Archive for October 2023

Firearms for WW3

This is all assuming you’re in a rural area with some geographical advantages that may allow you to survive drones, and/or would not be likely to be a heavily targeted area by air strikes and massive artillery. Because in that case, forget protecting your home, you need to be in a deep tunnel underground and hope it doesn’t collapse on you and that whenever you stick your nose out it doesn’t get blown off by a sniper with night vision or a kamikaze drone.

But assuming the most you will have to deal with are gangs of roaming looters and/or small units of soldiers trying to take advantage of the general chaos, then, in order of importance/usefulness from most to least useful, (but they are all useful):Assault rifle.

1. Assault Rifle

The Americans all swear by 5.56mm because it is lighter and you can carry more of it, and perhaps it is enough for most people, but the 5.56 round was also designed to wound and cripple enemy soldiers more than put them down, because a wounded soldier uses up more logistics than a dead one. But you are not a nation, you are one or a few guys trying to keep zombie-equivalents from murdering you and raping your women and goats. Or eating them, or both. So, my preferred assault rifle would still be 7.62 also generally known as .308. It is heavier, but hits harder and if you know what you are doing you can reach out to 800m or so with it relatively accurately. Overall, an assault rifle is the best for all-round capability. it can be used in home defence if needed, it is ideal for all mid-range combat, and can reach out to longer ranges if needed.

2. Concealed Carry Pistol

Personal preference here will rule the day, but the most important points to keep in mind are that you should have a reliable firearm. That means one that will not jam if at all possible, that will feed a bunch of different brand of ammunition without feeding problems and that comes in a common-ish caliber. While a lot of people will avoid revolvers, the fact is that it is almost impossible for one to jam although I have seen video of a Taurus revolver jamming, but I have never personally experienced it myself even when firing many rounds through one. Apparently Glocks are also quite reliable and they hold a lot more shots, but as I wrote before, the idea of spray and pray actually means people shoot less accurately than if they know they have limited ammo. And I am not sure that realistically you will need more than 6 shots anyway, but certainly, it’s always better to have them and not need them. Many 9mm pistols can carry 15 or 20 or even more rounds in one magazine, but ultimately the criteria are reliability, ease of use and accuracy for you and the ability to carry it all the time and keep it concealed but able to reach it and draw and fire it quickly. So, whatever works for you in the end. This would be the “goes everywhere with me gun” in a lawless scenario.

3. Shotgun

Make it a pump action and make it have as many rounds as possible. Pump action because it will feed almost anything without ever jamming, and the more rounds you have in it the better. apparently the Cal-tec can hold up to 25 rounds but people who used them also say it is finicky and not reliable at all, and a straight Remington or moss berg or Winchester pump action sells for little money and will fire anything that comes in 12 gauge through it. It’s the best weapon for home defence and can be used for hunting all sorts of game too, so it’s versatile, even if its range does not extend to rifle ranges.

4. Long Range Rifle

Whether for hunting larger game at a distance, or to secure larger areas from marauders, you want to be able to reach out to at least 1km in an apocalyptic type scenario. Most people will go for a .308 or a 6.5mm creedmoor, but I will opt for a .300 Winchester Magnum, for a number of reasons. Yes you can get to 1,000 metres with a .308, but you have to be doing things very well. While I reached out to 1,000 metres with my .308 the very first time I tried it. And if you can reach out to 1,000 m with a .308, then you can reach out to 1,500 with a .300 WM just as easily and I would say maybe even a little easier. Plus, getting hit by a .300 WM or a .308 is the same in terms of bullet size, but not the same in terms of energy released into the target. At 1,000 m a .300 WM has the same energy as being shot point blank with a .44 magnum handgun. You know, like Dirty Harry. Except you can Dirty Harry someone a 1,000 metres away and worry about wind and bullet drop a lot less than if you tried it with a .308

5. .22 LR rifle and/or decent quality air rifle

You can hunt small game very efficiently with a decent pellet gun. I know I did so throughout my childhood in Africa. A .22LR rifle is a bit more powerful and so easier to reach out further to various small game, but one can feed oneself with a pellet gun quite well if there are plentiful birds, squirrels, and so on in your area. Ammo is cheap and airguns are a lot quieter than firearms.

And that is it. Of course, you may not have all of these or you may have less than ideal versions, but don’t worry too much. The best gun is the one you have when you need it, rather than the one you wished you had but haven’t got round to buying yet.

On the Jews and their ways

Apparently, the Jews are the only people that are allowed to genocide other people. In fact, we should all clap and go along with the genocide of Palestinian non-combatants, women and children.

It’s not me saying it, it’s the current president of Israel.

In fact, you are so NOT ALLOWED to criticise ANYTHING Israel or Jews in general do that Israel itself is busy trying to pass a law where their police is allowed to fire on (and kill) their own citizens if they protest against the mass-murder of civilians currently taking place in Gaza.

It’s odd that when you mention that most of the mainstream media is owned or controlled by Jews, apparently that is antisemitic, but the fact that Israel is bombing civilians with no air defence and their own president states unambiguously that Palestinian civilians are legitimate targets, almost no mainstream media is in any kind of outcry about it.

Now, either genocide is acceptable or it is not. And if it is acceptable, well, then the Jews should not be surprised if at some point it is them that a whole bunch of people want to genocide, and might in fact succeed this time. What with global interconnectedness and information being if not free at least usually available.

And if it is not, if genocide is NOT acceptable, as most normal people think, then the Jews should most certainly be the first to state so very clearly and, much more importantly, ACT like it.

Instead, they are carpet bombing civilian areas, have cut off all electricity, water and supplies to Gaza and now completely removed any communications, so that they can go about whatever level of genocide they want, without any troubling images coming out of Palestine.

And yet, the world is still standing by and watching mostly. In fact, America has sent a bunch of warships in the Mediterranean to “help” Israel. Against what is essentially a rebel force of Palestinians pissed off at the various injustices, murders and land appropriation by Israelis over the last eight decades. I mean, I know that people like Ben Shapiro stated that a Jewish life is worth about 33 American ones, but those Hamas fighters must be worth 1,000 Israeli and another 1,000 American Marines if the level of force being rounded up against them is anything to go by.

Remember this?

Well, in the last 3 weeks the death toll of Palestinians has been overtaken this since there are very credible reports of about 7,000 dead at least as a result of the last three weeks of bombing. A number that is almost certainly below the real final one even it all stopped today. About a third or a bit more are children.

But Israel absolutely knew that the October 7 “Hamas” attack was coming. They got warned by the CIA three times, by Egypt 3 days before and now, it is apparently coming out that even IDF soldiers were aware and their alarms were ignored. Never mind the fact that Hamas is considered by many, including some Israeli officials, to be a creation of Mossad, much like ISIS was of the USA.

It is becoming patently clear to the entire world, that Israel wants to eliminate the Palestinians down to the last man, woman and child and is hellbent on doing it, regardless of what anyone else thinks about it.

It is also clear that Israel is the tail that wags the big dog: The USA.

The UN General Assembly voted overwhelmingly for a ceasefire 120 yes to 14 no.

Who were the 14 no?

In addition to Israel, which has vowed to eradicate Hamas, the only other countries to oppose the resolution were: 

  • The United States
  • Austria
  • Croatia
  • Czech Republic
  • Fiji
  • Guatemala
  • Hungary
  • Marshall Islands
  • Micronesia
  • Nauru
  • Papua New Guinea
  • Paraguay
  • Tonga

The Micronesians in bold are basically funded almost entirely by the USA. Guatemala and Paraguay are probably easy enough to push into the direction expected of them too. Stunningly, of all of Europe, only Austria Croatia, the Czech Republic and Hungary voted no. I am frankly amazed that Italy, and Japan merely abstained, along with another 43 countries. Consider that Italy has some 150 American bases on our territory and a completely USA deep state and WEF compromised government.

Israeli officials responded by reiterating Prime Minister Benjamin Netayahu’s pledge that every member of Hamas “is a dead man.”

“We reject outright the UN General Assembly despicable call for a ceasefire,” Israeli Foreign Minister Eli Cohen wrote on X, formerly Twitter.

“Israel intends to eliminate Hamas just as the world dealt with the Nazis and ISIS.”

Israel’s ambassador to the UN, Gilad Erdan, also vowed that the Jewish state would use “every means” to defeat the terror group, according to the Times of Israel.

“This is a dark day for the U.N. and for mankind,” Erdan said.

“Today is a day that will go down as infamy. We have all witnessed that the U.N. no longer holds even one ounce of legitimacy or relevance.”

Hamas welcomed the resolution in a statement that called for its immediate implementation, the Times of Israel said.

And even if the entire MSM sings the praises of Israel in chorus, the global level of communication available today, makes it impossible that anyone even remotely willing to find out what is really going on will not be aware of the multiple war crimes that Israel is committing presently. And frankly, aside from all the questionable history surrounding the entire history and reasons and events of WWII, the reality is that there is literally almost no one alive today that took part in it or was alive at the time. A five year old in 1945 would be 83 years old now and would have to have uncommon good memory to recollect anything clearly from that war. Anyone age 20 would be 98 years old now. In short, the Second World War is now essentially out of living memory. And people in their 20s and even 30s and 40s today know very little about it. Most can’t even get the dates of it right. And with regard to the Holocaust, enough questions regarding the details of it have surfaced that any young person is likely to be skeptical at best. When the officials concerned with the holocaust itself revise the number of people that died at Auschwitz from 4 million to about one million (including all ethnicities, not just Jews) the official figures of numbers presented for it become less believable by many people. And in fact, even the official numbers by active Jewish historians are not the ones I was taught at school as a young boy.

So, again, in brief, people are not as concerned about the Holocaust as they might have been a few decades ago. And are more prone to ask why it happened. They are more likely to ask why the Jews have been kicked out of 109 countries over a 1000 times in total if they never gave anyone reason to do so. I mean, it’s peculiar, right? These totally innocent good guys who happen to be disproportionately represented in banking, finance, entertainment and the media, seem to be constantly persecuted by everyone for no good reason anyone can fathom.

Just unlucky, is it? Nothing to do with practices that dehumanise, destabilise, devalue and degenerate host countries. Not a pathological hatred of White Europeans and Christianity. Nope. No, no, no, let’s not foster such unfounded antisemitic ideas, right? Let all evidence that might support those facts undeniable by anyone, nevertheless be labelled antisemitic. Let math be racist, and 2 + 2 equal purple.

For justice.

And truth.

Obviously.

But… wait, maybe, since a good number of them seem to be calling for genocide now, maybe that’s it. Maybe the Jews just need to learn and accept that genocide is bad, no good, and no one should do it. Not even them. And then there will be peace, finally!

One can hope, right?

Peace on Earth and all that.

Next Livestream on…?

You can pick up to 3 answers, but I will not be able to know which is your preferred one.

all polls are anonymous, I have no way of figuring out who answered what even if I wanted to, which I don’t.

Which of the following would you prefer to have a livestream on?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Urban Warfare Concepts

World War Three is clearly beginning its hot phase after 3 years of “soft” biowarfare in the form of genetic serums under cover of “vaccines”, 5G electromagnetic manipulation, information overload and gigantic psyops going on in turbo mode since 2016.

As such, in the keeping with the idea of constant education, this post will posit a few potential scenarios concerning various degrees of urban warfare and the best weapons for each of these scenarios.

The point is to give at least a general level of tactical understanding of urban warfare, starting with low-level riots/home intrusions and going all the way up to Gaza strip level of warfare.

As mentioned, the purpose is merely educational and not a suggestion to break laws or become a criminal. The idea is to inform people, on the basis of historical and/or actual/current conflicts, what one can expect in urban warfare and what the best approaches to self-defence of you and your lived ones might be in each instance.

In each case, it is assumed that the normal processes of law and order and just policing have been either completely lost or at best sporadic, unreliable and quite possibly hostile, depending on variables too numerous to mention.

Level 1 – low level rioting/home invasions

Do not be fooled into thinking that a home invasion, especially by an armed intruder is anything less than attempted murder.

I Jewish law (and anyone logical too) a man that enters your home, by force and armed, is logically assumed to be someone meaning you harm and at the very least willing to murder you in order to get away unscathed. Hence his being armed. That’s assuming his intent isn’t rape and murder to begin with anyway. So, in all instances of then hypothetical scenarios presented here, priority is given to your immediate survival, with zero thought of the aftermath and consequences that can arise from killing men intent of doing you harm.

In many countries, even legitimate self defence will still land you in a lot of legal trouble and quite possibly jail. So, keep that in mind, but for the purposes of this post, the idea is that, as my father says, better be judged by 12 than carried by 6. And as always: only YOU are responsible for your actions or inactions, son’t blame me or my blog or anyone else.

Regarding riots, the advice is simple: don’t be in one. If you find yourself in a sudden one, get away from it as fast as possible.

Regarding home invasions, many factors come into it, since the law is very different from place to place, however, since in thy is instance we are considering a scenario of catastrophic economic and societal collapse, with little to no police presence and/or most police being essentially just strangers already possessing guns, the legality side of things will be totally ignored here.

In such a lawless instance where someone enters your home with criminal intent, you are on your own, no police is going to help you while it happens, and as such, it is up to you to protect yourself. Obviously guns are best for home defence, especially since in the “apocalypse start” scenario, looters and home invaders will be in groups and seldom alone.

Your advantage is you know the layout and they do not. Faced with multiple armed attackers the policy must be shoot first and ask nothing. In such situations, a short shotgun with buckshot is hard to beat. My preferred item is an 8 shot pump action Winchester, because they are cheap, short, and reliable. You may have your own preferred and more expensive brand, Mossberg, or Benelli, but I would stick with pump action, because a bit like revolvers, you don’t need to worry about jams, which can happen in semi-automatic models. You should know the areas in your home that are bullet resistant. In the USA, where they build with wood and gypsum board, you’re in a lot more danger than in homes built with concrete and bricks, so know exactly what areas, if any, are actually bulletproof. What corners of your home you might take reasonable cover behind.

All else failing wait in your bedroom or wherever you are with your shotgun, pointing at the door and (assuming all your loved ones are with you and you are actually being home invaded, so you don’t accidentally shoot a family member because your cat made a noise in the night) blast away when bad guy opens it. And keep blasting until he and friends are appropriately neutralised.

Do not go outside or even start to creep around your home to search for intruders. Let them come to you. At least in the first place. But in most cases even after.

Level 2 – Anarchy: Early stages

This is the bit where in ex Yugoslavia, when it hit, people suddenly realised a cop was just a man with a gun. Which more often than not meant he could kill you and take your things, wife, children, car, and so on. And at the time, this realisation was a rude shock for normal people. This is the consolidation stage where families find the safest place to hole up and secure the area. If this is limited to your immediate family and just one house you are far from secure, because the immediate next step is gangs of armed men “foraging”. If you are in an apartment block, you’d best figure out which of your neighbours will fall into ally, liability or enemy category, fast. Depending on layout, shotguns will still ne the preferred interior weapon if you live in either apartment blocks or houses made with bullet resistant walls. I say resistant because most modern houses will not actually stop a standard NATO round with a single wall of cement blocks or bricks, much less an actual machine gun round (.50 BMG).

At this stage though, you also want to establish a perimeter and for that, the standard AK-47, AK-74, and various AR-15 and clones of a variety of civilian semi-automatic and military fully automatic weapons become more useful. While not as instantly deadly at interior of a home ranges as a shotgun, they more easily can shoot through interior walls, which can be an advantage or a liability, depending on the situation, but at this stage can be considered an advantage as your immediate family should already know how to act and where to be in case of an assault on your primary shelter/home location. If you’re in a rural area you should have had a little more time to organise yourself and possibly your neighbours, and depending on layout you might be relatively safe, but as this is about urban areas, this is where you try and get any extended family or really good friends to pull together and all inhabit the same place. A recounting of the Yugoslavian war explained how two families had pooled resources and people and places all the women and children in the middle of a giant open plan room, where the cooking and mending of clothes or other things happened, how the men remained armed at all times taking shifts to guard the perimeter and how only men armed to the teeth ever roamed away from the main home to forage for stuff. In fact they had knocked down a wall between their houses to form the central common area. This is smart thinking and the larger numbers make it easier to defend a position from competing tribes/gangs. The important thing to realise here is that your own neighbours and city block inhabitants are most likely your immediate enemy, competing for whatever limited resources you have. Water for drinking and cooking will be the primary resource everyone needs, so stock up, even if only by the immediate means of filling a bathtub with it before the mains are cut off or contaminated. Ammunition, weapons and numbers, will determine who ultimately can have what. Plan accordingly.

Level 3 – Anarchy: entrenched or early military actions

After the immediate shock of societal collapse, a certain level of “stable chaos” arises relatively quickly. If you take Gaza as a current example, after the initial events of October 7th, there was an immediate large scale chaos on both sides of the conflict, which could be thought of as Level 1 in the more secure and unaffected areas inside Gaza or the ones bordering the action inside Israel, and level 2 in the affected areas, but after a day or two, even the affected areas became this level 3, where there were some incursions from either side, but more a skirmish level of stuff which was the calm before the storm, and in the Gaza example this lasted some twenty days or so, roughly three weeks, which is about a ballpark figure for how long it takes a full military force to organise itself before a full assault or entrenched position. This is a period where most normal people will consolidate their situation (as explained above, level 2) but if there are scouts in the group, is actually the time to try to understand where and what will be the safest option. Figuring that out however, especially if your communications is cut off or non existent is far from easy and even supposed military experts have totally screwed that up in recent conflicts. The safest option of all of course is to never be in a conflict area. The early stages of collapse is potentially the easiest time to get out of the area, but this is also totally chaotic and unpredictable. Roads may be barricaded by the military, access to routes out of the conflict area may be blocked and so on, making escape difficult, but in all likelihood, easier earlier than at any other time. If I were trapped in London, say, at the start of a conflict, I would certainly take my chances to get my family out and rural as fast as possible. While almost all main routes out might well be blockaded either by armed forces or worse (initially at least) rioting looters, it is almost impossible to completely lock down the whole city in every respect. Even with small children, I would probably opt to try and get out by aide roads and if that fails I would still consider hiking it out on foot at night to get past road closures if there was a rural area I had relatives or potential shelter away from the city. But once again, this assumes urban warfare, so, assuming you are now in the entrenched anarchy or early stages of conflict, it is a time to seriously consolidate and fortify your position and/or relocate it if you realise it is in a bad area that will become the focal point of full on warfare. Creating some kind of bomb-shelter would be a priority for me, and given I’d prefer to be shot dead than buried alive, it would have to be a really secure one for me to opt for it instead of just taking my chances outside of it.

In a full on war, high-rise buildings do not fare well. Aside from the fact that water gets cut off first in such instances and getting it up there becomes a tiring and dangerous chore, since electricity and elevators are out, they are essentially vulnerable to bombing and structurally death-traps, so, my personal position would be to get out of any such structure and far away from it. Whatever your urban situation in this third stage, you are now dealing with area protection and area denial issues as well as firepower issues.

Making your perimeter non-obvious and yet extremely difficult to traverse is the main objective. If you can use vehicles and/or wreck them and/or set them on fire so they become permanent blockades is a quick solution to at least making certain roads or routes impassable to civilian vehicles and things smaller than military trucks or tanks. The ideal solution is not a giant wall around your home (though it can’t hurt if you have one) but rather a labyrinth of narrow accesses and rubble/blockades to get to them. Guarding the access routes being easier than guarding the whole perimeter, though you should guard the whole perimeter too, of course. The idea is to create zones that are too hard or unpleasant for most raiders to go through, leading them naturally to the easier routes which become your own kill zones or check points, depending on if enemy or friendly comes through it. This set up can be limited to the perimeter of your garden, or extended to include a few city blocks depending on the cohesion and number of people involved. Standard issue military weapons here are the preferred option, including some sniper rifle type set-up if you have vantage points from which to protect or oversee an area. In which case, the local bell tower is NOT a good idea. The obvious locations for snipers tend to attract not just high volumes of enemy fire, but also tank main weapon shells, drones and even airstrikes, so, if you fancy yourself a sexy sniper, think again. These are the guys who will crawl through a side road open sewer for two days then lie in it for three days just to keep observing enemy movements and then crawl all the way back without having fired a shot, because the information is more precious than a single dead enemy soldier.

Defending against enemy military is dangerous and difficult, but not impossible. The people of Donetsk and Luhansk did it for some 8 years. And it was a civilian resistance composed mainly of fathers and grandfathers. Again, knowing your terrain, creating kill zones and confusing blockades or fake ambush points, overwhelming firepower from multiple directions and scouting of enemy movements all become very important. Modern militaries will make extensive use of drones for reconnaissance, area denial and frontal assaults. The technology in these things is such they can literally see through walls in some cases, so, often, hiding from them is limited to being deep underground or at least buried enough by rubble or other materials to make their IR and UV sensors less effective. Against a determined military opponent armed with all the latest gadgetry, a civilian rabble force is at a distinct disadvantage, however, that said, look at Iraq or Afghanistan. The most powerful military in the world got routed by a bunch of sheep herders in Afghanistan. There is much to be said for area denial by improvised traps, explosive devices and so on. The danger being your own side and people can be subject to them too, including your own booby traps if you forget where they are exactly or are not aware of them having been added to. Any enemy military that is killed or captured would also obviously be a source of more or better weapons if it is possible to retrieve them.

In this level of conflict you will soon find out if you are on the front line or not, and with a little scouting you should be able to figure out when or if your position will become the front line.

Paper maps, binoculars, civilian drones, batteries, walkie-talkies, and securing better shelter/protection/area denial areas become important in this stage, as well ambush areas, coalition or ally making with nearby areas or factions. It is easy to get “comfortable” in this stage, especially if you are not in the front lines where the military conflict/action takes place and are not likely to be anytime soon. However, it is important to recognise when and how the war moves so that you have some warning of enemy troop movement and intentions, so that you have a chance of avoiding remaining in a level 4 zone later.

This level 3 time can still support weak non-combatants like children, the elderly, certain women, and so on, if you had the luck or foresight to prepare and be in a suitable area and have enough people to secure it as best as possible. Level 4 zones are essentially killing fields and active war zones, where military men die regularly and civilians are little more than dead bodies, so you want to avoid being in one at all costs, and that often is the result of good information, good scouting and correct use of such information. And, as always, luck or divine providence. Ideal weapons for level 3 are mostly assault rifles and long arms. In active war-zones handguns are what they always have been, secondary emergency weapons. And knives are merely field tools for the most part. Even shotguns will be of limited use depending on the layout of the city. If you are in Venice, and assuming no carpet bombing, even a hammer can be very useful given some of the tiny calles where you can only walk down in single file and have multiple brick and concrete doorways in them, but in a metropolis like London or San Francisco, a shotgun would be mostly useless between city blocks. So assault rifles would be the go to weapon in most cases. With the occasional sniper weapon by people trained in scouting or sniping, if such exist in your midst.

Level 4 – Active War Zone

Your best bet here is to not be in one. Full military force activity. Including active groups of enemy infantry, artillery, aerial bombardment by airstrikes and drones, including guided kamikaze drones, and attack helicopters, tanks and other military vehicles.

Your chances of survival here in a direct confrontation approach nil. Your best bet is to escape the area if possible or hide as deep underground as possible in a location you hope will not be struck by repeated bombardment.

Entirely collapsed buildings that have already been struck by aerial or artillery fire, preferably at least twice, may make ideal hiding spots. Usually rubble is not worth bombing repeatedly, unless live fire comes out of it again. And if you go deep enough in it, most drones will not easily pick you out and if they do and you don’t have obvious weaponry on you they may assume you’re a survivor of the original bombing and possibly not waste a drone or artillery round on you. Of course, rubble is dangerous anyway and you might end up buried alive by sheer bad luck without any enemy fire at all.

Unless you are part of the actual military force yourself, your survival here hinges mostly on becoming invisible or getting out of the area, and your weapons would be used mostly to keep you invisible or getting rid of other factions preventing your escape from the area. Even as active military, depending on circumstances, your survival here is precarious at best.

Conclusions

Other than the initial stages, which might be relatively “easy” to survive if they do not escalate, the worst place to be in a war is an urban zone. But if you are stuck in one, then the above general concepts are your most likely survivable scenario.

Concentrated Advice for Men (and some Women)

The sheer number of young men that I at first simply thought were rudderless, spineless, weaklings, is huge.

And perhaps many of them are. But I was also surprised by the enormous improvement and sensible life choices many of them make with only a little guidance. This post then, is like the postcard version of all you need to know to be a successful man.

And please understand that by “successful” I do not mean having great wealth or being famous or anything along those lines. Those things are incidental to the action and reality of being simply a man. In the order given below then, with mere bullet-points and little to no explanation of each of the points, except the last, here it is:

  • First decide what kind of man you want to be. What attributes, what values, what skills, what is important to the man you want to be and what is not. You can take inspiration from anyone or anything, from comic book characters, historical figures, or people you know, but decide who you would like to be. And try not to limit yourself. Obviously if you are 5’ 4” you aren’t going to become 6’ 4”, but aside physical axioms, you can decide how honest, how proficient at a chosen skill and so on.
  • Second: Work at it. From now until the day you die. If you feel at any point you have already achieved all you can in terms of who you want to be, you’re either lazy or aiming too low.
  • Chose your own path. Yes you will make mistakes, but everyone does, and your own are far more tolerable than having to live with the consequences that arise from making someone else’s mistakes.
  • Listen to everyone and ignore them all. Sounds contradicting but is really paradoxical. EVERYONE will give you free advice on EVERY aspect of your life. And most of it is bullshit. So, go ahead and ask or listen to it, but realise that in the end only YOU make the decisions in your life for everything in it, and that happens as a result of those —YOUR— decisions. No one else’s.
  • Respect hierarchies that deserve respect. Ignore fake one.
  • When it comes to women, remember that infinite topics are reduced to pithy sayings only as a result of large number statistics and generalities. And while that is true, generalities are still facts, just not every time; only most of the time. Most PUA stuff is advice given by people who think human beings are reducible to a set of mathematical variables. And who prey on the wallets of men. All you really need to know and do is simply to be a man, that is, your best self as per the advice above, and stick to your guns. Not unreasonably so, not eternally and unchangingly. Just most of the time in most of the ways.

On that last point especially, a recent conversation I had with my wife was quite endearing. I forget how we got onto the topic, I seem to recall it may have been to do with mentioning our son and life advice for the future and so on. In any case, my comment was simply along the lines that all a man needs to do is stick to his own road and way. Because women have no idea what they really want, and it changes with the weather, or the alignment of the planets and so on. So if you were to try and change your life in accordance with that, you will achieve the opposite kind of result you want and be miserable throughout it, and, so would the woman you are trying to please. That last being the key point almost all men today (and pretty much all women) get wrong, or don’t understand. She looked at me for a second or two, then smiled and kind of shyly carried on looking at me in that way she has. I always knew she was the right one. Long before she did.

And she told me a story about one of her relatives who as a young man really liked this girl, and when he told her and her other relatives about it, every one of the women present advised him to stay away from the girl, as they deemed she was trouble and up to no good and would get him in trouble too. She went on to say how this young man ignored all of them and carried on his pursuit of this girl. And now, years later they are not just married with children, but very happily so. And she said how glad she was he didn’t listen to any of their advice.

We talked about this too and two films come to mind, one is the one with Mel Gibson called What Women Want, which is where Mel gets the power to read the minds of women and in a scene, in a meeting, he reads the mind of what one of the women in the meeting is thinking, so he says exactly what she is thinking so as to get her to agree to whatever the issue was, and she immediately disagrees with him. I thought that was a brilliant aspect of the female mind well-explained.

Another, film, which we recently watched for the second time actually, as we had forgotten about it, is called About Time and is possibly one of the best films I have ever seen. So if you don’t want a spoiler, skip the next paragraph in Italic below this one.

In it, the main character wants to get with this girl and he has the power to travel back in his own timeline. He finally gets the nerve to ask the girl about being with him on the last day of her holidays with his family, and she says, it’s too late now, he should have made his move earlier. So he goes back in time and makes his move earlier and she says they should wait and he should ask her on the last day of her holidays.

Once again, a perfect exposition of how the female mind actually works. Because it has very little to do with linear logic or keeping your word, or being honest and direct. A woman may want to do all of these things, but… and there is always a but… her mood might change, her hormones may be out of balance, the Moon may be full that night and make her euphoric or morose. It’s not even that they mean to lie or be deceptive or inconsistent. A feminine woman will genuinely want to be a good girl, but will still screw this up regularly. And as long as those screw ups are within a certain realm of “passable” a man will forgive them, because from time to time, his life choices for them both will go via forest animal tracks instead of good, safe, highways, and she will forgive him those too.

The worst women, of course, will calculatingly use the fact they are a woman to put into action the very worst, nefarious schemes they planned from the start, then act the poor hormonal victim, but then, narcissists of either sex are a complete nightmare, and we are discussing here non-demonic types of human beings.

The point is that a man should first and foremost be himself. And as the ancient oracle to Delphi stated (a place I visited, by the way) the first rule for a man, is to know himself.

Know who you are. Know who you want to be. Know what you have done and are doing to get there, and what you will keep on doing until you do get there, and then improve on it, to the end of your days.

Now, a man that is himself, that knows who he is and why, and that has chosen to be as he is, consciously —not merely being the result of the hazards and parenting and trauma that invariably shapes all our lives— well, such a man will not veer his path for the mere whimsy of some woman. No matter how pretty she is, or how good in bed, or what promises she makes him. A man needs to, first and foremost, alter his path in the ocean he sails only as a result of his own choices and his own decisions.

Which is not to say he does not consider anyone else or ignores all advice or runs roughshod over the wishes and dreams and desires of his woman or other loved ones. It simply means exactly what I wrote, no more and no less. If you do veer the path for your woman in some way, let it be because YOU decided to do so. YOU calculated the risks and the losses and the gains. YOU decided this move was the best move, and YOU and only YOU will be to blame if it is the wrong move. Because to try and hold your woman to account for YOUR decisions is almost entirely nonsensical, weak, and fruitless.

Of course, YOU will be held responsible by her, for every stupid, weak, bad, decision SHE made that turned out badly. And your reminding her that if she believes the feminine imperative that women have their own agency in reality (the only actual fact of feminist theory, arguable though it is) then her mistakes are hers and hers alone, will not endear her to you (I know, it’s a shocking surprise!). Nor will explaining that if she does reject that feminine imperative, well, then, she should just go along with whatever her husband says and if and when some of his decisions turn out badly, she should be nurturingly understanding and remember all the good decisions he made for her and how the overall total (hopefully!) balances out far more in the positive than the negative.

The point is that ultimately, for all human beings, making your own choices and taking the responsibility that goes with it is your just lot in life. Few human beings live this way though, of either sex. Men generally are statistically a lot better at it than women though. And those men that live this way may have good or bad lives, but for the most part, they at least are at peace with themselves.

If you find a woman that lives this way, and she is happy with you, then marry her. It won’t mean she will not do female things in that infuriatingly chaotic female way. She will. Because she’s a woman. But if she also happens to be the type that in time or at least when faced with the cold facts, realises her own faults and admits them (at least to you and you alone) then, know you have with you an uncommon human being, and as far as women go, practically a unicorn.

And of course, it also helps if you are learned enough in mythology, to know how to guide unicorns to pleasant meadows where they might find fresh water to drink. And then they might choose to do so. While you patiently wait along the shore.

The morons reading this that will assume the usual (me big, bad, patriarchal, misogynist, chauvinist pig and woman, poor victims always and regardless, with all agency but no responsibility whatsoever) are, as I have always said, irrelevant human wreckage, so, as always, don’t just ignore them, shun them from your life, for they are a pestilence and bring nothing good to your life.

Those that are merely severely brainwashed by the modern zeitgeist (and who isn’t on some level) simply need to see, observe, learn and notice in their own lives, that women are happier when able to rely on their man to guide them both through life, with them helping and offering their perspective, but being comfortable letting him “drive” so to speak.

Of course, this is true when the man is actually a man, and not some semblance of a caricature, either being overly “dominant” or rather, arrogant, in an endeavour to cover up his lack of ability/knowledge/status/power/big dick energy/whatever.

And remember that I always make a distinction between an arrogant man (someone who says and/or thinks he can, when he actually can’t) and what in Italian is known as superbo which is a man that says he can, and he can. In short, someone who is not humble, (or at least apparently not humble at first impact or exterior appearance) but not a fake either.

The worst type of “man” is the faker who takes on the airs of a competent and self-conscious man (as in conscious of himself, not as in shy), while being an actual empty shell inside. Such men might fool a woman initially, but bring only misery. While an actually competent man, may or may not land the woman of his dreams, but pretty much any woman that is into him, would be generally happy with him if he is into her too.

But all these more detailed explanation and imaging of overall concept still boil down to basically just one thing:

Be who you choose to be, be consistent with it, and make your way in it. The rest, more or less, will follow and happen as it does and perhaps needs to. And the right woman for you will, indeed, not only follow in your path, she will help beautify it.

Life on this Earth can be very hard, and likely to get harder. Picking the right man or woman to make children with and go through it together is one of the things that makes it absolutely worthwhile. So choose carefully… but first…

Know yourself.

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks