Archive for the ‘Human Performance’ Category

The Speciation of the Species

It is usually my practice to observe something for a fairly long time before making any kind of new observation that is not commonly noticed by most, but in this case my observation is only about 4 years in the making so it may be a premature one, nevertheless I think it can be helpful to some, so here it is.

The human race is rapidly going to split into various different strata or types. It is hard to resist the analogy with the Role-Playing Game set in a post-apocalyptic world called Gamma World, although it is not really that as much as a mixture of the series Altered Carbon (season 1 is all I saw) and H.G. Wells’ The Time Machine.

The untermensch/morlocks

The vast underclass of morlocks will invariably have various and differing characteristics but their overarching feature will be their powerlessness, poverty and being at the mercy of not just the ruling class, but of every class above them. In practical terms they will be the untouchables of the Hindu caste system. And it will be a fine line between them and the homeless crack-heads that will begin to drop dead like flies in large numbers. At any rate, you don’t want to be one of these poor creatures we may refer to as NPCs. By and large the teeming masses of India, Africa and Asia, whether in their original geographical locations or overseas, invading other countries, are all people who will only “provide” poverty, crime, disease, and collapsing infrastructure at every level. They will be used cynically as weapons in their masses, as is already the case, and will constitute the vast majority of humans on Earth. If you are unfortunate enough to be born in this situation it will be extremely hard for you to get out of it and it will be made harder as time passes. These are the people they want to use as cannon fodder, science experiments, medical test-beds of new technology, and so on.

The lower class

This is where the kind of people who had their own home and a little bit of disposable income will soon end up. Barely making ends meet, renting, not quite eating the bug paste, but not eating meat or fish either other than on special occasions. They too will be at the mercy of every class above them and possibly will be required to be “vaxxed” and have a “universal basic income” even if at first it might be called something else at first; some kind of hook from the government to reel you in.

The rich

These will be of two types, the generationally wealthy, that is, people whose parents and grandparents made the wealth and they essentially are just inheritors of it, and perhaps a few of them will not be total moral vampires, but they will be rare and few and far between. It’s not the wealth per se that necessarily corrupts, but the fact that it is literally almost impossible to make any great wealth if you are not somehow in with the corrupt. The other type will be those that have fully embraced their natures and have no problem lording it over others.

The Chief Vampires

These are those who fancy themselves the elite and their lieutenants. The Bill Gates, the Klaus Schwabs, Soros’ spawn, Zuckeberg and so on who are the mere handmaidens of the real puppeteers like the Rothschilds owners of the Bank of International Settlement, the Federal Reserve and so on. They absolutely see the morlocks as useless eaters and/or playthings to do with as they wish and are most amused by, including mass murder of them etc. the lower class are their faceless go-to slave class that does whatever menial task required of them and barely above the untermensch and untouchable status, and in fact quite interchangeable with it individually but slightly less so on large scales projects. They see the rich with a mixture of amusement and contempt. Amusement at how the masses view the rich with such hatred and envy when these Chief Vampires know that they are, as a class, entirely bought and paid for mostly and certainly every single one of their lieutenants is.

The rich can be thought of as the footsoldiers of the Chief Vampires, and as such considered to be their first line of defence. How the masses react to the rich gives the Chief Vampires the data they need to then direct their lieutenants accordingly. The contempt comes when any of those allowed to form part of the class of the rich makes the error of thinking they belong to the same class as the lieutenants of the Chief Vampires, or worse, the actual Chief Vampires themselves.

The Lieutenants are the real enforcers and workforce of the Chief Vampires, putting in place the systems that the Chief Vampires want to be realised in order to control the rest of humanity as they wish.

The Independents

There will be several different types of these, and in a way this entire class, with its many types, essentially forms the core of what we might call the original humanity. Despite the large number of factions identified below (and even sub-factions within them) independents as a whole are a minority on Earth, comprising probably no more than 20% of humanity at the most optimistic, and realistically, almost certainly less than 10% as a whole. Consider for example that the Caucasoid race as a whole is somewhat less than 10% of the world population and the majority of those people are not independents even if the largest number of independents tend to be Caucasoid.

Independents will tend to be resourceful, and generally dislike having anyone impose their rules on them. As such they can be thought of as interchangeably useful, obstructive, dangerous, admirable, a threat to be extinguished, someone that one is secretly envious of, and even entertaining diversions to be messed with or made examples of. And they can be thought of in this way by everyone from the rich, the Chief Vampires and even the independents classes themselves. Furthermore, their status within each class by the various individuals in them can and usually does shift even for the individuals, or can have multiple labels on them at once. A Chief Vampire might actually notice an independent as a curiosity and at times perhaps even toy with them for entertainment, study or to satisfy their hint of envy at these creatures that attempt so desperately (and in the eyes of the Chief Vampires futilely so) to be… well… free and indeed independent. The rich will tend to somewhat admire and envy them as well as occasionally hate them for it, but it’s the lieutenants of the Chief Vampires who generally hate them the most. The independents are the very antithesis of what the Lietenants themselves are: people who regardless of the consequences and at times even just ignorance or blind faith, believe and even act as if they were free to think and do as they please! How dare they!

Security Personnel – These guys are generally not exactly completely or even meant to be independents, but by virtue of their positions have some autonomy and at times and historically can and have become even forces to be reckoned with when/if they turn on their masters and/or leave their employ. Their positions give them insights into the inner workings of the machinery of control and while they are mostly picked for their lack of imagination, propensity for following orders and so on, you get the occasional one that has some slightly more evolved brain or who slipped through the net by ascribing to samurai principles of duty without setting off too many alarm bells about other aspects of his character that are actually well evolved beyond the usual soldier/cop/grunt level.

Cult Leaders – What? You thought all Independents were the good guys fighting the good fight? Some of them are just grifters with a narrative and in it just for themselves. The Chief Vampires (CV) their Lieutenants, and even the rich can see these types as a sort of pressure release valve. They soak up large numbers of the disaffected, particularly single, heterosexual, younger men, and also drain them of what little finances they have along with giving them some grift or nonsense to waste their energy and time on. These are the Andrew Tates, the Jordan Petersons, the Ivan Thrones, most of the “famous” YouTubers and politicians and talking heads. They keep the teeming masses of Morlocks and the lower classes in check, and spinning on empty, which keeps things safer and more manageable by the people higher up like the rich and their masters and so on. Regardless of whether the cult leader or grifter actually believes their ideology or is in it just for the grift, they are mostly useful idiots to the classes above.

Religious Communities – In many respects these are often indistinguishable from cults because, well… so many of them are in fact cults, though they may not be focused on any individual/s as such. And even when they form a functional mini-society they are almost invariably never a threat to the rich and above since they are mostly of the non-violent variety. So for example, the Amish are not a threat and they remove any potentially disaffected who could organise in more dangerous ways as far as the rich and above are concerned. They may fit into the Chthulian model of being “eaten last” as long as their movement does not become too big or in competition with any aspect of the plan the CVs have in store for humanity. Some exceptions might be:

  • Islamic Jihadists – but not often as these are usually just useful idiots that can be wound up then released among the masses to keep anger and resentment focused on islam and their members instead of on the real architects of various terrorist attacks and so on.
  • Mormons – these are not a threat to the higher echelons but where they have “stitched up” an entire state, they may become part of the new rich; which is not a real problem as they are manageable as any of the rich are.
  • Trad Caths – these would be hangers on to the only real opposition the CV ever had are mostly a source of amusement and entertainment for the CV and their Lieutenants because the low-ranking members of it don’t realise that the entirety of the supposed “Catholic Church” has been driven and owned by the CV since 1958 and as such is entirely toothless and filled to the gills with the types of people that are purely in it to do the beck and call of the rich, the Lieutenants and above all the CV.
  • Sedevacantists of type 1 (SSPX, Ratzingers, trailer park “Popes”) – These fancy themselves as the last remnants of of true Catholicism but are in fact fooled ignorants and just as ineffective as Trad Caths at achieving anything concrete, and in fact are mostly useful idiots because they soak up a great deal of the disaffected European origin youth who might otherwise organise and become a problem. Their constant bickering, infighting, positioning for the most “purity of faith” keeps things nice and chaotic and nonsensical and that means ineffective and as such are great at sucking up any potentially troublesome people who might otherwise use their zeal in more effective ways against the CVs and their plans.
  • Sedevacantist of type 2 (1958 Sedes) – these are a real problem. They hold to the real Catholicism and have been the only real effective enemy of the CVs for the last 2,000 years. And the CVs had to move in shadows for centuries in order to infiltrate and bring low the Catholic Church and these upstarts are the only possible eventual threat, but they are small, economically completely insignificant and constantly bombarded with the temptations of modernism at all times and the confused and confusing autists of type 2 sedevacantism as well as the annoying and pompous Trad Caths that function as very effective barriers to entry for most normal people unwilling to wade through the various and multiple false narratives the CVs and their Lieutenants have funded to the tune of millions in order to present any form of sedevacantism as essentially all type 1 trailer park “Popes” with “craaaaazy” ideas. These type 2 Sedes are however absolutely resilient and relentless, so an eye must be kept on them and confusion, strive and chaos in every aspect of Catholicism must be kept alive and well so as to create such a storm of conflicting and apparently irresolvable information as to make any sense of it nigh on impossible for the average person even if the actual reality of Sedevacantism of type 2 is direct and simple enough that a 10 year old can grasp it in a matter of minutes if it is presented clearly to them. It is interesting to note that the fake Pope currently in the Vatican has literally been friendlier to atheists stating they too go to heaven than to Sedevacantists which are so hated that a journalist in Italy was even hired to write a book to discredit them called appropriately enough Sedevacantisti, yet the “arguments” in it are so weak and laughable it had the opposite effect and since then the very word sedevacantists has been almost taboo and ONLY used to refer to people like the SSPX or trailer park “popes” since both of these factions hold absolutely incoherent ideologies that do in fact present as completely illogical and thus present as pretty much “crazy” indeed to anyone rational; which is, of course, the intent of the CVs.

Barons – These are people that may have achieved genuine wealth without being bought and paid for. Their wealth is not on a par with the rich even, never mind those above them, but they have achieved a level of safety in this regard that somewhat insulates them from the plans of the CVs and their Lieutenants and even the Rich, and they may have come to conclude that the plans of the CVs and so on are distasteful enough they want no part of it. They are able for the most part to remain separate from the turmoil, but sooner or later they will have to declare for a side and they are well aware that going against the CVs will entail a battle that will try to ruin them and their offspring in the long term, so in the main they are not clear and present dangers and can be kept mostly “on side” or at least not very effective by the rich and the Lieutenants they may come into contact with. These types also tend to be cautious so are unlikely to declare openly against the plans of the CVs and even if they do they can usually be converted or persuaded to become just another grift or cult that syphons off any energy that would otherwise become more focused against the CVs in more meaningful ways.

Warlords – These are mostly prevalent in already Chaotic and broken societies and historically could be large enough to even be regarded as a whole “nation”. These however have mostly been broken up now, North Korea and the Houtis being the current exceptions. In other instances these may be regional African leaders, though the leaders of such can become leaders of independent nations, such as the events of the last year or so in Niger. These types are usually in a constant fight for power and survival so in the greater scheme of things nothing for the CVs to be too concerned about… unless… and until someone like Putin comes along and helps them organise better as an antagonistic block that may go rogue down the line and require a nice little war to be brought back in line, along with the opportunity for blood sacrifices, child trafficking and profit that war invariably brings to the CVs.

Hermits and Lone Wolves – Not really a threat to the CVs due to their being individual dots on an entire landscape. Even if one of them goes rogue, it is far more likely they bump off only a very minor player like a judge or a Rich, and so on. Historically they never even get violent much at all and if they do they don’t get to strike to even the Lieutenant level, never mind the CV level.

Now that the various types have been identified, chances are that if you are reading here you fall into one of the independent categories.

Personally I have gone from Lone Wolf, which was most of my entire life, simply wanting to be left alone, to now being still a relatively Lone Wolf but creating a religious, Sedevacantist Type 2 community around me. I am still too small and the community too new, small and scattered to matter at all, and perhaps, even if I eventually succeed, I will be only thought of as an oddity worthy of study for a while in the curiosity one might have for a tiny creature that fancies itself as relevant, but I have no doubt that if I do succeed in any meaningful way, the eye of Sauron will take note.

But my point here is a much broader one than merely what grouping you or I fall into. My point here concerns the future of my children and their children and the children after them.

I am aware of the existence of technology that can easily get us to the starts. And have been aware of it since my mid twenties. More recently I have also become aware of the spiritual realities involved on this planet and the way things really work.

My concern is that if the Chief Vampires get their way, humanity, or certainly the part of humanity that actually matters, that is worthy of being a star-faring race because of their nature, not just the availability of the technology, will not make it.

And I want us to make it.

I do not know if only this planet, or —as I more likely suspect— the entirety of material creation is under the Dominion of the Prince of Lies, but regardless of the extent of his reign, temporary though it is, it is my duty, and yours, if you are a real human being, to fight against him and all his minions, whatever forms they take.

The only people that may get access to that technology and use it in a positive, non-destructive way, to increase human freedom instead of decrease it, and reach out to whatever other intelligences must exist out there in due course, are those that currently fall in the Independent class.

Technically any weird sequence of events may get an Independent faction to achieve antigravity technology. Holding on to it against the onslaught that the Chief Vampires would unleash against such a group will be extremely difficult though. But even if they manage to do that, there remains an aspect that is going to work out for the good in only one of those faction: Sedevacantists Type 2.

That’s because absent an absolute moral path, the errors of ego, human flaws and so on, only get magnified as errors with terrible consequences for large numbers of people. Throughout the history of humanity, only a few people had the will and faith to choose death over breaking what they perceived as their sacred duty, and we still know their names millennia later. Many of these were Pagans or Heathens of some kind:

The Samurai, the Spartans, the Romans of warrior class, and probably others, but, while undeniably honourable in their ways, there was no absolute sense of Justice, Charity, Mercy, Beauty, and above all: Love.

Only Catholicism has had the kind of Martyrs that consistently died for Love of mankind as a whole, unspeciated, unpartisan, and indeed, our Lord Himself died for the love of his very enemies. The many, many martyrs of Catholicism like those who went willingly to be eaten by lions or to be shot by firing squad as a Priest who would not break the vow of confession. The Catholic warriors who went to certain death to protect Christendom as a whole, even when those who called for their help stabbed them in the back.

Only adherence to dogmatic Catholic principles, can result in a star-faring humanity that is not a blight on the rest of the Galaxies around us. And for those of you that think any “Christianity” will do, no. It won’t. No version of Christianity other than Catholicism has had the number of consistent martyrs of the type I just described.

Eastern “Orthodoxy” has a few (mostly by claiming Catholic martyrs as if they were “theirs” too) bit even that is only due to its relative nearness to Catholicism when compared to the other heretic versions of Chirchianity trying to pass as “Christians”. The same goes for the Copts even if their numbers are far lower than even the Eastern schismatics.

So, although my choice of becoming Catholic (1958 Sede) did not originally have anything to do with the eventual hopeful future of humanity, it turns out that, as is logical, the truth reflects in every way itself.

Above all, Catholicism is true, and if you do take the time to study it and its history and it fruits, you will soon enough come to realise that no other religion has been as beneficial and created as much beauty for humanity. It is the only light worth moving towards.

And wither way, whether you like it, see it, believe it or not, we are, as a species, being prodded, pushed, forced and in every way, good or bad, being made to keep moving towards the speciation I have laid out above. So chose a path, because if you do not, one will absolutely be chosen for you, and the likelihood is that without a lot if action from you, you will be shoved in the ranks of the Morlocks. So…

Choose wisely.

Blatherers are not relevant

If you are one of those people that thinks that blogging on the internet about the evils of the world and whining about it, or even whining about how young men should be doing X or young women should be doing Y (yes, pun intended) it still isn’t doing much of anything.

You write a book that leads people to a certain action or activity or teaches them a skill or gives them information that has been hidden or unknown ok, that’s better.

But best of all is you taking action in the real world. And while securing your own situation obviously and necessarily must come first, creating that community of zealots that bind together in hard times, is the immediate second thing, and you should really ideally be doing them concurrently as best you can.

I recently had a back and forth over substack comments with on Mark Bisone. That link is to my final comment, but you can thread back up on it and see how it progressed. All on John of Barsoom’s Substack comment section, which is sort of like having two homeless drunks fighting in your front yard because it’s one of those that doesn’t have a proper fence and is just adjacent to the road.

In any case, it became quickly apparent that this Bisone guy had no real clue. He’s the kind who writes pompously lengthy screeds to show you how smart and poetic he is and as Shakespeare said (I paraphrase) it’s all a bunch of hot air about nothing.

He tried to “shame me” into being less “arrogant” (i.e. calling him out on his various consciously chosen flaws), and “prideful” (real, PhULEEEZE! Stop pointing out how I am so deficient in effectiveness and results!) and questioned my “approach” to things despite the fact he hasn’t achieved a fraction of my results.

And finally he dodged the straight forward question of whether Vatican 2 and all its pomps is heresy most foul or not.

So, a wishy-washy, not here, nor there guy, who fancies himself as some sort of “traditionalist” or even (laughably) possibly Catholic layman, that is lukewarm throughout, and achieves little to no measurable impact on anyone’s life other than continuing and perpetrating the generic fog of despair and whining, providing no real applicable positive results.

Yet, I don’t doubt many will look to his writing and like chimps before a stone altar they will OOOOHHHH and AAAHHHHHH, and be enthralled by the fancy words and the verbose and belaboured “points” he makes.

And indeed he is considered somewhat of a “firebrand” I suppose, by a guy like John of Barsoom. Which is fine, because John is very much an intellectual and a theoretician, he’s sort of your crazy and mostly harmless alchemist trying to find how to turn base metals into silver. Or al least copper. And you never know, he might find something totally unexpected that adds to the discourse, but Mark Bisone, seem to me to just be blatherer. And the sole purpose of Blatherers is to waste your time.

When faced with these people always ask them what have they achieved.

  • Did you take the vaxx?
  • Did you stop anyone else from taking it? How exactly?
  • Do you own a business unrelated to your blogging or ideas you present here? If yes, is this a way to get clients?
  • What have you achieved in life that you think has value for others after the day you die?
  • Does he have children?
  • Are they married?

In person, it’s easier to assess quite a few other things, like, for example, are they able to take a punch? (Which does not mean you should punch them out the blue. But you should be able to assess their potential ability to get in a physical confrontation without needing to get into one).

And most importantly, what, if anything, are they doing in the physical world? Are they organising a community? Are they building something? Or at least moving towards it?

I’d take a 20 year old with a go-bag he’s prepared for emergencies, over a boomer with a ranch that has no clue what the problem is.

In the end, no one is coming to save you, no political system is going to fix any of this, and the internet is not real life.

So go on and BUILD your life. The one you want, not the one you’re not really into but is easy anyway.

The Definition of Respect

Having caught up reading the Sigma Game blog, I found this post to be quite interesting from the perspective of the definition of respect. And probably because this other post brought home to me why Vox always said he didn’t care about the why of the SSH.

This last one made me aware that having had years more practice at responding to the masses as a result of his blog, he is better skilled at communicating with people some 30 points or more lower on the IQ scale. The very idea that someone would assume that because they can’t imagine or understand something it doesn’t exist or doesn’t have a motive, or origin, literally never crossed my mind. Surely, I dimly thought wordlessly to myself in the depths of my mind, the point of asking why is to understand that which you do not… yet.

But once again, I forgot Professor Cipolla and his 5 rules of Human stupidity. Therefore, on reading about respect as Vox wrote on it, I asked myself how would I define the concept? Because I didn’t (and don’t) immediately agree with the descriptors Vox gave. And even more interestingly, how would I define the concept in a way that it makes sense and is mostly understandable to other people outside of my own head?

Personally, I have no need to define the concept in words, its limits and dimensions are crystal clear to me, however, as someone else said somewhere, the unverbalized thought is as the unrealised idea. Or words to that effect. And putting things into words certainly helps my ability to converse meaningfully with others. So let me try.

First I think it useful to define and separate two terms that can and often do become conflated, and which I think perhaps, Vox also conflated to some extent (maybe not, it’s hard to say without sitting across from him with some decent wine to hand); this is love and respect. While both can be present, they are totally separate terms. I can respect even people I hate, and I can love even people for whom my respect is negligible.

Fundamentally, I think for me respect is related to consistency and integrity even in the face of adversity. The Priest who would rather be executed than break the sacrament of confession. The man who right or wrong as he may be will suffer whatever consequences for his belief, the people or ideas he loves, is deserving of respect. It is why it is perfectly possible for me to respect an actual criminal more than a guy who has maybe never broken a single law, but who simply will go along with whatever rule comes along not because he agrees with them, but because he doesn’t believe anything strongly enough to resist.

In that respect, a person who takes the Vaxx despite having been warned about it, their contents, and so on, certainly will never have the same level of respect I have for someone who despite great difficulty refused to take it.

It does not mean I love them any less, but love does not require respect to exist. Friends and even family took the vacs. I still love them just as much. Maybe even a little bit more because now I am better aware of just how fragile and weak they were, but I can’t respect them as much as if they had not taken it.

The key passage for me were these four:

Respect should not be granted solely on the basis of approval, agreement, or perfection.

I agree wholly with this.

I was disappointed by the decisions of many of my friends and family members to get vaxxed. In a few cases, I was even surprised by them. But in no way did it lessen in any way my respect for them as individuals, or my regard for them as human beings.

It makes me wonder how Vox defines respect, because I don’t agree with this statement. I certainly don’t love any of the people less because of it. In fact, as I said, in a way I feel more sorry for them, which could be considered as a kind of love. A certain level of concern for their lives, and frankly, more so their spirits, which I think are weaker than I had thought.

But respect? No, it certainly has lowered from where it used to be. Conversely, people who I thought (and may well still think) are kind of assholes, but who resisted the vaxx, I have definitely more respect for.

Despite her disappointment, the wife should be able to at least respect the husband for ultimately being willing to listen to her and even to accept her advice in regards to his own actions.

Fair enough, this is a valid point, and I agree with it. She should take comfort in the fact that although he was wrong he listened and adjusted or at least let her direct him correctly. There is nothing wrong with this and in fact it is a good trait for a man to have, since we are all flawed, we will make mistakes and the ability to hear your wife out and adjust accordingly when required is certainly a quality deserving of respect.

I find that it is easier to develop respect for people who listen to me and then change their minds than for those who simply continue stubbornly on a path leading to a bad outcome. 

I would say this is obvious for most human beings, although that is mostly because we all like to be “right”. Though I am pretty sure Vox here means it rather differently, and in a way I agree with again. I respect a person able to review the data and change their mind based on the facts, rather than someone who will blindly continue on because of their emotions and inability to cogitate like a thinking creature capable of reason.

Certainly respect might not be so easy to define clearly in words, which is perhaps why it covers two full folio sized pages in my Volume VIII of the Oxford English Dictionary. Nevertheless, I would sum up my own definition as the admiration one may have for a person that is willing to undergo personal sacrifice or duress in order to maintain congruency with their world-view and the attending consequences and duties that should follow from holding that world-view.

Of the 23 different definitions of the word respect found in the OED, most of them refer to a relationship with. A contrast. A relation to. Which is only part of the equation. Only four of the first 17 definitions approach something closer to the meaning I would give it:

13: Regard, Consideration.

14: A consideration; a fact or motive which assists in, or leads to, the formation of a decision; an end or aim.

16: Deferential regard or esteem felt towards a person or thing.

17: Deferential or courteous attentions; actions expressive of respect for a person; politeness, courtesies.

In the second appearance of the word, there are 6 more definitions and only one fits to some degree:

4: To treat or regard with deference, esteem, or honour; to feel or show respect for.

There is one more that also ties in somewhat to my definition:

15: Dread; fear.

Overall then, I would say that respect is something that gives one consideration, regard, appreciation (which can even be in the form of caution, or fear) for a person or thing. And that sensation, consideration and so on can also result in actions that can be interpreted as being respectful. But the origin of that sensation, of that noticing, of that appreciation necessarily comes from some attribute (real, imagined or faked as it might be) that the person or thing has (or that we ascribe to it).

For me, congruency, things like keeping your word, behaving honestly and honourably, and so on, are all aspects that can and do merit respect, but perhaps the largest part, personally, is probably the willingness to stand against difficulty, society, bad odds, whatever, in order to do, or act, or defend, or protect what is true and just and good or innocent.

Those who took the Vaxx did none of those things. They bent.

Therefore, I don’t see how my consideration for them in that regard cannot possibly have been lowered. It has. And it should have. I don’t love them any less, but yes, I do respect them less. Inevitably.

Why such a post? Who cares how Vox defines it? Well, the man has an interesting brain, and there aren’t too many of those around, and one can always learn something going down occasional random rabbit holes, you never know what you might learn. And conversely, one never knows who might find this post useful too.

Told you. You’re gonna be controllable

I have been aware of the technological ability to control people by various forms of technology that directly affects the brain for almost 3 decades. And I have posted before on this as well as to a post that had recovered the video that was from 1995 of a French doctor who had also managed to get on TV to warn people of this technology.

More recently due to the Covid scam, I posited that there are reasons to believe the stuff they wanted to inject people with was also possibly an experiment in direct mind control Syndicate style.

Well… guess what… it was that too.

I’d say the evidence is now conclusive, as is the fact that ALL vaccines are harmful. Yes. All of them.

It’s such a Mystery

UPDATE: Adam Piggott pointed out the image is labelled as being from 2018. So my theory below is probably 100% wrong unless this guy was an early secret test subject.

Chalk one up to confirmation bias and not paying attention. Happens to all of us at one time or another. The important thing is to simply own up when you screw up. I have left the error below unchanged for the sake of honesty and suitable self-punishment for such a simple and stupid error.

In the interest of actual balance, since this was brought up by several people privately as well as in one comment, there is also this aspect to consider.

***

How could this possibly have happened? Surely it had nothing at all to do with the generic experiment combining genetic alteration, mind control via 5G by production of organic antenna in our bodies, sterilisation, and HIV, that was the COVID-19 Vaxx.

No, of course not, that would be a paranoid conspiracy theory with no basis in reality, except for, well, millions of dead bodies around the world and many multiples of that who are severely injured, and well, little things like this:

From the article here:

On Tuesday, The New England Journal of Medicine tweeted the most recent addition to its photo series of the most visually arresting medical anomalies. The image is of a mysterious, branchlike structure that, posted elsewhere, would probably pass for a cherry-red chunk of some underground root system or a piece of bright reef coral. But this is no creature of the deep. It’s a completely intact, six-inch-wide clot of human blood in the exact shape of the right bronchial tree, one of the two key tubular networks that ferry air to and from the lungs. And it was coughed up in one piece.

So, yeah. Total mystery. Not related to the Vaxx at all. Must be climate change.

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks