I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other! So, because you are lukewarm—neither hot nor cold—I am about to spit you out of my mouth. You say, ‘I am rich; I have acquired wealth and do not need a thing.’ But you do not realize that you are wretched, pitiful, poor, blind and naked.
It is possibly the biggest source of personal frustration when I encounter the lukewarm, which frankly, seems to be literally everyone, with exception of my children, and most pure being the littler ones.
I understand that obstinacy, especially given the average human monkey, leads to nothing good, of course.
And yes, we all see through a glass darkly. Every one of us.
Even so, some things are obviously true. Obviously clear to anyone who cares to look.
Two plus two is, and always will be, four.
It is also a sad fact that I doubt if there are even a handful of people that would be willing to die over that fact. If faced with the prospect:
“Defend that two and two is four to death, or, allow all of humanity to forego the very concept of mathematics, calculation and so on.”
Put that way, it would mean either you sacrifice yourself, or, humanity will literally be forever reduced to about the same level as bonobos, and in fact, possibly lower, in fact, almost assuredly lower; though I don’t expect most people reading this to have the imagination necessary to envision why unless they put some serious thought into it.
I also appreciate that the argument for Sedevacantism takes a certain level of ability and education. You not only need to be able to read, but have the intelligence, will and desire to do so, in the specifics of the details of Church history, law, dogma and credo. I understand that too. I know it is a minority that can do that and the rest tend to follow for the usual reasons, because their family or friends have done so and humans are at times essentially herd animals.
However, if you are one of them; and you have taken the time and effort to learn why Sedevacantism is the only valid Catholicism left, why on God’s green Earth would you give a second’s time to obvious heretics?
If you have understood and accepted that the Novus Orcians are impostors, fake “Catholics” then it is absolutely impossible that you should make any exception for any of them.
“Oh but…” just doesn’t come into it.
It doesn’t matter if on this particular Tuesday afternoon, of the blue Moon, he told the truth on this one point.
It doesn’t matter if he calls out Bergoglio.
It doesn’t matter if he saves starving orphans in Africa.
It doesn’t matter if “he makes so much sense”.
This is not about a “bad” Catholic that is badly catechised, or a weak one that fails. Or a bad one that is in mortal sin every week through a retinue of bad character traits. It’s about fake clergy pretending to be of a religion they patently are not.
They are, in essence, spiritual mass-murderers.
Would you extend the same “benefit of the doubt” to a serial killer? Does it matter if he had a really bad childhood? Or he hears voices? Or he really doesn’t realise the evil he is doing?
Are you going to be buddies with Ted Bundy because he really knows how to get women close to him?
And if you are an actual believer, spiritual mass-murderers are worse than mere physical ones. Physical mass murderers take your life on Earth and your body, but spiritual ones are trying to throw your soul into hell for eternity.
So, if you are a Sedevcantist, that is, an actual Catholic, you do not accept, in any way, shape or form:
Una-cum masses, they are a blasphemy and a heresy.
Novus Ordo anything.
Vatican II anything.
That includes ALL the fake clergy and pomp of the fake “Catholic” Bergoglian Church and ALL their members.
Because they are not Catholics. Just as two plus two is not five.
I have covered the knowing heretics, fake Catholics, and Freemason Satanists several times, and by now, I should hope it is clear that I give no “clergy” that doesn’t specifically reject Vatican II and the Fake Popes from 1958 on any kind of pass. They are knowing heretics, and to be treated as such, as per Cum Ex Apostolato Officio; to wit (emphasis added):
(iii) that all such individuals also shall be held, treated and reputed as such by everyone, of whatsoever status, grade, order, condition or pre-eminence he may be and whatsoever excellence may be his, even Episcopal, Archiepiscopal, Patriarchal and Primatial or other greater Ecclesiastical dignity and even the honour of the Cardinalate, or secular, even the authority of Count, Baron, Marquis, Duke, King or Emperor, and as such must be avoided and must be deprived of the sympathy of all natural kindess.
But… but… what about some poor wanna-be Catholic “priest” that is ignorant of the whole Vatican II issue, and the rampant sodomy in the seminaries, and the utter manifest heresy of Bergoglio in real-time, never mind all of it since 1958, you say?
Yeah… that’s like saying that an adult, who takes all the courses to be a firearms instructor, then points a loaded gun at a child and pulls the trigger and then claims he didn’t know the gun was loaded when he did it. Even if you assume he’s telling the truth, and even if you could somehow determine it with absolute certainty (impossible), the fact remains that such an idiot would and should, go to jail, or preferably the death penalty, for what is known legally as criminal negligence. Or as I prefer to call it, criminal stupidity. Yes, being stupid enough is a crime. Because really stupid people should not be allowed to take certain jobs. You don’t want a 50 IQ retard trying to fly a plane. And I don’t care whose feelings it hurts. Ditto these fake “idiot” “priests”. If they are that stupid, they have no business being priests, and no, I do not give them the benefit of the doubt, and neither should you. Why? Because it is Church dogma to not do so. If you act like a heretic, practice like a heretic, promulgate heresy, regardless of your possible retardation, we are to treat you like a heretic. And must be deprived of the sympathy of all natural kindess. See above.
So that deals with the intentional, knowing heretics.
But what about the laymen who are also trying to lead people to Hell? Well, once again, I have detailed some of these grifting liars, Emo Jones, Tay-Tay Marshall, Michelle Voris, Milo Yankmypoleus and their kind. And one hopes it is now relatively easy to spot them. And we have a generic witch test for all who profess to be “Catholics”, it’s really simple:
“Do you reject Vatican II and all those who promulgate it?“
Anything other than a resounding YES! means you are dealing either with a knowing impostor, an egomaniacal fame or status hungry “smartboi”, or, at best, a deceived, lazy, ignorant.
Yes, yes, I know, charity and all that, but let me point something out here: It is by using and appealing to your charity when they have absolutely no right to do so, that these snakes enter your home and pervert it. And the Catholic Church also dogmatically explains that one should use prudence and avoid anything suspect.
Great. We got that cleared up. What then of the autistically persistent laymen? And here I add a couple of warnings:
First of all assure yourself as best you can that they actually are simple laymen. The example of note here is John Salza. Who has written a retinue of lies against Sedevacantism, supposedly in defence of Catholicism as a simple, pious layman. Except… that Salza was (is) a self-confessed freemason. Oh, oh, but he’s not anymore… right, because Satanists are such paragons of truth-telling. Get it through your head, freemasons are Satanists, that is literally what Freemasonry is. The literal worship of Lucifer. The fact the lower echelons might not be immediately aware of it… again… see criminal stupidity above. And if a freemason did honestly convert and became a Catholic (there are historical examples) then the only thing they may continue to do is explain how freemasonry is Satanic. That’s it. And that is the only legitimate thing they might be allowed to speak on as laypeople. Because once you have been a Satanist, it’s really quite obvious you should never be allowed to say anything at all about Catholicism, other than it is the absolute truth and you were absolutely wrong. And should such a person go on to write long tracts on why this or that theological position is better or worse, they are to be immediately assumed to be simply continuing their Satanic mission. These people, once you discover they are in fact freemasons or associate with such, etcetera, can safely be dismissed as liars at the very least, and heretics almost to a certainty.
But let us now assume you have satisfied yourself that they are not intentional deceiver or gatekeepers. And further (somehow) satisfied yourself they are not grifters either, making a buck from their “preaching”. And by making a buck I mean, literally making their living, or a substantial part of it from it. Because if they are, well, then their intent might not be consciously Satanic, but they are certainly at least useful idiots for Satan.
Ok then, assuming they even pass the Satanists/Grifter smell test, what are we left with? The smartbois. The Gammas who do it for personal ego/stature/status.
Are there honestly deceived people who believe they are “Catholics” when instead they are just fooled, lazy ignorants? Yes. Plenty of them. Millions. maybe even over a billion of them. Certainly.
Why do I call them lazy ignorants? Because they are. Is it harsh? Not really, it is a statement of fact. If I decided to call myself a prince of the blue garter belt of Liliputz, or whatever, you can bet I would not do so until I have studied with care what and how one becomes or is born as a Prince of Liliputz, and even if I fit those requirements, I would then delve deeply into what it takes to belong to the order of the blue garter belt, and why that isn’t gay somehow, if indeed it is not!
And how much more important is your claim to belong to a specific religion, to a specific God, with specific rules, because after all, if God is real, and Good, and Loving, then he MUST have, at a minimum, a Way for you to find Him and His rules and a way for you to KNOW what those rules are. And indeed there is: The Catholic Church. And it is your minimum duty to ensure you are actually in it, and not fooled into some travesty of it through your laziness of not bothering to learn your own religion.
So, if you’re one of the lazy ignorants, either get offended, flounce off in flamboyant fake indignation, or, get your lazy ass off the couch, and start reading. And learning.
But what about the smartbois?
Ah yes.
And here we encounter one such: Michael Lofton (because I am still being charitable here and still investigating him). He appears to have spent a LOT of time and effort to defend the heretic, fake, impostor riddled “Catholic Church” headed by the Vicar of pedophiles himself, Bergoglio. Now, why would that be?
If we give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he’s a true believer (in the Novus Orco, fake Church) and not a grifter (but he does make considerable revenue from his podcasts) or an intentional deceiver, then we need to assess what he is, and why he’s doing it.
At first glance, what I can say so far is that he certainly likes to use the sophist’s method preferred by Bill Clinton when asked if he had sex with Monica Lewinsky. For those young-uns among you, here is the detail:
During his grand jury testimony, Clinton questioned the exact meaning of the word ‘is’ in an attempt to defend a false affidavit in which Lewinsky claimed ‘there is no sex of any kind, in any manner, shape or form with president Clinton’. When asked by former Deputy Independent Counsel Sol Wisenberg, to confirm the affidavit was ‘utterly false’, the former president gets into semantics. ‘It depends upon what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is. If ‘is’ means is and never has been, that is not—that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement,’ Clinton said with what seems like a smirk on his face.
I remember watching that on TV and seeing the lawyer take him to task on it, saying effectively: Wait…what? Are you saying that your statement was “true” because you weren’t physically having sex with Monica Lewinsky at that specific time the question was asked?!
It was truly baffling and absurd. Well, Michael does quite a bit of this.
When cornered on certain topics he tries to dodge by becoming absurdly “specific” about certain words.
For example, watch this video from 53.20 on, where he admits that Bergoglio said that Proselytising is a sin. But, he goes on to “explain” that what Bergy-the-Oleous means by that, is “to use force” to convert people to Catholicism.
Which is, of course, abject nonsense. “What does he mean by Proselytism?” he says, “the question is, is proselytism the same as evangelisation?” And he goes on to say that “convincing people” of the truth is evangelising, and fine, but Proselytism is, according to him, understood by Bergoglio to be the use of “coercion and force”. He doesn’t explain how he knows this, or what evidence he has that Bergy-the-Olous uses this word this way, of course. But does it matter? No. Because we know very well what words mean around here.
But hey, don’t take my word for it. Let’s go to my 13 volume set of the Oxford English Dictionary and look them both up.
Evangelise means:
to preach the gospel or
to bring under the influence of the gospel
the state or condition of being evangelised or converted to the Christian faith
And Proselytise means:
To make proselytes
To make a proselyte of
What is a Proselyte?
It is defined as:
One who has come over from one opinion, belief, creed or party to another; a convert
A gentile convert to the Jewish faith
to convert form one religious faith or sect to another
In short, they are perfectly synonymous of each other, and if anything evangelise is the one that could potentially have some “force” attributable to it since in definition 3 it simply states to be “converted to the Christian faith”. And in definition 2 one might be “brought under the influence of” by having a gun pointed to one’s head with a command to convert. One (if autistic) might try to argue that in this case, the presumption is that perhaps it’s okay to do it by any means, including against the individual’s free will.
While in the definitions of Proselyte the implication of free will of the convert is clearly always grammatically present.
So, it is, of course a lie. Nonsense. And it is said to run cover for the never-was-Catholic, protector of Pedophiles on Earth, Bergy-the-Oleous, fake “pope” and grand vizier of Moloch.
He does this in other ways and in other videos. He in fact tried to dismiss the entirety of the Code of Canon Law using similar subterfuge, I forget now the detail and I can’t be bothered to look for it presently, but the case is clearly made, if you listen to him for any length of time on the topic of Sedevacantism, that he is dishonest.
So WHY is he dishonest? Is he getting paid for it? (I don’t know)
Is he funded by some rich heretic interested in funding gatekeepers like the money man behind both Emo Jones and Church Militant’s ex(sure)gay guy Voris, Marc Brammer? (I don’t know)
Does he make a substantial amount of money from his podcasts? Yes. Is it enough to keep him in the level of luxury he wants? I don’t know but I doubt it, these guys tend to be greedy.
So can I definitely point at him and scream “KNOWING HERETIC! BURN HIM!” Well, I certainly will treat him like one, because he is, but no, I can’t quite yet do that, because he may just be stroking his own ego instead of have a vested interest in sending souls to Hell for a third party.
But what we can be certain of is that the he is a sophist. And I mean that in the EOD version n. 3:
One who makes use of fallacious arguments; a specious reasoner.
And by specious, here they mean EOD definition n. 2:
Having a fair or attractive appearance or character, calculated to make a favourable impression on the mind, but in reality devoid of the qualities apparently possessed.
And, without surprise, he not only never argues Sedevacantism honestly, but he is absolutely terrified of even beginning to have an argument with someone that (though ultimately wrong) knows enough to prove him to be absolutely flawed in all his reasonings concerning Catholicism.
Peter Dimond is ultimately wrong because he doesn’t not recognise Baptism of Desire and of Blood, which the Church and Canon Law in fact do recognise, and as a result of that error he then rejects the few remaining valid Priests and Bishops (sedevacantists).
That said, Dimond would wipe the floor with Lofton, because autistic though Dimond is about baptism of desire (he literally twists the meaning of the black on white word of Canon Law of 1917 to “make his case”, not unlike Lofton himself) he is pretty rock-solid on most other aspects of Catholicism. In fact, barring that (serious and unfortunate error) and a few other points which are really so far-out as to be literally non-issues for almost anyone at all, Dimond is sound in his Catholicism. But note how Lofton resorts to specious ad hominem instead of answering the question.
If I were tasked with arguing Dimond I would say that we essentially only have one main point of contention, and it is baptism of desire and baptism of blood. I would have to research the various places this was clearly stated by multiple Popes etcetera, which would be pointless, because it is addressed in the canon Law of 1917, and Dimond has already shown that his approach to it would be autism redux with no ability to objectively evaluate the relevant code. So, arguing with him would be pointless and fruitless for us both. But I have no doubt he would be able to recite the various passages from Papal Encyclicals that he uses (erroneously) to make his case, from memory. I certainly could not.
Lofton instead, tries to side-step the entire major point of the Sede vs Heretics arguments, and never really addresses them in his own “takes”.
Tell us Michael, where is the Code of Canon Law, or the Dogma, that says 70 years is too much for an interregnum? Oh wait…what is that? There isn’t one?
Right.
And the Church has been without a Pope for a few years before and for over 70 with no clear way of knowing who was Pope because there were up to three at a time claiming it. But that was fine was it?
Oh and, no one judges the Pope… yet… there have been more than 40 antipopes before 1958, so… SOMEHOW we must be able to know when a Pope is a heretic, eh Michael? And definitely judge it so. Why don’t you explain that one away too.
But I want to now address those who get affected by specialbois or deceivers, whichever he is, like Lofton.
That is, those who get convinced by him on the basis that he introduces right at the start of the linked video, and that is, that oh, well, if there are only a few actual Catholics left (i.e. if Sedevacantism is true and there are “only” 200,000 to a 1,000,000 catholics left) then one should despair and become oh… he doesn’t know… Say Eastern “Orthodox” or a Copt or maybe a Syrian Catholic… (are there even 200k of those guys?!) because, you know, as Jesus Himself and all the Apostles clearly stated, Christianity is a popularity contest!
If you don’t have the numbers you just don’t play, right?
Go to a “winning” team like Russian Orthobros. Or stick with the Molochian usurpers LARPing at being “Catholic” clergy, because, hey, they have the numbers!
Right. Sure.
If you go along with hat argument, then, it is patently obvious, that your flaw here is not just your ability to do logic, perceive truth, or understand objective reality, but also, that you are supremely weak, and more akin to a herd animal than a reasoning, thinking, human being.
And, at best, that’s the type of “Catholic” Michael Lofton is, Ladies and Gentlemen, by his own admission at 18.10 or so of his video.
So I rest my case.
Matthew 7:13-14
“Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.
This is where you can sponsor an olive tree in the name of a Saint for yourself or others. Prayers will be offered for yourself or the person/s it is being sponsored for, as well as the Saint in question. Once the first 50 trees are sponsored I will add the next 50. CLICK HERE to see how you can sponsor a tree in order to help create a Catholic (sedevacantist) community faster and receive prayers for your effort.
What has been called the placebo effect is in reality something far more complex and interesting than you have been led to believe.
And it has bearing on the current world situation to a very high degree.
The conclusions I come to are going to sound “fantastic”, at least to those unable to do logic and/or research the factual information I present for themselves, so as to verify I am not making anything up.
So, the approach will be to list a number of factual tests that have been done and have achieved the same results in a number of repeatable studies. Then I will present some additional information, usually not linked to the placebo effect at all, which will also require some research on your part in case you don’t want to take my word for it, which I always encourage you to do anyway. The research I mean, not taking my word for it. And finally I will explain what I think the placebo effect really is and how it works. And why it’s very important in the present dystopian reality we inhabit.
What is the placebo effect? A basic introduction.
The placebo effect is one that was noted by doctors when administering to a group of people some drug or medication that was supposed to make them better while administering to a control group sugar tablets or some other innocuous substance that did not contain the drug being used on the other patients.
What was discovered is that those taking the sugar tablets or saline solution or water, or whatever absolutely drug-free thing was being given to them, still healed better than people who received nothing and sometimes healed better than the ones taking the medication. This was thought to happen as a result of “mind over matter” the people receiving sugar tablets were not aware of being the control group, so they thought they were getting better and this somehow made them better. Some extreme cases of this have been well documented in a book called the holographic universe.
But if simple belief in a drug you were NOT being given could heal you, did you need the drug at all? So a series of tests with double blind situations were done. Over decades here is what the results showed time and again.
If the patients did not know who was receiving the placebo (non-active sugar pills or water, etc) and they believed they were getting the drug they healed better than people not receiving anything.
If the doctors administering the placebo did not know it was a placebo and thought it was an effective drug the patients improved too when compared to those who got nothing. In other words, the belief of the doctors alone transferred to the patients. And if I recall right, this was the case even if the patients knew it was a placebo but the doctors did not.
So. How would classical materialistic based science explain this transference of “belief”?
It can’t.
How does the placebo effect actually work?
Well. The Western version can’t. Unless you are familiar with at least some of the concepts discussed by Harold Aspen, Thomas Bearden, Michael Persinger and others and you are able to synergistically understand the links between them. You also need at least a rudimentary understanding of the physics of Burkhard Heim.
In Russia however, this is understood far better and in short, the psychotronic healing chambers I discuss in my “fiction” work are an easy way to grasp the concept of how you can heal people by use of various electromagnetic/frequency/resonance fields which can be induced mechanically. And I have it on good authority that such psychotronic healing chambers actually not only exist, but have existed for a long time. Decades at the very least.
The really important thing to note is that mechanical means of achieving such healing certainly may make the process easier and accessible to all, but they are not an absolute requirement.
Everyone from Tibetan monks, who are more likely to be able to “activate” such responses from the body, to even people I know personally, have at times healed in ways that are thought to be miraculous. You could, in effect say that the placebo effect is the way science has discovered or measured the results that can be achieved with genuine faith.
Of course, the danger here is that of falling into the trap of the unwashed, stinking, hippie masses of New Agers that will tell you if your child dies of cancer it’s because you and your child have negative vibes and don’t pray hard enough. Which is not just idiotic, bit also cruel in the way that only the truly uneducated ignorants can be.
So, allow me to explain the mechanism in simple, yet hopefully also relatively complete format.
My working hypothesis, which I have arrived at only after more than 15 years of practicing clinical hypnosis, is as follows:
Yes, there probably is some state of mind/frequency/prayer that theoretically could or can heal just about anything. I have written in some more detail on this concept of how to pray correctly in both my Systema book as well as as in Believe! and Reclaiming the Catholic Church. HOWEVER…
And it’s a HUGE however, there usually can be and almost always are, very real obstacles to your being able to achieve this specific state for any given thing. Particularly when it is of a huge importance like the health of your child and so on. The reason being that fear, desire, doubt, and so on are all counter-productive, and how can you NOT have all of those things when something really important is on the line?
In addition to the above-mentioned “states of mind” situations, there usually also are other physiological factors. Various blockages in your body which translate into mental counterparts. If, for example you have chronic tension in your shoulders and neck, you will have a corresponding mental mind-map that is similarly “fossilised” and thus unable to relax or otherwise assume the required physical state to produce the more etheric mental state (or electromagnetic field at the right frequency, if you prefer).
In normal effect, the placebo effect is the residual or partial ability you unconsciously have access to, or rather, to be more accurate, that your body has access to (almost without your awareness of it entirely) in order to naturally heal itself. Being unconscious, your conscious efforts to produce the same result will generally fail, unless you have achieved a relatively high level of internal congruity which honestly, 99.99% of human beings never are even aware of, much less actively seek it.
So what to do? And how do I know this anyway?
Learning to control your own body internally is a good first step, but even after a couple of decades of martial arts or meditation or learning how to control your heart rate, breathing and so on, it will not guarantee your ability to enter the right frame of mind or physiological state.
I know this because I have practiced martial arts for about 4 decades and hypnosis for more than 15 years. Hypnosis is intimately related to changing mental states and allowing your body to heal itself. Hypnosis goes beyond what most people assume is mere “suggestion”, which some interpret to mean “gullible” or weak-minded or something of the sort. All of which is nonsense.
Everyone can be hypnotised. In fact animals can be too. Which is not to say that every hypnotist can hypnotise every person. But the state of hypnotic trance is not only achievable by everyone, but it has profound effects on us when used correctly.
I have had patients that had visited up to 15 hypnotists, unsuccessfully, and smoked for many years, completely stop smoking after a 45 minute session with me. I have also seen the effects of hypnosis on the physical body, having experimented on this myself with regard to pain, scarring, healing of injuries and so on, but also on the bodies of others, from people that had MS to an accidental burn not evidencing as having taken place.
There is also the work of Peter Garajev, which I discussed in some depth in my System book, which explains how our DNA can also be thought of as a sort of mini-wormhole creator for information. Which is why things like timeline and regression therapy in hypnosis work and can seemingly reach back in time and undo various trauma or alter the past consequences in how they play out here in the present and the future.
The relevance today.
If you have read/understood my previous post on the space of variations, and the Mandala effect possibilities you may have begun to understand, that there is certainly enough scientific evidence (and I mean that as ACTUALLY scientific, not circus-monkey, politically trained “science”) that as God on some level wishes us to be co-creators of reality, and as we are made in His image, and we do have creationary power to some degree, we may well be able to influence reality. Certainly, at the very least, as it pertains to our own health; and quite possibly in much larger ways too. Your absolute faith can and does produce results and you can verify this for yourself scientifically by keeping track of your own experiences. Learning to control your emotions will inevitably help in many other spheres of life too, as does learning to flexibilise your body physically, as the practice of Systema teaches with pretty much every drill. And for a push into the direction you want to go, you can also use hypnosis, either learn how to self-hypnotise, or take a session ormore, as needed.
In short, you have far more power over your own states of being than you have been led to believe.
Which is not to say that every protestant is some kind of devil worshipper. In fact most are probably “good” people who believe themselves to be Christians. After all, if you are told from birth you are (fill in blank here), and given we now know 98% of people don’t even question the government, it stands to reason they would believe they are (fill in the blank).
See this video and try to understand that this is not “oh, just another church cucking” this is the absolutely inevitable result of Protestantism.
I will explain why in a way you probably have never come across before below the video.
There are multiple ways to point out the obvious Satanry of Protestantism, but almost none of them break the brainwashing that they have been subjected to.
Rivers of ink have been written proving that the lies Protestants have been taught about Catholicism are complete fabrications. Including by non-catholics not all of which converted but yet saw that Catholicism has been lied about for 5 centuries.
Equal or more amounts of ink have been put down to show that the 40,000 interpretations of the “Bible” are absolutely wrong, infantile, historically ignorant and so on.
It has been pointed out that their “top Bible” was the intentionally corrupted translation of an already pharisee corrupted version, ordered by an openly gay king who literally started the masonic (satanic) temples.
It has been demonstrated that it was Protestantism that first permitted divorce, then sex before marriage obviously becomes normalised, and sex for sport inevitably leads to abortion on demand. “Oh but not MY Church/sect/family…” shut up. America is a baby murdering factory that puts the FAKE numbers of the holohoax to shame, never mind the real ones. And America is predominantly a Protestant country.
But do any of these facts change the mind of a Protestant. Very rarely. And then usually only after years when they actually begin to read some patristic texts.
I even tried to show Protestants their absurd sects are absurd by the simplest of logic. After all, if Luther ripping out parts of the Bible finally “fixed it” how can you ever say that the Bible alone is all you need? First of all, the Bible itself was put together by TRADITION. And if the Bible that served Christianity perfectly well for over 1000 years needed “fixing” by a fat German of Jewish descent that had a fetish for raping maids and banging nuns, and who committed suicide, then I posit to you it couldn’t have been the “right” Bible and for all we know, when Bruce Jenner decides to rip some more out of it and interpret it so trannies are God’s chosen people, well… show me EXACTLY how you will be able to differentiate between Bruce’s “God-breathed” and Martin’s “God-breathed”. You won’t be able to, of course, because both versions are and would be only Satan-Farted.
And here is a picture for those of you allergic to reading (though it’s doubtful you got this far if you are, but maybe the colours attracted you.)
And keep in mind that Apostolic succession simply does NOT exist in ANY Protestant denomination. Not a single one. And it’s extremely doubtful if it exists at all in the supposedly “Orthodox” world, since in Russia and Greece, the metropolitans were essentially political plants of the KGB as one of the top Metropolitans recently admitted. Furthermore, they have their own schisms too, which invalidated the whole concept of “one body” as found IN THE BIBLE, not as invented by some bitter protestant.
But do any of these facts convince? Not often. What about all of them together? Well, they usually don’t sit through 1/10 of the information presented here before they try to think of objections.
But here is the thing:
Protestantism is absolutely shallow. It is fickle. It is ephemeral. Anyone can interpret anything the way they want. It literally has no rules except:
Interpreth as thou will (which is actually Satanic law, do as thou wills)
and
2. Jesus is the King of Kings. Well, even Demons know this.
It is not even a childish religion it is a religion for retarded toddlers.
Protestantism has only created degeneracy, weird Puritanism, divorce, destruction of the family, abortions and fuelled the flames of bitter feminism due to having relegated women to second class men-with-tits who must obey.
Catholicism has created the most advanced, humane and just civilisations in human history, the highest forms of art and engineering, love and respect for beauty, truth, honesty and helping your neighbour.
And Catholicism is DEEP. Roman law is an adult legal system, perfectly suited for messy, disagreeable, complicated human. It is deep because it is simple yet penetrating and cognisant of human nature. Anglo-saxon laws, and even worse, American laws, are a barbaric artificiality imposed on human beings as if they were machines in comparison.
Human beings are NOT robots, and allowances for specific circumstances should ALWAYS be aired out and considered. And discarded when they are absolutely in the wrong, or irrelevant, but used and listened to when they are very relevant.
Even murder is not always murder.
The spur of the moment robbery gone bad that kills a little old lady for stealing her pension, should get the death penalty. While the well-thought out, planned and executed homicide of a child rapist, in my view at least, deserves a medal and a small pension for life. You may disagree with my take, but don’t tell me that the two are equally guilty. They are not.
The Rules of Catholic Dogma and how to apply them are ALL enshrined in one document, the Pio-Bendictine Code of Canon Law of 1917.
If you read it and you consider what a society that follows these dogmatic rules would look like, you will see it can only create a great and wonderful civilisation with almost no crime.
The point is, in its very superficiality and paradoxical rigid flexibility (the main rule being you can make up your own rules, and don’t let anyone tell you otherwise!) Protestantism ultimately stands for nothing. It has no lasting values. while the Catholic `Church dogma has remained unchanged for almost two millennia. Sure, from time to time they refined a concept or expounded another, but the divine dogmas remain unchanged. The rules to manage worldly affairs certainly changed but that is not to say the old ways are invalid, in fact, in many cases, the old ways show how Sedevacantism always was the correct position to take when faced with a fake Pope, or one that was or became a heretic.
How can you possibly believe in a Church that is fallible? Does your version of Jesus lie? Produce fallible Church dogma? Or agrees that everyone should have their own “truth”? Including Bruce Jenner?
Catholic priests and Bishops and Popes even have always been only flawed human beings, but the church itself has endured all of these and the rules of the Church, as presented by the magisterium of the Church, in the form of the compiled Canon Laws, is indeed infallible and has stood the test of time. Not because Catholics are flawless or Popes infallible (they are only infallible when valid, pronouncing ex-cathedra, and then only because GOD ensures their infallibility, as per His promise, not because any Pope ever was perfect or infallible in se.
But such concepts are generally “too much” for the average protestant, brought up on a diet of soy for breakfast, lunch and dinner, presented with a succulent steak, or a boiled lobster, or even just a salad with pomegranate and orange in it, recoils in shock. His simple-minded palate cannot even imagine such rich textures and flavours and tradition and history and objective fact built on objective fact so that the very methods of science were invented by Catholics. He wants to deny such things even exist or were ever true.
“NEWTON!” He shouts almost like an atheist would retardedly shout “DARWIN!” Forgetting that Newton was an anti-trinitarian, wrote far more on religion in a heretical perspective than he ever did on physics and that about 30 years of his life were spend on occult alchemy.
While the anonymous 14th Century monk that wrote The Cloud of Unknowing, almost certainly touches on far more penetrating truths about God and Christianity than Newton did. And the original free version online in Middle English is delightful (if you are clear on the language, the modern version linked to above is useful to read alongside it).
And yet, even with this barrage of starting points to investigate, the average Protestant will simply dismiss them all out of hand and assume he’s right anyway.
Do you see now, why the Catholics thought it worse for pagans to be “educated” by Protestant “missionaries” about “Christianity” than if they were left to their own devices?
Being completely wrong on something you are ignorant of, you have a better chance that your God-given conscience leads you correctly, or, that conversely (or jointly) due to invincible ignorance, God takes mercy on you.
But a fake version of the truth, a corrupted, half-truth wrapped in poisonous lies, that will lead you to your death. The lies baked in as you learn them make you lazy and spoon-feed and you never bother to investigate them yourself. This is human nature. We have seen it.
98% of people would euthanise themselves instead of take the time to research something that they are supposed to inject themselves with because the government or the TV told them to do it. Why would they ever bother to question the absurd nonsense of Protestantism as it is fed to them from childhood?
THIS is why Protestantism is Satanic. Exactly like the Mutagenic Serum shots, it is designed to fool you and lead you to eternal Hell.
However uncomfortable this idea may make you, I put it to you that it is an infinitesimally tiny dot of absolute inconsequence when compared to eternity in Hell because you believed in something so utterly retarded as “Sola Scripture” and “Once saved always saved”.
The importance of the “Placebo” effect
What has been called the placebo effect is in reality something far more complex and interesting than you have been led to believe.
And it has bearing on the current world situation to a very high degree.
The conclusions I come to are going to sound “fantastic”, at least to those unable to do logic and/or research the factual information I present for themselves, so as to verify I am not making anything up.
So, the approach will be to list a number of factual tests that have been done and have achieved the same results in a number of repeatable studies. Then I will present some additional information, usually not linked to the placebo effect at all, which will also require some research on your part in case you don’t want to take my word for it, which I always encourage you to do anyway. The research I mean, not taking my word for it. And finally I will explain what I think the placebo effect really is and how it works. And why it’s very important in the present dystopian reality we inhabit.
What is the placebo effect? A basic introduction.
The placebo effect is one that was noted by doctors when administering to a group of people some drug or medication that was supposed to make them better while administering to a control group sugar tablets or some other innocuous substance that did not contain the drug being used on the other patients.
What was discovered is that those taking the sugar tablets or saline solution or water, or whatever absolutely drug-free thing was being given to them, still healed better than people who received nothing and sometimes healed better than the ones taking the medication. This was thought to happen as a result of “mind over matter” the people receiving sugar tablets were not aware of being the control group, so they thought they were getting better and this somehow made them better. Some extreme cases of this have been well documented in a book called the holographic universe.
But if simple belief in a drug you were NOT being given could heal you, did you need the drug at all? So a series of tests with double blind situations were done. Over decades here is what the results showed time and again.
So. How would classical materialistic based science explain this transference of “belief”?
It can’t.
How does the placebo effect actually work?
Well. The Western version can’t. Unless you are familiar with at least some of the concepts discussed by Harold Aspen, Thomas Bearden, Michael Persinger and others and you are able to synergistically understand the links between them. You also need at least a rudimentary understanding of the physics of Burkhard Heim.
In Russia however, this is understood far better and in short, the psychotronic healing chambers I discuss in my “fiction” work are an easy way to grasp the concept of how you can heal people by use of various electromagnetic/frequency/resonance fields which can be induced mechanically. And I have it on good authority that such psychotronic healing chambers actually not only exist, but have existed for a long time. Decades at the very least.
The really important thing to note is that mechanical means of achieving such healing certainly may make the process easier and accessible to all, but they are not an absolute requirement.
Everyone from Tibetan monks, who are more likely to be able to “activate” such responses from the body, to even people I know personally, have at times healed in ways that are thought to be miraculous. You could, in effect say that the placebo effect is the way science has discovered or measured the results that can be achieved with genuine faith.
Of course, the danger here is that of falling into the trap of the unwashed, stinking, hippie masses of New Agers that will tell you if your child dies of cancer it’s because you and your child have negative vibes and don’t pray hard enough. Which is not just idiotic, bit also cruel in the way that only the truly uneducated ignorants can be.
So, allow me to explain the mechanism in simple, yet hopefully also relatively complete format.
My working hypothesis, which I have arrived at only after more than 15 years of practicing clinical hypnosis, is as follows:
In normal effect, the placebo effect is the residual or partial ability you unconsciously have access to, or rather, to be more accurate, that your body has access to (almost without your awareness of it entirely) in order to naturally heal itself. Being unconscious, your conscious efforts to produce the same result will generally fail, unless you have achieved a relatively high level of internal congruity which honestly, 99.99% of human beings never are even aware of, much less actively seek it.
So what to do? And how do I know this anyway?
Learning to control your own body internally is a good first step, but even after a couple of decades of martial arts or meditation or learning how to control your heart rate, breathing and so on, it will not guarantee your ability to enter the right frame of mind or physiological state.
I know this because I have practiced martial arts for about 4 decades and hypnosis for more than 15 years. Hypnosis is intimately related to changing mental states and allowing your body to heal itself. Hypnosis goes beyond what most people assume is mere “suggestion”, which some interpret to mean “gullible” or weak-minded or something of the sort. All of which is nonsense.
Everyone can be hypnotised. In fact animals can be too. Which is not to say that every hypnotist can hypnotise every person. But the state of hypnotic trance is not only achievable by everyone, but it has profound effects on us when used correctly.
I have had patients that had visited up to 15 hypnotists, unsuccessfully, and smoked for many years, completely stop smoking after a 45 minute session with me. I have also seen the effects of hypnosis on the physical body, having experimented on this myself with regard to pain, scarring, healing of injuries and so on, but also on the bodies of others, from people that had MS to an accidental burn not evidencing as having taken place.
There is also the work of Peter Garajev, which I discussed in some depth in my System book, which explains how our DNA can also be thought of as a sort of mini-wormhole creator for information. Which is why things like timeline and regression therapy in hypnosis work and can seemingly reach back in time and undo various trauma or alter the past consequences in how they play out here in the present and the future.
The relevance today.
If you have read/understood my previous post on the space of variations, and the Mandala effect possibilities you may have begun to understand, that there is certainly enough scientific evidence (and I mean that as ACTUALLY scientific, not circus-monkey, politically trained “science”) that as God on some level wishes us to be co-creators of reality, and as we are made in His image, and we do have creationary power to some degree, we may well be able to influence reality. Certainly, at the very least, as it pertains to our own health; and quite possibly in much larger ways too. Your absolute faith can and does produce results and you can verify this for yourself scientifically by keeping track of your own experiences. Learning to control your emotions will inevitably help in many other spheres of life too, as does learning to flexibilise your body physically, as the practice of Systema teaches with pretty much every drill. And for a push into the direction you want to go, you can also use hypnosis, either learn how to self-hypnotise, or take a session or more, as needed.
In short, you have far more power over your own states of being than you have been led to believe.
You might be interested in the following posts:
By G | 14 April 2023 | Posted in Ancient Technology, Believe, Books, Brain-Mind Functionality, Catholicism, Christianity, Face on Mars, Human Performance, Increasing Happiness, Medical Science, Overlords of Mars - 1, Overlords of Mars - 2, Reclaiming the Catholic Church, Sedeprivationism, Social Commentary, Systema, Systema