Good God…

I did a bad thing…. I clicked on a random YT video. I admit it, I needed a break from what I was researching and doing and I did this. Like a fat person just gobbling up a cake by “mistake”. Nevertheless, it was informative, and possibly very helpful for young men in the West.

Here is the video:

Now, is there a chance you get divorce raped by a Russian hottie, or Filippina, one or whatever? Sure. Are there golddiggers outside of the USA and/or the West? Absolutely.

But, as the rest of the world has long-since seen Americans in general as arrogant, loud, ignorant, and fat (hey don’t shoot the messenger) I guarantee you that they have a generally even lower opinion of American women. And this video is a perfect example of why.

It’s 17 minutes or so and really worth watching if you are a young guy that is depressed about the dating pool in your Ununited States of Israel America.

The Filippina Pea wrecks this Yankee something brutal and absolutely deserved, it’s entertaining to watch just for that.

However, it also highlights the stupefying hypocrisy of the white girl in the video. An OF whore ragging on men who actually leave their countries to look for a better type of woman, that is, a woman that actually still behaves like one.

If this is truly indicative of your average 20-something US female, and not just the perception fomented by social media, then, if I were a 20-something American man, I certainly would either move to the rural South, where apparently there are at least a few hotties that can drive 4x4s, shoot a gun and still be very female, or I would emigrate.

In a way it could be said I did that too, though I was living outside of Italy from a young age, as I travelled around the world, I noted that while a certain type of loyalty could be expected from the average Italian woman, they also, to my mind anyway, seemed like ball-breaking, relentless, naggers.

To some extent, it’s a generic female trait anyway, but I found it to be more pronounced in Italian women, and as it’s one of the things I can’t stand, I can count on two hands the number of Italian women I entered into any kind of relationship with, but only one of those was in any way a long-term one. In fact, as far potential for long term relationships go, women from Eastern Europe definitely had the advantage in my dating life. Followed by South American, then UK and South African.

On reflection, and with the benefit of hindsight, while the South American women were definitely fun, their temperament is not exactly ideal for stability; it’s a bit like nitroglycerin, it’s kinda fun when it blows up… if it happens in the right context… and potentially deadly if it does it out of context.

East block women are probably the most reliably stable… and I say that with he usual warning that no woman is really ever stable, they are all crazy, of course, so we’re just talking about relative stability. East block women are more like C4. If they detonate it will be under precise conditions you can usually predict well in advance.

The South African ones are probably peculiar to people who have lived there as it’s quite a blend of femininity and practicality that is culturally not that common, perhaps they approach the Southern girls of the USA in this respect, which can be an acquired taste.

As for the English women, in truth they are among the ones I tended to avoid like the plague, because while all nationalities have various generic traits, both negative and positive, in general, the English women were so frustrated by their weak men that they tended to be blusterous, arrogant, crude, feminist in their external outlook (even if docile and feminine behind closed doors) and kind of trashily easy. Nevertheless, if you find an English woman that has somehow avoided the broad zeitgeist of their almost female dominated and frustrated nation, they are actually really quite feminine, as well as generally far more logical than most women. And this is a very attractive combination. But it is exceedingly rare, and the culture of Britain certainly does NOT promote it in any way; in fact the entire zeitgeist of the UK is designed to stamp this out as viciously as possible. A true pity, because just as the English gentleman is an extinct species, so too, they are trying to do away completely with the Heroine-like English Rose.

I only dallied with one American woman, and it was certainly not going to be for a serious or committed relationship, and I simply can’t even fathom, even just in my imagination, how I could possibly be with one. While the fantasy of the Southern Belle that is a mix of trashy, hot, dignified, practical and capable is appealing, in reality, I think in all likelihood even those will have an undercurrent of wokeism that would be intolerable. Maybe they exist, but like the English Rose, I would bet they are few and far between.

So, young American, if you are male, and since Putin is offering refugee status to Westerners wanting to escape Clown World, you could probably do worse than picking up some Pimsleur Russian (best language courses I ever found and cheap now), learning how to speak it, and moving to the East.

Will it be easy? No.

Is it guaranteed you will find a devoted supermodel wife? Please… stop hallucinating. If you suffer from such delusions as guaranteed anything in life, read this .

At any rate, the point is, don’t let anyone tell you that you have to put up with more insanity than you can willingly tollerate. Or any feminism at all.

I predicted already in my late teens that the next step in human evolution will be those men and women who choose to be able to do logic better than most of our ancestors, and who at the same time embrace their maleness unforgivingly for men, and their femininity unashamedly and happily for women.

All the rest are just NPCs at best and crazed flying monkeys with diseases at worst.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Adam posts less frequently than I do but his pieces can be interesting. And by interesting, of course, I mean, upside down. I mean he is Australian…

In any case, it is one of life’s joys to be able to discuss things with a friend in terms of proper argument and correct philosophy, which has nothing to do with losers like Nietzsche and Schopenhauer and so on.

His most recent piece is on forgiveness and worth a read .

But I do not generally agree with him. I think Adam often makes statements that are too broad and generic, a left-over of the Protestant Anglo-Saxon vibe all English speakers (well, ok, pretend-English speakers) are unfortunately subjected to, which tends to reduce all thinking to overtones of binaries.

Adam quotes theLord’s prayer Our father, but I think he comes to the wrong conclusion about forgiveness.

Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us.

That second part? It’s not there for no reason.

If the edict was to simply forgive everyone then it would say that: Forgive everyone for everything, always.

Well, not even God does that.

God does not forgive the unrepentant sinners.

Can a pedophile enter Heaven? Yes… IF he actually truly repents (and as far as I’m concerned that is purely between him and God and at best I can only help arrange the meeting by seeing to it the laws are quickly changed back to burning them at the stake). But absent that repentance, then no. They cannot.

There is a further corollary.

Those who trespass against others.

So let me categorise the levels of forgiveness or non-forgiveness.

Trespasses against you personally. Repentant or unrepentant. Most of these can be forgiven I think. It is certainly possible to forgive people who do this and do not repent for it. I know I have done so at least. I think in this regard, it may be the case that you should try to forgive these kind of things. It may not always be possible, but when it is not, I would guesstimate that the flaw is in us as fallible human beings, not doctrinally.

Trespass against others. Repentant. I think technically, these should be forgiven, but since we:

a) are not God so we cannot know for certain the heart of the guilty, and,

b) certain crimes require punishment regardless,

our forgiveness should be assumed, just as their repentance is assumed, but the full punishment for the transgression must be paid for in whatever way is appropriate, be it punishment for a crime, a simple apology, etc. etc. and willingly, —eagerly, so, even— by the perpetrator. In other words, the transgressor acts and behaves as if he repented and we treat him as if he has. But this is all external forum stuff. Only God really knows if they truly repent, but in any case, as Catholics, we should not hold hatred in our heart for such people, though, of course, caution is permitted. Once again, we can see this reflected in the repentant heretic. A heretic clergyman may repent and it will be accepted, but he will never agin hold authority over anyone.

Trespass against others. Unrepentant. This is the category I feel we theologically cannot forgive. It is absolutely logical and of course, in keeping with Church doctrine. We do not allow heretics to carry on as if they are not heretics, after all. In fact it is our duty to keep them away from decent people and deprive them of all natural human kindness. The logic is the same for unrepentant trespassers. Justice demands they remain unforgiven until they make amends.

So, once again, it is important that as a Catholic, you really need to exercise that kilo or so of soft grey matter in your skull. God put it there for a reason, and it’s not to imitate a warm bowl of tapioca. It’s to figure things out logically, and sensibly, with reason and directed by the principles of divine law, which in human terms is really perhaps best exemplified in Roman Law, which differs vastly from the Anglo-Saxon twists and abominations that have done to it.

Principle first, then details modify the effect of the law on the transgressor. And past cases have zero impact on current ones.

So, sure, say a Hail Mary over the corpses of your enemies, but don’t worry about being kind to them while they live and continue to be unrepentant. And in closing, I am sure the Crusaders did pray Adam, for forgiveness of their sins, no doubt, and forgiveness of the people who trespassed against them personally, I am sure, but also for victory over the unrepentant pagans, and Satan-inspired heathens they fought against.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I really don’t care much either way, and Adam Piggott has a very interesting take on the US elections, but as things stand now, and by my understanding of basic math, Trump is basically guaranteed to win. See the map below.

I am really just posting that for posterity, in case there is yet another attempot at a steal. I don’t mean the one in 2020. I mean that even this time around, in the early hours of the morning, there was yet again an attempt at the steal again, but this time it went like this (so far):

Nothing says they won’t pretend to flip a bunch of states over the next 3-4 weeks of course, but if either PA or GA come in for Trump before then, then the game is up. And even if BOTH of those flip back to Democrat, Kameltoe Harridan still doesn’t have 270, so they would still need to flip some of the red states that have not yet closed polling.

That all said, I think Adam had a valid point, which is that while Trump is undoubtedly better for Americans than Kameltoe, for the rest of the world this may not be the case. A more stable America means that the Satanism that is exported from the (((diaspora))) that runs the USA will continue for longer. The Harridan-PedoWaltz combination is of course a nuclear fire of incompetence, fraud, blackmail and deep state trash, and could potentially start WWIII with nukes as opposed to the limited genetic serums, bureaucracy and taxes to death and limited wars we have experienced for the last 4 years, but, it would certainly destroy America a lot faster and once it gets so bad internally, the rest of the world could more easily shrug off the tentacles that the First Freemasonic Country on Earth has spread throughout the globe as per direction of its middle-Eastern master.

US military bases in Europe may actually get sent back to the US, which would be awesome.

Of course, the average American is mostly innocent of the things their vicious and foreign ruled government does, and them turning out en masse for Trump is what I too would do is I were American. It’s not going to save the USA because Donald is not the kind of guy to actually properly clean house, that takes a guy like Putin, who has no qualms about taking out enemies, but even if he did that, Trump has certainly signalled his utmost support for Israel. Whether that is a ploy to get in and then flip the script, remains to be seen, and it would be awesome if it were, but I’m not holding my breath.

Anyway… if maths is a thing, Trump has won.

If blatant skulduggery done in broad daylight has the upper hand, Kameltoe Harridan will win.

Either way, I got a tractor to ride and brambles to churn.

Have a nice day, fellow humans.

UPDATE: Seconds after I posted this another state (WI) flipped, so Trump has already won… if math is a thing. But if the Demonrats find another 10 million votes over the next week or so I would not be very surprised either, so we really need to wait until all voting is stopped in all the states.

UPDATE II: I forgot to say, you must still be very impressed with the level of fraud the Kameltoe Harridan “campaign” has achieved. In my view, they have managed to fake and produce millions of votes for someone that probably didn’t get even 10% of the actual votes. Then again, I am a wild optimist and I keep forgetting Professor Cipolla’s first law of human stupidity, so maybe it’s more than 10%, but I would seriously doubt she actually got more than 30-40% of the votes, at the very most, that they say she got. That’s some considerable way north of 30 million fake votes they must have “snuck in”. Even so, it shows that while we may be on the cusp, if enough actual human bodies show up, we can still make some kind of difference.

I really hope humans across the globe are learning this and learning to ignore the mainstream media and taking a view to making the laws change so that burning pedophiles at the stake is the way to deal with them once again.

And this time around, no lukewarm Inquisition like Torquemada did.

Make me Grand Inquisitor of the Holy Catholic Church and give me a few thousand good men to lead, and I will cleanse the pedos from their thrones of power with a passion that would make Alexander the Great and Genghis Khan envious. And I’ll start right in the Vatican first.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

A recent long thread on Vox Day’s Social Galactic demonstrated in real time, one of my personal heroes of science — Professor Carlo Cipolla — was absolutely correct when he stated that:

The first basic law of human stupidity asserts without ambiguity that:

Always and inevitably everyone underestimates the number of stupid individuals in circulation.

At first, the statement sounds trivial, vague and horribly ungenerous. Closer scrutiny will however reveal its realistic veracity. No matter how high are one’s estimates of human stupidity, one is repeatedly and recurrently startled by the fact that:

a) people whom one had once judged rational and intelligent turn out to be unashamedly stupid.

b) day after day, with unceasing monotony, one is harassed in one’s activities by stupid individuals who appear suddenly and unexpectedly in the most inconvenient places and at the most improbable moments.

Both condition a) and b) were amply fulfilled on this thread. This will be an autist level length post with the vain hope of showing (the few people who can read for longer than 10 minutes without losing their place or straining their finger and drooling) the insanity of protestantism for the Nth time.

By the end of this you will see Protestants denying any rules at all, including probably baptism are required for salvation.

Don’t believe me? Read on. The Protestants will be in bold, I will be in mild standard text, others in Italics.

***

The display of completely absent logic, reasoning, or even just basic common sense was astonishing. The emoting and appeals to nothing other than people’s own egos when confronted with objective facts was truly stunning.

As SG recently added a rule that informally was originally going to be labelled as “The Kurgan Rule” to, erhm, curb yours truly from exposing people’s stupidity to the entire world, (as I did regularly on my currently off-line blog) 1 this post will, as per the rule, leave the people in question’s identifiers anonymous. But to give a sense of the level of absolute idiocy presented, I will reproduce a few of the types of things seen when it started out well-enough, with this comment, which clearly was inflammatory:

To which appeared a superficially reasonable response by a Protestant was made:

I wouldn’t be too confident about that. The Orthodox Church is looking a lot healthier than the Roman Catholic Church at the moment.

Just fight the satanics no matter what they call themselves. It’s no harder for them to call themselves “Catholics” than anything else.

After all, the Novus Orco “clergy” are indeed Satanists, Freemasons, Pedophiles, and none of them are even Catholic, never mind valid clergy. As for the fooled laypeople that are Novus Ordo, or the occasional genuine Novus Orco “priest” that really thinks the Vatican II sect is actually Catholic, they are simply fooled ignorants, guilty of sloth for not actually educating themselves about Catholicism, their professed religion, supposedly.

But nominally, such people are considered actual Catholics. In error, certainly, but at least until they read about Sedevacantism and then ignore it, not necessarily one attributable to them. If they have read this far though, and don’t bother to read up on what Sedevacantism is, and why we have not had a valid Pope since 1958, or why Vatican II is complete heresy, they then are guilty of the sin of sloth.

As I said in the thread, you may THINK you are a Catholic, but if you have no idea what the basic tenets of Catholicism are, and were always, before 1958; if you have no idea what the Code of Canon Law of 1917 is, or why it is of paramount importance; if you have never read the 16 Vatican II documents and compared them with Catholic dogma and understood why 15 of those 16 documents are replete with heresy; then, I ask: how can you actually consider yourself Catholic?

It would be as if I, armed with a cyclist’s shoes and a golfer’s club, wandered onto a basketball court and pretended to be called an NBA player. Without having a single clue as to what the rules of basketball are. Yes, I may have been fooled. Yes, someone perhaps told me that was the correct attire for being an NBA player and all I had to do was show up at court, but am I not responsible for educating myself too? And certainly after someone points out the errors?

This is why I wrote Believe and Reclaiming the Catholic Church and why now hundreds of people have converted, or returned to real Catholicism. The same Catholicism that launched the Crusades and protected Christendom at the siege of Malta with feats of heroism that have remained unmatched for close to a thousand years.

So, ok, fair enough, the average person probably thinks Bergolgio and his Satanic Imps are what “Catholicism” is, even if almost anyone on SG knows better by now, given the barrage of Sedevacantist truth that has been revealed in that place.

The thread then had this comment:

And structures and hierarchies are subverted. Look, it’s not an accident that dogmatic Protestants, Catholics, Orthodox, and atheists all behave in a similar matter. You’re all binary thinkers who put too much faith into human dogma, which is why you all keep making the same type of mistakes over and over again over the course of the centuries.

This is why the Bible talks about the importance of the Holy Spirit and listening to “the still, small voice” rather than “obey the law perfectly or else”. There are many excellent aspects to Roman Catholicism. I have a high regard for it. But it is still a human institution run by men with many rules invented by men, and therefore, like everything else on this planet, fallible and susceptible to subversion.

to which I replied with:

And this is the first time I have a quote from [REDACTED] I can wholly disagree with. With some corollaries.

1. what 99% of people think is the Catholic Church is no such thing. It is a hive of Satanic impostors and has been ruled by same since 1958. The devil, as they say is in the details, and most people, and especially Protestants, have been so utterly dumbed down in matters of history, doctrine and so on that getting them to pay attention for 10 minutes is too hard, never mind them actually looking into it and understanding what a Sedevacantist Catholic is (i.e. an actual Catholic). [REDACTED] gets irritated when people don’t understand what “progeny” means in the US constitution, and that’s even simpler to grasp than basic Catholic dogma (though not by much). So I relate.
2. I believe he understands the difference
3. but I think he writes for the masses.

Continuing from the comment above… the disagreement is that I absolutely believe the Catholic Church (now found only in Sedevacantist clergy and laypeople) was not created by men at all, but by Christ. And its dogmatic principles, are infallible because of it. The fact that:

1. Again, people are mostly idiots and so are incapable of following, reading and understanding the subtleties of Catholic dogma, so they reduce it, simplify it and corrupt it endlessly (which by the way is why and how Protestantism took such a hold, it is a ridiculous oversimplification of the Catholic reality it spawned from in horribly mutated form).
2. Church dogma is divided between unchanging divine laws and mutable human ones.
3. The Satanist that are impersonating the clergy of the Catholic Church intentionally lie, corrupt, and twist everything, and have done so for 250 years in a concentrated effort to destroy the Church.
4. Bad men exist and always will in even the real Church.

in no way invalidates Church infallibility.

You do, of course, need to SEEK. And more than just a little bit perfunctorily. And we all know reading is hard and logic burns the brains and basic comprehension is like violence to the weak, and so on and on. But just like your average peasant 300 years ago, or your average knight 500 years ago was a man that would do things that would break most men today after a week, the same degradation of thinking, logic, faith and cogent thought has occurred. So the present state of affairs is as it is. Reminiscent of the Radioactive Wastelands of the Cursed Earth of 2000 AD comics.

Lastly, of course, the fake “Catholic Church” known as Novus Ordo (Orco by me) is an absolutely Satanic thing which is why I wrote Reclaiming the Catholic Church. And it comes as no surprise they traffic in children, refugees, and whatever other thing Satanists get up to. But, properly speaking they are not Catholic at all.
Just as if I call you a cannibal pigmy and then accuse you of doing the things evil cannibal pigmies do, you are no more at fault than I am for you thinking I am a Novus Orco “Catholic”.

And by now, I think almost everyone on SG knows the divergence between an actual Catholic (Sede) and a Satanist wearing a Popehat.

Yes it was a wall of text, but I always try to ensure I am not leaving out too many dots to connect, as I often do this without meaning to, as many things I find obvious appear to be opaque to many.

Anyway, my wall of text was responded to thusly:

“Actual Catholicism is not anything like what you have been taught to think it is.”
Neither is true Protestantism.

To which I replied:

pity is no one ever will know what “true Protestantism” is. Because it’s whatever each individual wants it to be. The Dogma and rules of catholicism on the other hand have all been written down for 2000 years and then also compiled and encoded in one document. No other religion can say that. And no other religion can claim those rules not only work, but have worked every time they were followed, for 2 millennia.

And now the retardation began, and soon it grew to an avalanche.

Every religion thinks it has real wisdom cornered. Instead, Christ asked us to treat all those who believe in Him as brothers. Since no man can see into another’s heart, He created that test and boundary. Belief in Him. It’s not complicated.

Which had to be trolled with dialectic objectivity of inescapable quality by me:

two questions:

1. Do demons believe in Jesus Christ being…uh..you know…Jesus Christ?
2. See a problem with your statement yet?

the response from the person who said it wasn’t complicated? Pure retardation of distilled quality:

Absolutely not. Demons NEVER willingly admit they believe in Christ until they are cornered & outed as the enemy. Thank you for asking that question!

Astonishing stupidity, straw-manning and false humility in two short sentences. Who said women can’t multi-task?

The point of course is not whether demons ADMIT it, but rather whether they believe it and know it . To which the answer, of course, is a resounding yes. Which once again proves beyond a doubt that Protestants have the exact same standard to be a Christian as Demons do. Demons believe Christ is in fact who He says He is. If that were enough to bring you to Heaven, then Demons would be in Heaven too. And yes, this isn’t complicated. Not even for a child. But it is apparently way beyond a Protestant’s capacity to do basic logic.

Then a few attempts at reason by more reasonable people:

One thing I’ve not quite understood about Protestantism…
Many claim that the rules of Catholicism are complicated.

But you believe that The Bible… the densest and most significant work in creation with multiple layers of inter-related meaning, inspired by the words of God Himself, originally written in multiple ancient languages, can be picked-up by the average person, and without any authority to help you interpret it, has a meaning which is pretty straight-forward for the average person to pickup and understand?

And another:

Institutions of men are fallible in the sense that they are subject to corruption and confusion, but not that they are necessarily corrupt or confused.

The retard chimes back in:

Perhaps your concept of God is too small. He wrote it for everybody. That being said, every Christian church has leaders and experts to go to for help and clarification. Both points co-exist: Bible is for everybody, experts r welcome.

And so she then gets promptly and politely owned.

But here is the obvious problem… it demonstrably isn’t written in such a way that everyone will reach the same, essential conclusions about it. That’s why you can take “experts” from dozens of different Protestant denominations – people who have done a truly impressive level of study – and these various people will give not only different, but truly incompatible versions of what the Bible really means and how we should truly be good Christians.

I suppose for a Protestant this answer may seem crude, but to us Catholics when the question has been: “what is the simple criteria”? The answer has always been: look for the Church of Christ and following the teaching of the authorities that He established.

Rejoining with my earlier comment, I get accused of doing something I absolutely did not do, using my own quote, which note, has air-quotes on it for all to see:

no one ever will know what “true Protestantism” is.

That’s because there is no such thing. We know what a Methodist is. We know what a Baptist is. But all you’re offering there is meaningless rhetoric.

“No one will ever know what a true animal is, because a tiger is different than a duck.”

And of course I replied to that:

I didn’t come up with the meaningless phrase “true Protestantism”. [RETARDED PROTESTANT] did. Which is why I put it in inverted commas. I’m not the one coming up with meaningless rhetoric. Protestants are.
The point being that between the 40,000 denominations there is no agreement whatever as to what a “christian” even is.
There are about 800 million Protestants and as many versions of “Christianity” from them, which logically means their religion (whichever of the 800 million versions you pick) simply cannot be the salvific version of anything. If it were then everyone gets saved, which from an actual Christian perspective (or even just basic justice) is nonsensical.
Fake Catholicism is just as bad of course.
Actual Catholicism and actual Catholics on the other hand have a very clear, simple enough to follow religion with very clear rules that have consistently made life better for any society that adopted them.

Which ended that little side-thread apparently, but here are some others that went from mild to truly astonishing:

“if you don’t know what the code of Canon Law of 1917 is, if you have never read the 16 documents of Vatican II and if you don’t know why these two things matter, along with some basic tenets of your purported faith, then why do you think you actually ARE Catholic?”

Christianity is not knowing the details of the Law. Neither the thief on the cross nor the Ethiopian knew any of those things, and I doubt very much that Jesus will deny either of them.

I understand the sentiment. The basic premise being that it is obviously not necessary to read the entirety of the Code of Canon Law to be a decent Catholic. Which is true. But that is the case as long as you accept the infallible magisterium of the church. 2

If you do not, or if you want to understand WHY the Church has this or that rule, then there is certainly enough information and logic and reason, based on Roman Law, the most complete, fair and just system of laws for humans ever devised, 3 for you to research it to your heart’s content. This would require reading the Bible, or also the Code of canon Law of 1917 or even the references in it that lead directly to one or more of the documents or papal encyclicals that the Catholic Church has archived as part of the infallible magisterium of the Church.

In short, if you accept the rules, fine, just do as you are told by a decent priest or bishop and you don’t even have to know how to read. Knowing the Credo, Ave Maria, Our Father, maybe the Gloria, and attending the sacraments of Baptism, Holy Mass, Confession, Confirmation, Marriage, last rites, and Holy Orders where relevant, is all that millions and millions of illiterate peasants throughout the ages required, and they formed perfectly decent societies.

As for the comment on the thief on the Cross and the Ethiopian, again, Catholicism has detailed reasons for this. Because once again: Reason and logic. The Thief on the Cross going to heaven without having been baptised is accepted under the concept of baptism by desire, which is that exceedingly rare occasion whereby a person who truly did want to become catholic, dies before having the chance to be baptised. not because he stopped for a beer or a week on holiday to suntan, but because he literally dies before he gets to it. Catholics understand that there is an external appearance to things and an internal intent, of which only God knows the truth. And the thief on the cross, because Jesus explicitly said so, is proof that the internal forum, if truly earnest and true, can make one achieve salvation. And the Ethiopian of course actually received instruction by Phillip before choosing to be baptised, so not even really applicable. The point remains the same: It’s not necessary to be a doctor of the Church to be a good Catholic.

But to go from this to saying that no rules at all are required for salvation, is, of course, idiotic.

And yet… as we will see… prevalent among protestants. Behold:

“These disagreements range from the nature of Christ Himself, to the rules for attaining or losing salvation, to the exact nature and cure for sin, to how we as Christians should regard ourselves as a community.”

None of those things are essentials. Either Jesus will deny you on the day or he will not. That’s the only essential.

It’s a silly sentence.

It’s like saying: Whether you follow the rules of the road or not is not essential. On the day you will either get a fine or not.

Duh.

And what, pray tell, might get you fined? Oh, oh, I know! How about NOT FOLLOWING THE RULES?

This is really not difficult.

Well. Unless you’re a Protestant apparently. The Catholic interlocutor replied:

but will all due respect, that wasn’t my argument. I didn’t make an appeal to the need for everyone to be right about everything.

The argument is that there is demonstrable and consistent disagreement about the essentials. You have claimed that the list of doctrines I gave are non-essential, but whether they are essential parts of belief or not is itself therefore something that Christians disagree about.

You then claimed, “Either Jesus will deny you on the day or he will not. That’s the only essential.”, but is it not essential for us to know what we need to believe or do so that He will accept us?

For example, with the exception of cases in which it is genuinely impossible, is it necessary for a Christian to receive water baptism?

The astonishing response from a different but very retarded Protestant?

“but is it not essential for us to know what we need to believe or do so that He will accept us?”
Answer: NOPE.

So, we have final proof here that Protestants literally believe that all you need to do to be saved is:

1. Believe in Jesus Christ (demons do so as well)
2. Do whatever you want. No rules at all need be followed, known or understood. (Again, do as thou will shall be all of the law. Satanic.)

And more:

“You then claimed, “Either Jesus will deny you on the day or he will not. That’s the only essential.”, but is it not essential for us to know what we need to believe or do so that He will accept us?

Obviously not. The Bible specifically states that many who believe they were Christians who did what they were told will be rejected. Matthew 7:22-23.

Let’s look at Matthew 7:22-23 shall we?

²² Many will say to me in that day: Lord, Lord, have not we prophesied in thy name, and cast out devils in thy name, and done many miracles in thy name?

²³ And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, you that work iniquity.

Apparently, Protestants are too dense to even imagine this may apply precisely to them. Because you know… they profess to be Christians, but don’t actually follow any of the rules of it?

Such an astonishing display of complete lack of reasoning capacity can only mean that either:

1. Protestants are genuinely so brainwashed, or stupid and arrogant as to believe literally no rules need apply to them other than to have the same level of “belief” as demons do, or,
2. They are like Muslims, and believe Allah will do whatever he will do, for reasons completely unfathomable to anyone but himself, and he will condemn/save who he will, for totally inscrutable reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with your behaviour on Earth at all.

Either way it a pretty bold move to assert that no rules at all apply to your membership for Christianity, not to say, so retarded as to actually stun you for a moment with the abject stupidity of it.

I truly wonder what possible reason Protestants think may apply to those who Jesus rejects, if not their simply not doing as per his Will in order to be saved.

Which, you know, might include just a little bit more than saying “I believe Jesus is Jesus”.

Is baptism even required to be a Christian, according to Protestants?

For example, with the exception of cases in which it is genuinely impossible, is it necessary for a Christian to receive water baptism?

I doubt it. But I don’t pretend to actually know.

Apparently not! Although he does admit he is not 100% sure.

Appeals to the Bible (you know, their sola scripture that they changed and never put together to begin with?) were ignored:

As far as water baptism goes, it’s commanded by Christ, St. Peter, Phillip, and the whole Early Church. Simple.

Once again, selectively quoting of a random Bible verse that may as well read: Protestants will be rejected, is used as “proof” that no rules are required for salvation, but quotes that specifically state baptism is required only get a “probably not actually required” comment.

Protestantism: Perhaps the best proof of professor Cipolla’s First Law of Human Stupidity (and the other four too) you can find anywhere.

***

So that’s what level of reason and logic we may have to work with when helping any Protestant see some basic facts and logic. It’s a pretty tiny sliver of a hint, of a shadow of a gap, by which one might, with enormous luck or divine Grace, begin to try and shine some light, or basic common sense into the gap. It’s possible because I personally know various protestants that have (after many such lengthy threads on various social media or discussions in person, or reading one of my books) come round and declared themselves properly Catholic.

One such quite touching and awesome example is by this gentleman, who if anyone had hurdles to conversion, he definitely had, his Protestant Pastor father having been killed by militant Muslims before he was born. And yet, guided by logic, reason and divine Grace, he has made the shift.

I told you this was gonna be long, but I hope it was at least entertaining, and with a bit of Divine Grace, who knows, maybe even helpful.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Aside from the hack attempt and now redesign of the blog and updating etc, you may have noticed my complete disinterest in the US elections. Mostly because I genuinely don’t care. Either Trump will win and there will be massive screeching, or Kamala will win and there will be massive screeching. I don’t think either will result in civil war, because Americans are nowhere near uncomfortable enough for that yet, and maybe never will be. Will it be bad times, sure. Either way, and of course I think if the Kamala puppet is put in place it will be worse, but then, I am simply preparing for the worst since 2020 so… no change for me.

This little video however is absolutely brilliant and exposes the DIEhard virtue signallers for what they truly are and have always been. And it is funny. Enjoy.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

For now, this will take over the functions of the main blog, which will last a few weeks. Once we have changed a few things (not the theme!) we shall have the blog back up in it’s usual spot. In the meantime, please spread the word.

Regular blogging will recommence here on Sunday.

Thanks for your continued support and patience. And please keep sharing posts once I put some up that are a little more substantive. All will be revealed in due course.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here