Archive for the ‘Impostors and Frauds’ Category

The Limits of the SSH

If you are new here, the Socio-Sexual Hierarchy (which only applies to men) explained by Vox Day has had a lot of controversy around it and has been criticised, lauded and everything in between.

To be fair to Vox, he was always clear that his SSH was essentially a tool for generally understanding and predicting male behaviour in a social context and that it was fractal; which I think is a word that confuses most people and he might have got the point across somewhat better if perhaps less accurately by saying that it was contextual.

The point is that a guy who is generally an Alpha in most social situations might become a Delta in a situation that is totally unfamiliar to him.

The designation of Sigma has also gone viral to the point of almost absurdity, right up to people trying to ban the use of the word in schools.

There is a fairly exhaustive overview of the whole concept done by Sigma Frame that has some overall decent points to make, even if in some respect they miss the point, due to trying to retain a strictly “Christian” (still heretically Churchian to people like me) perspective, when in reality, the SSH is essentially silent on the topic of religion. The archetypes exist in any religious denomination of any religion under the sun you might care to imagine.

Anyway, the point I wanted to make here is that although it has already been noted that completely “pure” versions of each archetype don’t exist, because humans are messy, there is one aspect of the supposed would-be Alphas/Sigmas that I have noted over the years that is essentially the “chink” in their self-deluded armour.

What I mean here is that genuine Alphas, can and do have various weaknesses, and this is not news, everyone does, but there are certain types of “Alphas” that although would indeed be deemed to be alphas by most people, are in fact, mostly playing a role. A role they have convinced themselves of too mind you, to the point where they may even react unconsciously as the supposed Alpha they are; nevertheless, there remains an undercurrent of self-doubt.

I was recently asked by my friend Tony why I had referred to various people as Sigma-Gamma, Alpha-Gamma, or Omega-Gamma, and so on.

It is a difficult concept to get across, but he understood my attempts and defined it beautifully. Referring to two of these people, who may as well be polar opposites in many ways, yet also share some similarities he said:

It’s like they are both somehow performative caricatures of something… like their own, idealized versions of great men

And that hit the nail on the head.

Now, it was not performative in the rather obvious ways that someone trying to impersonate what they think is an Alpha, or whatever, can be. It was a subtler thing, like for example having a rule about never smiling in photographs taken in public. Or, on a recent podcast I saw, a rather well-known podcaster that seems relatively unassuming and calm, as he espouses relatively hardcore traditional values for men and women, stated he simply does not cry pretty much, ever, even when someone close to him dies. And yes, of course, that is generally true of men, but something about the way he said it set off my “this guy is forcing himself to try and be what he thinks the peak manly-man acts like” radar. I am sure he wasn’t lying, that he does not in fact cry, almost ever. Partly it can also be cultural, but there was an element there of insincerity. Some lack of real connection with his deeper self.

Of course, you can just think I am full of shit and just making assumptions without evidence, but that is not what I am doing. I come to these conclusions only after years of observation and confirming my observations to the point I can predict how these people will react, and do so in a way that goes “off-script” for their supposed archetype (which they tend to be very invested in.)

So, while I may not be able to give you a concise explanation with all the evidence, if you had 30 hours to review events that a specific person took over years of time, and then I can predict for you how they would react to X, Y, and Z in ways that contradict what most people would assume would be their reaction based on all the observations, and if I can do that repeatedly with different people claiming Alpha, Sigma (or more rarely Omega status) Or even who have just been labelled as such by others, then I would say that would be some solid evidence. Of course, I can hardly demonstrate that to you in a blog post, but I live that experience, and have been able to transmit it to others who bothered to try to confirm my observation, and they noted my predictions as correct too, so I know it is valid.

The difference, between what I would call a more genuine, or perhaps more “total” Alpha or Sigma, is a deep level of self-knowledge.

You know how Gammas inevitably recon they are anything BUT Gammas? That’s because at heart, the Gamma is the very antithesis of self-knowledge. These are men who avoid the truth about themselves the way most people would avoid pools filled only with radioactive, rabid, giant eels.

Picture of an actual Sigma, facing one of the minor ugly sides of his real nature.

Sigmas in general are the ones with the most self-knowledge, which is why the opinions of others generally do not affect them very much, if at all. However, when you note a Sigma that repeatedly tells you how much the opinions of other people don’t affect him (and they generally don’t) but then has an obvious reaction when a specific point of fact about him is pointed out, accurately, mind you, not merely accusatorially, well… he may still, generally speaking be a Sigma, but let’s say he’s not a 100% DOC (Di Origine Controllata – That is, of the true 100% quality). And the same goes if he also pretends to not be affected by anything at all, ever, because pretty much everyone has something that pisses them off.

For me, especially 30 years ago, it was mostly being accused of holding views, or internal concepts that I absolutely did not, by people I generally viewed as at least moderately intelligent and/or capable. Today, 30 years later… eh, I realise the stupidity factor of even moderately intelligent and capable people is still waaaaay higher than my young and optimistic self used to hope for. And then Covid, and then the Ukraine war, and the Gaza genocide, and, and, and… has just made it very clear that the fault in my getting upset at their tragic misjudgment of my character or intentions, was the fault of my very own rose-tinted glasses, wild, wild, optimism about humanity as a whole, and some misguided desire of wanting to believe that, surely, if only I could lay out the facts before them… they too would be able to see…

So, today, if they are too stupid to figure out the basics, I will not waste any time trying to correct them or “help” them. But that is not to say I am unreactive to almost everything.

My daughter tells me enthusiastically about some absolutely trivial thing she did, or found out, or thought of at school, or some observation she makes that is probably obvious to bacteria on Mars on some level, and it could be easy to simply let it wash over me and not respond or react to any of it.

However, doing so would crush her enthusiasm for life, and as such would be a bad thing. I try to put myself in her young mind and think, why would she find this fascinating or interesting, and how did I think about it at her age? And as she is on the cusp of becoming a young woman, the pattern it paints is mostly still rather… well, as man, imagine being in a giant shopping centre of just women’s shoes. And having to follow your female relative around as she waxed poetic about every pair she wanted to try on, and did. It’s kind of like that. About 3rd level of Hell in Dante’s Inferno.

So I amuse myself by seeing if I can at all nudge her train of thought into something mildly more interesting.

“Oh you like the lacquer on those? I see… I think lacquer used to be made from tree sap. And possibly bug paste to give it colour.”

“What?!??!”

“Yeah, shiny bug guts under polished resin. Phenomenal stuff.”

“Wait… I don’t believe you, I’m googling it!”

“You know google is just a CIA Psyops to keep the truth from you, right? The truth is not in google. You need to find a book on lacquer printed before 1842. Original only, because they corrupt the digital and new print versions. Like Roald Dahl’s books.”

“I Don’t care about lacquer that much dad, and I don’t care who Rodney Doug was, or whatever.”

“Roald Dahl. He wrote Little Red Riding Hood, the story. You know, where she has a pistol in her knickers.”

“Oh DAD! Little Red Riding Hood didn’t have a pistol in her knickers! I know that story, remember, I used to tell you about it, when I was little.”

“Google it.”

“Oh come on, I…”

“Google it.”

(huffs, types in phone… reads…) “Wait… what?”

“See? Now what pistol do you think it was? Probably a low calibre, right?”

And so you see, terminal brain death narrowly avoided once more.

Of course, that’s my daughter and I love her. 99.99999% of the rest of the planet that tried to subject me to that, I would find an excuse to get away, or possibly murder them and get rid of the body, if they insist.

But my point is that Self-Knowledge is ultimately the total measure of a man. A man that truly, deeply, knows himself for example to be a coward, and say, accepts it, is someone that I have more respect for than one who fancies himself a hero, maybe even acts as one in many situations, but in reality, perhaps even not fully known to what extent even to himself, he is, in fact, a coward.

It’s not that I necessarily think of him as evil, or intentionally deceitful (though some are) it’s just that I can’t take him all that seriously when he clearly is not even familiar with himself at any real depth.

So, when considering the SSH and what generic category a man may fall in more than another, remember that not only is that archetype at least partially and sometimes almost wholly, contextual, but just like there are always more stupid people than you can possibly imagine, there is also just a lot more Gamma fragments in far more people than you imagine. Including… terrifyingly… possibly… yourself.

But the only way to know for sure, friend, is to actually look under the proverbial bed.

Then get under there, armed with a sharp knife in your teeth, swim down to the monsters under there, and face them.

WWIII Update

In case you are new here, allow me to first of all present the sides of the WWIII conflict that started in early 2020.

On the side of Satan:

Israel (leading the charge both openly as the genociding power it is, as well as covertly through it’s displaced Diaspora and Owners of the Bank for International Settlement (the Rothschilds) and their sort – bankers that are literally above the law and create the world’s money supply out of thin air)

The USA (A vassal superstate of both Israel and Freemasonry, being the first Freemasonic country on Earth)

Western Europe (Composed of various vassal state to the USA)

Other general Vassal states (Canada, Australia, New Zealand) or original Satanic houses (the United Kingdom).

Against Satan (but not necessarily angels either)

Russia (Nominally Eastern Orthodox, so schismatics, but at least making a nod to the side of God)

China (Not actively directly involved yet, but this dragon is patient. The final living standards under a global China would possibly be marginally better than under a global Satanist leadership, but as I say, probably only marginally so)

India (Kind of like Italy in WWII, they will go wherever the side that wins seems to be at any given time)

Melange of the Mostly Irrelevant

These are essentially smaller countries that will not affect the outcome one way or the other. Pretty much what most of the Western European countries would be if their despotic, corrupt, for sale, traitorous, pedophile, blackmailable, fraudsters pretending to be their legitimate governments would be removed tomorrow and replaced with the average person in each of these countries that actually cares about the welfare of their people and nation.

This includes most of Africa and South America, all the little weird places like Micronesia, and also side-show pieces like Taiwan, which are geopolitically important, just by a number of factors that make them so, but are, militarily and in terms of affecting the path of the global war taking place, essentially also irrelevant. Japan is another such place. they may have valuable items that would help one side or the other, so become contentious places, but directly, they are essentially hostages, like the rest of Western Europe, just more obviously and dangerously so.

Where it Started

The Side of Satan, used to ruling the world by subterfuge, fear, and financial terrorism and enslavement, having succeeded at achieving pretty much whatever it wanted since 1945, decided to take the gloves off and start the process of changing the whole of planet Earth into the thing they really have been aiming consciously for since at minimum 1776, but really, that has been planned from the very start of mankind. The underlying power behind it all is indeed an immortal spirit of evil, we sometimes refer to by various names, but in any event, it utterly hates humanity and wants them crushed and humiliated in their totality. It does this by elevating various figures in the human world to do its bidding. The upper echelons of this essentially nested hive of secret societies, subterfuge, secret deals and hierarchies and inter-competitive backstabbing are indeed aware of who they serve, and do so consciously. Others may be operating under the guise that they know best, but really, they know, and they are feeling so confident now, they are not even hiding it any more. Listen to this guy, Graff at the World Economic Forum (see the whole long post Simplicious made that also covered this but is too long and autistic for most people)

Klaus Schwab of course has been boasting to the world that their WEF graduates have been infiltrating every Western government for decades. Literally almost every leader in Europe and abroad is a “graduate” of this process. Justin Trudeau being its most idiotic, obvious, annoying and completely controlled puppet, but so is the gay Macaroon of France and all the various others throughout Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand and so on. There is also another disturbing trend that some, along with most of the freaky “elites” that wear animal masks, rape children and dance around Bohmain grove, and hang out with “spirit cooker” Marina Abramovich and the likes of the Clinton Foundation, which we all know is a child trafficking ring. And that is the deep undercurrent of Occult stuff going back centuries. Meloni, the PM of Italy is on record saying she had an occult master since her early 20s. And that’s to say nothing of the connections to child rape by gigantic blackmailers like Jeffrey Epstein, and now Sean Coombs or P. Diddy, as he liked to be called, which hardly masks the proclivities he enjoyed with certain potentially underage people, like Justin Bieber, who literally sang about a P. Diddy party and how it warped him.

If you dig even just a little bit, the literally demonic, down to literal child sacrifice and cannibalism, is there. You don’t want to see it full in the face, because it is monstrous, but you know. And you know you could find out more if only it would not haunt your nightmares forever after.

As to where it started? Well, worshipping the devil is the oldest religion in the world. I literally started after Lucifer and a third of the host were cast out of Heaven.

You might not believe it that literally, but honestly, start from a blank slate and what makes most sense?

Money and power alone don’t explain it. The ritual abuse, murder, organ harvesting and adrenochrome farms of little children goes well beyond mere greed and a wish for power. And when it is on the absolutely enormous scale it is, it being merely the really twisted perversions of a mere few freaks doesn’t explain it either.

You say you want more proof? There is mountains of it. you just have to look for it. Find out what some of the veterans of the Ukraine conflict see and have witnessed. Look up what the Franklin scandal was decades ago. Or the Belgian scandal that encompassed pretty much all of the Belgian government and judiciary and had to do with an vast pedophile network that to all intents and purposes was the government and the judiciary and law enforcement too. Look at the testimony of British highly ranked police officers that tried to blow the whistle on the depth and scope of the same thing in the UK government, law enforcement and judiciary too. Do you really think that sick fuck of Jimmy Saville who raped and abused kids dying of cancer, by the hundreds, was not known about? Do you not know the statue of a pedophile is proudly displayed outside the BBC studios? And the rampant similar stuff that goes on at all the higher echelons of power? All the pesos in the fake “Catholic Church” which has been headed by Satanists pretending to be “Popes” uninterruptedly since 1958?

You may pretend to yourself I am just some crazy “conspiracy theorist” ranting, but it’s undeniable that the so-called conspiracy theorists turned out to be right about pretty much all of it. JFK, 9/11, the faked part of the Moon Landings (though we did go to the Moon, but not the way they tell you), the whole Covid Mass-Murder event, and on, and on, and on.

Of course, the majority who took the genetic serums that are now killing little children from heart attacks and giving turbo-cancers and other life-crippling effects, don’t want to know.

Operating under the idea that if you don’t say it out loud, maybe, just like the Candyman, the evil shit will not happen to you even if you did take that fake Vaxx that has never worked in over 30 years and only ended up killing the animals that were repeatedly subjected to it.

So because of that, everyone just keeps their head down and keeps quiet and just gets squeezed more and more, by more woke insanity and pregnant “men” and furries and other mentally ill freaks pushed on us by… yup, the usual suspects. Except no one is allowed to say it. No one is allowed to name them. The fact they have been chased out of 108 countries some 1004 times is just everyone else’s fault. never had anything to do with them or how they behave.

And blowing up thousands of devices remotely indiscriminately among civilians is supposed to be great, and good and acceptable. Not a terrorist act at all.

How it’s Going

You KNOW that all the stuff I wrote above is true and just scratching the surface. The level of deception, horror, total degeneracy and vile evil that is really all around us is nauseating and not hard to see even for those who only have a room temperature IQ.

In short, there are enough people now that have understood this at least to the point that one hopes most of the time they watch the bullshit spewing out of their television sets they simply roll their eyes and say “Bitch, Please!”

You KNOW they are lying to you. You know they are evil. And you KNOW there is no standing on the sidelines any more. They will not let you. Either you are one of them (you are not. They are few, very few, and wealthy to a point you have no conception of), you are one of their pets/slaves/sex toys, as they decide and want you to be, or you are against them. There is no other position where you will go by unnoticed and unmolested.

In short, we should all pretty much be here by now:

And guess what. He doesn’t call it that. He doesn’t express a framework within which what he says can be made to happen, but it exists. It’s called Catholicism. Not the fake Vatican II TurboPederasty on crack, no.

The Catholicism of the Crusaders of 1095, who put on their armours and with heir entire fortunes and families went to fight an invader that had been attacking them and enslaving and murdering them for nearly 400 years. We have been brainwashed for some 80 years really intensively.

It’s enough now.

And no, Catholic, real ones, do not “turn the other cheek” to this level of evil. They march either to their martyrdom, or to push the demons back into Hell. An remember, even the Gates of Hell, will not prevail on us.

So, yes, enter WWIII correctly.

It’s a spiritual fight first and a worldly one only secondly. Get the first right and build up your people, your community, your family and friends. Be clear on who and where you are and who is and is not with you. Organise. Group. Resist all the lies in every way, every day, and build up your life, your inspiration, your children, and make new alternatives and create new realities of local government, of local academics, and so on.

Maybe you are Vaxxed and dying or ill. So what? You want the bastards that fooled you into that to win? You want to pretend that’s not what happened as you quietly slip away into the darkness?

Whatever your personal situation, whatever you believe, simply know this: There are only two sides. The side of Good or the side of Evil. And no man’s land does not exist anymore, it is rapidly becoming territory of the enemy too, except for those who see the truth and become part of our side.

The opening salvos have been done. Now we enter the start of the real war. And it will go on at least a few years. I would say it is unlikely to chance quickly. So build up your forces. Ten years from now no one knows what the landscape will look like, but those who prepare now will be far better able to create and navigate it.

Deus Vult.

The Continuing Lies of Jay Dyer

Jay Dyer, once again makes things up, relating to the ecumenical council of Constance.

He contention is that the Council of Constance “ruled” who was the real Pope during the period in which there were three Popes (two of which were fake). This is absolute nonsense and of course, yet another lie.

He says this in this mostly boring and irrelevant podcast from about 2 hours and 10 or 11 minutes or so and carries on until about 2 hours and 30 minutes. He repeatedly says that the council of Constance resolved the issue.

This is absolutely and completely a lie.

What happened is that the three Popes were convened to this council originally by the fake Antipope John XXIII, who was pushed to do so by the Emperor. So nothing happening here except them basically saying: “We gotta sort this out.” As a result of this investigation John XXIII was going to be investigated for scandalous conduct so he ran away. In the meantime, the two remaining possible “Popes” Gregory XII and Benedict XIII came to an agreement which was that Gregory XII would be accepted as the one true Pope and instead of being deposed (as were the other two, for being antipopes) he would resign and a new and valid Pope (from the Roman see, would be elected). So that’s what happened.

In essence the one true Pope, Gregory XII resolved the issue. Not the Council.

This is typical of Jay, he just lies, makes straw man “arguments” and completely makes things up. As I demonstrated on my video of our debate, he literally makes quotes up from various documents they supposedly come from, and refers to others that are completely unrelated to the topic at hand.

As I said right from the start, the man is a liar and an intellectual pigmy. All you need to do is go read the documents he quotes and take them in proper context, because he of course will quote mine and try and twist black into being white and vice versa.

You can read the whole detail of what happened here.

In short, it was NOT the council that decided anything, but Gregory XII, the one true pope that for the good of the Church proposed the solution that everyone agreed with and everyone agreed he had the full authority to make this decision and that all of his appointments were in fact the only ones that would be valid, since he was the real pope.

Gregory XII sent to Constance as his representatives his protector Carlo Malatesta, the Lord of Rimini, and the Dominican cardinal, John Domenici—to Constance indeed, but not to the General Council assembled there by the authority, and in the name, of John XXIII. The envoys’ commission was to the emperor Sigismund, presiding over the various bishops and prelates whom his zeal to restore peace to the Church had brought together. To these envoys—and to Malatesta in the first place—Gregory gave authority to convoke as a General Council—to convoke and not to recognise—these assembled bishops and prelates ; [4] and by a second bull [5] he empowered Malatesta to resign to this General Council in his name.

The emperor, the bishops and prelates consented and accepted the role Gregory assigned. And so, on July 4, 1415. Sigismund, clad in the royal robes, left the throne he had occupied in the previous sessions for a throne placed before the altar, as for the president of the assembly. Gregory’s two legates sat by his side facing the bishops. The bull was read commissioning Malatesta and Domenici to convoke the council and to authorise whatever it should do for the restoration of unity and the extirpation of the schism—with Gregory’s explicit condition that there should be no mention of Baldassare Cossa, [6] with his reminder that from his very election he had pledged himself to resign if by so doing he could truly advance the good work of unity, and his assertion that the papal dignity is truly his as the canonically elected successor of Urban VI.

Malatesta then delegated his fellow envoy, the cardinal John Domenici, to pronounce the formal operative words of convocation [7] ; and the assembly—but in its own way—accepted to be thus convoked, authorised and confirmed in the name “of that lord who in his own obedience is called Gregory XII” [8]. The council next declared that all canonical censures imposed by reason of the schism were lifted, and the bull was read by which Gregory authorised Malatesta to make the act of abdication [9] and promised to consider as ratum gratum et firmum, and forever irrevocable, whatever Malatesta, as his proxy, should perform. The envoy asked the council whether they would prefer the resignation immediately, or that it should be delayed until Peter de Luna’s decision was known. The council preferred the present moment. It ratified all Gregory XII’s acts, received his cardinals as cardinals, promised that his officers should keep their posts and declared that if Gregory was barred from re-election as pope, this was only for the peace of the Church, and not from any personal unworthiness. Then the great renunciation was made [10], ” …. renuncio et cedo …. et resigno …. in hac sacrosancta synodo et universali concilio, sanctam Romanam et universalem eccleciam repraesentante” and the council accepted it [11], but again as made “on the part of that lord who in his own obedience was called Gregory XII”. The Te Deum was sung and a new summons drawn up calling upon Peter de Luna to yield to the council’s authority.

The work of Pisa was now almost undone, and by this council which, in origin, was a continuation of Pisa. It had suppressed the Pisan pope whom Pisa, with biting words, had rejected as a schismatic and no pope.”

Phillip Hughes,  A History of the Church, p. 289-291

All it takes to catch Dyer out in his lies is to actually refer to the documents and events he intentionally lies about and misrepresents.

It’s just like all the fake nonsense “scientists” and “historians” do, when, like “journalists” they give a bunch of “references”. No one ever bothers to look them up. I you do, you will find they literally list the very proof of their own lies.

Vigano demonstrated to be just another fake Catholic

As I have been saying officially since 2020 and the publication of my book Reclaiming the Catholic Church, Vigano is not, and never has been, anything other than at best a knowing heretic, and more likely, simply just another Satanic gatekeeper in place to merely “net” (catch) those that might otherwise stray into the truth of Sedevacantism.

As I have repeatedly explained the point is that Vigano, having a PhD in Canon Law of 1917, cannot in ANY way be excused for “not knowing” about the heresies of Vatican II. Which logically means he is a KNOWING perpetrator of the Satanic and impostor cult of the Novus Ordo. Which means he never was a Catholic to begin with. But even if you want to be brain-damaged and pretend he ever was, his “Catholicism” was immediately and permanently forfeited the moment he accepted heresy instead of truth and his continued promulgation of Vatican II for more than 50 years makes him in any case, a public, pertinacious and public heretic, as per Canon 188 part 4.

This was NEVER in any doubt, and despite all the rah-rah about Vigano being a true traditionalist, the reality always was the one I pointed out by the very simple expedient method of merely following Catholic dogma as pointed out in Canon Law. Vigano is a heretic. Always was, and continues to be.

I therefore have not been paying any attention whatsoever to whatever he has been up to, but Adam Piggott, ever the optimist when it comes to these Satanists, has, and having recently caught up with his blog, lo and behold, here is the ultimate proof of my point:

Vigano being interviewed by that other fake Catholic grifter-dwarf, Tay-Tay Marshall.

I suppose Emo Jones will be the next to “interview” him. They may skip Michelle Voris however since he has once more revealed himself to be what he always was, a Satanic, flaming homosexual pretending to be a Catholic under the banner of his fake and un-Catholic “ministry” of Church Militant.

I have laid out the whole grifting structure of these impostors before, as well as how easy it is to know who is or is not an actual Catholic.

It really is NOT difficult to know who is a fake, impostor, Satanist, pretending to be Catholic, who is a potentially well-meaning but lazy and ignorant layman that has been fooled into error, who is PRETENDING to be one, in order to lead more souls into confusion and Hell, and who is actually a Catholic.

And once you have understood the details, it really is impossible to be fooled any longer.

American Naivety

I have often made it clear that I consider Americans to be among the most naive of people. Usually in less than flattering terms. But it is not a hatred for Americans themselves, that prompts this. In the main, as with every country, there are trends, though America is so vast that it has multiple regional variations, an overall view of Americans is that they are friendly, superficial, somewhat artificial, think America and Americans are the best at everything, and they are very, very, naive.

Their naivety is by design from inception so it’s to a certain extent not their fault, and to be expected, because it was baked in from the very start if their fake nation, built by Satanic design by Freemasons.

Nevertheless, their “innocence” and arrogance, particularly given the last few years of unveiling of the curtains behind which the goblins that run the USA has happened, is irritating.

Their silly and absurd beliefs in utter mythologies such as free speech, or the power of the constitution and so on are truly mystifying.

Vox recently posted about The Law, and how it is not being respected by Clown World, but the astonishing thing is that anyone even needs this explained at all. A normal 7 year old in Italy absolutely understands that some words can get you killed, that no piece of paper or supposed law is worth the paper it’s written on, and so on.

I think most normal people around the world understand this.

Adherence to any kind of legal system is only contingent on one thing, and always has been, and always will be:

The people with the ability to use force the most, make the rules. It has always been this way and always will be.

The case of the Brazilian judge is also a case in point. If a man with a gun got into that Judge’s house and put it to his head, with a request for X to have unfettered access to Brazilian citizens but also the bank accounts of that specific judge, within minutes that would be granted.

I really don’t understand what is so difficult for anyone, including Americans, to grasp about the concept. The ONLY law that exists is that which can be ENFORCED. And the benign or noxious nature of it is fully dependant on the character of those with the power to do the enforcing.

That’s it. That is all the law that ever can exist for human beings.

Which is why a morality based religion based in fact is necessary for a society to flourish.

And of all the religions that have ever existed, only Catholicism has resulted in the overwhelmingly positive aspects of human progress. While other societies based on other religions did happen, none of them are even remotely comparable in terms of quality of life to the societies that had been created by Catholicism.

Sedevacantism is the only reasoned and logical choice.

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks