Archive for the ‘Christianity’ Category

Protestantism is Satanic

Which is not to say that every protestant is some kind of devil worshipper. In fact most are probably “good” people who believe themselves to be Christians. After all, if you are told from birth you are (fill in blank here), and given we now know 98% of people don’t even question the government, it stands to reason they would believe they are (fill in the blank).

See this video and try to understand that this is not “oh, just another church cucking” this is the absolutely inevitable result of Protestantism.

I will explain why in a way you probably have never come across before below the video.

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMYG3qce8

There are multiple ways to point out the obvious Satanry of Protestantism, but almost none of them break the brainwashing that they have been subjected to.

Rivers of ink have been written proving that the lies Protestants have been taught about Catholicism are complete fabrications. Including by non-catholics not all of which converted but yet saw that Catholicism has been lied about for 5 centuries.

Equal or more amounts of ink have been put down to show that the 40,000 interpretations of the “Bible” are absolutely wrong, infantile, historically ignorant and so on.

It has been pointed out that their “top Bible” was the intentionally corrupted translation of an already pharisee corrupted version, ordered by an openly gay king who literally started the masonic (satanic) temples.

It has been demonstrated that it was Protestantism that first permitted divorce, then sex before marriage obviously becomes normalised, and sex for sport inevitably leads to abortion on demand. “Oh but not MY Church/sect/family…” shut up. America is a baby murdering factory that puts the FAKE numbers of the holohoax to shame, never mind the real ones. And America is predominantly a Protestant country.

But do any of these facts change the mind of a Protestant. Very rarely. And then usually only after years when they actually begin to read some patristic texts.

I even tried to show Protestants their absurd sects are absurd by the simplest of logic. After all, if Luther ripping out parts of the Bible finally “fixed it” how can you ever say that the Bible alone is all you need? First of all, the Bible itself was put together by TRADITION. And if the Bible that served Christianity perfectly well for over 1000 years needed “fixing” by a fat German of Jewish descent that had a fetish for raping maids and banging nuns, and who committed suicide, then I posit to you it couldn’t have been the “right” Bible and for all we know, when Bruce Jenner decides to rip some more out of it and interpret it so trannies are God’s chosen people, well… show me EXACTLY how you will be able to differentiate between Bruce’s “God-breathed” and Martin’s “God-breathed”. You won’t be able to, of course, because both versions are and would be only Satan-Farted.

And here is a picture for those of you allergic to reading (though it’s doubtful you got this far if you are, but maybe the colours attracted you.)

And keep in mind that Apostolic succession simply does NOT exist in ANY Protestant denomination. Not a single one. And it’s extremely doubtful if it exists at all in the supposedly “Orthodox” world, since in Russia and Greece, the metropolitans were essentially political plants of the KGB as one of the top Metropolitans recently admitted. Furthermore, they have their own schisms too, which invalidated the whole concept of “one body” as found IN THE BIBLE, not as invented by some bitter protestant.

But do any of these facts convince? Not often. What about all of them together? Well, they usually don’t sit through 1/10 of the information presented here before they try to think of objections.

But here is the thing:

Protestantism is absolutely shallow. It is fickle. It is ephemeral. Anyone can interpret anything the way they want. It literally has no rules except:

  1. Interpreth as thou will (which is actually Satanic law, do as thou wills)

and

2. Jesus is the King of Kings. Well, even Demons know this.

It is not even a childish religion it is a religion for retarded toddlers.

Protestantism has only created degeneracy, weird Puritanism, divorce, destruction of the family, abortions and fuelled the flames of bitter feminism due to having relegated women to second class men-with-tits who must obey.

Catholicism has created the most advanced, humane and just civilisations in human history, the highest forms of art and engineering, love and respect for beauty, truth, honesty and helping your neighbour.

And Catholicism is DEEP. Roman law is an adult legal system, perfectly suited for messy, disagreeable, complicated human. It is deep because it is simple yet penetrating and cognisant of human nature. Anglo-saxon laws, and even worse, American laws, are a barbaric artificiality imposed on human beings as if they were machines in comparison.

Human beings are NOT robots, and allowances for specific circumstances should ALWAYS be aired out and considered. And discarded when they are absolutely in the wrong, or irrelevant, but used and listened to when they are very relevant.

Even murder is not always murder.

The spur of the moment robbery gone bad that kills a little old lady for stealing her pension, should get the death penalty. While the well-thought out, planned and executed homicide of a child rapist, in my view at least, deserves a medal and a small pension for life. You may disagree with my take, but don’t tell me that the two are equally guilty. They are not.

The Rules of Catholic Dogma and how to apply them are ALL enshrined in one document, the Pio-Bendictine Code of Canon Law of 1917.

If you read it and you consider what a society that follows these dogmatic rules would look like, you will see it can only create a great and wonderful civilisation with almost no crime.

The point is, in its very superficiality and paradoxical rigid flexibility (the main rule being you can make up your own rules, and don’t let anyone tell you otherwise!) Protestantism ultimately stands for nothing. It has no lasting values. while the Catholic `Church dogma has remained unchanged for almost two millennia. Sure, from time to time they refined a concept or expounded another, but the divine dogmas remain unchanged. The rules to manage worldly affairs certainly changed but that is not to say the old ways are invalid, in fact, in many cases, the old ways show how Sedevacantism always was the correct position to take when faced with a fake Pope, or one that was or became a heretic.

How can you possibly believe in a Church that is fallible? Does your version of Jesus lie? Produce fallible Church dogma? Or agrees that everyone should have their own “truth”? Including Bruce Jenner?

Catholic priests and Bishops and Popes even have always been only flawed human beings, but the church itself has endured all of these and the rules of the Church, as presented by the magisterium of the Church, in the form of the compiled Canon Laws, is indeed infallible and has stood the test of time. Not because Catholics are flawless or Popes infallible (they are only infallible when valid, pronouncing ex-cathedra, and then only because GOD ensures their infallibility, as per His promise, not because any Pope ever was perfect or infallible in se.

But such concepts are generally “too much” for the average protestant, brought up on a diet of soy for breakfast, lunch and dinner, presented with a succulent steak, or a boiled lobster, or even just a salad with pomegranate and orange in it, recoils in shock. His simple-minded palate cannot even imagine such rich textures and flavours and tradition and history and objective fact built on objective fact so that the very methods of science were invented by Catholics. He wants to deny such things even exist or were ever true.

“NEWTON!” He shouts almost like an atheist would retardedly shout “DARWIN!” Forgetting that Newton was an anti-trinitarian, wrote far more on religion in a heretical perspective than he ever did on physics and that about 30 years of his life were spend on occult alchemy.

While the anonymous 14th Century monk that wrote The Cloud of Unknowing, almost certainly touches on far more penetrating truths about God and Christianity than Newton did. And the original free version online in Middle English is delightful (if you are clear on the language, the modern version linked to above is useful to read alongside it).

And yet, even with this barrage of starting points to investigate, the average Protestant will simply dismiss them all out of hand and assume he’s right anyway.

Do you see now, why the Catholics thought it worse for pagans to be “educated” by Protestant “missionaries” about “Christianity” than if they were left to their own devices?

Being completely wrong on something you are ignorant of, you have a better chance that your God-given conscience leads you correctly, or, that conversely (or jointly) due to invincible ignorance, God takes mercy on you.

But a fake version of the truth, a corrupted, half-truth wrapped in poisonous lies, that will lead you to your death. The lies baked in as you learn them make you lazy and spoon-feed and you never bother to investigate them yourself. This is human nature. We have seen it.

98% of people would euthanise themselves instead of take the time to research something that they are supposed to inject themselves with because the government or the TV told them to do it. Why would they ever bother to question the absurd nonsense of Protestantism as it is fed to them from childhood?

THIS is why Protestantism is Satanic. Exactly like the Mutagenic Serum shots, it is designed to fool you and lead you to eternal Hell.

However uncomfortable this idea may make you, I put it to you that it is an infinitesimally tiny dot of absolute inconsequence when compared to eternity in Hell because you believed in something so utterly retarded as “Sola Scripture” and “Once saved always saved”.

So I hope you take heed.

The continuing lies of the Novus Orcos

It is by design that they continue to put forth a bunch of lies and try and confuse the waters, that is their entire purpose of course, but in reality, thanks to Pope Pius X and Benedict XV, the creation of the Code of Canon Law of 1917 means that how the dogmas of the Church are applied, from the start of the Church to 1917 are embodied in ONE book. This was a massive achievement and simplifies very clearly what is and not valid, licit, dogmatic or not in the Church, and how one is to function under the rules of the Church.

The Freemasons that usurped the Vatican of course hate the CL of 1917 and specifically Canon 188 part 4, because it is absolute, and stabs them in their blackened, foul, devil-worshipping little heart.

For clarity then, any and all rules of how to follow Catholic dogma, can only be contained in the CL of 1917 or, possibly, in one of the documents issued by the 3 valid Popes that ruled prior to the usurpation of the See of Peter by the Freemasons Satanist Roncalli, and all those like him who have come after, right up to and including Bergoglio.

These are the documents in question.

TitleAuthorYearType
Humani Generis RedemptionemBenedict XV1917Encyclical
Quod Iam DiuBenedict XV1918Encyclical
In Hac TantaBenedict XV1919Encyclical
Maximum IlludBenedict XV1919Apostolic Letter
Paterno Iam DiuBenedict XV1919Encyclical
Annus Iam PlenusBenedict XV1920Encyclical
Principi Apostolorum PetroBenedict XV1920Encyclical
Spiritus ParaclitusBenedict XV1920Encyclical
In Praeclara SummorumBenedict XV1921Encyclical
Rerum Omnium PerturbationemPius XI1923Encyclical
Quas PrimasPius XI1925Encyclical
Iniquis AfflictisquePius XI1926Encyclical
Rerum EcclesiaePius XI1926Encyclical
Rite ExpiatisPius XI1926Encyclical
Miserentissimus RedemptorPius XI1928Encyclical
Mortalium AnimosPius XI1928Encyclical
Divini Illius MagistriPius XI1929Encyclical
Mens NostraPius XI1929Encyclical
 Casti ConnubiiPius XI1930Encyclical
Non Abbiamo BisognoPius XI1931Encyclical
Nova ImpendetPius XI1931Encyclical
Acerba AnimiPius XI1932Encyclical
Dilectissima NobisPius XI1933Encyclical
Ad Catholici SacerdotiiPius XI1935Encyclical
Vigilanti CuraPius XI1936Encyclical
Divini RedemptorisPius XI1937Encyclical
Firmissimam ConstantiamPius XI1937Encyclical
Ingravescentibus MalisPius XI1937Encyclical
Mit Brennender SorgePius XI1937Encyclical
Sertum LaetitiaePius XII1939Encyclical
Summi PontificatusPius XII1939Encyclical
Saeculo Exeunte OctavoPius XII1940Encyclical
Divino Afflante SpirituPius XII1943Encyclical
Mystici Corporis ChristiPius XII1943Encyclical
Orientalis EcclesiaePius XII1944Encyclical
Communium Interpretes DolorumPius XII1945Encyclical
Orientalis Omnes EcclesiasPius XII1945Encyclical
Deiparae Virginis MariaePius XII1946Encyclical
QuaemadmodumPius XII1946Encyclical
Fulgens RadiaturPius XII1947Encyclical
Mediator DeiPius XII1947Encyclical
Auspicia QuaedamPius XII1948Encyclical
In Multiplicibus CurisPius XII1948Encyclical
Redemptoris Nostri CruciatusPius XII1949Encyclical
Anni SacriPius XII1950Encyclical
Mirabile IlludPius XII1950Encyclical
Summi MaerorisPius XII1950Encyclical
Evangelii PraeconesPius XII1951Encyclical
Ingruentium MalorumPius XII1951Encyclical
Sempiternus Rex ChristusPius XII1951Encyclical
Doctor MellifluusPius XII1953Encyclical
Fulgens CoronaPius XII1953Encyclical
Ad Caeli ReginamPius XII1954Encyclical
Ad Sinarum GentemPius XII1954Encyclical
Sacra VirginitasPius XII1954Encyclical
Musicae SacraePius XII1955Encyclical
Luctuosissimi EventusPius XII1956Encyclical
Fidei DonumPius XII1957Encyclical
Invicti AthletaePius XII1957Encyclical
Le Pèlerinage de LourdesPius XII1957Encyclical
Miranda ProrsusPius XII1957Encyclical
Ad Apostolorum PrincipisPius XII1958Encyclical
Meminisse IuvatPius XII1958Encyclical
St. Claire Heavenly Patron of TelevisionPius XII1958Apostolic Letter

In short, if it is not contained in CL of 1917 or one of the above documents, you are perfectly fine to ignore it as the creation of people who at a very minimum are suspect, and thus, as prudence dictates, to be avoided, and more likely, especially if pretending to be “catholic” clergy, are likely Satanists (that’s what Freemasons are), impostors, frauds, pedophiles or at the very least absolute liars and grifters.

I hope that makes things clear for everyone.

NB: As for the “hypocrisy” of not wanting to use the 1955 Liturgical changes that were unfortunately approved by Pius XII, first of all, let it be clear that the Liturgy is in a different class from Canon Law, and is not entirely dogmatic, in fact one could argue almost none of it is. Secondly, a rather simple and direct explanation is provided by Bp. Sanborn here.

Notwithstanding the problems actual Catholics have with Bp. Sanborn, this specific point (as well as many others, of course) he has addressed well.

Bergoglio denies the existence of what will be his permanent home

In Italian. And in English.

The Inevitable Fall of the Freemason Milo

For anyone living under a rock, who is still not aware that milo Yank-a-pole-r-us, is a total freemasons plant whose sole purpose is to pretend to be Catholic so as to lead any potentially actual Christians on the road to hell, here is a little background: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, but really, just use the Search me button on the right sidebar and type in Milo and you will have as much detail as you need.

His handlers and “fans” inevitably try to say that I focus on him because I “envy” him, or his “suck-cess” or whatever. But the reality is merely one: I too for a brief moment during gamer gate was fooled into thinking Milo was probably on the right side of things, however terminally flawed individually. But the reality has been that Milo was a gatekeeper from the start. Financed to be so.

He has had troubles with his financiers, and that more than once, but his grift and his gatekeeping continues. And his gatekeeping is one that affects primarily young men, and is intended to keep them from finding true Catholicism, while bombarding them with the literal opposite of pious messages or anything inspiring of actual Catholicism. Because the last thing the servants of the enemy want, is a bunch of young, determined, objective, sedevacantist men. Why? Simple, because Sedevacantism is the only actual Catholicism left, and actual Catholicism is fearless and militant. Did you think the Crusades stopped Islam from conquering Europe by writing them sarcastic witty letter?

Do you think all the pious saints and priests that would rather die than deny Jesus or break the confessionary seal were all just “mistaken”. Do you think that people like Bohemond, Tancredi, or Jean Parisot le Valette were anything other than proper, hardcore catholics. And do you think that such men will stand for any of the globohomo nonsense that is being pushed globally?

Of course not. So enter Milo the gay freemason to pervert, muddy, confuse and ultimately lead down the road to Hell instead.

I have been taking note of his telegram chat from shortly after the start of Lent, and decided to screenshot once every few days, just some of the type of messages he sends out there, and the overall quality of the “christian message” such a barrage of deviancy suggests and implies, sometimes very directly, sometimes more subtly, but always with impiety, perversion and deceit at its core. It is salutary to take note of this in a somewhat condensed fashion as displaying these screenshots in a row does.

It is also interesting to note that in the period of Lent, though he started with some 26,500 subscribers or so, and the 26,000 threshold was retained by the skin of his teeth for quite a while, when it dipped below 26,000 it plummeted pretty quickly. The number of comments on his chat is also certainly not in line with 25k or so active users. As I said before, I believe a large portion of his subscribers is fake and are likely bots.

Below is a string of just some of his posts starting shortly after Lent started. I added some commentary after certain examples, but mostly they are self-explanatory in their subversive intent. I leave a final comment at the end too.

Obvious Sexual reference (which in his case is gay)

Trying to keep youth in the unnatural centres of sin and degeneracy, cities, instead of allowing them to reconnect to the natural instincts and intrinsic divinity that contact with nature provides, along with a suggestion to violence.

Humiliation ritual demanded by being a Freemason (especially when you are not being effective and your subscriber numbers continue to fall)

Obvious mocking of Saints/Sainthood and divinity, humility, grace and certainly Lent in toto.

Intentionally trying to propose absolutely idiotic comments, to bring doubt into well established things, like quantum tunnelling, which has demonstrably transmitted Mozart’s 40th Symphony at 4.7 times light speed way back in 1994. While quantum dynamics has certainly got some issues (mostly related to the truncation of the Maxwell equations, and the removal of the concept of the Aether, which is related to scalar energy transmission (which can be used as weapons)) Quantum tunnelling, certainly produces engineering effects.

Homosexual writings.

More, very real (obvious to non-retarded humans) push for the flat earth and “viruses don’t exist” crowd of retards.

More homosexual direct innuendo.

Pretty obvious sexual imagery, especially since his “sadness” is essentially related to having to go back into the closet about being a homosexual, and as indicated above, being on his knees, etcetera.

More flat Earth nonsense, which is all distraction, nonsense and doubt for the Beverly mentally challenged.

Homosexual imagery, followed by clear blasphemy and ridicule of Lent.

Draw your own conclusions about what it might mean that he is sending out pictures with details of his eating while defecating. And the kind of imagery and intent such activity made public is supposed to inspire. During Lent, no less.

As above, plus the barren, slovenly nature of the whole composition is purposely meant to degrade, lower, and bring down the entire tone of anyone reading or seeing such images.

A video showing a rather cruel act to a child with the supposed intent of being “funny”.

Again with the defecation imagery, this time with a slurry meant to at least subconsciously refer you to both what he is “producing” as well as his sexual practices and their results, which he is also implying get swallowed. If you think I exaggerate the intent of these images, you are mistaken, this is classic psyops/hypnosis use for deviant/subterfugeous ends. And he is perfectly aware of what he is doing.

Usual profanity and general tone-lowering under the pretence of “funny”.

Promoting the idea of homosexuality or MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) abstention from heterosexual pairing, marriage and making Catholic families and children in a proper Catholic family. The whole thing is supposed to be a “deep” self-reflection, but in reality is yet again, another attempt to denigrate conventional family creation.

Totally disrespectful, mocking, vile and in any case corrupted thought, with association to an image of Jesus. What better way to confound, confuse, mock and denigrate our Lord and Saviour?

Here he is trying to “justify” and promote the absolute drivel of flat earth to those with IQ points above room temperature (in Alaska) who may actually notice that Flat Earth is absolute idiocy. Pushing the Psyops at different levels for maximum adoption of incredible stupidity and absolute lack of conventional science, logic, mathematics, and even mere simple observation the ancient Greeks managed without any modern technology.

More nonsense. Because if you make everything nonsense then…well…everything is nonsense. nothing matters. Nothing is sacred anymore. And that is his aim, as his master’s.

Clearly doing some psyops against DeSantis for whatever reason. Perhaps none other than simply causing more chaos. Or perhaps because, at least according to some, DeSantis may actually have been raised Sedevacantists and may be playing the game in order to gain enough power to possibly change things. So far anyway, he has been good for Florida.

More, general vicious gossip, during Lent, and general slovenliness, for the same reason. Lower the zeitgeist to the lowest possible status.

More, general lowering of the tone and causing chaos and chaos reactions.

Ultimately Milo is indeed going to fail. This is not news to me or anyone that has been paying attention. His downfall has a relatively slow arc, but is absolutely obvious, as I mentioned first privately way back in 2015 I think, when I still didn’t realise he was a Freemasonic plant.

He will be 39 in October of this year and after hitting his 40s, he will inevitably degrade faster. His appeal to the youth will be dimmer and dimmer as he gets older, his pudgy roundness is likely to balloon to obese fatness except if he undertakes some form of drastic surgery or dieting, which will further ravage his pudgy, weak body. He has nothing relevant left to say. His “edginess” is all spent and pointless in the aftermath of the scamdemic. People older than him see him as pointless, worthless and a continued degenerate, those younger than him see him either in the same way, or as a kind of circus freak, and they are not so much laughing with him, as they are laughing AT him. And the ones of his age that still follow him are Millennials, who, as a generation, generally, have the morals, work ethic, aptitude and loyalty of jelly fish. They may be following him simply because they are too apathetic to click the unfollow option. It’s like two, maybe three clicks to unsubscribe man. It’s like… tiring…you know? It’s like… wait, what is that shiny thing?

So. He is already, and will continue, to crash and burn. It’s a long arc, more like a satellite spinning out of good orbit than a plane tailspinning, And it will be similar too in the way he will simply just fade away after the nth attempts at reinvention fail faster and faster. He will not even have a “splashy” end. Unless, possibly, he swan dives off the 20th floor of some semi-luxurious hotel in a few years, in order to end it all. Even then, he will be forgotten after the usual 3 day news-cycle.

So why point all this out?

Because deceivers pretending to be Catholics are decidedly my number one target, as they are for any actual Catholic.

Why post this even before Lent is over? Because Lent is not a bad time for you to take stock of not only yourself, your weaknesses, and your need to do better. it is also a good time to commit more to being part of the Church MILITANT. Which means taking note of your enemies and their actions, their forces, their numbers, their tactics and their strategies.

And act as a proper Catholic regarding it.

If you get thrown out of 109 different clubs a total of over 1000 times, whose fault is it?

You know who’s been attacked from the very first moment He came to Earth, and it hasn’t ever let up since, 2023 years ago?

That’s right, the Christ.

And you know who has come a very close second ever since?

That’s right, the Catholic Church.

And you know who the pre-eminent enemies of both Christ and the Church were?

That’s right, the Pharisees.

And do you know who and what the Pharisees are now?

That’s right, they are what we call today, “The Jews.”

The Original Hebrew texts of the Old Testament are essentially 400 years of stories of both determination of God and prophecy concerning Him.

Isaiah essentially is one of the key texts that proves that Jesus Christ was the Messiah.

You may think all this is blitheringly obvious, and it is, but a lot of people who call themselves “Christian” are completely, abysmally, ignorantly unaware of these very fundamental, extremely basic truths about Christianity.

It is important to know your history, not just in general, but also your personal family history. It matters. Which is why communists, freemasons, etcetera —that is, in essence, all the Satanists, in their legion of names— have always tried to destroy history. Hide the past, pervert and change it. According to them, everyone in the past of any note was a homosexual. From Alexander the Great to Achilles in the Illiad to Tesla, to Julius Caesar, and on and on and on. The Egyptians were black, and so were the Romans in England (I kid you not, supposedly “professional” historians have tried to claim this nonsense).

So, for anyone even remotely cognisant of actual Christian history, the atavic hatred the Pharisees, that is, the Talmudic Jews, which includes all the Jews today that are even remotely Jewish in their self-identity, is no surprise. The jews have hated, and tried to destroy Christianity literally from the day Jesus was prophesied to arrive. And they have never stopped.

In the more recent they have almost succeeded, for they have passed off the second-biggest scam in world history: They have made almost everyone believe that the current “Catholic Church”, headed by Bergoglio, and previously by Ratzinger, and so on, all the way back to Roncalli in 1958, is the actual Catholic Church.

Anyone that can do logic to the level of a normal 10 year old and cares to take the time to investigate the matter, will know without any doubt that this deception, is only surpassed by the more recent one of getting possibly up to 5.5 billion people to take a deadly, poisonous, unnecessary and damaging genetic serum that literally changes your DNA as if it were a “life-saving vaccine”.

But of course, the real Church continues to exist. Not because any mortal man says so or wishes it, but because our Lord and Saviour told us he would be with us right up until the End Times, and that the number of believing Christians at that time, will be vanishingly small, and in fact would have become zero if it were not for His last minute return.

Of course, only Catholics are actually Christians, as the first thousand years of Christian history makes absolutely clear; and only Sedevacantists/Sedeprivationists are actually Catholic, so the number of actual Christians is relatively small, and proportionally could possibly be comparable to the first few hundred years of Catholicism. Perhaps around the year 400 AD when St. Dominic decided the world was so corrupt and totally devoid of good men that he retired to the Rocky Mountains and built a monastery, and in time, the entire Dominica order was born from the actions of one man. Estimates vary from between 100,000 at the low end to about 500,000 at the high end. The real figure of actual Sedeprivationists is probably about a quarter million, which is a mere 2 out of 10,000 people when compared to the 1.2 Billion supposed Catholics, which, are, however, only “catholic” Churchman’s, essentially a fooled and deceived, unknowing, very large branch of the 40,000-headed Hydra known as Protestantism.

So this basic knowledge is now largely unknown to most people, though it is far from hidden, given you have access to the Internet.

And it is for this reason that it is salutary to point out that Catholics, have pointed out the issue concerning the Jewish hatred of Catholics and their religious beliefs concerning the idea that they believe that non-Jews are merely cattle, here to serve them for literally centuries. That the life of a non-Jew can never be compared to, or ever considered anywhere near as worthy as that of a Jew. That they assume that they can and will become the rulers of the Earth and all the non-Jews will be their slaves. And that their Talmud permits them to rape 3 year olds with impunity.

Here is a link to a text from Civiltà Cattolica, which is 27 pages of perfectly thought out and detailed analysis of the Jewish issue.

It would be good for you to know the history of your people, especially if you consider yourself a Christian, however deeply in error that belief might be currently. After all, learning one’s errors and correcting them is what life is all about. Without doing that we would not even learn to walk or speak.

I certainly believed I was right for some 35 years of my life, concerning what “Catholicism” was and what the “Catholic Church” was all about. Which is why, like any sane person, I rejected it in toto and consciously so from the age of 7.

It was only by the literal Grace of God, which for hard-headed mules like me, usually comes in a rather unpleasant format, that I was able to recognise my spectacular error, and even then it was another 4 years before I finally decided to get properly Baptised as an actual Catholic.

So. I truly hope you will at least begin a little investigation into what you have been taught by “historians” and “teachers” (who in turn where mostly fooled themselves) concerning Catholicism. You may want to start with two books actually written by non-Catholics (one did convert to Catholicism, but the other remains a Baptist) on the matter. Honest men come in all kinds, including men who are not Catholics. These two are such men.

Rodney Stark, and Rod Bennett.

Enjoy the search and the reading. The revelation of the Truth is always astonishing, surprising and refreshing, like waking up as a child and seeing the most magical of places just outside your window, as your parents travelled with you asleep through the night.

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks