Archive for the ‘Impostors and Frauds’ Category

Andrew Torba’s Comment

Although Gab took a sharp downturn in usage when Torba decided to fully monetise Gab, it’s still one of the few places where a certain liberty of speech, especially political speech was permitted to an extent that while not approaching the 1990s, came close.

Today he advised people to not post anything even remotely hinting at a violent response in the face of the Trump assassination, which is about the limit any platform online simply cannot cross nowadays, but what I found interesting is that he made a comment that for the first time reflects what I have been doing and telling others to do for about two decades. And since two decades is about the time it takes for a lot of what I see as obvious to start to become accepted fact, I am hoping with some actual real hope for once, that the tide might actually be about to turn on the whole freakshow that is Clown World and their insane degeneracy, LGBTPedo agenda, “antifascism”, communist hive-think, nonsensical feminism, destruction of logic, knowledge of objective reality, demonisation of men in general and white, heterosexual males in particular.

Here is his comment. I have a couple of comments on it and a TL;DR version in my own words at the bottom.

After tonight’s events I have come to the realization that I no longer want any association whatsoever with any liberals. None. Not in the community, not at church, not anywhere. The reasons for this decision are rooted in the belief that being around these people poses a threat to our sanity, safety, and families. First and foremost, the constant bombardment of liberal ideologies and beliefs has become a source of mental and emotional exhaustion. The never-ending debates, the constant need to defend our values, and the relentless pressure to conform to their worldview have taken a toll on our mental well-being. These people are insane and in associating with them we allow their madness to infect us.  The safety of our families and communities is at risk when we associate with liberals. The liberal narrative often promotes a sense of victimhood, division, and chaos, which leads to violent protests, property destruction, and even physical harm to those who dare to oppose their views as we witnessed tonight. We must prioritize the safety and well-being of our loved ones by distancing ourselves from those who subscribe to such destructive ideologies. Get and stay far away from these people. 

He’s right broadly speaking, and I understand his reticence to host any incitements to violence on his platform, but there are two points of actual objective, factual, observable reality he’s missing and a third even more important one without which nothing will change, and they are these:

First: Retreating from these people is NOT the answer. It’s what the general population of not yet insane people have been doing for seven decades in a row. Enough. Fuck retreating. Make THEM retreat, and get back into whatever closet or rock they crawled out of. Be in their face. Stop tolerating their nonsense. No, homosexuality is not normal. No, it will not be taught to me or my children as being normal. It is unnatural, deviant, degenerate behaviour that carries extremely high health risks and is associate with extremely elevated incidence of child sexual abuse, rape and molestation. And I don’t give a flying solitary fuck if that upsets you. You can get upset about the sun rising in the East too and I don’t give a fuck about that upsetting you any more than the other facts I just stated. It’s how reality works. Deal with it. Your mental illness is not my problem and trying to make it so will not go well with you.

The same applies to EVERY one of their bullshit agendas. I don’t want my country, culture, religion, nation or people to be overrun by foreigners that not only have a different culture, religion and nation, but who are demonstrably, statistically, a net threat to my people. No, I don’t need to “respect” your pedophile religion, and fake “gods” and fake “messiah”. Go believe that shit in your own place and don’t expect me to pretend your fake religion is “equivalent” to mine, when mine created the best situation humanity has ever seen on Earth and yours has done no such thing but in fact is demonstrably a net negative when compared to mine. And no, I don’t give a shit if you think that makes me “racist” or a “bigot”. In fact I am. I absolutely discriminate against people incapable of facing and loving the truth above their own personal opinions based in selfishness, ego, cowardice, and intentional evil. The colour of your skin matters very little to me, except I have had a tendency to find slightly cappuccino coloured pretty girls more sexually enticing, perhaps, on average, but then I am not exactly a “bigot” in that regard either, since I have appreciated all sorts of diversity in the females of the species. All of which are moot points now since I am happily married and Catholic. The point is that my “racism/bigotry” is reserved for the shitty nature of your inability to face reality as it is, your capacity or lack thereof to act as a civilised human being; not only when everything is good, but also when things are less than ideal; and your overall level of virtues I appreciate, like honesty, courage, directness, patience, loyalty and so on, and your personal philosophy and belief systems and/or religion. And if your religion says fucking kids is fine, then fuck you, and fuck your religion; and that means Judaism and Islam. It’s in your books so stop pretending it’s not.

Feminism is toxic. The Patriarchy is good and what has built anything worthwhile on this Earth and Catholicism (not Novus Orcianism) is the one, true, holy religion on Earth. And while I will not hate you for not understanding that last point, as I missed it myself for most of my life, thanks to lies we are all raised under, and would have continued to miss it but for God’s Grace, I certainly understand the conviction of someone that thinks Catholicism is fake, gay and retarded. I was one of you. I can only suggest you read The Crusades, which is flawlessly historically accurate and now available easily in digital format here. I don’t think any man that is not, gay, fake and retarded can read what those men were like and what they did without getting an overwhelming sense of respect for them.

The whole point of this first point is simply this: No. retreating is NOT the way. Pushing back, directly, unequivocally, loudly, and unambiguously and unapologetically is the way.

Second: While I do not like or advocate for needless violence, I have always, and will always, advocate for self-defence. These people have been making you retreat psychologically, emotionally, intellectually and now physically, by violence and the threat of violence. I am supposed to let a predatory pedophile twerk in front of my toddler children but if I call you a fag, I can go to jail? Well, guess what: fuck you. I’ll call you a fag and physically remove you from anywhere near my children if I see you acting that way. And wake up: no one is voting these people out of the positions of power over you that they gained by subterfuge, bribery, fraud and murder. Do you really think the Clintons didn’t have a bunch of people killed? It was public knowledge in the early 1990s, now it’s “expected”. You think the war in Ukraine is not about money, power and control as well as intentional genocide? Or that the genocide in Gaza is not? Go see a few of the telegram channels that show you what the Jewish people and soldiers of Israel are doing to children in Palestine. And their mothers and fathers who have been labelled as a whole people as worthy of total elimination by standing politicians in Israel.

You think your vote is going to stop Bill Gates and Soros and WEF Klaus Schwabs and the other billionaire mentally ill degenerates from pumping chemtrails, mRNA, nanobots and 5G towers all around you? You think the people who run and own the Bank for International Settlement will not use every trick in the book to enslave you, including mass murder on a global scale? Because if you still believe you live on a fair planet based on some fiction called “democracy” then you really are too stupid to convince you of anything meaningful.

The only thing that will remove such people from the equation is force. The fact you have barely begun to understand how they have been intentionally poisoning you and your children for almost a century while destroying, infiltrating and corrupting anything that stood in their way (primarily the Catholic Church with its dogmas and nobility as its enforcing and defending arm), doesn’t mean they have not been attacking you. They have. You’re only starting to see it a bit now. When you realise 9/11 did not at all happen the way you have been told on TV, even when it literally did not play out as they are telling you in front of your own eyes, like announcing building seven too has collapsed while it’s still standing behind the live broadcaster, and hasn’t been hit by any plane at all. Or the entire Covid, genetic serums, and 5G genocidal scam. Or pretty much ALL vaccines, even the “real” ones, from the very start, being actually anything but good for you.

They have been trying to cripple, enslave, and murder you for generations. Self-defence is just fine. Which of course means identifying the real culprits and perpetrators as well as defending yourself in the immediate situation you may find yourself in. Violence to defend yourself from violence is fine. So learn to protect yourself and put things in their proper perspective.

Third: And this is really the key point. While you must, absolutely, push back on every level, vote in local elections, put yourself forward as a candidate, change things from the people you associate with to the local PTA or Home Owners Association board, all the way to the local council, professors in academia and so on, as well as absolutely defend yourself and your loved ones from any physical or violent attacks of force against you, you should not get bogged down in this so much that you lose sight of the real enemy. And while you may not be able to get to the real puppet masters directly, you can certainly get to their fifth puppets a few times removed.

Replace that woke teacher. Get a new sane mayor. Stop tolerating that degenerate freak that is a friend of a friend or even a family member. It’s simply time for you to make a choice. Reality or lies. Truth or fake. No, there is no way, ever, that a man can get “preganant”. Yes, there are ONLY two sexes. No, “gender” does not define the “sexuality” or rather sexual preference, of any living thing, it’s a word used in grammar to differentiate words, in romantic languages for example, that have feminine or masculine gender. Like il gatto (the cat) is masculine but la gatta (the [female] cat) is feminine. But also la tavola (the table) and la macchina (the car) are feminine, so it’s not limited to the sex of an animal. Again, this follows from point one and two above: push back in all the dimensions required, but never lose sight of who, specifically, both collectively and individually down to the specific person, has pushed for, financed, and legislated for, the current level of insanity; and who they have oppressed, murdered, cancelled, ruined emotionally, financially and physically. And as soon as you are able to, remove them from their positions and bring them to account for their crimes against humanity.

Succinctly then, the TL;DR is this:

1. Push back

2. Violence in self-defence is just fine

3. Know with specificity and precision who the masterminds are when it comes to your enemies.

None of these three points are controversial or difficult to understand, so stop being, or pretending to be, shocked. Man up and carry on.

Why Nothing Works Anymore

The usual suspects running the planet all suffer from a disease that is incurable in their ranks:

They are completely deluded regarding how reality works. They essentially, and at its deepest level, believe in magic. And more specifically, in their ability to do this magic and have reality warp to their will.

This is a complex subject and I hope at least some of what I write here will be understood at the level I intend.

Depending on your outlook, you might say that “magic” to a certain level does exist, if you assume things like miracles can, have and do occur. Describing and defining this level of metaphysical reality is complex and difficult in part because of the very subject matter not easily lending itself to what I would call strict scientific testing procedures on the one hand, and partly because we quite simply don’t even have the right words to describe certain aspects of the phenomenon, so we use analogies and approximations and the result is sub-optimal; especially given the constant efforts by the wicked to increasingly pervert language at even the most basic level, such as using the word “gender” —which is a purely linguistic related word to define words in romantic languages that have a masculine/feminine— to try and describe imaginary, false, and absurd concepts of sexuality as if they were a natural and normal part of life.

So let me try and define a few concepts first, which will, if understood, not only explain why nothing works anymore, but how the world “rulers” are ultimately as doomed as the “useless eaters” they hate so much, though their eventual downfall and demise is on a much longer and gradual path, but I am not sure it is necessarily preferable to the relatively short and brutal one they have in store for us.

Please keep in mind that none of these definitions are necessarily perfect, or complete, except the first one that defines reality.

Reality: While we may not always be aware, or even capable of being aware or understanding every aspect of it (or even perhaps the majority of it when considered in terms of the entirety of creation) it remains a fact that reality is objective. That is, for any specific event, situation, perspective, at any given time and place, there is an overarching reality or truth that is true independent of the positions or relative aspects of perception or fact of any of the constituent parts of the situation, circumstance event or concept. As a result, our powers of observation, deduction and induction, based on logic, are fundamental in our ability to understand and deal with reality in a useful manner.

Ethics: All ethics, if they are to be objective, must, necessarily and inescapably, be tied to the Will of the Creator. Absent a creator, no system, behaviour or action can be said to be any more or less ethical or moral than any other. At best you can claim a preference of one kind or another, but there is, nor could be, any objective reason why murder or rape could be considered intrinsically wrong when compared to acts of charity. And ultimately, absent a creator and thus a valid, objective authority for any ethics or morals, nothing matters. Not only does the individual return to meaningless dust, but so does the entirety of the human race, with the same total absence of meaning. As an aside, for the nodding nihilistic atheists, this in itself is not the only reason or evidence for there being a Creator, it is just one of many data points.

Practical aspects of physical reality

While there are many and important aspects of abstract reality as well as philosophy and logic which may be considered non-physical, there are many aspects that concern primarily the physical realm, even if they may well be driven by non-physical realities, and the average human being is mostly concerned with this aspect of reality in his day to day life. This is not to say the non-physical aspects are not important, or even primary in their influencing and directing our actions and reactions on the physical plane, they absolutely are, and as such, the question inevitably arises for each one of us of how and why you do as you do. Or not do, as the case may be. In short, your behaviour on the physical plane, is absolutely informed by your philosophical belief. This is true even if you are not aware of what that belief is.

You might say as an Atheist you don’t believe in a creator (and as such you also don’t believe in ethics as objective, even if you will argue the opposite until you go blue in the face, all you can argue for is your preferences, which have authority over precisely no one outside of yourself unless you are willing to impose your preferences by the use of force. And yes, this is the absolute reality, even if you don’t realise it. Trust me, as an ex-atheist I at least understood this point even then) and so your “unbelief” informs your choices. You might never have considered any of these things deeply, as most have not, and thus inhabit the general morass of vague Agnosticism and Churchianity that most people exist in, which is really just a more comfortable self-deception to allow you to deny you only do what you prefer instead of what is objectively more just.

You may also ascribe to various philosophies, ideologies, religions and beliefs that are mostly wrong, or in any case at least partially wrong. In fact, it is a given, certainly in real Christianity that not a single human on Earth is perfect and only Jesus was, by virtue of being God made man as per the mystery of the Trinity.

Nevertheless, some ideas, philosophies and so on are demonstrably closer to reality and consistently produce better overall results than others. As such, it certainly matters what your beliefs are, regardless of whether you even know what they are in any depth or not.

Once you understand these three basic concepts, it becomes obvious why certain people behave in ways that are relatively absurd in terms of objective reality that is cognisant of an objective aspect of Truth, Justice and Ethics.

Let us now think about such things in some more detail and see why this naturally leads to a generic degradation of services at all levels.

Some moral points to determine your overall philosophy.

Let’s begin with a few easy ones.

Would you say a philosophy that accepts child rape as natural and normal is something you personally prefer as a philosophy? Or that at any rate you think is the best approximation of objective reality? If not, would you then agree that any such philosophy as might exist that has the normalisation of child rape as part of its tenets is a philosophy that even if it had other components that might be accurate in reflecting reality, this one glaring error in it is enough to declare the whole thing suspect and therefore not to be used or accepted in any general way as a whole?

I am certainly of that persuasion. If you are too, then you clearly cannot be a Muslim or a Jew, since both those religions make it explicitly clear that child rape is perfectly acceptable in their belief systems.

Of course that leaves a great many other systems of belief, but if you are similar to myself in regard to child rape, you may at least be steering clear of those two. Hinduism results in strict caste systems determined by birth, not any kind of meritocracy, and thus, aside from any other aspects of it I tend to be inclined to think it is nonsense, since I have met people from all walks of life and their character is not determined purely from who or where they were born to, but also by their choices in life. That still leaves Buddhism, Taoism and Shintoism, along with a general Zen Agnostic Stoicism. Buddhism has many facts and most rely on the principle of not doing harm, which is a good start, however, those versions that did rely on non-violence to extreme levels have been for the most part taken over by other philosophies that are quite happy to use force. See Tibet for example. Or the Amish when rules against raw milk came into force.

Taoism, shintoism and generic Zen agnosticism and Stoicism all are generally relatively practical, can encompass aspects of self-defence and do not concern themselves overmuch with the after life, other than a generic reverence for the dead ancestors and maintaining a good overall family name reputation. Its adherence to various principles of justice or ethics can be somewhat arbitrary in that they are most often coloured by regional, cultural or geographic aspects and can vary greatly from place to place. This tends to suggest a general lack of coherence that indicates it cannot be a good approximation of reality beyond general over-arching views that are held together by a feeble reliance of possibly tradition or general amorphous concepts of “justice” that in any case each individual may feel personally different about and thus react differently to. Absent an overarching moral imperative beside a generic “do good” perspective, what exactly “doing good” entails, as well as its opposite, remains at least partially subjective to each person and thus ultimately not particularly fair or objective in the finer aspects of life.

When you look at Christianity, the situation is not much different. Almost all versions of what people call “Christianity” do not, in fact, have detailed, written down, specific positions, rules, principles or laws that one can refer to, other than one: Catholicism.

The result is that in every other aspect of Churchianity, the adherence tends to again be of a generic, amorphous, undefined type, of “overall do good” with the only real difference from say Buddhists, being that they ascribe their behaviour to being “Jesus followers” instead of “Buddha followers” or imitators. Leaving aside the fact that in both instances the practitioners fall very far short of the imitation of their supposed Godhead.

Only Catholicism took the step of ensuring its rules were codified and written down throughout the two millennia of its existence, and even that was a rather messy and difficult thing to follow as the documents piled up and only a select few had full access to them as well as the capacity to grasp their nuances and details. Finally however, all of these documents were vetted, examined and checked for ensuring no contradiction existed and were summarised and encoded in the Pio-Benedictine Code of Canon Law of 1917. This astonishing document essentially comprised (and referenced for completion) all of the dogmatic beliefs of the Catholic Church into one volume. No other religion has ever done or even attempted this. And here are a few important points to note:

Firstly: The broad history of Catholicism demonstrates many things, but among the two most important ones are that:

  • It was ferociously attacked from the very start, and many attempts at subverting and changing and perverting it have been made constantly throughout its history. The very fact it continued and continues to exist unchanged in its core (divine) philosophies, while making various changes and allowances (all of which can and at times have been returned to origin and/or done away with) for the human aspect of managing a world-wide organisation is in itself probably indicative of supernatural and miraculous protection given the absolute flaws in every human alive and the clear infiltration in the Church from the earliest times of frauds, impostors, nefarious enemies of the Church, greedy and power-hungry misers and so on.
  • Catholicism has not only civilised the world in terms of providing many human improvements like the scientific method, the abolition of slavery, the elevating of women to a role in the family that is respected while not pedastalised, an increase in art, architecture and beauty in general, as well as the raising of logic, mathematics and philosophy as a whole towards a more holistic, humane and charitable aspect, but it has done all this all while respecting the individual instead of mechanising him and his contributions to the human race.

These two aspects of catholicism are absolutely fundamental to evaluating it in the proper human and historical context. Despite many evil and corrupt men that pretended to be Catholics throughout the ages, the overall contribution of Catholicism to the human race has been overwhelmingly positive to a degree that absolutely no other philosophy in all the known history of mankind can make claim to. It’s not even remotely close. And this point alone should immediately make you begin to suspect that perhaps then, at least certainly in its overarching ways, Catholicism may indeed be the best representation of reality we have ever been able to come up with. This in itself, as a purely intellectual exercise is a fascinating topic to explore. If you do take the time to do so, it becomes pretty obvious fairly quickly that the Catholic Church too, suffered a huge tectonic shift as a result of the Vatican II heresies where two millennia of dogmatic and divinely inspired rules were literally flipped to their opposites. Luckily, prior to this event, the Code of Canon Law of 1917 had already been put together since Pope Pius X had seen the writing on the wall with regard to the massive subterfuges infiltrations that had started since the late 1700s and by the start of the 20th Century were Hellhound towards the destruction of every royal House in Europe (because since Charlemagne nearly a millennium earlier, European nobility had been recognised as the defenders of the Catholic faith). By 1958 however, the last valid Pope (as per Catholic dogma) had died and impostor antipope had usurped the Throne of Peter (this was not a unique occurrence, there have been over 40 antipopes in the Church’s history before 1958). This is clear and obvious if you simply follow the rules defined and described for all eternity in the Code of Canon Law of 1917, which covers the entire period of the history of the Church up to 1917. The only other ex-cathedra documents which need to be considered are those published by valid Popes from 1917 to 1958. After 9th October 1958, there has, to date, not been a valid Pope back on the throne of Peter, although valid Priests and Bishops continue to exist, that is, the ones that never faltered and continue to follow the proper Catholic rules as set out in the CoCL of 1917, the valid Popes, accepted catholic tradition and the Bible. None of these people are in the Vatican currently, which is now an infested hive of pedophiles, freemasons, satanists and homosexual orgies fuelled by cocaine.

There is a third aspect of actual Catholicism (now referred to as Sedevacantism [from Latin: Empty Chair, as the chair of Peter being empty of a valid Pope]) that is also extremely important: A willingness to defend itself by whatever appropriate means, including violence if necessary. This universal divine right every living creature has, is a natural part of Catholicism, as is the concept of the death penalty for certain crimes. This means that Catholicism does not suffer from the “non-violent” trope that has been pushed on humanity by those who want to have the monopoly on violence. In this respect then, Sedevacantist Catholics are the biggest real threat to those who would rule us by virtue of their “magic” word-spells.

And if you look around, the Satanists in the Vatican rail against sedevacatists with more vitriol than any other group, while they extend brotherly love to religions and people that literally would prefer every Christian on Earth dropped dead. It’s quite the contrast to observe. Now, why should this be?

Well, consider:

The ruling class that sees itself as lords and masters of humanity with everyone not a member of their club being at best their slave or sexual plaything to be discarded and used at will, from children all the way to adults, operate by subterfuge and manipulation. In their view, their cleverness at making you believe, agree with and even celebrate increasingly outrageous nonsense is indeed their very power. And you can hardly blame them for believing their word-magic is a real thing. They have, after all, achieved almost all of their objectives to date, even if it took several millennia. The point is that just like the Gordian knot was “dissolved” instantly by Alexander’s sword, all the carefully crafted web of lies overlaid upon falsity, baked in with deception, fermented in duplicity and matured in subversion, to which you have been subjected constantly since birth, will come crashing down in one fell swoop once you see the pattern and investigate it and recognise the constant, pervasive deception you have been subjected too. Once you dig deeper into human history and go to primary sources instead of the narratives you have been fed, and once you begin to follow the money, all the way back to their origin today, and once you follow it in the media, in entertainment, in politics, and you see it, and you keep seeing the same pattern over, and over, and over, it becomes impossible to be fooled any more.

Once that happens, the word spells no longer work on you. The “magic” of the usurpers is forever broken. At that point, you realise that you and we have something that is akin to Alexander’s sword: The simple ability to build. To do. To create. And that as long as we ignore, excise, ostracise, and eject the “wizards” from our midst, there is very little they can do. They are completely incapable in the real world of things and truth and objective reality. Like the wizard of Oz they are absolutely impotent when faced with such things as objective, factual, physical reality.

If you doubt it, look at the war in Ukraine. Incapable of doing anything physical with any kind of skill themselves, they bamboozle, and “word-magic” hundreds of thousands or millions to their death in wars that they orchestrate but never take part in. How many wars would take place if the people behind the curtain were paced on the very front of the first front line? Almost none. What would have happened if every Ukrainian male had said, “No. I will not fight. Let Putin come in, demolish the CIA offices and the CIA biolabs and take out the puppet government the USA has frankly admitted it placed in charge of Ukraine from 2014 using word magic, money and Mossad operatives to cause the Maidan “revolts” as they do everywhere when they start their colour revolutions.”? There would have been no war. Millions of people would not have been displaced, the totally corrupt elements of Ukrainian society would have been removed and the people controlling America would have screeched to high heaven with little consequence.

If you can understand all of the above, you will begin to understand that nothing works only because you have been fooled into believing a complete web of interwoven lies at every level and have been rendered practically useless in the physical world. You have been coerced and manipulated to stop learning any real physical skills and farm out the whole thing to third and fourth worlders. So much so that in the intervening 70 years, some of those guys have since got really good at the manufacturing of everything from widgets to microchips. See China.

Even as a child when the concept of “export of goods” was first presented to me in primary school at age 7, I thought it made no sense because they told me the best stuff gets saved for export. I was like…”Why? Keep the best stuff for us and sell the less good stuff to those who have none of it and need it even if it’s not the best.” It literally is a concept so simple a child gets it that you do not outsource your defence weapon construction and key industry manufacturing abilities. But this is apparently too difficult for the puppeteers to understand. Why? Because, remember, they believe in word magic.

All you need to do is get back to basic, rebuild things yourself, educate everyone around you about the wizards and their lies and word-magic nonsense and simply keep them and their lies out of your head first, family second, friends next and community last.

Let them have no hold on you at all. Eventually, they may well try to use some of their brainwashed servants to try and apply force to you, but by then you should have built up enough reality-based effects that you should have quickly become a veritable force to be reckoned with and as the education of these concepts continues, the wizards will become less and less powerful.

The current demise in the service quality at all levels is a direct result of this nonsensical belief in lies and word-magic over the practical, empirical and factual reality that makes your nose hurt when you walk into a wall.

Whatever you decide to do, do it yourself. Do it well. You want to code? learn it yourself. You want to farm? Farm. You want to build engines, you start learning how to do it. That’s all you need to do. And surround yourself only with people of this mindset. Marry and make as many children as you can. Do that, and even if you have passed the half-century mark, like I have, there is a good chance you will see some good fruits amidst the chaos that is coming even before you drop dead. You will quite likely see the beginnings of flourishing mini-city states and communities that are so self-sufficient that in a couple of generations they will likely really begin to consider becoming a star-spanning civilisation. The technology exists. It the communities free of the parasitic invasion of the liars that are lacking. So, do as I do. Build them. You build them. You. Not your neighbour, not some other guy… you. Or if not, at least join one. Not everyone is born to create and do. Some are better at following and supporting, but do one or do the other. any other option is a loss for you and your entire progeny, if it even will exist, without your choosing to either do or support.

Stop Being Timid. Push Back.

Without mentioning any identifiable information regarding any of the people involved, I have recently been directly made aware of one of the usual pushes for the pedophilic grooming of children that is now a continued effort in the West. The intent and planned event was a week long LGBT agenda culminating with a tranny in drag twerking to toddlers.

Several of the parents involved immediately pushed back and demanded to know what the hell was the justification for promoting adult sexual preferences to little children. And immediately, the groomers in charge backed down. Or almost immediately. First they lied with vague concepts of inclusivity, and diversity, when that absurd and nonsensical “justification” was immediately shot down in no uncertain terms by several of the mothers mind you, the relevant officials started to backpedal, state some children could be excluded (would you believe them to actually do so?!? Especially after they already lied about the intent?).

It then transpired that one of the gay teachers told a little girl in his class that girls could become boys by just “taking some tablets”. I am not aware of what the parents of that girl will do if anything, but I sincerely hope they sue the shit out of the school.

Make no mistake: NONE of this has to do with any “inclusivity” it is evil pedophiles trying to pervert children. And it needs to be called out precisely for what it is.

There is ZERO justification for telling 5, 6, 10 year olds anything about the homosexual lifestyle. And if it was really about “inclusivity” then where are the Christian priests and Muslim Imams telling people that sodomy will lead you to hell and that in Islamic countries the punishment for it is to be thrown off a roof, hung or decapitated? I mean, you wouldn’t want to discriminate on the basis of religion now, would you?

The only reason Clown world exists is because weak men allowed it and everyone was too polite to tell the freaks to STFU and get back under the dark holes they crawled out of.

Even under the Inquisition, literally no one got burnt at the stake for sodomy. No one. 163 pedophile that had raped children did. In a period of over a century. I’m fairly sure a proper investigation would turn up several multiples of that number in any major city in the West. And the fact that the FBI was UPLOADING incriminating images to someone that was pointing out some things about them, while they continue literal photographic and video evidence of child sexual rape and abuse by Hunter Biden tells you who is running things and what their proclivities are.

And it seems it is mostly the MOTHERS who are at least speaking out. One wonder where the fathers are. Where the uncles, brothers, and grandfathers are.

And to borrow and paraphrase a sentence from the film the Matrix:

Do you think you’re going to vote your way out of this? Interesting.

That said, I am fully for people that understand what is going on to get involved in everything from the PTA to the local council. Get in there every which way you can and subvert the Clown World agenda by every means available. Install your own in there and return things to a place where normality can thrive and that has absolutely ironclad policies of exclusion for anything that does not follow logic, reason and justice.

And stop being afraid. Speak up. Push back. Do NOT let anything slide. The only reason they keep encroaching is because you keep retreating.

Stalin Started WWII

Once again, as I have written before, you really need to start with WWII if you really hope to understand the world we live in, and the real history of it, not the absolute lies we have all been fed since childhood.

Rob Unz, once agin brings to our knowledge things no one in the West will tell you.

I was already familiar with “Viktor Suvorov”s work due to Systema as he has written on Russian special forces, but I have not read his Icebreaker mostly because I was not aware of it. Which as Unz explains, is intentional.

You really do need to understand WHO really started WWI and then pushed for WWII.

Then you need to go back again and learn who started the Bolshevik revolution and why.

And who created the Freemasons (King James of the KJV Bible) and the Illuminati (in the late 1700s) and the Carbonari, and so on, and why they targeted the royal houses of Europe and how THAT led to WWI. And then WWII. And now to this dystopian WWIII, and how there is an absolute thread of continuity in all of these supposedly disparate things in history. In fact, how it could arguably go all the way back to Charlemagne and his institutionalising the idea that emperors and kings were the non-clerical enforcing arm of the Catholic Church.

And why THAT idea was really what all these forces have spent centuries trying to destroy and chip away at it.

That’s ok, I don’t expect you to immediately jump on the whole Sedevacantists are right bandwagon I am on. Just start with figuring out that, as Unz himself put it:

Not even Hitler was Hitler.

Meaning that when they accuse Ghaddafi, Trump, Putin, or whoever of being “another Hitler” it’s obviously nonsense, but so is everything you have been told about Hitler and WWII.

To quote Unz in a small part:

During the early 2000s, I obviously recognized that Iraq’s ruler was a harsh tyrant, but snickered at the absurd media propaganda, knowing perfectly well that Saddam Hussein was no Adolf Hitler. But with the steady growth of the Internet and the availability of the millions of pages of periodicals provided by my digitization project, I’ve been quite surprised to gradually also discover that Adolf Hitler was no Adolf Hitler.

It might not be entirely correct to claim that the story of World War II was that Franklin Roosevelt sought to escape his domestic difficulties by orchestrating a major European war against the prosperous, peace-loving Nazi Germany of Adolf Hitler. But I do think that picture is probably somewhat closer to the actual historical reality than the inverted image more commonly found in our textbooks.

And he is right. Read the whole thing there.

And read the articles he links to.

I doubt they will be allowed to persist much longer in the Clown World side of things.

There is, indeed, always one.

Or a million for that matter, because the village idiots keep reproducing.

Allow me to introduce Ken.

Ken is one of the mouth-breathing retards who thinks he can “git me” with his tenuous grasp of metaphysics, Christianity, basic logic and special needs level of reading comprehension.

He thought he would post a wise and deep comment about “the Filioque” without even bothering to understand that word, where it comes from, what it signifies, or why it even exists.

Kind of like the equally stupid and drooling flat Earth cretins who hang on to the word “firmament” (from the freemason Bible intentionally mistranslated in over 33,000 places under the commission of flamboyantly gay King who also started the Freemason Temples in their current Satanic form, which is why the oh so revered KJV “Bible” is also known as the Freemason Bible (Satanist Bible, right, sounds like a good version to you)).

Just as the people who one truly hopes COULD walk off the edge, continue to think the word “firmament” for reasons best known to themselves means “giant bubble of glass that holds back an infinite ocean” without EVER bothering to find out what the word was in the original text nor what it meant. because if they did, they would find it means “the expanse”. You know, just like the Sci-Fi series of the same name all set in… (drum roll please) SPACE! In short, the very word the flat-brained idiots hang on to literally means sky in Hebrew.

Here, we have another version of what is basically a. lemur, trying to come to grips with the reading skills a normal six year old has mastered, enter (is it, could it be… “master” Ken, but of theology instead of bullshido?!) Let us begin dissecting this parasitic hanger-on:

The filioque is not so simple, because that phrase in the creed comes straight out of the gospel of John, and the gospel doesn’t have the filioque in it:

Right there, ladies and gentlemen, with that single first sentence, this moron has disqualified himself. Because he thinks (like all Protestant thinkers do, in grayscale at best) that the word Filioque is somehow MAGICAL! And if it’s not spelt in America-huh-n English like JE-AASUS spoke it, then you must REJECT the unholy pagan rites of Kath-hole-icism.

We will show below that the word is merely a CONCEPT. But we can’t expect Ken to understand things like abstract concepts. He clearly is one of those people who can’t even imagine an apple, never mind a concept.

% “When the Helper comes, whom I will send to you
% from the Father, that is the Spirit of truth
% who proceeds from the Father,
% He will testify about Me” John 15:26

Even the Douay-Rheims doesn’t have the filioque:

% But when the Paraclete cometh, whom I will send you
% from the Father, the Spirit of truth,
% who proceedeth from the Father,
% he shall give testimony of me. John 15:26

Note the second thing that proves he is absolutely retarded: That word that Jesus says: *I* or in full context “whom I will send you”.

Let’s do this at the pre-primary school level for Ken, shall we children?

Who sends it? Jesus does!

Where does it come from? The Father!

But who sends it? The Son!

YAY!!! Now clap your hands and take your blank and go lie down for a little nap after that exhausting use of brain cells, eh Ken?

The easiest thing for the various council fathers to do is to stick with scripture. To change the creed would require extraordinarily good arguments.

And here it is LADIES AND GENTLEMEN! In case you were wondering when it would make its appearance, here it is, the full blown special retardation that only Protestants can ever conjure up! Sola Scripture! Except, well, it isn’t what he believes it to be, is it. Because we literally just did look at the scripture, and guess what, it really quite clearly says the Holy Spirit comes from the father THROUGH the Son. So… yeah… you see why I use the word retarded so much when discussing Protestants who also would pretend to be faux-Orthos, because, oh, yeah, the Orthos too think that Sola Scriptura is completely retarded just as much as the Catholics know it is. But we’ll not tell Ken that, eh? He might cry.

Instead of providing those arguments, Rome has agreed to allow the eastern Catholics, and the Orthodox when they re-unite, to keep the creed as they have always known it.

There is no reunification, you special breed of incestuos experiment. But if there ver were to be, it would be under the One, True, Holy and Apostolic Catholic Church and its edicts and dogmas.

Now let’s look at how dumb Ken was to even comment on my blog.

How difficult would it have been to at least TRY to grasp the situation before shooting his retarded mouth off?

Second result on duck duck go if you type Filioque brings up this, which even though is Novus Ordo based, (so beware) is actually quite correct, because it is such a basic and simple and obvious thing that even the impostors of the Novus Ordo see no point in belabouring it.

The Western Church commonly uses a version of the Nicene creed which has the Latin word filioque (“and the Son”) added after the declaration that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father. Scripture reveals that the Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son. The external relationships of the persons of the Trinity mirror their internal relationships. Just as the Father externally sent the Son into the world in time, the Son internally proceeds from the Father in the Trinity. Just as the Spirit is externally sent into the world by the Son as well as the Father (John 15:26, Acts 2:33), he internally proceeds from both Father and Son in the Trinity. This is why the Spirit is referred to as the Spirit of the Son (Gal. 4:6) and not just the Spirit of the Father (Matt. 10:20).

The quotations below show that the early Church Fathers, both Latin and Greek, recognized the same thing, saying that the Spirit proceeds “from the Father and the Son” or “from the Father through the Son.”

These expressions mean the same thing because everything the Son has is from the Father. The proceeding of the Spirit from the Son is something the Son himself received from the Father. The procession of the Spirit is therefore ultimately rooted in the Father but goes through the Son. However, some Eastern Orthodox insist that to equate “through the Son” with “from the Son” is a departure from the true faith.

The expression “from the Father through the Son” is accepted by many Eastern Orthodox. This, in fact, led to a reunion of the Eastern Orthodox with the Catholic Church in 1439 at the Council of Florence. Unfortunately, the union did not last. In the 1450s (just decades before the Protestant Reformation), the Eastern Orthodox left the Church again under pressure from the Muslims, who had just conquered them and who insisted they renounce their union with the Western Church (lest Western Christians come to their aid militarily).

So let’s take a little look at Acts 2:33, shall we?

But let’s read it in context too, shall we, instead of doing the Prottie select a random text to twist it at will dance.

31 Foreseeing this, he spoke of the resurrection of Christ. For neither was he left in hell, neither did his flesh see corruption.

32 This Jesus hath God raised again, whereof all we are witnesses.

33 Being exalted therefore by the right hand of God, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath poured forth this which you see and hear.

34 For David ascended not into heaven; but he himself said: The Lord said to my Lord, sit thou on my right hand,

35 Until I make thy enemies thy footstool.

36 Therefore let all the house of Israel know most certainly, that God hath made both Lord and Christ, this same Jesus, whom you have crucified.

37 Now when they had heard these things, they had compunction in their heart, and said to Peter, and to the rest of the apostles: What shall we do, men and brethren?

38 But Peter said to them: Do penance, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ, for the remission of your sins: and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

Oh, so, this passage refers to Jesus again, receiving the Holy Ghost and then pouring it out to the others, just as… He said in… GASP! John 15:26! WOW! Will you look at that? it corresponds perfectly! It’s almost like MAGIC. If only you can read at the second grade level!

But wait, it’s not just one (or ok, two) simple trick, there is MORE!

(Perhaps I should use more fonts colours here and some more exclamation marks, so as to keep the brain damaged Protestants that are used to swallowing only adverts and soundbites into their atrophied brains more “engaged”? – let me know!)

We have Galatians 4:6 too! And again, maybe let’s read it in a bit of context eh? Like Catholics do, not like mouth-breathing retards like Ken PRETEND to (he can’t read, he obviously just repeats things he was told by rote).

And because you are sons, God hath sent the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying: Abba, Father.

Therefore now he is not a servant, but a son. And if a son, an heir also through God.

So… uh… what Spirit is it that God the Father might possibly send to the people? Oh, wait… the Spirit of his Son. So… what Spirit could that possibly be? Some other Spirt, that is NOT the Holy Spirit? Wait, have we got it wrong all this time? Is there really TWO Spirits, the Holy Spirit and then another mysterious unnamed one? Which doesn’t appear anywhere else and is not named in the passage that proves the Trinity beyond any doubt? Well, Ken apparently must believe this, but anyone that can read does not. Because clearly what is being referenced here is the Holy Spirit, and lo and behold, once again, it proceeds from the Father at minimum THROUGH the son, because a very strong argument can also be made that if the Father sends them the Spirit OF the Son, then that spirit is an intrinsic part of Jesus (as it is, being it’s the Holy Spirit) and as such proceeds from him too.

And does Matthew 10:20 contradict anything? Nope, It just says that the spirit of the Father will speak through you. There is no contradiction here. If he had stated the Spirit of Christ instead of The Father, it would have been the same, given that the Trinity is all three of them. It was obviously just a normal sentence spoken as anyone would. He could have said the spirit of God and left it at that too. It makes no difference and is certainly nothing to hang on to as if Matthew had some how EXCLUDED Jesus specifically. In short, it is the usual Protestant nonsense of people trying to find some Calvinistic absolutism and getting it retiredly wrong.

And finally, one last point, note that the Orthos, once again, AGREED with the Catholics and rejoined them over 400 years after their schism and repeated betrayal and murder of many of the Catholics who came to help them despite the fact they were already schismatics for 40 years.

And then, once again, they put their tail between their legs and did as the Muslims told them to do. Not exactly what real believers in Christ would act, is it?

So there you have it Ken. And he has the honour of having forced me to add a whole new category to the topics on this blog, though they have featured many times, Ken prompted the addition of the topic: Retards.

Probably about the only thing he will ever achieve in life, if his reading comprehension is anything to go by.

Why Protestantism is the Destruction of the West

Andrew Torba has written his regular newsletter, which you can see as a blog post here.

In it he laments the various issues that are ensuring the American population, along with the European one, are falling (and have been for a long time) below replacement value.

He does this by mentioning the issues, while apparently being totally oblivious of how any of these issues became issues in the first place, and what the root cause of all of them was and is.

It’s really quite astonishing. But I think it can be useful to look at this peculiar blindness of his as a starting point to show with a certain level of clarity and obviousness what the baseline issues are originating from, and how, specifically, in each case, this can be demonstrated to have massive evidence for the fact that, at root, all of these issues have the starting point of the Protestant rebellion against the Catholic Church.

Now, if you are a Protestant, irritating as you may find me and my perspectives, I sincerely hope you settle down, muster as much objective consideration for the rest of this post as you can, and consider it calmly and objectively. And if some of my rhetoric infuriates you, pay attention to that, and notice which bits do so the most (these are where your biggest logical hurdles and fallacies are going to be found), then let them go and try, for the sake of argument at least, to imagine they are true and correct anyway (they are, my rhetoric is so unpleasant for people because it invariably is laced with painful truth).

And then see if you can’t understand my points from a bird’s eye view, instead of taking it personally against you as a person, the people who taught you to be a Protestant that you care about, and so on.

Being as Torba is a Protestant himself, and being that Protestants, like solipsistic women, only backwards rationalise any reality in the past that factually makes them responsible for anything, instead of facing the facts squarely on, he seems to think this situation is totally divorced from anything to do with Protestantism. In fact he blindly points out the issues while completely oblivious to the reasons of why, how and when these things became issues.

It really is a kind of perspective of extreme selfishness or self-centeredness to the point of being oblivious of the destruction one leaves in one’s wake. Any damage done is just some magical thing that just happens on its own and is always fully justifiable in just such a way (by some magic) that means it is never, ever, ever, that person’s fault.

What a selfish, stupid, spoilt brat, or a woman (men too, but they generally are more consciously aware than women in this regard) would do on an individual level, Protestants do on a massive social level that covers the last five centuries.

So allow me now to quote Torba from his post and comment on each point in some detail. If you are able to divorce your personal feelings on each issue, and note the broad historical facts in each case, I think you will see that what I say about Protestantism is not just true, but that on some level, you have always known it, because the plastic, veneer feel of the disconnect between the entire Protestant mish-mash chaos non-structure of it, has never married properly to the deep sense of culture, tradition, history and ancestors that created and protected Christendom from the time of Jesus, to:

  • The formation of Benedictine monasteries,
  • The crusades, and the 200 years they held the Outremer while being attacked by both Muslims and the Eastern schismatics they came to the aid of (after they had already split themselves off from the One True Church),
  • The rebellion against God’s Church, under the guise of it being a Protestation against the corrupt men within it, which have always been there, but who never changed the truth of the Church,
  • The siege of Malta and the Catholic knights that defended it from the consequent destruction of Christendom as a whole if Malta had fallen,
  • The gradual, intentional and devastating infiltration of the Church by freemasons (illuminati, satanists, carbonari, etc their name is legion), communists, homosexuals and pedophiles, starting in earnest in the late 1770, alongside the planned and executed destruction of every European royal house; because since the time of Charlemagne, the nobility had been associated with being the protectors of the Church, that is, the physical and worldly protectors of the Church (the guys who fight, as all nobles who took part in the crusades did) and they had to be broken before the Church could be damaged meaningfully from within,
  • The noticing of this by various Popes, culminating in Pope Pious X who started the putting together of the code of canon law of 1917, an amazing document that reviewed tens of thousands of documents written over the last two millennia, in order to ensure there was no conflict, contradiction or logical fallacy among them all, so they could be summarised as the essence of Catholic dogma in one volume, which was completed and promulgated by Pope Benedict the XV in 1917 and stood the test of time from then, through to the death of the last valid Pope, Pious XII, and even beyond it, as the Satanists finally took the throne of Peter in 1958, and have held it since, yet the True Church remains, as does the impenetrable fortress of the Code of 1917, and the last remnant of faithful Bishops and Priests that retain Catholicism as their faith, and not the false, Satanic version of “Catholicism” espoused by the promulgators of Vatican II and its manifest heresies in the form of the deceitful Novus Ordo fake “Church”.

The simple fact is that on some level, every protestant senses that deep down, no matter how genuine their wish to be one with God the Father, Christ the Son, and the Holy Spirit, the entire history of their supposed religion is littered with disconnects and logical fallacies that simply cannot be reconciled. And deep down, they sense too, that one cannot simply be united with Christ by merely saying he is. There are rules. There always were from the start, and they do not change. But I have mentioned the historical perspective starting from the beginning, many times before, and few are willing to take that journey. So today, we will do something different. We will take Torba’s newsletter and dissect the issues he mentions and see how and where they came from in the first place.

You Need To Be Babymaxxing: A Call to Action for Christians A disturbing trend has been emerging over the past few decades: the birth rate of every US state, along with the birth rate in most western nations, has dipped below the replacement population level. This has sparked widespread concern and fear, as this demographic shift could have catastrophic consequences for the long-term survival of some of the world’s most prosperous and influential societies and people groups.

And what might have led to that catastrophic drop in birth rate, when third world Africans, Indians and others keep producing children despite conditions most Westerners can’t even imagine, much less are able to take on in their own lives? Let’s ponder it a bit, shall we?

The root causes of this demographic decline are complex and multifaceted, but there are a few key factors that stand out. First and foremost: the rise of secularism and individualism has led to a decreased emphasis on traditional family values and a growing number of people choosing not to have children. Our culture of atomized individualism in the West has transformed so many into self-centered and selfish monsters.

So… the increase of secularism, individualism and atomisation of society. Where, O WHERE might such an idea come from? Could it possibly have ANYTHING at all to do with going from a global religion that was prevalent throughout the entire West and even much of the East (though slightly perverted and erroneous there) to CHANGING that religion to be… what was it oh yeah…

  • Individualistic (every man interprets the Bible (which was changed from the original used for 1200 years) as he sees fit.)
  • Schismatic at its very root. We now have over 40,000 versions of Protestantism, but even then each of these is really only a shadowy illusion of coherence, because in truth EVERY Protestant feels entitled to be his own Pope, Bishop and Priest and interpret the Bible, and Christianity as a whole, (including the ancient traditions he is usually abysmally ignorant of) as he sees fit, which is why Protestants will change Church like normal people change socks. They are not Churches at all, just lose coalitions where you pick and choose the bits that suit you. What do you think the effect of that is on society as a whole? Might be just a tad atomising? Just a smidge of secularisation creeping in? You think? How would that play out over 500 years?

Additionally, the increasing cost of living and the pressure to pursue higher education and career success have made it more difficult for many couples to afford to have large families. It’s tough, but not impossible, to have a large family when the economy is so rigged against you doing so. Making it happen requires a lot of self-sacrifice and a reevaluation of your priorities.

No lie there, but where does this incessant need to have a “career” and prioritising work come from? Well, let’s see, historically where can we trace this sudden absolute importance of WORK over LIFE? What’s that, I hear? The Industrial Revolution? Right. I agree. Which was taught to me in school as a young boy as this marvel of British Engineering and know-how and just an overall great thing for the advancement of humanity. Except… no one mentioned the social consequences. They all presented the creation of trains and railways and machinery as all positive technological advancements while completely ignoring whether:

  • They actually were positive overall for humanity, or
  • Regardless of that, what social conditions did the much vaunted “Protestant Work Ethic” actually entail in day-to-day activities and family dynamics?
  • What priorities do you think you need to have to come up with the Industrial Revolution in terms of valuing your family time and your work time? What effects on general human interactions do you think are going to be more prevalent? Would a general disconnect from other human beings being seen as other human beings you necessarily relate to, regardless of personal differences, purely on the basis of the reality in front of you that they too are human beings, be useful to foster a general perception of other people being seen more as potential cogs in the machinery of “society” than actual human beings? The deeper implication of this are manifold and absolutely fundamental. A perfect example of this, which is an extreme case, in order to highlight the difference, is that if a Protestant mind were to say, be forced into a war of strife against invading foreigners, he would execute it more or less in cold blood for the most part as a negative but necessary thing. A Catholic would execute it with quite a different frame of mind. Alongside the same practical need, the Catholic would further be driven in his righteous rage that such an event has become necessary as a result of the other side refusing to act like reasonable human beings. So their extermination is not just a necessity for practical purposes, but also a necessity from an educational and spiritual perspective. A Protestant cuts a tree down because it’s in the way. A Catholic evaluates if the tree is noxious, in which case he will dig it up from the roots and burn it, or merely in the way, in which case he will endeavour to dig it up from the roots and replant it somewhere appropriate. It is a MASSIVE psychological difference and affects every aspect of your attitude towards life and all its challenges.

Finally, the widespread availability of birth control and abortion has enabled people to easily prevent pregnancies and terminate them when they do occur, further exacerbating the problem. We are making great strides on banning abortion in many states across the nation, but decades of damage has already been done.

And where did that magical birth control come from? Oh wait, the pill was invented by a Jewish guy. Just a coincidence I am sure, regardless of the fact that Jews (Talmudic Pharisees) have hated the Catholic Church from the start and have tried to destroy it at every turn including their deep infiltration of it over centuries and the Protestantisation of it with Vatican II in which they were instrumental in forming.

But what about the adoption of it? Which kind of people adopted birth control in this form? Not Catholics. Even today, some 66 years after the throne of Peter was usurped by Satanists, the momentum of the real Catholicism that still exists (though crumbling rapidly in the Novus Ordo fake Church) makes it nigh on impossible for the fake Pope Bergoglio to say it’s ok to use. It was Protestants in their legion of denominations that began to accept socially the concept of divorce in the first place. An event that was forbidden by the Catholic Church and only permitted in the sense of an annulment, which has very specific rules to be granted.

But if divorce becomes acceptable, then the entire concept of marriage becomes a store-bought idea, no longer a sacrament for life. And once you accept marriage as a kind of diploma you can buy in a store, well, you should be able to switch diplomas at will if one loses its lustre. And since it might go wrong, it only makes sense to take it for a test run first. Which means sex before marriage. Which could end up with babies with a person you’re just taking out for a test ride! I mean they have a nice body, or maybe are rich, or whatever, so you want to see if you’re “compatible” in terms of orgasms per month, you know, like miles per gallon and so on. So of course you need some baby making prevention thing!

And then it’s a short step from treating sex as a test run for marriage to making it just for fun. I mean sex is really a LOT of fun. Like a lot, lot. Like it messes with you brain and body chemistry level of great fun. So why wouldn’t you want to get addicted to this natural rush that doesn’t even require drugs, and is better than all the rushes you get from a drug anyway, if you practice it enough to really get good at it? Well, of course sex would go from being a test ride for marriage to a sport. And once sex is for fun, the last thing you want is a baby with someone you can’t even have a decent conversation with, but oh my God are they awesome at the orgasms per mile, or whatever the measure was, right?

So, “naturally” the next thing that happens if a baby does come into the equation… and marriage is not a sacrament anymore as a dedication to bringing in new life (that is what marriage is for, making children, I know, it’s a shock, but seriously, look it up historically, sport-fucking doesn’t feature at all. Not even a little bit), well, what else are you gonna do, other than kill that baby, since it’s a nuisance. And so we have gone in a few short steps from allowing divorce –> sex before marriage –> sex for fun –> contraception –> baby killing.

And remind yourself, which secularisation of Christianity movement did that? You can’t blame Catholicism for it. Even the fake “Catholic” Church to date at least can’t advocate for contraception (they will in due course, no doubt, because Satanists are gonna Satanist).

While there is undoubtedly a lot of fear-mongering surrounding this issue, it is not without merit. If the current trend continues it could lead to a significant decline in the population of some of the world’s most prosperous and influential nations, which would have far-reaching consequences for global stability and economic growth.

Note that Torba’s first concern is global stability and economic growth. The ever present and Jewish –> Protestant belief in their true God, the almighty dollar. Profit, wealth. An amorphous “stability” of people and lands so far removed from us you will never see them even once in your life. There is a reason why America is called the great Satan by the Arab world, and while their religion is demonic too, they are not entirely wrong, which is what I tried to explain as gently as possible here.

More importantly it would also represent a tragic loss for the unique cultures, traditions, and values that have been cultivated by these societies over centuries.

Again, while he is not wrong, the point is not that any one specific culture or tradition is really all that relevant in the scheme of things, UNLESS, that tradition and culture also happens to be the best, surest, most tried and tested true and real approximation of how reality actually works as God intended. Then it’s kinda like… ALL IMPORTANT. So, despite your specific and particular distaste for Catholicism, which is based on nothing but lies about what it is, perpetrated down the centuries that you never bothered to look up yourself and the same sense of things passed on to you by your relatives and people you loved, who were just as ignorant of the truth (or more) as you are and they too believed the lies and inaccuracies, you should really make an effort to educate yourself on these things and figure them out by yourself.

Christians are called to be fruitful and multiply (Genesis 1:28). We need to be babymaxxing. This commandment is not just a suggestion or a personal preference, but an essential part of our mission to spread the Gospel and disciple the nations. By having large families and raising our children to be faithful, God-fearing people we can ensure the continued growth and prosperity of our communities and the preservation of our shared values and traditions.

Sounds good? Sure. But it’s a plastic American commercial. “Buy this product, it looks good, it makes you look cool and it’s needed!”

Tell me Andrew, with SPECIFICITY:

  • Continued growth and prosperity for your communities. Exactly WHAT and HOW do you mean this? What do you think will happen if people have a lot of children with only a vague sense of community brought on by a generic, amorphous, non-specific, “belief in X” that has no set rules, no set tradition, no set reality.
  • What “community” are you referring to, PRECISELY. Are the Methodists gonna get along with the Mormons, and the Mormons with the Seventh Day Adventists, and they with the Amish, and they with the Anabaptists, and they with the Baptists, and they with the Lutherans, and they with the Calvinists, and they with the lesbian “bishops” of whatever “Church” that is, and they with the transgender “bishop” that was in the news of another faction and they with…(repeat for 40,000 iterations). Is that the “community” you refer to? Those people all gonna band together under the banner of “Christ” are they? I think not. I think the entire history of America, and all Protestant nations, has shown such people will band together only under the banner of the (previously) might dollar, or German mark, or Pound Stirling. And then only until it profits them. And any true believers in the mix will get stampeded in the overall melee. It’s hard enough to have a community when they actually ARE all Catholics, but it does work and it has for many centuries. It has never worked in any protestant country other than to create more government, more regulation, and a perpetual chase for profit.

Moreover, by focusing on our own households and prioritizing the growth of our families, we can counteract the destructive influence of our enemies, most of whom do not have children of their own. As their ideas and ideologies die with them, our faith and values will continue to thrive, passed down from generation to generation through the strong bonds of family and community.

What faith and values and traditions would those be? The ones that did not manage to survive other than as a thinly veiled veneer of false honesty, respectability and dignity to cover over the perpetual search for profit, worldly fame and fortune? The one that has not managed to keep trannies from claiming the “right” to get “married” in your protestant “Churches” and have “pregnant men” as part of the “accepted reality”?

And before you say “Oh but that doesn’t happen in MY denomination number 38,792!” Stop and think for 5 seconds, what the Hell you’re actually saying and how you are missing the ENTIRE point of what Christianity and being part of the ACTUAL “body of Christ” means and how and where your illogical, historical clown-world “religion”, came to be.

So, what can we do to address this crisis and fulfill our divine calling as Christians?

Well, you can start by actually becoming actual Christians, to begin with, which means the ONLY denomination of Christianity that has always been there from the start: Catholicism. And which today exists ONLY in Sedevacantist Catholicism, aka Catholicism, since the buildings, property, wealth and outer garments of Catholicism have all been usurped, infiltrated and corrupted by the Satanists pretending to be “Catholics” that now infest the Vatican and everyone remotely connected with Novus Ordo heresies.

Here are a few practical steps we can take:

Embrace the concept of “babymaxxing”: This means prioritizing the growth of our families and actively seeking to have as many children as possible. It may require making sacrifices and reevaluating our priorities, but the rewards will be immeasurable.

Support and encourage other Christian families in their efforts to have children: This can take many forms, from offering emotional support and guidance to providing material assistance, such as helping with childcare or contributing to the financial costs of raising a large family.

Advocate for policies that support large families: This can include lobbying for tax breaks and other financial incentives for families with multiple children, as well as pushing for educational and healthcare policies that make it easier for parents to raise large families.

Promote a culture of life: This means working to end the scourge of abortion and advocating for the sanctity of human life at all stages, from conception to natural death.

These are all good suggestions, but completely doomed to fail is they are not founded on a solid bedrock of being connected to truth and reality, and that means, a religion that is itself based in truth and reality. Anything that is a watered down version of the original, with literally tens of thousands of roads down false paths, simply cannot stand the test of time. It has never worked in ANY human endeavour, much less in the experience of mankind other than by the enforcing of it by brutal methods and force, be it Islam or communism. The ONLY philosophy that has thrived and done so entirely voluntarily, is Catholicism, which imposes force ONLY on its declared enemies, and even then, usually only after patiently trying to dissuade them from their evil paths of attack.

Educate and disciple our children: It is not enough to simply have many children; we must also ensure that they are raised in the fear and knowledge of the Lord, instilling in them the values and principles that will enable them to carry on our faith and traditions for generations to come.

Name me ONE Protestant denomination that has lasted unchanged and retained anything even resembling a constant tradition and heritage without multiple schisms for even just 100 years. It doesn’t exist. Not a single one. The Catholic Church has remained steadfast and its rules and dogma unchanged for almost precisely 2000 years.

The demographic crisis facing the world today is a serious and urgent challenge that demands our immediate attention and action. Christians have a unique responsibility to confront this issue head-on and work tirelessly to ensure the continued growth and prosperity of our communities and the preservation of our shared values and traditions. By embracing the concept of “babymaxxing” and focusing on our own households, we can secure the future of our faith and our people and leave a lasting legacy for generations to come.

Not really. Doing so within the context of a properly Catholic community (that is, sedevacantist) has a chance of succeeding because historically Catholicism has risen from the ashes many times, as it will continue to do, because it IS the real Christianity and Jesus promised us He will be with us to the End. Pretending or play-acting that role in a fake “Christian” denomination will only last barely the duration of one human lifetime IF the parties in question happen to have a real personal affinity, that is obviously totally absent from any group of people beyond a couple of families that get on with each other. Catholic communities are not held together by the ephemeral characters of any of its constituents, but by a shared absolute belief in God that transcends petty personal and human failings, of which we are ALL riddled with.

Babymaxxing is not just a personal decision, but a collective responsibility that requires the support and encouragement of the entire Christian community. It may involve making sacrifices and reevaluating our priorities, but the rewards will be worth it.

No group that is not tied together by a bond of religious belief that goes far deeper than mere words and appearances will ever give anything even remotely resembling the kind of helping hand they will inevitably secure for their own family above others. Even among Catholic families this is still an issue, though one that is absolutely muted to a huge extent. I have absolute certainty that if I or any other of the Catholic families we know suddenly won a billion dollars at the lotto, or even just a few million, ALL the Catholic families near them would benefit too. I for one would literally buy houses and land in other people’s names to have them and their children as neighbours, but I am NOT the only one by far. Any one of the people in our Sedevacantist community would act the same, I am certain of it, and this was never the case in any other “community” I was ever a part of, be it people I trained for decades in martial arts with, people I worked as an armed security professional with, and literally risked my life alongside theirs, nor even childhood friends. The bond created by a true religion is of a quality and nature you simply have no experience of until you are in it. And it does not happen as a result of any of the 40,000 Protestant denominations. It might happens between a few families and even then will not last beyond the second generation, but it has been demonstrated to exist and work and remain in Catholic communities even some 100 years after the basic infiltration of the Church was already complete.

All of the chips are on the table with this issue. Those who take it seriously will inherit the future by default as their continued growth and reproduction will ensure the long-term survival and prosperity of their communities, cultures, and values. While the rest of the world struggles with declining birth rates and the threat of extinction-level events, Christians can take comfort in the knowledge that our faith and values will continue to thrive, passed down from generation to generation through the strong bonds of family and community.

No Andrew. The reality is that all groups that are not homogeneously coherent, that is, all the varied Protestant denominations, will gradually be chewed down by the wolves at their edges, and continue to degrade and become diluted generation after generation until they are assimilated by the globular mass that is the entire plan of those who have been putting it in place for literally millennia.

Get married. Babymax. Get to Church. We are going to win.

The advice is sound, but not just any pretend, clown-costumed, “Church” will do. Only the real one will make a difference, as it always has throughout history. And while ULTIMATE victory is assured, no one, not even Jesus knows that day or hour of when that will come, only God the Father. So, the concept of you seeing this victory in YOUR lifetime is iffy at best, so best to not worry about it and get busy building the impregnable, un-infiltratable, ready to throw out anyone not part of it, community that is the only one to have overcome everything from the Roman Empire to the Arian heresy, and who, in time, will also triumph over the present desolation of the real Church, were only Sedevacantists are left to carry the faith.

Andrew Torba
CEO, Gab.com
Christ is King

And a little more understanding

Digest this too, then ponder the situation a bit, then, assuming you will be a little depressed by it all, come back here and read what I will post next, the title will be The Solution.

The Greens have always been liars

The “climate change” scam, has always been a massive lie. If you are over 50, like me, you know this anyway, since we were supposed to run out of “fossil” fuels sometime in 1978. Then we were supposed to be living on a Mars-like barren desert due to the stripping of the ozone layer by the mid 1990s. Then it was going to be the drowning of the cities by the melting polar ice caps also by the 1990s. Except the only decent model of the weather that has been accurate for over four decades was a Russian one that took into account the sun and its effect on Earth. And according to that one, we have started to enter a new ice age in 2021 and from personal experience of the last 3 years, that makes sense to me, notwithstanding all the chemtrails designed to absolutely mess with the weather. And not even mentioning the HAARP stuff that can literally cause tornadoes, tsunamis, or whatever else they want at will.

But now we have conclusive and final proof that the CO2 emissions really don’t do a damned thing at all and this is based on EXPERIMENTS in the real world, not fraudulent “hockey stick” nonsense made up by pony-tailed frauds pretending to be scientists.

And here is the link to the paper:

Were dinosaurs ever real?

I have unfortunately spent too much time today reading this series on dinosaur hoaxes at Agent 13 substack. To the point that I am beginning to question how much of the dinosaur theory is real. It is a long series of posts in 5 parts so will take you a while to read, but is definitely worth it, and pretty well-written too.

Let’s be clear that I am not a “the Earth is only 6,000 year old” weirdo, and absolutely, never have been, and never will be a Flat Earther, but the dinosaur thing I always knew was dodgy to some degree or other. It’s just that the degree of it has never been clear to me because primarily I wasn’t too concerned with looking into it. And I like the idea of dinosaurs. And I like the idea of them coming back and eating all the stupid people.

Agent 13 makes a good case and it is also clear he doesn’t disbelieve all fossils, since like amny of us, he has found some himself, but they tend to be little ones mostly of shells and such things.

The one on the left was a gift to me and the one on the right my wife found as a girl in her garden by randomly bashing a rock open with a hammer. So fossils do exist.

What I always questioned, even as a child, was a lot of the narrative around them, such as what they said they looked like exactly, what they ate, or what kind of vascular system they had. I have also been aware for a long time that no actual full skeleton or skull of a T-Rex has ever been found and I became aware of Marsh and Cope as a result of reading Michael Crichton’s book Dragon Teeth based on them and the fictional account of some of the characters around them in one of his earlier books, which I read only a couple of years ago.

I still hope T-Rexes really existed, along with all the other fantastic creatures, however, I am absolutely open to the idea that they were either vastly different than we have been told, or possibly, even almost entirely fabricated.

On the other hand, I am very open to the idea that giant humanoids at least 3 metres (10 feet) or so in height have existed at some point in the past.

You still get banned on sight here for suggesting the Earth is flat though. Especially if you base it on the absolutely ignorant rendering of the word “firmament” in the Freemason Bible ordered by the famously homosexual King James, with it’s 33,000 “errors” of translation, and 700 years of editing by literal Christ killing Pharisees before the German with a penchant for raping maids decided to alter it further before declaring it the one book that is the totality of Christianity on its own (but not before he ripped out books from it apparently).

And my views on the Moon landing have been made clear in both video and my SF series Overlords of Mars, which is wholly encapsulated in the tome Nazi Moon (paper copy), or digital version.

And yeah, I also am not a believer in any kind of Hollow Earth theory, though I do really like the idea of it as a fantasy/escapist concept.

So there you are. Let me know your thoughts.

Economics is a Lie

Vox recently posted on some of the details of why economics is a lie.

While this is a step in the right direction for the average normie, it doesn’t nearly go far enough in explaining what a total and complete nonsense modern economics is, and has been since the time of medieval Venetian accounting practices.

One of the reasons that in my professional life, in the financial aspects of both the construction industry and the security industry I have always, without exception, outperformed every single target that was ever put before me, sometimes by multiples of the expected figures, is precisely because I have always absolutely and completely ignored the nonsensical practices that are taught and promulgated by supposed professional economists, accountants and other financial “experts”. That level of professional “success” is not coincidence. And I put “success” in inverted commas because it is not really the result of playing the same game. It would be like competing in a football game were all the other “professionals” only have one leg. Most of these people have actually bought into the lies they continue to perpetrate. It’s a bit like the people who believe/follow the Novus Ordo fake “Catholic” Church thinking they are Catholics, when in fact they are merely fooled and deluded ignorants.

And don’t get me wrong, these people still “function” and “work” and “produce” in that sector of economics and finance and indeed produce reports and conclusions based on complete nonsense that has almost no relation to reality whatsoever, but because they are all listening to and playing by the same idiotic nonsense, there is a certain level of “coherence” that allows the whole system to stumble along like the drunk and incontinent uncle at the Christmas dinner.

But reality has very little to do with the nonsensical methodologies used by economists in the first place and various financial “professionals” in the second place.

When I was deciding what to study at university level, I briefly started a generic Business Degree, within which, economics was a quite large part of the course and had separate subjects for macro-economics and micro-economics which all tied in with the accounting subject. I did not last more than two months in the course because reading and digesting the material in those textbooks it became absolutely obvious it was all a bunch of utter nonsense. Most of it theoretical wish fulfilment fantasies that the accounting practice was essentially designed to “clothe” as being valid emperors. It was all fake and gay and it made it absolutely clear that everyone involved in those subjects that used or relied on such practices was either an idiot or a deceiver and quite often both.

The reality of how one could avoid all that nonsense was to not play that game. The over-riding forces that dispensed with all the lies and nonsense of economists, accountants, and various financial experts were of two types, and often related.

The first was the law of the land. While the law is often also nonsensical, especially in the USA, it absolutely trumps economics in day to day life. So if you understand and become familiar with how the law as actually applied to contracts (which can differ somewhat from the theoretical and financial matters, you can mostly ignore all the “noise” made by accounting and economic practices, and just focus on those pivot points and fulcrums of those clown disciplines that actually make a difference. All you need to trump all economic “predictions” and so on is a basic understanding of the law and how to use ledger entries as first invented by Venetians several centuries ago. And if you want to get really fancy use a red pen for outgoings and a black one for incoming revenue. And keep “potential” entries (i.e. those not as yet realised) separate or with an asterix or note in a column next to it that gets crossed through when it is realised.

The second aspect of reality that trumps even the law, as well as literally ALL of the economic and accounting practices is brute force. At its pinnacle, you can see it as currently playing out in Ukraine. All the idiocy of the USA and their puppet satrapies in Europe account for absolutely nothing in the face of Russian use of reality-based force. And keep in mind that Russia is still playing by an extremely fair gentlemanly code of war.

At a lesser level, force can be the result of merely understanding the realities of the legal system and applying them forcefully, which keeps things on the right side of legality. Beyond that, you enter into the realm of dealing with criminality, which I have encountered in my work as a close protection service provider, which entailed real physical threats against both myself, the team I operated with and our client (all of which were handled successfully by us, I am happy to say), but also in my work related to the financial aspects of business, where fraud, theft and illegal activity by various businesses or individuals were uncovered as a result of my work. Sometimes as a result of being hired explicitly as a forensic accounting investigation, and other times when I came across it as a routine part of my work.

In any case, the order of reality based economics is as follows:

1. Brute Force

2. The Law as applied

3. The Law in theory (which should never be relied upon, but which a lot of people are fooled by)

4. Real accounting (money in and money out) with real profit/loss ledger entries and reality based predictions and projections.

And that’s it. All the nonsensical theory that economists and accountants and financial experts all around the world use and either ignorantly believe in or deceitfully use to further their own ends can be safely and pretty much completely ignored if you understand these principles. And for most people, you only really need to grasp points 2 and 4 and it will serve you well your whole life. A grasp of the realities of point number 1 is also very important to have so that you don’t end up being suicided if you tread on the wrong toes inadvertently, as well as being able to recognise such possibilities before they come up. It certainly has kept me from entering in situations that would have been extremely dangerous, and I have not been one to shy away from complicated situations, but even those had to be based on understanding the realities of life and knowing that if one deals with elements of society that will cross the line from the law to criminality, even those situations have a certain set of rules that people tend to abide by. It is then merely a matter of remaining on the correct line of legality without compromising yourself to the point where you become an obstacle that the other side is prepared to remove by crossing into criminality.

On at least two occasions in my professional life, I definitely was able to avoid becoming an accidental statistic by simply understanding these realities and making the other side aware that while getting rid of me was certainly possible, doing so would ultimately result in them having losses that far outweighed the irritation I or my work may have been causing them. Neither side was bluffing, and as a result I was able to navigate the situation with a level of calm that others in merely adjacent positions not only did not have, but could not understand and assumed I was either naive, insane, or brave beyond reason. None of which was the case.

It has been a mild irritation, among many, of course, that most people who fancy themselves as “in the know” with respect to financial realities, often speak profound nonsense on these topics, and people often believe or listen to them because they may be wealthy and thus appear successful. In fact, I suppose by the standard terms most use for “success” they are. But it’s all sand castles built on sand castles, relying on sand foundations on a beach where the tide rolls in regularly.

Such people also assume that my commenting and indeed actions with regard to not just my life, but that of people who see what the trends are is borderline “conspiracy theorist” paranoia.

The reality is simply that, as per my prediction of the financial crash of 2008, which I assumed would happen by the year 2000 at the outmost, back in 1995 or so, I am merely considerably ahead of the curve.

I also am constitutionally, intellectually, and spiritually, averse to essentially dealing in deceit, so I have never been able to make use of such understanding of reality to make a huge amount of money in say, trading in the stock market for example. It’s not for a lack of ability or capacity, it is because doing so is something that would tend to consume my soul on some level. I have zero problem with confrontation or even facing physical danger, and taking all kinds of risks (because they may appear as reckless to others but are very much calculated ones from my perspective) but the constant and daily practice of dealing in lies and nonsense and fake math would take a toll on my psyche that I am simply not prepared to pay, and never have been.

But that is not to say I can’t recognise that aspect in others. I have worked for or with literal billionaires, as well as millionaires, politically influential people, captains of industry and leading experts in a number of diverse fields, and while each of these people was unique and talented in various ways, only a tiny number among them had lives that I would consider personally worthwhile. In fact, the only one that immediately comes to mind is a gun-shop owner that has done very well for himself.

That is not to say the others have pointless lives. I am sure from their perspectives my own life is irrelevant to the point they cannot even contemplate trading places with me. What they would probably be surprised to know is that despite their billions or millions, the feeling is mutual from my side.

If ever a multi-millionaire with a conscience similar to mine appears in my life, and we were to work together towards the creation of a better system of human life/experience, the resulting model of city-state would be very likely to become a model for a much improved humanity going forward. And after a certain tipping point would become practically unstoppable.

I think such an event is probably impossible unless it happens as the result of divine intervention on the billionaire/millionaire after the fact of their wealth, because the path to such wealth is often littered with choices and requirements that tend to chip away at such a sense of ideological imperatives as I continue to have well past the naive stage of youth.

So I won’t be holding my breath for Elon Musk to give me a ring anytime soon, after he has a vision from our Lord or something similar; and I’ll continue on my path, which reminds me I have now bought a gigantic chicken coop and I need to plan where to have it installed on our farm.

And to all those reading who are considering the points I make in this post, never forget the reality that copper-jacketed lead, always trumps gold when push comes to shove. Gold trumps the law. The law trumps accounting and economics, and basic math does too. And below that is only lies, deceivers and delusions.

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks