Andrew Anglin posts at the Unz a perfectly reasonable summary of the current Russian situation concerning the terrorist attack.
He basically says what anyone normal already knows concerning Russia, the CIA, ISIS and the Tajik retards hired to kill 139 innocent civilians.
But he highlights one very important point, which is the summary of it all in a nutshell that the average American still finds hard to swallow and understand; which might have something to do with the fact that the average American can’t reliably find Australia, China and Russia on a world map.
In any case, that key principle worth understanding is this:
What the Moscow terror attack shows is that all of the enemies of the US government, and the Jews that control it, will be treated exactly like Palestinians. And the only thing you have to do to become an enemy of the US government is simply disagree with their world domination agenda.
The US government is a mad brute. It is an existential threat to all life on earth.
In that he is absolutely right, and anyone who has had a real understanding of global politics since after the second world war, has been aware of that. The demonic freaks like Kissinger and his sort have been instrumental in creating foreign policy of this nature since the 1940s, and in fact were responsible for the very creation of the conditions that led to the Second World War.
We have all been trained to believe Hitler was a madman that wanted to conquer the world, but if one is to manage to understand anything about our planet and how it works, he has to put aside all the fairy tales we have been raised on and look at the cold hard facts. And those indicate that Hitler made repeated and serious requests for peace. He literally wanted to avoid war and tried to do so repeatedly. Now, that’s not to say that he was necessarily a great and good guy, but the way he has been portrayed as essentially an insane and literally the most evil man that ever lived is not based in reality either. Just as the Jewish Bolsheviks that caused over 50 million deaths of civilians from intentional policies of everything right up to starvation are also never mentioned as anything other than “liberators of the proletariat” is equally skewed, since no one has been taught to think of them as mass-murdering fanatic demons, even though they caused the largest mass murder on Earth. Beaten today and the years to come, only by the people who run the pharmaceutical companies that have tried their best to see to it everyone on Earth is injected with a generic serum that has already killed untold millions, and which may eventually outdo the Bolsheviks in raw numbers. And you might want to look at who the people that run those companies are. You know, out of general curiosity. Or where the hormone replacement injections created to sterilise and mutilate children who are “transitioning” are built and by whom, and where in the world. Again, just out of curiosity.
Anyway, I digress, but do I?
After all, it is useful to understand how the world works at a macro level, is it not? And if and when you do realise what the thread that connects seemingly disparate events becomes obvious, it becomes really hard to continue to ignore it. Especially since seeing it makes your ability to predict the future increase in accuracy by several orders of magnitude.
For example, one of the commenters at that very post at the Unz wrote the following:
Russia should make use of hit squads and proxies in western countries to deal with politicians, military people and officials that sanction killing innocent civilians and terrorism within Russia. Only if they knew that they were going to be targets themselves would they shut their fat mouths. It could be done in such a way that would give Russia plausible deniability, but the big mouths would fear that they might be next and this would go a long way to stopping the terrorism. Russia once had a very effective network of moles, spies and persons willing to work for their cause, in the west, they need to rebuild their network.
And he is exactly right. Wars and the other atrocities that we are now all being conditioned to accept as normal would end instantly if the people that planned them were the ones paying the price of being dismembered by an explosion that tore them and their children into scraps of meat, instead of some poor bastard thousands of miles away from them who has absolutely no power to change anything at all, including the murder of his little children.
Putin, for all his demonisation by the West, is still playing like a true gentleman. A strategist that truly understood the nature of his enemy with less patience or restraint than Putin has shown, would have been building his secret network of assassins from about 2008 on and would now be activating them in earnest. And if he were serious, he would not be immediately obvious, and the people suddenly dropping dead of new cases of suddenly would start at the edges of the circle, with those who are no longer at the centre of things, like retired mass-murdering sow Nuland herself. And would gradually corral the perpetrators into an ever-shrinking circle of concentrated evil.
Nor would this process end, as long as a single one of these monsters that toy with the lives of innocents to satisfy their own personal evil ideologies remains breathing.
Imagine what the world might be like if such creatures as Kissinger not only were no more, but were never born to begin with.
If you do start to think this way, it is common to arrive to the false conclusion that sooner or later, any ideology or philosophy or religion will arrive at a point where some mass murder will happen.
While there may be some truth to that, I put to you this idea: if you really look at the causes, far more mass murderous wars with a far greater death toll have happened as a result of the Kissingers and Bolsheviks of this world than by the rule of any Catholic leader or emperor that ever lived. And not by a small margin. We are talking MANY orders of magnitude more.
Why would that be?
Because Catholicism follows a principle of game theory that makes it clear it is the winning strategy. It is co-operative and does not force itself on anyone but must be freely adopted. In a future post on game theory I will get into more details of this, but in essence the statistically superior strategy is of this co-operative nature that has a rule on it that you are also protective and fight back. If a more complicated game can be set up, where you have sub-factions factions within groups, I would bet a lot of money on it that a group that would statistically be practically unbeatable would be one that follows the same Catholic model but with one small change: one of its internal sub-factions is a dedicated group that goes after any other group, be it the main group as such or one of its sub-groups that is hostile, and does not stop doing so as long as the other side continues being hostile. It would have to be a very complicated game because one of its threats could end up being itself, so one of the rules would have to be that this internal sub-faction can never become larger than a set and tiny fraction of the whole.
Well, Catholic history was pretty much exactly that until it git complacent and stopped training part of its nobility for war. That, by the way, is where the saying Noblesse Oblige comes from.
A similar principle to the word Samurai, which means servant. Yes being a nobleman entitles you to certain privileges; and certain duties. Amongst which, defence of the realm. Catholic leaders ran the necessary wars from the front, not from some subterfugeous tunnel at the back. And yes that makes such leaders somewhat vulnerable, but only if they are unwilling to have trained and specialised defenders that are expert tunnel rat clearers.
One of the reasons I am absolutely dedicated to Catholicism, and yes I need to specify it every time: the real one, the one only Sedevacantists still adhere to, is precisely because even if you were to strip it of every supernatural and metaphysical reality, and kept only the outward behaviour of it, it STILL models the healthiest, fairest, most secure and humane system of civilisation the world has ever seen in its entire history. And once again, if you just put aside the lies you have been told from birth, this become immediately obvious based on the simple and clear facts before us.
We have ALL been subjected to massive lies about pretty much everything, since after all, I too used to hate “Catholicism” because I too had been taught to believe that it was X when it was the exact opposite of X in reality. So this process is not easy, but it is necessary, and all you have to do is look at what’s before your eyes.
Who is it that tries very hard to avoid civilian casualties in the Russia versus the USA deep state? And who instead goes after the civilians?
Who makes it policy to play the victim even as they carpet bomb starving and dying of thirst women, children and non-combatants by the thousands?
Who is demonised for simply defending his nation, his people, or even just his principles or his non-violent religion?
Who is vilified online for simply saying Christ is King on Palm Sunday? And by WHOM are they vilified?
Who has lied and lied and lied about the events that have taken place in the past and are taking place now under our very noses? And who tells the truth?
Who controls the information and who presents it in this or that way?
Who pushes the child-mutilating tranny agenda?
These are not questions without answers. These are questions that have very clear and precise answers that are not difficult to find. The difficulty lies in you allowing yourself to ask them. For you have been trained to think that to simply ask the question itself, which is the most natural and normal thing to do, and that we all should do daily, is itself, somehow a terrible taboo that makes us the bad guys if we do it.
It’s a lie.
Ask yourself all the questions. And then answer them.
When you are ready to become a Sedevacantist Catholic, feel free to join those of us that have taken that step years ago, and help us build a better future that will be thoroughly insulated from the deceivers going forward.
Sometimes I wanna Believe…
…that Elon Musk got hit by lightning and he’s now secretly a hardcore Catholic fighting for God in secret because he’s surrounded by evil Satanists and he can only do so much.
I mean, Elon, if you’re listening, and that’s the case, let me know. I can put a teams together for you. Oh the things we could quietly accomplish…
But I digress (though, seriously, Elon, if you recognise that Christ is the King of Kings, give me a call, we’ll talk!). Everyone is REEEEEEEEEing all the way to Epsilon Eridani, because of this:
It’s that penultimate thing:
X will soon remove likes, retweets, and replies from the timeline.
Everyone is losing their mind over it, and I am smiling calmly. And I can’t even get on X. Reclaim your account? forget it. Sign up? I get a permanent error that says “something went wrong, try later.” It’s been showing me that for three months. But my calm smile is not out of envy towards those who do have an X account. I genuinely don’t care, but by removing likes and so on, what happens is that everyone is now just a prole. It doesn’t matter if people like you or not, if they don’t connect with what you write, you’re just another nameless, faceless pixel on a screen.
Only if what you type out on your X account is engaging enough, will you get people paying attention to what you write and what you believe, and this is only to the good.
The fame so many seek is not pleasant, or good. In fact, the unbridled fame and the shame that goes with it, requires a semi-constant vigil for things that could get you cancelled, while doing almost all of those very same things. You know, like rape, pedophelia, worshipping Satan, doing unholy orgies of sex rituals, and on, and on, and on.
But you see, all that fame, all that supposed power, is fake. And gay.
If I ever become famous for my books, it will be because of a massive grind that has gone on for at least a couple of decades, not because some Golbergercohenstein offers me a ticket. The only marketing I have done is to mention my book a few times on my blog after I launch it. And word of mouth. And that is in large part how I prefer it, and also how I know most of my client’s names. Because once you do a thing really well, regardless of of what it is really, if it has the potential to be exploited, and turn you into a gatekeeper. You’re Catholic, but not ALL Catholic. You’re a right-winger, but not too right wing. You climb the ladder by working hard, they tell you, but the reality is that beyond a certain pretty low point, to make it big you will be offered a ticket.
Without social proof, your meal ticket could enter through the only door on site, and if you blow your chance because you think he’s just some random guy you’d regret it. So what to do? Well, the solution is to treat everyone as if they were the prince, until the real prince reveals himself, or the white horse makes it clear to you that you need to move on.
The point is that the fame, the accolades, the drugs, the booze, the women, it’s all meaningless. And most people are on social media to have the last word and not listen much to anyone or anything else.
By removing the thing that addicted your amygdala to seeing the number of likes and retweets, you have taken away the fake motivator. The urge to write something, anything really, just so others will buy into the fake persona, and fake life, and fake surroundings that you keep pretending make you a “success”, is strong if you are in it for the money. But if you are not in it for the money, and you just do your thing, without knowing if one, or one thousand, or a hundred thousand people read your tweet, chances are you’re doing it because you want to or are compelled to.
And if you want to do certain things, confidently, relentlessly, and just rely on word of mouth and your friends passing on the message, eventually, the following you have, is one of real, organic people.
Because the Ben Shapiros and the Hollywood stars of today are created, they didn’t just get lucky, they bought the ticket.
So unlike the rest of the planet, I am all for removing likes, and retweets, and even number of followers. Let the actual talent of a writer determine how many people read him, not the amount of money that has been paid into the system to “launch him”, but rather, let only the quality of what he shares determine his success.
And yes, I am absolutely for a meritocracy.
No related posts.
By G | 30 March 2024 | Posted in Clown World, Russia and GAE, Social Commentary