Archive for October 2024

4 Rules

Hat tip to Adam Piggott.

For the Blackpillers

Blackpillers come in many forms and some would not even consider themselves as such, Vaxx Sabbath from Gab is one such creature. This is an old post of his but I had saved it for wider comment. Then… well… cutting wood for winter or something got in the way for a few months or a year. So here it is now.

It is basically true, but Trevor is right too. Although I don’t think Chris Langan would create anything in a lab.

Besides which, Vaxx Sabbath forgets or is ignorant of another thing:
He erroneously makes the mistake of thinking all decent things that were created by rocket scientists happened as a result of their ability to function in a well-ordered society.

It’s a lie.

Schwartchild figured out black holes while in the trenches of WW1.

Tesla electrified the world after working as a labourer for 3 years after Edison ripped him off. He also invented the lightbulb before Edison, wireless before Marconi and wireless power and flying drums which were “lost” after he died.

Einstein plagiarised anything of value from others, Roman concrete was lost to the Visigoth invasions and so on.

In short, it is more likely a Random Guy Farming to Survive figures out how to invent free energy batteries after shovelling pigshit while he work at a desk at 2 am, by candlelight, between preparing for a few hour sleep and building a bunker to use when the powers that be finally come for him and/or that doubles as a mass grave to hide the tax collector corpses in.


The point is… most rocket scientists have to survive AND build rockets.

See also Werner Von Braun and the Nazi scientists who DID build anti-g devices. They had to fight most of the entire world, and certainly that part of it controlled by the Rothschilds banking system to get a shot at it. And not exactly by pristine means. And no, that’s not an endorsement of Nazism, just a factual observation.


As an aside, pointing out such inconsistencies in his thinking is why Vaxx Sabbath blocked me long ago. The trouble is that even those who consider themselves “erudite” simply get offended when their logical fallacies are dragged into the sunlight.

Only a group of men willing and able to face reality as it is, and also willing and able to work co-operatively together regardless of personal differences, can achieve a change in the current state of affairs. And it has to start local.

So, like it or not, unless you happen to have millions burning holes in your pockets and you want to finance a bunch of works on my farm and nearby lands, it starts with shovelling said pigshit. Assuming you are lucky enough to start out with pigs.

Gran that shovel and start working, buddy.

Men vs. Women – Take 2

Below are the poll results of those that have voted so far (poll remains open so go vote if you want).

What I would like, is if the 14 people who voted no, could each provide at least ONE example of something that generally women are better than men at.

So far, one man suggested two things:

1. Living longer than men (which they generally do by ensuring it’s men that do all the riskier jobs, so it’s true, but certainly doesn’t speak well of equality, if you believed in that fiction).

2. Dancing. It’s arguable, as one would have to consider in which respect, because if it were reduced to technical aspects, perhaps men would win, out of sheer physicality. I have no idea, but I suspect that’s how it would likely go due to men’s generally much stronger bodies, and this capacity for more perfect physical movements overall. Nevertheless, from an aesthetic perspective, i certainly can’t argue the point. I definitely prefer to see a woman dancing than a man. Of course that’s probably true of most straight men, but I would add that even at a purely objective standard of beauty, women would win with regard to the aesthetics of dancing.

I prefer the readers provide any other items, as I will have part 6 of the TMOS series up in a while, and it may surprise a lot of readers given the general misconceptions that many have with regard to me and my beliefs, or even stated positions on any given topic. Part 6 deals with the individuality of the woman.

Polish MP Speaks

As readers here know, I lean into the generic Politically Incorrect narrative that the Poles are not the brightest bulbs in Europe. Because it’s funny. And it’s funny because it’s true.

See? You’re smiling, you dirty bigot!

But… as with every rule, there has to be the exception. Hats off to the Polish MEP Grzegorz Braun for telling the truth out loud and without fear.

Golf clap, sir. Golf clap indeed.

America was Never Christian

I know most of my readers are Americans and they will generally be upset at the title, but it’s true.

The USA was created by Freemasons and with Freemason rules and laws. The American revolution was largely financed by France, bankrupting that country and resulting in the guillotining of its king and consort, the infamous Marie Antoinette, which in reality were not bad royals, but they did take disastrous advice from their freemason “economists”.

The so-called founding fathers were Freemasons and Deists at best.

And Protestantism, in all its multi-faceted and endless splitting down to each man being his own (and only) theological authority, meant that America only ever had the veneer of Churchianity, never an actual valid Christianity that could last centuries.

Look at this publication from 1955

Of the six teenagers, only two state their future partner should be of their faith. Three of them deem it a kind of bonus if it works out that way, but not really important, and one doesn’t mention it at all. And this was in the supposed golden age of the “Christian” America.

The reality is that by any objective measure, protestantism is just a vague social club, not anything even remotely approaching an actual faith with any kind of rules other than exactly the same one that even demons know: Jesus is King.

It’s time Americans faced these truths, as well as how corrupted the machinery of their fake government covers over the real rulers. And how deceived they have been from birth. We all have, of course, but Americans in particularly have been subjected to the most relentless propaganda.

And such relentless pushing of fake food that it has resulted in American generally being in poor health.

I hope you make it, and figure out which is the closest proper church.

Men vs Women

I’m just curious what the readership here thinks.

Other than childbirth and breastfeeding, are men just generally better than women at everything?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Vox vs Kurgan Book Lists

Someone helpfully posted Vox’ list.

Since I consider myself to be literate, by definition any book that I have not read cannot be necessary for literacy. That knocks out more than a few books commonly listed, such as Portrait of the Author as a Young Man. (And while I have read Ulysses, it is by no means necessary.)

I should also note that I left out the OC’s spotting of a religious tome, because whereas the Bible is necessary to be considered literate, the Bhagavad Gita and the Koran are not. Most literate people have read neither. Anyhow, without further ado, here’s my list of 25 books which I believe is absolutely necessary to have read in order to be considered literate.

The Iliad
The Odyssey
The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire
Plato’s Republic
The Annals

The Decameron
The Complete Works of William Shakespeare
Candide
A Christmas Carol
Anna Karenina

Don Quixote
The Three Musketeers
The Complete Works of Edgar Allen Poe
Crime and Punishment
Brideshead Revisited

1984
The Name of the Rose
The Glass Bead Game
The Adventures of Tom Sawyer
The Hound of the Baskervilles

The Lord of the Rings
The Chronicles of Narnia
20,000 Leagues Under the Sea
Foundation
The Code of the Woosters

There’s a few books you may not have read that aren’t absolutely necessary to be considered literate, but I’ll nevertheless look at you somewhat askance if you haven’t: The Tale of Genji, The Dark is Rising, Watership Down, The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius, The Divine Comedy, Madame Bovary, a collection of short stories by Guy de Maupassant, a Poirot novel.

I have struck through the ones I have read on his list.

I will also substitute for a Poirot novel several I read by Agatha Christie, though I don’t recall all their names.

My list is different, but then I don’t necessarily consider myself “literate” in the classical sense. Instead, I consider myself well-read, and well-rounded, with an emphasis on being generally well-versed in understanding the reality of the world as we find it, with some relatively good insight into some of the fundamentals of it (Physics, Astronomy, some Chemistry, Engineering and Human history). So my list is leaning more in that direction than pure literacy for the sake of the prose. I would add that I think it is a far larger endeavour to be well-rounded, as I intend it, rather than merely literate, so I’m giving myself 30 books instead of 25.

The Crusades – Iron Men and Saints

The Illiad

The Odyssey

The Lost Books of the Odyssey

The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity

Black Holes and Time Warps: Einstein’s Outrageous Legacy (various Astronomy books throughout my life, but this probably encompasses a lot of the concepts)

Physics without Einstein (again, various books, but the ones by Harold Aspden are most interesting and this one probably best represents them)

The Dictionary of word origins

The Pio-Benedictine Code of Canon Law of 1917

Go Rin No Sho (A book of five rings)

The Face on Mars (it may be seen as vain, as I wrote it, but honestly I wrote it because I think it is really quite important for people to know the very origin of the Human race is far more interesting and unexpected than anyone imagines, and the evidence for it is overwhelming)

The Irrational Atheist

The Hoax of the Twentieth Century (good luck finding a copy without needing to act like some spy trying to purchase hidden plans to the enemy’s mind-control machine)

Lost Science

Psycho-cybernetics

A New Science of Life (and The Science Delusion which is really part II)

The Mneme

Gilgamesh

L’Eletta Del Dragone

The Spear of Destiny – Ravenscroft was a POW in WW2 and after he wrote this the “official” historians attacked him as a “fantasist”. Given the almost total fabrication in many respects of those same “historians” I am far more inclined to take Ravenscroft version of events as being closer to accurate. More importantly, it was the first book (after decades of reading up on the Nazis because the entire country suddenly becoming evil never made sense to me) that gave me a hint of some of the other forces involved in the Nazi regime, including the occult side of it.

The Conquistadors

Soldier of the Mist (It’s a trilogy but I really liked the first book the most and you can’t find it on its own easily now)

The Lord of the Rings (You kinda need the Hobbit thrown in there as well, and possibly The Silmarillion)

The Greek Myths (there were many books on this topic as a child, but this although technical, covers most of them is in summary form, but cross-referenced)

The ESP Enigma

La Divina Commedia (reading it in English is a minor capital crime)

The Complete works of Shakespeare

I Segreti Dei Samurai

The SS Brotherhood of the Bell: NASA’s Nazis, JFK and Majic-12

Dark Star: The Hidden History of German Secret Bases, Flying Disks, and U-Boats

Also… if you have not read through a dictionary or two I will tend to also look you askance, and if you think the Earth is flat I will consider you an abject moron.

So that’s my list of books you need (at a minimum) to begin to be considered a generally well-read man.

The Most Important Book I Ever Read

For some years now, I have toyed with making some kind of list of the ten most important or enjoyable books I have read (different lists) but it has been very hard, mostly because I could easily extend both lists to 20 or 30, and partly because many books I (most) have been lost to moves and unfortunate storage choices by my relatives when I left them in their care.

Nevertheless, I recently posted on the Best book I ever read. But that was my attempt at mixing what I thought was important with what I enjoyed. By the same token, my own books, The Face on Mars could be of the same category, if for very different reasons. While Reclaiming the Catholic Church – The True History of Vatican II and the Visible Remnant of the Real Catholic Church now that the Vatican is a Pederast Infested Hive of Impostors, to my mind, would be important, but probably not as fun to read (still way ahead of any book on theology I read to date though).

Believe! On the other hand was a short book and to the point, with references, and relatively entertaining too, and it probably had far more of an impact than the detailed deep dive that Reclaiming had. Certainly I didn’t expect whole families to convert to Catholic Sedevacantism as regularly and as frequently as that little book seemed to have inspired. So one could say it was a useful book.

By the above metrics then, I hope to explain why I consider this book, freely available at the link, to be the most important I ever read.

Carlo Cipolla was obviously a brilliant man, but his book, THE BASIC LAWS OF HUMAN STUPIDITY is truly ground-breaking.

He encapsulated in both hilarious yet perfectly accurate scientific notation, just how human stupidity presents itself in observable reality.

As he mentions in his own first edition of the book.

In fact, the publisher’s note alone is worth reproducing in full:

PUBLISHER’S NOTE

Originally written in English, The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity was published for the first time in 1976 in a numbered and private edition bearing the unlikely imprint of “Mad Millers.”

The author believed that his short essay could be fully appreciated only in the language in which it had been written. He consequently long declined any proposal to have it translated. Only in 1988 did he accept the idea of its publication in an Italian version as part of the volume titled Allegro ma non troppo, together with the essay Pepper, Wine (and Wool) as the Dynamic Factors of the Social and Economic Development of the Middle Ages, also originally written in English and published privately by Mad Millers for Christmas 1973.

Allegro ma non troppo has been a bestseller both in Italy and in all the countries where translated versions have appeared. Yet, with an irony that the author of these laws would have appreciated, it has never been published in the language in which it was first written.

Thus, more than a quarter of a century since the publication of Allegro ma non troppo, this in fact is the first edition that makes The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity available in its original version.

The private edition of 1976 was preceded by the following publisher’s note written by the author himself:

The Mad Millers printed only a limited number of copies of this book, which addresses itself not to stupid people but to those who on occasion have to deal with such people. To add that none of those who will receive this book can possibly fall in area of the basic graph (figure 1) is therefore a work of supererogation. Nevertheless, like most works of supererogation, it is better done than left undone. For, as the Chinese philosopher said: “Erudition is the source of universal wisdom: but that does not prevent it from being an occasional cause of misunderstanding between friends.”

Supererogation means to do more than is required (especially in a work). So Cipolla is saying that although it should be obvious that stupid people will not be the ones reading it or making use of it, it is best to state it, even if it should be obvious, and he (politely in my opinion) states that this is necessary even among “erudite” friends, in order to avoid misunderstanding.

Now you know why I have rather long-run-on sentences and verbose paragraphs to make relatively simple points. I could make them in a sentence, but then… the “erudites” who grasp the full meaning would be a tiny number indeed!

I also agree that though he was Italian, the work is really best appreciated in English, which is how he wrote it. I find the same is true of much of my own work. The English language is perfectly technical and lends itself far better to technical explanations, scientific work, and precise language. We Lagos tend to lose something in translation in the written word if we can’t add a look, a hand gesture, or both. And the number of people who can write in technically excellent Italian are probably down to a half dozen. those who can appreciate it may ten or so.

At any rate, you really need to read this short book the Professor left for the non-stupid.

The planet is fast approaching a critical mass of stupidity that may well result in the extinction of the human race, or at least, of that part of it that makes life on this planet marginally tolerable despite the teeming waves of idiots we are constantly surrounded by.

Mostly, this is because of a corollary I would like to add to his Fifth Law of Human Stupidity.

A STUPID PERSON IS THE MOST DANGEROUS TYPE OF PERSON. A STUPID PERSON IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN A BANDIT.

Professor Cipolla himself already understood the inevitable result of the relationship between stupid people and power (in the political and force-projection sense), as he wrote finally at the end of the fifth law:

In a country that is moving downhill, the fraction of stupid people is still equal to σ; however, in the remaining population one notices among those in power an alarming proliferation of the bandits with overtones of stupidity (subarea BS of quadrant in figure 3) and among those not in power an equally alarming growth in the number of helpless individuals (area in the basic graph, figure 1). Such change in the composition of the non-stupid population inevitably strengthens the destructive power of the σ fraction and makes decline a certainty. And the country goes to Hell.

Given the current state of affairs however, it is important to spell this out in even simpler terms:

The Bandits use the Stupid to weaponise them against any attempt (by the Intelligent) of removing them from power.

It may be the natural (or Divinely Ordained) order of things that humanity is indeed to go extinct, as some giant Universe 25 experiment with mice, be that as it may, surely, as a member of the Intelligent group, it behoves us to do whatever we can to ensure the continuation of at least our part of humanity, as best we can.

Aside the fact that humans are not mice, and that the Universe 25 narrative played very much in the depopulationist boomer agenda espoused by the culprits of the recent mass-murder event called COVID, with its related fake “vaccines” that are really murderous genetic serums, there is also the fact that if intelligent humans organise and come together, their effect on the planet is far more impactful than the masses of idiots that inevitably get in our way to derail plans and efforts, as they invariably do.

In short, the book Cipolla wrote is extremely important because it formally recognises a fundamental issue that humanity has to face in order to survive the next stage of human advancement: The increasing and intentional stupidification of the human race by a few bandits orchestrating it.

Only a concerted effort by organised intelligent people can counter this global phenomenon.

Which, of course, is why I started trying to build up a Sedevacantist Catholic Community in a remote village in Italy. While my wife and I, despite our rather advanced age for it, certainly did not shirking our duty of making a bunch of children.

It is heartening to see that other sedevacantist couples, younger and therefore likely to produce many more children, are trying to do the same in their own ways in various places around the world.

The independent cell-nature of the Sede Catholics, coupled with absolutely shared dogmatic values, is a strong combination for weathering all sorts of nefarious events and plots by the Bandits; and historically too, no one has been quite as successful at rising from the supposed ashes of their religion.

So we are on good ground.

Go read Professor Cipolla’s Magnum Opus. It is truly wonderful and important.

See my Shocked Face

A faint hope

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks