Those who love the Truth and pursue it regardless of where it leads or if it agrees with their preconceived ideas or not, and the ones who lie.
Archive for the ‘Sedevacantism’ Category
Just a Reminder
In theory, all supposed “Christians” who considered themselves “based” are in agreement with he above statement.
In practice, not a single Protestant actually lives by it.
If Christianity is true, then it necessarily means that a loving God who is the epitome of Truth, Love, Mercy, and… JUSTICE, has, necessarily MUST have, very clear and defined rules as to what is and is not good. And thus what is acceptable or not acceptable behaviour. This is why the Catholic Church and actual catholics have always maintained that outside of the Catholic Church there is no salvation. And that non-Catholics are not in fact Christians at all, but heretics.
This is also absolutely obvious and true regarding anything that is true. It either is true, just and correct, or it is not. Just as in math, the tiniest deviation from the truth will eventually lead to untenable errors and collapse.
Since the Catholic Church was there from the very start, with Popes and everything else, it necessarily MUST follow that EITHER the Christian God exists and therefore Catholicism MUST be true, and indeed infallible, OR the Christian God does not exist and all of Christianity is a lie.
Furthermore, we can tell that if the Christian God is real and True, then His Church MUST be infallible, that is, the official pronouncements of it must also be TRUE. And while any number of men and women within it can be in abysmal error, or even part of the enemy forces, the overall official position of His Church cannot be flawed. A Perfect God cannot create or allow an imperfect Church to exist on Earth. While He can and does allow imperfect humans (because Free Will) His Church will be supernaturally protected from error.
And this has indeed been the case with the Catholic Church, which has all of its rules written down in the Code of Canon Law of 1917 plus whatever Papal encyclicals were released up to 9th October 1958 when the last valid Pope died. Everything since has been the work of Satanists, infiltrated into the Church for at least 200 years and creators of the Satanic and Heretical abomination that is Vatican II.
The only people still holding to the truth and the official position of the Catholic Church are Sedevacantists.
Because tolerating evil, lies and fakeness is NOT part of Christianity and only Catholics are Christians, this is why Catholics do not pray with non-Catholics or consider their “Churches” as valid or relevant.
And in most cases the protestants get really upset about it, yet it is an obvious way to be.
It’s why I always make the analogy of how much sewage to you want in your ice cream.
The truth is ONE.
It is infallible. It is eternal. It is not open to corruption.
And the truth itself remains what it is regardless of what you feel about it. Just like God Himself.
So, if you are not a Sedevacantist Catholic yet, you may want to ask yourself why that is. What, exactly, is your position that you think it somehow can avoid these inescapable logical conclusions? Because there is absolutely not a single logical argument against what I have written here. In fact, the only objection I have ever heard worth mentioning at all, from even the most intelligent Protestants is simply this:
“I feel that…” And fill in the blanks. Well, I have news for you. Some people “feel that” they should be of a sex different than the one they were born as. And yet, surgically mutilating yourself doesn’t change the fact you will remain the sex you were born as, for the entirety of the rest of your life.
This is much the same. It really doesn’t matter how you feel about it. Maths is a thing. Reason and logic are a thing. The Truth is a thing. Your feelings about any of the above? They are not a thing to anyone anywhere except you.
Cristo Redentore e Salvatore dell’Umanita
Gloria Patri et Filio et Spiritui Sancto,
sicut erat in principio, et nunc, et semper,
et in saecula saeculroum.
Amen.
Pharisees are NOT your friends
Vox has posted a more detailed explanation of what I have been saying for nearly a decade now, and that is: Protestantism is corrupt from the baseline.
The blog he links to is definitely not pro-Catholic, as he absolutely lies about what the Catholic Church DID, if not about what was done by the Pharisees who have been trying to destroy it from the start.
As for the name of God, our Indo-European language tradition has an impressive and consistent history. In Sanskrit, the name was dyus; in Phoenician & ancient Briton it was dias; in Greek it was theos and zeus; in Latin it was deus. The word YHWH never entered our Bible until nearly 1,000 AD when the Masoretic Text (MT) in Hebrew was completed and presented to the Roman Catholic church as the authentic original language and text of the Old Testament. The eastern half of Christendom at that time rejected the text as fraudulent and retained the Greek Septuagint of 285 BC, which they still use today.
The name, “Jesus,” is the proper English pronunciation for His true Greek name of IESU. The Aramaic pronunciation for IESU is “yahshua.” That Aramaic name is then translated into English as Joshua. It was a IESU who led the Israelites across the Jordan into Canaan, their promised land. And it will be IESU again who leads God’s people from this kingdom of World into the Kingdom of Heaven. To use the Aramaic pronunciation, namely “yahshua,” is a mistake. Jesus, his disciples, and everyone else spoke Greek. Some of the Cain races who were their neighbors retained their native language of Aramaic along with the common language of Greek. Certainly, Jesus and his friends knew some Aramaic (He even spoke a phrase of it from the cross, Eli, Eli, lamasabachthani, where “El“ was a generic name for God. But Greek was their first language because it had naturally evolved from the Phoenician language of their ancestors. Those who claim that Jesus’ first language was Aramaic are simply wrong. Greek is the language of our people.
His lie, the implication that the Western Catholic Church is who believe the Masoretic texts and came up with YHWH, is typical of that kind of retardation that is absolutely required and prevalent for anyone to be Protestant. Namely, a total cognitive dissonance with any remotely logical aspect of reality. To wit:
The Catholic Church LITERALLY PUT THE BIBLE TOGETHER! And NOT from the Masoretic texts, which appeared only about seven centuries later! That is precisely what I have been saying on this blog for several years now. The Masoretic texts are the ones the Pharisees, or Talmudic Jews if you prefer to use the modern-day name for them, created, edited and perverted for seven centuries, before that sex pervert and literal hater of reason and logic, Martin Luther used them to still further cripple the original by also removing several books from it to make it fit his heretic nonsense fake religion: Protestantism. Only for it to be FURTHER perverted by the flaming Homosexual King James and his Freemasonic Bible the KJV which has over 33,000 transaction errors in it.
And no, the Catholic Church never “forgot” what the originals were. Not only did the Catholics, (yes with Popes, already) actually put the Bible together, they translated it into Latin. HELLOOOOOO…?
St. Jerome anyone?
The Vulgate is a Latin version of the Holy Bible, and largely the result of the labors of St Jerome (Eusebius Sophronius Hieronymus), who was commissioned by Pope Damasus I in 382 A.D. to make a revision of the old Latin translations. By the 13th century this revision had come to be called the versio vulgata, that is, the “commonly used translation”, and ultimately it became the definitive and officially promulgated Latin version of the Holy Bible in the Catholic Church.
Saint Jerome had been commissioned by Pope Damasus to revise the Old Latin text of the four Gospels from the best Greek texts, and by the time of Damasus’ death in 384 A.D. he had thoroughly completed this task, together with a more cursory revision from the Greek Septuagint of the Old Latin text of the Psalms.
After the death of the Pope, St. Jerome who had been the Pope’s secretary, settled in Bethlehem, where he produced a new version of the Psalms, translated from the Hexaplar revision of the Septuagint. But from 390 to 405 A.D., St. Jerome translated anew all 39 books in the Hebrew Bible, including a further, third, version of the Psalms, which survives in a very few Vulgate manuscripts. This new translation of the Psalms was labelled by him as “iuxta Hebraeos” (i.e. “close to the Hebrews”, “immediately following the Hebrews”), but it was not ultimately used in the Vulgate. The translations of the other 38 books were used, however, and so the Vulgate is usually credited to have been the first translation of the Old Testament into Latin directly from the Hebrew Tanakh, rather than the Greek Septuagint.
And here is the preface he wrote addressed to POPE Damasus I. Yes, POPE, because The Catholic Church has ALWAYS HAD POPES, and everyone knew the Pope was the Head of the Chruch on Earth until, you know, Satan came along and first with a schism of the East, then, almost 500 years later, with the pervert with a penchant for having sex with nuns and raping maids, came along and fooled a lot of people even further.
St. Jerome’s Preface to the Vulgate Version of the New Testament
Addressed to Pope Damasus, A.D. 383.
You urge me to revise the old Latin version, and, as it were, to sit in judgment on the copies of the Scriptures which are now scattered throughout the whole world; and, inasmuch as they differ from one another, you would have me decide which of them agree with the Greek original. The labour is one of love, but at the same time both perilous and presumptuous; for in judging others I must be content to be judged by all; and how can I dare to change the language of the world in its hoary old age, and carry it back to the early days of its infancy? Is there a man, learned or unlearned, who will not, when he takes the volume into his hands, and perceives that what he reads does not suit his settled tastes, break out immediately into violent language, and call me a forger and a profane person for having the audacity to add anything to the ancient books, or to make any changes or corrections therein? Now there are two consoling reflections which enable me to bear the odium—in the first place, the command is given by you who are the supreme bishop; and secondly, even on the showing of those who revile us, readings at variance with the early copies cannot be right. For if we are to pin our faith to the Latin texts, it is for our opponents to tell us which; for there are almost as many forms of texts as there are copies. If, on the other hand, we are to glean the truth from a comparison of many, why not go back to the original Greek and correct the mistakes introduced by inaccurate translators, and the blundering alterations of confident but ignorant critics, and, further, all that has been inserted or changed by copyists more asleep than awake?
I am not discussing the Old Testament, which was turned into Greek by the Seventy elders, and has reached us by a descent of three steps. I do not ask what Aquila and Symmachus think, or why Theodotion takes a middle course between the ancients and the moderns. I am willing to let that be the true translation which had apostolic approval. I am now speaking of the New Testament. This was undoubtedly composed in Greek, with the exception of the work of Matthew the Apostle, who was the first to commit to writing the Gospel of Christ, and who published his work in Judæa in Hebrew characters. We must confess that as we have it in our language it is marked by discrepancies, and now that the stream is distributed into different channels we must go back to the fountainhead. I pass over those manuscripts which are associated with the names of Lucian and Hesychius, and the authority of which is perversely maintained by a handful of disputatious persons. It is obvious that these writers could not amend anything in the Old Testament after the labours of the Seventy; and it was useless to correct the New, for versions of Scripture which already exist in the languages of many nations show that their additions are false. I therefore promise in this short Preface the four Gospels only, which are to be taken in the following order, Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, as they have been revised by a comparison of the Greek manuscripts. Only early ones have been used. But to avoid any great divergences from the Latin which we are accustomed to read, I have used my pen with some restraint, and while I have corrected only such passages as seemed to convey a different meaning, I have allowed the rest to remain as they are.
So, yeah… the Catholic Church is NOT the one that was fooled into using the version of the “Bible” that was edited and messed with by people who literally HATE Christ and want him to be in Hell boiling in a lake of excrement. Nope. That was the Protestants. Via Martin Luther and Henry the VIII and then gay King James who commissioned the even further corrupted KJV and set up the freemasons Temples as the current houses of Sodom and Gomorrah that have always been: literal Temples to people who at the highest vertices all literally worship who…? yup, Satan. Coincidentally the same Satan that the most highly “respected” Rabbis admit is in fact, the real god of the Jews. A lot of those videos have been memory-holed now, because the genocide currently ongoing in Gaze is making a LOT of people start to take notice of how Jews really see non-Jews. Like, you know, calling us cattle, and saying it very clearly in their Talmud that any non-Jew who strikes a Jew should be put to death and that it is not a crime to rape little children, or kill or rob or defraud non-Jews. Don’t take my word for nay of it. Go get yourself a copy of the Talmud properly translated (really hard to do but they can be found) or, you know, just ask a really high up Rabbi.
Here is a little research you can start on with a couple of archive sites.
Archive 1: A general primer. Not the best references.
Archive 2: Famous Rabbi talks about what Gentiles are for in the Jerusalem Post. the article has since been disappeared, but was archived before it could be memory holed. Alternative copy if the first one disappears.
Archive 3: This is a whole archived book, and page 62 is relevant concerning the talmud, the whole book is fairly interesting but not as dense with references as I would like. Nevertheless, various Rabbis are quoted throughout the text.
Screenshots of the Talmud:
Henry Makov archive: No doubt this man will be vilified to the end of his days, but one needs to ask: Is what he writes about Zionism a lie? And if not… then why vilify him?
Larry Romanov on the richest man in the world.
But I digress. Why? Well because all the New Age, Woo-Woo, theosophy, Freemasonry, Illuminati, Carbonari, ALL have roots in and are often led by, Actually Jewish leaders. Just check who the leader of the Church of Satan is.
And look at the largest cases of mass-murder and genocide on the planet and who pushed the ideologies that led to those massacres. Look up who invented Communism, what the Russian revolution and how many perished and at the hands of whom.
The whole point here, my Protestant friend and ignoramus, is simply this: Do you really trust that these people, who absolutely HATE Christ with a passion of a thousand burning suns, to not edit the texts that tell us he is the true Messiah? And who called them a generation of vipers, and chased them out of the temple by whipping them in the face?
For 700 years.
And then they made you swallow gallons of that other made up word and cool aid: Judeo-Christianity. There has NEVER been any such thing.
The word didn’t even exist until around the time a Jewish guy invented contraception for women, which led to what? Oh, right, casual sex, which led to no-fault divorce, which led to abortion, which the French, who always massacred Catholics as commanded and directed by the freemasons that literally created America by financing the revolution and then the “Enlightenment” with its massacres of Catholics, have now enshrined into law. Yes, the French have now passed a law that murdering babies is a human right.
So yeah, is it really that hard to understand they pretty much brainwashed the Protties into believing some made up name is the secret, super-special, name of God that you should never spell out? It’s nonsense, it’s always been nonsense, just like KJV “Bible” which is literally known as the freemasonic Bible, is nonsense. No one who actually knows the very basic reality of the Bible and how it came about, and the basic history of Christianity for the first thousand years can POSSIBLY be so retarded as to become or choose to believe, to be a Protestant. It’s nonsense. Like really low-level, obvious nonsense. A child can see it. The only way you can be a Protestant is if:
- You are born into it and brainwashed into it from birth. Same goes for Islam really.
- You totally reject logic and reason, as you “Protestant Pope” Martin Luther made very clear you should, stating that “reason is the whore of the Devil.”
- You literally refuse to investigate the matter honestly on your own. I’m not asking you to believe me over the lies told to you by the people who loved you growing up, who in turn were lied to and so on all the way back to that deceiver Martin and his heresy. Nope. But I am saying if you consider yourself a Christian, then by God man, stop being such a lazy, ignorant, unschooled asshole. Pick a book or ten, go read up what was going on in the year 50, 70, 100, 150, 200, 300 AD. Go see how and BY WHOM the Bible was put together. Go on. Stop believing some cretin who calls himself a “Pastor”. What are you? Illiterate? Or just sickeningly lazy? Pick up a damn book or ten. I’m not even going to tell you which books. I have done so before all over this blog, but hey, ignore me, go find out for yourself.
This is also the reason why so many have been deceived by the Novus Ordo fake Church, created at the behest of who…? yup…Jews again, and Protestants. The Novus Ordo is no more Catholic than Joel Osteen. And probably considerably less so than the savages on Sentinel Island. The only Catholics left are Sedevacantists. And yes, uncomfortable as it may be for you, the truth is only Catholics are Christians.
So, yeah… who knew that YHWH is a nonsense word? That the rapture is also nonsense, that Martin was a deceiver and that the only law of Protestantism is literally Satanic (Interpreth as thou will)? Catholics. That’s who.
But hey, don’t take my word for it. Continue stuffing your face with plastic American cheese, believing “reverend” Gimmebucks and his wife Tammy are true leaders of Christ and not just grifters in skin suits and fake tits.
It doesn’t really matter to me all that much, I know it should, because your soul is in danger, but eh… we all have our flaws. I AM Catholic, but not a very good one, and although now over a hundred people that read BELIEVE! have returned to proper Catholicism, and several of them have been married since, and now have babies on the way, I really don’t have the energy to try and convince Protestants of much of anything. So you go on now. Go listen to Billy-Bobby-Jean the snake handler or Miriam shriekfest the female “Bishop” that is an LGBT ally in your “church”, at the crossroads of Protestantism and Satanry, on the corner of Inferno.
After all, Heaven is supposed to be perfect. Which means really stupid people probably aren’t going to exist there. At least not the stupid, arrogant lazy ones anyway. They are headed for warmer climates. So your not being there when (if?) I eventually make my way out of Purgatory, is really for the best, after all.
Some Spiritual Realities
It occurred to me that there is something quite obvious about the various religions that I had never considered before.
Catholicism originated from the most absurdly improbable roots and was so diffused throughout the world that we literally date our time on the basis of the birth of Jesus.
First, consider that Catholicism, or Christianity, since the words are synonymous as ALL Christianity was always and only Catholic before the infiltrations and schisms were created by the enemy, allowed anyone around the world, to participate in a Holy Mass that was identical wherever you were in the world, and regardless of what language you spoke. This was the case since the 1960s when the Satanic impostor Montini, against canon law, dogma and Catholicism itself, changed the Mass in line with the equally Satanic Vatican II events.
Secondly, consider that it started with 4 women and 11 guys too scared to adit they followed Jesus. And it civilised the world. Despite constant attacks from gnostics, other religions, atheists, $cienc-eh and so on. It’s really quite astonishing since the divine principles of Catholic dogma remain unchanged after 2000 years.
So let’s look at what other religions had also a decent run, time-wise at least.
Islam, of course, Hinduism, though it is mostly secularised, 40,000 versions and counting of Protestantism, which can’t really be said to agree on anything other than “Catholicism bad”, Eastern “Orthodoxy” which is starting to split off like Protestantism but much slower and in any case is really quite schizophrenic historically and hasn’t spread itself very far comparatively speaking and the only fruits it can boast of is that presently Russia is the least cucked country on the planet. Novus Ordo fake Catholicism doesn’t really count, because this Satanic institution was only really “born” in 1958, when Angelo Roncalli became the first of the current and ongoing era of fake Popes, but really the infiltrators are mask-wearing Stanists. Satanism itself, in its many, many, many guises and under its legion of names, is, of course older than Christianity, being the first rebellion, or Protestation, against truth. And of course, Pharisaical or Talmudic Judaism which is what people who call themselves Jews today are. There is also Buddhism and Shintoism, and I think that covers the main ones. People LARPing at being “Pagans” really fall in the category of cosplayers at comic book conventions, if not furries and other fetishists, so we can’t seriously consider them, especially given their pitiful numbers and not insignificant mental health issues.
There have been many other religions that fell to the wayside for many reasons, conquest often being the main one, either physical or intellectual/spiritual. The Pagan religions of the Vikings for example died out because they gradually and spontaneously converted to Catholicism. The Mayan beliefs died out because the Spanish conquered them and the survivors converted too. and so on.
But the point is that only religions that have a spiritual basis in reality tend to stand the test of time.
And according to Catholic doctrine and belief, every one of those religions does, to some extent, square with reality, because they essentially are the creation of, or the literal worshipping of demons.
I will give a necessarily very brief and absolutely incomplete and also reductionist view of each of them below. It will be easy to critique any of these thumbnail summaries for being “simplistic” or incomplete, nevertheless, they will give a good and not unfair general sense of each one. And for good measure, I will give an equally brief and objective view of Catholicism at the end so you can get a feel for the level of both reductionism and oversimplification, but also of fairness and no overt or intentional mischaracterisation of any of them.
Protestantism – (See also Catholicism below) – The idea that a unified religion with one set of rules agreed to by a hierarchy that referred directly to God and was promised to be infallible until the end of time, should be split into each individual interpreting these divine truths independently and on their own, from one book alone, that had been edited and had parts removed by the founder of this hydra-like religion, who also expressly stated that because “reason was the whore of the devil” it should essentially be abandoned and all his ideas and theories (or the ones of your own head) should be accepted purely on faith. The obviously deaf, dumb and blind kind, one presumes, since reason could not be part of it.
Islam – the idea that a mass-murdering pedophile could do no wrong, and was the spokesman for a God that does whatever He wants arbitrarily. Reason is once again not required. Merely obedience. Conquest and conversion by force is perfectly acceptable, and should ultimately be done as soon as you are strong enough to impose it on non-muslims. Treating anyone not Islamic as an enemy, lying to them, and pretending to be their friend, but always holding in your heart the concept that they are enemies, being the right way.
Hinduism – Belief in a wide ranging pantheon of Gods for various specific things each deity takes care of. Some of these deities are said to have been historical personages from the ancient past with extra-solar origins, and others are considered to be proper deities. Regardless of either case, human beings are divided into various classes from untouchables to nobles that are like princes and reincarnation is the only way you can move up or down the hierarchy, and this is achieved by burning or not accumulating Karma in your present life.
Catholicism (today only found in 1958 Sedevacantists) – The idea that God came down to Earth as a man to take on all the sins of the world past, present and future, and any human beings who accepted this truth and kept his laws and rules would also be saved from separation from God and thus Hell. The baseline behaviour is to treat others as you wish to be treated and to spread these good news all over the world, but no one can become catholic other than by free choice.
Novus Ordo “Catholicism” – false representation of Catholicism that inverts its dogmatic principles in order to create what is ultimately a false religion, analogous to Protestantism, which informed much of its creation, alongside the push from Jewish interests behind it too and the obvious Freemasonic infiltration the real Church suffered for centuries.
Eastern Orthodoxy – The idea that keeping Christianity mostly confined to your own country, that there is no overarching authority in it, and that splitting from the origins of Catholicism, then asking their help when Muslims go to war with you, and when the Catholics come to help, you literally backstab them and try and murder them 3 times in a row, you are somehow the victim when the fourth time they sack your capital city. You also ignore basic tenets of the original religion like priests being celibate, which were in place both before, during and after the arrival of Jesus Christ.
Buddhism – The idea that life is suffering and eternal permanent death (Nirvana, the absence of all desire and therefore consciousness) is the ultimate aim of reincarnation. Mostly harmless in its wider worldly extent, but ultimately nihilistic.
Shintoism/Zen agnosticism/Taoism – While each is a distinct belief system, they all have Buddhist origins and generally do not refute reincarnation and veneration of the ancestors for guidance. In this respect they are similar to Catholicism (veneration of Saints) although not with regard to reincarnation, which Catholicism refutes as irrelevant and unnecessary at best and possible demonic deception at worst. The emphasis is on trying to achieve serenity, balance and harmony in everyday life in order to achieve it also spiritually.
Judaism – The idea that Catholicism is the worst possible religion on Earth and needs to be destroyed, and that all non-Jews are but cattle to be enslaved in order to serve Jews. According to their own most revered Rabis, the Jews worship the god of this World, known by Catholics as Satan.
What can we deduce by this brief thumbnail summary of religions from a Catholic perspective then?
- Judaism most directly serves Satan
- Hinduism could be said to serve various demons and/or long-since dead personages that originated from space
- Protestantism and Novus Ordo False Catholicism are a perversion of every Catholic Principle
- Eastern “Orthodoxy” is schismatic at best
- All Buddhist linked religions that do not worship pantheons of false Gods (ie Hinduism) or even any specific “gods” are the least bad of the Pagan religious beliefs, though far from ideal as while many of them promote generosity and friendliness towards strangers, there is no clearly defined rules on it.
If you also look at the fruits born by each of these religions over time, we see that Protestantism and more recently Novus Orcism (they are Orcs, let’s call them Orcs) are merely tools to secularise Catholicism into a human based false religion The object of “worship” is a false idol. A God with no set rules, no set divine Laws, where everyone is “free” to believe s they will and is saved anyway because they agree Jesus is King. That is literally the same level of “Christianity” that demons have. They too know Jesus is King. the result has also been acceptance of contraception, divorce, and ultimately baby murder because babies get in the way of reckless fornication with people you do NOT want to have children with.
Eastern “Orthodoxy” is slow-burn Protestantism, and hasn’t produced much of anything but its stagnant state is presently proving rather useful as a bulwark to the disintegration of faith in general in the West.
Hinduism is a horrible caste system where your station in life is determined solely by your birth, and can’t be escaped, nor is it desirable to escape it since anyway all is karma, so why bother. The resulting inefficiency, squalor and destitution of the people who practice this religion, compounded with purely worldly attempts to gain more wealth by any means necessary, is rather well-known, and surpassed only by Judaism which is, however, very effective at it, since its central principle is to enslave the world to bring it under the yoke of the Jews themselves who will rule all the non-Jews as their property and slaves.
Buddhist types are for the most part the equivalent of mostly harmless NPCs. Individuals may be positive or not, but overall as a religion they do not cause particularly good or bad societies, and the tendency tends to be towards them being organised, clean, safe and efficient.
Catholicism is the only religion that has drastically elevated the whole of humanity while keeping the individual at its core as the important thing, while also understanding his or her role in the wider social context.
There are really only four routes:
- Direct Satanism
- Indirect Satanism
- Indirect Satanism Lite
- Catholicism
So take your pick of the oldest religion of all, or one of its offshoots, or Catholicism.
Good Luck.
Blog Topics
- Categories
- Actual Science
- Agnostic Christianity
- Ancient Technology
- Artificial Intelligence
- Billionaire Pedophiles
- Book Review
- Books
- Brain-Mind Functionality
- Caveman Theory
- Christianity
- Clown World
- Cypto
- Farming Life
- Female Socio-Sexual Hierarchy
- Fighting SJWs
- Film Review
- Freemasons
- Gammas
- Guns
- HAARP Attacks
- Hard Facts
- Heretics
- Human Performance
- Humour
- Hypnosis
- Impostors and Frauds
- Increasing Happiness
- Kurgan Art
- Martial Arts
- Mass Murderers
- Nazi Conspiracies
- News
- On War And Civil Unrest
- Poll
- Relationships
- Retards
- RPGs
- Russia and GAE
- Social Commentary
- Stupid PUAs
- The Enemy Within
- The Jews
- Theoretical Models of Society
- Travel
- Writing
- Zombie Apocalypse
- Categories
Blog Archives
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- April 2016
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- November 2013
- October 2013
- March 2013
- December 2012
- August 2012
- March 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
Daddy-itis
I recently had yet the umpteenth comment from one of the MGTOW incels that thank God, are self-selecting for their DNA being removed from the gene pool, who, as usual, whined and bitched like the mewling excuse for a man that they invariably are, that you should “protect yourself” from women, divorce and children.
I mean, seriously, these guys make the most flamboyant homosexual look like a paragon of manliness. I also find it extremely funny and interesting that when I invariably thank them and encourage them to absolutely stick to their guns and never change their mind; that is, to make sure they NEVER reproduce and thankfully end their weak and irrelevant line of DNA, they tend to get irate and immediately begin both LOLing in text and trying to insult me, my children and wish death upon them. Truly, it demonstrates being a shadow of a doubt that they are simply absolute cowards, involuntary celibate and incapable of attracting a woman at all and are unlikely to ever do so. And like feminists try to convince other, better looking, sexier, more feminine women to become as miserable as they are, the MGTOW movement is essentially the same thing for men.
Imagine being so weak, so incompetent, so scared of life that you don’t even bother to TRY and find a good woman and make a family. Imagine being such a wuss that you whine and cry about “the gubment” not being on your side. When has it ever been on the side of actual men? Government, as Lysander Spooner pointed out a couple of centuries ago, is simply a coalition of the most violent thugs who take things by force. And they eventually get organised and call themselves government. They are composed of the laziest, most fraudulent, cowardly, vicious parasites humanity has ever created. And while in times long past sometimes these men were the result of courageous warriors taking leadership roles, and it meant from time to time their tyrannical exploits were at least mostly just, today, they are invariably toadies and worm-tongues. And have been for at least a couple of centuries for sure. So, which man, that still has his own set of testicles attached really sits there and whines about “…the government should make it easier for me to…(fill in the blank)”.
What a bunch of useless oxygen thieves they are.
Anyway, now that I have mentioned how I feel about these idiots, allow me to point out one of the infinite benefits of having children.
The littlest one, who has blue eyes like her mom, since my own mother also had blue eyes, has got a serious case of Daddy-itis. So much so that my wife has said if it wasn’t for the fact she breastfeeds, this little one would forget she exists.
The hugs and cuddles and laughter she exhibits just from simple things is amazing. As soon as she wakes up her first word is “daddy!” and then a rush to hug me and give me some kisses. Her first complete sentences are along the lines of asking her brother and mother “Where is daddy?”
She has the ability to interrupt practically anything I am doing by simply saying “Daddy…?” meaning she would like me to notice her and take time with her. The other day her eldest sister was playing a game with her, which consisted of her running towards her sister, then getting picked up and thrown in the air a little. She loved it and carried on doing it but required me watching each run. When I got distracted by missing one of the runs, she ran up to me and gently slapping my leg was like: “daddy, daddy… ook!”
She misses the L from look still.
Each one of them has their own way, the boy invariably asks me if he can help. I gave him the electric pruners the other day, standing over him and making sure he had both hands on them and instructing him all the way as he cut little branches of a bush I was clearing from near the fish pond. I didn’t let it go on too long because his mother was clearly having palpitations watching him snip branches that were several times the size of his fingers. Even so, I can see why farmer’s kids help around the farm by age five or six. A friend of mine was driving the tractor for his dad at age eight, and it was more difficult because he’s a little guy and he could barely reach the pedals. The point is that the natural way of doing things explains why people that were 13 or 14 years old even led armies a few centuries ago. We have been a few generations of molly-coddled, cotton-ball wrapped, bunch of weaklings for at least seven or eight decades now, but I am seeing how simply growing up in touch with nature helps our children return to a natural way of being that has been almost lost for Western men and women. I too was lucky in that I grew up with almost zero supervision outside the home and in as wild an Africa as you got back then, which is nowhere near what it is today. I often feel I was indeed born in the wrong century, either one from long, long, ago, or at least the 1800s might have been almost ideal for me, or then again, maybe a few centuries from now when exploring other star systems is a thing. Well, I think it might be a thing already, but I am just not privy to that aspect of it. Yet. Then again, it’s probably the case every man feels out of time when in reality they are exactly where they need to be.
I don’t want any MGTOW incels anywhere near me. I want men that understand what family is and who know what it feels like to have your little daughter have daddy-its, or your son. Or see one of your children have mommy-itis, like our second-youngest daughter has. And feeling genuine love. The love described in the Bible, that wants nothing for itself, but exists solely to give, and see the beauty in every little moment of the day.
I have never been a huge fan of Hemingway, mostly because I didn’t find his writing particularly great. I could approximate it even as a teenager. And a lot of his “manly stories” were the result of an almost obsessive need to be perceived that way. His life was a serial set of tragedy and drama and the final end of his life was frankly, pathetic. I do not say this to speak ill of the dead, I hope God had mercy on his soul and we all have our demons, but I think it was him that said that for someone to be a man he should plant a tree, write a book and have a child. Well I have done plenty of all of those things, and I have faced some dangerous situations and people, but above all, I think what makes a man is an absolutely unflinching ability to truly know yourself in the very depths.
And I have never met a man that qualifies under that definition that would not have his heart melt when at a two-foot tall little person runs at him every time she sees him, squealing “Daddy!” in delight, as if you had just returned from a six month trip to the Siberian outback, instead of just getting something from one of the garden sheds for five minutes, and who rams into your legs, hugging you then looks up at you full of joy and enthusiasm and stretches her little arms and hands up at you so you can pick her up and she can squeeze your neck into a hug that would be life-threatening if she was little bigger.
So, to those nihilists, boomers, black-pillars, incels, bitter losers at life, acidic feminists (there is no other kind, the PH of their vaginas is literally a threat to all life), and their insipid doom and gloom predictions, all I can say is: Carry on just as you are. Never change.
They are doing us the enormous favour of ensuring that genetic mishap that is them is never propagated further into the species. And that is good. All we want now are the kind of men and women that heard Urban II in the year of our Lord 1095, and listened to him, and acted accordingly with it.
It is no place for their kind or kin.
It is our time returning now.
No related posts.
By G | 13 April 2024 | Posted in Catholicism, Relationships, Sedevacantism, Social Commentary