4 Comments

Bruce Charlton reposts a bunch of nonsense

Bruce has some good takes from time to time and his addicted to distraction short online pamphlet is brilliant. That said he also posts some complete rubbish.

Here is the post in question where he basically reposted some Protestant ecumenical utter idiocy. It’s here.

This kind of stupidity irritates me for its complete absence of logic. Let us count the ways:

1. Even if it were true that we are lost in the darkness and no one has the full truth (it’s a lie as we will see later) or if we state it more intelligently and say that while the full truth must exist we are too lazy, stupid, confused, and very much deceived by the enemies of God to be sure of it, it nevertheless MUST be true that ONE of the positions is perforce closest to the full truth. And that being so, it is our duty to do our best to find it.

2. Ecumenism is the idiotic idea that if we just tolerate every kind of heresy, inconsistency, stupidly wrong conclusion, outright falsehood and so on, out of some misguided idea that we are all “Christians” we will somehow all be a more polite, tolerant, “good” society. NO! This is a filthy and absolute lie. Try and shift that idea onto a sport field. Let the golfers use some of their rules on the football field, and mix in some Rugby rules and some basketball rules too, after all, we’re all “ball players” what could go wrong? Ecumenism is completely Satanic. And obviously so if you are not retarded. The truth and a falsehood cannot share the same room. Nor the same mind, heart, or Church.

3. Ass-u-ming that God left NO WAY for one to know the truth and be clear about it implies that God simply didn’t care enough to do so. So… wait… God is love, the all-father that loves us perfectly but he leaves us absolutely no clear way of knowing how to be closest to him? Instead he leaves 40,000 different versions of Protestantism, a few versions of traitorous “Orthodox” in the East and a now fully converged fake “Catholic Church” run by pedophile protector Bergoglio and his retinue of child raping, homosexuals, fraudsters, satanists and demon worshippers (but I repeat myself)? You think that is what a loving God does? No.

4. Catholicism (the real one, known today as Sedevacantism) is the only remnant of the true Church left. Anyone who bothers to study will eventually come to this conclusion, and surprise, surprise, it’s the one religion that:

• Is logical

• Was there from the start of Christianity

• Fulfilled the prophecies of the Old Testament

• has been historically the same from the first century after Jesus’s ascenscion

• put the Bible together

• Created the best civilisation Humanity has ever seen, including art, science and economics

So, no Bruce. No.

We are NOT all Christian. We are not the same.

There is a reason the great majority of people will end up in Hell. And they will do so by their own choices.

UPDATE: Charlie goes full coward and clips a comment I had left him. Pretending it was quite different from the full comment. And also pretending he is not the cowardly type that his back and forth by email with me demonstrates him to clearly be.

So for now Charlie has taken the “It depends on what the meaning of the word “is” is” defence.

No Charlie. Everyone with a dictionary knows what ecumenism is and it is PRECISELY what both you and the other guy you quote are doing. And I’ll serve him up next, since neither of you has the testicular fortitude to bother emailing me when you TRY (and fail) to criticise my work from the shadows. Unlike me, who lets you know and offers you to counter argue.

And then you flounce away while claiming victory… right.

4 Responses to “Bruce Charlton reposts a bunch of nonsense”

  1. “Instead he leaves 40,000 different versions of Protestantism, a few versions of traitorous “Orthodox” in the East and a now fully converged fake “Catholic Church” run by pedophile protector Bergoglio and his retinue of child raping, homosexuals, fraudsters, satanists and demon worshippers (but I repeat myself)? You think that is what a loving God does? No.”

    But God objectively *has* left all those various denominations, all of which have extremely serious problems and most of which are currently serving Satan. It’s no use saying a loving God would never leave us in that situation; he has. The question is why he has allowed this situation and what he wants us to learn from it.

    Your position is apparently that it is extremely important to recognize one of these de-facto-Satanic organizations as a corruption of what is ideally God’s One True Church (in contrast to all the others, which are corruptions of earlier corruptions of God’s One True Church).

    My own position (and I think Charlton’s is similar) is that, since all churches are now corrupt, we are to pursue a Direct Christianity not dependent on any church, seeking fellowship with real Christians wherever we find them but not delegating our Christianity to any organization.

    I think it is wrong to conflate this with ecumenism, despite the superficial similarities. We divide so-called Christendom into real and fake Christians as ruthlessly as any denominational hardliner would do; it’s not a “Big Tent” thing. The difference is that our litmus tests do not coincide with historical denominational differences.

    • G says:

      You are just plain flat out wrong.
      God has not left us in this state.
      We did.
      Do you not understand the concept of free will at all?

      You Protestants are really all children at heart who believe in a Calvinist sky daddy being there to make sure you never crap your pants. No. That’s not how it works.
      God left us one true Church and you either take the time to investigate it or you choose not to. It’s entirely your choice.

  2. jerome redivus says:

    The reason Catholicism became globohomo is [… a bunch of insane idiocy this cretin wrote]

    GF adds:
    No. It is not. The reasons are well documented and also reported on in my book on reclaiming the Catholic Church as well as many other sources. And you are too stupid to comment here again. Bye.

  3. […] would anathemize). Herein lies a few errors, promulgated by denominationalists, though seeing the Sedevacantists do this when when I agree that the seat of Peter is worse than empty gives me a bleak sense of […]

Leave a Reply

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks