A recent conversation with a guy I have a lot of time and respect for took me a little by surprise, since it appeared that somewhat out of the blue he went a little anti-Catholic.
It’s not that in itself that was the surprise, but rather that he seemed to have made some assumptions about my perspective which frankly, I am at a loss as to how he did that, since my views are pretty clearly identified both her and on my YouTube channel, on pretty much everything I care to discuss.
In order to make it even clearer, I thought it best to identify perhaps more clearly, if somewhat succinctly (for me anyway) some of my positions.
The use of generalities will be very common, and if you’re too stupid to understand that “in general” does not mean “every single time”, well, I can’t help you.
On Catholic crimes of conquest
Perhaps the most touted is the one concerning South America. Did Catholics do som bad shit there? Sure. Did they destroy Mayan codexes and such? Sure. Although if my memory serves one of the few salvaged was by a monk (I may be wrong). Did this somehow lower human knowledge of human history in some important ways? Perhaps. Am I really torn up about it?
No. No I am not. And keep in mind I was big on trying to figure out stuff about that culture for years. But the reality is that ultimately it was an extremely cruel and vicious culture, and there is more than a little evidence that some of the symbols used in it are reflective of some used in Freemasonry, and there is a guy who has written at least one book on the topic of Satanic cultures having such common threads. In case tearing open 20,000 living men, women and children to rip their hearts out to appease their gods wasn’t evidence enough.
On the Catholic practice of building Churches on top of Pagan shrines they had destroyed, so that the Pagans would still show up, and over time be converted, once again, I am not going to shed any tears of it. Might this have possibly reduced human knowledge with regard to lay lines and potentially some astronomical correlations and aspects? Possibly. But even if that were the case, what are the societies that were replaced by Catholicism like? Almost without exception (certainly none I am aware of) they were more brutal, violent, oppressive and vicious than Catholicism.
And as for the Inquisition supposedly being this bloodbath of thousands of innocent women being burnt at the stake, it is perhaps one of the biggest lies ever perpetrated by the Satanists of the so-called French “enlightenment” and revolution. Did you ever ask yourself why it is called the “enlightenment” and Lucifer is known as the light bringer? Or the fact that the American revolution was financed by Freemasons with French money to create the first country that actually operated from the start on the basis of Freemasonic principles barely covered over by a veneer of Protestant puritanism?
The grand total of “witches” killed by the Inquisition over more than 100 years is 12.
And they also killed only 163 pedophiles in the same period. I could top that in a week-end just by clearing out the Vatican.
So, overall, in general, no, I don’t care about the “atrocities” that Catholics may have committed against some supposedly innocent group of heart-eating, child-raping, goat-fuckers.
And while I am sure some innocents somewhere, invariably get killed in any kind of war or uprising and so on, by and large Catholicism has only improved life for all people under it when compared to what it replaced.
The simple proof of it is that no one can point to any other civilisation under which human beings have flourished and generally had as good a time than under Catholicism. Similarly, the greatest number of works of unparalleled beauty have happened under Catholicism. And please note that I am not saying beauty is a uniquely Catholic perspective, for example, I have always found Japanese aesthetics to be appealing too, I said the “greatest number” of beautiful works of art.
The de-chattalisation of women, children and the abolition of slavery all also followed.
Not to mention the literal invention of the scientific method.
So, overall, despite the inevitable collateral damage, conquering Catholics inevitably brought a better life than the alternative. And let’s not forget that while we as Catholics will convert and then happily mix with whatever we conquered (see South America) the Protties tend to exterminate (see North America).
On Race and Culture
It would be hard for anyone to really accuse me of racism if they have even the tiniest glimmer of insight into my personal history, but let me be clear that I absolutely am aware and notice and see and consider race. Because my brain functions normally. Just like I notice sunshine, rain, and any other number of things.
My position is again, very Catholic. But this probably needs further explanation, because the overwhelming zeitgeist of “Christianity” is really Churchianity and not actual belief. Protestantism has made it so a “Christian” is anyone that says he is. The reality is that unless you are literally willing to die rather than denounce Christ, you are simply NOT an actual believer. You’re a pretender.
So:
IF you are an actual believer,
AND you actually understand agree with and do your best to follow Catholic dogma,
THEN, your race, culture, etc matter less to me. That said, I am not blind to either race or culture, and 25 plus years in Africa has made it abundantly clear to me that the average African is not suited to live in the average Traditional Catholic European country any more than the average Catholic European is suited to live in the average Traditional African Village. And there is nothing wrong with that. In fact I am absolutely for the Africans to have their own ways and cultures and nations and for every people to have theirs. I for one would very much like my nation to return: The Most Serene Republic of Venice.
Since that is not really how things are, I am absolutely for having very clear and strong borders and repatriating any illegals by the most expedient, efficient ways and I don’t care if they are a bit brutal too. Nor am I in favour of second or third generation people of a completely different religion and culture pretending to be natives of a country their ancestors came to.
It’s really not hard to understand. My father has lived in Africa over 40 years but he will never act, think, or behave like an African any more than a Zulu who has lived in Venice for 40 years can be a Venetian. And I absolutely wish to preserve every culture possible. The Zulus in Zululand and with their rules and ways to be respected by any visiting foreigner or foreign resident, and Venice for Venetians, with our rules and ways.
That is real diversity. I can then experience Japan in Japan and Botswana in Botswana and Venice in Venice.
And if your claim is that some people (say white Europeans) are far more technologically advanced than some other people (like say black Africans or Brown Indians) well, sure, I also agree there are differences between races and cultures. These are simple facts to observe. And the best thing one can do is to simply allow each culture and ethnicity to grow on their own terms.
There really is nothing any more “unfair” about it than saying a humming bird has an unfair advantage in flight over a lion. So what? They are different and let them carry on in their own way.
Not all cultures are equal. Some are objectively better than others. And Catholicism is unquestionably the best culture Humanity has ever seen. It doesn’t matter if it upsets you. It’s just as true that Japanese Katanas are the best kind of sword ever built for the purposes they fulfilled.
As for the outliers… sure… they exist in all aspects of life. Generally speaking I have been one myself in multiple aspects of life and have I been discriminated against for it? Sure. So what? The outlier will find a way. And again, my approach here is perfectly Catholic. Just like nothing could prevent Joan of Arc from being Joan of Arc, if God wills it, nothing is impossible. The priest Joan initially told her visions to told her to shut up and stop being crazy. Because he knew, most likely she’s just crazy, but if not… God will find a way. And even when I was not Catholic I always understood this very simple principle: life is not fair. So what? Buckle up sunshine!
On the LGBT-Pedos
Just like it is a fact that generally the IQ of caucasians is higher than that of Africans, no matter how many people it upsets, the fact also remains that the incidence of child sexual abuse committed by homosexuals is over ten times that committed by non homosexuals. And that’s on reported cases, which we all know are a fraction of the real number. So, at a bare minimum, no child should be given into “adoption” to homosexuals. And that is far from the only argument against it, by the way.
Secondly, from a purely natural perspective, it is absolutely clear that homosexuality is a deviancy, a clear defect, regardless of your opinion of how it comes about. Because if we all went homosexual, the human race would disappear and be unrecoverable after about 4 decades. And by the way, the only study I am aware of on it, which I read over 30 years ago, concluded that in about 90% of cases homosexuality in men was a result of either a choice, or sexual trauma and was reversible, while only about 10% of cases seemed to be a birth defect.
That said, I am no more for burning homosexuals at the stake than I am for doing so for people born with six fingers or missing a leg. I certainly will be absolutely wary around them, as I would be around anyone with proclivities that might play out as harmful towards my children, but ultimately my position is indeed that what they do behind closed doors, with other consenting adults, can and should remain behind such closed doors. Proselytising your deviancy as normal is not, and should not be permitted. And if you disagree, I would like you to now defend my personal preference for hunting pedophiles down on horseback with lances and making a corrida of it through all towns around the world.
If you are a pervert, you KNOW you are a pervert. So shut the fuck up, stay in your closet and lane, and don’t you dare try and normalise it.
Just like it would be absurd to tell golfers how it’s perfectly normal to shove a bucketful of golf balls up your arse every Friday night, it is absurd to teach that homosexuality is “normal”. It isn’t. And it never can be. Just like being born with only one leg is not normal. So as far as I am concerned, the rules Russia has imposed concerning the LGBT nonsense are perfectly fine. With one exception:
Pedophiles really should be burnt at the stake, and as my recent survey shows, (feel free to add your vote) most men really agree with me.
Conclusion
So, that covers the main topics. And feel free to try and critique my “bigoted” views but be mindful of the rules of this blog if you want to avoid an insta-ban.
The Kurgan view through the Catholic Glass
A recent conversation with a guy I have a lot of time and respect for took me a little by surprise, since it appeared that somewhat out of the blue he went a little anti-Catholic.
It’s not that in itself that was the surprise, but rather that he seemed to have made some assumptions about my perspective which frankly, I am at a loss as to how he did that, since my views are pretty clearly identified both her and on my YouTube channel, on pretty much everything I care to discuss.
In order to make it even clearer, I thought it best to identify perhaps more clearly, if somewhat succinctly (for me anyway) some of my positions.
The use of generalities will be very common, and if you’re too stupid to understand that “in general” does not mean “every single time”, well, I can’t help you.
On Catholic crimes of conquest
Perhaps the most touted is the one concerning South America. Did Catholics do som bad shit there? Sure. Did they destroy Mayan codexes and such? Sure. Although if my memory serves one of the few salvaged was by a monk (I may be wrong). Did this somehow lower human knowledge of human history in some important ways? Perhaps. Am I really torn up about it?
No. No I am not. And keep in mind I was big on trying to figure out stuff about that culture for years. But the reality is that ultimately it was an extremely cruel and vicious culture, and there is more than a little evidence that some of the symbols used in it are reflective of some used in Freemasonry, and there is a guy who has written at least one book on the topic of Satanic cultures having such common threads. In case tearing open 20,000 living men, women and children to rip their hearts out to appease their gods wasn’t evidence enough.
On the Catholic practice of building Churches on top of Pagan shrines they had destroyed, so that the Pagans would still show up, and over time be converted, once again, I am not going to shed any tears of it. Might this have possibly reduced human knowledge with regard to lay lines and potentially some astronomical correlations and aspects? Possibly. But even if that were the case, what are the societies that were replaced by Catholicism like? Almost without exception (certainly none I am aware of) they were more brutal, violent, oppressive and vicious than Catholicism.
And as for the Inquisition supposedly being this bloodbath of thousands of innocent women being burnt at the stake, it is perhaps one of the biggest lies ever perpetrated by the Satanists of the so-called French “enlightenment” and revolution. Did you ever ask yourself why it is called the “enlightenment” and Lucifer is known as the light bringer? Or the fact that the American revolution was financed by Freemasons with French money to create the first country that actually operated from the start on the basis of Freemasonic principles barely covered over by a veneer of Protestant puritanism?
The grand total of “witches” killed by the Inquisition over more than 100 years is 12.
And they also killed only 163 pedophiles in the same period. I could top that in a week-end just by clearing out the Vatican.
So, overall, in general, no, I don’t care about the “atrocities” that Catholics may have committed against some supposedly innocent group of heart-eating, child-raping, goat-fuckers.
And while I am sure some innocents somewhere, invariably get killed in any kind of war or uprising and so on, by and large Catholicism has only improved life for all people under it when compared to what it replaced.
The simple proof of it is that no one can point to any other civilisation under which human beings have flourished and generally had as good a time than under Catholicism. Similarly, the greatest number of works of unparalleled beauty have happened under Catholicism. And please note that I am not saying beauty is a uniquely Catholic perspective, for example, I have always found Japanese aesthetics to be appealing too, I said the “greatest number” of beautiful works of art.
The de-chattalisation of women, children and the abolition of slavery all also followed.
Not to mention the literal invention of the scientific method.
So, overall, despite the inevitable collateral damage, conquering Catholics inevitably brought a better life than the alternative. And let’s not forget that while we as Catholics will convert and then happily mix with whatever we conquered (see South America) the Protties tend to exterminate (see North America).
On Race and Culture
It would be hard for anyone to really accuse me of racism if they have even the tiniest glimmer of insight into my personal history, but let me be clear that I absolutely am aware and notice and see and consider race. Because my brain functions normally. Just like I notice sunshine, rain, and any other number of things.
My position is again, very Catholic. But this probably needs further explanation, because the overwhelming zeitgeist of “Christianity” is really Churchianity and not actual belief. Protestantism has made it so a “Christian” is anyone that says he is. The reality is that unless you are literally willing to die rather than denounce Christ, you are simply NOT an actual believer. You’re a pretender.
So:
IF you are an actual believer,
AND you actually understand agree with and do your best to follow Catholic dogma,
THEN, your race, culture, etc matter less to me. That said, I am not blind to either race or culture, and 25 plus years in Africa has made it abundantly clear to me that the average African is not suited to live in the average Traditional Catholic European country any more than the average Catholic European is suited to live in the average Traditional African Village. And there is nothing wrong with that. In fact I am absolutely for the Africans to have their own ways and cultures and nations and for every people to have theirs. I for one would very much like my nation to return: The Most Serene Republic of Venice.
Since that is not really how things are, I am absolutely for having very clear and strong borders and repatriating any illegals by the most expedient, efficient ways and I don’t care if they are a bit brutal too. Nor am I in favour of second or third generation people of a completely different religion and culture pretending to be natives of a country their ancestors came to.
It’s really not hard to understand. My father has lived in Africa over 40 years but he will never act, think, or behave like an African any more than a Zulu who has lived in Venice for 40 years can be a Venetian. And I absolutely wish to preserve every culture possible. The Zulus in Zululand and with their rules and ways to be respected by any visiting foreigner or foreign resident, and Venice for Venetians, with our rules and ways.
That is real diversity. I can then experience Japan in Japan and Botswana in Botswana and Venice in Venice.
And if your claim is that some people (say white Europeans) are far more technologically advanced than some other people (like say black Africans or Brown Indians) well, sure, I also agree there are differences between races and cultures. These are simple facts to observe. And the best thing one can do is to simply allow each culture and ethnicity to grow on their own terms.
There really is nothing any more “unfair” about it than saying a humming bird has an unfair advantage in flight over a lion. So what? They are different and let them carry on in their own way.
Not all cultures are equal. Some are objectively better than others. And Catholicism is unquestionably the best culture Humanity has ever seen. It doesn’t matter if it upsets you. It’s just as true that Japanese Katanas are the best kind of sword ever built for the purposes they fulfilled.
As for the outliers… sure… they exist in all aspects of life. Generally speaking I have been one myself in multiple aspects of life and have I been discriminated against for it? Sure. So what? The outlier will find a way. And again, my approach here is perfectly Catholic. Just like nothing could prevent Joan of Arc from being Joan of Arc, if God wills it, nothing is impossible. The priest Joan initially told her visions to told her to shut up and stop being crazy. Because he knew, most likely she’s just crazy, but if not… God will find a way. And even when I was not Catholic I always understood this very simple principle: life is not fair. So what? Buckle up sunshine!
On the LGBT-Pedos
Just like it is a fact that generally the IQ of caucasians is higher than that of Africans, no matter how many people it upsets, the fact also remains that the incidence of child sexual abuse committed by homosexuals is over ten times that committed by non homosexuals. And that’s on reported cases, which we all know are a fraction of the real number. So, at a bare minimum, no child should be given into “adoption” to homosexuals. And that is far from the only argument against it, by the way.
Secondly, from a purely natural perspective, it is absolutely clear that homosexuality is a deviancy, a clear defect, regardless of your opinion of how it comes about. Because if we all went homosexual, the human race would disappear and be unrecoverable after about 4 decades. And by the way, the only study I am aware of on it, which I read over 30 years ago, concluded that in about 90% of cases homosexuality in men was a result of either a choice, or sexual trauma and was reversible, while only about 10% of cases seemed to be a birth defect.
That said, I am no more for burning homosexuals at the stake than I am for doing so for people born with six fingers or missing a leg. I certainly will be absolutely wary around them, as I would be around anyone with proclivities that might play out as harmful towards my children, but ultimately my position is indeed that what they do behind closed doors, with other consenting adults, can and should remain behind such closed doors. Proselytising your deviancy as normal is not, and should not be permitted. And if you disagree, I would like you to now defend my personal preference for hunting pedophiles down on horseback with lances and making a corrida of it through all towns around the world.
If you are a pervert, you KNOW you are a pervert. So shut the fuck up, stay in your closet and lane, and don’t you dare try and normalise it.
Just like it would be absurd to tell golfers how it’s perfectly normal to shove a bucketful of golf balls up your arse every Friday night, it is absurd to teach that homosexuality is “normal”. It isn’t. And it never can be. Just like being born with only one leg is not normal. So as far as I am concerned, the rules Russia has imposed concerning the LGBT nonsense are perfectly fine. With one exception:
Pedophiles really should be burnt at the stake, and as my recent survey shows, (feel free to add your vote) most men really agree with me.
Conclusion
So, that covers the main topics. And feel free to try and critique my “bigoted” views but be mindful of the rules of this blog if you want to avoid an insta-ban.
No related posts.
By G | 26 July 2024 | Posted in Catholicism, Clown World, Sedevacantism, Social Commentary