Archive for the ‘Christianity’ Category

The Speciation of the Species

It is usually my practice to observe something for a fairly long time before making any kind of new observation that is not commonly noticed by most, but in this case my observation is only about 4 years in the making so it may be a premature one, nevertheless I think it can be helpful to some, so here it is.

The human race is rapidly going to split into various different strata or types. It is hard to resist the analogy with the Role-Playing Game set in a post-apocalyptic world called Gamma World, although it is not really that as much as a mixture of the series Altered Carbon (season 1 is all I saw) and H.G. Wells’ The Time Machine.

The untermensch/morlocks

The vast underclass of morlocks will invariably have various and differing characteristics but their overarching feature will be their powerlessness, poverty and being at the mercy of not just the ruling class, but of every class above them. In practical terms they will be the untouchables of the Hindu caste system. And it will be a fine line between them and the homeless crack-heads that will begin to drop dead like flies in large numbers. At any rate, you don’t want to be one of these poor creatures we may refer to as NPCs. By and large the teeming masses of India, Africa and Asia, whether in their original geographical locations or overseas, invading other countries, are all people who will only “provide” poverty, crime, disease, and collapsing infrastructure at every level. They will be used cynically as weapons in their masses, as is already the case, and will constitute the vast majority of humans on Earth. If you are unfortunate enough to be born in this situation it will be extremely hard for you to get out of it and it will be made harder as time passes. These are the people they want to use as cannon fodder, science experiments, medical test-beds of new technology, and so on.

The lower class

This is where the kind of people who had their own home and a little bit of disposable income will soon end up. Barely making ends meet, renting, not quite eating the bug paste, but not eating meat or fish either other than on special occasions. They too will be at the mercy of every class above them and possibly will be required to be “vaxxed” and have a “universal basic income” even if at first it might be called something else at first; some kind of hook from the government to reel you in.

The rich

These will be of two types, the generationally wealthy, that is, people whose parents and grandparents made the wealth and they essentially are just inheritors of it, and perhaps a few of them will not be total moral vampires, but they will be rare and few and far between. It’s not the wealth per se that necessarily corrupts, but the fact that it is literally almost impossible to make any great wealth if you are not somehow in with the corrupt. The other type will be those that have fully embraced their natures and have no problem lording it over others.

The Chief Vampires

These are those who fancy themselves the elite and their lieutenants. The Bill Gates, the Klaus Schwabs, Soros’ spawn, Zuckeberg and so on who are the mere handmaidens of the real puppeteers like the Rothschilds owners of the Bank of International Settlement, the Federal Reserve and so on. They absolutely see the morlocks as useless eaters and/or playthings to do with as they wish and are most amused by, including mass murder of them etc. the lower class are their faceless go-to slave class that does whatever menial task required of them and barely above the untermensch and untouchable status, and in fact quite interchangeable with it individually but slightly less so on large scales projects. They see the rich with a mixture of amusement and contempt. Amusement at how the masses view the rich with such hatred and envy when these Chief Vampires know that they are, as a class, entirely bought and paid for mostly and certainly every single one of their lieutenants is.

The rich can be thought of as the footsoldiers of the Chief Vampires, and as such considered to be their first line of defence. How the masses react to the rich gives the Chief Vampires the data they need to then direct their lieutenants accordingly. The contempt comes when any of those allowed to form part of the class of the rich makes the error of thinking they belong to the same class as the lieutenants of the Chief Vampires, or worse, the actual Chief Vampires themselves.

The Lieutenants are the real enforcers and workforce of the Chief Vampires, putting in place the systems that the Chief Vampires want to be realised in order to control the rest of humanity as they wish.

The Independents

There will be several different types of these, and in a way this entire class, with its many types, essentially forms the core of what we might call the original humanity. Despite the large number of factions identified below (and even sub-factions within them) independents as a whole are a minority on Earth, comprising probably no more than 20% of humanity at the most optimistic, and realistically, almost certainly less than 10% as a whole. Consider for example that the Caucasoid race as a whole is somewhat less than 10% of the world population and the majority of those people are not independents even if the largest number of independents tend to be Caucasoid.

Independents will tend to be resourceful, and generally dislike having anyone impose their rules on them. As such they can be thought of as interchangeably useful, obstructive, dangerous, admirable, a threat to be extinguished, someone that one is secretly envious of, and even entertaining diversions to be messed with or made examples of. And they can be thought of in this way by everyone from the rich, the Chief Vampires and even the independents classes themselves. Furthermore, their status within each class by the various individuals in them can and usually does shift even for the individuals, or can have multiple labels on them at once. A Chief Vampire might actually notice an independent as a curiosity and at times perhaps even toy with them for entertainment, study or to satisfy their hint of envy at these creatures that attempt so desperately (and in the eyes of the Chief Vampires futilely so) to be… well… free and indeed independent. The rich will tend to somewhat admire and envy them as well as occasionally hate them for it, but it’s the lieutenants of the Chief Vampires who generally hate them the most. The independents are the very antithesis of what the Lietenants themselves are: people who regardless of the consequences and at times even just ignorance or blind faith, believe and even act as if they were free to think and do as they please! How dare they!

Security Personnel – These guys are generally not exactly completely or even meant to be independents, but by virtue of their positions have some autonomy and at times and historically can and have become even forces to be reckoned with when/if they turn on their masters and/or leave their employ. Their positions give them insights into the inner workings of the machinery of control and while they are mostly picked for their lack of imagination, propensity for following orders and so on, you get the occasional one that has some slightly more evolved brain or who slipped through the net by ascribing to samurai principles of duty without setting off too many alarm bells about other aspects of his character that are actually well evolved beyond the usual soldier/cop/grunt level.

Cult Leaders – What? You thought all Independents were the good guys fighting the good fight? Some of them are just grifters with a narrative and in it just for themselves. The Chief Vampires (CV) their Lieutenants, and even the rich can see these types as a sort of pressure release valve. They soak up large numbers of the disaffected, particularly single, heterosexual, younger men, and also drain them of what little finances they have along with giving them some grift or nonsense to waste their energy and time on. These are the Andrew Tates, the Jordan Petersons, the Ivan Thrones, most of the “famous” YouTubers and politicians and talking heads. They keep the teeming masses of Morlocks and the lower classes in check, and spinning on empty, which keeps things safer and more manageable by the people higher up like the rich and their masters and so on. Regardless of whether the cult leader or grifter actually believes their ideology or is in it just for the grift, they are mostly useful idiots to the classes above.

Religious Communities – In many respects these are often indistinguishable from cults because, well… so many of them are in fact cults, though they may not be focused on any individual/s as such. And even when they form a functional mini-society they are almost invariably never a threat to the rich and above since they are mostly of the non-violent variety. So for example, the Amish are not a threat and they remove any potentially disaffected who could organise in more dangerous ways as far as the rich and above are concerned. They may fit into the Chthulian model of being “eaten last” as long as their movement does not become too big or in competition with any aspect of the plan the CVs have in store for humanity. Some exceptions might be:

  • Islamic Jihadists – but not often as these are usually just useful idiots that can be wound up then released among the masses to keep anger and resentment focused on islam and their members instead of on the real architects of various terrorist attacks and so on.
  • Mormons – these are not a threat to the higher echelons but where they have “stitched up” an entire state, they may become part of the new rich; which is not a real problem as they are manageable as any of the rich are.
  • Trad Caths – these would be hangers on to the only real opposition the CV ever had are mostly a source of amusement and entertainment for the CV and their Lieutenants because the low-ranking members of it don’t realise that the entirety of the supposed “Catholic Church” has been driven and owned by the CV since 1958 and as such is entirely toothless and filled to the gills with the types of people that are purely in it to do the beck and call of the rich, the Lieutenants and above all the CV.
  • Sedevacantists of type 1 (SSPX, Ratzingers, trailer park “Popes”) – These fancy themselves as the last remnants of of true Catholicism but are in fact fooled ignorants and just as ineffective as Trad Caths at achieving anything concrete, and in fact are mostly useful idiots because they soak up a great deal of the disaffected European origin youth who might otherwise organise and become a problem. Their constant bickering, infighting, positioning for the most “purity of faith” keeps things nice and chaotic and nonsensical and that means ineffective and as such are great at sucking up any potentially troublesome people who might otherwise use their zeal in more effective ways against the CVs and their plans.
  • Sedevacantist of type 2 (1958 Sedes) – these are a real problem. They hold to the real Catholicism and have been the only real effective enemy of the CVs for the last 2,000 years. And the CVs had to move in shadows for centuries in order to infiltrate and bring low the Catholic Church and these upstarts are the only possible eventual threat, but they are small, economically completely insignificant and constantly bombarded with the temptations of modernism at all times and the confused and confusing autists of type 2 sedevacantism as well as the annoying and pompous Trad Caths that function as very effective barriers to entry for most normal people unwilling to wade through the various and multiple false narratives the CVs and their Lieutenants have funded to the tune of millions in order to present any form of sedevacantism as essentially all type 1 trailer park “Popes” with “craaaaazy” ideas. These type 2 Sedes are however absolutely resilient and relentless, so an eye must be kept on them and confusion, strive and chaos in every aspect of Catholicism must be kept alive and well so as to create such a storm of conflicting and apparently irresolvable information as to make any sense of it nigh on impossible for the average person even if the actual reality of Sedevacantism of type 2 is direct and simple enough that a 10 year old can grasp it in a matter of minutes if it is presented clearly to them. It is interesting to note that the fake Pope currently in the Vatican has literally been friendlier to atheists stating they too go to heaven than to Sedevacantists which are so hated that a journalist in Italy was even hired to write a book to discredit them called appropriately enough Sedevacantisti, yet the “arguments” in it are so weak and laughable it had the opposite effect and since then the very word sedevacantists has been almost taboo and ONLY used to refer to people like the SSPX or trailer park “popes” since both of these factions hold absolutely incoherent ideologies that do in fact present as completely illogical and thus present as pretty much “crazy” indeed to anyone rational; which is, of course, the intent of the CVs.

Barons – These are people that may have achieved genuine wealth without being bought and paid for. Their wealth is not on a par with the rich even, never mind those above them, but they have achieved a level of safety in this regard that somewhat insulates them from the plans of the CVs and their Lieutenants and even the Rich, and they may have come to conclude that the plans of the CVs and so on are distasteful enough they want no part of it. They are able for the most part to remain separate from the turmoil, but sooner or later they will have to declare for a side and they are well aware that going against the CVs will entail a battle that will try to ruin them and their offspring in the long term, so in the main they are not clear and present dangers and can be kept mostly “on side” or at least not very effective by the rich and the Lieutenants they may come into contact with. These types also tend to be cautious so are unlikely to declare openly against the plans of the CVs and even if they do they can usually be converted or persuaded to become just another grift or cult that syphons off any energy that would otherwise become more focused against the CVs in more meaningful ways.

Warlords – These are mostly prevalent in already Chaotic and broken societies and historically could be large enough to even be regarded as a whole “nation”. These however have mostly been broken up now, North Korea and the Houtis being the current exceptions. In other instances these may be regional African leaders, though the leaders of such can become leaders of independent nations, such as the events of the last year or so in Niger. These types are usually in a constant fight for power and survival so in the greater scheme of things nothing for the CVs to be too concerned about… unless… and until someone like Putin comes along and helps them organise better as an antagonistic block that may go rogue down the line and require a nice little war to be brought back in line, along with the opportunity for blood sacrifices, child trafficking and profit that war invariably brings to the CVs.

Hermits and Lone Wolves – Not really a threat to the CVs due to their being individual dots on an entire landscape. Even if one of them goes rogue, it is far more likely they bump off only a very minor player like a judge or a Rich, and so on. Historically they never even get violent much at all and if they do they don’t get to strike to even the Lieutenant level, never mind the CV level.

Now that the various types have been identified, chances are that if you are reading here you fall into one of the independent categories.

Personally I have gone from Lone Wolf, which was most of my entire life, simply wanting to be left alone, to now being still a relatively Lone Wolf but creating a religious, Sedevacantist Type 2 community around me. I am still too small and the community too new, small and scattered to matter at all, and perhaps, even if I eventually succeed, I will be only thought of as an oddity worthy of study for a while in the curiosity one might have for a tiny creature that fancies itself as relevant, but I have no doubt that if I do succeed in any meaningful way, the eye of Sauron will take note.

But my point here is a much broader one than merely what grouping you or I fall into. My point here concerns the future of my children and their children and the children after them.

I am aware of the existence of technology that can easily get us to the starts. And have been aware of it since my mid twenties. More recently I have also become aware of the spiritual realities involved on this planet and the way things really work.

My concern is that if the Chief Vampires get their way, humanity, or certainly the part of humanity that actually matters, that is worthy of being a star-faring race because of their nature, not just the availability of the technology, will not make it.

And I want us to make it.

I do not know if only this planet, or —as I more likely suspect— the entirety of material creation is under the Dominion of the Prince of Lies, but regardless of the extent of his reign, temporary though it is, it is my duty, and yours, if you are a real human being, to fight against him and all his minions, whatever forms they take.

The only people that may get access to that technology and use it in a positive, non-destructive way, to increase human freedom instead of decrease it, and reach out to whatever other intelligences must exist out there in due course, are those that currently fall in the Independent class.

Technically any weird sequence of events may get an Independent faction to achieve antigravity technology. Holding on to it against the onslaught that the Chief Vampires would unleash against such a group will be extremely difficult though. But even if they manage to do that, there remains an aspect that is going to work out for the good in only one of those faction: Sedevacantists Type 2.

That’s because absent an absolute moral path, the errors of ego, human flaws and so on, only get magnified as errors with terrible consequences for large numbers of people. Throughout the history of humanity, only a few people had the will and faith to choose death over breaking what they perceived as their sacred duty, and we still know their names millennia later. Many of these were Pagans or Heathens of some kind:

The Samurai, the Spartans, the Romans of warrior class, and probably others, but, while undeniably honourable in their ways, there was no absolute sense of Justice, Charity, Mercy, Beauty, and above all: Love.

Only Catholicism has had the kind of Martyrs that consistently died for Love of mankind as a whole, unspeciated, unpartisan, and indeed, our Lord Himself died for the love of his very enemies. The many, many martyrs of Catholicism like those who went willingly to be eaten by lions or to be shot by firing squad as a Priest who would not break the vow of confession. The Catholic warriors who went to certain death to protect Christendom as a whole, even when those who called for their help stabbed them in the back.

Only adherence to dogmatic Catholic principles, can result in a star-faring humanity that is not a blight on the rest of the Galaxies around us. And for those of you that think any “Christianity” will do, no. It won’t. No version of Christianity other than Catholicism has had the number of consistent martyrs of the type I just described.

Eastern “Orthodoxy” has a few (mostly by claiming Catholic martyrs as if they were “theirs” too) bit even that is only due to its relative nearness to Catholicism when compared to the other heretic versions of Chirchianity trying to pass as “Christians”. The same goes for the Copts even if their numbers are far lower than even the Eastern schismatics.

So, although my choice of becoming Catholic (1958 Sede) did not originally have anything to do with the eventual hopeful future of humanity, it turns out that, as is logical, the truth reflects in every way itself.

Above all, Catholicism is true, and if you do take the time to study it and its history and it fruits, you will soon enough come to realise that no other religion has been as beneficial and created as much beauty for humanity. It is the only light worth moving towards.

And wither way, whether you like it, see it, believe it or not, we are, as a species, being prodded, pushed, forced and in every way, good or bad, being made to keep moving towards the speciation I have laid out above. So chose a path, because if you do not, one will absolutely be chosen for you, and the likelihood is that without a lot if action from you, you will be shoved in the ranks of the Morlocks. So…

Choose wisely.

The Confusions of Australians

Adam gets it wrong once again. I like Adam, I consider him a friend and he certainly has behaved like one. However, one must remember, he is still an Australian, and as such from faulty genetic stock. Particularly when it comes to things like, well, you know… following the law!

On his thoughts on Vigano he goes on to say that he does not dismiss the man, despite Vigano’s cowardly silence on Vatican II and his still not having specifically called out all the fake Popes since 1958 as fake Popes for over 50 years, and he says this is because:

If I were to do that then I should also dismiss the apostle Paul, who actively persecuted Christians until his meeting with Christ on the road to Damascus. And if Paul then many others also over the vast pages of human history.

No Adam. No, no, no, no!

Paul was NOT a Catholic when he was persecuting Christians. He was a Jew. You can call him a heathen if you prefer, even a Pagan. But the whole point is he was NOT a Catholic, nor pretending to be one.

So, when he repented and became one, whatever sins he had, including presumably multiple counts of murder, the one thing he could not be accused of is heresy.

The difference is Vigano absolutely is a heretic. And has been and acted like one in absolutely full knowledge of the fact.

While this does not forbid him from genuine repentance, and thus, eventual entry into heaven, it absolutely does prevent him from ever again having any legitimate clerical authority over absolutely anyone. And that, is not only logical, but divine law as far as the Church is concerned.

Might God still use him to in some way partially, or even totally to (eventually) reclaim the Catholic Church back from the pedophile infested, homosexual orgy indulging impostors currently squatting in the Vatican? Sure. God certainly loves to use broken tools.

But does it change the fact that Vigano, in the very best of cases, by dogmatic rule of Canon Law can only aspire to a lifetime of penance with authority over no one? No. It does not.

And this sort of “charitable” wishy-washy, mealy-mouthed, trying to see the best in people nonsense is how a freemasonic scum like Roncalli and a demonic infested Montini almost succeeded in destroying the Catholic Church, and certainly dealt it one of the worst blows of its 2000 year history.

So, no. Correct yourself friend.

Sure, the Vigano situation can be used to the advantage of the Church and it should be, but let us not let heretics avoid their just punishments.

Of course, I don’t begrudge Adam his sentiments or his prayers, which are all entirely appropriate, but let us not confuse what a heretic is nor what an ex-heretic may do or not do.

Lastly, it is also a logical flaw to expect that the only way the Church can heal is by the actions of the perverts, cowards and satanists within its buildings currently pretending to be Catholic. One might as well say the Satanic pedophiles in charge of the deep state are the only hope we have for eventually getting a good government.

Don Ricossa of the IMBC on Vigano

For those of you that don’t speak Italian, here is a summarised version that I perfectly share and agree with, as I hope was already evident from my previous post on it a short while ago.

Don Ricossa states that [items in bold and square brackets are my notes]:

  • Vigano in his response to the request he presents himself in Rome to answer for his supposed crime of schism, and therefore, ultimately heresy, stated he refuses to present himself in Rome since he does not recognise the legitimacy of the current occupier of the See of Rome and wants nothing to do with it, nor to remain in communion with it since he describes the current Bergoglian hierarchy as the final metastasis of the cancer that is Vatican II.
  • Don Ricossa started out by saying that although he does not usually like to discuss current events, since there is such a need of understanding the gospels at present, the present situation that everyone is talking about concerning Vigano is an excellent opportunity to possibly begin to heal the Church, if it is considered and acted upon fruitfully. He goes on to explain how and why as follows:
  • In the first place, while it is true that the current situation is terrible, it is important to note that this is merely an effect of the cause and not the cause itself. In short, while it is true that the cancer is bad, the problem started at the origin of the cancer and that is Vatican II. And this being the case, the focus should absolutely be on explaining and detailing the exact issues with Vatican II. This has already been done in various ways by various people [including by me —-in what I believe in the most exhaustive way I am aware of—- in Reclaiming The Catholic Church, where I list at least some of the heresies present in all 15 of the 16 documents that compose Vatican II that have direct heresy in them] and Father Ricossa mentions that one can bring to the attention of everyone (including Vigano) these arguments, and their already detailed and well presented points. Or one can expand on them or even start them anew and as thoroughly as one likes [As far as I am aware a complete listing of all the heresies of the Vatican II documents has not been done for there are so many, but I believe my version is the one that so far comes closest.]
  • Further, once you do this, it become obvious that the problem is not just the current impostor on the throne of Peter, but also all those from the very start of Vatican II who have continued to promulgate, promote and agree with Vatican II. [In short, here, Don Ricossa states simply the same thing I have been telling everyone from 2017 on, which is that every single fake Pope from Angelo Roncalli on, and all the Novus Orco clergy are invalid and as such heretics and non-Catholics. Nor is anything they teach related to Catholicism, but rather, its inversion.] Don Ricossa therefore clearly implied that this situation, that is, that Vigano has not yet explicitly stated this, needs to be corrected.
  • He goes on that, in order to be coherent, Vigano can only refuse the order to come to Rome, as well as refuse to recognise Bergoglio’s authority if he truly believes Bergoglio is not a legitimate Pope AND he can demonstrate too that this is the case (because Catholics follow the rules, not their feelings about what they think of particular cotta). And once again, this leads back to Vatican II and how it is indeed possible (and the case) that only fake “Popes” has been present in the Vatican since 28th October 1958. Otherwise, failing to obey a legitimate Pope is indeed schism and this can only eventually become heresy.
  • Don Ricossa goes on to say that therefore, it is absolutely necessary to explain, formally, and clarify:
    • Why the current occupier of the Vatican is not a valid Pope.
    • And also to clarify Vigano’s position on the matter, [that is of not formally and clearly declaring all the previous fake “Popes” and all previous and current fake “clergy” as the fakes they are] this removing for is the current doubt we have about what is Vigano’s real thoughts on the matter.]
    • He goes on to say that he has never had any communication with Vigano, so it is not a matter of the person of Vigano as such, but rather that while Vigano has expressed an opinion that Don Ricossa agrees with (i.e. that the Novus Ordo Church is a fake mess) Vigano needs to follow through, for the sake of clarity and the truth of it for all concerned, from Bergoglio and his retinue to you and I mere laymen.
  • He goes on to say that his suggestion (though he points out no one asked him) to Mr. Vigano, is to hold fast to his position, focusing on the validity (or rather, lack of validity) of Bergoglio’s election as a “Pope”. He also explains that nowadays a lot of people (unlike before when we were the only ones stating the seat of Peter was vacant) are claiming it is vacant with reference to Ratzinger having been the real Pope. And Don Ricossa here states he will not enter into the various theories and details that such “sedevacantists” hold, because it is not our problem/issue to do so, since the reality is that none of rhe Popes from Roncalli on have been legitimate. He specifies that NO ONE who has accepted the so-called cancer of Vatican II can ever be the legitimate authority of the Church, (since Vatican II is heresy and the Church, being infallible, obviously cannot promulgate heresy) and so while Bergoglio is not legitimate, neither was Ratzinger.
  • It would be therefore a massive error to allow yourself to be fooled into this error that “Ratzinger was the real Pope” which so many are now trying or thinking of following [Hi Ann, Andrea Tossato, and others].
  • Instead, Vigano should hold to his position that regardless of whether you consider the election of any specific “Pope” to have been valid or not, it becomes clear that the incumbent has NOT accepted the election validly because it is clear from his actions, that are habitual, repetitive and obvious, that he has not
  • In summary, Vigano must clarify his position, because while it appears that Vigano is rejecting the current usurper of the Roman See, at other times one is left perplexed he says, because in the same document where he rejects Bergoglio, he also says he aligns himself with Msgr. LeFebrve, original position, but Msgr. LeFebrve at the time communicated with all the clergy while telling them they should rebel against the (according to Lefebrve) legitimate Pope [which is why the SSPX position is nonsense, as I and many before me, including Father Chekada before his passing made abundantly clear]. But Vigano says he rejects the authority of Bergoglio, so he cannot claim he aligns with LeFebrve’s position. If he rejects Bergoglio, and thus all of Vatican II he should say and detail how and why, and the same if he does not. And while the man also refers to a book by Lefebrve that defends the validity of the Pope he disobeys, one can only ask: what is then, the real opinion of Mr. Vigano? [Personally I have already expressed that Vigano is not anyone to follow or put any trust in, as per Canon Law. No heretic shall have ecclesiastical authority over anyone even if his repentance were 100% genuine, and Vigano is far from fulfilling the idea his repentance is in fact genuine as far as I am concerned].
  • He reiterates once more that Vigano should be clear as to if he does reject Bergoglio as legitimate or not, and he should say so in direct, simple terms, as well as why he does if he does. So as to be perfectly and unambiguously clear.
  • As a third and final point, once clarity has been made, and if Vigano in fact refutes Vatican II and all its authors and not just the current impostor in the Vatican, but all those before him [back to Pious XII who was the last legitimate Pope] since, as already explained the Church cannot schism from itself and therefore anyone who does so from it cannot be part of the Church, then what to do? And here he uses the example of Montini who while pretending to talk about the “ongoing destruction of the Church” he was the very one destroying it by the most assiduous enactment of the 14 Vatican II documents replete with heresies he himself produced, along with the 2 produced by his predecessor Roncalli, leat Vigano be another one of these impostors speaking from both sides of their mouth, or, as the errors of those at the time of Montini who kept silent, waiting for Montini to die and hoping a successor would come along to put right all the things Montini had destroyed. And instead he says this was an illusion, aince the successors of Montini only continued with the destruction of the Church. [I must interject a note here that while I respect Do Ricossa and the other members of the IMBC, I cannot, in good conscience be as charitable to those timid and cowardly bishops, cardinals and priests who kept silent at the time of Montini. Logically they had no excuse for their silence, as neither did Vigano for over 50 years. It is only cowardice and self-serving reasons that kept their mouth shut, or, at best, a criminal level of ignorance inexcusable from any member of the clergy, that in secular terms is equivalent to the charge of criminal negligence. Nor, am I wrong, nor can I be criticised on this matter given that St. Luis stated it very clearly that a heretic making a heretical comment in Church should not be argued with, but rather run through with a sword. If a Saint of the Church made that point, mine surely must be valid too. Furthermore, while in no way being disrespectful to the valid clergy of the Church which remain and of which Don Ricossa is undoubtedly a member, it is the absolute duty of any Catholic to call out heresy wherever it is present, and the level and extent of dereliction of duty in this regard, of the clergy at the time is one I will never permit to happen again, as best I can, as ling as I live.]
  • Vigano, therefore, inasmuch as he is supposedly a “bishop” (and Don Ricossa specifically states he is not now going to get into the details concerning the validity of Vigano’s legitimacy as such, because the point is that Vigano has a huge “weight” within the “Church” and as such he has the opportunity (unlike the e average layman or even priest) to gather around him as many people as he can with his same perspective, and thus, in essence, create a much more widespread acknowledgements of the situation, while being very clear about the errors of Vatican II and therefore NOT recognising the authority of ANY of those who promulgated them, and if he did so this, there could be many improvements and who knows, perhaps also a beginning of the solution to the current situation.
  • He closes stating of course all this needs the help and grace of God and his own suggestions are provided in utmost humility.

Personally I find Don Ricossa to be too charitable and too humble, and while I absolutely understand why and respect his way and his position and his methodology, in good conscience, I can only maintain my position, which is that while all this CAN —and indeed I too very much hope does— improve things, and results in many more proper Catholics returning to the fold in good standing (that is, that of 1958 Sedevacantists) I will always hold the canonical position that once a heretic, even if the repentance is true, a heretic clergyman should spend the rest of his days in perpetual penance with authority over precisely no one.

Nor do I in any way begrudge Don Ricossa or any other valid clergy from holding positions like his. But even a porter was not a priest and yet he controlled the entry to the Church.

And at various times in history it was nobility, duty bound, that helped restore the legitimate Papacy to its throne, and not infrequently by direct and even violent action.

Well, as a Catholic, and even if only a minor noble (the lowest of the ranks: Patrician) it remains my family name’s duty to take as unpleasant and as direct and even offensive a stance as I deem necessary to protect the sanctity of the Church. So, even if Vigano were to truly repent, and even restore the Church, I will never formally recognise him as having any legitimate authority in the Catholic Church. And the same goes for every Novus Orcian “clergy”.

A Review of my Observations on Privacy from 2008

The previous post linked to something I wrote in 2008, but had been aware of from at least 1992 or so.

Here it is, and below I am going to review its predictions against the current state of things, point by point.

Generally

A lot of things have changed in the last 16 years. I went from being a single, once divorced, childless, generally Zen Agnostic hedonist type with strong views on justice and laissez-faire liberalism to a thrice married, father of five children and a hardcore Sedevacantist Catholic with strong views on justice and strong views on the consequences of laissez-faire liberalism.

It can be said that 16 years ago, despite my obvious general cynicism and misanthropy I was still, like all of us before the covid scam/mass murder events of current WWIII a wide-eyed, rose tinted glasses optimist about humans and their nature in general.

1. People will become a lot more tolerant towards each other

This I was waaaay off on. And you can tell that even at my most secularist cynical I was in fact a wide eyed optimist about humans and their ability to do logic instead of their monkey-like tendencies to just fling their own faeces at random based on their emotions and that behaviour exponentially increasing the more their real nature is exposed to the world.

2. Certain behaviours will have to be de-regulated

This I was rather correct on, but more in the sense that all sorts of perversions are now more and more normalised and the only real taboo now is to have any moral standards whatsoever.

I hadn’t specifically thought too much about the clown world tendency to want to pervert and degrade everything because i simply assumed that things like child rape would always be things everyone would agree should result in the sentence, and as a then secularist for the most part, didn’t consider deeply enough what things like sexual permissiveness amongst adults would eventually lead to, because even as degenerate as my own tastes may have been, I never imagined anyone would try to normalise bestiality say, or people in assless gimp suits or worse, being urinated on in public at “pride” events. Once again, my boundless optimism about humanity had me fooled.

3. Identity theft will become harder and more severly punishable

Generally I was correct except if the government is trying to do it to you, although in fairness this hardly needed mentioning, and the reality is that even then it IS more difficult to fool people into buying the lies like Obama being American or the Las Vegas shooting being all by that one lone gunman and so on. They will of course still make you subject to all the punishments, but no one is really fooled by the Biden body doubles and the fake news.

4. Identity theft will become more common and more lucrative

Also kind of generally correct.

5. The faceless corporation will begin to die

In a sense this is true although the faceless corporations are also morphing into faceless government branches of the bureaucracy, but individuals within them are getting easier to expose in general terms even then. See Fauci for example amd Bourla and Klaus Schwab and even the major puppeteers like the Rothschilds running the BIS and so on. It will be a while before small groups of people are more immune to the ravages of such monstrous and monolithic entities, but it is/will continue to happen. In isolated incidents for now but increasingly more likely. One larger example is the shedding of French colonial power from Africa and other colonies.

6. You will not be able to get away from anyone

This was essentially correct.

7. Who you are will become more and more evident to all from this moment forward.

Also true mostly, despite the amount of energy spent in trying to persuade the masses of variously more or less carefully crafted narratives concerning various individuals, anyone who cares enough and has a modicum of intelligence can generally get a good sense of who almost anyone is

So: In conclusion. Why wait?

Wether you like it or not, privacy is mostly dead and it’s not going to get better unless we are all thrown back to the stone age. So you need to adapt to this reality regardless of your feeling about it, which was the same as my original perspective 16 years ago.

Nothing New Presented as News

This “shocking development” is literally nothing new. This possible use of interferometry has been known for decades and been used since astronomy started to use radio and other wavelengths to produce better resolution images and data collection via interferometry.

And I doubt even this use is new at all. At any rate, it’s not as if the fact that privacy is completely dead hasn’t been known by anyone that even remotely paid attention for more than 30 years.

The only difference is the extent, reach and consequences for the odd thorn in the side of the establishment. The counter to that is massive community response. What communities, if any, will begin to push back, and in what ways remains to be seen over the next decade or so.

I am confident that my specific choice of the Sedevacantist remnant is the way to go. The Amish or possibly so group of inter-related rednecks in the Appalachians will have their own ideas, and more power to all of them, but don’t be fooled, it is becoming absolutely clear that standing on the sidelines is not an option for anyone anymore. Whether this is Revelation Times or not is immaterial. What is certain is that as Jesus specifically stated, either you are with Him or you are against him.

Regardless of your personal beliefs, it is a sobering intellectual exercise to consider which side you take if in absolute terms Catholicism (Sedevacantism) is actually true and your options are only get with it or get against it. Try it. After all, it’s just a thought experiment right?

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks