is why fifth columnists within all churches have so often hidden their real (and anti-Christian – often personal, or ideological) agendas behind a façade of strict legalism. Such agents destroy and personally profit (or simply enjoy the process of destruction), while pretending to protect.

Nope. You’re now trying to conflate sophists and liars like yourself with being strict. The truth IS strict, Bruce. Reality IS strict. That’s just how it is. And so, liars like you are called out for the liars they are.

And the same can happen unconsciously, delusionally, or from a desire for “certainty” – in order, to “settle the question” once and for all. Many motives are possible.

Look at all the nonsense you’re throwing at Sedes, hoping something will stick. Amazing. Well, I know you’re not doing this “unconsciously” Bruce, it’s very intentional and conscious on your part. Nor is it delusional. Underhanded, subversive, deceitful, false, and cowardly, yes, it’s all of those, but not delusional. Well, except if you think your ploy will work on actual Catholics, then yes, you would be delusional. But that’s not your target, is it Bruce, no, like all the gatekeeping Satanists, your target is the newly interested neophyte. You aim to prevent anyone from even looking at sedevacantism. Because you know if they do they will see the perfect reasoning of it and become proper, actual, Christians. And that would leave you out in the cold. Well… for. bit, you’ll get to a real warm place in due course.

The point is that In These Times we can be sure that (later if not sooner) our fundamental assumptions will be exposed, and tested to breaking point. The question is: what then breaks?

You. Bruce. You break. And all those like you. You know what doesn’t break? Catholicism. Or Catholics. At most we die. And either as martyrs (the best of us) or as warriors, taking as many of you scum as possible down with us, except your ride will be a lot lower down and more permanent than ours.

It was good to see I was not the only one that recognised Bruce for what he is. CT had some pertinent thoughts on the matter.

C T Reply to  bruce g charlton 15 hours ago

What a steaming heap of bafflegarble. When the new Inquisition is put into place, you are not going to make it.

As is known now, the Secret King Bruce had to continue to try to have the last word

bruce g charlton Reply to  bruce g charlton 9 hours ago

I should add that I regard the basic “sede” stance – i.e. that the RCC was poisoned by Vatican II – as obviously correct.

Here he uses one of the tried and tested methods of the deceiver: “Oh but I agree with you, see? Now come walk with me down this yellow-bricked road…”

But I suggest that this position can and should be reached without recourse to legalism, and the solutions to Vatican II should not be legalistic either.

Transaltion: But I suggest that this position can and should be reached without recourse to TRUTH, and the solutions to Vatican II should not be TRUE either.

I would have thought it obvious that the Holy Ghost can and will (as I said) “short circuit” the impossibly complex legal problems to provide direct answers that can be agreed by all Catholics of good (i.e. genuinely Christian) motivation.

See? You are a “good” Catholic, if you listen to old uncle Bruce here who has genuine “Christian” motivation. And we’ll skip right over the simple fact that Catholicism IS Christianity. That the ONLY Christianity that has ever existed IS Catholicism, and all else is heresy, nonsense, lies and deceit.

What a serpentine mollusc you are Bruce, you might as well write, All men of good brotherhood can agree that good brotherhood and equality and liberty is the true “catholicism”. You freemason brothers would be proud.

But this can only happen if other factor/s than legalism are regarded as primary and foundational to the Catholic faith. Legalism (aka Pharisees-ism) – if adopted – will empower the wrong people by focusing on the letter, will utterly fail to solve the real problems – and will prove utterly destructive of the Christian spirit (as it always has done and will continue to do). If any church survives, it will be an empty shell.

Translation: But this can only happen if other factor/s than TRUTH are regarded as primary and foundational to the Catholic faith.

See Bruce, you have a bit of a hurdle here, in the sense that K2 or Mount Olympos is a “bit of a hill”. Catholicism has always stayed very clearly that it is the ONLY, ONE, TRUE, HOLY, APOSTOLIC, RELIGION. You really can’t get away from that. Now, you can agree or not. Don’t agree, then you’re not Catholic. Buh-Bye. Off you go, piss off and don’t bother us again. No Catholic cares about your opinions of Catholicism, you are not one of us, you don’t count. End of. Or you agree, in which case, you can’t water down the truth Bruce. You can’t twist it. You can’t change it. You can’t ignore it. Which is what you are advocating for. Precisely what you’d like Catholics to do is completely anathema to us. Oh, does it hurt you feel that we plainly say, we are right and yes, all of you who are not with us are wrong? Hmmm…I wonder who else said if you are not with me you’r against me. Anyone? Anyone? Guy in Galilee? Answered to the name of Jesus? Ever heard of Him, Bruce? Guess what, we Catholics ARE with him. People like you, I’m fairly sure He’s gonna say “I never knew you.” Go look it up. You might as well read that Bible one day eh?

CT too also fired back. More gentlemanly than I, as is often the case. But then I am not going for polite. I want to obliterate any shred of credibility these charlatanic gnostic deceivers have, forever. So Orbital Nukes is more my speed.

C T Reply to  bruce g charlton 3 hours ago

You often make these weird mistakes — e.g. “pharisees-ism” — that make me wonder sometimes what language you actually speak.

No, God won’t “short-circuit” His own law. That’s a stupidity that only a maleducated, non-Christian midwit could envisage. The plain truth is that outside of the Church there is no salvation, therefore all who wish to be saved must be brought into It, legally and publicly because there is no other way. Baptisms and other sacraments must be performed properly, evil must be publicly renounced, penance must be visibly performed before the apostates can be accepted as Catholic.

You are not even a member of the Church. You are so far from being a well trained and educated cleric that you can only aspire to be a layman. You have no say, are entitled to no opinion, can offer no relevant advice on the matter.

Quite. And on that note, we once more, turn the page on the non-Christian, liar, deceiver and intentional sophist Bruce Charlton.

Sex and Relationship Lies

The largest battleground for human happiness and misery is in the field of romantic relationship between a man and woman.

UPDATE: you can now read how to make the best of the current situation in my book Caveman Theory. Available ONLY at my E-Store as it is too politically incorrect for Amazon. But read the post below to get a general sense of things first. As the book in large part is written to help you navigate the current situation and achieve success in the kind of relationship you want to have.

If you just listen to the first 7 minutes of this podcast on it, the lady in it identifies really quite well the basic issues facing young people today and what I found particularly useful is that she indicates, as does the guy doing the podcast, the specific fact that it is the general zeitgeist of the world to present things as if love itself is not part of the equation any longer. They refer to recent movies, Barbie and apparently Snow White and how the main woke actress in Snow White, Rachel Ziegler, says:

“She’s not going to be saved by the Prince, she’s not going to be dreaming about true love, she’s dreaming about becoming the leader she knows she can be. The Prince in the original movie stalked her.”

Imagine, someone from the hypokrite class thinking this way about the classic story of Snow White. The word hypokrite of course, was the original term for actors in Ancient Greece. You can see why it’s relevant to study the classic, and etymology, yes? Actors in classical times were essentially thought of as basically prostitutes. And while the glorification of whores is also nothing new (The temple prostitutes used to get paid to have sex with any man that donated to the temple and were held in high esteem by mostly Babylonian/Sumerian people, while the Greek Herodotus, in his Histories referred to the practice of forced prostitition at least once as “foul”.

The foulest Babylonian custom is that which compels every woman of the land to sit in the temple of Aphrodite and have intercourse with some stranger at least once in her life. 

As pretty much the entire #metoo movement proved, thinking most actors and actresses are essentially highly paid prostitutes is really about the size of it. And in fact, having met a few actresses and also a few prostitutes in my life, generally, a highly paid whore who makes no pretence of being anything other than what she is, in my experience of conversing with such people, are far more honest and interesting than those who fancy themselves as artists that should be venerated. And if you doubt, me look up the term “yachting” when used in the context of famous actresses, fashion models and so on. Having worked as close protection for some wealthy people from all around the world, I can tell you that some world-recognised names of women that literally everyone knows, have, in fact, been bought an paid for to have sex with, like any common prostitute. It just cost more. And while I have no personal experience in the matter, if I had to bet on it I would bet that the more expensive famous whores probably performed worse than the cheaper unknown ones.

But I digress. The point is that the famous people a lot of young people look up to are essentially spouting the narrative they are paid to vomit out of the orifices they use to make their money.

And that narrative, as the man and woman in the podcast state, is that love makes you weak, is some kind of outdated, or outmoded way of being, removes choice and fun from your life, causes unnecessary suffering and is no good at all. And it is a narrative being pushed, as the lady correctly identifies, primarily by people who are undesirable to the opposite sex.

I have been saying for years that I have yet to meet a beautiful woman that is reasonably normal (i.e. hasn’t suffered some genuinely dramatically traumatising event) that is in any way a feminist. Pretty women pretty much can get a LOT of what they want primarily by playing to their straights and those are the feminine qualities. And if they are really smart, they will use those to snatch a quality man who has masculine qualities.

The blue-haired manatees that scream feminism, and the incel-gargoyles that become MGTOW types, along with a few others that are internally as repulsive as the aforementioned generally are externally, are essentially deeply miserable human wreckage and as they say, misery loves company, so they try to drag everyone else down to their level of despair.

The narrative is so pervasive and so prevalent in literally every aspect of life that you don’t even realise in how many multitudes of ways it is pushed on you and at you throughout every single day. If you read my last blog post before this one, perhaps, you might begin to become more aware of how insidiously the lies about reality and ESPECIALLY about relations between men and women are inculcated in you by subterfuge, stealth, unstated assumptions (one of the biggest culprits and methods), and so on.

Reality all around you is narrated and presented in a twisted manner in order to make you think that the current narrative of feminism-über-alles and being a strongly independent woman and an asexual automaton male, are the pinnacle one should strive for. That is, when they are not pushing the idea you should sexually mutilate yourself in order to become a tragic parody of the opposite sex.

So you bet, there are a lot of unhappy young men and women, unfulfilled in any relationship they attempt to get into and so on. Even if one of them has actually seen through most of the fog, finding a partner that has too, or that at least is amenable to being shown the way through the lies is difficult. It requires patience, skill, intelligence, and genuine research that does not collapse into embittered despair.

I have mentioned these type of things over the years a lot, both on this blog and on my Youtube channel, so search through it and see the videos on the topic too, and pluck what you can from it, but in just a few key sentences, as a starting point, please try to keep this in mind:

  • Male and female brains are physically and structurally different. That has an effect.
  • Male and female hormones and the female cycle of hormones are wildly different and this affects everything.
  • Women are far more swayed by their emotions and hormones than men are, generally speaking, and as a result less likely to be objective overall. Their biology demands a certain level of “selfishness” that has served humanity well in the survival of the species. Just like male biology has a tendency to be more logical and objective and (at least until fairly recently) be more prone to self-sacrifice for the sake of his family, has also served the survival of the species well.
  • Yes technology has made our survival far more likely than it used to, but our biology remains essentially the same and the answer is not to try and modify our biology to suit the machines, but rather to alter the machines to suit our biology. This last point has literally not been understood by any one of the myriad “relationship” experts you see all over the internet and seminars and books. Which should tell you how useful a lot of their other advice is (which they generally demand money for). Well, you read it here first. For free.

Above all, a lifelong marriage for the purpose of raising multiple children in a loving, strong, family, with emphasis on overcoming hardship and sticking by your blood whenever you can, with the ethics that Catholicism has, —that is, the original real Catholicism (sedevacantism now), which includes Just War and the Death Penalty, as well as the DUTY to defend innocents, yes even with violence, yes even with pre-emptive violence— produces the genuinely happiest life you can possibly imagine.

I stumbled into it by never giving up my fight against perceived nonsense from childhood until my late 30s. the Boomer zeitgeist did a lot of damage to my generation (and your too), but I sincerely hope you throw off the mental shackles I got rid of mostly by brutish (yet correct) animal instinct (at least at first) by conscious understanding and reasoned contemplation of reality and truth.

March on brothers and sisters; and win.

UPDATE:

Lest you think I am unkind… let me be clear, that even though you may be a gargoyle, it’s up to you what TYPE of Gargoyle you make yourself into.

The Loser, Omega, Poor-me, Gargoyle-Incel:

The “Red-Pilled” All-women-are-bitches, MGTOW Incel-Gargoyle:

Or… The…

I’m a Gargoyle! And I kick all the ass! NON-Incel Gargoyle:

PS: Please ignore the demonic undertones, Gargoyles are traditionally representative of demonic beings, while the unfortunates that look like them are not necessarily evil any more than anyone else is. I hope the images illustrate the point I am trying to make in a sufficiently obvious manner. You can’t help some of the cards you are dealt. But you have absolute authority in how you play them.

The Root of All Evil

This is probably going to piss off most of my readers. Well, brace yourselves, boys and girls, after all, I am not a millionaire because I really suck at telling people lies they’d rather hear instead of cold hard facts that upset their fragile egos.

Some premises are in order before I blow your minds:

  • This overview is a synergistic whole based on VALID and VERY significant statistical realities.
    • Which means Not All X Are Like That is an OBVIOUS point, and being obvious needs not be mentioned. Especially in screaming, frantic, Bommer CAPS LOCK.
    • While stacking statistical reality on statistical reality generally reduces the overall “certainty” of the final conclusion, that also depends on the size of the data set and the certainty of each statistical reality being stacked. The data sets here are absolutely staggeringly huge and also consistent over several centuries of time, so… kinda like: The Sun Rises in the East type of thing. Sure it might not ALWAYS have had, hypothetically, if the Moon is an alien dormant spaceship placed there by Annunnaki, or a meteor hit the Earth long ago and changed a lot of its astronomical properties, or… theoretically, if it might happen yet… you see where I am going with this.
  • The historical realities I will mention are probably not all known to you and you may very well be skeptical about them, please do your own research and realise google and most search engines are quite compromised on pretty much anything involving the Jews, Freemasons, and so on. That said, don’t take my word for it, check it out for yourselves. If you want a general reference book that has a LOT of the murkier stuff already proven beyond doubt, along with references and so on, you can read my Reclaiming the Catholic Church. It’s 530 pages, but not a single person I know that has read it has said it is in any way boring. But otherwise, do your own work. I will not spend weeks providing links etc to every premise detailed below. I will add enough general information to give you a starting point and then if you want to refute what I am saying, please, unless you want to be banned without any warning whatever (and permanently because I just spam you and never look back) read the rules for commenting here. Intellectual honesty is not optional. Neither is the dialectic form of argument. You can add rhetoric at will to it, but the point must be solidly founded on dialectic. Sophistry of any kind is an immediate ban too.

Right Then. Let us begin, so that you may learn where and what the real root of pretty much all evil on our planet today comes from and is based on. In order to do so, we need to be aware of several things.

Here is the TL;DR version:

Know the History of Evil

The History of it of course, goes back right to the very creation of mankind, but here, today, we will concern ourselves only with the last 500 years or so of it.

Protestantism is not Christianity

  • Martin Luther was probably a Jewish hit-man, with the task of literally trying to destroy Catholicism. He changed the Bible that had been used for over 1500 years by literally everyone, denied the Papacy which, again, literally everyone for over 1,000 years accepted as it was, and then, totally illogically, said the Bible was the ONLY source of doctrine or theology, when:
    • The Bible itself refers to traditions outside of it
    • He changed the Bible to begin with, so we must suppose that he meant the Martin Bible, as opposed to the one that…
    • Oh, yeah, CATHOLICS put together, some 300 years after Jesus ascended, using…
    • OOOPPSSS…oral and written tradition to decide what went in and what was left out of the actual Bible. Yeaahhh kinda embarrassing for the whole Sola Scriptura thing.
    • Oh an also tried to remove James entirely from the Bible and add the word “alone” after the words “justified by faith”. Yeaahhh kinda embarrassing for the whole Sola Fide thing.
  • Over 40,000 denominations of Protestantism exist today, and that’s being generous since literally, the entire premise of Protestantism is that each man should interpret the Bible by himself, so in reality there are some 700 million versions and more. A ridiculous situation that clearly goes against the Biblical instructions to be one Church united, to not accept any teachings that are not apostolic ally approved and so on.
  • Since anyone can be a Protestant “pastor” there is absolutely no Apostolic succession and literally no difference in “teachings” from one Protestant “pastor” or a Wiccan or a reader of Harry Potter, since, literally, the only rule Protestantism has is the demonic: “Interpreth as thou wilt”. They literally have no firm standards at all and as such can’t even call each other heretic, because they all are.
  • The lies spread by Protestants about Catholicism and the Catholic Church are literally endless, but even honest Protestants are at least somewhat aware of this. See Rodney Stark and Rod Bennett.

Protestantism created Freemasonry

There really is no way around this at all.

  • King James, a flamboyantly gay man, a fact that was known then and somewhat hidden now, except that his love letters to hi various male lovers are published, so there really is no doubt, started Freemasonry with their temples, black masses, sodomitical and sacrilegious orgies and so on. He also commissioned the King’s James Bible, which is also known as the Freemasonic Bible. It contains over 33,000 “errors” of translation to reduce the importance and place of Mary, the Holy Spirit and Jesus too. And was taken from the version of the “Bible” that had been edited by the literal Pharisees that hated Jesus, and had him killed by the Romans.

Freemasonry is Satanic

Again, there really is no way around this. This is not the only 5 hour long video, on the topic, and though slightly irritating in presentation format, if you get over the first few minutes and move to the factual stuff that is presented and undeniable, you will find it impossible to deny. There are several such videos. And books. Go research on your own.

Freemasonry, Illuminati, Carbonari, Rosicrucians, their name is Legion

All of the above structures operate on three baseline principles:

  • Secrecy. This is a typical aspect of gnosticism, that is heretics, Satanists and so on. They will give various excuses for why their demonic nonsense needs to remain secret, but the reality is that the internal practices after a certain level has been reached, become progressively and more obviously Satanic. Secrecy allows them to indoctrinate people for long periods of time before they “move up the ladder” so to speak, by which time, even if perhaps originally ignorant, the “student” has now been corrupted and compromised to the point that he is both indoctrinated as well as blackmail able.
  • Playing both sides of the same coin. Freemasons will have people in both the extremely liberal side of an issue as well as the supposedly “conservative” side of an issue. Both sides will work at getting “true believers” to avoid the path of true Catholicism, truth, courage, honesty, and basically all the Human virtues of Western Civilisation which Catholicism propagated. Examples of such gatekeeping grifters are Emo Jones, Milo Yankmypoulos, Tay-Tay Marshall and Gay Gary “Michelle” Voris, and that’s just to name a few of the “pretend Trad Catholics”. There are many, many, many of these freemasons and their lapdogs in all spheres of life, from comic books, to the mass media (where they are a large majority), almost the entirety of the entertainment world, and of course politics of any kind.
  • Reducing and undercutting as well as subverting any type of human dignity, heroic impulses, and generally the virtues that make heroes. This is covered in more detail in my book Reclaiming The Catholic Church and is a stated strategy of theirs, which is also perfectly in line with their “god” Lucifer, who, of course hates Humanity and revels in making human beings debase themselves in every way imaginable.
  • It is, of course a given that they will pretend to be ANYTHING, while lying so ferociously, and unashamedly, that normal people are usually unable to grasp that anyone can really lie on that scale, and as such they often think along the lines of “Well, perhaps they are exaggerating a bit, but where there is smoke…” And yes there is fire, but not because anything they say is true, but only because in every way it is designed to make you go to Hell.

Freemasonry is responsible for the destruction of all Royal Houses in Europe

Once again, this is really not in dispute once you look into it. It does take some digging though, because they obviously don’t advertise this point much, but the documents of the Carbonari made this extremely clear, as well as the known actions of known Freemasons like Mazzini in the “unification” of Italy, and later of Europe by similar means and so on. The extermination of the Russian Tsar, etcetera. the only Royal house to “survive” is the entirely corrupted on of Windsor, where the male sons are all circumcised by a Jewish Rabbi, and have been for centuries. One might ask why, of course, but one is unlikely to get an answer.

The reason for the destruction of the Royal Houses was because since the days of Charlemagne, Kings had been thought of as Divinely ordained to be Kings. That is, NOT that a King was put there by God Himself as the rightful ruler and everyone should obey him, but rather that God allowed such men to become Kings. It was then up to such men themselves, to comport themselves in keeping with being good Catholics. As such, the populace understood that if a man was good and obeyed the Catholic rules, their lot would be lighter and easier, and if he was not, it would be darker and heavier. And indeed this was the case for centuries. The First World War was instigated in part in order to “break” the link of loyalty between peasants and the nobility. The Marxist (who was a Jew) ideas of Communism (also a Jewish concept) were supposed to destroy the social gap between the working class and aristocracy. And yet, despite the tragic loss of life in these fomented brother wars, in the main, people still accepted mostly, that they belonged to this o that social strata, and aside some possibility of movement here and there, in the main accepted it. Because once again, the concept of Royalty being a Godly ordained (albeit very human) order, resided in most people’s minds.

The Church was far too powerful to attack directly as long as the enforcing arm of the Church (lay nobility) continued to exist and command the respect of the common people. And so, the work began in earnest right away, pretty much as soon as the Freemasons and the Illuminati and the Carbonari each were “started”.

America is a Freemasonic Country and was so from the Start

The American revolution against Britain was funded by French money. French money which was “advised” to be spent thusly by the Freemasons at the court of King Louis XVI and Marie Antoniette, and had already begun to cause troublesome economic hardship right before the War of independence started in 1775.

From Wikipedia (hardly a bastion of historical truth in such matters, proving that even there these facts are not exactly refuted, even if not highlighted):

By the time of the Flour War of 1775, a series of riots (due to the high price of flour and bread) had damaged her reputation among the general public. Eventually, Marie Antoinette’s reputation was no better than that of the favourites of previous kings. Many French people were beginning to blame her for the degrading economic situation, suggesting the country’s inability to pay off its debt was the result of her wasting the crown’s money.[40] In her correspondence, Marie Antoinette’s mother, Maria Theresa, expressed concern over her daughter’s spending habits, citing the civil unrest it was beginning to cause.

The blame of the country’s economic downturn being laid at the feet of Marie Antoinette and her husband was a somewhat convenient approach to also removing the entire royal house from power, as was the main concern of Freemasonry at the time.

And the rumours persisted throughout the American Revolution to its end in 1783.

In 1783 the queen was busy with the creation of her “hamlet“, a rustic retreat built by her favoured architect, Richard Mique, according to the designs of the painter Hubert Robert.[92] Its creation, however, caused another uproar when its cost became widely known.[93][94] However, the hamlet was not an eccentricity of Marie Antoinette’s. It was en vogue at the time for nobles to have recreations of small villages on their properties. In fact, the design was copied from that of the Prince de Condé. It was also significantly smaller and less intricate than many other nobles’.[95] Around this time she accumulated a library of 5,000 books. Those on music, often dedicated to her, were the most read, though she also liked to read history.[96][97] She sponsored the arts, in particular music. Marie-Antoinette preferred to hold her musicales in the salon of her Petit appartement de la reine in the Palace of Versailles, or in the Théâtre de la Reine. She limited the audience to her intimate circle and a few musicians, among them the Chevalier de Saint-Georges. “Admitted to perform music with the Queen,”[98] Saint-Georges probably played his violin sonatas for two instruments, with Her Majesty playing the fortepiano. She also supported some scientific endeavours, encouraging and witnessing the first launch of a Montgolfière, a hot air balloon for the first time in human history; this extraordinary feat which represented a turning point in human civilization was done by Jean-François Pilâtre de Rozier.

Once the matter of the American War was over, the efforts to remove the royals redoubled:

Marie Antoinette began to abandon her more carefree activities to become increasingly involved in politics in her role as Queen of France.[118] By publicly showing her attention to the education and care of her children, the queen sought to improve the dissolute image she had acquired in 1785 from the “Diamond Necklace Affair”, in which public opinion had falsely accused her of criminal participation in defrauding the jewelers Boehmer and Bassenge of the price of an expensive diamond necklace they had originally created for Madame du Barry. The main actors in the scandal were Cardinal de Rohan, Prince de Rohan-Guéméné, Great Almoner of France, and Jeanne de Valois-Saint-Rémy, Comtesse de La Motte, a descendant of an illegitimate child of Henry II of France of the House of Valois. Marie Antoinette had profoundly disliked Rohan since the time he had been the French ambassador to Vienna when she was a child. Despite his high clerical position at the Court, she never addressed a word to him. Others involved were Nicole Lequay, alias Baronne d’Oliva, a prostitute who happened to look like Marie Antoinette; Rétaux de Villette, a forger; Alessandro Cagliostro, an Italian adventurer; and the Comte de La Motte, Jeanne de Valois’ husband. Madame de La Motte tricked Rohan into buying the necklace as a gift to Marie Antoinette, for him to gain the queen’s favour.

When the affair was discovered those involved (except de La Motte and Rétaux de Villette, who both managed to flee) were arrested, tried, convicted, and either imprisoned or exiled. Madame de La Motte was sentenced for life to confinement in the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, which also served as a prison for women. Judged by the Parlement, Rohan was found innocent of any wrongdoing and allowed to leave the Bastille. Marie Antoinette, who had insisted on the arrest of the Cardinal, was dealt a heavy personal blow, as was the monarchy, and despite the fact that the guilty parties were tried and convicted, the affair proved to be extremely damaging to her reputation, which never recovered from it.[citation neede

The machinations continued not just in France but Austria and aBavaria too and by the end of 1793, both Luis XVI and Marie Antoniette had been executed by Guillotine and the monarchy had been abolished in France as of 10th August 1792.

The period of the French Revolution, from 1789 to the late 1790s also produced some of the worst crimes against Catholics since the time of Henry the VIII.

And the Freemasonic stamp of “fraternity” still echoes today in the French motto of Liberté, Ègalité, Fraternité, it’s always the same with them. Preach liberalism to be rid of the “oppressive” old “regime” and crowbar in degenearcy of every sort to weaken and demoralise the entire citizenry, then push the fable of “equality” between people, cultures, physical and intellectual abilities of vastly different capacities and possibilities, while masking it as “spiritual enlightenment” but in reality producing further corrosion of the capacity to maintain a functioning society. Not hard to do when 85 IQ semi-illiterates are now put in charge of say nuclear power plants, and you begin to have brown-outs if not total core melt-down, to select an extreme but obvious example.

From History.com:

IIn late August, [1789] the Assembly adopted the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen), a statement of democratic principles grounded in the philosophical and political ideas of Enlightenment thinkers like Jean-Jacques Rousseau.

The document proclaimed the Assembly’s commitment to replace the ancien régime with a system based on equal opportunity, freedom of speech, popular sovereignty and representative government.

In April 1792, the newly elected Legislative Assembly declared war on Austria and Prussia, where it believed that French émigrés were building counterrevolutionary alliances; it also hoped to spread its revolutionary ideals across Europe through warfare.

On the domestic front, meanwhile, the political crisis took a radical turn when a group of insurgents led by the extremist Jacobins attacked the royal residence in Paris and arrested the king on August 10, 1792.

The following month, amid a wave of violence in which Parisian insurrectionists massacred hundreds of accused counterrevolutionaries, the Legislative Assembly was replaced by the National Convention, which proclaimed the abolition of the monarchy and the establishment of the French republic.

On January 21, 1793, it sent King Louis XVI, condemned to death for high treason and crimes against the state, to the guillotine; his wife Marie-Antoinette suffered the same fate nine months later.

Notice how the intent of the Freemasons was to spread this war on the established systems of Europe throughout the land, not just France.

And the reign of Terror followed, and please note its central tenet: The abolition of Christianity. Which is and always has been the aim of Satanists throughout the ages, the Freemasons merely having been more successful than most at implementing their aims.

Reign of Terror 

Following the king’s execution, war with various European powers and intense divisions within the National Convention brought the French Revolution to its most violent and turbulent phase.

In June 1793, the Jacobins seized control of the National Convention from the more moderate Girondins and instituted a series of radical measures, including the establishment of a new calendar and the eradication of Christianity.

They also unleashed the bloody Reign of Terror (la Terreur), a 10-month period in which suspected enemies of the revolution were guillotined by the thousands. Many of the killings were carried out under orders from Robespierre, who dominated the draconian Committee of Public Safety until his own execution on July 28, 1794.

Did you know? Over 17,000 people were officially tried and executed during the Reign of Terror, and an unknown number of others died in prison or without trial.

The Crimes against Catholics, including horrific mutilations and tortures of babies and children was well-documented at the time even by the perpetrators, and was honestly one of the most horrific and disgusting periods of human action that undoubtedly pleased many demons in Hell.

All of the above is merely to give a TINY bit of context to the point that America was essentially funded with French money, the use of which was then used to blame and frame the French Monarchy and cause further revolution throughout Europe along with the rapid abolition of other monarchies in Europe in quick succession.

Austria-Hungary, Prussia, Germany, Montenegro, Portugal and Russia had ALL lost their kings by the end of the First World War. You might think some 120 years or so is a long time, but not really when your machinations to change the entire world of Europe from a Catholic and orderly group of individual nations to a homogenous grey soup of “Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity” that can then be fully controlled by the purse-masters of the world.

The remaining monarchies were abolished or made into constitutional republics by the end of the Second World War, which any historian worth anything agrees was really an extended continuation of the First World War. And the end result of all this was finally what?

The Establishment of the American Empire

It cannot be argued that America was founded by Freemasons and on Freemasonic Principles. Washington was widely known to be a Freemason and to this day, the various secret societies of Skull and Crossbones and so on are essentially Freemasons by another name. But in any case, of the 45 presidents America has had at least 15 are KNOWN to have been Freemasons without a doubt, Including the first, as already mentioned, as well as BOTH Roosevelts.

Theodore Roosevelt, who was president from 1901 to 1909, immediately followed by Taft, also a Freemason, from 1909 to 1913, and as everyone knows, the First World War’s start in 1915 was set in motion in these years, even if Woodrow Wilson was actually president during WWI, who is not known to have been a Freemason, but who is still widely thought to have been one of the worst presidents in American history. And probably still has that “honour” Since Biden clearly was not legitimately elected. Then again, who knows if Wilson was either.

We also have Franklin Roosevelt who just so happened to be president from 1933 to 1945, followed by fellow Freemason Truman until 1953, so the entire period leading up to WWII and quite a bit after it.

After WWII, by deft economic manipulations that both funded and started both wars, the American Empire was pretty much established globally.

The placing of American military bases all around the world as well the usurious practices of tentacled creatures like the IMF, the WEF, the trilateral commission and on and on and on, ensured that other states became vassals of America and were destroyed economically if they did not obey.

The establishment of the Universal Commercial Code set of rules effectively made pretty much every country on the globe a subsidiary company of the business of the United States of America. Look it up. It’s a giant rabbit hole. One I have been aware of for almost 30 years and that almost no one even has any idea about. Italy for example is STILL subjected to rules that are literally secret and not able to be seen by anyone in Italy, that were signed off after WWII and which fundamentally makes a mockery of the idea that the Italian state is in any way sovereign. That is in case you couldn’t figure it out from the over 150 American military bases placed throughout Italy. And the fact that our current prime minister, Georgie Tits, sorry, I mean Georgia Meloni, is absolutely known to have had a “master” in her 20s when she followed occult practices. And remember that having a “master” is a Freemasonic thing. And touting her as a “right-wing” leader is absolutely ridiculous and merely the posturing of the usual crack whores doing as their are told (with apologies to crack whores for using them as descriptors for journalists and the mass media), which is simply the usual Freemasonic thing of playing both sides of the fake “divide”.

With America as the powerhouse of the world, American “entertainment”, began making its way across the airwaves to literally every place on Earth. Sitcoms made in the USA are known throughout the world and if you think that doesn’t change the zeitgeist of the planet, then I have some transgender floating bridges to sell you in Shangri-La.

And all this stuff is all run by the (((usual suspects))) who, Cohen-cidentally, I am sure, are always, always, always, but only every single time, at the very root of ALL of these machinations, be their financial and economic, propaganda or “entertainment” or “news” based, and lately also “scientifically” based (don’t let me start of the incestuous plagiarist Albert Einstein and his lies, as this is long enough as it is!)

So, it can be now perhaps better understood why brown people who get the crap bombed out of them, their kids and families killed and used as training grounds for the absolute worst rejects and sad examples of “soldiers” America has produced since “generation kill”, might refer to the USA as The Great Satan.

What with their “soldiers” literally shooting peasants for sport and out of boredom in many cases, often via drones controlled from an air conditioned room tens of thousands of kilometres away, run as just any other 9 to 5 job, and this then being presented as “heroic war action”.

Pretty much regardless of whatever religion, culture, ethnicity, or IQ you may have, it’s not difficult to see why if your children or loved ones are on the receiving end of people that do what the CIA and NSA and Abu Grhaib and Guantanamo Bay “prison wardens-slash-torturers” do, you might think it’s perfectly acceptable to Strat 20kg of C4 to your chest and walk into the nearest American mall to detonate it.

Finally

So, yes. Unpleasant as it may sound, the real root of pretty much most of the evil present in our world today does originate from the USA. Which is not to say that the average American is specifically guilty of doing this.

By and large, the average American is a drug-addled fattie, stunned by GMO foods and processed crap that most animals in the wild would not dream to ingest even if starving, maleducated to the point that some Africans in small villages have a better grasp of reality, and thoroughly brainwashed into believing whatever the tell-lie-vision in their lounge, bedroom and even bathroom, tells them 24/7. In short, the average American is for the most part a victim of his handlers. True, he’s a lazy, cowardly sort, but one must understand that the brainwashing was very gradual and very well orchestrated. Think about it:

  • Most American men are circumcised. The “reasoning” is that it’s supposed to be more “hygienic”. And if you believe that, you probably believe men can get pregnant, that the wage gap is real and that women can fight in a war or in the ring, just as well as men. So, figure out why this is the case. Who did it? Why? And then look into why the royal house of Windsor (that is the British Royals) all have their maps circumcised by a Rabbi even though they are not Jewish and never have been.
  • They legal system is absurd and essentially allows for anything to be done. Which is why their food is unfair for animal consumption, yet is shovelled into their faces until they explode or die of the inevitable cancer it produces when you eat plastic cheese and fake foods.
  • They are maleducated to believe that America is the best country in the world because they “won” WWII, “went” to the Moon, and have the most nuclear bombs (ok, had). And somehow that translated to you, Johnny, the illiterate and innumerate teenager who reads at 5 year old’s level in the Europe I grew up in, being somehow “naturally better at everything” than the other people around the world. And they really believe it. Even after reality smacks them in the head with a brick repeatedly as soon as they step out of the USA.
  • The zeitgeist in America is driven by absolute terror of legal-warfare, that is being sued in one form or another, and making enough money (mostly to buy creature comforts that help rot your brain, but also to protect yourself from the legal-warfare). The concept of family may still exist in a few cousin-marring hillbillies or rednecks, but even if so is essentially limited to specific families or very small groups.
  • Money, and fame are the real American Gods, regardless of whatever veneer of “humanity” they plaster over themselves. And those few genuine people left who don’t think that way are not only a tiny minority today (as they are in most nations thanks to the American zeitgeist being exported) but are also completely ostracised from mainstream American reality.

I don’t blame the average American citizen any more than I blame the average Mexican or Italian or Chinese. But first and foremost, I really wish every single American (and Mexican, and Italian and Chinese) remained in his own country, and kept all of his ideologies, programmes and military in their own fucking country too.

Of course, the Average American has about as much say in where his government places American military bases as I do about Georgia Meloni’s letting boat after boat after boat of invaders land on the shores of Italy, which is to say, pretty much zero right now. And that’s because the average American has zero representation, because the entire system is rigged and the people who actually run the US government are mostly foreigners and their puppets.

And if you still have to ask who that is today, when you notice what the American government and deep state does, who it supports beyond any reason, and who it will jail you and cancel you and punish you for criticising or even just not wanting to deal with, well… If you STILL haven’t figured it out, I can’t help you. Just go back to your Netflix series.

But not to leave you on a downward note, let me assure you that my next giant post will be on what the solutions are for this apparently unsolvable situation and what you, at an individual level can and should and must do about it.

PS: I have NOT spell-checked this and my autocorrect inevitably mangles a lot of words, aside any errors I make myself. I will correct this as time permits over the next day or two, but hopefully you get the gist.

Play the Boomer Game

Vox Posted his wife’s response to this article about the 17 things Boomers consider positive things they have given the world. I think we should all copy the list and make our own observations! It’s a fun game that highlights just how deluded they are. Unlike Spacebunny, my answers are likely to be longer. Because beating the ghosts of dead horses is what I do here. Also, you might think I am joking in some of my replies. I am not. the replies might be funny, but this does not mean they are not my honest opinion.

The baby boomer generation—the 76.4 million of us born between 1946 and 1964—don’t always get the respect we deserve.

Because mostly, you don’t deserve any.

We made driving safer.

Though seat belts were invented all the way back in 1885, most baby boomers remember youths in which nobody wore them. 

As the baroque wallpaper of my very own blog that you are on right now indicates, as well as my thoughts on the matter in general, the late 1800s was actually probably the pinnacle of actual scientific investigation. It was a time when Catholics were still Catholics, where science was still relatively honest, and where people like Tesla, even if robbed and cheated at every turn, still managed to change the world. So. You think even though they invented them, the fact they did not make them mandatory to have nor wear is an error? An oversight? No, you miserable cretin. It was precisely what it was intended to do: A way for the more daring to try and ensure survival for their sin of chasing the adrenaline rush, or to feel safer against those who thought they could chase it but were not as competent as they thought, or… or not. And for the rest, it was Darwinian selection. The too slow, the too foolish, and the occasional unlucky, would not get to reproduce. It was natural selection at its finest.


We immortalized road trips and travel in general.

nothing makes us more nostalgic than the memory of dad studying a Rand McNally atlas—to road trip poets like Jack Kerouac, we were the first generation to prove that it really was the journey, not the destination.

Uh… your own post makes it clear you did not. your father’s generation did. You did not. The Silent and WWII generation did that. The “road trips” of that gay, hedonistic, drug-addled kind that hung out with Jack Kerouac, (who wasn’t a boomer either) and that were “written about” was the hallucinations of the melted brains of the generation before yours. And then you took it on as though it was yours. And produced only more incoherent wandering by drug addled brains that mostly complained that wherever you went, they didn’t do things like you had them back home. The real beauty of travel and adventure was done —you guessed it— in the late 1800s and early 1900s when dirigibles flew the air and then in the WW years, before you were born in 1946. When a trip in a plane was an adventure, as was one in a boat. Where Shanghai was exotic as was the Amazon, and when men carried rifles and handguns pretty much all the time when making such trips. Later, in the 90s, Gen X took to discovering the world just for the sake of it far more than the Boomers ever did. And without using it as a point-score-keeping mechanism with the neighbours either.


We pioneered rock ‘n’ roll.

Rock pioneers like Elvis Presley and Chuck Berry weren’t technically boomers,

That’s right they were not. So you did not. Neither was Jerry Lee Lewis. What you brought the world was the fucking Beatles, for God’s sake. And goddamned Hotel California. And for that you deserve a lower pit of Hell.

We invented the internet.

No. You did not. Computer scientists Vinton Cerf and Bob Kahn are credited with inventing the Internet communication protocols we use today and the system referred to as the Internet. Vinton was born in 143 and Bob in 1938. What you did (and do) very well though is try to take credit for anything even remotely or potentially good, and pretend the bad you did just sort of “happened”.


We created personal computers.
Fair.


We ushered in the era of screen time.
You think millennials are addicted to their phones? Ha, boomers invented screen addiction! During our youth, we were hypnotized by everything that popped up on the small screen, making us feel more connected with the outside world. According to Newsweek, it’s estimated that boomers watched an average of  12,000 hours of TV before they turned 16 years old.

The fact you think this is an accomplishment shows just how utterly detached from reality you are. There was a reason that every night you morons had to have an advert come on TV to tell you that it’s ten o’clock, do you even know where your children are? And it’s because you were abysmal parents in the main. I agree that Millennials are almost as vapid as you were, though.


We launched Saturday Night Live.
When Saturday Night Live premiered in 1975—starring comedy legends (and boomers) like John BelushiBill Murray, and Gilda Radner—it was the hippest thing on TV.

I’m just leaving this here for those Zoomers who can’t believe you’re so self-involved, egomaniacal and out of touch that you would actually write this. Yes, little Zyklon friends, they really are. And they always were.


We turned movies into cultural events.

And it wasn’t just a fun weekend diversion, either; movies like Jaws and Star Wars became true cultural events.

Look up the word culture. Now explain to me what cultural progress was made as a result of jaws or Star Wars. Go on. I’ll wait.

We took volunteering to new heights.
When President John F. Kennedy established the Peace Corps in 1961, creating opportunities for everyday U.S. citizens to go overseas and help “break the bonds of mass misery,” thousands of letters “poured into Washington from young Americans hoping to volunteer,” 

You’re clearly too stupid to understand that was the geopolitical move to infect the rest of the planet with your toxic version of Americanism, and had nothing to do with helping the poor masses, but rather with influencing and corrupting everyone from the governments of those countries to the young people in them and make them all become twisted copies of yourselves, with outsized greed for material wealth and even more deludedly: fame.

We stood up for LGBTQIA+ rights.
For this alone they deserve the pillow that’s coming.

I can only second Spacebunny’s statement above. You are the beasts for which we now have tranny story hour and an absolute pedophile fest infesting everything from the top government officials to the now freemasons Vatican. And yes, there absolutely IS a link between sexual deviance and sexual child abuse, in both directions. Because math is not an opinion.

We fought for gender equality.
See above – world changing in the worst way.

Again, seconded. Especially true about it being world-changing in the worst way, given the end results of feminism are essentially misery for women even more than for men, as some of the women that have +1SD IQs are figuring out ahead of their slower sisters.


We protested war.
“Legally avoiding the draft was a rational, morally defensible rebuke to the government’s hypocritical way of making war.”

As per your own comment, you actually did NOTHING. In fact you participated and took part in the war. Legally avoiding the draft is certainly not the mark of a revolutionary. Or one that has affected any actual change whatsoever. You just made a bunch of noise as an excuse to slack off and smoke more dope and share your wives and have divorces and on, and on, and on.

We kickstarted environmental activism.
People like to criticize boomers for not doing enough, and it’s true, we could’ve taken bigger strides to save the planet.

Well, you could have gassed yourselves in large numbers I suppose, but that was not likely given the narcissism. And no, it would not have made much difference to the Ten X numbers, you aborted us at record numbers anyway.

But we absolutely cared. We were the first generation to come out in full force, demanding we stop polluting the world. And there’s science to prove it: A 2012 study out of San Diego State University found that boomers in their youth were considerably more committed to environmental activism than Gen Xers or millennials.

Zoomers, please note. Studies show they “made more noise”. Not actually changed anything at all. In fact, they have been the most consistent users of things like strip-mining, deforestation and unsustainable methods of fishing, hunting and farming that has ever been seen on this entire planet.


We made waves in forensic analysis.
Boomers lived in a world where serial killers like Ted BundyRichard Ramirez, and John Wayne Gacy were a horrifying reality.

Translation: Boomers produced the first generation of large scale serial killers ever. So they also tried to find a way to figure out who the serial killers among them were.


We ended the Cold War.
Absolute lie. Boomers perpetrated and kept that shit going long past due. And anyway, the “collapse” of the “Cold War” was pre-ordained, as Werner Von Braun, (also not a boomer and head of the Apollo programme) explained in some detail and as was explained in even more detail by the lady he worked with and explained it to, when she testified before congress (Carol Rosin).


We reduced the stigma around divorce.
For this alone they deserve the pillow that’s coming. World changing in the worst way.

Again, Spacebunny said it all.

We increased life expectancy.
Life expectancy is actually falling, but Boomers don’t care about facts.

And again.

So yeah… one out of 17. About par for the course for Boomers.

Black Mountain Analysis – Freemasons

Aleks of Black Mountain Analysis produces a clearly occult/mystic post from his French friend who just happens to be a freemason.

Well. That actually explains a lot. Now, I don’t KNOW that Aleks is himself a freemason. But even if we just assume that he is merely an innocent ignorant about them, it doesn’t quite fit, does it?

The guy is busy making pronouncements about big world events and yet… there is always something off about them a bit. Like he’s too innocent, too naive, to see the real picture. His latest posts of Israel were completely Narrative adjacent and he made it obvious he would not, and could not write anything critical about Israel, or the Jews in general.

To a certain extent, I get it, most people are not anti-fragile and the powers that be are hellbent of punishing anyone that speaks the truth about the genetic serums, who the principal players in that global mass-murder event are and of what ethnicity they all happen to be, or what Israel is doing now to civilians, or a million other things that one can validly, unequivocally, and absolutely point out about the methods of Israel and the Jews that support it and essentially run much of the USA infrastructure and politics.

But… if you can’t be honest, your value as a commentator on current affairs, and especially on the events currently pushing us all towards WWIII, then you are at best, useless and pointless, and at worst, a collaborator.

I don’t know if Aleks is a collaborator, but at best, he has become entirely useless as an analyst of current affairs. And that is me being extremely charitable.

Because there really is no excuse in 2023 to pretend that you are not aware that Freemasons are Satanists with a globalist agenda.

And no, I am not going to do all your homework for you, because I already did it. Read Reclaiming The Catholic Church if you want to find out about the very real infiltration of the Church since the late 1700s with documented and irrefutable proof, as well as the long list of duplicity, murder and fraud they have perpetrated for centuries.

I also have direct knowledge of Freemasons through two people I know personally that joined them. One did it as a general political/social/status move to better his overall position (which is really always the reason even those unaware of their Satanic ends have for joining). He was (probably remains) an Orthodox Jew and I believe he never really participated in their events. My impression was that he simply didn’t really get into it so to speak. The other guy did. He was working in finance and doing well but also working very hard. He became a freemason and fully bought into the whole thing. His kids now go to exclusive and frighteningly expensive private schools, and he no longer really interacts even with his own family. Old friends have been discarded like second-hand dirty socks and even his children have been trained to respond to children they used to see regularly and be friends with with a supercilious air of arrogant superiority.

I have no doubt that guy is doing, and will do, whatever is required of him in order to maintain his “position”. I say it in inverted commas because he is the typical gamma that no matter how much money and supposed power he has, he will never be at the top of the pyramid. His position is destined to always be a number two. And to always be treated by those above him, pretty much as the guy they will call in to wipe them clean after they have themselves done a “number two”. And he will obediently perform that task in whatever degenerate way will be asked of him by his masters.

Notice, also, that the very first thing the French Freemason (who hides his identity, which should make you wonder why, right? I mean he’s such a philanthropist!) does is thank his masters.

Tell me, who has masters?

What kind of hierarchy has masters in it?

Certainly not the Catholic one.

We have humans we may give respect to, but no masters. And even our Lord, Jesus Christ, is our Lord, not our Master. We do (fallibly and not very well) what he would like us to do out of love and respect for Him, not out of being His puppets. Now you may quote the Bible about being a slave and needing to serve one of two masters, and all that (and quote it badly and out of context), but I assure you, there is a world of difference in Freemasonic hierarchy and Catholic Hierarchy; and that’s because they are opposites. One serves darkness, the other salvation and the light of truth.

The “light” freemasons refer to is the Luciferian one. The very name of Satan, Lucifer, means in fact the light-bringer. And is related mythologically to Prometheus, who stole fire from the Gods and was eternally punished for it.

So, yeah, I have no idea what the relationship of Aleks and Black Mountain Analysis is to Freemasons, but it is enough for me to simply never even bother reading anything they have to say from today onwards.

HAHAHAHAHA Really?!

Talk about Chutzpah.

Consider that they and their proxies are the ones pushing for and financing all the illegals to flood Europe in the first place, while making it clear that what is good for us is not good for them. Then watch this amazing little video that is supposed to instantly get us on their side.

Seriously, it actually made me laugh out loud.

Sure doc, sure. Let me get right on that, immediately after I take your word about how safe and effective the myocarditis inducing genetic serum is.

As someone said on telegram:

Do these people just have zero ability to recognize how psycopathic this behavior rightfully appears to everyone who isn’t them?

No. The answer is no. They may well be the first human species that has narcissism encoded in their DNA.

I really think this time, number 110 might just end up being global. Which could pose a bit of a problem for (((some people))).

Because in case you forgot:

What we know so far…

I really want to get back to my Colt 1911 binge stuff, but still…

I read Black Mountain Analysis because they are quite insightful on many things. On Israel, however, Aleks’s personal opinion is way off the mark.

I am not saying this in any kind of confrontational way, or disrespectful way. I value his work, however, like all of us, sometimes he’s just flat out wrong about some stuff.

I want to be honest here, I assume that the current operation of Hamas, which will most likely spread to Hezbollah and maybe even further, is controlled by the Iranian Quds Forces. It is the very reason for their existence. Iran saw that the balance of power is in their favor now, and it is now willing to act. I assume the goal could be to defeat Israel and force the “Two States” solution upon Israel. But I don’t (and can’t) know. And I will not value my own opinion in here. This is only a dry analysis.

Please note his statement that he is not married to his opinion. It’s just what it is right now. That’s important to remember as it’s the main issue in a man that is able to change his mind based on facts, not just feelings.

I do NOT thing the current “Hamas” operation is controlled by Iran. There is a simple reason for that. We now have it absolutely confirmed by the USA, which is really usually a proxy for Israel anyway that not only did Egypt warn Net-a-Yahoo directly 3 whole days before the “attack”, but also that the USA itself did so on three separate occasions. And besides all that, no one on this planet is going to convince me that Israel was just totally surprised by this attack from Hamas that demonstrated immense co-ordination to even begin to be achieved. As Vox Day puts it, this was a Green Flag event. Israel absolutely KNEW the attack was coming, moved the concert to an unsecured location without reason 48 hours before it was supposed to happen, with no explanation, and then simply allowed the “Hamas” guy to get in.

As it happens, from various interviews of “hostages”, images of old ladies holding the assault rifles of the Hamas “terrorists” and giving the peace sign, as well as the now admitted false nonsense about Hamas behaving 40 babies, it is also clear that the “inhumane” attack of the Palestinians, whatever it is, and whoever is directly behind it, was not quite the bloodbath that the people in power in Israel would like us to believe.

On the other hand, the fact is that Israeli politicians and the Mass Media in general, which we also know for a fact is largely controlled by Jewish people and/or interests, is basically openly calling for the genocide of all Palestinians including women and children. So, what can we deduce from this, using basic logic?

  • The attack was at the very least permitted to take place. it is not unreasonable to assume that it was therefore also planned and executed, to whatever extent, by the Israeli government itself.
  • The wish to wipe out Palestine altogether is obvious and clear and has been the intent from the start and since Israel has ignored resolution 242 of the UN which would have established an actual Palestinian state accepted by all.
  • Oh, and how and why did that Palestinian state not happen? Well… see the video below.

So, logically, if we know Israel always wanted to wipe out the Palestinian people and do away with a Palestinian state, and we know it at the very least allowed the current attack to happen, it’s fairly clear even to people that had multiple lobotomies, that the perpetrator of this cannot be Palestine. Or Iran.

The instigator is, and has to be, Israel.

To what end? Well to genocide the Palestinian people and do away with Gaza and anything Palestinian and just have Israel without any more Palestine to speak of. This has been the plan and this has been the actions taken since 1946, as the map below clearly shows.

Now, for those thinking, but… but… surely Israel would not sacrifice it’s own people for political or even geographical gains… well… I have some sky hooks and land bridges for sale you may be interested in!

What makes this rather confusing however, is the timing.

When America (the lapdog, wallet, and caucasian bodies for the meat-grinder in any war required for and by Israel) is at its weakest point it has ever been, to launch this kind of operation seems incautious and foolish.

And it is. However, it does fit spectacularly well with the arrogant, psychotic psychology of the people in power in Israel. The people responsible for this stuff, be they Jews in power in Israel or Jews behind the scenes in the USA, or Goyim working for their handlers in the American deep state, are invariably incapable of reading a room. They have been pushing absolute radioactive nonsense so long that even brainwashed normies are starting to wake up. And this is typical of this class of people. They simply assume they are intellectually superior to everyone else and that they will get their way by arrogant pushiness and outrageous lies. And it certainly has worked well for them in the past.

My opinion, and like Alex, I am willing to be wrong, is that the people in charge totally misread the situation. Perhaps desperate given the waning power of the USA, perhaps arrogant in thinking this is the time, they pushed the button on Operation Wipeout Palestine at the wrong time.

The world reaction has been anything but supportive of Israel. Some pretty big players, China, South Africa, and others have clearly stated Israel need to be rained in, and pretty much all the Arab states in the region are making noises that sound a lot like “stop your shit or we’re going to collectively stomp your ass.”

What would happen if Israel’s neighbours decided to stomp Israel out of existence in a co-ordinated attack?

It’s hard to say, I am fairly sure Israel WOULD use nuclear weapons, which I am also fairly sure it has, possibly in the Samson Option, which is the idea that Israel has smuggled atomic bombs in various of its embassies around the world, like London, Rome, and other places, and if Israel were about to be overrun, they may well set them off, either spitefully or in an attempt to blame the “terrorists” they are trying to exterminate and thus get the outrage of the world on their side.

Except that a lot of people are now aware of both the Samson option as well as the fact that Israel probably has nukes within its own border. Even if Israel did nuke a bunch of places, would it absolutely mean global nuclear war?

It might. Or America may decide to stay its hand, especially if Israel itself was also simultaneously reduced to glowing glass. However, that is unlikely to happen in the short term because the only country with the possibility to nuke Israel currently is Russia, and it is extremely unlikely they would do so. Unless, that is, an Israeli embassy in Moscow also goes up in a mushroom cloud.

But more likely would be a horrific ground war between the Arab states and Israel. In the long term (which might be only days or weeks) Israel would simply be overrun. And in such instance the global outcry would be a shriek heard around the world, but ultimately, I am not sure that anyone other than Israel would be willing to use nukes to “save” Israel.

Especially from a plan they started, regardless of how badly wrong it goes due to their bad judgement.

So, my conclusion so far is:

Israel started something and it may well have bitten off more than it can chew.

How it will turn out, I doubt anyone can know, right now, but that’s my take so far. Time will tell if Aleks or I was closer to the mark.

Telling the Woke Commies Where to Go

Coincidentally to my own piece on the lefty rapist types that are frenzy-whipped by the shrews in their life, Vox posted the response of a CEO of a comics publishing house to the suggestions that Chuck Dixon, an iconic comic book creator, should be deplatformed for… reasons. I have no idea. I don’t care at all. I read plenty of comic books as a teenager and earlier and the ones I liked best would probably get people jail time today.

Jonah Hex was my favourite one of the I think they are silver age comics we used to have hundreds of before my dad got rid of them all after we left home. It’s why I don’t feel bad he helped me buy this farm. If he hadn’t chucked those out I probably would have been okay getting it on my own. Maybe ten years ago.

Interestingly, DC also made a roleplaying game that my brother and I briefly owned and it had little cards for each of the DC heroes, that included a motivation for each one of them. Jonah Hex’s was correct: Seeking Justice. It’s why that character resonated with me so much. I think if I were reduced to a cardboard cutout that would be my primary motivation too. And as it was a Western, Jonah blasted a few bad guys per episode. The themes were quite adult and the writer of the stories was brilliant. Jonah Hex was discontinued and then they kind of did to him in real life what happens to him in the comic book. In a future he gets wormholes into, Jonah finds out his own body was embalmed as a circus attraction. Well, the subsequent restart attempts and the film made were kinda that. Whoever wrote those stories and film should be horse-whipped.

Aaaaanny way, I digress, the point is the CEO of the publishing house producing the latest Chuck Dixon comic told the entire woke world to go pound sand. And then cry a bit and pound it a bit more.

Good. And so should say all of us to every insane, retarded, Satanic, nonsense that is currently being peddled by the perennially offended. Common sense needs to prevail and courtesy and good manners be reserved for those who deserve it and earn it.

To the screeching “social justice”, cultural marxist, types trying to convince your three year old son that he can become a girl or that your three year old daughter can become a boy, we should have a resounding: “Fuck right off, groomer!” ringing in their ears until they disappear back into whatever festering hellhole they climbed out of.

And it should be loud and clear and backed up by legislation, and penalties, and consequences. These toxic excuses for “equality” in the name of “respect” and “fairness for all” are really evil. There is no other word for it. they intend to do harm and they do. The last thing they do is respect anyone, or try to be fair. They, in fact, are the very worst little tyrants, and everyone normal has had enough. So it’s time to put the mentally ill, the unbalanced, the insane, and the intentionally evil child predators back into proper health care, be that a mental institution, a home for the criminally insane, or being noted as a potentially unstable person that an eye should be kept on, for their own safety and that of others.

And it starts with you. Be more Tyson Fury and less Danny Masterson.

This is what you need to push back against.

Why Pick Up Artists, Con-Men, Liars and Losers are all one and the same

This is gonna be a long post, and many will interpret it as either some kind of general shit-cannon against all sorts of supposed “gurus”, or some way to tell you all how clever, smart, and cool I am for having seen the obvious more than a decade ago, or whatever. So let me disabuse you of that notion right from the start.

The ENTIRE point of this post is simply one:

To show, by showing ample working out, with indelible proof, that the best path for men to take, especially young men, is to choose the ancient and classical virtues. Above all seek truth, honour, courage, perseverance, beauty, and justice. Never compromise your personal integrity. Learn from your mistakes. Reject degeneracy, lies, puffed up ego, material status over integrity, and understand why a small deviation into the lies and nonsense of the World, can lead you to perdition, even in only the material sense, even if you are not a believer.

If you learn just this, even only from a secular perspective, later, you may begin to compare the life of a righteous man and how it compares to the life of pious man, and recognise they are the same path. And later still, you may realise that Catholicism has always championed the virtues and rejected the lies. But that is a far-away hope. For now, I want to demonstrate to you, how the snake-oil salesmen, the liars, the peddler of sexualised fantasies, have, and continue, to lead men astray into distraction, nonsense, and perversion, and away from a life that can be truly worth living and is rooted in all that is good in mankind.

Let me show you the ways of the serpents exposed.

PUAs

Pretty much as soon as I became aware of them, I was critical of PUAs, and not once, randomly, but rather, consistently.

From my February 2010 piece linked above, which was probably one of the more gentle criticisms:

By the time that I discovered anything about PUAs I had developed quite happily on my own into a man more than capable to satisfy his curiosity of women. This was a fortunate thing because it allowed me a perspective on PUAs and their techniques that was free of being sucked into the promise of alluring women falling at my feet almost as if by magic. To a degree, I already had this power (insofar as it can be had let’s say) so I could look into and study and evaluate the information with eyes already filled of my own experiences. To sum up PUAs briefly is difficult, however I will try. Initially, most of these guys are frustrated geeks that have broken down social interactions between naturally successful ladies’ men and attractive women. They then practice these routines like social robots and begin to have some success at obtaining sex with these plastic techniques. As their confidence grows they refine the techniques and become more adept at luring an ever increasing series of women to their beds. The more daring then continue into experimenting with multiple partners at a time as well as multiple girlfriends at a time. Some openly, others secretly. By and large though, certain truths remain evident. Even if successful at having multiple sex partners most of these individuals are still what I would consider socially inept people. They may have achieved an ability at obtaining sex from women but that per se does not make them good people necessarily. Or likeable. Or happy. Furthermore, the level of hyperbole in this community is rather extreme; especially when you consider that many of the so called Pick-Up Gurus sell products that supposedly will increase a man’s ability to bed stunningly beautiful women.

In brief, PUAs are not really picking up women. they are picking up men. In order to sell them fancy stories and elaborate processes by which they can supposedly gain sex from alluring women.

Later, they tried to morph into a general, self-betterment community and even went into how you could use PUA tactics to keep your marriage intact.

And later still they even tried to morph into how real relationships were a mixture of game and Churchianity.

At every turn, the targets were other men.

It is probably true that some desperate men did gain some benefits from some of these guys, but that’s more along the lines of me coming closer to Christianity by reading the arch-heretic Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. In other words, more by random luck, effort on their part, and that leading to something positive. Overall, however, the whole PUA movement was mostly a con. And the people who set themselves up as gurus often poor excuses for functional human beings. One of the most egregious examples was a guy who called himself Mehow, who produced a whole host of products and seminars and books, all aimed at men and teaching them “Game”.

From the same 2010 post:

Mehow has been in the pick-up community pretty much to the exclusion of everything else (it’s his day job as well as his lifestyle) for some 10 years. He also has spent by his own admission about $500,000 of what seems to mostly be daddy’s money to set himself up in the “PUA business”. Again by his own admission in 10 years of hard partying day and night full-time and being trained by the biggest and best Pick-Up Artists in the world, gaining invaluable knowledge of body-language, NLP and who knows what other mystical seduction arts of his own invention, and spending half a million dollars essentially on this sexual crusade, what is Mehow’s tally? By his own admission again, as of about mid 2009, Mehow had had carnal knowledge of “something like 30 to 40 girls”.

So, yes, most PUAs are hyperbolic, dishonest, socially inept guys, preying mostly on desperate and other sexually inept men first and foremost, and possibly the occasional drunk, indiscriminating, kind of woman they might get a one night stand with.

But it gets more insidious than that.

The mindset created by PUAs is one of accelerated mechanisation of human beings. In this respect, the mechanisation of women as mere sexual masturbation devices for men. And, by cause and effect, the mechanisation of men as masturbation devices, and/or, walking wallets for women.

In short, it is a destruction of intimacy, humanity and genuine connection between men and women.

And I wrote this even during the relative “height” (or depth, if you prefer) of my own depravity, when I was never short of female company. Even in my hedonistic phase, I always preferred a genuine connection, however brief, rather than mere sexual relief. I especially never indulged in sex with any woman that was under the influence of anything. Certainly not as a beginning anyway. Once I was comfortable with a woman I had been seeing for some time, it did happen here and there that they may be a little drunk after a party (I never was, I have been drunk precisely once and that was by choice under rather controlled conditions), but certainly compos mentis enough to know precisely what was happening and be quite enthusiastic about it.

My point here is that even as a non-christian of any kind, even in my zen-agnostic, hedonistic general approach to life, I never saw the PUA stuff and the related attitudes as anything other than the weak, pissing about, damaging, cowardly actions of sub-standard men.

And time has proven me eminently correct.

The point here is not to focus on how smart or cool or prescient I am/was, but to note the pattern. To notice what made me notice (lack of virtue in their ways and at least basic adherence to at least some virtue for myself).

And to notice the path and the trajectory of these “men” who instead either fell into, or promoted the PUA grift and general attitude.

Let us then, notice the paths of some of these characters and who and how and where they link to and where they ended up.

A relatively decent article (despite it being by buzzfeed) and already 4 years old, overall is pretty good about the whole situation of PUAS, and Mystery and some of the early PUAS. Mostly, they really are scattered like rats, with a few hangers on like Mystery himself, trying to reinvent himself (and failing).

There are a bunch of tragic endings too.

A guy called Gunwitch (Allen Reyes) shot a girl in the face. Remember this, because it links back to the very granddaddy of PUA bullshit himself.

Another called Tom Torero (Tom Rails) killed himself, probably as a result of being exposed and vilified by a journalist named Danya Hajjaj in a Newsweek article that by all accounts imploded his life and earnings from his PUA business.

Some, like Tyler Durden (Owen Cook) as can be seen from this review video of his “skills” which also includes some of his seminar antics (about 6 minutes in and later too) make both men and women marvel at the fact that he managed to procreate. I mean, does this not look like a macho-man that women naturally swoon over to you? No? Why then, the problem must be with you then, naturally!

But ok, enough of these sad creatures. I think you can do your own research to figure out they are basically noxious beings. They are pathetic, but they also have contributed to the ongoing degeneration of life in general as far as it relates to intimate relationships. But where did they originate from?

The “Hypnosis” and NLP Connection

And here we come to some little known truths. A LOT of the whole “Game” and PUA stuff started with Hypnosis, and NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming), which is the brainchild of two guys: Richard Bandler and John Grinder. I know. God has a sense of humour.

Dick Bandler and John Grinder (the gay app… was it named after him? One has to wonder).

I have not looked into Grinder very much, but Bandler I have, long ago already.

From the above linked February 7 2010 entry:

There is one last point that I cannot help but enjoy needling the hordes of NLP enthusiasts who seem to consider Richard Bandler as their guru with. Milton Erickson practiced hypnosis and cured many, many people of sometimes very serious afflictions and certainly cannot be disputed to have been overall a power for good in the world. The man usually mostly credited with the “discovery” of NLP is Richard Bandler —in great part also due to his own self-marketing as such— it is interesting to note that Bandler was one of only three people in the room when one of those three people, the only woman in the room, was shot in the face with a .357 magnum revolver and killed. Neither Bandler nor his then friend James Marino was ever convicted of her murder though it was clearly not a suicide. Bandler also was demonstrated to be a fantasist about more than a little of his past, somewhat obsessed with violence, having threatened innocent people with firearms on at least some other occasion before as well as being a heavy drinker and also user of cocaine in large quantities. Personally, I am also extremely dubious that Bandler was a force for good in anyone’s life that he acted on directly, though of course I have met many of his devoted followers, who have attended his seminars and trainings at rather expensive prices for the privilege of being trained by a fantasising, heavy drinking, cocaine user that was somehow or other involved in the murder of an unarmed woman in circumstances that can only be described as suspect in the best of cases. [1]

Here is another take on Bandler closer to the shooting death of the woman.

Why is Bandler relevant?

Because pretty much all the hype about how you could use hypnosis to get women into bed supposedly at magical will, pretty much all originated with the whole PUA “gurus” reading up and trying to learn NLP to “trick” women into bed. The same was somewhat true of magic tricks, which Mystery himself still practices, as the buzzfeed article points out.

So, a bunch of socially maladjusted, sex starved, incels (involuntary celibates) learn the BIG SEEEECRIT of how to “hypnotise” women into becoming sex slaves from… a cocaine snorting, con man who is responsible either directly (my personal opinion) or at the very least by proxy, for the murder of his then on-off girlfriend.

What could possibly go wrong?

And who else took up the Bandler flag of being a master-guru of manipulation to achieve riches, glory and concubines?

Yeah, this is not gonna make anyone look good. Brace yourselves.

Andrew Tate – Cam Boy to Miles Sonkin

Enter Iggy Semmelweise (Miles Sonkin). Who the hell is that? He’s the man behind the curtain of Andrew Tate’s supposed Man’s Man world of… pimping girls on webcams. I am not a fan of the BBC or of the journalist who broke the story, but the facts stated, remain facts.

And let’s look at what handler in his prime affected as his guru look:

Now, I don’t want to say for sure it was Bandler, but in one of my delving into various subcultures of cults, I took a Tony Robbins seminar, which generally tried to upsell you other stuff during it. One of which was some advanced guru magic of some sort or other and you could go meet the guru in question briefly if you wanted to take the add on course for some eye-watering cost that I forget. Anyway, I went to see what this guru’s guru looked like and if it was not Bandler (I honestly don’t recall the name that was given or even if it was given) it was his spiritual twin. He had black painted fingernails, a leather vest very much like the one in the image above, a graying pony tail and some odd rings and other accessories on and about his person. It fairly screamed new Age Hippy Boomer dipped in narcissism and lies. I didn’t even listen to his free presentation.

Now let’s look at what Miles Sonkin looks like:

Honestly that’s the most flattering image I could find of the man.

Here he is with the War Room’s supposed main guy Andrew Tate and some of his victims successful peers.

According to the credible side of the reporting done on Miles, he really is the main brain behind the whole War Room thing, that apparently, and credibly, teaches men to essentially brainwash naive girls into becoming their cam girls as well as getting their names tattooed on them, as Andrew Tate himself has done to several women. Supposedly a few dozen of them having tattooed his name on their bodies. A kind of branding really that is not uncommon in various prostitution rings, and sex cults, like the notorious NXIVM one that involved the actress from the Superboy Smallville TV series.

It is fairly obvious from pretty much everything about Miles Sonkin that he has styled himself, literally, as a wizard and very much on the lines and methods pioneered by Bandler.

And insidious as the “hypnotist” NLP/PUA guru persona is, and as much damage as it does to those unfortunates that decide to “follow” them, the fall-out goes well beyond the directly affected.

The mannerisms and manipulation techniques of these conmen affect to one degree or other many other second-tier snake-oil salesmen.

Second Tier “Gurus”

Here we see a link between Miles the “wizard” and Ivan Throne, the boastful deaf salesman of supposedly man-improving seminars, and self-help… packages of… “Dark Triad”… I dunno, books, grandiose bullshit, etc.

I interacted with Throne directly online for a time as I had introduced him to an online Facebook group I was part of before it was nuked. Something I soon regretted when I saw his bluster was padded with what he thought was grandiloquent language, unfortunately for him, despite English being my second language, I actually know how to use it and was not the only one to notice that, more than once, he did not know the correct meaning of the “big” words he used. Something I took him up on, which caused him to get rather upset and use more words he misused, thus losing a bit of the shine anyone in the group may have had for him. The group has long since been nuked and I never had anything else to do with him.

Chernovich, he of the ever present lisp, gorilla mindset and, “it wasn’t me, it was a friend who sucked off the ladyboy, even though it was on my blog as a first person experience without explanation” infamy, also has attended the war room in some capacity or other.

The whole War Room, Secret Knowledge, I was born to be King and have women fall eat my feet, is as old as humanity.

It is by no means new.

Nor are the scams they pull, the dishonesty, the manipulation and the grift.

In the past however, the damage they did was limited by their reach. Today, their reach is the entire world, and Andrew Tate has managed to convince an untold number of young men that somehow manipulating young women to be your personal cam-girl whore, and stealing her money and being essentially a digital pimp, is the epitome of what success as a man is.

And keep in mind that Andrew Tate is on the record on video, stating that he would rather be with a 10 looking transvestite (that is a man, pretending to be a woman) than a much lower number looking woman.

Yeah. Peak heterosexuality right there boys. I just wonder if Tate will be the pitcher or the catcher when he eventually gets jail time in Romania for the things he is being charged with: sex trafficking, rape, and other stuff, including, I presume, tax evasion, which historically governments look to as a far more serious offence than mere rape and sex trafficking.

So. What was the point of showing you all these links?

Is this just an extended gossip girl column of pointing fingers and showing you just how “bad” these guys are. And how “smart” and “good” I am?

No.

Personally I don’t really care about any of these guys. I have known their associations and methods for years. I avoid them as soon as I become aware of them and don’t interact with them after I recognise them for the unethical people I judge them to be. I haven’t even shown you all the links by any means. I trained in hypnosis with a guy that is probably one of the best hypnotists in the world, but he too was pretty useless with women and fell into the PUA thing enough to “learn” some of the “tricks” of people like Mystery and then trying to use them at his teaching seminars. He wasn’t a bad guy. He was ambitious and he tried very hard, and I believe he was trying to be a really good and honest guy. But, as is the case with pretty much all “thirsty” men, his lack of ability with women, meant he was not in a satisfied relationship, and as far as this guy is concerned, I believe he would have been happy with just one woman. That’s actually true of most men. If they could get with a woman they were attracted to that treated them well, they would probably be unlikely to stray. Or at least would be a lot less prone to it.

In short, it doesn’t necessarily mean that everyone that had anything to do with any of these linchpins of the PUA movement and related scams is by default a complete loser, manipulator or freak. Some are just sad guys that want to get a girlfriend or wife. And have no idea of how in the modern setting of things, so they try to find some knowledge from people who tell them “this is how you get all the sex and glory an riches”.

PUAs are the sexual equivalent of Nigerian Prince e-mail scams.

The difference is that not only are they after your money, they are also polluting the general zeitgeist of human interactions.

It’s the difference between the 1950s’ dishonest door-to-door seller of encyclopaedias or vacuum cleaners and today’s online marketers of get-rich-quick schemes. The financial damage the old version could do has been amplified by several orders of magnitude. And in addition, the degradation of humanity has taken several steps closer to hell.

The whole point, of this loooooong post, was not just to show you the links between these people —and believe me, there are many more that go to both, higher places of power, and lower ones— but more importantly, how they percolate into the grander overview of life that you are slowly being boiled alive inside of.

Take this post together with the one I wrote immediately before it and think about them a bit. Then you may begin to appreciate why it is probably far safer for you to strike out on your own and make your own mistakes, always with a critical eye on taking note of how reality works and how to better adjust yourself to reality, rather than fool yourself into being into some fantasist’s scenario that you would prefer to believe in.

If you want to meet women and eventually make one your wife, start talking to people in general. Become someone you are happy and proud to be regardless of the attention of lack of it you get from anyone else. Learn to mix and talk with everyone. Become comfortable in the presence of people, then women, then beautiful women, and learn to talk and interact with them. Learn from your mistakes and failed interactions, keep your cool, adjust and correct your approach to whatever it is, be it becoming comfortable with women or learning to pilot a plane. Obviously, in the latter case, you really need to study enough to ensure you don’t go into a tailspin. Recovering from a bad relationship can be hell, fatal even at times, but no one walks away from a plane screw-driving into the Earth with you in it.

Above All

Learn this one thing: Honour, Truth, Justice, Beauty, Courage, the traditional virtues of Catholicism and manhood even before it, are Good. They are true. And they are a better guide for you than any guru. Have faith. Trust yourself to be good. To be able to become virtuous in these true ways, not the fake ones of Clown World. And beware, there are a lot of Clowns out there, and “Wizards”, and snakes in the guise of doves, and gay wolves in the guise of heterosexual pet dogs.

Be careful my adventurer friend. Count your gold pieces, equip yourself well, and follow no man but your own heart.

A Question for a hypothetical Scenario

Assume a race of aliens has the ability to basically clone or adapt themselves to look exactly like human beings except for a tiny mark, a symbol, say, either tattooed somewhere on their body, or occasionally no tattoo, but adherence to using a specific item of clothing, say a type of hat, or a handkerchief of a specific colour say.

So, in short, while some of the aliens could be recognised by the tattoo in the case of those who sport it, others could only be inferred by a specific item of clothing that they carry on their person, but that obviously, also non-aliens can carry on their person, either unknowingly, or intentionally to try and either curry favour with the aliens or to appear as one of them to the humans, for whatever reason.

Let’s also postulate that these aliens have nefarious intentions towards humanity at large and their first order of business is to get rid of all those people who:

  1. Understand they are aliens and expose them as such
  2. Have the best chance technologically and socially to prevent their nefarious actions and intent to subjugate the whole of humanity to a state of perpetual slavery and depopulation
  3. Organise to prevent their take over

Now, given their human appearance and lack of ease in understanding they are aliens, and secondly, that they have evil intent towards us, I think it’s fairly obvious that the average person would have trouble even being aware an existential threat to their entire civilisation even exists.

Even if they DO become aware and research and realise this is real, they will have an almost impossible task in trying to convince other humans, especially given the level of distraction the average human is subjected to daily.

But there is more. Suppose that in the past of human history, throughout the centuries, these aliens have, at different times and places, been recognised as a threat, and different groups of people took action against them. Sometimes violent, other times, merely excluding them from certain geographic areas, since they looked perfectly human and no normal person would have tolerated what they saw as a genocide.

Yet, these pushbacks from humanity, over the centuries, became always labelled as unjust, the persecution of innocents and so on. You could see how much more difficult that would make the task of the humans who become aware of the aliens and their plans. Exposing them would become almost impossible socially.

Now add to the fact that the aliens all seem to be linked by a kind of telepathy, or some other form of communication, that the humans are unaware of and don’t really recognise. Very quickly, the aliens, though an overall minority on the planet, would infest positions in government and begin to dictate policies in all countries around the globe, to begin acting in a coordinated fashion to the detriment of humanity in general. What are the things these aliens might want to begin doing on a large scale, and over long periods of time? Because remember, they have been among us for centuries.

I think the following would definitely be things they want to do:

  1. Erase any history that exposes their existence and their practices as well as how to recognise them as aliens.
  2. Create systems of taxation, bureaucracy, legislation that all overburden the local humans in each region, and focusing first of all on the people and geographic areas that have the highest level of technology and best communication.
  3. Create multiple systems of distraction and malediction. If the humans can be kept distracted, stupid, overwhelmed with he daily concern of living and so on, they won’t have time to even notice the aliens, much less act against them in concert.
  4. Take over the financial reins of each nation and eventually centralise them as much as possible, with aliens being ultimately in charge of the very process of the creation of money and how and why this is distributed at national and supra-national levels.
  5. Incite as much chaos as possible, especially in the more technologically advanced ethnicities and geographic areas. This can be done by mass movement of peoples from very different and disparate cultures, religions and wealth levels. The more mixed and chaotic the cultures, the more there will be clashes, further distractions and a general breakdown of any kind of law and order, as social cohesion breaks down.
  6. Ensure that the entire legal and government system, works in favour of the most technologically incapable sections of humanity and to the detriment of those most able to organise and create both technology as well as robust social systems of law and order.
  7. Begin a strong system of sexual confusion, promoting any and all lifestyles that do not result in reproduction, and/or that can damage and collapse the normal nuclear family that is the bedrock of humanity, and has been for millennia.
  8. As much as possible, turn the humans one against the other, by any and all means possible. Men against women, gays against straight, one religion against all the others and vice versa, nation against nation, ethnicity against ethnicity, culture against culture, history against narrative and so on.
  9. Begin a process of malediction that begins to intrinsically question hard science and replaces it with emotional and subjective political issues. Math can suddenly become racist, for example. Men can suddenly become women, or vice versa. Child rape can become merely a sexual preference. A nuclear family composed of a man and woman of the same ethnicity, background and culture becomes vile and racist. Borders that protect different cultures and societies from each other become barriers to “social justice” and are to be done away with, and so on.
  10. Infiltrate and corrupt the medical profession, and begin to make global efforts to force theoretically “helpful” vaccines and other drugs onto healthy people, especially children, so as to begin to weaken their natural immune systems and actually make them less healthy in large numbers over long periods of time. Use the fear of illness and the need to safeguard the weakest members of society as a moral crowbar to begin to implement these things, especially in the most advanced human populations.

Alright, starting to feel pretty dystopian yet?

Good, good. Now assume that on Earth there is ONE organisation, that is at least a couple of millennia old, that has always been aware of these aliens. They started out small, but then grew very large, but eventually they too were infiltrated over the centuries and corrupted and very nearly destroyed. Let’s say this organisation is a religious one, that has rituals and orders and so on, with a military arm and a clerical arm. Now that it has been almost completely corrupted, however, a small core of them continue to exist, and practice their religion, as well as the knowledge of the aliens, if not completely in secret, certainly to the almost total ignorance of most of humanity.

Suppose also, that you, as the aliens, are aware of this last remnant of hardcore human loyalists. What are the actions you might take, aside from direct force of violence?

You might slander them, call them all sort of crazy, bigoted, racist and on and on. In fact, you would try to exclude them as some kind of cultish band of crazy people. You would do all in your power to keep people ignorant of their history, of the fact that their religion models reality better than any other systems humans had ever come into contact with, and the fact that their rules were all codified and written down and have consistently produced safe havens of human progress, safety and advanced civilisation.

While you would be far less critical of all the other misguided religions on the planet, and in fact, even help promote many of them, especially those you have convinced that you are their greatest ally, you would absolutely try to stomp this small band of resistance fighter out of existence.

So… here, finally, is the question.

Assume you are just a normal human, going about your business, unaware of most of this stuff, and then, in whatever way, and by whatever means, you begin to become aware of all of the above. What would you do?

Would you take the time to investigate the seemingly absurd claims about alien invaders hellbent on the total enslavement and massive reduction of the human race?

Would you investigate the belief systems and history of the small band of remaining resistance fighter?

Would you be willing to have all your dearly held beliefs exploded in the face of factual evidence that yes, these things are in fact true?

Realistically, would you take the time to really look into it? Or would you pretend you never came across any of this and just carry on with your day to day life and hope it was all just a bad dream?

Honestly, I am curious, what would you do?

In a way, it’s the same question one might ask of the original film the Matrix. Would you want to wake up and become part of the resistance against the aliens? Or would you choose to remain oblivious in your caged in state?

I put it to you that most will choose to remain caged in. Especially those who are not in already poor and tragic circumstances. I put it to you that the boomer ethic of “hey, I am still ok, screw the world” would preside majorly in almost all of the people who stumble upon the reality of the evil aliens.

And I call such people NPCs. Non-player characters. After all, just like in role playing games, be they Dungeons and Dragons, Traveller, or my own Q.O.R.G. , only a few take the risk to become relevant in the world they live in.

So that’s my question. What do you do?

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks