Archive for the ‘Christianity’ Category

Blackpilling Gnostics – Bruce Charlton Edition. Again.

Blackpilling deceivers, gnostics, and sophists need to be ignored. At least until we can change the laws back to outlawing them, ostracising them from civilised society, and in the worst cases make their nightmares come true by burning them at the stake.

My friend Adam posted a very nice, polite, well-reasoned missive for the indefatigable Ann Bernhardt, basically asking her a slightly different take on the question I have been asking her for years now.

My version: Ann, show me where in Canon Law it states there is a limit of duration to an interregnum.

Adam’s take: Ann, ALL of these “Cardinals” are demonstrable demon worshippers. And when Bergoglio kicks the bucket THEY will be “electing” the next “Pope”. Can you see why I am using inverted commas and why we 1958 Sedevacantists are correct and not you, laughably wrong 2023 sedevacantist?

But Ann will not respond to either of us, I am certain.

I know, I know, to you non-Catholics, and therefore non-Christians, this all sounds like the Baptist joke about the guy who’s gonna jump from a bridge.

But that’s only because you’re an ignorant heathen, a pretend-Christian of some rebellious Protestant denomination, or you simply never got round to reading the Patristic fathers, the history of Christianity, or the Bible. Take your pick, it doesn’t matter, because the point of this post is simply to show in the clear light of day, what a sophist, deceiver, and mollusc Bruce Charlton is, and why anyone sane will ignore pretty much anything he has to say.

I first came across Bruce because of an admittedly brilliant little pamphlet he wrote (free on the internet) called Addicted to Distraction. It really is good and you don’t need to be in any way religious to enjoy it.

That said, pretty much everything else after that has been a steaming pile of Gnosticism, spiritual deviancy, and sophistry.

For reasons only known to himself, (or perhaps the demons riding him) Bruce decided that the best thing he could do to Adam’s post was discourage anyone from being a proper Catholic. i.e. a Sedevacantist.

Interesting; since Bruce has professed for some time that he feels the closest thing he is Christianity-wise, is to a Mormon.

I thought he’d misspelt Moron (as I think Mormons have too) but he repeated it quite a lot a while back. Now, far be it from me to criticise anyone who believes Joseph Smith wasn’t a complete sex perverted charlatan who made the whole idiotic thing up, including there being golden sheets of words written by an Angel called Moroni (there’s a hint here, honest!) that he put inside a box and that only he, and he alone, could read, and then only with a seer stone inside his tuba hat, but no one else was allowed to see the sheets and the “translated” Angelic words were noted down by a scribe on the other side of a screen from Smith who “read them” using his special tuba hat. And that was how the Book of Mormon, and his fucking everyone’s wife, and the entire Moronic/Mormonic religion came about.

If you think I am having a fever-dream-hallucination, you are wrong, that insanity is literally how Mormonism came about. Yes. I know, it makes the Scientologists with their Xemu seem a LOT more plausible.

But yeah, when THAT guy starts telling people to NOT be proper Catholics… well… light him up is what I’m gonna do, so here it is. And here is Bruce’s first Gnostic comment.

bruce g charlton 1 day ago

@Adam – One difficulty of going back to Vatican II is logistical, given the importance given to a valid apostolic succession. Because most of what has happened in the RC church all over the world over the past half-century would be utterly invalidated.

Indeed, so large and complex is this problem, that it seems (obviously!) utterly impossible to unpick the valid from the invalid – and spiritually almost lethal even to try.

In other words, I am sure that a strict and logical legalism – even if completely honest and rigorously applied – cannot extricate the RCC from the mess that it now inhabits. Therefore, that legalistic approach to the problem is doomed to fail, and therefore should not be embarked-upon.

But that does Not mean the task is impossible, merely that a legalistic approach cannot accomplish the task.

I am sure that insofar as Roman Catholics are motivated to live in accordance with God’s will; then ways will be found in practice to “short circuit” these problems – and these ways will be clear and simple, and known in their hearts to be valid, by those Roman Catholics of genuine good will.

Thus will a part of the Roman Catholic survive and thrive – to the benefit of all.

But the strictly legalistic approach would (will) need to be let-go at some point; or else it will block what is necessary and good.

I wasn’t the first one to get a shot back at him…

 Reply to  bruce g charlton 1 day ago

That’s not the way this works. All that happened over the last several decades is in fact invalid and it can and must be recognized as such. Catholicism is not Romantic Christianity.

But I think mine was more balanced, fair and complete:

 Reply to  bruce g charlton 1 day ago

Bruce, you whiny, gnostic, coward.
Crawl back under the retarded rock of Moroni you climbed out from under.
You literally stated that the absurd cult of Mormonism is the closest you come to Christianity, and here you are, once again, trying to dissuade anyone from even thinking about sedevacantism; aka actual Catholicism, which is thriving and expanding daily and makes perfect sense since what happened with V2 is really simple enough an honest ten year old can understand it. But not deceivers like you. Just like you ran away from the truth I forced your nose into at my blog (you deleted my replies on yours) run along now, sede blogs are not places for spineless Brits like you.

If you think that didn’t explain too much, you’re right, but that’s because me and Bruce have had this out before, so if you need more information, you might start here for generics on Sedevacantism, or buy one of my books Believe! (short) or Reclaiming the Catholic Church (long).

If instead you want to read up on Bruce and me, knock yourself out, here. I started to call him out over a year ago.

Bruce ignored my comment, of course, but felt the need to keep making random sophistry up. Which is such bullshit I just need to break it up and comment on it.

Problems don’t go away just because they are unacknowledged; and the worst real problems are those due to unacknowledged metaphysical assumptions.

No, Bruce, the worst problem is intentional, lying deceivers like you trying to lead souls to Hell by lying to them.

One such is that the bottom line essence of Roman Catholicism is legalistic in nature – i.e. that the legal aspects trump all other considerations.

No Bruce. The Bottom Line of Catholicism is that it is the TRUTH. And the Truth cannot be lied about, changed, made different or perverted. Legalism, as YOU use it is simply subterfuge, lies, and twisting the truth. What the Church does is not “legalism” Bruce, it’s defending the factual, inerrant, infallible, eternal TRUTH. Yes, your very Nemesis, the thing that sends you scurrying like a cockroach for shadows and sophistry. You would not know this, being what you are, but you see Bruce, honest men will NEVER flex or bend or break before creatures of shadow like you. Nope. We will look at the truth and point it out, and call you out for the deceiving liar you are.

Until That is recognized as an assumption, and that assumption compared with other possible assumptions, then discussion cannot proceed beyond primary school playground verbal scraps (yawn…).

Yawn away you little runt. There is nothing assumed in Catholicism. It is reasoned, thought out, proven, checked against scripture and tradition and divine dogma, and reality. And because Jesus instituted the Church on Earth, and he is not a liar, the Church too, despite being filled with flawed men, remains infallible in its Magisterial teachings. Yes, even after there has been no valid Pope since 1958. Because Jesus promised he would be with us until the end times, and so it is. Real Priests and real Bishops continue to exist. Just nowhere in the Vatican. None within the Novus Ordo Satanic impostor religion pretending to be Catholicism. But as it always did, the Church continues to exist.

If discussion gets trapped by unexamined legalistic assumptions that contain necessarilydestructive consequences, then it will be Roman Catholicism that suffers.

There is no legalistic assumption, only undeniable fact and reality. There is nothing destructive in Catholicism. And in case you are wondering, yes, burning heretics at the stake is salutary and civilisational, as history has proven time and again, not destructive. Not even for the heretic, since contemplating his own burning flesh gives him time to ponder his errors and possibly repent, thus entering Purgatory and eventually Salvation too.

This is why fifth columnists within all churches have so often hidden their real (and anti-Christian – often personal, or ideological) agendas behind a façade of strict legalism. Such agents destroy and personally profit (or simply enjoy the process of destruction), while pretending to protect.

Nope. You’re now trying to conflate sophists and liars like yourself with being strict. The truth IS strict, Bruce. Reality IS strict. That’s just how it is. And so, liars like you are called out for the liars they are.

And the same can happen unconsciously, delusionally, or from a desire for “certainty” – in order, to “settle the question” once and for all. Many motives are possible.

Look at all the nonsense you’re throwing at Sedes, hoping something will stick. Amazing. Well, I know you’re not doing this “unconsciously” Bruce, it’s very intentional and conscious on your part. Nor is it delusional. Underhanded, subversive, deceitful, false, and cowardly, yes, it’s all of those, but not delusional. Well, except if you think your ploy will work on actual Catholics, then yes, you would be delusional. But that’s not your target, is it Bruce, no, like all the gatekeeping Satanists, your target is the newly interested neophyte. You aim to prevent anyone from even looking at sedevacantism. Because you know if they do they will see the perfect reasoning of it and become proper, actual, Christians. And that would leave you out in the cold. Well… for. bit, you’ll get to a real warm place in due course.

The point is that In These Times we can be sure that (later if not sooner) our fundamental assumptions will be exposed, and tested to breaking point. The question is: what then breaks?

You. Bruce. You break. And all those like you. You know what doesn’t break? Catholicism. Or Catholics. At most we die. And either as martyrs (the best of us) or as warriors, taking as many of you scum as possible down with us, except your ride will be a lot lower down and more permanent than ours.

It was good to see I was not the only one that recognised Bruce for what he is. CT had some pertinent thoughts on the matter.

C T Reply to  bruce g charlton 15 hours ago

What a steaming heap of bafflegarble. When the new Inquisition is put into place, you are not going to make it.

As is known now, the Secret King Bruce had to continue to try to have the last word

bruce g charlton Reply to  bruce g charlton 9 hours ago

I should add that I regard the basic “sede” stance – i.e. that the RCC was poisoned by Vatican II – as obviously correct.

Here he uses one of the tried and tested methods of the deceiver: “Oh but I agree with you, see? Now come walk with me down this yellow-bricked road…”

But I suggest that this position can and should be reached without recourse to legalism, and the solutions to Vatican II should not be legalistic either.

Transaltion: But I suggest that this position can and should be reached without recourse to TRUTH, and the solutions to Vatican II should not be TRUE either.

I would have thought it obvious that the Holy Ghost can and will (as I said) “short circuit” the impossibly complex legal problems to provide direct answers that can be agreed by all Catholics of good (i.e. genuinely Christian) motivation.

See? You are a “good” Catholic, if you listen to old uncle Bruce here who has genuine “Christian” motivation. And we’ll skip right over the simple fact that Catholicism IS Christianity. That the ONLY Christianity that has ever existed IS Catholicism, and all else is heresy, nonsense, lies and deceit.

What a serpentine mollusc you are Bruce, you might as well write, All men of good brotherhood can agree that good brotherhood and equality and liberty is the true “catholicism”. You freemason brothers would be proud.

But this can only happen if other factor/s than legalism are regarded as primary and foundational to the Catholic faith. Legalism (aka Pharisees-ism) – if adopted – will empower the wrong people by focusing on the letter, will utterly fail to solve the real problems – and will prove utterly destructive of the Christian spirit (as it always has done and will continue to do). If any church survives, it will be an empty shell.

Translation: But this can only happen if other factor/s than TRUTH are regarded as primary and foundational to the Catholic faith.

See Bruce, you have a bit of a hurdle here, in the sense that K2 or Mount Olympos is a “bit of a hill”. Catholicism has always stayed very clearly that it is the ONLY, ONE, TRUE, HOLY, APOSTOLIC, RELIGION. You really can’t get away from that. Now, you can agree or not. Don’t agree, then you’re not Catholic. Buh-Bye. Off you go, piss off and don’t bother us again. No Catholic cares about your opinions of Catholicism, you are not one of us, you don’t count. End of. Or you agree, in which case, you can’t water down the truth Bruce. You can’t twist it. You can’t change it. You can’t ignore it. Which is what you are advocating for. Precisely what you’d like Catholics to do is completely anathema to us. Oh, does it hurt you feel that we plainly say, we are right and yes, all of you who are not with us are wrong? Hmmm…I wonder who else said if you are not with me you’r against me. Anyone? Anyone? Guy in Galilee? Answered to the name of Jesus? Ever heard of Him, Bruce? Guess what, we Catholics ARE with him. People like you, I’m fairly sure He’s gonna say “I never knew you.” Go look it up. You might as well read that Bible one day eh?

CT too also fired back. More gentlemanly than I, as is often the case. But then I am not going for polite. I want to obliterate any shred of credibility these charlatanic gnostic deceivers have, forever. So Orbital Nukes is more my speed.

C T Reply to  bruce g charlton 3 hours ago

You often make these weird mistakes — e.g. “pharisees-ism” — that make me wonder sometimes what language you actually speak.

No, God won’t “short-circuit” His own law. That’s a stupidity that only a maleducated, non-Christian midwit could envisage. The plain truth is that outside of the Church there is no salvation, therefore all who wish to be saved must be brought into It, legally and publicly because there is no other way. Baptisms and other sacraments must be performed properly, evil must be publicly renounced, penance must be visibly performed before the apostates can be accepted as Catholic.

You are not even a member of the Church. You are so far from being a well trained and educated cleric that you can only aspire to be a layman. You have no say, are entitled to no opinion, can offer no relevant advice on the matter.

Quite. And on that note, we once more, turn the page on the non-Christian, liar, deceiver and intentional sophist Bruce Charlton.

No related posts.

By G | 20 November 2023 | Posted in Believe, Freemasons, Gammas, Impostors and Frauds, Reclaiming the Catholic Church, Sedevacantism

Kurgan Woodchipper Time!

Behold, ladies and gentlemen, yet another volunteer, sacrificing himself on the altar of the gods of retards, at the pious hands of your dutiful servant, my humble self.

Let us begin the mental flaying of this latest of LARPing retards.

First off, Moron of Simba, I don’t actually read Z blog. I have read it perhaps a handful of times in 10 years and certainly not in the last several months for sure, so I am not sure what made you think that. But then, as some famous Romans probably said before crushing some now extinct species of troglodytes: There is no accounting for retards.

That’s a literary joke for those who know some latin. Never mind, just hear the WOOSH sound and move on Moron.

Secondly, I have zero narcissistic personality traits. If you could actually read and if you did, you would have discovered that long ago, since I have explained my specific type of neurology in some detail. In any case, everyone that knows me personally can also attest that I have zero narcissistic personality traits. You, of course, being the usual retard, couldn’t tell the difference between a chicken and a donkey anyway, so it’s pointless to try to explain anything to you, nor, provide you with factual evidence. We know this without shadow of a doubt because you claim to be a someone who worships a “god” who sucks semen out of other men’s penises, including those of dead men. I didn’t claim this, you have:

Now, we know for a fact, that no one, literally no one, including retards like you, would get martyred in the name of the mythical cocksucker Odin. So, yes, you are a LARPer. To every single effect.

You are stupid, ignorant, obviously have massive latent homosexual tendencies or might be a raging homo yourself, given who you worship —or pretend to worship to be more accurate— and without doubt you are also a liar. We know this because you say you “don’t mind” about any of the false things you accuse me of doing, and yet, you felt the need to write this comment to show me how much you don’t mind.

Moving on…

You also conflate confidence with narcissism, once again, demonstrating your sub-par IQ and poor language as well as reasoning skills all-round. And ascribe my confidence to my success with women. Another tragic error. While learning about women, being a skill like anything else, certainly made my confidence in being able to attract women I was interested in grow —again, as with any other skill, if you practice it you get better at it— my personal generic level of confidence did not arise from this, but was there long before that and was developed in pretty early childhood; insofar as it can be developed beyond being an innate quality that is probably genetic on some level.

And the cherry on the top being your accusation that Catholicism is a) MY brand of anything, which is clearly absurd unless you think I am Jesus, in which case, your mental problems are even more severe than even I can imagine, b) “random”, given it’s literally the very root, beginning, middle and eventually end (at least insofar as the End Times are the “end” of anything) of Christianity. Catholicism IS Christianity. Now, if I were a Protestant, you might be able to accuse me of having rolled dice (lots of them!) or, more realistically using a large random number generator to pick a brand of fake Christianity, but you’re really shit out of luck on this one. Especially if you could read. At all.

So, yes, overall, you have succeeded in demonstrating (as usual) that:

  • “Pagans” are fake, gay retards
  • Actual “viking type” Pagans have gone the way of the dodo, except about a thousand years ago. Know why, retard? Because they ALL converted to Catholicism and then went on to become Crusaders, you stupid, stupid, ignorant, illiterate, ahistorical LARPer.
  • You can’t read. And never have picked up a book beyond probably Harry Potter, who you thought was ok but only a Wicca, not a real Shaman.
  • My detractors are by and large idiots like yourself who need to wear sandals because shoelaces prove impossible for them to figure out.

Thanks for playing. Buh-bye now.

*Shoves drooling idiot into mass grave of spammed morons*

No related posts.

By G | 20 November 2023 | Posted in Catholicism, Humour, Social Commentary, Zombie Apocalypse

The Bonobo Problem

Imagine if you Bonobos could speak like humans, with a near full vocabulary, but retained their bonobo interests and brains although they were trying to pretend to be the rightful rulers of Earth. In short: Planet of the Apes, the original film.

Then imagine these apes pretending to discuss an item of basic philosophy or religion, or metaphysics. And imagine how you might feel and what you might think observing them.

Any attempt at trying to seriously engage with them on the topic would be utterly frustrating, as you might only get a few basic concepts across before their limited ape brain got them back to talking about bananas and how they are intrinsic to the question at hand. Or how rutting with the nearest female bonobo right then and there was. All the while pretending they are sophisticated philosophers even as they rape the nearest female and shortly eat the banana she was trying to keep for herself.

Would you get angry and beat the male and try and educate him? Would you take the banana from him and at least try to prevent him from stealing it from the other ape? Would any of it be worth doing at all?

Or you might poke at them with a stick or a sentence, to see what they might do. You might get more fond of one or two oft mhm who seemed to have some beginning of a kind of understanding, or more human-like behaviour. But in the end, you would realise they are bonobos.

Arrogant as it will sound, this is very often the case I encounter when I come across the average “theologian on the internet”. They say the most absurd and retarded things, with no basis in the factual information they are pretending to base their opinions on. Literally none.

So, I am often finding myself making comment like this one:

And people think “Oh, what a rude bigot!”

Insofar as they think of anything at all past the nearest fetching female ape with a banana in hand, that is.

But you see, for the half-dozen or so of you that might not be apes who actually read and comprehend… the fact is that I didn’t just become a Sedevacantist (that is a proper Catholic) by chance. I wasn’t born into it. I rejected religion as a whole in general and Catholicism as it was preached to me by the then Novus Ordo (but probably validly ordained) priest we had come talk to us in school when I was 7. I have read thousands of books and probably hundreds on various concepts of physics, astronomy, philosophy, various religions, and metaphysical beliefs. I literally read hundreds of research papers on everything from neurology to ESP testing. I practiced various forms of martial arts and the associated exercises of mental and physical control that goes with them. I have read pretty much everything Milton Erikson wrote on hypnosis and practices self hypnosis on myself for over a year and a half before I tried it on anyone else. I have yet to fail at a single session of smoking cessation done on others and have helped people heal even from clinically diagnosed paranoid schizophrenia that meant they were on mandated medication. I have read enough stuff on neuroscience and tested various practices on myself to know most doctors haven’t got a clue of the level of brain-body-mind connection that exists and how much it is interrelated.

So, when I had a unique, Road to Damascus experience, I didn’t just go “Oh, right, I’m Catholic now!”.

Nope, I spent the next 4 years obsessively reading and researching Christianity, which I had already read up on a lot of stuff before already, but now I went back to the very earliest writings on it and started there. And slowly but surely it became obvious that Catholicism was far and away the closest interpretation of reality as it actually is that exists. And I didn’t just assume this. I tested it. I tested it scientifically with prayer and various methods of belief and so on. And my life radically changed path in ways that are literally nothing short of miraculous.

If you take the approach I did to Christianity, which is to assume nothing, to release all and any preconceived ideas you had and just do the work of researching it from the very baseline, it becomes absolutely impossible to assume that Protestant-anything has any validity whatsoever.

That’s because Christianity absolutely has rules. Which, of course, is perfectly logical. If God is good and loving and logical (the word Logos literally is part of Christianity) it makes absolute sense that you have rules and things you can do and things you should not do. And things that you need to do and things you need to NOT do. Simply saying “I believe in God and Christ is King!” just is NOT enough. Nor would it be enough for anyone even remotely reasonable and good. That level of “belief” is literally identical to the one demons have. They know God is real and they know Jesus is King. Which is why they have to flee before him and people who invoke his name with true faith in our Lord.

And if you study Christianity, you realise that Catholicism IS Christianity. It always was. Infallible Popes and everything else. And you realise the lies told about it and the eternal and relentless attacks against it from the very start. And you also begin to see how the politics and byzantine machinations of the East led them to splinter away for purely human and worldly reasons, even though they recanted their errors several times, even four centuries later at the ecumenical council in Florence. What is more, you see the fruits of Catholicism literally throughout the world. And as you continue to study you begin to realise the evil of freemasonry, Satanism and the Judaic principles behind it all. And you begin to appreciate a lot more exactly what Jesus meant in Revelation 3:9. Or how America came about and who made it as it is, and who controls it to this day.

You begin to see the French Revolution and the so-called “Enlightenment” and the Industrial Revolution in a new light and why they had to happen after the staged Rebellion by the fat German sex pervert, aided by the wife-murdering, impotent, English King.

You begin to understand the absolute majestic heroism of the Crusaders and the vicious lies told about them by Protestant historians for centuries.

You begin to grasp the treachery of the Eastern “orthodox” backstabbers and the further lies they tell about the oh so “unjust” fourth Crusade that sacked Constantinople. Which was eminently just in the scheme of things, and rightly and deservedly so, by the logic of any reasonable man.

Then you read the Code of Canon Law of 1917 and you begin to now really understand why what you always thought WAS the Catholic Church in fact is no such thing and hasn’t been since 1958, when the first fake Catholic, a confirmed freemason named Angelo Roncalli, took over the papcy by an completely invalid “election” with many more fremasons already entrenched in the Vatican. After that foul day on the 28th October 1958, there has not been a valid pope since and almost the entirety of the catholic Clergy became apostate and heretical by continuing to promote the absolute and obvious heresy of Vatican II. Absolute and obvious to anyone who has bothered to do what I did and research the history and the ways of Christianity from the very first principles, without any preconceived idea of what I might or “should” find.

So, you then go and investigate both he fake Bergoglian-led home of pederastry, communism, and lies, and you compare it to your investigation of Sedevacatnist priests and bishops and their congregations. And here it becomes obvious that the Novus Ordo clergy are really Novus Orco. Just new orcs, spouting the same gnostic and satanic lies all attackers of christianity always spouted. They are fake and they know they are fake. Perhaps the very newer and younger priests aren’t aware even of Vatican II, but if that is so, whose fault is it? If I study to be an engineer, do I not learn about bending moments? Catholicism is not magic. It is based on reasons and logic. there is a REASON why it was Catholic monks that invented the scientific method and applied it to pretty much everything.

But the Novus Orco “Church” is fake and gay and pederastic, and the fruits it produces are the same, rancid and abusive. It literally has nothing to do with actual Catholicism, which is now, exclusively the purview of Sedevacantists. Nor is it my opinion that makes it so. It is the same, logic, reason, and scientific method that does so. With he added benefit that it is supernaturally protected from error by Jesus’s promise to always be with “us” that is, the church.

All the rules of Catholicism are written down. And why would they not be for any ACTUAL RELIGION BASED IN TRUTH?!?

It’s not write your own rules, nor choose your own adventure book and if you don’t like the outcome you just choose differently until you get the result you want. A real God that Loves us would have a way for us to KNOW the rules and for them to be clear and simple, and available. Even despite EVERY human being being flawed and imperfect. THAT is the amazing, miraculous thing. If you read the Code of Canon Law of 1917, it is absolutely obvious that a society based on these rules would produce amazingly good results. And we have 2,000 years of proof of it too. Literally no other religion on Earth even comes close to having done what Catholicism has done for humanity. CATHOLICISM. Not some vague and corrupted “christianity”.

And protestantism has brought us, in straight line order:

  • Contraception, which leads to sex before marriage and sex for entertainment. Which in turns leads to…
  • Divorce. Which was only accepted by Protestant denominations in Christianity and at first still thought of as pretty scandalous, so they went ahead with…
  • Fault-free divorce. Which of course led to…
  • Sex as mere sport/entertainment/pleasure with no connection to marriage, which naturally led to…
  • Killing babies so they don’t get in the way of having sex just for “fun”. And killing them by the most horrific way possible by sucking them out of the womb in pieces, ripping them limb from limb. And by the MILLIONS. Every. Single. Year.
  • Gay “marriage” which leads to…
  • Child trafficking. Because that is literally what adoption by homosexuals is, since they are obviously unable to reproduce naturally. Which leads to…
  • Transgenderism and the associate child abuse and sexual mutilation.

And so on and so forth. You can scream and shout and tell me that the Novus Orco “Catholic” Church is now heading down the same path led by its “pope” Bergoglio, and I of course agree with you. The Novus Orco is a creation of Protestants and Jews.

No seriously, I am not making this up. The entire set-up of Vatican II was the result of consultation with protestants and Jews. People who historically obviously never had any input whatsoever into Catholicism. Don’t take my word for it. I wrote a book of 530 page with lots of references in it. Try and prove me wrong if you can.

So… perhaps now you understand why when some brainwashed protestants, with all the best of intentions, I am sure, gets all shouty about how the Catholic Church is not the Real, One, True, Holy and Apostolic Church, I hover between wanting to bitchslap them le Valette style, until they recant —and I’d probably be happy to do the same 4 months in jail for it if it means every other cretin becomes aware of the reality of behaving like such a retarded ape— or laughing in their face and scrubbing them entirely from my life forever, as I would any annoying and irrelevant insect.

In fact, it is my rather miserly level of Christian charity that keeps me engaged from time to time with the rutting bonobos and their cursed bananas. Because I know, in such efforts, the few who are capable, who can read, who are not impossibly lazy and illiterate, may and do pick up the thread and do the research, and in time, they may get there. And getting there is the important part.

Whether they do so through my books or not is not important, though it does save a lot of time, since I have put a lot of references for people to verify for themselves within them.

I have been told by several people who also happen to admit that on investigation, they really cannot falsify or deny my logic and hence they too should really be Sedevacantists, that one of the things that prevents them from doing so at times is the WAY I present this information. With sarcasm, humiliating examples of people’s ignorance, and ridicule of their sophistry and ruthless exposition of their lies. You can go look at the videos I did on Jay Dyer if you want, to see their point.

But I feel the only point they have is that perhaps, my behaviours in that respect might earn me a little more time in purgatory (assuming I make it there). Firstly, Jesus himself was not averse to insulting, ridiculing and generally making the Pharisees and the idiots look like liars and morons, so, you know, I feel I’m on fairly solid ground here.

But more importantly, the number of people who have written to thank me and have gone on to get baptised, confirmed, married and proceeded to have their friends and family become interested and closer to doing so themselves outnumbers the complainers of my lack of “decorum” by at least two orders of magnitude. That’s times 100 for those of you who are not sure what an order of magnitude is (x 10).

So… if you’re holding your breath for me to become a softer, gentler, kinder Kurgan with the fake Pagans, the sophists, the morons, the Protestants, the “Orthodox”, the liars and especially the fake, Satanic Clergy of the Novus Orco, well… good luck with that.

No related posts.

By G | 19 November 2023 | Posted in Actual Science, Believe, Catholicism, Christianity, Reclaiming the Catholic Church, Sedevacantism, The Jews

Sex and Relationship Lies

The largest battleground for human happiness and misery is in the field of romantic relationship between a man and woman.

UPDATE: you can now read how to make the best of the current situation in my book Caveman Theory. Available ONLY at my E-Store as it is too politically incorrect for Amazon. But read the post below to get a general sense of things first. As the book in large part is written to help you navigate the current situation and achieve success in the kind of relationship you want to have.

If you just listen to the first 7 minutes of this podcast on it, the lady in it identifies really quite well the basic issues facing young people today and what I found particularly useful is that she indicates, as does the guy doing the podcast, the specific fact that it is the general zeitgeist of the world to present things as if love itself is not part of the equation any longer. They refer to recent movies, Barbie and apparently Snow White and how the main woke actress in Snow White, Rachel Ziegler, says:

“She’s not going to be saved by the Prince, she’s not going to be dreaming about true love, she’s dreaming about becoming the leader she knows she can be. The Prince in the original movie stalked her.”

Imagine, someone from the hypokrite class thinking this way about the classic story of Snow White. The word hypokrite of course, was the original term for actors in Ancient Greece. You can see why it’s relevant to study the classic, and etymology, yes? Actors in classical times were essentially thought of as basically prostitutes. And while the glorification of whores is also nothing new (The temple prostitutes used to get paid to have sex with any man that donated to the temple and were held in high esteem by mostly Babylonian/Sumerian people, while the Greek Herodotus, in his Histories referred to the practice of forced prostitition at least once as “foul”.

The foulest Babylonian custom is that which compels every woman of the land to sit in the temple of Aphrodite and have intercourse with some stranger at least once in her life. 

As pretty much the entire #metoo movement proved, thinking most actors and actresses are essentially highly paid prostitutes is really about the size of it. And in fact, having met a few actresses and also a few prostitutes in my life, generally, a highly paid whore who makes no pretence of being anything other than what she is, in my experience of conversing with such people, are far more honest and interesting than those who fancy themselves as artists that should be venerated. And if you doubt, me look up the term “yachting” when used in the context of famous actresses, fashion models and so on. Having worked as close protection for some wealthy people from all around the world, I can tell you that some world-recognised names of women that literally everyone knows, have, in fact, been bought an paid for to have sex with, like any common prostitute. It just cost more. And while I have no personal experience in the matter, if I had to bet on it I would bet that the more expensive famous whores probably performed worse than the cheaper unknown ones.

But I digress. The point is that the famous people a lot of young people look up to are essentially spouting the narrative they are paid to vomit out of the orifices they use to make their money.

And that narrative, as the man and woman in the podcast state, is that love makes you weak, is some kind of outdated, or outmoded way of being, removes choice and fun from your life, causes unnecessary suffering and is no good at all. And it is a narrative being pushed, as the lady correctly identifies, primarily by people who are undesirable to the opposite sex.

I have been saying for years that I have yet to meet a beautiful woman that is reasonably normal (i.e. hasn’t suffered some genuinely dramatically traumatising event) that is in any way a feminist. Pretty women pretty much can get a LOT of what they want primarily by playing to their straights and those are the feminine qualities. And if they are really smart, they will use those to snatch a quality man who has masculine qualities.

The blue-haired manatees that scream feminism, and the incel-gargoyles that become MGTOW types, along with a few others that are internally as repulsive as the aforementioned generally are externally, are essentially deeply miserable human wreckage and as they say, misery loves company, so they try to drag everyone else down to their level of despair.

The narrative is so pervasive and so prevalent in literally every aspect of life that you don’t even realise in how many multitudes of ways it is pushed on you and at you throughout every single day. If you read my last blog post before this one, perhaps, you might begin to become more aware of how insidiously the lies about reality and ESPECIALLY about relations between men and women are inculcated in you by subterfuge, stealth, unstated assumptions (one of the biggest culprits and methods), and so on.

Reality all around you is narrated and presented in a twisted manner in order to make you think that the current narrative of feminism-über-alles and being a strongly independent woman and an asexual automaton male, are the pinnacle one should strive for. That is, when they are not pushing the idea you should sexually mutilate yourself in order to become a tragic parody of the opposite sex.

So you bet, there are a lot of unhappy young men and women, unfulfilled in any relationship they attempt to get into and so on. Even if one of them has actually seen through most of the fog, finding a partner that has too, or that at least is amenable to being shown the way through the lies is difficult. It requires patience, skill, intelligence, and genuine research that does not collapse into embittered despair.

I have mentioned these type of things over the years a lot, both on this blog and on my Youtube channel, so search through it and see the videos on the topic too, and pluck what you can from it, but in just a few key sentences, as a starting point, please try to keep this in mind:

  • Male and female brains are physically and structurally different. That has an effect.
  • Male and female hormones and the female cycle of hormones are wildly different and this affects everything.
  • Women are far more swayed by their emotions and hormones than men are, generally speaking, and as a result less likely to be objective overall. Their biology demands a certain level of “selfishness” that has served humanity well in the survival of the species. Just like male biology has a tendency to be more logical and objective and (at least until fairly recently) be more prone to self-sacrifice for the sake of his family, has also served the survival of the species well.
  • Yes technology has made our survival far more likely than it used to, but our biology remains essentially the same and the answer is not to try and modify our biology to suit the machines, but rather to alter the machines to suit our biology. This last point has literally not been understood by any one of the myriad “relationship” experts you see all over the internet and seminars and books. Which should tell you how useful a lot of their other advice is (which they generally demand money for). Well, you read it here first. For free.

Above all, a lifelong marriage for the purpose of raising multiple children in a loving, strong, family, with emphasis on overcoming hardship and sticking by your blood whenever you can, with the ethics that Catholicism has, —that is, the original real Catholicism (sedevacantism now), which includes Just War and the Death Penalty, as well as the DUTY to defend innocents, yes even with violence, yes even with pre-emptive violence— produces the genuinely happiest life you can possibly imagine.

I stumbled into it by never giving up my fight against perceived nonsense from childhood until my late 30s. the Boomer zeitgeist did a lot of damage to my generation (and your too), but I sincerely hope you throw off the mental shackles I got rid of mostly by brutish (yet correct) animal instinct (at least at first) by conscious understanding and reasoned contemplation of reality and truth.

March on brothers and sisters; and win.

UPDATE:

Lest you think I am unkind… let me be clear, that even though you may be a gargoyle, it’s up to you what TYPE of Gargoyle you make yourself into.

The Loser, Omega, Poor-me, Gargoyle-Incel:

The “Red-Pilled” All-women-are-bitches, MGTOW Incel-Gargoyle:

Or… The…

I’m a Gargoyle! And I kick all the ass! NON-Incel Gargoyle:

PS: Please ignore the demonic undertones, Gargoyles are traditionally representative of demonic beings, while the unfortunates that look like them are not necessarily evil any more than anyone else is. I hope the images illustrate the point I am trying to make in a sufficiently obvious manner. You can’t help some of the cards you are dealt. But you have absolute authority in how you play them.

You might be interested in the following posts:

  1. The Lies You are Told
  2. Clown World Comes at you FAST!
  3. Clown World Fatigue
  4. Withhold your Charity, Pilgrim
  5. You are here…

By G | 18 November 2023 | Posted in Actual Science, Brain-Mind Functionality, Freemasons, Impostors and Frauds, Increasing Happiness, Relationships, Sedevacantism, Social Commentary, The Enemy Within, The Jews

The Lies You are Told

Some years back I did a video on the Lies You Are Told in general History, and more recently on Kurgan TV I did a series (which I will pick up again soon, on the more specific lies of history starting with pre-history really and eventually working my way to the present day (all in due course).

And of course, if you read this blog, you are aware that for some 30 plus years, all the supposed “crazy” theories I held have, over time, been proven to be absolutely factually correct. It’s not because I am some oracle, it’s just I pay attention to things, can do basic math and logic and have had to deal with the rabid flying monkeys some people refer to as Journalists and the Mass Media in general.

By now, anyone that trusts a Mass Media Outlet can be considered to essentially be a full-blown Zombie.

You always need to interpret newspapers, TV news, and so on as being the lowest form of crack-whore and deceiver, who probably worships Satan in their spare time. And I apologise in advance to crack-whores for the comparison.

As long as you do that, you MIGHT be able to understand the truth behind their obfuscations, and can then confirm it by researching a topic on your own.

But the problem has been so pervasive and for so long, that people are essentially anaesthetised into believing “official sounding” or “authoritative sounding” or “famous person speaking” or “super rich person speaking” as being “true”.

And not only is there no correlation whatsoever between truth and those categories of people, but if there were to be a correlation, you may find it is negative.

Let me highlight a little bit what I mean.

Take Steven Bartlett and his podcast.

Steven is clearly an intelligent guy and he made a lot of money. I also found out recently he comes from Botswana, which made want to say ‘Hey! Give me five, man!” Since I grew up there. He is a lot younger than I am and a millionaire, so despite the originally smaller group of people that used to live there, I don’t believe our paths or even our parent’s paths ever crossed while I was there. But it’s always nice to know that someone that comes from or spent some time in the same little-known area as you, did well for himself. It genuinely makes me happy for him, and even makes me a little “proud” as silly as that sounds given I had nothing to do with his success and that I don’t know him at all; but it’s still a fairly common human response.

His podcasts are genuinely interesting in-depth interviews with pretty extraordinary people, and definitely entertaining. Steven himself appears to be a very decent person too and although I never met the guy, it is obvious he is extremely well-read and at least a couple or three standard deviations north of normal IQ.

That all said, his guests, which cover a very wide range but are usually experts or wealthy men and women in their field, are, as I said, genuinely interesting, but even so, there is an overarching veneer of respectability that is to a certain extent rooted in falsity.

And I absolutely do not mean to imply with this that Steven is in any way trying to do anything other than get to the real truth of very interesting topics. I genuinely believe he really is interested, and he really is trying to get to the bedrock of truth of whatever he gets interested in. I realise his podcast to a certain extent is also a “performance” and like all of us he has a “mask” to some degree or other, but I have spent enough time watching a half-dozen or so of his podcasts over the last few months that I am confident in saying that if I had to judge him, with a gun to my head, I would say he is likely:

  • Honest
  • Principled
  • Truth Seeking
  • Interested in People and their well-being
  • Self-motivated (very much so)
  • Confident in practice, yet has a core deep down that may still wobble internally
  • Very intelligent

If I were really pushed I might also say that if absolutely forced to, I would likely bet that he is no stranger to the female of the species, and probably indulged quite a bit before (I think?) apparently settling down with one girlfriend.

I would guess he is mostly (and honestly) agnostic religiously speaking (as was I for most of my life) though I am unaware of his position at all on the matter and if he has said what it is, I have no idea.

So, all in all, my point is that I absolutely and genuinely expect that Steven tries to put out information that is truthful, practical and useful for as many people as possible. I have nowhere near his reach, wealth or effectiveness, and our styles of presentation are probably almost diametrically opposite, and he is without any shadow of a doubt far, far, far more polite and, shall we say: “professionally spoken” than I am, but at core, I recognise the intent is very similar. If we figure out something important or that might be good for other people, we genuinely want to spread it, aside from any money or commercial considerations. Which yes, we may indulge in to some extent or other, but really is not the primary motivator at all. We all have to eat and he does his podcasts for free, and if I had his money, I might even produce my books for free too.

This long intro, is not to suck up to Steven, I am fairly sure he will never have any interest in interviewing me, if he ever even came across me for my ideas. I present it because I want to be absolutely clear in how you are personally being deceived, and how people like Steven have (in my opinion) genuinely ZERO interest in trying to intentionally deceive you, and yet, the zeitgeist of the world is such that deception is baked into the very fabric of almost any information you consume.

Allow me now to use Steven and his (most excellent) podcasts to point out what I mean.

Let’s start with Scott Galloway and the podcast I saw in full of him, here:

Now, before you get all concerned, please don’t worry about me, my sex life is great, as the three children we have had in the last 4 years should prove. But I know a LOT of younger men are having a bad time of it, which is why I get emails and I try to comment on the topic when I can. And why perhaps I have some success at this, since at least 3 young couples in their early to mid 20s that came across my ideas over the last couple of years are now happily married and working towards their first babies. So I thought I’d listen to what some other supposed expert in the field had to say.

And if you listen to the podcast, Scott makes quite a lot of valid points, then at some point (about halfway or so on) he kind of goes completely off the rails by presenting and baking in his viewpoints of politics. He literally says Putin is a murderer, Trump is a criminal and essentially saying parents that decide to give hormone treatments to their children for the eventual sexual mutilation that is known as “transgenderism” are you know… normal, instead of the child-abusing freaks they are. He repeats some of these absolutely insane points along with the idea that Ukraine is winning the war against Russia. I mean, anyone that really thinks Russia is on the ropes and thinks this as of 1 month ago, is clearly either doing a lot of heavy drugs, or is completely delusional.

Once you become aware of this and you rewind and listen to his “good points” you then realise that they too are somewhat tainted. Notice how he says that masculinity needs an update basically. Because you know, things that literally worked and created civilisation for thousands of years are somehow now suddenly “bad” because of technology and our supposedly superior brains of the modern age. That modernism is great theme is one we shall return to again, both in this post as well as in general.

I have already described how the mechanisation of humanity as a direct result of protestantism and the much vaunted “protestant work ethic” which came about due to the industrial revolution is really a Satanic and dehumanising principle. Something Steven instinctually (if not intellectually yet I believe) grasps, since if I remember well, I heard mention of the fact that he has a rule of no meetings before 11 am. Meaning he has already shaped his work as he wishes more or less instead of necessarily as is demanded by “the world”.

So let me make a stark comparison of two hypothetical worlds, and you tell me, if you are a man, which world you’d prefer to live in.

Scott world: You can “transition” your child to a “different” sex by mutilating him/her and giving him/her physical irreversible operations to do so perfectly legally and the zeitgeist accepts this as normal. One parent only can force this on their children and the other parent cannot prevent it. LGBT Pride Parades are a normal part of life and naked, sexually suggestive, adults can take part in these in front of small children without any repercussion. LGBT agenda in schools is considered part of normal education, and transexuals that may be convicted pedophile in drag can always read to small children in libraries, along with possible displays of hardly covered genitals. You are not allowed to respond to ANY verbal statements with ANY physical violence, no matter what. You are not allowed to respond with deadly force even to an attacker, no matter the circumstances, without undergoing at minimum a very lengthy and expensive trial with economic, social and possibly physical (incarceration) effects even in the best of cases. Weapons are limited to ownership or use only by police/military, and thus the use of force is mandated only for specific government employees. Any physical altercation of any nature whatsoever results in automatic assault charges for at least one and possibly both parties. Martial arts are heavily regulated and practitioners are considered as “dangerous”, so if they are EVER in any physical altercation, they are considered as unfairly “armed”. Physical restraint of even a violent home intruder is considered kidnapping and not permitted.

NOTE: EVERY aspect of Scott World is currently a reality in at least some countries around the world. All the LGBT Stuff in most of the Anglo-Saxon world and the gun stuff in the Anglo-Saxon world outside of the USA for the most part.

Kurgan World: Any form of “transitioning” is outlawed, regardless of age. Psychological counselling is offered for people with sexual dysphoria. Homosexuality is not permitted to be taught in any fashion as being “normal” or natural, since it obviously is not. And “pride” parades are not permitted by law, nor is proselytising of homosexuality. Homosexuality itself is not specifically outlawed, nor punished by law, however any public displays of it would fall under an obscenity law (say a fine or so depending on the severity of the display). Any homosexuality performed on anyone under the age of at least 18 (and preferably 21) would also be considered a crime, similar to having sex with an underage person. Any doctor that performed un-needed surgery on people who wish to be amputees, would be incarcerated for intentional grievous bodily harm and mutilation of another, and obviously stripped of their medical licence. Men who chose to settle their differences by unarmed combat are not subject to any prosecution as long as both agree to the fight in front of witnesses and do so away from public areas. In the event that a physical attack on a man is launched in public, for whatever reason, he has the absolute right to defend himself with force. The force should generally be appropriate to the attack, but in any legal disputes on the matter, the erring should be on the side of the victim. So, if a 6’3″ 250 lbs bodybuilder violently attacks and sustains that attack on a 5′ 120 lbs guy, and that little guy draws a .45 colt and places three rounds in the bodybuilder’s head, eh… good shooting Tex, is about all he’d get from the cops. If the last two rounds where after the bodybuilder had already hit the floor and was lying in a pool of his own blood, yeah… maybe Tex loses his gun licence and gets some community service. Anyone braking into your home, armed or not, who gets shot dead or shot wounded and/or crippled is not going to get to sue anyone for anything. Cops do NOT get special treatment for unlawful behaviour, and any citizen can make a proper citizen’s arrest just like any cop, as long as he is following the correct procedure. Concealed weapon carrying is permitted to anyone who applies for it formally and has not been charged previously with some firearm or general violent crime offence. Drink driving results in immediate loss of licence, and have to do community service along with a doctor’s note certifying the man has attended AA like meetings for an uninterrupted 6 months, before he is allowed behind a wheel again, with a licence with a single point on it from then on. Meaning any infraction results in loss of licence and similar situation for a year before he gets it back. Third strike and he’s out of driving for good. Public indecency, obscenity, or extreme vulgarity is punishable by law, as is public blasphemy of the national religion. Persons in position of authority or public officials (government employees) who perform criminal acts are punished more severely (generally double the sentence of a normal citizen at a minimum). The death penalty exists and is swift and efficient for certain crimes (child rape or murder, murder without any mitigating factors, imprisonment with aggravating circumstances [e.g. imprisonment for the purposes of rape, torture, sexual trafficking and so on]). Generally the breaking of agreed upon contracts incurs quite stiff penalties, and the principles of Roman Law apply (Principles guide, specific cases are judged on an individual basis based on their specifics). The murder of a confirmed rapist of a child, by literally anyone, but especially anyone connected to the child by friendship or family relationship, is not considered a crime in itself, but if done in public would fall under the obscenity laws and one may face punishment for it. Unprovoked assaults of anyone, regardless of sexual orientation, sex, religion or ethnicity, is subject to stiff penalties and these are enforced.

Those are your choices. Let’s ay you can only pick one of them and there is nothing in between. I genuinely am not aware of anyone actually male that would pick Scott World. Are you?

You see, there is literally NOTHING WRONG with men resolving their differences with some sensible but brutish violence. In fact, it would really resolve a lot of the world’s problems if that was returned to. It is only the Scotts of this world that disagree with it. And once I heard his take on the whole “transgender” child mutilation thing, I became instantly aware that Scott must have probably been a member of a tribe that seems to think it’s ok to foster that kind of thing on Europeans, although they tend to reject it in their own societies. So I decided to google him. And wouldn’t you know it…

Early life and education

Galloway grew up in Los Angeles, California. His father was a Scottish immigrant to the United States who worked as a sales executive. His mother, a Jewish emigrant from London, England, worked as a secretary.

Yup, just as expected. Yet another Cohen-cidence. That now confirmed fact wasn’t even remotely in the back of my mind while I listened to the podcast with Scott, until I noticed a pattern that is now fairly obvious not just to me, but to most people that are paying attention now, and that is: whom, exactly, pushes which type of narrative.

And the guy is planning to write a book on Masculinity. Yeah. Good luck with that. You might as well read a book on mental health and not being an egomaniacal globalist written by Jordan Peterson. Oh… Wait…

But if you were to just gloss over his trangendersim nonsense, or his absolutely deluded take on Ukraine, or Trump for that matter, given that Trump, like him or hate him has had investigation after investigation pushed on him, and came out squeaky clean every time. While Biden, literally can’t complete a full sentence, is incontinent, has all the behaviour of a long-standing pedophile, has molested children on camera under the guise of… what? Sniffing them? As if THAT was acceptable? Is a known taker of monies from foreign interests he was absolutely not allowed to take money from, is a certified blackmailer, and has covered up for his drug addicted, pedophile son, in every way possible. And yes, Hunter Biden is a pedophile, the images and video from his laptop, which are now confirmed beyond any doubt as being real, even by the fully partisan FBI on his side, demonstrate this without any possibility of doubt. But Trump is the criminal. And Putin a murderer. According to Scott. Right.

Ok, then, that’s sort of an extreme example though right? Not really. Steven does not challenge Scott on any of these absurd points. To be fair he doesn’t agree with them either, but you can see the wisdom of the Romans now surely, yes?

Qui Tacet Consentit – He who remains silent consents.

And that, like it or not, is really the truth of the matter. I have no idea if Steven agrees with Scott on transgenderism, Trump and Putin. I suspect probably and mostly not. But under the veneer of wanting to be civilised, Steven remains silent. Then again, Steven is far more British than I am and I am far more African savage than he is, despite initial appearances. I would have laughed in Scott’s face and forced him to prove his ridiculous assertions with any facts he thought he had, just so as to expose him to global ridicule, not just my own.

My interview skills would be kinda more like this:

Do I mean to say that Steven is allowing lies to propagate if he doesn’t agree with my take on things? No. I am saying that the lies are so enmeshed in the current zeitgeist you need to be consciously awake to see them, because we have started to accept complete nonsense as if it had any basis in reality. Like math being racist. Men being able to get pregnant and “trans women” being real women. Or 2+2 being anything other than 4.

Let’s take now a completely different podcast, in case you are about to start accusing me of being an indefatigable noticer. Let me pre-empt you: I am. I notice. I pretty much always notice, sooner or later.

Let us look now at Bryan Johnson

Bryan is obsessed with immortality. It’s sort of a clikbaity reductionist sentence, but as far as normal humans go, it’s a fair assessment. The man has gone to absolutely incredible lengths to try and figure out how to reverse and slow down the ageing process. From a scientific standpoint it is absolutely fascinating, and he puts all the information out there for free for everyone. Even though the man is a self-made multi-millionaire, it is absolutely clear he is not primarily motivated by money.

In fact, by his own admission, he struggles to get his main point across, which —if I understood him at all correctly— is primarily that our future could and would be so far removed from what we think we know now, that we might as well be Homo Erectus a million years ago, trying to conceive of us and our technology today.

Bryan has done some incredible studies on the human body and brain and created a helmet that gives you instant brain feedback. I sure would LOVE to have one of those, and he has figured out that one of the very best things you can do for your health is eat a tablespoonful of extra virgin olive oil at every meal. I kinda knew proper olive oil was good for you to begin with, but his scientific and obsessive approach allowed him to realise it really is one of the very best things you can do for your body.

And as it happens, my own olive oil, cold-pressed, unfiltered, and without any kind of screwing around with it, literally happens to have been voted the best in the world bar none, for two years in a row.

And I could relate absolutely when he was saying that the stuff you buy in shops is not really proper extra virgin olive oil. He’s right. But he only sells the good stuff. And mine definitely qualifies. So, hey Bryan, if I can be your oil guy in Italy, please get in touch.

Does Bryan lie? Is he deluded? No, I don’t think so at all. I think Bryan is not neurotypical, but then, neither am I. He is absolutely driven and I may be wrong, but I don’t even get the sense that he is necessarily terrified of dying. He might be, I can’t say for sure, but I sense for him it might be more of an intellectual challenge. His main take seems to be: Look, no one knows a damned thing. We are monkeys scratching in the sand. So I want to figure out how it actually works. In a very undeniable way the man is a genius.

And like perhaps all geniuses, he might go down a road that really benefits mankind, or that creates unmitigated disaster, no one really knows. I don’t believe Bryan is looking to create a bad outcome for anyone, quite the opposite. I really think he is at heart, a very honest, curious, intense person of probably impeccable integrity. We neuro-a-typical freaks tend to be too interested in our own little projects we obsess over to have much room left over in our ever-spinning brains for deception. And in that sense, I recognise Bryan as a fellow freak. I don’t have his money, perhaps not even his drive, though I think I do, it’s just that mine was in different and perhaps multiple directions, and I achieved different things. He made millions, I learned to disarm people with loaded guns and probably handle myself very well in any physical confrontation throughout most of my life, and hopefully still some way into the future too.

To be perfectly honest, Bryan’s end goal of increasing longevity is only somewhat interesting to me. I like the idea of being physically more able than I have been lately, given my back injury, niggling knee injury and overall decline in health after catching Covid and then two pneumonias. He does freaky things like inject himself with things I am not certain might not impact his genetics permanently, but I would bet money he didn’t get Vaxxed either, just like me. And I would be shocked if I was wrong about that. I like the idea of being able to be fit and healthy right up to the day I drop dead, but I am not particularly against dropping dead. The biggest issue I have with death is that I started to make children late in life and I am curious! I want to know what happens with them and their children and their grandchildren. But if I am right about what happens at death, if there is any way to be, and I think there would be, some part of me will likely be quite aware of it, for quite some time anyway. Aside missing out on more time with people I love, death has never held any fear over me. And I faced it several times in situations I was sure would be the end at the time and I never flinched, so I’m fairly sure I’ll be ok on the day.

Philosophically I also think that death is probably necessary, and ultimately a good thing, in the normal affairs of a good life well-lived. Of course it feels absolutely tragic and unfair and evil when it happens in unexpected ways to people who we are sure had a lot more to offer or had such horrible ends. But my point is not that Bryan is in any way a bad guy or a liar, I am as reasonably sure as a person can be from watching a couple of hours of one podcast of a person that Bryan is probably a very honest and earnest person. It’s just that his whole fascination/obsession, while absolutely valid, as is any topic of genuine scientific endeavour that is not actively harming anyone else (Bryan experiments all his stuff on himself first and one volunteer so far I believe), and while I can be fascinated by the science and details of it, personally, the search for immortality, or even just life extension by a hundred years, is not something that keeps me particularly interested in se.

Furthermore, the people who ARE interested in it are possibly the very worst elements of humanity. Can you imagine another century under the incessant egomania of the Boomer generation? The recurring politicians passing the baton amongst each other for generation after generation, like the Italian politicians did from the close of WWII until their death from old age? It’s enough to send a shiver down your spine and pray for nuclear war or rogue asteroids.

My point here is that the ever-grasping for a longer life at all costs is a mistake. You are FAR better served by reaching for a GOOD life, well-lived. And please understand the Paradox: I believe Bryan IS living his best life well-lived. He is doing what he wants to do and doing it with great intent and passion. As I said, I am not even sure that immortality is really his core goals. I mean, sure it kind of “has to be” because of the topic, but I think the intellectual curiosity is probably the driver. It would be like me trying to create antigravity machines, yeah, yeah, ok, I care about all the sexy physics, free energy, and so on of antigravity technology and aether science, but in reality, it absolutely would not be the core driver. The core driver for me would be to get into such a spaceship and wormhole my way across the Galaxy to go and see all the alien planets and weird creatures and strange civilisations and amazing sights that the Universe has to offer. And I think in a way Bryan’s search for immortality is similar; sure, ok, it would be great to live forever for him (maybe) but really I think he would perhaps be really more stoked to have figured out what our future a million years from now looks like, I think.

And people who don’t get that would be hung up on the longevity thing, and be chasing that with all the anxiety and additional fear of death and therefore wrong focus on the present life they have, which would have long-term, and probably quite drastic and overwhelmingly negative, impacts on their day-to-day existence.

Conclusion

Yes there are the absolutely obvious lies, like, bombing children in Gaza is good and fair and helps the whole West. Or people of a foreign ethnicity, culture, language and religion, being offloaded by the hundreds of thousands and millions into countries that are not their own is somehow good for the natives of those countries. Or equality among human beings being based in physical reality instead of a spiritual intangible relating to souls.

Then there are the subtler lies, like Hitler having been the absolute, worst, worst, most evil man in the entire history of the world. When compared to say Stalin. Or Ted Bundy. Or a bunch of others. Or maybe that hey, people being gay hurts no one and we should stay out of people’s bedrooms. Sure, nice idea in theory. And now we have tranny story hour at the library for toddlers, by convicted pedophiles. Oh and don’t you DARE say there is a straight link between the two things, you dirty bigot.

And then there are the really subtle lies that you are not even aware you believe in and are ruining your life, like the idea that female and male brains are the same or operate the same or even can operate the same (bar physical oddities and mutations that are in no way the norm).

These lies affect your life negatively. And it really is important you begin to consciously pay attention and evaluate things properly. Bryan is kind of right in saying we pretty much know nothing about anything and we are little better than monkeys scratching in the dark. He’s not really wrong about that. However, we CAN know something. And it is our God-given duty (and gift) to be able and willing to try to do so.

And as a final point —that I hope you look into yourself, and that no doubt sounds insane to people like Bryan and Steven— the best approximation for how reality really works, and what is absolutely best for humanity, I advise you to look into and in due time, and after proper consideration, embrace and join, the real Catholic Church.

Which I have to stress every time is the sedevacantist one.

Sedevacantists are the only actual Catholics practicing actual Catholicism as it really was and remains to this day. The Bergoglian pedophile hive of frauds in the Vatican and all those who subscribe to the Novus Ordo heresies are absolutely not a reflection of anything other than Satanic intent to hide, obfuscate and destroy the one institution and organisation that has most elevated humankind more than any other religion or ideology, bar none.

I think you can see why there is no absolutely no fear, or chance whatsoever, that I will ever be invited to appear on Steven’s podcast. I’d probably get his entire channel banned within the first ten minutes and then catalyse an absolute avalanche of cancel culture on every business he is in any way involved with.

And I’d probably make it worse by playing the African card for fun; saying they just want to ban me because I am too light a shade of African, and Steven’s partly white privilege is being used as the excuse to silence my noticing.

Hi Steven. It’s ok, if you ever read this, and want to get in touch, I promise I won’t tell. Nor would you be the first famous person whose association with me I never mention. I am motivated by curiosity and truth you see, not fame or status (other than one very specific type of internally, self-evaluated status, unique to me, that is of pretty much no consequence to anyone else).

To the rest of you, I hope that this post if of some use to at least a few of you and hopefully a lot of you, to help you see the lies, the unintentional ones especially, baked into our very lives, as well, of course, as the more readily perceivable ones.

You might be interested in the following posts:

  1. Sex and Relationship Lies
  2. Clown World Fatigue
  3. An Important Point of Neurology
  4. And Now For The Positives…

By G | 17 November 2023 | Posted in Actual Science, Brain-Mind Functionality, Human Performance, Increasing Happiness, Medical Science, Relationships, Sedevacantism, Social Commentary, The Enemy Within

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks