This is probably going to piss off most of my readers. Well, brace yourselves, boys and girls, after all, I am not a millionaire because I really suck at telling people lies they’d rather hear instead of cold hard facts that upset their fragile egos.
Some premises are in order before I blow your minds:
This overview is a synergistic whole based on VALID and VERY significant statistical realities.
Which means Not All X Are Like That is an OBVIOUS point, and being obvious needs not be mentioned. Especially in screaming, frantic, Bommer CAPS LOCK.
While stacking statistical reality on statistical reality generally reduces the overall “certainty” of the final conclusion, that also depends on the size of the data set and the certainty of each statistical reality being stacked. The data sets here are absolutely staggeringly huge and also consistent over several centuries of time, so… kinda like: The Sun Rises in the East type of thing. Sure it might not ALWAYS have had, hypothetically, if the Moon is an alien dormant spaceship placed there by Annunnaki, or a meteor hit the Earth long ago and changed a lot of its astronomical properties, or… theoretically, if it might happen yet… you see where I am going with this.
The historical realities I will mention are probably not all known to you and you may very well be skeptical about them, please do your own research and realise google and most search engines are quite compromised on pretty much anything involving the Jews, Freemasons, and so on. That said, don’t take my word for it, check it out for yourselves. If you want a general reference book that has a LOT of the murkier stuff already proven beyond doubt, along with references and so on, you can read my Reclaiming the Catholic Church. It’s 530 pages, but not a single person I know that has read it has said it is in any way boring. But otherwise, do your own work. I will not spend weeks providing links etc to every premise detailed below. I will add enough general information to give you a starting point and then if you want to refute what I am saying, please, unless you want to be banned without any warning whatever (and permanently because I just spam you and never look back) read the rules for commenting here. Intellectual honesty is not optional. Neither is the dialectic form of argument. You can add rhetoric at will to it, but the point must be solidly founded on dialectic. Sophistry of any kind is an immediate ban too.
Right Then. Let us begin, so that you may learn where and what the real root of pretty much all evil on our planet today comes from and is based on. In order to do so, we need to be aware of several things.
Here is the TL;DR version:
Know the History of Evil
The History of it of course, goes back right to the very creation of mankind, but here, today, we will concern ourselves only with the last 500 years or so of it.
Protestantism is not Christianity
Martin Luther was probably a Jewish hit-man, with the task of literally trying to destroy Catholicism. He changed the Bible that had been used for over 1500 years by literally everyone, denied the Papacy which, again, literally everyone for over 1,000 years accepted as it was, and then, totally illogically, said the Bible was the ONLY source of doctrine or theology, when:
The Bible itself refers to traditions outside of it
He changed the Bible to begin with, so we must suppose that he meant the Martin Bible, as opposed to the one that…
Oh, yeah, CATHOLICS put together, some 300 years after Jesus ascended, using…
OOOPPSSS…oral and written tradition to decide what went in and what was left out of the actual Bible. Yeaahhh kinda embarrassing for the whole Sola Scriptura thing.
Oh an also tried to remove James entirely from the Bible and add the word “alone” after the words “justified by faith”. Yeaahhh kinda embarrassing for the whole Sola Fide thing.
Over 40,000 denominations of Protestantism exist today, and that’s being generous since literally, the entire premise of Protestantism is that each man should interpret the Bible by himself, so in reality there are some 700 million versions and more. A ridiculous situation that clearly goes against the Biblical instructions to be one Church united, to not accept any teachings that are not apostolic ally approved and so on.
Since anyone can be a Protestant “pastor” there is absolutely no Apostolic succession and literally no difference in “teachings” from one Protestant “pastor” or a Wiccan or a reader of Harry Potter, since, literally, the only rule Protestantism has is the demonic: “Interpreth as thou wilt”. They literally have no firm standards at all and as such can’t even call each other heretic, because they all are.
The lies spread by Protestants about Catholicism and the Catholic Church are literally endless, but even honest Protestants are at least somewhat aware of this. See Rodney Stark and Rod Bennett.
Protestantism created Freemasonry
There really is no way around this at all.
King James, a flamboyantly gay man, a fact that was known then and somewhat hidden now, except that his love letters to hi various male lovers are published, so there really is no doubt, started Freemasonry with their temples, black masses, sodomitical and sacrilegious orgies and so on. He also commissioned the King’s James Bible, which is also known as the Freemasonic Bible. It contains over 33,000 “errors” of translation to reduce the importance and place of Mary, the Holy Spirit and Jesus too. And was taken from the version of the “Bible” that had been edited by the literal Pharisees that hated Jesus, and had him killed by the Romans.
Freemasonry is Satanic
Again, there really is no way around this. This is not the only 5 hour long video, on the topic, and though slightly irritating in presentation format, if you get over the first few minutes and move to the factual stuff that is presented and undeniable, you will find it impossible to deny. There are several such videos. And books. Go research on your own.
Freemasonry, Illuminati, Carbonari, Rosicrucians, their name is Legion
All of the above structures operate on three baseline principles:
Secrecy. This is a typical aspect of gnosticism, that is heretics, Satanists and so on. They will give various excuses for why their demonic nonsense needs to remain secret, but the reality is that the internal practices after a certain level has been reached, become progressively and more obviously Satanic. Secrecy allows them to indoctrinate people for long periods of time before they “move up the ladder” so to speak, by which time, even if perhaps originally ignorant, the “student” has now been corrupted and compromised to the point that he is both indoctrinated as well as blackmail able.
Playing both sides of the same coin. Freemasons will have people in both the extremely liberal side of an issue as well as the supposedly “conservative” side of an issue. Both sides will work at getting “true believers” to avoid the path of true Catholicism, truth, courage, honesty, and basically all the Human virtues of Western Civilisation which Catholicism propagated. Examples of such gatekeeping grifters are Emo Jones, Milo Yankmypoulos, Tay-Tay Marshall and Gay Gary “Michelle” Voris, and that’s just to name a few of the “pretend Trad Catholics”. There are many, many, many of these freemasons and their lapdogs in all spheres of life, from comic books, to the mass media (where they are a large majority), almost the entirety of the entertainment world, and of course politics of any kind.
Reducing and undercutting as well as subverting any type of human dignity, heroic impulses, and generally the virtues that make heroes. This is covered in more detail in my book Reclaiming The Catholic Church and is a stated strategy of theirs, which is also perfectly in line with their “god” Lucifer, who, of course hates Humanity and revels in making human beings debase themselves in every way imaginable.
It is, of course a given that they will pretend to be ANYTHING, while lying so ferociously, and unashamedly, that normal people are usually unable to grasp that anyone can really lie on that scale, and as such they often think along the lines of “Well, perhaps they are exaggerating a bit, but where there is smoke…” And yes there is fire, but not because anything they say is true, but only because in every way it is designed to make you go to Hell.
Freemasonry is responsible for the destruction of all Royal Houses in Europe
Once again, this is really not in dispute once you look into it. It does take some digging though, because they obviously don’t advertise this point much, but the documents of the Carbonari made this extremely clear, as well as the known actions of known Freemasons like Mazzini in the “unification” of Italy, and later of Europe by similar means and so on. The extermination of the Russian Tsar, etcetera. the only Royal house to “survive” is the entirely corrupted on of Windsor, where the male sons are all circumcised by a Jewish Rabbi, and have been for centuries. One might ask why, of course, but one is unlikely to get an answer.
The reason for the destruction of the Royal Houses was because since the days of Charlemagne, Kings had been thought of as Divinely ordained to be Kings. That is, NOT that a King was put there by God Himself as the rightful ruler and everyone should obey him, but rather that God allowed such men to become Kings. It was then up to such men themselves, to comport themselves in keeping with being good Catholics. As such, the populace understood that if a man was good and obeyed the Catholic rules, their lot would be lighter and easier, and if he was not, it would be darker and heavier. And indeed this was the case for centuries. The First World War was instigated in part in order to “break” the link of loyalty between peasants and the nobility. The Marxist (who was a Jew) ideas of Communism (also a Jewish concept) were supposed to destroy the social gap between the working class and aristocracy. And yet, despite the tragic loss of life in these fomented brother wars, in the main, people still accepted mostly, that they belonged to this o that social strata, and aside some possibility of movement here and there, in the main accepted it. Because once again, the concept of Royalty being a Godly ordained (albeit very human) order, resided in most people’s minds.
The Church was far too powerful to attack directly as long as the enforcing arm of the Church (lay nobility) continued to exist and command the respect of the common people. And so, the work began in earnest right away, pretty much as soon as the Freemasons and the Illuminati and the Carbonari each were “started”.
America is a Freemasonic Country and was so from the Start
The American revolution against Britain was funded by French money. French money which was “advised” to be spent thusly by the Freemasons at the court of King Louis XVI and Marie Antoniette, and had already begun to cause troublesome economic hardship right before the War of independence started in 1775.
From Wikipedia (hardly a bastion of historical truth in such matters, proving that even there these facts are not exactly refuted, even if not highlighted):
By the time of the Flour War of 1775, a series of riots (due to the high price of flour and bread) had damaged her reputation among the general public. Eventually, Marie Antoinette’s reputation was no better than that of the favourites of previous kings. Many French people were beginning to blame her for the degrading economic situation, suggesting the country’s inability to pay off its debt was the result of her wasting the crown’s money.[40] In her correspondence, Marie Antoinette’s mother, Maria Theresa, expressed concern over her daughter’s spending habits, citing the civil unrest it was beginning to cause.
The blame of the country’s economic downturn being laid at the feet of Marie Antoinette and her husband was a somewhat convenient approach to also removing the entire royal house from power, as was the main concern of Freemasonry at the time.
And the rumours persisted throughout the American Revolution to its end in 1783.
In 1783 the queen was busy with the creation of her “hamlet“, a rustic retreat built by her favoured architect, Richard Mique, according to the designs of the painter Hubert Robert.[92] Its creation, however, caused another uproar when its cost became widely known.[93][94] However, the hamlet was not an eccentricity of Marie Antoinette’s. It was en vogue at the time for nobles to have recreations of small villages on their properties. In fact, the design was copied from that of the Prince de Condé. It was also significantly smaller and less intricate than many other nobles’.[95] Around this time she accumulated a library of 5,000 books. Those on music, often dedicated to her, were the most read, though she also liked to read history.[96][97] She sponsored the arts, in particular music. Marie-Antoinette preferred to hold her musicales in the salon of her Petit appartement de la reine in the Palace of Versailles, or in the Théâtre de la Reine. She limited the audience to her intimate circle and a few musicians, among them the Chevalier de Saint-Georges. “Admitted to perform music with the Queen,”[98] Saint-Georges probably played his violin sonatas for two instruments, with Her Majesty playing the fortepiano. She also supported some scientific endeavours, encouraging and witnessing the first launch of a Montgolfière, a hot air balloon for the first time in human history; this extraordinary feat which represented a turning point in human civilization was done by Jean-François Pilâtre de Rozier.
Once the matter of the American War was over, the efforts to remove the royals redoubled:
Marie Antoinette began to abandon her more carefree activities to become increasingly involved in politics in her role as Queen of France.[118] By publicly showing her attention to the education and care of her children, the queen sought to improve the dissolute image she had acquired in 1785 from the “Diamond Necklace Affair”, in which public opinion had falsely accused her of criminal participation in defrauding the jewelers Boehmer and Bassenge of the price of an expensive diamond necklace they had originally created for Madame du Barry. The main actors in the scandal were Cardinal de Rohan, Prince de Rohan-Guéméné, Great Almoner of France, and Jeanne de Valois-Saint-Rémy, Comtesse de La Motte, a descendant of an illegitimate child of Henry II of France of the House of Valois. Marie Antoinette had profoundly disliked Rohan since the time he had been the French ambassador to Vienna when she was a child. Despite his high clerical position at the Court, she never addressed a word to him. Others involved were Nicole Lequay, alias Baronne d’Oliva, a prostitute who happened to look like Marie Antoinette; Rétaux de Villette, a forger; Alessandro Cagliostro, an Italian adventurer; and the Comte de La Motte, Jeanne de Valois’ husband. Madame de La Motte tricked Rohan into buying the necklace as a gift to Marie Antoinette, for him to gain the queen’s favour.
When the affair was discovered those involved (except de La Motte and Rétaux de Villette, who both managed to flee) were arrested, tried, convicted, and either imprisoned or exiled. Madame de La Motte was sentenced for life to confinement in the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, which also served as a prison for women. Judged by the Parlement, Rohan was found innocent of any wrongdoing and allowed to leave the Bastille. Marie Antoinette, who had insisted on the arrest of the Cardinal, was dealt a heavy personal blow, as was the monarchy, and despite the fact that the guilty parties were tried and convicted, the affair proved to be extremely damaging to her reputation, which never recovered from it.[citation neede
The machinations continued not just in France but Austria and aBavaria too and by the end of 1793, both Luis XVI and Marie Antoniette had been executed by Guillotine and the monarchy had been abolished in France as of 10th August 1792.
The period of the French Revolution, from 1789 to the late 1790s also produced some of the worst crimes against Catholics since the time of Henry the VIII.
And the Freemasonic stamp of “fraternity” still echoes today in the French motto of Liberté, Ègalité, Fraternité, it’s always the same with them. Preach liberalism to be rid of the “oppressive” old “regime” and crowbar in degenearcy of every sort to weaken and demoralise the entire citizenry, then push the fable of “equality” between people, cultures, physical and intellectual abilities of vastly different capacities and possibilities, while masking it as “spiritual enlightenment” but in reality producing further corrosion of the capacity to maintain a functioning society. Not hard to do when 85 IQ semi-illiterates are now put in charge of say nuclear power plants, and you begin to have brown-outs if not total core melt-down, to select an extreme but obvious example.
From History.com:
IIn late August, [1789] the Assembly adopted the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen), a statement of democratic principles grounded in the philosophical and political ideas of Enlightenment thinkers like Jean-Jacques Rousseau.
The document proclaimed the Assembly’s commitment to replace the ancien régime with a system based on equal opportunity, freedom of speech, popular sovereignty and representative government.
In April 1792, the newly elected Legislative Assembly declared war on Austria and Prussia, where it believed that French émigrés were building counterrevolutionary alliances; it also hoped to spread its revolutionary ideals across Europe through warfare.
On the domestic front, meanwhile, the political crisis took a radical turn when a group of insurgents led by the extremist Jacobins attacked the royal residence in Paris and arrested the king on August 10, 1792.
The following month, amid a wave of violence in which Parisian insurrectionists massacred hundreds of accused counterrevolutionaries, the Legislative Assembly was replaced by the National Convention, which proclaimed the abolition of the monarchy and the establishment of the French republic.
On January 21, 1793, it sent King Louis XVI, condemned to death for high treason and crimes against the state, to the guillotine; his wife Marie-Antoinette suffered the same fate nine months later.
Notice how the intent of the Freemasons was to spread this war on the established systems of Europe throughout the land, not just France.
And the reign of Terror followed, and please note its central tenet: The abolition of Christianity. Which is and always has been the aim of Satanists throughout the ages, the Freemasons merely having been more successful than most at implementing their aims.
Reign of Terror
Following the king’s execution, war with various European powers and intense divisions within the National Convention brought the French Revolution to its most violent and turbulent phase.
In June 1793, the Jacobins seized control of the National Convention from the more moderate Girondins and instituted a series of radical measures, including the establishment of a new calendar and the eradication of Christianity.
They also unleashed the bloody Reign of Terror (la Terreur), a 10-month period in which suspected enemies of the revolution were guillotined by the thousands. Many of the killings were carried out under orders from Robespierre, who dominated the draconian Committee of Public Safety until his own execution on July 28, 1794.
Did you know? Over 17,000 people were officially tried and executed during the Reign of Terror, and an unknown number of others died in prison or without trial.
The Crimes against Catholics, including horrific mutilations and tortures of babies and children was well-documented at the time even by the perpetrators, and was honestly one of the most horrific and disgusting periods of human action that undoubtedly pleased many demons in Hell.
All of the above is merely to give a TINY bit of context to the point that America was essentially funded with French money, the use of which was then used to blame and frame the French Monarchy and cause further revolution throughout Europe along with the rapid abolition of other monarchies in Europe in quick succession.
Austria-Hungary, Prussia, Germany, Montenegro, Portugal and Russia had ALL lost their kings by the end of the First World War. You might think some 120 years or so is a long time, but not really when your machinations to change the entire world of Europe from a Catholic and orderly group of individual nations to a homogenous grey soup of “Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity” that can then be fully controlled by the purse-masters of the world.
The remaining monarchies were abolished or made into constitutional republics by the end of the Second World War, which any historian worth anything agrees was really an extended continuation of the First World War. And the end result of all this was finally what?
The Establishment of the American Empire
It cannot be argued that America was founded by Freemasons and on Freemasonic Principles. Washington was widely known to be a Freemason and to this day, the various secret societies of Skull and Crossbones and so on are essentially Freemasons by another name. But in any case, of the 45 presidents America has had at least 15 are KNOWN to have been Freemasons without a doubt, Including the first, as already mentioned, as well as BOTH Roosevelts.
Theodore Roosevelt, who was president from 1901 to 1909, immediately followed by Taft, also a Freemason, from 1909 to 1913, and as everyone knows, the First World War’s start in 1915 was set in motion in these years, even if Woodrow Wilson was actually president during WWI, who is not known to have been a Freemason, but who is still widely thought to have been one of the worst presidents in American history. And probably still has that “honour” Since Biden clearly was not legitimately elected. Then again, who knows if Wilson was either.
We also have Franklin Roosevelt who just so happened to be president from 1933 to 1945, followed by fellow Freemason Truman until 1953, so the entire period leading up to WWII and quite a bit after it.
The placing of American military bases all around the world as well the usurious practices of tentacled creatures like the IMF, the WEF, the trilateral commission and on and on and on, ensured that other states became vassals of America and were destroyed economically if they did not obey.
The establishment of the Universal Commercial Code set of rules effectively made pretty much every country on the globe a subsidiary company of the business of the United States of America. Look it up. It’s a giant rabbit hole. One I have been aware of for almost 30 years and that almost no one even has any idea about. Italy for example is STILL subjected to rules that are literally secret and not able to be seen by anyone in Italy, that were signed off after WWII and which fundamentally makes a mockery of the idea that the Italian state is in any way sovereign. That is in case you couldn’t figure it out from the over 150 American military bases placed throughout Italy. And the fact that our current prime minister, Georgie Tits, sorry, I mean Georgia Meloni, is absolutely known to have had a “master” in her 20s when she followed occult practices. And remember that having a “master” is a Freemasonic thing. And touting her as a “right-wing” leader is absolutely ridiculous and merely the posturing of the usual crack whores doing as their are told (with apologies to crack whores for using them as descriptors for journalists and the mass media), which is simply the usual Freemasonic thing of playing both sides of the fake “divide”.
With America as the powerhouse of the world, American “entertainment”, began making its way across the airwaves to literally every place on Earth. Sitcoms made in the USA are known throughout the world and if you think that doesn’t change the zeitgeist of the planet, then I have some transgender floating bridges to sell you in Shangri-La.
And all this stuff is all run by the (((usual suspects))) who, Cohen-cidentally, I am sure, are always, always, always, but only every single time, at the very root of ALL of these machinations, be their financial and economic, propaganda or “entertainment” or “news” based, and lately also “scientifically” based (don’t let me start of the incestuous plagiarist Albert Einstein and his lies, as this is long enough as it is!)
So, it can be now perhaps better understood why brown people who get the crap bombed out of them, their kids and families killed and used as training grounds for the absolute worst rejects and sad examples of “soldiers” America has produced since “generation kill”, might refer to the USA as The Great Satan.
What with their “soldiers” literally shooting peasants for sport and out of boredom in many cases, often via drones controlled from an air conditioned room tens of thousands of kilometres away, run as just any other 9 to 5 job, and this then being presented as “heroic war action”.
Pretty much regardless of whatever religion, culture, ethnicity, or IQ you may have, it’s not difficult to see why if your children or loved ones are on the receiving end of people that do what the CIA and NSA and Abu Grhaib and Guantanamo Bay “prison wardens-slash-torturers” do, you might think it’s perfectly acceptable to Strat 20kg of C4 to your chest and walk into the nearest American mall to detonate it.
Finally
So, yes. Unpleasant as it may sound, the real root of pretty much most of the evil present in our world today does originate from the USA. Which is not to say that the average American is specifically guilty of doing this.
By and large, the average American is a drug-addled fattie, stunned by GMO foods and processed crap that most animals in the wild would not dream to ingest even if starving, maleducated to the point that some Africans in small villages have a better grasp of reality, and thoroughly brainwashed into believing whatever the tell-lie-vision in their lounge, bedroom and even bathroom, tells them 24/7. In short, the average American is for the most part a victim of his handlers. True, he’s a lazy, cowardly sort, but one must understand that the brainwashing was very gradual and very well orchestrated. Think about it:
Most American men are circumcised. The “reasoning” is that it’s supposed to be more “hygienic”. And if you believe that, you probably believe men can get pregnant, that the wage gap is real and that women can fight in a war or in the ring, just as well as men. So, figure out why this is the case. Who did it? Why? And then look into why the royal house of Windsor (that is the British Royals) all have their maps circumcised by a Rabbi even though they are not Jewish and never have been.
They legal system is absurd and essentially allows for anything to be done. Which is why their food is unfair for animal consumption, yet is shovelled into their faces until they explode or die of the inevitable cancer it produces when you eat plastic cheese and fake foods.
They are maleducated to believe that America is the best country in the world because they “won” WWII, “went” to the Moon, and have the most nuclear bombs (ok, had). And somehow that translated to you, Johnny, the illiterate and innumerate teenager who reads at 5 year old’s level in the Europe I grew up in, being somehow “naturally better at everything” than the other people around the world. And they really believe it. Even after reality smacks them in the head with a brick repeatedly as soon as they step out of the USA.
The zeitgeist in America is driven by absolute terror of legal-warfare, that is being sued in one form or another, and making enough money (mostly to buy creature comforts that help rot your brain, but also to protect yourself from the legal-warfare). The concept of family may still exist in a few cousin-marring hillbillies or rednecks, but even if so is essentially limited to specific families or very small groups.
Their religion is a splintered heretical mess that resembles actual Christianity about as well as the modern day incels who LARP at being “Pagan warriors” represent the original actual Vikings and Norsemen (aside from the eating of semen in copious quantities I mean).
Money, and fame are the real American Gods, regardless of whatever veneer of “humanity” they plaster over themselves. And those few genuine people left who don’t think that way are not only a tiny minority today (as they are in most nations thanks to the American zeitgeist being exported) but are also completely ostracised from mainstream American reality.
I don’t blame the average American citizen any more than I blame the average Mexican or Italian or Chinese. But first and foremost, I really wish every single American (and Mexican, and Italian and Chinese) remained in his own country, and kept all of his ideologies, programmes and military in their own fucking country too.
Of course, the Average American has about as much say in where his government places American military bases as I do about Georgia Meloni’s letting boat after boat after boat of invaders land on the shores of Italy, which is to say, pretty much zero right now. And that’s because the average American has zero representation, because the entire system is rigged and the people who actually run the US government are mostly foreigners and their puppets.
And if you still have to ask who that is today, when you notice what the American government and deep state does, who it supports beyond any reason, and who it will jail you and cancel you and punish you for criticising or even just not wanting to deal with, well… If you STILL haven’t figured it out, I can’t help you. Just go back to your Netflix series.
But not to leave you on a downward note, let me assure you that my next giant post will be on what the solutions are for this apparently unsolvable situation and what you, at an individual level can and should and must do about it.
PS: I have NOT spell-checked this and my autocorrect inevitably mangles a lot of words, aside any errors I make myself. I will correct this as time permits over the next day or two, but hopefully you get the gist.
So, I have achieved my original modest goal of over 100k views from 30k unique vistors.
It looks fairly certain that barring some sudden shift, I will not hit any of the “blue sky” goals, which where 200k views from 100k visitors, but I think it should be just with reach to possibly hit the revised goal which, as I said, I would be happy with, of 150k views from 50k visitors.
I’m currently at 134k and change views with every month since February of this year averaging over 10k views, and just over 40k visitors, with the monthly average therefore somewhere just over 3,000 visitors a month.
This month is already past 10k views and we are just halfway yet, so the 150k views should be achievable unless there is a drastic drop off in December. The 50k visitors will be harder to reach, but not out of the realm of possibility.
The realistic likelihood is that I will be about 5k short on each of both views and visitors to hit 150k and 50k respectively, but we’ll soon find out.
A more interesting stat is the comments which went from a total for the years 2018 (end of it only when the counter was added) to 2022 inclusive, of 298 comments to 544 comments in 2023 to date, and that is with my brutal perma-spamming with no warning anyone who doesn’t follow the rules. And said rules are not exactly prominently displayed.
Plus the comment link is also not prominently displayed being at the top of posts rather than the bottom, which probably discourages many from even trying or knowing that one can comment.
So, overall, I’m quite happy with the results achieved. I’ll post a final update at the end of 2023 and look forward to bettering the stats for 2024, assuming I am not hunted down for my views by clown world death squads, nuclear war and the resulting EMPs don’t wipe out the internet as a whole, or the WEF doesn’t do it somehow, or one of the fake asteroid or alien craft Von Braun warned us about crash lands or craters me and mine, or the chemtrails finally get me, or, you know, something else happens.
At least, that is how I would have to describe Vox’s enthusiastic response to my “theological challenge” if I were using the Western’s zeitgeist concerning the war with evil Russia and how they are now obviously on the ropes.
The Kurgan makes his pre-Vatican II Roman Catholic perspective clear in a recently published article; to which I may or may not respond at some point in the next ten years depending upon my time and interest.
As you can see he’s obviously a hair’s breath away from total conversion!
Be that as it may, and probably surprising to many that read his blog, Vox is actually a very subtle writer, and even subtler reader. I think he admitted it himself as being, if I recall correctly our conversation, a “literary snob”.
Which means the man can both read and write at a level that is today rapidly becoming as rare as finding an original Atlantean. So, totally unwarranted, but driven by my ungentlemanly curiosity, I will take a few of the things he wrote and comment on them.
Evil observably exists. Mankind is observably fallen into evil. The world is observably ruled by an immortal being that hates Man, Jesus Christ, the Good, the Beautiful, and the True. Jesus Christ, the Son of God and the Living Word, is literally and observably the only hope of Man.
And that is the full extent of the theology I am willing to assert and defend.
This, is why I have very little issue with Vox’s theology. In essence, his position is really not that different from the one of millions and millions of illiterate Catholic peasants throughout the ages that were in fact good catholics despite their inability to read or write. And yes, I know how this looks based on the previous paragraphs, but I am not actually taking pot shots. On a personal level, my own theology is not far from this either, with the only added point that, as far as I can tell to date, the REAL Catholic Church, has made no errors in dogma or doctrine, and even those parts I personally resist, or dislike, are objectively better for making as a whole to follow and in fact cause no harm in any case.
That being the case, it is absolutely of imperative importance from my perspective, to make as many people as possible (especially the fooled “Novus Ordo” laypeople) aware of the fact that, actually, yes, an infallible Church does exist, as reason and logic demand, and here it is. And yes it was fought against and infiltrated and also comprised corrupt men from the very start, because, duh: Humans. Do you even READ the Bible? Or LISTEN to the actual Church? They been telling you this from the start too. And yet, every single infiltration, usurpation and attack against it has ultimately failed, the doctrine remained unsullied and in fact more explicit and clarified as time passed, precisely to fend off the further and future attacks, culminating in the saintly and to my view obviously infallible and supernaturally protected Code of Canon Law of 1917, which comprised and summarised EVERY bit of Catholic doctrine, rule and law since Christianity began, all the way to 1917. And since the last valid Pope died on October 9th 1958, whatever other writings he pronounced ex cathedra, could also be added to it. I especially like his encyclical, Mystici Corporis Christi even if the link it’s from is from the current Satanic coven pretending to be Catholic clergy, so perhaps save a local copy before they start editing in how sodomy is part of it all.
The point of agreement I think are likely to be valid for both me and Vox are, aside from his above professed theology, the fact that human beings need rules for civilisation to thrive, as a generic but EXTREMELY statistical significant fact. And by civilisation he and I would both mean something both he and I would recognise as civilised and good and beautiful, despite possible minor details being different.
There are another two points he makes that I think can be seen as quite meaningful. The first:
Nor do I take my own occasional contemplations on the subject terribly seriously; I am from the “glass darkly” school of theological thought.
One can hardly argue with him on this point. In fact, it is a very wise perspective to have. One thing we can ALL be absolutely certain of, is that every single one of us is in error.
I think that once one really begins to appreciate the magnitude and type and kind of error you are in, you begin to be far more likely to think that perhaps, St. Augustine, which Vox is not particularly fond of, mostly, if my memory is correct, or at least in part, because of St. Augstine’s habit of referring to himself as the most miserable of miserable sinners and wretches and so on and on. I get it, when you have a healthy self-esteem, or you build one, as the case may be, for most of your life, you’re not likely to look favourably upon some guy grovelling in a manner that appears to you as some kind of worm-tongue looking to not be squished like the maggot he clearly is.
And that is indeed so.
Until you have a moment before a tiny part of the radiance of God. Or as in my case, and/or people Like Saul/Paul who tend to fall off horses and go blind for a few days when it happens. Then, when faced with the true dimensions of your multiple and seemingly endless errors, you begin to start, to have an inkling of an idea, that perhaps, good old St. Augustine, really did know something about reality. And probably a good fat chunk of it more than you or I.
Since we are ALL in error, it makes logical sense to some degree, that any absolute conviction about Christianity (or Catholicism, as it should be properly called, heh!) must be also in error. And absolute errors are bad, so should be avoided. Kinda.
Because far worse than a categorical and absolute error, is relativism. Putting an innocent man to death, or a young woman, in the case of Joan of Arc, is very, very bad (and in her case done by corrupt evil bastards too, so sort of beside this point), but letting all blasphemy and various crimes of ever escalating violence go unpunished, inevitably results in a failed civilisation, as history continues to show.
The difference, then between Vox’s theology and my own, as I suspected, comes down to the precise things he and I would agree or disagree are non-negotiables.
And I am sure there are some. But probably less than he suspects.
The Catholic Church itself has it as doctrine that while there is such a thing as Papal infallibility (explained many times of this blog, so use the Search Me link on the right if you are not sure what it is) and that the Magisterium of the Church is similarly infallible (hence why the CoCL of 1917 also is, since it was put together by the Magisterium of the Church and approved by two valid Popes), the Church itself is NOT necessarily always infallible.
There are doctrines that are deemed to be absolutely and forever unchangeable, of course, known as divine doctrine, as they come straight from God and there really is no question about them, or are evidently simple to understand and extrapolate from such rules (the idea of non-catholics not being valid catholic clergy being an obvious one) but other rules might just be for the running of the Church or apply in almost but not all cases and so on. A deep understanding of Roman law and Catholic doctrine may be required for some of these, but in essence the Church clearly states that ultimately, the only true infallibility comes from God.
Which is not to say that infallible doctrine might be flawed, but rather, that humans within the Church can and do make plentiful errors as well as some making consciously and known heretic attacks on it.
One of the points Vox makes that could be construed as a criticism is this:
My chief criticism of all theology and all theologians is this: they tend to artificially narrow the art of the possible, by which I mean they usually assign divine significance to one of several possible interpretations of a phrase – often a phrase that has already been translated one or more times – and then deny all potential legitimacy to the other possible interpretations.
I don’t really have any objection to this point, and I think Vox may have it possibly as being more familiar with the endless squabbling that goes on amongst Protestant theologians. But in this respect, it could possibly be applied to the idea that Peter was not only the leader of the Apostles but also the first Pope and the Rock upon which the Church is built, and what follows from it, as I explained in my original post from which this one stems from.
But the fact is that as far as I am concerned, the whole “Peter is the Rock” thing is absolutely not limited to one quote from the Bible. This attitude of selecting a tiny piece of text from the Bible and then applying it patch-work style to whatever nonsensical idea your average protestant is trying to defend, is really a Protestant hobby, not so much a Catholic one at all. And when I say Protestant, I include the fully Protestant, satanic Novus Orco Vatican II fake Church.
Peter being the Rock is borne out by not just one or two lines in the Bible, but several passages taken in context, as is the entire 2,000 year history of the Church. Christianity literally would NOT EXIST without THAT specific interpretation of it. And even more stunningly, is the fact that the Catholic Church is literally the LONGEST form of reign that has EVER taken place in the entirety of known human history. All the attacks against it ultimately failed. Including the Arian heresy during which 97% to 99% of ALL then existing bishops subscribed to it. Or as the current era when out of nearly 2 billion nominal “Catholics” there are maybe say a million Sedevacantists. This crisis too will pass. Because either the Catholic Church is true and real and infallible, as it has proven itself to be for two millennia if you bother to really look into it, or it is not, in which case ALL of Christianity is a complete fairy tale. Which happens to be what I USED to believe for over 40 years of my life.
The inescapable conclusion I make, is based not on this one, or that other single scarp of evidence, or quote, or Biblical sentence, or other evidence in its singular form. No, my conclusion is based on the absolutely overwhelming totality of evidence that:
Catholicism created the absolute best conditions for human beings bar none in the entire history of mankind we know of.
Catholicism in the main and almost alone in this was responsible for the creation of the actual, valid, real scientific method that ultimately created science, engineering and so on, and this was done precisely because Catholic doctrine hinges of God being a Loving, Just, Merciful and LOGICAL God. That is, reason is a thing. And that theological concept meant that the Universe could be studied and greatly understood. Protestantism both thanks to the explicit statement of Luther that “Reason is the whore of the devil” and the abundantly clear and obvious evidence presented by Protestants in general, rejects reason entirely. It’s all about the feels and possibly some foggy notion of following “God-breathed” theology, which is unfortunately indistinguishable from pastor-con-man-grifter farted theology.
Catholic doctrine and dogma did this and I can find no flaw or fault in it once I properly examined any specific dogma or doctrine as it actually is, instead of how people might tell you it is.
Catholicism literally is Christianity and “Christianity” that is not Catholicism:
Would not exist at all without Catholicism, since they are all bastardised and corrupted offshoots of Catholicism, first split-off in this specific manner by the fat German maid-raping, nun-banger, Martin.
Secondly has DEMONSTRABLY created a far worse lot for humanity, since it has slowly and consistently corroded Catholicism to the point that now we have accepted as a general, global whole: sex before marriage, contraception, divorce, and ultimately baby killing (abortion). And now have shifted on to “transgenderism” and tranny “bishops” in Protestant Covens oh… sorry… “Churches”.
And that’s just to scratch the surface. Keep in mind about 500 years ago, Jean Parisot Le Valette beat a man nearly to death for blasphemy and he did only four months in jail.
In 1538, while on Malta, Valette was sentenced to four months in a guva (a hole in the ground) on Gozo for nearly beating a layman to death, and he was subsequently exiled to Tripoli for two years to serve as military governor. Upon his return he was punished again for bringing a negro slave not liable for servitude.
As you can see, even back then, Catholicism was way ahead of the rest of the world on even things like slavery.
In short, and to clarify, my position on Catholicism does not hinge simply on Matthew 28:18-20, but on, as I said, a staggering preponderance of evidence, of which the above are really just the highlights.
This is also the reason why I remain interested in further investigating the issue. If I were utterly closed to the concept, as many assume, I would not care to. And in truth, in MANY aspects of “Christianity” I have zero interest left in “exploring” the issue. Not because I am “closed off” but because those particular rabbit warrens have been thoroughly excavated, mined and blasted and there is simply nowhere else to go.
Catholicism (the sedevacantist one, which is the original one) is the truest philosophy of reality bar none that I have found to date. And it is so by many, many, many light years of distance from the next truest thing I had found up to then, which was a mixture of semi-Shintoists, Zen-Agnosticism, with elements of Feudal Japanese Samurai philosophy.
And surprising as the revelation of actual Catholicism being absolutely true AND the best descriptor of reality was to me, it remains the case. And the reason it was so surprising was because essentially, EVERYTHING I thought I knew about Catholicism was actually a carefully crafted network of absolute lies concocted by various “Christians”. What I thought was Catholicism, was in fact “Catholicism” or Novus Orco “Christianity” which is absolute Satanry of the worst sort. And of which, Protestantism was its initial offshoot of evil intended to pervert and twist.
So, there are some of my clarifications.
I look forward with baited breath to Vox’s additional, en passant, coincidental, possibly related, commentary on same, in the next fifteen to twenty years; probably without fail!
I have had several rather interesting conversations over the last few days and a recurring theme has been how so much of what is accepted as normal today, really is not.
Some are obvious things, that only the unhinged think are normal:
Mutilating children to supposedly give them the sex they “desire” instead of the one they were born with
That trans-anything is anything other than mental illness
And the consequent nonsense that men can be women or vice-versa
That math is somehow “racist”
That only white people can be “racist”
That there is any such thing as “White Privilege”
That Black Lives Matter is actually based on statistically relevant data concerning the incidence of shootings of black males by white police instead of statistically significant on the basis of incidence of violent crime by black males
That there is any such thing as the “gender” pay gap
That men and women are equal in any way (psychologically, or physically)
That diversity is a strength
That all cultures/religions are equivalent in civilisational values
That different ethnicities are equivalent in terms of IQ, physical performance of various activities, intellectual performance of various activities, and cultural approaches to different concepts
Then there are what I would call “second tier” observations, which really are (or should be) obvious is you realise the obvious issues above and simply extrapolate them a little bit:
That anyone on Earth is not somehow “racist” (literally anyone with a brain that works and eyes and ears that function will notice differences in people and will make instantaneous value-judgements on the basis of those differences. In short, you’d have to be deaf, dumb and blind, not to have what are intrinsically “racist” judgment calls. Literally everyone is “racist”. Including you. Deal with it and stop lying about it to yourself and others).
That sexual deviance is somehow “normal”. It clearly is not. Anything that does not naturally perpetuate the species is a deviant and unsustainable sexual dysfunction. that’s just a fact. More subtly, anything that is not geared towards a family unit comprised of one husband, one wife and the purpose of their lifelong marriage being to make and raise children is of markedly, objectively, lower civilisational value than any other set-up, even if they could reproduce children (polygamy of Mormons and Muslims for example, Polyamory, swinging, and so on).
Since men and women are not equal and since the best civilisational set-up is the one of the family unit as described above, it become objectively obvious that the roles of men and women are different and complementary in that family unit. Pretending otherwise, regardless of technological advancements is a recipe for disaster, since we have some 2 million years of biological wet-ware to over-ride and also a LOT of unchangeable hardware that simply is never going to go away or suddenly stop making us be men or women, no matter how many hormones and puberty blockers and deranged surgeon’s scalpels you go under.
In view of all the above and the historical evidence of some 2,000 years, it also becomes obvious that Catholicism has undoubtedly produced the very pinnacle of human civilisation around the world. this needs a little more fine-tuning to realise for a couple of aspects:
The Industrial Revolution was primarily a Protestant driven change, and touted as a benefit to mankind, but on deeper reflection, whether the Industrial Revolution really was of benefit to humanity is at best, very questionable, and rationally speaking, almost certainly a turn for the worst.
The working systems that came along as a result of the Industrial Revolution, similarly allow people to produce a higher output of work, but this is not rewarded by a correspondingly higher effect on people’s standard of living. In fact, it eventually settles down into a corrosive process that fills every waking hour of ever longer work-days, to fulfil and endless drive for “more”.
This “mechanisation” of human beings further corrodes time with family, the very dynamic of how a family works and operates, and consequently the type and level of education that the children in a family unit receive both directly and indirectly.
These are less obvious points and not applicable in all cases, but overall, the pattern’s statistics are as described in three above points.
And once you have digested all of the above, you begin to see a whole other level of reality that has been obfuscated by the creeping demonic lies that have been filtering into human life since the start but really took off after 1521 and then got turbo-charged during and after WWII and then started taking steroids in the mid to late 1990s and meth and cocaine from about 2008 on and finally a whole bunch of LSD since about 2016/7.
You begin to realise that corporal punishment in general, and the death penalty in particular, is absolutely reasonable and logical for certain level of crimes. No, not the ones that the current zeitgeist would put you to death for if they could, which might be calling Bruce Jenner, Bruce Jenner, or stating unambiguously that there are only two sexes and that homosexuality is a deviant sexuality that is not conducive to a natural continuation of the species, and that adoption by homosexual is in essence, child trafficking.
You realise that the desensitising to certain stimuli is beneficial while to others it is detrimental.
Given the above two points alone, the whole concept of training people like soldiers, police or other force on force/warrior types would drastically change.
As would the education/disciplining of children depending on their aptitudes and interests.
And intelligent education would be treasured and asked for by anyone who understood the above principles. And education that follows the baseline principles of things like the Trivium, the study of logic, reason. Basic principles of mathematics like ratios, sets, percentages, trigonometry, statistics, and algebra, taking the time with each not to just learn the formulae off by heart, but understand the principles. Along with a study of history beginning with the classics, explained and recounted at appropriate age level of understanding, starting with the Illiad and the Odyssey as stories and then the gradual introduction of the Greek classics, the study of Sparta and Athens, Rome, and the Roman Empire, and Egypt and its unexplained structures. As well as, of course, the study of dinosaurs, which really every child loves if properly introduced, and astronomy and geography, with a hint of exploration, archaeology and discovery. After which, biology and chemistry and physics can be tackled with a more reasonable background to build upon.
The study and use of various weapons and principles of martial disciplines.
The learning of basic home economics such as balancing a budget, the basics of cooking and keeping a clean home, and so on. All of these topics could be integrated into equal parts indoor and outdoor activities.
Described as I have above it all sounds like a super expensive classical education, but in reality it is something easily achieved by a group of parents that are willing and able to organise themselves and get this done.
And doing so would probably be considered some radical alt-right, Neo-nazi, eeeeeebil indoctrination of children. When in reality it would simply be giving them the tools to observe and evaluate the objective universe as it exists, instead of the lies it is presented as.
Do not accept the current twisted ideologies of Clown World. Study and re-learn what has been hidden from you and presented under a tsunami of lies and fakery the likes of which no generation before the present ones has seen.
Rebuilt the concept of objectivity and the study of both the physical and natural world as well as the metaphysical one.
I know there are now going to be heads exploding in various gamma hives around the internet as they hope and pray to their slithering nether-gods for a major rift between myself and Vox.
While I am sure nothing of the sort is or will be the case. In fact, many moons ago, I asked Vox if he would be willing to have a friendly discussion/debate on Catholicism vs Protestantism, or to be more precise, my Sedevacantist Catholicism and his specific brand of Protestantism which I believe hinges on the original Nicene creed.
Even back then, somewhat to my surprise, he said he wasn’t against it in principle, but the time required for it (and I suspect utility of it) was not really worth it. Which, in general I agreed with.
That all said, my brain can’t help but want to continue down paths that in my view are likely to increase my understanding of reality. Christianity, is one of those paths that is essentially endless in this regard, so, like say learning to paint, or make music, is a lifelong continuous investigation.
With such endeavours, after a time, there comes a point where your understanding or skill in the topic is good enough to outdo the common men and women in the field and then even the well-known ones. In short, it becomes difficult to find other minds against which you can confront yourself in order to learn more of the topic that interests you. And when you do find one, naturally, at least for me, you’d like to investigate it and push and prod at it and test your theories and ideas and baselines against.
Well, Vox has such a mind. I also consider him a friend and few things in life are as enjoyable to me as philosophical conversation of some substance with a friend. Preferably over a good wine and light meal, or with decent cognac after a good dinner. Alas, distance and circumstance prevents such discourse in the customary civilised fashion I just described. So I find myself limited to this rather barbaric format. Blog to blog. Well, perhaps we might do a livestream on it one day, but be as it may, I will now simply dive into the post Vox put up which prompted this one for me: This is it.
As baseline axioms I think I have the following, which are:
Pretty sure both Vox and myself do not like having human authority over us. I think the generic difference might be that I am willing to go along with it for the greater good as long as the human with “authority” over me continues to follow the correct rules. As far as Catholicism goes, if the priest/bishop does not himself contravene Canon Law (as per Code of Canon Law of 1917) and his advice is in line with it, I will obey. The reason I believe the Code of Canon Law is correct is because at core, I believe that Jesus would not have left a FALLIBLE Church on Earth. He wanted a Church and we are instructed to use reason and logic to figure stuff out, but not that it’s all guesswork. Having read the CoCL twice, while I find rules that personally bug me, in objective consideration, even those rules are civilisational, and my personal preference is the one that is not ideal to building a truly civilised world. The classic example is duelling. I am all for it, but Catholicism forbids it, because, in general, duelling would be a sin of pride. Not really my problem, but if it were widespread you can see that the sin of pride would be what motivates it for most, instead of a burning desire to see justice done.
Pretty sure we both dislike dishonesty in general and especially dishonesty designed to lead people astray spiritually.
One thing I think we differ on is that I think Vox is more prone to the error of Erroneous Loyalty. Something I discussed in Reclaiming the Catholic Church at some length. It is an error I used to live myself for many years, so I think I understand the dynamic well. As an extreme and hypothetical example that ignores human laws for the purpose of the intellectual exercise, I recall a long while back, in one of his posts, Vox mentioned that under certain circumstances, a friend that was guilty of certain crimes would be best served by being handed a pistol with one bullet in it and leaving him alone in his room, giving him the dignity of suicide. I believe he was referencing a supposed “friend” of John Scalzi that had been discovered to be some kind of sexual predator, and if memory serves Vox’s comment was along the lines of what you would do if someone you considered to be a friend turned out to be, say a child rapist. In my case, my loyalty of friendship would NOT prevent me (again, in a hypothetical world of no human laws being present) from helping the man pull the trigger, or even doing it for him. You don’t want to leave these things to chance! In fact, as per my comments many times, I absolutely believe that the punishment for child rape should be the legalised and accepted method of burning at the stake. Suicide is considered a mortal sin by Catholicism and as such, judgement by the community so you burn at the stake gives you the chance to repent while you burn and possibly enter purgatory and eventually heaven instead of eternal Hell. So, in broad terms, I think Vox may be more prone to being loyal beyond the just point. As I say, an error I myself had for a long while in my youth, but that I gradually got out of over several years until I finally realised that the line of Justice is more important than the line of loyalty. Vox may have other theories on this, which I am unaware of but that’s the sense I have of it presently.
Given the above premises/axioms, I will then look at the above linked post critically. And consider that I am absolutely in no way defending the Boomertastic Doug Wilson. I read a couple of his post years ago, before I was even a Christian and the illogic and hypocrisy prevalent in Protestantism made me conclude he’s an idiot and not worth listening to at all.
One more difference between Vox and myself I need to point out, the man is certainly more patient than I am as well as far more forgiving. I remember we briefly discussed Jordan Peterson at the time and Vox stated the man was intelligent. I was astonished and asked why on Earth he thought that, he quite correctly pointed out that in order to spew the level of bafflegarble nonsense he does and fool a lot of people into thinking he is not some absolutely insane globalist with severe psychological issues, takes a certain level of IQ. Personally I evaluated the bafflegarble nonsense and concluded the man is mentally unstable and absolutely wrong and a liar. I can’t reconcile that with being intelligent, but strictly speaking, that is an error on my part conflating ethics and sanity with intelligence.
Vox concluded that Doug Wilson is a gatekeeper but still keeps tabs on him clearly, which is understandable, as I keep tabs on other gatekeepers like Milo and EM Jones and Taylor Marshall and so on. But perhaps does not condemn him as thoroughly as I do, and perhaps, in general he might not condemn the gatekeepers as thoroughly as I do. I may be wrong, but I suspect he is more forgiving than I am on such matters.
Anyway, to examine the post in more detail:
I will first note that this is precisely the same defense that is regularly offered up on behalf of other gatekeepers like Jordan Peterson and Ben Shapiro, and also of books like the Harry Potter series. Don’t criticize the obvious errors and the demonstrable falsehoods when they are otherwise doing so much good? Don’t you understand that if they tell the truth instead of lying, they won’t be able to reach as many of those who need the truth? Isn’t it better that they read godless tales of evil being portrayed as good than not read at all?
And the answer is no. This is a false, pernicious, and fundamentally short-sighted perspective. It is less a defense than an attempt to negotiate a guilty plea in exchange for a lesser penalty.
And so far we are in absolute agreement. For example, the Catholic Church teaches that it is better to leave aborigines in jungles alone and not instruct them at all than to instruct them with Protestantism. Because as per Church doctrine, a savage that has never heard of Christ might yet enter heaven judged by God on the merits of his own conscience, but one that has taken on a perverse version of Christianity is far less likely to escape the mortal sins of pride and in essence, choosing “me and my way” over “God and His ways”. I have always had the same idea. I met some of the last Khoi San that were free of any influence from so-called civilised men, and I found them to be honest, reliable, friendly, and just. Their society might be very primitive, but within the confines of that limitation they were essentially innocent and good people. Take a couple of generations of essentially Protestant “education” and a previously scrupulously honest primitive people become dishonest, haphazard, unpredictable and liable to suffer from everything to alcoholism to being criminals.
Let me be perfectly clear: No one who advocates equality of any kind, and no one who is a civic nationalist of any variety, and no one who falsely asserts that which is not a sin is a sin, should ever be considered a genuine or reliable advocate of the Good, the Beautiful, and the True, no matter what their other positive attributes might be.
Because liars cannot, and will not, defend the truth. They will always produce one reason or another for refusing to do so. And if you are foolish enough to trust or follow a liar, you will come to regret it, as all of you – and readers here should recall, the vast majority of you – who used to lionize Jordan Peterson and consider him to be a great intellectual champion should know.
Again, I agree whole-heartedly. Although, I realise Vox here was referring specifically to Civic Nationalism and so on, the fact remains that:
no one who falsely asserts that which is not a sin is a sin, should ever be considered a genuine or reliable advocate of the Good, the Beautiful, and the True, no matter what their other positive attributes might be.
And this remains the absolute point for me which I cannot reconcile with Vox’s theology.
Vox, is, after all, a Protestant. A very unique one he might be, but he (as far as I know) does not subscribe to the rules of the Catholic Church as per the Code of Canon Law of 1917 which in essence simple explains/extrapolates from both the Bible and Catholic (Christian) Tradition and has compiled and summarised all the various extrapolations, dictates, and dogma of the Catholic Church into one volume that covers all of those documents from the period of human history up to the year 1917. As a Catholic, you then may also wish to add the Papal ex-cathedra commentaries made from 1917 to 1958. After that we have not had any valid Popes since, so everything else can be safely ignored.
I am fairly sure Vox has not read the Code of Canon Law. And if he did I think the things he might object to are probably not as many as he might envision, but I am (foggily) aware he has some issue with some aspects of Mariology, though I am not sure what they are. I feel fairly confident he is well-read enough to be aware that Catholics do not actually “worship” Mary, but simply ask for her intercession, as we do to various Saints. In essence, the difference between catholics and Protestants is that we don’t stop communicating with our dead friends and people. We pray for them and we also ask them to pray for us.
One of the only times we briefly discussed my Catholicism (sedevacantism) and I pointed out some of the main issues he immediately said words to the effect of “Oh, well, those are Catholics I can get behind”. So again, I doubt the differences between us are huge in terms of theology.
He also agrees with me that in general humans need rules, otherwise they will pretty much eat each other alive in the street, which, to a certain extent we are starting to really see on a global level when Christianity fades.
We are also both smart enough understand that, while perhaps a certain optional rule for people may not really be designed for me or him specifically, we can’t really have rules for thee but not for me. And if there are exceptions, they should be based on sound reasoning, logic, and justice, not personal preference. So, in short, I ask myself:
“Why is Vox not actually a sedevacantist?”
I am presently only aware of one possible hitch which is his specific interpretation of the Trinty. Which I will not attempt to speak for him on as I would probably get it wrong. For myself, I do not pretend to know the intricacies of the Trinity, and I am perfectly happy to act in this regard very much as an illiterate peasant from the year 800. The Church says the Trinity works thusly, and I accept it as a given. I see no possible profit in trying to atomise that concept, nor do I have any interest in it.
While I may atomise the concept of not duelling and understand it very well, and instinctively want to say: “But Bishop, I don’t want to run that guy through with a rapier because I am proud, but because he defrauds little old ladies and steals candy from children, and blasphemes! C’MAWN…Just this one (ok, half-dozen) time?!” But intellectually I understand I must just bow my head and NOT challenge the man to a duel to the death. And if I do confront him, it would be a sin to smack the living crap out of him until he makes amends. I know that. Which makes it a bad sin. But… y’know… I’m only human. Maybe next time I’ll give him a warning first. You know, if I really see the error of my ways. Otherwise all I can do is really try to work on it over time. But in the meantime: no duels have been had. #winning.
So, it might be an intellectual disparity, perhaps the things that interest Vox to dissect are so different from the ones that interest me that it causes him a problem with Catholicism. And this, THIS is the real interest to me.
What are those details? Is he seeing something I am not, or is it vice-versa? Or is there a third possibility that we are both missing?
Such conversations, or investigations, if you prefer, are what fascinates me, and the ones that I think help us to see more truth when done with an intellectually honest person that is also curious enough and interested enough to examine such details.
I seem to recall for example that Vox also labelled Once Saved Always Saved as a retarded concept (he may have been more polite about it) and I would expect he similarly considers Sola Scriptura as absurd, but I never asked him the question. I also seem to recall that his generic approach to the Bible was not that this or that version was “better” but to just read one and go with it as best you can, which is “close enough” for really about 99.99% of people.
I suspect that his avoidance of hardcore Catholicism is linked to what he believes are “lies” or untruths that the Catholic Church has as various dogmas. What these are, however I am unaware, and it is my experience that most such ideas are usually rooted in some Protestant fake news about Catholicism. Several aspects of which, honest historians like Rodney Stark have pointed out even though they are not Catholics.
At any rate, I would certainly be interested in looking at what the differences between his and my theological philosophies are.
I suspect he doesn’t have the time, but the invitation is open.
UPDATE: A reader pointed out I have not explained the absolute point that anyone who advocates that a sin is not a sin should not be trusted. As often happens with me, I thought the point was obvious, but I failed to realise it is not as obvious to many as I think. So, to clarify, The very concept of Protestantism that each man can interpret the Bible as he wishes, is a pernicious sin of pride. Even the sola scriptura retards must know that man is perfectly honest, clean and good as well as smart and reasonable. It very clearly states this in Hebrews and elsewhere if memory serves.
Secondly, it is just as obvious that a good and loving God would not leave a DYI kit for interpreting His Will and what the rules He wishes us to follow are. Because given the fact we are all a bunch of retards to one degree or other, we are guaranteed to screw it up. And the idea a flawless and loving God would leave us a flawed theology is equally retarded.
Therefore, a FLAWLESS theology MUST exist. And there must be a way to know which it is. As it happens, there is. Jesus Appointed Peter as the Head of His Church, instructed the Apostles to teach His teachings and Paul tells us also that we are to reject things that are not as per their teachings as given to them by Jesus (that is, Apostolic succession, is a thing).
All of which would still screw up if it were not for the fact that Jesus also told us He would be with us to the end of time. Now, if Jesus is with us always to the end, and He commanded the Apostles to teach what He taught them, then their teachings cannot be in error. Not because even the Apostles are flawless, but because Jesus is.
That is the whole point of Papal infallibility. It’s not due to some superhuman characteristic of Popes. There have been plenty of greedy, power-hungry, deviants as Popes, but they did not teach erroneous dogma when speaking ex-cathedra because of the supernatural protection due to Jesus’ promise. Who can speak erroneous or wrong doctrine? People who are not protected by Jesus’ promise and who is that? People who are not the foundation on which the rock is based, which has two parts. The non visible supreme one, Jesus, and his vicar on Earth, which is the man holding the position that Peter held as leader of the Apostles.
18 And Jesus coming, spoke to them, saying: All power is given to me in heaven and in earth.
19 Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.
20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world.
Priests can lie or be wrong. Bishops can lie or be wrong. Popes can lie or be wrong. But valid, legitimate Popes talking officially for the entire Church on matters of faith and morals, that is the foundational principles of Christianity, cannot be wrong. Again, not because they are infallible in and of themselves, but because Jesus specifically said he was specifically with them to the End of the World. And Jesus cannot be wrong, nor is he a liar. And what He taught the apostles is true and He also specifically stated he would build the Church on Peter,, renaming him from Simon to Peter, which in Latin, Aramaic and most Latin languages literally means Rock.
Regardless of whatever brain-twisting Protestants come up with to try and say Jesus didn’t mean or say what he meant and said, even a child can understand that if someone says, to a guy called Simon:
“Hey buddy, come here, gonna run a little test by you…”
And he does, and Simon passes, and the guy says:
“You know what buddy, I’m gonna call you Rock from now on, and on this rock, I will build my church.” It’s a fairly clear point that Good old Simon/Rock, is now the head of the Church. Seriously, a child gets it. You need to be indoctrinated into lies from birth not to see this as it is.
So, the first lie is to tell people that to not be Catholic is not a sin. It is. You’re ignoring God’s Will. And the entire retinue of sins that follows from anyone following that advice is literally endless. And frankly, it ALL stems from pride to begin with. Some German fattie with a penchant for sexing up nuns and raping maids and swearing and calling reason literally “the whore of the devil”, comes along some 1500 years after Christ and the Catholic Church which has been the ONLY valid Christianity to that point and he FIXES everything? It’s moronic. Jesus didn’t say:
“Oh, by the way, all the people for the next 1500 years or so that call themselves Christians, and all the Popes which everyone agrees for that long are the main dudes, yeah, well, forget about all of them, they are all wrong and Pagan worshippers that ask my mother and a bunch of dead guys of no importance whatsoever to put in a good word for them with me. Anyway, all those guys? Going straight to Hell. Only when that rotund German with the beer and all the sex comes along will AKCHUAL Christianity be fixed. And he will do it by changing the Bible before he says it’s the only thing you should refer to at all. But only the one he changed, not the one everyone used for 1200 or so years and that was put together by the same Catholics who got it all wrong. And oh that Bible that the German guy changed, which was also changed by the Pahrisees, you know, the guys who had me killed, for 700 years before him, that’s the good Bible, scrap that other one. And oh, oh, one more thing: The best Bible, it’s the one with 33,000 translation errors ordered to be put together by a flamingly homosexual English King. Jimmy boy, that’s his name. He also starts up the Freemasons, which are Satanists, but don’t let that bug ya, seriously, his version of the Bible is the best one.”
The Root of All Evil
This is probably going to piss off most of my readers. Well, brace yourselves, boys and girls, after all, I am not a millionaire because I really suck at telling people lies they’d rather hear instead of cold hard facts that upset their fragile egos.
Some premises are in order before I blow your minds:
Right Then. Let us begin, so that you may learn where and what the real root of pretty much all evil on our planet today comes from and is based on. In order to do so, we need to be aware of several things.
Here is the TL;DR version:
Know the History of Evil
The History of it of course, goes back right to the very creation of mankind, but here, today, we will concern ourselves only with the last 500 years or so of it.
Protestantism is not Christianity
Protestantism created Freemasonry
There really is no way around this at all.
Freemasonry is Satanic
Again, there really is no way around this. This is not the only 5 hour long video, on the topic, and though slightly irritating in presentation format, if you get over the first few minutes and move to the factual stuff that is presented and undeniable, you will find it impossible to deny. There are several such videos. And books. Go research on your own.
Freemasonry, Illuminati, Carbonari, Rosicrucians, their name is Legion
All of the above structures operate on three baseline principles:
Freemasonry is responsible for the destruction of all Royal Houses in Europe
Once again, this is really not in dispute once you look into it. It does take some digging though, because they obviously don’t advertise this point much, but the documents of the Carbonari made this extremely clear, as well as the known actions of known Freemasons like Mazzini in the “unification” of Italy, and later of Europe by similar means and so on. The extermination of the Russian Tsar, etcetera. the only Royal house to “survive” is the entirely corrupted on of Windsor, where the male sons are all circumcised by a Jewish Rabbi, and have been for centuries. One might ask why, of course, but one is unlikely to get an answer.
The reason for the destruction of the Royal Houses was because since the days of Charlemagne, Kings had been thought of as Divinely ordained to be Kings. That is, NOT that a King was put there by God Himself as the rightful ruler and everyone should obey him, but rather that God allowed such men to become Kings. It was then up to such men themselves, to comport themselves in keeping with being good Catholics. As such, the populace understood that if a man was good and obeyed the Catholic rules, their lot would be lighter and easier, and if he was not, it would be darker and heavier. And indeed this was the case for centuries. The First World War was instigated in part in order to “break” the link of loyalty between peasants and the nobility. The Marxist (who was a Jew) ideas of Communism (also a Jewish concept) were supposed to destroy the social gap between the working class and aristocracy. And yet, despite the tragic loss of life in these fomented brother wars, in the main, people still accepted mostly, that they belonged to this o that social strata, and aside some possibility of movement here and there, in the main accepted it. Because once again, the concept of Royalty being a Godly ordained (albeit very human) order, resided in most people’s minds.
The Church was far too powerful to attack directly as long as the enforcing arm of the Church (lay nobility) continued to exist and command the respect of the common people. And so, the work began in earnest right away, pretty much as soon as the Freemasons and the Illuminati and the Carbonari each were “started”.
America is a Freemasonic Country and was so from the Start
The American revolution against Britain was funded by French money. French money which was “advised” to be spent thusly by the Freemasons at the court of King Louis XVI and Marie Antoniette, and had already begun to cause troublesome economic hardship right before the War of independence started in 1775.
From Wikipedia (hardly a bastion of historical truth in such matters, proving that even there these facts are not exactly refuted, even if not highlighted):
By the time of the Flour War of 1775, a series of riots (due to the high price of flour and bread) had damaged her reputation among the general public. Eventually, Marie Antoinette’s reputation was no better than that of the favourites of previous kings. Many French people were beginning to blame her for the degrading economic situation, suggesting the country’s inability to pay off its debt was the result of her wasting the crown’s money.[40] In her correspondence, Marie Antoinette’s mother, Maria Theresa, expressed concern over her daughter’s spending habits, citing the civil unrest it was beginning to cause.
The blame of the country’s economic downturn being laid at the feet of Marie Antoinette and her husband was a somewhat convenient approach to also removing the entire royal house from power, as was the main concern of Freemasonry at the time.
And the rumours persisted throughout the American Revolution to its end in 1783.
In 1783 the queen was busy with the creation of her “hamlet“, a rustic retreat built by her favoured architect, Richard Mique, according to the designs of the painter Hubert Robert.[92] Its creation, however, caused another uproar when its cost became widely known.[93][94] However, the hamlet was not an eccentricity of Marie Antoinette’s. It was en vogue at the time for nobles to have recreations of small villages on their properties. In fact, the design was copied from that of the Prince de Condé. It was also significantly smaller and less intricate than many other nobles’.[95] Around this time she accumulated a library of 5,000 books. Those on music, often dedicated to her, were the most read, though she also liked to read history.[96][97] She sponsored the arts, in particular music. Marie-Antoinette preferred to hold her musicales in the salon of her Petit appartement de la reine in the Palace of Versailles, or in the Théâtre de la Reine. She limited the audience to her intimate circle and a few musicians, among them the Chevalier de Saint-Georges. “Admitted to perform music with the Queen,”[98] Saint-Georges probably played his violin sonatas for two instruments, with Her Majesty playing the fortepiano. She also supported some scientific endeavours, encouraging and witnessing the first launch of a Montgolfière, a hot air balloon for the first time in human history; this extraordinary feat which represented a turning point in human civilization was done by Jean-François Pilâtre de Rozier.
Once the matter of the American War was over, the efforts to remove the royals redoubled:
Marie Antoinette began to abandon her more carefree activities to become increasingly involved in politics in her role as Queen of France.[118] By publicly showing her attention to the education and care of her children, the queen sought to improve the dissolute image she had acquired in 1785 from the “Diamond Necklace Affair”, in which public opinion had falsely accused her of criminal participation in defrauding the jewelers Boehmer and Bassenge of the price of an expensive diamond necklace they had originally created for Madame du Barry. The main actors in the scandal were Cardinal de Rohan, Prince de Rohan-Guéméné, Great Almoner of France, and Jeanne de Valois-Saint-Rémy, Comtesse de La Motte, a descendant of an illegitimate child of Henry II of France of the House of Valois. Marie Antoinette had profoundly disliked Rohan since the time he had been the French ambassador to Vienna when she was a child. Despite his high clerical position at the Court, she never addressed a word to him. Others involved were Nicole Lequay, alias Baronne d’Oliva, a prostitute who happened to look like Marie Antoinette; Rétaux de Villette, a forger; Alessandro Cagliostro, an Italian adventurer; and the Comte de La Motte, Jeanne de Valois’ husband. Madame de La Motte tricked Rohan into buying the necklace as a gift to Marie Antoinette, for him to gain the queen’s favour.
When the affair was discovered those involved (except de La Motte and Rétaux de Villette, who both managed to flee) were arrested, tried, convicted, and either imprisoned or exiled. Madame de La Motte was sentenced for life to confinement in the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, which also served as a prison for women. Judged by the Parlement, Rohan was found innocent of any wrongdoing and allowed to leave the Bastille. Marie Antoinette, who had insisted on the arrest of the Cardinal, was dealt a heavy personal blow, as was the monarchy, and despite the fact that the guilty parties were tried and convicted, the affair proved to be extremely damaging to her reputation, which never recovered from it.[citation neede
The machinations continued not just in France but Austria and aBavaria too and by the end of 1793, both Luis XVI and Marie Antoniette had been executed by Guillotine and the monarchy had been abolished in France as of 10th August 1792.
The period of the French Revolution, from 1789 to the late 1790s also produced some of the worst crimes against Catholics since the time of Henry the VIII.
And the Freemasonic stamp of “fraternity” still echoes today in the French motto of Liberté, Ègalité, Fraternité, it’s always the same with them. Preach liberalism to be rid of the “oppressive” old “regime” and crowbar in degenearcy of every sort to weaken and demoralise the entire citizenry, then push the fable of “equality” between people, cultures, physical and intellectual abilities of vastly different capacities and possibilities, while masking it as “spiritual enlightenment” but in reality producing further corrosion of the capacity to maintain a functioning society. Not hard to do when 85 IQ semi-illiterates are now put in charge of say nuclear power plants, and you begin to have brown-outs if not total core melt-down, to select an extreme but obvious example.
From History.com:
IIn late August, [1789] the Assembly adopted the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen), a statement of democratic principles grounded in the philosophical and political ideas of Enlightenment thinkers like Jean-Jacques Rousseau.
The document proclaimed the Assembly’s commitment to replace the ancien régime with a system based on equal opportunity, freedom of speech, popular sovereignty and representative government.
In April 1792, the newly elected Legislative Assembly declared war on Austria and Prussia, where it believed that French émigrés were building counterrevolutionary alliances; it also hoped to spread its revolutionary ideals across Europe through warfare.
On the domestic front, meanwhile, the political crisis took a radical turn when a group of insurgents led by the extremist Jacobins attacked the royal residence in Paris and arrested the king on August 10, 1792.
The following month, amid a wave of violence in which Parisian insurrectionists massacred hundreds of accused counterrevolutionaries, the Legislative Assembly was replaced by the National Convention, which proclaimed the abolition of the monarchy and the establishment of the French republic.
On January 21, 1793, it sent King Louis XVI, condemned to death for high treason and crimes against the state, to the guillotine; his wife Marie-Antoinette suffered the same fate nine months later.
Notice how the intent of the Freemasons was to spread this war on the established systems of Europe throughout the land, not just France.
And the reign of Terror followed, and please note its central tenet: The abolition of Christianity. Which is and always has been the aim of Satanists throughout the ages, the Freemasons merely having been more successful than most at implementing their aims.
Reign of Terror
Following the king’s execution, war with various European powers and intense divisions within the National Convention brought the French Revolution to its most violent and turbulent phase.
In June 1793, the Jacobins seized control of the National Convention from the more moderate Girondins and instituted a series of radical measures, including the establishment of a new calendar and the eradication of Christianity.
They also unleashed the bloody Reign of Terror (la Terreur), a 10-month period in which suspected enemies of the revolution were guillotined by the thousands. Many of the killings were carried out under orders from Robespierre, who dominated the draconian Committee of Public Safety until his own execution on July 28, 1794.
The Crimes against Catholics, including horrific mutilations and tortures of babies and children was well-documented at the time even by the perpetrators, and was honestly one of the most horrific and disgusting periods of human action that undoubtedly pleased many demons in Hell.
All of the above is merely to give a TINY bit of context to the point that America was essentially funded with French money, the use of which was then used to blame and frame the French Monarchy and cause further revolution throughout Europe along with the rapid abolition of other monarchies in Europe in quick succession.
Austria-Hungary, Prussia, Germany, Montenegro, Portugal and Russia had ALL lost their kings by the end of the First World War. You might think some 120 years or so is a long time, but not really when your machinations to change the entire world of Europe from a Catholic and orderly group of individual nations to a homogenous grey soup of “Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity” that can then be fully controlled by the purse-masters of the world.
The remaining monarchies were abolished or made into constitutional republics by the end of the Second World War, which any historian worth anything agrees was really an extended continuation of the First World War. And the end result of all this was finally what?
The Establishment of the American Empire
It cannot be argued that America was founded by Freemasons and on Freemasonic Principles. Washington was widely known to be a Freemason and to this day, the various secret societies of Skull and Crossbones and so on are essentially Freemasons by another name. But in any case, of the 45 presidents America has had at least 15 are KNOWN to have been Freemasons without a doubt, Including the first, as already mentioned, as well as BOTH Roosevelts.
Theodore Roosevelt, who was president from 1901 to 1909, immediately followed by Taft, also a Freemason, from 1909 to 1913, and as everyone knows, the First World War’s start in 1915 was set in motion in these years, even if Woodrow Wilson was actually president during WWI, who is not known to have been a Freemason, but who is still widely thought to have been one of the worst presidents in American history. And probably still has that “honour” Since Biden clearly was not legitimately elected. Then again, who knows if Wilson was either.
We also have Franklin Roosevelt who just so happened to be president from 1933 to 1945, followed by fellow Freemason Truman until 1953, so the entire period leading up to WWII and quite a bit after it.
After WWII, by deft economic manipulations that both funded and started both wars, the American Empire was pretty much established globally.
The placing of American military bases all around the world as well the usurious practices of tentacled creatures like the IMF, the WEF, the trilateral commission and on and on and on, ensured that other states became vassals of America and were destroyed economically if they did not obey.
The establishment of the Universal Commercial Code set of rules effectively made pretty much every country on the globe a subsidiary company of the business of the United States of America. Look it up. It’s a giant rabbit hole. One I have been aware of for almost 30 years and that almost no one even has any idea about. Italy for example is STILL subjected to rules that are literally secret and not able to be seen by anyone in Italy, that were signed off after WWII and which fundamentally makes a mockery of the idea that the Italian state is in any way sovereign. That is in case you couldn’t figure it out from the over 150 American military bases placed throughout Italy. And the fact that our current prime minister,
Georgie Tits, sorry, I mean Georgia Meloni, is absolutely known to have had a “master” in her 20s when she followed occult practices. And remember that having a “master” is a Freemasonic thing. And touting her as a “right-wing” leader is absolutely ridiculous and merely the posturing of the usual crack whores doing as their are told (with apologies to crack whores for using them as descriptors for journalists and the mass media), which is simply the usual Freemasonic thing of playing both sides of the fake “divide”.With America as the powerhouse of the world, American “entertainment”, began making its way across the airwaves to literally every place on Earth. Sitcoms made in the USA are known throughout the world and if you think that doesn’t change the zeitgeist of the planet, then I have some transgender floating bridges to sell you in Shangri-La.
And all this stuff is all run by the (((usual suspects))) who, Cohen-cidentally, I am sure, are always, always, always, but only every single time, at the very root of ALL of these machinations, be their financial and economic, propaganda or “entertainment” or “news” based, and lately also “scientifically” based (don’t let me start of the incestuous plagiarist Albert Einstein and his lies, as this is long enough as it is!)
So, it can be now perhaps better understood why brown people who get the crap bombed out of them, their kids and families killed and used as training grounds for the absolute worst rejects and sad examples of “soldiers” America has produced since “generation kill”, might refer to the USA as The Great Satan.
What with their “soldiers” literally shooting peasants for sport and out of boredom in many cases, often via drones controlled from an air conditioned room tens of thousands of kilometres away, run as just any other 9 to 5 job, and this then being presented as “heroic war action”.
Pretty much regardless of whatever religion, culture, ethnicity, or IQ you may have, it’s not difficult to see why if your children or loved ones are on the receiving end of people that do what the CIA and NSA and Abu Grhaib and Guantanamo Bay “prison wardens-slash-torturers” do, you might think it’s perfectly acceptable to Strat 20kg of C4 to your chest and walk into the nearest American mall to detonate it.
Finally
So, yes. Unpleasant as it may sound, the real root of pretty much most of the evil present in our world today does originate from the USA. Which is not to say that the average American is specifically guilty of doing this.
By and large, the average American is a drug-addled fattie, stunned by GMO foods and processed crap that most animals in the wild would not dream to ingest even if starving, maleducated to the point that some Africans in small villages have a better grasp of reality, and thoroughly brainwashed into believing whatever the tell-lie-vision in their lounge, bedroom and even bathroom, tells them 24/7. In short, the average American is for the most part a victim of his handlers. True, he’s a lazy, cowardly sort, but one must understand that the brainwashing was very gradual and very well orchestrated. Think about it:
I don’t blame the average American citizen any more than I blame the average Mexican or Italian or Chinese. But first and foremost, I really wish every single American (and Mexican, and Italian and Chinese) remained in his own country, and kept all of his ideologies, programmes and military in their own fucking country too.
Of course, the Average American has about as much say in where his government places American military bases as I do about Georgia Meloni’s letting boat after boat after boat of invaders land on the shores of Italy, which is to say, pretty much zero right now. And that’s because the average American has zero representation, because the entire system is rigged and the people who actually run the US government are mostly foreigners and their puppets.
And if you still have to ask who that is today, when you notice what the American government and deep state does, who it supports beyond any reason, and who it will jail you and cancel you and punish you for criticising or even just not wanting to deal with, well… If you STILL haven’t figured it out, I can’t help you. Just go back to your Netflix series.
But not to leave you on a downward note, let me assure you that my next giant post will be on what the solutions are for this apparently unsolvable situation and what you, at an individual level can and should and must do about it.
PS: I have NOT spell-checked this and my autocorrect inevitably mangles a lot of words, aside any errors I make myself. I will correct this as time permits over the next day or two, but hopefully you get the gist.
You might be interested in the following posts:
By G | 15 November 2023 | Posted in Believe, Catholicism, Freemasons, Impostors and Frauds, Reclaiming the Catholic Church, Social Commentary, The Enemy Within, The Jews