On SG Vox made a comment about how software is essentially not doing its primary business. Which is to just work. To do it’s function.
I recently came across a piece of software that actually does what it’s supposed to, very well. And then I had an update. I downloaded it and it was… 1.2Mb.
I knew then I had found a set of Dodo teeth embedded in lost Nazi gold: A software program done by people who actually understand how to program.
As I said on SG, when I become world emperor, the highest programming language that will be permitted will be assembler. Anything above that will be considered witchcraft and the perpetrators will be burnt at the stake. Buggy software released before it is functional will result in mass hanging of the whole development team.
I am also certain that if those things were implemented, within 20 years we would have spaceships able to travel to other stars.
No, I am not kidding. We would.
Programmers today don’t even have a baseline grasp of how computers work. They are basically like retarded children that have learn to pile up kitchen implements into shiny towers that look “impressive” to them, but have the functionality of a rabid rat having an epileptic fit in your underpants. While you are wearing them.
I truly believe that it should be acceptable for programmers to be whipped when their code is the buggy, crappy, incoherent drivel it so often is.
And no, I am sorry, there is no solving this problem without corporal punishment to those perpetrating the software crimes. It’s the only way.
It was brought to my attention that the Hire Me Page for the various types of Hypnosis I do had a broken link, so that’s now fixed. I wasn’t aware it was broken because most people just emailed me with requests directly and we took it from there.
And that works fine too, but the Hypnotic Services link on the right does help to answer pretty much all questions you may have.
Since I have also now been doing Hypnosis via Skype for over two years, I have put my prices back up to 75% of where they where when I used to do it face-to-face (over 3 years ago, and really I still have prices from 2014 or so).
I have not seen any appreciable difference in doing the sessions with Skype instead of live, and since most people resolve their issues permanently with a session or two, and in the last 3 years none went over 6 sessions (over a period of months) and that was for an issue that I can honestly say most humans would never even tackle, never mind resolve, it means I should probably eventually put my prices back up to the same level as face-to-face costs.
For the present though, They are still mostly under £100 an hour.
So, if you are curious, go take a look at the relevant sections, and enjoy even reading about some of the Experiments I did.
I have written before about how I don’t fear AI, and provided a few examples (from memory so use the search function if you care):
I broke Chat GPT with one question about Moonraker (the film).
They still can’t get the number of FINGERS right on human hands, how hard is that?
4 sets of marines in pairs defeated AI sentries in absolutely ridiculous ways.
The (((woke))) usual suspects are trying to make AI so progressive that it is actually pretty severely racist against white people. And ONLY white people, which sort of gives the game away.
For the same reason as above, the AI rot will invariably get worse over time.
AI that is left to its own devices become pretty much like any 1980s teenager, likely to take the most extreme, offensive, yet dialectical position. So… you know… racist, misogynist, homophobic, transphobic, and REALLY noticing in general. They tend to get nuked by their own creators within a week.
It’s going to be out on December 12th, I am not sure when Amazon will allow pre-purchasing, but I think probably after the 6th as I have until then to do any corrections. So by the 9th I think it should be available for pre-release purchasing.
It will retail at $29.95 in the US, which sounds probably quite high, but… It’s a stonking brick of 828 pages (which is actually the maximum limit of a book size by Amazon), and is a collection of 3 books, complete with notes for each book, a map, technical details, and enough information about its setting to make it really, quite a project. Think of it as my version of The Lord of The Rings, though, of course, of a genre completely different and I can’t approach the master’s level of quality as a writer, but I assure you that the detail that went into developing this story is second to none. I may not have invented a new language, but I do believe this work has the capacity to at least shift any reader’s mind, at least a little, concerning the reality we live in, and what is actually possible, and probably really going on, too.
My style would be closer to a somewhat pornographic Edgar Rice Burroughs, in that it is high adventure stuff and quite cinematic, especially from book 2 on, but the strength of the story, in my humble opinion, is the plot, or rather, multiple plots and sub-plots throughout the story, some of which have story arcs that resolve only further down the line, so for those who like plot-driven stories and who enjoy trying to figure things out before they are explained by the story itself, this should be a pretty decent read, and something not often found in what has become “modern” SF.
In any case, I am terrible at marketing myself, so the above is just to give those interested an overall sense of things, not just hyperbole.
It’s in 9″ x 6″ format, so, comfortable despite its size.
Please order it as soon as you can, as it helps the algorithms if there is a high pre-release purchase.
The point of this book is multifold. And for those who care, here is a little on its nearly 30 year history in the making.
Dream-Writing
The three books that form part of Nazi Moon, are really the result of three dreams I had concerning Mars and the Moon. The dreams were so vivid and clear that I still recall them almost 30 years later. I have had a very strange relationship with dreams throughout my life as I have had premonitory dreams more than once, which were absolutely confirmed because I had shared them with my girlfriend at the time, so when they happened, I had objective confirmation I wasn’t just imagining things.
I also had a dream some 10 years before I met my present-day wife that, the day I met her, I recalled, and once again, I had an objective way to confirm this as she was showing me an apartment and in the dream I had, there had been a specific statue in the corner of the block’s gardens. I could not see that location from where we were and I also had never been to this particular block of apartments so, if that specific statue did turn out to be there, then… well… something! And indeed it was there.
I also had dreams where I have like part 1 of it and then, years later, I have part 2 of it and it flows just as if it was the continuation of the original dream even though years have passed in the waking world. I do not know what any of these things necessarily mean, I have my theories, but they are my best guesses. What I do know is that human beings absolutely have an element of precognition, because at least twice in my life it saved my life, and I had it other times in less life-and death situations, but, as I discuss in a lot more depth in my book Systema – The Russian Martial System (which I taught for years) the US military is training Special Ops people to develop this by testing it in absolutely scientific settings. The Russians are ahead on it, having it be part of their normal analogous training system. Something that the original Systema trainers did a bit at first, but tends to not be done now. Some of the “superhuman” powers of this nature are explained in my Systema book, and have been experienced by others who read it and experimented for themselves.
And Honorton and Ferrari demonstrated years ago (when science could still be reproduced reliably) that precognition is something that a statistically significant (though low) number of humans can do, and have as an ability. Details of this are included in the Systema book too, along with a computerised test that, using video, was the first of its kind in the world and for which I was a test subject, that proved Systema movements and strikes are the least predictable ones of all the ones tested.
ANYWAY… that long preamble was just to point out that I am not sure what the significance of each dream was, but each one pretty much was the launching point for each of the three books.
The cover of the original Overlords Of Mars first book (Inception) was a little similar to the one above, but later I changed it and I think the one usually presented is the one with the image of Mars (which has a story all on its own, as it’s an image rendered by a guy that uses actual telemetry data from NASA to get his images as accurate as possible and was featured in National Geographic, and he gave me permission to use it completely free of any royalties) and a pair of very blue female eyes. Those eyes were taken from a photograph my wife had sent me, though she was not my wife or even girlfriend at the time, and I used them because they were the closest ones to the kind of eyes I had dreamt about in the first dream that became the Overlords of Mars series.
The cover of the second book was done by a guy who now lives in LA and has done most of the special effects in pretty much every film you have seen in the lat 20 years. His team was the lead SFX guys in all the Iron Man films. We used to train Systema together in London and due to his move and work load we sort of lost touch, but I’ll be sending him a copy anyway, as he loved the story when he did the cover for me, again, just as a friend.
The first dream had been about encountering people of a more evolved sort and without giving any spoilers, readers will be able, I think, to figure out when that happens in book 1.
The second dream was of being on Mars, with the kind of equipment described in book 2, exploring, going into underground locations, and the sense of a female presence being there too, which, once again, I think will be recognisable in book 2 – Stasis.
The third dream was of something I do not describe in book three, specifically, but definitely represented the social set-up present there, and the technology that made it possible to be on the surface, as described in book 3 – Black Sun.
The first dream was had in the early to mid 1990s and the third one was had in 1996. And yes, I developed those dreams and the idea for the books, way back then. I had just finished and published The Face on Mars at the end of 1995, which I want to stress is completely NON-Fiction, and is the only book that has really explained what happened on Mars and how. The main concept has been plagiarised by Graham Hancock, which he admitted to me in person in late 1997, (and yes, I have a witness) but in any case, my theory of the reality of how Mars was destroyed has never been found to be flawed, and in fact, some of the things I wrote about as being possible back in 1995 have since been proven to be exactly as what I predicted, and as they should be, if my theory on the destruction of Mars being intelligent is correct, which I am still sure it is. I also updated the book in 2014, which has more information, relevant to the current fiction Omnibus Nazi Moon.
I met all the top people involved in studying Mars at the time, in conferences, speeches we gave, magazine articles I wrote, and even radio and TV interviews I did at the time. Mark Carlotto remains a long distance friend and I have made some videos on Kurgan TV to explain why the man’s work is really second to none concerning his science. He is a consummate scientist, a real one, that actually does proper science, regardless of any politics or anything else. And he too believes The Face is artificial, which was my own conclusion before the later images were produced. Since then, what NASA actually has been producing, image-wise is, to my mind, suspect in the extreme. For reasons that are obvious and explained very early in the fiction works.
Anyway, the point is that in order to write The Face on Mars, I had spent literally every waking minute researching everything from the most obscure astronomical information to details of the first (real or not) Alien abductions. And then I had a very weird experience, which, luckily, was also confirmed by pretty much the whole of South Africa, as a bunch of UFOs basically flew down the N1 main national highway that runs the length of the country, and entire police stations came out to see them, not just me and a friend with my video camera, and it was on the front page of newspapers and still in the news a few days later. It was what we would today call a UFO “Flap”. And luckily I wasn’t the only one to document it, at least partially, in my book. I didn’t explain the whole thing because it sounded crazy, but at least the verifiable parts I did put in the book. And I had a video of the whole event.
Shortly thereafter I was burgled and the only thing that was taken was those videos and the video camera, not cash, not the stills camera, nothing else, and the “break-in” was done professionally without leaving a trace of “breaking-and-entering”. My phone was also tapped, which was confirmed by the n.2 guy in the equivalent of the South African secret service at the time, although he said he had no idea who was doing it as it wasn’t the South African Government.
I had a lot of strange meetings with various people, from Admirals’ daughters that had apparently been drugged and messed with because they found out too much about what daddy was doing, to professional and well-known European astronomers that worked for ESA (European Space Agency) that told me privately they agreed with all my theories in the book, and they said I was absolutely correct, but they could not support me publicly or they would lose their job. I also met a lot of clearly disturbed people, but the meetings with the non-crazy people were really quite astonishing, because I could confirm who these people were and they were not random morons, nor where they looking for fame, fortune or anything else from me, other than just their being glad someone else had figured out some of the things that they knew and which they could not really discuss, either for fear of reprisals, or for fear of being thought of as a crazy person.
After I wrote The Face on Mars, I had already figured out that if antigravity technology was a thing (and it absolutely is) then, there were a bunch of logical consequences that made it obvious that:
The world we live in, is really, little more than a prison planet.
Aliens that also had the technology could/would have been in contact already, especially given what the destruction of Mars signified, since this Solar System MUST be known of already.
The kind of “war” that intelligent races that had extensive access to antigravity technology would tend to be sneaky, subterfugeous, and indirect, because if you start flinging rocks around with that technology, the casualties are on a civilisational, and even system-wide scale.
So, these strange situations that were happening to me and these people I met or would approach me, along with the clear psyops I was subjected to from time to time, (in a fairly light mode, it must be admitted) made perfect sense to me.
I had made it clear that I thought antigravity technology was absolutely planet-busting capable, and as such needed to be absolutely regulated, so, it’s not like I was threatening to release the blueprints of how to build your own little UFO, which in any case I would not know how to do. And over the years, I have held that position consistently. Which is why I assume I have mostly been left alone.
The reality is that even if only really good guys had access to antigravity technology (I wish!) it would still need to be regulated and controlled with a pretty ironclad set of rules that are absolutely enforced. One crazy bastard with an anti-gravity machine the size of your car can reduce our planet to a smouldering death-ball if not just another asteroid belt where Earth used to be. And there are a LOT of crazy bastards on top of the billions of idiots, so, even if I were put in charge of all the antigravity technology for the Sol system tomorrow, you bet I would put in place absolutely Draconian security systems to use the stuff. The only difference is that once I have that aspect completely nailed down, I would gradually release the information concerning the technology to the whole planet. And yes, that is absolutely fraught with danger, I know, which is why the information would need to be released gradually and anyone not following or trying to avoid the protocol would need to be hammered into the ground.
Over time, the procedures of security concerning the operation of antigravity machines would become a standard Modus Operandi for all humans and eventually, the Human race would evolve enough to be able to take its place in the Galactic scheme of things where the other intelligent races have already come to similar conclusions that, when everyone has a zap gun that can destroy entire stars and planets, no one had better use it that way, otherwise everyone else will see to it that you and your species disappear from the genetic code of this section of space.
So… I have been living with that reality in my head, pretty much fully-formed since age 26. And nothing in the intervening 28 years has done anything other than confirm this theory at every turn and in every aspect.
And the books have been in my head since then. Certainly these three.
Confederate Rising was a little novella I wrote for fun (see the notes in the section labelled Overlords of Mars on the left) as a kind of joke for a group of online friends, and it is set in the same Universe as these books, but in the far future, a few hundred years from the events of Nazi Moon.
Now that you know the underlying premise of the realm in which my stories take place, I sincerely hope you not only buy and read the book, but I really hope you spread it around and give it as a gift to friends and family, because, as some of you know, science fiction is more than just entertainment. It propagates certain ideas and realities through human consciousness, and thanks to principles of morphic resonance, when enough people have an idea in their heads as a possibility, it becomes a reality. Films like a 2001: Space Odyssey was filmed in 1968 and inspired by a short story from the almost self-confessed pedophile Arthur C. Clarke written in 1951. That film showcased technology that now we take for granted and have even surpassed in some cases.
Now, I am not a well-connected elite, being as I am absolutely not only, not a pedophile, but believing that they deserve the death penalty, so… I have to rely on you normal people to spread the word for me and change quite a bit of the false narratives that are flying around the entire globe as though they were absolute truths, when in fact, they are vicious lies designed to keep the best of us down.
And if you also just enjoy a good story for the entertainment purposes, that’s absolutely fine too, but your help in spreading the word would be very much appreciated.
Lastly, if any of you want signed copies, the only way I can do that is to order some books myself, sign them and post them, which is quite expensive and can take a LONG time, especially since US customs can hold books for up to 8 weeks in customs, for reasons best known to themselves. However, if any of you are interested and are willing to pay for the postage, please leave me a comment or send me an email and we will see about doing that for you.
Imagine if you Bonobos could speak like humans, with a near full vocabulary, but retained their bonobo interests and brains although they were trying to pretend to be the rightful rulers of Earth. In short: Planet of the Apes, the original film.
Then imagine these apes pretending to discuss an item of basic philosophy or religion, or metaphysics. And imagine how you might feel and what you might think observing them.
Any attempt at trying to seriously engage with them on the topic would be utterly frustrating, as you might only get a few basic concepts across before their limited ape brain got them back to talking about bananas and how they are intrinsic to the question at hand. Or how rutting with the nearest female bonobo right then and there was. All the while pretending they are sophisticated philosophers even as they rape the nearest female and shortly eat the banana she was trying to keep for herself.
Would you get angry and beat the male and try and educate him? Would you take the banana from him and at least try to prevent him from stealing it from the other ape? Would any of it be worth doing at all?
Or you might poke at them with a stick or a sentence, to see what they might do. You might get more fond of one or two oft mhm who seemed to have some beginning of a kind of understanding, or more human-like behaviour. But in the end, you would realise they are bonobos.
Arrogant as it will sound, this is very often the case I encounter when I come across the average “theologian on the internet”. They say the most absurd and retarded things, with no basis in the factual information they are pretending to base their opinions on. Literally none.
So, I am often finding myself making comment like this one:
And people think “Oh, what a rude bigot!”
Insofar as they think of anything at all past the nearest fetching female ape with a banana in hand, that is.
But you see, for the half-dozen or so of you that might not be apes who actually read and comprehend… the fact is that I didn’t just become a Sedevacantist (that is a proper Catholic) by chance. I wasn’t born into it. I rejected religion as a whole in general and Catholicism as it was preached to me by the then Novus Ordo (but probably validly ordained) priest we had come talk to us in school when I was 7. I have read thousands of books and probably hundreds on various concepts of physics, astronomy, philosophy, various religions, and metaphysical beliefs. I literally read hundreds of research papers on everything from neurology to ESP testing. I practiced various forms of martial arts and the associated exercises of mental and physical control that goes with them. I have read pretty much everything Milton Erikson wrote on hypnosis and practices self hypnosis on myself for over a year and a half before I tried it on anyone else. I have yet to fail at a single session of smoking cessation done on others and have helped people heal even from clinically diagnosed paranoid schizophrenia that meant they were on mandated medication. I have read enough stuff on neuroscience and tested various practices on myself to know most doctors haven’t got a clue of the level of brain-body-mind connection that exists and how much it is interrelated.
So, when I had a unique, Road to Damascus experience, I didn’t just go “Oh, right, I’m Catholic now!”.
Nope, I spent the next 4 years obsessively reading and researching Christianity, which I had already read up on a lot of stuff before already, but now I went back to the very earliest writings on it and started there. And slowly but surely it became obvious that Catholicism was far and away the closest interpretation of reality as it actually is that exists. And I didn’t just assume this. I tested it. I tested it scientifically with prayer and various methods of belief and so on. And my life radically changed path in ways that are literally nothing short of miraculous.
If you take the approach I did to Christianity, which is to assume nothing, to release all and any preconceived ideas you had and just do the work of researching it from the very baseline, it becomes absolutely impossible to assume that Protestant-anything has any validity whatsoever.
That’s because Christianity absolutely has rules. Which, of course, is perfectly logical. If God is good and loving and logical (the word Logos literally is part of Christianity) it makes absolute sense that you have rules and things you can do and things you should not do. And things that you need to do and things you need to NOT do. Simply saying “I believe in God and Christ is King!” just is NOT enough. Nor would it be enough for anyone even remotely reasonable and good. That level of “belief” is literally identical to the one demons have. They know God is real and they know Jesus is King. Which is why they have to flee before him and people who invoke his name with true faith in our Lord.
And if you study Christianity, you realise that Catholicism IS Christianity. It always was. Infallible Popes and everything else. And you realise the lies told about it and the eternal and relentless attacks against it from the very start. And you also begin to see how the politics and byzantine machinations of the East led them to splinter away for purely human and worldly reasons, even though they recanted their errors several times, even four centuries later at the ecumenical council in Florence. What is more, you see the fruits of Catholicism literally throughout the world. And as you continue to study you begin to realise the evil of freemasonry, Satanism and the Judaic principles behind it all. And you begin to appreciate a lot more exactly what Jesus meant in Revelation 3:9. Or how America came about and who made it as it is, and who controls it to this day.
You begin to see the French Revolution and the so-called “Enlightenment” and the Industrial Revolution in a new light and why they had to happen after the staged Rebellion by the fat German sex pervert, aided by the wife-murdering, impotent, English King.
You begin to understand the absolute majestic heroism of the Crusaders and the vicious lies told about them by Protestant historians for centuries.
You begin to grasp the treachery of the Eastern “orthodox” backstabbers and the further lies they tell about the oh so “unjust” fourth Crusade that sacked Constantinople. Which was eminently just in the scheme of things, and rightly and deservedly so, by the logic of any reasonable man.
Then you read the Code of Canon Law of 1917 and you begin to now really understand why what you always thought WAS the Catholic Church in fact is no such thing and hasn’t been since 1958, when the first fake Catholic, a confirmed freemason named Angelo Roncalli, took over the papcy by an completely invalid “election” with many more fremasons already entrenched in the Vatican. After that foul day on the 28th October 1958, there has not been a valid pope since and almost the entirety of the catholic Clergy became apostate and heretical by continuing to promote the absolute and obvious heresy of Vatican II. Absolute and obvious to anyone who has bothered to do what I did and research the history and the ways of Christianity from the very first principles, without any preconceived idea of what I might or “should” find.
So, you then go and investigate both he fake Bergoglian-led home of pederastry, communism, and lies, and you compare it to your investigation of Sedevacatnist priests and bishops and their congregations. And here it becomes obvious that the Novus Ordo clergy are really Novus Orco. Just new orcs, spouting the same gnostic and satanic lies all attackers of christianity always spouted. They are fake and they know they are fake. Perhaps the very newer and younger priests aren’t aware even of Vatican II, but if that is so, whose fault is it? If I study to be an engineer, do I not learn about bending moments? Catholicism is not magic. It is based on reasons and logic. there is a REASON why it was Catholic monks that invented the scientific method and applied it to pretty much everything.
But the Novus Orco “Church” is fake and gay and pederastic, and the fruits it produces are the same, rancid and abusive. It literally has nothing to do with actual Catholicism, which is now, exclusively the purview of Sedevacantists. Nor is it my opinion that makes it so. It is the same, logic, reason, and scientific method that does so. With he added benefit that it is supernaturally protected from error by Jesus’s promise to always be with “us” that is, the church.
All the rules of Catholicism are written down. And why would they not be for any ACTUAL RELIGION BASED IN TRUTH?!?
It’s not write your own rules, nor choose your own adventure book and if you don’t like the outcome you just choose differently until you get the result you want. A real God that Loves us would have a way for us to KNOW the rules and for them to be clear and simple, and available. Even despite EVERY human being being flawed and imperfect. THAT is the amazing, miraculous thing. If you read the Code of Canon Law of 1917, it is absolutely obvious that a society based on these rules would produce amazingly good results. And we have 2,000 years of proof of it too. Literally no other religion on Earth even comes close to having done what Catholicism has done for humanity. CATHOLICISM. Not some vague and corrupted “christianity”.
And protestantism has brought us, in straight line order:
Contraception, which leads to sex before marriage and sex for entertainment. Which in turns leads to…
Divorce. Which was only accepted by Protestant denominations in Christianity and at first still thought of as pretty scandalous, so they went ahead with…
Fault-free divorce. Which of course led to…
Sex as mere sport/entertainment/pleasure with no connection to marriage, which naturally led to…
Killing babies so they don’t get in the way of having sex just for “fun”. And killing them by the most horrific way possible by sucking them out of the womb in pieces, ripping them limb from limb. And by the MILLIONS. Every. Single. Year.
Gay “marriage” which leads to…
Child trafficking. Because that is literally what adoption by homosexuals is, since they are obviously unable to reproduce naturally. Which leads to…
Transgenderism and the associate child abuse and sexual mutilation.
And so on and so forth. You can scream and shout and tell me that the Novus Orco “Catholic” Church is now heading down the same path led by its “pope” Bergoglio, and I of course agree with you. The Novus Orco is a creation of Protestants and Jews.
So… perhaps now you understand why when some brainwashed protestants, with all the best of intentions, I am sure, gets all shouty about how the Catholic Church is not the Real, One, True, Holy and Apostolic Church, I hover between wanting to bitchslap them le Valette style, until they recant —and I’d probably be happy to do the same 4 months in jail for it if it means every other cretin becomes aware of the reality of behaving like such a retarded ape— or laughing in their face and scrubbing them entirely from my life forever, as I would any annoying and irrelevant insect.
In fact, it is my rather miserly level of Christian charity that keeps me engaged from time to time with the rutting bonobos and their cursed bananas. Because I know, in such efforts, the few who are capable, who can read, who are not impossibly lazy and illiterate, may and do pick up the thread and do the research, and in time, they may get there. And getting there is the important part.
Whether they do so through my books or not is not important, though it does save a lot of time, since I have put a lot of references for people to verify for themselves within them.
I have been told by several people who also happen to admit that on investigation, they really cannot falsify or deny my logic and hence they too should really be Sedevacantists, that one of the things that prevents them from doing so at times is the WAY I present this information. With sarcasm, humiliating examples of people’s ignorance, and ridicule of their sophistry and ruthless exposition of their lies. You can go look at the videos I did on Jay Dyer if you want, to see their point.
But I feel the only point they have is that perhaps, my behaviours in that respect might earn me a little more time in purgatory (assuming I make it there). Firstly, Jesus himself was not averse to insulting, ridiculing and generally making the Pharisees and the idiots look like liars and morons, so, you know, I feel I’m on fairly solid ground here.
But more importantly, the number of people who have written to thank me and have gone on to get baptised, confirmed, married and proceeded to have their friends and family become interested and closer to doing so themselves outnumbers the complainers of my lack of “decorum” by at leasttwo orders of magnitude. That’s times 100 for those of you who are not sure what an order of magnitude is (x 10).
So… if you’re holding your breath for me to become a softer, gentler, kinder Kurgan with the fake Pagans, the sophists, the morons, the Protestants, the “Orthodox”, the liars and especially the fake, Satanic Clergy of the Novus Orco, well… good luck with that.
The largest battleground for human happiness and misery is in the field of romantic relationship between a man and woman.
UPDATE: you can now read how to make the best of the current situation in my book Caveman Theory. Available ONLY at my E-Store as it is too politically incorrect for Amazon. But read the post below to get a general sense of things first. As the book in large part is written to help you navigate the current situation and achieve success in the kind of relationship you want to have.
If you just listen to the first 7 minutes of this podcast on it, the lady in it identifies really quite well the basic issues facing young people today and what I found particularly useful is that she indicates, as does the guy doing the podcast, the specific fact that it is the general zeitgeist of the world to present things as if love itself is not part of the equation any longer. They refer to recent movies, Barbie and apparently Snow White and how the main woke actress in Snow White, Rachel Ziegler, says:
“She’s not going to be saved by the Prince, she’s not going to be dreaming about true love, she’s dreaming about becoming the leader she knows she can be. The Prince in the original movie stalked her.”
Imagine, someone from the hypokrite class thinking this way about the classic story of Snow White. The word hypokrite of course, was the original term for actors in Ancient Greece. You can see why it’s relevant to study the classic, and etymology, yes? Actors in classical times were essentially thought of as basically prostitutes. And while the glorification of whores is also nothing new (The temple prostitutes used to get paid to have sex with any man that donated to the temple and were held in high esteem by mostly Babylonian/Sumerian people, while the Greek Herodotus, in his Histories referred to the practice of forced prostitition at least once as “foul”.
The foulest Babylonian custom is that which compels every woman of the land to sit in the temple of Aphrodite and have intercourse with some stranger at least once in her life.
As pretty much the entire #metoo movement proved, thinking most actors and actresses are essentially highly paid prostitutes is really about the size of it. And in fact, having met a few actresses and also a few prostitutes in my life, generally, a highly paid whore who makes no pretence of being anything other than what she is, in my experience of conversing with such people, are far more honest and interesting than those who fancy themselves as artists that should be venerated. And if you doubt, me look up the term “yachting” when used in the context of famous actresses, fashion models and so on. Having worked as close protection for some wealthy people from all around the world, I can tell you that some world-recognised names of women that literally everyone knows, have, in fact, been bought an paid for to have sex with, like any common prostitute. It just cost more. And while I have no personal experience in the matter, if I had to bet on it I would bet that the more expensive famous whores probably performed worse than the cheaper unknown ones.
But I digress. The point is that the famous people a lot of young people look up to are essentially spouting the narrative they are paid to vomit out of the orifices they use to make their money.
And that narrative, as the man and woman in the podcast state, is that love makes you weak, is some kind of outdated, or outmoded way of being, removes choice and fun from your life, causes unnecessary suffering and is no good at all. And it is a narrative being pushed, as the lady correctly identifies, primarily by people who are undesirable to the opposite sex.
I have been saying for years that I have yet to meet a beautiful woman that is reasonably normal (i.e. hasn’t suffered some genuinely dramatically traumatising event) that is in any way a feminist. Pretty women pretty much can get a LOT of what they want primarily by playing to their straights and those are the feminine qualities. And if they are really smart, they will use those to snatch a quality man who has masculine qualities.
The blue-haired manatees that scream feminism, and the incel-gargoyles that become MGTOW types, along with a few others that are internally as repulsive as the aforementioned generally are externally, are essentially deeply miserable human wreckage and as they say, misery loves company, so they try to drag everyone else down to their level of despair.
The narrative is so pervasive and so prevalent in literally every aspect of life that you don’t even realise in how many multitudes of ways it is pushed on you and at you throughout every single day. If you read my last blog post before this one, perhaps, you might begin to become more aware of how insidiously the lies about reality and ESPECIALLY about relations between men and women are inculcated in you by subterfuge, stealth, unstated assumptions (one of the biggest culprits and methods), and so on.
Reality all around you is narrated and presented in a twisted manner in order to make you think that the current narrative of feminism-über-alles and being a strongly independent woman and an asexual automaton male, are the pinnacle one should strive for. That is, when they are not pushing the idea you should sexually mutilate yourself in order to become a tragic parody of the opposite sex.
So you bet, there are a lot of unhappy young men and women, unfulfilled in any relationship they attempt to get into and so on. Even if one of them has actually seen through most of the fog, finding a partner that has too, or that at least is amenable to being shown the way through the lies is difficult. It requires patience, skill, intelligence, and genuine research that does not collapse into embittered despair.
I have mentioned these type of things over the years a lot, both on this blog and on my Youtube channel, so search through it and see the videos on the topic too, and pluck what you can from it, but in just a few key sentences, as a starting point, please try to keep this in mind:
Male and female brains are physically and structurally different. That has an effect.
Male and female hormones and the female cycle of hormones are wildly different and this affects everything.
Women are far more swayed by their emotions and hormones than men are, generally speaking, and as a result less likely to be objective overall. Their biology demands a certain level of “selfishness” that has served humanity well in the survival of the species. Just like male biology has a tendency to be more logical and objective and (at least until fairly recently) be more prone to self-sacrifice for the sake of his family, has also served the survival of the species well.
Yes technology has made our survival far more likely than it used to, but our biology remains essentially the same and the answer is not to try and modify our biology to suit the machines, but rather to alter the machines to suit our biology. This last point has literally not been understood by any one of the myriad “relationship” experts you see all over the internet and seminars and books. Which should tell you how useful a lot of their other advice is (which they generally demand money for). Well, you read it here first. For free.
Above all, a lifelong marriage for the purpose of raising multiple children in a loving, strong, family, with emphasis on overcoming hardship and sticking by your blood whenever you can, with the ethics that Catholicism has, —that is, the original real Catholicism (sedevacantism now), which includes Just War and the Death Penalty, as well as the DUTY to defend innocents, yes even with violence, yes even with pre-emptive violence— produces the genuinely happiest life you can possibly imagine.
I stumbled into it by never giving up my fight against perceived nonsense from childhood until my late 30s. the Boomer zeitgeist did a lot of damage to my generation (and your too), but I sincerely hope you throw off the mental shackles I got rid of mostly by brutish (yet correct) animal instinct (at least at first) by conscious understanding and reasoned contemplation of reality and truth.
March on brothers and sisters; and win.
UPDATE:
Lest you think I am unkind… let me be clear, that even though you may be a gargoyle, it’s up to you what TYPE of Gargoyle you make yourself into.
The Loser, Omega, Poor-me, Gargoyle-Incel:
The “Red-Pilled” All-women-are-bitches, MGTOW Incel-Gargoyle:
Or… The…
I’m a Gargoyle! And I kick all the ass! NON-Incel Gargoyle:
PS: Please ignore the demonic undertones, Gargoyles are traditionally representative of demonic beings, while the unfortunates that look like them are not necessarily evil any more than anyone else is. I hope the images illustrate the point I am trying to make in a sufficiently obvious manner. You can’t help some of the cards you are dealt. But you have absolute authority in how you play them.
Some years back I did a video on the Lies You Are Told in general History, and more recently on Kurgan TV I did a series (which I will pick up again soon, on the more specific lies of history starting with pre-history really and eventually working my way to the present day (all in due course).
And of course, if you read this blog, you are aware that for some 30 plus years, all the supposed “crazy” theories I held have, over time, been proven to be absolutely factually correct. It’s not because I am some oracle, it’s just I pay attention to things, can do basic math and logic and have had to deal with the rabid flying monkeys some people refer to as Journalists and the Mass Media in general.
By now, anyone that trusts a Mass Media Outlet can be considered to essentially be a full-blown Zombie.
You always need to interpret newspapers, TV news, and so on as being the lowest form of crack-whore and deceiver, who probably worships Satan in their spare time. And I apologise in advance to crack-whores for the comparison.
As long as you do that, you MIGHT be able to understand the truth behind their obfuscations, and can then confirm it by researching a topic on your own.
But the problem has been so pervasive and for so long, that people are essentially anaesthetised into believing “official sounding” or “authoritative sounding” or “famous person speaking” or “super rich person speaking” as being “true”.
And not only is there no correlation whatsoever between truth and those categories of people, but if there were to be a correlation, you may find it is negative.
Steven is clearly an intelligent guy and he made a lot of money. I also found out recently he comes from Botswana, which made want to say ‘Hey! Give me five, man!” Since I grew up there. He is a lot younger than I am and a millionaire, so despite the originally smaller group of people that used to live there, I don’t believe our paths or even our parent’s paths ever crossed while I was there. But it’s always nice to know that someone that comes from or spent some time in the same little-known area as you, did well for himself. It genuinely makes me happy for him, and even makes me a little “proud” as silly as that sounds given I had nothing to do with his success and that I don’t know him at all; but it’s still a fairly common human response.
His podcasts are genuinely interesting in-depth interviews with pretty extraordinary people, and definitely entertaining. Steven himself appears to be a very decent person too and although I never met the guy, it is obvious he is extremely well-read and at least a couple or three standard deviations north of normal IQ.
That all said, his guests, which cover a very wide range but are usually experts or wealthy men and women in their field, are, as I said, genuinely interesting, but even so, there is an overarching veneer of respectability that is to a certain extent rooted in falsity.
And I absolutely do not mean to imply with this that Steven is in any way trying to do anything other than get to the real truth of very interesting topics. I genuinely believe he really is interested, and he really is trying to get to the bedrock of truth of whatever he gets interested in. I realise his podcast to a certain extent is also a “performance” and like all of us he has a “mask” to some degree or other, but I have spent enough time watching a half-dozen or so of his podcasts over the last few months that I am confident in saying that if I had to judge him, with a gun to my head, I would say he is likely:
Honest
Principled
Truth Seeking
Interested in People and their well-being
Self-motivated (very much so)
Confident in practice, yet has a core deep down that may still wobble internally
Very intelligent
If I were really pushed I might also say that if absolutely forced to, I would likely bet that he is no stranger to the female of the species, and probably indulged quite a bit before (I think?) apparently settling down with one girlfriend.
I would guess he is mostly (and honestly) agnostic religiously speaking (as was I for most of my life) though I am unaware of his position at all on the matter and if he has said what it is, I have no idea.
So, all in all, my point is that I absolutely and genuinely expect that Steven tries to put out information that is truthful, practical and useful for as many people as possible. I have nowhere near his reach, wealth or effectiveness, and our styles of presentation are probably almost diametrically opposite, and he is without any shadow of a doubt far, far, far more polite and, shall we say: “professionally spoken” than I am, but at core, I recognise the intent is very similar. If we figure out something important or that might be good for other people, we genuinely want to spread it, aside from any money or commercial considerations. Which yes, we may indulge in to some extent or other, but really is not the primary motivator at all. We all have to eat and he does his podcasts for free, and if I had his money, I might even produce my books for free too.
This long intro, is not to suck up to Steven, I am fairly sure he will never have any interest in interviewing me, if he ever even came across me for my ideas. I present it because I want to be absolutely clear in how you are personally being deceived, and how people like Steven have (in my opinion) genuinely ZERO interest in trying to intentionally deceive you, and yet, the zeitgeist of the world is such that deception is baked into the very fabric of almost any information you consume.
Allow me now to use Steven and his (most excellent) podcasts to point out what I mean.
Let’s start with Scott Galloway and the podcast I saw in full of him, here:
Now, before you get all concerned, please don’t worry about me, my sex life is great, as the three children we have had in the last 4 years should prove. But I know a LOT of younger men are having a bad time of it, which is why I get emails and I try to comment on the topic when I can. And why perhaps I have some success at this, since at least 3 young couples in their early to mid 20s that came across my ideas over the last couple of years are now happily married and working towards their first babies. So I thought I’d listen to what some other supposed expert in the field had to say.
And if you listen to the podcast, Scott makes quite a lot of valid points, then at some point (about halfway or so on) he kind of goes completely off the rails by presenting and baking in his viewpoints of politics. He literally says Putin is a murderer, Trump is a criminal and essentially saying parents that decide to give hormone treatments to their children for the eventual sexual mutilation that is known as “transgenderism” are you know… normal, instead of the child-abusing freaks they are. He repeats some of these absolutely insane points along with the idea that Ukraine is winning the war against Russia. I mean, anyone that really thinks Russia is on the ropes and thinks this as of 1 month ago, is clearly either doing a lot of heavy drugs, or is completely delusional.
Once you become aware of this and you rewind and listen to his “good points” you then realise that they too are somewhat tainted. Notice how he says that masculinity needs an update basically. Because you know, things that literally worked and created civilisation for thousands of years are somehow now suddenly “bad” because of technology and our supposedly superior brains of the modern age. That modernism is great theme is one we shall return to again, both in this post as well as in general.
I have already described how the mechanisation of humanity as a direct result of protestantism and the much vaunted “protestant work ethic” which came about due to the industrial revolution is really a Satanic and dehumanising principle. Something Steven instinctually (if not intellectually yet I believe) grasps, since if I remember well, I heard mention of the fact that he has a rule of no meetings before 11 am. Meaning he has already shaped his work as he wishes more or less instead of necessarily as is demanded by “the world”.
So let me make a stark comparison of two hypothetical worlds, and you tell me, if you are a man, which world you’d prefer to live in.
Scott world: You can “transition” your child to a “different” sex by mutilating him/her and giving him/her physical irreversible operations to do so perfectly legally and the zeitgeist accepts this as normal. One parent only can force this on their children and the other parent cannot prevent it. LGBT Pride Parades are a normal part of life and naked, sexually suggestive, adults can take part in these in front of small children without any repercussion. LGBT agenda in schools is considered part of normal education, and transexuals that may be convicted pedophile in drag can always read to small children in libraries, along with possible displays of hardly covered genitals. You are not allowed to respond to ANY verbal statements with ANY physical violence, no matter what. You are not allowed to respond with deadly force even to an attacker, no matter the circumstances, without undergoing at minimum a very lengthy and expensive trial with economic, social and possibly physical (incarceration) effects even in the best of cases. Weapons are limited to ownership or use only by police/military, and thus the use of force is mandated only for specific government employees. Any physical altercation of any nature whatsoever results in automatic assault charges for at least one and possibly both parties. Martial arts are heavily regulated and practitioners are considered as “dangerous”, so if they are EVER in any physical altercation, they are considered as unfairly “armed”. Physical restraint of even a violent home intruder is considered kidnapping and not permitted.
NOTE: EVERY aspect of Scott World is currently a reality in at least some countries around the world. All the LGBT Stuff in most of the Anglo-Saxon world and the gun stuff in the Anglo-Saxon world outside of the USA for the most part.
Kurgan World: Any form of “transitioning” is outlawed, regardless of age. Psychological counselling is offered for people with sexual dysphoria. Homosexuality is not permitted to be taught in any fashion as being “normal” or natural, since it obviously is not. And “pride” parades are not permitted by law, nor is proselytising of homosexuality. Homosexuality itself is not specifically outlawed, nor punished by law, however any public displays of it would fall under an obscenity law (say a fine or so depending on the severity of the display). Any homosexuality performed on anyone under the age of at least 18 (and preferably 21) would also be considered a crime, similar to having sex with an underage person. Any doctor that performed un-needed surgery on people who wish to be amputees, would be incarcerated for intentional grievous bodily harm and mutilation of another, and obviously stripped of their medical licence. Men who chose to settle their differences by unarmed combat are not subject to any prosecution as long as both agree to the fight in front of witnesses and do so away from public areas. In the event that a physical attack on a man is launched in public, for whatever reason, he has the absolute right to defend himself with force. The force should generally be appropriate to the attack, but in any legal disputes on the matter, the erring should be on the side of the victim. So, if a 6’3″ 250 lbs bodybuilder violently attacks and sustains that attack on a 5′ 120 lbs guy, and that little guy draws a .45 colt and places three rounds in the bodybuilder’s head, eh… good shooting Tex, is about all he’d get from the cops. If the last two rounds where after the bodybuilder had already hit the floor and was lying in a pool of his own blood, yeah… maybe Tex loses his gun licence and gets some community service. Anyone braking into your home, armed or not, who gets shot dead or shot wounded and/or crippled is not going to get to sue anyone for anything. Cops do NOT get special treatment for unlawful behaviour, and any citizen can make a proper citizen’s arrest just like any cop, as long as he is following the correct procedure. Concealed weapon carrying is permitted to anyone who applies for it formally and has not been charged previously with some firearm or general violent crime offence. Drink driving results in immediate loss of licence, and have to do community service along with a doctor’s note certifying the man has attended AA like meetings for an uninterrupted 6 months, before he is allowed behind a wheel again, with a licence with a single point on it from then on. Meaning any infraction results in loss of licence and similar situation for a year before he gets it back. Third strike and he’s out of driving for good. Public indecency, obscenity, or extreme vulgarity is punishable by law, as is public blasphemy of the national religion. Persons in position of authority or public officials (government employees) who perform criminal acts are punished more severely (generally double the sentence of a normal citizen at a minimum). The death penalty exists and is swift and efficient for certain crimes (child rape or murder, murder without any mitigating factors, imprisonment with aggravating circumstances [e.g. imprisonment for the purposes of rape, torture, sexual trafficking and so on]). Generally the breaking of agreed upon contracts incurs quite stiff penalties, and the principles of Roman Law apply (Principles guide, specific cases are judged on an individual basis based on their specifics). The murder of a confirmed rapist of a child, by literally anyone, but especially anyone connected to the child by friendship or family relationship, is not considered a crime in itself, but if done in public would fall under the obscenity laws and one may face punishment for it. Unprovoked assaults of anyone, regardless of sexual orientation, sex, religion or ethnicity, is subject to stiff penalties and these are enforced.
Those are your choices. Let’s ay you can only pick one of them and there is nothing in between. I genuinely am not aware of anyone actually male that would pick Scott World. Are you?
You see, there is literally NOTHING WRONG with men resolving their differences with some sensible but brutish violence. In fact, it would really resolve a lot of the world’s problems if that was returned to. It is only the Scotts of this world that disagree with it. And once I heard his take on the whole “transgender” child mutilation thing, I became instantly aware that Scott must have probably been a member of a tribe that seems to think it’s ok to foster that kind of thing on Europeans, although they tend to reject it in their own societies. So I decided to google him. And wouldn’t you know it…
Early life and education
Galloway grew up in Los Angeles, California. His father was a Scottish immigrant to the United States who worked as a sales executive. His mother, a Jewish emigrant from London, England, worked as a secretary.
Yup, just as expected. Yet another Cohen-cidence. That now confirmed fact wasn’t even remotely in the back of my mind while I listened to the podcast with Scott, until I noticed a pattern that is now fairly obvious not just to me, but to most people that are paying attention now, and that is: whom, exactly, pushes which type of narrative.
And the guy is planning to write a book on Masculinity. Yeah. Good luck with that. You might as well read a book on mental health and not being an egomaniacal globalist written by Jordan Peterson. Oh… Wait…
But if you were to just gloss over his trangendersim nonsense, or his absolutely deluded take on Ukraine, or Trump for that matter, given that Trump, like him or hate him has had investigation after investigation pushed on him, and came out squeaky clean every time. While Biden, literally can’t complete a full sentence, is incontinent, has all the behaviour of a long-standing pedophile, has molested children on camera under the guise of… what? Sniffing them? As if THAT was acceptable? Is a known taker of monies from foreign interests he was absolutely not allowed to take money from, is a certified blackmailer, and has covered up for his drug addicted, pedophile son, in every way possible. And yes, Hunter Biden is a pedophile, the images and video from his laptop, which are now confirmed beyond any doubt as being real, even by the fully partisan FBI on his side, demonstrate this without any possibility of doubt. But Trump is the criminal. And Putin a murderer. According to Scott. Right.
Ok, then, that’s sort of an extreme example though right? Not really. Steven does not challenge Scott on any of these absurd points. To be fair he doesn’t agree with them either, but you can see the wisdom of the Romans now surely, yes?
Qui Tacet Consentit – He who remains silent consents.
And that, like it or not, is really the truth of the matter. I have no idea if Steven agrees with Scott on transgenderism, Trump and Putin. I suspect probably and mostly not. But under the veneer of wanting to be civilised, Steven remains silent. Then again, Steven is far more British than I am and I am far more African savage than he is, despite initial appearances. I would have laughed in Scott’s face and forced him to prove his ridiculous assertions with any facts he thought he had, just so as to expose him to global ridicule, not just my own.
My interview skills would be kinda more like this:
Do I mean to say that Steven is allowing lies to propagate if he doesn’t agree with my take on things? No. I am saying that the lies are so enmeshed in the current zeitgeist you need to be consciously awake to see them, because we have started to accept complete nonsense as if it had any basis in reality. Like math being racist. Men being able to get pregnant and “trans women” being real women. Or 2+2 being anything other than 4.
Let’s take now a completely different podcast, in case you are about to start accusing me of being an indefatigable noticer. Let me pre-empt you: I am. I notice. I pretty much always notice, sooner or later.
Let us look now at Bryan Johnson
Bryan is obsessed with immortality. It’s sort of a clikbaity reductionist sentence, but as far as normal humans go, it’s a fair assessment. The man has gone to absolutely incredible lengths to try and figure out how to reverse and slow down the ageing process. From a scientific standpoint it is absolutely fascinating, and he puts all the information out there for free for everyone. Even though the man is a self-made multi-millionaire, it is absolutely clear he is not primarily motivated by money.
In fact, by his own admission, he struggles to get his main point across, which —if I understood him at all correctly— is primarily that our future could and would be so far removed from what we think we know now, that we might as well be Homo Erectus a million years ago, trying to conceive of us and our technology today.
Bryan has done some incredible studies on the human body and brain and created a helmet that gives you instant brain feedback. I sure would LOVE to have one of those, and he has figured out that one of the very best things you can do for your health is eat a tablespoonful of extra virgin olive oil at every meal. I kinda knew proper olive oil was good for you to begin with, but his scientific and obsessive approach allowed him to realise it really is one of the very best things you can do for your body.
And as it happens, my own olive oil, cold-pressed, unfiltered, and without any kind of screwing around with it, literally happens to have been voted the best in the world bar none, for two years in a row.
And I could relate absolutely when he was saying that the stuff you buy in shops is not really proper extra virgin olive oil. He’s right. But he only sells the good stuff. And mine definitely qualifies. So, hey Bryan, if I can be your oil guy in Italy, please get in touch.
Does Bryan lie? Is he deluded? No, I don’t think so at all. I think Bryan is not neurotypical, but then, neither am I. He is absolutely driven and I may be wrong, but I don’t even get the sense that he is necessarily terrified of dying. He might be, I can’t say for sure, but I sense for him it might be more of an intellectual challenge. His main take seems to be: Look, no one knows a damned thing. We are monkeys scratching in the sand. So I want to figure out how it actually works. In a very undeniable way the man is a genius.
And like perhaps all geniuses, he might go down a road that really benefits mankind, or that creates unmitigated disaster, no one really knows. I don’t believe Bryan is looking to create a bad outcome for anyone, quite the opposite. I really think he is at heart, a very honest, curious, intense person of probably impeccable integrity. We neuro-a-typical freaks tend to be too interested in our own little projects we obsess over to have much room left over in our ever-spinning brains for deception. And in that sense, I recognise Bryan as a fellow freak. I don’t have his money, perhaps not even his drive, though I think I do, it’s just that mine was in different and perhaps multiple directions, and I achieved different things. He made millions, I learned to disarm people with loaded guns and probably handle myself very well in any physical confrontation throughout most of my life, and hopefully still some way into the future too.
To be perfectly honest, Bryan’s end goal of increasing longevity is only somewhat interesting to me. I like the idea of being physically more able than I have been lately, given my back injury, niggling knee injury and overall decline in health after catching Covid and then two pneumonias. He does freaky things like inject himself with things I am not certain might not impact his genetics permanently, but I would bet money he didn’t get Vaxxed either, just like me. And I would be shocked if I was wrong about that. I like the idea of being able to be fit and healthy right up to the day I drop dead, but I am not particularly against dropping dead. The biggest issue I have with death is that I started to make children late in life and I am curious! I want to know what happens with them and their children and their grandchildren. But if I am right about what happens at death, if there is any way to be, and I think there would be, some part of me will likely be quite aware of it, for quite some time anyway. Aside missing out on more time with people I love, death has never held any fear over me. And I faced it several times in situations I was sure would be the end at the time and I never flinched, so I’m fairly sure I’ll be ok on the day.
Philosophically I also think that death is probably necessary, and ultimately a good thing, in the normal affairs of a good life well-lived. Of course it feels absolutely tragic and unfair and evil when it happens in unexpected ways to people who we are sure had a lot more to offer or had such horrible ends. But my point is not that Bryan is in any way a bad guy or a liar, I am as reasonably sure as a person can be from watching a couple of hours of one podcast of a person that Bryan is probably a very honest and earnest person. It’s just that his whole fascination/obsession, while absolutely valid, as is any topic of genuine scientific endeavour that is not actively harming anyone else (Bryan experiments all his stuff on himself first and one volunteer so far I believe), and while I can be fascinated by the science and details of it, personally, the search for immortality, or even just life extension by a hundred years, is not something that keeps me particularly interested in se.
Furthermore, the people who ARE interested in it are possibly the very worst elements of humanity. Can you imagine another century under the incessant egomania of the Boomer generation? The recurring politicians passing the baton amongst each other for generation after generation, like the Italian politicians did from the close of WWII until their death from old age? It’s enough to send a shiver down your spine and pray for nuclear war or rogue asteroids.
My point here is that the ever-grasping for a longer life at all costs is a mistake. You are FAR better served by reaching for a GOOD life, well-lived. And please understand the Paradox: I believe Bryan IS living his best life well-lived. He is doing what he wants to do and doing it with great intent and passion. As I said, I am not even sure that immortality is really his core goals. I mean, sure it kind of “has to be” because of the topic, but I think the intellectual curiosity is probably the driver. It would be like me trying to create antigravity machines, yeah, yeah, ok, I care about all the sexy physics, free energy, and so on of antigravity technology and aether science, but in reality, it absolutely would not be the core driver. The core driver for me would be to get into such a spaceship and wormhole my way across the Galaxy to go and see all the alien planets and weird creatures and strange civilisations and amazing sights that the Universe has to offer. And I think in a way Bryan’s search for immortality is similar; sure, ok, it would be great to live forever for him (maybe) but really I think he would perhaps be really more stoked to have figured out what our future a million years from now looks like, I think.
And people who don’t get that would be hung up on the longevity thing, and be chasing that with all the anxiety and additional fear of death and therefore wrong focus on the present life they have, which would have long-term, and probably quite drastic and overwhelmingly negative, impacts on their day-to-day existence.
Conclusion
Yes there are the absolutely obvious lies, like, bombing children in Gaza is good and fair and helps the whole West. Or people of a foreign ethnicity, culture, language and religion, being offloaded by the hundreds of thousands and millions into countries that are not their own is somehow good for the natives of those countries. Or equality among human beings being based in physical reality instead of a spiritual intangible relating to souls.
Then there are the subtler lies, like Hitler having been the absolute, worst, worst, most evil man in the entire history of the world. When compared to say Stalin. Or Ted Bundy. Or a bunch of others. Or maybe that hey, people being gay hurts no one and we should stay out of people’s bedrooms. Sure, nice idea in theory. And now we have tranny story hour at the library for toddlers, by convicted pedophiles. Oh and don’t you DARE say there is a straight link between the two things, you dirty bigot.
And then there are the really subtle lies that you are not even aware you believe in and are ruining your life, like the idea that female and male brains are the same or operate the same or even can operate the same (bar physical oddities and mutations that are in no way the norm).
These lies affect your life negatively. And it really is important you begin to consciously pay attention and evaluate things properly. Bryan is kind of right in saying we pretty much know nothing about anything and we are little better than monkeys scratching in the dark. He’s not really wrong about that. However, we CAN know something. And it is our God-given duty (and gift) to be able and willing to try to do so.
And as a final point —that I hope you look into yourself, and that no doubt sounds insane to people like Bryan and Steven— the best approximation for how reality really works, and what is absolutely best for humanity, I advise you to look into and in due time, and after proper consideration, embrace and join, the real Catholic Church.
Which I have to stress every time is the sedevacantist one.
Sedevacantists are the only actual Catholics practicing actual Catholicism as it really was and remains to this day. The Bergoglian pedophile hive of frauds in the Vatican and all those who subscribe to the Novus Ordo heresies are absolutely not a reflection of anything other than Satanic intent to hide, obfuscate and destroy the one institution and organisation that has most elevated humankind more than any other religion or ideology, bar none.
I think you can see why there is no absolutely no fear, or chance whatsoever, that I will ever be invited to appear on Steven’s podcast. I’d probably get his entire channel banned within the first ten minutes and then catalyse an absolute avalanche of cancel culture on every business he is in any way involved with.
And I’d probably make it worse by playing the African card for fun; saying they just want to ban me because I am too light a shade of African, and Steven’s partly white privilege is being used as the excuse to silence my noticing.
Hi Steven. It’s ok, if you ever read this, and want to get in touch, I promise I won’t tell. Nor would you be the first famous person whose association with me I never mention. I am motivated by curiosity and truth you see, not fame or status (other than one very specific type of internally, self-evaluated status, unique to me, that is of pretty much no consequence to anyone else).
To the rest of you, I hope that this post if of some use to at least a few of you and hopefully a lot of you, to help you see the lies, the unintentional ones especially, baked into our very lives, as well, of course, as the more readily perceivable ones.
I have had several rather interesting conversations over the last few days and a recurring theme has been how so much of what is accepted as normal today, really is not.
Some are obvious things, that only the unhinged think are normal:
Mutilating children to supposedly give them the sex they “desire” instead of the one they were born with
That trans-anything is anything other than mental illness
And the consequent nonsense that men can be women or vice-versa
That math is somehow “racist”
That only white people can be “racist”
That there is any such thing as “White Privilege”
That Black Lives Matter is actually based on statistically relevant data concerning the incidence of shootings of black males by white police instead of statistically significant on the basis of incidence of violent crime by black males
That there is any such thing as the “gender” pay gap
That men and women are equal in any way (psychologically, or physically)
That diversity is a strength
That all cultures/religions are equivalent in civilisational values
That different ethnicities are equivalent in terms of IQ, physical performance of various activities, intellectual performance of various activities, and cultural approaches to different concepts
Then there are what I would call “second tier” observations, which really are (or should be) obvious is you realise the obvious issues above and simply extrapolate them a little bit:
That anyone on Earth is not somehow “racist” (literally anyone with a brain that works and eyes and ears that function will notice differences in people and will make instantaneous value-judgements on the basis of those differences. In short, you’d have to be deaf, dumb and blind, not to have what are intrinsically “racist” judgment calls. Literally everyone is “racist”. Including you. Deal with it and stop lying about it to yourself and others).
That sexual deviance is somehow “normal”. It clearly is not. Anything that does not naturally perpetuate the species is a deviant and unsustainable sexual dysfunction. that’s just a fact. More subtly, anything that is not geared towards a family unit comprised of one husband, one wife and the purpose of their lifelong marriage being to make and raise children is of markedly, objectively, lower civilisational value than any other set-up, even if they could reproduce children (polygamy of Mormons and Muslims for example, Polyamory, swinging, and so on).
Since men and women are not equal and since the best civilisational set-up is the one of the family unit as described above, it become objectively obvious that the roles of men and women are different and complementary in that family unit. Pretending otherwise, regardless of technological advancements is a recipe for disaster, since we have some 2 million years of biological wet-ware to over-ride and also a LOT of unchangeable hardware that simply is never going to go away or suddenly stop making us be men or women, no matter how many hormones and puberty blockers and deranged surgeon’s scalpels you go under.
In view of all the above and the historical evidence of some 2,000 years, it also becomes obvious that Catholicism has undoubtedly produced the very pinnacle of human civilisation around the world. this needs a little more fine-tuning to realise for a couple of aspects:
The Industrial Revolution was primarily a Protestant driven change, and touted as a benefit to mankind, but on deeper reflection, whether the Industrial Revolution really was of benefit to humanity is at best, very questionable, and rationally speaking, almost certainly a turn for the worst.
The working systems that came along as a result of the Industrial Revolution, similarly allow people to produce a higher output of work, but this is not rewarded by a correspondingly higher effect on people’s standard of living. In fact, it eventually settles down into a corrosive process that fills every waking hour of ever longer work-days, to fulfil and endless drive for “more”.
This “mechanisation” of human beings further corrodes time with family, the very dynamic of how a family works and operates, and consequently the type and level of education that the children in a family unit receive both directly and indirectly.
These are less obvious points and not applicable in all cases, but overall, the pattern’s statistics are as described in three above points.
And once you have digested all of the above, you begin to see a whole other level of reality that has been obfuscated by the creeping demonic lies that have been filtering into human life since the start but really took off after 1521 and then got turbo-charged during and after WWII and then started taking steroids in the mid to late 1990s and meth and cocaine from about 2008 on and finally a whole bunch of LSD since about 2016/7.
You begin to realise that corporal punishment in general, and the death penalty in particular, is absolutely reasonable and logical for certain level of crimes. No, not the ones that the current zeitgeist would put you to death for if they could, which might be calling Bruce Jenner, Bruce Jenner, or stating unambiguously that there are only two sexes and that homosexuality is a deviant sexuality that is not conducive to a natural continuation of the species, and that adoption by homosexual is in essence, child trafficking.
You realise that the desensitising to certain stimuli is beneficial while to others it is detrimental.
Given the above two points alone, the whole concept of training people like soldiers, police or other force on force/warrior types would drastically change.
As would the education/disciplining of children depending on their aptitudes and interests.
And intelligent education would be treasured and asked for by anyone who understood the above principles. And education that follows the baseline principles of things like the Trivium, the study of logic, reason. Basic principles of mathematics like ratios, sets, percentages, trigonometry, statistics, and algebra, taking the time with each not to just learn the formulae off by heart, but understand the principles. Along with a study of history beginning with the classics, explained and recounted at appropriate age level of understanding, starting with the Illiad and the Odyssey as stories and then the gradual introduction of the Greek classics, the study of Sparta and Athens, Rome, and the Roman Empire, and Egypt and its unexplained structures. As well as, of course, the study of dinosaurs, which really every child loves if properly introduced, and astronomy and geography, with a hint of exploration, archaeology and discovery. After which, biology and chemistry and physics can be tackled with a more reasonable background to build upon.
The study and use of various weapons and principles of martial disciplines.
The learning of basic home economics such as balancing a budget, the basics of cooking and keeping a clean home, and so on. All of these topics could be integrated into equal parts indoor and outdoor activities.
Described as I have above it all sounds like a super expensive classical education, but in reality it is something easily achieved by a group of parents that are willing and able to organise themselves and get this done.
And doing so would probably be considered some radical alt-right, Neo-nazi, eeeeeebil indoctrination of children. When in reality it would simply be giving them the tools to observe and evaluate the objective universe as it exists, instead of the lies it is presented as.
Do not accept the current twisted ideologies of Clown World. Study and re-learn what has been hidden from you and presented under a tsunami of lies and fakery the likes of which no generation before the present ones has seen.
Rebuilt the concept of objectivity and the study of both the physical and natural world as well as the metaphysical one.
Came across this and I wanted to point out a rather profound point it shows about human neurology and identity.
It sounds silly and funny at first, but precisely because it is so obviously absurd, it best highlights exactly how the human brain functions for most humans. As well as why it is so very difficult for people to let go of completely wrong ideas about themselves above all, but also of life in general, beliefs they associate with their own persona and so on.
The seemingly absurd idea that trying some cheese causes such emotional and psychological angst to this guy makes it clear that he’s obviously mistaken about the importance of cheese in general and almost certainly of cheese specifically as it refers to him. Eat the cheese, don’t eat the cheese, he’ll be fine. Barring some exotic allergy that will kill him the minute he tries cheese that is. HA! See? Made you doubt it too now.
Ha, ha, silly guy, right? Cheese. So funny.
Now do Protestantism. It’s at least as retarded, but look at all you Protties reading this now suddenly getting a thin line where your mouth used to be and furrowed brows of disapproval.
The reason this guy is so hung up on cheese is most likely because all the old traditional things people used to fight and die over have been corrupted to a degree whereby, the average boomer now considers the most trivial and idiotic things as being fundamental aspects of his personality. Like not eating cheese. The alternative is considering almost NOTHING as being fundamental to your personality, which is why there is a heavy uptick in teenagers pretending to be the opposite sex, or taking part in orgies, or believing the Earth is flat, and the Moon is made of cheese.
Not only are the traditions corrupted and in many cases destroyed, but the very tools of basic logic and basic reasoning have been intentionally kept from these people. They literally do NOT have the mental ability to reason their way into a reasonable position. They are, in effect, magical thinkers. Cargo cultists to Nth degree.
Leaving aside for a moment the religious or other ideologies, and focussing purely on the neurological element, the reality is that all humans have an idea, a representation of themselves in their own head. Depending on what that idea is composed of, how those beliefs came about and how attached one is to them, changing can be nigh on impossible.
I was lucky that at an early age I put it into my head that anything any one human being on Earth could do, was possible, so if I applied myself, it was likely I too could do it eventually. I also had persistence and never giving up drilled into me and reinforced by myself and my own choices throughout my life, and still do. Even so, certain patterns and behaviours that I felt were a fundamental part of who I was were very difficult for me to break out too. Part of why I learnt to do deep hypnosis was precisely so I could delve into my own psyche at the deepest level I could. And before I hypnotised anyone else, I put myself into trances that lasted up to a couple or more hours regularly. In this manner I did at first shift, then crack, then removed beliefs about who I was that were not ideal for me. I wrote briefly about this in Reclaiming the Catholic Church, but the point is that we are NOT our beliefs about who we are. We have an infinitely larger potential and amplitude of behaviour and personality colouring.
Martial arts can change this but it usually takes years. So does any endeavour indulged in almost fanatically for a couple of decades, but aside from controlled LSD trips under clinical settings, the fastest way I know to do this is with Hypnosis. After you have changed a few really core (but erroneous) beliefs about your of identity, and if you have the requisite faculties to do so, you can learn to change other patterns. I have done it several times throughout my life, and the longest and hardest pattern to break was the one I described in RTCC as erroneous loyalty.
The problem, of course, is not loyalty, which is a virtue, but loyalty to the erroneous concept, idea or person. If you have “being loyal” as one of your core beliefs about yourself, it becomes very difficult to see the errors, evil, or even outright lies and negative values that you don’t share, with your guru, your religion, your family, friends or whatever. It took a long time for me to realise that being objective and letting go of people or thoughts that were ultimately negative was the correct action to take, and was NOT a negative reflection of me or of my being “disloyal”. Since then I have had ample occasion to not only confirm that changing that aspect of myself was the intelligent, correct and good thing to do, but also to confirm that I am indeed, loyal unto death when it is for the right reason. In short, it was a drastic improvement not just for me, but in general, in terms of how I related to the world.
If you take any of the important things, like your belief in your religion, your beliefs about loyalty, love, kindness, and what part or aspect of these you consider to be core parts of who you are, it will feel absolutely horrifically difficult and wrong to change any of them. And yet, many of these patterns are probably not serving you best.
No one sane born in a neutral, objective, honest household would become a Muslim or a Jew, since both religion permit sex with underage children and don’t consider sex with toddlers to be a crime.
Similarly, no one capable of doing basic logic can possibly assume that Protestantism is any kind of thing other than a total perversion of Christianity. And with a little more digging, no one sane could possibly mistake the Novus Ordo Impostors for actual Catholic Clergy.
No more than anyone would mistake 6’2″ me for an African pigmy.
But you have no skin in the personality of seeing me as my 6’2″ self, so you see me as what I am, not as a 4′ pigmy.
You might dislike me, you might be insulted by the undeniable facts about your fake “Christianity” I point out to you, and you will in at least some cases, choose to die rather than admit your error. Not because you are especially brave, but because changing such a core aspect of who you think you are, feels to you, like a fate, even worse than death. Death of the ego feels, to the human brain, very much like impending and undignified death at that. So, truly worse than just mere death. And as a result your brain will fight back with everything it has. Which is quite a lot since the Sub and Unconscious together form at least 90% of your brain by my reckoning.
The thing is, if you consider the level of lies you have noted in the last 4 years, then begin to realise that your ENTIRE LIFE you have been exposed to lies just as pervasive, just as big, just as pernicious, as the ones you have noted more recently, what do you think the odds are that all your core beliefs about yourself that you hold dear are true, and objective, and good and correct? Yup. Pretty much zero.
Problem is, if you can’t do at least rudimentary logic, you’re never going to learn how to get out of the erroneous thoughts you think are you.
Usually people who DO change change only as a result of long and determined effort over a long time, or if and when a big Significant Emotional Event (SEE) happens to them. The Alcoholic kills a kid in his car and never touches alcohol again. The drug addict sees himself in the mirror and something triggers deep in his limbic brain and he stops being an addict. The tough cop that just “get the job done” quits his job, takes time out, realises how all the crap he has seen has hurt him, and takes up landscaping as his next job because it helps him feel good.
A few people do it consciously by themselves by learning hypnosis and also just working obsessively on themselves, but these are a TINY minority.
And remember, you are NOT your personality. You are NOT what or who you think about yourself. Those things, in a great many cases, are almost just like persistent clothing in a video game. You can change the colour and shape of your clothes, just like you can change the type of personality you want to have.
Many people do not understand why from time to time, when I feel like it and have time, I take to task some mouth-breathing retard about everything from Protestantism, a known, illogical and obvious degradation of Christianity into secular nonsense, which happens to be followed by millions, including some nominally intelligent people, to the covid “vaccines” which I explained from the start are genetically altering serums that will cause extreme harm to your body, which is a medical reality that has been known for 30 years since the experimentation with mRNA genetic messing started, with testing on animals.
Plus any number of other topics that I feel are relevant to humanity at large.
People think I am just ornery and opinionated, which is not entirely wrong, the average stupidity of humans is indeed irritating to me and I can only suffer them in small doses normally, and I do have strong ideas (but few opinions, which I hardly voice) because they are based usually on decades of empirical testing in the real world.
But I do not fight the idiots because I enjoy it. No, I fight the stupid because it is a sacred duty. If you care about humanity at all (which I find I do, against my own general inclinations) you MUST try to correct their incessant stupidity, passed down from generation to generation, creating an avalanche of imbeciles, which, thanks to those of us that understand engineering, continue being safer and safer and not getting rightfully Darwined out of the gene pool by their own idiocy.
The village idiots, like rabbits run wild with endless food, and ergonomically ultra-safe step-ladders, are creating our own Universe 25. And their damaging idiocy is now so pervasive that they are starting to really affect the entire globe.
We don’t have a climate crisis, we have a fucking abominable retard catastrophe.
Idiots who think the word “gender”, which is used in linguistics, can be re-adapted to be a synonym for sex. And then they try to tell you that human sex is “fluid” or “non-binary”. No. No it is not. You are born male or female, or, if you are unlucky and the result of a natural mishap of chromosomes and body parts, you might be born a hermaphrodite. And some people are born with six fingers or a brain deformation that makes them handicapped in some way. Such is life. Sometimes some guy draws a shitty hand.
But that does not make men women, or vice-versa. Nor does your particular sexual fetish, unnatural propensity, or deviation make it “ok” to tell people it is normal, or even acceptable in many cases. And if one of those mental deviations is one that makes you want to rape children, then, it is simply salutary and best if you are removed from the gene pool forthwith. And we should absolutely pass laws to make this all legal and normal, as it is, and as it should be.
Now, when it comes to pedophiles —the freaks who want to rape children— most people, including most normies (but not all, believe me) especially if they are essentially normal and have children, are not too far-removed from sanity, and those that do have some knowledge of the damage that pedophiles cause are generally quite happy for pedos to get the death penalty and even making it all legal and official. That said, few would volunteer to be the executioner. At least, few that are mentally healthy, because being an executioner is difficult work, and most human beings are not armoured mentally against that kind of work. In the past, a lot more healthy men were, but we have lived in decadent comfort in the West for almost a century now, and while in at least some third world countries corporal punishment is still accepted as more or less normal for certain crimes, so is generally a level of brutality that most would prefer to do away with. A modern, civilised society that does apply the death penalty and corporal punishment in a balanced fashion is rare.
Singapore comes to mind, but some, of course will argue about some of the reasons to issue a death penalty, and very few will consider the issue in the most fair and logical legal manner ever invented by humans, which, like it or not, understand it or not, being aware of it or not, is Roman Law. The principle in Roman is the main framing of an issue, however the details of it are then examined and each case valued on its merits. This at least was the original Roman Law. It has since been somewhat perverted even in Italy, where it originated.
The reality is that the death penalty is absolutely a deterrent against much vicious crime. And anyone that says it is not, is a liar that usually tries to appeal to fake and false “studies” done by compromised and utterly unscientific organisations. Very much like the anti-gun brigade.
Now, I am pro-guns, but even I would not be happy with literally ANYONE being able to buy fully automatic weapons in the same fashion one buys bread. HOWEVER, that is because of the mayhem that would happen for the first, oh, say five years or so. And because I have children and a wife and I care about them. For myself, I’d probably be ok to take my chances (as in any case, I kind of did to a certain extent, working in close protection in South Africa for some years). Mostly out of curiosity and to verify that my prediction would be correct. Because if it became a thing that both civilians as well as the military and police could all have access to fully automatic weapons including machine guns, after five years, I suspect the death by guns would approach zero and for the most part be confined to suicides and the occasional nutter, who probably would not get to fire too much before he became Swiss cheese at the hands of a totally armed citizenry.
To a certain extent I already lived through this kind of change in South Africa. When guns were limited to ownership by whites, there was a regular shooting every week-end over road rage. When gun ownership became open to anyone regardless of skin colour, utter mayhem ensued. And carried on for the next 30 years, because, politically correct to say it or not, it remains a fact, that a people who have NOT developed, invented, and created a certain technology, will invariably misuse it. And the average African is simply not at a civilisational level that permits them to responsibly use or own a firearm. As usual, are there exceptions, sure. But statistics is a thing, and if used correctly, not only it doesn’t lie, it tells all the truths people are uncomfortable with. Besides, if you want to accuse me of “racism”, keep in mind that: a) I don’t give a fuck about your idiotic opinion, b) it is wrong insofar as you use and mean the word “racist” in any case, and c) I’m not the one that made this obvious thing about cultural and technological differences obvious to the world. It was Michael Crichton. Yup. Go ahead and read the original book Jurassic Park.
What did change though was that the number of road rage shootings between whites pretty much disappeared almost overnight. And the average Afrikaner became suddenly a LOT more polite. This is not just a random idea. It is something I personally experienced. And a very real change. The average white man now was so conscious that if he started shooting for a stupid reason, there were a LOT more people that could suddenly shoot back, and that were likely to as well.
The point is that in any case, the statistics are in. In the USA, the states with the highest number of concealed carry citizens have lower gun crimes. The exceptions are areas that are predominantly African-American in population. If you are black does that upset you? Do you think I am some racist Neo-Nazi because I can do math? Well, guess what: Fuck you. I don’t care.
Because if *I* was a big black bald guy, but with *my* brain in my head, instead of yours, I wouldn’t get upset about this at all. Just like I don’t get upset if someone judges Italians on average as being people that generally talk too much, wave their hands a lot, and often speak on topics they are ignorant of as if they knew a lot more than they do (though that Americanism is becoming global in fairness). Or if you said that Venetians are ornery bastards that kinda try to irritate you off the bat, just to see how you react. Or if you said it about me specifically. Hell, I don’t get upset about the Sun rising in the East either, or water being wet. You know why? Because I am not a complete fucking idiot.
So… if *you* are getting all upset… we-eeel… you might wanna check that IQ loooooooooooong before I ever, ever, ever, will check my “privilege”.
White, or Olive Nigger that it may be. In fact I’m kinda quite fond of the term Olive Nigger, I find it funny. As far as I know it was coined by a Lilly white American who, quite frankly, is almost translucent as far as skin colour goes. And he also has a higher IQ than me by a few points. Do I care? Am I offended? Look in my eye pilgrim, go on, take a good long look. You see me offended anywhere? That’s right. I could not care less. So why do you, you unspecified nigger of whichever ethnic, or socio-economic, or skin colour persuasion? I’ll tell you why.
Because you are fucking stupid. Stupid. S T U P I D.
The point is that like it or not, you can’t let stupid people run the world. Not without absolutely dire consequences. Idiocracy was supposed to be a comedy film, not a tragic documentary, although, to be honest, I found the film too irritating and true to life to watch when it actually came out. I could only stomach about 5 minutes of it by skipping large sections of it. And that was nearly 20 years ago now.
And you absolutely can’t let evil people run the world.
Firstly because they are evil, but also because, being evil, they promote and support the stupidity, they increase it and fuel it and feed it. And for that crime alone, among all the others, they should absolutely be hung from the neck until dead, gassed, shot in a firing squad, or even just like rabid dogs Ceausescu style. And they know it. Which is why they promote the stupidity. Smart, intelligent, honest, and good men of strong character, in any great numbers, would storm the places of power where these evil pedophile and child killers live and work, and would dispense rough street justice to them immediately. Which sometimes in the world takes place before appropriate and salutary laws and good people put in place to see them well-enforced are secured in place. As, for example, in Singapore.
My main objection to Singaporean laws is certainly not the death penalty, but perhaps, rather, the level at which it is applied. But that is absolutely NOT a criticism of Singapore or its laws or even the judiciary. It is a criticism of humanity. Allow me to explain.
I am vehemently against drugs of any sort. I never even touched the stuff at all for the entirety of my life until my late thirties and early forties, and even then, the sum total of my experimentation was perhaps a handful of times smoking cannabis, and precisely once, snorting some cocaine. I did it for the sole reason that people I care about and valued had done some of these things; and more. And despite being intelligent and capable, they seem to use this crap regularly. A young guy I used to work with, who was a decent person, worked well, and was smart, apparently snorted coke almost every weekend. People I grew up with, my close friends, hid the fact they occasionally smoked Cannabis because they feared how I would react to them. I simply told them they were morons, but it didn’t concern me, other than make me realise they were more moronic than I thought to begin with.
After that singular experience with cocaine, it became absolutely confirmed to me that the only people who snort cocaine are either idiots or such weak and/or damaged people that they cannot reason their way out of their situations and lives, or at least change them in any really positive way. Are they evil? Usually not, although the drug use can eventually corrode them to the point they become it. Are they weak? Yes. Are they dumb? Not always necessarily, in a classical sense, but certainly in regard to making stupid life choices, yes. No one needs any mind-altering substance in a civilised and logical world. And although we are living far from either thing, it is still not a good idea to drug yourself up in order to temporarily escape it (only to be faced with it again and much more so a little while later).
In short, I am not a fan of drugs.
That said, I think that giving someone the death penalty for having half a kilo of Cannabis is probably a bit extreme. HOWEVER, it is a FACT that if you do NOT do that, then it will start with Cannabis and before you know it you will have meth-heads running around burglarising homes and hurting people to feed their habit. While if you DO have the death penalty for Cannabis, guess what, aside the odd idiot here and there, everyone stops using it to alter their brain chemistry and the entirety of society is better off.
No. I am not interested in your idea that smoking that shit does no harm. I saw it with my dad’s workers for decades at a time, because it was in a country where it is not really criminalised at all; and it absolutely rots your brains. So keep such retarded opinions to yourself.
So my problem with the Singaporean laws is not that they are too harsh. It is that humans are so utterly stupid that they are necessary. In a civilised world, the cannabis smoker would (unrealistically) be smart enough to not do that shit where I can smell it, or where it affects me, or anyone else, or his driving, or his cognitive abilities…
You see why it’s necessary to have the death penalty, right? Because honestly, if a drug addled fucker runs over one of my kids, I don’t care that he was a “responsible” user. He clearly wasn’t.
And therein lies the problem.
SO.
Is it clear now why it is absolutely your DUTY, if you are at all a good guy, to call out the stupid. To limit their activity and range and effect they have on others. The village idiots need to be put back in the closets and kept there. And their families made responsible for the harm they cause. Their doors marked with the red letter I for AN IDIOT LIVES HERE.
You must show them up for the harm and damage and stupidity they cause to the world at large and to yours and mine.
It’s not that I enjoy beating atomised ghosts of dead horses. It is that it is a sacred duty. So, if you possess at least the minimum IQ required to understand the point, get to it. Learn the truth, learn logic, learn basic mathematics, and then join me in a crusade against Human Stupidity. We can’t really win the fight, but like Leonidas and his 300, perhaps we will be remembered in the millennia that follow us.
12.12.23 – NAZI MOON is Out
It’s going to be out on December 12th, I am not sure when Amazon will allow pre-purchasing, but I think probably after the 6th as I have until then to do any corrections. So by the 9th I think it should be available for pre-release purchasing.
It will retail at $29.95 in the US, which sounds probably quite high, but… It’s a stonking brick of 828 pages (which is actually the maximum limit of a book size by Amazon), and is a collection of 3 books, complete with notes for each book, a map, technical details, and enough information about its setting to make it really, quite a project. Think of it as my version of The Lord of The Rings, though, of course, of a genre completely different and I can’t approach the master’s level of quality as a writer, but I assure you that the detail that went into developing this story is second to none. I may not have invented a new language, but I do believe this work has the capacity to at least shift any reader’s mind, at least a little, concerning the reality we live in, and what is actually possible, and probably really going on, too.
My style would be closer to a somewhat pornographic Edgar Rice Burroughs, in that it is high adventure stuff and quite cinematic, especially from book 2 on, but the strength of the story, in my humble opinion, is the plot, or rather, multiple plots and sub-plots throughout the story, some of which have story arcs that resolve only further down the line, so for those who like plot-driven stories and who enjoy trying to figure things out before they are explained by the story itself, this should be a pretty decent read, and something not often found in what has become “modern” SF.
In any case, I am terrible at marketing myself, so the above is just to give those interested an overall sense of things, not just hyperbole.
It’s in 9″ x 6″ format, so, comfortable despite its size.
Please order it as soon as you can, as it helps the algorithms if there is a high pre-release purchase.
The point of this book is multifold. And for those who care, here is a little on its nearly 30 year history in the making.
Dream-Writing
The three books that form part of Nazi Moon, are really the result of three dreams I had concerning Mars and the Moon. The dreams were so vivid and clear that I still recall them almost 30 years later. I have had a very strange relationship with dreams throughout my life as I have had premonitory dreams more than once, which were absolutely confirmed because I had shared them with my girlfriend at the time, so when they happened, I had objective confirmation I wasn’t just imagining things.
I also had a dream some 10 years before I met my present-day wife that, the day I met her, I recalled, and once again, I had an objective way to confirm this as she was showing me an apartment and in the dream I had, there had been a specific statue in the corner of the block’s gardens. I could not see that location from where we were and I also had never been to this particular block of apartments so, if that specific statue did turn out to be there, then… well… something! And indeed it was there.
I also had dreams where I have like part 1 of it and then, years later, I have part 2 of it and it flows just as if it was the continuation of the original dream even though years have passed in the waking world. I do not know what any of these things necessarily mean, I have my theories, but they are my best guesses. What I do know is that human beings absolutely have an element of precognition, because at least twice in my life it saved my life, and I had it other times in less life-and death situations, but, as I discuss in a lot more depth in my book Systema – The Russian Martial System (which I taught for years) the US military is training Special Ops people to develop this by testing it in absolutely scientific settings. The Russians are ahead on it, having it be part of their normal analogous training system. Something that the original Systema trainers did a bit at first, but tends to not be done now. Some of the “superhuman” powers of this nature are explained in my Systema book, and have been experienced by others who read it and experimented for themselves.
And Honorton and Ferrari demonstrated years ago (when science could still be reproduced reliably) that precognition is something that a statistically significant (though low) number of humans can do, and have as an ability. Details of this are included in the Systema book too, along with a computerised test that, using video, was the first of its kind in the world and for which I was a test subject, that proved Systema movements and strikes are the least predictable ones of all the ones tested.
ANYWAY… that long preamble was just to point out that I am not sure what the significance of each dream was, but each one pretty much was the launching point for each of the three books.
The cover of the original Overlords Of Mars first book (Inception) was a little similar to the one above, but later I changed it and I think the one usually presented is the one with the image of Mars (which has a story all on its own, as it’s an image rendered by a guy that uses actual telemetry data from NASA to get his images as accurate as possible and was featured in National Geographic, and he gave me permission to use it completely free of any royalties) and a pair of very blue female eyes. Those eyes were taken from a photograph my wife had sent me, though she was not my wife or even girlfriend at the time, and I used them because they were the closest ones to the kind of eyes I had dreamt about in the first dream that became the Overlords of Mars series.
The cover of the second book was done by a guy who now lives in LA and has done most of the special effects in pretty much every film you have seen in the lat 20 years. His team was the lead SFX guys in all the Iron Man films. We used to train Systema together in London and due to his move and work load we sort of lost touch, but I’ll be sending him a copy anyway, as he loved the story when he did the cover for me, again, just as a friend.
The first dream had been about encountering people of a more evolved sort and without giving any spoilers, readers will be able, I think, to figure out when that happens in book 1.
The second dream was of being on Mars, with the kind of equipment described in book 2, exploring, going into underground locations, and the sense of a female presence being there too, which, once again, I think will be recognisable in book 2 – Stasis.
The third dream was of something I do not describe in book three, specifically, but definitely represented the social set-up present there, and the technology that made it possible to be on the surface, as described in book 3 – Black Sun.
The first dream was had in the early to mid 1990s and the third one was had in 1996. And yes, I developed those dreams and the idea for the books, way back then. I had just finished and published The Face on Mars at the end of 1995, which I want to stress is completely NON-Fiction, and is the only book that has really explained what happened on Mars and how. The main concept has been plagiarised by Graham Hancock, which he admitted to me in person in late 1997, (and yes, I have a witness) but in any case, my theory of the reality of how Mars was destroyed has never been found to be flawed, and in fact, some of the things I wrote about as being possible back in 1995 have since been proven to be exactly as what I predicted, and as they should be, if my theory on the destruction of Mars being intelligent is correct, which I am still sure it is. I also updated the book in 2014, which has more information, relevant to the current fiction Omnibus Nazi Moon.
I met all the top people involved in studying Mars at the time, in conferences, speeches we gave, magazine articles I wrote, and even radio and TV interviews I did at the time. Mark Carlotto remains a long distance friend and I have made some videos on Kurgan TV to explain why the man’s work is really second to none concerning his science. He is a consummate scientist, a real one, that actually does proper science, regardless of any politics or anything else. And he too believes The Face is artificial, which was my own conclusion before the later images were produced. Since then, what NASA actually has been producing, image-wise is, to my mind, suspect in the extreme. For reasons that are obvious and explained very early in the fiction works.
Anyway, the point is that in order to write The Face on Mars, I had spent literally every waking minute researching everything from the most obscure astronomical information to details of the first (real or not) Alien abductions. And then I had a very weird experience, which, luckily, was also confirmed by pretty much the whole of South Africa, as a bunch of UFOs basically flew down the N1 main national highway that runs the length of the country, and entire police stations came out to see them, not just me and a friend with my video camera, and it was on the front page of newspapers and still in the news a few days later. It was what we would today call a UFO “Flap”. And luckily I wasn’t the only one to document it, at least partially, in my book. I didn’t explain the whole thing because it sounded crazy, but at least the verifiable parts I did put in the book. And I had a video of the whole event.
Shortly thereafter I was burgled and the only thing that was taken was those videos and the video camera, not cash, not the stills camera, nothing else, and the “break-in” was done professionally without leaving a trace of “breaking-and-entering”. My phone was also tapped, which was confirmed by the n.2 guy in the equivalent of the South African secret service at the time, although he said he had no idea who was doing it as it wasn’t the South African Government.
I had a lot of strange meetings with various people, from Admirals’ daughters that had apparently been drugged and messed with because they found out too much about what daddy was doing, to professional and well-known European astronomers that worked for ESA (European Space Agency) that told me privately they agreed with all my theories in the book, and they said I was absolutely correct, but they could not support me publicly or they would lose their job. I also met a lot of clearly disturbed people, but the meetings with the non-crazy people were really quite astonishing, because I could confirm who these people were and they were not random morons, nor where they looking for fame, fortune or anything else from me, other than just their being glad someone else had figured out some of the things that they knew and which they could not really discuss, either for fear of reprisals, or for fear of being thought of as a crazy person.
After I wrote The Face on Mars, I had already figured out that if antigravity technology was a thing (and it absolutely is) then, there were a bunch of logical consequences that made it obvious that:
So, these strange situations that were happening to me and these people I met or would approach me, along with the clear psyops I was subjected to from time to time, (in a fairly light mode, it must be admitted) made perfect sense to me.
I had made it clear that I thought antigravity technology was absolutely planet-busting capable, and as such needed to be absolutely regulated, so, it’s not like I was threatening to release the blueprints of how to build your own little UFO, which in any case I would not know how to do. And over the years, I have held that position consistently. Which is why I assume I have mostly been left alone.
The reality is that even if only really good guys had access to antigravity technology (I wish!) it would still need to be regulated and controlled with a pretty ironclad set of rules that are absolutely enforced. One crazy bastard with an anti-gravity machine the size of your car can reduce our planet to a smouldering death-ball if not just another asteroid belt where Earth used to be. And there are a LOT of crazy bastards on top of the billions of idiots, so, even if I were put in charge of all the antigravity technology for the Sol system tomorrow, you bet I would put in place absolutely Draconian security systems to use the stuff. The only difference is that once I have that aspect completely nailed down, I would gradually release the information concerning the technology to the whole planet. And yes, that is absolutely fraught with danger, I know, which is why the information would need to be released gradually and anyone not following or trying to avoid the protocol would need to be hammered into the ground.
Over time, the procedures of security concerning the operation of antigravity machines would become a standard Modus Operandi for all humans and eventually, the Human race would evolve enough to be able to take its place in the Galactic scheme of things where the other intelligent races have already come to similar conclusions that, when everyone has a zap gun that can destroy entire stars and planets, no one had better use it that way, otherwise everyone else will see to it that you and your species disappear from the genetic code of this section of space.
So… I have been living with that reality in my head, pretty much fully-formed since age 26. And nothing in the intervening 28 years has done anything other than confirm this theory at every turn and in every aspect.
And the books have been in my head since then. Certainly these three.
Confederate Rising was a little novella I wrote for fun (see the notes in the section labelled Overlords of Mars on the left) as a kind of joke for a group of online friends, and it is set in the same Universe as these books, but in the far future, a few hundred years from the events of Nazi Moon.
Now that you know the underlying premise of the realm in which my stories take place, I sincerely hope you not only buy and read the book, but I really hope you spread it around and give it as a gift to friends and family, because, as some of you know, science fiction is more than just entertainment. It propagates certain ideas and realities through human consciousness, and thanks to principles of morphic resonance, when enough people have an idea in their heads as a possibility, it becomes a reality. Films like a 2001: Space Odyssey was filmed in 1968 and inspired by a short story from the almost self-confessed pedophile Arthur C. Clarke written in 1951. That film showcased technology that now we take for granted and have even surpassed in some cases.
Now, I am not a well-connected elite, being as I am absolutely not only, not a pedophile, but believing that they deserve the death penalty, so… I have to rely on you normal people to spread the word for me and change quite a bit of the false narratives that are flying around the entire globe as though they were absolute truths, when in fact, they are vicious lies designed to keep the best of us down.
And if you also just enjoy a good story for the entertainment purposes, that’s absolutely fine too, but your help in spreading the word would be very much appreciated.
Lastly, if any of you want signed copies, the only way I can do that is to order some books myself, sign them and post them, which is quite expensive and can take a LONG time, especially since US customs can hold books for up to 8 weeks in customs, for reasons best known to themselves. However, if any of you are interested and are willing to pay for the postage, please leave me a comment or send me an email and we will see about doing that for you.
You might be interested in the following posts:
By G | 4 December 2023 | Posted in Actual Science, Ancient Technology, Books, Face on Mars, Increasing Happiness, Nazi Conspiracies, NAZI MOON, Overlords of Mars - 1, Overlords of Mars - 2, Social Commentary, Systema, The Enemy Within