It seems violence really is the answer!
I have known this since I was a child. People in war zones rarely commit suicide. Interesting isn’t it. It’s almost as if men are designed to strive against something… say like… an immortal evil trying to defeat them… just saying.
As John Adams said, the unintended entertainment value in the comments is better thanmost netflix series. Or something like that.
If you want to have a laugh, go to this Sigma Game post and read the exchanged between “Grace” and me (The Kurgan). The last comment I just typed out on that thread should be enlightening about how women process things when they get emotional (and all too often even just in general).
No one likes to be betrayed, but I am not talking about infidelity in your marriage here, rather, I am trying, as I have for years, to make you understand a core deceit that you have been living with all your life, like a hooded hawk, without even realising it.
It has always amazed me over the last 4 decades or so, how often the masses, but also a decent number of supposedly, or even apparently intelligent people get fooled, and deceived by what to me, at first glance immediately give off a whiff of… sulphur? Deceit? Lies wired into the DNA. In short, the nefarious stench of the Freemasonic gatekeeper.
If you were to study the history of the Catholic Church, you would come across plots so devious and intricate and ancient that any desire to delve into old conspiracies would be sated within hours and last probably the rest of your natural life if you wanted to keep digging. I covered the main aspects in RTCC, but the fact is that since the official formation of the Illuminati in 1776, the strategy of the Satanists (they have, like their boss, many, many names, Carbonari, Illuminati, Freemasons, Rosicrucians, and on and on and on) has always been the same:
The point is that the Satanists, always, always, ALWAYS rig the game. Bet on red they win, bet on black, you lose.
And even relatively sharp people like James Delingpole get taken in by these deceivers. His recent talk with David Icke and his post about it explain it, but he does not do a very good job in either case. If you look at the podcast from about one hour and thirty minutes in or so, James misses the opportunity to nail Icke to the floor by hammering the one nail he is absolutely correct on.
Aside his fantastic, reptilianoid theories (which he has mutated into more palatable stuff over the years since he first started) even if you were to accept his ideas as somewhat coherent, James makes a very solid point: If Icke’s theories are correct, and we are being run in a simulation by demonic entities that use human bloodlines to control and enslave us and our “waking up” just means we see the bigger “allness” of it all but there is no God, no loving creator, no actual specific saviour, then what’s the point? And what is the origin of it all? Icke avoids the question like a greased eel and never gives a straight answer, and James gets flustered and lets him slide off.
I would never waste 15 seconds of my time on Icke other than to expose him, so I would never have given him my time to begin with, but if I had been on that panel, I would have relentlessly hammered the point home. What’s it all about David? Where is “God” in your philosophy? And Icke kind of admitted there isn’t really a God, just an “allness”. But if that’s all there is, why the demons? Why their need to corrupt humanity? Are they just interdimnsional parasites and we are unlucky in this part of the Universe? It is, of course, nonsensical, and insofar as it could be making sense to a point, you lose sight of the fact that its real, subterfugeous and hidden aim, is really to distance you from the truth of God and hence the truth of how to fight back and not fall into deception and eventually the despair of hell.
Icke and Alex Jones, Joe Rogan, and Milo YankmyPoleUs, Jordan Peterson, Andrew Tate (and his Gamma wizard that runs him), Emo Jones, Gay Gary Voris, Taylor Marshall, black science man, bowtie “do butt stuff’ science man, the entire Vatican, Bergoglio and his retinue of pedophiles and frauds, Protestantism as a whole, the “right” and “left” political parties, really pretty much everything in modern life is really just designed to distract you, delay you, and waste your life in inconsequential, or (better yet for them) self-destructive, nefarious, degenerate nonsense, and if you begin to get an inkling of an idea about the truth, then they want you wallowing in the retard pool of the fake “truthers” that tell you tidbits of information and then blend it in with complete nonsense. The Flat Earth stuff is a typical example. Mix it in and get operatives to bring it up in groups that maybe are actually looking at real stuff, like antigravity technology, and it gives the whole exercise a sudden stench of retardation and so-called normal people don’t even look at any of it because it’s like picking sewage out of your ice-cream.
And these are not coincidences or temporary efforts, there are endless money and conscious plots to stop any truth, and real resistance, and any truth about Catholicism at all getting out. There are powerful people with essentially infinite resources dedicated to this stuff. So they are not going away and no, none of them are “salvageable”.
I have been explaining this in as many ways as possible since my early to mid-twenties. It is literally a strategy identified in the Permanent Instructions to the Alta Vendita (Carbonari) and these documents were captured and discussed in the Papacy some 200 years ago. I mention them in RTCC and translate some extracts and related documents, so you don’t have to take my word for it, I give you the references.
But above all, my point is simply this:
BEWARE the gatekeepers. When a nobody suddenly shoots to fame for being “a good guy” against the homoglobos, be extremely suspicious, and look into his background. Especially if they are heavily funded.
Of course, aside the gatekeepers there are also a bunch of cracked eggs that believe all sorts of insane stuff, like the Flat Earthers, and so on, but the David Ickes of the world can be both in your face as well as subtle, and you need to learn to spot them in the wild.
And if you are despairing right now and thinking, but then, what is true? What refuge is there?
Refuge? Not much son, we are at war don’t you know? It’s a war between Satan and his minions, in all their forms, and Christ and his soldiers, on the other side. Here, learn about 1958 Sedevacantist Catholicism, AFTER you learn about REAL Catholicism first. Then tell me if that doesn’t describe and fit and make sense of the world as we have it today better than any other philosophy since the dawn of man.
No refuge, but there is an almost dry trench here, plenty of ammo, a good bayonet and trench clubs, and if you keep on your toes, you might even get a cup of hot coffee and some toast and jam before we crawl through the mud in the dead of night to go send those demons back to the pit they crawled out of.
Welcome. (Pats you on the back as he hands you your rifle and ammo).
As regular readers of this blog know, I am not exactly the spiritual guy to go to for correct advice on the Catholic perspective on sex.
I don’t actually have any issue with the Catholic position on sex, I believe it is indeed the best way for a married couple to relate to each other.
Thanks to Adam for this video, which he posted at his blog a little while back, and which I present here below:
It is definitely one of the better discussions I have seen on the topic, even though it is clear both are Novus Orco believers, so, I do take everything they say with a pinch of salt. It may be of interest to readers here that I give the video high marks, because my position on sex in Catholicism has at times been seen as wrong, or perhaps leading people to sin, or something along those lines, so, if you had a rather debauched sex life, as I did for most of my life, it might interest you to see the interview, since I found it very well done for the most part.
Given my first 40 plus years of sexual experiences prior to becoming a Catholic I think it’s fair to say that it wasn’t going to be an easy transition. And there are some aspects of the theology behind it that I find difficult to reconcile with logic from a spiritual perspective. Nor is sex the only area I have this with, just because I am Catholic does not mean I don’t think about these things. For example, my perspective on Confession is that at a practical level it makes you into a better person, so it is a definitely good thing overall, and there is no reason not to do it or not to have it, but the idea that God would not be aware of my sin, or conversely, send to Hell despite my genuine repentance and atonement to the best of my ability if I did not manage to go to confession before I drop dead, is, to me, at the very least extremely unlikely, and honestly, I think erroneous. Nevertheless, if everyone said “oh that’s not how it works” pretty soon you’d get… well… Protestantism; because humans without rules are for the most part, no better than cattle or sheep without a Shepard to keep them in line.
Similarly, I have no problem with the Church’s teaching on sex, which in a nutshell (forgive the somewhat “scandalous” pun) is as follows:
Modernised women have now been “taught” for almost 100 years, that using their bodies to withhold sex from their husbands is “obviously” their “right” and the reality of it is that it has been “weaponised” to essentially cow men into a kind of sex-starved submission.
Even in my pre-Catholic days, I found that there was broadly speaking (and I will generalise a lot here) two types of women:
Those who instinctually understood that using sex as a bargaining tool in a relationship (other than perhaps as a joke in some role-play) was a despicable way to act, and never indulged in it.
Then there were the others, who, as my brother once crudely put it, thought their pussy had the key to an actual spaceship in it (he knew I cared nothing for gold if I could just get access to a small hyperspace capable starship!) and limiting access to it in order to get what they wanted (regardless if it was some specific (and usually unnatural) behaviour from me, or more crudely, material things) was how they operated. This second type of woman tried that tactic with me precisely once. Because the minute they tried it, the relationship was instantly and permanently over. Their shock at this reaction, which was delivered calmly and with absolute finality, was always somewhat amusing. And I can’t recall an instance where they did not then (sometimes immediately) try to reverse the situation, but there was never any coming back from it. A woman that behaved that way was in a space mentally that I wanted nothing to do with, and I strongly advise all men to take a similar approach in this regard. It’s nothing to do with “needing” sex so desperately, or being “angry” at the lack of it, and so on. It is to do with the very foundational issue of how she sees sex, intimacy and indeed marriage as a whole and in context.
Frankly, I find an actual prostitute that says it will cost X amount for a set time to be with her sexually, to be less offensive to the entire concept of intimacy than a woman that uses sex as a tool to “control” or manipulate a man. And similarly, I find any man that submits to such behaviour to be unworthy of being called a man.
There was also another type of woman, and these were those that unfortunately had been sexually abused, and given the numbers, it is inevitable that I came across everything from incest to gang-rape. One positive aspect of it was that as far as I know, every woman I was with that had that happen, felt comfortable enough with me to share it, and a second positive aspect is that, again, in I think almost all cases, the resulting physicality between us, helped them resolve many issues.
There was also, a notable example or two of women that had been sexually abused (rather extremely, really) who, while not at all shy or withholding sexually, at least with me, did have certain difficulties, and occasional really strange behaviours, and I am not referring to various kinks, which can be understandable, but I mean sudden bouts of sadness, depression and so on. These were more difficult aspect to improve rapidly, but in any case, open and honest communication always improved things for them, and did so even in their subsequent relationships, which they did let me know about in most cases.
Now, setting aside the cases where sexual abuse was present, and given our secularised approach to sex in today’s day and age, it is interesting to note that the women that were most balanced sexually, instinctively never treated sex as a bargaining chip.
It is a quite fascinating topic really, and one that older women (grandma aged ones) with successful families that are happy and well-balanced will (if you have their confidence) unashamedly tell you that their husbands were never turned away from their bodies. Conversely, a lot of supposedly “Catholic” women, especially in Anglo-Saxon countries, will be prudish and miserly with their bodies even from their husbands.
The women have been taught this is their God-given right as a “strong independent woman”, their “dignity” as a human being and not being a sex object and so on. Totally inverting the reality of the issue.
It is precisely because sex has become transactional and objectified in the extreme, that most people have absolutely no idea of what an actually properly intimate sexual act can feel like, or even is, that they assume and “teach” that as with any disposable property, you have to “work” to get it. An analogy might be making your four year old “work” before he can get access to eating food for his dinner. It is an absurd inversion of the concept of a sexual relationship, as much as making your little child work for his food would be an inversion of a parent’s duty.
So even mentioning this aspect of essentially unrestricted access to your spouse’s body, gets you labelled as some kind of sexual slave-trader, probable human trafficker, or whatever.
The reality is, of course, as usual, quite different. Although in the modern day, the pleasure of truly gifting your body to another has, for the most part, in many women, been reduced to a pleasure in being especially submissive during the sex act, the reality is that a true and natural submission to your spouse (husband or wife as they may be) is of incomparably finer and deeper beauty than a mere sex act, however “accomplished” that might be.
It is a difficult concept to transmit to another human being that has not experienced both the degraded version (which almost everyone today that is asexually active knows only too well) and the correct one, but the difference is obvious and unforgettable once experienced.
The unfortunate (and intentional) barriers to understanding these things have been hammered into all of us with such persistence and over all of our lives, that regaining a properly ordered sexuality is going to be quite the task, and will require conscious effort. But I assure you it is worth it.
I hope the video helps clarify many things for a lot of people.
Sometimes, it is actually worthwhile pointing out something that even the most basic wide-angle or bird’s eye view observation of affairs on Earth would make blindingly obvious, and yet, seems to escape the vast majority of humanity. More often than I’d like, including me too.
If the last four years have made anything absolutely crystal clear it is that this whole planet is almost entirely under the rule of people and organisations that not only lie blatantly about pretty much everything, but that, in the main, are hell-bent on trying to kill us, wipe us out and destroy our families, children and general lives.
If you pay attention at a global level in a dispassionate, objective, coldly mathematical sense, it become absolutely obvious that IF we accept the premise that “most people are basically good” then something is badly wrong with the world. Because literally most of everything that goes on is certainly not good for you. From the foods they promote and produce to “feed” you, to almost everything pharmaceutical, to the ways in which governments around the world work (in case you are wondering, in the parasitic and self-sustaining-at-your-expense way, best explained by Lysander Spooner in his outstanding piece on Natural Law) to how the “laws” are applied, to how commerce between people is often designed to “work” and that’s even before we bring up usury, banks, and the absolutely criminal practices those bunch of degenerate thugs indulge in. How is it possible, that if “most people are basically good” so much wrong, so much structurally painful, and really outright evil is going on.
Statistically, even if you were to put it down to the average person being a complete moron (well intentioned as they may be, morons cause all sorts of problems) you have two problems: That level of global stupidity would not be capable of creating, nor maintaining the very evil structures we now have in place. In short, there needs to be a certain level of intelligence behind it. And yet, even in countries where the average IQ is relatively low, sometimes even greater evil is absolutely prevalent (see the kind of things that go on in African genocidal wars of the 1990s). Secondly, even if you consider “stupid but basically good” people as indeed damaging (they are) the (supposed) preponderance of intelligent and also basically good people, would build systems that the average moron can navigate with relatively little potential for causing endemic evil.
So, while stupidity is certainly a contributing factor, it cannot be a pivotal factor. Nor can misplaced “good intentions”. Because again, if “most people are good” the intelligent ones go ahead and build systems that are safer from “good intentions” with bad outcomes.
Then you take another data point. The average human. Or even just you, the superior kind of human being that reads this blog (and understands it). Well, good as you may be, you lie. You may only lie infrequently, and mostly to avoid hurting others, but the reality is all human beings lie. It’s just a matter of degree. Personally I have a sliver-thin tolerance for it in general and pretty much none in my private and family life. And of course, yes, I have lied in my own private and family life. Nothing big, really pretty innocuous stuff for the most part (but hey, if I was some kind of freak it’s not like I’d tell you on my blog, right?). And we all have such hypocrisy in our lives. Of course the reasons “vary” but not really. In essence, lies all originate from fear. A fear of the consequences of the truth. Whether to us or loved ones.
But let’s imagine a planet where no one lies. Where everyone just always tells the truth as objectively and unafraid as possible. If we also assume that human beings on this planet also have the same general emotional maturity (or rather lack of) that we have now, and that event (the no lies thing) switched on suddenly at midnight today, the body count would be astronomical within 24 hours.
But let’s say after a week, when most of the human population has killed each other off because of the radical honesty, and there are only a few of us left, strong and emotionally secure enough to survive the truth and noting it daily (assuming such a rose-tinted outcome would even happen, because the mass murders would lead to more, etcetera), what would such a planet look like? Well, it might actually be a kind of paradise.
Imagine the consequences. No stealing, no theft, no injustice. Because if everyone was honest, we all know what is right and wrong, and if you are truly honest, you can’t justify any of your shitty behaviours. And really, why do we not live on such a planet? It would clearly be a better world. So what keeps pushing humanity into ever deeper pits of deception and self-deception? And why is it we tend to crucify those few who really try to tell the truth?
Well… and here is the obvious part:
Do you realise that the Christian explanation of reality fits these conditions precisely, explains them and can be used to predict many, many, many things accurately?
And in specific I mean the Catholic (yes, yes, only the 1958 Sedevacantists are Catholics today) explanation. Original sin explains the fact that despite our supposedly “good intentions” and our supposedly all being “mostly good” we all behave like shitty humans. We are all, literally, flawed.
And the fact that this planet is under the dominion of evil and lies, can hardly be denied when you look at things from a bird’s eye view.
Plus, if you look at history with the same bird’s eye view, (assuming you can find the truth in the events that actually took place) then the general trend you will note is that literally every other philosophy aside from Catholicism has led humanity to a place of, at the very best, not totally horrific stagnation. And in most cases utter malignant societies. And Catholicism is literally the only perspective that has factually improved humanity’s lot.
In short, regardless of your personal beliefs, if you actually take the time to observe the human story of the last few thousand years, it is utterly undeniable that Catholicism explains reality better than any other model.
Of course, today, the supposed “catholic” Church as presented in the Novus Orco is yet another nest of indemoniated pedophiles, and only a remnant is left. But this too happened before and, again, if you educate yourself on all the times Catholicism by all rights should have disappeared from the Earth, it become nigh-on impossible to explain how it has survived unless it is miraculously protected, at least on some level, by a benevolent and all-powerful force.
And as I always say, regardless of your own ideas, if a model works, use it, at least until you find a better model that better predicts reality in all its multi-faceted possible outcomes.
And if the model works, then there really is no reason to not embrace, it. Or at least, to seriously investigate its less obvious underpinnings.
Well, at least that’s the way those of us who are not playing the part of the apes in our very own version of Planet of the Apes.
So, I hope you will at least consider this obvious but oft-ignored perspective, and may it be fruitful to you.
And especially the younger ones, really should understand this from a young age. He puts it in a very nice and digestible way that MIGHT get some women to actually listen to the whole 10 minutes.
This one on the other hand, the conclusion regarding women apologising and why they should, is solid gold advice. And some women probably need it tattooed on their forehead so they see it every time they look in a mirror.
I do not know this guy and only came across the first video as a result of a comment on gab from TrevorGoodchild which was synthesised more along the way I tend to present this stuff when I do:
The point is that as a general rule, since a very early age, I learnt that presenting information in a synthesised, or boiled down form was (and is) an excellent filter for gauging the general intelligence of the person receiving it. And because stupid people absolutely surround me at all times in pretty much every setting, and as they are unbearably tiresome, boring and often also irritating, their getting “offended” and then leaving me mostly alone after a few encounters is a feature, not a bug.
I read somewhere, long ago, that warrior souls never lose their fire, but as they get older wiser they may tend to burn at a lower temperature. My personal experience is that there is no drop off in intensity overall, really, perhaps in fact an increase, but… the frequency of the smouldering and flare-ups changes. I ignore or only smoulder a little at the smaller stuff, but some of the things that matter to me, I am more ready to go to absolute war for than before. And not as a simple flare-up, but as a relentless, steel-melting, sustained, furnace level.
I mention this because, in the various discussions I have had and written about here concerning community, it is obvious that my natural/instinctive misanthropy is not the best way to build a solid group of people. As I mentioned before, I am not general material. I’m more special ops small team commander material. But given I don’t seem to have any generals around me, a certain level of “normal” human interactions is useful to try and if not master (I simply am not built in such a way I will ever want to do so) at least learn the basics of.
Intimate relationships have invariably been the thing I cared the most about and given my aspieness and IQ, also the things that have caused me both the best highs and the lowest lows.
Aside the fact that women will generally not take any good advice from pretty much anyone anyway, and if they do it will be from a random stranger before it’s their husband, brother, father or other man that actually cares about them, but will generally jump at the chance to take some “advice” from their female friend (or other women in general) that will tell them to get a nice haircut to be “hotter”, the fact remains that given how the female brain works (for the aspies out there… I use the term loosely!) regardless of how good the information you present to them might be, women are pretty much incapable of simply processing the dialectic facts.
Prove to them with scientific evidence done on humans for 100 years that has all been verified that eating X amount of dark chocolate a week is good for you in simple, cold, hard facts, shooting down all their objections from cosmopolitan magazine, Cadbury adverts, their idiot doctor, their gay friend Charlie, and all her fat friends with blue hair, and she will ignore it.
Let her best friend tell her in hushed and conspiratorial tones that she just tried this new “chocolate” that is made from “sterilised” dogshit, and she will wolf-down a bar of it just to prove she’s “with it”.
At the lower end of the female scale of intelligence, it is literally not too different from communicating with your pet dog. It matters little what you say, as long as it’s in soothing, calming tones, or happy excited ones.
Oh, yes, yes, I know, the feminists are climbing the walls on that one: “How dare he! Comparing women to dogs!” Well, no, I am not. For one, dogs are far more loyal than women (men too to be fair). And said feminists, throughout my life, have invariably completely lost their shit whenever I actually spoke to them precisely the way I would to a man. While very rarely has a man lost his shit with me for being brutally direct.
All this long introduction, simply to say that it probably pays to find a nicer, easier way to get your point across without needing to water it down, nor feel you’re being deceitful, since, after all, presenting the information in a way that it is received more easily, is simply a skill, like any other.
And as a bonus, since that ship has pretty much sailed for me at about age 16, and given that I don’t give a rat’s ass about being labelled whatever the gynocracy is going to label me, you could probably do worse than directing women you care about to these two videos, and feel free to tell them to “Look at what videos this chauvinist pig has on his blog! Ha, ha, so funny!” Well, ok, maybe don’t do that unless you’re a metrosexual male feminist, but you get what I mean. It will be quite interesting to see what they say (if anything) after viewing the total 15 minutes or so both videos come to.
He really does.
A lot of people are wondering what they can do about the current situation in their lives, and perhaps struggling to come up with answers. Generally, I have always advised that you really don’t know what you can do until your back is against the wall and you have no options. So, generally, fight like a bastard is the go-to. And generally, it is a sound philosophy, after all, you can rest when you are dead, right?
Furthermore, your doubt about what, if anything, you can do, almost always stems from your simply not knowing yourself well and deep enough. It is the central aspect of what I explained in detail in my Systema book. And it long been knows that this is the very base of any man’s life. The same concept was also written down at the Oracle of Delphi in Ancient Greece: “Man, know yourself.” So it is really imperative you do the necessary work (usually involving blood, sweat and tears in large quantities) to figure out right down to your DNA, who you really are.
At times, though, and if you have had enough life experience to really know what your limitations are —which are generally at least an order of magnitude more than you think when you are in your teens and twenties and maybe even early thirties in some respects— life will come along in a way that will basically be a nuclear bomb going off too close, Godzilla stomping you, or a horde of orcs surrounding you on a plain.
Of course, if there really is no way out, then, you may as well take as many heads as you can on your way out.
But at times, the issue is simply one where you’re going to have to realise, you can only walk away. And nothing more.
This is What Real Racism Looks Like
No one can figure out the why apparently. Well, let me tell you, after 25 years in Africa, I know with 99.99999999999% certainty what the reason is. And the remaining 0.000000000001% chance is that she’s schizophrenic.
For my money, if I was Emperor and could establish global laws, a parent that saw that and turned that freak’s head into a pink cloud, right there in the mall, would be facing some disciplinary charges for creating an obscene spectacle in a public place, and depending on angle and trajectory, possibly unsafely firing a weapon in a public space. Some community service, gun training, and possibly a fine. That’s it.
Absent that, the subhuman scum would be charged with attempted first degree murder, (minimum sentence is life, and possibly the death penalty) and jail time in my world is hard labour or you don’t eat.
No related posts.
By G | 25 January 2024 | Posted in Social Commentary