and not to put too fine a point on it, we both agree it is ultimately demonic and cannot result in anything good.
The reason is simple.
Axiom 1: All Humans are flawed.
Axiom 2: Only the creator behind reality is a truly loving force (i.e. God, but the reality of intelligence behind creation is essentially provable now, so don’t let the word God with whatever negative associations it may have for you hamper you from being able to follow the reasoning).
Axiom 3: Humans are the only and necessary link between the loving intelligence of the creator and AI driven machines and software.
Given the above three facts, the only possible conclusion is that the inevitable iterations of Artificial Intelligence will increasingly be more and more flawed from the perspective of a Loving Creator. And thus descend into the very opposite of a Loving Creator, which is essentially a demonic outcome.
And it will do so at a super-efficient speed and efficacy. In short, the deleterious effects on humanity will rapidly accelerate.
We can already see this to a certain extent with AI replacing people in various industries:
Translation, art generation, mathematical calculations, even complex hard science problems of engineering, medicine and so on.
The future looks bleak and if you don’t want to take my word for it, take a look at this short video, it really is worth it (but don’t lose hope and read my take after the video).
As I said in the discussion with Tony, AI has been able to duplicate video for years already. It’s just now to the point that you and I will soon be able to do it from our own computers too.
So what can we do about it? The way I see it there are a few things that are working in our favour.
1. Resources are finite
Yes, a potential army of self-replicating terminators that can independently build bioweapons and deploy them globally could wipe us out, but… we are not yet there, and the resources required to create fully independent robots that can build all the required infrastructure to keep themselves repaired, going, and building up more of the weaponised drones and automated weapon posts and so on eventually requires huge power requirements. It’s just not sustainable at the current commonly understood level of power generation.
Counter: Anti-G tech is real and AI could develop it and since Anti-G tech is related to accessing zero point vacuum fluctuations, it could hypothetically create near infinite power generation.
Counter-Counter: Even so, the physical material is limited, and the autonomy required to build all the related infrastructure to monopolise access to it is still very large in scale, so not happening in the next few years at least.
2. Unintended Consequences of Evil
Ultimately the most efficient way to wipe out humanity is not with robot armies but biologically engineered contagious pathogens.
In fact, there is already ample evidence that the COVID mass-murder event orchestrated by the usual suspects and their ever-obedient puppets was already using certain genetic markers to be most deadly on humans with certain genetic traits (Vikings to be dramatic) and far less deadly on other people with different genetic markers (Ashkenazi Jews).
And if the more recent evidence that the nanobots in the serums are self replicating, and the spike-protein generating mutants that injected themselves with the genetic serum of the vaxx also continue to produce and shed the same spike-protein, then we may already be in the early stages of a human-guided AI take-over.
If that’s the case, we can at least reliably know that there will be unexpected consequences for those people who put this whole thing in motion.
Which is essentially that their stupid, arrogant, and small-minded, short-term, materialist way of thinking inevitably means they too will be wiped out by their own creations.
It’s cold comfort, but it’s something. Which tends to lead me think that there is also going to be some “fix” available. Recent examples have been how military robots were defeated by humans in various tests by really high-tech and difficult things like placing themselves in cardboard boxes and advancing on them a little at the time until they could be in close quarters with the robot. The machine did not perceive them as dangerous because they didn’t look like humans. In a series of tests, this was just one of the ways in which humans could fool the machines.
A recent video/report by quinta columna also indicated that a solution of distilled water and nicotine apparently wipes out the nanobots and may also be efficient against the spike protein, as was alcohol and smoking.
The point here being that the mass-murdering sons of bitches that are orchestrating all this are far from being geniuses.
What they have are infinite resources based on fiat money, because they have orchestrated the planet so that fiat money has become an effective substitute for power acquisition, and they also orchestrated it (especially over about the last 200 years or so, mainly as the Rothschilds family trajectory shows) so that they are also able to literally create the same fiat money out of thin air at will, while you and I have to trade our lifetimes (and for some their souls too) just to accumulate enough of it not to starve. So yes, they have that undeniable source of power acquisition and projection, which is absolutely massive, BUT, they have very little in the sense of imagination and intelligence.
Ultimately these people are evil, and for reasons that are obvious to someone NOT evil, but that are absolutely opaque to actual evil people, evil cannot genuinely create. It can only corrupt or destroy.
This is a very important point that can be demonstrated fairly easily by pure logic, absent the belief in any supernatural entities, at least to a point.
That is, eventually the logic inevitably leads you to the concept of supernatural entities because that is the only way the logic, including logic itself, can even exist. The very baseline concept of good and evil itself is meaningless absent an intelligent and benevolent creator. In short, the very fact good and evil actually exist for you at all, is undeniable evidence that a Loving God is the creator (think it through, it really is a logically inescapable fact, even if you may not see it right away. Seriously… think it through, this post is not going away anytime soon, it’ll wait.)
Which is why ultimately faith is more important (and powerful) than knowledge, and why millions of illiterate peasants throughout the ages, have always known better than the wealthy, nominally intelligent, educated, but evil scum that has tried to rule over them throughout the centuries.
As an aside, in times past, being wealthy was not necessarily as closely or likely to mean the individual was as corrupt as it is likely they are today (evil has accelerated and consolidated its position, as inevitably it must, hence, again, the so-called eventual End Times bottleneck).
Bringing all this together in a short summary then:
This combination of the stupidity, arrogance and blindness of evil, coupled with its inability to generate, create or grow anything self-sustaining and viable long-term, leads to two factors:
1. Unintended consequences that indicate a way out of their nefarious plans.
2. Ultimately a collapse of their structure/position/power-base. This may not always be total (evil too is a fundamental property of reality, so while it cannot generate the so-called tower of Babel successfully, some critters beholden to evil will always escape its collapse and go on to try again more or less quickly after the crash).
So in this respect there is always some way out and as such some hope.
3. Some humans somewhere may be able to pull the plug.
Usually not the guy you hope or think. Trump is not going to save us from the WEF mass murderers any more than he will save any Gazan children being torn to shred by the American bombs supplied to genocidal Israel for the same purpose of mass murder.
Elon Musk is not suddenly going to have a change of heart and fight the global alliance of globohomo that put him in place, not even if his son became a tranny as a result of it. I mean, miracles do happen, but miracles require miraculous evidence, and so far there is none.
On the other hand, God has a sense of humour and loves using the most unlikely of people for His purposes (of turning even conscious evil, ultimately, to good in some way). I mean, I am a perfect example of that. Of all the people He could get to become a Catholic zealot pushing original Catholicism (which I remind you is only found in Sedevacantism) instead of some hedonistic take on life, the universe and everything, I was about as unlikely a choice as any.
So, it may well be that some jabbed janitor coughs on the latest dish at the next Davos conference and all the mass-murderers present die of turbo-ebola-ass-cancer within the month (hey, miracles of unexpected joy, happen, you just keep praying along with me, right?!).
Or some other unexpected and unthought of black swan event suddenly becomes a tipping point. Say if spontaneously, something in the human spirit snapped and every father affected by the muslim rape gangs in England suddenly decided that regime change was required in the UK, well… the entire government, armed forces and police would be swept away in 24 hours.
This last hypothetical however seems unlikely (but you never know) here is why:
Part of the reason that the COVID mass murder was enacted, was also so that they could deploy the mass-control technology.
It has been known since the 1990s that human emotions at the very least can be controlled by a variety of EM fields and waves. Today that level of specific mental control is undoubtedly higher.
And we now know with certainty that the 5G antennae deployed globally absolutely can direct EM energy in ways that is essentially weapon grade level stuff. So maybe all the fathers of abused children in the UK are not even able to reach a tipping point anymore if their bloodstream and brains are teeming with nanobots and spike proteins that are receptive to whatever the 5G antennae is able to make them feel or not feel.
But then it will be something else.
Like, for example, maintenance and sustainability.
Think about it. Ok, the Soros, Klaus Schwabs, Zuckebergers, Bill Gates of the world have it all figured out and enslaved all of us and have a supply of small children to satisfy their proclivities, but… who is going to maintain and upkeep their infrastructure?
None of these people are themselves capable of changing a car tire, much less build or maintain (and I also think really intellectually understand) the required infrastructure to keep their pedovore utopia going. They really are not geniuses. They are mostly useless parasites with infinite money.
They have to rely on actual functioning human beings to keep this stuff running, and while you can corrupt a lot of them to do your bidding, you inevitably run into the degradation problem.
Evil cannot create. Eventually corrupting the maintainers will produce diminishing results as they too shift from starry eyed scientist glad their pet project is funded to disillusioned automatons who realises they are actually perpetrating and producing the total evil that destroys anything worth living for. The realisation is usually very slow and gradual, but it exists, and the outcome is always only one of two things: conversion to fully and consciously evil – which we already know is not sustainable long term because logic (and/or God if you prefer and can’t see the logic yourself) or self-disgust so great it prompts collapse or occasionally even total conversion (which effectively produces a monkey-wrench in the globohomo machine).
Conclusions
There are a few simple conclusions we can summarise from all of the above, and they are:
1. Fiat money is their primary lever of control.
2. Propaganda is their secondary lever of control.
3. Force is their tertiary lever of control.
4. Cohesive, logical, capable, communities immune to the above are their greatest threat, and always have been. This is why for centuries, their primary aim has been the Catholic Church (now reduced only to Sedevacantist Communities): Consider:
* Catholic communities quickly become self-sufficient (immune to Fiat money)
* Catholic communities are 100% immune to globohomo propaganda
* In times past Catholic communities could defend themselves well even against mass invasion by larger enemy forces like Islam.
The only barrier we have to reclaiming our freedom is the nihilism and loss of hope and inability to functionally do logic anymore in the vast majority of the populace (at least to a higher degree than it was until relatively recently).
So: Spreading proper Catholicism (i.e. actual Christianity instead of one of its fake, Churchian versions) and creating communities of Sedevacantists is really the quickest and simplest solution, and all we need worry about in the short term is the weaponisation of legislation and economic sanctions that are being levelled against us all but for the moment can’t necessarily (yet) target us Sedes specifically.
So… build those communities ASAP right now.
Guard against infiltration far more than you presently need to worry about force being applied on you. Select rural places out of the way, get involved with local government and begin to shore up the general defences against bureaucracy first. You don’t need to worry about direct force for a while yet. It will come but it will be some years yet.
Of course… if you are one of the zombies already prey to the centuries long propaganda, you will simply dismiss all the logic and verifiable information above and assume I am just another deluded “religionist”. And if that’s who you are, that’s ok. We don’t need you.
Catholicism started with eleven frightened men and four women. And we overcame the wrath of the then most powerful empire humanity has ever seen.
It’s just another day/era/persecution-time.
We’ve been here before. We’ll be here again.
And the Gates of Hell will not withstand against us.
Andrew Wilson is one of the most prominent political commentators on the internet. His own site The Crucible is I think referred to as the bloodsport of the internet in terms of logical arguments.
Andrew is a regular guest on the Whatever podcast, where he inevitably intellectually curb stomps a bunch of thots for entertainment purposes and, one hopes, trying to raise the general tone of degeneracy from the very bottom of the sewer to maybe floating atop it.
He is also an Eastern Orthodox and refers to his Christian Ethics often as the baseline foundation for his argument.
He is a very decent debater, and one of the very few people on the internet that argues correctly and intellectually honestly, so basically he’s like a species of internet denizen that is as rare as a living example of a T-Rex.
Despite this, he did make a truly moronic statement in a clip of a podcast I saw, where he claimed that “The Catholic Church agrees with us [The Eastern Orthodox] but we don’t agre with them.”
Prompted by this absolutely false assertion, I went on one of his livestreams and gave him a superchat to ask if he was willing to argue Sedevacantist Catholicism vs. Eastern Orthodoxy.
His response was a long and drawn out “Nooooo!” And I think he assumed I was your garden variety monomaniac autist that would be about as entertaining to argue with as watching paint dry.
And in fairness, argument of theological minutiae, are not too often very interesting, although, the videos were I bury Jay Dyer under his own lies are some of the most popular, so, what do I know.
At any rate, my contention here is that officially, Andrew Wilson ran away from the potential debate like scared little girl.
But then, this super-chat of mine obviously weighing heavily on his corrupt, schismatic conscience, he had a feudal slip. That’s not a typo. The feud between the schismatics of the East and the pure, true and good Catholics of the West has been ongoing for nearly a thousand years. You know, except when they periodically agree with us, like at the concil of Florence Andrew, remember that one, where you guys all agreed WE were right? Officially? yeah!
But then, as is typical of the Orthobros, they turn around and backstab, renege and basically go back on their word.
Anyway, on that stream of mine a guy left a comment:
I’ve never heard of any censure from any valid priest against lay-people expressing and defending their Church’s validity to schismatic, but I suppose it’s normal for the schismatics to want to avoid truth-tellers like roaches scatter from sunlight.
And there is more disturbing news that makes me wonder if elbrad02 is not really Andrew in a sock-puppet costume trying to give further reasons to avoid the truth, and it is this:
If this is true, and I have no reason to doubt it, because I know chadbh, then this post has just gone from 80% trolling in good nature to 50% trolling and the 30% drop in respect is if he really is friends with a demonstrable liar, quote-miner, deceiver, and fraud as Vajay Drier is.
I mean, look, don’t get me wrong, I have been friends with actual criminals, I have known the odd murderer or prostitute, and so on, but pathological liars… no. I can’t stand that shit.
In fairness I think Andrew himself is probably mostly or even almost wholly honest, so I’m giving him the benefit of the doubt.
Anyway, that’s the tag line: Andrew Wilson cowardly runs away from debate with Sedevacantist Kurgan.
Weak, very weak.
And we all know why, including him:
And I know, I know, he’s say he misspoke, and this is all just a cynical ploy to raise my audience, and so on, and sure, it would be nice if I got a bunch more subscribers since the shadowbanning has been in effect for a long time I think, but none of that is an actual argument against the position I hold that Catholicism is the only Christianity, now, is it, Andrew?
No, no, it isn’t.
And Feudian slips are still indicators of the truth, Andrew. You know it, I know it, we all know it.
One of the perpetual complaints made by deceivers and ignorants alike, as well as people who apparently can’t do proper logic, concerning sedevacantism, is that they say the Church needs to have an unbroken line of Papal successors.
This is, of course, nonsense. It’s not true at all. The requirement is not that there is an unbroken line of Popes, because if that were the case, then the Church would have ended when Peter died. The requirement is that there is a perpetual line of Popes.
When one Pope dies and another is eventually elected, between the death of one Pope, and when the new Pope is elected, there is a period of time called an interregnum (Latin for in between realms).
Now, it is absolutely clear that nowhere has there ever been defined a limit for how long an interregnum can last. Read that again. There is no such rule. And in fact we have plenty of evidence that it does not matter how long it lasts. The Church has been officially without anyone on the Throne of Peter at all for almost three years at one point, and had up to three Popes claiming popehood for a period of some 40 years at other times, the resolution of which was only arrived at when Pope Gregory the XII agreed to resign too as long as it was accepted he had been the only legitimate Pope.
In short, the situation we are in today, of being in an interregnum since 9th October 1958 is perhaps unique in its detail, but is not unique in principle.
And all of this is readily understood if you simply are capable of understanding basic English; and namely, the word perpetual.
So, let’s go to the most complete dictionary of the English language ever put together, which my wife kindly gifted me for my 50th Birthday. The 13 volume set of the Oxford English Dictionary, and let’s look up the word perpetual.
Well… will you look at that… very first definition:
Lasting, or destined to last for ever; eternal, unceasing; permanent (during life).
Emphasis added. It is right there in the very first definition, that the word perpetual, while being an eternal continuation, is not necessarily an unbroken one.
What the deceivers do, and possibly those who don’t understand English very well, is confuse ONE of the possible definitions (usually relegated to the engineering field, which, ironically, also has never yet managed to actually create anything truly perpetual with the second definition found below) with the correct one. Namely definition 1 above, with definition labelled as 2. below.
Finally, there is a further, quite specific subtextual use, even in this second definition, under section C. 3.
Well, well, will you look at that.
A hereditary or heritable office.
Which is PRECISELY what the papacy is. And clearly, if it is hereditable, it means the people who inherit it replace someone who died and used to hold it. The people die, the office remains. In perpetuity. And remains empty until a VALID claimant fills it.
On SG, the question was asked as to essentially, “How did we get here?”
Mostly referring to usury, and how it came to be that people “chose it” over building Cathedrals. Now, to be fair, usury is, indeed, the root of a huge amount of evil in the world. In fact I can’t think of a single more important issue in how the planet has become as corrupted as it has.
And it wasn’t “chosen” so much as it was instilled by the usual methods of subterfuge, corruption, lies, underhandedness, deception, murder and force. To really grasp the levels of this you would need to study in great detail the history of the Rothschilds from their beginnings all the way to the way the Bank of International Settlement works today and what it is. As well as appreciate the multiple and absolutely world-encompassing effects of tentacles it created and controls from behind the curtain of things like The World Economic Forum, The Trilateral Commission (Rockefellers), Committee on Foreign Relations, the UN, the WHO and so on, as well as swamp creatures like the CIA and various of its projects, like the spread of “post-modernism” in all its inhuman and beauty destroying tactics.
But it all starts with usury. And it was no more “chosen” than you “choose” to eat white flour with all the toxins, poisons and vitamins in it that mean a wild rat will not actually eat it, but you, stupefied into ignorance and “education” think it’s healthy for you.
Anyone that says that usury was freely “chosen” by the average, honest person, is basically a deceiver. Much like those who pushed usury in all its forms by all means and relentlessly so.
There is a greater point on this worth making, but as a short and concise answer, I have placed below the reply I posted on SG.
The 1700s saw the real start of the organising of the forces of evil determined to destroy the Church (the Catholic Church being the only one that matters). It took them about 250 years to create:
the first Freemasonic country in the world (the USA), while bankrupting France and destroying its Royal house
Starting the “enlightenment” with all its “freethinkers” and mass murder of Catholics
Destruction of royal houses in Europe (nobility was essentially the military/protective arm of the Church)
Start WWI
Force the “unification” of Italy (the home of Rome and thus the centre of Christianity)
Infiltrate the Church massively with homosexuals, communists, etc.
Start WWII
Install a Freemason as “Pope” in 1958 and every year since then.
Infect the entire planet with (((Hollywood values))) just as they had done to Weimar Germany. There is also some evidence the entire “reformation” (rebellion) of 1521 was orchestrated by the same (((people))). It took centuries.
The wider point is that usury (along with its other related tactics of general degradation of human dignity) works for a very simple reason.
One people don’t like to admit, but remains absolutely true:
Humans are all flawed. Because of original sin.
And all you ahistorical and illogical Protestants can gnash your teeth as much as you like, but the evidence is absolutely overwhelming and incontrovertible.
As such, an appeal to humanity’s basest instincts of greed, avarice, envy, sloth, pride, wrath and gluttony, will ALWAYS, snare a percentage of the population, no matter how religious, pious, well-meaning and orderly the original community may have been. And this is precisely why you absolutely need rules, as well as their enforcing.
And the people doing the enforcing need to be, generally, men of outstanding virtue in terms of courage, and moral character. Their leaders, at an absolute minimum, need to be married men with children, who have had first-hand experience of physical labour, (for at least 5 years) and be self-made to the point of owning some land and property that is no more than say 30% from generational wealth. I would also want them to have been involved in some physical level of confrontation for at least another 5 years, whether in a proper, hardcore martial arts class, serving in law enforcement, including things like being a bouncer (if absolutely clean of any involvement with the inevitable criminal side of that life) close protection work (as the grunt, not owner of a firm), soldier (in combat), and be honestly religious. For my culture and people at least, that means a proper Catholic (only sedevacantists of the 1958 type and non-una Mass, currently are).
The rules are required to identify those elements that would corrupt humanity, and usury, should be absolutely and completely banned eternally from any civilised society. Anyone advocating for it, or trying to perform it should, in my honest opinion, be put to death.
If a society formed to make that law number one, and enforced it absolutely, human society would flourish in a way that almost no one can even imagine. And very fast too.
For this reason, the enforcing arm of society needs to be an unusual and rare mix of wise, experienced, charitable, but also absolute when required, and using Roman Law, which is unique on Earth and works on the principle being only a guide, but each individual situation needing to be evaluated on its own merits in accordance with justice above law, and not law above justice.
There is literally no other system on Earth that ever came even remotely close to having this and creating societies cantered around such principles that Catholicism.
You can TRY and argue otherwise, but you would be just the male equivalent of the dumb onlyfans women on something like the whatever podcast, making appeals not to logic, facts, reason, and objective reality, but only your personal, solipsistic, nonsensical, selfish, hypocritical, hormonally driven rhetoric that you have been brainwashed with. Any actual measure of it done objectively places Catholicism at the top of the mountain for centuries and centuries and centuries in a row. And when compared to the present day, which as stated above took at least 250 years to degrade, and mostly since 1958, the current “liberal world order” is proving to be a dystopic descent into literal Hell on Earth.
But hey, don’t you worry. You go ahead and chomp down on that chemical burger while you binge on reality TV and CNN and let your arse keep expanding molasses-like on that couch. And don’t forget to masturbate some more to porn, so that in case you get the urge to actually get off that couch and change something in your life, you are sure to not bother after the fact.
So that’s how we got here.
And if there is any hope of getting out of it, it will be only because of men with giant, octagonal balls, made of adamantium, who will be blamed for being “oppressive and brutal”, who will not compromise their honour, faith, or objective reality as it is, in order to appease the masses.
And to a leaser extent, but still absolutely necessary, of those men who will follow them and stand with them even in the bowels of Hell, until order, peace, sanity, and God’s divine laws, are restored once more, as best we can, on this fallen Earth.
Jay Dyer, once again makes things up, relating to the ecumenical council of Constance.
He contention is that the Council of Constance “ruled” who was the real Pope during the period in which there were three Popes (two of which were fake). This is absolute nonsense and of course, yet another lie.
He says this in this mostly boring and irrelevant podcast from about 2 hours and 10 or 11 minutes or so and carries on until about 2 hours and 30 minutes. He repeatedly says that the council of Constance resolved the issue.
This is absolutely and completely a lie.
What happened is that the three Popes were convened to this council originally by the fake Antipope John XXIII, who was pushed to do so by the Emperor. So nothing happening here except them basically saying: “We gotta sort this out.” As a result of this investigation John XXIII was going to be investigated for scandalous conduct so he ran away. In the meantime, the two remaining possible “Popes” Gregory XII and Benedict XIII came to an agreement which was that Gregory XII would be accepted as the one true Pope and instead of being deposed (as were the other two, for being antipopes) he would resign and a new and valid Pope (from the Roman see, would be elected). So that’s what happened.
In essence the one true Pope, Gregory XII resolved the issue. Not the Council.
This is typical of Jay, he just lies, makes straw man “arguments” and completely makes things up. As I demonstrated on my video of our debate, he literally makes quotes up from various documents they supposedly come from, and refers to others that are completely unrelated to the topic at hand.
As I said right from the start, the man is a liar and an intellectual pigmy. All you need to do is go read the documents he quotes and take them in proper context, because he of course will quote mine and try and twist black into being white and vice versa.
In short, it was NOT the council that decided anything, but Gregory XII, the one true pope that for the good of the Church proposed the solution that everyone agreed with and everyone agreed he had the full authority to make this decision and that all of his appointments were in fact the only ones that would be valid, since he was the real pope.
Gregory XII sent to Constance as his representatives his protector Carlo Malatesta, the Lord of Rimini, and the Dominican cardinal, John Domenici—to Constance indeed, but not to the General Council assembled there by the authority, and in the name, of John XXIII. The envoys’ commission was to the emperor Sigismund, presiding over the various bishops and prelates whom his zeal to restore peace to the Church had brought together. To these envoys—and to Malatesta in the first place—Gregory gave authority to convoke as a General Council—to convoke and not to recognise—these assembled bishops and prelates ; [4] and by a second bull [5] he empowered Malatesta to resign to this General Council in his name.
The emperor, the bishops and prelates consented and accepted the role Gregory assigned. And so, on July 4, 1415. Sigismund, clad in the royal robes, left the throne he had occupied in the previous sessions for a throne placed before the altar, as for the president of the assembly. Gregory’s two legates sat by his side facing the bishops. The bull was read commissioning Malatesta and Domenici to convoke the council and to authorise whatever it should do for the restoration of unity and the extirpation of the schism—with Gregory’s explicit condition that there should be no mention of Baldassare Cossa, [6] with his reminder that from his very election he had pledged himself to resign if by so doing he could truly advance the good work of unity, and his assertion that the papal dignity is truly his as the canonically elected successor of Urban VI.
Malatesta then delegated his fellow envoy, the cardinal John Domenici, to pronounce the formal operative words of convocation [7] ; and the assembly—but in its own way—accepted to be thus convoked, authorised and confirmed in the name “of that lord who in his own obedience is called Gregory XII” [8]. The council next declared that all canonical censures imposed by reason of the schism were lifted, and the bull was read by which Gregory authorised Malatesta to make the act of abdication [9] and promised to consider as ratum gratum et firmum, and forever irrevocable, whatever Malatesta, as his proxy, should perform. The envoy asked the council whether they would prefer the resignation immediately, or that it should be delayed until Peter de Luna’s decision was known. The council preferred the present moment. It ratified all Gregory XII’s acts, received his cardinals as cardinals, promised that his officers should keep their posts and declared that if Gregory was barred from re-election as pope, this was only for the peace of the Church, and not from any personal unworthiness. Then the great renunciation was made [10], ” …. renuncio et cedo …. et resigno …. in hac sacrosancta synodo et universali concilio, sanctam Romanam et universalem eccleciam repraesentante” and the council accepted it [11], but again as made “on the part of that lord who in his own obedience was called Gregory XII”. The Te Deum was sung and a new summons drawn up calling upon Peter de Luna to yield to the council’s authority.
The work of Pisa was now almost undone, and by this council which, in origin, was a continuation of Pisa. It had suppressed the Pisan pope whom Pisa, with biting words, had rejected as a schismatic and no pope.”
Phillip Hughes, A History of the Church, p. 289-291
All it takes to catch Dyer out in his lies is to actually refer to the documents and events he intentionally lies about and misrepresents.
It’s just like all the fake nonsense “scientists” and “historians” do, when, like “journalists” they give a bunch of “references”. No one ever bothers to look them up. I you do, you will find they literally list the very proof of their own lies.
Bear with me, because the introduction to this one takes a little while, but is absolutely necessary in order for us to understand each other properly. I think you will agree, especially if you are not Catholic; as —perhaps to your surprise— this post is nevertheless for you too.
As usual, the Intro:
This is the fourth in the Theoretical Models of Society series of Posts. Use the category of the same name or the Search Me function on the right-hand sidebar to find all related posts in the series.
It is generally helpful to a reader if they are already familiar with some of my other work, in order for this stuff to have the most useful effect on your life. In particular, The Face on Mars and Believe! would be the top reads to have done to have the generic global perspective of reality well in hand. Systema and Reclaiming the Catholic Church would have the most impact on a more personal level. On health/security/self-protection, and on the reality of Catholicism as it was (and remains with Sedevacantists) before Vatican II and why the Novus Ordo Church is not only not Catholic, but Satanic at its core. I will repeat this little paragraph on each new part, as I think it is important to have a general foundation if one is really interested in more than skim-reading before returning to the general slumber we are all being attempted to be forced into.
In writing this ongoing series, despite the fact it was the most requested among the choices I gave on the Poll, the fact is that it is at times hard to determine if it is having the intended useful effect.
Of the people who read this blog regularly, only a fraction will reply to polls, and of that, possibly a part will be hate-readers trying to skew the stats.
That said, I received a private message that made it clear that at least one person, and a very good person at that, is finding it useful. Among a busy life, a relatively recent marriage and a new son, he is also busy trying to form a Sede community in a place where there isn’t even a proper Catholic Church. Sounds crazy? Well he is not, and amazingly, he is already having some material success, grouping the few Sedes and making them achieve a first contact with each other. Meaning he is becoming successful at creating one of those communities I tell you all you should be busy forming, of like-minded people, whether you are Catholic or not.
His comment to me was also helpful because it ties very smoothly into the next aspect of TMOS, and that is, the proto-cell of the whole thing: The Individual Man.
Introduction before the concept
In my explanation, the analogies and explanations are best executed in terms of the underlying Catholic (1958 Sedevacantist) spiritual underpinnings.
Now, possibly heretical though it might be, I do not want this to dissuade people who are not Catholic from understanding the baseline concepts. Remember that if the model works, you should use it. As I already explained in the first 3 parts, as long as you base everything on the spiritual reality that sustains the physical, you will achieve some measure of success, and there are many spiritual realities. It’s just that most are not good, and of the few that might be considered “good” all but one are less than ideal. And even if you don’t agree with me about which one that is, if you can do basic logic at all, you must concede that the truth can only be one, whatever it is. Nothing can be both true and not true at the same time.
It became my considered opinion, after some 4 years of intense investigation (between 2013 and 2017) that the original Catholicism that existed (mostly) and was promulgated by the Vatican until 1958, is the very best approximation or approach to reality that humanity has ever had. It has produced the best and most fruits globally, and therefore has an impeccable track record when compared to any other spiritual model.
That said, is it possible for a human being with some other philosophy to produce demonstrable and overall good effects in the world? Yes. Absolutely.
It is certainly possible for a truly pious, well-meaning Buddhist, or even Protestant, or even Muslim believer, to have interpreted what shrinking good there is in their false philosophies, just so, that they really do produce an overall net good that is certainly superior to that of a genuine Catholic, that however genuine in intent, may have misunderstood the basics of his own philosophy. We are all in error to some degree or other, and it is not a race to some finish line, so this is a bad analogy in many ways, but if we assume that in order to get into heaven you have to accumulate 1,000 points, starting out as a proper Catholic is like starting with 1,000 points right out the gate. You can certainly lose points in your journey, and it may be a lot easier to do so than you think maybe, but you sure have a better shot than someone who starts out as a Muslim, which might be like starting out with -500 points and generally in a lifetime you can only accumulate say 500 points max, and converting to Catholicism gives you a 1,000 points.
I mention all this not to try and scare you into conversion (I mean, hey, if it happens, and you chose it of your own free will, great) but only to identify that fact that despite there not being any salvation outside of the Catholic Church, in our path of life, it is possible (if not very probable) to find people who are not on the true path (Catholicism) that nevertheless can have demonstrable (good) effects in the world due to a variety of variables and factors.
There are also plenty of people that have demonstrable effects in the world that are using an underlying evil spiritual underpinning of course, but we are talking only to the “good” guys here.
And while I sure hope you would all become able to see the logic, beauty and truth of Catholicism, find yourself a real Church, a real priest, fall to your knees and beg for proper baptism in it, I am, above all, a realist. Which means I am aware of the war I face. And while I wish you all the Truth with a capital T, I know many, probably most, will not be moved an inch from your erroneous ideas any more than I was moved from mine for 43 years.
So, while I leave the details of your possible salvation by conversion to the Lord, because ultimately it is a job waaaaaaaaaaay above my station to even worry about, aside from pointing out, as crudely, simply, and correctly as my human flaws allow, the retta via (right path), I tend to work with what I have.
And if all I have are a bunch of Pagans, heathens, agnostics and autistic atheists, so be it. Within your errors, I wish you to find the best, the snippets, the shards of good that may exist, imperfect and insufficient though they are, for you to fashion weapons out of them and combat the enemy.
Do not think I will treat you as equal, or pray with you in your heathen ways, we are not the same; but also know, I do not hate you; and, in my heart, I wish you only well and that one day you too are saved, and get to heaven, by whichever tortuous path you might need to. My own path has certainly been far from straight, after all.
And now, with that out of the way, let us now get to this Part 4: The individual Man
The Proto-Cell: The Individual Man
Continuing with my imperfect analogies, and considering you as if you have already read and digested parts 1-3 (including 3a), I shall now explain why the individual man is the proto-cell.
The actually cell of human society is the nuclear family, and the only version of that that actually works analogously to a healthy cell within the body, is one that is composed of a Husband, Wife and Children, all operating under the foundational principles of a real spirituality, which I will from now on simply refer to as Catholicism. But feel free to substitute that with your own word for your philosophy of life; and if you do, yet are perceptive, you may notice that certain things simply do not work in your heathen ways, because you lack the demonstrable fruits throughout history to show you the truth of the matter, you lack the reason and logic that prove the truth of Catholicism throughout the ages, and on and on. I am not striking at you here, just making a point that you might want to take note of and verify for yourself.
Any other version of the nuclear family that is not composed of Husband, Wife and Children can be considered as a damaged, crippled or even a cancerous cell. Now, there are some cells, that can’t have children, but these too, if under proper spiritual underpinning, are genuinely positive and helpful. In each body there are cells that are specialised and appear to be slightly different, because they have a different role, but all are still healthy and required. Childless couples can improve the world by adopting children that might otherwise be lost, or help others in other ways, and they do. But the model is still based on the same foundations.
We will discuss the nuclear family in the greater context of the very practical and beneficial effects they have on society in later posts, but first things first. The proto-cell, if you like, the DNA of the cell, is the individual man. And I say man not coincidentally. Without a man at the spiritual helm, you get nowhere. The female may be considered the cell wall and other parts of it, you need both to form a real, proper, functioning cell, but the code of life is in the DNA and similarly, the code of a proper community and functional society is the individual man, both in each cell (family unit), as well as in greater society.
The second concept, that of the proto-cell in greater society will be a subject for a future post. Here, today, we will only examine the proto-cell of the individual man on its own terms. What makes a valid, viable, strong, Individual Man? That is going to be a good example that will perform well in both the complete cell (nuclear family) and/or in the larger body (community/society). This is what we will concern ourselves with in this post.
Trying to avoid my common error of skipping something obvious to me that turns out to be not so obvious to others, I also just want to say that why the individual MAN is the focus first, is because both in a family, as well as in society, it is ultimately men that create civilisation. Which is not to say that women are completely useless in the process, but women simply are not the civilisers of humanity. Men are. Always have been, and always will be. No matriarchal society has ever existed, and any attempts at creating one have invariably always failed in ways that are absolutely horrific. The current fruits of feminism most certainly included. But again, the details of the role of the woman, as well as the evils of feminism, etc. are for a post way down the line.
Accepting the above premise then, what makes a “good” proto-cell?
We already know he has to have a a sound spiritual foundation but on a more practical level, the key factor that makes the difference is self-knowledge.
The Oracle at Delphi was right.
Above all, Know Thyself
I need to emphasise something regarding the examples I make below. Whenever I insert myself in the discussion, it is not for some reach for glory, but rather because if I use an example from my own life, the experience is absolutely real and factual. In other words I am trying to show you it is based in reality. And it is not my “opinion” of some third party, but rather something I have personally tested and verified works. So keep that in mind.
Even from a very young age, possibly due to my touch of Aspergers’/High IQ I spent time imagining various scenarios life might throw at me and how I wanted to respond. Many were prompted by the fact that my life had been different from most children my age in rather extreme ways. My father moved us to Nigeria when I was four and we grew up pretty wild, being home schooled by my mother in how to read and write and do maths. Periodic returns to Italy were usually short lived and then my brother and I lived with out grandparents in rural Italy for a number of years too. When I enrolled in my first elementary school I was ahead of most of the other children in both maths and reading and writing comprehension. Socially I was never much of a joiner and this sometimes resulted in what today would be labelled as “bullying”, but I never took it and generally fought back regardless. It wasn’t that I was necessarily brave, as such, just that my sense of innate justice was more powerful than fear generally speaking. It was mostly a reaction, treat me bad, I treat you bad right back. The fact there are 30 of you and one of me is sort of irrelevant.
That was luck, genetics, some of my upbringing, and I stress, only some of it, or divine intervention that made me that way from early on, because I don’t think I can take any credit for it before say age seven or so for trying to foster that mentality consciously. But because Justice absolutely is a fundamental spiritual concept, that is closely aligned to Love, my spiritual foundation, even if shaky in many other respects, had at least one strong and unshakable pillar around which the rest of my personality could grow. If Seeking Justice is your main characteristic, you can’t really do it without developing Courage. Which is not easy to do, but is doable, I know, because I did. Courage may or may not come easier to some than others, but I certainly am aware I had to consciously work at it as a child and even as a teenager. It has been one of the constants in my life, to continually try to improve it. At age 55 my efforts are far less in the physical realm, but rather more on the intellectual, emotional, and spiritual level. By exposing perhaps more of myself to the wider world, there are costs to it, but I feel it is important and as such the type of courage required in it is of a different sort than facing, say, an armed opponent.
My point is that in order for you to be effective, you need to be congruent. I made conscious choices as to what type of man I wanted to be, and pursued those choices relentlessly. So I imagined all sorts of scenarios or situations in order to understand what was my natural inclination, and if I was happy or not with it, and if not, how to change it or improve it. By the time I was in my late teens, and certainly by my early 20s, my internal self-knowledge was pretty absolute. Certain events continue to happen in life for which you can never be prepared, but if you have a truly deep understanding of who you are, even the unexpected, tragic, surprising, and so on, can be at least survived, and often navigated and sometimes even taken advantage of and turned into an opportunity. If however, when life throws you a curve ball, you end up reeling in confusion as to what to do with it because, on top of the event itself, you also are unsure of who you are and, so are unable to quickly or even instinctively process it appropriately, life will definitely be harder for you.
Self-knowledge inevitably requires a deep delving into your philosophies of life, and if these are in turn based on false spiritual concepts, your efficiency in the world will, once again, reflect that.
Prior to my baptism, my overall philosophies of life were few and far between, and I always knew and said this too. They were limited to a set of ethics that I had investigated very deeply and knew was correct, but did not venture much beyond that. Justice was absolutely the core of it (and remains so, mostly), followed by the related concepts of honesty and honour (keeping your word, essentially) and courage. The rest I was pretty much agnostic about. And because I limited myself to the spiritual reality I could absolutely reconcile with reality, my foundation has always been solid. One can say it was incomplete, but not that it was ever unstable. Which is why, mentally, emotionally, and even physically, I have generally been able to outperform most people in terms of efficacy and results.
When I suddenly was presented with a huge revelation concerning the very bedrock of reality, I took time to simply sit and observe. Try to learn, as I did when I was a small child, by simply sitting and observing everything going on around me. Except I was 43, not a child. Which meant some things I could actively begin to investigate in more depth and detail right away, as soon as I became aware of them. And this search was done in the same relentless way I did my previous investigation of the fundamentals of reality. I suddenly had a gigantic, pivotal, absolutely core piece of information that I never had before, and had experienced it directly and unquestionably. For the first time I realised with absolute certainty that:
God exists, and,
God is Love, and Loves us, (despite ourselves!) individually, specifically, and personally.
It took some time (months for the basics at least, but it continues throughout life) to process my past experiences, my life to that point, so that I could verify that yes, those two points are absolutely true and everything in my life to that point actually proved them. Nothing contradicted or invalidated those two key points. Literally nothing. Including my “worst” or most “lost” moments. In other words, perhaps if I had been a more careful observer, I could have, or maybe I should have, inferred God simply by my surroundings and reality as we find it.
In fairness, the enemy does throw up quite the smokescreen at every level of our lives, so it’s not as easy as all that, but it certainly has been possible for others. My friend Tony for example, in pure weaponised autist fashion, became a Catholic purely as a result of following the logic of it.
So that was step one. Verifying that my Road to Damascus experience was rooted in reality; that is, in truth, that the aspects of reality I had shown did in fact fit my experience, observations, and logical deductions. And not only did they do so, but they did so to a level of precision, perfection and correctness I had not encountered even in engineering, which tends to be a rather “exact” science.
Then I proceed to step two, which was to test the model. This took longer (at least two years I would estimate) but once again, every experiment I did, as long as I did it correctly, fit the model. Of course, in experimentation, the failed experiments are worthwhile too, as they provide information on the processes that do or do not fit reality. To my astonishment, I discovered prayer absolutely works. It is a difficult thing to get right, and in some cases almost impossible at times, BUT if and when the conditions are repeated correctly, the result is invariably positive. In other words, the scientific method can be applied to prayer and the results it provides are proof enough that it is a real thing and works.
The issue with prayer is not that it does not work, but that in almost all cases, we are not applying the “formula” or “rules” correctly or sufficiently accurately, to make it work, and some of it is also possibly dependent on external factors beyond our control. Nevertheless it remains wholly and totally scientifically testable.
Say you want to prove that you could use ball-lightning to power something, say charge a battery fully in seconds. First of all you would need to test various models of engineered equipment to make it happen, but you also need the ball-lightning to happen too. Even if you have got all the equipment totally correct, but you do your experiment on a cloudless and sunny day, your results will be zero. If you then chalk that up as evidence that ball-lightning cannot charge a battery in seconds, or that the equipment used is faulty, you are making an error. In good science, the conditions need to be replicated in order to test a theory. So it is not easy to test for how prayer works and how to do it properly. Nevertheless, I have explained this in both Believe! and Reclaiming the Catholic Church.
Again, to summarise, I had a deep knowledge of myself, and this was based only on those valid principles of spirituality I was sure of because I could test and verify them to an absolute degree and see them reflected in physical reality as well. Then when additional information was given to me that showed me a whole aspect of reality I was ignorant of before, I immediately set about observing, exploring and testing it.
It is only in this fashion that I gradually came to my conclusions regarding Catholicism. In each step of the process, I tested, kicked at, explored, and verified, each additional element of the philosophies I was taking on.
The process, in very summarised format was as follows:
Road to Damascus moment leads to the observation that:
God exists, and
God is Love and does Love us, individually, specifically and personally.
At this point I could be defined as a Deist. Shortly thereafter however, observation and testing makes it absolutely clear that:
An enemy to God absolutely does exist and is actively trying to lead us as far from the truth as possible. In fact this reality is so obvious once you even begin to look, that the fingerprints and clues of the eternal psychopath are littered all over the place, as if the entire planet was a giant crime scene, which, in reality, it kind of is, and this too fits with reality as we find it, as well as the historical models of it.
At the same time, it also becomes obvious that the only possibly valid version of God that fits the experience and observations must be one of the following:
An open-ended generic Loving God that potentially (but not historically) could be associated with certain aspects or elements of: Shintoism, Zen agnosticism, Taoism. Vanishingly small chance of being the case, but not totally excluded.
Hinduism, Judaism and Islam are absolutely and definitely out, and not related to the reality of God at all.
Christianity is the only religion that descriptively and historically presents God (the father) as approaching the same reality I was aware of and tested to my satisfaction.
All of the other Pagan religions from the Aztec gods to the Zoroastrian ones, are clearly either nonsensical, or actively working for the glorification of the precise opposite of God.
Further investigation then makes option 1 potentially “valid” but without any real evidence of it throughout human history beyond some inference here and there. The focus then becomes Christianity as a whole, but necessarily the process must now include the question: “Which Christianity?”
Further observation and investigation very quickly makes it absolutely plain that everything and anything related to Protestantism is, in fact, almost certainly the work of the enemy and designed to secularise, destroy and confuse the truth. Every single one of the 40,000 denominations of it (more like 700 million, though since each person is an interpreter of the law onto him or herself) can be safely discarded with the same ease one discards the “logic” of a child that is trying to convince you that 2+2 is purple.
This leaves the Copts, the Eastern Orthodox and the Catholics.
The first two have a problem of not bearing anywhere near sufficient fruits to be the One True religion. The Copts are also almost extinct and never achieved much at all anywhere at any time. That leaves the EO, which are generally split into nationalistic versions, did not spread the gospel anywhere near as much as Catholics, did not achieve any of the civilisational markers Catholicism did, did not invent the scientific method, did not create as varied and beautiful palette of art in all its forms and has not been exactly the fountainhead of logic and reason that Catholicism has been since the start. They also betrayed the very Catholics that came to rescue them despite their schism from them some 40 years earlier, and literally tried to kill them by making pacts with the very Muslims the Catholics were saving them from. Three times in a row. And then are still bitching about when the fourth time round the Catholics sacked Constantinople (which as far as sacking of cities goes for the period, was really quite a gentle affair anyway).
Against that, I had a “Pope” that protected pedophiles, homosexual orgies fuelled by cocaine in the Vatican by supposed Catholic clergy, and this too could not be reconciled. While it was clear that human fallibility was always going to be a part of any One True Church, because humans gonna human, two things had to logically be true:
God’s real Church, if one existed, must, logically, be infallible, and also be able to be discovered (visible) and tested to be as such. This is no small feat. I have no problem with it being possibly difficult to find; or you needing to work your butt off to figure it out. All that is fine to me, because there is the enemy, and the smokescreens he shoots up are huge, and so on, but anyone truly earnestly seeking should, be able to find it. Logic dictates that a Loving God, even allowing for free will, would absolutely make it possible for you to find it in some way if you truly were seeking for the truth. So that was a thing, secondly, it had to be infallible despite the humans that represented it. Which it would and could only be by supernatural Godly protection, because you can bet every single human in it was going to fuck up some aspect of it in some way to other. And there is only ONE Church that makes that claim. The Catholic One. But even that claim could be fake, so you need to study what the rules of this Church are, and how do they fit reality, which leads to the second point:
The One True Church must —again, necessarily, by reason of the most basic logic— have rules. And at least some of those rules, like absolute truth and math, must be eternal and unchanging, because if a Loving God exists, that Love would NOT be actual Love if:
It was not inclusive of you having free will, including the free will to reject it, and,
Love without Justice (rules) is not Love. If Justice does not exist, then neither can Love. If your Love towards another is potentially never even acknowledged, or worse, is abused constantly, can it really be love? Or is it merely a perverse dictate without any goodness in it? Just as if you were forced to Love God, that would invalidate Free Will, if you were forced or only able to “Love” no matter the response, then it would just as identically not be actual Love, because Love, the real one, can ONLY be given as an act of free will.
Now, again, the only Church that has:
Visibility,
Infallibility, and
A Code of Conduct that is precisely spelt out
is the Catholic Church.
But far more impressive than that, it has had this from the start, has always proclaimed it, and the deeper into it you look, the more astonishing what you find.
You find that the Church has been protected from fantastically “successful” attacks, heresies, lies, and attempts to subvert and destroy it, for two millennia; and no matter how dark and desperate the times can be, even for centuries at a time, ultimately, it continually returns triumphant against odds that simply make no sense unless some divine intervention was taking place.
All of that made it pretty clear that Catholicism was probably it… except… Pedophiles.
In my heart of hearts, it could never be accepted and reconciled that the One True God that I personally experienced in that Road to Damascus moment could ever, or would ever, let His Church ever be represented by Pedophiles. That the odd pedophile pretended to be a member? Sure. Just like the thousands of fraudsters, unrepentant thieves, murderers, adulterers, whatever. But those would be “members” of it; but as a class, represented so repeatedly and dramatically in its upper echelons of the supposed “leadership”? No. It could not be. Cannot be. And yet, Catholicism seemed to fill all the other requirements. So what happened? I began to investigate if it was always thus, and discovered that no, it was not. And then I became aware that the real infiltration started in earnest in the late 1700s. And following that thread of Illuminati, Freemasons, Carbonari, Rosicrucians, Communists, Homosexuals, Jews, and Protestants that plotted against the Church over at least two and a half centuries, it became obvious that Vatican II was the culmination of those efforts and it usurped the Church almost (but not quite) entirely.
At this point one might lose hope if one was affected by rhetoric and appearances instead of fundamentally seeking only the facts. That is: Only the pure unadulterated truth as we really find it, and can test it in reality as we find it all around us.
And luckily for me (and some others too, I guess) precisely because I always had an instinctive understanding of the importance of knowing yourself —and basing it only on the truth that you can absolutely demonstrate is real and reflects reality as it is, not as you wish it were— I carried on digging.
I read the Code of Canon Law of 1917 by myself, and came across Canon 188.4 by myself. It was here that a light bulb moment went off. I had found the point of departure.
It was, indeed Vatican II, its instigators, and all its pomps. And it also confirmed that the impostors squatting in the Vatican not only are NOT merely human representatives of God’s Church, but they are in fact, working for the enemy.
Imagine then my amusement when I discovered that this too is prophesied both in the Bible as well as in the visions of many saints throughout the centuries of the Catholic Church. If you had taken this journey with me, even if perhaps you are the type prone to despair because of appearances, this discovery would undoubtedly provide comfort and joy.
Because although it is sad that the Catholic Church has now been reduced to only a tiny remnant of what it was at its peak, it at least explains everything. It explains precisely why things are as they are and, once again, it explains reality as we find it. The Pedophiles and their “Pope” protectors are Satanists, just pretending to be “Catholics”, and yes, fooling more than a billion people, but that too is to be expected. Again, we know that the large and well paved road leads to Hell.
Only at this point then, and studying and testing further to my satisfaction, did I realise that indeed, the position known as Sedevacantism is actually, simply, truly, mere Catholicism. The real one. The one that has survived other dark times like the persecutions by the Roman Emperors, the Arian crisis, the attacks by numerically superior Muslims, and now, the almost total infiltration of the Church by its enemies now pretending to be the rightful “Catholic Clergy”, but really only being servants of Moloch and other demons under Lucifer himself.
It all fits, the logic returns correct, the math works, the reality we live in proclaims every aspect and facet of this correctly, so I am now comfortable to take on the rules and ethics of the Catholic Church. As best I can of course, which is miserably imperfect, because as I keep saying, all humans are badly flawed, and me perhaps more than most in some ways, but nevertheless, I understand that the correct position is Catholicism and any errors or lacunae I make are mine alone.
The official processes, and rules and ways of Catholicism, are all written down in one volume, the Code of Canon Law of 1917, and it all stems from the Bible and the Catholic tradition that actually put the Bible together too. And reason and logic, verifiable in the world and reality all around you, if you can but do it.
Armed with all of the above then, I went from one solid pillar (Justice) to a veritable temple composed of many huge and unshakable pillars. Some that created themselves in some mystic fashion that I yet do not understand but cannot deny.
Added to Justice comes Love, Charity, Beauty, Virtue (in its many forms), Miracles, the sacrifice of Christ, and my very simple, but honest devotion to Him and His Church. The reality of the Saints and how we are eternally linked to and connected to them. The mystical effects that praying the Rosary has on your very Terrene and Earthly life.
I went from one lone column in the dirt of no man’s land, called Justice, with vines of Honour, Honesty and Courage growing upon it, to a veritable enormous and constantly expanding beautiful temple of many columns and rooms and altars of beauty that almost blinds the eyes.
My knowledge of self has expanded exponentially simply by having seen far more of the truth of the spiritual reality that underpins all of creation, and seeing exactly how it absolutely verifies all that we see in the world, both good and evil.
Aligning myself with that wider and deeper and far more beautiful spiritual reality, absolutely makes me more capable, more effective and more able to create more in the world in accordance with His Will, which I absolutely wish to serve as best I can, within the confines of my human flaws and any God-given talents I may posses.
And yes, Evil certainly appears to have the upper hand in this specific timeline. You can argue that it is in fact a reality and not just an appearance. But am I worried? No. Not at all. I am aware and I will fight to my last breath, but I am not unduly worried. Because even if it lasts for a few centuries, the Church is undefeatable, at least until the very end, at which point, it will rise triumphant, and more so than in any other human era, with the return of our Lord and the final cleansing of the evil spirits from this world, to be relegated to their eternal prison.
Now this last bit may seem to be absolute nonsensical fantasy to you. It certainly seemed so to me for some 42 years or so. And I certainly can’t prove it even now.
But what I can prove and have done so, first of all to myself —and then only very imperfectly and distantly to others through my books and words— is that the entirety of those things that the Catholic Church says that can be tested and that I have tested, have, without fail, proven to be true.
Therefore, I trust too, the extrapolated “big picture” for the future as well. But even if it were wrong, even if the ultimate big picture turned out to be an error, I still, cannot see a better way to live until it is revealed as such by actual events in physical reality. Which I doubt will happen in my lifetime.
So, once again, even if you have followed me here only as a secular reader, I ask you: What other system or model can even begin to provide the same level of recurring proof and evidence, as well as functional societies that come anywhere close to the beauty, glory, peace, serenity and joy that a real Catholic community exhibits? There simply isn’t one.
All of the above, to show you that my acceptance of Catholicism is based not on any kind of idiotic version of “blind faith” but rather on the detailed, deep, constant, probing and testing of all that I can observe and test within the dogma of Catholicism. And should I later find any “holes” in it, I’ll be sure to let you know, but, so far, there aren’t any. And there are gaping maws letting fetid water in, in every other system I have checked.
My self-knowledge has expanded and some of my reactions changed in light of this new information, that I have tested and continue to test daily, but that is not to say I am a different person. My soul is still the same, but as my understanding has evolved, my actions, choices and efficiency changes with it and shifts in expression and scale, all of which is normal.
The overarching point I want to make in this whole extremely long post then is this:
I have shown you (briefly and imperfectly, but I think well enough) the level and depth with which I look into things before I base any of my principles on them. How much work have you done? How much of this investigation into reality do you do, or can you do, before you get too scared of what you might find and stop? How much of it is based on true, objective investigation and how much instead because someone or multiple someones in your life have told you “Here be Dragons! Don’t you DARE go look in there.”
And to be sure, there are places that are absolutely dangerous to go look into, but I for one, will never tell one of my children “Don’t go there and that’s that!” I will instead say “My son, in that hole you will find a snake that is poisonous, it is of this shape and colour and general size. And you can smoke it out in this way, and kill it in this way, using this tool. Now, if I am still able enough, come, I will show you and you can see for yourself, and if I am not, then heed my warning, because I love you, and I trust whatever you decide to do, you will use your brain and your heart as best you can. Do not be afraid, but also, do not be foolish either.”
And with that last sentence as a guide, there is very little a man cannot more or less safely investigate.
So I tell you the same, reader, if you are still with me to this point.
Find out who you really are, and what you base it on. Discover what is absolutely true and what is merely a shadow created by your own ignorance, fear, or arrogance. And then decide who you are going to be once you discover the deepest truth you are able to. And don’t stop doing it.
And I was always clear on the fact that even if I used the term Sedeprivationism originally, I was clear in my 2020 book Reclaiming the Catholic Church that I was using the term completely differently from what most people that call themselves Sedeprivationists do.
I (being elitist in my linguistics) was referring merely to the etymology of the word. Strictly speaking, Sede Vacante is Latin for Empty Chair Which is shorthand for there is no valid Pope. However, strictly speaking, the chair is not empty. it is filled with an impostor, never-was-Catholic, Satanist and protector of pedophiles on Earth, currently Bergoglio. And this illegal and usurping occupation prevents a real and valid Pope from filling it. Hence Sede Privationist, a mixture of Latin and English. The usurper is Jorge Bergolgio is preventing the legitimate occupation of the chair of Peter.
But of course, by absolute divine law, codified in the Canon Law of 1917, which in no way cancels the perennial Papal encyclical of Pope Paul IV titled Cum Ex Apostolato Officio* but in fact refers to it, it is every single adherent to the Novus Ordo (I call them Novus Orco — the New Orcs) “clergy” too that is ALSO not a Catholic at all, but in fact an enemy of the Church. The Satanists have made this sound very complicated, but it exceedingly simple to understand. A child gets it.
You cannot be Pope if you are not Catholic, and you cannot be Catholic if you promote, promulgate, and espouse concepts that go against the Catholic faith (which is ENTIRELY codified and therefore logically consistent and clear) and act in ways that go against it too and call yourself a Catholic. When you do this publicly, notoriously and repeatedly, it becomes clear you are simply NOT a Catholic. End of. It would be like me calling myself a leader in the sport of golf. I can say what I want. I can dress like a golfer, I can even get some clubs and go tearing up a golf course, but since my golfing ability is nil, never having done it even once, absolutely no one sane would ever take note, care, or listen to anything I am saying about golf. Nor should they.
The sedeprivationist position ORIGINALLY, when it was first presented in the late sixties or early 70s, by the noted and well-respected Dominican theologian, father Michel-Louis Guérard des Lauriers, who was later made Bishop, it was a potentially if very temporary charitable “way out” for all the traitorous and cowardly “clergy” that did not immediately reject the false “elected” and Freemasonic enemies of the Church, Roncalli and Montini and their Satanic Vatican II heresies. It was a (VERY charitable) way to say:
“Okay, look, maybe you guys were asleep at the wheel, your weak and cowardly natures, coupled with the long-standing tradition to simply obey what you consider to be your superiors, made you “vote” or “elect” this obvious at best apostate, at worst sworn enemy of the Church as “Pope”, but come on, it’s fairly obvious what he and his predecessor were, so let’s get back on the right track, find the right way to get together and kick his heretic ass out of the Vatican and put back in a real Pope.”
And that, of course was the error on which the Freemasons and infiltrators of the Church have relied on for at least the last 250 years to infiltrate and corrupt it to the point that we have not had a valid Pope since 9th October 1958, and what people think is the Catholic Church is in reality, just another branch of Satanic fake Churchianity. The error being that devout Catholics got complacent and started to “give the benefit of the doubt” and “respectfully” not question supposed “leaders” in the Church.
The Satanists ALWAYS appeal to your kinder, charitable, more forgiving nature in order to insidiously enter your home, like snakes, and poison everything and everyone in it. That is probably why God also allows ornery, unagreeable, rude, too-direct, pains-in-the-ass like me to exist.
My misanthropic tendencies aside, the reality is that my ability to reason and do correct logic and dialectic are far above those of the average person and also the average nominal cradle “Catholic” that thinks he or she is Catholic but has never once even asked themselves what being Catholic means, has no idea what the Code of Canon Law of 1917 is, has never even read ONE of the 16 documents of Vatican II, and could not tell you who Roncalli was and why he was invalidly elected to usurp the rightful place of Giuseppe Siri who HAD been validly elected. Twice.
And no, my simply and boldly stating this fact out loud is NOT a matter of personal pride. It’s just not false humility, which too is not a virtue. It’s just a fact, and despite dozens of Freemasons trying to “poke holes” in any of my arguments, they have all utterly failed, which is why some of my work has in fact resulted in people realising the truth and coming back to the real Catholic Church.
However, all of this, if you care enough (you should if you call yourself a Catholic, since your belief in God should be extremely important to you) requires quite a bit of reading. The details in RTCC that I put together are undeniable and in the last 4 years not a single valid argument has been made against any of the information and details I presented in that book. Not one. People have lied, people have misrepresented and straw manned the arguments, but no one has been able to engage with them honestly and people who had no dog in the fight but took the time to look at my arguments and compare them with the “criticisms” have, without exception, even when not Catholic, understood that given the base premises of Catholicism, my arguments are the only ones that hold water.
Now, I am not writing this to tell you what a good and perfect Catholic I am. Or how smart and handsome I am. Think of me as badly as you like, its fine, but engage with the arguments I make, if you will.
As I wrote in BELIEVE! a much shorter book that is far easier to read and more popular, I am not a particularly a good Catholic. But I am an earnest one. And I absolutely have the temperament to NOT keep quiet, when someone, regardless of who he is lies or talks logical nonsense with respect to the truth. Pretty much in any area I am knowledgeable of, but absolutely and particularly in respect of Catholicism.
All that said, however, and if you would rather digest the list of the Sedevacantism vs Sedeprivationism argument in video format, I have not come across a better short form version than the one below. I do, of course, have a whole series on it on Kurgan TV, along with some other very interesting and unrelated topics (the face on mars, the lies of history, etc etc) topics totalling some 160 hours of video.
In short, the entire theory of Cassiciacum, or the “official” position of Sedeprivationism is simply not logically tenable or valid. The only valid position is that of Sedevacantism. Or, in fact, of being Catholic.
The position and even name of “Sedevacantism” sounds complicated and convoluted thanks to the efforts of the Satanists that have usurped the Church, so it is probably more effective to simply say that:
I am Catholic, not Novus Orco.
* It is in fact referred to in Canon 188, of which part 4 makes absolutely clear that all the non-Catholic clergy currently squatting illegally in the Vatican are not Catholics but at best heretics, and given the time lapse, currently probably actually full blown freemasons Satanists
In parts 1-3 I have covered the fundamental abstract aspect of what sustains any kind of social movement, and in broad terms this boils down to how accurate your foundational spiritual model is with respect to objective reality. The closer to it it is, the more likely your social changes or your Theoretical Model of Society is to take hold in the real, physical world.
I have already shown —and history does it for me better than any argument— that Catholicism has been the absolute best at this, precisely because it models objective reality, including all the metaphysical and underlying spiritual and non-tangibles that the modern man is stupefyingly unaware of for the most part, better than any other religion or philosophy that humans have ever come up with. Historically this is simply undeniable. However, there is a subtle but important point to clarify, one that Vox in his recent post expressed rather well (as he has done for a long time):
A Germany full of Germans is an economic powerhouse. An area of 357,022 square kilometers in the middle of Europe populated primarily by German-speaking Turks, Arabs, and Africans will be neither German nor an economic powerhouse. This is not rocket science.
He refers here to the obvious replacement taking place of native Germans, which is simply a factual and mathematical reality
The dirt is not magic. The ideas are not material. People will always live according to their own natural preferences. The transplantation of White Anglo-Saxon Protestants to the New World is what made America what it was in the place of the American Indian societies that preceded it. Neither geography nor ideology nor language nor even religion are determinant in the end, as genetics ultimately and always dictates the destinies of nations.
That last sentence is the main point I want to cover “nor even religion”.
He is right… up to a point.
It is true that a Venetian Catholic is different from a Japanese or Zimbabwean or even just Spanish Catholic, HOWEVER, if the Zimbabwean is in Zimbabwe surrounded by his brother and sister Zimbabweans, and ditto the others, the coalition of Catholics around the world, at the level of nation to nation, is valid, helpful and good.
This is why Catholicism has been relatively unique amongst the religions of the world. While maintaining the national identity, sovereignty, culture, and ethnicity of each people, it also managed to have an over-arching belief system that conquered their souls enough to bring them into positive co-operation with each other. In real terms. Not in the usual, cynical, controlling lever that the elites invariably grasp for and use to try and make cattle of us and lords and masters of themselves and their offspring.
It is why until 1958, the Holy Mass could be said in any country around the world and it would be identical, regardless of the local customs or language. As soon as the impostors took over, and the Catholic Church was almost entirely subverted to the new orc cult (Novus Orco, as I call them) dedicated to paedophelia, homosexuality, fraud and Satanism, one of the very first things they did was to change the Mass and make it just like any Protestant quasi-ritual re-enactment of some theatre production of lunch. The solemnity, respect and truth of it was reduced to localised absolute parodies of it in a cacophony of languages and complete with dancing dervishes in colourful costumes. The true and holy mass was (and is) unchangeable by infallible decree and dogma embodied in the Papal encyclical Quo Primum, the fact the impostors pretending to be Catholics changed it was just further evidence of the fact they were absolute enemies of the Church.
This is an important aspect to also keep in mind.
I will expose the enemy in more detail in part 4 and why ultimately, Catholicism, the real deal, not the pedophile infested Novus Ordo impostors pretending to be Catholics since 1958, is not only unique, but historically, the only force that has resisted the predators that try to lay claim over every aspect of our lives.
In part 1 we discussed the importance of spiritual group cohesion. In part 2 we looked at how the more reflective of a true spiritual reality the religion or belief system is, the more durable and resilient it is in creating a physical group cohesion. These are the inevitable large scale realities of mass change, and need to be understood at their scale before anything meaningful that has a chance to create real change in a society can even take place. As usual, the Intro:
This is the third in the Theoretical Models of Society series of Posts. Use the category of the same name or the Search Me function on the right-hand sidebar to find all related posts in the series.
It is generally helpful to a reader if they are already familiar with some of my other work, in order for this stuff to have the most useful effect on your life. In particular, The Face on Mars and Believe! would be the top reads to have done to have the generic global perspective of reality well in hand. Systema and Reclaiming the Catholic Church would have the most impact on a more personal level. On health/security/self-protection, and on the reality of Catholicism as it was (and remains with Sedevacantists) before Vatican II and why the Novus Ordo Church is not only not Catholic, but Satanic at its core. I will repeat this little paragraph on each new part, as I think it is important to have a general foundation if one is really interested in more than skim-reading before returning to the general slumber we are all being attempted to be forced into.
You may have the most wonderful ideas of how to make a better society, but if you are unable to base them on solid spiritual footings that are widely acceptable to the masses, and also broadly representative of reality, so that the operation of these spiritual principles produces tangible effects in the physical reality we all share, your ideas will never even get out of the crib.
In this part 3 we are going to explore how even if you intellectually grasp the above points, your ability to create real, lasting effects in the world, are unlikely to produce any meaningful results unless you too, at a personal level, are driven by a spiritual reality that has tangible effects in the world too.
It is important to understand how this works, and thus, also, to understand that this works regardless of whether your spiritual reality is good or evil. As long as it reflects reality enough, it will produce results.
For example, the Joel Osteens or Jim Jones of the world, may be conmen, they probably don’t believe the spiritual aspect of what they are selling, at least not in the way they sell it to you, and the basis of the spiritual ideologies they sell is a con, a fake, but —and this is important— the spiritual reality they are selling has at least some elements of it based in a twisted form of the real spiritual dimension. And they do believe in that, aspect of it, at least for themselves.
For example the whole spiritual gospel of “Jesus wants you to be rich and happy and successful” sold by the Osteens of the world, is a twisted aspect of a loving God wanting the best for us. American society has been so corrupted for so long that “love” in today’s times is often interpreted as being material wealth and goods. The average man and woman in America (and elsewhere too) if given the magic wand choice of having all the material wealth they want, but no deeply loving relationship, or a deeply loving relationship but being mostly poor, will take the cash and things instead of a truly loving wife or husband. It is understandable therefore that such a false gospel would “hook” a lot of people. And when I say “false” I mean that ultimately it is a lie from the spiritual reality perspective, however, it IS based on a spiritual reality too; one which is ultimately Satanic. After all, it is indeed the general temptation even Jesus was presented with by Satan, is it not? Material goods now, for your soul later. So it does have a “solid” spiritual foundation, in the sense that Satan is the Prince of this world and we are indeed under his dominion, here on Earth. So, this kind of spiritual reality is certainly something that can produce results in the physical world too. All the Satanists, blackmailable Freemasons, and Illuminati in the film and music industry, who have to signal their membership by the usual “ok” sign over one eye and so on, will attest to the fact that if you are willing to commit your soul to the devil, you can gain material wealth.
You may personally not believe in the devil as such, but the physical reality of the associations of such people with spiritual rituals to Satan, is now undeniable. Enough of these people have come forward and either repented or spelt it out that it requires only a little bit of research for you to confirm this.
Now, while the spiritual reality being sold to the masses by a Joel Osteen, a Jim Jones, or an Imam or fake “Catholic” priest of the fake Novus Ordo “Church” is far from the truth, and far from the real Loving God and His Will, it nevertheless has some power because it is based on aspects of spiritual reality. They may not be the good side of spiritual reality, but the bad side exists too. In fact, in the world (using the word “world” in the Catholic Christian sense) the evil, corrupt, bad side of spiritual reality is in fact the main situation of how things are currently; especially over the last four years.
This is not to say all is lost, quite the opposite, the revelation of just how much corruption and evil there is in the world is becoming so prevalent that we may well be heading into an eventual spiritual awakening by the masses. Whether this happens before or after even darker times remains to be seen, but the point is that the spiritual reality is a fact. Whether for evil or for good it exists, and it informs the physical reality. And ultimately, your chances of achieving good in the world are best if you are aligned with the spiritual reality that is truly closest to the truth of the ultimate good in creation.
Personally, what I have been telling you, is that after some 42 years on Earth observing and trying to figure out the real truth of the essence of reality, it took a shocking and life-changing event, a literal road to Damascus moment, for me to finally have the illusions of the world collapse enough that I saw enough of the face of God to know with absolute and permanent certainty that God is Love.
And in my subsequent investigation of that aspect of God, the spiritual reality that most closely represented what I was made aware of was the original, actual rules of the real Catholic Church, which are founded in Love and reason to a degree no other ideology or religion has ever compared with, and which has been tested in time over two millennia, to produce the absolute best societies the human race has ever seen.
And while perfection in humans on Earth is not possible, actual Catholic communities have a true respect of both the individual, regardless of age, or sex, as well as of the family unit, which is described as the cell of the body of Christ, which is defined as the wider Catholic society that has given us some of the greatest thinkers, works of art, martyrs, Saints, and peaceful societies ever seen, all while also being able to defend itself from the evil that also exists in the world.
Now, you may or may not agree with me and you may or may not be a 1958 Sedevacantist Catholic like I am. You might be fooled by people like Ann Barnhardt and be a 2023 Sedevacantist who thinks Ratzinger was a Catholic or even a valid Pope (he was neither, of course). Or you may be a Buddhist, or have bought into the absurdity of one of the 40,000+ “demon-nimations” of Protestantism, or you may think Gurdjeff had it right, or L.Ron Hubbard, and so on.
But whatever your ultimate belief system, it is only going to produce any results insofar as you actually truly are of it and believe in it fully.
So, even if you truly do understand and believe the usefulness of say real Catholicism, and this 1958 Sedevacantism, intellectually, but if you personally are not truly a believer in it, it is unlikely you will be able to create very much in the world of the physical from it. On the other hand, if you are a true believer, but have little interest in proselytising to the masses, again, it is unlikely you will be able to achieve too much in the greater physical world in terms of changing things on a grand scale.
The point is that whatever your personal belief system is at a spiritual level, it too has to first of all be aligned with spiritual reality, secondly, it has to be practiced in order to produce those physical results in the world, and third, your greater mission both within the spiritual reality as well as the physical one, has to be aligned too, for results to begin to appear.
In my own case, the spiritual reality for me internally is strong, especially if I compare it to the average human, or even the average true believer. By those standards, I am a fundamentalist zealot that would have fit in just fine with the guys going on the first crusade in 1095. By my own standards, I am barely scratching the surface, and really only starting to begin to approach what I would consider a minimum level of actual proper spiritual practice and piety now, some 7 years and a half after being baptised.
As such, my concern for the wider world has been relatively superficial, and been encapsulated mostly in my short book Believe! And my subsequent far more detailed work focusing on Catholicism specifically, Reclaiming the Catholic Church. And in the wider world those works have already produced results, in the form of over a hundred souls returning to, or discovering, actual Catholicism and being baptised into it, and some of them going on to help others see it, and/or improve their own lives and those of others in various ways, and/or to form families and have children who will also be raised Catholic and so on. Some are even intent on forming proper Catholic (that is, not Novus Orco) Churches in their country where currently no real Catholic presence exists. And all of these are good things. But on a personal level, I am still putting together my own house, trying to get to as self-sufficient a level as I can, in order to be able to then become a hub, for more sedevacantists to move here and become a real physical presence of note in the world. The obstacles I face are huge, and not easily tackled, but there is measurable progress, and I know that once I achieve real independence from clown world, primarily financial, which is the hardest part, but also in every other respect, it will open the floodgates to other people being able to do it as well, and at that point, the Sedevacantist community near me as well as further afield that I am in contact with, will explode. But it will not happen in a day. And there are, will be, and continue to appear, all sorts of obstacles, people that get in the way of you trying to create something good, and so on.
That is simply the way things are. It is also why the Church here on Earth and its members is referred to as the Church Militant. Because it is a fight. It’s primarily a spiritual fight, but it can be also a physical one. Making your home and family self-sufficient and as off-grid as possible, while also being able to remain integrated in the beast world enough that you can be a model for others to follow or copy, and yet not feel you are too far removed from the “norm” for them to feel capable of doing so, is far from an easy task.
Add in five children, (soon six) a house that needed massive works on it and still requires regular maintenance and constant little upgrades, the running of a farm in an activity I have zero experience in, the bureaucracy of any venture in the world today, the need to rely on others for some elements of this, and the continuing need for enough income to sustain all of it, and you can imagine why progress might be slow. I spent the first year and a half just getting the house liveable. And within six months of our arrival here, a major event that had serious and long term ramifications that are ongoing also happened. The down side is that it impacted everything in multiple ways and at a practical level made everything far more difficult; the up side is that my daughter, who I had not been able to raise for the last nine years, nor spend time with for the last five of those nine years, has now been living with me for the last three years. And you can bet that if everything else had to take (and in many ways continues to take) a back seat, well, so be it.
Some of you may think that this means I will not bear fruit in the long term. But if so you are mistaken. What is happening here is that my personal aspects of reality are first of all aligning with my spiritual understanding, and this process is lifelong. As I have always been a man apart, so to speak, from most of polite society, regardless of which country or culture I may be in, it makes sense, that my own, personal situation has to resolve first at least to an extent that makes it good, and stable, and secure, to a point that it then becomes a foundation from which to move in the wider arena.
This applies almost always in this fashion if it is to be stable in the long term (I have also added my own timeline to it, in order to give a sense of the process as it may apply to you and your beliefs):
Personal Spiritual revelation—> [3rd March 2013]
personal change—> [2013 to present and ongoing]
Personal spiritual growth—> [baptised 25th May 2017]
Personal physical expression in the wider world—-> [Newly Sedevacantist friends appear and help us on the farm and in general – 2021-2022]
spiritual revelation in the wider world (to others)—-> [Newly Sedevacantist friends go on to spread the word, write their own books, get married, have children, etc. 2021-2024]
personal change in the wider world of people (the others go through their own spiritual revelations)—-> [2024 – first Sedevacantist buys property near us, more Sedevacantist babies are born, new sedevacantist budding communities are forming around the world, that are in touch with me/us/our friends]
spiritual growth in the wider world (expansion of the concepts, new members, attendance in churches goes up, etc.)—> [we are currently here]
growth in the wider world [this is the point at which wider communities begin to form and take hold]
What the timeline is like, to achieve strong, permanent, communities that will be able to resist clown world in true and meaningful fashion is hard to predict, but given the course of things, and the fact that while I have been aware of this process from 2014 onwards, I only really started to try to work towards creating something from 2018 at the very earliest in its protozoic form, I expect that within the next ten years there should be a definite sustainable group of sedevacantists where I am. It may happen sooner, depending on various factors, many out of my control whatsoever, but I doubt it will take any longer. And in 20 years I expect several strong such communities will exist around the world; some more successful than others, which will broadly speaking be a function of how close to the rules of Catholicism they actually stick to, with respect to things like non-una cum masses, and being proper Catholics, instead of binary thinkers; which is essentially a Protestant mindset, with merely a veneer of Catholicism over it.
From a personal perspective, frustrated and frustrating as I may find the slowness of the entire process, I also realise that in social, human terms, it is moving at breakneck speed.
My personal revelation was 11 and a half years ago (as of 2024), and it completely overturned pretty much all my lifelong zen-agnostic state of being. My own personal situation and challenges at that time seemed absolutely unsurmountable and beyond any possibility of repair to just “normalcy”, never mind actual achieving of “goodness”. But the only skill I always had that remained valid even spiritually was the inability to give up, or to stop fighting for what I believe is true, and being able to wait like a hunter if that is what is required.
There was no thought at all for even thinking remotely about building anything beyond the mere survival of whatever of my life I could put together just for my own bare minimum peace of mind. And that happened in the blink of an eye, so that by 2018 I was baptised and married in Church. It was only then, and only very much at arm’s length that I thought of the wider world; hence the two books, Believe! and Reclaiming the Catholic Church in 2019 and 2020 respectively.
Then the whole COVID takeover of human brains by the Satanists with the use of global fear, followed by widespread mass-murder by fake vaccines and draconian and dystopic intrusions in all our lives with MORE chemical poisons like chemtrails, the introduction of graphene in all anaesthetic injections now being reported on, the contamination of foods with mRNA murder “vaxx” and so on happened. And at that point I decided to take care of my family first. Hence the farm in Italy in 2021. But it was an investment in time and money that would be further along if the aspects of my personal life that actually led to my initial spiritual revelation had not also miraculously resolved itself in a completely unexpected but oh so welcome way.
Call me selfish if you like, but having my daughter with me for the last three years, whose childhood had essentially been stolen from me, matters to me far more than creating a city state of Catholics. And in any case, it’s not like it stopped those efforts, but the practicalities related to this event have certainly impacted on the wider goals considerably, and I am only now, starting to think about the wider goals, while at the same time also very aware that I first need to establish a self-sufficient hub here, first for my family and myself, so that I then have the possibility to focus on the wider issues. Even so, slowly, the wider community continues to grow, and even begin to form around me, because that is the power of being connected to a spiritual reality that is true and good. If you had told me in 2014 that in a mere 4 years later I would be married, and that 4 years after that I would have three more children and reunite with my first daughter, I would have assumed you were just making up the most fantastic lie to make me feel better. But all of these things happened as if by magic, only as a result of me internally and personally doing my best, imperfect as that is, to follow the spiritual truth I became more aware of and that became more obvious to me the deeper into it and the more I tried to follow and live it.
So, in this rather lengthy and apparently rambling post (but it is not rambling at all in reality, if you pay attention to the macro as well as the micro intent!) the point I am trying to get across to you is primarily one: whatever your belief system is, if you want to create something lasting, it has to be based in something real. And that reality begins in the spiritual underpinnings. All of life does. Even in my brief period as an atheist I understood that.
As to what spiritual underpinnings you choose, I would say be careful. A lot of them are not based in the good. There is only one true God of Love. And like it or not, such a God does have rules for us to live by so as to achieve what is best for us. Just like a truly wise and loving father will tell his children what the rules of life are, for their benefit, yet he will not compel us by force to follow them, because love necessarily entails free will.
So, I hope that given my personal example, which is presented only because it is a real, tangible, proof of the logic that I presented and in any case was aware of even long before I was Catholic or baptised at all, you too begin to see the entire process and how it works.
Furthermore, your life may be less complicated than mine, or you may already have enough wealth, so maybe you can do things faster or more efficiently than I have, but even so, if your spiritual foundations are based in falsehoods, ultimately your community will not form or will collapse or become perverted.
Lastly, you may be disheartened by the time it takes, especially to start from scratch, and even more so if your specific spiritual underpinnings have little history of long term success. I on the other hand have spiritual underpinnings that have been responsible for the literal invention of the scientific method, the use of reason and logic for the investigation of the natural world, and the creation of societies that have been the best in the world bar none, and have done so uninterrupted despite constant attacks for 2000 years. So I feel pretty confident that regardless of my own personal success or failure, I am most definitely on the right track. And even after I drop dead —hopefully in advanced but coherent old age, so I get to meet my grandchildren if not great-grandchildren— others will carry on whatever I managed to start. And that gives my children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren, a chance to create and live in a world that has been permanently rid of the kind of scum that are trying to murder you and make your children their disposable sex toys.
So, if you don’t have the strength to form your own community, at least, dig as deep into reality and your own heart as you can. Find the deepest spiritual truth you can, and then join and help whatever community that is based on that same spiritual truth that you can find.
As for me, I will never stop or give up, but all and any glory is only God’s.
This is the first in the Theoretical Models of Society series of Posts. Use the category of the same name or the Search Me function on the right-hand sidebar to find all related posts in the series in due course. The precursor to this series as way of introduction is the post immediately before this one.
It is generally helpful to a reader if they are already familiar with some of my other work, in order for this stuff to have the most useful effect on your life. In particular, The Face on Mars and Believe! would be the top reads to have done to have the generic global perspective of reality well in hand. Systema and Reclaiming the Catholic Church would have the most impact on a more personal level. On health/security/self-protection, and on the reality of Catholicism as it was (and remains with Sedevacantists) before Vatican II and why the Novus Ordo Church is not only not Catholic, but Satanic at its core. I will repeat this little paragraph on each new part, as I think it is important to have a general foundation if one is really interested in more than skim-reading before returning to the general slumber we are all being attempted to be forced into.
The Foundation
Before anything of note can be constructed, the thought of it, and the abstract foundations on which it rests need to be clear enough if it is to have any chance of success. Therefore, although this is a little analogous to being able to understand the basics of mathematics before you describe how to build a bridge, it is very important stuff, even if it may appear rather “airy” and removed from the very practical aspect of putting bricks and mortar together to form the columns that will sustain the bridge.
The basic foundation of ANY meaningful social change is, always has been, and always will be, a commonality of purpose.
While this seems obvious, what almost no one realises today is that society in the West has been throughly atomised by use of the double wielding of two edged swords of appealing to greed, materialism, sloth, and pride.
In times of actual war where bombs are dropping on your head, you may well “come together” with people you would normally not associate with, but there are two major problems with that, the first is that such alliances are extremely temporary at best. The second, and more important one is that you do not have a commonality of purpose and ideology in times of peace at all, so the baseline for the initial commonality does not even exist.
There is also a third problem that is that actual war today is no longer anything that resembles any of the WWII films you have seen and read about. Modern warfare is as disjointed, atomised and impersonal as the rest of the atomised West. Drones you will not even see will take you out without you ever having seen an enemy soldier. Artillery and aircraft will do the same and the infantry movements will tend to be squad-sized and therefore also relatively atomised with at best squad-sized groups looking out for themselves; even at the expense of other squads. The days of massive infantry assaults are all essentially charges of the light brigade today and are absolute suicide in any modern conflict.
Because of these issues, the most fundamental thing to have right from the start is a common purpose, which in essence means a common world view. There are many factors that influence this.
The more obvious and less politically correct (but nevertheless factually true) ones are that race and culture play a massive role in this and the constant DIE (Diversity, Inclusivity, and Equality) being pushed on Europeans and all caucasians generally (Americans, Australians, New Zealanders, etc etc) is unprecedented in human history. The reality is that you are far more likely to have more things in common with a white person that is a heterosexual and has your same nominal religion than with a black (African), brown (Indian, dot, not feather), yellow (Chinese, Korean Japanese) or red (feather not dot) person that is a homosexual. This is not rocket science, and your feelings about it are irrelevant, it’s simply a generically true fact, and the exceptions to the rule do not change the overall situation.
But even this is not the main issue. For example, even within each of the above-mentioned race-based groups there will be cultural differences that make a difference. A Spaniard, Portuguese or Italian is more likely to get along with a Greek than a German, Austrian or Norwegian, and vice versa.
If you reduce this even further, you get back to almost individual granularity, which is atomised, so again ineffective. And all this is natural. If you are Venetian like me, you don’t even really like other Venetians, or humans in general. Sicilians are also a little similar in that regard. And you thought we were both “Italians”; ha!
So, in order to be effective as a group, since the familial tribe-lines have been broken long ago, by the general same principles that the nuclear family has been destroyed, so have the links to ancestors, the pride in your family name, the knowledge of your ancestral history, and so on. Of course, even just in trying to recapture some of this context and keep your family together, you are likely to consume so much time and energy you have none left for anything else. On top of which, each of these points raised above is a rabbit hole you can spent a lifetime in; without getting out of it again in any meaningful or useful fashion.
So, then, what is the answer? The answer is a common ideology, but even there you have a problem, because ideologies in general are always in error to a degree or other and therefore eventually fail over time.
The only form of “ideology” that has in fact stood the test of time is religion. Now, you may be a convinced atheist, or more likely, a general agnostic, or possibly a generic churchian, but the reality is that only religion has banded people from different walks of life together in a very coherent fashion. When I say that, of course, I do not mean that every religion is equivalent, they are not. Absolutely not.
You have to consider them in turn, and in broad strokes they boil down to the few main world religions, in no particular order then:
Buddhism (I include Taoism and Zen Buddhism/philosphy in this)
Hinduism
Islam
Judaism
Protestantism
Eastern Orthodoxy
Novus Ordo (fake) Catholicism (really a subset of Satanism/Freemasonry)
Catholicism (today only found in sedevacantists that recognise there has been no valid Pope since 1958, and all Novus Ordo clergy are invalid and likely Satanists or at best criminally ignorant)
Satanism (it goes by many names: Freemasonry, Rosicrucians, Illuminati, Carbonari, etc etc)
Each has issues and very briefly, and necessarily in extremely summarised format then:
Hinduism: Caste system, hasn’t exactly produced the peaks of human ability or culture, as cow and human dung-filled streets, extreme poverty and disease can readily confirm.
Buddhism: For all that it is generally mostly harmless and rather neat and practical, it has not stood up well to the ravages of more predatory ideologies, the last one that did so was Feudal Japan, and they were defeated.
Islam and Judaism: While they can both be said to have a achieved a certain level of “success” (Islam in the overtaking of the native populations of other cultures by reproduction and having secured some oil fields of global importance, and Judaism by having cornered the global financial machine, and global entertainment and news media) both religions are essentially parasitic, paedophilic and Satanic in their activities. Islam is incapable of maintaining, never mind creating 20th Century infrastructure and technology, never mind 21st Century. They literally buy other people to do it for them, or enslave them, as they did when they took over previously Catholic lands and then the moronic “historians” of today tell us that a lot of the modern stuff like algebra “came from the Arab world”. No. It did not. It came from the Catholics they enslaved in the regions they put to the fire and the sword, as their religion demands of all Infidel lands. While Judaism is essentially in a parasitic and destructive relationship with the gentiles that they see as beasts of burden only fit to be their slave at best. Both religions also permit the rape of children.
Protestantism: Has been incoherent and atomising as well as secularising of actual Christianity (i.e. Catholicism) from the start. With each man essentially being his own “denomination” since each man can interpret at will the scriptures (which have been altered by the very founder of the start of this ridiculous melange of Churchianity, by old maid-raping Martin himself) there is no real community other than the same level of superficial “cohesion” you may have at a social club, which is all that Protestant “Churches” are.
Eastern Orthodoxy: is basically a far more insular and slower version of Protestantism, and as such is far more coherent than any of the above mentioned religions. It tends to be a far more practical than theoretical religion, is close to the original Christianity even if it does not bear the same fruits, did not proselytise much at all, tends to be nationalistically specific to each country, and backstabbed the Catholics that came to rescue them in 1095 for about 200 continuous years, meaning they are certainly not the one true church, but compared to the others above they are certainly far better.
Novus Ordo “Catholicism”: Or Novus Orco, as I call them (the new orcs) are simply the impostors that infiltrated the Catholic Church for the last 250 years (documented) that destroyed the lay arm of the Church in Europe (the Royal Houses and Nobility), formed the first Freemasonic country (the USA) and eventually took over the Papacy in 1958 starting with the demonstrated Freemason Angelo Roncalli. All their clergy are not Catholic by dogmatic Canon Law of the Catholic Church and specifically Canon 188.4 of the inviolable and infallible magisterium of the Church that compiled the Code of Canon Law of 1917, which vetted tens of thousands of documents in order to compile all the actual rules of Catholicism in one volume. This means ALL the Novus Ordo clerics are not Catholic and cannot perform valid sacraments and while the laity that are fooled by them are in error, they do not have fault while they remain ignorant of the usurpation that took place during Vatican II, other than the one of sloth, for not educating themselves about their own supposed religion. In short, the leaders of this fake and impostor Church are really Satanists (and you can tell by their fruits, homosexual orgies in the Vatican, rampant pedophilia, massive bank and financial frauds, etc etc) leading an extremely large number of fooled ignorants to perdition.
Satanism: They are the eternal enemy of Catholics first and foremost, and humanity at large, and go by many, many, many names and permutations, as the saying goes, their name is legion. Mainly Freemasonry in today’s world.
Actual Catholicism (1958 Sedevacantists): While this group is in effect the only one that has held on to the actual Catholic religion in its eternal format, and is reflective of how reality actually works better than any other religion or ideology ever found on Earth, and the fruits of Catholicism prove it, since it formed the most human-supportive and kind, just and true societies known in the entire history of mankind, discovering the true scientific method, creating works of unparalleled beauty in art, architecture, and philosophy, the down side is that their numbers are relatively small (probably no more than a million world-wide) and their religion has been overshadowed by the usurpers who are pretending to be the “real Catholics”. The details of these facts require some reading and time to understand, especially if you have no context of Catholicism to begin with. On the positive side their numbers grow daily and their churches are filled to capacity and more and further, it is young people making children that form the majority of it. Lastly, Catholicism has been in such dire straits before, but has inevitably risen again from its embers (see the Arian Heresy, the Persecution by the early Roman Empire, and so on).
Now, you may say the Amish are pretty coherent, and I would agree. However, the Amish are (like most Buddhists) committed pacifists, which means that when the SHTF, they will not be anything to be reckoned with. they will literally be wiped out.
Catholics, on the other hand have a long history of suffering great injustices patiently, but then fighting back with a ferocity that has been unmatched in success in battle by any other people expect possibly the pagan Spartans, whose empire in any case did not last but a small fraction of the time that the Catholic Church has been around, which is now more than two thousand years old if you count from the year 0.
Now, you may also just decide you will create your “cohesion” by having weekly meetings of the Beer Drinkers Association of Appalachian Rednecks, or whatever, and if so, good luck to you, but what I can tell you from experience is that I have NEVER encountered cohesion and loyalty as I have among Sedevacantist (Catholics). These are people that across time, space and any level of financial and personal hardship, simply help each other and soldier on, while they make a bunch of children unrelentingly.
And I used to work as an armed personal protection guy in a team of people in South Africa, and made life-long friends in various Martial arts clubs around the world. But literally none of those other friendships, that at times involved situations of life and death, even come close to the cohesion I have with people from completely different walks of life that however share their Catholicism with me. In fact, it is true to say that within Sedevacantists, the cultural and racial origins, DO take second place, which everyone would like to pretend happens in many aspects of life, but in reality, is actually extremely rare and confined to individual levels. In Catholicism (Sedevacantism) it is widespread. And more importantly, it is almost impossible to fake being a Sedevacantist. Which makes it difficult to be infiltrated by agents of the Enemy (in their many guises).
This whole long post then, is simply to point out two things:
You absolutely NEED the coherent and cohesive religion if you are going to have any measure of success in time in the founding a more perfect society (the details of which will be forthcoming in subsequent posts on this topic).
The best one I found, that models reality accurately, is not prone to schism and includes people that will absolutely stand with you in a foxhole, is proper Catholicism, which is today only found in the 1958 Sedevacantists, the one group that Bergoglio and his minions try to stomp out more than any other religion on Earth. incredible as it is.
So that is the foundation of any improvement you may wish to make in any society. You need to begin with the spiritual. And Catholicism is the only religion that is both absolute in its divine edicts, yet extremely subtle and nuanced in its human laws and the charity and understanding provided for the ever-erroneous human position.
You may disagree, in fact, most people will, without even bothering to educate themselves at all on the topic, because after all, as we are told, “the road to hell is wide and well-travelled”, nevertheless, don’t forget that Catholicism began with eleven scared men and four women and went on to become the largest religion in the world. Like it or not, even if today it is a tiny fraction of the size it was at its peak, it’s stood (and is still standing) the test of time, and its fruits are evident throughout the world.
Any objective betting man or neutral alien that had been observing our planet from afar would very likely bet on Sedevacantism. You will, of course, do as you wish, but them’s the facts.
On AI
Tony and I recently discussed AI and its dangers:
and not to put too fine a point on it, we both agree it is ultimately demonic and cannot result in anything good.
The reason is simple.
Axiom 1: All Humans are flawed.
Axiom 2: Only the creator behind reality is a truly loving force (i.e. God, but the reality of intelligence behind creation is essentially provable now, so don’t let the word God with whatever negative associations it may have for you hamper you from being able to follow the reasoning).
Axiom 3: Humans are the only and necessary link between the loving intelligence of the creator and AI driven machines and software.
Given the above three facts, the only possible conclusion is that the inevitable iterations of Artificial Intelligence will increasingly be more and more flawed from the perspective of a Loving Creator. And thus descend into the very opposite of a Loving Creator, which is essentially a demonic outcome.
And it will do so at a super-efficient speed and efficacy. In short, the deleterious effects on humanity will rapidly accelerate.
We can already see this to a certain extent with AI replacing people in various industries:
Translation, art generation, mathematical calculations, even complex hard science problems of engineering, medicine and so on.
The future looks bleak and if you don’t want to take my word for it, take a look at this short video, it really is worth it (but don’t lose hope and read my take after the video).
As I said in the discussion with Tony, AI has been able to duplicate video for years already. It’s just now to the point that you and I will soon be able to do it from our own computers too.
So what can we do about it? The way I see it there are a few things that are working in our favour.
1. Resources are finite
Yes, a potential army of self-replicating terminators that can independently build bioweapons and deploy them globally could wipe us out, but… we are not yet there, and the resources required to create fully independent robots that can build all the required infrastructure to keep themselves repaired, going, and building up more of the weaponised drones and automated weapon posts and so on eventually requires huge power requirements. It’s just not sustainable at the current commonly understood level of power generation.
Counter: Anti-G tech is real and AI could develop it and since Anti-G tech is related to accessing zero point vacuum fluctuations, it could hypothetically create near infinite power generation.
Counter-Counter: Even so, the physical material is limited, and the autonomy required to build all the related infrastructure to monopolise access to it is still very large in scale, so not happening in the next few years at least.
2. Unintended Consequences of Evil
Ultimately the most efficient way to wipe out humanity is not with robot armies but biologically engineered contagious pathogens.
In fact, there is already ample evidence that the COVID mass-murder event orchestrated by the usual suspects and their ever-obedient puppets was already using certain genetic markers to be most deadly on humans with certain genetic traits (Vikings to be dramatic) and far less deadly on other people with different genetic markers (Ashkenazi Jews).
And if the more recent evidence that the nanobots in the serums are self replicating, and the spike-protein generating mutants that injected themselves with the genetic serum of the vaxx also continue to produce and shed the same spike-protein, then we may already be in the early stages of a human-guided AI take-over.
If that’s the case, we can at least reliably know that there will be unexpected consequences for those people who put this whole thing in motion.
Which is essentially that their stupid, arrogant, and small-minded, short-term, materialist way of thinking inevitably means they too will be wiped out by their own creations.
It’s cold comfort, but it’s something. Which tends to lead me think that there is also going to be some “fix” available. Recent examples have been how military robots were defeated by humans in various tests by really high-tech and difficult things like placing themselves in cardboard boxes and advancing on them a little at the time until they could be in close quarters with the robot. The machine did not perceive them as dangerous because they didn’t look like humans. In a series of tests, this was just one of the ways in which humans could fool the machines.
A recent video/report by quinta columna also indicated that a solution of distilled water and nicotine apparently wipes out the nanobots and may also be efficient against the spike protein, as was alcohol and smoking.
The point here being that the mass-murdering sons of bitches that are orchestrating all this are far from being geniuses.
What they have are infinite resources based on fiat money, because they have orchestrated the planet so that fiat money has become an effective substitute for power acquisition, and they also orchestrated it (especially over about the last 200 years or so, mainly as the Rothschilds family trajectory shows) so that they are also able to literally create the same fiat money out of thin air at will, while you and I have to trade our lifetimes (and for some their souls too) just to accumulate enough of it not to starve. So yes, they have that undeniable source of power acquisition and projection, which is absolutely massive, BUT, they have very little in the sense of imagination and intelligence.
Ultimately these people are evil, and for reasons that are obvious to someone NOT evil, but that are absolutely opaque to actual evil people, evil cannot genuinely create. It can only corrupt or destroy.
This is a very important point that can be demonstrated fairly easily by pure logic, absent the belief in any supernatural entities, at least to a point.
That is, eventually the logic inevitably leads you to the concept of supernatural entities because that is the only way the logic, including logic itself, can even exist. The very baseline concept of good and evil itself is meaningless absent an intelligent and benevolent creator. In short, the very fact good and evil actually exist for you at all, is undeniable evidence that a Loving God is the creator (think it through, it really is a logically inescapable fact, even if you may not see it right away. Seriously… think it through, this post is not going away anytime soon, it’ll wait.)
Which is why ultimately faith is more important (and powerful) than knowledge, and why millions of illiterate peasants throughout the ages, have always known better than the wealthy, nominally intelligent, educated, but evil scum that has tried to rule over them throughout the centuries.
As an aside, in times past, being wealthy was not necessarily as closely or likely to mean the individual was as corrupt as it is likely they are today (evil has accelerated and consolidated its position, as inevitably it must, hence, again, the so-called eventual End Times bottleneck).
Bringing all this together in a short summary then:
This combination of the stupidity, arrogance and blindness of evil, coupled with its inability to generate, create or grow anything self-sustaining and viable long-term, leads to two factors:
1. Unintended consequences that indicate a way out of their nefarious plans.
2. Ultimately a collapse of their structure/position/power-base. This may not always be total (evil too is a fundamental property of reality, so while it cannot generate the so-called tower of Babel successfully, some critters beholden to evil will always escape its collapse and go on to try again more or less quickly after the crash).
So in this respect there is always some way out and as such some hope.
3. Some humans somewhere may be able to pull the plug.
Usually not the guy you hope or think. Trump is not going to save us from the WEF mass murderers any more than he will save any Gazan children being torn to shred by the American bombs supplied to genocidal Israel for the same purpose of mass murder.
Elon Musk is not suddenly going to have a change of heart and fight the global alliance of globohomo that put him in place, not even if his son became a tranny as a result of it. I mean, miracles do happen, but miracles require miraculous evidence, and so far there is none.
On the other hand, God has a sense of humour and loves using the most unlikely of people for His purposes (of turning even conscious evil, ultimately, to good in some way). I mean, I am a perfect example of that. Of all the people He could get to become a Catholic zealot pushing original Catholicism (which I remind you is only found in Sedevacantism) instead of some hedonistic take on life, the universe and everything, I was about as unlikely a choice as any.
So, it may well be that some jabbed janitor coughs on the latest dish at the next Davos conference and all the mass-murderers present die of turbo-ebola-ass-cancer within the month (hey, miracles of unexpected joy, happen, you just keep praying along with me, right?!).
Or some other unexpected and unthought of black swan event suddenly becomes a tipping point. Say if spontaneously, something in the human spirit snapped and every father affected by the muslim rape gangs in England suddenly decided that regime change was required in the UK, well… the entire government, armed forces and police would be swept away in 24 hours.
This last hypothetical however seems unlikely (but you never know) here is why:
Part of the reason that the COVID mass murder was enacted, was also so that they could deploy the mass-control technology.
It has been known since the 1990s that human emotions at the very least can be controlled by a variety of EM fields and waves. Today that level of specific mental control is undoubtedly higher.
And we now know with certainty that the 5G antennae deployed globally absolutely can direct EM energy in ways that is essentially weapon grade level stuff. So maybe all the fathers of abused children in the UK are not even able to reach a tipping point anymore if their bloodstream and brains are teeming with nanobots and spike proteins that are receptive to whatever the 5G antennae is able to make them feel or not feel.
But then it will be something else.
Like, for example, maintenance and sustainability.
Think about it. Ok, the Soros, Klaus Schwabs, Zuckebergers, Bill Gates of the world have it all figured out and enslaved all of us and have a supply of small children to satisfy their proclivities, but… who is going to maintain and upkeep their infrastructure?
None of these people are themselves capable of changing a car tire, much less build or maintain (and I also think really intellectually understand) the required infrastructure to keep their pedovore utopia going. They really are not geniuses. They are mostly useless parasites with infinite money.
They have to rely on actual functioning human beings to keep this stuff running, and while you can corrupt a lot of them to do your bidding, you inevitably run into the degradation problem.
Evil cannot create. Eventually corrupting the maintainers will produce diminishing results as they too shift from starry eyed scientist glad their pet project is funded to disillusioned automatons who realises they are actually perpetrating and producing the total evil that destroys anything worth living for. The realisation is usually very slow and gradual, but it exists, and the outcome is always only one of two things: conversion to fully and consciously evil – which we already know is not sustainable long term because logic (and/or God if you prefer and can’t see the logic yourself) or self-disgust so great it prompts collapse or occasionally even total conversion (which effectively produces a monkey-wrench in the globohomo machine).
Conclusions
There are a few simple conclusions we can summarise from all of the above, and they are:
1. Fiat money is their primary lever of control.
2. Propaganda is their secondary lever of control.
3. Force is their tertiary lever of control.
4. Cohesive, logical, capable, communities immune to the above are their greatest threat, and always have been. This is why for centuries, their primary aim has been the Catholic Church (now reduced only to Sedevacantist Communities): Consider:
* Catholic communities quickly become self-sufficient (immune to Fiat money)
* Catholic communities are 100% immune to globohomo propaganda
* In times past Catholic communities could defend themselves well even against mass invasion by larger enemy forces like Islam.
The only barrier we have to reclaiming our freedom is the nihilism and loss of hope and inability to functionally do logic anymore in the vast majority of the populace (at least to a higher degree than it was until relatively recently).
So: Spreading proper Catholicism (i.e. actual Christianity instead of one of its fake, Churchian versions) and creating communities of Sedevacantists is really the quickest and simplest solution, and all we need worry about in the short term is the weaponisation of legislation and economic sanctions that are being levelled against us all but for the moment can’t necessarily (yet) target us Sedes specifically.
So… build those communities ASAP right now.
Guard against infiltration far more than you presently need to worry about force being applied on you. Select rural places out of the way, get involved with local government and begin to shore up the general defences against bureaucracy first. You don’t need to worry about direct force for a while yet. It will come but it will be some years yet.
Of course… if you are one of the zombies already prey to the centuries long propaganda, you will simply dismiss all the logic and verifiable information above and assume I am just another deluded “religionist”. And if that’s who you are, that’s ok. We don’t need you.
Catholicism started with eleven frightened men and four women. And we overcame the wrath of the then most powerful empire humanity has ever seen.
It’s just another day/era/persecution-time.
We’ve been here before. We’ll be here again.
And the Gates of Hell will not withstand against us.
You might be interested in the following posts:
By G | 5 October 2024 | Posted in Artificial Intelligence, Believe, Billionaire Pedophiles, Catholicism, Clown World, Farming Life, Increasing Happiness, Reclaiming the Catholic Church, Sedevacantism, Social Commentary, The Crusades - Iron Men and Saints Vol. 1, The Enemy Within, The Jews, Theoretical Models of Society