Archive for the ‘Sedevacantism’ Category

Daddy-itis

I recently had yet the umpteenth comment from one of the MGTOW incels that thank God, are self-selecting for their DNA being removed from the gene pool, who, as usual, whined and bitched like the mewling excuse for a man that they invariably are, that you should “protect yourself” from women, divorce and children.

I mean, seriously, these guys make the most flamboyant homosexual look like a paragon of manliness. I also find it extremely funny and interesting that when I invariably thank them and encourage them to absolutely stick to their guns and never change their mind; that is, to make sure they NEVER reproduce and thankfully end their weak and irrelevant line of DNA, they tend to get irate and immediately begin both LOLing in text and trying to insult me, my children and wish death upon them. Truly, it demonstrates being a shadow of a doubt that they are simply absolute cowards, involuntary celibate and incapable of attracting a woman at all and are unlikely to ever do so. And like feminists try to convince other, better looking, sexier, more feminine women to become as miserable as they are, the MGTOW movement is essentially the same thing for men.

Imagine being so weak, so incompetent, so scared of life that you don’t even bother to TRY and find a good woman and make a family. Imagine being such a wuss that you whine and cry about “the gubment” not being on your side. When has it ever been on the side of actual men? Government, as Lysander Spooner pointed out a couple of centuries ago, is simply a coalition of the most violent thugs who take things by force. And they eventually get organised and call themselves government. They are composed of the laziest, most fraudulent, cowardly, vicious parasites humanity has ever created. And while in times long past sometimes these men were the result of courageous warriors taking leadership roles, and it meant from time to time their tyrannical exploits were at least mostly just, today, they are invariably toadies and worm-tongues. And have been for at least a couple of centuries for sure. So, which man, that still has his own set of testicles attached really sits there and whines about “…the government should make it easier for me to…(fill in the blank)”.

What a bunch of useless oxygen thieves they are.

Anyway, now that I have mentioned how I feel about these idiots, allow me to point out one of the infinite benefits of having children.

The littlest one, who has blue eyes like her mom, since my own mother also had blue eyes, has got a serious case of Daddy-itis. So much so that my wife has said if it wasn’t for the fact she breastfeeds, this little one would forget she exists.

The hugs and cuddles and laughter she exhibits just from simple things is amazing. As soon as she wakes up her first word is “daddy!” and then a rush to hug me and give me some kisses. Her first complete sentences are along the lines of asking her brother and mother “Where is daddy?”

She has the ability to interrupt practically anything I am doing by simply saying “Daddy…?” meaning she would like me to notice her and take time with her. The other day her eldest sister was playing a game with her, which consisted of her running towards her sister, then getting picked up and thrown in the air a little. She loved it and carried on doing it but required me watching each run. When I got distracted by missing one of the runs, she ran up to me and gently slapping my leg was like: “daddy, daddy… ook!”

She misses the L from look still.

Each one of them has their own way, the boy invariably asks me if he can help. I gave him the electric pruners the other day, standing over him and making sure he had both hands on them and instructing him all the way as he cut little branches of a bush I was clearing from near the fish pond. I didn’t let it go on too long because his mother was clearly having palpitations watching him snip branches that were several times the size of his fingers. Even so, I can see why farmer’s kids help around the farm by age five or six. A friend of mine was driving the tractor for his dad at age eight, and it was more difficult because he’s a little guy and he could barely reach the pedals. The point is that the natural way of doing things explains why people that were 13 or 14 years old even led armies a few centuries ago. We have been a few generations of molly-coddled, cotton-ball wrapped, bunch of weaklings for at least seven or eight decades now, but I am seeing how simply growing up in touch with nature helps our children return to a natural way of being that has been almost lost for Western men and women. I too was lucky in that I grew up with almost zero supervision outside the home and in as wild an Africa as you got back then, which is nowhere near what it is today. I often feel I was indeed born in the wrong century, either one from long, long, ago, or at least the 1800s might have been almost ideal for me, or then again, maybe a few centuries from now when exploring other star systems is a thing. Well, I think it might be a thing already, but I am just not privy to that aspect of it. Yet. Then again, it’s probably the case every man feels out of time when in reality they are exactly where they need to be.

I don’t want any MGTOW incels anywhere near me. I want men that understand what family is and who know what it feels like to have your little daughter have daddy-its, or your son. Or see one of your children have mommy-itis, like our second-youngest daughter has. And feeling genuine love. The love described in the Bible, that wants nothing for itself, but exists solely to give, and see the beauty in every little moment of the day.

I have never been a huge fan of Hemingway, mostly because I didn’t find his writing particularly great. I could approximate it even as a teenager. And a lot of his “manly stories” were the result of an almost obsessive need to be perceived that way. His life was a serial set of tragedy and drama and the final end of his life was frankly, pathetic. I do not say this to speak ill of the dead, I hope God had mercy on his soul and we all have our demons, but I think it was him that said that for someone to be a man he should plant a tree, write a book and have a child. Well I have done plenty of all of those things, and I have faced some dangerous situations and people, but above all, I think what makes a man is an absolutely unflinching ability to truly know yourself in the very depths.

And I have never met a man that qualifies under that definition that would not have his heart melt when at a two-foot tall little person runs at him every time she sees him, squealing “Daddy!” in delight, as if you had just returned from a six month trip to the Siberian outback, instead of just getting something from one of the garden sheds for five minutes, and who rams into your legs, hugging you then looks up at you full of joy and enthusiasm and stretches her little arms and hands up at you so you can pick her up and she can squeeze your neck into a hug that would be life-threatening if she was little bigger.

So, to those nihilists, boomers, black-pillars, incels, bitter losers at life, acidic feminists (there is no other kind, the PH of their vaginas is literally a threat to all life), and their insipid doom and gloom predictions, all I can say is: Carry on just as you are. Never change.

They are doing us the enormous favour of ensuring that genetic mishap that is them is never propagated further into the species. And that is good. All we want now are the kind of men and women that heard Urban II in the year of our Lord 1095, and listened to him, and acted accordingly with it.

It is no place for their kind or kin.

It is our time returning now.

There are only two types of people

Those who love the Truth and pursue it regardless of where it leads or if it agrees with their preconceived ideas or not, and the ones who lie.

The Joys of Antiracism

I posted on my long-since abandoned (but still present) blog back in 2011 how crime statistics in South Africa had been “hidden” for a long time, but the “hiding” was done in the usual African style of efficiency, meaning you could still get a very clear picture of how things really were.

They had put a moratorium on crime statistics for several years between 1990 and 2009 because wouldn’t you know it, after apartheid was ended the murder and violent crime rates went through the roof. And continued to stay there. Despite the South African Police Services and the office of national crime statistics doing that, no one told the hospitals to stop putting cause of death on death certificates. So when you added up all the “bullet to the chest”, “knife stab to the throat”, and so on on hospital death certificates, you still got a fairly accurate picture of what did not exactly constitute “natural causes”. The upshot of it is that in a very conservative estimate, for that 19 year period, there was an average of almost 24,000 deaths from violent crime a year. Every year. For 19 years in a row. That’s 65 murders a day.

I made the following comparison back then, 13 years ago:

COMPARED TO A WAR ZONE

By contrast, the total number of deaths due to the Bosnian war, which lasted from march 1992 to November 1995 and included instances of ethnic cleansing, carpet bombing and mass graves, has wildly fluctuating estimates, but these range from as low as 25,000 to as high as 329,000. Both of these figures are obviously wrong. The best estimate as a result of population census in 2003 is under 150,000 (more like 105,000 or about 25,000 per year).

This includes deaths from all causes, including things like poor conditions, disease and wounding or exposure as indirect results of the war, so is not limited to pure casualties of direct violence.

So a war zone that lasted the better part of 4 years could only do something less than a  quarter the death toll due to violent crime that the “peaceful and democratic” country of South Africa did in 19 years. In other words, a comparable figure of deaths in a war zone when YOU INCLUDE DEATHS FROM NON-DIRECT VIOLENCE IN THE WAR ZONE.

In other words, death by violent crime in South Africa outstrips death by direct military action (inclusive of civilians) in a war zone that included actions of ethnic cleansing (mass genocide) and carpet bombing. And has done so, year on year, for 19 years in a row. Why is this not discussed in the world media?

CONCLUSION

Now I ask you: Just how “peaceful” and “democratic” and “successful” do you think the new non-apartheid government has been for its people? Please keep in mind that the deaths are generally disproportionately slanted towards the non-white population by representation. In other words, the biggest number of victims are non-white and the biggest number of perpetrators are also non-white, both groups being over-represented for their representation as a race in the country.

13 years have passed since I wrote that.

Well, things have not improved.

Every day in South Africa there are 75 murders and 120 rapes mainly carried out between rival gangs and in the impoverished areas where police rarely venture.

Keep in mind that neither the statistics I demonstrated 13 years ago with their respective impeccable references, nor the ones above from a single point source are the real numbers. The real numbers are much higher, with official statistics stating in some cases that violent crime since 2012 is up by 77%.

Another point to keep in mind is that again, in neither case, are we even mentioning the lives affected by violent crime that don’t result in an actual dead body. Just you know, some mutilation, rape, severe crippling and so on. Never mind psychological trauma and other such things.

For those of you more concerned about my apparent “racism” in pointing out these absolutely rock solid factual realities, keep in mind too, that the majority of these violent events take place between black Africans. Which is not to say white Africans are not affected, they massively are too, but as they comprise less than 10% of the population, it is still a fact that they are not the main numerical number of cases. If they were, there would have been not a single white South African left by now.

Now, I ask you, is it any wonder that even the black African can often be heard complaining that life was better under apartheid?

Compared to this, was it really so evil for the old system to have created internal puppet states like Bophuthatswana, where the apartheid laws of segregation did not apply as they did in greater South Africa, allowing black African to be treated like equals but under a system that actually ensured there was law and order and it was not a giant murder-fest for the people living there?

Which brings me to a wider point.

No doubt, boomers especially will be aghast at my pointing out with hard numbers and facts, the reality that black Africans are simply incapable of governing themselves into anything resembling a European style of civilisation. Oh how rude of me. How racist. Well, the numbers are what they are, and are similar throughout the African continent.

And before mass immigration, and even now after it, crime statistics in Europe reflect the exact same reality. Most crimes and especially sex crimes are caused per capita, by people that don’t need to suntan to get browner. But your modern sensibilities would rather “notice” and be “shocked” at my impoliteness of mentioning this out loud, instead of having that reaction at, say, just to pick one at random, the gang rape of a minor by 7 Egyptian men.

But my point is even wider than that. And includes YOU specifically. Yes, you, the reader.

Because you see, in keeping with your no doubt shocked (or even approving) face, I am now going to remind you of something that every South African knows, and a phrase that was often used by white people there when I lived there.

“You don’t have to be black to be a kaffir.”

Or in American parlance, “You don’t need to be black to be a nigger.”

And lest you think I am going for some boomerism where I say some completely idiotic thing like “I don’t see colour” (everyone does unless you’re blind, deaf and dumb) or “there is only one race, the human race” (genetics and reality disprove this too, just like a chihuahua is not a doberman pincher, though both are dogs), let me be clear that no, I not only do I see colour, I also see ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, and everything else too. And I take notice. I absolutely do. So do you, I am just honest about it.

But all that aside, I want to remind you that you too are basically like a feral monkey that needs a big stick to be kept in line. Oh, your behaviour may not result directly in a wanton trail of death, sexual victimisation and destruction, but it still kind of does so indirectly. Your tolerance, your antiracism, your deep hatred of uncomfortable facts, mathematics and logic, creates the conditions where such violence and such crimes are permitted to continue to exist and even flourish. And why?

Well, because like the feral monkey you are, you simply refuse, or are intellectually incapable, of simply adopting a system of behaviour that guarantees peace, justice, the rule of people by just laws, and a system that allows anyone to have the opportunity to achieve a level of practical freedom and success that is based on merit and reality instead of nepotism, greed, nefarious action and deception. Or at least that allows as close to that as any system in the entire history of humanity has ever achieved.

Because you too, you feral baboon, still, despite all the historical evidence and proof of it, despite the unassailable logic of it, despite the absolute truth of it, still, refuse to accept the truth. And the truth is that of all the systems ever created by man, none compare to that created by Jesus Christ when he came to Earth: Catholicism.

So, until you submit to the rules of the Catholic Church, which has without shadow of a doubt created the best civilisations on Earth, you too, are just a feral monkey that corrupts and destroys everything on a longer or shorter timeline.

And of course, the only Catholicism left is 1958 Sedevacantism.

And your dismissive reaction is no different to the one of the average murderous black African when he is told that his way of life is terrible and he too would be happier is he stopped being a murderous rapist.

Just a Reminder

In theory, all supposed “Christians” who considered themselves “based” are in agreement with he above statement.

In practice, not a single Protestant actually lives by it.

If Christianity is true, then it necessarily means that a loving God who is the epitome of Truth, Love, Mercy, and… JUSTICE, has, necessarily MUST have, very clear and defined rules as to what is and is not good. And thus what is acceptable or not acceptable behaviour. This is why the Catholic Church and actual catholics have always maintained that outside of the Catholic Church there is no salvation. And that non-Catholics are not in fact Christians at all, but heretics.

This is also absolutely obvious and true regarding anything that is true. It either is true, just and correct, or it is not. Just as in math, the tiniest deviation from the truth will eventually lead to untenable errors and collapse.

Since the Catholic Church was there from the very start, with Popes and everything else, it necessarily MUST follow that EITHER the Christian God exists and therefore Catholicism MUST be true, and indeed infallible, OR the Christian God does not exist and all of Christianity is a lie.

Furthermore, we can tell that if the Christian God is real and True, then His Church MUST be infallible, that is, the official pronouncements of it must also be TRUE. And while any number of men and women within it can be in abysmal error, or even part of the enemy forces, the overall official position of His Church cannot be flawed. A Perfect God cannot create or allow an imperfect Church to exist on Earth. While He can and does allow imperfect humans (because Free Will) His Church will be supernaturally protected from error.

And this has indeed been the case with the Catholic Church, which has all of its rules written down in the Code of Canon Law of 1917 plus whatever Papal encyclicals were released up to 9th October 1958 when the last valid Pope died. Everything since has been the work of Satanists, infiltrated into the Church for at least 200 years and creators of the Satanic and Heretical abomination that is Vatican II.

The only people still holding to the truth and the official position of the Catholic Church are Sedevacantists.

Because tolerating evil, lies and fakeness is NOT part of Christianity and only Catholics are Christians, this is why Catholics do not pray with non-Catholics or consider their “Churches” as valid or relevant.

And in most cases the protestants get really upset about it, yet it is an obvious way to be.

It’s why I always make the analogy of how much sewage to you want in your ice cream.

The truth is ONE.

It is infallible. It is eternal. It is not open to corruption.

And the truth itself remains what it is regardless of what you feel about it. Just like God Himself.

So, if you are not a Sedevacantist Catholic yet, you may want to ask yourself why that is. What, exactly, is your position that you think it somehow can avoid these inescapable logical conclusions? Because there is absolutely not a single logical argument against what I have written here. In fact, the only objection I have ever heard worth mentioning at all, from even the most intelligent Protestants is simply this:

“I feel that…” And fill in the blanks. Well, I have news for you. Some people “feel that” they should be of a sex different than the one they were born as. And yet, surgically mutilating yourself doesn’t change the fact you will remain the sex you were born as, for the entirety of the rest of your life.

This is much the same. It really doesn’t matter how you feel about it. Maths is a thing. Reason and logic are a thing. The Truth is a thing. Your feelings about any of the above? They are not a thing to anyone anywhere except you.

Cristo Redentore e Salvatore dell’Umanita

Gloria Patri et Filio et Spiritui Sancto,

sicut erat in principio, et nunc, et semper,

et in saecula saeculroum.

Amen.

Pharisees are NOT your friends

Vox has posted a more detailed explanation of what I have been saying for nearly a decade now, and that is: Protestantism is corrupt from the baseline.

The blog he links to is definitely not pro-Catholic, as he absolutely lies about what the Catholic Church DID, if not about what was done by the Pharisees who have been trying to destroy it from the start.

As for the name of God, our Indo-European language tradition has an impressive and consistent history. In Sanskrit, the name was dyus; in Phoenician & ancient Briton it was dias; in Greek it was theos and zeus; in Latin it was deus.  The word YHWH never entered our Bible until nearly 1,000 AD when the Masoretic Text (MT) in Hebrew was completed and presented to the Roman Catholic church as the authentic original language and text of the Old Testament. The eastern half of Christendom at that time rejected the text as fraudulent and retained the Greek Septuagint of 285 BC, which they still use today.

        The name, “Jesus,” is the proper English pronunciation for His true Greek name of IESU. The Aramaic pronunciation for IESU is “yahshua.” That Aramaic name is then translated into English as Joshua. It was a IESU who led the Israelites across the Jordan into Canaan, their promised land. And it will be IESU again who leads God’s people from this kingdom of World into the Kingdom of Heaven. To use the Aramaic pronunciation, namely “yahshua,” is a mistake. Jesus, his disciples, and everyone else spoke Greek. Some of the Cain races who were their neighbors retained their native language of Aramaic along with the common language of Greek. Certainly, Jesus and his friends knew some Aramaic (He even spoke a phrase of it from the cross, Eli, Eli, lamasabachthani, where “El was a generic name for God. But Greek was their first language because it had naturally evolved from the Phoenician language of their ancestors. Those who claim that Jesus’ first language was Aramaic are simply wrong. Greek is the language of our people.

His lie, the implication that the Western Catholic Church is who believe the Masoretic texts and came up with YHWH, is typical of that kind of retardation that is absolutely required and prevalent for anyone to be Protestant. Namely, a total cognitive dissonance with any remotely logical aspect of reality. To wit:

The Catholic Church LITERALLY PUT THE BIBLE TOGETHER! And NOT from the Masoretic texts, which appeared only about seven centuries later! That is precisely what I have been saying on this blog for several years now. The Masoretic texts are the ones the Pharisees, or Talmudic Jews if you prefer to use the modern-day name for them, created, edited and perverted for seven centuries, before that sex pervert and literal hater of reason and logic, Martin Luther used them to still further cripple the original by also removing several books from it to make it fit his heretic nonsense fake religion: Protestantism. Only for it to be FURTHER perverted by the flaming Homosexual King James and his Freemasonic Bible the KJV which has over 33,000 transaction errors in it.

And no, the Catholic Church never “forgot” what the originals were. Not only did the Catholics, (yes with Popes, already) actually put the Bible together, they translated it into Latin. HELLOOOOOO…?

St. Jerome anyone?

The Vulgate is a Latin version of the Holy Bible, and largely the result of the labors of St Jerome (Eusebius Sophronius Hieronymus), who was commissioned by Pope Damasus I in 382 A.D. to make a revision of the old Latin translations. By the 13th century this revision had come to be called the versio vulgata, that is, the “commonly used translation”, and ultimately it became the definitive and officially promulgated Latin version of the Holy Bible in the Catholic Church. 

Saint Jerome had been commissioned by Pope Damasus to revise the Old Latin text of the four Gospels from the best Greek texts, and by the time of Damasus’ death in 384 A.D. he had thoroughly completed this task, together with a more cursory revision from the Greek Septuagint of the Old Latin text of the Psalms. 

After the death of the Pope, St. Jerome who had been the Pope’s secretary, settled in Bethlehem, where he produced a new version of the Psalms, translated from the Hexaplar revision of the Septuagint. But from 390 to 405 A.D., St. Jerome translated anew all 39 books in the Hebrew Bible, including a further, third, version of the Psalms, which survives in a very few Vulgate manuscripts. This new translation of the Psalms was labelled by him as “iuxta Hebraeos” (i.e. “close to the Hebrews”, “immediately following the Hebrews”), but it was not ultimately used in the Vulgate. The translations of the other 38 books were used, however, and so the Vulgate is usually credited to have been the first translation of the Old Testament into Latin directly from the Hebrew Tanakh, rather than the Greek Septuagint.

And here is the preface he wrote addressed to POPE Damasus I. Yes, POPE, because The Catholic Church has ALWAYS HAD POPES, and everyone knew the Pope was the Head of the Chruch on Earth until, you know, Satan came along and first with a schism of the East, then, almost 500 years later, with the pervert with a penchant for having sex with nuns and raping maids, came along and fooled a lot of people even further.

St. Jerome’s Preface to the Vulgate Version of the New Testament

Addressed to Pope Damasus, A.D. 383.

You urge me to revise the old Latin version, and, as it were, to sit in judgment on the copies of the Scriptures which are now scattered throughout the whole world; and, inasmuch as they differ from one another, you would have me decide which of them agree with the Greek original. The labour is one of love, but at the same time both perilous and presumptuous; for in judging others I must be content to be judged by all; and how can I dare to change the language of the world in its hoary old age, and carry it back to the early days of its infancy? Is there a man, learned or unlearned, who will not, when he takes the volume into his hands, and perceives that what he reads does not suit his settled tastes, break out immediately into violent language, and call me a forger and a profane person for having the audacity to add anything to the ancient books, or to make any changes or corrections therein? Now there are two consoling reflections which enable me to bear the odium—in the first place, the command is given by you who are the supreme bishop; and secondly, even on the showing of those who revile us, readings at variance with the early copies cannot be right. For if we are to pin our faith to the Latin texts, it is for our opponents to tell us which; for there are almost as many forms of texts as there are copies. If, on the other hand, we are to glean the truth from a comparison of many, why not go back to the original Greek and correct the mistakes introduced by inaccurate translators, and the blundering alterations of confident but ignorant critics, and, further, all that has been inserted or changed by copyists more asleep than awake? 

I am not discussing the Old Testament, which was turned into Greek by the Seventy elders, and has reached us by a descent of three steps. I do not ask what Aquila and Symmachus think, or why Theodotion takes a middle course between the ancients and the moderns. I am willing to let that be the true translation which had apostolic approval. I am now speaking of the New Testament. This was undoubtedly composed in Greek, with the exception of the work of Matthew the Apostle, who was the first to commit to writing the Gospel of Christ, and who published his work in Judæa in Hebrew characters. We must confess that as we have it in our language it is marked by discrepancies, and now that the stream is distributed into different channels we must go back to the fountainhead. I pass over those manuscripts which are associated with the names of Lucian and Hesychius, and the authority of which is perversely maintained by a handful of disputatious persons. It is obvious that these writers could not amend anything in the Old Testament after the labours of the Seventy; and it was useless to correct the New, for versions of Scripture which already exist in the languages of many nations show that their additions are false. I therefore promise in this short Preface the four Gospels only, which are to be taken in the following order, Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, as they have been revised by a comparison of the Greek manuscripts. Only early ones have been used. But to avoid any great divergences from the Latin which we are accustomed to read, I have used my pen with some restraint, and while I have corrected only such passages as seemed to convey a different meaning, I have allowed the rest to remain as they are.

So, yeah… the Catholic Church is NOT the one that was fooled into using the version of the “Bible” that was edited and messed with by people who literally HATE Christ and want him to be in Hell boiling in a lake of excrement. Nope. That was the Protestants. Via Martin Luther and Henry the VIII and then gay King James who commissioned the even further corrupted KJV and set up the freemasons Temples as the current houses of Sodom and Gomorrah that have always been: literal Temples to people who at the highest vertices all literally worship who…? yup, Satan. Coincidentally the same Satan that the most highly “respected” Rabbis admit is in fact, the real god of the Jews. A lot of those videos have been memory-holed now, because the genocide currently ongoing in Gaze is making a LOT of people start to take notice of how Jews really see non-Jews. Like, you know, calling us cattle, and saying it very clearly in their Talmud that any non-Jew who strikes a Jew should be put to death and that it is not a crime to rape little children, or kill or rob or defraud non-Jews. Don’t take my word for nay of it. Go get yourself a copy of the Talmud properly translated (really hard to do but they can be found) or, you know, just ask a really high up Rabbi.

Here is a little research you can start on with a couple of archive sites.

Archive 1: A general primer. Not the best references.

Archive 2: Famous Rabbi talks about what Gentiles are for in the Jerusalem Post. the article has since been disappeared, but was archived before it could be memory holed. Alternative copy if the first one disappears.

Archive 3: This is a whole archived book, and page 62 is relevant concerning the talmud, the whole book is fairly interesting but not as dense with references as I would like. Nevertheless, various Rabbis are quoted throughout the text.

Screenshots of the Talmud:

Henry Makov archive: No doubt this man will be vilified to the end of his days, but one needs to ask: Is what he writes about Zionism a lie? And if not… then why vilify him?

Larry Romanov on the richest man in the world.

But I digress. Why? Well because all the New Age, Woo-Woo, theosophy, Freemasonry, Illuminati, Carbonari, ALL have roots in and are often led by, Actually Jewish leaders. Just check who the leader of the Church of Satan is.

And look at the largest cases of mass-murder and genocide on the planet and who pushed the ideologies that led to those massacres. Look up who invented Communism, what the Russian revolution and how many perished and at the hands of whom.

The whole point here, my Protestant friend and ignoramus, is simply this: Do you really trust that these people, who absolutely HATE Christ with a passion of a thousand burning suns, to not edit the texts that tell us he is the true Messiah? And who called them a generation of vipers, and chased them out of the temple by whipping them in the face?

For 700 years.

And then they made you swallow gallons of that other made up word and cool aid: Judeo-Christianity. There has NEVER been any such thing.

The word didn’t even exist until around the time a Jewish guy invented contraception for women, which led to what? Oh, right, casual sex, which led to no-fault divorce, which led to abortion, which the French, who always massacred Catholics as commanded and directed by the freemasons that literally created America by financing the revolution and then the “Enlightenment” with its massacres of Catholics, have now enshrined into law. Yes, the French have now passed a law that murdering babies is a human right.

So yeah, is it really that hard to understand they pretty much brainwashed the Protties into believing some made up name is the secret, super-special, name of God that you should never spell out? It’s nonsense, it’s always been nonsense, just like KJV “Bible” which is literally known as the freemasonic Bible, is nonsense. No one who actually knows the very basic reality of the Bible and how it came about, and the basic history of Christianity for the first thousand years can POSSIBLY be so retarded as to become or choose to believe, to be a Protestant. It’s nonsense. Like really low-level, obvious nonsense. A child can see it. The only way you can be a Protestant is if:

  1. You are born into it and brainwashed into it from birth. Same goes for Islam really.
  2. You totally reject logic and reason, as you “Protestant Pope” Martin Luther made very clear you should, stating that “reason is the whore of the Devil.”
  3. You literally refuse to investigate the matter honestly on your own. I’m not asking you to believe me over the lies told to you by the people who loved you growing up, who in turn were lied to and so on all the way back to that deceiver Martin and his heresy. Nope. But I am saying if you consider yourself a Christian, then by God man, stop being such a lazy, ignorant, unschooled asshole. Pick a book or ten, go read up what was going on in the year 50, 70, 100, 150, 200, 300 AD. Go see how and BY WHOM the Bible was put together. Go on. Stop believing some cretin who calls himself a “Pastor”. What are you? Illiterate? Or just sickeningly lazy? Pick up a damn book or ten. I’m not even going to tell you which books. I have done so before all over this blog, but hey, ignore me, go find out for yourself.

This is also the reason why so many have been deceived by the Novus Ordo fake Church, created at the behest of who…? yup…Jews again, and Protestants. The Novus Ordo is no more Catholic than Joel Osteen. And probably considerably less so than the savages on Sentinel Island. The only Catholics left are Sedevacantists. And yes, uncomfortable as it may be for you, the truth is only Catholics are Christians.

So, yeah… who knew that YHWH is a nonsense word? That the rapture is also nonsense, that Martin was a deceiver and that the only law of Protestantism is literally Satanic (Interpreth as thou will)? Catholics. That’s who.

But hey, don’t take my word for it. Continue stuffing your face with plastic American cheese, believing “reverend” Gimmebucks and his wife Tammy are true leaders of Christ and not just grifters in skin suits and fake tits.

It doesn’t really matter to me all that much, I know it should, because your soul is in danger, but eh… we all have our flaws. I AM Catholic, but not a very good one, and although now over a hundred people that read BELIEVE! have returned to proper Catholicism, and several of them have been married since, and now have babies on the way, I really don’t have the energy to try and convince Protestants of much of anything. So you go on now. Go listen to Billy-Bobby-Jean the snake handler or Miriam shriekfest the female “Bishop” that is an LGBT ally in your “church”, at the crossroads of Protestantism and Satanry, on the corner of Inferno.

After all, Heaven is supposed to be perfect. Which means really stupid people probably aren’t going to exist there. At least not the stupid, arrogant lazy ones anyway. They are headed for warmer climates. So your not being there when (if?) I eventually make my way out of Purgatory, is really for the best, after all.

Jesus Christ is King

As some of you may know, apparently, being a Christian is anti-semitic.

This of course assumes that “being anti-semitic” means “telling the truth”.

Now, I doubt there are too many Jews reading this blog, but if there are, and you’re bleating in protest at the screen, all I can say to that, is: Be silent, liar.

Now, if you happen to be a Jew that is reading here and NOT bleating to the screen, or yourself, silently or loudly, but simply hate Christians and are willing to say so openly without playing the victim, but just simply stating your preference, or maybe stating why, you, as a Jew, prefer to worship Satan, or the God of this world, as your Rabbis are well aware and state so clearly, once again, at least you’re telling the truth, and on that single occasion and single event, and single matter, at the very least, as a Catholic, and therefore a lover of absolute truth, that attitude is more commendable than the first option mentioned.

And, always as a Catholic, we have always known, precisely who the Pharisees are, and what they are like, and how they feel about Jesus, and us as Christians. This is why in any valid, real, proper, Catholic Mass (the only ones left are the ones being said by Sedevacantist Priests and Bishops that say the proper, non-use cum Mass) there is the statement about praying for the conversion of the Jews. We know full well that they hate us and are our eternal enemies, who wish us evil, death and destruction and see us as nothing more than cattle to enslave, as, again, many of their most famous Rabbis have always admitted and said. But as we are Catholics, we do pray for our enemies. Which is not to say, that we “turn the other cheek” as your kind has so successfully indoctrinated the ignorant pretend-“Christians” of Protestantism and general Churchianity, which today, of course, includes all the Novus Orco fake “Catholics” to do.

We Catholics know full well that “turning the other cheek” is merely as regards to personal, inconsequential insults. When we are faced with an existential, murderous, persecuting and Satanic enemy, such as the Jews, or the ancient Roman Pagans, or the militant Muslims, we are fully entitled to defend ourselves, which as per our dogma of self-defence as well of Just War, entitles us to respond in kind and even pre-emptively so when required. And since you Jews are trying, and succeeding, in getting some Shabbos Goys paid to pass laws that literally outlaw the Bible, it is high time, that Christian countries pass laws outlawing the Talmud, which is a work of pedophiles that says in its very pages that it is not a crime to rape little children, or murder a non-jew, for that matter, and indeed ban the very practice of Judaism, since, obviously, anyone who subscribes such evil is not fit to be a member of any Christian society. And if you call yourself a Jew, then, clearly, you subscribe to being ok to rape little children, and killing non-jews, along with raping, robbing and lying to them too.

Christ is indeed King, and because we Catholics are a peaceful people until you give us reason not to be, we strongly advise any Jew, anywhere in the world, to immediately make Aliyah and return to Israel as soon as possible.

The inevitable noticing by literally everyone, of how Jews really see and treat anyone that is not Jewish, is unstoppable, even despite the almost total control that Jews have on the Mass media and literally almost all the politicians in the West, and don’t take my word for it, do the research of how this is the case, for example, here. Or perhaps more generally by reading the articles found here and then verifying for yourself if they are accurate or not. For this reason, the unrelenting noticing, it is very likely that at least some people, will, sooner or later, become so upset at the truths that we Catholics have known for two millennia, that they may decide to take unwise and violent action against any and all Jews.

We Catholics are aware that paradoxically, Jews hate us more than any other religion or people on Earth, and that is because we tell the truth. Which is why they have conspired to infiltrate the Catholic Church and destroy it for centuries, nearly achieving their aims by 1958, but, precisely because Catholicism IS true, they will not succeed in completely vanquishing the Church, as it continues to exist, and will continue to do so until our Lord and King returns. And paradoxically, we Catholics, despite being the ones you hate the most, have always, been the first to try to help you, first of all to convert to the truth, and secondly, to at least save your miserable and shrivelled souls for a little longer in this world, by avoiding the eventual inevitable backlash that comes to your people as a result of their practices. If you return home to Israel you are at lest among your own people and far from any such potential events. Of course, the fact that your brethren are busy geocoding Palestinians and carpet bombing starving and defenceless men, women and children may become a larger issue, but you know… something about chickens? Them coming home to roost? Especially given the things your people do to chickens in order to supposedly remove sin from yourselves, eh?

In any case, since it is now apparently illegal in some US states, but not anywhere else as far as I know, let us now look at just two, of the many verses from the Bible you have banned, because they tell the truth about your people.

1 Thessalonians 2:14-15

Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition

14 For you, brethren, are become followers of the churches of God which are in Judea, in Christ Jesus: for you also have suffered the same things from your own coutrymen, even as they have from the Jews,

15 Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and the prophets, and have persecuted us, and please not God, and are adversaries to all men;

New International Version

14 For you, brothers and sisters, became imitators of God’s churches in Judea, which are in Christ Jesus: You suffered from your own people the same things those churches suffered from the Jews 15 who killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets and also drove us out. They displease God and are hostile to everyone

Matthew 27:24-25

New International Version

24 When Pilate saw that he was getting nowhere, but that instead an uproar was starting, he took water and washed his handsin front of the crowd. “I am innocent of this man’s blood,” he said. “It is your responsibility!”

25 All the people answered, “His blood is on us and on our children!”

Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition

24 And Pilate seeing that he prevailed nothing, but that rather a tumult was made; taking water washed his hands before the people, saying: I am innocent of the blood of this just man; look you to it.

25 And the whole people answering, said: His blood be upon us and our children.

Now, why would anyone want to outlaw these statements? Unless they were absolutely true, of course, and you knew it, yet somehow wanted to escape all the other consequences that such truth would reveal about you and how you act towards the entirety of the rest of humanity that is not part of your specific tribe?

I mean, I can’t thing of any other reason. My own ancestors I am sure probably did some shitty things, but they do not inform in any way about me or my practices or ways of treating other human beings I may have. Firstly because they never did for the entire time I was NOT a Catholic, and secondly because today that I AM a Catholic, any actions my ancestors took were either going against Catholic Dogma, in which case, if they were bad actions then they were wrong and did wrong and there is no shame in simply admitting it and recognising it as such; OR, they did not act against Catholic dogma, but acted instead in unison with it, in which case, they did nothing wrong, since Catholic dogma is fair and just and true and treats everyone deserving of it as a human being. Which is why Catholics do not try to convert anyone by force, and, dogmatically, do not perpetrate violence of any sort against anyone who is not either perpetrating or committing or intends to commit violence against them, in which case it is their duty to defend themselves.

Now, if you are a typical Protestant, you may want to begin to wonder, why the Jews have taught you to hate Catholicism and believe in the absolute fable that there ever has been such a thing as Judeo-Christianity. You have a lot of reading ahead of you. I suggest you may want to begin with a couple of the books I wrote, since they are filled with references and you can verify for yourself anything claimed in them. You can start with Believe! (short) and Reclaiming the Catholic Church (Long). Both available cheaper on my E-store in digital format, or you can find them on Amazon, just click on the Books I wrote Icon at the top left.

Oh, and in case I wasn’t clear: Christ is King.

A Sober Realization

Andrew Anglin posts at the Unz a perfectly reasonable summary of the current Russian situation concerning the terrorist attack.

He basically says what anyone normal already knows concerning Russia, the CIA, ISIS and the Tajik retards hired to kill 139 innocent civilians.

But he highlights one very important point, which is the summary of it all in a nutshell that the average American still finds hard to swallow and understand; which might have something to do with the fact that the average American can’t reliably find Australia, China and Russia on a world map.

In any case, that key principle worth understanding is this:

What the Moscow terror attack shows is that all of the enemies of the US government, and the Jews that control it, will be treated exactly like Palestinians. And the only thing you have to do to become an enemy of the US government is simply disagree with their world domination agenda.

The US government is a mad brute. It is an existential threat to all life on earth.

In that he is absolutely right, and anyone who has had a real understanding of global politics since after the second world war, has been aware of that. The demonic freaks like Kissinger and his sort have been instrumental in creating foreign policy of this nature since the 1940s, and in fact were responsible for the very creation of the conditions that led to the Second World War.

We have all been trained to believe Hitler was a madman that wanted to conquer the world, but if one is to manage to understand anything about our planet and how it works, he has to put aside all the fairy tales we have been raised on and look at the cold hard facts. And those indicate that Hitler made repeated and serious requests for peace. He literally wanted to avoid war and tried to do so repeatedly. Now, that’s not to say that he was necessarily a great and good guy, but the way he has been portrayed as essentially an insane and literally the most evil man that ever lived is not based in reality either. Just as the Jewish Bolsheviks that caused over 50 million deaths of civilians from intentional policies of everything right up to starvation are also never mentioned as anything other than “liberators of the proletariat” is equally skewed, since no one has been taught to think of them as mass-murdering fanatic demons, even though they caused the largest mass murder on Earth. Beaten today and the years to come, only by the people who run the pharmaceutical companies that have tried their best to see to it everyone on Earth is injected with a generic serum that has already killed untold millions, and which may eventually outdo the Bolsheviks in raw numbers. And you might want to look at who the people that run those companies are. You know, out of general curiosity. Or where the hormone replacement injections created to sterilise and mutilate children who are “transitioning” are built and by whom, and where in the world. Again, just out of curiosity.

Anyway, I digress, but do I?

After all, it is useful to understand how the world works at a macro level, is it not? And if and when you do realise what the thread that connects seemingly disparate events becomes obvious, it becomes really hard to continue to ignore it. Especially since seeing it makes your ability to predict the future increase in accuracy by several orders of magnitude.

For example, one of the commenters at that very post at the Unz wrote the following:

Russia should make use of hit squads and proxies in western countries to deal with politicians, military people and officials that sanction killing innocent civilians and terrorism within Russia. Only if they knew that they were going to be targets themselves would they shut their fat mouths. It could be done in such a way that would give Russia plausible deniability, but the big mouths would fear that they might be next and this would go a long way to stopping the terrorism. Russia once had a very effective network of moles, spies and persons willing to work for their cause, in the west, they need to rebuild their network.

And he is exactly right. Wars and the other atrocities that we are now all being conditioned to accept as normal would end instantly if the people that planned them were the ones paying the price of being dismembered by an explosion that tore them and their children into scraps of meat, instead of some poor bastard thousands of miles away from them who has absolutely no power to change anything at all, including the murder of his little children.

Putin, for all his demonisation by the West, is still playing like a true gentleman. A strategist that truly understood the nature of his enemy with less patience or restraint than Putin has shown, would have been building his secret network of assassins from about 2008 on and would now be activating them in earnest. And if he were serious, he would not be immediately obvious, and the people suddenly dropping dead of new cases of suddenly would start at the edges of the circle, with those who are no longer at the centre of things, like retired mass-murdering sow Nuland herself. And would gradually corral the perpetrators into an ever-shrinking circle of concentrated evil.

Nor would this process end, as long as a single one of these monsters that toy with the lives of innocents to satisfy their own personal evil ideologies remains breathing.

Imagine what the world might be like if such creatures as Kissinger not only were no more, but were never born to begin with.

If you do start to think this way, it is common to arrive to the false conclusion that sooner or later, any ideology or philosophy or religion will arrive at a point where some mass murder will happen.

While there may be some truth to that, I put to you this idea: if you really look at the causes, far more mass murderous wars with a far greater death toll have happened as a result of the Kissingers and Bolsheviks of this world than by the rule of any Catholic leader or emperor that ever lived. And not by a small margin. We are talking MANY orders of magnitude more.

Why would that be?

Because Catholicism follows a principle of game theory that makes it clear it is the winning strategy. It is co-operative and does not force itself on anyone but must be freely adopted. In a future post on game theory I will get into more details of this, but in essence the statistically superior strategy is of this co-operative nature that has a rule on it that you are also protective and fight back. If a more complicated game can be set up, where you have sub-factions factions within groups, I would bet a lot of money on it that a group that would statistically be practically unbeatable would be one that follows the same Catholic model but with one small change: one of its internal sub-factions is a dedicated group that goes after any other group, be it the main group as such or one of its sub-groups that is hostile, and does not stop doing so as long as the other side continues being hostile. It would have to be a very complicated game because one of its threats could end up being itself, so one of the rules would have to be that this internal sub-faction can never become larger than a set and tiny fraction of the whole.

Well, Catholic history was pretty much exactly that until it git complacent and stopped training part of its nobility for war. That, by the way, is where the saying Noblesse Oblige comes from.

A similar principle to the word Samurai, which means servant. Yes being a nobleman entitles you to certain privileges; and certain duties. Amongst which, defence of the realm. Catholic leaders ran the necessary wars from the front, not from some subterfugeous tunnel at the back. And yes that makes such leaders somewhat vulnerable, but only if they are unwilling to have trained and specialised defenders that are expert tunnel rat clearers.

One of the reasons I am absolutely dedicated to Catholicism, and yes I need to specify it every time: the real one, the one only Sedevacantists still adhere to, is precisely because even if you were to strip it of every supernatural and metaphysical reality, and kept only the outward behaviour of it, it STILL models the healthiest, fairest, most secure and humane system of civilisation the world has ever seen in its entire history. And once again, if you just put aside the lies you have been told from birth, this become immediately obvious based on the simple and clear facts before us.

We have ALL been subjected to massive lies about pretty much everything, since after all, I too used to hate “Catholicism” because I too had been taught to believe that it was X when it was the exact opposite of X in reality. So this process is not easy, but it is necessary, and all you have to do is look at what’s before your eyes.

Who is it that tries very hard to avoid civilian casualties in the Russia versus the USA deep state? And who instead goes after the civilians?

Who makes it policy to play the victim even as they carpet bomb starving and dying of thirst women, children and non-combatants by the thousands?

Who is demonised for simply defending his nation, his people, or even just his principles or his non-violent religion?

Who is vilified online for simply saying Christ is King on Palm Sunday? And by WHOM are they vilified?

Who has lied and lied and lied about the events that have taken place in the past and are taking place now under our very noses? And who tells the truth?

Who controls the information and who presents it in this or that way?

Who pushes the child-mutilating tranny agenda?

These are not questions without answers. These are questions that have very clear and precise answers that are not difficult to find. The difficulty lies in you allowing yourself to ask them. For you have been trained to think that to simply ask the question itself, which is the most natural and normal thing to do, and that we all should do daily, is itself, somehow a terrible taboo that makes us the bad guys if we do it.

It’s a lie.

Ask yourself all the questions. And then answer them.

When you are ready to become a Sedevacantist Catholic, feel free to join those of us that have taken that step years ago, and help us build a better future that will be thoroughly insulated from the deceivers going forward.

Some Spiritual Realities

It occurred to me that there is something quite obvious about the various religions that I had never considered before.

Catholicism originated from the most absurdly improbable roots and was so diffused throughout the world that we literally date our time on the basis of the birth of Jesus.

First, consider that Catholicism, or Christianity, since the words are synonymous as ALL Christianity was always and only Catholic before the infiltrations and schisms were created by the enemy, allowed anyone around the world, to participate in a Holy Mass that was identical wherever you were in the world, and regardless of what language you spoke. This was the case since the 1960s when the Satanic impostor Montini, against canon law, dogma and Catholicism itself, changed the Mass in line with the equally Satanic Vatican II events.

Secondly, consider that it started with 4 women and 11 guys too scared to adit they followed Jesus. And it civilised the world. Despite constant attacks from gnostics, other religions, atheists, $cienc-eh and so on. It’s really quite astonishing since the divine principles of Catholic dogma remain unchanged after 2000 years.

So let’s look at what other religions had also a decent run, time-wise at least.

Islam, of course, Hinduism, though it is mostly secularised, 40,000 versions and counting of Protestantism, which can’t really be said to agree on anything other than “Catholicism bad”, Eastern “Orthodoxy” which is starting to split off like Protestantism but much slower and in any case is really quite schizophrenic historically and hasn’t spread itself very far comparatively speaking and the only fruits it can boast of is that presently Russia is the least cucked country on the planet. Novus Ordo fake Catholicism doesn’t really count, because this Satanic institution was only really “born” in 1958, when Angelo Roncalli became the first of the current and ongoing era of fake Popes, but really the infiltrators are mask-wearing Stanists. Satanism itself, in its many, many, many guises and under its legion of names, is, of course older than Christianity, being the first rebellion, or Protestation, against truth. And of course, Pharisaical or Talmudic Judaism which is what people who call themselves Jews today are. There is also Buddhism and Shintoism, and I think that covers the main ones. People LARPing at being “Pagans” really fall in the category of cosplayers at comic book conventions, if not furries and other fetishists, so we can’t seriously consider them, especially given their pitiful numbers and not insignificant mental health issues.

There have been many other religions that fell to the wayside for many reasons, conquest often being the main one, either physical or intellectual/spiritual. The Pagan religions of the Vikings for example died out because they gradually and spontaneously converted to Catholicism. The Mayan beliefs died out because the Spanish conquered them and the survivors converted too. and so on.

But the point is that only religions that have a spiritual basis in reality tend to stand the test of time.

And according to Catholic doctrine and belief, every one of those religions does, to some extent, square with reality, because they essentially are the creation of, or the literal worshipping of demons.

I will give a necessarily very brief and absolutely incomplete and also reductionist view of each of them below. It will be easy to critique any of these thumbnail summaries for being “simplistic” or incomplete, nevertheless, they will give a good and not unfair general sense of each one. And for good measure, I will give an equally brief and objective view of Catholicism at the end so you can get a feel for the level of both reductionism and oversimplification, but also of fairness and no overt or intentional mischaracterisation of any of them.

Protestantism – (See also Catholicism below) – The idea that a unified religion with one set of rules agreed to by a hierarchy that referred directly to God and was promised to be infallible until the end of time, should be split into each individual interpreting these divine truths independently and on their own, from one book alone, that had been edited and had parts removed by the founder of this hydra-like religion, who also expressly stated that because “reason was the whore of the devil” it should essentially be abandoned and all his ideas and theories (or the ones of your own head) should be accepted purely on faith. The obviously deaf, dumb and blind kind, one presumes, since reason could not be part of it.

Islam – the idea that a mass-murdering pedophile could do no wrong, and was the spokesman for a God that does whatever He wants arbitrarily. Reason is once again not required. Merely obedience. Conquest and conversion by force is perfectly acceptable, and should ultimately be done as soon as you are strong enough to impose it on non-muslims. Treating anyone not Islamic as an enemy, lying to them, and pretending to be their friend, but always holding in your heart the concept that they are enemies, being the right way.

Hinduism – Belief in a wide ranging pantheon of Gods for various specific things each deity takes care of. Some of these deities are said to have been historical personages from the ancient past with extra-solar origins, and others are considered to be proper deities. Regardless of either case, human beings are divided into various classes from untouchables to nobles that are like princes and reincarnation is the only way you can move up or down the hierarchy, and this is achieved by burning or not accumulating Karma in your present life.

Catholicism (today only found in 1958 Sedevacantists) – The idea that God came down to Earth as a man to take on all the sins of the world past, present and future, and any human beings who accepted this truth and kept his laws and rules would also be saved from separation from God and thus Hell. The baseline behaviour is to treat others as you wish to be treated and to spread these good news all over the world, but no one can become catholic other than by free choice.

Novus Ordo “Catholicism” – false representation of Catholicism that inverts its dogmatic principles in order to create what is ultimately a false religion, analogous to Protestantism, which informed much of its creation, alongside the push from Jewish interests behind it too and the obvious Freemasonic infiltration the real Church suffered for centuries.

Eastern Orthodoxy – The idea that keeping Christianity mostly confined to your own country, that there is no overarching authority in it, and that splitting from the origins of Catholicism, then asking their help when Muslims go to war with you, and when the Catholics come to help, you literally backstab them and try and murder them 3 times in a row, you are somehow the victim when the fourth time they sack your capital city. You also ignore basic tenets of the original religion like priests being celibate, which were in place both before, during and after the arrival of Jesus Christ.

Buddhism – The idea that life is suffering and eternal permanent death (Nirvana, the absence of all desire and therefore consciousness) is the ultimate aim of reincarnation. Mostly harmless in its wider worldly extent, but ultimately nihilistic.

Shintoism/Zen agnosticism/Taoism – While each is a distinct belief system, they all have Buddhist origins and generally do not refute reincarnation and veneration of the ancestors for guidance. In this respect they are similar to Catholicism (veneration of Saints) although not with regard to reincarnation, which Catholicism refutes as irrelevant and unnecessary at best and possible demonic deception at worst. The emphasis is on trying to achieve serenity, balance and harmony in everyday life in order to achieve it also spiritually.

Judaism – The idea that Catholicism is the worst possible religion on Earth and needs to be destroyed, and that all non-Jews are but cattle to be enslaved in order to serve Jews. According to their own most revered Rabis, the Jews worship the god of this World, known by Catholics as Satan.

What can we deduce by this brief thumbnail summary of religions from a Catholic perspective then?

  • Judaism most directly serves Satan
  • Hinduism could be said to serve various demons and/or long-since dead personages that originated from space
  • Protestantism and Novus Ordo False Catholicism are a perversion of every Catholic Principle
  • Eastern “Orthodoxy” is schismatic at best
  • All Buddhist linked religions that do not worship pantheons of false Gods (ie Hinduism) or even any specific “gods” are the least bad of the Pagan religious beliefs, though far from ideal as while many of them promote generosity and friendliness towards strangers, there is no clearly defined rules on it.

If you also look at the fruits born by each of these religions over time, we see that Protestantism and more recently Novus Orcism (they are Orcs, let’s call them Orcs) are merely tools to secularise Catholicism into a human based false religion The object of “worship” is a false idol. A God with no set rules, no set divine Laws, where everyone is “free” to believe s they will and is saved anyway because they agree Jesus is King. That is literally the same level of “Christianity” that demons have. They too know Jesus is King. the result has also been acceptance of contraception, divorce, and ultimately baby murder because babies get in the way of reckless fornication with people you do NOT want to have children with.

Eastern “Orthodoxy” is slow-burn Protestantism, and hasn’t produced much of anything but its stagnant state is presently proving rather useful as a bulwark to the disintegration of faith in general in the West.

Hinduism is a horrible caste system where your station in life is determined solely by your birth, and can’t be escaped, nor is it desirable to escape it since anyway all is karma, so why bother. The resulting inefficiency, squalor and destitution of the people who practice this religion, compounded with purely worldly attempts to gain more wealth by any means necessary, is rather well-known, and surpassed only by Judaism which is, however, very effective at it, since its central principle is to enslave the world to bring it under the yoke of the Jews themselves who will rule all the non-Jews as their property and slaves.

Buddhist types are for the most part the equivalent of mostly harmless NPCs. Individuals may be positive or not, but overall as a religion they do not cause particularly good or bad societies, and the tendency tends to be towards them being organised, clean, safe and efficient.

Catholicism is the only religion that has drastically elevated the whole of humanity while keeping the individual at its core as the important thing, while also understanding his or her role in the wider social context.

There are really only four routes:

  • Direct Satanism
  • Indirect Satanism
  • Indirect Satanism Lite
  • Catholicism

So take your pick of the oldest religion of all, or one of its offshoots, or Catholicism.

Good Luck.

It’s not stupidity

Following on from the point of my previous post about how people are literally unable to see the pattern of the enemy playing both sides of the same coin, is the other problem, of thinking evil bastard are just incompetent fools.

Even Vox, on this post, he says:

The behavior of European leaders like Macron, Merkel, and Boris Johnson does often strike one as significantly out-of-touch with basic reality. When they talk about “defeating Russia” or “sanctioning China”, it makes one seriously wonder if they are even capable of basic math, let alone capable of understanding that the balance of power is no longer in their favor.

But it’s not stupidity that drives these people. It is a personal self-interest that makes your average clinical narcissist psychopath look like St. Francis of Assisi.

People like Macron are not sabre-rattling against Russia because they are dumb.

They do so because they are thoroughly corrupt to the very end of their souls.

Be it that they are involved in sexual things so disgusting and socially taboo that they would be lynched in the public square if the average person was even capable of imaging what they really get up to, or be it their insatiable greed for both fame, power and wealth, or as is usually the case a combination of both, the sad truth is that the average person, or even the well-read and intelligent person, really has absolutely not even an inkling of an idea of just how ferocious these demon-spawned creatures in human skin-suits are.

Your brain, dear reader, is like that of the average “investigator” in a Chthulu Mythos “adventure”. And if you were to find out the truth of these “people” that the WEF has placed strategically around the globe, Hollywood execs have placed in entertainment, and “others” have placed in the chairs of Presidents, Prime Ministers and “Popes”, you would start leaking sanity points from both your ears at a dizzying rate.

It is an uncommon mind that can learn of the things these people do and not take sanity points of damage that risk making their life unlivable.

The only historical type of man that I am aware of that could have been Catholic Knights, who were usually noblemen that had been trained both for war as well as to be Charitable Catholic men from the time they could walk and speak.

It is not a pleasant path, but it is a necessary one.

Never, ever, ascribe to stupidity what can be explained by raw, unadulterated, total, selfish, evil.

Learn this lesson.

Quickly and deeply. There isn’t much time left for you and your progeny to do so.

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks