Archive for November 2023

Bruce The Deceiver is at it again

In typical, cowardly, effeminate, weak, English, passive-aggressive fashion, Bruce Charlton, or Brucie, as he will henceforth be named, has obviously seen my latest exposition of him for the liar, blackpiller and general heretical gnostic and non-christian sophist that he is.

Because trust me, that little wormtongue checks to see what I say. Except he is too cowardly to actually come out and try and respond, so instead he makes some vagueposting about sedevacantists.

So, because he probably has some kind of humiliation fetish, in line with all his other “quirky” passive aggressive, worm-tonguing, I will oblige, and once more vivisect his rubbish right here at my blog. His rubbish has a grey background to represent the fog-fart nature of his shrivelled soul.

JRR Tolkien and the disaster of the Second Vatican Council (Vatican II) – implications for the legalistic sedevacantist position

To judge by his behaviour (if not by his explicit statements) there seems little doubt that JRR Tolkien regarded the consequences of the Second Vatican Council with a combination of deep dismay and horror; indeed, I once wrote that Vatican II may have been the most deeply dismaying event of Tolkien’s whole life. 

His friend (and fellow Catholic) George Sayer; believed that Tolkien saw little or nothing wrong with the pre-Vatican II Roman Catholic Church. 

Well, Brucie, that would be because there was little to nothing wrong with the pre-Vatican II Catholic Church. I mean, it was already infested to the gills with communists, homosexuals and Freemasons, as history has proven, and Bella Dodds has confessed, along with other undeniable proofs, some of which I highlighted in my book Reclaiming the Catholic Church. But that problem aside, the Dogma of The Church was as pristine as it has ever been. Not that most would know it, since most have literally no actual idea what the dogma of the Catholic Church is. They only THINK they do, thanks to 500 years of Satanic/Protestant lies, as even other honest Protestants will readily admit, like the Baptist Rodney Stark in his Bearing False Witness, or the man who wrote The Four Witnesses, Rod Bennett, who ended up converting as a result of reading up on the first 200 years of Christianity.

This is worth contemplating because it shows that a Catholic as devout as Tolkien could be in deep opposition to Vatican II; but without making reference to “legalistic” aspects of the validity of Papal elections. I imagine Tolkien would have found that whole “sedevacantist” line of argument on both sides to be extremely distressing and fraught with dangers – especially when engaged-in by lay people. 

God, Brucie, you’re such a raging faggot. Let me explain ladies and gents: Here, Brucie, while he waves his wrist limply in my general direction but without ever making eye contact, is trying to imply that because people like me (probably, as far as Brucie knows, and thinks, and expects) respect the memory of Tolkien not just as a writer (personally I respect him a lot more for having literally invented the Elvish language. JRR would have been an absolute genial game master for a Dungeons and Dragons game!) but as a Catholic.

So, because Brucie says so, I (and other sedevacantists) are supposed to now assume that Brucie had a direct line of knowing what JRR would have thought or said about Sedevacantism, and because Bruce says so, we should recoil in horror at taking a position Brucie imagines JRR might have had (should have, according to Brucie, nay would have had) with respect to Sedevacantism. That’s right ladies and gents, we are supposed to assume because Brucie says so, that Tolkien would have wagged a stern finger in our direction and told us: Bad Catholic! Submit to a fake Pope.

Seriously. How passive aggressive and sophistic and gay, GAY, Brucie, GAY, do you have to be to behave like such a little, whiny, bitch?

Besides which, what do you care? You like the Moronic Mormons. Go find yourself a tuba hat with a “seer-stone” in it so you can decipher your own bullshit, eh, Brucie?

This may have some implications for traditionalist Catholics who all agree that the RCC took a severe wrong turn, a down-turn and movement towards apostasy, with the Second Vatican Council. 

Oh Mah GAWD! Brucie! Bring out the fainting couches! IMPLICATIONS you say (with emphasis on YOU SAY) Good God Brucie, what’s next? Will CONSEQUENCES ever be the same again, now, after the IMPLICATIONS?

My point is that the disastrous nature of Vatican II may be regarded as common ground among serious Roman Catholics. And indeed all serious Christians of any- or no-denomination, who wish for the recovery and renewal of spiritual health in the largest and most influential Christian church – this may be common ground quite apart from the legal arguments. 

What a transparent and ineffective satanist you are Brucie.

Translation: Because Catholics recognise that the Novus Ordo is just the latest and most noxious branch of Protestant heresy (with apology to the Protestants, really, because the Novus Orco really is Satanic) everyone should come together and all be “christians” together. Making the satanic nonsense of the fake churches a common cause, why a… a… dare I say it, a fraternity even, you know, like in the Freemason words of “Spiritual Fraternity among men of Goodwill”. What’s your code name in the “brotherhood” Brucie? I propose if they haven’t given you a Freemason codename yet you ask for Brucie-of-the-flower.

In other words; sedevacantism can reasonably be regarded as one of several (or many) possible hypotheses for explaining the disastrous effect of Vatican II; and, most importantly, how to set it right. 

And here he is, trying to add sewage to sedevacantism. The usual sewage by the way, nothing original even.

“Oh it’s just a THEORY!”

“Just one of many HYPOTHESES, you see”

“It’s all very LEGALISTIC and COMPLICATED, you see.”

No Brucie, No.

It’s childishly simple. The Catholic Church has and always had, unchangeable divine dogma, which is ALL codified, and was ALL collated and summarised and approved by the INFALLIBLE Magisterium of the Church in the Code of Canon Law of 1917.

That’s ALL the Rules of Catholicism from the year zero to 1917 all in one place, Brucie. And guess what, as Code 188 part 4 makes eminently clear, as do ALL the other even tangentially related codes to it, ANYONE, who publicly defects from the faith —which teaching heresy as though it was valid doctrine counts and always has counted as doing so— is no longer a representative of the Church, and NO ONE need say or approve, or pass ANYTHING. Its done. The law itself convicts them. It’s VERY clear, and VERY simple. A Child gets it. If you are NOT a CATHOLIC, you are not in the club. You can’t speak for it, you are not part of it, you are irrelevant to it, and even anything you did while you might have been a member before then, becomes instantly invalid and worthless. It’s Very, very, very, simple and only sophists and freemasons like you have tried to make it “complicated” by lying, and lying, and lying, with every breath you take.

It is indeed possible that the sedevacantist legal arguments for why the papal seat is empty might be true; but the legalistic solutions may nonetheless be ineffective or counter-productive in solving the Roman Catholic Church’s many and deep problems. 

Hahahhahahah and here he reveals his true nature. Pay attention to what he says:

“Oh yes, X may be true, but we can’t have truth be used to solve anything!”

“No, no, truth is counter-productive to solving anything, you see?!”

What a disgusting creature. He probably has candle-lit dinners with Jordan Peterson, while they agree on truth being untruth.

That is, indeed, my opinion – I mean that the sedevacantist solutions (i.e. their advocated approach to dealing with the RC problems) are ineffective, and would be counter-productive: they are wrong in their spirit. 

Firstly Brucie, no one, literally no one on Earth gives a flying crap about your opinion. You are absolutely irrelevant to everyone with the possible exception of your cat, if you have one. But even if some misguided soul cared anything for your opinion, let me assure you that not a single Catholic does. That is Sedevacantist or even just nominally ignorant lay Novus Order kind that is simply fooled by the impostors pretending to be Pope and Bishops and priests. Because you are NOT Catholic Bruce. You’re a Gnostic. You are the enemy. We really don’t consider you at all other than as I am doing now, to make an example of you for others to point and laugh at the tarring and feathering and ass-kicking you’re getting here metaphorically speaking.

Secondly, who on Earth would YOU be to judge what is or is not wrong “in the Spirit” whatever that new-age-gnostic phrase is supposed to mean. You silly, cowardly wormtongue, Brucie, go fret for your tuba hat and the Angel Moroni, go on, get out of here, you spiritually empty sack of lies.

And third, Sedevacantism is growing by leaps and bounds. Our Churches are literally bursting at the seams, with often standing room only, and guess what, it’s young people in them. People making children. LOTS of Children Brucie. I know, I know, a lifelong incel like you can’t understand, especially given the faggotry you speak, but believe me Brucie, Sedevacantism is booming.

Because I think it can be known in advance – from multiple experiences in multiple churches – that legal solutions will not have a good effect; that a re-set is impossible (and the attempt undesirable) because it will empower the wrong people and set faithful Catholics at each others throats… 

Again, first, NOTHING can be known in advance, especially not by “people” to use the term loosely, like you.

Secondly there has never been any such thing as “multiple experiences in multiple churches” the way you mean it, because there is no such thing as “multiple churches”. There is ONE Church, Brucie, the ONE, True, Holy, and Apostolic CATHOLIC CHURCH.

It doesn’t matter if YOU believe in it or not. None of us care. It is an unchangeable Catholic dogma that there is no salvation outside of the Catholic Church, so there IS only one Church. The Catholic one. Obviously. And logically. Because unlike what “people” like you want to pretend, Brucie, there is only ONE truth. Can only BE one truth. Either Catholicism is true, in which case we are right, or it is not, in which case Christianity doesn’t exist. And again, it doesn’t matter if you and the rest of the world disagrees. We don’t care. We never have cared in two millennia. Catholicism IS Christianity and the ONLY Christians are Catholics.

Thirdly, there is absolutely nothing to “re-set”. The Catholic Church continues as it always did undisturbed. All that Vatican II did is expose all the fake Catholics, those too lazy to learn the facts, those too lazy to hold the line. And of course, the infiltrating Satanists. It’s fine, we’re fine. As I said, our Churches continue to grow and basic game theory makes it mathematically obvious that by being as we are, either eventually we win, or, it’s the end times and we win anyway too. Besides which, either way, the current goings on are all prophesied, so we really have nothing to worry about.

Lastly, faithful Catholics are never at each other’s throats. Stop making shit up. Catholics call out deceivers, gnostics, satanist, and liars like yourself, because it is the duty of every Catholic to do so, and we will always call your kind and Bergoglio’s and all the fake impostors out. But there is never any issue between faithful Catholics. Because we’re all one family. Of course, those genuinely deceived into thinking the Novus Ordo is the “real” Church are just fooled ignorants at best and very lazy ones in the worst cases, but all it takes is a little study and they will see the truth. And THAT is what you fear Brucie, which is why you keep attacking the Sedevacantists, unlike any other of the fake denominations you carry water for. Including the absurd Mormons with their insane idea that a sex pervert with a tuba hat with a “seer-stone” in it was the only one that could decipher the hidden scrolls from the Angel Moroni, and that those pronouncements created the Book of Mormon. That is who you publicly carry water for the most in fact. You’re such an obvious degenerate, infiltrating, miserable, sad little clown Brucie.

That this negative potential can be known in advance from experience, and legalism eschewed, even despite that (probably) nobody has yet proposed any other clearly promising and practical way of genuinely revitalizing the Roman Catholic Church in the West. 

There is nothing to “revitalise” never has been. The Novus Orco is not Catholic, so you go ahead and “revitalise” it any gay way you want, Brucie. The actual Catholic Church and its practitioners will continue on as we always have and continue to grow our churches and communities and families.

For what little it is worth; I suspect that an answer might be found in the actual practice of Roman Catholicism at its Christian best; rather than in abstract theories about the matter. 

Sedevacantism IS the practice of Catholicism, Brucie. So you have that as a pesky little spanner in your intended works of subversion. Because nothing else IS.

Something to do with the lives of ordinary Catholics (including ‘ordinary’ Saints); rather than the models and hypotheses of canon lawyers, theologians, philosophers, church bureaucrats or the like.  

Look at the wormtongueing. It’s almost impressive. Here Brucie is trying to say that Catholic Canon Lawyers, Catholic Philosophers, Catholic Theologians and validly ordained Catholic Clergy (that’s what he means by bureaucrats) have the wrong model of Catholicism. The arrogance in even trying this trick is stunning. Incidentally exposing Brucie’s narcissistic streak in thinking he can get away with it.

It’s a sleight of hand of course, he’s pretending your average street crier with a megaphone is the equivalent of an actual Catholic priest. Or that your current day “philosopher”, who is unaware after 4 years of University that Logic is indispensable in philosophy, is somehow comparable to, say, Thomas Aquinas. It’s all implied you see, none of it spelt out, typical sophist language. Letting your own mind fill in the false “gaps” he implies without stating.

And ending off with that “humble” appeal to “just ordinary folks” don’t you see? Good old Marxist approach, eh Brucie? I’m starting to wonder if you may have been born in a synagogue, Brucie.

The problem you have Brucie, is that “ordinary Catholics” who are actually Catholic, are all, in the main, kinda like me. Really not susceptible to your lies. Because once you have seen the truth Brucie, you can’t be so easily fooled again. And the lies of your kind are failing more and more regularly and more and more people see you for the masked soul-robber you are.

Maybe the most luminous, rich, and inspiring aspects of the pre-Reformation Catholic ‘world’ – something rather like GK Chesterton’s imaginative pictures of “Merrie England” – could be found to contain clues toward the changes that are needed and would work and could grow; and also (and vital) what aspects ought to be de-emphasized… 

You shameless vermin, someone should really slap your mouth for daring to mention good men like Tolkien or Chesterton in that whore’s hole you speak your nonsense out of. Chesterton and Tolkien were proper Catholics, which is why Tolkien made a point to LOUDLY protest the Novus Ordo fake Mass every single time he went to Church. He would have got on just fine with us other Catholics. i.e. Sedevacantists. Especially since he died in 1973, when the situation had hardly crystallised, since Vatican II ended at the end of 1965, and people were still trying to see if there was anything salvageable. De Laurier’s only published his thesis on Sedeprivationism in 1979, six years after Tolkien had already passed on. And Lefebvre opened his SSPX seminary only in 1970. Both of these in continental Europe, not England. So Brucie is also imagining things that are counter to likelihood by many orders of magnitude. I feel quite certain that had Tolkien been able to transported to today, he would almost without a doubt be a Sedevacantist.

Selected cuttings from that ancient tree of faithful living might be planted to yield new and different fruits, but recognizably derived from the same root stock. 

And again, in the end, he gives himself away as the modernist deceiver he is.

No Brucie, Catholicism is not Protestantism. We don’t do “branches”.

Oh, and Brucie…? Every time you lift your head above the parapet to try and lob dirt on Catholicism, that is, the ONLY Catholicism left, Sedevacantism, I’ll be here.

No related posts.

By G | 22 November 2023 | Posted in Catholicism, Freemasons, Gammas, Impostors and Frauds, Sedevacantism

Apparently the infiltration is everywhere

Those who read here know that the Novus Ordo is nothing but a coven of impostors and pederasts, but a reader sent me the following, at the end of an email:

On another topic, have to tell you that the mascalzoni in the House of Windsor (you mentioned them) are not British but Germans, likely Ashkenazi. 
Even wiki admits: in 1901, a line of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha succeeded the House of Hanover to the British monarchy with the accession of King Edward VII, son of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. In 1917, the name of the British royal house was changed from the German Saxe-Coburg and Gotha to the English Windsor, taking its name from the royal residence in Berkshire.They changed their names because of the anti-German sentiment in England after that war to end all wars. 

I knew about their Germanic genes, of course, but until I found out all the male sons are circumcised by a Rabbi, or at least a few decades ago, I would have probably thought the label of being Ashkenazi was fanciful invention.

Considering the more recent information that the males are indeed snipped by a Rabbi, AND that they are the last surviving royal house in Europe, when all others were wiped out by the machinations of the Satanists (Freemasons, Illuminati, Carbonari, they took different names in different countries to further muddy the waters) certainly does make it look like quite the Cohen-cidence. Not that I have any incontrovertible evidence one way out he other, nor care particularly, as my interest in the entire ruling class is essentially limited to that a carpenter may have had in the late 1700s in, oh, say France.

No related posts.

By G | 22 November 2023 | Posted in Billionaire Pedophiles, Sedevacantism, The Enemy Within, The Jews

Kurganomics

As a result of a post Vox did on the coming economic collapse, here, I asked a question about his opinion on the when it all might get really quite serious:

His response was along my own lines of thought in general terms but pointed out something important:

And that is, we have already crossed the threshold that for me, circa 1995 was the year 2000 or so. At the time, living in South Africa, and having dabbled in trading a tiny bit, and having seen the “soul” of that industry and the people in it, I had concluded that in 5 years tops, the whole house of cards must come tumbling down. I had not accounted for human greed and stupidity of course, so the crash happened 8 years beyond my outer limit expectation. The 2000/2001 rubicon of disbelief had been crossed in my mind because I could not see how the giant global Ponzi scheme could still function. Perhaps I was wrong about it all being a giant Ponzi scheme? Although I could not see how. And I did not really connect the whole 9/11 false flag perpetrated by Mossad agents who liked dancing at the time, with a further artificial propping up of the US dollar global economy (backed by the US military might, of course). It was a little strange that Trillions of dollars were being shipped to Iraq on literal pallets in cargo planes with no oversight, but you know… American things. I figured somehow they had managed to stave the mathematically unavoidable collapse off… sort of. And then 2008 hit and… they covered it up.

Just took a giant pile of your money and bailed out the criminal fraudsters and con men that people call bankers, and made the whole problem go away. And most people still haven’t got a clue how or why the collapse happened. That is obvious, because if they DID understand it, if Joe average literally knew what the 2008 crash was about and how and who made it happen, every single bank on the planet would be torched to the ground, anyone working in the financial industry would be lyinched, as would everyone that works anywhere near anything related to tax collection. As would, of course, the nominal puppets controlled by the bankers that people think are their “elected” government.

I mean, it’s fine for me. I realised this entire planet was total clown world fake at age 26 when I published The Face on Mars and had satisfied myself entirely with the fact that human history had nothing to do with what we are taught in school, is actually astonishing, and antigravity technology has been a thing since 1928 and definitely a very real thing used in flying craft since the end of WWII. So yeah. If you want to understand why everything is absolutely fake and gay, why I never voted in any election for anything except once a year ago, as just a small test to confirm my already foregone conclusions, then you can read that book.

It’s also why I never waste time trying to read texts about economics or anything related to that other than as a glancing note of what lie they are trying to push, just so I get a sense of things in general terms. Because it’s all lies. It’s all, completely fake. You and I break our backs to make enough money to survive and the people who literally create money out of thin air have billions on demand and can fund whatever they want; which for the most part is gay, transexual, “democracy”, global warming, take-everything-from-you-and-you be-happy-technology, GMO everything, including GMO people now, death-inducing “medicine”, genetically altered death mosquitoes, control, surveillance, taxation, and regulation, to death, of everyone else that is not them.

Vox on the other hand I believe majored in economics, and has even more incredibly, written books on the topics. What can I say, there is no accounting for taste in people’s absurdly insane hobbies that look like the mental equivalent of years of being told “there are five lights” to the rest of us.

Perhaps his deeper study is what made him make a statement that is obvious in retrospect: We have already past the point of what anyone thought was possible. The entire covid scam proved there was in essence infinite fake money if you just played along with the lies. And while the money is fake it is not exactly infinite or free. The doubling cost of food and other things in the last year and a half or so is the mathematical inevitability of what will follow. And at this point, I was asked to expound on the topic.

And I was asked by possibly a Chinese Spy, regarding my ideas of the economic collapse of the (mostly) West. While I do not welcome our Chinese overlords and hope for the eventual freedom of my people to rebuild the ancient and honourable Most Serene Republic of Venice, I also harbour them no ill will. After all, my ancestral countryman Marco was the first to open up the old Silk Road, and I am on official record, on TV too, from China, to say that my and my partner’s firm intended to reopen that route. Whether that will ever be achieved or not, given the current political realities, is arguable, but I for one would not have a problem with it; as long as China stays Chinese, and La Serenissima stays Venetian.

So here is my take on the coming economic meltdown.

Timeline: I would say within 5 years, but Argentina’s sudden capitulation to globohomo over the last few days might stretch that to say… 10 years? depending on who else the (((USA))) manages to force into subservient slaves. That said, some other factor (and there are many, many, many of them, many unknown to you and me) might make it all collapse tomorrow. Or at least do so for where you specifically live. Italy might become the next Greece or 1990 Argentina overnight. Or maybe France. The UK is more steadily sliding into full-blown mandatory homosexuality, so a more “gentle” economic ride there, but perhaps worse than anywhere else mind-wise.

A Hard Crash: A Hard crash would be that your money in the bank turns to absolute vapour could dust overnight, 90% of people can’t afford food, never mind other things and you get… (drum roll please)… VENEZUELA!

Thank you, thank you, you’re welcome. And depending on where you are in the world, your particular Venezuela may in fact include roaming military death squads, looting gangs, wild civil unrest put down brutally by the armed forces, a military coup with large (or apparent/manufactured) popular support, CIA/Israel funded “regime change”, uncontrolled immigration and skyrocketing violent crime of all kinds.

This kind of crash tends to be limited more or less to certain specific countries or regions and would probably still be a relatively “soft” hard crash compared to one in say Africa, or even South America. Think of tens or even hundreds of thousands of people having their arms cut off by machetes like in Rwanda. Not as likely to happen in say Rome. Well, ok, maybe Milan, which is a bit further North and so not quite as African. Ok, fine, some mountain villages in the Veneto. But you get what I mean.

Paradoxically, I think the UK with their unarmed police, and ban on guns and so on, are going to have a far more violent rude awakening than most continental European countries when such a potential fast/hard crash happens. Most of continental Europe outside of the large cities still has a sort of rural, grow my tomatoes in the garden mentality. And while it is nowhere near enough to stave off famine and so on, they are, overall, statistically, better placed to survive actual famines. Plus, in places like Italy, you have about 2 million registered and legal and law-abiding armed citizens, but about 8 million guns that are known to be around and unregistered and illegal. So, kicking doors in gestapo style of random citizens, in not quite as law-abiding places as the UK, is going to result in more dead jackboot wearers, meaning overall their operations would probably be more brutal but in less areas and in more concentrated and specific instances. The cowed Brits on the other hand, will walk to their metaphorical (or actual) cattle wagons in silent acquiescence. And their trains run on time, too.

In some ways, a hard crash can be preferable. The puppets of government change rapidly sometimes in such cases, and there might even be the occasion of some partially principled military guy taking over by force and running things in a way that makes the earlier graft, theft, robbery and murder, look like a simple and mostly bloodless gas station stick-up.

Remember kids, a benign dictatorship remains the best form of government. and Democracy is not the worst form of government only because a malign dictatorship beats it.

The “soft” crash: This is what I think will actually happen for most of Europe, or at least, that is the “plan”. It can always go off the rails. I also think it applies to various parts of the US but I am not knowledgeable enough to be precise on where, but in essence democrat run large cities and those states that are governed by such creatures. So California as a visual certainty, but perhaps also places like Florida and Texas along with New York for most people. And possibly Washington D.C. unless you are one of the political class, but even then you’d be living behind barbed wire fences probably.

So the soft crash is just an escalation of what’s already happening now. Higher cost of everything, no increase in wages or buying power. The average person is hardly making ends meet in terms of paying rent and feeding themselves and their families, while getting more and more forced into basically accepting all sorts of restrictions in order to not incur even further hardship. The ultimate end of it being your subservience to a Universal Basic Income, tied to your digital cash, with all that implies:

  • Total control of your finances
  • Total regulation of what you may or may not buy
  • The eventual reclamation of anything you own by the “state” meaning the bankers that run it
  • Inability to work in what has been the traditional manner until now (you can’t get the BUI if you do, or you are limited in what you MUST do to receive the BUI and so on)
  • Regulation and limitation of everything from travel, to what food you can purchase, to how often, to how many clothes you can buy, to whom you can or must or cannot or must not associate with in order to keep your UBI and so on.

As people get more and more uncomfortable, the occasional flare-up here or there will happen and be BRUTALLY repressed.

There is a way out and around all of this but historically it has not often happened. Perhaps, one hopes, it MIGHT, this time.

I will post below a link to an archived post that proves categorically how this has ALREADY happened, but you don’t know it, of all places, in CANADA. Yes, I know, I know, but bear with me, and read the story at the link. And for those of you literally too lazy to click on the link and read it (please do, honestly it explains so much) the answer is to make friends in real life, use social media only to meet and organise those things you can’t to face to face and building community in your immediate, walking distance vicinity, then link up to other similar communities as you can, and establish networks of people that think like you.

Here is the link about why something you are not aware of is presented as a LOSS while in reality it was a MASSIVE WIN.

Short of people doing that, you will be squeezed, impoverished, regulated, fined, isolated and ultimately conquered. And worse, so will your children. the brainwashing will proceed full force with penalties for those who don’t comply. Anyone succeeding in creating alternate realities will be cancelled, silenced, not talked about and those who try to resist in any appreciable manner will be made a spectacle of and plastered all over the news.

But what you must realise is that IT’S ALL FAKE.

No government can force a million or two of their own people who are organised, willing to stand together and stand their ground. to do what the government without the use of overwhelming force. And by overwhelming force I don’t mean police charges with batons. That will eventually only get police stations burnt to the ground and cops killed. I mean flying fighter-bomber jets over them and carpet-bombing them. And even then, if that million or two is willing to fight, they will, in due course, win.

You don’t believe me? here are a few examples just from recent years:

Ukraine: Donetsk and Lugansk – Bombarded with artillery and fired upon by active military for 8 years until Russia intervened.

Afghanistan: Kicked the ass of the entire US military with sheepherders willing to do whatever required to never stop fighting back.

Vietnam: Ditto, but they were rice farmers and had some support from commies, weapon wise.

In various other ways, Ethiopia / Sudan are hellholes, but are certainly NOT controlled by the US military that has played in those areas.

If the stance is mostly peaceful as with the Truckers in Canada, or the Netherlands, the bloodied will be minimal, but as with all human problems, if push comes to shove, violence will eventually be the final arbiter of which side comes out on top. Because anyone who thinks that “elections” are in any way related to who controls your government, clearly also still believes in the tooth fairy leaving money under their pillow for teeth and Santa Claus coming down the chimney on Christmas Eve.

And, you know, generally speaking, pedophiles, narcissists, egomaniacs, power-hungry, greedy, molluscs of the types that actively want to be politicians are not in the habit of just handing over the reigns of power and quietly going to the dungeon they belong in, or in many cases, the hangman’s noose. So what will eventually happen is that either, they manage to get everyone to climb aboard the cattle carts and go to the concentration camps hoping that they are not too bad, on the basis of a tiny minority telling them they have no option and having another tiny group of enforcers do their bidding, OR, eventually normies will get pissed off enough to pick up pitchforks and torches and will literally drag the politicians out of their ivory towers and make them into wet piñatas.

Before it come to that however, a LOT of hardship will be tolerated by the vast majority, in fact they may well end up all going to the camps (or whatever the metaphorical alternative will be). Because the majority is ALWAYS sheep. But in such times, random leaders can from time to time pop up and change the course of history in very unexpected ways. And if they get any actual traction, they will also have massive popular followings.

The issue with the traction is that social media and so on is absolutely controlled so not a real avenue. Hence why such people will do better in face-to-face community building. 100 men in real life with one purpose are worth much more than one million men online changing their profile picture.

So that’s how I see it.

Hence, The Kurganate.

No related posts.

By G | 22 November 2023 | Posted in Face on Mars, Farming Life, Increasing Happiness

Blackpilling Gnostics – Bruce Charlton Edition. Again.

Blackpilling deceivers, gnostics, and sophists need to be ignored. At least until we can change the laws back to outlawing them, ostracising them from civilised society, and in the worst cases make their nightmares come true by burning them at the stake.

My friend Adam posted a very nice, polite, well-reasoned missive for the indefatigable Ann Bernhardt, basically asking her a slightly different take on the question I have been asking her for years now.

My version: Ann, show me where in Canon Law it states there is a limit of duration to an interregnum.

Adam’s take: Ann, ALL of these “Cardinals” are demonstrable demon worshippers. And when Bergoglio kicks the bucket THEY will be “electing” the next “Pope”. Can you see why I am using inverted commas and why we 1958 Sedevacantists are correct and not you, laughably wrong 2023 sedevacantist?

But Ann will not respond to either of us, I am certain.

I know, I know, to you non-Catholics, and therefore non-Christians, this all sounds like the Baptist joke about the guy who’s gonna jump from a bridge.

But that’s only because you’re an ignorant heathen, a pretend-Christian of some rebellious Protestant denomination, or you simply never got round to reading the Patristic fathers, the history of Christianity, or the Bible. Take your pick, it doesn’t matter, because the point of this post is simply to show in the clear light of day, what a sophist, deceiver, and mollusc Bruce Charlton is, and why anyone sane will ignore pretty much anything he has to say.

I first came across Bruce because of an admittedly brilliant little pamphlet he wrote (free on the internet) called Addicted to Distraction. It really is good and you don’t need to be in any way religious to enjoy it.

That said, pretty much everything else after that has been a steaming pile of Gnosticism, spiritual deviancy, and sophistry.

For reasons only known to himself, (or perhaps the demons riding him) Bruce decided that the best thing he could do to Adam’s post was discourage anyone from being a proper Catholic. i.e. a Sedevacantist.

Interesting; since Bruce has professed for some time that he feels the closest thing he is Christianity-wise, is to a Mormon.

I thought he’d misspelt Moron (as I think Mormons have too) but he repeated it quite a lot a while back. Now, far be it from me to criticise anyone who believes Joseph Smith wasn’t a complete sex perverted charlatan who made the whole idiotic thing up, including there being golden sheets of words written by an Angel called Moroni (there’s a hint here, honest!) that he put inside a box and that only he, and he alone, could read, and then only with a seer stone inside his tuba hat, but no one else was allowed to see the sheets and the “translated” Angelic words were noted down by a scribe on the other side of a screen from Smith who “read them” using his special tuba hat. And that was how the Book of Mormon, and his fucking everyone’s wife, and the entire Moronic/Mormonic religion came about.

If you think I am having a fever-dream-hallucination, you are wrong, that insanity is literally how Mormonism came about. Yes. I know, it makes the Scientologists with their Xemu seem a LOT more plausible.

But yeah, when THAT guy starts telling people to NOT be proper Catholics… well… light him up is what I’m gonna do, so here it is. And here is Bruce’s first Gnostic comment.

bruce g charlton 1 day ago

@Adam – One difficulty of going back to Vatican II is logistical, given the importance given to a valid apostolic succession. Because most of what has happened in the RC church all over the world over the past half-century would be utterly invalidated.

Indeed, so large and complex is this problem, that it seems (obviously!) utterly impossible to unpick the valid from the invalid – and spiritually almost lethal even to try.

In other words, I am sure that a strict and logical legalism – even if completely honest and rigorously applied – cannot extricate the RCC from the mess that it now inhabits. Therefore, that legalistic approach to the problem is doomed to fail, and therefore should not be embarked-upon.

But that does Not mean the task is impossible, merely that a legalistic approach cannot accomplish the task.

I am sure that insofar as Roman Catholics are motivated to live in accordance with God’s will; then ways will be found in practice to “short circuit” these problems – and these ways will be clear and simple, and known in their hearts to be valid, by those Roman Catholics of genuine good will.

Thus will a part of the Roman Catholic survive and thrive – to the benefit of all.

But the strictly legalistic approach would (will) need to be let-go at some point; or else it will block what is necessary and good.

I wasn’t the first one to get a shot back at him…

 Reply to  bruce g charlton 1 day ago

That’s not the way this works. All that happened over the last several decades is in fact invalid and it can and must be recognized as such. Catholicism is not Romantic Christianity.

But I think mine was more balanced, fair and complete:

 Reply to  bruce g charlton 1 day ago

Bruce, you whiny, gnostic, coward.
Crawl back under the retarded rock of Moroni you climbed out from under.
You literally stated that the absurd cult of Mormonism is the closest you come to Christianity, and here you are, once again, trying to dissuade anyone from even thinking about sedevacantism; aka actual Catholicism, which is thriving and expanding daily and makes perfect sense since what happened with V2 is really simple enough an honest ten year old can understand it. But not deceivers like you. Just like you ran away from the truth I forced your nose into at my blog (you deleted my replies on yours) run along now, sede blogs are not places for spineless Brits like you.

If you think that didn’t explain too much, you’re right, but that’s because me and Bruce have had this out before, so if you need more information, you might start here for generics on Sedevacantism, or buy one of my books Believe! (short) or Reclaiming the Catholic Church (long).

If instead you want to read up on Bruce and me, knock yourself out, here. I started to call him out over a year ago.

Bruce ignored my comment, of course, but felt the need to keep making random sophistry up. Which is such bullshit I just need to break it up and comment on it.

Problems don’t go away just because they are unacknowledged; and the worst real problems are those due to unacknowledged metaphysical assumptions.

No, Bruce, the worst problem is intentional, lying deceivers like you trying to lead souls to Hell by lying to them.

One such is that the bottom line essence of Roman Catholicism is legalistic in nature – i.e. that the legal aspects trump all other considerations.

No Bruce. The Bottom Line of Catholicism is that it is the TRUTH. And the Truth cannot be lied about, changed, made different or perverted. Legalism, as YOU use it is simply subterfuge, lies, and twisting the truth. What the Church does is not “legalism” Bruce, it’s defending the factual, inerrant, infallible, eternal TRUTH. Yes, your very Nemesis, the thing that sends you scurrying like a cockroach for shadows and sophistry. You would not know this, being what you are, but you see Bruce, honest men will NEVER flex or bend or break before creatures of shadow like you. Nope. We will look at the truth and point it out, and call you out for the deceiving liar you are.

Until That is recognized as an assumption, and that assumption compared with other possible assumptions, then discussion cannot proceed beyond primary school playground verbal scraps (yawn…).

Yawn away you little runt. There is nothing assumed in Catholicism. It is reasoned, thought out, proven, checked against scripture and tradition and divine dogma, and reality. And because Jesus instituted the Church on Earth, and he is not a liar, the Church too, despite being filled with flawed men, remains infallible in its Magisterial teachings. Yes, even after there has been no valid Pope since 1958. Because Jesus promised he would be with us until the end times, and so it is. Real Priests and real Bishops continue to exist. Just nowhere in the Vatican. None within the Novus Ordo Satanic impostor religion pretending to be Catholicism. But as it always did, the Church continues to exist.

If discussion gets trapped by unexamined legalistic assumptions that contain necessarilydestructive consequences, then it will be Roman Catholicism that suffers.

There is no legalistic assumption, only undeniable fact and reality. There is nothing destructive in Catholicism. And in case you are wondering, yes, burning heretics at the stake is salutary and civilisational, as history has proven time and again, not destructive. Not even for the heretic, since contemplating his own burning flesh gives him time to ponder his errors and possibly repent, thus entering Purgatory and eventually Salvation too.

This is why fifth columnists within all churches have so often hidden their real (and anti-Christian – often personal, or ideological) agendas behind a façade of strict legalism. Such agents destroy and personally profit (or simply enjoy the process of destruction), while pretending to protect.

Nope. You’re now trying to conflate sophists and liars like yourself with being strict. The truth IS strict, Bruce. Reality IS strict. That’s just how it is. And so, liars like you are called out for the liars they are.

And the same can happen unconsciously, delusionally, or from a desire for “certainty” – in order, to “settle the question” once and for all. Many motives are possible.

Look at all the nonsense you’re throwing at Sedes, hoping something will stick. Amazing. Well, I know you’re not doing this “unconsciously” Bruce, it’s very intentional and conscious on your part. Nor is it delusional. Underhanded, subversive, deceitful, false, and cowardly, yes, it’s all of those, but not delusional. Well, except if you think your ploy will work on actual Catholics, then yes, you would be delusional. But that’s not your target, is it Bruce, no, like all the gatekeeping Satanists, your target is the newly interested neophyte. You aim to prevent anyone from even looking at sedevacantism. Because you know if they do they will see the perfect reasoning of it and become proper, actual, Christians. And that would leave you out in the cold. Well… for. bit, you’ll get to a real warm place in due course.

The point is that In These Times we can be sure that (later if not sooner) our fundamental assumptions will be exposed, and tested to breaking point. The question is: what then breaks?

You. Bruce. You break. And all those like you. You know what doesn’t break? Catholicism. Or Catholics. At most we die. And either as martyrs (the best of us) or as warriors, taking as many of you scum as possible down with us, except your ride will be a lot lower down and more permanent than ours.

It was good to see I was not the only one that recognised Bruce for what he is. CT had some pertinent thoughts on the matter.

C T Reply to  bruce g charlton 15 hours ago

What a steaming heap of bafflegarble. When the new Inquisition is put into place, you are not going to make it.

As is known now, the Secret King Bruce had to continue to try to have the last word

bruce g charlton Reply to  bruce g charlton 9 hours ago

I should add that I regard the basic “sede” stance – i.e. that the RCC was poisoned by Vatican II – as obviously correct.

Here he uses one of the tried and tested methods of the deceiver: “Oh but I agree with you, see? Now come walk with me down this yellow-bricked road…”

But I suggest that this position can and should be reached without recourse to legalism, and the solutions to Vatican II should not be legalistic either.

Transaltion: But I suggest that this position can and should be reached without recourse to TRUTH, and the solutions to Vatican II should not be TRUE either.

I would have thought it obvious that the Holy Ghost can and will (as I said) “short circuit” the impossibly complex legal problems to provide direct answers that can be agreed by all Catholics of good (i.e. genuinely Christian) motivation.

See? You are a “good” Catholic, if you listen to old uncle Bruce here who has genuine “Christian” motivation. And we’ll skip right over the simple fact that Catholicism IS Christianity. That the ONLY Christianity that has ever existed IS Catholicism, and all else is heresy, nonsense, lies and deceit.

What a serpentine mollusc you are Bruce, you might as well write, All men of good brotherhood can agree that good brotherhood and equality and liberty is the true “catholicism”. You freemason brothers would be proud.

But this can only happen if other factor/s than legalism are regarded as primary and foundational to the Catholic faith. Legalism (aka Pharisees-ism) – if adopted – will empower the wrong people by focusing on the letter, will utterly fail to solve the real problems – and will prove utterly destructive of the Christian spirit (as it always has done and will continue to do). If any church survives, it will be an empty shell.

Translation: But this can only happen if other factor/s than TRUTH are regarded as primary and foundational to the Catholic faith.

See Bruce, you have a bit of a hurdle here, in the sense that K2 or Mount Olympos is a “bit of a hill”. Catholicism has always stayed very clearly that it is the ONLY, ONE, TRUE, HOLY, APOSTOLIC, RELIGION. You really can’t get away from that. Now, you can agree or not. Don’t agree, then you’re not Catholic. Buh-Bye. Off you go, piss off and don’t bother us again. No Catholic cares about your opinions of Catholicism, you are not one of us, you don’t count. End of. Or you agree, in which case, you can’t water down the truth Bruce. You can’t twist it. You can’t change it. You can’t ignore it. Which is what you are advocating for. Precisely what you’d like Catholics to do is completely anathema to us. Oh, does it hurt you feel that we plainly say, we are right and yes, all of you who are not with us are wrong? Hmmm…I wonder who else said if you are not with me you’r against me. Anyone? Anyone? Guy in Galilee? Answered to the name of Jesus? Ever heard of Him, Bruce? Guess what, we Catholics ARE with him. People like you, I’m fairly sure He’s gonna say “I never knew you.” Go look it up. You might as well read that Bible one day eh?

CT too also fired back. More gentlemanly than I, as is often the case. But then I am not going for polite. I want to obliterate any shred of credibility these charlatanic gnostic deceivers have, forever. So Orbital Nukes is more my speed.

C T Reply to  bruce g charlton 3 hours ago

You often make these weird mistakes — e.g. “pharisees-ism” — that make me wonder sometimes what language you actually speak.

No, God won’t “short-circuit” His own law. That’s a stupidity that only a maleducated, non-Christian midwit could envisage. The plain truth is that outside of the Church there is no salvation, therefore all who wish to be saved must be brought into It, legally and publicly because there is no other way. Baptisms and other sacraments must be performed properly, evil must be publicly renounced, penance must be visibly performed before the apostates can be accepted as Catholic.

You are not even a member of the Church. You are so far from being a well trained and educated cleric that you can only aspire to be a layman. You have no say, are entitled to no opinion, can offer no relevant advice on the matter.

Quite. And on that note, we once more, turn the page on the non-Christian, liar, deceiver and intentional sophist Bruce Charlton.

No related posts.

By G | 20 November 2023 | Posted in Believe, Freemasons, Gammas, Impostors and Frauds, Reclaiming the Catholic Church, Sedevacantism

Kurgan Woodchipper Time!

Behold, ladies and gentlemen, yet another volunteer, sacrificing himself on the altar of the gods of retards, at the pious hands of your dutiful servant, my humble self.

Let us begin the mental flaying of this latest of LARPing retards.

First off, Moron of Simba, I don’t actually read Z blog. I have read it perhaps a handful of times in 10 years and certainly not in the last several months for sure, so I am not sure what made you think that. But then, as some famous Romans probably said before crushing some now extinct species of troglodytes: There is no accounting for retards.

That’s a literary joke for those who know some latin. Never mind, just hear the WOOSH sound and move on Moron.

Secondly, I have zero narcissistic personality traits. If you could actually read and if you did, you would have discovered that long ago, since I have explained my specific type of neurology in some detail. In any case, everyone that knows me personally can also attest that I have zero narcissistic personality traits. You, of course, being the usual retard, couldn’t tell the difference between a chicken and a donkey anyway, so it’s pointless to try to explain anything to you, nor, provide you with factual evidence. We know this without shadow of a doubt because you claim to be a someone who worships a “god” who sucks semen out of other men’s penises, including those of dead men. I didn’t claim this, you have:

Now, we know for a fact, that no one, literally no one, including retards like you, would get martyred in the name of the mythical cocksucker Odin. So, yes, you are a LARPer. To every single effect.

You are stupid, ignorant, obviously have massive latent homosexual tendencies or might be a raging homo yourself, given who you worship —or pretend to worship to be more accurate— and without doubt you are also a liar. We know this because you say you “don’t mind” about any of the false things you accuse me of doing, and yet, you felt the need to write this comment to show me how much you don’t mind.

Moving on…

You also conflate confidence with narcissism, once again, demonstrating your sub-par IQ and poor language as well as reasoning skills all-round. And ascribe my confidence to my success with women. Another tragic error. While learning about women, being a skill like anything else, certainly made my confidence in being able to attract women I was interested in grow —again, as with any other skill, if you practice it you get better at it— my personal generic level of confidence did not arise from this, but was there long before that and was developed in pretty early childhood; insofar as it can be developed beyond being an innate quality that is probably genetic on some level.

And the cherry on the top being your accusation that Catholicism is a) MY brand of anything, which is clearly absurd unless you think I am Jesus, in which case, your mental problems are even more severe than even I can imagine, b) “random”, given it’s literally the very root, beginning, middle and eventually end (at least insofar as the End Times are the “end” of anything) of Christianity. Catholicism IS Christianity. Now, if I were a Protestant, you might be able to accuse me of having rolled dice (lots of them!) or, more realistically using a large random number generator to pick a brand of fake Christianity, but you’re really shit out of luck on this one. Especially if you could read. At all.

So, yes, overall, you have succeeded in demonstrating (as usual) that:

  • “Pagans” are fake, gay retards
  • Actual “viking type” Pagans have gone the way of the dodo, except about a thousand years ago. Know why, retard? Because they ALL converted to Catholicism and then went on to become Crusaders, you stupid, stupid, ignorant, illiterate, ahistorical LARPer.
  • You can’t read. And never have picked up a book beyond probably Harry Potter, who you thought was ok but only a Wicca, not a real Shaman.
  • My detractors are by and large idiots like yourself who need to wear sandals because shoelaces prove impossible for them to figure out.

Thanks for playing. Buh-bye now.

*Shoves drooling idiot into mass grave of spammed morons*

No related posts.

By G | 20 November 2023 | Posted in Catholicism, Humour, Social Commentary, Zombie Apocalypse

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks