The videos of Orion Teraban are generally good advice and this one is too, concerning what he refers to as the present day dating market.
However, it is not correct to say that things were really any different ten or even twenty years ago.
I have been essentially out of the dating market since early 2017 now, but I was certainly in it from about 2004 or 2005 until then, with a hiatus of some 5 years or so between 2008-9 and early 2013 which is how long my second marriage lasted. Before that, online dating wasn’t really a thing for me because I had been in a long relationship since before the internet until that ended and I met my first wife shortly thereafter, which sort of imploded about the 2004/2005 point.
There are some observations I found interesting in comparing my own experience with what Orion states in the above-linked video, and as these may be useful to younger men that are still in the process, I thought it would be useful to share them.
The first point is that the advice concerning the having high hopes but low expectations is absolutely correct and is probably pivotal if you’re not going to he a bitter and resentful weirdo. Personally, maybe because of my slightly autistic but high IQ perspective, this was never really an issue after a certain point. At first my main frustration was really more about my perception that women’s brains appeared not to function properly. Logic appeared to be a mystery to them and when you layered that on top of the basic 30 point IQ communication gap that I tend to have with most people, it honestly felt as if I was trying to have a meaningful relationship with monkeys.
If you are a woman reading, I realise how all this sounds misogynistic, etc. etc. But your feelings on the matter are irrelevant, because this is not about you, but rather my lived experience. So, you can either continue reading and possibly learn something about male and female interactions that may be useful to you, or you can get offended and stop reading or rage against it, either way, my life and perspective will not change one iota. So, comport yourself accordingly, and consider this your lesson number one in basic logic.
Now, returning to us, men, the experience felt disturbing to me because on the one hand I had the vague idea (instilled by boomer lies) that men and women were supposed to have equivalent brains, and on the other, my lived experience was that I was generally dealing with creatures that were possibly more akin to a pet you can have sex with than a real, thinking, human being.
It seemed to me that the female brain was hardly at all interested in any of the abstract things that interested me on almost any level, and were instead apparently fixated almost entirely on the human interaction level, to the point that gossip, drama, and needless emotional negativity consumed their lives. The only positive aspect of this was the sexual component, in which they could become as interested as I was, even if they started out relatively tame. Once I demonstrated to them certain aspects of their own physical and/or mental sexuality they had either not explored or encountered before, they generally speaking became, sexually at least, quite entertaining. And they quite often also mistook sexual compatibility with being deeply in love. A facet I tried very hard to prevent them from confusing, certainly when I was not interested in them in that way.
I did not want to have a pet-like relationship where the main component of the relation was essentially only great sex. It got to the point where I started to worry that I would end up seeing women in general as just that, creatures to have sex with but not even bother trying to engage in any other meaningful discourse. I knew this was not reality either, though it also quickly became obvious that the boomer lie of equality between male and female brains was just that: an outrageous lie.
As a result I also took up reading about the differences between male and female brains and although the literature on it is scant (because God forbid anyone tells the truth, doing so gets you cancelled if not incarcerated these days) one of the more useful books on it is Mapping the Mind by Rita Carter. Though I note with some cynicism that the linked book is an “updated and revised” edition, so I am not sure if it still says the things it used to or if the “updating” has resulted in a sanitising of any politically “unacceptable” facts.
At any rate, the reality is that the male and female brains have noticeable structural differences. And once you know this, a basic grasp of logic will immediately tell you two things:
One: they will perform differently
Two: they will have developed (or been created) differently for a reason that is valid in reality, regardless of what political narratives by homoglobos, boomers, satanists, feminists, or anyone else, will tell you to the contrary.
In large part, that is how I developed my Caveman Theory, (see books I wrote) and using it as a model certainly proved very useful in my life.
What changed for me was that I began to study the women I dated more as a scientist might, and noted a number of behaviours that while irrational in the specifics of my circumstances with them, had an original logical and biological imperative behind it. Once I catalogued these behaviours and recognised their origins as per my model of reality, it was then just a matter of on the one hand accepting reality as it is, which was the easy part for me, and on the other, reconciling what my tolerance for humanity could be raised to without me losing my mind.
I discovered that I could genuinely enjoy the company of women, regardless of what I would have labelled as their chicken-headed behaviour a few years earlier, as long as it was somewhat limited, or at least when they had a certain level of self-awareness. Women that were aware of their irrational behaviour were quite entertaining and even endearing at times, which made up at least for a bit of the times they behaved essentially insanely from a male perspective.
The change was that I had gone from processing women as:
beings incapable of reason that had only sex and a generic companionship level to offer for the relative trouble having them around entailed
To:
Partial aliens that had biological motivations stuck in reasons that originated from millennia in the past if not millions of years ago.
Suddenly they were interesting beings again, and I could appreciate them not just generally but also at the individual level.
Yet, I was also aware that becoming overly invested in one of them that did not cross the threshold of minimum ability to reason and be self-aware that I required, was a stupid thing to do and entirely my fault.
This realisation was of course gradual and only improved over time. Nor did it necessarily make me aware of various pitfalls that can be encountered, such as getting involved with narcissists that have oscar-like acting abilities, and ignoring various red flags because you’re into exploring all the facets of this partially alien species.
The outcome, from a purely secular standpoint is indeed a rather brutal one. You will bounce from one woman to the next, leaving behind the ones who you can’t tolerate beyond a certain level or who vice-versa can’t tolerate you.
It is true that in this purely secular mode, it becomes easy enough to bed various women and it is true that in that milieu, you find plenty of women who also are just interested in the sex and not much else. Certainly I had plenty of encounters where the main factor was just to satisfy our respective curiosity of each other’s bodies. Those situations usually lasted no more than a few days, and sometimes only mere hours.
But then you realise too that even though you are now able to fulfil pretty much any purely sexual desire you may have, there is still something missing.
Considering women as a kind of partially alien species still does not permit that level of intimacy that gives you a sense of deep fulfilment. Yet, at the same time, and paradoxically, as so many deep truths are, if all you focus on is your desire for that deep connection, you are almost certain to never get it, or experience it, other than perhaps only as your own delusion; which is all the more devastating when the illusion inevitably collapses, and the faux-relationship ends.
It was then that I realised that the only thing left in terms of relationship challenge and goals was the very thing that boomers have advised my generation against all our lives: creating a family and having children.
My first attempt at this succeeded only insofar as my daughter was created, but failed by every other metric after which I had a revelatory experience and began to study the reality I had encountered concerning the reality of a Loving God I had never really believed in before.
In reading parts of the New Testament I realised that the nature of the relationship between a man and a woman that led to the creation of functional families, was not only absolutely correct and made perfect sense, but it was also so far removed from my own experience and even way of seeing things that it might as well be in another Galaxy.
I resolved to simply drift through life with whatever female companionship I could tolerate. I had no specific need for a permanent relationship, personal loyalty beyond a few (but relatively absolute) aspects, or even much in the way of connection beyond any woman I had anything to do with not irritating me past a certain level.
I did not try to mask any of these realities and I still wasn’t short of female companionship, but I was mostly indifferent to it beyond some biological and emotional basic needs for sex, some human connection, and a certain level of peace.
Gradually however, as I deepened my understanding of God, and concluded the Christian God was the real one, and more specifically the Catholic God, and even more specifically that only the sedevacantists were still actual Catholics, a natural, organic, and quite honestly mysterious change came over me, and in some way, mysterious and unknowable in human words, yet, life, God, myself, and the Universe, all seemed to conspire to get another, extremely unlikely one, to come closer to me over time and then, all of a sudden, in one day, move in with me.
The first few years were certainly difficult, and there are plenty of practical issues left even today, but for the most part, the emotional and intellectual ones we have worked out. And in some ways though we have been married 7 years already, it all feels as if it happened a few weeks ago. And in other ways it feels as if we have been together for 40 years.
The difference between my marriage now, the only one I did as a baptised Catholic in a Church with all the correct Catholic procedures for it by a real Catholic priest and also a Bishop, and the relationships I had before, is not something that is in any way easy to put into words.
What I can say without ANY hesitation at all is that it beats all the other experiences put together in terms of fulfilment and peace it brings to my life.
The connection is real and deep and although generally speaking my wife is not especially interested in astronomy, martial arts, or even, the theological details of Catholicism, I certainly can converse with her about pretty much any topic and she is more than capable of keeping up with any of them, being as there is no IQ communication gap, and this is undoubtedly absolutely fundamental for me. And although women on that IQ range definitely have a bunch of quirks, some of them truly trying for an impatient man like myself, (for example, she simply has no conception of time, and can take hours to get ready then sometimes do it in minutes, but it’s a process so random that no computer will ever be able to model it), I can handle them, because the positives she brings —in far more important aspects of life— clearly outweigh any minor irritants.
But none of this can transmit the sensation of connection I have with her that goes beyond anything I can explain in secular terms. We just barely even have the words in any language to even address it, and I don’t intend to try.
My best advice to you is to first discover the truth about God, the rest will take care of itself.
My book Caveman Theory is geared towards secular people, but the thread in it is based on pure logic and if you can do logic well, the natural place you end up at, by the way, is the same one that Catholics have taken for centuries:
Proper marriage and making children.
May you find your right path.
Torba Still Doesn’t Get It
Leaving aside all the various evidence that Torba is probably not at all what he presents himself or his platform Gab to be, even if you were to simply take him at his word, his grasp of human nature, as well as geopolitics is naive at best.
In his latest round of request for financial support for Gab he says:
Consider this: many people have no issue paying $150 a month for a cable bill to watch the fake news media, but they balk at the idea of spending $10 a month to support platforms like Gab. They’ll readily drop $10 every morning on coffee that they could make at home for pennies, without a second thought. This inconsistency in our priorities is baffling and must change if we want free speech online to survive. Please consider supporting our efforts by making a donation, upgrading your Gab account to GabPRO, or purchasing merchandise from the Gab Shop. It’s time to rewire our brains and recognize that if we’re not paying for the product, we become the product ourselves. We must collectively support free speech platforms by building a patronage network, just as we would support any other vital service or cause we believe in.
And a little later:
To build a strong patronage network, it’s crucial to foster a sense of community and shared values among supporters of free speech. This can be achieved through regular communication, transparent financial reporting, and the creation of exclusive content or experiences for patrons. By nurturing a sense of belonging and investment in the success of free speech platforms, we can create a loyal and dedicated base of supporters who are committed to the long-term sustainability of the free speech wing of the internet.
Ending with:
Free speech is not free, and it’s up to all of us to ensure its survival. By recognizing the true costs of running social networks, reevaluating our priorities, and forming a robust free speech patronage network, we can safeguard one of our most precious rights and foster a healthier, more open digital landscape for generations to come.
There are at least three major structural flaws with pretty much everything he says. Any ONE of which is enough to render what he says moot. But let us look at each in turn:
First – The culture of Free is not an accident
It was created by mostly intelligence agencies to gather information on the users, but more importantly, by the people behind the intelligence agencies in order to not just gather information, but confirm psychological aspects of human nature in an input/response feedback loop. At least at first. Very quickly it then moved to:
Input —> to produce desired response
feedback loop that has since been studied, perfected and refined.
And as we have seen thanks to the first openly murderous and information-free test run they set up years earlier and ran essentially openly with minimal cover for the outrageous lies they were selling, the average person has as much discernment, individual thought, independence and ability to reason on their own as the average garden petunia. Right to the point of injecting themselves, and worse, their children, with a genetic serum whose 30 year old attempts have never resulted in anything but catastrophic results in every animal trial ever done.
So… right off the bat, the problem you have in an appeal to reason is that both professor Cipolla (there are always more idiots than you think there are) and Vox Day (Most People Are Idiots) are absolutely right. Which means the people who even can reason is minimal.
But even the few who might have been able to reason have essentially been brainwashed into apathy over a period of decades. It takes an uncommon state of being to be relatively immune to this kind of neuro-psychological manipulation. So the pool of actively and genuinely independent thinkers is even smaller than you think.
Second – Neither is the atomisation of culture
Torba goes on to mention “community” while having no clue as to what actually forms one, or keeps one alive. Again, this state of affairs of no one any longer having any experience of what community really means is not something that came about by accident.
The infiltration and destruction of every culture that has ever produced anything positive has been a long and studied effort by the same people mentioned above that has been going on for much longer. Their primary target has been religion of course, because that is the real glue of a community. If you are one of the few capable of individual and original thought based on the evidence before you, you will note that the one religion that has brought the most elevation of humanity above all has been Catholicism, which was finally deeply infiltrated from 1958 on and has nearly collapsed after Vatican II, the only remnant left of it being Sedevacantists (i.e. actual Catholics). You will also note that this assault on community (the Church) has been ongoing for centuries and that the shadow version of it, Protestantism has the atomisation baked right into it, since every single person is supposedly able to interpret the entire edifice of Christianity on their own based on false histories told to them since childhood. Don’t forget, the ONLY rule of Protestantism is that each man, woman or child can and should interpret anything in the Bible by themselves. There is a reason why the devil smiles at the 40,000 denominations of heresy Protestantism has resulted in.
Aside Protestantism, every other infection of humanity with parasitical ideologies invented in the last couple of hundred and fifty years or so (not coincidentally from about the formation of the first Freemason country in the world and the official start of the Illuminati) is designed to atomise people due to a delusion/illusion of “freedom” and “democracy” and destroy the traditional, patriarchal, nuclear family that has been responsible for every single advancement of culture and humanity in real human terms (as opposed to national GDP). Charlemagne had set up the concept of nobility being placed where they were by God, but mot as with previous Pagan rulers such as the Egyptians, Japanese or even Ancient Romans, who tried to Deify their rulers, but more as an “accident” of Fate or inscrutable mysteries of God’s mind. A nobleman was to be a servant of God and thus also the protector of the Church and protector of his lands and people. But this was by no means guaranteed, because as any Catholic knows, all men are flawed. The point was not that a nobleman was appointed by God so people must necessarily assume he is good and Godly. The point was: God put him there; now let’s see if he is going to do that position any justice.
The Church being the Spiritual guide, nobility being the material/practical protectors of it from outside enemies in times of war, and hopefully noble guardians and protectors of commoners in time of peace. That is where the whole concept of chivalry comes from: Catholicism. And no, it was not about pedastalising women like the fake “pastors” of Protestantism do today, nor relegating them to second class citizens fit only for sex and rearing of children as again, Protestants did do, and also accused Catholicism of doing. No. Women had and have their proper and unique position as cherished daughters, wives and mothers, to be safeguarded, protected and loved, and doing so lovingly means also leading and taking care of the hardships the world invariably throws at you.
A lasting community can only exist in the context of reality. When that reality is based on purely material concerns the community does not last beyond a few generations at most. Without a basis deeply embedded in a Spiritual truth, no community survives.
The Zen/Buddhism stoicism of the Samurai or the Chinese has truth in it, to the extent that “chop wood carry water” is true. You need to do what you need to do to live. So do it and get on with it. And you may as well enjoy it as best you can.
Judaism/Phariseeism is deeply rooted in serving the Prince of this world, who is very real, and as a result, they have been “successful” at taking almost total control of the financial aspects of how the entire planet is run.
But no religion has been as beneficial for human beings as Catholicism. Don’t take my word for it. Do an objective comparison. Assuming you are one of the dozen or so people left that can actually be mostly objective.
Protestantism instead has been the relentless secularisation of Christianity (i.e. Catholicism) with the most devastating consequence being the allowing of divorce. Which leads to sex before marriage. Which leads to contraception. Which leads to abortion (murder) so as to not interrupt the “pleasure” of fucking for fun, instead of uniting as one to create a family with children.
But Torba understands none of these things, having been raised in the heretic soup that is Protestantism and liberalism, with a flamingly gay brother to boot, how can he? Assuming, of course he is not actually intentionally working as yet another gatekeeper.
Third – the Money
Just on the first two points you now realise you are surrounded by unthinking morons that have been trained since birth to only care about themselves and their stupidest, most selfish, petty, idiotic concerns of the moment at all times.
Now realise that not only is the entire gigantic amounts of money that gets regularly given to sell-outs, shills and puppets of the controllers behind the known bankers and “movers and shakers” in the hands of the controllers, and as such they can fund or bankrupt whoever they decide literally at will.
But even more importantly, and never understood by the masses —yet it was something as a four year old I realised even if I did not fully grasp the implications of it— the ENTIRE construct of Fiat money is completely arbitrary, fake and made up, and is totally controlled by the people who create such thing as the Bank of International Settlement (BIS). Look it up. I also talked about it before. So, while you struggle to eke out a living, the freemason down the street is provided with millions. But even if you manage to make “your own” money, it doesn’t matter, because the whole concept of the entire creation and supply of it is in their hands.
Until you become free of the need for fiat money, you will always be at the mercy of the creators of it. And if you try to set up a system to bypass it, they will immediately kill you. See Gaddafi etc.
The Connection
These three points are intimately linked. It is not a coincidence that the Satanic Pedophiles that run the world on the basis of literally controlling the very concept of money and its creation out of thin air, also worship the enemy of Humanity and have worked tirelessly for two thousand years to prevent the truth and good that a Catholic world would represent, and for a brief period nearly did even as it overcame assault after assault of the centuries.
It is not a coincidence that the same people orchestrated the destruction of every royal house in Europe, (except the fully freemasonic British one) because they represented the protectors of the Church and a natural hierarchy humans respond to.
It is not a coincidence that the same people caused WWI, the Bolshevik revolution, and WWII and the same people created COVID and its related mass murder factories.
It is not a coincidence the same people caused the Ukraine war and the current genocide in Gaza.
They are all the same people spread out over centuries, retaining generational control. And the ONLY opposition they EVER faced was by Catholic Western men. No wonder they spent all that time infiltrating it for centuries. And no wonder that today, Sedevacantist are the most maligned of all “Christians”; because any false “Christianity” will do, but not the real and only existing one: real Catholicism as it has always been from the time of Jesus.
Fourth Bonus Point – Free Speech always was a myth
Only a people as naive and innocent (due to masterful brainwashing by the usual suspects) could ever believe something so absurd as “free speech”. Even as a child it took me only seconds when I first encountered the concept to ridicule it.
Speech has never been free and never will be. Ever.
Given all the above, it is absolutely clear, that even if Torba were legitimate, which is questionable at best, he has zero understanding of what makes for a lasting counter to the global Satanists.
St. Benedict on the other hand did.
Of course, if you were raised like Torba you will not have any clue why retiring to desertic hills to build monasteries one at a time helped change the world, while asking for money online to fund your “free speech” will probably not.
The truth is not difficult to understand or see, but you do need to be objective as much as possible to even begin to be able to reason, and you can’t see the truth if you can hardly reason your way past not injecting a deadly poison into your body because some talking head on TV tells you to.
And of course, if that truth makes you too upset to notice the other things I am saying… well… what can I say, other than: enjoy your offended.
You might be interested in the following posts:
By G | 30 August 2024 | Posted in Billionaire Pedophiles, Catholicism, Christianity, Clown World, Freemasons, Heretics, Impostors and Frauds, Mass Murderers, Retards, Sedevacantism, Social Commentary, The Enemy Within, The Jews, Zombie Apocalypse