I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other! So, because you are lukewarm—neither hot nor cold—I am about to spit you out of my mouth. You say, ‘I am rich; I have acquired wealth and do not need a thing.’ But you do not realize that you are wretched, pitiful, poor, blind and naked.
It is possibly the biggest source of personal frustration when I encounter the lukewarm, which frankly, seems to be literally everyone, with exception of my children, and most pure being the littler ones.
I understand that obstinacy, especially given the average human monkey, leads to nothing good, of course.
And yes, we all see through a glass darkly. Every one of us.
Even so, some things are obviously true. Obviously clear to anyone who cares to look.
Two plus two is, and always will be, four.
It is also a sad fact that I doubt if there are even a handful of people that would be willing to die over that fact. If faced with the prospect:
“Defend that two and two is four to death, or, allow all of humanity to forego the very concept of mathematics, calculation and so on.”
Put that way, it would mean either you sacrifice yourself, or, humanity will literally be forever reduced to about the same level as bonobos, and in fact, possibly lower, in fact, almost assuredly lower; though I don’t expect most people reading this to have the imagination necessary to envision why unless they put some serious thought into it.
I also appreciate that the argument for Sedevacantism takes a certain level of ability and education. You not only need to be able to read, but have the intelligence, will and desire to do so, in the specifics of the details of Church history, law, dogma and credo. I understand that too. I know it is a minority that can do that and the rest tend to follow for the usual reasons, because their family or friends have done so and humans are at times essentially herd animals.
However, if you are one of them; and you have taken the time and effort to learn why Sedevacantism is the only valid Catholicism left, why on God’s green Earth would you give a second’s time to obvious heretics?
If you have understood and accepted that the Novus Orcians are impostors, fake “Catholics” then it is absolutely impossible that you should make any exception for any of them.
“Oh but…” just doesn’t come into it.
It doesn’t matter if on this particular Tuesday afternoon, of the blue Moon, he told the truth on this one point.
It doesn’t matter if he calls out Bergoglio.
It doesn’t matter if he saves starving orphans in Africa.
It doesn’t matter if “he makes so much sense”.
This is not about a “bad” Catholic that is badly catechised, or a weak one that fails. Or a bad one that is in mortal sin every week through a retinue of bad character traits. It’s about fake clergy pretending to be of a religion they patently are not.
They are, in essence, spiritual mass-murderers.
Would you extend the same “benefit of the doubt” to a serial killer? Does it matter if he had a really bad childhood? Or he hears voices? Or he really doesn’t realise the evil he is doing?
Are you going to be buddies with Ted Bundy because he really knows how to get women close to him?
And if you are an actual believer, spiritual mass-murderers are worse than mere physical ones. Physical mass murderers take your life on Earth and your body, but spiritual ones are trying to throw your soul into hell for eternity.
So, if you are a Sedevcantist, that is, an actual Catholic, you do not accept, in any way, shape or form:
Una-cum masses, they are a blasphemy and a heresy.
Novus Ordo anything.
Vatican II anything.
That includes ALL the fake clergy and pomp of the fake “Catholic” Bergoglian Church and ALL their members.
Because they are not Catholics. Just as two plus two is not five.
I have covered the knowing heretics, fake Catholics, and Freemason Satanists several times, and by now, I should hope it is clear that I give no “clergy” that doesn’t specifically reject Vatican II and the Fake Popes from 1958 on any kind of pass. They are knowing heretics, and to be treated as such, as per Cum Ex Apostolato Officio; to wit (emphasis added):
(iii) that all such individuals also shall be held, treated and reputed as such by everyone, of whatsoever status, grade, order, condition or pre-eminence he may be and whatsoever excellence may be his, even Episcopal, Archiepiscopal, Patriarchal and Primatial or other greater Ecclesiastical dignity and even the honour of the Cardinalate, or secular, even the authority of Count, Baron, Marquis, Duke, King or Emperor, and as such must be avoided and must be deprived of the sympathy of all natural kindess.
But… but… what about some poor wanna-be Catholic “priest” that is ignorant of the whole Vatican II issue, and the rampant sodomy in the seminaries, and the utter manifest heresy of Bergoglio in real-time, never mind all of it since 1958, you say?
Yeah… that’s like saying that an adult, who takes all the courses to be a firearms instructor, then points a loaded gun at a child and pulls the trigger and then claims he didn’t know the gun was loaded when he did it. Even if you assume he’s telling the truth, and even if you could somehow determine it with absolute certainty (impossible), the fact remains that such an idiot would and should, go to jail, or preferably the death penalty, for what is known legally as criminal negligence. Or as I prefer to call it, criminal stupidity. Yes, being stupid enough is a crime. Because really stupid people should not be allowed to take certain jobs. You don’t want a 50 IQ retard trying to fly a plane. And I don’t care whose feelings it hurts. Ditto these fake “idiot” “priests”. If they are that stupid, they have no business being priests, and no, I do not give them the benefit of the doubt, and neither should you. Why? Because it is Church dogma to not do so. If you act like a heretic, practice like a heretic, promulgate heresy, regardless of your possible retardation, we are to treat you like a heretic. And must be deprived of the sympathy of all natural kindess. See above.
So that deals with the intentional, knowing heretics.
But what about the laymen who are also trying to lead people to Hell? Well, once again, I have detailed some of these grifting liars, Emo Jones, Tay-Tay Marshall, Michelle Voris, Milo Yankmypoleus and their kind. And one hopes it is now relatively easy to spot them. And we have a generic witch test for all who profess to be “Catholics”, it’s really simple:
“Do you reject Vatican II and all those who promulgate it?“
Anything other than a resounding YES! means you are dealing either with a knowing impostor, an egomaniacal fame or status hungry “smartboi”, or, at best, a deceived, lazy, ignorant.
Yes, yes, I know, charity and all that, but let me point something out here: It is by using and appealing to your charity when they have absolutely no right to do so, that these snakes enter your home and pervert it. And the Catholic Church also dogmatically explains that one should use prudence and avoid anything suspect.
Great. We got that cleared up. What then of the autistically persistent laymen? And here I add a couple of warnings:
First of all assure yourself as best you can that they actually are simple laymen. The example of note here is John Salza. Who has written a retinue of lies against Sedevacantism, supposedly in defence of Catholicism as a simple, pious layman. Except… that Salza was (is) a self-confessed freemason. Oh, oh, but he’s not anymore… right, because Satanists are such paragons of truth-telling. Get it through your head, freemasons are Satanists, that is literally what Freemasonry is. The literal worship of Lucifer. The fact the lower echelons might not be immediately aware of it… again… see criminal stupidity above. And if a freemason did honestly convert and became a Catholic (there are historical examples) then the only thing they may continue to do is explain how freemasonry is Satanic. That’s it. And that is the only legitimate thing they might be allowed to speak on as laypeople. Because once you have been a Satanist, it’s really quite obvious you should never be allowed to say anything at all about Catholicism, other than it is the absolute truth and you were absolutely wrong. And should such a person go on to write long tracts on why this or that theological position is better or worse, they are to be immediately assumed to be simply continuing their Satanic mission. These people, once you discover they are in fact freemasons or associate with such, etcetera, can safely be dismissed as liars at the very least, and heretics almost to a certainty.
But let us now assume you have satisfied yourself that they are not intentional deceiver or gatekeepers. And further (somehow) satisfied yourself they are not grifters either, making a buck from their “preaching”. And by making a buck I mean, literally making their living, or a substantial part of it from it. Because if they are, well, then their intent might not be consciously Satanic, but they are certainly at least useful idiots for Satan.
Ok then, assuming they even pass the Satanists/Grifter smell test, what are we left with? The smartbois. The Gammas who do it for personal ego/stature/status.
Are there honestly deceived people who believe they are “Catholics” when instead they are just fooled, lazy ignorants? Yes. Plenty of them. Millions. maybe even over a billion of them. Certainly.
Why do I call them lazy ignorants? Because they are. Is it harsh? Not really, it is a statement of fact. If I decided to call myself a prince of the blue garter belt of Liliputz, or whatever, you can bet I would not do so until I have studied with care what and how one becomes or is born as a Prince of Liliputz, and even if I fit those requirements, I would then delve deeply into what it takes to belong to the order of the blue garter belt, and why that isn’t gay somehow, if indeed it is not!
And how much more important is your claim to belong to a specific religion, to a specific God, with specific rules, because after all, if God is real, and Good, and Loving, then he MUST have, at a minimum, a Way for you to find Him and His rules and a way for you to KNOW what those rules are. And indeed there is: The Catholic Church. And it is your minimum duty to ensure you are actually in it, and not fooled into some travesty of it through your laziness of not bothering to learn your own religion.
So, if you’re one of the lazy ignorants, either get offended, flounce off in flamboyant fake indignation, or, get your lazy ass off the couch, and start reading. And learning.
But what about the smartbois?
Ah yes.
And here we encounter one such: Michael Lofton (because I am still being charitable here and still investigating him). He appears to have spent a LOT of time and effort to defend the heretic, fake, impostor riddled “Catholic Church” headed by the Vicar of pedophiles himself, Bergoglio. Now, why would that be?
If we give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he’s a true believer (in the Novus Orco, fake Church) and not a grifter (but he does make considerable revenue from his podcasts) or an intentional deceiver, then we need to assess what he is, and why he’s doing it.
At first glance, what I can say so far is that he certainly likes to use the sophist’s method preferred by Bill Clinton when asked if he had sex with Monica Lewinsky. For those young-uns among you, here is the detail:
During his grand jury testimony, Clinton questioned the exact meaning of the word ‘is’ in an attempt to defend a false affidavit in which Lewinsky claimed ‘there is no sex of any kind, in any manner, shape or form with president Clinton’. When asked by former Deputy Independent Counsel Sol Wisenberg, to confirm the affidavit was ‘utterly false’, the former president gets into semantics. ‘It depends upon what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is. If ‘is’ means is and never has been, that is not—that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement,’ Clinton said with what seems like a smirk on his face.
I remember watching that on TV and seeing the lawyer take him to task on it, saying effectively: Wait…what? Are you saying that your statement was “true” because you weren’t physically having sex with Monica Lewinsky at that specific time the question was asked?!
It was truly baffling and absurd. Well, Michael does quite a bit of this.
When cornered on certain topics he tries to dodge by becoming absurdly “specific” about certain words.
For example, watch this video from 53.20 on, where he admits that Bergoglio said that Proselytising is a sin. But, he goes on to “explain” that what Bergy-the-Oleous means by that, is “to use force” to convert people to Catholicism.
Which is, of course, abject nonsense. “What does he mean by Proselytism?” he says, “the question is, is proselytism the same as evangelisation?” And he goes on to say that “convincing people” of the truth is evangelising, and fine, but Proselytism is, according to him, understood by Bergoglio to be the use of “coercion and force”. He doesn’t explain how he knows this, or what evidence he has that Bergy-the-Olous uses this word this way, of course. But does it matter? No. Because we know very well what words mean around here.
But hey, don’t take my word for it. Let’s go to my 13 volume set of the Oxford English Dictionary and look them both up.
Evangelise means:
to preach the gospel or
to bring under the influence of the gospel
the state or condition of being evangelised or converted to the Christian faith
And Proselytise means:
To make proselytes
To make a proselyte of
What is a Proselyte?
It is defined as:
One who has come over from one opinion, belief, creed or party to another; a convert
A gentile convert to the Jewish faith
to convert form one religious faith or sect to another
In short, they are perfectly synonymous of each other, and if anything evangelise is the one that could potentially have some “force” attributable to it since in definition 3 it simply states to be “converted to the Christian faith”. And in definition 2 one might be “brought under the influence of” by having a gun pointed to one’s head with a command to convert. One (if autistic) might try to argue that in this case, the presumption is that perhaps it’s okay to do it by any means, including against the individual’s free will.
While in the definitions of Proselyte the implication of free will of the convert is clearly always grammatically present.
So, it is, of course a lie. Nonsense. And it is said to run cover for the never-was-Catholic, protector of Pedophiles on Earth, Bergy-the-Oleous, fake “pope” and grand vizier of Moloch.
He does this in other ways and in other videos. He in fact tried to dismiss the entirety of the Code of Canon Law using similar subterfuge, I forget now the detail and I can’t be bothered to look for it presently, but the case is clearly made, if you listen to him for any length of time on the topic of Sedevacantism, that he is dishonest.
So WHY is he dishonest? Is he getting paid for it? (I don’t know)
Is he funded by some rich heretic interested in funding gatekeepers like the money man behind both Emo Jones and Church Militant’s ex(sure)gay guy Voris, Marc Brammer? (I don’t know)
Does he make a substantial amount of money from his podcasts? Yes. Is it enough to keep him in the level of luxury he wants? I don’t know but I doubt it, these guys tend to be greedy.
So can I definitely point at him and scream “KNOWING HERETIC! BURN HIM!” Well, I certainly will treat him like one, because he is, but no, I can’t quite yet do that, because he may just be stroking his own ego instead of have a vested interest in sending souls to Hell for a third party.
But what we can be certain of is that the he is a sophist. And I mean that in the EOD version n. 3:
One who makes use of fallacious arguments; a specious reasoner.
And by specious, here they mean EOD definition n. 2:
Having a fair or attractive appearance or character, calculated to make a favourable impression on the mind, but in reality devoid of the qualities apparently possessed.
And, without surprise, he not only never argues Sedevacantism honestly, but he is absolutely terrified of even beginning to have an argument with someone that (though ultimately wrong) knows enough to prove him to be absolutely flawed in all his reasonings concerning Catholicism.
Peter Dimond is ultimately wrong because he doesn’t not recognise Baptism of Desire and of Blood, which the Church and Canon Law in fact do recognise, and as a result of that error he then rejects the few remaining valid Priests and Bishops (sedevacantists).
That said, Dimond would wipe the floor with Lofton, because autistic though Dimond is about baptism of desire (he literally twists the meaning of the black on white word of Canon Law of 1917 to “make his case”, not unlike Lofton himself) he is pretty rock-solid on most other aspects of Catholicism. In fact, barring that (serious and unfortunate error) and a few other points which are really so far-out as to be literally non-issues for almost anyone at all, Dimond is sound in his Catholicism. But note how Lofton resorts to specious ad hominem instead of answering the question.
If I were tasked with arguing Dimond I would say that we essentially only have one main point of contention, and it is baptism of desire and baptism of blood. I would have to research the various places this was clearly stated by multiple Popes etcetera, which would be pointless, because it is addressed in the canon Law of 1917, and Dimond has already shown that his approach to it would be autism redux with no ability to objectively evaluate the relevant code. So, arguing with him would be pointless and fruitless for us both. But I have no doubt he would be able to recite the various passages from Papal Encyclicals that he uses (erroneously) to make his case, from memory. I certainly could not.
Lofton instead, tries to side-step the entire major point of the Sede vs Heretics arguments, and never really addresses them in his own “takes”.
Tell us Michael, where is the Code of Canon Law, or the Dogma, that says 70 years is too much for an interregnum? Oh wait…what is that? There isn’t one?
Right.
And the Church has been without a Pope for a few years before and for over 70 with no clear way of knowing who was Pope because there were up to three at a time claiming it. But that was fine was it?
Oh and, no one judges the Pope… yet… there have been more than 40 antipopes before 1958, so… SOMEHOW we must be able to know when a Pope is a heretic, eh Michael? And definitely judge it so. Why don’t you explain that one away too.
But I want to now address those who get affected by specialbois or deceivers, whichever he is, like Lofton.
That is, those who get convinced by him on the basis that he introduces right at the start of the linked video, and that is, that oh, well, if there are only a few actual Catholics left (i.e. if Sedevacantism is true and there are “only” 200,000 to a 1,000,000 catholics left) then one should despair and become oh… he doesn’t know… Say Eastern “Orthodox” or a Copt or maybe a Syrian Catholic… (are there even 200k of those guys?!) because, you know, as Jesus Himself and all the Apostles clearly stated, Christianity is a popularity contest!
If you don’t have the numbers you just don’t play, right?
Go to a “winning” team like Russian Orthobros. Or stick with the Molochian usurpers LARPing at being “Catholic” clergy, because, hey, they have the numbers!
Right. Sure.
If you go along with hat argument, then, it is patently obvious, that your flaw here is not just your ability to do logic, perceive truth, or understand objective reality, but also, that you are supremely weak, and more akin to a herd animal than a reasoning, thinking, human being.
And, at best, that’s the type of “Catholic” Michael Lofton is, Ladies and Gentlemen, by his own admission at 18.10 or so of his video.
So I rest my case.
Matthew 7:13-14
“Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.
You get up and the sky is criss-crossed by chemtrails by the soulless, unloved, disgusting sacks of shit pretending to be humans, and I mean the pilots along with their puppet masters.
And you don’t have a crate of cheap stinger missiles from the “war” in Ukraine to take the fuckers out in a blaze of glory throughout the early morning hours.
And you wake up with the same bastard headache you had when you went to bed, despite the 800mg of ibuprofen last night. The chemtrails are probably doing it.
Or the mould. Because there is mould in the bathroom.
And the bedroom.
And one of the other rooms.
So you steel yourself for a messy day of sandpapering and vacuuming and fucking dust everywhere and then the stench of mould-killer stuff after.
And the sander is out of sand-paper. And the hardware store is closed until 4pm
And the bastard gasifier is still not doing what it should because you need to re-adapt the blower and probably the filter and maybe do a couple other things, and you wonder, why did no one from WW2 leave detailed notes on how to build these things?
And THEN you find out a major clusterfuck thanks to trusting someone in IT. And you KNOW you should know better. But you did it anyway, so 2 years of contacts from interested parties just weren’t forwarded at all. Nor their messages saved. Only their emails in the logs.
But murder is not the answer they say…
And the kid’s trampoline has a piece that broke and you need to fix it cause they love that thing.
And it’s only lunchtime.
And you try to pray.
And you remember that song… there’ll be days like this.
Yeah. but it wasn’t mama telling me about the days.
It was dad. And he had more days of this sort than most. And the one thing I either learnt, or got from DNA or figured out somehow is that when there are damned dog days like this…
You keep punching.
You reload and keep firing.
You pick up the hammer or the screw-driver, or the drill, or the grinder, or whatever, and you keep going.
And focus. Cause nothing spills blood more easily than a pissed off attitude and a tired or sloppy attention span working with power tools.
So, yeah, there are days like this.
And the correct attitude is that described in various stanzas of the poem IF.
If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
But make allowance for their doubting too;
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
Or being lied about, don’t deal in lies,
Or being hated, don’t give way to hating,
And yet don’t look too good, nor talk too wise:
If you can dream—and not make dreams your master;
If you can think—and not make thoughts your aim;
If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
And treat those two impostors just the same;
If you can bear to hear the truth you’ve spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken,
And stoop and build ’em up with worn-out tools:
If you can make one heap of all your winnings
And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss,
And lose, and start again at your beginnings
And never breathe a word about your loss;
If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew
To serve your turn long after they are gone,
And so hold on when there is nothing in you
Except the Will which says to them: ‘Hold on!’
If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
Or walk with Kings—nor lose the common touch,
If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you,
If all men count with you, but none too much;
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that’s in it,
And—which is more—you’ll be a Man, my son!
And my mama never told me about the other days, the Van Morrison song days either. In fact, I like that song because I figured out on my own that they existed a little before it came out in 1995.
And it’s important to remember that. Especially when you have days like the one I’m having today.
You know what grinds us down?
Hope.
People forget that in the badly mangled version of the Myth of Pandora, which is the most popular —because people are idiots— they say it is hope that leaves her jar of miseries last.
In truth, in the actual myth, it is first of all Pandora herself that is the plague on mankind, representing woman in general, and later, her jar, filled with all sorts ills for humanity as punishment for the stealing of fire by Prometheus. And in that version, hope never leaves the jar.
But, at any rate, if we lived more in accordance with Catholic faith, we would go about our days, Van Morrison version or shitty life version, with Nec Spe, Nec Metu.
No Hope, No Fear.
You see it is when our hopes get dashed that we suffer. Because our hopes are usually an avoiding of pain, which is, of course, motivated by Fear. And if you live trying to avoid your fears by hoping to do so, somehow, well… you’re definitely going to suffer.
But if you have no hopes to be dashed, and no fear to terrorise you into having “hopes”, well, then you are free. And while shitty days and Van Morrison days are not the same, if you have no hope and no fear, they are not quite as far apart as if you do.
So.
Off I go to walk the rest of this day, however it turns out.
A reader writes in. I post his email and name in the hope it is of some use to someone.
As always, this is the internet, I am not a doctor, etc. Remember, only YOU are responsible for YOU and your loved ones. Also, please note, I have no relationship whatsoever with any of the things recommended in the email nor any financial link/incentive/remuneration regarding anything in this email, and I have not personally verified the recommended multi-pill, but the advice seems logical and sound to me and the advice of checking any pills yourself at a minimum as he describes is also something that makes sense to me. As you know, and as per my last post, I am personally trying to revert completely to nature. We don’t use any kind of fertilisers or insecticides of any kind on our land either.
Hi Giuseppe,
I can confirm that a combination of 6 ingredients do eviscerate covid.
N-acetyl Cysteine
Quercetin
Vitamin C and D
Olive leave extract
Zinc
The pseudonymous Dr. Grouf has been censored over this:
You’ll find the price of €20 to be much more affordable over a period of years as prophylaxis than the €120+ of the individual bottles of ingredients just for a very short battle with covid.
[redacted comment here that does not affect the rest of this email]
I’ve seen a video of Australians purebloods explaining how a vitamin pill company with a history of freemason ownership was placing a metal into the pills.
The metals in the disolved pills could be seen reacting to a magnet.
We should repeat this test on any pills before recommending them.
I’ll update you if I remember anything more.
Kind regards,
David James
(You can use my name since I should be held accountable if something goes wrong. You have my address.)
NB: I am hoping this list will diminish the number of retards I need to spam permanently. I know, I know, but one can hope…
The official story about 9/11
The official story NASA says about:
The Moon landing/s
The Face on Mars
Losing the technology to go to the Moon
Taping over the original Moon landing videos
What Mars is like on about all levels, and why
The nature of the Asteroid Belt
The nature of Venus
Pretty much all they said about all the Mars missions
The Clementine Moon Mission
In general, almost anything they say
That Lee Harvey Oswald Killed JFK
That Antigravity Technology does not exist
That far more efficient ways to create electricity don’t exist
That cold fusion was a total scam
That Edison was the inventor of the Lightbulb
That the Talmudic religion of the Jews is NOT officially, admitted to be by both notable Rabbis and their Talmud, a tyrannical pedophile one whose aim is to rule over all non-Jews, making them slaves
That airships are inherently dangerous
That space travel is wasteful or impossible
What I refer to as Psychotronic Healing Chambers in my SF are not a reality (if not quite exactly as I presented them)
That the Great Pyramid in Giza was build as the official Egyptologists say
That the Sphinx is what the official story says
That both the Giza Pyramids and the Sphinx were built:
When the Egyptologists tell us they were
How they tell us they were built
By whom they were built
Why they were built
That the history of Humanity does not include advanced civilisations in our past
That Hitler died in his bunker from suicide
That the Crusaders were “the bad guys”
That the Eastern “Orthodox” were the “good guys” despite betraying the Catholics who came to help them for three crusades in a row and forever after
That Martin Luther improved anything for Christianity
That Henry the VIII improved anything for Christianity
That the KJV “Bible” is the best one (despite it being ordered by a flaming homosexual who literally created the Freemason Temples as we have them today and having over 33,000 “mistranslations” including in the Ten Commandments, and being translated from a version of the Bible that was edited by Pharisees for 700 years and had books ripped out of it by the Luther followers)
That there are anything other than two sexes
That we should use the word “gender” —which is properly to be used for discussing the grammar of the romantic languages, which have feminine and masculine words— to describe what should be referred to as the sex of human beings
That “transitioning” children is anything than an utterly perverse form of both sexual, emotional, intellectual and demonic physical abuse
That there is no link between homosexuality and child sexual abuse in both directions, that is at the level of both the causation of homosexuality as well as the resultant effects of it
That very highly placed people in especially the US, but also most Western governments, legislature and law enforcement are not active pedophiles, blackmailable on multiple front and/or covering for various colleagues of theirs who are pedophiles
That the naked mask-wearing dancing ritual that happen at places like Bohemian grove are perfectly innocent “games” and not demonic rituals performed by highly wealthy and powerful individuals
That the Brandenburg Group is benign
That the Covid Genetic Serums are in any way, shape or form actual Vaccines
That the Covid Genetic Serums are in any way benign
That the entire Covid scam was not a planned depopulation agenda years in the making and well co-ordinated
That the videos of Fauci and his colleagues essentially admitting to wanting to bypass all standards of due process for these fake “vaccines” are not real
That event 201 was just a coincidence
That the Green Pass was put in place for our benefit and not to regulate every aspect of our life, Chinese style as is already happening in China
That 5G is for our own good and poses no health risks for humans whatsoever
That the Port Alfred Massacre official story is the truth and Bryant is guilty of anything other than being mentally handicapped and a patsy
That brain-controlling weaponry on both individual and mass scale doesn’t already exist and has existed since at least the 1990s
That democracy is the best system of government
That violence is never the answer
That there ever has been, or ever will be, anything such as “free speech”
That America was ever intended to be “the land of the free”
That America was not conceived of, funded by, and created by Freemasons as a Freemasons country with Freemason rules which have gradually become more and more obviously Freemason over time
That the “Catholic Church” after Vatican II is the same Catholic Church as before it and teaches the same things
That the Catholic Church was not intentionally infiltrated by Freemasons, Carbonari, Illuminati (all variations of Satanists) and Communists for at least 250 years until the invalid election of “Roncalli” in 1958 finally meant they had taken over the structure of the Catholic Church almost entirely
That Catholicism lasted almost 2000 years (and continues to exist today if much reduced) and created the best civilisations humanity has ever seen as well as the best real advances in human conditions by “chance”
That Einstein was a great guy, not a sexual pervert and a plagiarist
That Bill Gates is a great guy, not a pervert and depopulationist that was never any good even at his supposed original work and that Paul Allen was wrong when he let it be known Bill just masturbated to porn almost constantly and didn’t do any of the work attributed to him
That the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and other ridiculously wealthy individuals that had a hand in WW1, WW2, The Federal Reserve and so on are perfectly nice people without a conspiratorial, mass-murdering bone in their body
That Epstein killed himself
That Bill and Hillary Clinton did not have a bunch of people killed over the years
That only the government and its operatives should have a monopoly on the use of force
That government is efficient at anything other than protecting government against justice from its citizens
That Anglo-saxon or American “common-law” is superior to Roman Law
That Truth is relative and not objective
That your emotions should take precedence over logic that is based in principles of Roman Law and Catholic Justice
That the death penalty is wrong or inhumane
That Church and State should be separate in one nation
That diversity in a nation is a positive
That Feminism is good or has achieved anything good when compared overall to the patriarchal way civilisation was achieved
That men and women are in any way equal
That all religions, ideologies and beliefs have equal value or are deserving of equal respect
That evil people do not exist or that evil itself does not exist
That spiritual beings or entities with nefarious intent towards us do not exist
That the Universe is just a random accident even if it is absolutely obvious to anyone who bothers to look that the math simply does not, in any way, stack up
That a billion monkeys on a billion typewriters, for ten billion years could write just one of the plays of Shakespeare, never mind all his works. Seriously. Do the math. Actually do the math.
That “faith” doesn’t involve or shouldn’t involve reason
That a higher IQ automatically means a higher moral code
That (as Martin Luther did, explicitly) reason (logic, objectivity and so on) is “the whore of the devil”
That “once saved always saved” makes any sense or is how Christianity works
This is by no means a complete list. It’s not even a decent partial list. It’s just what popped into my head without any interruption for the few minutes it took me to write it. And I could probably continue for several hours without pause, but it will do for the normies, for now.
I am certain almost no-one will agree with he whole list, but if such a person does exist, do let me know and leave a comment, I’m curious.
