I like Ann, she is terribly, terribly in error, but she mostly means well. A little too much pride in her thinking she is right and not checking her work on that score, but no one’s perfect. And I really would not mind at all except she is leading too many people down the wrong path, and that matters. She has a counter on her site now, that looks like this:
I mean, she’s just way off on the math.
It’s actually been 65 YEARS, 8 MONTHS and 7 DAYS.
So, come on Ann, I thought you worked in finance before, or cows, or something that had some math in it.
Anyway, at least she’s on the right track. But I still really would like for her to answer the question of how LONG can an Interregnum last according to her.
We know it can definitely be 2 years without anyone sitting on the Throne at all, because it happened before. And we know it can be up to 70 years when there is at least one VALID Pope and one or more fake ones (and this is therefore not really an Interregnum). But we also know that way back in 2013 Ann also thought the 1958 Sedes were “crazy” so she doesn’t have 65 years before she is crazy too, not, only about 54 or so.
And it’s getting pretty close to the two year mark, so… What will it be Ann?
I still have that tequila bottle if you’re willing to answer! And if that’s too unladylike, perhaps a nice sherry?
I know, it’s a little mean of me to make fun of the lady, but dammit, I can’t stand it when people are completely illogical and hypocrites to boot because they just want to protect their pet theory, regardless of facts, objective reality, and (literally) God.
[…] time lag between “crazy” and “totally reasonable and properly Catholic is.” I hope she does so before another 52 years pass. I might not make it to […]