It is by design that they continue to put forth a bunch of lies and try and confuse the waters, that is their entire purpose of course, but in reality, thanks to Pope Pius X and Benedict XV, the creation of the Code of Canon Law of 1917 means that how the dogmas of the Church are applied, from the start of the Church to 1917 are embodied in ONE book. This was a massive achievement and simplifies very clearly what is and not valid, licit, dogmatic or not in the Church, and how one is to function under the rules of the Church.
The Freemasons that usurped the Vatican of course hate the CL of 1917 and specifically Canon 188 part 4, because it is absolute, and stabs them in their blackened, foul, devil-worshipping little heart.
For clarity then, any and all rules of how to follow Catholic dogma, can only be contained in the CL of 1917 or, possibly, in one of the documents issued by the 3 valid Popes that ruled prior to the usurpation of the See of Peter by the Freemasons Satanist Roncalli, and all those like him who have come after, right up to and including Bergoglio.
These are the documents in question.
Title | Author | Year | Type | |||
Humani Generis Redemptionem | Benedict XV | 1917 | Encyclical | |||
Quod Iam Diu | Benedict XV | 1918 | Encyclical | |||
In Hac Tanta | Benedict XV | 1919 | Encyclical | |||
Maximum Illud | Benedict XV | 1919 | Apostolic Letter | |||
Paterno Iam Diu | Benedict XV | 1919 | Encyclical | |||
Annus Iam Plenus | Benedict XV | 1920 | Encyclical | |||
Principi Apostolorum Petro | Benedict XV | 1920 | Encyclical | |||
Spiritus Paraclitus | Benedict XV | 1920 | Encyclical | |||
In Praeclara Summorum | Benedict XV | 1921 | Encyclical | |||
Rerum Omnium Perturbationem | Pius XI | 1923 | Encyclical | |||
Quas Primas | Pius XI | 1925 | Encyclical | |||
Iniquis Afflictisque | Pius XI | 1926 | Encyclical | |||
Rerum Ecclesiae | Pius XI | 1926 | Encyclical | |||
Rite Expiatis | Pius XI | 1926 | Encyclical | |||
Miserentissimus Redemptor | Pius XI | 1928 | Encyclical | |||
Mortalium Animos | Pius XI | 1928 | Encyclical | |||
Divini Illius Magistri | Pius XI | 1929 | Encyclical | |||
Mens Nostra | Pius XI | 1929 | Encyclical | |||
Casti Connubii | Pius XI | 1930 | Encyclical | |||
Non Abbiamo Bisogno | Pius XI | 1931 | Encyclical | |||
Nova Impendet | Pius XI | 1931 | Encyclical | |||
Acerba Animi | Pius XI | 1932 | Encyclical | |||
Dilectissima Nobis | Pius XI | 1933 | Encyclical | |||
Ad Catholici Sacerdotii | Pius XI | 1935 | Encyclical | |||
Vigilanti Cura | Pius XI | 1936 | Encyclical | |||
Divini Redemptoris | Pius XI | 1937 | Encyclical | |||
Firmissimam Constantiam | Pius XI | 1937 | Encyclical | |||
Ingravescentibus Malis | Pius XI | 1937 | Encyclical | |||
Mit Brennender Sorge | Pius XI | 1937 | Encyclical | |||
Sertum Laetitiae | Pius XII | 1939 | Encyclical | |||
Summi Pontificatus | Pius XII | 1939 | Encyclical | |||
Saeculo Exeunte Octavo | Pius XII | 1940 | Encyclical | |||
Divino Afflante Spiritu | Pius XII | 1943 | Encyclical | |||
Mystici Corporis Christi | Pius XII | 1943 | Encyclical | |||
Orientalis Ecclesiae | Pius XII | 1944 | Encyclical | |||
Communium Interpretes Dolorum | Pius XII | 1945 | Encyclical | |||
Orientalis Omnes Ecclesias | Pius XII | 1945 | Encyclical | |||
Deiparae Virginis Mariae | Pius XII | 1946 | Encyclical | |||
Quaemadmodum | Pius XII | 1946 | Encyclical | |||
Fulgens Radiatur | Pius XII | 1947 | Encyclical | |||
Mediator Dei | Pius XII | 1947 | Encyclical | |||
Auspicia Quaedam | Pius XII | 1948 | Encyclical | |||
In Multiplicibus Curis | Pius XII | 1948 | Encyclical | |||
Redemptoris Nostri Cruciatus | Pius XII | 1949 | Encyclical | |||
Anni Sacri | Pius XII | 1950 | Encyclical | |||
Mirabile Illud | Pius XII | 1950 | Encyclical | |||
Summi Maeroris | Pius XII | 1950 | Encyclical | |||
Evangelii Praecones | Pius XII | 1951 | Encyclical | |||
Ingruentium Malorum | Pius XII | 1951 | Encyclical | |||
Sempiternus Rex Christus | Pius XII | 1951 | Encyclical | |||
Doctor Mellifluus | Pius XII | 1953 | Encyclical | |||
Fulgens Corona | Pius XII | 1953 | Encyclical | |||
Ad Caeli Reginam | Pius XII | 1954 | Encyclical | |||
Ad Sinarum Gentem | Pius XII | 1954 | Encyclical | |||
Sacra Virginitas | Pius XII | 1954 | Encyclical | |||
Musicae Sacrae | Pius XII | 1955 | Encyclical | |||
Luctuosissimi Eventus | Pius XII | 1956 | Encyclical | |||
Fidei Donum | Pius XII | 1957 | Encyclical | |||
Invicti Athletae | Pius XII | 1957 | Encyclical | |||
Le Pèlerinage de Lourdes | Pius XII | 1957 | Encyclical | |||
Miranda Prorsus | Pius XII | 1957 | Encyclical | |||
Ad Apostolorum Principis | Pius XII | 1958 | Encyclical | |||
Meminisse Iuvat | Pius XII | 1958 | Encyclical | |||
St. Claire Heavenly Patron of Television | Pius XII | 1958 | Apostolic Letter |
In short, if it is not contained in CL of 1917 or one of the above documents, you are perfectly fine to ignore it as the creation of people who at a very minimum are suspect, and thus, as prudence dictates, to be avoided, and more likely, especially if pretending to be “catholic” clergy, are likely Satanists (that’s what Freemasons are), impostors, frauds, pedophiles or at the very least absolute liars and grifters.
I hope that makes things clear for everyone.
NB: As for the “hypocrisy” of not wanting to use the 1955 Liturgical changes that were unfortunately approved by Pius XII, first of all, let it be clear that the Liturgy is in a different class from Canon Law, and is not entirely dogmatic, in fact one could argue almost none of it is. Secondly, a rather simple and direct explanation is provided by Bp. Sanborn here.
Notwithstanding the problems actual Catholics have with Bp. Sanborn, this specific point (as well as many others, of course) he has addressed well.
The Inevitable Fall of the Freemason Milo
For anyone living under a rock, who is still not aware that milo Yank-a-pole-r-us, is a total freemasons plant whose sole purpose is to pretend to be Catholic so as to lead any potentially actual Christians on the road to hell, here is a little background: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, but really, just use the Search me button on the right sidebar and type in Milo and you will have as much detail as you need.
His handlers and “fans” inevitably try to say that I focus on him because I “envy” him, or his “suck-cess” or whatever. But the reality is merely one: I too for a brief moment during gamer gate was fooled into thinking Milo was probably on the right side of things, however terminally flawed individually. But the reality has been that Milo was a gatekeeper from the start. Financed to be so.
He has had troubles with his financiers, and that more than once, but his grift and his gatekeeping continues. And his gatekeeping is one that affects primarily young men, and is intended to keep them from finding true Catholicism, while bombarding them with the literal opposite of pious messages or anything inspiring of actual Catholicism. Because the last thing the servants of the enemy want, is a bunch of young, determined, objective, sedevacantist men. Why? Simple, because Sedevacantism is the only actual Catholicism left, and actual Catholicism is fearless and militant. Did you think the Crusades stopped Islam from conquering Europe by writing them sarcastic witty letter?
Do you think all the pious saints and priests that would rather die than deny Jesus or break the confessionary seal were all just “mistaken”. Do you think that people like Bohemond, Tancredi, or Jean Parisot le Valette were anything other than proper, hardcore catholics. And do you think that such men will stand for any of the globohomo nonsense that is being pushed globally?
Of course not. So enter Milo the gay freemason to pervert, muddy, confuse and ultimately lead down the road to Hell instead.
I have been taking note of his telegram chat from shortly after the start of Lent, and decided to screenshot once every few days, just some of the type of messages he sends out there, and the overall quality of the “christian message” such a barrage of deviancy suggests and implies, sometimes very directly, sometimes more subtly, but always with impiety, perversion and deceit at its core. It is salutary to take note of this in a somewhat condensed fashion as displaying these screenshots in a row does.
It is also interesting to note that in the period of Lent, though he started with some 26,500 subscribers or so, and the 26,000 threshold was retained by the skin of his teeth for quite a while, when it dipped below 26,000 it plummeted pretty quickly. The number of comments on his chat is also certainly not in line with 25k or so active users. As I said before, I believe a large portion of his subscribers is fake and are likely bots.
Below is a string of just some of his posts starting shortly after Lent started. I added some commentary after certain examples, but mostly they are self-explanatory in their subversive intent. I leave a final comment at the end too.
Trying to keep youth in the unnatural centres of sin and degeneracy, cities, instead of allowing them to reconnect to the natural instincts and intrinsic divinity that contact with nature provides, along with a suggestion to violence.
Obvious mocking of Saints/Sainthood and divinity, humility, grace and certainly Lent in toto.
Intentionally trying to propose absolutely idiotic comments, to bring doubt into well established things, like quantum tunnelling, which has demonstrably transmitted Mozart’s 40th Symphony at 4.7 times light speed way back in 1994. While quantum dynamics has certainly got some issues (mostly related to the truncation of the Maxwell equations, and the removal of the concept of the Aether, which is related to scalar energy transmission (which can be used as weapons)) Quantum tunnelling, certainly produces engineering effects.
Homosexual writings.
More homosexual direct innuendo.
Pretty obvious sexual imagery, especially since his “sadness” is essentially related to having to go back into the closet about being a homosexual, and as indicated above, being on his knees, etcetera.
More flat Earth nonsense, which is all distraction, nonsense and doubt for the Beverly mentally challenged.
Homosexual imagery, followed by clear blasphemy and ridicule of Lent.
Draw your own conclusions about what it might mean that he is sending out pictures with details of his eating while defecating. And the kind of imagery and intent such activity made public is supposed to inspire. During Lent, no less.
As above, plus the barren, slovenly nature of the whole composition is purposely meant to degrade, lower, and bring down the entire tone of anyone reading or seeing such images.
A video showing a rather cruel act to a child with the supposed intent of being “funny”.
Again with the defecation imagery, this time with a slurry meant to at least subconsciously refer you to both what he is “producing” as well as his sexual practices and their results, which he is also implying get swallowed. If you think I exaggerate the intent of these images, you are mistaken, this is classic psyops/hypnosis use for deviant/subterfugeous ends. And he is perfectly aware of what he is doing.
Usual profanity and general tone-lowering under the pretence of “funny”.
Promoting the idea of homosexuality or MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) abstention from heterosexual pairing, marriage and making Catholic families and children in a proper Catholic family. The whole thing is supposed to be a “deep” self-reflection, but in reality is yet again, another attempt to denigrate conventional family creation.
Totally disrespectful, mocking, vile and in any case corrupted thought, with association to an image of Jesus. What better way to confound, confuse, mock and denigrate our Lord and Saviour?
More nonsense. Because if you make everything nonsense then…well…everything is nonsense. nothing matters. Nothing is sacred anymore. And that is his aim, as his master’s.
Clearly doing some psyops against DeSantis for whatever reason. Perhaps none other than simply causing more chaos. Or perhaps because, at least according to some, DeSantis may actually have been raised Sedevacantists and may be playing the game in order to gain enough power to possibly change things. So far anyway, he has been good for Florida.
More, general vicious gossip, during Lent, and general slovenliness, for the same reason. Lower the zeitgeist to the lowest possible status.
Ultimately Milo is indeed going to fail. This is not news to me or anyone that has been paying attention. His downfall has a relatively slow arc, but is absolutely obvious, as I mentioned first privately way back in 2015 I think, when I still didn’t realise he was a Freemasonic plant.
He will be 39 in October of this year and after hitting his 40s, he will inevitably degrade faster. His appeal to the youth will be dimmer and dimmer as he gets older, his pudgy roundness is likely to balloon to obese fatness except if he undertakes some form of drastic surgery or dieting, which will further ravage his pudgy, weak body. He has nothing relevant left to say. His “edginess” is all spent and pointless in the aftermath of the scamdemic. People older than him see him as pointless, worthless and a continued degenerate, those younger than him see him either in the same way, or as a kind of circus freak, and they are not so much laughing with him, as they are laughing AT him. And the ones of his age that still follow him are Millennials, who, as a generation, generally, have the morals, work ethic, aptitude and loyalty of jelly fish. They may be following him simply because they are too apathetic to click the unfollow option. It’s like two, maybe three clicks to unsubscribe man. It’s like… tiring…you know? It’s like… wait, what is that shiny thing?
So. He is already, and will continue, to crash and burn. It’s a long arc, more like a satellite spinning out of good orbit than a plane tailspinning, And it will be similar too in the way he will simply just fade away after the nth attempts at reinvention fail faster and faster. He will not even have a “splashy” end. Unless, possibly, he swan dives off the 20th floor of some semi-luxurious hotel in a few years, in order to end it all. Even then, he will be forgotten after the usual 3 day news-cycle.
So why point all this out?
Because deceivers pretending to be Catholics are decidedly my number one target, as they are for any actual Catholic.
Why post this even before Lent is over? Because Lent is not a bad time for you to take stock of not only yourself, your weaknesses, and your need to do better. it is also a good time to commit more to being part of the Church MILITANT. Which means taking note of your enemies and their actions, their forces, their numbers, their tactics and their strategies.
And act as a proper Catholic regarding it.
No related posts.
By G | 28 March 2023 | Posted in Catholicism, Christianity, Impostors and Frauds, Reclaiming the Catholic Church, Sedeprivationism, Social Commentary, The Enemy Within