This beautiful lady is probably destroying her career for simply stating an objective fact and calling out the sexual abuse of a necessarily hungry baby for his own sexual gratification.
What say you America?
From Intel-Republic:
PEDO ALERT: Riley Gaines, US swimmer who protested against swimming in competitions with transgender (born male) Lia Thomas – speaks out further on an LGBT issue.
A transgender man with a nipple clamp fetish appears to use baby as a sexual prop (he’s “breastfeeding” 🤮), and there’s no outrage. Because he identifies as a woman.
Riley has been branded “all guts, no nuts!” for standing up to these issues publicly. Should men who identify as women be able to adopt babies?
Both on Gab and at Vox’s blog, the mentioning of Free Speech was discussed and I thought I’d add my 2 cents, which are radically different from probably any of the stuff you read so far, and perhaps ever, in your life.
I was in my early teens the first time I heard of the absolutely idiotic concept of “free speech”. It was at the private school my brother and I went to in Africa that was based on the British Model but had considerable influence and funding, as well as several teachers from America.
Previous to some misguided “teacher” presenting this wholly retarded notion, no normal human being of average intelligence had ever considered this “idea” any more than they would have considered trying to fly from the tenth floor of a building by leaping off it and flapping their arms. This was immediately obvious to me as well as random Africans with an 85 IQ or Scandinavians with 120 IQ. And all of this was when I was still in my atheist or at best agnostic stage. The idiocy of Free Speech has literally nothing to do with blasphemy laws. I mean it may have historically been concocted to corrode them, but my point is that the notion is absurd regardless of if you even have any religion!
I am continually amused at even supposedly “intellectual” Americans and their acolytes going on about this or that “Free Speech” and how it applies to this or that subset of speech… It’s all so ridiculous.
Only a people as naïve and gullible as the Americans could ever have even considered such an absurd idea for a minute, never mind try to espouse it as some kind of cornerstone of civilisation.
It’s such absolute insanity.
Now, I can feel all the yankees and some Southrons too getting all their heckles up, but consider… REALITY!
The reality is not only that certain speech WILL get you killed, but that it absolutely SHOULD get you killed.
Now, you and I may disagree on what kind of speech deserves you getting killed for it, but rest assured that pretty much every normal human will be willing to kill you for certain types of speech. Including (and sometimes especially) the ones that are supposedly all for it.
The classic example I always make is your new neighbour coming to your door, knocking on it, and when you answer it, he happily informs you he is the local pedophile and can’t wait to get his hands on your toddler for a bout of child rape. As far as I am concerned, that’s an instant visit to the nearest swamp, where said pedophile will have gone “hiking” and is never found again.
The waddling Americans are all shouting “I’m talking’ political speech… not…”
Yeah, shut up.
When the politics becomes that the local pedophile should absolutely have the right to rape your toddler, then that politician too, should get a free ride to the swamp hiking trail.
The REALITY is that NO SPEECH, ever, in the entirety of the human existence has EVER been free, nor will it ever be.
Only a literal retard can even consider the concept at all.
So… if this is all a rude shock to you, my American friend, take a seat, relax, open a beer (a real one, not a transgender piss one) and think about it for a minute or ten.
Then say it with 12 year old me, and 53 year old me, and every version of me in between: Free Speech is absolute retardedry. And anyone espousing it should be pelted in the face with Frozen Peaches until he or she repents!
Look, I get it, the world is going to Hell in a hand basket, more absurd news daily and if you are so foolish as to watch the actual news it’s a constant flow of terrifying nonsense. From Transgenderism to Climate Change and everything in between. they are literally spraying you with chemicals and trying to prevent you from travelling or eating meat. Yup.
And they are also ridiculing anyone who tries to organise or tell the truth and above all they want to keep you separate and infertile.
Yes they are passing laws that make it illegal to criticise laws, any laws, Israel, Jews, or to write anything deemed “hateful”. Yes with huge fines and jail time. And yeah they are going after people already.
Oh, and they want you unbelieving in God, of course.
And 5G and next 6G and always more restrictions and so on. Sure. It’s certainly in their plans and they are pushing these thing through.
Despair for you is their total aim. Their only and constant mission.
But you can EASILY fight back. Read my blog sure, and take notes from the posts I made about how to win against clown world or how your mind is your baseline strongest weapon.
Remember the following:
We outnumber them by at least two orders of magnitude and most likely three or four. For every one of these bastards trying to get us to take murder-juice, and “have nothing and be happy” there are AT LEAST 100 people that want nothing to do with their evil dystopia future. And more likely 10,000, if not 100,000.
This is why they are TERRIFIED of us having free movement and free association. The answer is simple. Ditch your phones. Leave them at home and meet your friends like EVERYONE did throughout all the 1980s. In person, no mobile phones of other trading devices. Hell, wear Jeans and converse shoes if you want a bit of nostalgia too. Talk. Face to face without digital devices on you or them. Make it a habit.
Get rid of TV. If you have one, unplug it and go a week without it. Then try two weeks. You’ll live, trust me. We didn’t have one up for months and then we put it up to watch some films, and now I am seriously thinking screw that. TV existed when I was born, but was life worse when it didn’t exist? People read books. Had conversations. Made more children. My Russian friends in London don’t have a TV in the home and their 7 year old kid kicked my ass at a logic puzzle game while only half-paying attention. Sure he played it daily but I was in my late 40s.
Get married. Yes in Church. Yes in a REAL Catholic Church (sedevacantist), after you got baptised and converted to Catholicism for real, not as a joke. Why? Because Catholicism is the only religion in which divorce is not permitted. Doesn’t matter if you married a nasty cheating crack-whore or a violent womanising drunk. So choose wisely. You think maybe that matters more than the other superficial crap they sell you 24/7 on TikTok? Family, is the one thing that matters more than anything else. Real family means you are willing to kill and die for your loved ones. Yes, it’s true that sometimes the family you are born is NOT the one where you find love, loyalty and truth. That’s why you got to make your own. And since you had such shitty examples (as we all had) get a manual and learn the right way.
Sure, finding a life-partner today is “difficult”. But is it, really? I went through a LOT of women and I chose wrong twice before I finally got it right. My own journey was one of going through every wrong path until I returned to the origin. It’s a hard way and almost everyone attempting it will be lost along the way. Consider instead, that today, if you refused the murder-juice and don’t believe the big lies, you can already sort the world into those who are pureblood and those who are mutants (a small number of which actually may have got saline so they could be pureblood without knowing it). If you want to remain a pureblood and produce pureblood children… well… your choice is a lot simpler and reduced to a smaller pool of candidates right away. If you then have at least an INTEREST in a traditional way of life, it gets even smaller. And if you are looking at a proper Catholic way of life (sedevacantist) it’s small enough that the likelihood is YOU PHYSICALLY NEED TO CREATE IT. I am in regular contact now with 3 couples that are composed of young men and women NONE of which started out as Sedevacantists, but now all are, all are baptised, all are confirmed and all have been married by side priests in church. I am just one guy and these people in 3 different countries around the world, one of which in Finland, which has NO Sede priests, so meant travelling to another country for Baptism etc. The starting point needs to be YOU. Your mind, then your Faith, then your wife or husband and then your children. CREATE your reality. Literally.
Either follow, support or join an existingKurganate like community, or create your own. Those are the only two options that produce lasting results.
If you’re gonna create your own try to select the best geography and own the land in as free a country as you can, and get others to move there with you.
That’s it. Use the Search Me button on the right sidebar to look for other posts that go into more details of each step. And if doing even that small effort for your own education is too much… well… good luck, but I think…YNGMI.
About as rare as Dodo teeth, but this lady, the German EU Parliamentarian Christine Anderson, is one.
I base that on the face that her comments are unambiguous, and absolutely direct, both of which are total no-nos in government, politics and public life of the WEF puppets, and this is the reason why I am prone to thinking she is a legitimately honest politician.
Probably nothing to do with the passages in the Talmud that says it’s perfectly acceptable and no sin at all to rape children under the age of 3.
The video below is only a couple of minutes long. Look at the way the Zyklons are trying to shut the prof down when he shows the links between Anarchists (antifa types), homosexuality, and pedophiles. Using unassailable facts, no less.
Maybe one in five Zyklons really is not just LGBT, but actually is a pedophile?
I can prove quite conclusively to you, within about an hour or two, less if you are a bit less brainwashed, and if you can do basic math, that the lives of the so-called “rich and famous” are a complete and utter pit of despair.
All you need to do is browse CDAN (Crazy Days and Nights) and scroll down the blog, reading the entries. If after about an hour or so of doing that and doing a quick mental guesstimate of the number of glitterati there are in the pool from which that litany of despair is taken, you will soon realise that the toll one needs to pay to enter that club is —literally— at minimum, a piece of your soul, and in many, even most cases, the entirety of it.
What CDAN does, above all, in my opinion, is list very clearly, the resulting human wreckage that a life dedicated to hedonistic materialism produces.
Most of those people are so far gone, so utterly lost, that a homeless guy who is not a drug-addict has a better shot at making a happy life for himself.
I knew this at a relatively young age, and then confirmed it when I was offered certain “tickets” to do with being involved in a tv documentary-series at various points and/or a film, both based on my book The Face on Mars. I was 26 at the time and even before these “offers” came in, I had already seen the effect of being an author with books on the shelves of the local bookshops had on “friends” and acquaintances.
The interviews I did for television and radio were absolutely geared to turn the whole thing into clickbait, and since I’m a pretty quick study and I realised the interviewer was trying to take the approach of letting me run my mouth to then edit things in some tinfoil hat fashion, I very quickly reverted to one word answers and mini-sound bytes. the result was they could not make me sound crazy, so they did what a friend of mine at the time suggested they would do, jokingly.
I explained to him the interview was a hit piece and they would try hard to make me look insane, and he laughed and said, “yeah they may morph you into an alien on TV! ha, ha, ha.”
Well, that is exactly what they did, I kid you not. When the interview aired, at one point they fade my face out and gradually faded a gray alien head over it. My friend and I couldn’t believe it and laughed ourself to tears. I was 26 and I didn’t care for these people or their lies.
An outfit that was supposed to do a 13 part documentary had only to produce an outline of the 13 part documentary, I had already lined up an investor for them and this was all they wanted. They had 2 months to do it. They produced 2 pages of incoherent A4 where they had also screwed up the major premise. I advised the investor to not deal with these clowns.
Graham Hancock plagiarised large parts of the book as well as its main concept and still got the basic premise wrong. It’s like… steal Ferrari’s plans for a fast engine and still build a crappy Mini Morris one. They aren’t even good thieves. The guy who wrote the original comics on which the film The Matrix is based more than a little, will tell you the same thing.
Elvis didn’t write his songs, though I like how he sings them, and so do many others. Everything in the entertainment world is basically a lie. And usually also very gay; when it’s not also pedophile infested.
Graham Hancock certainly made a lot more money than I ever will from my work, with “his” stolen, then half-assed-executed ideas. And sure, that can irk a person somewhat, but you know what, when I confronted him face to face on it in Cape Town, his demeanour was the one of an apologetic, scared, cardboard-cut-out of a “man”. He apologised, blamed his ghost-writers and “complimented” me on my astonishing and brilliant work. He was a middle-aged journalist of supposed world-renowned fame, I was I think 27 at the time, had little or no money and did karate on an almost daily basis and worked as an armed bodyguard/security specialist and sold computers now and then when I could.
And I wouldn’t have traded his life for mine for any amount of money on the planet. I could then, and I still can now, look in the mirror and know that whatever errors I made in life, they were honest ones, and that despite all my faults, and they are many, I, at least, did not become whatever subspecies of cowardly, underhanded, sneaky, slithering animal people like that become. My brother and others were more enraged than I ever was by such occurrences. Which makes sense. They saw only the surface loss of what generally gets perceived as money, fame, and glory.
But I got to see the people that supposedly had or created this money, fame and glory. And this is what I saw, time and again:
The fame was a net negative. People wanted to be with you, whether as friends or sex partners, based on your fame. They had no idea, who you are, nor cared. the scary thing about this was that it wasn’t limited to gold-digging whores. In fact it was something that affected roughly the same percentage of people that decided to take the genetic serum or buy into the lie of the rona. Men wanted to be my friend and women wanted to bear my children, because I had a book on the shelves of the local book shops and did signing events. Or because they heard me interviewed on the radio or saw me on TV in the UK or, the USA, or in one case, saw my book briefly on CNN apparently (I never saw it myself but several people told me they had in a brief mention).
What becomes absolutely obvious then is that most human beings do not live, love, or care about the person they are with, perhaps marry and even have children with. No. They do not. They care about the idea about them they have in their head of them. Or they later end up hating the idea they have about them in their head. It is absolutely rare that they even glimpse the reality of who or what you are even if you spend decades with them.
In the modern era, this “disease” is a lot worse than it ever was in the past before television, the internet and mobile brainwashing and attention destroying machines we call “phones”.
Seeing this firsthand, noticing a girl you might have thought of as attractive and even intelligent if you had met her under different circumstances, and then noting how she is so transparently offering herself as some kind of sacrificial sex toy, purely in order to have the “thrill” of having had a “famous” person inside her, well… I know I am the minority perhaps in this, but I assure you, it is depressing. It destroys a certain aspect of innocence that makes life easier and more beautiful, and is hard to live happily without.
And that’s just the “fame” part.
And if you did sleep with such a girl, chances are, that after a while (or maybe only after minutes if you’re no good in bed) she would too feel empty, and disappointed, and lacklustre, because her fantasy of who you are and how her life might become is a fairy tale. As much as the one you might have told yourself if you’d met her as a nobody at a party and saw how pretty and quick-witted she appeared. Only to realise later it was just a facade, she is not smart, or quick-witted, she just learnt a routine of things to do and say at parties.
That, right there, the shabby feeling of mild despair that grows on you if you do take the ticket, if you do reach for the “glory”? That is the real “glory”.
The fame makes you a cartoon caricature and the glory turns out to be dust and emptiness. I at least was wise enough to not indulge in either.
The money sure can be useful, but it invariably comes with those two strings attached, and no amount of money on the planet is worth that. Not to me anyway.
It is possible, to get at least some of the money and dodge the “fame” and the “glory” and if you are smart, you can even manage a certain level of “fame” in a way that it doesn’t harm you, but it takes uncommon firmness of mind, courage, and not a little luck, or fate, or divine providence, whatever you choose to call it. In short, it is very rare, and probably has a cost anyway, as all roads do.
All of these despairing things, are made a thousand or a million times worst if you are alone in it all. Even family and close friends can turn, like zombies in a horror movie, becoming infected and turning on you with those soulless, dead eyes. Imagine your own parents or children becoming swallowed by the despair and materialism of “fame” and “glory”, or, much more often, your wife, or husband.
And where, in a world like the one of today, do you find a wife or husband that is not ready to jump neck-deep into the mire of “fame” and “glory” given a half a chance? Especially for those who grew up with the internet as a done thing?
There is no easy answer, but I assure you that whatever difficulties I faced or will face in life, I would always choose them over the ones that come with Hollywood level “fame” and “glory”.
I made my life an exercise in living between the cracks and not getting caught by what Vadim Zeland calls “Pendulums”, and just to be safe, I never tried to “transurf” the waves more than a tiny little bit here or there, (long before I read anything Vadim wrote) because in this game of life, one big wipeout is enough to reduce you to shark-food. And even as it is, I took my wipeouts, and they were hard enough, and perhaps many would not have survived them, but I did; again, by my will, but also a lot of divine providence and grace, which the lost often call luck or fate.
My problem has always been the same one.
My DNA, as far back as I can find information on my ancestors, has the curiosity of the explorer in it, and the fearlessness of the fool. It is a dangerous combination, and I do not advise it to anyone. I certainly hope my son is wiser than I was, but already, I see in him, the brutal honesty he has with himself, the fearlessness in the face of danger, at times due to innocence, and other times due to calculated observation. And the calm, considered, approach to things that might be dangerous, which he has not yet investigated.
How to guide such a boy?
There is no simple or clear path, because these are the qualities of a man, and ultimately, as men know, we are born alone, and we die alone, and every choice we make, every effort, every despair, every victory and every crushing defeat, is ours, and ours alone, no matter who loves us and may help us, or who hates us and may try to destroy us. All we can rely on is providence, God’s grace and our tiny, but eternal flame of faith inside ourselves, regardless of if we know it exists in there or not. He has it, and perhaps all I can do is try to make him aware of it consciously. Maybe, if I can help him be less mute than I have been to myself, he might be able to more readily rely on that fire in the centre of his heart even when he is alone and tired and scared, and I am no longer around to do what I can.
Maybe, if I train him even as I play with him, he can learn to roll with the punches of life and pop up nearby and unexpectedly, and turn things to his advantage then too.
And above all, I hope I can do a good job of showing him the decay and deceit and lies and illusion of “fame” and “glory” and instead choose the real Glory of, and for, God, and Honour, and the ones you Love. And to know fame is a lying whore riddled with disease and fancy clothes, and make-up; and real fame is the trust and loyalty of your friends and your loved ones, and nothing else compares.
And hopefully, in the Fake New World that is being prepared for him, either we are able to collapse the shit out of it before it gets off the ground, or there will in any case remain a way for him to navigate the “pendulums” and “surf” the “waves” remaining as best as possible, untouched by the filth of the sewage from which they are formed.
The lives of the “rich and famous” are a preview of the Hell that awaits us all if we don’t wake up and return to what really matters: The virtues of Truth, Honesty, Honour, Fortitude, Courage, and Faith.
Except it will be worse for you will not even have the villas and the retinue of concubines and the drugs, because you will not even have the money to distract you from the despair.
So.
Choose your path wisely, friend, and support that which is real, and see through that which is fake, and gay, and Satanic.
I have covered the knowing heretics, fake Catholics, and Freemason Satanists several times, and by now, I should hope it is clear that I give no “clergy” that doesn’t specifically reject Vatican II and the Fake Popes from 1958 on any kind of pass. They are knowing heretics, and to be treated as such, as per Cum Ex Apostolato Officio; to wit (emphasis added):
(iii) that all such individuals also shall be held, treated and reputed as such by everyone, of whatsoever status, grade, order, condition or pre-eminence he may be and whatsoever excellence may be his, even Episcopal, Archiepiscopal, Patriarchal and Primatial or other greater Ecclesiastical dignity and even the honour of the Cardinalate, or secular, even the authority of Count, Baron, Marquis, Duke, King or Emperor, and as such must be avoided and must be deprived of the sympathy of all natural kindess.
But… but… what about some poor wanna-be Catholic “priest” that is ignorant of the whole Vatican II issue, and the rampant sodomy in the seminaries, and the utter manifest heresy of Bergoglio in real-time, never mind all of it since 1958, you say?
Yeah… that’s like saying that an adult, who takes all the courses to be a firearms instructor, then points a loaded gun at a child and pulls the trigger and then claims he didn’t know the gun was loaded when he did it. Even if you assume he’s telling the truth, and even if you could somehow determine it with absolute certainty (impossible), the fact remains that such an idiot would and should, go to jail, or preferably the death penalty, for what is known legally as criminal negligence. Or as I prefer to call it, criminal stupidity. Yes, being stupid enough is a crime. Because really stupid people should not be allowed to take certain jobs. You don’t want a 50 IQ retard trying to fly a plane. And I don’t care whose feelings it hurts. Ditto these fake “idiot” “priests”. If they are that stupid, they have no business being priests, and no, I do not give them the benefit of the doubt, and neither should you. Why? Because it is Church dogma to not do so. If you act like a heretic, practice like a heretic, promulgate heresy, regardless of your possible retardation, we are to treat you like a heretic. And must be deprived of the sympathy of all natural kindess. See above.
So that deals with the intentional, knowing heretics.
But what about the laymen who are also trying to lead people to Hell? Well, once again, I have detailed some of these grifting liars, Emo Jones, Tay-Tay Marshall, Michelle Voris, Milo Yankmypoleus and their kind. And one hopes it is now relatively easy to spot them. And we have a generic witch test for all who profess to be “Catholics”, it’s really simple:
“Do you reject Vatican II and all those who promulgate it?“
Anything other than a resounding YES! means you are dealing either with a knowing impostor, an egomaniacal fame or status hungry “smartboi”, or, at best, a deceived, lazy, ignorant.
Yes, yes, I know, charity and all that, but let me point something out here: It is by using and appealing to your charity when they have absolutely no right to do so, that these snakes enter your home and pervert it. And the Catholic Church also dogmatically explains that one should use prudence and avoid anything suspect.
Great. We got that cleared up. What then of the autistically persistent laymen? And here I add a couple of warnings:
First of all assure yourself as best you can that they actually are simple laymen. The example of note here is John Salza. Who has written a retinue of lies against Sedevacantism, supposedly in defence of Catholicism as a simple, pious layman. Except… that Salza was (is) a self-confessed freemason. Oh, oh, but he’s not anymore… right, because Satanists are such paragons of truth-telling. Get it through your head, freemasons are Satanists, that is literally what Freemasonry is. The literal worship of Lucifer. The fact the lower echelons might not be immediately aware of it… again… see criminal stupidity above. And if a freemason did honestly convert and became a Catholic (there are historical examples) then the only thing they may continue to do is explain how freemasonry is Satanic. That’s it. And that is the only legitimate thing they might be allowed to speak on as laypeople. Because once you have been a Satanist, it’s really quite obvious you should never be allowed to say anything at all about Catholicism, other than it is the absolute truth and you were absolutely wrong. And should such a person go on to write long tracts on why this or that theological position is better or worse, they are to be immediately assumed to be simply continuing their Satanic mission. These people, once you discover they are in fact freemasons or associate with such, etcetera, can safely be dismissed as liars at the very least, and heretics almost to a certainty.
But let us now assume you have satisfied yourself that they are not intentional deceiver or gatekeepers. And further (somehow) satisfied yourself they are not grifters either, making a buck from their “preaching”. And by making a buck I mean, literally making their living, or a substantial part of it from it. Because if they are, well, then their intent might not be consciously Satanic, but they are certainly at least useful idiots for Satan.
Ok then, assuming they even pass the Satanists/Grifter smell test, what are we left with? The smartbois. The Gammas who do it for personal ego/stature/status.
Are there honestly deceived people who believe they are “Catholics” when instead they are just fooled, lazy ignorants? Yes. Plenty of them. Millions. maybe even over a billion of them. Certainly.
Why do I call them lazy ignorants? Because they are. Is it harsh? Not really, it is a statement of fact. If I decided to call myself a prince of the blue garter belt of Liliputz, or whatever, you can bet I would not do so until I have studied with care what and how one becomes or is born as a Prince of Liliputz, and even if I fit those requirements, I would then delve deeply into what it takes to belong to the order of the blue garter belt, and why that isn’t gay somehow, if indeed it is not!
And how much more important is your claim to belong to a specific religion, to a specific God, with specific rules, because after all, if God is real, and Good, and Loving, then he MUST have, at a minimum, a Way for you to find Him and His rules and a way for you to KNOW what those rules are. And indeed there is: The Catholic Church. And it is your minimum duty to ensure you are actually in it, and not fooled into some travesty of it through your laziness of not bothering to learn your own religion.
So, if you’re one of the lazy ignorants, either get offended, flounce off in flamboyant fake indignation, or, get your lazy ass off the couch, and start reading. And learning.
But what about the smartbois?
Ah yes.
And here we encounter one such: Michael Lofton (because I am still being charitable here and still investigating him). He appears to have spent a LOT of time and effort to defend the heretic, fake, impostor riddled “Catholic Church” headed by the Vicar of pedophiles himself, Bergoglio. Now, why would that be?
If we give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he’s a true believer (in the Novus Orco, fake Church) and not a grifter (but he does make considerable revenue from his podcasts) or an intentional deceiver, then we need to assess what he is, and why he’s doing it.
At first glance, what I can say so far is that he certainly likes to use the sophist’s method preferred by Bill Clinton when asked if he had sex with Monica Lewinsky. For those young-uns among you, here is the detail:
During his grand jury testimony, Clinton questioned the exact meaning of the word ‘is’ in an attempt to defend a false affidavit in which Lewinsky claimed ‘there is no sex of any kind, in any manner, shape or form with president Clinton’. When asked by former Deputy Independent Counsel Sol Wisenberg, to confirm the affidavit was ‘utterly false’, the former president gets into semantics. ‘It depends upon what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is. If ‘is’ means is and never has been, that is not—that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement,’ Clinton said with what seems like a smirk on his face.
I remember watching that on TV and seeing the lawyer take him to task on it, saying effectively: Wait…what? Are you saying that your statement was “true” because you weren’t physically having sex with Monica Lewinsky at that specific time the question was asked?!
It was truly baffling and absurd. Well, Michael does quite a bit of this.
When cornered on certain topics he tries to dodge by becoming absurdly “specific” about certain words.
For example, watch this video from 53.20 on, where he admits that Bergoglio said that Proselytising is a sin. But, he goes on to “explain” that what Bergy-the-Oleous means by that, is “to use force” to convert people to Catholicism.
Which is, of course, abject nonsense. “What does he mean by Proselytism?” he says, “the question is, is proselytism the same as evangelisation?” And he goes on to say that “convincing people” of the truth is evangelising, and fine, but Proselytism is, according to him, understood by Bergoglio to be the use of “coercion and force”. He doesn’t explain how he knows this, or what evidence he has that Bergy-the-Olous uses this word this way, of course. But does it matter? No. Because we know very well what words mean around here.
But hey, don’t take my word for it. Let’s go to my 13 volume set of the Oxford English Dictionary and look them both up.
Evangelise means:
to preach the gospel or
to bring under the influence of the gospel
the state or condition of being evangelised or converted to the Christian faith
And Proselytise means:
To make proselytes
To make a proselyte of
What is a Proselyte?
It is defined as:
One who has come over from one opinion, belief, creed or party to another; a convert
A gentile convert to the Jewish faith
to convert form one religious faith or sect to another
In short, they are perfectly synonymous of each other, and if anything evangelise is the one that could potentially have some “force” attributable to it since in definition 3 it simply states to be “converted to the Christian faith”. And in definition 2 one might be “brought under the influence of” by having a gun pointed to one’s head with a command to convert. One (if autistic) might try to argue that in this case, the presumption is that perhaps it’s okay to do it by any means, including against the individual’s free will.
While in the definitions of Proselyte the implication of free will of the convert is clearly always grammatically present.
So, it is, of course a lie. Nonsense. And it is said to run cover for the never-was-Catholic, protector of Pedophiles on Earth, Bergy-the-Oleous, fake “pope” and grand vizier of Moloch.
He does this in other ways and in other videos. He in fact tried to dismiss the entirety of the Code of Canon Law using similar subterfuge, I forget now the detail and I can’t be bothered to look for it presently, but the case is clearly made, if you listen to him for any length of time on the topic of Sedevacantism, that he is dishonest.
So WHY is he dishonest? Is he getting paid for it? (I don’t know)
Is he funded by some rich heretic interested in funding gatekeepers like the money man behind both Emo Jones and Church Militant’s ex(sure)gay guy Voris, Marc Brammer? (I don’t know)
Does he make a substantial amount of money from his podcasts? Yes. Is it enough to keep him in the level of luxury he wants? I don’t know but I doubt it, these guys tend to be greedy.
So can I definitely point at him and scream “KNOWING HERETIC! BURN HIM!” Well, I certainly will treat him like one, because he is, but no, I can’t quite yet do that, because he may just be stroking his own ego instead of have a vested interest in sending souls to Hell for a third party.
But what we can be certain of is that the he is a sophist. And I mean that in the EOD version n. 3:
One who makes use of fallacious arguments; a specious reasoner.
And by specious, here they mean EOD definition n. 2:
Having a fair or attractive appearance or character, calculated to make a favourable impression on the mind, but in reality devoid of the qualities apparently possessed.
And, without surprise, he not only never argues Sedevacantism honestly, but he is absolutely terrified of even beginning to have an argument with someone that (though ultimately wrong) knows enough to prove him to be absolutely flawed in all his reasonings concerning Catholicism.
Peter Dimond is ultimately wrong because he doesn’t not recognise Baptism of Desire and of Blood, which the Church and Canon Law in fact do recognise, and as a result of that error he then rejects the few remaining valid Priests and Bishops (sedevacantists).
That said, Dimond would wipe the floor with Lofton, because autistic though Dimond is about baptism of desire (he literally twists the meaning of the black on white word of Canon Law of 1917 to “make his case”, not unlike Lofton himself) he is pretty rock-solid on most other aspects of Catholicism. In fact, barring that (serious and unfortunate error) and a few other points which are really so far-out as to be literally non-issues for almost anyone at all, Dimond is sound in his Catholicism. But note how Lofton resorts to specious ad hominem instead of answering the question.
If I were tasked with arguing Dimond I would say that we essentially only have one main point of contention, and it is baptism of desire and baptism of blood. I would have to research the various places this was clearly stated by multiple Popes etcetera, which would be pointless, because it is addressed in the canon Law of 1917, and Dimond has already shown that his approach to it would be autism redux with no ability to objectively evaluate the relevant code. So, arguing with him would be pointless and fruitless for us both. But I have no doubt he would be able to recite the various passages from Papal Encyclicals that he uses (erroneously) to make his case, from memory. I certainly could not.
Lofton instead, tries to side-step the entire major point of the Sede vs Heretics arguments, and never really addresses them in his own “takes”.
Tell us Michael, where is the Code of Canon Law, or the Dogma, that says 70 years is too much for an interregnum? Oh wait…what is that? There isn’t one?
Right.
And the Church has been without a Pope for a few years before and for over 70 with no clear way of knowing who was Pope because there were up to three at a time claiming it. But that was fine was it?
Oh and, no one judges the Pope… yet… there have been more than 40 antipopes before 1958, so… SOMEHOW we must be able to know when a Pope is a heretic, eh Michael? And definitely judge it so. Why don’t you explain that one away too.
But I want to now address those who get affected by specialbois or deceivers, whichever he is, like Lofton.
That is, those who get convinced by him on the basis that he introduces right at the start of the linked video, and that is, that oh, well, if there are only a few actual Catholics left (i.e. if Sedevacantism is true and there are “only” 200,000 to a 1,000,000 catholics left) then one should despair and become oh… he doesn’t know… Say Eastern “Orthodox” or a Copt or maybe a Syrian Catholic… (are there even 200k of those guys?!) because, you know, as Jesus Himself and all the Apostles clearly stated, Christianity is a popularity contest!
If you don’t have the numbers you just don’t play, right?
Go to a “winning” team like Russian Orthobros. Or stick with the Molochian usurpers LARPing at being “Catholic” clergy, because, hey, they have the numbers!
Right. Sure.
If you go along with hat argument, then, it is patently obvious, that your flaw here is not just your ability to do logic, perceive truth, or understand objective reality, but also, that you are supremely weak, and more akin to a herd animal than a reasoning, thinking, human being.
And, at best, that’s the type of “Catholic” Michael Lofton is, Ladies and Gentlemen, by his own admission at 18.10 or so of his video.
So I rest my case.
Matthew 7:13-14
“Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.
NB: I am hoping this list will diminish the number of retards I need to spam permanently. I know, I know, but one can hope…
The official story about 9/11
The official story NASA says about:
The Moon landing/s
The Face on Mars
Losing the technology to go to the Moon
Taping over the original Moon landing videos
What Mars is like on about all levels, and why
The nature of the Asteroid Belt
The nature of Venus
Pretty much all they said about all the Mars missions
The Clementine Moon Mission
In general, almost anything they say
That Lee Harvey Oswald Killed JFK
That Antigravity Technology does not exist
That far more efficient ways to create electricity don’t exist
That cold fusion was a total scam
That Edison was the inventor of the Lightbulb
That the Talmudic religion of the Jews is NOT officially, admitted to be by both notable Rabbis and their Talmud, a tyrannical pedophile one whose aim is to rule over all non-Jews, making them slaves
That airships are inherently dangerous
That space travel is wasteful or impossible
What I refer to as Psychotronic Healing Chambers in my SF are not a reality (if not quite exactly as I presented them)
That the Great Pyramid in Giza was build as the official Egyptologists say
That the Sphinx is what the official story says
That both the Giza Pyramids and the Sphinx were built:
When the Egyptologists tell us they were
How they tell us they were built
By whom they were built
Why they were built
That the history of Humanity does not include advanced civilisations in our past
That Hitler died in his bunker from suicide
That the Crusaders were “the bad guys”
That the Eastern “Orthodox” were the “good guys” despite betraying the Catholics who came to help them for three crusades in a row and forever after
That Martin Luther improved anything for Christianity
That Henry the VIII improved anything for Christianity
That the KJV “Bible” is the best one (despite it being ordered by a flaming homosexual who literally created the Freemason Temples as we have them today and having over 33,000 “mistranslations” including in the Ten Commandments, and being translated from a version of the Bible that was edited by Pharisees for 700 years and had books ripped out of it by the Luther followers)
That there are anything other than two sexes
That we should use the word “gender” —which is properly to be used for discussing the grammar of the romantic languages, which have feminine and masculine words— to describe what should be referred to as the sex of human beings
That “transitioning” children is anything than an utterly perverse form of both sexual, emotional, intellectual and demonic physical abuse
That there is no link between homosexuality and child sexual abuse in both directions, that is at the level of both the causation of homosexuality as well as the resultant effects of it
That very highly placed people in especially the US, but also most Western governments, legislature and law enforcement are not active pedophiles, blackmailable on multiple front and/or covering for various colleagues of theirs who are pedophiles
That the naked mask-wearing dancing ritual that happen at places like Bohemian grove are perfectly innocent “games” and not demonic rituals performed by highly wealthy and powerful individuals
That the Brandenburg Group is benign
That the Covid Genetic Serums are in any way, shape or form actual Vaccines
That the Covid Genetic Serums are in any way benign
That the entire Covid scam was not a planned depopulation agenda years in the making and well co-ordinated
That the videos of Fauci and his colleagues essentially admitting to wanting to bypass all standards of due process for these fake “vaccines” are not real
That event 201 was just a coincidence
That the Green Pass was put in place for our benefit and not to regulate every aspect of our life, Chinese style as is already happening in China
That 5G is for our own good and poses no health risks for humans whatsoever
That the Port Alfred Massacre official story is the truth and Bryant is guilty of anything other than being mentally handicapped and a patsy
That brain-controlling weaponry on both individual and mass scale doesn’t already exist and has existed since at least the 1990s
That democracy is the best system of government
That violence is never the answer
That there ever has been, or ever will be, anything such as “free speech”
That America was ever intended to be “the land of the free”
That America was not conceived of, funded by, and created by Freemasons as a Freemasons country with Freemason rules which have gradually become more and more obviously Freemason over time
That the “Catholic Church” after Vatican II is the same Catholic Church as before it and teaches the same things
That the Catholic Church was not intentionally infiltrated by Freemasons, Carbonari, Illuminati (all variations of Satanists) and Communists for at least 250 years until the invalid election of “Roncalli” in 1958 finally meant they had taken over the structure of the Catholic Church almost entirely
That Catholicism lasted almost 2000 years (and continues to exist today if much reduced) and created the best civilisations humanity has ever seen as well as the best real advances in human conditions by “chance”
That Einstein was a great guy, not a sexual pervert and a plagiarist
That Bill Gates is a great guy, not a pervert and depopulationist that was never any good even at his supposed original work and that Paul Allen was wrong when he let it be known Bill just masturbated to porn almost constantly and didn’t do any of the work attributed to him
That the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and other ridiculously wealthy individuals that had a hand in WW1, WW2, The Federal Reserve and so on are perfectly nice people without a conspiratorial, mass-murdering bone in their body
That Epstein killed himself
That Bill and Hillary Clinton did not have a bunch of people killed over the years
That only the government and its operatives should have a monopoly on the use of force
That government is efficient at anything other than protecting government against justice from its citizens
That Anglo-saxon or American “common-law” is superior to Roman Law
That Truth is relative and not objective
That your emotions should take precedence over logic that is based in principles of Roman Law and Catholic Justice
That the death penalty is wrong or inhumane
That Church and State should be separate in one nation
That diversity in a nation is a positive
That Feminism is good or has achieved anything good when compared overall to the patriarchal way civilisation was achieved
That men and women are in any way equal
That all religions, ideologies and beliefs have equal value or are deserving of equal respect
That evil people do not exist or that evil itself does not exist
That spiritual beings or entities with nefarious intent towards us do not exist
That the Universe is just a random accident even if it is absolutely obvious to anyone who bothers to look that the math simply does not, in any way, stack up
That a billion monkeys on a billion typewriters, for ten billion years could write just one of the plays of Shakespeare, never mind all his works. Seriously. Do the math. Actually do the math.
That “faith” doesn’t involve or shouldn’t involve reason
That a higher IQ automatically means a higher moral code
That (as Martin Luther did, explicitly) reason (logic, objectivity and so on) is “the whore of the devil”
That “once saved always saved” makes any sense or is how Christianity works
This is by no means a complete list. It’s not even a decent partial list. It’s just what popped into my head without any interruption for the few minutes it took me to write it. And I could probably continue for several hours without pause, but it will do for the normies, for now.
I am certain almost no-one will agree with he whole list, but if such a person does exist, do let me know and leave a comment, I’m curious.
Yeah a nice “invisible barrier” for bugs and…and…not at all to make you sick with toxic mono & diglycerides. Nooo. No, no, no. Of course not. He wouldn’t do that. Mr genetic Serum Patent holder on Coronavirii stuff that paid ALL the people involved in the corona scam.
As readers of this blog will know, I tend to track Milo’s slow descent into Hell for personal entertainment as well as an occasional warning to people who might be inclined to follow his gay brand of Novus Orco fake Catholicism directly into the fire below.
I posted before how he’s rapidly becoming what he was always destined to become, as I predicted nearly a decade ago now (in relative “privacy” to some online group) when I still thought that despite his deep personal flaws he was at least somewhat useful at pushing back the general globohomo narrative.
Well, since about a week or two before the end of Lent until now, he has obsessively posted about an individual I had zero knowledge of, a barracuda-faced Indian/Pakistani gay guy called either Ali Alexander or Ali Akbar, or whatever, who apparently is a good butt-buddy of that other homosexual, Nikki, Fuentes of the absurd “grouper” movement, America First.
Now, I have mentioned before that Nikki, is obviously gay. Straight men do not go on 10 hour dates with tranny guys calling themselves catboi, nor do they have tranny sex tabs open when watching their favourite porn, both of which Nikki has done. His butt-buddy/general/tea-boy/whatever the fuck he is, Ali, is not just a flaming homosexual, but he is also a pederast, soliciting young boys for pictures of their privates and masturbatory video for his own use.
So… what can we gather from all this?
Well, as anyone who has looked at my posts on Milo before will know, we have:
Supposedly “ex” gay Gary Voris, who tries to go by his second name Michael (because the archangel) had Milo, supposedly also “ex” gay and shamed “personality” working for him for a bit, trying to hawk plastic Mary statuettes on TV infomercials. Gary runs “Church Militant” which was funded by the same Opus Dei guy who funded EM Jones, or Emo Jones, as I call him, and Taylor Marshall (Tay-Tay).
Milo originally went to work for Gary because he crashed and burnt on a Joe Rogan podcast where he admitted to being present at Hollywood parties where underage boys were being plied with drugs and booze in order to be sodomised by various “personalities”. Which he has yet to name. As a result, his funding by yet another rich gatekeeper type was pulled and Milo left in Freemason purgatory for a few years. Church Militant and his no longer being actively gay was supposed to be his rebirth.
Milo then tries to work for Marjorie Taylor Greene as an unpaid Intern, seems to quit that as quietly as he started it, then tries to latch on to Jewish controlled and drugged up (by his Jewish handler) famous rapper Ye on a supposedly run for President for 2024. Yes, it’s like the plot line of a bad comedy dreamt up by people huffing cheap lead paint while on meth. He introduces Nikki to Ye then leaves the campaign after various accusations.
Ali continues to solicit dick pics and masturbation videos from young men, some underage, and Milo is aware of it and informs Nikki, who basically goes “meh, it’s not rape-rape”.
At some point, don’t ask me why exactly, this is waaaaay more gay crap than anyone should ever have to know about, Milo decides to out Ali publicly. After he basically outed Laura Loomer as a sexual predator who gives unwanted blowjobs to young men she finds attractive while pretending she is Jewish (which Milo himself did until recently when he “discovered” he wasn’t Jewish after all).
Nikki Continues to go “meh.” Even after it’s obvious Ali is indeed a disgusting barracuda-faced predatory homosexual who is trying to get young men to insert their penises in his moray-eel faced jaws. As if just being gay wasn’t horrific enough. And in fact Nikki basically says publicly, “meh. no one was raped, it’s fine.”
At which point, at least SOME of the metrosexuals that form the majority of the “grouper” America First movement might begin to go….”errr waitaminute…our esteemed leader hangs out with Ali and Beardson, both known to solicit sexual images from underage people, he goes on a ten hour date with a transvestite he posts the video of some of it online, he enjoys watching tranny porn on his computer…wait, wait…MAYBE HE’S GAY!”
Oh, and we KNOW Ali is also a Fed and that milo too fed stuff to the Feds at some point in the past. We also know that Dick Spencer is a Fed and we can surmise he is probably gay too.
You’ll forgive me if I don’t have much faith in the boomer generation building awesome spaceships. In fact I’d be amazed if they manage to retain indoor plumbing and heating.
It was entirely obvious from the start that Nikki and his entire AF movement was gay and fake from the start, and AF probably stood for Anal Fisting long before they tried to change it to America First, though, given the current direction of America, one could argue the terms are synonymous.
I told you all, and anyone with a brain has known this since literally childhood:
ALL OF POLITICS IS FAKE, GAY AND FILLED WITH PEDOPHILES.
That’s it. That’s all there is. And until a Herculean effort analogous to clearing the Stygian stables is undertaken, that is all it will ever be.
PS: Oh, but don’t worry, the Patriot Front guys are TOTALLY LEGIT and not a Fed operation at all. Nu-huh. You BELIEVE IT, Patriot!
Riley Gaines Speaks Out
This beautiful lady is probably destroying her career for simply stating an objective fact and calling out the sexual abuse of a necessarily hungry baby for his own sexual gratification.
What say you America?
From Intel-Republic:
PEDO ALERT: Riley Gaines, US swimmer who protested against swimming in competitions with transgender (born male) Lia Thomas – speaks out further on an LGBT issue.
A transgender man with a nipple clamp fetish appears to use baby as a sexual prop (he’s “breastfeeding” 🤮), and there’s no outrage. Because he identifies as a woman.
Riley has been branded “all guts, no nuts!” for standing up to these issues publicly. Should men who identify as women be able to adopt babies?
No related posts.
By G | 6 July 2023 | Posted in Fighting SJWs, Freemasons, Social Commentary, Zombie Apocalypse