Archive for the ‘Fighting SJWs’ Category

A Fighter’s Absolute Top Weapon: Mindset

Regardless of your IQ, your reflexes, your physical constitution, your resources and your opportunity relative to your target, all of which are obviously important, there is one thing that absolutely separates the warriors from the LARPers, and the winners from the losers.

A fighter’s mindset is the absolute foundational bedrock on which everything else that makes him a fighter hinges, and this is even far more important in real life than in set-pieces like a boxing or MMA match which have rules and are set in essentially artificial parameters.

In real life, there is no referee, the fight is not necessarily directly physical against another human and so on.

The last 3 years of total war have demonstrated that in order to depopulate you, personally and specifically, weapons of mass effect have been used against you. And if you pay any attention to these things, you will note that the primary weapon used was psychological.

The constant media bombardment of fear of the deadliest virus ever known to man in all of human history, was relentless. A virus so deadly that it turned out it had a mortality rate lower than the common flu. Nevertheless, it worked. People were scared, especially initially when nothing was known and the fake numbers and fake information coming through was apocalyptic in nature.

In parallel was run a massive campaign of economic destruction and psychological isolation and terror about your loved ones dying as well as yourself if you did not inject yourself with a genetic serum they SAID was safe and effective, but really was and is murder-juice.

And of course, they used the state sanctioned force to impose house arrest, business shut-downs, and fines and imprisonment for anyone who did not comply with self-tagging with totally pointless masks and so on.

You didn’t get the red commie bastards, freaks and totalitarian useful idiots charging your home with machine guns. It wasn’t required. They got you do do everything for them.

They used MINDSET against you. They affected YOUR mindset. And if your mindset was weaker than theirs you complied. The mixture of psychological warfare, gaslighting and actual physical and economic discomfort was enough to make the majority bend and take the genetic serum as deep as they wanted to shove it in you.

This was easily predictable on a simple basis: At a minimum, 80% of people will not fight back at all. And in the modern era, I think that number is probably well over 90%, but let’s remain optimistic and say it is 90% “only”.

That means that 9 out of 10 people will climb into the cattle cars when they are told the concentration camps are really not so bad and it’s for their own good they need to go there.

Of that remaining 10% very few would actually take up arms even in a real “we’re coming door to door to arrest and jail and forcibly jab all the no-vaxxers”. Historically the number is somewhere between 5% and 1%.

It is true however, that if/when that level of direct conflict arrives, that 1% or 5% or whatever it is, will get some effective and practical support by much larger number of people and in fact will even be able to double or triple its ranks quickly if they achieve some strategic (morale boosting) victories. At a certain point, the straw breaks the camel’s back and then you will find no one that argues against the tip of the spear. Almost everyone will have magically now become “the good guys” again.

As an Italian, we have a special understanding of this from WW2. We started out siding with the Germans, but as the Germans began losing, we gradually became pro-Allied powers, and by the time Italy was “liberated” we had made sure to kill Il Duce ourselves, to show what good allies we were. Everyone still remembers the Germans as the evil Nazis, and the Japanese as torturing freaks, but everyone loves the Italians. Well… except the incels, they hate us for stealing all your women and then some.

But you see my point.

Now, the beauty of the fighter’s mindset is that regardless of the weapons used against him, physical or psychological, the baseline features of a fighter’s mindset remain unchanged.

And that mindset is simply this:

A total devotion to winning the fight by whatever means.

I can hear the hippies and their “honourable” counterparts saying “well… well… not by ANY means surely!”

And that is the first hurdle. Every man has a set of morals and ethics, lines he will or will not want to cross and most would be very surprised to find out just how quickly and easily they would cross those lines at a run given certain circumstances. The primary difference between a warrior’s mind and everyone else is self-knowledge.

I am under no illusions whatever about my ethical limits, as well as all the other limits, physical, intellectual, and so on.

As the Greeks used to say:

Man – Know Thyself.

I literally went to Delphi in Greece, where that statement is said to have originated with the Oracle there. You can see images of that trip in the Image Gallery. And it is the foundational statement I have right from the start in my book on Systema.

If you know yourself intimately and profoundly, if you have found yourself repeatedly in situations that went beyond your self-perceived concepts of yourself and yet you overcame them, and you learnt your true limits better, then you will have no hesitation in knowing where your personal “line” is.

I certainly have no doubts on it. You can place me into pretty much any hypothetical or real situation and a “moral dilemma” is almost certainly never going to even slow me down for a fraction of a second.

That’s point number one of mindset: Know your ethical lines.

Point number two: Know your level of combativeness.

This is to a certain degree inborn, it can be developed, curated, certainly increased and refined, but ultimately, the level of combative response is yet another fundamental thing you need to be very keenly and deeply aware of within yourself. And it does not apply just to physical confrontations. It applies to any situation that requires confrontation. It can be business, a rude guy having some road rage, or whatever. Mine is specific to circumstances and can utterly confuse even people that have known me for decades. Yet it is very simple. I react usually in a fairly de-escalating way with people or situations that are not really immediate threats, unless of course, they tickle my injustice bone, which is something rather rarefied in design and quality, hence quite rare in the modern age, which again, surprises people at odd times. In life-or-death situations or ones that can be such for people dear to me, then, well, some might pity the fools that go there, but I am not one of them. The response will be likely to be nuclear and permanent, regardless of consequences.

Point number three: Emotional Control.

If you can’t keep your eyes open the minute someone throws a punch at you, you can’t duck it effectively. If you can’t stay calm when the violence is about to kick off, you get tunnel vision and miss things. If you can’t keep thinking while fighting, you will not see the best opportunities. If you let your emotions control you, your enemies will use them to do so. Emotional control can only be increased by placing yourself in emotionally difficult situations repeatedly. It is, essentially, a desensitising process. And again, it applies to all facets of life. If you are too scared to ask a pretty girl out, you will never get a date with a pretty girl. If you force yourself to ask every pretty girl for a date, over time you will learn to adjust and not get freaked out. And eventually, asking a pretty girl for a date will have the same emotional content as drinking a cup of tea.

Point number four: Know your triggers.

Everyone has these, and you need to know precisely where they are, why they are, and be able to be non-reactive to them. Sounds impossible right? Not really. If your level of combativeness is extremely high but your emotional control is low, you will likely end up in jail later, even if you win the fight. Or, you might get the bad guy in front of you, but not his whole crew.

If on the other hand you have extremely high combativeness and also extremely high emotional control, you will react only when doing so ensures not only that you avoid punishment later, but that you get the bad guy, his crew, his family and acquaintances, and his pets too. And will have the truck with salt delivered just in time over the ashes of his entire genetic line. Having triggers doesn’t mean you have to react to them instantly.

Point number five: Patience.

This is a difficult one, and most people that (think) they know me will laugh at the idea I could teach anyone anything about patience. Keep in mind that my last employer had printed two of my sayings and pinned them up on the wall of his office under the label Giuseppe’s Sayings. They were:

  • False modesty is not a virtue, and
  • Patience is an excuse for the witless

And mostly it is. However, there are things at which my patience will wear out most everyone else. I grew up in a family of hunters, and learnt from a young age that I had a natural talent for waiting in order to get that kill shot, or find that animal, or track it. Then I worked in security and that same skill was honed when investigating people and crimes and frauds. The ability to bide your time when required, so as to get the best of your enemy, is innate in me, and I am not sure if it is genetic (I suspect it is) but as with anything, it can probably be improved upon, that said, I think a predisposition for this, if you have the other attributes too, especially combativeness, makes you a dangerous enemy.

Point number six: Speed of Variation and Improvisation.

A real fighter can instantly alter his trajectory if the conditions suddenly change or require it. This is something that has all the above elements in part, and experience and genetics as well as IQ to a certain degree all blended in, but can be dramatically improved by playing out scenarios in your head almost constantly and thinking of alternatives and situational changes. If you also train this way, it improves your ability dramatically. Systema uses many fun such “drills” that have unexpected, unorthodox components in hand to hand training, but you can use the same general attitude in (as usual) all aspects of life. It is a mixture of quick thinking, willingness to act at a moment’s notice, the ability to calculate probabilities on the fly on the basis of the multiple variables of a dynamic situation while being objective about your own abilities. The switch from patient observer to sudden striker in the event of a hunt that changes suddenly, the ability to throw your opponent off guard by doing the unexpected, all can be used in most interactions too. That chubby girl cockblocking you from her hot friend you’d like to get to know better and maybe get together with? Instead of remaining stumped or quiet at her rudely trying to show you up with inappropriate (and often untrue) public statements? Counter-attack instead.

A simple example from my debauched past need not be as drastic, you can tone it to the situation, but to her “Leave my friend alone, she has a boyfriend and is not interested in you!”

Instead of looking like a deer in headlights, you could instantly respond with “What? Oh you got it so wrong! I was only trying to speak to your hot friend in order to get close to you! I can tell YOU don’t have a boyfriend, and I’m into getting the plumper lonely ones away from the herd, you know, for the added meat when I axe murder them and cannibalise them. Come here, my soft, dear girl, do you like Chianti?” Anyone listening to this is bound to laugh, especially if they have seen the Hannibal Lecter films or series. And it also neutralises her. Of course it is also a filter for how “woke” her friend is if she freaks out at the “plumper” comment, and so on. In short, you have put the enemy off balance and at the same time undermined their position while still keeping the original target in your sights, though indirectly, for example, by turning to the pretty girl and asking with obviously feigned nonchalance “Does your boyfriend like fillet mignon? No, just you then for dinner?” The triple entendre is baked in (which I only realised long after I wrote this, during a second pass hours later to correct for spelling etc, because it is honestly the kind of sentence that just comes to me, the skill has become unconscious).

The more dangerous a situation is, the more likely that the fog of war is more, and in those cases, being able to improvise can literally mean life and death.

The above pretty much defines the mindset. Of course, resources, possibilities and so on are all important, but remember that third worlders with inferior technology by a few levels (in traveller terms), inferior equipment at all levels, and inferior training and opportunities still kicked the crap out of the most powerful military in the world. Twice. (Vietnam and Afghanistan). What they had, was a mindset that squished the American one at fifty paces with merely a glance.

So. Focus on building up your mindset. The rest will follow.

Here is a book/game I wrote to help you begin developing it and learning by playing, which is the best way to learn, how to imagine and resolve various scenarios.

Hollywood Fame and Glory

I can prove quite conclusively to you, within about an hour or two, less if you are a bit less brainwashed, and if you can do basic math, that the lives of the so-called “rich and famous” are a complete and utter pit of despair.

All you need to do is browse CDAN (Crazy Days and Nights) and scroll down the blog, reading the entries. If after about an hour or so of doing that and doing a quick mental guesstimate of the number of glitterati there are in the pool from which that litany of despair is taken, you will soon realise that the toll one needs to pay to enter that club is —literally— at minimum, a piece of your soul, and in many, even most cases, the entirety of it.

What CDAN does, above all, in my opinion, is list very clearly, the resulting human wreckage that a life dedicated to hedonistic materialism produces.

Most of those people are so far gone, so utterly lost, that a homeless guy who is not a drug-addict has a better shot at making a happy life for himself.

I knew this at a relatively young age, and then confirmed it when I was offered certain “tickets” to do with being involved in a tv documentary-series at various points and/or a film, both based on my book The Face on Mars. I was 26 at the time and even before these “offers” came in, I had already seen the effect of being an author with books on the shelves of the local bookshops had on “friends” and acquaintances.

The interviews I did for television and radio were absolutely geared to turn the whole thing into clickbait, and since I’m a pretty quick study and I realised the interviewer was trying to take the approach of letting me run my mouth to then edit things in some tinfoil hat fashion, I very quickly reverted to one word answers and mini-sound bytes. the result was they could not make me sound crazy, so they did what a friend of mine at the time suggested they would do, jokingly.

I explained to him the interview was a hit piece and they would try hard to make me look insane, and he laughed and said, “yeah they may morph you into an alien on TV! ha, ha, ha.”

Well, that is exactly what they did, I kid you not. When the interview aired, at one point they fade my face out and gradually faded a gray alien head over it. My friend and I couldn’t believe it and laughed ourself to tears. I was 26 and I didn’t care for these people or their lies.

An outfit that was supposed to do a 13 part documentary had only to produce an outline of the 13 part documentary, I had already lined up an investor for them and this was all they wanted. They had 2 months to do it. They produced 2 pages of incoherent A4 where they had also screwed up the major premise. I advised the investor to not deal with these clowns.

Graham Hancock plagiarised large parts of the book as well as its main concept and still got the basic premise wrong. It’s like… steal Ferrari’s plans for a fast engine and still build a crappy Mini Morris one. They aren’t even good thieves. The guy who wrote the original comics on which the film The Matrix is based more than a little, will tell you the same thing.

Elvis didn’t write his songs, though I like how he sings them, and so do many others. Everything in the entertainment world is basically a lie. And usually also very gay; when it’s not also pedophile infested.

Graham Hancock certainly made a lot more money than I ever will from my work, with “his” stolen, then half-assed-executed ideas. And sure, that can irk a person somewhat, but you know what, when I confronted him face to face on it in Cape Town, his demeanour was the one of an apologetic, scared, cardboard-cut-out of a “man”. He apologised, blamed his ghost-writers and “complimented” me on my astonishing and brilliant work. He was a middle-aged journalist of supposed world-renowned fame, I was I think 27 at the time, had little or no money and did karate on an almost daily basis and worked as an armed bodyguard/security specialist and sold computers now and then when I could.

And I wouldn’t have traded his life for mine for any amount of money on the planet. I could then, and I still can now, look in the mirror and know that whatever errors I made in life, they were honest ones, and that despite all my faults, and they are many, I, at least, did not become whatever subspecies of cowardly, underhanded, sneaky, slithering animal people like that become. My brother and others were more enraged than I ever was by such occurrences. Which makes sense. They saw only the surface loss of what generally gets perceived as money, fame, and glory.

But I got to see the people that supposedly had or created this money, fame and glory. And this is what I saw, time and again:

The fame was a net negative. People wanted to be with you, whether as friends or sex partners, based on your fame. They had no idea, who you are, nor cared. the scary thing about this was that it wasn’t limited to gold-digging whores. In fact it was something that affected roughly the same percentage of people that decided to take the genetic serum or buy into the lie of the rona. Men wanted to be my friend and women wanted to bear my children, because I had a book on the shelves of the local book shops and did signing events. Or because they heard me interviewed on the radio or saw me on TV in the UK or, the USA, or in one case, saw my book briefly on CNN apparently (I never saw it myself but several people told me they had in a brief mention).

What becomes absolutely obvious then is that most human beings do not live, love, or care about the person they are with, perhaps marry and even have children with. No. They do not. They care about the idea about them they have in their head of them. Or they later end up hating the idea they have about them in their head. It is absolutely rare that they even glimpse the reality of who or what you are even if you spend decades with them.

In the modern era, this “disease” is a lot worse than it ever was in the past before television, the internet and mobile brainwashing and attention destroying machines we call “phones”.

Seeing this firsthand, noticing a girl you might have thought of as attractive and even intelligent if you had met her under different circumstances, and then noting how she is so transparently offering herself as some kind of sacrificial sex toy, purely in order to have the “thrill” of having had a “famous” person inside her, well… I know I am the minority perhaps in this, but I assure you, it is depressing. It destroys a certain aspect of innocence that makes life easier and more beautiful, and is hard to live happily without.

And that’s just the “fame” part.

And if you did sleep with such a girl, chances are, that after a while (or maybe only after minutes if you’re no good in bed) she would too feel empty, and disappointed, and lacklustre, because her fantasy of who you are and how her life might become is a fairy tale. As much as the one you might have told yourself if you’d met her as a nobody at a party and saw how pretty and quick-witted she appeared. Only to realise later it was just a facade, she is not smart, or quick-witted, she just learnt a routine of things to do and say at parties.

That, right there, the shabby feeling of mild despair that grows on you if you do take the ticket, if you do reach for the “glory”? That is the real “glory”.

The fame makes you a cartoon caricature and the glory turns out to be dust and emptiness. I at least was wise enough to not indulge in either.

The money sure can be useful, but it invariably comes with those two strings attached, and no amount of money on the planet is worth that. Not to me anyway.

It is possible, to get at least some of the money and dodge the “fame” and the “glory” and if you are smart, you can even manage a certain level of “fame” in a way that it doesn’t harm you, but it takes uncommon firmness of mind, courage, and not a little luck, or fate, or divine providence, whatever you choose to call it. In short, it is very rare, and probably has a cost anyway, as all roads do.

All of these despairing things, are made a thousand or a million times worst if you are alone in it all. Even family and close friends can turn, like zombies in a horror movie, becoming infected and turning on you with those soulless, dead eyes. Imagine your own parents or children becoming swallowed by the despair and materialism of “fame” and “glory”, or, much more often, your wife, or husband.

And where, in a world like the one of today, do you find a wife or husband that is not ready to jump neck-deep into the mire of “fame” and “glory” given a half a chance? Especially for those who grew up with the internet as a done thing?

There is no easy answer, but I assure you that whatever difficulties I faced or will face in life, I would always choose them over the ones that come with Hollywood level “fame” and “glory”.

I made my life an exercise in living between the cracks and not getting caught by what Vadim Zeland calls “Pendulums”, and just to be safe, I never tried to “transurf” the waves more than a tiny little bit here or there, (long before I read anything Vadim wrote) because in this game of life, one big wipeout is enough to reduce you to shark-food. And even as it is, I took my wipeouts, and they were hard enough, and perhaps many would not have survived them, but I did; again, by my will, but also a lot of divine providence and grace, which the lost often call luck or fate.

My problem has always been the same one.

My DNA, as far back as I can find information on my ancestors, has the curiosity of the explorer in it, and the fearlessness of the fool. It is a dangerous combination, and I do not advise it to anyone. I certainly hope my son is wiser than I was, but already, I see in him, the brutal honesty he has with himself, the fearlessness in the face of danger, at times due to innocence, and other times due to calculated observation. And the calm, considered, approach to things that might be dangerous, which he has not yet investigated.

How to guide such a boy?

There is no simple or clear path, because these are the qualities of a man, and ultimately, as men know, we are born alone, and we die alone, and every choice we make, every effort, every despair, every victory and every crushing defeat, is ours, and ours alone, no matter who loves us and may help us, or who hates us and may try to destroy us. All we can rely on is providence, God’s grace and our tiny, but eternal flame of faith inside ourselves, regardless of if we know it exists in there or not. He has it, and perhaps all I can do is try to make him aware of it consciously. Maybe, if I can help him be less mute than I have been to myself, he might be able to more readily rely on that fire in the centre of his heart even when he is alone and tired and scared, and I am no longer around to do what I can.

Maybe, if I train him even as I play with him, he can learn to roll with the punches of life and pop up nearby and unexpectedly, and turn things to his advantage then too.

And above all, I hope I can do a good job of showing him the decay and deceit and lies and illusion of “fame” and “glory” and instead choose the real Glory of, and for, God, and Honour, and the ones you Love. And to know fame is a lying whore riddled with disease and fancy clothes, and make-up; and real fame is the trust and loyalty of your friends and your loved ones, and nothing else compares.

And hopefully, in the Fake New World that is being prepared for him, either we are able to collapse the shit out of it before it gets off the ground, or there will in any case remain a way for him to navigate the “pendulums” and “surf” the “waves” remaining as best as possible, untouched by the filth of the sewage from which they are formed.

The lives of the “rich and famous” are a preview of the Hell that awaits us all if we don’t wake up and return to what really matters: The virtues of Truth, Honesty, Honour, Fortitude, Courage, and Faith.

Except it will be worse for you will not even have the villas and the retinue of concubines and the drugs, because you will not even have the money to distract you from the despair.

So.

Choose your path wisely, friend, and support that which is real, and see through that which is fake, and gay, and Satanic.

You might be a complete idiot if you believe…

NB: I am hoping this list will diminish the number of retards I need to spam permanently. I know, I know, but one can hope…

  • The official story about 9/11
  • The official story NASA says about:
    • The Moon landing/s
    • The Face on Mars
    • Losing the technology to go to the Moon
    • Taping over the original Moon landing videos
    • What Mars is like on about all levels, and why
    • The nature of the Asteroid Belt
    • The nature of Venus
    • Pretty much all they said about all the Mars missions
    • The Clementine Moon Mission
    • In general, almost anything they say
  • That Lee Harvey Oswald Killed JFK
  • That Antigravity Technology does not exist
  • That far more efficient ways to create electricity don’t exist
  • That cold fusion was a total scam
  • That Edison was the inventor of the Lightbulb
  • That the Talmudic religion of the Jews is NOT officially, admitted to be by both notable Rabbis and their Talmud, a tyrannical pedophile one whose aim is to rule over all non-Jews, making them slaves
  • That airships are inherently dangerous
  • That space travel is wasteful or impossible
  • What I refer to as Psychotronic Healing Chambers in my SF are not a reality (if not quite exactly as I presented them)
  • That the Great Pyramid in Giza was build as the official Egyptologists say
  • That the Sphinx is what the official story says
  • That both the Giza Pyramids and the Sphinx were built:
    • When the Egyptologists tell us they were
    • How they tell us they were built
    • By whom they were built
    • Why they were built
  • That the history of Humanity does not include advanced civilisations in our past
  • That Hitler died in his bunker from suicide
  • That the Crusaders were “the bad guys”
  • That the Eastern “Orthodox” were the “good guys” despite betraying the Catholics who came to help them for three crusades in a row and forever after
  • That Martin Luther improved anything for Christianity
  • That Henry the VIII improved anything for Christianity
  • That the KJV “Bible” is the best one (despite it being ordered by a flaming homosexual who literally created the Freemason Temples as we have them today and having over 33,000 “mistranslations” including in the Ten Commandments, and being translated from a version of the Bible that was edited by Pharisees for 700 years and had books ripped out of it by the Luther followers)
  • That there are anything other than two sexes
  • That we should use the word “gender” —which is properly to be used for discussing the grammar of the romantic languages, which have feminine and masculine words— to describe what should be referred to as the sex of human beings
  • That “transitioning” children is anything than an utterly perverse form of both sexual, emotional, intellectual and demonic physical abuse
  • That there is no link between homosexuality and child sexual abuse in both directions, that is at the level of both the causation of homosexuality as well as the resultant effects of it
  • That very highly placed people in especially the US, but also most Western governments, legislature and law enforcement are not active pedophiles, blackmailable on multiple front and/or covering for various colleagues of theirs who are pedophiles
  • That the naked mask-wearing dancing ritual that happen at places like Bohemian grove are perfectly innocent “games” and not demonic rituals performed by highly wealthy and powerful individuals
  • That the Brandenburg Group is benign
  • That the Covid Genetic Serums are in any way, shape or form actual Vaccines
  • That the Covid Genetic Serums are in any way benign
  • That the entire Covid scam was not a planned depopulation agenda years in the making and well co-ordinated
  • That the videos of Fauci and his colleagues essentially admitting to wanting to bypass all standards of due process for these fake “vaccines” are not real
  • That event 201 was just a coincidence
  • That the Green Pass was put in place for our benefit and not to regulate every aspect of our life, Chinese style as is already happening in China
  • That 5G is for our own good and poses no health risks for humans whatsoever
  • That the Port Alfred Massacre official story is the truth and Bryant is guilty of anything other than being mentally handicapped and a patsy
  • That brain-controlling weaponry on both individual and mass scale doesn’t already exist and has existed since at least the 1990s
  • That democracy is the best system of government
  • That violence is never the answer
  • That there ever has been, or ever will be, anything such as “free speech”
  • That America was ever intended to be “the land of the free”
  • That America was not conceived of, funded by, and created by Freemasons as a Freemasons country with Freemason rules which have gradually become more and more obviously Freemason over time
  • That the “Catholic Church” after Vatican II is the same Catholic Church as before it and teaches the same things
  • That the Catholic Church was not intentionally infiltrated by Freemasons, Carbonari, Illuminati (all variations of Satanists) and Communists for at least 250 years until the invalid election of “Roncalli” in 1958 finally meant they had taken over the structure of the Catholic Church almost entirely
  • That Catholicism lasted almost 2000 years (and continues to exist today if much reduced) and created the best civilisations humanity has ever seen as well as the best real advances in human conditions by “chance”
  • That Einstein was a great guy, not a sexual pervert and a plagiarist
  • That Bill Gates is a great guy, not a pervert and depopulationist that was never any good even at his supposed original work and that Paul Allen was wrong when he let it be known Bill just masturbated to porn almost constantly and didn’t do any of the work attributed to him
  • That the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and other ridiculously wealthy individuals that had a hand in WW1, WW2, The Federal Reserve and so on are perfectly nice people without a conspiratorial, mass-murdering bone in their body
  • That Epstein killed himself
  • That Bill and Hillary Clinton did not have a bunch of people killed over the years
  • That only the government and its operatives should have a monopoly on the use of force
  • That government is efficient at anything other than protecting government against justice from its citizens
  • That Anglo-saxon or American “common-law” is superior to Roman Law
  • That Truth is relative and not objective
  • That your emotions should take precedence over logic that is based in principles of Roman Law and Catholic Justice
  • That the death penalty is wrong or inhumane
  • That Church and State should be separate in one nation
  • That diversity in a nation is a positive
  • That Feminism is good or has achieved anything good when compared overall to the patriarchal way civilisation was achieved
  • That men and women are in any way equal
  • That all religions, ideologies and beliefs have equal value or are deserving of equal respect
  • That evil people do not exist or that evil itself does not exist
  • That spiritual beings or entities with nefarious intent towards us do not exist
  • That the Universe is just a random accident even if it is absolutely obvious to anyone who bothers to look that the math simply does not, in any way, stack up
  • That a billion monkeys on a billion typewriters, for ten billion years could write just one of the plays of Shakespeare, never mind all his works. Seriously. Do the math. Actually do the math.
  • That “faith” doesn’t involve or shouldn’t involve reason
  • That a higher IQ automatically means a higher moral code
  • That (as Martin Luther did, explicitly) reason (logic, objectivity and so on) is “the whore of the devil”
  • That “once saved always saved” makes any sense or is how Christianity works

This is by no means a complete list. It’s not even a decent partial list. It’s just what popped into my head without any interruption for the few minutes it took me to write it. And I could probably continue for several hours without pause, but it will do for the normies, for now.

I am certain almost no-one will agree with he whole list, but if such a person does exist, do let me know and leave a comment, I’m curious.

Ireland becomes a concentration camp of the WEF Transgender Homosexual Globalists

Ireland has actually passed a law that factually and objectively makes literally every single person living there a prisoner.

Oh you might be permitted to not be in jail, but that is at the pleasure of the mentally ill, sexual dysphoria trannies and/or homosexual “leaders” and/or of the pedophile satanists pulling their strings.

You probably think I am exaggerating, well, no, I am not. Because logic.

Yes, yes, I know, logic, objective reality and facts, like actual science and engineering are now considered practically mythical beats of legend, but for those of us who still know the meaning of these things, and of words in general, allow me to explain why what I wrote above is perfectly correct. *

Here is a report on the law, and not the transcript of it that’s highlighted.

Now, using logic, we can assume that literally anyone can be guilty of containing hate-speech on at least some of their devices. Ever saved a meme of any kind? Guilty! Ever visited a porn site? Guilty! Ever send a joke to a friend via text or an app? Guilty! You say I exaggerate? How? Where? Why do you think that? The “Hate Speech” or “hateful content” is not defined. Neither are the protected classes.

You can literally be prosecuted and get jail time for anything that can be in any way construed as “hateful”, to unspecified protected classes of “people”.

Go, on try me. Send me anything you think is totally innocuous and I bet you any amount of money I can find it hateful.

But that’s not all. Just in case this was not absurd enough, if and when they decide to jail you for the content, and you claim that “but wait a minute, I never sent that to anyone at all, it was just saved on my phone, or downloaded by my telegram app, I literally have never even looked at that meme/comment/whatever, it’s on a muted channel I haven’t visited until you guys went thereon my phone to entrap me!”

Ah well, that’s won’t save you, because they require you to literally do something impossible: prove a negative.

Which any first year student of logic knows is literally impossible.

Allow me to quote the relevant passage:

The REASON that laws used to have that “innocent until proven guilty” part is not because anyone was trying to be super nice. it’s because you literally can’t prove a negative. Here, you are presumed guilty until found guilty. Because you can’t prove you are not guilty of something like intent. I can prove I was not in location A at a specific point in time if I can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that I was actually in location B at that time, but no one can prove that they never had the intent to fill in the blank.

I can literally accuse you of being a potentially hateful, perverse, duck rapist wanna-be. And if the onus is on you that you literally never even thought of raping a duck, well, tough. How are you going to do that?

“Your honour, I never even owned a duck, much less raped one!”

Aha! But you walked in that park with the ducks, once!

“But… I never even saw the ducks, never even threw breadcrumbs at them!”

Aha! that is because you hate them and want them to suffer! You only didn’t rape one because of the loving tourists feeding them breadcrumbs! You pervert!

“What? Are you insane?”

Guards! Take this hateful duck rapist away! He dishonours this court!

At this point, I think that many in Ireland would probably welcome the shootings, bombings, beatings and killings of the IRA as a welcome respite from Clown World.

* Ok, some of the evildoers who came up with this stuff might just be actual Satanists and/or puppets of Satanists possibly without being pedophiles, trannies and homosexuals, but you’ll admit it’s a stretch, still, I suppose it’s remotely possible a few of these also exist.

The March to Hell is Gay

It is almost impossible for a secular person to even begin to understand what has happened to this planet and its people over the last few hundred years.

The two main reasons are:

1. The change is very gradual over time so that one generation merely complains about the previous one or the latest one but, also due to family ties, no doubt, doesn’t really take up arms, metaphorically or literally, to return things to a more Just, more True, more Beautiful and Good state of affairs.

2. The primary motive is imputed to mere human foibles and weaknesses, which is correct as far as it goes, but ignores the primary motivator and movers behind the human element. Absent this point, it becomes truly impossible to see the issue as it really stands, and therefore, quite naturally, also impossible to fix or even marginally improve, both individually as well as socially. That motive force, I ask you, especially if you are an atheist, or agnostic, or lukewarm Churchian, to bear with me a moment, and for the sake of pure intellectual thought experiment, assume for a moment that what you read next is simply correct, and run the model in your head, seeing how it would apply. If you do this exercise honestly, you may well be stunned into realising that the model answers more questions and situations than you could possibly have suspected. And that, logically, means the model is superior to anything you’ve used up to now. So here it is: the motive force behind all the degradation and corruption of our present situation derives from demons. Demons and their ruler, Satan. Spiritual entities that have various powers and abilities to interact with the material world also directly in mostly rare occurrences, but whose primary means of achieving their aims is to influence, subtly, nefariously, indirectly, and fuel the flaws, sinful nature and weaknesses and cowardice that is present in every human being.

I ask you to keep this model in mind, whether you believe it or not, as you read the rest of this post, and then, after, note for a few days how it models the world. If you do, you may find your way, eventually, to the real Church Militant; but for now, let us merely observe the last few thousand years of human history and note the arc of human virtue and its counterpart, human weakness, sin, or outright evil.

Before Christ, the best of humanity could probably be found in the Roman Empire or the Greek classical times. Even so, life was decidedly brutal. While men certainly exhibited a level of concepts of honour and valour, including the ability and will to commit suicide rater than lose dignity, similarly to later Japanese Samurai, it was also true that certain practices of the day were abhorrently vicious. Rape, murder for entertainment, enslavement of defeated enemies and so on were all normal occurrences of the day. While the Spartans certainly were formidable warriors, their brutality even with their own people was similarly legendary. Defective children were abandoned to the elements because they would not make healthy warriors or healthy birthers of same.

Their gods were fickle, dangerous and used human beings as set pieces in their Olympian squabbles. Truly their influence was really demonic, and as far as catholic thought goes, that is precisely what they were. The “Gods” in the Old Testament, that the one supreme God chastises for their tragic and evil non-compliance with leading humanity in a good way, is noted in Genesis as well as the Psalms. Their legendary offspring, the titans or nephilim were also deemed to be not only giants, but also unquestionably corrupt beyond redemption.

After Christ, the viciousness of the Roman Empire, along with its utter degeneracy began to collapse and gradually humanity was elevated into a level of scientific method, beauty, art, human behaviour and charity for your neighbour that has been unsurpassed in human History. And this happened most and most rapidly in those areas that were Catholic. Despite the unending lies of the fomenters of the “enlightenment”, the so-called “Dark Ages” were anything but. Had the psychotic pedophile and demon inspired “Prophet” of Islam not started a vile, murderous, rape-and-pillage oriented religion, who knows to what heights this planet would have reached? Are you even aware that hundreds of years ago Catholic theologians contemplated aliens, invented the actual, real, functional scientific method and dragged humanity out of Barbarism into what is in fact, the Risorgimento, the rising from metaphorical (and often literal) death and the murky waters of demon-filled “life”.

If you are not familiar with this history, allow me to suggest for your four books. If you actually read all of these, I promise that your perspective on the past is going to shift drastically.

In order then:

  1. The Four Witnesses
  2. Bearing False Witness
  3. God’s Battallions
  4. The Crusades – I have read thousands of books, this might be my top one. Certainly it’s in the top 5. But reading the other three above first will heighten the appreciation and enjoyment you will get from this one.

Bonus book: The Great Siege 1565

If you take the time to just read even just one or two of those books, you might well note the dramatic shift in attitude to life, honour, duty, valour, courage and so on.

In today’s world, feminism has been injected into every so-called “modern” culture, and throughout human history, what has happened to societies that had rule by women imposed on them? Without exception, transgenderism, homosexuality and child sexual abuse become rampant. The brutality of Ancient Rome or Ancient Greece was in large part required in order to prevent the depredations of competing tribes of peoples from murdering, raping and enslaving your own people. But the degeneracy that quickly results from effiminating mankind is a special kind of chaotic hell that has only viciousness at it heart, and that turned against the most defenceless member son society: Children.

Being raised a few hundred years ago meant you certainly had a hard time of it from the start. If poor and of peasant stock, you had to work hard daily to simply survive. If born wealthy and of noble stock, you were trained to be a warrior and take part in wars from a young age, to defend your lands, your peasants and your King, or whichever noble higher up the ladder you aligned with. But in Catholic creation, the nobility had a duty to protect his charges and by and large, noblemen were men that had the respect of their people because when called to it they did not hesitate to go into battle for the right reasons. This parallel reality of the noble warrior is, paradoxically, better known to Westerners from the Japanese counter-part of Samurai, while they ignore their own history of even more charitable and equally courageous men within their own ancestry.

Now, why do you think you are not being made familiar with such history? With eh type of men and attitudes that existed for centuries? With the way a boy was raised or disciplined a few hundred years ago?

Today the mere idea of a spanking for a child is seen almost as some kind of abuse. And in fairness, those parents who do still install corporal punishment around the world, often, because absent a proper moral, ethical and logical foundation based in Catholic principles, do so out of mere rage or frustration, or without a real understanding of the role of such an act in respect of your own child.

The imperative is to raise your children as “friends” and to ensure the poor darlings know just how special they are, regardless of their lack of manners, lack of ability to focus, lack of ability to read a room, lack of ability to not just be little narcissistic imps. And they becomes such little terrors, not because they are born bad, quite the contrary, children are fundamentally born with an awesome capacity to be logical and make very logical conclusions from their observations. They do this instinctively and in keeping with their natural sex. Boys will tend to be more direct and simple, girls will tend to be more circumspect and devious in their ways. While a boy may simply ask for something that he knows is not really good for him, say eating all the chocolate he can before getting sick from it, a girl will try to get in your good graces before pulling at those emotional strings.

There is a reason why fathers tend to be more forgiving of their daughters than of their sons. Mostly because as men, they want and know the importance of their sons being able to be strong when required, compassionate but also just, and to be able to overcome whatever difficulty they encounter mostly on their own, because life will often throw that at them. But faced with their daughter saying pretty please and giving a hearty smile and a hug, strong men falter. Similarly, while their mothers will not be fooled by their endearing ways, they will often let a son get away with more, because after all, he is their little prince, and damn the world.

And such balance is good and healthy.

But if you listen to the metrosexualised working couples on a diet of TV and Netflix, with their children in government schools, who are barely aware of what their own children are exposed to daily, you will tend to think that such concepts are bigotry made flesh and evil, evil, evil. And gay couples who want to purchase small children to pretend to play at “family” are jus as healthy and normal as any heterosexual couple who produces their children the “old fashioned” (normal, proper and correct) way, by procreating them with each other. Never mind the statistical reality of what child sexual abuse in homosexual “couples” looks like. Because after all, math is racist! Or something.

So teaching your children to farm, to hunt, to shoot, to defend themselves, to reason, to do logic, to know their ancestry and traditions, to learn about the “rituals” of Catholicism and what they mean and what they are and the benefits they bring to everyday life, oh, no, no, no, that would be some troglodyte regression to cave-times.

Which is why the average “parent” injects their children with weird foreign substances that demonstrably cause more harm than good, as anyone that, like me, used to think vaccines were good… until I actually read up on their history, the “science” behind them, the actual ingredients and more importantly than all of it, the real motivations for them by the people who imposed them on us all.

The Genetic Serums passed off as “vaccines” for the last 3 years certainly got me to take note of what the “good” vaccines, which went from 5 or 6 to 30 in my lifetime alone, in many countries, actually are. What is in them and what they actually do or don’t do. If you take the time to research these things yourself, any normal person of normal intelligence that is not ideologically invested in a false narrative, but is instead simply after the truth, will be unlikely to ever inject themselves, or especially their children, with any of them.

Certainly those they would take would be a far reduced number and subject to control processes they can vet themselves with total transparency.

BUT WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? VACCINES? DEMONS? GAY PEOPLE? PEDOPHILES? YOU’RE AL OVER THE PLACE!

No, I am not. If it seems that way to you, it’s because each of these things, from your secular or at best Churchman model of the world is not linked. Each is a separate issue. Their causalities and determinants and originators are separate and disparate. But are they? Are they really? If you bother to take the time to examine these things, even from a secular perspective, it becomes difficult to avoid noticing certain linking factors.

The overwhelming presence of people that have huge financial impact. The overwhelming presence of a certain tribal group’s over representation in the entertainment, mass media and banking activities. The overwhelmingly mass-murderous and anti-European ideologies of these same people.

And if and when you do notice these things, you may be tempted to revisit history from only some 80 years ago and what and how certain groups that have since been defined as the most evil humans to ever have lived came to the conclusions they did and to act as they did. And how those acts may not be precisely what you have been told they were. At least not in a large number of cases. And maths, once again, becomes very bigoted if you apply it objectively to certain events of the Second World War.

You might begin to wonder why a certain tribe is protected from criticism legally in an increasing number of countries in the world, while that same tribe can do the very things that are illegal to do or say against them to pretty much the entire Caucasoid/European people.

And if you do notice all of these things, from a secular perspective, and you connect the dots, always from a secular perspective, the reaction that may well derive could be a secular solution. Perhaps even a final solution to the issue. And reaching such a final solution, you might be likely, to, in the event that such an unlikely event were to take place, follow a fiery leader with practical, if somewhat distasteful, final solutions.

And that would still play into the demonic world’s scheme of things.

While you certainly have the God-given right to assemble with whom you like, and to exclude whom you like from your company, and while they may pass laws to try and regulate your God-given rights, you can always bypass them. Because ultimately, if it comes down to being regulated as to how and when you breathe near whom, well, mass revolution and rivers of blood let it become then, because some fates are worse than mere death.

But from a secular perspective, that is really the only options. Submit to a totally tyrannical slavery of mind and body unprecedented in the entirety of Human history, or, armed rebellion and a politician hanging from every lamppost, overpass and tall enough tree.

It’s a Satanic gambit and while one option is marginally preferable to the other, neither is ideal.

IF, however, you understand the hidden, the intentionally occult, the “ridiculed” —by those intentionally trying to deceive, or those ignorant and maleducated enough to buy into the deceiver’s lies— concept of the demonic forces at work in this world; the fact that we are under the Dominion of Satan, that we are, literally, if on the side of God, special operatives waaaayy behind enemy lines, and that is why our Church is called the Church Militant, then, your duty, your mission, becomes extremely clear and relatively simple.

Which is not to say it becomes easy. But it is simple. Simple to understand. Simple to know in the marrow of your bones. Acting on it becomes easier not because the actions are easy, but because the distinct and deep understanding that it is the right path, makes the difficulties on that path much easier to bear.

It also becomes obvious that the work you need to do is, in this order:

  1. First of all on yourself. To know the Truth and live it. Ultimately, this means to know God. And ultimately, however absurd the proposition may sound to you now (it certainly would have seemed absolutely absurd to me eleven years ago) that the best model of God, His will, and how to best fit into the world, is the Catholic model (sedevacantist, obviously since what most people assume is the “Catholic Church ” is in reality the very hub of one of the portals to Hell, manned and populated by Satanists, freemasons and pedophiles, none of which are valid clergy being as they are not even valid Catholics).
  2. To lead others, first of all your spouse and family, to the Truth, and living it.
  3. In doing 1 and 2 above, ensure the safety, security, cohesion, education, intelligence, truth, beauty and loyalty, of your own family first and foremost. The family YOU and your wife create, not necessarily the one you were born into, though, if that is good and doable, so much the better.
  4. To lead by example, and begin to influence others around you to your ways. To begin to form a community of like-minded people.
  5. Reject, totally and absolutely, all of the following:
    • Anything and everything related to Vatican II.
    • All and every Novus Ordo “Cleric” they are not Catholics, they are not validly ordained, and in the unlikely event that they were in the past, they have been heretics for some 60 years or more, like Vigano. And heretics are to be shunned by all. Even should they repent, they are to spend the rest of their days in penitence secluded in a monastery, with authority to preach or expound their thoughts on precisely no one.
    • Anything and everything offered to you by globohomo world.
    • The false narratives presented to you on:
      • Feminism.
      • Toxic Masculinity.
      • Anything “gender”. It’s called sex. Gender is for grammar.
      • And there are only two sexes: male and female.
      • Equality. No two humans are equal, not even twins.
        • No culture is equivalent to another.
        • No ethnicity is equivalent to another.
        • No system of laws and rules is equivalent to another.
        • No religion is equivalent to another.
      • Tolerance. Tolerating evil is evil. It is not good.
      • Moral relativity. No. Wrong is wrong and right is right.
        • Justice is not complicated. If you think it is read On Natural Law, or the Science of Justice, by Lysander Spooner. It is 8 pages of A4 printed and is all the law and all the politics any honest person will ever need.
        • A world without Justice is a world in which Love cannot exist, only perversion.
        • “Social Justice” is not Justice, but the inversion of it.
      • Violence. While certainly violence is never optimal, from a Catholic point of view, it is, absolutely, at times, necessary. Such is the state of things in a fallen world, if we are to preserve Justice and Love. This is why Catholics absolutely believe in the death penalty, and always have. human dignity demands it. (When I say Catholics, I always mean the real ones, Sedevacantists, not fake “Catholic” Churchians that do not reject completely all of the Novus Ordo lies).
      • The LGBTQ agenda. Educate yourself on things like the incidence of violence in homosexual relationships, the incidence of childhood sexual abuse in those presenting as homosexual, the incidence of the perpetrators of child sexual abuse among homosexuals, as well as various other things, such as the incidence of horrific diseases brought on by their lifestyle, or their overall personality disorders beyond the obvious ones.
    • Reject absolutely the very concept of Truth Relativity. Objective truth exists and is a foundational concept of reality. Regardless of whether you personally are able to know what the highest truth of any given situation or event is, an objective, absolute position exists.

If you do this work, you will find that those texts discussing the way people lived, believed and acted a few hundred years ago, suddenly make a whole lot of sense and that your life is immensely improved by re-learning some basic principles of virtue, courage and perseverance in the face of a demonically inspired world.

Once again, this is not to say your life will necessarily become “easier” in practical terms, but it will absolutely become far more beautiful and significant, and that is a prize worth having a little discomfort for. After all, all the great achievements involved sacrifice. it is the very quality that makes us admire the achievement! And how much better an achievement to have begun the creation of a community dedicated to Truth, Family, Courage and the ability and will to resist the demonic processes and practices now so diffuse into the world.

Once you reclaim the ability to think, move and above all, ACT like a man, instead of some feminised version of one, and understand the judicious use of reason, and of all your other faculties, to achieve success, not by mere brute force, but by use of your intellect as required and to overcome the devious even at their own game if need be, in service of God, Truth, Beauty and the human virtues of the best of humanity, then, life truly becomes worthwhile living.

And remember how to define success:

To create a powerful, strong, family, with powerful, strong bonds and excellent values of the main virtues of honour, honesty (but learn to deceive the deceivers too) right action, justice, truth and beauty. And to not only resist the temptations and moral decay and degeneration of the worldly all around you, but lead others to salvation by example and create the tide that will reverse and overcome the evil and the deceitful in ways neither you nor I could even imagine, but that, when you follow God’s Will, appear to happen spontaneously in very unexpected ways.

And real success is to pass on a legacy to your children so they continue to build on what you started, never relenting, never allowing tolerance for evil to creep in, and never to become so soft that squashing the snake heads as soon as they appear ever becomes too distasteful for them.

I for one am doing my part. I hope you are doing yours, and that one day, we see each other from across the way and recognise: Ah. There is another brave soul who stood when it counted and held his shield next to mine, even if I may not have know it.

Miles Mathis on Suicidal Teenagers

Mr. Mathis has produced an interesting paper on the phenomenon of vastly increased numbers of suicides and suicidal thoughts in teenagers, particularly in girls.

Mr. Mathis has a liberal ideology of sorts. It is too simplistic to label him a straight liberal of course, so i hope you will not make that mistake. His position concerning sexual relations between teenagers is not one I can wholeheartedly support, being a Catholic, but that is not to say it doesn’t have some merit. After all, should we return to the morals of the time of the Crusaders, or the Inquisition, or even as late as the defence of Malta, all good, solid Catholic times, it remains true that teenagers both male and female would be considered available for marriage and procreation. And this was not just 13 year old peasant girls being raped by 40 year old barons, as the woke “historians” would have you believe.

Boys and girls were in essence considered pretty much as adults from about age 13 or so. Biologically, most hit puberty at that time and while there is some small variance, in general, by age 14, both boys and girls have passed puberty.

I certainly do NOT agree that it is fine for a 30 year old modern male to have sex with a 13 year old girl, but that is also influenced by how present-day 30 year old males are. And I see nothing wrong with a 25 year old woman getting married and bearing children to, say, a 40 year old man. Nor was this uncommon back then. On this point at least, Mr. Mathies and I are in general agreement.

To bring things in stark relief (both for myself as well as for you readers) I think about my daughters, of which I have 4. And my boy, of which we have one. I live in a country where the age of consent is 14, which probably is scandalous to the average Protestant Anglo type.

But I consider various scenarios.

In the first place, I do not believe, that if I do my job correctly as father, any of my daughters would be so foolish as to “fall” for some 30 or 40 year old predator while they are 14. And even if such a situation arose, as a result of God knows what tragic set of circumstances, said predator would be very lucky to achieve the protection of the state in very short order. So that does not concern me.

What if, however, we were to posit say a 17 year old or 18 year old boy with one of my 14 year old daughters? In that respect, it would very much depend on the boy in question. And while there would be no question of my approving of sexual relations at that age, IF the boy turned out to be a decent sort (they still exist, in fact, one of our not too-far off neighbours have a young boy that if he keeps on the same track is quite an outstanding young teenager) I would not be against them courting, with actual sex being not an option, but again, if they are raised right, they probably would not venture into such waters for a good amount of time while courting, even allowing for the escapades of youth.

But consider now a real Zombie Apocalypse scenario. And one of those decent boys really cares for one of my daughters, and the situation is dire and rough and there is death and calamity everywhere. Well, always depending on the boy, I may well be more willing to even let them escape and elope to safer lands on their own. Why? Because at that age, a boy that really loves a girl, is likely to still have that instinct to literally take a bullet for her if need be, and that’s the kind of boy I want for my girls. And if they grow up together surviving all sorts of hellish landscapes, chances are that they will actually end up staying together down the line too.

The problem is that in a Universe 25 scenario, with no bombs dropping, no life-and-death derring do, or survival requirement, most teenagers are functionally retarded. Their attention span is limited to a Tik-Tok video of 90 seconds, their imagination even more stunted and their future makes the radioactive landscape of Gamma World look like fun.

It’s hard to argue with Mr. Mathies’ overview either:

Likewise with these CDC numbers from highschools. If I am shocked by anything, I am shocked by the fact that these kids haven’t already burned down every highschool in the country. If the school uniform weren’t a straightjacket, they probably would have. I think the only way they have avoided it is by masking everyone and then sending them all home for a Zoom conference. To avoid revolution in the next round, they are going to have to graduate to kevlar muzzles, leg manacles, iron bars, and electrified fences. You may laugh, but they are already installing expensive security systems nationwide, and it isn’t to keep the shooters out. It is to keep the prisoners in. The fake shooters are just the excuse.
If kids were now what they were in my day, the highschools would already be ash. Young people now are so decimated by fluoride, poisoned food, drugs, and 24/7 brainwashing and gaslighting, they seem to us older generations like some nuked cave-people, slouching around glassy-eyed in clown clothing, mesmerized by their phones and puking up chopped sentences that only distantly resemble language. The military is now admitting that 75% of them aren’t even qualified to clean latrines or polish their shoes while saying yessir. And the other 25% is skinny-stupid.
The only way I can believe highschool students aren’t all suicidal or homicidal, down to the last boy and girl, is that they are too vacant to achieve the state. They are too zonked on anti-depressants they stole from the medicine cabinet to remember what sadness is. They are too bombed on thorazine to spell hopelessness. This CDC report we have been looking at includes sections on alcohol, weed, illicit drugs, and opioids, telling us their levels of use in highschool are all dropping, but that leaves out prescription drugs, doesn’t it? If there is less use of all this other stuff—which is highly doubtful—it can only be because the drug companies have replaced those things with their own products. Like their parents, these kids are wasted beyond any conception of sadness on anti-depressants, anti-anxieties, anti-psychotics, and anti-emotives of all classes and types, beyond the comprehension of any person of my limited experience.
Despite that, I honestly wouldn’t be surprised if the revolution started in the highschools, and I hope it does since the kids will be the hardest to shoot, jail, or disappear without incident. The nation seems to have accepted having its great-grandparents murdered by ventilators and fake drugs; we will see how it responds to having its children rounded up and jailed for “insurrection and terrorism” when they dry out and torch all these concentration camps we now call schools.

Truly, young people, if any of you can even read this, I truly hope you get off the drugs, off the weird internet, and start to plan the complete takedown of the society the boomers instigated, that we GenXers didn’t burn at the stake, although, in fairness, we were too few, and many beaten down and shell-shocked, but most importantly, we were unable to see that we were heading to this place we are in now. The Millennials are basically Boomers redux, so it’s up to the Zyklons, if they are not too stoned and drugged out, and whatever comes next, which I hope are going to be the equivalent of Crusading Inquisitors. For my part, and I know I am not alone among GenXers, I’ll certainly do what I can. Building up the zealots for now, trying to put together communities of hardcore Catholics and when and if the zombie apocalypse does arrive, oh well… don’t be surprised is a few grey-haired older guys are laughing as they empty all their weapons at the enemy, Severely outnumbered and outgunned though they might be.

Tranny Narrative not Going Well in Italy

This were the stencils painted on the doors of the toilets at a pretty upscale bar/cafe we went to today.

Why PUAs suck. And always have sucked.

Bear with me a minute, (or 30, this is long. Impossibly so for most millennials) because in order to really drive this point home, it is necessary to understand the origins of the problem, which are far-removed enough from the rotting fruit that most never even have a clue about it.

Have you ever read any G.K. Chesterton? If you have, you’ll be familiar with his style of presenting some preposterous thing in one phrase, and then, go on in a few paragraphs to prove his point in an undeniable fashion. The man was absolutely brilliant at it and I often say that had I come across his writings in my twenties instead of after I was already a Catholic, I may have become one a lot sooner.

Now, I am no Chesterton, not by a very, very long shot, as anyone that has read my Believe! will be able to attest, nevertheless, that little book has resulted in over a hundred people converting to proper Catholicism (Sedevacantism), so, while I am but a butcher to Chesterton’s refined sushi preparations, I must serve a purpose too.

And the title of this post is going to be a bit of a “preposterous” or at least “well, you’re totally wrong” proposition for a lot of the people that might stumble across this.

Especially the zombie army of complete fuckwits like Andrew Tate. So. As I said: bear with me a minute. And no, this will not be some long, drawn out, moralistic diatribe with Bible verses scattered throughout. This is going to be as close to engineering as human social “science” gets. And as anyone who knows what engineering is will know, engineering is the only science that really matters or makes a difference in worldly matters. And much like a gun, it can be used in a destructive or mechanistic way, or guided by a higher intent of purpose and produce spiritually and humanly uplifting effects.

So let us begin.

The aim of every PUA (Pick-Up Artist — in case you have just come out of a cave in Afghanistan after hiding for 20 years) is essentially, at least initially, to be able to have sex with (in theory) as many beautiful women as possible. In reality, in many cases, those who try to learn from supposed PUAs, would be very happy to just get any sex at all. And in a few cases, the prospective “student” merely wants to be able to meet a girl he likes and be able to get her in bed and fall in love and live happily ever after.

Right. So let’s deal with the usual objections first.

1. Is it true that having sex with lots of women makes you a better man.

In order to know, we’d first have to define “better” so let’s do that by the usual and most common factors those interested in PUA activity would say “better” means.

  • Make you more able to communicate with everyone in general and women in particular.
  • Make you more likely or able to get any specific woman you are interested in to get intimate with you.
  • Make you generally more socially aware and raise your general status in the common parlance of the world as we generally find it today.
  • As a result of the above, generally increase your likelihood of being able to secure a better job, better prospects in general and so on.

The answer to the above is yes. Yes it does.

Reminder: Note I asked if having sex with lots of women does that. Not paying a bunch of money to a PUA. It’s a very important distinction, so remember it.

2. Can any of the things PUAs say/tell you/teach you/ increase your chances of having sex with some women.

Sure. It’s certainly possible anyway. They also could irretrievably damage your perception of reality in a way that is so fundamental it is akin to setting you up for a life of misery.

The reality is that most PUAs are wannabe tryhards. I have peculiar interests, one of which is cults and cults of personality, (remind me to tell you about my experiences with Dianetics, [scientology], Amma the hugging saint, Tony Robbins, a number of his wannabe clones, the Novus Orco “catholic church” and so on) which I enjoy breaking, making fun of and generally exposing for the fraudulent snake-oil sellers it involves. PUAs are borderline types in this realm, so I turned my baleful eye on them a long time ago. I will pick one PUAk as a relatively typical example. At one point, one of the most prolific producers of PUAs books, courses, and seminars was a guy who called himself Mehow. Which might have been his real name, as I think he was of Polish ancestry (I know, I know! If he’s Polish it’s no wonder he’s retarded right? But hey, chalk this up as another nail in the coffin of “all humans are just one race, human”, ok?).

Here is a glowing review of him apparently, though he seems to have disappeared in the last few years. Sounds great if you’re after that number 1 stuff above, right?

Well, I probably should have screen shotted it all way back when, in 2009 or so, because it was all information that he himself provided, on various of his own platforms, though no one had really taken the time to actually look at what he said and put it together. The facts are that by his own admission, he had spent 10 years partying hard with daddy’s money, to the tune of $500,000, been trained by supposedly the best Pick-Up Artists in the world, and become a PUA guru himself, in order to have sex with… drum roll please… “about 30-40 women” which probably means 25 or so.

Now, as I pointed out back then, if this is the level of “skill” of a top PUA, most women really have nothing to fear from them in terms of losing their virtue to these irresistible ladies men!

Wealthy fathers on the other hand, may want to teach basic economics to their incel sons.

Ok then, but still, if you find a “good” PUA, and do get good at having sex with lots of women, you too admit you get all that good stuff at point 1 above, right? So it’s all good!

Well, actually no. As I wrote a long time ago, I had been with a lot of women before anyone even mentioned PUAs or The Game to me. In fact, it was precisely because my friends, and people at the gym I trained with, saw me leaving with a different pretty woman each week, that they told me about it. A friend literally gave me a copy of the book and said: “You should have a chapter in here. Or maybe a whole book.”

So, my perspective of PUAs was from the top of the mountain, looking down on these peasants in the rice fields scrambling about to get some, and then scrambling about some more to try and sell their “skills” to each other.

As I wrote almost 15 years or so ago:

By the time that I discovered anything about PUAs I had developed quite happily on my own into a man more than capable to satisfy his curiosity of women. This was a fortunate thing because it allowed me a perspective on PUAs and their techniques that was free of being sucked into the promise of alluring women falling at my feet almost as if by magic. To a degree, I already had this power (insofar as it can be had let’s say) so I could look into and study and evaluate the information with eyes already filled of my own experiences. To sum up PUAs briefly is difficult, however I will try. Initially, most of these guys are frustrated geeks that have broken down social interactions between naturally successful ladies’ men and attractive women. They then practice these routines like social robots and begin to have some success at obtaining sex with these plastic techniques. As their confidence grows they refine the techniques and become more adept at luring an ever increasing series of women to their beds. The more daring then continue into experimenting with multiple partners at a time as well as multiple girlfriends at a time. Some openly, others secretly. By and large though, certain truths remain evident. Even if successful at having multiple sex partners most of these individuals are still what I would consider socially inept people. They may have achieved an ability at obtaining sex from women but that per se does not make them good people necessarily. Or likeable. Or happy. Furthermore, the level of hyperbole in this community is rather extreme; especially when you consider that many of the so called Pick-Up Gurus sell products that supposedly will increase a man’s ability to bed stunningly beautiful women.

 

Keep in mind this was my perspective long before I had any remote hint of Christianity in my world view.

My perception of PUAs has not improved over time either.

The key negative here is not even their wish or attempts at getting laid, but rather, the phrase “social robots”.

While it is understandable that when first attempting some intimidating social interaction one might rely on some repetitive approach, the fact is that a very large number of these would-be Casanovas, end up making “approach routines” and so on their way of relating to the world. Yes, the female world, but really the world at large. They read a Tim Ferris book and then assume all of life is about “hacks”. Then they get into NLP which is a “hack” of proper hypnosis created by a cocaine fiend that either shot and killed his then girlfriend at the time himself, or was responsible for it anyway.

That’s right, Richard Bandler is not quite the great guy you might have imagined.

So the really nefarious aspect of PUAs both those who “teach it”, and those who practice it, os the mechanisation of humanity.

It’s like the series upload. You just order your sex like you do deliveroo and that’s that.

Honestly, it is more dehumanising than actual prostitution. But the real issue, is that the problems this sort of interaction creates are far-reaching and affect pretty much everything in society in a negative way.

And this is where we now get to the crux of the PUAs suck statement.

The entire PUA phenomenon is not really the origin of what we might want to call social degradation, but rather, a reaction to it.

As, indeed, was my own exploring, and wading through different women in quick succession without any precise aim beyond that of “finding the right one” in the most general of terms. Again, quoting myself from early 2010:

 

The underground world of PUAs was first exposed by Neill Strauss’ book The Game. As someone interested in all aspects of hypnosis I did look into this community as I will look just about anywhere if it will increase my knowledge base and help me to be more effective in my work. Fortunately for me, somewhat contemporaneously to my study of hypnosis I was also undergoing some drastic life changes in all areas of my life. One of these was my intimate relationships. I had divorced and then had two relationships one after the other which were both extremely intense one very beautiful until its unfortunate and somewhat inevitable end, the other extremely stressful and painful yet coloured with flashes of beauty and power so intense they literally changed my views of radical aspects of my philosophies. As a result, after this, I gave myself to a sort of uninhibited search for some deeper meaning in intimate relationships.

 

I begun a period of my life that was almost scientific in its detachment and approach yet also extremely intimate and self-revealing. I had more intimate encounters in a few months than I had had in the previous 10 years. I also (counter-intuitively to what most men that behave this way do) was extremely direct and honest with the women involved. I never lied to any of them and I always made it clear how I felt (and more importantly didn’t feel) towards them. With only a few exceptions no one was really hurt emotionally and even when this occurred occasionally it was never anything very serious, merely a little bruised ego either for them or for me. Some of these women —all of whom I am grateful to by the way and for whom I did genuinely care though I may not have been in love with any of them— I only saw once. Some I spent a little time with; all were intelligent, capable women in their own right and they were from all walks of life. They ranged in age, cultures, backgrounds, languages they spoke and of course all other details, yet I could not help but notice that for the most part they were all quite beautiful not only to me but to most men. Every one of these women would be considered a great ‘catch’ by the very vast majority of men.

 

And to be honest it surprised me. I had never considered myself particularly good looking and certainly not a socially skilled person. I am extremely individualistic, never required much social approval and the very concept of peer pressure was as foreign to me throughout my formative years as was evident the absence of girlfriends.

 

On examining my past I realised for the first time that apparently through luck or chance or some factor I could not identify, though relatively few in number up to that point, I had always been with beautiful looking women. And those I had fallen in love with were without exception well above any kind of norm (in looks, character and mind). I began to actually experiment with this and became more and more selective. Pretty soon I discovered a sense of things that I think few men really achieve in their life. A sense of self-confidence that I didn’t even know I was missing to begin with that can really only come from being validated by women we value. Undoubtedly some people reading this will consider me a misogynist chauvinist pig. I do not consider myself so, and in fact I love women. Nor, unbelievably as it may sound to some, am I a polygamist by nature.

 

My nature is monogamous. As long as I find the one, and as long as she’s always earning it (and me for her obviously) I seek nothing more than one woman. This period of my life though helped me to realise that. And I am eternally grateful to every woman I have ever had the good fortune to spend any time with. Without women, truly life would have no purpose I think. If it were possible for men to exist without women we would still live in trees and caves.

 

Which man would do anything more than club some food to death and find a relatively warm place to sleep if it weren’t for women?

 

Everything that was ever created, invented, built, reached for, designed, fought for…as the French say (but perhaps differently than they mean!): Cherchéz la femme. Behind everything that man ever did…there is somewhere a woman or the thought of her.

 

My reaction was due to the eventual collapse of a relationship that had lasted 13 years, though I was never married, then the collapse of my first marriage, which lasted only 4 years and then 2 more relationships of even shorter duration. These four relationships were the only ones that had mattered to me on a rather deeper level, with whatever liaisons happened in between them being essentially distractions or errors.

In a society that values people, individuals and life in general, in short, in a properly Catholic society, it is extremely likely that I would have remained with my first serious relationship for life. At least in part, and probably a very large part of it, the reason that 13 year old relationship eventually collapsed was probably due to the subtle but persistent infiltration of unhealthy, worldly infiltrations into what would otherwise have been a lifelong relationship.

The destroyed concept of marriage and family created by my boomer generation parents was common to all of generation X. As was the “natural” idea of abortion rather than having a child at “too young” an age. The utter secularisation of life as a whole, with the total absence of any higher spiritual direction whatever, the only purpose of life seemingly to be exclusively the satanic idea of “being happy”, led to a life that you were being told in every possible way should limit itself to, having as much material possessions as you could, avoid having children altogether because they got in the way of you having “a life”. A life that was supposedly dedicated to essentially the constant pursuit of material distractions and hedonistic pleasures. Frankly, it is only my “noble pagan” ancestral roots that saved me in some ways. Having been raised in a family tradition that still respected concepts like honesty, honour, keeping your word, a sense of natural and simple justice, permitted me to completely sidestep many of the pitfalls that lay there for so many of my generation and perhaps even more so for those that followed.

I never touched any drugs, never even got drunk once in fact. And my being involved in the budo philosophy of Japanese Karate-do from an early age meant I had a peculiar mix of agnostic zen philosophy with aspects of Shintoist if not reverence, at least historical respect for my ancestors, despite not knowing very much about them until relatively later in life.

We were also the first generation that became exposed to pornography to a degree that was unprecedented since Roman orgy times, and went well beyond the dirty magazines and hippie “free-love” of the boomer generation. While they had couched perversion and degeneracy as some deluded fantasy of being free of “jealousy” and “possessiveness”, by the time we were coming of age, it had already devolved into the idea that having as much sex as possible with as many people as possible was the “normal” way of life.

But consider for a moment, what the “rewards” of such an existence would be.

  • The absence of children as the pivotal part of family, because they get in the way of your hedonistic lifestyle.
  • The absence of relationships that endure hardships together because united by any higher purpose beside each part “being happy” and that individualistically within the “relationship”. The very concept that any relationship that had that as foundation could last beyond a few years at most is absurd.
  • Sex as a point-scoring status badge of sorts.
  • Emphasis on the ephemeral aspects of materialism: travel for travel’s sake, with no real deep penetration of cultures or geography beyond the required status symbol passport stamp and digital photo album (later to be displayed publicly online); owning of property and vehicles as further status badges if your success; wealth as proof of your superior intellect and ability, regardless of any other moral considerations.

I mean, think about it, bombarded by this message constantly, your own parent’s generation committed to these very same “ideals” with the narcissistic compulsion only the boomer generation ever managed to have, even if you “achieved” all of the supposed benchmarks of “success” this lifestyle supposedly promised, what would you be left with?

At best a healthy property portfolio with no one to leave it to besides the lawyers and ex-wives, as you descended into unglamorous old age alone and spiritually hollow.

And despite this, as well as being the most aborted generation, many GenXers managed to raise some form of families. Of course the carnage was spectacular. Divorces, abortions, and the pursuit of narcissistic, degenerate, selfishly hedonistic “happiness”, absent of any spiritual or moral rudder, was what surrounded us as we raised ourselves mostly, and these were the “values” we were exposed to constantly. It’s a miracle any of us managed to reproduce and retain a semblance of family at all.

Of course divorce, and abortion, and chasing smoke dragons, and drugs to numb the existential void, caught almost all of us to some degree or other. And for a generation already drastically reduced by being killed before we were born, then mostly stomped down and limited by our own parent’s generation in multiple ways, we did pretty well at surviving and overcoming and even reversing a few of the trends here and there in individual cases and small pockets of guerrilla resistance. Particularly given how thoroughly the truth of the spiritual aspects of life were hidden from us.

The boomers were (and remain) so desperate to remain unaware of their own spiritual and moral abyss, that they ridiculed, destroyed, discarded, disgraced, devalued, hid, and avoided, any meaningful confrontation with the numinous. With the reality of existence that truly forms the foundation of any true purpose. With any aspect of catering to the soul instead of the flesh. The boomers rejected what the silents couldn’t hold on to, we GenXers were not even aware something had existed there, for the most part.

The idea of a True Catholic Mass being meaningful, true, beautiful or even merely useful, was as foreign to us as the idea that some quaint pagan ritual to long-dead Gods might serve any purpose other than historical curiosity of a people that was obviously primitively superstitious and disappeared long ago; probably precisely because they wasted time and energy on such meaningless rituals.

And yet. If you look around now, it is mostly GenXers rallying the flag of Sedevacantism, and already beginning to pass that torch to generation Zyklon, which are our historical continuation, much as the millennials are that of the boomers.

Wait, what?

Allow me to recap. That historical aside was to give you a sense of why and how my generation was steered onto rocks instead of the meaningful life journey of marriage until death, children, family, tradition, real worship of God and respectful obedience to His laws as best as we can, creating truly meaningful lives (and thus happy in the only way that matters) rather than “hollywood happy” ones.

My personal story is a reflection of what a very few of my generation managed to do: I went full circle, and by luck or divine intervention, had the peculiar attribute of a persistence that almost none of my generational peers had any right to have. What was the point of never giving up when you had no real purpose to fight for? My adopted samurai code kept me away from drugs and a certain level of moral corruption, which did not, however, extend to sexual relations with women. In that respect, my descent into libertine ways was to a certain extent inevitable, given my intense nature, insatiable curiosity, and explorer’s heart.

But once again, if that becomes the totality of your life, what are you left with at the end of it?

It was that very conscious thought that led me initially at least partially out of it.

I distinctly recall the precise moment. I was alone at home, in an apartment I loved and that, incidentally, my eventual future wife had found for me. Lying on the orange couch that had come with the place, on a Saturday I think, having binge-watched a couple or three episodes of NCIS, I consciously considered my life. I was 39 years old, had travelled to many places, had essentially given up on trying to make any meaningful long term relationship work, I was limiting myself to having them last until the woman in question either irritated me or I got bored of her, and had rotated through a few cycles of getting a bunch of women under me in quick succession, then getting rid of all of them for a week or two, then starting the cycle again but with a somewhat “improved” version of the women-merry-go-round. Better read, prettier, dirtier in bed, or whatever the attribute, or set of attributes I got interested in that month.

I contemplated my future and thought about the different paths it could go. It was obvious to me by now that I could spend the rest of my life as I had been doing for the last few years and I could go to my grave with a constant change of woman on my arm, and that comparatively speaking —in spite of whatever my age or eventual decrepitude and wrinkles would be— such women would always be younger than me and prettier than most men would get a chance to be with long term, never mind temporarily more or less at will.

The appeal of that sort of future was essentially limited to the frisson of a new woman lifting herself partially off your bed as you gently slide down her knickers for the first time.

The intensity of a new body under you intent to please you or you pleasing her in ways she had not yet experienced. It’s thrilling. Intoxicating. I suppose, perhaps, there is a kinship to a kind of drug maybe. I wouldn’t know, I never did drugs, but the addiction to the ephemeral might be similar. It’s the kind if life where soon, familiarity could begin to breed contempt instead of a deepening love.

Where the normal, terrene, aspects of humanity become irritations and inspire contempt, instead of charity, forgiveness and a contemplation of our own weaknesses and errors; a practice that the boomers we were raised by avoided like vermin fleeing fire.

What can one be left with, living such a life, at say, age 99, looking back while cuddling your shotgun, your cognac and your memories, on your rocking chair?

The melancholy of remembering (assuming your brain didn’t go to shit by then) the fleeting sensation of how this or that woman’s foot felt on your calf as she orgasmed under you?

The erotic smell or taste of another?

The beautiful sunsets over an exclusive beach you shared with the one you had a few months with?

And who other than yourself to even remember these things with? Or even tell them to? And of what use would they be to anyone? Or of what interest, other than possibly morbid fascination with degeneracy?

So I thought about the alternative. Find a woman I could tolerate long term and have children and raise a family with. I was not naïve about the hardships that would entail. Including the putting up with the woman, since I had been through enough of them to know that, like all human beings, they all will irritate you in some ways or others. And the complications of raising a child, how it affects every aspect of your life, work, travel. I was not naïve any of those aspects of it. But thinking about it with cold reason, it was obvious that all those efforts would be worth it.

What I was naïve about however, was actual, full-blown narcissists. In a society that expects and enforces proper courtship, such creatures would be more likely to die alone. But, like the devil, in modern society, actual narcissists of the full blown variety were considered a somewhat mythological creature. At least back in 2008 or so they were. And to me they may as well have been werewolves. Creatures that didn’t actually exist. I was aware of evil people and of extremely selfish, manipulative and unethical ones. I had dealt with them more than most. But I was not prepared to imagine that a quasi-mythical creature, which is really more a shapeshifter at will than just a poor werewolf, who is a mere lunatic after all, could insinuate itself in my life.

The “methods of measurement” I had evolved were not really designed to sift for narcissists. They covered:

  • Looks – I had to be physically attracted to a high degree to get interested for a potential long term situation
  • Sex – plentiful and varied
  • IQ – they had to at least be able to understand some of the things that interested me once explained. At least in general terms. And be able to hold at least some level of conversation concerning philosophy (of life as lived, not the esoteric writings of some German incel like Schopenhauer)
  • Their attraction to me – If they weren’t interested to a certain level, then I lost interest in them pretty quickly too.
  • Some generic quasi-moral rules of ethics that at least mostly aligned with my own.

Well, let me tell you, that list does not, in any way sift for narcissists. In reality, as far as functional marriages are concerned, while a mutual attraction is certainly ideal, it is not even necessary. Neither is the sex or, necessarily, the IQ. But their character and ethics are pretty fundamental.

Today’s superficial ways have seen to it that as long as you have painted over your crappy moral fibre with enough glossy nail polish, sexy underwear, porn-star bedroom etiquette, and CNN or Fox News sound bytes  (to cater to left or right leanings) your abyss of the soul is not even noticed, much less criticised. 

Yes, it is true, that after such an experience, and in part also thanks to my previous encounters with women of all types, eventually, after I went through all that hell, and came out the other side, I found and ended up with what I believe will be my wife until we drop dead. Hopefully a very long time from now. But the difference is that instead of having adult children starting out in life, I now have children that I hope will get married early and make babies pretty much immediately after doing so, in the hope I get to be a grandfather before I drop dead. 

I do not regret any aspect of my life. It’s certainly been a hell of a ride so far and has no indications it will be any less interesting going forward, but it is probably true that in a society that had the values that Catholic society had a few hundred years ago, I probably would have married and had a lifetime with hat first girl I was with for 13 years. We would have had a bunch of children and be comfortable enough now to be able to retire in some semblance of peace.

It does happen to be true that I also believe I am much better able to appreciate the joys of life now than I would have been in that alternate history, and I think I am happier too and with a woman I certainly feel is perfectly matched to me, so overall, I ended up in a better place that will certainly keep me busy (and entertained too, both good and bad) until I eventually do join my ancestors in the afterlife. 

So What’s The SOLUTION then Kimosabe?

Patience grasshopper. First, understand where we are:

  • I have identified the issue is the mechanisation of human interactions.
  • I have shown some of the errors, pitfalls and ultimately nihilistic and generation-ending future this way of life produces.
  • The “benefits” such a lifestyle provides would absolutely not be positives or even required in an ordered, Catholic society.

But before I show you the solutions, you need to understand the real root of the problem. And that is the secularisation of society. That happened because of Protestantism. Protestantism is literally nothing less than the rebellion against God first done by Lucifer the so-called Lightbringer. 

I have covered this before and in various degrees of detail. But the point remains relatively simple. Protestantism brought in the disordering of relations between the sexes. It started with the introduction of contraception, which changed the dynamic of marriage. From the primary purpose being to create, nurture and raise a family, to having sex for fun.

Think about that. 

Serioulsy. Think about it. 

Try to imagine what the world would be like if not only you, but everyone around you, thought of marriage as a situation in which you remain with that person for life, no matter what, and create and raise children together (as long as you are physically able to). How would that life be? 

Well, we had that. For quite a long time. Now that attitude is seen as “backward”, unjust to women, socially irresponsible, and endangering the planet.

Before contraception was accepted by Protestant branches, the very idea of divorce was considered quite scandalous throughout Western Civilisation. After it, divorce naturally became commonplace.

It is perfectly logical of course, when the primary function of having sex become personal enjoyment, instead of family creation, with the bonus of personal enjoyment, then, sex becomes just one of the many things that has to be “perfect” in order to fill in the relevant box-ticking list that one must curate in order to “be happy”.

After contraception and fault-free divorce on demand, the very act of getting pregnant is a misfortune, something that will prevent you from doing what you want when you want, with anyone you want. So you begin to murder babies. And today we have “ex-spurts” trying to make it legal to kill babies up to 2 year olds. Mostly it started with this piece of shit in human form.

Contraception took a while to be “socially acceptable” thanks to the strength that even a declining morality within the greater Catholic Church had instilled in Western man. It took some 400 years from 1521 to get contraception to be more widespread. And it took until 1958 for the Papacy to be taken over right up to the present day, by Satanic freemasons. 

But here we are. Add in ubiquitous pornography and degeneracy of every kind, such as the current “transgender” movement, aimed specifically at children by the usual LGBTQPedo types and is it any wonder we have a generally sociopathic undercurrent to human relations in 2023.

So, here FINALLY are the solutions.

If you have read all that and got to this point, it is probable you’re not a millennial. Maybe a Zyklon with reading skills, which is rare enough but not unheard of. So it is only fair that I point out that this is not Boomer-type “advice” of the “don’t do as I did, but do as I say” variety. Nor is it of the same Boomer type that is more akin to “I did it when it was cool, and I *am* cooler, but don’t YOU do it, you’re not cool enough to pull it off.”

No. This is the kind of advice from someone that has come through the fire and miraculously is not just alive, but has a happy ending. 

In essence what I am telling you is:

“Don’t believe the bullshit of Hollywood son!”

“You have to fuck your way through an army of whores, gold-diggers and idiots to just begin to understand that porn stars don’t make the best mothers!”

It’s not so much “don’t be a criminal, because crime doesn’t pay,” type of Bible-thumping advice. It’s more of a “you get ass-raped in prison,” reality check.

And criminals go to jail. Almost all of them in the long run.

Ok, fine! as my three year old says, while stamping his foot. But then what do I do?

Learn. Educate yourself about proper Catholicism. That was the society that created the best situation for humanity, so learn what they did and how and why. And believe me when I say that what you think you know of Catholicism has, in fact, almost nothing to do with it.

Find out what Sedevacantism is and why it exists. 

Understand what relationships are from that perspective and what they look like.

If you can read Italian (or French) you can certainly get into the extreme detail of it by reading this book.

Understand above all, what is the lie concerning familiarity with many women. I said above that having had lots of sexual interactions can result in an increased ability in having such encounters, obviously, but also that it had other “benefits” of status among your equally brainwashed peers and so on, and by extension in relation to your general life prospects. Sure, but it does that in the context of a fallen world.

My personal sense of self-worth or ability to achieve certain things in life, was never tied to the number of women I had been with. When I stated that:

Pretty soon I discovered a sense of things that I think few men really achieve in their life. A sense of self-confidence that I didn’t even know I was missing to begin with that can really only come from being validated by women we value.

I was referring to my ability with women. I never had doubts about my abilities on other aspects of life, be it work, politics, skills or whatever. The self-confidence with women was merely a confirmation (by these women) that my abilities in general tallied with my own view of them. 

I assure you that my intensity at any job I undertook, confrontation I faced, or difficulty in life, was in no way affected by how many women I had been with other than very tangentially. Because they had been with me (those whose encounters were of a duration that permitted it) and seen other aspects of my life, they had confirmed their noticing of such abilities by, in a sense, giving themselves to me, at times at least, also in a secondary relation to those abilities. 

For example, if you’re a millionaire, some women will get sexual with you because of your money. And in that sense it “confirms” you have money. It was never my case, but I had such “confirmation” based on other aspects of my abilities, often in cases that were not even conscious for the women. It doesn’t matter at all —consciously anyway— to most women, if you are a good martial artist, or painter, or poet (assuming the talent isn’t related to wealth), and yet, talented men will tend to attract more women. It’s a natural selection thing, but undeniably, after enough interactions, a pattern of “merit” of various skills could be derived by the number of women who took notice.

In short, being with lots of women only means you will feel you are able to get with lots of women. And while that skill may give you an ego boost, if you are rational, you will realise that if that ego-boost got you to a better job, say, it was not because you banged a dozen girl in a week. And consequently you will also realise that since you can manipulate your own internal ego-sensations, you can get the ego-boost at will.

I for example, have almost never been rejected after a face-to-face job interview, and it had absolutely nothing to do with my sexual prowess, I assure you.

Learn courtship. And no, it doesn’t matter if the woman doesn’t know anything about it or is not used to it. And no, courtship is not bringing flowers and being totally chaste and so on. Sure, it can encompass those things, for a girl that understands such gestures rather than expects them as a tribute to her superficial beauty. It means taking the time to get to know the character of this woman you are interested in. And being able to recognise Red Flags. Which are not necessarily the ones popular culture tells you they are. A man that stands his ground, morally, intellectually or physically, today is labelled some kind of aggressive bully, intolerant, backward, and so on. Society does not supposedly approve of a straight white male that tells you to fuck right off when you try to push your SJW agenda on him, or worse, his children. But guess what, women worth marrying, even if they might deny it from their upset mouths, or believe that no, no, no, they don’t want a “brute” of that sort, inevitably, deep down, ultimately, want to surrender to such a man.

I honestly would have to think hard to count how many supposed feminists, discovered they really enjoyed discarding the feminist card completely once in the bedroom, and then pretty much never picked it up again. Feminism is the female equivalent of sexual frustration rage that people like Elliot Rodger have. 

The male incel rage is: If I can’t get any of the pretty girls, then no one will! I’ll kill you all!

The female incel rage is: If I can’t get any of the deeply hormonally satisfying sexual relationships I want, then no woman ever shall enjoy sex again with anyone!

Well that’s a lot of time investment but where’s your proof?! (aka provide peer reviewed source).

Ok, my internet autist friend. Read more. See what Catholic cities, lives and lifestyles were in the 1600s, or the 1700, or the 1800. Learn who invented the actual scientific method. Learn who the greatest astronomers and scientists were in most of human history.

And if the past is not evidence enough, know that as of 2023, I know of at least 3 or 4 couples that have got engaged to be married as a direct result of reading at least Believe! and maybe event RTCC, but at any rate, of learning about Catholicism. I know of more that got married. And of at least a couple of people that have potentially avoided suiciding themselves because of learning about these things.

Beyond that, if you are hellbent on drowning your soul and future in pussy, there’s not much I can do, or even want to do, to dissuade you. If god has given us free will, who am I to try to force you away from the path to hell you are choosing?

All I can do is tell you of my walk along that route and why I think it’s a very bad idea in the end. I not only survived, but I got uncommonly lucky, and I say luck because I know who I am talking to here, people that either are, or were, or aspire to be, as I was, some kind of fearless pussy-hunter, and I don’t want to be so presumptuous to ascribe God’s grace to me to the extent that He clearly Has done so. Not because He has not, but because I don’t want you getting the idea that I think I deserve it. 

I know I don’t and didn’t deserve it. But God permitted me to have it anyways, and even better than I thought it could be. Of course, there are hardships too, but man, am I glad for these hardships as opposed to the alternatives that I would have faced in that life of headlong hedonism.

So I hope you have read this all, young man. And I hope you take the advice and use it to avoid all the pitfalls and traps that delayed and snared me, and make the future for you and your children one where the Klaus Schwabs and globohomo pedo-satanists of the world have their DNA eradicated forever.

And if you’re not all that young anymore, then I hope you are in time still. You can be, and yes, sometimes it’s up to God, but buddy, trust me, if you’re in your late 40s or even 50s, you still can get it all. Which is not to say you don’t need to move your ass, you do, because as my Grandmother always said: “Aiutati e il ciel t’aiuta.” 

Help yourself and heaven helps you.

But it’s still all doable.

Yesterday I spoke to a guy I used to know some 20 years ago and that I did some security/bodyguard/close protection/hello-sir-can-interest-you-in-some-fairness-karma-and-justice kind of stuff. We are the same age. He has 7 children (he started earlier than me, the weakling, so I only have 5) the youngest being 7 months old. And trust me when I say that he had very few redeeming human qualities. Having been who I was, I can say that without any malice.

If he can, and I can, so can you.

And in case you’re wondering, no, he’s not Catholic. But he is religious, and believes in his culture and his people’s traditions, and in fact moved back to his ancestral land, as, in a sense, have I. Well, I haven’t taken the Most Serene Republic of Venice back yet, but you know, give it time, I may do it just yet.

And if you are a Boomer, and managed to read this all without spitting at the screen about how your g-g-generation was the best ever, and how we GenXrs should just have lifted ourselves from our bootstraps, like you did, and all that, then do what you can to help your sons, or theirs, or a total stranger if it comes to it. I mean, hey, if you’re short of ideas, you can always donate to my project here at The Kurganate

Or like my own father did, help your son/s daughters own property/land/a business that they can develop and pass on to their children and so in in turn. Remember that most wealthy people are so because of generational wealth being passed down.

My ancestors were adventurers, explorers and handy with swords and guns and some with politics, but they also squandered their fortunes in some cases and made them and passed it on in others, but I plan, as best I can, to pass it all on. And to raise wolves. Good, strong, ethical, Catholic wolves, but wolves nonetheless.

I hope you do too.

 

THE JAY DYER DEBATE – Written After-Report

This is probably going to be a long entry requiring various updates I have divided this into four sections. I’ll add to them as time permits and if required by any commentary.

It refers to a debate between myself and Jay Dyer prompted originally by his zombie-like followers harassing me for months that I should listen to, debate, etc this guy. When I eventually, after a few months of this decided to go look at who or what this guy was it was clear within five minutes that he was deceitful and also exhibited some autistic traits (in the worst possible sense), and those of you horrified at me beating on a poor autist, remember I have Aspergers’ myself, so, relax. 

UPDATE: On that very note, ironically, I have noticed a fault of mine I must admit to. It’s not that I wasn’t aware I had this issue, I did, but the hundreds of comments both on my channel, at Vox’s blog, emails etc I got regarding this debate, there was a thin, yet noticeable pattern that in all fairness I have to admit I am almost certainly guilty of, and that would be a lack of patience and to a certain extent of charity too.

I would like to be precise, since this problem is ultimately one of precision and while from my perspective the issue is simply one of almost everyone else being mostly too stupid to follow things that seem obvious to me, it is also true that that IQ gap issue is a real thing and ultimately, given I am generally the one with the higher IQ, it is absolutely incumbent upon me to bridge the gap (insofar as it can be bridged, which honestly, sometimes I think is just not possible). So I have made an attempt at correcting below, in green so that there is no revisionism and my faults are exposed properly, what could possibly be misunderstandings rather than out and out deception on the part of Jay Dyer. I did make an attempt at this in the debate itself, when I said that perhaps we were talking past each other and I tried to understand if he perhaps meant something different than what I was perceiving, but Jay of course was busy repeating himself, and not really listening to anything so that didn’t work either, anyway, the rest below remains unaltered and my general reasoned and instinctive opinion, however, you could look at any green text as an alternative view I theoretically could have or maybe should have come up with instead if I was giving the befit of the doubt at every turn. 

It’s not something I tend to do because of my general life experience, but I can see that in some instances, and genuine argument/debate is one place, where in proper etiquette, it should probably almost always be extended, so if nothing else I have possibly learnt that, even if, in practice it’s a lost art and I don’t think there are but a handful of people capable of doing it. That said, there is objectively no reason why I could fault the green version of events on deeper reflection, so it’s at least possible.

The debate is here

UPDATE: Apparently the full debate has been deleted for whatever reason. There is however a 3 minute mostly recap of the internet bunfight main points.

SPOILER: It’s well made because I am sure it will let the idiots who follow Jay continue to believe they are right, despite the fact that Jay absolutely wrecks himself with the correct answer to the question: How do you interpret Catholic Dogma Jay? The answer, of course, is CANON LAW, which is precisely the point, the entire volume of Denzinger, or the works of  Ott, or Thomas Aquinas for that matter, are irrelevant, because HOW you interpret it, is by using Canon Law.

Jay Dyer’s original Video I was critiquing is here

and of course, my channel is here 

with a post-analysis for video (not as exhaustive as this post but for those of you who find reading painful) is here

***

PART I – Answering the spergs – This is simply a list of the false accusations made against me by both Dyer and his colony of gamma zombies with responses to the individual items. Some agglomerated for ease of reply, some with examples to show the level of IQ the morons making them have.

PART I A – The Denzinger Debacle – As this was a main point of contention and one his spergy followers couldn’t grasp I devoted a whole little section to it.

PART II – The actual issues – This will be rather lengthy and grow over time as I add details, this first draft is taken from the general notes I had taken and adjusted slightly to try and deal with the points made, it also tries to follow the original format of the debate in terms of Chronology but not necessarily.

PART III – Conclusions – My take on it all

***

Read more »

Vox Day, Joe Rogan and fighters vs training

Vox recently made a couple of videos on his darkstream about fighting and the differences between that and training in a gym as well as some comments of Joe Rogan and Brazilian Jiujitsu practitioners that drew some fire by various offended parties.

This topic could go on for hours, so I tried to limit myself only to step 1, the identifying of much of the bullshit that unfortunately is present in a lot of the martial arts world and even more so in the commentary on it.

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks