And now go back and re-read my previous post and understand that I am not just hyperboling when I say the people at the top are child raping killing and eating Satanist freaks.
In case you are new here, allow me to first of all present the sides of the WWIII conflict that started in early 2020.
On the side of Satan:
Israel (leading the charge both openly as the genociding power it is, as well as covertly through it’s displaced Diaspora and Owners of the Bank for International Settlement (the Rothschilds) and their sort – bankers that are literally above the law and create the world’s money supply out of thin air)
The USA (A vassal superstate of both Israel and Freemasonry, being the first Freemasonic country on Earth)
Western Europe (Composed of various vassal state to the USA)
Other general Vassal states (Canada, Australia, New Zealand) or original Satanic houses (the United Kingdom).
Against Satan (but not necessarily angels either)
Russia (Nominally Eastern Orthodox, so schismatics, but at least making a nod to the side of God)
China (Not actively directly involved yet, but this dragon is patient. The final living standards under a global China would possibly be marginally better than under a global Satanist leadership, but as I say, probably only marginally so)
India (Kind of like Italy in WWII, they will go wherever the side that wins seems to be at any given time)
Melange of the Mostly Irrelevant
These are essentially smaller countries that will not affect the outcome one way or the other. Pretty much what most of the Western European countries would be if their despotic, corrupt, for sale, traitorous, pedophile, blackmailable, fraudsters pretending to be their legitimate governments would be removed tomorrow and replaced with the average person in each of these countries that actually cares about the welfare of their people and nation.
This includes most of Africa and South America, all the little weird places like Micronesia, and also side-show pieces like Taiwan, which are geopolitically important, just by a number of factors that make them so, but are, militarily and in terms of affecting the path of the global war taking place, essentially also irrelevant. Japan is another such place. they may have valuable items that would help one side or the other, so become contentious places, but directly, they are essentially hostages, like the rest of Western Europe, just more obviously and dangerously so.
Where it Started
The Side of Satan, used to ruling the world by subterfuge, fear, and financial terrorism and enslavement, having succeeded at achieving pretty much whatever it wanted since 1945, decided to take the gloves off and start the process of changing the whole of planet Earth into the thing they really have been aiming consciously for since at minimum 1776, but really, that has been planned from the very start of mankind. The underlying power behind it all is indeed an immortal spirit of evil, we sometimes refer to by various names, but in any event, it utterly hates humanity and wants them crushed and humiliated in their totality. It does this by elevating various figures in the human world to do its bidding. The upper echelons of this essentially nested hive of secret societies, subterfuge, secret deals and hierarchies and inter-competitive backstabbing are indeed aware of who they serve, and do so consciously. Others may be operating under the guise that they know best, but really, they know, and they are feeling so confident now, they are not even hiding it any more. Listen to this guy, Graff at the World Economic Forum (see the whole long post Simplicious made that also covered this but is too long and autistic for most people)
Klaus Schwab of course has been boasting to the world that their WEF graduates have been infiltrating every Western government for decades. Literally almost every leader in Europe and abroad is a “graduate” of this process. Justin Trudeau being its most idiotic, obvious, annoying and completely controlled puppet, but so is the gay Macaroon of France and all the various others throughout Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand and so on. There is also another disturbing trend that some, along with most of the freaky “elites” that wear animal masks, rape children and dance around Bohmain grove, and hang out with “spirit cooker” Marina Abramovich and the likes of the Clinton Foundation, which we all know is a child trafficking ring. And that is the deep undercurrent of Occult stuff going back centuries. Meloni, the PM of Italy is on record saying she had an occult master since her early 20s. And that’s to say nothing of the connections to child rape by gigantic blackmailers like Jeffrey Epstein, and now Sean Coombs or P. Diddy, as he liked to be called, which hardly masks the proclivities he enjoyed with certain potentially underage people, like Justin Bieber, who literally sang about a P. Diddy party and how it warped him.
If you dig even just a little bit, the literally demonic, down to literal child sacrifice and cannibalism, is there. You don’t want to see it full in the face, because it is monstrous, but you know. And you know you could find out more if only it would not haunt your nightmares forever after.
As to where it started? Well, worshipping the devil is the oldest religion in the world. I literally started after Lucifer and a third of the host were cast out of Heaven.
You might not believe it that literally, but honestly, start from a blank slate and what makes most sense?
Money and power alone don’t explain it. The ritual abuse, murder, organ harvesting and adrenochrome farms of little children goes well beyond mere greed and a wish for power. And when it is on the absolutely enormous scale it is, it being merely the really twisted perversions of a mere few freaks doesn’t explain it either.
You say you want more proof? There is mountains of it. you just have to look for it. Find out what some of the veterans of the Ukraine conflict see and have witnessed. Look up what the Franklin scandal was decades ago. Or the Belgian scandal that encompassed pretty much all of the Belgian government and judiciary and had to do with an vast pedophile network that to all intents and purposes was the government and the judiciary and law enforcement too. Look at the testimony of British highly ranked police officers that tried to blow the whistle on the depth and scope of the same thing in the UK government, law enforcement and judiciary too. Do you really think that sick fuck of Jimmy Saville who raped and abused kids dying of cancer, by the hundreds, was not known about? Do you not know the statue of a pedophile is proudly displayed outside the BBC studios? And the rampant similar stuff that goes on at all the higher echelons of power? All the pesos in the fake “Catholic Church” which has been headed by Satanists pretending to be “Popes” uninterruptedly since 1958?
You may pretend to yourself I am just some crazy “conspiracy theorist” ranting, but it’s undeniable that the so-called conspiracy theorists turned out to be right about pretty much all of it. JFK, 9/11, the faked part of the Moon Landings (though we did go to the Moon, but not the way they tell you), the whole Covid Mass-Murder event, and on, and on, and on.
Of course, the majority who took the genetic serums that are now killing little children from heart attacks and giving turbo-cancers and other life-crippling effects, don’t want to know.
Operating under the idea that if you don’t say it out loud, maybe, just like the Candyman, the evil shit will not happen to you even if you did take that fake Vaxx that has never worked in over 30 years and only ended up killing the animals that were repeatedly subjected to it.
So because of that, everyone just keeps their head down and keeps quiet and just gets squeezed more and more, by more woke insanity and pregnant “men” and furries and other mentally ill freaks pushed on us by… yup, the usual suspects. Except no one is allowed to say it. No one is allowed to name them. The fact they have been chased out of 108 countries some 1004 times is just everyone else’s fault. never had anything to do with them or how they behave.
And blowing up thousands of devices remotely indiscriminately among civilians is supposed to be great, and good and acceptable. Not a terrorist act at all.
How it’s Going
You KNOW that all the stuff I wrote above is true and just scratching the surface. The level of deception, horror, total degeneracy and vile evil that is really all around us is nauseating and not hard to see even for those who only have a room temperature IQ.
In short, there are enough people now that have understood this at least to the point that one hopes most of the time they watch the bullshit spewing out of their television sets they simply roll their eyes and say “Bitch, Please!”
You KNOW they are lying to you. You know they are evil. And you KNOW there is no standing on the sidelines any more. They will not let you. Either you are one of them (you are not. They are few, very few, and wealthy to a point you have no conception of), you are one of their pets/slaves/sex toys, as they decide and want you to be, or you are against them. There is no other position where you will go by unnoticed and unmolested.
In short, we should all pretty much be here by now:
And guess what. He doesn’t call it that. He doesn’t express a framework within which what he says can be made to happen, but it exists. It’s called Catholicism. Not the fake Vatican II TurboPederasty on crack, no.
The Catholicism of the Crusaders of 1095, who put on their armours and with heir entire fortunes and families went to fight an invader that had been attacking them and enslaving and murdering them for nearly 400 years. We have been brainwashed for some 80 years really intensively.
It’s enough now.
And no, Catholic, real ones, do not “turn the other cheek” to this level of evil. They march either to their martyrdom, or to push the demons back into Hell. An remember, even the Gates of Hell, will not prevail on us.
So, yes, enter WWIII correctly.
It’s a spiritual fight first and a worldly one only secondly. Get the first right and build up your people, your community, your family and friends. Be clear on who and where you are and who is and is not with you. Organise. Group. Resist all the lies in every way, every day, and build up your life, your inspiration, your children, and make new alternatives and create new realities of local government, of local academics, and so on.
Maybe you are Vaxxed and dying or ill. So what? You want the bastards that fooled you into that to win? You want to pretend that’s not what happened as you quietly slip away into the darkness?
Whatever your personal situation, whatever you believe, simply know this: There are only two sides. The side of Good or the side of Evil. And no man’s land does not exist anymore, it is rapidly becoming territory of the enemy too, except for those who see the truth and become part of our side.
The opening salvos have been done. Now we enter the start of the real war. And it will go on at least a few years. I would say it is unlikely to chance quickly. So build up your forces. Ten years from now no one knows what the landscape will look like, but those who prepare now will be far better able to create and navigate it.
If you are a regular here, you will no doubt be familiar with the regular Kurganing of some deceitful half-wit that catches my attention from time to time.
Simple. The truth matters. And these guys would mug and rape the truth if they ever met it face to face.
If someone was going around telling people 2+2 is 5, and people listen to that liar, try to comprehend what the ramifications of that are. Imagine what would happen to engineering as a whole.
Well, this is the same.
And even if you are not Catholic, are you the type that would let absolute lies “pass” if only they agreed with your specific pre-conceived ideas? Most of which aren’t in fact your ideas at all, they may have been your great-great-great-grandfather’s long ago, when he was very drunk one night and got upset at a Catholic priest calling him out so he went hardcore Protestant on the spot. Truth is most people have not spent 20 minutes checking on the factual basis for their religious identity.
If they had, their journey would take a lot longer and resemble something like the steps identified here.
Anyway, that’s why I do it.
Oh; and also… I kinda enjoy it. It’s not quite the same as charging heretics on horseback with a lance, but hey, we have to take our fun where we can.
Jay Dyer, once again makes things up, relating to the ecumenical council of Constance.
He contention is that the Council of Constance “ruled” who was the real Pope during the period in which there were three Popes (two of which were fake). This is absolute nonsense and of course, yet another lie.
He says this in this mostly boring and irrelevant podcast from about 2 hours and 10 or 11 minutes or so and carries on until about 2 hours and 30 minutes. He repeatedly says that the council of Constance resolved the issue.
This is absolutely and completely a lie.
What happened is that the three Popes were convened to this council originally by the fake Antipope John XXIII, who was pushed to do so by the Emperor. So nothing happening here except them basically saying: “We gotta sort this out.” As a result of this investigation John XXIII was going to be investigated for scandalous conduct so he ran away. In the meantime, the two remaining possible “Popes” Gregory XII and Benedict XIII came to an agreement which was that Gregory XII would be accepted as the one true Pope and instead of being deposed (as were the other two, for being antipopes) he would resign and a new and valid Pope (from the Roman see, would be elected). So that’s what happened.
In essence the one true Pope, Gregory XII resolved the issue. Not the Council.
This is typical of Jay, he just lies, makes straw man “arguments” and completely makes things up. As I demonstrated on my video of our debate, he literally makes quotes up from various documents they supposedly come from, and refers to others that are completely unrelated to the topic at hand.
As I said right from the start, the man is a liar and an intellectual pigmy. All you need to do is go read the documents he quotes and take them in proper context, because he of course will quote mine and try and twist black into being white and vice versa.
In short, it was NOT the council that decided anything, but Gregory XII, the one true pope that for the good of the Church proposed the solution that everyone agreed with and everyone agreed he had the full authority to make this decision and that all of his appointments were in fact the only ones that would be valid, since he was the real pope.
Gregory XII sent to Constance as his representatives his protector Carlo Malatesta, the Lord of Rimini, and the Dominican cardinal, John Domenici—to Constance indeed, but not to the General Council assembled there by the authority, and in the name, of John XXIII. The envoys’ commission was to the emperor Sigismund, presiding over the various bishops and prelates whom his zeal to restore peace to the Church had brought together. To these envoys—and to Malatesta in the first place—Gregory gave authority to convoke as a General Council—to convoke and not to recognise—these assembled bishops and prelates ; [4] and by a second bull [5] he empowered Malatesta to resign to this General Council in his name.
The emperor, the bishops and prelates consented and accepted the role Gregory assigned. And so, on July 4, 1415. Sigismund, clad in the royal robes, left the throne he had occupied in the previous sessions for a throne placed before the altar, as for the president of the assembly. Gregory’s two legates sat by his side facing the bishops. The bull was read commissioning Malatesta and Domenici to convoke the council and to authorise whatever it should do for the restoration of unity and the extirpation of the schism—with Gregory’s explicit condition that there should be no mention of Baldassare Cossa, [6] with his reminder that from his very election he had pledged himself to resign if by so doing he could truly advance the good work of unity, and his assertion that the papal dignity is truly his as the canonically elected successor of Urban VI.
Malatesta then delegated his fellow envoy, the cardinal John Domenici, to pronounce the formal operative words of convocation [7] ; and the assembly—but in its own way—accepted to be thus convoked, authorised and confirmed in the name “of that lord who in his own obedience is called Gregory XII” [8]. The council next declared that all canonical censures imposed by reason of the schism were lifted, and the bull was read by which Gregory authorised Malatesta to make the act of abdication [9] and promised to consider as ratum gratum et firmum, and forever irrevocable, whatever Malatesta, as his proxy, should perform. The envoy asked the council whether they would prefer the resignation immediately, or that it should be delayed until Peter de Luna’s decision was known. The council preferred the present moment. It ratified all Gregory XII’s acts, received his cardinals as cardinals, promised that his officers should keep their posts and declared that if Gregory was barred from re-election as pope, this was only for the peace of the Church, and not from any personal unworthiness. Then the great renunciation was made [10], ” …. renuncio et cedo …. et resigno …. in hac sacrosancta synodo et universali concilio, sanctam Romanam et universalem eccleciam repraesentante” and the council accepted it [11], but again as made “on the part of that lord who in his own obedience was called Gregory XII”. The Te Deum was sung and a new summons drawn up calling upon Peter de Luna to yield to the council’s authority.
The work of Pisa was now almost undone, and by this council which, in origin, was a continuation of Pisa. It had suppressed the Pisan pope whom Pisa, with biting words, had rejected as a schismatic and no pope.”
Phillip Hughes, A History of the Church, p. 289-291
All it takes to catch Dyer out in his lies is to actually refer to the documents and events he intentionally lies about and misrepresents.
It’s just like all the fake nonsense “scientists” and “historians” do, when, like “journalists” they give a bunch of “references”. No one ever bothers to look them up. I you do, you will find they literally list the very proof of their own lies.
This little video embedded below, of the real life gamma Captain Sobel in the excellent Band of Brothers series, demonstrates that the concept of the Gamma, and the worst thing that can happen, a gamma in a position of authority over others, is a real concept that has been well described by Vox Day.
As an aside, while it is true, and something I expected right from the start of the video that the men benefitted from the gruelling training, I feel that this was more despite Captain Sobel rather than it being an intentional effect he was going for regardless of personal cost.
The clue is in the fact that he was vindictive, held a grudge, and was overall a bad leader, but expected to be seen as the perfect Captain. His harassing the men on the smallest detail, had nothing to do with making them more efficient, and everything to do with making (in his own mind) him appear to be a “perfectionist” and/or having standards higher than everyone else. Which is also what drove him to take part in the training exercises, but, however, disappear for pretty much the rest of the time, where he clearly shirked the duties he instead piled on and gave to Winters.
I would bet that if had ever lead Easy Co. in actual combat for any length of time, it would have been quite likely that he would have suffered some fatal “accident”.
Bear with me, because the introduction to this one takes a little while, but is absolutely necessary in order for us to understand each other properly. I think you will agree, especially if you are not Catholic; as —perhaps to your surprise— this post is nevertheless for you too.
As usual, the Intro:
This is the fourth in the Theoretical Models of Society series of Posts. Use the category of the same name or the Search Me function on the right-hand sidebar to find all related posts in the series.
It is generally helpful to a reader if they are already familiar with some of my other work, in order for this stuff to have the most useful effect on your life. In particular, The Face on Mars and Believe! would be the top reads to have done to have the generic global perspective of reality well in hand. Systema and Reclaiming the Catholic Church would have the most impact on a more personal level. On health/security/self-protection, and on the reality of Catholicism as it was (and remains with Sedevacantists) before Vatican II and why the Novus Ordo Church is not only not Catholic, but Satanic at its core. I will repeat this little paragraph on each new part, as I think it is important to have a general foundation if one is really interested in more than skim-reading before returning to the general slumber we are all being attempted to be forced into.
In writing this ongoing series, despite the fact it was the most requested among the choices I gave on the Poll, the fact is that it is at times hard to determine if it is having the intended useful effect.
Of the people who read this blog regularly, only a fraction will reply to polls, and of that, possibly a part will be hate-readers trying to skew the stats.
That said, I received a private message that made it clear that at least one person, and a very good person at that, is finding it useful. Among a busy life, a relatively recent marriage and a new son, he is also busy trying to form a Sede community in a place where there isn’t even a proper Catholic Church. Sounds crazy? Well he is not, and amazingly, he is already having some material success, grouping the few Sedes and making them achieve a first contact with each other. Meaning he is becoming successful at creating one of those communities I tell you all you should be busy forming, of like-minded people, whether you are Catholic or not.
His comment to me was also helpful because it ties very smoothly into the next aspect of TMOS, and that is, the proto-cell of the whole thing: The Individual Man.
Introduction before the concept
In my explanation, the analogies and explanations are best executed in terms of the underlying Catholic (1958 Sedevacantist) spiritual underpinnings.
Now, possibly heretical though it might be, I do not want this to dissuade people who are not Catholic from understanding the baseline concepts. Remember that if the model works, you should use it. As I already explained in the first 3 parts, as long as you base everything on the spiritual reality that sustains the physical, you will achieve some measure of success, and there are many spiritual realities. It’s just that most are not good, and of the few that might be considered “good” all but one are less than ideal. And even if you don’t agree with me about which one that is, if you can do basic logic at all, you must concede that the truth can only be one, whatever it is. Nothing can be both true and not true at the same time.
It became my considered opinion, after some 4 years of intense investigation (between 2013 and 2017) that the original Catholicism that existed (mostly) and was promulgated by the Vatican until 1958, is the very best approximation or approach to reality that humanity has ever had. It has produced the best and most fruits globally, and therefore has an impeccable track record when compared to any other spiritual model.
That said, is it possible for a human being with some other philosophy to produce demonstrable and overall good effects in the world? Yes. Absolutely.
It is certainly possible for a truly pious, well-meaning Buddhist, or even Protestant, or even Muslim believer, to have interpreted what shrinking good there is in their false philosophies, just so, that they really do produce an overall net good that is certainly superior to that of a genuine Catholic, that however genuine in intent, may have misunderstood the basics of his own philosophy. We are all in error to some degree or other, and it is not a race to some finish line, so this is a bad analogy in many ways, but if we assume that in order to get into heaven you have to accumulate 1,000 points, starting out as a proper Catholic is like starting with 1,000 points right out the gate. You can certainly lose points in your journey, and it may be a lot easier to do so than you think maybe, but you sure have a better shot than someone who starts out as a Muslim, which might be like starting out with -500 points and generally in a lifetime you can only accumulate say 500 points max, and converting to Catholicism gives you a 1,000 points.
I mention all this not to try and scare you into conversion (I mean, hey, if it happens, and you chose it of your own free will, great) but only to identify that fact that despite there not being any salvation outside of the Catholic Church, in our path of life, it is possible (if not very probable) to find people who are not on the true path (Catholicism) that nevertheless can have demonstrable (good) effects in the world due to a variety of variables and factors.
There are also plenty of people that have demonstrable effects in the world that are using an underlying evil spiritual underpinning of course, but we are talking only to the “good” guys here.
And while I sure hope you would all become able to see the logic, beauty and truth of Catholicism, find yourself a real Church, a real priest, fall to your knees and beg for proper baptism in it, I am, above all, a realist. Which means I am aware of the war I face. And while I wish you all the Truth with a capital T, I know many, probably most, will not be moved an inch from your erroneous ideas any more than I was moved from mine for 43 years.
So, while I leave the details of your possible salvation by conversion to the Lord, because ultimately it is a job waaaaaaaaaaay above my station to even worry about, aside from pointing out, as crudely, simply, and correctly as my human flaws allow, the retta via (right path), I tend to work with what I have.
And if all I have are a bunch of Pagans, heathens, agnostics and autistic atheists, so be it. Within your errors, I wish you to find the best, the snippets, the shards of good that may exist, imperfect and insufficient though they are, for you to fashion weapons out of them and combat the enemy.
Do not think I will treat you as equal, or pray with you in your heathen ways, we are not the same; but also know, I do not hate you; and, in my heart, I wish you only well and that one day you too are saved, and get to heaven, by whichever tortuous path you might need to. My own path has certainly been far from straight, after all.
And now, with that out of the way, let us now get to this Part 4: The individual Man
The Proto-Cell: The Individual Man
Continuing with my imperfect analogies, and considering you as if you have already read and digested parts 1-3 (including 3a), I shall now explain why the individual man is the proto-cell.
The actually cell of human society is the nuclear family, and the only version of that that actually works analogously to a healthy cell within the body, is one that is composed of a Husband, Wife and Children, all operating under the foundational principles of a real spirituality, which I will from now on simply refer to as Catholicism. But feel free to substitute that with your own word for your philosophy of life; and if you do, yet are perceptive, you may notice that certain things simply do not work in your heathen ways, because you lack the demonstrable fruits throughout history to show you the truth of the matter, you lack the reason and logic that prove the truth of Catholicism throughout the ages, and on and on. I am not striking at you here, just making a point that you might want to take note of and verify for yourself.
Any other version of the nuclear family that is not composed of Husband, Wife and Children can be considered as a damaged, crippled or even a cancerous cell. Now, there are some cells, that can’t have children, but these too, if under proper spiritual underpinning, are genuinely positive and helpful. In each body there are cells that are specialised and appear to be slightly different, because they have a different role, but all are still healthy and required. Childless couples can improve the world by adopting children that might otherwise be lost, or help others in other ways, and they do. But the model is still based on the same foundations.
We will discuss the nuclear family in the greater context of the very practical and beneficial effects they have on society in later posts, but first things first. The proto-cell, if you like, the DNA of the cell, is the individual man. And I say man not coincidentally. Without a man at the spiritual helm, you get nowhere. The female may be considered the cell wall and other parts of it, you need both to form a real, proper, functioning cell, but the code of life is in the DNA and similarly, the code of a proper community and functional society is the individual man, both in each cell (family unit), as well as in greater society.
The second concept, that of the proto-cell in greater society will be a subject for a future post. Here, today, we will only examine the proto-cell of the individual man on its own terms. What makes a valid, viable, strong, Individual Man? That is going to be a good example that will perform well in both the complete cell (nuclear family) and/or in the larger body (community/society). This is what we will concern ourselves with in this post.
Trying to avoid my common error of skipping something obvious to me that turns out to be not so obvious to others, I also just want to say that why the individual MAN is the focus first, is because both in a family, as well as in society, it is ultimately men that create civilisation. Which is not to say that women are completely useless in the process, but women simply are not the civilisers of humanity. Men are. Always have been, and always will be. No matriarchal society has ever existed, and any attempts at creating one have invariably always failed in ways that are absolutely horrific. The current fruits of feminism most certainly included. But again, the details of the role of the woman, as well as the evils of feminism, etc. are for a post way down the line.
Accepting the above premise then, what makes a “good” proto-cell?
We already know he has to have a a sound spiritual foundation but on a more practical level, the key factor that makes the difference is self-knowledge.
The Oracle at Delphi was right.
Above all, Know Thyself
I need to emphasise something regarding the examples I make below. Whenever I insert myself in the discussion, it is not for some reach for glory, but rather because if I use an example from my own life, the experience is absolutely real and factual. In other words I am trying to show you it is based in reality. And it is not my “opinion” of some third party, but rather something I have personally tested and verified works. So keep that in mind.
Even from a very young age, possibly due to my touch of Aspergers’/High IQ I spent time imagining various scenarios life might throw at me and how I wanted to respond. Many were prompted by the fact that my life had been different from most children my age in rather extreme ways. My father moved us to Nigeria when I was four and we grew up pretty wild, being home schooled by my mother in how to read and write and do maths. Periodic returns to Italy were usually short lived and then my brother and I lived with out grandparents in rural Italy for a number of years too. When I enrolled in my first elementary school I was ahead of most of the other children in both maths and reading and writing comprehension. Socially I was never much of a joiner and this sometimes resulted in what today would be labelled as “bullying”, but I never took it and generally fought back regardless. It wasn’t that I was necessarily brave, as such, just that my sense of innate justice was more powerful than fear generally speaking. It was mostly a reaction, treat me bad, I treat you bad right back. The fact there are 30 of you and one of me is sort of irrelevant.
That was luck, genetics, some of my upbringing, and I stress, only some of it, or divine intervention that made me that way from early on, because I don’t think I can take any credit for it before say age seven or so for trying to foster that mentality consciously. But because Justice absolutely is a fundamental spiritual concept, that is closely aligned to Love, my spiritual foundation, even if shaky in many other respects, had at least one strong and unshakable pillar around which the rest of my personality could grow. If Seeking Justice is your main characteristic, you can’t really do it without developing Courage. Which is not easy to do, but is doable, I know, because I did. Courage may or may not come easier to some than others, but I certainly am aware I had to consciously work at it as a child and even as a teenager. It has been one of the constants in my life, to continually try to improve it. At age 55 my efforts are far less in the physical realm, but rather more on the intellectual, emotional, and spiritual level. By exposing perhaps more of myself to the wider world, there are costs to it, but I feel it is important and as such the type of courage required in it is of a different sort than facing, say, an armed opponent.
My point is that in order for you to be effective, you need to be congruent. I made conscious choices as to what type of man I wanted to be, and pursued those choices relentlessly. So I imagined all sorts of scenarios or situations in order to understand what was my natural inclination, and if I was happy or not with it, and if not, how to change it or improve it. By the time I was in my late teens, and certainly by my early 20s, my internal self-knowledge was pretty absolute. Certain events continue to happen in life for which you can never be prepared, but if you have a truly deep understanding of who you are, even the unexpected, tragic, surprising, and so on, can be at least survived, and often navigated and sometimes even taken advantage of and turned into an opportunity. If however, when life throws you a curve ball, you end up reeling in confusion as to what to do with it because, on top of the event itself, you also are unsure of who you are and, so are unable to quickly or even instinctively process it appropriately, life will definitely be harder for you.
Self-knowledge inevitably requires a deep delving into your philosophies of life, and if these are in turn based on false spiritual concepts, your efficiency in the world will, once again, reflect that.
Prior to my baptism, my overall philosophies of life were few and far between, and I always knew and said this too. They were limited to a set of ethics that I had investigated very deeply and knew was correct, but did not venture much beyond that. Justice was absolutely the core of it (and remains so, mostly), followed by the related concepts of honesty and honour (keeping your word, essentially) and courage. The rest I was pretty much agnostic about. And because I limited myself to the spiritual reality I could absolutely reconcile with reality, my foundation has always been solid. One can say it was incomplete, but not that it was ever unstable. Which is why, mentally, emotionally, and even physically, I have generally been able to outperform most people in terms of efficacy and results.
When I suddenly was presented with a huge revelation concerning the very bedrock of reality, I took time to simply sit and observe. Try to learn, as I did when I was a small child, by simply sitting and observing everything going on around me. Except I was 43, not a child. Which meant some things I could actively begin to investigate in more depth and detail right away, as soon as I became aware of them. And this search was done in the same relentless way I did my previous investigation of the fundamentals of reality. I suddenly had a gigantic, pivotal, absolutely core piece of information that I never had before, and had experienced it directly and unquestionably. For the first time I realised with absolute certainty that:
God exists, and,
God is Love, and Loves us, (despite ourselves!) individually, specifically, and personally.
It took some time (months for the basics at least, but it continues throughout life) to process my past experiences, my life to that point, so that I could verify that yes, those two points are absolutely true and everything in my life to that point actually proved them. Nothing contradicted or invalidated those two key points. Literally nothing. Including my “worst” or most “lost” moments. In other words, perhaps if I had been a more careful observer, I could have, or maybe I should have, inferred God simply by my surroundings and reality as we find it.
In fairness, the enemy does throw up quite the smokescreen at every level of our lives, so it’s not as easy as all that, but it certainly has been possible for others. My friend Tony for example, in pure weaponised autist fashion, became a Catholic purely as a result of following the logic of it.
So that was step one. Verifying that my Road to Damascus experience was rooted in reality; that is, in truth, that the aspects of reality I had shown did in fact fit my experience, observations, and logical deductions. And not only did they do so, but they did so to a level of precision, perfection and correctness I had not encountered even in engineering, which tends to be a rather “exact” science.
Then I proceed to step two, which was to test the model. This took longer (at least two years I would estimate) but once again, every experiment I did, as long as I did it correctly, fit the model. Of course, in experimentation, the failed experiments are worthwhile too, as they provide information on the processes that do or do not fit reality. To my astonishment, I discovered prayer absolutely works. It is a difficult thing to get right, and in some cases almost impossible at times, BUT if and when the conditions are repeated correctly, the result is invariably positive. In other words, the scientific method can be applied to prayer and the results it provides are proof enough that it is a real thing and works.
The issue with prayer is not that it does not work, but that in almost all cases, we are not applying the “formula” or “rules” correctly or sufficiently accurately, to make it work, and some of it is also possibly dependent on external factors beyond our control. Nevertheless it remains wholly and totally scientifically testable.
Say you want to prove that you could use ball-lightning to power something, say charge a battery fully in seconds. First of all you would need to test various models of engineered equipment to make it happen, but you also need the ball-lightning to happen too. Even if you have got all the equipment totally correct, but you do your experiment on a cloudless and sunny day, your results will be zero. If you then chalk that up as evidence that ball-lightning cannot charge a battery in seconds, or that the equipment used is faulty, you are making an error. In good science, the conditions need to be replicated in order to test a theory. So it is not easy to test for how prayer works and how to do it properly. Nevertheless, I have explained this in both Believe! and Reclaiming the Catholic Church.
Again, to summarise, I had a deep knowledge of myself, and this was based only on those valid principles of spirituality I was sure of because I could test and verify them to an absolute degree and see them reflected in physical reality as well. Then when additional information was given to me that showed me a whole aspect of reality I was ignorant of before, I immediately set about observing, exploring and testing it.
It is only in this fashion that I gradually came to my conclusions regarding Catholicism. In each step of the process, I tested, kicked at, explored, and verified, each additional element of the philosophies I was taking on.
The process, in very summarised format was as follows:
Road to Damascus moment leads to the observation that:
God exists, and
God is Love and does Love us, individually, specifically and personally.
At this point I could be defined as a Deist. Shortly thereafter however, observation and testing makes it absolutely clear that:
An enemy to God absolutely does exist and is actively trying to lead us as far from the truth as possible. In fact this reality is so obvious once you even begin to look, that the fingerprints and clues of the eternal psychopath are littered all over the place, as if the entire planet was a giant crime scene, which, in reality, it kind of is, and this too fits with reality as we find it, as well as the historical models of it.
At the same time, it also becomes obvious that the only possibly valid version of God that fits the experience and observations must be one of the following:
An open-ended generic Loving God that potentially (but not historically) could be associated with certain aspects or elements of: Shintoism, Zen agnosticism, Taoism. Vanishingly small chance of being the case, but not totally excluded.
Hinduism, Judaism and Islam are absolutely and definitely out, and not related to the reality of God at all.
Christianity is the only religion that descriptively and historically presents God (the father) as approaching the same reality I was aware of and tested to my satisfaction.
All of the other Pagan religions from the Aztec gods to the Zoroastrian ones, are clearly either nonsensical, or actively working for the glorification of the precise opposite of God.
Further investigation then makes option 1 potentially “valid” but without any real evidence of it throughout human history beyond some inference here and there. The focus then becomes Christianity as a whole, but necessarily the process must now include the question: “Which Christianity?”
Further observation and investigation very quickly makes it absolutely plain that everything and anything related to Protestantism is, in fact, almost certainly the work of the enemy and designed to secularise, destroy and confuse the truth. Every single one of the 40,000 denominations of it (more like 700 million, though since each person is an interpreter of the law onto him or herself) can be safely discarded with the same ease one discards the “logic” of a child that is trying to convince you that 2+2 is purple.
This leaves the Copts, the Eastern Orthodox and the Catholics.
The first two have a problem of not bearing anywhere near sufficient fruits to be the One True religion. The Copts are also almost extinct and never achieved much at all anywhere at any time. That leaves the EO, which are generally split into nationalistic versions, did not spread the gospel anywhere near as much as Catholics, did not achieve any of the civilisational markers Catholicism did, did not invent the scientific method, did not create as varied and beautiful palette of art in all its forms and has not been exactly the fountainhead of logic and reason that Catholicism has been since the start. They also betrayed the very Catholics that came to rescue them despite their schism from them some 40 years earlier, and literally tried to kill them by making pacts with the very Muslims the Catholics were saving them from. Three times in a row. And then are still bitching about when the fourth time round the Catholics sacked Constantinople (which as far as sacking of cities goes for the period, was really quite a gentle affair anyway).
Against that, I had a “Pope” that protected pedophiles, homosexual orgies fuelled by cocaine in the Vatican by supposed Catholic clergy, and this too could not be reconciled. While it was clear that human fallibility was always going to be a part of any One True Church, because humans gonna human, two things had to logically be true:
God’s real Church, if one existed, must, logically, be infallible, and also be able to be discovered (visible) and tested to be as such. This is no small feat. I have no problem with it being possibly difficult to find; or you needing to work your butt off to figure it out. All that is fine to me, because there is the enemy, and the smokescreens he shoots up are huge, and so on, but anyone truly earnestly seeking should, be able to find it. Logic dictates that a Loving God, even allowing for free will, would absolutely make it possible for you to find it in some way if you truly were seeking for the truth. So that was a thing, secondly, it had to be infallible despite the humans that represented it. Which it would and could only be by supernatural Godly protection, because you can bet every single human in it was going to fuck up some aspect of it in some way to other. And there is only ONE Church that makes that claim. The Catholic One. But even that claim could be fake, so you need to study what the rules of this Church are, and how do they fit reality, which leads to the second point:
The One True Church must —again, necessarily, by reason of the most basic logic— have rules. And at least some of those rules, like absolute truth and math, must be eternal and unchanging, because if a Loving God exists, that Love would NOT be actual Love if:
It was not inclusive of you having free will, including the free will to reject it, and,
Love without Justice (rules) is not Love. If Justice does not exist, then neither can Love. If your Love towards another is potentially never even acknowledged, or worse, is abused constantly, can it really be love? Or is it merely a perverse dictate without any goodness in it? Just as if you were forced to Love God, that would invalidate Free Will, if you were forced or only able to “Love” no matter the response, then it would just as identically not be actual Love, because Love, the real one, can ONLY be given as an act of free will.
Now, again, the only Church that has:
Visibility,
Infallibility, and
A Code of Conduct that is precisely spelt out
is the Catholic Church.
But far more impressive than that, it has had this from the start, has always proclaimed it, and the deeper into it you look, the more astonishing what you find.
You find that the Church has been protected from fantastically “successful” attacks, heresies, lies, and attempts to subvert and destroy it, for two millennia; and no matter how dark and desperate the times can be, even for centuries at a time, ultimately, it continually returns triumphant against odds that simply make no sense unless some divine intervention was taking place.
All of that made it pretty clear that Catholicism was probably it… except… Pedophiles.
In my heart of hearts, it could never be accepted and reconciled that the One True God that I personally experienced in that Road to Damascus moment could ever, or would ever, let His Church ever be represented by Pedophiles. That the odd pedophile pretended to be a member? Sure. Just like the thousands of fraudsters, unrepentant thieves, murderers, adulterers, whatever. But those would be “members” of it; but as a class, represented so repeatedly and dramatically in its upper echelons of the supposed “leadership”? No. It could not be. Cannot be. And yet, Catholicism seemed to fill all the other requirements. So what happened? I began to investigate if it was always thus, and discovered that no, it was not. And then I became aware that the real infiltration started in earnest in the late 1700s. And following that thread of Illuminati, Freemasons, Carbonari, Rosicrucians, Communists, Homosexuals, Jews, and Protestants that plotted against the Church over at least two and a half centuries, it became obvious that Vatican II was the culmination of those efforts and it usurped the Church almost (but not quite) entirely.
At this point one might lose hope if one was affected by rhetoric and appearances instead of fundamentally seeking only the facts. That is: Only the pure unadulterated truth as we really find it, and can test it in reality as we find it all around us.
And luckily for me (and some others too, I guess) precisely because I always had an instinctive understanding of the importance of knowing yourself —and basing it only on the truth that you can absolutely demonstrate is real and reflects reality as it is, not as you wish it were— I carried on digging.
I read the Code of Canon Law of 1917 by myself, and came across Canon 188.4 by myself. It was here that a light bulb moment went off. I had found the point of departure.
It was, indeed Vatican II, its instigators, and all its pomps. And it also confirmed that the impostors squatting in the Vatican not only are NOT merely human representatives of God’s Church, but they are in fact, working for the enemy.
Imagine then my amusement when I discovered that this too is prophesied both in the Bible as well as in the visions of many saints throughout the centuries of the Catholic Church. If you had taken this journey with me, even if perhaps you are the type prone to despair because of appearances, this discovery would undoubtedly provide comfort and joy.
Because although it is sad that the Catholic Church has now been reduced to only a tiny remnant of what it was at its peak, it at least explains everything. It explains precisely why things are as they are and, once again, it explains reality as we find it. The Pedophiles and their “Pope” protectors are Satanists, just pretending to be “Catholics”, and yes, fooling more than a billion people, but that too is to be expected. Again, we know that the large and well paved road leads to Hell.
Only at this point then, and studying and testing further to my satisfaction, did I realise that indeed, the position known as Sedevacantism is actually, simply, truly, mere Catholicism. The real one. The one that has survived other dark times like the persecutions by the Roman Emperors, the Arian crisis, the attacks by numerically superior Muslims, and now, the almost total infiltration of the Church by its enemies now pretending to be the rightful “Catholic Clergy”, but really only being servants of Moloch and other demons under Lucifer himself.
It all fits, the logic returns correct, the math works, the reality we live in proclaims every aspect and facet of this correctly, so I am now comfortable to take on the rules and ethics of the Catholic Church. As best I can of course, which is miserably imperfect, because as I keep saying, all humans are badly flawed, and me perhaps more than most in some ways, but nevertheless, I understand that the correct position is Catholicism and any errors or lacunae I make are mine alone.
The official processes, and rules and ways of Catholicism, are all written down in one volume, the Code of Canon Law of 1917, and it all stems from the Bible and the Catholic tradition that actually put the Bible together too. And reason and logic, verifiable in the world and reality all around you, if you can but do it.
Armed with all of the above then, I went from one solid pillar (Justice) to a veritable temple composed of many huge and unshakable pillars. Some that created themselves in some mystic fashion that I yet do not understand but cannot deny.
Added to Justice comes Love, Charity, Beauty, Virtue (in its many forms), Miracles, the sacrifice of Christ, and my very simple, but honest devotion to Him and His Church. The reality of the Saints and how we are eternally linked to and connected to them. The mystical effects that praying the Rosary has on your very Terrene and Earthly life.
I went from one lone column in the dirt of no man’s land, called Justice, with vines of Honour, Honesty and Courage growing upon it, to a veritable enormous and constantly expanding beautiful temple of many columns and rooms and altars of beauty that almost blinds the eyes.
My knowledge of self has expanded exponentially simply by having seen far more of the truth of the spiritual reality that underpins all of creation, and seeing exactly how it absolutely verifies all that we see in the world, both good and evil.
Aligning myself with that wider and deeper and far more beautiful spiritual reality, absolutely makes me more capable, more effective and more able to create more in the world in accordance with His Will, which I absolutely wish to serve as best I can, within the confines of my human flaws and any God-given talents I may posses.
And yes, Evil certainly appears to have the upper hand in this specific timeline. You can argue that it is in fact a reality and not just an appearance. But am I worried? No. Not at all. I am aware and I will fight to my last breath, but I am not unduly worried. Because even if it lasts for a few centuries, the Church is undefeatable, at least until the very end, at which point, it will rise triumphant, and more so than in any other human era, with the return of our Lord and the final cleansing of the evil spirits from this world, to be relegated to their eternal prison.
Now this last bit may seem to be absolute nonsensical fantasy to you. It certainly seemed so to me for some 42 years or so. And I certainly can’t prove it even now.
But what I can prove and have done so, first of all to myself —and then only very imperfectly and distantly to others through my books and words— is that the entirety of those things that the Catholic Church says that can be tested and that I have tested, have, without fail, proven to be true.
Therefore, I trust too, the extrapolated “big picture” for the future as well. But even if it were wrong, even if the ultimate big picture turned out to be an error, I still, cannot see a better way to live until it is revealed as such by actual events in physical reality. Which I doubt will happen in my lifetime.
So, once again, even if you have followed me here only as a secular reader, I ask you: What other system or model can even begin to provide the same level of recurring proof and evidence, as well as functional societies that come anywhere close to the beauty, glory, peace, serenity and joy that a real Catholic community exhibits? There simply isn’t one.
All of the above, to show you that my acceptance of Catholicism is based not on any kind of idiotic version of “blind faith” but rather on the detailed, deep, constant, probing and testing of all that I can observe and test within the dogma of Catholicism. And should I later find any “holes” in it, I’ll be sure to let you know, but, so far, there aren’t any. And there are gaping maws letting fetid water in, in every other system I have checked.
My self-knowledge has expanded and some of my reactions changed in light of this new information, that I have tested and continue to test daily, but that is not to say I am a different person. My soul is still the same, but as my understanding has evolved, my actions, choices and efficiency changes with it and shifts in expression and scale, all of which is normal.
The overarching point I want to make in this whole extremely long post then is this:
I have shown you (briefly and imperfectly, but I think well enough) the level and depth with which I look into things before I base any of my principles on them. How much work have you done? How much of this investigation into reality do you do, or can you do, before you get too scared of what you might find and stop? How much of it is based on true, objective investigation and how much instead because someone or multiple someones in your life have told you “Here be Dragons! Don’t you DARE go look in there.”
And to be sure, there are places that are absolutely dangerous to go look into, but I for one, will never tell one of my children “Don’t go there and that’s that!” I will instead say “My son, in that hole you will find a snake that is poisonous, it is of this shape and colour and general size. And you can smoke it out in this way, and kill it in this way, using this tool. Now, if I am still able enough, come, I will show you and you can see for yourself, and if I am not, then heed my warning, because I love you, and I trust whatever you decide to do, you will use your brain and your heart as best you can. Do not be afraid, but also, do not be foolish either.”
And with that last sentence as a guide, there is very little a man cannot more or less safely investigate.
So I tell you the same, reader, if you are still with me to this point.
Find out who you really are, and what you base it on. Discover what is absolutely true and what is merely a shadow created by your own ignorance, fear, or arrogance. And then decide who you are going to be once you discover the deepest truth you are able to. And don’t stop doing it.
Orion has a very successful YouTube channel, and I assume decent practice too. His videos are very popular and in general his advice is good to excellent from a secular perspective. This video interview he did recently was particularly revealing of his own way of seeing things, which in any case he generally tends to espouse in his advice on videos related to relationships and dating and so on.
It’s worth watching the interview for various reasons and points he makes, at about the 22 minute mark, he refers to Dan Bilzarian saying that after he has spent a decade having sex with who knows how many women, now he’s looking for just one person to devote himself to, while a bored housewife might be seeking a thrill and that is why she may end up stepping out of the marriage (cheat, divorce, get into swinging, etc).
Earlier he also made the statement that the only valid reason he sees for a marriage today is if you want to have children and are both committed to that. I find his views and general advice interesting because, given my history of basically doing pretty much what I wanted and with a rather large number of women, before I had my road to Damascus change, while I was still in my secular ways, I could definitely relate to this.
Another important point he makes is that there are many ways people can get stuck (or lost) in various aspects of the modern (secular) lifestyle we seem to all be mired in. He makes a point I was aware of even before I started to have sex with lots of different women, and it is a very important point: Some men get totally lost in the lust of the chase, of new conquests, and so on, to the point where their primary aim just becomes to have an ever higher number of notches on their belt.
I was in my first serious relationship for 13 years and I never cheated or anything of the sort the whole time, even if I did have a number of very well-presented offers. Sexually I was “inexperienced” in terms of the number of women I had been to bed with, but one can hardly say I was sexually inexperienced, given that I had sex pretty much daily if not multiple times a day for the entire period. When that relationship ended (by mutual accord and peacefully so) I did not have any difficulty in finding other female companionship, because in a sense I was already well-accustomed with interacting with a woman on a sexual level to the point that it did not hold a lot of mystery for me, and while each woman is unique, in a sense, —and I don’t mean to be crude— so is each bicycle, but the general principle of how to ride one tends to be relatively well-understood, no matter what local variance each one might require for maximum enjoyment.
The point is that even when I was in my first serious relationship, I could look at a man and recognise whether they were the kind that is always “thirsty”, regardless of if married or not, successful or not, rich or poor.
In one instance I recall a very well-to-do doctor who was married to a beautiful and intelligent woman, who nevertheless cheated on her repeatedly with younger women in the perpetual chase of his “youth”. He was far from the only married guy who still hunted around or used prostitutes in some vain search for “manliness”, and they seemed oblivious to the fact that whether it’s one or a thousand, it’s not the number of women you slept with that makes you what I would consider a man. In fact, the two concepts are only very mildly related if at all. Having been with many different women might make a man more aware of women in general, more capable of becoming involved with them, certainly, but almost invariably this is just a veneer, a superficial level of the qualities I would define as being essential to a man. In fact, some of the effects of being promiscuous with a lot of women may well degrade some of the essentials for some men.
So, Dr. Teraban is definitely correct in that men can get lost in the lustful side of the equation. And women too can get lost in various aspects of it too, if in usually different ways.
The larger and more important point however, the aspect that Dr. Teraban misses too, and not just in terms of missing it as a perspective, because intellectually I think he is intelligent enough to probably grasp it, even allow for it in his model of reality, but it’s something he clearly does not have in his life. He is missing this point without even knowing it really exists, and it is the reality, the truth, behind actual marriage.
I can recognise with ease that he is missing it, because I too missed it, as long as I was secular. And even when I did get married, my grasp of marriage was still secular. Yes, I believed in marriage, as a kind of team of two, the best descriptor of it I saw was in the film The Thin Red Line, and is provided by the monologue that Sean Penn’s character provides at the end, which in summary is:
The world is shit, life is hard and the humans in it are pretty much all assholes, so the best you could do is find a woman that loves you and you love her, and make an island of the two of you and leave the rest of the world behind.
It is true, that even at our most secular, it is men, ultimately that are the romantic sex. Women are far more pragmatic… in the secular sense.
But even that belief, which most women seeking a husband would be ecstatic to find in a man that wanted to marry them —regardless of whether they felt the same way or not about it— is not really enough to keep the world, the corruption, the degeneracy, the inevitable corrosion of your relationship at bay. Because unless you have something real and true and far deeper than the mere physical or even emotional and intellectual transactional nature of the secular relationship to base your values on, eventually, steel will wear down steel.
As much as you can be an honourable, successful, powerful, famous, funny, good guy, and as much as she can be beautiful, classy, great in the bedroom, funny, intelligent and able to discuss any topic well with you, ultimately, if your relationship is to move beyond the “perfect flashy couple everyone loves and wishes they were in”, the world, that is the secular world, will, invariably, inevitably, inexorably, wear you down.
Her looks and energy and vitality will fade. So will yours. Your fame and fortune, even if it remains to the end of your days will, eventually lose it’s lustre, because that is the nature of the human void that is never filled enough by material things. If I were given a few millions to retire with, never having to worry about money again, and a 70 foot white trimaran, I’d sure be happy, and because of my current mindset I’d be sure to enjoy it to the end of my days, but, with a secular mindset, it would only be a matter of time before I’d get bored of even the 70 foot trimaran and sailing the oceans.
The secular life is a constant trying to stay ahead of the encroaching reality that nothing material, ultimately, really matters. A man (or woman) that arrives at age 99, as a multi-millionaire that never lacked for anything materially at all, and that had all the sex, with all the supermodels they could possibly imagine, that achieved all sorts of fame and worldly success, who reaches there with no children, no grandchildren, no one, ultimately who really cares when he shuffles off this mortal coil, is, in truth, one of the saddest souls on Earth. You might not think so, you might be on the breadline and wondering where your next meal comes from and think I am talking complete bullshit here. Certainly the harshness of the world can make you feel and think that way, but in reality, in objective truth, a man who struggled financially all his life but raised a few good sons and daughters, is wealthy beyond measure compared to the lone multi-billionaire.
Or, alternatively, take Elon Musk, who has a bunch of children with various different women and is supposedly (but not actually) the richest man on Earth. Would I want his life? Not in a million years. I think if you offered me to trade places either with Elon Musk or one of the random natives of Sentinel Island, it would be about par, and in all truth, if I chose the Elon Musk life it would only be in the (vain) hope, that if I had his money I MIGHT be able to achieve something good that MIGHT affect more people than as a random native of Sentinel Island. But in terms of personal enjoyment, I genuinely think I would probably pick the Sentinel Island life. You might not believe me, and I understand that, but I promise you, this is my most honest thought on this matter. I express it, because if you are a regular reader, regardless of your opinion of me on a personal level, you will probably agree that I am not stupid. And if I say this, there is probably some value and truth to it worth noting. At least I hope you see that.
Because Dr. Teraban is not wrong. As far as the secular life of this world at this time goes, the things he says are correct. The math “works”. But… and it is a very important but, there is a reality that supersedes the one we are all familiar with. It remains invisible to most of us, but it actually informs and creates the physical, secular reality we are all familiar with.
The origin of all you know and see and can touch and perceive, is from a realm that is invisible to the eye and body for the most part. Yet… when you do get to “see it” it cannot be unseen. And once you become conversant with it, once you begin to see the truth of it, like Neo in the Matrix, once you see the code behind what you used to think was “reality” everything takes on a completely different meaning.
And it is from this perspective that I would like to inform you about marriage.
Once you can see in the unseen realm, you notice that random hook-ups are actually a general degradation of your own anchor to and ability to perceive that very same unseen realm.
And you also see that marriage, as it was intended to be, is something completely different from what any aspect of it is presented in the secular world. And yes it is for creating children and raising them, but also so much more besides, though that remains the main purposes above all. The reality of marriage (which applies also to people who maybe are not able to have children) is something that increases your anchor and ability to see the unseen realm of the fundamentals of reality, and in that context, you really perceive why it is a sacrament. A holy thing. Something beyond our mere mortal desires and hopes.
If you have no experience of this unseen realm that is the foundation of all reality, I can’t convince you of it with words. I can’t make you see it. And you are perfectly free to think I am just some bible-thumping moron that is pedastalising his wife, or a woman that will not divorce you, or some other worldly effect that you might think I am under the spell of. But I assure you it is none of these things. I have lived where you may be. I have been where Dr. Teraban is in terms of having figured out, insofar as secularism goes, the optimal way to live with women, relationships, hooking up, and even secular “marriage”, of which I have been through two of before really becoming actually properly, truly, married.
I can’t convince Dr. Teraban either probably (should he ever become aware of this post and bother to read it) of the truth of what I am positing here. The difference between being told about this and experiencing it is too vast to even be able to make an analogy, but maybe it would be like the difference between a primitive caveman being told about the ability of flight for humans and that same primitive man being placed in a rocket that fires him into Earth orbit for a few revolutions before flying back down to Earth.
From the exterior I look the same and my marriage may seem more or less conventional (more likely less than more, but still within “normality” I suppose) but internally, I assure you, it is far from that. The internal reality of it is Galaxies distant from either of my previous two secular “marriages”.
This element, which is hard enough to even define, is clearly missing from Dr. Teraban’s life both personally as well as in his philosophy. It is enmeshed however, as best as I could do so, in my book Caveman Theory which is only available in digital format, because it probably would get me banned from Amazon otherwise.
Both men and women are in a sort of relationship crisis mode, if for different reasons, and it will not improve for either side until this concept I am trying to get across to you permeates their psyche to a degree that is a lot higher than what it currently is.
It is also important for you to understand two things concerning this:
First: Despair is NOT the way. Your constant thinking that what I am discussing here is the equivalent of flying unicorns to find, or is nonsense, or just my delusion, or real but you are not clever, rich, good-looking, or whatever, enough for it to apply to you, is only going to give you a magnetic field that repels any possibility of you living it. Your accepting this reality, regardless of your own current circumstances, is going to make it a LOT more likely that you will find such a situation naturally. When I first discovered this reality, the concept I could ever even be in a long-term relationship that mattered to me at all was just a complete fantasy and mirage. I had no belief it would even be relevant to me. But I was not in despair. I just assumed that sort of reality was way beyond my reach. Like thinking I would not be the first man to land on Mars kind of thing. It’s just how it is, but I was aware of the reality. I saw it, felt it, knew it. And gradually, that knowledge alone put me in a position where I could relate to that reality and in fact even influence others towards it, including women, without even specifically discussing it. It was just a sense of things, of how I moved, of my general approach to women, even women I got involved with, that was noticeably different and produced different results.
Secondly: If you are honest with your own number (based purely on you looks on a 1-10 for women and on looks plus a blend of success (money/status/fame) for men) and realistic about it and look within your own range, and with this understanding of the unseen realm alive in your being, there absolutely is someone out there that would fit with you. And while finding them might not happen immediately, the likelihood that it does happen, as long as you are not in desperate mode (see First above) are decent at least, possibly good, and maybe even very good or inevitable, because if you learn to navigate that unseen realm, the physics there works very differently than from the secular world you and I and everyone else is familiar with. In that realm, just being aware and having a concept alive inside you, tends to bring that thing to you. It is when you grasp for it that you lose it, generally. It sounds like woo-woo New Age “Law of Attraction” bullshit, but it is not that. It is something true but as I say, unseen. Unperceived by us today almost entirely, but that was known in the past, that people were aware of.
It is related to how prayer works. To sensing the divine. To the underlying truth of reality.
And I truly hope this post at least, gives you some sense of it. Because until you have it, you are unlikely to be able to form a marriage that truly lasts till death do you part.
And I was always clear on the fact that even if I used the term Sedeprivationism originally, I was clear in my 2020 book Reclaiming the Catholic Church that I was using the term completely differently from what most people that call themselves Sedeprivationists do.
I (being elitist in my linguistics) was referring merely to the etymology of the word. Strictly speaking, Sede Vacante is Latin for Empty Chair Which is shorthand for there is no valid Pope. However, strictly speaking, the chair is not empty. it is filled with an impostor, never-was-Catholic, Satanist and protector of pedophiles on Earth, currently Bergoglio. And this illegal and usurping occupation prevents a real and valid Pope from filling it. Hence Sede Privationist, a mixture of Latin and English. The usurper is Jorge Bergolgio is preventing the legitimate occupation of the chair of Peter.
But of course, by absolute divine law, codified in the Canon Law of 1917, which in no way cancels the perennial Papal encyclical of Pope Paul IV titled Cum Ex Apostolato Officio* but in fact refers to it, it is every single adherent to the Novus Ordo (I call them Novus Orco — the New Orcs) “clergy” too that is ALSO not a Catholic at all, but in fact an enemy of the Church. The Satanists have made this sound very complicated, but it exceedingly simple to understand. A child gets it.
You cannot be Pope if you are not Catholic, and you cannot be Catholic if you promote, promulgate, and espouse concepts that go against the Catholic faith (which is ENTIRELY codified and therefore logically consistent and clear) and act in ways that go against it too and call yourself a Catholic. When you do this publicly, notoriously and repeatedly, it becomes clear you are simply NOT a Catholic. End of. It would be like me calling myself a leader in the sport of golf. I can say what I want. I can dress like a golfer, I can even get some clubs and go tearing up a golf course, but since my golfing ability is nil, never having done it even once, absolutely no one sane would ever take note, care, or listen to anything I am saying about golf. Nor should they.
The sedeprivationist position ORIGINALLY, when it was first presented in the late sixties or early 70s, by the noted and well-respected Dominican theologian, father Michel-Louis Guérard des Lauriers, who was later made Bishop, it was a potentially if very temporary charitable “way out” for all the traitorous and cowardly “clergy” that did not immediately reject the false “elected” and Freemasonic enemies of the Church, Roncalli and Montini and their Satanic Vatican II heresies. It was a (VERY charitable) way to say:
“Okay, look, maybe you guys were asleep at the wheel, your weak and cowardly natures, coupled with the long-standing tradition to simply obey what you consider to be your superiors, made you “vote” or “elect” this obvious at best apostate, at worst sworn enemy of the Church as “Pope”, but come on, it’s fairly obvious what he and his predecessor were, so let’s get back on the right track, find the right way to get together and kick his heretic ass out of the Vatican and put back in a real Pope.”
And that, of course was the error on which the Freemasons and infiltrators of the Church have relied on for at least the last 250 years to infiltrate and corrupt it to the point that we have not had a valid Pope since 9th October 1958, and what people think is the Catholic Church is in reality, just another branch of Satanic fake Churchianity. The error being that devout Catholics got complacent and started to “give the benefit of the doubt” and “respectfully” not question supposed “leaders” in the Church.
The Satanists ALWAYS appeal to your kinder, charitable, more forgiving nature in order to insidiously enter your home, like snakes, and poison everything and everyone in it. That is probably why God also allows ornery, unagreeable, rude, too-direct, pains-in-the-ass like me to exist.
My misanthropic tendencies aside, the reality is that my ability to reason and do correct logic and dialectic are far above those of the average person and also the average nominal cradle “Catholic” that thinks he or she is Catholic but has never once even asked themselves what being Catholic means, has no idea what the Code of Canon Law of 1917 is, has never even read ONE of the 16 documents of Vatican II, and could not tell you who Roncalli was and why he was invalidly elected to usurp the rightful place of Giuseppe Siri who HAD been validly elected. Twice.
And no, my simply and boldly stating this fact out loud is NOT a matter of personal pride. It’s just not false humility, which too is not a virtue. It’s just a fact, and despite dozens of Freemasons trying to “poke holes” in any of my arguments, they have all utterly failed, which is why some of my work has in fact resulted in people realising the truth and coming back to the real Catholic Church.
However, all of this, if you care enough (you should if you call yourself a Catholic, since your belief in God should be extremely important to you) requires quite a bit of reading. The details in RTCC that I put together are undeniable and in the last 4 years not a single valid argument has been made against any of the information and details I presented in that book. Not one. People have lied, people have misrepresented and straw manned the arguments, but no one has been able to engage with them honestly and people who had no dog in the fight but took the time to look at my arguments and compare them with the “criticisms” have, without exception, even when not Catholic, understood that given the base premises of Catholicism, my arguments are the only ones that hold water.
Now, I am not writing this to tell you what a good and perfect Catholic I am. Or how smart and handsome I am. Think of me as badly as you like, its fine, but engage with the arguments I make, if you will.
As I wrote in BELIEVE! a much shorter book that is far easier to read and more popular, I am not a particularly a good Catholic. But I am an earnest one. And I absolutely have the temperament to NOT keep quiet, when someone, regardless of who he is lies or talks logical nonsense with respect to the truth. Pretty much in any area I am knowledgeable of, but absolutely and particularly in respect of Catholicism.
All that said, however, and if you would rather digest the list of the Sedevacantism vs Sedeprivationism argument in video format, I have not come across a better short form version than the one below. I do, of course, have a whole series on it on Kurgan TV, along with some other very interesting and unrelated topics (the face on mars, the lies of history, etc etc) topics totalling some 160 hours of video.
In short, the entire theory of Cassiciacum, or the “official” position of Sedeprivationism is simply not logically tenable or valid. The only valid position is that of Sedevacantism. Or, in fact, of being Catholic.
The position and even name of “Sedevacantism” sounds complicated and convoluted thanks to the efforts of the Satanists that have usurped the Church, so it is probably more effective to simply say that:
I am Catholic, not Novus Orco.
* It is in fact referred to in Canon 188, of which part 4 makes absolutely clear that all the non-Catholic clergy currently squatting illegally in the Vatican are not Catholics but at best heretics, and given the time lapse, currently probably actually full blown freemasons Satanists
In parts 1-3 I have covered the fundamental abstract aspect of what sustains any kind of social movement, and in broad terms this boils down to how accurate your foundational spiritual model is with respect to objective reality. The closer to it it is, the more likely your social changes or your Theoretical Model of Society is to take hold in the real, physical world.
I have already shown —and history does it for me better than any argument— that Catholicism has been the absolute best at this, precisely because it models objective reality, including all the metaphysical and underlying spiritual and non-tangibles that the modern man is stupefyingly unaware of for the most part, better than any other religion or philosophy that humans have ever come up with. Historically this is simply undeniable. However, there is a subtle but important point to clarify, one that Vox in his recent post expressed rather well (as he has done for a long time):
A Germany full of Germans is an economic powerhouse. An area of 357,022 square kilometers in the middle of Europe populated primarily by German-speaking Turks, Arabs, and Africans will be neither German nor an economic powerhouse. This is not rocket science.
He refers here to the obvious replacement taking place of native Germans, which is simply a factual and mathematical reality
The dirt is not magic. The ideas are not material. People will always live according to their own natural preferences. The transplantation of White Anglo-Saxon Protestants to the New World is what made America what it was in the place of the American Indian societies that preceded it. Neither geography nor ideology nor language nor even religion are determinant in the end, as genetics ultimately and always dictates the destinies of nations.
That last sentence is the main point I want to cover “nor even religion”.
He is right… up to a point.
It is true that a Venetian Catholic is different from a Japanese or Zimbabwean or even just Spanish Catholic, HOWEVER, if the Zimbabwean is in Zimbabwe surrounded by his brother and sister Zimbabweans, and ditto the others, the coalition of Catholics around the world, at the level of nation to nation, is valid, helpful and good.
This is why Catholicism has been relatively unique amongst the religions of the world. While maintaining the national identity, sovereignty, culture, and ethnicity of each people, it also managed to have an over-arching belief system that conquered their souls enough to bring them into positive co-operation with each other. In real terms. Not in the usual, cynical, controlling lever that the elites invariably grasp for and use to try and make cattle of us and lords and masters of themselves and their offspring.
It is why until 1958, the Holy Mass could be said in any country around the world and it would be identical, regardless of the local customs or language. As soon as the impostors took over, and the Catholic Church was almost entirely subverted to the new orc cult (Novus Orco, as I call them) dedicated to paedophelia, homosexuality, fraud and Satanism, one of the very first things they did was to change the Mass and make it just like any Protestant quasi-ritual re-enactment of some theatre production of lunch. The solemnity, respect and truth of it was reduced to localised absolute parodies of it in a cacophony of languages and complete with dancing dervishes in colourful costumes. The true and holy mass was (and is) unchangeable by infallible decree and dogma embodied in the Papal encyclical Quo Primum, the fact the impostors pretending to be Catholics changed it was just further evidence of the fact they were absolute enemies of the Church.
This is an important aspect to also keep in mind.
I will expose the enemy in more detail in part 4 and why ultimately, Catholicism, the real deal, not the pedophile infested Novus Ordo impostors pretending to be Catholics since 1958, is not only unique, but historically, the only force that has resisted the predators that try to lay claim over every aspect of our lives.
I have to admit I was remiss in my previous post on how to find a husband. Luckily, reader A. a lady, asked a very valid question in a manner so forthright it matched the style of my post.
Here is the comment from that post:
All great information and thank you. Never had any problem getting attention. “Be a slut” sounds effective, but how can a woman tell she’s with a good guy?
This is a valid point. In fact a very valid one. Let us attempt to answer it in a rather detailed fashion then.
First of all, we need to define what is a “good guy”, and since women have more or less the ethics and understanding of concepts like honour and honesty of feral ferrets,* we will define what a “good guy” is by the more objective and universal male standard first, then add in some truth about what women really want too.
A good guy is, above all, a man who can keep his word. If he gives it out officially very rarely that’s even better. But generally it’s a guy who says what he means and means what he says and STICKS TO IT. No matter how hard things get.
A good guy is loyal to the right people. He’s the kind who dies trying to get his wounded buddy out of a foxhole. He’s the guy who comes to your place at 3 am to help you get rid of the bodies of the intruders you just killed and don’t feel like spending 20 years in jail for. Now, a man can, in fact, be loyal to the wrong people. And that can be a serious problem. A woman he loves can at times make him see this, but generally not by ultimatums. IF it works, it is usually only by holding true to her own values, and for the sake of her own and her children’s futures, letting him know she can’t let what are essentially strangers endanger her life and family. So if your guy is loyal to his good friends who are also loyal to him, great. But if he is loyal to the local pimp, not so great.
He’s also the guy who has an intrinsic, instinctive, sense of justice. Which often has little to do with the law of the land. And because everyone has been brainwashed for 70 years non-stop that “all violence is bad” now only the thugs that call themselves government tend to have the monopoly on it. And actual nothing-to-lose type criminals. Violence is unfortunate, but it absolutely can be a force for good. But a good guy is not going to step aside if someone tries to harm people he cares about.
A good guy is not a fool, and above all, he will not put up with any of your female bullshit. Your attempts to emotionally manipulate him, change him, nag him to become a “better version of himself” and whatever other nonsense you might come up with, will be checked. You will be told in various ways to leave off. If the offence is large, he will show you the door and that will be the end of that. If it is small and maybe cute, he may let you “get your way” with it, or laugh it off, or tease you about it. Or maybe, more dangerously for your relationship, say nothing and let you think you got away with it; all while he observes what you do next. If it is some gaslighting rubbish he will simply tell you to stop lying and leave. And he might not come back. He will not tolerate disrespectful behaviour from you, his potential wife, nor should he. Now, this does not mean he is a completely rigid puritan that can’t smile. A man has to be able to laugh at the world and take some of the female nonsense, half-truths, wild and unfounded accusations, hysterics, and general drama they bring with them, with a smile and a laugh, a pinch of salt, some patience, and the occasional light smack on the ass that is sexy instead of violent.
All of the above can be somewhat faked by men, at least for a time, but one thing that cannot be faked is a certain level of success. Some women require him to be a “provider” and in America especially, the female delusion bubble about what a man should earn before he can be with them is truly astonishing. Besides, women are fully capable of earning their own money too now, so that gap has certainly closed and in some ways is actually in reverse. So the point is not so much that he has to have a set amount of money, but he has to be capable. At least capable in general or capable at something specifically, or a few somethings.
Those are the basic points, but now let’s also dispel some of the myths that both men and also some women have about women in general.
I hear constantly how these days all women are just gold-digging whores, and if you are not a millionaire, you can’t even get laid, never mind engaged and married and so on.
Well, I am here to tell you: that is simply not true. Let me get specific.
Are there plenty of gold-digging whores out there? Sure. Just like there are plenty of lazy, drug-addled, loser men that will accomplish nothing in their entire life. Most humans suck. That’s just how things are in this fallen world. But assuming you are not an NPC, which is why you read my blog regularly, you both aspire to a bit more than an NPC wife or husband, and in order to be with a Player Character level husband or wife, guess what YOU have to be? That’s right, player character material. If you don’t know what an NPC or PC is, read this first.
As readers here know, I had a rather scandalous past before becoming a good, well, ok, devout, Catholic. And I assure you, that money was never a function of why women came home with me. There is no easy short way to say this other than crudely, but it transmits best perhaps what is even more powerful than money for most women and for almost all genuine women who just want a good guy: Balls.
Especially in my native language, the idea of “having balls” encompasses a great many things. It means being your own man, not taking shit from people, regardless of if they are powerful, rich or famous, or not. It means treating even bad guys fairly, because sometimes even a bad guy is not the real bad guy. It means doing the right thing even when it’s very hard to do. It means justice and your personal code of honour (which has to be rooted in real justice for it not to become something obscene) take precedence over even the (corrupt and fake) law.
I have known women that betrayed their multi-millionaire husband (who was not exactly a weak or beta type either) for the chance to be with someone that had that intrinsic sense of simply being a man who will go where he wants and do what he wants (not in a way that harms other innocent people) and not let fear or the narrative of lesser men get in his way.
In the course of my life, at least twice, and this was after my days working in close protection in South Africa, I ran into cases of corruption and fraud so extensive that my life was honestly potentially in danger. In one case the lawyer I hired to make my case warned me that it would be cheaper to have me killed than have any of the information I had become aware of get out publicly.
In the other case, my now wife, who was not even my girlfriend at the time, very reasonably pointed out that my taking down a giant machine of theft and corruption on a grand scale where millions were involved and would be lost by the people doing the stealing, was reason enough to have me have some kind of accident. In both cases, while I took various precautions (some of which remain in place) in the event I ever do have a suspicious accident, the idea of NOT doing the right thing, didn’t even cross my mind. The only thought that did, was: fuck these guys. And I did what I did and their corrupt enterprises suffered for it. These were not just the usual slightly “dodgy” business deals, these were people that were ruining families of honest people just trying to do their job properly so as to pocket millions on the back of their misery. So, yeah, fuck them.
Now, a genuine woman, will tend to be attracted and more than just superficially if she gets in any way invested, in a man of that sort, far more than a white collar banker that would crap his pants if faced with an aggressive drunk.
Money, and political power, and fame are certainly attractive to most women, but like most men, most women are kind of dumb, and superficial, because Law n.1. And who wants to get stuck with one of those. For a woman that is worth being with, at least in my personal opinion, money, power, and fame can all be attractive, but balls trump all of them. And if you have all four aspects, well, great, then you are the unicorn they seek and you can have a whole harem, if that is your fancy. If it is, by the way, congratulations, you are part of law 1. Any sane non-stupid man is aware that a harem is a bad, bad, bad, choice. Some of us find out the hard way, but believe me, it’s much better as a fantasy than a reality.
And this is where the concept that women liking bastards comes in. Now, it is true, I was born a bastard, but that’s my parent’s fault, not mine. I also go into this in a lot more depth in Caveman Theory, which by the way is useful for women too even if it is mostly addressed at men, but the point is that biologically, humans are still pretty much with the same wiring we had a couple or ten thousand years ago. Modern life has made us all weak pansies, that whine if the internet goes out for an hour, but we still have a lot of wiring that is not too far removed from apes.**
Which means that a man that genuinely acts without fear of other men, takes things on, is competent, and doesn’t put up with a lot of female nonsense, gets evaluated by a woman’t instinctive biology as a “mover and shaker”. Because back in cave times for the last 2 million years, that is the ONLY reason he would act that way. He was a genuine badass. Today, of course, he may be a drug-dealing pimp with the IQ of a lemur, and the unsophisticated woman who has not evolved past her base instincts will still “choose him” even if it’s a terrible choice, because her biology erroneously is still living in the year 10,000 BC instead of 2024 AD.
That biology is more powerful than you think. And just as I always said, that the most valuable material in a crisis is not gold, but rather copper-jacketed lead, in a crisis, a woman will drop her multi-millionaire banker for a Hell’s Angels criminal with a gun that can get her through the zombielands safely.
The infestation of gold-digging whores, is simply a reaction to the infestation of metrosexual half-fags that now populate the Earth, pretending to be men.
Now, in order for a man to have all the qualities identified above, he also does to need to be a bit of a bastard at times. Because humans, professor Cipolla, and a fallen world. If you prefer it in proper Catholic parlance, a man also needs to be as wise as a serpent, not just as innocent as a dove. And really, he needs to really be both. Have the curiosity and wonder of a child, but the wisdom and reason of an adult man.
Now, ladies, if you have become even just a little aware of how truly deluded some of your expectations are, that’s great, but now pay attention: Finding a guy that fits the above criteria is a LOT more important and better for your long term prospects of having a decent life, a good family and happy children. Like so much more so, that you have no idea. And the lucky thing is that while they too are rare, there are certainly more of them than there are billionaires willing to marry your 38 year-old, 7 in a good light, ass.
I hope this clarifies things for you and if not, A. I would welcome any further questions or comments you have.
* I cover this in a lot more detail in Caveman Theory, but in essence, these concepts work entirely differently for a woman, for reasons that are essentially part of her biology, so despite my rhetoric (they can after all modulate things more than they pretend they can in most cases) in a lot of instances, their inability to see these concepts as men do is simply unavoidable, and if you get upset by that reality as a man, you will only corrode your liver at that inevitable reality. you may as well get upset the sun rises in the East.
** Yes, yes, I know evolution as they tried to tell us about is complete nonsense, because it doesn’t work mathematically, I have known that since my 20s, that’s not the point.
It’s not just metaphors
Listen to the very last two sentences.
And now go back and re-read my previous post and understand that I am not just hyperboling when I say the people at the top are child raping killing and eating Satanist freaks.
No related posts.
By G | 24 September 2024 | Posted in Billionaire Pedophiles, Social Commentary