Archive for October 2023

On the Role of Women

As mentioned en passant on a previous post on the infiltrators, a lot of so-called “red-pilled” or MRA (Men’s Rights Activists), or PUA or MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way [incels for short]), or general inches and embittered “men”, make the mistake of assuming I am “one of them” or at least “nominally” on their side.

And ALL the embittered, acidic feminists, as well as the generally brainwashed females of planet Earth assume I am just a misogynist, EEEEBIL (yes with a B, because they are retards after all) woman-hater, patriarchal, oppressor of women everywhere.

And of course, before we delve into this topic at all, let us say a prayer of thanks to the Saintly Professor Cipolla and his first Law of Human Stupidity:

1. Always and inevitably, each of us underestimates the number of stupid individuals in the world

That there are stupid people in the world is well known. But Cipolla was convinced that we underestimated their number and influence in our lives and in society. He stated that “any numerical estimate would prove to be an underestimate”.

It’s enough thinking, for example, of those people we classified as intelligent but who suddenly begin to behave in a foolish and obtuse manner. Or it’s enough going out to the street to see how many people insist on hindering us, for no apparent reason other than stupidity.

Ave professor, Ave.

Armed with his fundamental concept, let us then proceed to discuss in a little more detail my actual take on women.

Very simply put, it is simply Catholic. As we give respect and reverence to Holy Mary, mother of our Lord and Saviour, without any shame or discomfort as experienced by Protestants, who seem to think to do so is somehow “worship” or “unmanly”, so Mary reflects the natural positive aspects of womanhood in general.

The demonic secularisation of Christianity, also known primarily as Protestantism, has caused incalculable damage to humanity over the last 500 years, culminating (and not yet at the apex) in today’s absolutely insane ideology of madness, where even something as absolutely obvious as the sex of a man or woman is “questioned” by the freaks trying to groom children into their disgusting sexual deviancy.

Since time immemorial, however, every sane and normal human being, yes, even the stupid ones, was perfectly aware that men and women are different on every level. Not just physiologically, but also and inevitably psychologically, because after all, form does follow function and mentality follows both form and function. Their different bodies mean also different ways of being, thinking and experiencing reality. The physical structures of a woman’s brain are also physically different from those of a man, and obviously, this too influences their thinking process.

In broad terms (and it bores me to death to have to explain BASIC statistics to retards, so do catch up if you don’t understand what that three word sentence means) we can say that women:

  • Are less Logical
  • Are more prone to being emotional
  • Respond more to Rhetoric than Dialectic
  • Have shifting hormonal patterns that greatly influence their moods
  • Are more nurturing and less combative
  • Tend to nag and complain instead of resolving issues (because it irritates the men into doing whatever it is… eventually)
  • Tend to want to be “listened to” more than “fixing” the issue
  • Are more verbal than men
  • Are absolutely more solipsistic than men
  • Have a completely different concept of things like Honour, Courage, Friendship, Loyalty, and so on than men do

These are simply observable facts. It really doesn’t matter if you agree or not, if you like it or not, if you understand it or not. the Universe, (and me) really don’t care if you can’t grasp the basic reality placed in front of your nose.

But does the above mean I see women as “useless” or less worthy of men, or that they are somehow inferior?

The ultimate answer is simply: No.

Are women less able than men? Sure, in a BUNCH of things. Pretty much anything requiring physical strength, iron-clad logic (especially under duress) or non-solipsistic abstract thought, they are at a massive disadvantage.

BUT.

And it’s an important but, a feminine woman makes life worth living for a man. Her loving tenderness, her animalistic instinct (acted on in the positive) will produce a sensation of care, love and attention to detail that a man simply would not even think of, but is absolutely able to appreciate and enjoy. The devotion of a woman in love with a man can be insane to the point of self-immolation in a way that goes beyond the rational and conscious self-sacrifice that a man may (and should for the right woman) have towards his woman. They are able to suffer day-to-day grinds that are as detrimental to a man as attempting to be a coal miner would be to a woman. A perfect example I recall that explain this is the one of a Southern Belle recounting the time her husband went to do a shopping trip in a supermarket for the first time. And consider these two had been married a long time and have grandchildren. She said when her husband came home with the shopping, he dropped the bags off then immediately went to his wife and thanked her profusely and hugged and her and told her how much he appreciates and loves her for doing all the shopping for all the years they were together. I laughed when she told the story, and she was of good humour telling it. And it absolutely represents the natural instincts of a man and a woman. A woman actually (probably? Almost?) enjoys going shopping. Especially if not rushed and able to buy what she wants without worrying too much about budgeting (but, conversely, they are also good at budgeting if they are provided parameters). While a man is just as likely to prefer being in a trench in a bloody war than traipse at funeral speed through endless shelves of despair and soul-crushing routine.

Her caring and listening to every little issue her little children tell her about is a necessary and important part of their feeling loved and cared for. Of course, a father too should never ignore his children, but let’s say that my enthusiasm for their showing me their scribbles “art” wanes somewhat at the 14th example. On the other hand, when it will be time to teach them to drive, or handle a firearm, or discuss the Illiad, or the principles of astronomy, or how a star works, and so on, they will find it difficult to have a more enthusiastic teacher than their father. And this balance, this being present in both the day-to-day minutiae, as well as the life-defining aspects, balanced between both father and mother is pivotal in having healthy childhood. It is indispensable. And yes, it is true that statistically, single mothers turn out far worse prospects for their children than single fathers, because an objective understanding of the Universe is gained primarily from the father, and not having a good grasp of that invariably leads you to bad choices in life. But the absence of motherly love can also result in an austere, somewhat desertic, self-evaluation that is not healthy, especially if that man or woman in turn goes on to become a parent.

Just like I do not think less of a man that has no warrior instinct, because he has the soul of a painter, of maybe of a farmer, I do not think less of women for their different skills and abilities. I cannot give birth to a child, nor would I ever want to, and I am infinitely grateful that women can and do this.

In short, when it comes to dealing with the world, it is just, proper and normal that the man leads in this. And leads absolutely in extreme situations. The reason is obvious: A man (if he is worthy of the name) is more objective, is more logical, is instinctively designed to put his family first and himself last in situations of extreme danger or even death. And in general, being non-solipsistic is better able to plan ahead and for the future of his family, children and wife, without being as easily swayed by temporary set-backs, difficulty or hardship.

And it is also just and proper that, generally speaking, if a woman wants a specific set of plates or layout of a room, (as long as certain basic practicalities are not ignored) or detail of their home life to be just so, that she should feel free to have it her way. The exception, of course, is any specifically male space the man has in the house, and/or, the in any way messing with his tools/weapons/workshop/study/books.

Similarly, a child is far more appreciative of the general attentiveness his mother gives to things like the clothes they wear, the school lunches she prepares for them, and so on. While a man’s general attitude is more akin to: Is it snowing? Here is a huge weatherproof jacket, boots and gloves and a hat. So what if it’s bright yellow, the boots are pink and the hat green with a pom-pom? Packed lunch? What, you can’t catch something and cook it over an open flame? What do they even teach you at kindergarten anyway?

The balance between a man and a woman is delicate, but not so delicate as you may think. It is increasingly difficult in the modern era mostly because of the degrees of lies that women have had inculcated in their heads (it’s easier to fool a woman with nonsense aimed at her solipsistic nature inspiring a victim complex, since it uses her own biological weaknesses against her). And of course, men have been lied to as well, using the same “chink in their armour” of “well, just man up”, which in a way is true, however, actually manning up, would probably look more like an armed rebellion that hangs all politicians from the nearest lampposts, rather than a peaceful demonstration about men’s rights that achieves precisely nothing. Instead they try and convince men to just shut up and take whatever new emasculating, humiliation ritual they come up with while convincing women that they are poor, oppressed victims of sexist men.

It’s all lie. Men’s natural instinct is to protect and take care of women’s primary needs. And women’s natural instinct is to nurture, feed and take care of her man’s secondary needs of comfort, peace and tenderness.

A very feminine woman and a very masculine man will feel a natural attraction to one another, but if you think the modern world is in any way conducive to their finding peaceful bliss right off the bat, you’re dreaming. The path to that has to be consciously chosen by both. Held to firmly by the man and eventually understood and appreciated by the woman too. In fact, the natural dynamic between the manly man and the womanly woman, was always a spark-filled dynamic since ancient times. The stories could as easily result in tragedy as in heroic bliss. Perhaps more often tragic in fact, if the ancient poems and legends are to be believed. Even so, the risk, for those men willing to take it, always seems worthwhile to them, it’s just that in modern times, the “crazy” of the feminine woman has risen exponentially and has far more paths to lead down nefarious ends. Which means the man must have all the more resolve, calm and steadiness in all things. A man’s strength lies in his willingness and ability to simply walk away if a when a woman is unwilling to listen to reason. Not as a ploy, not in anger, not as some kind of “game” theory. But simply, as just the truth of life. Hard as it may be; painful as it may be; if and when you have determined what is the ultimate truth of a situation, you are best served by taking the objective course of action that follows from it. Because in the end, that is the path you will be most able to live with in your own dark moments. The Ancients Greeks at Delphi said:

“Man, know thyself.” And they were right. I would add, “And act accordingly.”

In the end, if a man is simply coherent, consistent and true to himself, I guarantee a woman that fits with him exists in the world, and his chances of getting with her and eventually finding a lasting happiness with her are far better than if he simply tries to modify himself to try to fit with what he perceives is “expected” of him.

Fuck what the “world” wants. Let the world worry about how to fit to truth, justice and beauty instead, while you hold to those things and navigate life by them.

Remember, as Catholicism clearly states, we live in the world, but do not be of it. As a man, it is your duty to live, aspire to, and inspire in others, the virtues of life. Truth, Justice, Honour, Courage, Beauty.

Hold that line, friend.

Hold that line as surely and as absolutely as your Spartan ancestors held theirs, at Thermopylae. And let your stance reflect, and reverberate, and shape history, and inspire men for thousands of years to come, no matter what the specific fate of your individual life might be.

Stop Noticing!

You racist, bigot, antisemite, homophobe! Just stop noticing reality!

Recognising Infiltrators

I have been ranting about freemasons and their tactic of playing both sides of the coin for quite some time.

In my Reclaiming The Catholic Church, I specifically identified 11 things that deceivers do to try and confuse, gaslight, deceive and distort the truth. Even if you don’t care about Christianity, that section alone is worth looking at, as the lesson of how to spot deceivers is one that is useful in all aspects of life.

On this blog, I regularly dump into the spam filter, the type of deceivers as well as idiotic commenters that don’t bother to follow some really basic and simple, common sense. I even wrote a little post to make it clear that commenters need to follow a basic premise or two. There are no warnings on my blog. If you are the kind of deceiver, or complete moron, that discussing anything with is a waste of time, then I simply dump your comment (and all future ones automatically) into spam.

Sometimes though, it is useful to keep one of these comments on here just as a teaching moment.

Most people assume I am just a heartless, too harsh, fascist of some sort. But it is not so. I just have a LOT of experience with intentional liars and deceivers. So, here is a good example.

This was a comment supposedly “asking for clarification” but really just trying to undermine the entire process of reading body language, as per my post here. Go see that one first if you have not already, then take a look at the comment below:

Let us now look at the multiple and underhanded ways this deceiver is attempting to subvert the truth in all its glory.

Firstly, consider that classically only about 7% of our communication is verbal. So by pretending that reading body language is some kind of superstitious magic, is basically the equivalent of ignoring over 90% of our communicative ability. But that’s the implication. “Oh if you believe in this witch magic you, obviously a fool.” Uh-huh. And yet, any trained investigator and interrogator knows body language is a very reliable indicator of truthfulness and insight into the psychology of the subject being interrogate.

Secondly, in the vain attempt at “aligning” with this idiot’s perception of my “masculinity” he tries to imply that Bombard’s analysis is simply feminine snark. This is a multi-level failure of triple proportion, since:

A) I am pro women being feminine and Bombard is a lady.

B) Her humorous takes on other videos are almost entirely absent in this take. Where, exactly, is the supposed “snark”? But this tells us also that the commenter is familiar with other videos of Bombard’s. This is not his first video of hers he has watched. Or the second or third. This commenter is familiar with Bombard’s style. Meaning he has spent some time watching her work. And why would he do that if it’s all just superstitious nonsense? And why would he be trying to link her work to “snark” and “femininity”? I’ll tell you why. Because Bombard is very good at her work and tells the truth as she sees it, which is generally in alignment with the actual truth and not the Clown World Narrative. So he tries to make it sound as if she’s just some bitchy female, while…

C) …hoping to appeal to what he erroneously assumes is my “red pill misogyny”. He gets it spectacularly wrong. Bombard is far from bitchy. She makes pertinent fun of evil, deceitful scum on a regular basis. And yes she does it in a feminine way, which makes it quite entertaining. But with regard to this triple failure, I am not your retarded, PUA-influenced, “red pilled”, incel, that has a thinly veiled hatred of women. Quite far from it. I am a Catholic, a man, and perfectly at ease with women, especially women who are perfectly at ease being women.

Yes, of course, a natural woman can be a tornado of chaos, hormonal hysterics, and irrational, insanity-inducing spirals of emotions. But it’s those same qualities that can make a woman an intolerable harpy of nonsense that can also make her a creature of loving, nurturing, sweetness, sexiness, tempering kindness, and spontaneous joy. My own wife skirts the edge between raving insanity and the kind of love that inspires Greeks to siege cities for a decade. Precisely because she is extremely female. And just like my own maleness can walk the edge between merciless brutality and courageous sacrifice, I have never been so stupid, weak, or deceived to actively hold women in general in some kind of contempt. Like I said, triple failure of this fed to read the room.

Third, complete failire of logic in his attempted “take-down”. So Bombard only has “opinions” with “zero evidence”, that she gets from… err… micro-expressions. Ooopps. So, what are micro-expressions then, if they are not evidence of any kind? Zero evidence right? And yet… and yet… her “opinions” are based on the very micro-expressions you acknowledge exist. Pray, do tell, what, precisely do you think micro-expressions are? Why do they exist at all? Go on, we’ll wait.

Fourth, he has the throw-away comment “I sincerely hope the rest are better” as a means of influencing even those people who do watch Bombard’s videos regularly. What he’s going for here is the intro to his next piece:

Oh yeah, ok, maybe she does a better job elsewhere, but on this video… oh no… on this one she gets it wrong! Because…” see the fifth point below

Fifth, “Well, because war is chaos, it’s all just a blur and she’s trying to judge these poor innocents that were just swept up in the red tide of war, don’t you know!” Yeah… no. Doesn’t cut it. First of all because as both these subspecies of “men” admitted, they were moving down, torturing, raping and killing men, women and children that were also unarmed civilians. This is absolutely clear. You don’t get to chase after people to set them on fire with flame throwers if they are in any way armed with any kind of firearm. You don’t get to cage men and shoot them down if they are armed and fighting back. And if the micro-expressions you produce when “reminiscing” on the actions of raping of a sixteen year old and the murdering of unarmed civilians including children is a “cheeky/naughty smile” well, then you belong in Hell. And no, it was not chaos for these perpetrators of war crimes. They knew exactly what they were doing. As they recount quite clearly. This was the attempt to devalue Bombard’s work as well as body language reading in general, while trying to bury it under a generic “well, no one can really know anything about the internal world of another” as well as casting aspersions on the process as a while as though Bombard was just stating opinions, instead of meticulously explaining precisely why and how she was reaching the conclusions she did.

Sixth and finally, the last attempt to both engage me in a futile and fruitless “explanation” or perhaps even “argument” with the sole purpose of wasting my time and no-doubt further deceive and divert readers. It’s the classic; “Oh, I’m just asking a question to clarify.” Designed to derail the entire topic.

And lastly, of course, his chosen name. They really can’t help themselves.

So, please note, if you pay attention, this is NOT an innocuous commentator. This was a deceiver or ticket seller, trying to derail the very fact of the inhumanity these two old Jews, much like the younger ones now, have towards anyone not Jewish. See the video below for just this point.

As opposed to the now admitted to have been totally FAKE NEWS even by the mainstream media of the 40 beheaded babies by Hamas, this guy, who is the former prime minister of Israel actively wants, and in fact is, ensuring that actual babies in incubators no longer have life-sustaining electricity.

As a result of a false flag operation by the way, that we now know the Americans warned Israel was about to happen 3 separate times days before it took place, as well as Egypt calling Net-a-yahoo, current prime minister, 3 days in advance telling him that an attack was imminent. Which Bibi denied he had ever received, except that… err, yeah, the Americans proved he did receive. So yeah… that happened.

As did this:

So don’t be fooled. The old Jews that burned raped and killed with impunity, then lied about it for decades, are the same, and of the same type, as the young Jews who are doing it now and then will lie about it.

And that’s the history and current reality they don’t want you to know about. Hence the fed-comment that inspired this post.

And by the way… were is Western outrage at all the inhumanity?

Colt .45 1911

I’m not sure why, but I always liked the Colt 1911, even though I have never owned one. Yet.

I have a theory though.

In martial arts, generally, someone starts it for some reason like wanting to be able to defend themselves, or not be bullied, or be tough, something like that. Over time, if you do it long enough, you either remain one of these anxious guys, or you develop into someone that no longer has those hang-ups.

A certain level of proficiency means that you don’t worry about physical confrontations anymore. Which is not to say you are or even feel invincible, it just means you have taken enough hits that you know if it happens you’re going to respond to the best of your ability, and that in itself is both all you can do, as well as often enough, all you need to really come out on top. When you reach that level, you don’t worry about “form” or technique or this or that special strike. You will have natural things you are good at that work for you, but in an unprepared for situation anything is a weapon, including the environment itself and it will happen as it happens.

Even when I worked in close protection, my choices in weapons were not dictated by the latest fashion trends, but rather my own ability and real world understanding of things.

I did not care for the “spray and pray” mentality of the glock-loving 17 shot plastic guns. I carried a 4” Ruger GP 100 revolver in .357 magnum with one or sometimes two spare speed loaders in my suit jacket pocket. And a razor sharp tanto. I used to practice regularly with that gun and I had got to the point that I could draw it from concealed, aim and fire at a target 50 metres out and so a headshot on it, all under 2 seconds.

And I saw absolutely no reason that 6 shots would not be enough for anything we might encounter in our work, which was close protection for VIPs. Even a concerted attack would not have included more than 5 or six attackers and as the core team was 3 people, at least one or two would be engaged by the other guys. At worst. As I was the undercover guy, the idea is I would get the jump on the bad guys and on those occasions where people attempted an attack it was me who spotted them ahead of time and warned the team, which reconfigured in ways that made the potential attackers retreat. If a shootout were to take place I’d almost certainly get the drop on the bad guys, which I estimated even if they were trained pros would mean at least two of them would be dead before the others reacted.

In reality, handgun fights happen at about three meters or under. Most people in a gunfight panic, can’t hold their adrenaline rush in check and get disturbed motor functions. Trained people can panic too. Some trained people and some naturals, be it due to brain wiring (Aspergers for the win!) or whatever else, actually get more precise, they get time dilation and precise movement with what is sometimes referred to as “flow”. Myamoto Mushashi describes this in the fifth book of his book of five rings: The Void. The translation from Victor Harris is the best.

In such instances, if I have used up six shots, to my mind that would mean at least three dead bodies if not more. If I had cover to reload great. If not, the knife was faster than that at that range and frankly, scarier than being shot given what a single slash of it can do.

If you have experienced The Void, you will recognise precisely what that one page of text describes. If you have not, it will look like mystic woo-woo for the most part.

If you have experienced it enough that to a certain extent you have learnt to, or can, put yourself in a psychological state that approaches it, then, generally speaking, your level of paranoia will be minimal. At this point, you will begin to observe reality as it is, relatively free of subjective bias.

And here is where appreciation for beauty really enters into it.

Coming from a family of hunters and familiar with pretty much all aspects of shooting, meant that in general I would subjugate my personal preferences to functionality. That said, I always had an eye for the beauty of a weapon. The colt navy 1851 for example was one I always liked the look of.

And not just the fancy version above. Even the original one below.

Of course, being a blackpowder weapon, it’s hardly practical, but that octagonal barrel, the way it fits in the hand, the perfect balance of it, and even the single action only function of it just blends into a perfect combination of classic, dignified, gentlemanly, if you like, aspect of weapon use. Call me an old fashioned romantic, if you like, but there is a level of dignified beauty in the idea of drawing and firing a weapon of that sort at your enemy. One that hardly exists at all in the banging away with eyes half-closed, flinching as you run and spray and pray with a plastic obscenity like a glock at some equally retarded counterpart that is also filling the entire area with innocent bystander cases of “suddenly”.

The Colt 1911, for me, has a similar sort of dignified look that also takes into account the modern version of events. It is a semi-automatic, not a revolver, yet only holds 7+1 in the original format and 8+1 in faithful modern replicas.

As it happens, the aesthetic is important to me, and despite my definitely not being American, I find the original version, that is the pre-1924 or so version of the 1911 to be the handsomest of the many, many variations.

That is, the one with the straight backstrap, with lanyard loop, and the unbevelled approach to the trigger mechanism.

In short, I like the earliest version best, the pre-WWI, original 1911, as its name implies, now well over 100 years old in design.

The A1 version, which was introduced sometimes before WWII and looks very similar except for the differences I already mentioned, see below.

Somehow, I have learned long ago, I appear to have an instinctual appreciation for the older or original of a thing. It’s not limited to guns. I have the same approach to many things. Desks, libraries, work tools, even cars, which I care little about, and writing.

And yes, yes, I know all the criticisms of the original Colt 1911, that the sights are too small, that it’s basically a point and shoot firearm, that the .45 ACP is a slow round, that Colt 1911 might jam if not fed simple ball ammo.

All those things may be “true”, if you are just a straight out of the box, plug and play type, but less so if you take the time to get to know, and use, your guns regularly.

At any rate, they are hard to come by and expensive and not really an expense I can justify at the moment… although, no man ever has to justify the wish, nay, genetically induced need for yet another firearm or weapon, or work tool, or —being an educated warrior— anything related to stationary, writing, painting or sculpting.

And if the kids go hungry for a while, well, it all builds character and will get them to appreciate the art of hunting, right?

Besides… maybe I can start a gofund me. I mean, it’s like a necessity, right? Preservation of history sort of thing? C’mon, whatcha say? Isn’t there a wealthy philanthropist lover of the arts out there that wants to gift me a pre-1924 version of the Colt 1911 in .45 ACP? I’m not fussy, it doesn’t even have to have been built before 1924. I’ll take one of the newer ones built the same by Colt. Think of me like the old Catholic monks of Ireland that hid various Bibles and other patristic works from the depredations of Vikings and Danes by sequestering them and themselves, in remote and inhospitable islands.

The way America is going lately, you’d really be best served by letting a remote, rural Venetian, hold on to a piece of your legendary history for safekeeping and benefit of future generations. Maybe, one fine day, a beautiful, blonde, blue eyed, Southern Belle will marry my son, and maybe they will have half-Venetian, half-Southern children, and one day, his first born son may inherit his grandfather’s old Colt 1911.

You know it can happen.

I’ll accept cash, money transfer, silver coins, gold, or, best of all, just the Colt 1911 itself directly. C’mon I can get one for under 2k in some cases! You know you want to help…

Body Language Ghost Nails it

If you don’t subscribe to her channel, you should.

As a trained hypnotist and having worked in close protection for some years, as well as generally always having had a decent ability to observe humans more objectively than most (the Asperger’s hint with high IQ makes this particularly useful) I have found her videos and explanations to be first order and world class.

I find her work particularly useful because while my skill is I would say excellent, it tends to be more insular. It works for me, I can detect things and know them with a high degree of certainty, but I don’t have her same facility with instantly being able to explain the micro cues I am picking up on. Her simultaneous ability to break down the observed micro cues even as she processes them is what makes her work really world class and high on it.

So, here is her assessment of the video where two Israelis discuss the war crimes they took part in.

And here is a comment from it that sums up the whole thing very well:

The Narrative … it’s not working so well anymore…

A few images worth noticing:

Well, it definitely worked that way for well over 80 years now.

As for the next 80 years however…

Oh, and goys, goys, let’s not forget this guy!

Because consequences will never be the same, Goyim! (Especially for him).

I was Wrong

Remember when I said AI was pretty much useless as far as I was concerned?

Well, I take it back. It’s been making some absolutely incredibly brutal and yet hilarious memes.














But don’t worry; there is still room for a few human craftsmen forging ones by hand…

Clown World is Hard World

As predicted…

So, Israel’s now essentially proven false flag, with the intent of taking over in the Middle East and knocking out the last vestiges of the Palestinians, as well as Iran, is already showing cracks.

Firstly, Iran and their surrounding Arab neighbours are ready to stomp on Israel if Iran is attacked.

Second, the world at large has, generally speaking, except for some of the usual retarded boomers, is aware that:

1. The “Hezbollah/Hamas/Iran” narrative doesn’t hold water and even if it was them that co-ordinated the attack and not outright Israeli agents that planned and pushed for its execution, it was, at the very least allowed to proceed, much like the “Pearl Harbour” attack by Japan was known about and permitted to happen.

2. Israel bombing civilians is not accepted in general and the hostages that were taken, including top Israeli military officials, were clearly taken precisely because this indiscriminate slaughter by Israel of Palestinian civilians has been going on for decades.

And since Jewish commentators have taken to openly admitting that one Jewish life is equivalent to 33 American lives (33? Freemasons, are a Jewish creation, what? Sorry, couldn’t resist):

Nor was this an isolated incident:

So, we can use the same “logic” and do a Palestinian to Israeli conversion:

Population of Israel: 9.73 million

Population of Gaza strip: 1.99 million

Each Palestinian life is worth about 5 Israeli lives.

To which:

And looking at the graph above, the 5,590 deaths and the more than 114,000 wounded Palestinians since 2008 are the equivalent of nearly 30,000 Israeli deaths and some 570,000 injured. A total of about 600,000 people, representing almost an entire third of the total population of the Gaza strip.

And the current “war” is proceeding along these lines:

With the intentional murder of the last few Christians left in the region proceeding apace.

Because remember that Palestinian Christians remain as the last remnant of Christianity since the depredations of Muslims starting some 400 years before the Crusades, when the entire region was peacefully Catholic.

So.

As I predicted, Israel is going to confine itself to trying to genocide the Palestinians within its own stolen borders, and even that isn’t going particularly well from a PR point of view, despite the world’s (((mass media))) all being rabidly pro-Israel.

It would become really interesting if the combined Arab states decided to either come to the aid of their Arab neighbours in Palestine (we know there are no Christian countries left with an actual Christian government anywhere on Earth, so the Palestinian Christians are on their own, sadly) or, even decided to impose an immediate ceasefire on Israel on pain of actual war.

It’s really difficult to know what would happen then and how badly it might spiral, but whatever happens, you can be certain that the big moves, in the geopolitical world-order, are made mostly by the foreign pedovores running America like it’s puppet, and by extension, all the Western European governments.

How the rest of the world, in its multifaceted ways will respond, is hard to guess.

What, in fact, would happen if, as an extreme hypothetical example, suddenly Israel was turned to glowing glass by 3 or 4 nukes? Would full scale nuclear war take place? Against whom? Who would be blamed and who would the targets be? What is Mecca was nuked instead, or simultaneously to Israel? What would happen then? And, more importantly, what would it really take to get rid of the parasites in every government around the world that lead millions of normal human beings to war and death for their own, egomaniacal ends?

Because we all know that if the people responsible for the wars had to lead into battle for them, there never would be any.

The last times leaders actually led into battle was in antiquity and in the Crusades. After that, it’s been lying, conniving, parasitical politicians led by the even worse bankers, all the way down.

And nothing will change until the genetic descendants of Leonidas and Bohemond and Myamoto Mushashi, retake their rightful place in humanity, as Warrior caste leaders ready to actually lead from the front.

Will it happen? I hope so. I sincerely do, but it’s way too early and still way too pleasant for anyone to be able to tell; because sadly, it isn’t likely to happen until almost all of civilisation has collapsed. In that respect, Russia is way ahead of the game. Especially if it can find a fitting and worthy successor to Putin in due course.

Long term, I still think my prediction is accurate, what will matter and reappear in Europe are:

1. City states, and

2. Catholicism (the real one, not the Novus Ordo impostor Satanic version)

Time will tell.

That didn’t take long to prove

Typical. Not only so idiotically arrogant to think anyone would be fooled by the totally absurdist narrative, but so utterly and completely idiotically arrogant that you pretend you knew nothing about the impending attack when even your sworn enemies literally called to warn you of… err… well… I guess at this point we must assume that Egypt actually called Israel to warn them of Israel’s impending attack on Israel… which is why Israel ignored it.

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks