For those of you that don’t speak Italian, here is a summarised version that I perfectly share and agree with, as I hope was already evident from my previous post on it a short while ago.
Don Ricossa states that [items in bold and square brackets are my notes]:
Vigano in his response to the request he presents himself in Rome to answer for his supposed crime of schism, and therefore, ultimately heresy, stated he refuses to present himself in Rome since he does not recognise the legitimacy of the current occupier of the See of Rome and wants nothing to do with it, nor to remain in communion with it since he describes the current Bergoglian hierarchy as the final metastasis of the cancer that is Vatican II.
Don Ricossa started out by saying that although he does not usually like to discuss current events, since there is such a need of understanding the gospels at present, the present situation that everyone is talking about concerning Vigano is an excellent opportunity to possibly begin to heal the Church, if it is considered and acted upon fruitfully. He goes on to explain how and why as follows:
In the first place, while it is true that the current situation is terrible, it is important to note that this is merely an effect of the cause and not the cause itself. In short, while it is true that the cancer is bad, the problem started at the origin of the cancer and that is Vatican II. And this being the case, the focus should absolutely be on explaining and detailing the exact issues with Vatican II. This has already been done in various ways by various people [including by me —-in what I believe in the most exhaustive way I am aware of—- in Reclaiming The Catholic Church, where I list at least some of the heresies present in all 15 of the 16 documents that compose Vatican II that have direct heresy in them] and Father Ricossa mentions that one can bring to the attention of everyone (including Vigano) these arguments, and their already detailed and well presented points. Or one can expand on them or even start them anew and as thoroughly as one likes [As far as I am aware a complete listing of all the heresies of the Vatican II documents has not been done for there are so many, but I believe my version is the one that so far comes closest.]
Further, once you do this, it become obvious that the problem is not just the current impostor on the throne of Peter, but also all those from the very start of Vatican II who have continued to promulgate, promote and agree with Vatican II. [In short, here, Don Ricossa states simply the same thing I have been telling everyone from 2017 on, which is that every single fake Pope from Angelo Roncalli on, and all the Novus Orco clergy are invalid and as such heretics and non-Catholics. Nor is anything they teach related to Catholicism, but rather, its inversion.] Don Ricossa therefore clearly implied that this situation, that is, that Vigano has not yet explicitly stated this, needs to be corrected.
He goes on that, in order to be coherent, Vigano can only refuse the order to come to Rome, as well as refuse to recognise Bergoglio’s authority if he truly believes Bergoglio is not a legitimate Pope AND he can demonstrate too that this is the case (because Catholics follow the rules, not their feelings about what they think of particular cotta). And once again, this leads back to Vatican II and how it is indeed possible (and the case) that only fake “Popes” has been present in the Vatican since 28th October 1958. Otherwise, failing to obey a legitimate Pope is indeed schism and this can only eventually become heresy.
Don Ricossa goes on to say that therefore, it is absolutely necessary to explain, formally, and clarify:
Why the current occupier of the Vatican is not a valid Pope.
And also to clarify Vigano’s position on the matter, [that is of not formally and clearly declaring all the previous fake “Popes” and all previous and current fake “clergy” as the fakes they are] this removing for is the current doubt we have about what is Vigano’s real thoughts on the matter.]
He goes on to say that he has never had any communication with Vigano, so it is not a matter of the person of Vigano as such, but rather that while Vigano has expressed an opinion that Don Ricossa agrees with (i.e. that the Novus Ordo Church is a fake mess) Vigano needs to follow through, for the sake of clarity and the truth of it for all concerned, from Bergoglio and his retinue to you and I mere laymen.
He goes on to say that his suggestion (though he points out no one asked him) to Mr. Vigano, is to hold fast to his position, focusing on the validity (or rather, lack of validity) of Bergoglio’s election as a “Pope”. He also explains that nowadays a lot of people (unlike before when we were the only ones stating the seat of Peter was vacant) are claiming it is vacant with reference to Ratzinger having been the real Pope. And Don Ricossa here states he will not enter into the various theories and details that such “sedevacantists” hold, because it is not our problem/issue to do so, since the reality is that none of rhe Popes from Roncalli on have been legitimate. He specifies that NO ONE who has accepted the so-called cancer of Vatican II can ever be the legitimate authority of the Church, (since Vatican II is heresy and the Church, being infallible, obviously cannot promulgate heresy) and so while Bergoglio is not legitimate, neither was Ratzinger.
It would be therefore a massive error to allow yourself to be fooled into this error that “Ratzinger was the real Pope” which so many are now trying or thinking of following [Hi Ann, Andrea Tossato, and others].
Instead, Vigano should hold to his position that regardless of whether you consider the election of any specific “Pope” to have been valid or not, it becomes clear that the incumbent has NOT accepted the election validly because it is clear from his actions, that are habitual, repetitive and obvious, that he has not
In summary, Vigano must clarify his position, because while it appears that Vigano is rejecting the current usurper of the Roman See, at other times one is left perplexed he says, because in the same document where he rejects Bergoglio, he also says he aligns himself with Msgr. LeFebrve, original position, but Msgr. LeFebrve at the time communicated with all the clergy while telling them they should rebel against the (according to Lefebrve) legitimate Pope [which is why the SSPX position is nonsense, as I and many before me, including Father Chekada before his passing made abundantly clear]. But Vigano says he rejects the authority of Bergoglio, so he cannot claim he aligns with LeFebrve’s position. If he rejects Bergoglio, and thus all of Vatican II he should say and detail how and why, and the same if he does not. And while the man also refers to a book by Lefebrve that defends the validity of the Pope he disobeys, one can only ask: what is then, the real opinion of Mr. Vigano? [Personally I have already expressed that Vigano is not anyone to follow or put any trust in, as per Canon Law. No heretic shall have ecclesiastical authority over anyone even if his repentance were 100% genuine, and Vigano is far from fulfilling the idea his repentance is in fact genuine as far as I am concerned].
He reiterates once more that Vigano should be clear as to if he does reject Bergoglio as legitimate or not, and he should say so in direct, simple terms, as well as why he does if he does. So as to be perfectly and unambiguously clear.
As a third and final point, once clarity has been made, and if Vigano in fact refutes Vatican II and all its authors and not just the current impostor in the Vatican, but all those before him [back to Pious XII who was the last legitimate Pope] since, as already explained the Church cannot schism from itself and therefore anyone who does so from it cannot be part of the Church, then what to do? And here he uses the example of Montini who while pretending to talk about the “ongoing destruction of the Church” he was the very one destroying it by the most assiduous enactment of the 14 Vatican II documents replete with heresies he himself produced, along with the 2 produced by his predecessor Roncalli, leat Vigano be another one of these impostors speaking from both sides of their mouth, or, as the errors of those at the time of Montini who kept silent, waiting for Montini to die and hoping a successor would come along to put right all the things Montini had destroyed. And instead he says this was an illusion, aince the successors of Montini only continued with the destruction of the Church. [I must interject a note here that while I respect Do Ricossa and the other members of the IMBC, I cannot, in good conscience be as charitable to those timid and cowardly bishops, cardinals and priests who kept silent at the time of Montini. Logically they had no excuse for their silence, as neither did Vigano for over 50 years. It is only cowardice and self-serving reasons that kept their mouth shut, or, at best, a criminal level of ignorance inexcusable from any member of the clergy, that in secular terms is equivalent to the charge of criminal negligence. Nor, am I wrong, nor can I be criticised on this matter given that St. Luis stated it very clearly that a heretic making a heretical comment in Church should not be argued with, but rather run through with a sword. If a Saint of the Church made that point, mine surely must be valid too. Furthermore, while in no way being disrespectful to the valid clergy of the Church which remain and of which Don Ricossa is undoubtedly a member, it is the absolute duty of any Catholic to call out heresy wherever it is present, and the level and extent of dereliction of duty in this regard, of the clergy at the time is one I will never permit to happen again, as best I can, as ling as I live.]
Vigano, therefore, inasmuch as he is supposedly a “bishop” (and Don Ricossa specifically states he is not now going to get into the details concerning the validity of Vigano’s legitimacy as such, because the point is that Vigano has a huge “weight” within the “Church” and as such he has the opportunity (unlike the e average layman or even priest) to gather around him as many people as he can with his same perspective, and thus, in essence, create a much more widespread acknowledgements of the situation, while being very clear about the errors of Vatican II and therefore NOT recognising the authority of ANY of those who promulgated them, and if he did so this, there could be many improvements and who knows, perhaps also a beginning of the solution to the current situation.
He closes stating of course all this needs the help and grace of God and his own suggestions are provided in utmost humility.
Personally I find Don Ricossa to be too charitable and too humble, and while I absolutely understand why and respect his way and his position and his methodology, in good conscience, I can only maintain my position, which is that while all this CAN —and indeed I too very much hope does— improve things, and results in many more proper Catholics returning to the fold in good standing (that is, that of 1958 Sedevacantists) I will always hold the canonical position that once a heretic, even if the repentance is true, a heretic clergyman should spend the rest of his days in perpetual penance with authority over precisely no one.
Nor do I in any way begrudge Don Ricossa or any other valid clergy from holding positions like his. But even a porter was not a priest and yet he controlled the entry to the Church.
And at various times in history it was nobility, duty bound, that helped restore the legitimate Papacy to its throne, and not infrequently by direct and even violent action.
Well, as a Catholic, and even if only a minor noble (the lowest of the ranks: Patrician) it remains my family name’s duty to take as unpleasant and as direct and even offensive a stance as I deem necessary to protect the sanctity of the Church. So, even if Vigano were to truly repent, and even restore the Church, I will never formally recognise him as having any legitimate authority in the Catholic Church. And the same goes for every Novus Orcian “clergy”.
This “shocking development” is literally nothing new. This possible use of interferometry has been known for decades and been used since astronomy started to use radio and other wavelengths to produce better resolution images and data collection via interferometry.
The only difference is the extent, reach and consequences for the odd thorn in the side of the establishment. The counter to that is massive community response. What communities, if any, will begin to push back, and in what ways remains to be seen over the next decade or so.
I am confident that my specific choice of the Sedevacantist remnant is the way to go. The Amish or possibly so group of inter-related rednecks in the Appalachians will have their own ideas, and more power to all of them, but don’t be fooled, it is becoming absolutely clear that standing on the sidelines is not an option for anyone anymore. Whether this is Revelation Times or not is immaterial. What is certain is that as Jesus specifically stated, either you are with Him or you are against him.
Regardless of your personal beliefs, it is a sobering intellectual exercise to consider which side you take if in absolute terms Catholicism (Sedevacantism) is actually true and your options are only get with it or get against it. Try it. After all, it’s just a thought experiment right?
Gather your lonely eyes to your bright screen, young-one. Read in your solitary life, how we of the old world used to roam the lands without cell phones or any other means of communicating at a distance, and engaged in rituals you know nothing about.
You associate the acronym RPG with computer generated games you play by yourself, on a screen, perhaps at best talking over the internet with a few other strangers. Political correctness now being s draconian that the mere calling of another player a “faggot” will get you banned from the server in many cases. You have been robbed of your history, because it is always year zero in your dystopian world, and as you stuff more carcinogen-laced, nutrient-free, soy-based, fat-free, but lard-inducing pretend-food into your sickly, inflamed body, you are unaware of the origins of RPGs: Role-Playing Games.
They started all long, long, ago, in a land far, far away. And the grandfather of them all was Dungeons & Dragons. Back then, personal computers did not really exist yet, these were the early 1980s, and neither did mobile telephones. I first heard of these games as if they were some sort of illegal thing that only one kid that was year older than my friend and I had, and that you could not use alone. Nevertheless we went to his home and asked if we could take part, and he said yes.
So we gathered in his lounge, about 5 or six of us, my friend, my brother, the boy we had gone to who owned the books, and a couple of other guys, neither of whom we had met before. We were told to roll some six-sided dice in order to create the “stats” the attributes our characters would have. But even before we did this, we marvelled at the gems before us, because along with normal dice we had all seen before, were a bunch of see-through dice inscribed with numbers, but they were unusually shaped and looked like nothing we had ever seen before.
A tiny three-sided pyramid was a D-Four, a four-sided dice! A dodecahedron shaped one with pentagonal faces was a twelve-sided dice, a pointed one onto ends was a D-8 and there were a pair of D-10s of different colours, which when rolled together could generate a D-100; one die being the tens, and the other the units. And then of course, the one die that ruled them all: The D-Twenty. Where a result of 1 was a critical failure, and a result of 20 a critical success. And if you rolled two twenties in a row you then got to roll on the special critical success table with a D-100 and some of the results were awesome, like a decapitation of the master you were fighting instantly.
You needed to calculate what your armour class was, and depending on that, you would be more or less difficult to hit by the monsters, the referee, who presented the scenario and acted for all the monsters and NPCs (non-player characters) would recount the story and present you with situations the group had to deal with. The various classes were fighters, which could also have sub-classes like knights, paladins, and Rangers, and later, also the evil Anti-Paladin, you could be a magic user, who were weak and could not wear armour nor wield anything other than a staff or a dagger or maybe one other weak weapon, but if they survived long enough would eventually gain powerful spells like invisibility and fireball and so on, or be a cleric who could wear armour and use quite decent weapons, as well as cast spells granted to them by their deities, that were usually of a healing nature. No one wanted to be a druid because aside the no armour they also had crappy nature-spells and no one wanted to be a bard, because who wants to be some long-haired prancing faggot in tights who plays a banjo and sings when you could wield a bastard sword, be an expert dagger thrower and wear chain mail and a +2 shield that was also +4 protection versus Dragon breath? Thieves and assassins were untrustworthy but sometimes needed and Rangers were the coolest of all, because we had all read the Lord of the Rings. Paladins were supposed to be cool, but really were seen by most of us as real puritanical pains in the ass that wouldn’t let you flirt with the hot princess you just rescued before you delivered her, a bit disheveled, back to the king; though we did all take exception to the dwarf raping her dead body when the rescue didn’t go as well, and without even discussing it, every player attacked the now naked dwarf while he was molesting the corpse of the princess.
Yes, such were the things that sometimes happened between surviving pit traps and many other types of traps once that infamous book to traps came out, or the new monsters that were in the fiend folio and so on.
Then Traveller came out and now your character could die while you were generating him, even before he had started playing at all. If he did survive, he then had to contend with aliens, space pirates, crappy laser guns that needed a backpack if you were not from a high enough tech level, faulty hyperspace drives that would deposit you into unchartered space with no way back, leaky space suits, absolutely deadly space battles that would wreck your space-ship, and imperial customs searches that would tend to end up with your crew becoming fugitives or prisoners on some god-forsaken asteroid mining radioactive isotopes while you tried to find a way to escape.
And after that Top Secret was out, and you tried your best to take part in some secret agent stuff, though in our case that usually resulted in massive mayhem in downtown LA or whatever city we were supposed to be in, with police sirens, the military and the mafia all having running gun battles with disgustingly high civilian body counts, through shopping centres. Unless we were playing out The Thing in Antarctica with a few twists.
Some of us even played Killer, the very first Live Action Role Playing Game, that’s right, the real LARP. This was a game where each player got a dossier at random, which would be his or her “target” they would have to assassinate, and you could do this by say taping a little note to the bottom of their cup in school that said “poison” and if they drank from it without noticing the note, they were then “dead”. None of us had phones with cameras because they didn’t exist, but if you could take an actual photograph of them and have it developed, and you put a cross-hair which had to be strictly in the middle of the picture both vertically and horizontally, and the cross was on a vital area of the body, then you had successfully “sniped” them. Or you could shoot them with a water pistol and so on. Of course, doing this during class times could easily get you detention, but that just added a certain “frisson” to the game.
The point is that when you played these games, sometimes for days with little sleep between at your friends homes or your own home, especially during the school holidays, you would come across, or invent, scenarios that were sometimes frustrating, but more often than not hilarious, fun and which would make you all laugh. The action all took place in each other’s imaginations, and today when I tried to play such games with people in their twenties even, very often I could see the atrophied brain cells struggling to image the scenes described to them. They would draw a weapon and fire it in the middle of a shopping mall like some kind of psychopath, without any thought of realism. Our running gun battles in downtown San Francisco were the culmination of large bank robberies gone disastrously bad, they weren’t how we started out when some NPC questioned us!
You can see the lack of interest or curiosity when you describe a zombie attacking them or a dragon poking its head out of a cave. They don’t even ask if it’s fast or slow zombies. No curiosity about how decomposed and mechanically viable the zombies are (because it matters, is it a realistic zombie, or is it more a magical type of zombie?) No question about the colour of the dragon’s head (red ones breathe fire, but black ones acid, and so on). It’s sad really.
But aside the laughter and friendship, which are both very important, you learnt so many other things, how to have some kind of team-work going, how to figure out ways to solve problems, and have a ‘there must be a way” attitude no matter what the problem facing you was. We got so good at this that my brother and I even derailed official adventure models that had been professionally produced to result in the players ending up arrested and captured because the fight they faced would otherwise be too impossible to win. Except, using the pre-generated characters from those same modules, so without any special or indeed any change to them, we would defeat the small army of enemies placed against us.
That attitude, with the camaraderie has actually served us all well in real life. When some intractable problem comes up on the farm, my first thought is not “Aw, I need to purchase something, or get a professional here, or…” My first thought is “right, there has to be a way around this”. It’s just instinctive. And sure, maybe some of it comes from growing up in Africa and being a hunter from young age, or in the case of my friend who helped e adapt a part of the tractor, it was because as a farmer’s son, with little money, he too had to invent his own entertainment and make his own go-carts, and little weird wooden toys, not to mention small but functional bombs using fire-crackers and match-heads.
But the point is that your being glued to that phone or PC or TV, and not interacting with other humans in real life of more or less your own age, regardless of if you are 13 or 23 or 33, or even, sadly, 43, is just not good for you. It really isn’t.
And I have no way of making you experience the reality of what I am telling you other than writing it here, far away from you, so you can read it, alone, on your little screen, far away from me, but please believe me, it’s worth doing. it’s worth the embarrassing, scary idea of asking a couple of your friends if they want to try playing a few games to see if it’s fine enough.
And you need to convince them to stick with it for a few games because none of you know how to do it and you may be so socially awkward at first you will be too shy to play properly and spell out well how your characters act, or if you are the referee you will be scared to sound foolish when you describe a weird scenario. But that’s all part of it. And trust me, it doesn’t make you a nerd to play such games with a few friends. Just ask Vin Diesel. Or me, or the friends I had growing up. In fact, if anything, exercising our imaginations made us better at talking to people, coming up with funny things to say on the spur of the moment, or realise that man, as anxious as you might be, if you don’t get off your ass and go ask that pretty girl if she’ll go out with you, nothing is gonna happen, so you do get up and you do go and ask. And usually they turn out to say yes, but even if they say no… ah well… in real life you would have faced off against a red dragon, and probably got your face melted off you even if you survived; so what’s a little rejection. Eh. There are plenty of prettier girls to ask out for coffee. Or maybe she’ll change her mind if you quickly change tack and say: “Oh good! Phew! You’re really pretty, but I can’t STAND coffee drinkers. Awful people. I’m glad we got that out of the way, so, how about a tea instead? glass of water? Sparkling maybe? What’s that? with a slice of lemon? Still no, how about a fruit juice, because I’d really rather not involve any alcohol in our first date, I mean, sorry, but I just want to be safe, girls who make me drink alcohol invariably want to take advantage of me and I just can’t even!” She might still say no, but she’s almost guaranteed to smile a little, and if she really doesn’t, and still says no, and maybe is even rude about it… hey, at least you uncovered her true nature and made your saving through against illusion/charm spell that her appearance was trying to foster on you. Good riddance!
Anyway, you don’t HAVE to play in the flesh, pen and paper role-playing games with real people, and no one can make you, but I really, truly, hope you do. You really don’t know what you are missing out on if you don’t.
And yes I will recommend the game I created, and the ready made adventure module for it in case you are not sure where to start, because it’s funny, easy to learn on and still relatively “realistic” and you can use it to play almost any kind of scenario, and you would benefit from my years of playing RPGs in it because the design of it is both simple yet can be as nuanced or complex as you are comfortable with if you want to get a bit deeper with it. And you can get the digital version then in the best old-style tradition, print the PDF at home, or pay a bit more and get the full colour paperback from Amazon (link to the Amazon version is in the description at the links above). But you don’t have to play this game specifically. I just hope you play one, Any one.
It is truly difficult to transmit to other human beings how massively almost everything they believe is either complete nonsense or a lie.
I occasionally stray into the human pits of despair that are online “debates”. They are not really debates at all, they are more like the entertainment of watching someone club stupid people to death. It’s not exactly soul enriching or worth the time. Nevertheless, given my gushing optimism for the human race, being as I think only about 98% of it is composed of absolute morons, it is necessary for me to once in a while dip my foot in the festering sewer that is the average normie mindset.
Specifically I have watched a few clips of Andrew Wilson vivisecting the “brains” of a few feminists, only fans prostitutes, and related NPCs.
In truth I had to force myself to stomach more than a few minutes of the absolute IQ sapping radiant stupidity that comes out of these women’s mouths, because it is so absurd it literally could set your nerves on fire. I don’t know much about Andrew other than he says he is married has children and is an Eastern “Orthodox” Christian. He argues dialectically and has the patience of a saint despite being a schismatic and not exactly a genius since he stated on one clip I saw that the Catholic Church agrees with the Eastern “Orthodox” but they don’t agree with Catholicism. That’s obviously nonsensical, but after all, he is American and probably raised Protestant, so making the shift to Eastern Orthodox is certainly a step in the right direction.
That aside, and also putting aside the absolutely completely degenerate mindset of the whores on the whatever podcast, it needs to be realised that while the women’s mindset may be on the extreme end (one hopes), the reality is that a LOT of the issues they “believe” in, stem from the pernicious lies spread by feminism and their ever-present (((pushers of degeneracy))).
It is hard enough to realise how wrong most so-called “normal” positions are on DIE (Diversity, Inclusivity, and Equality) but when the bell curve on one side is shifted so far into literal Babylonian total depravity, it colours the rest of life and redshifts it all that much closer to Hell.
Now, I am no prude, I have enjoyed far more sex and sexual adventures and partners than the average man by at least an order of magnitude.
I certainly understand the allure of the forbidden, the temptation of the taboo, and the visceral pleasures of the flesh. I also know that I am unlike most men. The things I can (and have) survive, or go through, or walk past would cripple most men. It is not an exaggeration to say that, nor is it a boast. It is simply a fact.
Some guys are better chess players or smarter or more able to design a functioning rocket, I just happen to be better than most at surviving situations that most men may well find almost impossible to navigate. And it’s not even necessarily the function of great intelligence, it’s more akin to a talent or perhaps lucky survivor’s statistics, I mean, they say that death, divorce and moving home are the three most traumatic experiences a person can undergo. I was close to, and lost all four of my grandparents between my early teens and my 30s. I had two divorces, the last one included my first daughter too; and I have moved home 54 times and am now 54 years old. I also started my “career” a number of times, in different fields, starting from zero and with little or no money a number of times. I also have 5 children now and a Catholic (sedevacantist) which was unthinkable say 15 years ago. So perhaps it’s just a matter of if you throw enough guys into a meatgrinder life, at least a few survive and maybe they get better at it.
My point here is simply that when I discuss the issues facing men (or women for that matter) who want to be in a proper, life-long committed marriage to form a coherent and traditional nuclear family, I am not just whistling theoretical dixie. You could say I have definitely been in the trenches, the air-raids, the tank battles, the drone attacks, the psyops and the treachery that the modern day “battle of the sexes” and all the absolute bullshit that is shovelled into people’s heads about men and women and their roles in society that goes with it.
Nor have I come through it unscathed. No one goes through that stuff without taking body shots, but the point is that I always had this intrinsic belief that no matter how much you damage me, if I am still alive, I will get up again at some point. Maybe I’ll be crippled, maybe I won’t be able to run or fight as well, but I will get up. And I will not stop.
That mindset has allowed me to walk through valleys and mountains of deceit, lies, intentional misinformation, propaganda, and false narratives that most human beings are not even aware are being actively perpetrated on them.
And after all that, these are the simple, basic, truths I have concluded make life MOST worthwhile to live, in no particular order:
Be a MAN. Honour your word and give it out as rarely as possible and only if you really must. Let your yes be yes and your no be no.
God is real and he is the Catholic God, and the One True Church is the Catholic Church. The Novus Ordo “Church” is a Satanic lie and should be rejected even harder than the poor ignorant Protestant 40,000 denominations of nonsense. Catholicism describes objective reality bette than any other system or philosophy, period.
The most important thing you can do in this life is be a good husband and a good father and lead your woman to having the opportunity of being a good wife and good mother. Within this context, the following things are true:
School is a damaging prison for children and unnatural for the most part. If at all possible educate them yourself (assuming you have at least the basic tools and intellect for doing so). If not immediately possible try to enrol them in the most rural, small, ethnically similar school possible.
Going to work out of the home and letting your wife do the same so your children can be raised by strangers is unnatural and not good. Your work should be such you can show it to your children and they can learn from it if possible, but in any case, you should be present in their daily life.
Your wife should be the nurturer and shelter for your children from your disciplining and rules laying down.
Rules of life with regard to how to treat others, each other and family should generally be laid down by the father, and be in agreement by the mother.
A little corporal punishment correctly administered goes a very long way towards instilling discipline and respect and becomes unnecessary for the most part once the child has reached the age of reason.
For the best raising of children, the mother should make it clear the father is the most important person in the house, and the father should make it clear the mother is the most important person to him as far as respect and deference of the children is concerned, but both parents should also be clear in their action and thought and spirit that the lives of their children are more important than their own or even each other’s lives.
Children are perfectly logical, don’t lie to them and explain things calmly and gradually and truthfully and they will astonish you with the level of comprehension they have.
Do not ignore your children. If one of them is upset find out why and deal with it. If they are being a spoilt brat, punish them or educate them as required, but do not let things fester. Mental torture that lasts long is more damaging and less educational than a spanked arse in just proportion.
Justice above Law.
Courage is more important than intelligence, imagination more than knowledge, and faith more than wisdom.
There is no Love without Justice and there is no Justice without Love.
Marriage is for life and should be in Church and almost no one today is equipped to make it a truly life-long commitment. Finding a woman that understands this and is willing to fight for it too is exceedingly difficult, and may not in fact exist in the wild, and you may have to educate, shape, and lead them to this truth. It is particularly hard to get women to understand this because marriage involves sacrifice and the general solipsism and biological selfishness of women has been weaponised against them by Feminism since the early 1960s without any respite. However, it is not impossible. The Truth will out, but it takes humility for a woman to accept this reality, even when it smacks them in the face repeatedly in life.
Reject any woman that has any kind of entrenched feminist ideals in her brain. Simply do not even bother wasting time with them. Even if you are a hedonist secularist without any religion, even just using them for a one-night stand is very often more trouble and riskier than the simple, secular pleasure, of sex for a night or a couple of nights at most is worth. And entertaining any kind of relationship with such a creature is demonstrably going to be more damaging to your life than probably trying to sleep with a venomous snake in your bed for the rest of your days.
Most religious people are liars and/or ignorants who have no idea what the basic tenets of their religion are, but you should absolutely judge them and treat them as if they did know.
Most humans are driven by their emotions and the lies they have bought into. Study Professor Cipolla’s theorem and learn it well, so that you might be fortified against the reality facing you.
Antigravity technology exists and was re-discovered officially by Thomas Townsend Brown first, then developed much further by the Nazis during WWII and eventually by the US Naval Research Laboratories.
Yes, the financial system is essentially controlled by the Rothschild family and a few others, and yes, they do want to enslave the rest of humanity, and yes, many of them are honest-to-God Satan worshippers. Regardless of whether you believe in the devil or not, they do. Regulate yourself accordingly.
Do not be too afraid to speak your mind. Of course, time and place, the truth can and will get you killed at times, so exercise some discernment, but do not keep quiet in the face of any of Clown World agendas. They are an insane and unhinged minority, let them know they need to get back under the rocks from which they crawled out of and be silent.
Logic, reason and objective reality are important and real things. Learn them.
Free Speech is an idiotic and deluded idea that has never, and will never, exist as long as humanity exists. Realise this truth, even if you are American and have been brainwashed into believing such a thing exists or ever did. Honestly, actual unicorns are more likely to have existed than this absolute fiction.
The IQ Gap is real and having one in your marriage is not a good thing. try to find a woman that is at least within 30 IQ points of you at most. Especially if you are relatively high IQ.
You certainly don’t HAVE to take my advice on life. No one is forcing you to, certainly, but, I would at least consider the words of a man that had survived multiple combat situations I might find myself in. Or who managed to find a way to reconcile the world with a lasting marriage and creation of a family, or who managed to play the system into accumulating enough wealth to leave a good legacy for his family. We all have choices to make as to how we choose to live, die and what we want to leave behind, if anything. there are many more bullet points, but this is about what I can do in one post. If you want more detailed information concerning relationships, Caveman Theory is there for it.
It is truly difficult to transmit to other human beings how massively almost everything they believe is either complete nonsense or a lie.
I occasionally stray into the human pits of despair that are online “debates”. They are not really debates at all, they are more like the entertainment of watching someone club stupid people to death. It’s not exactly soul enriching or worth the time. Nevertheless, given my gushing optimism for the human race, being as I think only about 98% of it is composed of absolute morons, it is necessary for me to once in a while dip my foot in the festering sewer that is the average normie mindset.
Specifically I have watched a few clips of Andrew Wilson vivisecting the “brains” of a few feminists, only fans prostitutes and related NPCs.
In truth I had to force myself to stomach more than a few minutes of the absolute IQ sapping radiant stupidity that comes out of these women’s mouths, because it is so absurd it literally could set your nerves on fire. I don’t know much about Andrew other than he says he is married has children and is an Eastern “Orthodox” Christian. He argues dialectically and has the patience of a saint despite being a schismatic and not exactly a genius since he stated on one clip I saw that the Catholic Church agrees with the Eastern “Orthodox” but they don’t agree with Catholicism. That’s obviously nonsensical, but after all, he is American and probably raised Protestant, so making the shift to Eastern Orthodox is certainly a step in the right direction.
That aside, and also putting aside the absolutely completely degenerate mindset of the whores on the whatever podcast, it needs to be realised that while the women’s mindset may be on the extreme end (one hopes), the reality is that a LOT of the issues they “believe” in, stem from the pernicious lies spread by feminism and their ever-present (((pushers of degeneracy))).
It is hard enough to realise how wrong most so-called “normal” positions are on DIE (Diversity, Inclusivity, and Equality) but when the bell curve on one side is shifted so far into literal Babylonian total depravity, it colours the rest of life and redshifts it all that much closer to Hell.
Now, I am no prude, I have enjoyed far more sex and sexual adventures and partners than the average man by at least an order of magnitude.
I certainly understand the allure of the forbidden, the temptation of the taboo, and the visceral pleasures of the flesh. I also know that I am unlike most men. The things I can (and have) survive, or go through, or walk past would cripple most men. It is not an exaggeration to say that, nor is it a boast. It is simply a fact. Some guys are better chess players or smarter or more able ro design a functioning rocket, I just happen to be really capable at both inserting myself into very weird/freaky/dangerous situations and coming back out of them. Not necessarily unscathed, but at least not crippled either. Besides, you know that old saying, scars heal, and chick dig them.
My point here is just that what advice or strategies or tactics I could give would for the most part not be useful, and in fact would most likely be damaging for most people, so I try to refrain from writing for you the “how to survive the Demonic aspect of humanity as you delve in areas of Hell where even demons fear to tread”.
It would cause more harm than good.
But I do hope that you will at least consider my stories and conclusions. You don’t have to put your hand on a hot plate if someone tells you about it and what happens when you do.
So, even if I assume it will fall on deaf ears, please, try to consider the following facets of what I can tell you is the truth based on my over half a century on this Earth.
For Women
If you’re a virgin or have a low(ish) body count of say 3 or less, KEEP IT THERE.
And instead of telling you the usual things about religion etc, I’ll tell you about the actual, undeniable, brain science related to why.
I don’t expect any of you women that might read this post to do so, but just in case there is a freaky 130 IQ slightly autistic girl that wants the data, read Richard Semon’s The Mneme, and Mapping the Mind by Rita Carter, and read my own post on how the human mind works too. That will give you the basics. But since 99.999999% of you will not read those works, allow me to give you the cliff notes. Every time you orgasm and/or have sex with a man your brain literally creates neural pathways towards creating a pair-bonding experience that in nature is supposed to be very strong and lasting (for both of you but much less so for men, due to differences in biology). These pathways are powerful and get deeper and more meaningful over time. They literally make valleys in your brain where the neurones interact with each other (it’s why “smooth-brain” is an insult denoting absolute stupidity because a brain with no valleys literally has no neurones interacting very much at all). Think of it as inscribing an old style vinyl record. The more you play that song (bang that guy) the deeper and more rich and textured will be the song.
If on the other hand you have a new song try to re-write over the last song every couple of weeks, pretty soon it’s all just white noise and all you get is the very temporary high of the actual orgasm or “new” body experience. Guess what this does to your ability to EVER pair bond with a man to have a family, and children and a stable existence. It literally kills it. And no, you are NOT different. No one is. It’s literally how the human wetware works. Those onlyfans whores who suck dicks on camera for cash? Yeah, ASIDE from no man really wanting to ever wife up someone like that, even if they did, you will not be able to stay. You literally would not be able to commit and stick it out. Like a junkie, even if it was fillet mignon put before you, you would find some excuse to go get your fix and then get back to eating second-hand McDs from trash cans.
If you’re a middling slut say 4-8 body count.
Read the above. Make better choices and try and take your time in selecting the next man (see below) and try to indeed make it your last one. It will take conscious effort. You will need to overlook his flaws (we all have them) and acknowledge your own too (much, much, harder for women to do). You need to know marriage is about making and raising children together, and in that respect, you should absolutely fixate into your head that marriage is for life. Your next man is to be the father of your children. And make sure he knows that is what you are in the market for, and realise if you pocked the wrong guy… tough titties. It’s FOR LIFE. That is the WHOLE and ONLY point of marriage.
If you just want to ride dicks until you get too old and wrinkly to get any, and will die alone and have been partially eaten by your cats by the time the stench of your corpse attracts enough attention to be discovered, then, by all means, carry on. Just don’t bitch about the consequences down the line. And there is no reason to get married at all in this case.
If you’re an advanced slut 9-15 body count.
As above, but you’re already at a threshold of past recovery. Most women with this level of body count will struggle to remain in a marriage even when kids are involved. The typical female solipsism will almost certainly make them want to “find themselves” and “recover their joy” and “eat, pray, fuck (oh sorry, they’ll call it “love” but it’s not) and they will just “want to be happy”. If you’re one of these women, you need to take a ling self-appraising look in the mirror and at the very least become conscious of the neural scratchings you have all over your brains and what they are doing to you and your relationship/s now and will do to you in the future.
If you’re a complete slut with a body count of 16-30.
Chances are you’re unrecoverable and your chances of a happy family life are slim. Divorce and heartache are the most probable outcomes.
The same lessons as above apply. How you deal with it from here on is up to you.
If you’re a City-Girl/nymphomaniac/amateur whore (you don’t charge hard cash because it didn’t enter your mind)/borderliner/habitual drunken slut/etc with a bodycount 30+
Assuming no hard drugs, alcoholism, childhood sexual abuse, or other serious daddy issues are involved, you are probably a highly sexed woman with an actual nymphomaniac trend. In general though, at least some, and usually more than a couple if not all four things are involved. You probably need a time alone in some remote place to introspect and rebalance. Your neural pathways are a scrambled mess, but with almost superhuman like determination, you could write your own path. It’s not anything most humans ever do. But short of some miraculous thing happening to you, the chances of a successful family life are small to none.
Professional Sluts: Body count up to and over 100.
Whether these are actual prostitutes or just really highly sexed women, and regardless of the reason why —not because it’s not important, context always makes a difference— the reality is that their pair-bonding ability is non-existent. In the case of professional whores who charge cash for sex they may well have a body-count of thousands. And IF they get past the seeing men as simply wallets with legs (which is hard for most of them to do) and IF they somehow conclude they would like to be with someone permanently and into old age (rarely do they want any, or at least, any more children), they may well have a more rational and considered approach to it and paradoxically, because their pair-bonding capacity has been all but completely cauterised, they will be more able to observe more objectively what is there and thus, potentially at least, make not terrible choices. They might actually pick decent enough men to spend the rest of their days with. However, their ability to do so will be rooted in brutal practicality that may feel rather cold and calculating, and as such, not be exactly enticing for a man to bond with. On the other hand, such a woman, IF she decides she wants to be in a permanent relationship, may well go the distance. The amateurs (party girls who just liked the dick a lot, and/or were drunks or junkies or whatever) are actually more of a train-wreck likelihood for a permanent relationship than professional prostitutes.
This is basically playing Russian roulette with five chambers loaded. At best. Most times it’s like playing Russian roulette with a semi-auto pistol.
As for the women this applies to. I don’t know what to tell you ladies… you’re seriously broken. All I know is God loves you and that sometimes, if you really ask, He really does show you the way.
For Men
The ability of a male to pair bond is also affected by multiple partners, but not as much or as deeply as that of a woman. That’s just biology. A horn dog guy is far more likely to cheat on a woman he decides to settle with than leave her. Which is why, historically, in many cultures, the odd affair here and there was more or less tolerated and occasionally even the woman could have one (if with far less frequency and with far more social backlash if it became public) and the general attitude was to pretend it didn’t happen and continue the relationship. That dynamic is essentially not prevalent anymore and is instead switching to more generally dysgenic situations like open relationships where one or both partners also have sex with other people from time to time. I am here, referring primarily to the “first world” or the West, or if you prefer, the predominantly caucasian part of the planet, which is just under 10% or so of the global population. Most African, Indian, and Chinese and Arabic relationships still follow their cultural traditions and will continue to do so for some time yet. The overall result of this is that while birthrates in the West of caucasians continue to drop, the birth rates of non caucasians will continue to stay the same or drop considerably less than those. The eventual result will either be a hardening of racial intermixing by the caucasians or eventual racial extinction as eventually the caucasian side vets mixed into the other races to become a remnant only in DNA, perhaps like Neanderthals did.
My prediction is that both things will happen, and if antigravity capable space travel becomes more prevalent than os admitted to today, the eventual colonisation of other planets will have been done primarily by the people who invented and perfected the technology, which essentially means caucasians.
That is a side issue, but it explains the consequences for both the planet and those of caucasoid origin, for the destruction of the traditional family unit as caucasians have had it for several millennia.
Personally I all for preserving every type of cultural and ethnic type that is either not harmful to others directly, or is segregated into its own area and kept there where it is. So for example, I am entirely for leaving the people of Sentinel Island alone as they clearly wish to be, for Arabs not to have Catholic Churches or Jewish Synagogues on their land and so on, but I am also for there being no mosques or synagogues on Catholic lands and so on.
Of course, my preferences have nothing to do with the natural way things unfold (absent my making my preferences count, that is) and the likelihood of the traditions of my people (the Venetians) disappearing are real if we don’t organise and work against that.
As a man, this should concern you. And if it does, and you think about it, it becomes obvious that the root of the issue is first of all the nuclear family, and secondly, that that was held together really well by above all Catholicism. Not some generic “christianity” which permitted secularism and all its Satanry to infiltrate, including Novus Ordo “Catholicism”, but rather, full blown Catholicism which currently resides only in sedevacantists.
Once you have reached the intellectual, objective, studied, reasoned, position that the nuclear family and sedevacantism are both true and necessary for civilisation, the next step is to simply wife up and community up.
There are enough people already doing this in my immediate sphere of influence that I am aware of, which is quite a bit smaller than the sphere of influence my books and videos have created so far, that I am confident that there will, indeed be enclaves of, or city states of, proper Catholics. I predicted this way back in 2014 and it’s proving to be slowly starting to happen on a general level amongst the young, even if they often lack the details. Even so, it is enough to see there is a shift happening. And paradoxically, the harder the (((powers that be))) try to swing against it, the more zealously Catholic they become. It’s truly interesting to observe, but with that preamble, let us look at your position vis a vis the women described above:
For younger men (and all men in general)
It is invariably easier and more beneficial for you and more likely to succeed if you pick a woman with as low a body count as possible that is wither already on the right path with respect to Catholicism, or is at least willing to be led there. The leading is important and should never be direct and authoritarian. This generally comes across as rigid, is often the left-over puritanical Calvinist zeitgeist of the fake religion of Protestant binary thinking and is completely counter-productive.
Instead YOU be as good a Catholic as you can be and explain your position with logic, reason, and charity and empathy, while not making ultimatums or demands that are immediately final before you really understand the consequences of you doing that, which in the main will at minimum be the dissolution of your relationship. A woman that loves and respects her man will gradually follow his example as long as he is coherent with himself and reliable to her.
I am personally aware of maybe only one woman that started out as sedevacantist among those couples that got together after coming across my work, but all the others converted to it in due course. And happily so, because there was no imposition.
Similarly, it has been shown that if the father attends church, the children are likely to do so later in life to an order of magnitude more than if only the mother does so.
Women and children naturally want and feel good to follow the way of a man that behaves like a good father and husband. It is basically how nature and God has built us. Every son wants to look up to his father, every girl wants to do so as well, every wife too. And every man wants to look at his wife and children and feel overjoyed grace at their love of him, as well as the urge to do his absolute best for them because of it.
Your best bet for this is to start with selecting a woman that has her neurology as close to this as possible. Body-count is the quickest and most reliable data point on this.
For older or more experiences men
If you’ve been around the block a few times yourself, your ability to negate some of the worst aspects of hypergamy and solipsism in a woman may let you select some that are higher in the slut-o-meter category, but:
It will STILL be hellish hard, and,
You STILL need to have a sense of your initial selection that has a baseline of possibility
That last point means that while it is possible that an ex-prostitute, ex-junkie, or current actual nymphomaniac ends up making a really excellent wife for someone, the chances of it are vanishingly small, to the point that it makes miracles like walking on water almost pedestrian by comparison. And that’s just the first half of it. The second half of it is that even if such a woman has the potential, the likelihood that it is you specifically that will activate it are, again, in the miraculous side of things. In general, such a woman might come to the right way of being, only when matched with something like an ex-pimp/serial killer that has had a personal experience of God that has re-written his DNA.
Or as my grandmothers used to say, “God makes them and then pairs them up.” Meaning every freak probably has its counterpart out there. But that is not a strategy for finding a wife and making a good family. Don’t try for that possibility and don’t look for it.
It does not work from intention, and only happens to a very few random people by the Grace of God alone. Their road is not one anyone should try and emulate, ever. Please understand that.
The best advice for a man is for him, regardless of age, to steep himself as deeply as he can in Catholicism proper. To understand that EVERYTHING that calls itself Catholic after 1958 that does not explicitly reject all the fake Popes from Roncalli on and reject all the “priests” and “bishops” who do not specifically and clearly reject Vatican II and its fake Popes, is NOT Catholic at all.
My books, BELIEVE! and Reclaiming the Catholic Church provide concise and detailed explanations of Catholicism complete with many references you can verify for yourself, and have helped many people understand the magnitude of the absolute lie and lies we have been steeped in from birth, so they may be of use to you too.
But whether you buy my books or not, I hope you study the points I am making here. If you do so honestly, eventually, you too will join us, because in the end there are only two sides, and no one gets to sit on the fence forever.
Conclusions
If you have read this far, male or female, married or not, Catholic or not, if you bother to take the time to honestly investigate what I discuss here, I think it will profit you regardless of where you end up. At a minimum, you should be able to conclude that the nuclear family is ultimately the core of life, and that as such there is a philosophy of it that marries up naturally with reality.
Investigating honestly what philosophy that is that most reflects reality as we find it, and that is best able to predict things because it is in fact based on how reality really operates, if you are objective and honest, in the end, there is no way around it, you will see that Catholicism really is that Way.
And I certainly don’t expect you to take my word for it. I just hope you will look, that is all it will take; God will do the rest. As long as you don’t actively reject His Graces, (which we all can do, having the free will to choose poorly) then you will come to the Truth eventually.
UPDATE: This was posted yesterday and as I was surprised at the low engagement I came to look at it and the post had been deleted. Luckily we are prepared for such things and it is now restored, but it is interesting to note that it definitely was published yesterday as several people I contacted had in fact read it. What do you know, I must be over the target again. And if I get cancelled here, not to worry, we have prepared for such events if they happen.
Vox’s most recent post has helped me coagulate the necessary elements of communication that I have been obviously missing —those troublesome 30 IQ point bridges of communication— in order to transmit to the average person concepts that should be absolutely obvious to everyone, at least as far as I am concerned, but that are apparently completely opaque to the average person.
This has been so much so an issue that throughout my life I am continuously… not exactly surprised, but something similar to it, perhaps the right word is repeatedlydisappointed in the average human response to various events and specifically to events of a wide-ranging, global nature.
I have lived long enough that it is not a surprise, and I concluded long ago that the average person is a moron that has quite literally not a single original thought in his entire lifetime, being driven by the nonsense he sees on TV or that the media in general presents as a narrative.
This infects everything and creates a reality that is many orders of magnitude uglier, stupider, more boring, irrelevant and inconsequential in every respect than it needs to be.
And I mean everything. I am not taking about merely technological advancements that would mean we could already be travelling amongst the stars, not just between the moons and planets of out solar system (and no, I do mot mean in theory, I mean in practice, the technology not only existed but was even already developed decades ago, and that’s before we even bring antigravity technology into it — see The Face on Mars for further details). No, I am literally referring to everything in your life, from the type of interaction you have instead of what it could be, with your child, your wife or even your pet or a walk in nature, to the experience of beauty, love and intimacy you could have for everyone and everything around you, as well as the practical, real world, effective applications of reality based technologies and methodologies that could quite realistically cure almost every ailment we know of and bring humanity to live on other planets.
I know, it sounds like utopia and a pipe-dream. I KNOW how it sounds, but what have you got to lose except a few minutes reading this, and what if I am right? Strange as it seems, what if I can show you just how twisted and insane and stupid what you think is the limit of how things are is?
And what if you spread this around and other people get it too? Because I tell you right now that from all I know about resonance and its effects, it takes approximately only 1/1000 of a population, whether of living beings or of things like photons, to resonate at the same frequency, after which a tipping point is reached and the rest of the population (of living beings or photons) all “convert” to the same frequency and you get an effect that is so unexpected, so miraculous that it completely shatters the previous paradigm.
Simple light becomes a laser that cuts through steel. A population of frogs all suddenly learn a skill none of them previously even had. A small vibration becomes an earthquake. And I am not even convinced we need 1/1000 of the entire world’s population, which given we are about 8 billion now would mean 8,000,000 people. And Eight million people is not that many. There are plenty of YouTubers with many more followers than that. So this article could easily spread through the aether and change the world. The ideas I will present here are certainly not beyond anyone’s grasp in and of themselves. The difficulty is not in understanding or even testing and realising the truth of any one of its components or even a few of them. The greatest difficulty is in understanding (and verifying if necessary so it is real knowledge, not merely a theory held for a few minutes only to be discarded because it makes us feel uncomfortable) each part of the whole theory, each component, and then holding them, or putting them, all together into one coherent whole and seeing how each part affects the others and causes the inevitable, inescapable, resonating effect that no force can stop. No human force or even demonic force if you believe in such things.
Because unexpected as it may be, while each component part does not in itself necessarily present as part of a greater and more wholesome whole —in fact, some parts may even appear or even be, brutal, separate and “ugly” in and of themselves— when joined and infused with the other parts they too change and morph into something altogether wholesome and truly a harmonious whole.
So, allow me then to present first each component part of this larger idea. Each subset is simple, easy for anyone to understand and verify for themselves, you will not have any trouble here. The second half of each of these steps is to show you how that very simple and obvious truth was perverted and changed to the point that you yourself, while agreeing with the obvious point later come to think of it more in terms of “yes, but…(insert insurmountable objection here)” instead of “yes, that’s true and obvious and not a problem or difficult to put in practice.”
The third step is the big one, and that is to show you that if you can keep the simple and obvious true concepts in mind all together and link them, you come up with a system of behaviour for yourself and humanity at large too, that produces the “miraculous” conditions I mentioned above. The beauty of this is that even if you are the only one to do it, your own life will immeasurably improve in every way. It will not be the “miraculous” fly to the stars version it would be if at least 1/1000 of the planet gets it and acts it too, bit it will still kick the crap out of whatever your life is like now. Big claim? Sure. Real? Absolutely. Demonstrable? Provable? Yes, also absolutely. All you need to do is apply the concepts I will list below and understand how and why they have been perverted, and reject the perverted version and apply the original, true and obvious aspect together with all the other true and obvious and original aspects. Just doing that, I guarantee you, will absolutely change your life for the better.
And to be clear, better does not necessarily mean easier. Easy is a mutable concept and you may want to remember that old meme, that lists a bunch of things that are hard, and their opposite also being hard, and ultimately coming down to you choosing your hard.
For example, learning to read is hard. Being illiterate is hard. Choose your hard.
Being healthy is hard. Being unhealthy is hard. Choose your hard.
So I warn you now that like everything else in life, this too is like that. Reading all of this and putting it into practice is not easy. Continuing not to do it is far worse. So, choose your hard.
Right then, to the concepts first and later to how they have been perverted.
The Simple, Basic, Truths, and their Inversions
SIMPLE TRUTH
PERVERTED INVERSION
1. Physical Force Trumps everything else.
Regardless of if it’s money, gold, status, influence, etcetera, when push comes to shove, physical violence is, always has been, and always will be, the final arbiter of any conflict resolution.
.
Corollary to 1.
Eventually, anything important enough, will come down to physical violence.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2. Objective reality exists
It doesn’t matter if you believe it or not, if you like it or not, if you understand it or not, or even if you are ABLE to understand it or not. Every single experience of life we have confirms again and again and again that objective reality exists and is absolutely the same for everyone in the Universe. Your delusion that you are living in a dream, can fly, have your own “truth” or anyone else does, is absolute nonsense and has zero impact on reality, other than causing harm to yourself and anyone else stupid enough to believe such lies. You can easily disprove this by trying to flap your arms to fly off the fifth floor of any convenient building, thus removing your own delusion, as well as the negative effects of it for anyone else inclined to listen to your nonsense.
.
.
.
3. Equality has never existed and never will. this is an objective aspect of reality.
Men and women are intrinsically different. Each man is different form every other man and groups of people of a certain ethnicity, culture or religion differ from each other in massive ways. While philosophically no one person has more of a “right” to life or is even necessarily “superior” in every respect (because the superiority depends on what you are measuring) only a mentally deranged person is unwilling to admit these differences, and similarly, only a coward is unwilling to admit that they affect much of life. People of differing origins, cultures and religions, should, as a general rule, stick to their own kind for the most peaceful and best results. Diversity and proximity inevitably results in conflict and conflict eventually leads to violence (see rule 1 above). The only sensible approach in life is to be aware of the differences, accept them, evaluate them on their own merits and act appropriately in the context within which this all takes place. Broadly speaking, each person should generally stay in their own nation, marry and reproduce with his or her own kind and people, and respect any different cultures or nations when visiting them. Genetic assimilation is not really possible in periods that relate to individual human lifetimes, and generally are not a good idea. While regulating these things with laws is seen as cruel and inhumane, there isa path to it that is acceptable. Reducing permanent immigration by foreigners to a small percentage in each case, using work-permits or temporary work visas, being tough on illegal immigration and so on is all perfectly humane and sensible without affecting any but a small percentage of people. The exception should never govern the rule.
4. Everything you do and say has consequences. Always did, and always will.
“Free Speech” is a completely Freemasonic idea that was perpetrated and could only be believed by possibly the most gullible population on Earth: Americans. It has never existed in the entirety of human history and never will even millennia from now. It is an idea so stupid that I was aware of this even as a young teenager, immediately upon the first time I came across the ridiculous concept.
5. Almost all political systems devolve into a struggle for the levers of power by those implementing the systems. Secular system absent a divine doctrine do so faster by orders of magnitude.
The only partial bulwark agains this has historically been been adherence to religious principles that unfortunately do need to be enforced and invariably the enforcers tend to become corrupt over time and correction becomes required. A system that recognises this and has produced the best results and been tested over many centuries, and has so far produced the best results for humanity has ever seen has been Catholic Christianity. At least until it was infiltrated (which took centuries) and perverted and twisted to produce the fake Novus Orco inversion of it. The only remnant of it being the fast-growing Sedevacantist (or unchanged and original version of) Catholicism. A corollary to this may have been the methodology invented and adopted by the Venetians to elect a Doge. No other system on Earth was as concerned with Justice as Catholicism. While other relatively stable systems did exist (Shintoism under Feudal Japan, Taoism under Imperial China, Traditional beliefs under the iron-fisted empire of Genghis Khan, the Rule of Imperial Rome prior to Christianity, Spartan culture, and others) none of them lasted anywhere near as long as Catholicism, which, though much reduced, still exists, against all odds, and has risen again and again throughout history, despite events that should have snuffed it out (the Arian heresy, the Roman Empire’s persecution of it, the infiltration of it by Satanists (Freemasons), the destruction of the protecting arm of the Church (the Royal houses of Europe)). Furthermore, it continues to exist and once again is growing. It is also single-handedly responsible for the largest increase in Justice, Beauty and the behaving with Virtues (Courage, Temperance, Justice, Fortitude, Loyalty, Honour, and so on) than any other religion, ideology or philosophy in the entire known history of Humanity.
The Catholics are the only people to originally ban Usury and recognise the Christ-Killers (Jews) as needing special prayers for their salvation, since they had chosen to be generationally guilty for the crucifixion of Christ.
6. Jews do NOT have the same belief system or veneration of the same virtues we have.
They simply believe they are the Chosen people, the only ones with real souls and everyone else is a beast of burden designed to serve them and no perpetration against them, including murder is a crime in their belief system. Present day Judaism is Talmudic and the laws of the Talmud are absolutely clear that anyone not a Jews is at best a beast of burden for the Jew to exploit.
Their ejection from some 110 countries or more is the direct result of their behaviours towards the host nations, and not a coincidence based on irrational hatred of Jews for no reason.
The Talmud specifically states any crime including murder of non-Jews is not a crime and that having sex with children under the age of three is also not a crime, along with many other behaviours that are intolerable to normal people being perfectly acceptable when perpetrated on non-Jews.
The BIS (Bank for international Settlement) is a giant superbank that yes, does control the finances of the entire planet and is run by the Jewish Rothschild family among others, though under a hidden veil of secrecy for the most part.
1. Violence is wrong, evil and never the answer.
From “toxic masculinity” to “words can never hurt you” to jailing people for self-defence or even defence of others, we have all, globally, been trained to believe violence is ALWAYS wrong. This is, of course, and absolute lie.
Corollary inversion to 1.
Certain classes of people/crimes should NEVER be responded to with violence. Women, homosexuals, the criminally insane, or whatever. This is, of course, just a furthering of the lie. If a black, handicapped lesbian is about to stab my child, you can bet your ass I would happily turn her head into a pink cloud and sleep like a baby, consequences be damned even in current clown world. In a sane world, of course, such an event would just be followed by the crowd giving a gentle golf clap of approval.
.
2. Everyone has their own “truth”
A man can be a woman, women can be men, men can get pregnant, everyone is equal but black/brown/off-white people are oppressed, homosexuality is perfectly normal, natural and to be celebrated, “adopting” babies from surrogate mothers to fulfil homosexual fantasies of having a “family” is not child trafficking and a perversion of the very essence of human nature. Pedophiles are just normal people and we should all accommodate them because age is just a number, sex with children is fine as long as the child “consents”. The objective statistics on child sexual abuse by homosexuals, higher incidence of suicide by sexually mutilated people undergoing a “sex change” and the incidence of violence in lesbian “marriages” are all just coincidences or part of a vast right-wing conspiracy, as Hillary Clinton would put it. I could add about 17,000 other insane nonsense to this list. You get the idea.
3. There is only one race, the Human race.
And everyone is equal. Except if they are white, then they are more racist, evil, oppressive and undeserving than anyone else. Racism can only be done by whites. George Floyd was a saint murdered by a racist policeman and no factual proof that he died of a heart seizure induced from a fentanyl overdose and that he was a violent criminal that threatened and injured a pregnant woman, among other felonies should ever be brought up. Systemic oppression, internalised misogyny, and internalised racism are real things and don’t you dare say otherwise. The fact that an Australian Aborigine and a Swedish woman look about as different as any other subspecies of creature might, and also have measurably different cognitive capacities and drastically different approaches to everything from problem-solving to adequate medical care or food consumption is not to be noticed. The jews are also absolutely never, ever, ever, the bad guys. they are victims and always will be, even when they genocide other peoples. Also, stop noticing it.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
4. Free Speech is the best and truest way for a “democracy” to work.
This lie was invented simply so the Freemasons could ignore blasphemy laws to begin with and gradually every other moral, ethical and decent concept of behaviour.
.
.
.
.
5. God is dead and Science and Secularist Atheism is the only sensible way forward. Please ignore the 100 million dead bodies this ideology in its various forms has produced in just the last 100 years or so. Above all, Catholicism is the worst of all, and filled with dirty pedophiles (ignore the fact that they are known as poor victims called Minor-Attracted-Persons when not part of “Catholicism”. Further ignore that such people were burnt at the stake in higher numbers than any other class of perpetrator during the Spanish and Portuguese inquisitions and were never tolerated by the Catholic Church prior to the Vatican II inversion and the first of the current fake Popes from 1958 to today). Every other religious belief is also not ideal, but they are ALL, without exception, better than Catholicism. Catholicism is the absolute worst. It is also the only religion that is specifically “antisemitic”. Well, originally anyway, the Novus Ordo has finally realised the Jews are like our older brothers and we should respect and revere them.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
6. Jews are persecuted innocents that can’t help being so successful in so many spheres of life because they are just smarter and more hard-working than everyone else.
Their success has nothing to do with nepotism, bribery, blackmail, underhand financial behaviours, usury, murder, or any other immoral tactic. It is also illegal and antisemitic, to notice that they have a higher incidence of child sexual abuse than anyone else, that their Talmud specifically states crimes against non Jews are fine, or that sex with children is acceptable. In fact, criticising the Jews in general or suggesting 6 million of them did not die in the Holocaust (even though they admit as much even in the Holocaust museum in Israel) is a crime and punishable by imprisonment and fines in many areas around the world and it should be a crime to criticise Jews anywhere by anyone in the world as per NOAHIDE Laws. The idea Jews control most of the world finances, mass media and entertainment is just a lie, And when it is demonstrated it is not a lie it is just because jews are so intelligent and successful.
That will do for now. Just six little (big) truths and if you can process them all at once in your head, then some other very basic, also simple, truth naturally will coalesce out of knowing the six above facts. In brief these are:
1. The need for a holistic, virtue-based (real virtues, not fake ones promoted today like the aptly named D.I.E. Ideology (Diversity, Inclusivity, Equality) system of belief that is as much as possible resistant to corruption, infiltration and subversion is required. It must necessarily be:
Based in reality
Exclusive of those with bad intent
Inclusive of those with good intend but remaining separatist in terms of culture, ethnicity and cultural preferences
Promoting of meritocracy based in virtue and achievement
Helpful to those weaker or less able but not to detriment of those stronger and more capable
2. The need to act as required in defence of the natural order of things, that have formed part of the most successful system of beliefs that has brought the most good to the largest number of people in the history of Humanity, that being, being the nuclear family, traditional marriage, traditional male and female roles and a reliance on honour, beauty, truth, honesty, charity, mercy and justice. But never at the detriment of truth, and above all justice.
3. The need to reject as a whole the current system/s of control, which ultimately means the need to separate yourself from the need of FIAT money, at least until when such a new system has been implemented that does not permit usury and does not rely on the current systems of banking in place as control mechanisms. In the short term this means to achieve the self-sufficient production of food, clean water and energy for your immediate family and then your expanding community guided by the above points.
4. The need to have the capacity to protect yourself, your family, and your way of life, by all available means and avoiding violence when and if possible, but including it when this is no longer possible to avoid, under the principle of self-defence and Just war.
If you do realise these four principles, then you may find that the initial point is in fact, the cohesive belief system. Because without it, nothing lasts in time. And that System, as far as the human experience goes, has been Catholicism. It really doesn’t matter if you like or believe this, because remember, objective reality is a thing, and if you bother to study human history at all, the benefits of Catholicism overall, compared to any other system are simply undeniable by anyone even remotely honest. If that is the case, and if you are honest, then at the very least it deserves further investigation; and if you feel so inclined to save yourself some time you may wish to read Believe! (short quick read of a couple of hours) or Reclaiming the Catholic Church (more than five times as big as Believe! and packed with references you can verify for yourself.) But in any case, you need not buy my books specifically. Just educate yourself and see why Catholicism worked and still does. Then get up and begin forming your own community of Sedevacantists or join one of the ones already in place and forming, like the one I am building.
Once this veil of lies has been ripped from you, you can begin to see, even if you are not yet a catholic, so much of what you believe is an absolute lie. From the way you relate to your spouse or children or co-workers, to the way we live, work, and think about money, time, life in general, education and human worth and value as well as fundamental concepts like sex, marriage, love, intimacy, and so on. If the interpersonal relationships interest you, then you can also read Caveman Theory, which unlike the other books is NOT available in paper format on Amazon due to its content being politically “unacceptable” as is all truth today and throughout most of human history.
In any case, realise that you are in no way as powerless and without options as you feel. And that the people ruling over you have almost no power once you see them and their lies for what they are and begin, without fanfare, without rage, without much of anything except steely-eyed determination, to remove yourself from their systems of influence. Use, leverage, and make us of their systems as you can and must in order to remove yourself gradually and permanently from them. Consider these simple but very true facts:
Taxes are not needed to have all the services we currently have
Fiat money is NOT the only way to have mediums of exchange
Leaving your family to go and work in order to provide for them is not how things were done for most of human history
Tangible assets like land and gold do not lose their value regardless of economic fluctuations artificial or real as they may be
Force trumps everything in the final analysis, so be able to deliver it if necessary
Respect from your spouse and children is not optional and never was throughout human history
Charity and cherishing your wife is also not optional towards her
Your physical ability matters, but your virtues are measured in your actions and inactions aside from your specific talents or lack thereof and remember that God often prefers to use broken tools to make His point
Putting your children in a box where they have to sit for 5 or 6 hours to learn mostly by rote a bunch of things that are aside from learning to read, write and do various forms of mathematics, as well as learn real (not falsified) history is not education but indoctrination
A violent reaction to an injustice, in proportion to the injustice, is perfectly natural and normal, regardless of what local laws may say about it. Obviously, acting intelligently in this regard is also not optional. Proportionality is also not optional. Killing someone because they bumped into you or damaged your car, is not acceptable. Killing someone raping your child or attempting to murder you is.
Think through these concepts and see if you still recognise the world we currently live in as even remotely sane.
This post is one of those simple ones to summarise and extremely difficult to get into people’s head or to take positive action in their own lives with.
The basic message is simple:
Keep going. Literally every meaningful discovery, real progress, increase in truth, beauty and justice was inevitably the effort of one man (or less frequently one woman) against all odds.
The trend is that the lone individual, working endlessly, sometimes for years, makes the discovery/breakthrough/whatever that is to the good and then he is promptly buried, forgotten, and his name often also dragged through the mud as the vultures in human form take up his work as their own, slander it while aggrandising their own plagiarisms and so on.
This is the pattern. If you study any history at all, it is the process. Everyone knows Einstein, no one knows the names of the people whose work he shamelessly plagiarised, reworked and pretended to have come up with something brand new. Tesla changed the world more than any other single person except Jesus and yet until a couple of decades ago almost no one knew who he was or what he did. Only the internet brought back his relevance. Everyone knew who Edison was or Marconi, neither of which invented what they are known for first and in fact they stole it from Tesla and even didn’t make a good a job as he had. I know the feeling, since Graham Hancock did a similar thing, taking my The Face On Mars, plagiarising some concepts from it and STILL getting it wrong. But such is life, and such are journalists. Hancock, has made millions and I struggle to maintain my small farm. And Tesla died destitute and Edison was wealthy.
Maxwell figured out the equations and Heavyside crippled them.
Tesla created the alternating current motor and wanted the world to have free energy and JP Morgan and others saw to it we all have to pay for it.
I figured out a pivotal part of human history and the context of it and Hancock still can’t figure out that context in a way that makes coherent sense. Then again, his surname tells us all we need to know about him.
But the key difference is that the people who MAKE the discoveries are almost universally not doing it for the fame or the money. They are doing it for the literal pursuit of truth.
If and when you come across such people, regardless of the fact that like all human beings they will have their flaws, it is important to support them as best you can. I certainly always have and always will.
I was reading Agent 13’s third post on UVALDE and what it cost him, and it is very true and an important point to note that not only is it only one guy that usually figures something out, but if and when that one guy is taken out, a lot of truth is lost. My books are already out there, so there isn’t too much I am worried about, also because I think I have reached a sort of equilibrium with the powers that be. I am not large enough to be a worry, and the things I say, while true, tend to be on the esoteric and general side of things, so while at an individual level for those that take on the concepts they absolutely can be and are life-changing, it is unlikely to form a massive movement of tens of thousands of souls suddenly ready to be my armies of conquest. Also because I tend to avoid wanting to lead anything, and what little I do in that regard I do grudgingly and because it is needed and even then only in a small way. Which is not to say that if a million men suddenly decided to make me their warrior-king I wouldn’t put them to use, but in reality, I neither seek nor particularly want that. It would be a horrible pain in my backside and a distraction from the things I care about. On the other hand, if I did have a cadre of people willing to work hard at a few things, the positive effects that can be had are huge and more than the sum of its parts, which is why I keep slowly building up my little fiefdom.
From the Agent’s Post:
Thank you so much for being a paid sub! There are a lot of people out there who attack certain authors and try to get them to quit, but when I feel like giving up, I remember that there are also people out there who find what I have to share of importance enough to take money out of their pocket and share it with me and that’s a really big deal because you don’t have to do that, especially when inflation is at an all-time high and everyone is struggling. I also financially support those I find to be of importance in our movement. We are awesome souls because without support, Truthers feel alone, stranded on an island in Clown World and there’s nothing left to spread Truth for.
Writing this series has been really difficult for me because it forced me to divulge my failures, mistakes and problems in my life including marriage issues, none of which are comfortable topics. It would have been so much easier to just write about my Uvalde findings and leave out everything else but I think it’s important that people get a glimpse into how evil and secretive The Powers that Be really are, especially toward researchers who look too deep. If you look back at Sandy Hook, there were thousands upon thousands of people digging and exposing so much information. Compare that to Uvalde and what do we see? A couple dozen people truly researching and thousands of others sharing their content. Where did all the Sandy researchers go? Well, we know many ended up dead, and based on my experience, a large portion had their good lives fall apart due to a sudden onslaught of happenstance.
Notice that? The Sandy Hook researchers that were actually the real researchers, not just the “spreaders” tended to die off in bizarre ways. Like the 9/11 researchers which now I think number in the over hundred dead bodies. Like the FTL (faster than light) researchers that started to disappear in the 70s, 80s, and 90s (today everyone is to stupi-fied by Tik-Tok to even read a full length novel, never mind research high tech stuff.
And yes, I have definitely been subjected to a few psyops over the years. Most notably and frequently in the 1990s after I published The Face on Mars and a little bit after the updated version in 2014. And a bit after the Systema book. I have been shadow banned and throttled in many online endeavours, losing a Youtube Channel that was really quite harmless but has proved impossible to regain control of despite repeated attempts and appeals to Google to do so, and so on. Anyway, none of this is really surprising, bandits will try to protect their turf and exposing them, their lies, their crimes or finding a way to avoid them and their extortions is bound to attract their attention in one way or another. Yet, to sit there and worry about it is pointless. Anyone that is worthy of being called a man will do what he does, regardless of the threats levelled against him.
And yes, they will go after your reputation, your marriage, everything. And God only knows how many men have been crushed by the Satanic forces and their demon-ridden puppets over the millennia, but after all, our very own Lord was crucified, so its should come as no surprise.
And that is my point. The point of this post is NOT the slings and arrows you might incur. That’s just to be expected. The point of this post is simply this:
DO NOT STOP.
If you have a passion for truth, whatever aspect of it you are digging into, carry on. It is only such people that create good things for humanity at large. And it is always single individuals or at best a pair of them, like the Wright brothers, say. Do not get disheartened, do not give up.
The Power of One is unbeatable and it begins with you and your spirit. One man not only can win against 10,000, he can inspire one million, and change life for all 8 billion of us down the line.
The secondary part of this post is this:
SUPPORT THE ONES.
When you come across some crazy bastard that is trying to build a free energy machine and has survived a couple of freak “accidents”, fund him as best you can, even if it’s just five bucks to buy him coffee. You never know, that coffee, at the end of a crushing year, might just be the one that gives him that added neurone firing that will help him create something that will change the world. While we are all broken flawed, weak, nasty little creatures, it has been my experience that ultimately there are only two types of people. Those who love the truth and will die pursuing it if need be, and then there is everyone else.
As with my own version of the Male Socio-Sexual Hierarchy, (Alphas, Betas and Scouts) this is surely an oversimplification, (Truth Seekers/Everyone else) as there are many subsets of the people who do not choose to pursue truth relentlessly, and many of them are good and even decent people, but from my perspective, how relevant are they? What are they going to change? At best, they are logistics supporters. Which don’t get me wrong, they are saints; those who support the doers help immeasurably, and without them, nothing would get done, but they are even more anonymous than the lone genius, and more importantly, without them, the lone genius will likely still get there. Just much later and perhaps only at the end of his life.
But the fanatics are the ones that make the difference.
Certainly in those who are not fanatics for truth there are a huge number who enjoys truth well-enough, but just not when it hits a bit too close to home. Or when it exposes very unpleasant realities they don’t want to face or even be aware of. And we all do this to some extent. While I am a fanatic in regard to Truth, when those adverts or docu-dramas come on about starving children in Africa or the trafficked ones in Ukraine and so on, I change channel. I click elsewhere. It’s not that I don’t know about that stuff. I am more aware of it than 99.99999% of humans on Earth, which is why if I ever come across people involved in those activities in a nice remote area of say the Gobi Desert, there will be a slightly more composted patch of it after my passing, but I don’t need that reality, of which I am already aware, forced any further into my skull, since I am not going to dedicate myself to solving that particular problem. Not directly anyway, because even if I went super special forces and was funded by some oligarch to take out bad guys, which I admit would be a job I not only would enjoy, but think I would excel at (given a few caveats), the reality is that the mechanism that allow these realities to be in place would not even be dented by that approach, at least not very noticeably, and the truth is that such a “solution” while emotionally appealing is unrealistic.
If, however, you manage to get humanity to simply not rely on the entire concept of banking and the issuing of fiat money however, that would be really disruptive to those parasites pretending to be human beings that indulge in such activities.
Instant gratification is fun, but in serious matters I tend to play the very long game.
In a typical aspect of synchronicity, when I came here to write this there was a comment on my previous post by Sasha of Synlogos, which is a great aggregator of various blogs and sites that in the main spread (overall) a more positive approach to life I think. So go there and bookmark his site and then go visit it daily for updates on all your favourite zealots; of which, I hope I top your list.
But above all, never, ever, ever, let the bastards grind you down. And even if they do, rebuild yourself and get right back up. This is the Way.
This post goes out to them mostly, but really to everyone too. We have all been subjected to the absolutely toxic and dysgenic ideology of the narcissistic Boomers and their destruction of all that came before them that was good and healthy and worthwhile. They built nothing, climbing on the corpses of the things they destroyed only to aggrandise themselves while feverishly blocking their own offspring from either being born in the first place, or any effort to have them catch up to them.
And while there are exceptions here and there, the extremely absolute vast majority of boomers are an absolute toxic sludge of modernity, self-obsession and narcissistic demonry. And to one extent or other, we have all been polluted by its stench.
So… please read this post at Sigma Game, where a comment by a GenX lady was posted in full. Read the whole thing there, but here is the pivotal jist of it:
Most women are natural followers and need an in-group of other women to build and grow their identity. And the older Boomer women who should be our matriarchs are STD-ridden, Diamond Princess-cruising nightmares.
When I left my stunningly-successful-early-in-my career professional position to (a) stay home with babies and (b) turn my professional skills toward supporting my husband’s business endeavors, every single one of the Boomer women in both of our families let me know how shocked and disappointed they were in me. How I was setting myself up to be too dependent on my husband, and was throwing away all the opportunities they fought so hard for. This included both my mother who was living vicariously through me, my you-go-girl mother-in-law, all three of their sisters, and three boomer aged step-sisters.
Notably, all but one of them are divorced. The one who isn’t is miserable. So it didn’t take long to look at their lives and think, well, if they’re all disappointed in me it must be the right call for not ending up as a miserable old biddie like them.
And the comment on it by Vox is spot on:
This woman did exactly what I fault young women, particularly of the Millennial and Gen Z generations for not doing, which is paying attention to the outcomes of the older women who are attempting to advise you! Misery loves company, and failures love giving advice; in both cases, the wise young woman will reject both.
However, this will inevitably create a challenge for the woman who has neither mentors nor matriarchs from whom she can learn. I know one Gen X woman who rejected her Boomer mother’s insane ways, but it took her literal years to learn how to cook, clean, and make a home from scratch as a post-college adult, because she had no female role model younger than her grandmother upon whom she could rely.
Both the lady who wrote in and Vox absolutely right. And I can attest to it myself, since I certainly did not have a good role model for marriage, but I was lucky enough to spend a few formative years with my grandparents, which on both sides were an model of stability so solid that as a child you just took it for granted. And that is not because things were necessarily rosy between my paternal grandparents. But whatever things they may have gone through, it was kept intensely between them and never touched us as their grandchildren. The love they had for us was never conditional or faked. The primary concepts my brother and I picked up in growing up were probably limited to a limited warrior code of being honest, keeping your word, not taking any shit from anyone, but not be obsessive about it. Justice was the thing, not your ego. And self-reliance, mostly not because it was taught but because we were left to our own devices pretty much unless it was something extremely serious. And even then, sometimes it was down to us anyway. I suppose you could put it down to being raised by a Sigma boomer father in that respect. He wasn’t very present and when he was it was mostly corrective (even when he was wrong). But that all said, I have no animosity at all towards the man, and he certainly always came through when it counted, nor was his love ever in question. Even so, I can’t say the example we had was a good one, in terms of creating a stable family life.
My wife had even less of any kind of even distant view of a traditional marriage and family life, and it has indeed taken her a long time to find her way in even the basics, which given my own examples probably made everything harder on both of us. One thing that has however held everything together is that we both have either a learnt or natural element of deep loyalty. In general, to each other, and to our children. It is an odd kind of loyalty, because it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s shared in the same way at the same time, we are only getting to that point now, after 7 years of marriage, before that, I would say it was our own, individual sense of loyalty and justice that kept us on course even when things were not ideal.
And certainly, I think a lot of grace, or divine assistance too, came into it. By all metrics, our marriage should have been an absolute train derailment, caused by a car-crash pile up on the railway, due to an airplane smashing into a level crossing. At rush hour.
Instead, it’s starting to become what I might have imagined in. my most fevered and fantastic imagination, as an idealistic 16 year old wondering what the perfect life might look like.
And if I have to point to a single thing that made it most possible (you know, after miracles, divine intervention, possible cohorts of angels and so on) when it comes to our human attributes, I would say that it is without a doubt my wife’s ability to do something that very, very, very, very, few women are truly capable of to any decent degree, and it is this:
She has the capacity to pause, review, and recognise logical paths before her and her own errors regarding them.
It is really quite astonishing, because she is absolutely female. Her emotions are truly like a storm at sea, both in the good and the bad. I really believe no man has any real clue the levels of emotional tides that women experience, and I say that being a man that clearly has a wide range of them beyond most normal men. The astonishing thing, which I tried to transmit also in Caveman Theory, is that the more of a safe realm you give your woman’s emotions to run free, yet are able to keep them also “contained”, that is allow her to do her freak-outs but don’t get phased by them nor let them steer you onto the rocks of dissent, disrespect, or utter madness (and that last one can be hard to define!), the more, if she is at heart a healthy person (and not a raging narcissist, in which case, you may not survive) she may become able to reason herself back to sanity once the tsunami of whatever it was has passed.
Perhaps it’s because she’s English. Those people have the almost alien-like ability to simultaneously not know themselves very well or very deeply, and yet to try to do so by the use of cold and calm logic. Unfortunately the study, use and practice of logic in the last century or so has been vilified, negated and denied to most people. So, great damage to this ability has been done, and the Anglo-Saxon female realm has gone from trying to reason things out during the calm between emotions, to the simple rationalisation/justification of whatever emotion happens to be running them in any given moment.
Certainly she also has an IQ that is well above average, which also helps, firstly because there isn’t an actual 30 point IQ communication gap between us. Or at least, mostly there isn’t and those little gaps that can happen if not taking the time to examine them can be bridged by a calm conversation.
But whatever the reason, she has the ability to do logic if given time and space to do it. She still needs to sometimes be “corralled” to the “logic box” because there are things that otherwise will be ignored for years, and being that as well as extremely feminine, she also has the tendency towards wanting to be as free as the proverbial mustang running in the prairies, that corralling is really something only a vastly experienced cowboy with the talent to make it an art might be able to do. The fine line has to be taken that she has to see it for herself. The corral, needs to be seen from a distance, because if she suddenly finds herself in one, even one of her ow making, then it’s usually panic stations and red alarms going off. And she also has to see it is good, from a distance, because again, it might be perfect but if in her imagination it comes as a sudden imposition she will panic without even evaluating what it is. And then see has to see it is not a prison but a home, a place you return to, not one that prevents you being free, but in fact one that allows you even more, and real freedom, once you accept the responsibilities of it.
It is not always easy, and I have never been a patient man, which may be a curse for some, but perhaps, in her case, it is a good thing. Pretty women invariably get away with murder with men. Most are too timid to even point out certain things, never mind make it something they will insist is part of their life. In short, sometimes, it takes a bastard to point a spoilt pretty girl in the right direction. It is not a trope in all the girly romantic novels for no reason after all, cliched as it sounds.
But the point is that above all, as I have been saying for literally decades, women need to begin to learn how to do actual logic. Their wild emotions and crazy feelings need to be learnt to be put aside and things reasoned out. And not with a view to justifying their feelings, emotions or what they want to happen, but so that objective reality can be evaluated and where they have lacunae (gaps, holes of knowledge, behaviour, understanding, intimacy, or whatever) they, not their husbands, not their children, not society, not the universe, not God, but they, they themselves, need to change and take the appropriate action to rectify and improve the issue. Very few women do this process consciously.
Most women who have read this will at this point be screaming at the screen, saying that sentence is so much nonsense because they…(add endless list of self-recriminating statements here). So let me explain it another way, and if you are a woman, please, put your emotions aside and pay attention.
Being able to observe yourself critically but in an objective fashion is very difficult for all human beings, men as well as women, because we are mostly selfish, weak, petty, ego-driven, flawed, nasty, little creatures. Yes, all of us, in varying degrees, but all of us.
Women, being far more governed by their emotions than men, naturally find this exercise far more difficult than even most men. Compounded by the biological solipsism intrinsic to women, which they can no more help than other attributes of their biology, and it is really quite hard to do. This process, has nothing to do with, and is very different from, the constant self-recrimination that most women who are not actual full-blown narcissists do. Allow me to give an example that will be instantly familiar to any woman.
Every normal woman, no matter how physically attractive she is, will invariably find some flaw with herself if standing naked in front of a full-length mirror. I know because I have observed this myself with literally every woman I have been with. And trust me, at the risk of sounding arrogant, I have had some very pretty girlfriends. And yet, they will absolutely crap all over themselves about some non-issue, that can range from the shape of their fingers, to the way their hair falls on them, a slight defect like a birth-mark, a tooth that is not perfectly straight, you name it, they will see flaws that no man would care at all about when looking at the rest of them. Women do this not just about their bodies but any number of other utterly irrelevant things.
If I ask a friend over to my place, it hardly makes a difference to me if there are dead bodies stacked by the front door. He’s my buddy, he’s not coming over for the decor. My wife (and this is natural and a good thing, I am not saying it is not) will freak out and try and spic and span the whole house like a tornado if the postman is dropping a parcel off and I invite him for coffee. She is starting to learn (the hard way) that in rural setting with 5 children, she may as well ask for herds of unicorns to line up outside for filming. But regardless she still gets rather upset at life, the universe, and sadly, herself, for not having things as perfect as she would like.
But I am not talking about these sort of recriminations. they are mostly a slight disease of the mind, quirks, and the general approach a man should have is to try your best to put her mind at ease and let her see her efforts are appreciated and her “flaws” are meaningless or even endearing to you.
When I talk about correcting a behaviour or flaw, I mean important shit that can fuck up your life, like excessive solipsism, or disrespecting your husband for some idiotic feminist concept that has no place in a healthy society. If you are a stay at home housewife and your husband works all day, learn to cook. Learn to take care of the home. And if you think that is “below your standard as a woman” then explain to me why driving a truck for 15 hours a day and getting a back injury from it, or being a plumber and literally fixing people’s shitty pipes all day, or an. oil rig driller and being covered in slurry and toxic shit day and day out is not below a man’s standard. looking after your family as you are able to is your duty. And yes, we all have duties if we are human beings even worthy of the name. And yes, your duties are more important than some fake, magical, Disney/Hollywood fairy tale life. If I need to crawl through a pile of rotting dead bodies for my family to be safe and happy, I will not even hesitate. Hell, I wouldn’t hesitate if I have to MAKE the pile of dead bodies before I crawl through it. And I full expect my wife to be able to do the same if called upon it. Though I will volunteer first for the dead bodies stuff, so it’s only fair she is the primary cook at home. There is absolutely nothing intrinsically wrong in each one having different roles. Not respecting those roles or not performing our duty-bound actions in their regard is the problem. Not the thing or the doing of the thing.
The moment women learn to do a lot more logic than they have been taught in the last hundred years, the sooner they will get back to being the kind of heroines that their grandmothers and great-grand-mothers probably were; with the added bonus that the “feminizing” of the men that has taken place over the same period, has resulted in the minority of men that have remained men, instead of becoming metrosexual, androgynous, confused fools, better able to appreciate a woman who is properly a woman instead of a spoilt brat or a slovenly slattern.
In short, the attitude that having a big family with lots of children, that being as self-sufficient as possible, and that the traditional roles of a wife and husband in a traditional family are not just good things, but things to aspire to, today takes a conscious effort to understand and put into practice. Plus, as the doing so is not necessarily easy or the process entirely rosy, you need to work at it even as you gradually get an appreciation for it as you climb over the hurdles, especially at the starts, which without fail tend to be rooted in the following:
General laziness
General selfishness (greed for time to waste, consumer crap no one really needs, keeping up with the Joneses, lust for ever-changing sexual partners and gratification, gluttony to eat/travel/do as you please every minute of your day outside of work because your duty is ultimately and primarily focused on your having as easy a life as possible, gluttony for distraction TV/videogames/random hobbies with no real effect on your life)
General weakness. The usual “It’s too hard” without even trying. “I don’t know how” without ever trying to learn or find out. “I’m just not that kind of person” (too lazy). Which all falls under my label of, well, guess what, if you had a guy shoot you in the foot every time you whined about how you can’t, you’d learn to do it hopping on one leg after the first shot, and you would learn it right away. So it’s a matter of laziness and weakness of character ultimately.
Now, if you are wondering why anyone should put themselves through so much just to have a numerous and worthwhile and loyal family… well, I can’t help you. You’re probably the kind of person that will never do, achieve or teach anyone anything, other than possibly as an example of how not to be.
There is no substitute on Earth for a functional, loving, big family. I didn’t have one like that growing up. Neither did my wife. But we sure are going to keep working at making sure our children (and ourselves) do.
Andrew Torba has written his regular newsletter, which you can see as a blog post here.
In it he laments the various issues that are ensuring the American population, along with the European one, are falling (and have been for a long time) below replacement value.
He does this by mentioning the issues, while apparently being totally oblivious of how any of these issues became issues in the first place, and what the root cause of all of them was and is.
It’s really quite astonishing. But I think it can be useful to look at this peculiar blindness of his as a starting point to show with a certain level of clarity and obviousness what the baseline issues are originating from, and how, specifically, in each case, this can be demonstrated to have massive evidence for the fact that, at root, all of these issues have the starting point of the Protestant rebellion against the Catholic Church.
Now, if you are a Protestant, irritating as you may find me and my perspectives, I sincerely hope you settle down, muster as much objective consideration for the rest of this post as you can, and consider it calmly and objectively. And if some of my rhetoric infuriates you, pay attention to that, and notice which bits do so the most (these are where your biggest logical hurdles and fallacies are going to be found), then let them go and try, for the sake of argument at least, to imagine they are true and correct anyway (they are, my rhetoric is so unpleasant for people because it invariably is laced with painful truth).
And then see if you can’t understand my points from a bird’s eye view, instead of taking it personally against you as a person, the people who taught you to be a Protestant that you care about, and so on.
Being as Torba is a Protestant himself, and being that Protestants, like solipsistic women, only backwards rationalise any reality in the past that factually makes them responsible for anything, instead of facing the facts squarely on, he seems to think this situation is totally divorced from anything to do with Protestantism. In fact he blindly points out the issues while completely oblivious to the reasons of why, how and when these things became issues.
It really is a kind of perspective of extreme selfishness or self-centeredness to the point of being oblivious of the destruction one leaves in one’s wake. Any damage done is just some magical thing that just happens on its own and is always fully justifiable in just such a way (by some magic) that means it is never, ever, ever, that person’s fault.
What a selfish, stupid, spoilt brat, or a woman (men too, but they generally are more consciously aware than women in this regard) would do on an individual level, Protestants do on a massive social level that covers the last five centuries.
So allow me now to quote Torba from his post and comment on each point in some detail. If you are able to divorce your personal feelings on each issue, and note the broad historical facts in each case, I think you will see that what I say about Protestantism is not just true, but that on some level, you have always known it, because the plastic, veneer feel of the disconnect between the entire Protestant mish-mash chaos non-structure of it, has never married properly to the deep sense of culture, tradition, history and ancestors that created and protected Christendom from the time of Jesus, to:
The formation of Benedictine monasteries,
The crusades, and the 200 years they held the Outremer while being attacked by both Muslims and the Eastern schismatics they came to the aid of (after they had already split themselves off from the One True Church),
The rebellion against God’s Church, under the guise of it being a Protestation against the corrupt men within it, which have always been there, but who never changed the truth of the Church,
The siege of Malta and the Catholic knights that defended it from the consequent destruction of Christendom as a whole if Malta had fallen,
The gradual, intentional and devastating infiltration of the Church by freemasons (illuminati, satanists, carbonari, etc their name is legion), communists, homosexuals and pedophiles, starting in earnest in the late 1770, alongside the planned and executed destruction of every European royal house; because since the time of Charlemagne, the nobility had been associated with being the protectors of the Church, that is, the physical and worldly protectors of the Church (the guys who fight, as all nobles who took part in the crusades did) and they had to be broken before the Church could be damaged meaningfully from within,
The noticing of this by various Popes, culminating in Pope Pious X who started the putting together of the code of canon law of 1917, an amazing document that reviewed tens of thousands of documents written over the last two millennia, in order to ensure there was no conflict, contradiction or logical fallacy among them all, so they could be summarised as the essence of Catholic dogma in one volume, which was completed and promulgated by Pope Benedict the XV in 1917 and stood the test of time from then, through to the death of the last valid Pope, Pious XII, and even beyond it, as the Satanists finally took the throne of Peter in 1958, and have held it since, yet the True Church remains, as does the impenetrable fortress of the Code of 1917, and the last remnant of faithful Bishops and Priests that retain Catholicism as their faith, and not the false, Satanic version of “Catholicism” espoused by the promulgators of Vatican II and its manifest heresies in the form of the deceitful Novus Ordo fake “Church”.
The simple fact is that on some level, every protestant senses that deep down, no matter how genuine their wish to be one with God the Father, Christ the Son, and the Holy Spirit, the entire history of their supposed religion is littered with disconnects and logical fallacies that simply cannot be reconciled. And deep down, they sense too, that one cannot simply be united with Christ by merely saying he is. There are rules. There always were from the start, and they do not change. But I have mentioned the historical perspective starting from the beginning, many times before, and few are willing to take that journey. So today, we will do something different. We will take Torba’s newsletter and dissect the issues he mentions and see how and where they came from in the first place.
You Need To Be Babymaxxing: A Call to Action for Christians A disturbing trend has been emerging over the past few decades: the birth rate of every US state, along with the birth rate in most western nations, has dipped below the replacement population level. This has sparked widespread concern and fear, as this demographic shift could have catastrophic consequences for the long-term survival of some of the world’s most prosperous and influential societies and people groups.
And what might have led to that catastrophic drop in birth rate, when third world Africans, Indians and others keep producing children despite conditions most Westerners can’t even imagine, much less are able to take on in their own lives? Let’s ponder it a bit, shall we?
The root causes of this demographic decline are complex and multifaceted, but there are a few key factors that stand out. First and foremost: the rise of secularism and individualism has led to a decreased emphasis on traditional family values and a growing number of people choosing not to have children. Our culture of atomized individualism in the West has transformed so many into self-centered and selfish monsters.
So… the increase of secularism, individualism and atomisation of society. Where, O WHERE might such an idea come from? Could it possibly have ANYTHING at all to do with going from a global religion that was prevalent throughout the entire West and even much of the East (though slightly perverted and erroneous there) to CHANGING that religion to be… what was it oh yeah…
Individualistic (every man interprets the Bible (which was changed from the original used for 1200 years) as he sees fit.)
Schismatic at its very root. We now have over 40,000 versions of Protestantism, but even then each of these is really only a shadowy illusion of coherence, because in truth EVERY Protestant feels entitled to be his own Pope, Bishop and Priest and interpret the Bible, and Christianity as a whole, (including the ancient traditions he is usually abysmally ignorant of) as he sees fit, which is why Protestants will change Church like normal people change socks. They are not Churches at all, just lose coalitions where you pick and choose the bits that suit you. What do you think the effect of that is on society as a whole? Might be just a tad atomising? Just a smidge of secularisation creeping in? You think? How would that play out over 500 years?
Additionally, the increasing cost of living and the pressure to pursue higher education and career success have made it more difficult for many couples to afford to have large families. It’s tough, but not impossible, to have a large family when the economy is so rigged against you doing so. Making it happen requires a lot of self-sacrifice and a reevaluation of your priorities.
No lie there, but where does this incessant need to have a “career” and prioritising work come from? Well, let’s see, historically where can we trace this sudden absolute importance of WORK over LIFE? What’s that, I hear? The Industrial Revolution? Right. I agree. Which was taught to me in school as a young boy as this marvel of British Engineering and know-how and just an overall great thing for the advancement of humanity. Except… no one mentioned the social consequences. They all presented the creation of trains and railways and machinery as all positive technological advancements while completely ignoring whether:
They actually were positive overall for humanity, or
Regardless of that, what social conditions did the much vaunted “Protestant Work Ethic” actually entail in day-to-day activities and family dynamics?
What priorities do you think you need to have to come up with the Industrial Revolution in terms of valuing your family time and your work time? What effects on general human interactions do you think are going to be more prevalent? Would a general disconnect from other human beings being seen as other human beings you necessarily relate to, regardless of personal differences, purely on the basis of the reality in front of you that they too are human beings, be useful to foster a general perception of other people being seen more as potential cogs in the machinery of “society” than actual human beings? The deeper implication of this are manifold and absolutely fundamental. A perfect example of this, which is an extreme case, in order to highlight the difference, is that if a Protestant mind were to say, be forced into a war of strife against invading foreigners, he would execute it more or less in cold blood for the most part as a negative but necessary thing. A Catholic would execute it with quite a different frame of mind. Alongside the same practical need, the Catholic would further be driven in his righteous rage that such an event has become necessary as a result of the other side refusing to act like reasonable human beings. So their extermination is not just a necessity for practical purposes, but also a necessity from an educational and spiritual perspective. A Protestant cuts a tree down because it’s in the way. A Catholic evaluates if the tree is noxious, in which case he will dig it up from the roots and burn it, or merely in the way, in which case he will endeavour to dig it up from the roots and replant it somewhere appropriate. It is a MASSIVE psychological difference and affects every aspect of your attitude towards life and all its challenges.
Finally, the widespread availability of birth control and abortion has enabled people to easily prevent pregnancies and terminate them when they do occur, further exacerbating the problem. We are making great strides on banning abortion in many states across the nation, but decades of damage has already been done.
And where did that magical birth control come from? Oh wait, the pill was invented by a Jewish guy. Just a coincidence I am sure, regardless of the fact that Jews (Talmudic Pharisees) have hated the Catholic Church from the start and have tried to destroy it at every turn including their deep infiltration of it over centuries and the Protestantisation of it with Vatican II in which they were instrumental in forming.
But what about the adoption of it? Which kind of people adopted birth control in this form? Not Catholics. Even today, some 66 years after the throne of Peter was usurped by Satanists, the momentum of the real Catholicism that still exists (though crumbling rapidly in the Novus Ordo fake Church) makes it nigh on impossible for the fake Pope Bergoglio to say it’s ok to use. It was Protestants in their legion of denominations that began to accept socially the concept of divorce in the first place. An event that was forbidden by the Catholic Church and only permitted in the sense of an annulment, which has very specific rules to be granted.
But if divorce becomes acceptable, then the entire concept of marriage becomes a store-bought idea, no longer a sacrament for life. And once you accept marriage as a kind of diploma you can buy in a store, well, you should be able to switch diplomas at will if one loses its lustre. And since it might go wrong, it only makes sense to take it for a test run first. Which means sex before marriage. Which could end up with babies with a person you’re just taking out for a test ride! I mean they have a nice body, or maybe are rich, or whatever, so you want to see if you’re “compatible” in terms of orgasms per month, you know, like miles per gallon and so on. So of course you need some baby making prevention thing!
And then it’s a short step from treating sex as a test run for marriage to making it just for fun. I mean sex is really a LOT of fun. Like a lot, lot. Like it messes with you brain and body chemistry level of great fun. So why wouldn’t you want to get addicted to this natural rush that doesn’t even require drugs, and is better than all the rushes you get from a drug anyway, if you practice it enough to really get good at it? Well, of course sex would go from being a test ride for marriage to a sport. And once sex is for fun, the last thing you want is a baby with someone you can’t even have a decent conversation with, but oh my God are they awesome at the orgasms per mile, or whatever the measure was, right?
So, “naturally” the next thing that happens if a baby does come into the equation… and marriage is not a sacrament anymore as a dedication to bringing in new life (that is what marriage is for, making children, I know, it’s a shock, but seriously, look it up historically, sport-fucking doesn’t feature at all. Not even a little bit), well, what else are you gonna do, other than kill that baby, since it’s a nuisance. And so we have gone in a few short steps from allowing divorce –> sex before marriage –> sex for fun –> contraception –> baby killing.
And remind yourself, which secularisation of Christianity movement did that? You can’t blame Catholicism for it. Even the fake “Catholic” Church to date at least can’t advocate for contraception (they will in due course, no doubt, because Satanists are gonna Satanist).
While there is undoubtedly a lot of fear-mongering surrounding this issue, it is not without merit. If the current trend continues it could lead to a significant decline in the population of some of the world’s most prosperous and influential nations, which would have far-reaching consequences for global stability and economic growth.
Note that Torba’s first concern is global stability and economic growth. The ever present and Jewish –> Protestant belief in their true God, the almighty dollar. Profit, wealth. An amorphous “stability” of people and lands so far removed from us you will never see them even once in your life. There is a reason why America is called the great Satan by the Arab world, and while their religion is demonic too, they are not entirely wrong, which is what I tried to explain as gently as possible here.
More importantly it would also represent a tragic loss for the unique cultures, traditions, and values that have been cultivated by these societies over centuries.
Again, while he is not wrong, the point is not that any one specific culture or tradition is really all that relevant in the scheme of things, UNLESS, that tradition and culture also happens to be the best, surest, most tried and tested true and real approximation of how reality actually works as God intended. Then it’s kinda like… ALL IMPORTANT. So, despite your specific and particular distaste for Catholicism, which is based on nothing but lies about what it is, perpetrated down the centuries that you never bothered to look up yourself and the same sense of things passed on to you by your relatives and people you loved, who were just as ignorant of the truth (or more) as you are and they too believed the lies and inaccuracies, you should really make an effort to educate yourself on these things and figure them out by yourself.
Christians are called to be fruitful and multiply (Genesis 1:28). We need to be babymaxxing. This commandment is not just a suggestion or a personal preference, but an essential part of our mission to spread the Gospel and disciple the nations. By having large families and raising our children to be faithful, God-fearing people we can ensure the continued growth and prosperity of our communities and the preservation of our shared values and traditions.
Sounds good? Sure. But it’s a plastic American commercial. “Buy this product, it looks good, it makes you look cool and it’s needed!”
Tell me Andrew, with SPECIFICITY:
Continued growth and prosperity for your communities. Exactly WHAT and HOW do you mean this? What do you think will happen if people have a lot of children with only a vague sense of community brought on by a generic, amorphous, non-specific, “belief in X” that has no set rules, no set tradition, no set reality.
What “community” are you referring to, PRECISELY. Are the Methodists gonna get along with the Mormons, and the Mormons with the Seventh Day Adventists, and they with the Amish, and they with the Anabaptists, and they with the Baptists, and they with the Lutherans, and they with the Calvinists, and they with the lesbian “bishops” of whatever “Church” that is, and they with the transgender “bishop” that was in the news of another faction and they with…(repeat for 40,000 iterations). Is that the “community” you refer to? Those people all gonna band together under the banner of “Christ” are they? I think not. I think the entire history of America, and all Protestant nations, has shown such people will band together only under the banner of the (previously) might dollar, or German mark, or Pound Stirling. And then only until it profits them. And any true believers in the mix will get stampeded in the overall melee. It’s hard enough to have a community when they actually ARE all Catholics, but it does work and it has for many centuries. It has never worked in any protestant country other than to create more government, more regulation, and a perpetual chase for profit.
Moreover, by focusing on our own households and prioritizing the growth of our families, we can counteract the destructive influence of our enemies, most of whom do not have children of their own. As their ideas and ideologies die with them, our faith and values will continue to thrive, passed down from generation to generation through the strong bonds of family and community.
What faith and values and traditions would those be? The ones that did not manage to survive other than as a thinly veiled veneer of false honesty, respectability and dignity to cover over the perpetual search for profit, worldly fame and fortune? The one that has not managed to keep trannies from claiming the “right” to get “married” in your protestant “Churches” and have “pregnant men” as part of the “accepted reality”?
And before you say “Oh but that doesn’t happen in MY denomination number 38,792!” Stop and think for 5 seconds, what the Hell you’re actually saying and how you are missing the ENTIRE point of what Christianity and being part of the ACTUAL “body of Christ” means and how and where your illogical, historical clown-world “religion”, came to be.
So, what can we do to address this crisis and fulfill our divine calling as Christians?
Well, you can start by actually becoming actual Christians, to begin with, which means the ONLY denomination of Christianity that has always been there from the start: Catholicism. And which today exists ONLY in Sedevacantist Catholicism, aka Catholicism, since the buildings, property, wealth and outer garments of Catholicism have all been usurped, infiltrated and corrupted by the Satanists pretending to be “Catholics” that now infest the Vatican and everyone remotely connected with Novus Ordo heresies.
Here are a few practical steps we can take:
Embrace the concept of “babymaxxing”: This means prioritizing the growth of our families and actively seeking to have as many children as possible. It may require making sacrifices and reevaluating our priorities, but the rewards will be immeasurable.
Support and encourage other Christian families in their efforts to have children: This can take many forms, from offering emotional support and guidance to providing material assistance, such as helping with childcare or contributing to the financial costs of raising a large family.
Advocate for policies that support large families: This can include lobbying for tax breaks and other financial incentives for families with multiple children, as well as pushing for educational and healthcare policies that make it easier for parents to raise large families.
Promote a culture of life: This means working to end the scourge of abortion and advocating for the sanctity of human life at all stages, from conception to natural death.
These are all good suggestions, but completely doomed to fail is they are not founded on a solid bedrock of being connected to truth and reality, and that means, a religion that is itself based in truth and reality. Anything that is a watered down version of the original, with literally tens of thousands of roads down false paths, simply cannot stand the test of time. It has never worked in ANY human endeavour, much less in the experience of mankind other than by the enforcing of it by brutal methods and force, be it Islam or communism. The ONLY philosophy that has thrived and done so entirely voluntarily, is Catholicism, which imposes force ONLY on its declared enemies, and even then, usually only after patiently trying to dissuade them from their evil paths of attack.
Educate and disciple our children: It is not enough to simply have many children; we must also ensure that they are raised in the fear and knowledge of the Lord, instilling in them the values and principles that will enable them to carry on our faith and traditions for generations to come.
Name me ONE Protestant denomination that has lasted unchanged and retained anything even resembling a constant tradition and heritage without multiple schisms for even just 100 years. It doesn’t exist. Not a single one. The Catholic Church has remained steadfast and its rules and dogma unchanged for almost precisely 2000 years.
The demographic crisis facing the world today is a serious and urgent challenge that demands our immediate attention and action. Christians have a unique responsibility to confront this issue head-on and work tirelessly to ensure the continued growth and prosperity of our communities and the preservation of our shared values and traditions. By embracing the concept of “babymaxxing” and focusing on our own households, we can secure the future of our faith and our people and leave a lasting legacy for generations to come.
Not really. Doing so within the context of a properly Catholic community (that is, sedevacantist) has a chance of succeeding because historically Catholicism has risen from the ashes many times, as it will continue to do, because it IS the real Christianity and Jesus promised us He will be with us to the End. Pretending or play-acting that role in a fake “Christian” denomination will only last barely the duration of one human lifetime IF the parties in question happen to have a real personal affinity, that is obviously totally absent from any group of people beyond a couple of families that get on with each other. Catholic communities are not held together by the ephemeral characters of any of its constituents, but by a shared absolute belief in God that transcends petty personal and human failings, of which we are ALL riddled with.
Babymaxxing is not just a personal decision, but a collective responsibility that requires the support and encouragement of the entire Christian community. It may involve making sacrifices and reevaluating our priorities, but the rewards will be worth it.
No group that is not tied together by a bond of religious belief that goes far deeper than mere words and appearances will ever give anything even remotely resembling the kind of helping hand they will inevitably secure for their own family above others. Even among Catholic families this is still an issue, though one that is absolutely muted to a huge extent. I have absolute certainty that if I or any other of the Catholic families we know suddenly won a billion dollars at the lotto, or even just a few million, ALL the Catholic families near them would benefit too. I for one would literally buy houses and land in other people’s names to have them and their children as neighbours, but I am NOT the only one by far. Any one of the people in our Sedevacantist community would act the same, I am certain of it, and this was never the case in any other “community” I was ever a part of, be it people I trained for decades in martial arts with, people I worked as an armed security professional with, and literally risked my life alongside theirs, nor even childhood friends. The bond created by a true religion is of a quality and nature you simply have no experience of until you are in it. And it does not happen as a result of any of the 40,000 Protestant denominations. It might happens between a few families and even then will not last beyond the second generation, but it has been demonstrated to exist and work and remain in Catholic communities even some 100 years after the basic infiltration of the Church was already complete.
All of the chips are on the table with this issue. Those who take it seriously will inherit the future by default as their continued growth and reproduction will ensure the long-term survival and prosperity of their communities, cultures, and values. While the rest of the world struggles with declining birth rates and the threat of extinction-level events, Christians can take comfort in the knowledge that our faith and values will continue to thrive, passed down from generation to generation through the strong bonds of family and community.
No Andrew. The reality is that all groups that are not homogeneously coherent, that is, all the varied Protestant denominations, will gradually be chewed down by the wolves at their edges, and continue to degrade and become diluted generation after generation until they are assimilated by the globular mass that is the entire plan of those who have been putting it in place for literally millennia.
Get married. Babymax. Get to Church. We are going to win.
The advice is sound, but not just any pretend, clown-costumed, “Church” will do. Only the real one will make a difference, as it always has throughout history. And while ULTIMATE victory is assured, no one, not even Jesus knows that day or hour of when that will come, only God the Father. So, the concept of you seeing this victory in YOUR lifetime is iffy at best, so best to not worry about it and get busy building the impregnable, un-infiltratable, ready to throw out anyone not part of it, community that is the only one to have overcome everything from the Roman Empire to the Arian heresy, and who, in time, will also triumph over the present desolation of the real Church, were only Sedevacantists are left to carry the faith.
Did you all miss ShadoHand, ladies and gents? He of the striped chest and iron bicycles and four cold showers a day (to cool down his ShadoHand activities, no doubt, since he does not have anything to do with women, of course, being a tragic incel, errr… Manly man, that mannilly goes his own Way. (With a Hand. Like a Shadow!)
Fear not, the blognovella that is the Saga of ShadoHand continues, and like all good soap operas, will probably never, ever, ever end. But first, here he is in all his glory!
In case you missed the unmissable and very entertaining first three episodes of this dumpster fire of a human, exemplary specimen of manly Sigmaness, here they are, in order:
Today, now that we have ensured the pilot first few episodes of this blognovella have been a resounding success with our audience, we announce the next instalment: The Unhinged comment.
Which can be found for your amusement, along with the previous one and my response to it, here: The Comments
Here is his glorious insanity in full glory:
Click to enlarge the below
We really need to update his skill set ladies and gentlemen! We are doing this schizophrenic trainwreck obvious manliest, manly, Sigma, a disservice by not including his deeply important work on piezoelectric sources of energy! Which ONLY a Millennial could do. Certainly in this fashion anyway.
But the kicker? The reference to Douglas Jones is what really made my day and cracked me right up.
Douglas Jones, is a character in my latest novella, In the Shadow of Monte Castello (the sequel is being written as we speak) which has had really excellent feedback, so I am hoping it may become an alternative to Monster Hunter International type of novels that people might enjoy. I’m fairly sure Larry Correia wouldn’t mind nor care even if I did become in any way relevant competition to his books (fat chance, but one can dream) as our styles are quite different, and he’s actually a very decent guy from every interaction I had with him online.
Anyway, Douglas Jones, the character in the novella, is based on an actual guy I kinda know, and he knows I based this character on him. He was as amused by the reference as I was. He’s now such a badass that his alter ego gets used to threaten people who mock you for your incomparable stupidity and Gammaness. If that is not a glowing review for my character-writing abilities, I don’t know what is.
Don Ricossa of the IMBC on Vigano
For those of you that don’t speak Italian, here is a summarised version that I perfectly share and agree with, as I hope was already evident from my previous post on it a short while ago.
Don Ricossa states that [items in bold and square brackets are my notes]:
Personally I find Don Ricossa to be too charitable and too humble, and while I absolutely understand why and respect his way and his position and his methodology, in good conscience, I can only maintain my position, which is that while all this CAN —and indeed I too very much hope does— improve things, and results in many more proper Catholics returning to the fold in good standing (that is, that of 1958 Sedevacantists) I will always hold the canonical position that once a heretic, even if the repentance is true, a heretic clergyman should spend the rest of his days in perpetual penance with authority over precisely no one.
Nor do I in any way begrudge Don Ricossa or any other valid clergy from holding positions like his. But even a porter was not a priest and yet he controlled the entry to the Church.
And at various times in history it was nobility, duty bound, that helped restore the legitimate Papacy to its throne, and not infrequently by direct and even violent action.
Well, as a Catholic, and even if only a minor noble (the lowest of the ranks: Patrician) it remains my family name’s duty to take as unpleasant and as direct and even offensive a stance as I deem necessary to protect the sanctity of the Church. So, even if Vigano were to truly repent, and even restore the Church, I will never formally recognise him as having any legitimate authority in the Catholic Church. And the same goes for every Novus Orcian “clergy”.
No related posts.
By G | 23 June 2024 | Posted in Catholicism, Reclaiming the Catholic Church, Sedevacantism, Social Commentary