Humour « The Kurgan Blog

Giuseppe Filotto Logo

Special Operations & Exploration

Archive for the ‘Humour’ Category

The Dirty Old West RPG Gaming Report

It was a little while ago, but I refereed a brief RPG of the pen and paper kind, the one I wrote a while back and revamped last year.

I know that pen and paper RPGames are probably a GenX thing now, the Millennials can’t read and the Zyklons keep sliding their fingers on the pages wondering why the writing doesn’t change.

That all said, it was a n enjoyable experience considering the players were a rather autistic millennial, a slightly autistic Gender and my eldest daughter.

None of them had played any such games before, and I did throw at them a rather “advanced” RPG scenario, nevertheless, it was far from a total failure, and I think they did enjoy parts of it.

I am used to battle-hardened RPGers so it was my fault for not giving them a more linear and simple scenario. I should have stuck to simple cowboy antics with maybe a little supernatural thrown in, but noooo, I had to get them into a Red Indian Shaman temporal wormhole opening that threw them into a semi-post zombie apocalypse scenario from the future with things like helicopters that had to be described as giant mechanical beetles (I must have done a good job because it took them a while to realise it was a helicopter).

My old RPG friends would have revelled in that. But these guys could have used a much simpler scenario to get them used to the mechanics, even though they are frightfully simple even compared to old D&D rules.

Anyway, I was dusting off some papers and came across the gaming notes and I read through the rules again for fun, and even if I do say so myself, it is a good little game. Quite possible to run a brief, bloody and fun scenario in an hour even with 4 or 5 players, including character creation if the referee is up to speed with the rules (reading the short rulebook once a couple of hours before is enough to make you player ready. When you have read it through a couple of times and played a few games this becomes ridiculously simple to run games for).

Anyway, even if you have not played pen and paper RPGs before, or you think you are too old, or whatever, I strongly suggest you try it and at least let your children try it. The face-to-face interaction with the other humans fosters interpersonal skills that frankly I think are almost lost to the internet and digital “social” brain-sucking platforms.

Sure I’d love it if you played my RPG games, either this one or the Zombie Apocalypse one, which also has a module out, but either way just play them. I don’t care what game or what system, try it. It really is a worthwhile endeavour.

By G | 1 May 2023 | Posted in Humour, RPGs, StCZA - Module 0, StCZA - Q.O.R.G., The Dirty Old West, Zombie Apocalypse

Quicksilver Syndrome

Quicksilver in the original comics I read as a kid belonged to the evil legion of mutants, an ill-defined (for a long while at least) group of “bad guys”. When they did delve a bit into their group, it came out that after all, these so called “evil” mutants, weren’t really evil, but that was the narrative that SJW types from the “superhero” class came up with. You know the types, never kill bad guys, fisticuffs only, humans and mutants can live in harmony, etc. etc.

Well, as it turns out, Pietro, or Quicksilver as he’s named, has super-speed, which we all knew, but what we didn’t know is that it is always on for him.

There is a scene where he begins to argue with one of the women in the group, and he starts to talk and then the writing in his speech bubble gets smaller and joined together and finally is just a line. The woman, which if I recall right may have been the Scarlet Witch, calls him “Pietro! Pietro! You’re speaking too fast, I can’t understand!” And then it comes out. Pietro is living his life always at supersede, (autocorrect typo, it was supposed to say superspeed but funny in the context of this blog!) but in order to interact with others he is constantly slowing himself down.

Imagine living like that. Speaking in slow motion, moving in slow motion, in order to have a chance at some kind of human connection. He was always portrayed as guy with a very short fuse, bad-tempered, and quick to anger.

Really though?

He’s the most patient of any group of super-heroes or villains put together. Imagine having to listen in slow motion to a point you already know precisely where it’s going and seeing someone have in slow motion, about to make an error and you even warn them, tell them, several times, and they just slowly, carry on making it. Imagine that being your day-to-day experience with other humans.

Well… that one frame in the comic book I read when I was in my teens struck me so much and stayed with me so long, precisely because I can relate. If I also had supersede the way he does, life would be pretty unbearable. It’s hard enough just having brain that works at roughly three times the speed of everyone else’s on a slow day for me. But yes, it is trying at times. Very trying.

I know, I know, High IQ problems are a bit like Rich People Problems. No one cares and they don’t seem real. But I assure you, they are. Despite the fact that most people wish to have such “problems” the reality is that not many are equipped to handle them.

It’s like this e-card.

Yes, Yes, I will now go shed a single tear for myself and how badly I am misunderstood from the apes monkeys that surround me.

I know you will all commiserate with me, of course.

By G | 23 April 2023 | Posted in Human Performance, Humour, Zombie Apocalypse

Didn’t I tell you the “Pagan” LARPers are Retarded?

For the uninitiated LARP stands for Live Action Role-Playing. It’s like make believe where people dress up in cardboard costumes pretending to be cartoon animals or superheroes, or, in this case “Vikings”.

The difference being that the actual LARPers are knowingly engaging in a bit of fun and games, the “Pagans” somehow believe they are “real” Vikings, just waiting for the right time before they take over the world.

See my last post on the blackpilled where this fantastic specimen decided to comment. Think of this as part 2 of The unbearable Weight of Stupid People.

I have copied his comments and will now be doing the usual: Kurgan Woodchipper Moment for your entertainment. His Commentary is in retarded bold, mine in refined Italic.

Jeff Rollin, (retarded “Pagan” LARPer) whose email I will provide you at the end in case you want to converse with him about his impending “Viking” rising, wrote the following, apparently “innocuous comment”:

I would be a great Pagan Viking, if only guns didn’t exist and swords and war-axes were still the peak of military technology. Is that black-pilled?

But, as the comment from Uncle John’s Band, stated, it was already clear to me what we were dealing with, thanks to, as he mentioned in the same post, Single Data Point Pattern Recognition. Nevertheless, for your benefit and amusement, I thought I’d lay the obvious Kurgan pit of doom with woodchopper at the bottom right in front of him, and asked:

Well, I have a few questions for you:
1. Do you even know anything at all about the Vikings and the practical consequences of their beliefs?
2. Are you even remotely in shape?
3. Are you even remotely aware of what life back then was like?

Now, what do you think his response was going to be? An objective reply to my questions, perhaps showing a deep knowledge of ancient Viking practices? Yeah… don’t hold your breath. In the first place, because literally most of the ancient Viking practices are now completely unknown, and the few hints we do have about them are really quite horrific and nothing anyone today would really want to live by. Their ideas on marriage/death/rape for example, and the interplay between them were, a tad uncivilised you might say. The ONLY people who might think this was cool are frustrated incels fantasising about becoming the next Elliot Rodger.

So let us now begin the woodchipper process in earnest. I have combined his two retarded comments into one continuous one that I comment as we go. As I said, he’s in retarded bold, I am in refined italic.

You’re just avoiding the question Not at all. I was, charitably, giving you a tiny chance to prove you are not exactly the kind of LARPing retard your kind ALWAYS, invariably, inevitably, absolutely, always is. Thanks for playing, now we have absolute proof for everyone.

because you don’t want to admit you are too knee-jerk-reactionary in labelling any complaint about modernity as “blackpilled.” First of all, unlike you amoeba-like creatures, I knee-jerk, to practically nothing, with a bit of concentration, I can even make the reaction to an actual knee-jerk test be muted. But you can’t understand that, as you are a barely sentient biomass with no conception of agency or free will beyond possibly choosing which breakfast cereal you eat in the morning, alone and miserable in your council estate. Secondly, people who incessantly complain about modernity while doing absolutely nothing to change it, are indeed, oxygen thieves and disgusting parasites, so it is not a “reaction” of any kind to label them thusly, merely a factual observation. People who can do logic and note ratios, patterns and sets understand this. Oh, I am sorry, I’ll try to not bring in things you have no conception of whatsoever, like logic and factual observation, though it will be difficult unless I reduce myself to making monkey noises at you. I know you’d prefer that, but we’re not doing this for you. We’re doing it to amuse the people who can read.

Just becauae someone complains about some aspect of the economy doesn’t mean they are blackpilled. Blackpilled means they’ve given up. Yes, and you clearly fit the description, as does the other moron who got fisked. You have given up (on reality) and are a coward (for having abandoned reality and retreating in your homoerotic fantasies of “Vikings”).

Some guy complaining he hates his job and doesn’t even care if they fire him because it will just give him a vacation before he finds another one is not “blackpilled.” Yes, yes he is. He’s a coward and a loser that doesn’t have the balls to say “Shove your shit job” to the employer, because he is too lazy, too stupid, and too cowardly to do so. Explain to me how a “powerful, Viking-like MAN” would justifiably sit there like a wet, rotten fruit, stinking up the place doing as little as possible as he continues to try and leech some form of payment for no good reason, instead of, you know, standing up and saying “fuck this, I can and I will do better. Now!” I’ll wait.

And complaining that its harder to find one because of H1B visa hires (a US thing, i.e. importing Indians to take white-collar jobs) or illegal immigrants (for blue collar jobs). Oh, oh, wait, he WANTS to say “shove your job” but doesn’t because he’s scared it’s harder to find another one? Oh, yeah, THAT is how brave, courageous “Vikings” behave and behaved in history all the time right? Yeah, of course. It’s not the inaction of a cowardly worm, right? And goes counter to your previous statement directly above, right? Hey, why so silent… right?

That’s a fact, not “blackpilled.” No, as I have just shown that’s a blackpilled attitude a coward and loser has.

You are just a fossilized boomer so you can’t see. As anyone who really can’t think their way out of a wet paper back should do, a minimum of effort would have made it clear I am GenX and have no boomer traits since I changed careers, jobs and countries multiple times, all successfully, without any of the Boomer advantages. But I understand, a guy who can’t even see himself even remotely accurately is hardly going to get anything right about anyone else.

But the vikings will return, Ahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahah! Yeah, sure… oh, wait, you’re “serious” hahhahahahhahahah! Dear readers, do you see? Do you see what I mean? hahahhahahahahaha. I suppose he also thinks guns will all just disappear, and drones, and well… reality. Literal reality. Hahahahhahahah Seriously, perhaps I should feel bad for making fun of the mentally ill, but hey, he asked for it.

and they will be pagans, Hahahahahahahahahahah, sure they will, sure. And will they be wearing big helmets with horns too? Shave their heads like in the Last Kingdom? Tatoo their face? Oh yeah, you may have one of those eh Jeff? Wait, are you going to keep that name? Jeff? It doesn’t sound very “Viking-ish” you know? Maybe Jeff-O, or Jeff-O of the Rollin, Rollin, Rollin Stones? I dunno, I’m not too familiar with your fantasy version of “Viking-ness”, but I’m just saying… “Jeff” hmmmm…iffy, you know? Just think about it.

because vikings is killing the browns and taking their land. Really? Is there a new war I am unaware of? Tell me Jeff, can you see these murderous Vikings right now? In your council estate one bedroom flat?

You might say “Catholica can do that too”; No, I would not say that, because “Catholica” is not even a word, but assuming you mean Catholics, they actually only responded to aggressions and RECLAIMED their own lands for a time. Oh, but you’d have to have read a few books to know that. And reading is hard for you Jeff, isn’t it? That big horned helmet always falls over your eyes when you bend over to follow your index finger over the page, I get it.

yes, because Catholicism inbided the paganism of the vikings. Hahahahah, seriously, stop, you’re retarded and ignorant to a degree that is hilarious, but all this laughing might hurt someone’s spleen or something. You fucking idiot. the Vikings CONVERTED to Catholicism after the monks on the shores of Normandy got tired of being raided and said, look, you can stay here but protect the lands from other raiders, and they did and after they saw that Catholicism was a better way they converted. You absolute idiot. Read a book once in your life. No, not Cos-Play for retards, or wherever you get your knowledge of “history” from. An actual book.

But that was then. Indeed. Vikings don’t exist AT ALL anymore. None. Not a single one. Catholics on the other hand, we’re still here aplenty. Much reduced from our heyday, no doubt, but real Catholics continue to exist as Sedevacantists.

Modern Catholics don’t have it in them any more than the Prots do. Assuming you’re even talking about actual Catholics and not the Novus Orco, but that aside, “have it in them” to do what? Oh, right, “kill brown people and take their lands” according to your pearls of wisdom. Yeah, generally mass murder based on skin-colour is not a big thing with us Catholics. To be fair, it generally tends to be more of an African people thing. Generally done against whites in the modern age. See Zimbabwe and South African farm murders, but yes, we’re not absolute retards with mass murder fantasies like you.

So when the vikings return after the collapse caused by WW3, Wait, I am still curious about where these Vikings are going to come from, Jeff. Do they come in a spaceship? Or maybe in longships from beyond the ice-wall on your flat Earth? Or… wait, I have it! Magic! Magic right? Like spells of teleportation and so on? Magic portals from the Viking world? Or maybe just from our past? But then the time-continuity issues alone…what’s that? I should spell it Magik, you say? Oh, ok, sure, we gotta get the “runes” in the right order for the Stargate spell eh?

they will be pagan. They told you this through a time-portal spell too right? Yeah, I knew it. You just hear the “voices” in your head right? Uh-huh… I see, Jeff, I see.

And they won’t be of youe boomer “the system is great, you’re just lazy” fossilized dinosaur denial of reality generation. Well, that’s quite the “grammar” there, Jeff, but I think I understand. Still, Jeff, they won’t be of ANY generation, because the Vikings, Jeff, are gone. All gone. And they are not coming back. Ever. Ever, ever. Oh, I know, it makes you so sad. Never mind eh, just get another delivery of Indian curry (dirty foreigners eh, but you love a good curry in your council estate flat in front of the telly to watch the football, hey Jeff? And put on another episode of “Vikings” on Netflix. Don’t get too excited by all the muscly men, hey Jeff, you know it’s wrong. You know it.

And even among Sedes, whether vacantisg or privationist, manly acts are forboden and the only act allowed is praying a novena to your gynoceatic goddess. I think you’re getting excited there Jeff. Probably thinking of “manly acts” is getting you all hot and bothered and one-handed typing is resulting in your current word/spelling salad. Just take your time and when you’re done get back to using both hands calmly to type, yeah? Now as to the actual “point” of your one-handed comment, you’re again, totally wrong and lying too. In Catholic dogma, it is actually a DUTY of any Catholic man to defend the innocents from aggression of any kind, and they are duty bound to act. Including with extreme violence if required, in their defence. You, on the other hand, are only familiar with the “manly acts” that are currently impeding your typing.

Yoy aren’t men but women. I see you have taken on board the current narrative of transgenderism Jeff. This is why you’re confused Jeff. Now, listen up: Men are men and women are women, and no man can be a woman or vice versa. Got it? Get right in your head about this Jeff. Just because you like men doing “manly acts” on you, doesn’t make you a woman Jeff. You’re just gay, and a fake “Viking” that’s all Jeff. Gay and fake.

And the pagan vikings will wipe you out along with the rest of the trannies, when the vikings finally return after civilization completely collapses. That’s quite the fantasy scenario you have there Jeff. So, when is this total civilisation collapse happening Jeff? Is it this week? Or next year? And you still haven’t told me, WHERE are these Vikings coming back from? Where did they go for a thousand years? It’s the ice wall isn’t it? You think they are tunnelling their way through the ice-wall of the flat Earth as we speak, right? Oh Jeff. I hate to do this to you, I am not a cruel person, but you have to know this… the flat-Earth Jeff, it’s a lie. We’re on a ball, spinning in space. Yup. I know. Another dream crushed. That’s ok. You always have Netflix.

What is paganism? Oh that’s easy. It’s the worship of demons under the mistaken idea they are “gods”.

One god didn’t create all the races. Oh. pray, do tell Jeff. I am soooo curious as to your gods-created race-theory. I can’t tell you. Maybe you’ll write a book on it eh? Ok, no, I know, teasing. Writing is hard for you as you’ve clearly demonstrated. Maybe a video though? Yeah. A video. Put it on YouTube and send me a link ok? And don’t forget to wear the horned helmet. Maybe a Thor’s hammer in your hand too. Well, ok, a papier-mache version, but still. A hammer. Good touch eh? Or maybe you can buy a rubber mallet from B&Q! Classy!

So pagans can kill other races. Ah, is this like a rule in the card game MagiK! The reterdening! That you play/made up? Only Pagans can kill people with a different skin tone? You know, I’m fairly sure the prison populations of any country will make it clear that rule you have Jeff, it’s only in your head. Like the voices from the “Vikings” beyond the “ice-wall”.

Catholics have to worship other races as the image of their one woman-god mary. That’s… yeah, that’s a real new take on “Catholicism” for me Jeff. That LARPing you do, is sure confused. and by “confused” I mean, batshit insane and not even remotely pretending to have a thread linked to any aspect of reality.

Vatican II is the natural consequence of your theology. I’d really enjoy seeing your 200 page thesis on this point Jeff. Could you send me a hardcopy?

Even if you roll it back it will happen again because you believe your kween mary created all the races. Again… I really am at a loss here. Do you “see” this “queen” in your room right now Jeff? Does she “create” races Jeff? Or… wait, are you playing with dolls again Jeff? I hope that’s it, really, because the alternative is probably more disturbing from a mental health perspective.

Gay priests and effiminate priests is the natural consequence of mary-goddess worship. I wouldn’t know Jeff. I’m a Catholic and we don’t worship anyone called mary. Much less any “goddess”. But I’ll take your word for it. In your “Pagan” made-up religion you’re gay because you worship a made-up “goddess”, ok Jeff.

“but pagans worshipped goddeses too” the women did. Ok Jeff, it’s good you admit you worship your “goddess” and that’s what you think made you gay, I get it, but you’re gay Jeff, not a “woman”. Ok? Get it right. And… I know this is personal Jeff, but I’m curious, is your mommy called Mary by any chance? Cause you seem to have a few issues, Jeff. Maybe you should talk to someone about them.

men worshipped the male gods obviously. Right…obviously. Because of your demonstrated, deep knowledge of your made-up “religion” with transgenderism rules. Ok, Jeff.

Catholicism imposes female religion on men and turns them into women. Again Jeff, you really need to get this into your head. Men are born men, stay men and die men. And never, ever become women. Not even if you cut your junk off Jeff. So don’t do it. Stop wearing mommy’s dresses and the horned helmet too Jeff. You’re just gay, you’re not a woman trapped in a man’s body. The sexes are not interchangeable Jeff. Wake up. For the love of God, Jeff, wake up! join reality!

Catholicism is religious transgenderism. I am sure in your head that probably makes sense Jeff. But only there, I assure you.

And now you see why I can’t do this every time. I actually have a farm and a family to tend to, as much fun as this has been. Just try to imagine the responses I might give for the next lot of idiots. Try it yourselves, it’s quite entertaining. And if you wish to continue an in depth conversation with Jeff about his religion, write him a note at: jeffrollin@ukmail.com

By G | 21 April 2023 | Posted in Catholicism, Gammas, Humour, Impostors and Frauds, Social Commentary, Zombie Apocalypse

As they say, a picture is worth a thousand words…

This is essentially the totality of the entire Andrew Tate story.

Except that he’s going to be in jail for some years, of course.

Whoever made the meme got it right.

By G | 23 March 2023 | Posted in Gammas, Humour, Impostors and Frauds, Increasing Happiness, Relationships, Relationships, Social Commentary, Stupid PUAs

Best Fiction Titles

Leaving this pinned for a bit as people are enjoying them. New posts are below.

The below is the fiction titles of all time I recall and have enjoyed the most. No doubt some escape me, but overall, if you are looking for a good read, these are it. Where they are available for purchase online somewhere I have added a link.

The Sub-Genre column needs a little explanation. For Example, my book 2 in the Overlords of Mars series says “film” because the events in it are written more as you would expect them to appear in a film. And the Hyperion series is sort of, kinda, about Christianity, in a way, but a very cool, sci-fi way. Anyway, I hope you enjoy them.

Genre	Sub-Genre	Book Title
Fantasy	Christianity	The High Crusade
Fantasy	Poetry	The Lost Books of the Odyssey
Fantasy	Romance	All My Friends Are Superheroes
Fantasy	Venice Mythology	The Stress of Her Regard
Humour	Cartoons	Calvin & Hobbes
Poetry	Poetry	John Keats Complete Poems
Reincarnation	Love	Cloud Atlas (See the film which is better)
RPG	Fantasy	The Rules Cyclopedia – D&D or PDF
RPG	Sci-Fi	Classic Traveller Role Playing Game (the three little black books 1, 2 and 3)
Sci-Fi	Androids	Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep
Sci-Fi	Christianity	The Hyperion Series (get the whole thing)
Sci-Fi	History	Overlords of Mars – Inception (book 1)
Sci-Fi	Graphic Novel	Aldebaran
Sci-Fi	Graphic Novel	Antares
Sci-Fi	Graphic Novel	Betelgeuse
Sci-Fi	Greek Mythology	Ilium
Sci-Fi	Film	Overlords of Mars – Stasis (book 2)
Sci-Fi	Mars	John Carter of Mars the film too is good
Sci-Fi	Precognition	The Stochastic Man
Sci-Fi	Telepathy	The Hollow Man

And of course, I did forget some in the table there, so they are here:

The continuation of the Bladerunner (the original film) but in book format (and bury that foulness from the pit that was the film Bladerunner 2049) by KW Jeter. He actually has 3 more out, I didn’t even know as I had only read the second one. Which was brilliant.

I am sure I have forgotten many more, or perhaps I simply have outgrown some I really enjoyed when younger, like the Dragonlance Series, which I read when I was 16 and played Dungeons and Dragons quite a bit, but these above are the ones that stuck in my mind off the top of my head.

A reader reminded me in the comments I did not include anything by gene Wolf. For which I will lash myself in penance. My personal best loved of his books is Soldier of the Mist. But the man was a genius, you can’t go wrong with any of his stuff.

By G | 25 February 2023 | Posted in Books, Film Review, Humour, Increasing Happiness, Overlords of Mars - 1, Overlords of Mars - 2, Writing

Another idiot for the Kurgan wood chipper

So, one more deceitful liar trying to peddle Protestant nonsense has decided that the smart thing to do is try and bullshit his way past the facts I present with the usual outrageous lies, conflation, sophistry and other standard MO of these morons that somehow think will work if *they* are the ones to do it, because the other 9000 morons before them just weren’t as smart you see.

This one is a particularly retarded version of idiot because he calls himself Lord Mountbanks on Social Galactic, assuming he’s too smart for you to realise he is actually telling you he’s an outrageous liar right there in his nickname but you’re just not well-read enough to notice it you see. Isn’t that oh so clever, haw-haw-haw!

Never mind an eyeroll. These idiots deserve the Indiana Jones with the swordsman treatment.

Without further ado, here is his “review” of my short book Believe! Done, supposedly, with a heavy heart you see, aren’t we oh so pious while we lie outright like a festering pus-filled scab on the tongue of a regular wormtongue.

My words in bold italic, his in skinny normie.

It is with a heavy heart that I type this. Where to begin? I don’t even remember where I first heard of the Kurgan.

I watched a few of his streams, a few of his other videos, and rather liked the guy. He made salient points, was obviously an intelligent man, and there was a good deal of common ground between us.

and then I became aware of his Protestant bashing. At first, I thought it was a schtick, as at times it could be really funny. (Did I mention he can be funny too?)

Alas, it isn’t a schtick.

Having read most of ‘Reclaiming the Catholic Church’, and all of ‘Believe!’, I have to conclude that he considers us protestants to be… Enemies of the Church. Not rivals, or wayward children. Enemies. Of the ‘one true Church’.

Not accurate but fine. Some Protestants are just morons, some are fine humans though totally deceived and some are active enemies of truth. Pretty much the same as the cross section of most humans. That said; anyone who knowingly hides, perverts and lies about the truth is indeed an enemy.

*Sigh*. I doubt many of you will read this, and I know that ‘rivers of ink (and blood) have been spilled’ on this subject, but here we go; a review of the relevant part of ‘Believe!’ i.e. Chapter III, protestants.

For disliking binary thinking, he does it off the start; ‘the Church… must be one of these three denominations’. Why? Why not in all three? (because it dosn’t fit the ‘one true church’ narrative)

For an idiot, you sure do act like an idiot.

Based on your logic, every gnostic heresy, every random Muslim who’s a decent man, and ANY interpretation at all of facts, truth and reality is all one. Why, you’re just like Bergoglio. According to you both, Jesus sang Kumbaya and drank grape juice and interpreth as thou will is the whole of the law.

What a snivelling lying little turd of a half-man you are.

I do like judging by fruits; have not all three of these produced Godly men? Have not the protestant denominations as well? The Catholics had many men of science, so did the protestants. Men of industry, war.

Individuals do not make the Church. The community does. What are the fruits of Protestantism?

The industrial Revolution and the consequential mechanisation of human beings.

Divorce

Contraception

Abortion

40,000 denominations and counting and the utter secularisation of Christianity.

Sexual dysphoria misnamed “gender fluidity” and all the other utter nonsense originate from Protestant countries, not Ex-Catholic ones.

Compare that to the CIVILISATIONS that Catholicism created.

The Crusades; A favorite topic. Indeed, Christendom was well served by them. The only shame is that the latin kingdoms were left to wither, and fall one by one. I’ll add a counterpoint; it was protestants who ended the mohammedan european slave trade, and eventually put paid to their caliphate.

Yes. Christianity is central to Western civilization, and Catholicism essentially WAS Christianity in the west for three quarters of Christianities existence. No argument.

‘…it is absolutely not in doubt that the Catholic Church is more responsible for the spread of Christianity on planet Earth…’ ummm… source? way of measuring? a bold claim, though not impossible. We protestants, if we are behind, can’t be too far behind, though, and have had 1500 less years to work on it.

This is so genuinely retarded that it really doesn’t require any answer at all.

Anyone who has ever read even a child’s history book is aware of how stupid the above paragraph is, and anyone who does not is clearly of an IQ that cannot possibly matter in the scheme of things since they have the intellectual equivalent of tree moss.

And now we come to the ‘fun’ bit, where narratives collide.

What was the purpouse of the Reformation, according to Filotto? I’ll let you judge the section yourself… It’s… colorful. It is also pure ad hominem.

He definitely doesn’t think that the theses had any merit, or that the various German princes, or the English monarch who supported Luther did so for any reason other than their own vanity and moral decadence.

Well, let us then count the facts:

Did Luther want to have sex with nuns? Why yes, yes he did.

Did he swear like a sailor, eat and drink like a pig and suggest raping the maid if the wife was unwilling? Yes. Yes he did.

As for the English King (Henry, the blank firing VIII) did he support Luther when he first came out with his nonsense? No. No he did not.

So when did he? Well, when he wanted to murder-divorce his wife/s of course, and the Pope wouldn’t let him.

These are historical facts that anyone with even a shred of honesty can verify for themselves in 30 seconds EVEN on notoriously converged Google.

And let’s not forget that noted and Protestant historian Rodney Stark has made a very clear, factually supported and undeniable case for the simple fact that the so-called princes who went Protestant did so for one reason and one reason alone: money. Because it allowed them to not pay any to the Catholic Church. As for the “merits” of the Protestant argument, again, Professor Stark proves beyond doubt that literally almost no one, including the princes, even knew what they were or could articulate any of them.

The reformation had very little to do with dogma or truth and everything to do with land, money and the sexual perversions of the ex-monk and sterile King.

Them’s the facts, read them and weep Protty.

As for the 1500 year strawman… Really Kurgan? Is that something Luther claimed?

Then we come back to the ‘one true Church’ bit. No, Kurgan. The Church doesn’t have to be a single denomination.

Yes. It does. But you’d have to have actually read the New Testament to know that. And I note you have not referenced a single one of the passages I refer to here but only later to try and confuse the issue. I am now going to surmise that in addition to being a deceitful intentional, conscious liar like Bergoglio and his sort, we should probably keep an eye out in case you have their other proclivities towards children. I mean so far you have mirrored their behaviour exactly, as anyone who has read Reclaiming the Catholic Church will know.

Sola Scriptura:

1. This is, honestly, a question I have had, and it is where tradition and scholarship are quite handy.

2. You are, I assume, referring to the Deuterocanonicals, or Apocrypha? The books that at the time of the reformation there were still questions about them being scripture? Yeah, I wonder why he left those out.

You aren’t changing scripture if it isn’t scripture.

3. I get the feeling you don’t understand what protestants mean by these things. Does ‘sanctification’ mean anything to you? how about the parable of the sower?

Your nonsensical nonsense is noted.

And the fact that the Bible itself was put together only some 3 centuries AFTER Jesus ascended? You forgot to mention that little tidbit of fact eh? Spoils the whole Sola Scriptura idiocy doesn’t it. If tradition has no place in Christianity then how did the Bible even come about? You have to be a mental retard to be a Protestant.

Back to fruits. Genocide? Ok. Fallen man, right? still all equal.

I have no idea what he’s referring to here but I assume as a friend of Moloch he would side with the French “enlightenment” types.

This next bit is… interesting. I half agree with him. He posits that the sexual revolution, and the normalization of ‘various sexual practices’ is one of the fruits of protestantism. It is a long explanation, but my answer is short;

Humanism and the line of despair. Look up Francis E. Schaeffer, he wrote several (short!) books explaining it.

No. I don’t need to read some bullshit to know it’s bullshit. Just like you and your kind, one can smell you from afar; I have a finely developed sense of smell.

All the sexual perversions lie clearly at the foot of the secularisation of Christianity and that is absolutely in the court of the Protestants.

‘And when there are no rules, you are left with only one rule.

“Do as thou will”‘

That is literally what Protestants do.

It’s all interpreth as thou will. And it’s that ALL the way DOWN. Real deep down, where it’s hot.

The fact that I know he isn’t jesting makes me wonder what sort of protestants he has encountered who would actually act or even think in the manner he describes. Suffice to say; that isn’t how biblical interpretation works,

because stupid. Really, really stupid.

Well, we agree on one thing I suppose. Protestants are really stupid or brainwashed or both. I agree.

So lets play that game.

He now lists references from the Bible I gave to show the One Church concept and pretends to “debunk” them. Let’s see how he fares.

1 Cor 1:10-13 : Why are you arguing about who you follow? we all follow Christ! Eph. 4:4-6 : United! in… Christ! John 17:21 : ‘May they be one in me’ in who? Christ! Matt 16:18 : oh… I love this one. Catholics will claim it as divine authority. I adhere to a place based interpretation. Christ is referring to the place he is, where there was a shrine considered to be a gate to Hades.

Let’s take them in turn but let’s start with the last one. That view is the view that was popularised by Mike Heiser. Which I discovered and read and listened to long before you had a Protestant outrage in your tiny brain.

The physical location theory in other words did not EXIST until the present day yet you invoke it as if it were always the case for Protestants. Which is, of course, an outrageous lie.

And now the rest:

1 Corinthians 1:10-13;

Here is the passage for some context:

10Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all speak the same thing, and that there be no schisms among you; but that you be perfect in the same mind, and in the same judgment. 11For it hath been signified unto me, my brethren, of you, by them that are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions among you. 12Now this I say, that every one of you saith: I indeed am of Paul; and I am of Apollo; and I am of Cephas; and I of Christ. 13Is Christ divided? Was Paul then crucified for you? or were you baptized in the name of Paul?

Does that sound to you like Paul would approve of 40,000 denominations? For that matter does it sound to you at ALL honest for this snivelling wormtongue to say that we all follow the same Christ when very clearly Protestants cannot and do not believe, ascribe, have loyalty to the same concept and ideas even between themselves, hence the 40,000 denominations. In fact, they can’t even bother to define their beliefs in writing. They say its all in the Bible and it can all be interpreted in 7 billion different ways but every human being individually.

Does that sound like they follow Christ or their own ego to you?

Ephesians 4:4-6;

3Careful to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. 4One body and one Spirit; as you are called in one hope of your calling. 5One Lord, one faith, one baptism. 6One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in us all.

One body and one spirit. Somehow 40,000 different official bodies with different and irreconcilable differences are one body and one spirit in this guy’s diseased mind. I mean, it IS diseased. Only an unhealthy mind could pervert a simple truth so perniciously. But in addition, his peculiar obsession with me clearly affects his mind. Now why would that be if in his mind I’m just another Christ follower?

I spend literally zero time thinking about this cretin and his beliefs or ideas. I will of course, respond to his wormtonguing until it is clear to all he is a liar and an idiot, because that’s simply what needs to happen to people who lie outrageously about things I care about, but short of responding to his lies with a view to entertain and educate, I assure you that one minute after I posted this I will spend zero time thinking about this fool or his nonsense.

His dis-ease at my writings and concepts is because he feels the natural truth and it burns him.

John 17:21;

Lets get a little more here for context too because really all of John 17 is pretty much relevant.

20 “My prayer is not for them alone. I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message, 21 that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me. 22 I have given them the glory that you gave me, that they may be one as we are one— 23 I in them and you in me—so that they may be brought to complete unity. Then the world will know that you sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me.

Notice how he skips that troublesome “that all of them may be one” part as well as blatantly misrepresents the “that they may be one as we are one” and “so that they may be brought to complete unity”. Truly you see the intentional lying and deception of this moron who calls himself Lord Mountbanks thinking he’s oh so very witty at calling himself a deceiver right under your nose thinking you won’t notice because he’s so clever using such a name you see.

Matthew 16:18;

We have already dealt with this, but here it is for context again, and since Jesus is clearly talking to and answering back to Simon who he renames Peter (rock), Heiser’s contention that Jesus is referring to a physical place is clearly wrong and reaching. Besides which if that were the case, Jesus’s Church would be somewhere in war torn Iraq with literally no one even thinking it’s a revered spot. In other words, it’s just more of the usual Protestant absurd nonsense.

16 Simon Peter answered and said: Thou art Christ, the Son of the living God.

17 And Jesus answering, said to him: Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-Jona: because flesh and blood hath not revealed it to thee, but my Father who is in heaven.

18 And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

Acts 9:2 : Followers of The Way. Those who follow Christ.

Acts 9 starts with the story of Saul (Paul) who was persecuting Christians before his conversion. And the words “the way” are used in the same way that the Japanese use the same words “do” as in karate-do (empty hand way) or ju-do (gentle way) or bu-do (war-way). The West still also uses these words in the same style. So the “way” mentioned is Christianity: aka Catholicism.

And Saul, as yet breathing out threatenings and slaughter against the disciples of the Lord, went to the high priest,

2 And asked of him letters to Damascus, to the synagogues: that if he found any men and women of this way, he might bring them bound to Jerusalem.

He then proceeds to again assume that Christ, and therefore the Church, belongs to only one of these denominations. To my knowledge, no protestant denomination does that.

Well of course you don’t. You’re heretics and you’ll hardly be bringing sunlight to the fact. You certainly can’t accuse anyone else of being a heretic without accusing yourself of the very same thing.

And again, let’s not let you sneak in the very idea that there ever were “denominations”. There were not. There was ONE Church for over a 1000 years. Popes and all. Recognised by ALL as the only, one, true, apostolic and Catholic Church, with the Pope at its head.

Then the Byzantine schismatics split off and even then there remained in essence only two denominations. Then the German pervert and the English pervert came along 500 years later and THEN we reach today with OVER 40,000 denominations of your heretic nonsense.

Each of which is blasphemy and rubbish.

Let’s have a look at that archive of Martin Luther’s heresies and inconsistencies; archive.is/9LbeJ

So; first point. Authority.

Next: I assume it has to do with the church holding the ‘seat of moses’, and so falls under the category of authority.

Wow. That is long. I am going to stick with authority, and call it quits for tonight, as the rest of the chapter is conjecture, and a misunderstanding of how protestants think. (we elect our captains. imagine an army following the orders of people they like and respect)

No. Imagine a “military” that has self-elected “leaders” who literally make the rules up as they go along and are fully invested in doing so as their only means of income. Oh and none of them co-ordinate or even know of each other except perhaps in some of the various “armies” of which there are over 40,000. That’s a closer analogy.

And compare that hot mess of dog-vomit, against an actual military with rules, a chain of command and where everyone speaks the same language and everyone recognises the various leaders regardless of location on the globe (Latin mass).

So, Authority. When is it right, and proper, to rebel against authority, even when that authority is legitimate? My answer is, when that authority attempts to take from you what is not theirs to take. When authority oversteps its bounds.

And here we have it: each man as the ultimate and supreme authority deciding, judging and choosing for himself his own right to heaven. Not demonic, prideful and nonsensical at all, right?

Can the Papal See even do that?

Do what?

Do try to stick to the generic rules of grammar and syntax, even if you very much want to make up your own.

Well, I would say yes.

In the English language, you know, according to the rules of grammar, syntax and tradition, all things we know you despise, you have just answered your own question by stating that that Holy See can rebel against authority (presumably its own). You really need to stop sending me these long, rambling, drunk texts.

Mostly because the See only has as much authority as you give it. It is not established by God, and does not have divine authority.

Well, except for that pesky passage in the New Testament where Jesus changes Simon’s name to Rock then says on this rock he will build His Church. And that other passage giving the Apostles divine rights from which comes Apostolic succession. And the fact that literally every single person calling themselves a Christian accepted this as true and factual for over a millennia and a half. But hey, what’s all THAT when compared to the shouty, swear-word-filled rantings of a German sex pervert, right?

That is where the real conflict between protestants and Catholics arises. More on that next time.

Not even close. If the only issue was the Papacy then Protestants would be Eastern Orthodox. As it happens, of course, the EO consider Protestants abysmal heretics without exception though, now why would that be if the only difference was pretty much the same one the EO have with Catholicism? Notice the pervasive deception and lies that this creature exhales in practically every sentence; using the very common modus operandi of these deceivers: namely the pervasive use of conflation of completely disparate and unrelated points to try and create a brand new, shining lie they want you to swallow whole; ideally without any analysis of their terms, their intentional confusions, their abysmal grammar and their perennial misrepresentation of facts.

No doubt, he will continue to quintuple down, but I trust I have now conclusively demonstrated why whatever he says or may come up with has less relevance than a flea’s fart in a cyclone.

By G | 2 January 2021 | Posted in Catholicism, Christianity, Humour, Sedeprivationism, Social Commentary

Mickey the Lesser

A foolish Satanist or at the very least supporter of Vicar of pedopjiles on Earth Bergoglio foolishly stuck his head above the parapet and I noticed. Enjoy.

As usual his words in black and mine in blood-splattered red.

Sedevacantism Is Modern Luciferianism

Michael Massey December 2, 2019

At some time, we have all encountered a sedevacantist — if not in person, at least online. I won’t bore you with the theology of the sedevacantism except to say they hold that a heretic cannot be pope, with the most common strain affirming that Pius XII was the last legitimate pope (although I did once come across one who believed that Pius V was the last legitimate pope).

I see, so you admit right from the start that you will avoid the actual reasons that Catholics remain Catholics and instead project your own Satanic leading of others into error directly from the title of this drivel throughout the rest of it. Got it. Let us begin the rhetoric war then, silly Hellish Padawan of Novus Orco and let us see how you fare against Lord Kurgan.

Oftentimes, sedevacantists lived through the turbulent times after Vatican II or are the children of those who did.

Neither applies here and in my experience most remaining actual Catholics are simply people like me: those who still have the almost lost skill of reading comprehension.

They know either first- or second-hand of the terrible persecution of orthodoxy and suppression of the Tridentine Mass. They often fought valiantly against the heresies constantly flowing from the Vatican and were maltreated by many local bishops and priests.

Again, none of these things apply. I rejected the Novus Orco impostors out of pure instinct at age 7. My only “error” was believing these “priests” were in fact Catholics. They presented themselves as such, they had usurped the buildings and other worldly trappings of material goods of the Catholics, so I was fooled by their pretending to be Catholics, but certainly not by much of anything else since their theology was so badly flawed as to be obviously evil even to my 7 year old self.

Many know their faith very well and can easily explain the errors of liberalism, modernism, and countless other heresies. In all respects but one, they are orthodox Catholics.

So, just to recap, we are correct on every point and you can’t and won’t argue against them (because you would have your head handed to you in seconds) but you have the one true silver bullet against Catholics coming right up… (cue spectacular rhetoric fail coming up)…

The one error of sedevacantism is essentially pride. They raise their opinion over that of the Church when judging that the pope is a formal and manifest heretic, while we know that the Church teaches that the First See is judged by no man.

Ahh, yes, that old Canard. Truly, nothing new with you Satanists is there? Once again, your despicable projection is obvious. Catholics to NOT sin of pride in being Catholics, we, in fact, follow the Magisterium of the Church which very clearly tells us that notorious, public heretics are not Catholics, do not speak for the Church, have nothing of relevance to say about Catholicism and that anyone who receives them as Catholics in turn ALSO becomes a heretic. This is all clear and obvious to anyone who, as I previously mentioned has the lost art of basic reading comprehension and reads the Code of Canon Law, particularly code 188 part 4 of the code (of 1917, the only valid code of Catholic Canon Law, the Satanic non-Catholics like this imp here produced a fake one in 1983, but as they are not Catholics of any kind it has no bearing on truth or reality or Catholicism). For the uninitiated, you merely need to read Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio on which much of the Canon Law for canon 188 part 4 is based.

As an aside, you don’t NEED to know what any doctor of the Church said in detail by the way, nor try to interpret it, because the Code of 1917 did that. And no, it does not require Canon lawyers to interpret it for you, poor peasant, because it is written on the principles of Roman Law. Not fake, loophole filled Anglo-Saxon Lawyerspeak. And in any case, the commission that was set up to interpret it already did that job and since it was published the code had one minor revision of one code (1099) in over 40 years and for the last decade or so nothing at all was changed and in all likelihood over 14,000 documents were consulted to ensure no part of the Code contradicted any part of Catholic dogma divine or Church law. So, yeah… reading comprehension. We Catholics dote on it. And reason. And logic. Because that is one of the Dogmas by the way, we use reason and logic and our God-given ability to study and know objective truth, not lies like your father teaches you and your kind.

But what about Luciferianism?

Well, you are the expert there, go on…

With the crisis in the Church since Vatican II, many comparisons have been drawn with the Arian crisis of the 4^thcentury, when the majority of the Church’s bishops fell into the heresy of Arianism. There are four parallels that can be drawn between the Arian crisis and the crisis in the Church today. There are, as Michael Davies noted, the heroic Athanasius, Hilary, and Eusebius of Vercelli (not to be confused with the ecclesiastical historian Eusebius of Caesarea or the leading Arian heretic Eusebius of Nicomedia, Eusebius seemingly being a popular name among 4^th-century mothers) who are types of the heroic clerics such as Archbishop Lefebvre,

Lefebvre ultimately belonged to the R&R class, so he’s was not Catholic either from that moment on.

Recognise (the antipope as pope) and yet “resist” his underlings is, of course, not logical, objective, reasonable, or, frankly, sane. It is based on nothing more than womanish emotions marinaded in a fake worship of “tradition” and pomp instead of truth and logic and objective reality.

Bishop de Castro Mayer, and other orthodox priests who suffered persecution for their defense of the Faith. There are also the diabolical prelates such as Arius, Saturninus, and Eusebius of Nicomedia, who resemble those infiltrators who infected the Church prior to the Second Vatican Council and sowed the seeds of doctrinal and liturgical destruction (think de Lubac, Congar, Rahner etc.). Then there are the orthodox princes of the Church who, knowing the truth, succumb to outside pressures and outwardly join the ranks of the victorious heretics, much like Pope Liberius.

So…wait, you admit there were infiltrators. You admit Vatican II is replete with heresy and heretics, you admit all this and yet, somehow, those who do all this and point it all out backed up by the MAGISTERIUM OF THE CHURCH (which is what Canon Law is), logic, reason and facts, somehow are the Luciferians? Truly your inversion of roles between us is the usual stunning bold-faced lie your kind subsists on.

Finally, there are those who can see the errors of heretics for what they are and take a heroic stand against them; however, they succumb to their own pride and employ schism to fight heresy.

Ah, so we are heroes who… succumb. You pathetic wormling. You’re not really worthy of a Kurgan inquisition. You have nothing. We are not heroes, just Catholics. And while no doubt some of us will become heroic in their persecution, as martyrs or warriors, as the case may be, it’s not anything a Satanist like you could possibly understand, comment on or know anything about. We are Catholics, you are not. You wouldn’t understand.

It is this final parallel in which we can see the Luciferianism within the sedevacantist movement. There is the remarkable similarity between today’s sedevacantists and a group of schismatics who were spawned during the Arian crisis: the Luciferians.

Oh let’s see what utter reversal of any shred of truth you come up with now wormling.

The Luciferians were less nefarious than their name implies.

Can’t help throw a little shade to your fellow Satanist names eh? Here is a hint: No actual Catholic would refer to themselves by such a name. Ever. In any age.

Rather than being devil-worshipers, they were simply followers of the schismatic Bishop Lucifer of Cagliari. (The interesting naming trends of 4^th-century mothers continues — what mother looks at her newborn son and thinks, “He looks like a Lucifer”?) Nothing much is known about Lucifer’s origin, save that he was born at some time in the early 4^th century.

Riiiiight…I’m SURE that was his given name at birth by his mommy. What utter nonsense. At most his name MIGHT have been Lucius, which was at least a Latin name, and if it got changed to Luciferus, it doesn’t take a genius to figure out why wormling. You really must do better in your efforts. Not that he is more intelligent or anything, but you should perhaps think of apprenticing under John Salza, who is verbose, long-winded, and easily demonstrated to be a Satanic liar and he is a self-admitted Freemason, so no real struggle to expose, but at least he presents more of a fake argument than this drivel. I’m sure for merely a few sexual favours of the Satanic kind he may well take you on as an understudy. At this rate you’ll not even reach the 9^th Circle of Hell, you’ll be relegated to one of the outer and upper layers of torment for your pathetic efforts.

Those familiar with Church history will know that during the Arian crisis, the greater number of bishops had fallen into the Arian and semi-Arian heresies.

Most Catholics know of St. Athanasius’s heroic defence of orthodoxy during the crisis, but few will know of his good friend and stalwart defender of the faith, Lucifer of Cagliari. At the egregious Council of Tyre, Athanasius was condemned and exiled, and Pope Liberius wished to defend him by calling a new Council at Milan to resolve the Arian Crisis. Liberius chose Lucifer as his representative at this council, which was convened in 355 A.D. At the council, Lucifer spoke strongly in favor of St. Athanasius and the Homoousion doctrine (which holds Christ is consubstantial with the Father) and convinced many bishops, including Dionysius of Milan, to support the orthodox cause. Sadly, however, the Arian bishops retained their majority, and with the support of the Arian Emperor Constantius, they confirmed their heretical Homoiousion positions (which holds that Christ is only of a similar substance to the Father); flogged the orthodox prelates; and exiled many, including Lucifer.

Another great blow to orthodoxy was dealt in 357 A.D., when Pope Liberius succumbed to the great pressure of Emperor Constantius; signed the formula of Hosius, which denied the Homoousion doctrine; and excommunicated Athanasius.

In his wonderful work History of the Catholic Church, Fr. Mourett described Lucifer as “an impetuous orthodox bishop.” In 360, Lucifer advocated shunning dealings with Arian heretics in De non consentiendo cum haereticis and compared Emperor Constantius with the idolatrous kings of Israel in De regibus apostaticis. At no stage throughout the crisis did Lucifer succumb to heresy; however, he certainly gave in to imprudence. Finally, after many more trials and tribulations too long to expound upon, Athanasius, Lucifer, and the orthodox prelates were restored, and a council was convened in Alexandria to finally resolve the Arian crisis.

At the Council of Alexandria, which did largely resolve the Arian crisis, the holy fathers deemed that all of those priests and bishops who had worked with the Arians and sided with them in various councils, but who had not publicly professed the heresy of Arianism, could retain their offices and sees within the Church. It further declared that those who publicly renounced their heresy could return to communion with the Holy Catholic Church. This was too much for the “impetuous” Lucifer. He had fought the good fight since the very beginning, was ridiculed, and suffered terrible persecution for the Faith. He had been a loyal servant to his pontiff, Liberius, but even his friend Liberius had abandoned the orthodox Homoousion proposition under pressure. Along with Saints Hillary, Athanasius, and Eusebius, and a handful of others, he was at one time one of the last orthodox prelates in the entire Church.

Seeing the Arians and semi-Arians he had fought against at Milan and elsewhere rehabilitated was too much for his pride to swallow. How could they, who had been at enmity with Christ and His Church, be returned to their sees and positions of power above him, when he, a valiant defender of orthodoxy and veteran of the underground Church, still fought the good fight?

Lucifer turned against his former friend Athanasius and decried the measures taken to restore the repentant Arians. Pope Liberius ratified the decisions of the council, but he was a heretic. He had signed the heretical formula of Hosius, which had rejected the Homoousion doctrine. He had not been condemned as a heretic, but he was a heretic nonetheless, and heretics are to be shunned. Lucifer declared that heretics — even repentant heretics — could not hold ecclesiastical offices, and he proceeded to condemn Liberius, Athanasius, and all the bishops of the Church who would not support him.

And if the above description of things is true (I haven’t bothered to check because my time is limited, but it is irrelevant because my knowledge on matters of what is heresy and who is a heretic is rather exhaustive) then Lucifer (which I assume was really Lucius and thus re-named by your own kind of people) was 100% correct. A former heretic can only be reconciled with the Church insofar as he retires to a monastery with authority over no-one and spends the rest of his days in penance. Again, this is Catholic Dogma that remains unchanged throughout history and is of course spelt out in Cum-Ex Apostolatus Officio.

He abandoned the Church and retired to Sardinia with his followers, who took up the name “Luciferians.” There Lucifer would live out the remainder of his life separated from communion with the pope, Athanasius, and the Church. The once great defender of orthodoxy died in schism.

No, he clearly didn’t if your account is at all correct.

When one is tempted to reject the pope and all the bishops of the Church due to the heresy and scandal they constantly promote, remember the example of St. Athanasius, who always fought to remain in communion even with the heretic Pope Liberius.

Moderates are what God will spit out, remember. While a possible passage of power may require such “compromises” in the first place they are illegitimate compromises and dogmatically in error and in the second, they rarely ever result in an actual transfer of power from the corrupt to the non-corrupt. In fact, they merely tend to provide deeper cover for the most corrupt of all.

When you recognize and resist the pope, you are in communion with St. Athanasius, but when you reject and resist him, you are in communion with Lucifer.

Absolute nonsense. Let me write that in correct English as it actually is:

When you recognise a demonstrable persistent and unrepentant never-was-Catholic as legitimate “Pope” you are in communion with Satan and his henchmen and we like that. When you reject such persons as legitimate “Pope” you are in Communion with the remnant of the Catholic Church.

Writer’s note: I have an uncle whose misfortune it is that I bear his name (we’ll call him “Michael Massey the Greater”). Consequently, when I have written on sedevacantism in the past, a concerned sedevacantist wishing to send me his…ahem…constructive feedback thoroughly confused my dear uncle by sending him a voluminous tract in “refutation” of “his” essay. Suffice it to say, to avoid any confusion, please address any criticisms to Michael Massey the Lesser, and leave poor Uncle Mick alone.

Consider yourself addressed Mickey the Lesser.

Oh, and don’t bother to respond, since your own attack was pure rhetoric and intentional lies, I have zero interest in anything other than further exposing you. You are a supporter of a known paedophile promoter and protector and associate of child traffickers, the vicar of Paedophiles on Earth, Bergoglio, so you know where you fall in the hierarchy of people I sincerely hope get what’s coming to them in this life and the next.

For those readers who are still figuring things out, my latest book here, covers all the objections to Catholicism (Sedeprivationism) in exhaustive and irrefutable detail and since it is written in my usual brutal style, I am told that as well as informative it is also entertaining.

By G | 17 September 2020 | Posted in Catholicism, Humour, Impostors and Frauds, Sedeprivationism