And it’s not like we didn’t know this YEARS before covid. In fact, I recall an online conversation with a guy that explained way back in 2018 I think, that the way to really get rid of all the Europeans was precisely to use the kind of genetic modification serum that was passed off as a “vaccine” for COVID. This was not a virologist or doctor. Just a guy with above average IQ who took an interest and read various medical papers for fun and shared his thoughts with a group of online friends I belonged to. So, contrary to the Scott Adams of this world, it was absolutely clear and possible to know what the vaxx would do to you long before anyone took it.
Aside from all that, there is also the graphite and other bugs, of course.
McKernan, who has 25 years’ experience in his field, ran the experiment again, confirming that the vials contained up to, in his opinion, 18-70 times more DNA contamination than the legal limits allowed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).In particular, McKernan was alarmed to find the presence of an SV40 promoter in the Pfizer vaccine vials. This is a sequence that is, ‘…used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies,’ McKernan explains. This is something that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines.Knowing that the contamination had not been disclosed by the manufacturers during the regulatory process, McKernan raised the alarm, posting his findings to Twitter (now X) and Substack with a call-out to other scientists to see if they could replicate his findings.Other scientists soon confirmed McKernan’s findings, though the amount of DNA contamination was variable, suggesting inconsistency of vial contents depending on batch lots. One of these scientists was cancer genomics expert Dr Phillip Buckhaults, who is a proponent of the mRNA platform and has received the Pfizer Covid vaccine himself.In September of this year, Dr Buckhaults shared his findings in South Carolina Senate hearing. ‘I’m kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine – it’s different from RNA, because it can be permanent,’ he told those present.‘There is a very real hazard,’ he said, that the contaminant DNA fragments will integrate with a person’s genome and become a ‘permanent fixture of the cell’ leading to autoimmune problems and cancers in some people who have had the vaccinations. He also noted that these genome changes can ‘last for generations’.
Over the last few days (and years and years) I have posted various things highlighting several of the very disordered aspects of modern society. I have specifically focussed in various ways on relationships between men and women, and how these are affected by so much of the surrounding nonsense.
I have often pointed out the Satanic nature of feminism (literally, it has purely Satanic roots at all levels, no matter how seductive the initial presentation is), which, of course, upsets feminists, and may rub many women the wrong way even if they are not avowed feminists.
The measure of discomfort a woman feels on reading that feminism is a net evil in the world is directly proportional to her lack of understanding of what it means to be a woman in reality, nature and as God intended.
And if that last sentence makes you even more upset, well, it’s unlikely you will have the mental fortitude to read the rest of this post, or ever learn anything useful about correcting the ills of the world, starting with yourself, as we all must.
In fairness to women, and as I have pretty much always stated, the fault of their disordered attitudes to life, lies in great part with men. That said, however, unless women want to be thought of, treated as, and in fact be, the human equivalent of cattle without any agency whatsoever, they need to take at least some responsibility. Incidentally, I advise they do. A vast majority of men would be perfectly happy to assume women have no more agency than ruminants, but I don’t think that’s the way forward.
So, then, according to me, and a lot of thoughtful men, what is it that women are getting so wrong and should make an effort to improve?
Settle down and let me mansplain it to you. Feel free to imagine me manspreading with a cowboy hat on and a redneck accent if it helps. Hell, if it helps go ahead and really fire up your imaginations and try and imagine me with a mullet and a cigarette. Whatever works ladies, whatever works!
The pivotal error most women have been trained to do, is to stop being women. To stop being feminine, and girly, and pretty, and pleasant, and polite, and dignified, and well-dressed. Yes, in effect I am saying that the pivotal error is that they are failing to act, be and enjoy being, like a prim and proper lady straight out of a 1950’s fiction about what the future would have been like.
Allow me to present to you some imagery that may help inspire you a little to at least understand what I mean. Try and grasp the sense of what the woman in these images feels like and how she feels about herself and her place in the world. Imagine it as something eminently positive even if you have been hypnotised to believe the opposite. Imagine their smiles, whether in drawings or photographs are genuine and happy, not posed or faked. Genuinely try to grasp the sense of this, and, if you like, imagine too, what the men in their lives are and should be like for them to genuinely be that happy and content and internally free.
And in case you think those images are too “dated” for your sense of modern style, then allow me to further help you “update” them in modernistic fashion as envisioned back then too.
You see, you can transpose the imagery, you can change the setting, you can manipulate the exterior and the style, but it is the inner sense of things which is the key.
What no man wants is this:
Or God-forbid, this:
In fact, almost all men, certainly all sane, well-balanced, normal ones, being confronted with this in their home,
Will gladly and regularly put up with this:
which, by the way, is pretty normal and natural for a woman to have and be like. And occasionally, when we deserve it, and as we are humans, we all do at times, even this:
ESPECIALLY, if it is presented in this very feminine fashion, which is indirectly and sweetly, VERY direct.
Now, to the squeals of the beached whales complaining, my ears are deaf, but to those perspicacious females that noted the question above as to what the man in their life should look like and act like for them to be happy to be as mentioned above, again, perhaps some inspirational imagery is in order.
And again, the images above reflecting men, are not supposed to “inspire” a bunch of metrosexuals to take on the airs of such imagery as boxers, mountaineers, soldiers, and random adventurers so as to impress women. The whole point of such men is that they do what they do because they want to. The impressing or not of others is inconsequential to them.
And while the entrenched feminist will continue to squeal like a poked pig that such patriarchal oppression is endemic of rape-culture and toxic masculinity and blah, blah, blah, who cares… it will be essentially because deep down in their core, like the hole at the centre of the Gamma male’s soul, entrenched feminists have a similar eternal void of self, and deep, deep down know they will never be able to snag, keep and be loved truly by such a man. So, just like the gamma male, they rage. And their rage tries to burn down all men, all pretty, feminine women and all nuclear families.
But every woman who has not yet succumbed to totalitarian feminism, deep down, knows she would love to be with such a stereotypical manly man. Stereotypes are stereotypes for a reason. And truly, actual manly men, are happy to treat their wives as their princesses as long as they in turn treat them as their kings. It is a mutual admiration society founded in genuine care for the other above our own concerns.
That is not to say the manly man will not screw up from time to time. Or that the feminine woman will not. Humans ALL screw up. But that is not reason enough to give up on them. God didn’t. Jesus let himself be scoured, spat upon and nailed to a cross while wholly innocent in order not to give up on us. So… be kind to each other.
And as we are only human, and not like Jesus, it is perfectly acceptable to completely avoid feminists, not engage with them, not have sex with them, and most certainly not marry or have children with them. And it is equally perfectly acceptable for women to similarly avoid “male” metrosexual “feminist-allies”, and their spineless, manipulative, weak, PUA ways.
What no woman wants, in keeping with the imagery above for what men do not want, is the gamma male:
Ultimately, cliched as it is, the natural order of things is probably most expressed by Tarzan and Jane.
And the 1981 version of the film with Bo Derek as Jane remains one of the better versions. If memory serves, the point where Tarzan meets Jane and sniffs her is very well done. I think it was the 1981 film version, but it’s possible it may have been the 1999 version with Christopher Lambert as Tarzan.
The man being a quasi savage is fine. Dealing with the world, especially if one understands the reality of things, often resembles something not unlike a fight with wild animals (with apologies to all wild animals who do not deserve to be compared to the parasitic classes of human bureaucrats that infest our lives today), but it is the very femininity of his woman that softens his ways with her, and it is his caring and protective masculine efforts that give her that peaceful sense of security that no matter how crazy the world gets, he will take care of her.
Today’s world has made the acting as a man almost illegal. And the acting as a woman something to be disparaged and ridiculed. The effect is most noticeable on women, as they are far more social animals than men are. But the results are destructive and create profound unhappiness in women above all. Quoting various scientific studies is near useless given that overall so-called peer reviewed studies are fake and irreproducible by over 50% of cases, however, you can find some with actual methodology that is explained (if not verified).
Here is an interesting graph that measures overall self-reported happiness (of both men and women) against perceived freedom. From this site.
The interesting thing to note, if you search a bit and try to get a general sense of all these studies, is that general happiness took a dive for everybody starting around 1990, although the trend had been downward already. What happened in 1990? Well, political correctness really started up quite prominently and feminism began its ascendance on steroids.
The world has made it quite difficult for a man to single handedly go and work and provide for a numerous family of a wife and several children.
And equally difficult for a woman to be a home-maker and housewife without being criticised by her (less happy) “peers” for being a spineless doormat, subjugated to the always evil and perverted desires of her male oppressor (aka husband).
The answer needs to be in a certain evolutionary step women need to take and it needs to be a step they understand and choose for themselves.
Just like men had to learn to somewhat curb their temperament. Because challenging a rude waiter, or a slow one, to a death duel with your sixgun or samurai sword apparently is “rude”. And then they went completely overboard correcting in the other direction and outright banning the challenge to a duel as being all “illegal” and “murder-y”, go figure.
Well, anyway, women need to now make the evolutionary step that realises that the opinions of other women, especially, but other people, in general, are pointless to worry about or lose sleep over. My post on whoyour critics most often are, is as valid for women as it is for men. Perhaps even more so (with respect to the who).
If it is rare for an efficient and capable man to be your avowed critic (unless you in fact are, mostly an oxygen thief) when it comes to women, even if they are efficient and capable, they are generally worse than men at gaslighting each other as well as critiquing you unfairly or wholly based on their own failings (usually not to your face though). So in that respect at least, the advice given in that post, is valid for women too.
Biologically, it is objectively harder for a woman to be objective than a man. That is just a fact of nature, and trying to deny it is pointless and counter-productive. Because hormones are real and a thing. Nevertheless, assuming that because of it rationality and good logic are therefore impossible, is a lie. Just as men had to evolve to not let their own hormonally driven instincts direct their actions, so now women need to learn the same lesson.
And remember, always, always, always:
Women are not the enemy. Men are not the enemy. The lies and the liars who speak them are the enemy. And you should give them no quarter and no mercy. Expose them, reject them, and have nothing to do with them.
Safeguard the roles nature intended for us and learn them anew if you must (as most of us have to), supporting each other as you do so and learn together. There is no human unit, group, or community, more important, more necessary, more valid, than the nuclear family composed of one man, one woman and their children. All the rest is shadows and lies and meaningless details in the face of that truth.
So come together and know: You have been lied to. Rediscover. Rebuild. Learn. Marry, for life, make children, and reject the world’s lies and fake “rewards”.
Is it easy? No. Of course not. Your own family, especially if you had boomer parents, is probably riddled with divorce, lack of funds, and dysfunctionality at a core level. That’s the reality. So YOU be the start.
You’re like a rootless couple of shipwrecks on a hostile alien planet. You need to first of all get together, realise you need to make your partnership, your marriage, be the core of everything. Without that, you will not survive. Then do all the things that need doing so your children will be able to start off their lives in a tradition that is worthwhile, healthy and gives them the chance to create a solid footing for their own children.
Make that future bright and real, no matter what difficulties you need to face.
Vintage illustration of a futuristic American family on vacation, with the father driving his wife and two kids in a flying saucer instead of a car, 1950s. (Illustration by GraphicaArtis/Getty Images)
And ignore the human wreckage and misshapen mutants that try and tell you you’re wrong, a racist, some kind of supremacist this or that, a hater, an evil, evil, EEEEBIL (yes with a B) toxic male or spineless female.
They, after all, are evolutionary dead ends. The blind frogs that can’t swim that nature experiments with by the thousands just to have them die off in a genetic cul-de-sac.
Forge ahead and take a picture of the freaks, so you can leave a warning in your photo-album for your grandkids.
Vox Day’s Socio-Sexual Hierarchy nomenclature receives plenty of criticism from some people, and much praise from others. The split itself is telling. Those men who have observable patterns of behaviour most associated with being Gammas reject or try to redefine the entire hierarchy to somehow position themselves as the real “tops”, which is why Vox refers to them also as Secret Kings.
A recent comment on my own post about rapey idiots in glass houses expresses what many normal (Delta) Type men believe:
These famous rich guys who drug women like Bill Cosby and this Danny Masterson must be particularly depraved because being rich and famous they could surely get women without doing so.
This idea shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the inner world of the Gamma and what drives them, in the context of being rapists or at a minimum creeps. I have observed their behaviour for years, with the same kind of disgusted fascination one might observe some parasite burrowing under an innocent’s skin.
The behaviour first became more prevalent and obvious on the internet in the mid 1990s, where frustrated men in alt-dot forums expressed a vitriolic hatred bordering on the psychotic towards any form of female rejection they experienced. Then I saw it in the flesh too and mostly it got told to me by pretty much almost all the women I was with in my life.
At first I though the behaviour of rage, when rejected, must apply to only a small percentage of unbalanced losers, but as I was told the same type of stories, by woman after woman after woman, and indeed saw it with my own eyes at times when a girl I was seeing was being hit on by some guy who usually was unaware she was with me in the specific context. As soon as she made it clear she was with me and therefore not available for his advances, some of these guys went into an obvious instant red-hot hatred. Because I look like I do, they usually just left, very occasionally making some sarcastic jab before slinking quickly away. On some occasions I even got an after-event report. One girl I was seeing for a time was a student at university and we had very much an on-off relationship. She was very pretty and was always surrounded by hangers on that thought they might eventually get with her if they just kept being in her orbit. One guy in particular went overboard with the “friends” cover. Whenever this girl and I were not seeing each other for a couple of days he would go over and try and “keep her company”. All of it was non-sexual “let’s watch a film together” or whatever, but his intent was obvious to me and I think to her too, though we didn’t really discuss it, because frankly, he was a non-entity and there was no chance she would do anything with him. It had not anything to do with looks or money either. He was just that sort of milque-toasty guy that really no woman wants to be with by choice.
Anyway, during one of these “pauses” in our relationship she later told me the guy was at her place for two days straight, during which she bitched to him about me and my uncompromising ways. She was marinated in British Feminist theory, and I simply have never had anything to do with it, nor ever accepted any of their absurd ideology. Her feminist theory invariably failed when confronted with her natural instincts concerning me and she would inevitably return to me with some very intimate ways to “make up”. Over time she would try to get me to bend to some insane feminist idea and I would once more simply reject it. Anyway, after her bitching about this for two days to this guy and his enthusiastically agreeing with her, and finally beginning to think this was his way to finally get with her, I believe, from memory that she recounted to me how her conversation went in the final stages. She had just said that I was impossible and drove her crazy with how I just made arguments she couldn’t really counter and it pissed her off and she “hated” me for it. He nodded and said something along the lines of “yeah, he sounds terrible, you should forget about him.”
To which she replied: “Yes, he’s terrible, makes me so mad… And yet… I can’t do without him. I’m going to go over to him now and be completely on his cock.”
And she did. Now, in that case, I can see the guy being frustrated, in his mind he had been sidling up to her like a proper gentleman of the woke variety, and was agreeing with her all the time and was obviously the “better” man, what with being all woke and pro-whatever feminist crap she spouted, and he affirmed and supported all her patriarchal suffering, or whatever, and then, she promptly announces that she’s off to do the very things he desperately was hoping to get from her with me.
You can see how he’d be upset. But the reality is he was more than just dejected. He was furious. Luckily he did not react physically against her, but the next time I saw him several days later, you could tell he had a murderous rage all about him towards me and her too. He never spoke to her again, as far as I know, which was just as well.
Now, in the above case you can sort of sympathise with the guy a little (not about the rage) at least everyone has felt a little sad or frustrated at being rejected by someone they really liked. But in my case, really that is as far as it has ever gone. Ultimately, if a person genuinely has no attraction for you, how can you get angry at them for that? The idea is just absurd to me. It has never computed and never will.
The reason I recounted that chapter of my life was to try and give you some insight into the fundamental difference of internal mechanism that a Gamma has from other archetypes.
The difference is in the internal world of the Gamma from that of a Delta or an Alpha or a Sigma.
The Alpha may actually get quite stung at rejection, especially if it is public and from a high status woman. His ego and need to be seen as the Alpha may in fact also cause him to be quite caustic or dismissive, but if so it will be generally only in the moment and temporarily. After all, no real Alpha wants to be seen as a pitiful shadow of a man that is pining after some woman. Besides, there are usually several waiting in the wings for him, happy to heal his broken heart. In the Alpha mind, getting angry at rejection from a woman is essentially below his dignity and status to do. He may privately be quite hurt, but rage, even to himself, goes against his nature, which is essentially generous and expectant of plentifulness (be it women, business, fame, and so on). The Alpha is a reacher for things, including women, but usually not a desperate grabber in the normal course of affairs.
The Delta is more of a balanced individual and generally will take rejection on the chin, be hurt, then move on with his life and try and find peace where he can. These are the majority of well balanced men.
The Sigma is a special case and may not care at all about the rejection, or be a freak on which the rejection is really the least of his concerns. Keep in mind that both James Bond as well a the character in the series Hannibal are Sigmas. These are not people who follow normal social conventions, but precisely because of that, their internal world, strange as it may be, is founded on a solid bedrock of self-reliance and hence self-knowledge. While they might be professional killers for hire, they are probably unlikely to get angry at a woman for rejecting them. A case in point from fiction may be Dexter. He killed bad guys with abandon, but was always a loyal boyfriend to the women he was with, and took their rejections or bad behaviours with calm resignation.
The Gamma however has wholly different internal mechanisms and they end up being the really creepy and dangerous ones, even if they present as easy-going, liberal, modern metrosexual men in touch with their feminine side. In almost diametric opposition to Sigmas, the Gamma has a profound (and un-admitted) lack of self-confidence. This is a root cause in their very core and they try to cover up that existential hole in their soul with all manner of fakery. Be it money, status, recognition by the masses for their achievements (real or most often imagined or “manufactured”), it is never enough to really fill that essential lack of self-truth.
A Gamma can be a billionaire (see Bezos) and still behave in a completely creepy/loser/gamma way with women. It is true that an Alpha or a Sigma or even a Delta, that is really a millionaire or billionaire can have his pick of women willing to be his sexual partners, and many of those women, initially attracted by the power, wealth and status, may even end up having genuine feelings for the man in question, but there is a core difference in the dynamics with a Gamma.
The billionaire alpha, sigma or even delta, may be perfectly aware of the sexual liaison with women being purely transactional. Their temporary thrill at being on a private jet, or even just seen with the billionaire in question, is enough for them to permit sex between them. The Delta will eventually be a bit sad at such an arrangement and over time get disillusioned with this woman or perhaps even women in general if the pattern repeats. An Alpha may even prefer the situation to be transactional and be fine with it and get a new “performer” once he bores with the first one, or have multiple ones in play or make a proper business contract out of a “marriage”. A Sigma may do the same or become a pimp, or a celibate monk by choice. But a Gamma will simply think that his material wealth gives him the right and the authority to do what he imagines Alphas do or get away with doing. And this is the tragic error.
An Alpha, whether a billionaire or homeless, will have a woman act towards him intimately because she wants to. Because the man’s internal sense of self is strong and she responds to that, ultimately, aside from his exterior, worldly, if you like, trappings. I have personally known (in my hedonistic days) beautiful women, married to extremely wealthy men, who, nevertheless would get naked and have sex with a man that had no money to speak of, but a sense of self that was of a different order from their husbands. This type of effect cannot be bought. The effect it has on women cannot be replicated nor faked very effectively even by the women themselves. So, what happens when a Gamma has reached some perceived pinnacle of power, wealth, fame or combination thereof, in his abysmal understanding of the female mind and heart, he thinks he is now “entitled” to the female attention that he imagines Alphas and Sigmas get (and in fact do get). When, to his utter shock and horror women continue to dodge him like radioactive plague, his natural emotion is rage. In his broken understanding of “life” he is rich, he is successful, he is famous, EVERY woman OWES him sex at will. HIS will. And if they don’t give it of their own volition, why, they must be defective, and/or it doesn’t matter, because in the Gamma’s mind Alphas just take what they want anyway and the women always go along with it.
And this is how you get the Danny Masterson of the world, the Bill Cosbys and all the other wealthy and powerful executives that end up getting caught groping angrily at unwilling secretaries and colleagues. So, no, the money is not enough. The fame is not enough. The status is not enough. And gammas simply will never get that.
Because all it takes is what in Italian is commonly referred to as “balls”.
And like real courage, real, intimate self-knowledge can’t be faked. And women can sense it.
One of the principal reasons I have been a misanthrope from an early age is because of the hypocrisy and stupidity of the average human.
As I have recently posted concerning your potential critics being usually drug-addled alcoholics with dysfunctional children trying to tell you how to parent or live your life, and how supposed gurus of sexuality and relationships tend to be involuntary celibate, socially inept desperates, I wanted, as is normally the case, to also try and give some hope and inspiration.
I don’t know who needs to know this or indeed if anyone will actually investigate this deeply enough that it becomes a factor in their life, but I know many people have done so, as a direct result of things I have written, and they inform me periodically about how much healthier and happier their life is as a result.
Any regular readers should already be aware of the fact that I have presented in depth how a properly Catholic people not only have created the best civilisation ever recorded in human history, but how I believe they will do so again.
I was baptised on May 25th 2017, so not long ago in the scheme of things, although, in my life, one should probably measure things in dog years, since in the intervening six and a half years I changed job at least 4 times, moved home 3 times, got married in Church, had three children, bought a small farm, moved country, and started the makings of a small Catholic community. The first person to purchase property near me and join those efforts is currently signing on his house purchase contract in the next couple of days.
Despite all that movement and associated turbulence, the reality is that I have been practically helped by other Catholics (all sedevacantists as my family is) to a degree that I have never had before in my life by any group of people or individuals.
The main issue between me and other humans has never been one related to intelligence. Yes, the disparity is a thing, and yes the IQ communication gap is very real and has real effects on your life, mostly negative at an interpersonal level, but IQ per se has never been a factor in my friendships. One of the most loyal and honest people I ever met, a young Motswana I worked with for a few years, was (and remains) incapable of grasping the concept of square metres. Yet I would trust him with a million dollars in cash or taking care of one of my children long before I would do so with almost any of the Europeans I worked with since.
No, the deciding factor has never been IQ, culture (insofar as it does not apply to the real reason), race or much of anything else. The main, pivotal, key factor is the dishonesty.
Hypocrisy is the worst form of dishonesty as far as I am concerned. And the level of it in most humans surpasses my tolerance for it, which is, admittedly, very low. When you add stupidity to hypocrisy, well… let’s just say that my tolerance drops to a frosty 0 degrees Kelvin.
Catholicism, the real one only continued presently by Sedevacantists, is, undoubtedly a net good. It produces strong and helpful communities of people that you can rely on and that rely on you. It produces healthy, balanced, happy children, and couples that correctly understand the nuclear family dynamics for the good of not just themselves or their children, but for the entire family.
But even if you are not Catholic, consider: what is the level of hypocrisy in your own life?
In the life of your supposed friends or relatives?
Who do you most get on with? What is their level of hypocrisy?
If you are like me, the key factor that makes other people creatures you simply do not enjoy the company of, is, and always will be, hypocrisy.
And for those too lazy to google it:
But for me, the absolute definition is a fourth one:
Applying, or trying to apply, or impose, rules, laws, judgements or behaviours on others that you avoid and do not comply with yourself.
You can see why, if that is your key philosophy concerning how you value other humans, entire classes of people are almost instantly excluded from consideration:
Politicians, most so-called law enforcement, all heretical, apostate, fake “clergy”, any kind of “woke” person, since their ideology is inherently hypocritical, and so on and on.
So, while the habitual drunk that smokes dope daily right next to their small child with soiled nappies, obviously become a complete nullity with zero value in your life whatsoever, there are also less obvious results.
For example, people that are stereotypically considered “bad guys” can in fact be more honest and less hypocritical than the stereotypically “good guys”.
Who would you trust more, after all, one of the bought and paid for supposedly professional doctors that pushed hard to inject your child with a genetic serum that in the BEST of cases was demonstrated for the previous 30 years to eventually result in an autoimmune disorder that becomes fatal in all animal testing, and that it is now also demonstrated in various batches contained graphite, HIV virii, and other nefarious substances, OR, a bank robber that for all his criminal activity has a code that he will never hurt women or children?
It is not always immediately obvious where anyone’s lines of behaviour are, but once you are able to figure out their level of hypocrisy, everything suddenly clarifies a great deal.
In my experience for example, I have always found that people that work primarily with their hands, as a general rule, are more honest and less hypocritical than most white collar workers.
Be they farmers, metal workers, soldiers, are they rougher? Sure. Are they less polite? Absolutely. Are there more liable to try and punch you in the face if you piss them off? Yes.
And most people stop there and see no further.
So, try to see the net good from a perspective of the absence of hypocrisy.
But are they also more fundamentally honest than the soft-handed white collar workers you exchange pleasantries on a daily basis at the office? In my experience, also yes.
Coincidentally to my own piece on the lefty rapist types that are frenzy-whipped by the shrews in their life, Vox posted the response of a CEO of a comics publishing house to the suggestions that Chuck Dixon, an iconic comic book creator, should be deplatformed for… reasons. I have no idea. I don’t care at all. I read plenty of comic books as a teenager and earlier and the ones I liked best would probably get people jail time today.
Jonah Hex was my favourite one of the I think they are silver age comics we used to have hundreds of before my dad got rid of them all after we left home. It’s why I don’t feel bad he helped me buy this farm. If he hadn’t chucked those out I probably would have been okay getting it on my own. Maybe ten years ago.
Interestingly, DC also made a roleplaying game that my brother and I briefly owned and it had little cards for each of the DC heroes, that included a motivation for each one of them. Jonah Hex’s was correct: Seeking Justice. It’s why that character resonated with me so much. I think if I were reduced to a cardboard cutout that would be my primary motivation too. And as it was a Western, Jonah blasted a few bad guys per episode. The themes were quite adult and the writer of the stories was brilliant. Jonah Hex was discontinued and then they kind of did to him in real life what happens to him in the comic book. In a future he gets wormholes into, Jonah finds out his own body was embalmed as a circus attraction. Well, the subsequent restart attempts and the film made were kinda that. Whoever wrote those stories and film should be horse-whipped.
Aaaaanny way, I digress, the point is the CEO of the publishing house producing the latest Chuck Dixon comic told the entire woke world to go pound sand. And then cry a bit and pound it a bit more.
Good. And so should say all of us to every insane, retarded, Satanic, nonsense that is currently being peddled by the perennially offended. Common sense needs to prevail and courtesy and good manners be reserved for those who deserve it and earn it.
To the screeching “social justice”, cultural marxist, types trying to convince your three year old son that he can become a girl or that your three year old daughter can become a boy, we should have a resounding: “Fuck right off, groomer!” ringing in their ears until they disappear back into whatever festering hellhole they climbed out of.
And it should be loud and clear and backed up by legislation, and penalties, and consequences. These toxic excuses for “equality” in the name of “respect” and “fairness for all” are really evil. There is no other word for it. they intend to do harm and they do. The last thing they do is respect anyone, or try to be fair. They, in fact, are the very worst little tyrants, and everyone normal has had enough. So it’s time to put the mentally ill, the unbalanced, the insane, and the intentionally evil child predators back into proper health care, be that a mental institution, a home for the criminally insane, or being noted as a potentially unstable person that an eye should be kept on, for their own safety and that of others.
Have you ever noticed how most of the nu-male feminist “allies”, who are permanently woke, go “yes ma’m, no ma’m, three bags full ma’m” and whose wives (when they are married) seem to have their testicles in a jar by their bedside, despite all their tut-tutting about “toxic masculinity” this or “misogynist” that, quite often, turn out to be actual rapists?
And also often enough, with incontrovertible video evidence of their rapist inclinations?
Kind of strange huh?
What I can’t fathom, is in what world to these wormtongue-like weaklings think they live? They feel entitled to point to a guy who’s maybe just living his life, as a man, and try and make him out to be this evil, woman-hating psychopath, all-the while, at any minute, they can be exposed for precisely exactly what kind of sexual predator they are.
Is it hubris? Stupidity? Both? Or are they pushed to do it? And if so, is it by their evil and knowing masters? I put it to you that aside from the rich and famous, there are probably a high number of your average, run-of-the-mill household rapists, that are probably put to championing the feminist flag by their unknowing, woke, feminist wives.
And they may well live in a state of semi-constant terror that one day, they may be pushed to criticise, or try to #metoo, a guy who doesn’t give a shit and has the will and ability to burn their whole life down by exposing them in an incontrovertible fashion for their own real and actual behaviours, instead of the fake accusations they cast about towards their betters.
It is fascinating really.
Let me make a random and at least partially hypothetical example.
Take Tyson Fury, the boxer also known as the Gypsy King.
Go read his wikipedia page, it’s actually really quite interesting. And see how he had anything but an easy life, and also how he was lambasted by the media for his stance on homosexuality, pedophiles, abortion, his belief in Jesus Christ being King, and so on.
The limp-wristed, nu-male allies of feminism, joined in the chorus of shouting about how Tyson Fury is an obvious misogynist, “homophobic”, woman-hating tyrant, to the tune of some 140,000 signatures trying to deny him the title of Sports person of the year in 2015. Can’t give it to a man such as Mr. Fury! Egads!
“Homophobic” Tyson Fury – the word makes me laugh, it literally means afraid of “homos”. Does Mr. Fury look like he’s prone to much fear of… anyone?
And yet, I’d bet money that the likelihood of Tyson Fury ever having raped anyone is very, very, very, low to none. I don’t know the man. I never met him. I saw a fight or two of his and I saw more of him telling journalists in no uncertain terms what they are and what actually matters. He certainly can present as arrogant and controversial. Which I understand very well. It’s a quick way to get rid of the weak and unintelligent. Oh they will snipe from afar, but they daren’t open their weak mouths in your presence. And that is a measure of peace.
Anyway, like him or hate him, Tyson Fury is clearly a man that says what he means and means what he says. He seems to have a family that does well and despite his very hard life, he and his wife are teenage sweethearts and still together with six children. No one imagines everything between them has always been a garden of roses, and given the pressures the man has endured, regardless of what the outside world thinks, I have no doubt that him and his wife have a bond that most marriages simply can’t even imagine. I would not be surprised at all if Tyson Fury was to sacrifice his own life to protect his wife or children at a moment’s notice. As I said, I don’t know the man at all and maybe if I did sit down with him for five minutes I’d not like him. Or maybe I would. But if ever the opportunity presented itself, I’d take that five minutes. Not because I care about his fame or his boxing status. But because whatever his faults, he is a man. An interesting guy who has overcome things that would have destroyed weaker ones.
Now let’s take this guy:
Looks like just the sort of suave nu-male that is woke about the plight of women, while being all trendy and metrosexual right? Yeah. Right.
If by woke and trendy and aware of the patriarchy obviously oppressing women, you mean, drugging and repeatedly raping them over a period of years. And note that even after he was found guilty —being a darling of the trendy jet-set life that all pretend to be so concerned about women— he had letters of support from his famous colleagues in the entertainment industry.
How much do you want to bet that if Danny Masterson’s wife, had ever seen Tyson Fury talk about how he is the King of his household, she would have had something to say about the awful, awful, evil, brute of a man that is Tyson Fury? And so would all her friends and all his friends too. And Danny himself would have made some disparaging comment about Tyson Fury to the delight of all present, haw-hawing at the “beastly” Mr. Fury?
Yeah. It’s amazing isn’t it?
So, perhaps, all those closeted, or not so closeted, creepy rapist types hiding in the shadows, should have a think. Do you really want to keep poking at the Tyson Furys of the world? Because I think the Tyson Furys of the world have had about enough, and they would all be well within their rights to start their own movement against rapey creeps hiding behind façades of modern sensibilities and social justice.
I’m thinking that instead of #metoo though, it might be called #youtoo.
Just pause and think for a moment what it was that ever persuaded you, at any time in his career, that Russell Brand was a thing, someone you should have at least a semi-soft spot for, rather than someone you should recoil from as you might from a recently soiled wank rag.
What I think you’ll probably find is that you never really liked him. He looked greasy, dirty, like the junkie boyfriend your daughter dragged home in the small hours and whom you would happily have shot but for the tearful plea ‘But Dad, I LOVE him.’ Even though he was trapped inside a TV screen, you could still almost smell the whiff of stale sweat and smegma permeating your sitting room.
I can honestly say, nothing. I never was persuaded he was anything but a lecherous creep from the very first time I saw him.
As for Jimmy Saville, I always found him absolutely disgusting. I could never watch a second of him on TV at all. I would literally change the channel instantly if he came on.
It seems then, my pedophile/wanker/creep radar functions well above the norm. But it’s been (and often still is) a mystery to me why that is. The difficulty for me is not in why I am able to instinctively spot these slithering vermin; no, the difficulty for me has always been the trying to understand why so many can’t.
This is gonna be a long post, and many will interpret it as either some kind of general shit-cannon against all sorts of supposed “gurus”, or some way to tell you all how clever, smart, and cool I am for having seen the obvious more than a decade ago, or whatever. So let me disabuse you of that notion right from the start.
The ENTIRE point of this post is simply one:
To show, by showing ample working out, with indelible proof, that the best path for men to take, especially young men, is to choose the ancient and classical virtues. Above all seek truth, honour, courage, perseverance, beauty, and justice. Never compromise your personal integrity. Learn from your mistakes. Reject degeneracy, lies, puffed up ego, material status over integrity, and understand why a small deviation into the lies and nonsense of the World, can lead you to perdition, even in only the material sense, even if you are not a believer.
If you learn just this, even only from a secular perspective, later, you may begin to compare the life of a righteous man and how it compares to the life of pious man, and recognise they are the same path. And later still, you may realise that Catholicism has always championed the virtues and rejected the lies. But that is a far-away hope. For now, I want to demonstrate to you, how the snake-oil salesmen, the liars, the peddler of sexualised fantasies, have, and continue, to lead men astray into distraction, nonsense, and perversion, and away from a life that can be truly worth living and is rooted in all that is good in mankind.
Let me show you the ways of the serpents exposed.
PUAs
Pretty much as soon as I became aware of them, I was critical of PUAs, and not once, randomly, but rather, consistently.
From my February 2010 piece linked above, which was probably one of the more gentle criticisms:
By the time that I discovered anything about PUAs I had developed quite happily on my own into a man more than capable to satisfy his curiosity of women. This was a fortunate thing because it allowed me a perspective on PUAs and their techniques that was free of being sucked into the promise of alluring women falling at my feet almost as if by magic. To a degree, I already had this power (insofar as it can be had let’s say) so I could look into and study and evaluate the information with eyes already filled of my own experiences. To sum up PUAs briefly is difficult, however I will try. Initially, most of these guys are frustrated geeks that have broken down social interactions between naturally successful ladies’ men and attractive women. They then practice these routines like social robots and begin to have some success at obtaining sex with these plastic techniques. As their confidence grows they refine the techniques and become more adept at luring an ever increasing series of women to their beds. The more daring then continue into experimenting with multiple partners at a time as well as multiple girlfriends at a time. Some openly, others secretly. By and large though, certain truths remain evident. Even if successful at having multiple sex partners most of these individuals are still what I would consider socially inept people. They may have achieved an ability at obtaining sex from women but that per se does not make them good people necessarily. Or likeable. Or happy. Furthermore, the level of hyperbole in this community is rather extreme; especially when you consider that many of the so called Pick-Up Gurus sell products that supposedly will increase a man’s ability to bed stunningly beautiful women.
In brief, PUAs are not really picking up women. they are picking up men. In order to sell them fancy stories and elaborate processes by which they can supposedly gain sex from alluring women.
Later, they tried to morph into a general, self-betterment community and even went into how you could use PUA tactics to keep your marriage intact.
And later still they even tried to morph into how real relationships were a mixture of game and Churchianity.
At every turn, the targets were other men.
It is probably true that some desperate men did gain some benefits from some of these guys, but that’s more along the lines of me coming closer to Christianity by reading the arch-heretic Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. In other words, more by random luck, effort on their part, and that leading to something positive. Overall, however, the whole PUA movement was mostly a con. And the people who set themselves up as gurus often poor excuses for functional human beings. One of the most egregious examples was a guy who called himself Mehow, who produced a whole host of products and seminars and books, all aimed at men and teaching them “Game”.
From the same 2010 post:
Mehow has been in the pick-up community pretty much to the exclusion of everything else (it’s his day job as well as his lifestyle) for some 10 years. He also has spent by his own admission about $500,000 of what seems to mostly be daddy’s money to set himself up in the “PUA business”. Again by his own admission in 10 years of hard partying day and night full-time and being trained by the biggest and best Pick-Up Artists in the world, gaining invaluable knowledge of body-language, NLP and who knows what other mystical seduction arts of his own invention, and spending half a million dollars essentially on this sexual crusade, what is Mehow’s tally? By his own admission again, as of about mid 2009, Mehow had had carnal knowledge of “something like 30 to 40 girls”.
So, yes, most PUAs are hyperbolic, dishonest, socially inept guys, preying mostly on desperate and other sexually inept men first and foremost, and possibly the occasional drunk, indiscriminating, kind of woman they might get a one night stand with.
But it gets more insidious than that.
The mindset created by PUAs is one of accelerated mechanisation of human beings. In this respect, the mechanisation of women as mere sexual masturbation devices for men. And, by cause and effect, the mechanisation of men as masturbation devices, and/or, walking wallets for women.
In short, it is a destruction of intimacy, humanity and genuine connection between men and women.
And I wrote this even during the relative “height” (or depth, if you prefer) of my own depravity, when I was never short of female company. Even in my hedonistic phase, I always preferred a genuine connection, however brief, rather than mere sexual relief. I especially never indulged in sex with any woman that was under the influence of anything. Certainly not as a beginning anyway. Once I was comfortable with a woman I had been seeing for some time, it did happen here and there that they may be a little drunk after a party (I never was, I have been drunk precisely once and that was by choice under rather controlled conditions), but certainly compos mentis enough to know precisely what was happening and be quite enthusiastic about it.
My point here is that even as a non-christian of any kind, even in my zen-agnostic, hedonistic general approach to life, I never saw the PUA stuff and the related attitudes as anything other than the weak, pissing about, damaging, cowardly actions of sub-standard men.
And time has proven me eminently correct.
The point here is not to focus on how smart or cool or prescient I am/was, but to note the pattern. To notice what made me notice (lack of virtue in their ways and at least basic adherence to at least some virtue for myself).
And to notice the path and the trajectory of these “men” who instead either fell into, or promoted the PUA grift and general attitude.
Let us then, notice the paths of some of these characters and who and how and where they link to and where they ended up.
A relatively decent article (despite it being by buzzfeed) and already 4 years old, overall is pretty good about the whole situation of PUAS, and Mystery and some of the early PUAS. Mostly, they really are scattered like rats, with a few hangers on like Mystery himself, trying to reinvent himself (and failing).
Some, like Tyler Durden (Owen Cook) as can be seen from this review video of his “skills” which also includes some of his seminar antics (about 6 minutes in and later too) make both men and women marvel at the fact that he managed to procreate. I mean, does this not look like a macho-man that women naturally swoon over to you? No? Why then, the problem must be with you then, naturally!
But ok, enough of these sad creatures. I think you can do your own research to figure out they are basically noxious beings. They are pathetic, but they also have contributed to the ongoing degeneration of life in general as far as it relates to intimate relationships. But where did they originate from?
The “Hypnosis” and NLP Connection
And here we come to some little known truths. A LOT of the whole “Game” and PUA stuff started with Hypnosis, and NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming), which is the brainchild of two guys: Richard Bandler and John Grinder. I know. God has a sense of humour.
Dick Bandler and John Grinder (the gay app… was it named after him? One has to wonder).
There is one last point that I cannot help but enjoy needling the hordes of NLP enthusiasts who seem to consider Richard Bandler as their guru with. Milton Erickson practiced hypnosis and cured many, many people of sometimes very serious afflictions and certainly cannot be disputed to have been overall a power for good in the world. The man usually mostly credited with the “discovery” of NLP is Richard Bandler —in great part also due to his own self-marketing as such— it is interesting to note that Bandler was one of only three people in the room when one of those three people, the only woman in the room, was shot in the face with a .357 magnum revolver and killed. Neither Bandler nor his then friend James Marino was ever convicted of her murder though it was clearly not a suicide. Bandler also was demonstrated to be a fantasist about more than a little of his past, somewhat obsessed with violence, having threatened innocent people with firearms on at least some other occasion before as well as being a heavy drinker and also user of cocaine in large quantities. Personally, I am also extremely dubious that Bandler was a force for good in anyone’s life that he acted on directly, though of course I have met many of his devoted followers, who have attended his seminars and trainings at rather expensive prices for the privilege of being trained by a fantasising, heavy drinking, cocaine user that was somehow or other involved in the murder of an unarmed woman in circumstances that can only be described as suspect in the best of cases. [1]
Because pretty much all the hype about how you could use hypnosis to get women into bed supposedly at magical will, pretty much all originated with the whole PUA “gurus” reading up and trying to learn NLP to “trick” women into bed. The same was somewhat true of magic tricks, which Mystery himself still practices, as the buzzfeed article points out.
So, a bunch of socially maladjusted, sex starved, incels (involuntary celibates) learn the BIG SEEEECRIT of how to “hypnotise” women into becoming sex slaves from… a cocaine snorting, con man who is responsible either directly (my personal opinion) or at the very least by proxy, for the murder of his then on-off girlfriend.
What could possibly go wrong?
And who else took up the Bandler flag of being a master-guru of manipulation to achieve riches, glory and concubines?
Yeah, this is not gonna make anyone look good. Brace yourselves.
And let’s look at what handler in his prime affected as his guru look:
Now, I don’t want to say for sure it was Bandler, but in one of my delving into various subcultures of cults, I took a Tony Robbins seminar, which generally tried to upsell you other stuff during it. One of which was some advanced guru magic of some sort or other and you could go meet the guru in question briefly if you wanted to take the add on course for some eye-watering cost that I forget. Anyway, I went to see what this guru’s guru looked like and if it was not Bandler (I honestly don’t recall the name that was given or even if it was given) it was his spiritual twin. He had black painted fingernails, a leather vest very much like the one in the image above, a graying pony tail and some odd rings and other accessories on and about his person. It fairly screamed new Age Hippy Boomer dipped in narcissism and lies. I didn’t even listen to his free presentation.
Now let’s look at what Miles Sonkin looks like:
Honestly that’s the most flattering image I could find of the man.
Here he is with the War Room’s supposed main guy Andrew Tate and some of his victims successful peers.
According to the credible side of the reporting done on Miles, he really is the main brain behind the whole War Room thing, that apparently, and credibly, teaches men to essentially brainwash naive girls into becoming their cam girls as well as getting their names tattooed on them, as Andrew Tate himself has done to several women. Supposedly a few dozen of them having tattooed his name on their bodies. A kind of branding really that is not uncommon in various prostitution rings, and sex cults, like the notorious NXIVM one that involved the actress from the Superboy Smallville TV series.
It is fairly obvious from pretty much everything about Miles Sonkin that he has styled himself, literally, as a wizard and very much on the lines and methods pioneered by Bandler.
And insidious as the “hypnotist” NLP/PUA guru persona is, and as much damage as it does to those unfortunates that decide to “follow” them, the fall-out goes well beyond the directly affected.
The mannerisms and manipulation techniques of these conmen affect to one degree or other many other second-tier snake-oil salesmen.
Second Tier “Gurus”
Here we see a link between Miles the “wizard” and Ivan Throne, the boastful deaf salesman of supposedly man-improving seminars, and self-help… packages of… “Dark Triad”… I dunno, books, grandiose bullshit, etc.
I interacted with Throne directly online for a time as I had introduced him to an online Facebook group I was part of before it was nuked. Something I soon regretted when I saw his bluster was padded with what he thought was grandiloquent language, unfortunately for him, despite English being my second language, I actually know how to use it and was not the only one to notice that, more than once, he did not know the correct meaning of the “big” words he used. Something I took him up on, which caused him to get rather upset and use more words he misused, thus losing a bit of the shine anyone in the group may have had for him. The group has long since been nuked and I never had anything else to do with him.
Chernovich, he of the ever present lisp, gorilla mindset and, “it wasn’t me, it was a friend who sucked off the ladyboy, even though it was on my blog as a first person experience without explanation” infamy, also has attended the war room in some capacity or other.
The whole War Room, Secret Knowledge, I was born to be King and have women fall eat my feet, is as old as humanity.
It is by no means new.
Nor are the scams they pull, the dishonesty, the manipulation and the grift.
In the past however, the damage they did was limited by their reach. Today, their reach is the entire world, and Andrew Tate has managed to convince an untold number of young men that somehow manipulating young women to be your personal cam-girl whore, and stealing her money and being essentially a digital pimp, is the epitome of what success as a man is.
And keep in mind that Andrew Tate is on the record on video, stating that he would rather be with a 10 looking transvestite (that is a man, pretending to be a woman) than a much lower number looking woman.
Yeah. Peak heterosexuality right there boys. I just wonder if Tate will be the pitcher or the catcher when he eventually gets jail time in Romania for the things he is being charged with: sex trafficking, rape, and other stuff, including, I presume, tax evasion, which historically governments look to as a far more serious offence than mere rape and sex trafficking.
So. What was the point of showing you all these links?
Is this just an extended gossip girl column of pointing fingers and showing you just how “bad” these guys are. And how “smart” and “good” I am?
No.
Personally I don’t really care about any of these guys. I have known their associations and methods for years. I avoid them as soon as I become aware of them and don’t interact with them after I recognise them for the unethical people I judge them to be. I haven’t even shown you all the links by any means. I trained in hypnosis with a guy that is probably one of the best hypnotists in the world, but he too was pretty useless with women and fell into the PUA thing enough to “learn” some of the “tricks” of people like Mystery and then trying to use them at his teaching seminars. He wasn’t a bad guy. He was ambitious and he tried very hard, and I believe he was trying to be a really good and honest guy. But, as is the case with pretty much all “thirsty” men, his lack of ability with women, meant he was not in a satisfied relationship, and as far as this guy is concerned, I believe he would have been happy with just one woman. That’s actually true of most men. If they could get with a woman they were attracted to that treated them well, they would probably be unlikely to stray. Or at least would be a lot less prone to it.
In short, it doesn’t necessarily mean that everyone that had anything to do with any of these linchpins of the PUA movement and related scams is by default a complete loser, manipulator or freak. Some are just sad guys that want to get a girlfriend or wife. And have no idea of how in the modern setting of things, so they try to find some knowledge from people who tell them “this is how you get all the sex and glory an riches”.
PUAs are the sexual equivalent of Nigerian Prince e-mail scams.
The difference is that not only are they after your money, they are also polluting the general zeitgeist of human interactions.
It’s the difference between the 1950s’ dishonest door-to-door seller of encyclopaedias or vacuum cleaners and today’s online marketers of get-rich-quick schemes. The financial damage the old version could do has been amplified by several orders of magnitude. And in addition, the degradation of humanity has taken several steps closer to hell.
The whole point, of this loooooong post, was not just to show you the links between these people —and believe me, there are many more that go to both, higher places of power, and lower ones— but more importantly, how they percolate into the grander overview of life that you are slowly being boiled alive inside of.
Take this post together with the one I wrote immediately before it and think about them a bit. Then you may begin to appreciate why it is probably far safer for you to strike out on your own and make your own mistakes, always with a critical eye on taking note of how reality works and how to better adjust yourself to reality, rather than fool yourself into being into some fantasist’s scenario that you would prefer to believe in.
If you want to meet women and eventually make one your wife, start talking to people in general. Become someone you are happy and proud to be regardless of the attention of lack of it you get from anyone else. Learn to mix and talk with everyone. Become comfortable in the presence of people, then women, then beautiful women, and learn to talk and interact with them. Learn from your mistakes and failed interactions, keep your cool, adjust and correct your approach to whatever it is, be it becoming comfortable with women or learning to pilot a plane. Obviously, in the latter case, you really need to study enough to ensure you don’t go into a tailspin. Recovering from a bad relationship can be hell, fatal even at times, but no one walks away from a plane screw-driving into the Earth with you in it.
Above All
Learn this one thing: Honour, Truth, Justice, Beauty, Courage, the traditional virtues of Catholicism and manhood even before it, are Good. They are true. And they are a better guide for you than any guru. Have faith. Trust yourself to be good. To be able to become virtuous in these true ways, not the fake ones of Clown World. And beware, there are a lot of Clowns out there, and “Wizards”, and snakes in the guise of doves, and gay wolves in the guise of heterosexual pet dogs.
Be careful my adventurer friend. Count your gold pieces, equip yourself well, and follow no man but your own heart.
While I think this advice may well be positively life-changing, especially for younger men, but men in general, let’s first point out some things that should be obvious to all, but probably aren’t, so bear with me with the disclaimers for a second.
This advice is primarily for men. It certainly does not apply to women in anything to the same degree, and there are lots of reasons for this but let’s look at the main 2.
Women are solipsistic by nature, so they hardly ever take on board criticism, valid or invalid.
The social interactions relating to men are critical from both men and women, while the social interactions for women tend to be politely suggestive from men, or typically, completely positive gaslighting from other women. See this humours clip to understand.
As a result, the advice provided here applies to women only rarely.
2. General common sense (which is exceedingly rare) should prevail. Some criticisms are obviously valid, but these tend to be of the extreme nature pretty much everyone is already aware of, including the perpetrator (don’t rob little old ladies, don’t do drugs, steal, etc. etc. etc.) the advice here is primarily related to more general and widespread life choices, your career, job, relationship/s (of various types) and so on.
3. I am not your dad. Ultimately you make your own choices and suffer their consequences or gain from their benefits. Ultimately, all responsibility for your actions rests with you. This is ALWAYS the case. Always.
Ok, now that we got that out the way, let’s get into the meat of this.
For the most part, men, and moreso the younger ones, have been thoroughly dipped in absolute bullshit narratives from birth.
Now, don’t go feeling particularly special, everyone on this planet has been lied to massively from birth, about pretty much everything, and the only way you may begin to see some truth here and there is by studying history. Not the prescribed narrative you have been told to believe in primary school, and later all higher education, but rather the real history, as documented at the time. Do your own investigations into things that interest you. One down side of realising you have been lied to is that as soon as enough people begin to figure out the truth about a few things, like say:
And many, many, many other topics, you invariably get the screeching harpies of complete bafflegarble idiocy, lies, and outright intimidation based on getting you cancelled, fired, and demonised or even physically assaulted and killed. We are referring of course, to absolutely dishonest things like:
Antifa in any form
Social Justice being about any kind of Justice
BLM in any form relating to any kind of Justice
Feminism being a good thing
Flat Earth
Equality being real
Diversity being a strength
The immigration of “poor war victims” instead of fighting age males by the millions from cultures that are incompatible with the civilised west
All cultures and all religions being equivalent in morals, ethics, and civilising value
And on, and on, and on, of course.
On top of that, men have now been percolating in the nonsensical invention of radical feminists and cultural marxists: “toxic masculinity”.
Should you be a normal man, interested in, for example, hunting or exploring remote areas; learning to use weapons or practicing martial arts; studying historical conflicts, human biodiversity and different cultures; noticing the differences between men and women, and cultures and cultures, religions and religions, chastising weak, cowardly, lying men, and teaching your sons honour, courage, and anything from handling woodworking tools to shooting a rifle, you are most likely going to be labelled as some kind of violent monster that hates women, homosexuals, likes to torture animals for fun and is a sociopath. It is, of course, complete nonsense, and accusations that only radicalised feminists, virulently and toxically homosexual men, child predators, and completely dishonest people would throw at you. But then, their numbers are on the rise lately.
So, let me explain to you, my brothers in arms, first of all WHY your critics are complete fucking idiots to begin with, meaning they absolutely must be not only ignored, but actively shunned and distanced from all aspects of your life, and secondly I will explain WHO your critics tend to be in the vast majority of cases, which will make the need from keeping them out of your life even more obvious.
Why are they wrong?
The reasons are almost infinite, but as a general rule:
1. They are Historically Ignorant
Now, you may think this has nothing to do with their criticising your “toxic masculinity” or your choice of weird “career” or of becoming a farmer in remote forests far from large cities, and building your own home starting out with only basic tools (but think about things first, eh?), or your personal relationship with your girlfriend, and so on. But it does.
The recent somewhat humorous meme about men thinking about Ancient Rome on a daily basis is essentially true.
Consider:
EVERYTHING you see around you that can be considered a positive factor of civilisation, was essentially created by men willing and able to do violence to defend, protect, and remove enemies in the way of building those very things you appreciate today.
Indoor Plumbing: Romans.
System of laws that are still in use today all over the world in diluted and worsened forms: Romans.
Roads: Romans
Astonishing works of architecture never before seen: Romans (and Greeks)
The longest and most functional of human empires in all of human history: Rome. The only other system of “empire” that lasted longer and is still functional —as a remnant— is the real Catholic Church (today remaining true and correct as it has for 2000 years only in actual Catholics (Sedevacantists)). And guess where the Catholic Church sprang forth to conquer the world with its truth, beauty and goodness? Rome.
Literally, everything you see would not have happened without the Romans civilising pretty much the then known world. Yes by brute force. Yes by imposing rules and laws on the conquered people, yet letting them have autonomy in their own affairs. And whether you like it or not, the fact is that Rome, by civilising most of humanity at the time, opened the door for the next step, which was the even greater civilising effect of Christianity, which, let’s be clear, is and always was, and always will be, Catholicism. All other pretend versions of “Christianity” including the Novus Ordo fake “Catholic Church” are at best Churchianity and in many cases, actually Satanic inversions.
But even if you step away from Rome, understand that every city you have ever seen or lived in was created by men. Men who fought, and died, against other men, the elements, wild beasts, disease, famine, and natural disasters, in order to impose systems of law, order, food production, animal husbandry, mining, smelting, forging, building, and improving. All while they also did artwork, created places of worship, contemplated the infinite and the divine, raised children, protected their families, and led them to what was best for them, often regardless of personal sacrifice.
Literally pretty much EVERYTHING you see around you was invented, created, improved and built by men. While there are certainly exceptions and some women here and there have contributed positive things to civilisation, you will find even the best among them were aware of the fact that it was essentially men who had the objective perspectives of logic, reason, and factual appreciation of reality to make the necessary choices and actions that improved life for all. Florence Nightingale and her statements concerning women in general comes to mind.
So, when so random effeminate male, or bitter, entitled, spoilt, pointless female criticises you, realise, that in the first place, they literally know NOTHING of how the world came to be so pleasant and easy that they can sit on their ever-expanding arse and pontificate about thing that they never had the intellect to even understand, never mind philosophise about or create.
They are cargo-cultists. What is a cargo cultist? It originates from groups of tribes in the Pacific Islands that assumed that cargo (material goods, shipping containers full of new and wonderful stuff they had never seen before) would come if they pleased the gods in various rituals. In modern usage, this means something slightly different. The retards criticising you and your life choices are generally morons that haven’t got a clue about how to perform the most basic of tasks, like changing a car tire, or knowing what a spark plug is, and so on. They take all of these things for granted, as if moving vehicles (with their spark plugs, and tires and rotary wings and so on, and on, and on) are just a normal fact of nature. Apples grow on trees, and international flights and iPads just sprout naturally from the ground. And female Grrrrll power makes them work even better.
This complete ignorance and detachment from history translates into a complete detachment from reality. The same retards are bound to think that a woman can compete in sports at the same level of a man, that mutilating your genitals changes your sex, that shoving people from different cultures, religions and backgrounds together by force results in anything other than eventual war between them, and so on and so forth. So, their opinions, are invariably completely ignorant and detached from reality. And have as much value, generally speaking, as the farts of drug-addled gnats.
2. They are Stupid
You can’t get away from it. They are simply not very intelligent. They are unable to observe reality and make effective, logical, reasoned, conclusions that match reality. Ignorance, even engrained through indoctrination, can be remedied, albeit far less easily than most people assume, but the absolute absence of historical context, constant lies spread by all mass media in its multitude of forms and so on, can make the best of us ignorant.
That, however, is less excusable when you become old enough to make your way in the world. If you have any kind of functioning brain, you should be able to notice reality around you; and where it is intentionally being subverted and lied about to you in a consistent and ridiculous manner. In short, only a complete fucking idiot believes that a man can become a woman by genital mutilation, or vice versa, or that wanting to rape little children is just “another form of sexuality”, or that men and women are equal (or that any two human beings are, for that matter, including twins). Now, it is fair to say that one can be confused about a great many things, and not necessarily be an idiot, and I will give a few brief examples below to give a general sense, but anyone of middle age that still believes the absurd versions of the narrative described immediately above, is, without question, a moron. And why on Earth would you ever take life advice from a moron?
If you are confused about a topic, study it. Look into it. On the surface, feminism sounds like a good thing, right? I mean, I thought so too at about age 13, way back in say 1982 or so. Because, on the surface, what did we initially get told feminism was about? Well, equality before the law. And who would want to argue that, right? I mean would you not want everyone to be treated the same before the law? Sounds good right? Except it’s not.
And let’s leave aside for a moment the reality of who the luminaries of feminism were, and what they actually wanted to achieve and what their motives were. Let’s just skip right over that little portal to Hell and instead just focus on the supposedly “good” aspects of it, like that whole “equality before the law” thing.
It’s actually fucking evil, and a perversion of justice. Roman Law (the original one, from Ancient Rome, now very diluted) knew this. Anglo-Saxon law, and eventually American “law”, being a gradual and increasing descent into hell, have steadily moved away from the fact that the law, if it is to be just, should NOT apply equally to everyone. Is it fair to judge someone that has an IQ of 75 by the same standards as someone that has an IQ of 150? Is it fair to judge someone that is biologically less emotionally stable because of how hormones work in their body than someone who is biologically more stable hormonally? If you are honest, while you may well (and justifiably) become fearful at the prospect of just how do you act fairly to everyone, the reality is that each individual circumstance, as much as possible, should be somewhat allowed for.
Personally, for example, I have no real problem with women generally receiving lighter sentences for most violent crimes against adults. Take the example of say Charlize Theron. Her mother shot and killed her father supposedly because of the physical abuse she was subjected to by her husband, and imminent threat in that specific instance. Was it all real? I have no clue. Apparently she was found not guilty of murder because the situation was clearly one of self-defence. And if so, good for her. It seems a pretty clear cut case, and I have zero problem with the lady in question being perfectly free. But even if there was some question of it, in general, I too would tend to favour the woman’s account of things. It is —for the very same reasons that women did not build empires— generally, not usual for a woman to resort to deadly force as a “go to” response. Of course exceptions exist, the specific of each case need to be looked at etc etc. But as a general rule, what I am saying is that, while we know that women receive much lighter sentences than men for violent crimes, I don’t really have a problem with it. The exception for me is when women harm children, particularly their own. In those instances, the penalty, as far as I am concerned, should absolutely be equal, and when they kill children, the penalty should absolutely be death.
Why don’t I have problem with the lighter sentences for women? For the same reason I don’t have a problem with lighter sentences for children. On average, they are less emotionally capable than adult males.
Or to put it bluntly: Should a woman (in general, on average) receive a lighter sentence for, say, a shooting that results in a death?
Yes. I think in general that is probably ok. Why? Because in general, women will also have less access to legally owned firearms. The training that I personally would like to have in place for people to own firearms would be far above present requirements. (Note I said training, not bureaucracy and paperwork). BUT, if and when that training is done and regularly kept up with, I literally would have zero problem with people (citizens of the country only, regardless of country) going about and being armed in their day to day life. Despite anti-gun people screaming till they are blue in the face, the statistics on this are absolutely clear. Where concealed carry of firearms is legal, violent crime drops dramatically. It’s not what they tell you or want you to know, but historical statistics on this are unequivocal.
Despite the fact that the rules as I would like them are NOT in place anywhere, it remains the case that in those societies where being armed is permissible, most women choose to not go through the process. And many are indeed, scared of guns in se. As they might be of a chainsaw too. And that’s perfectly normal. I also strongly agree with men using chainsaws and not women, unless absolutely necessary. None of this is rocket science, but can you see how that translates in making all the rules the same for everyone, unjust? Roman law applies principle as a generality, but looks at each individual case on its own merits, and because of it, is an eminently better legal system than any of the ones currently in place in the English speaking world for sure, and probably the rest of the planet too. So, once again, an echo of Rome, but also, of the inability of the ignorant giving you crappy advice to think things through based on what’s in front of their own eyes at any given point.
The same idiocy applies to pretty much all of their assumed ideas about life, the Universe and everything. Because in the main, whatever idiotic idea they think they have, is not even theirs. These people have never had an original thought in their entire existence. They merely absorbed whatever “fashionable” nonsense they have been instructed to believe. And it is so with literally everything in their stupid lives.
Fifteen years ago, Russell Brand was supposedly this sexy, intellectual “naughty boy” that any woman would (should?) have been grateful to be bedded by, him being constantly described in the press as a “Lothario”. Now he is supposedly a perverse sexual predator that has been hiding his vile practices for years. The reality is that Russell Brand always was a complete fake with respect to being any kind of “intellectual”, he was an entirely manufactured “sensation”, and above all, as I stated way back then, in my opinion, always was a creep, and I am also certain he was sexually inept on every level. I would have bet money on it then and I would do so now too.
But the same cretinous people that used to “love him” then, will “hate him” now. And not because they finally see through anything at all. Because they never do, and never did before. They simply follow the narrative they are imbibed with. These are not the behaviours of people you can respect for their intelligence, insightful nature, or valid powers of observation. So why on Earth would you listen to their criticisms of you and your life choices?
And those two are main and general points that apply to over 95% of the morons that spew they idiotic opinions out of their drooling mouths, which is enough to discredit all of their opinions, pretty much, but please keep in mind there are many, many, more valid reasons, that can also apply generally, or more specifically, and it would take a book or ten to list them all in detail. I list only a few here for ease of use:
An inability to understand percentages, probabilities, and statistics in general.
As a result of their innumeracy, a complete inability to evaluate a scientific paper, a news report, or really any bit of information, including self-observed ones, for objective factual value. In short, they are completely unable to even be aware if a scientific methodology as applied to a study is valid or not. Never mind analyse the results of the study with a critical eye founded in statistical knowledge.
An inability to spot obvious logical fallacies.
An inability to follow, much less produce, a valid logical syllogism.
An inability to foresee obvious problems with a theoretical concept or idea. Even after the problems start showing up en masse.
An inability to select for logic over emotions.
A complete inability to design, perform, execute and review an actual scientific experiment of any kind. And the total lack of imagination to even consider doing so.
So, yeah. They are ignorant and they are stupid. Really that is all you need to know to realise you can and should ignore their bullshit ideas about you and/or your loved ones.
Who are these Critics?
1. Human Wreckage
Ever notice who the biggest critics are?
I have.
You will never receive as much criticisms from the human equivalent of flotsam.
The alcoholics. The junkies. The permanently unemployed. The drug addled, pot-smoking, shiftless human shadows that perambulate life in a way that is analogous to the permanently sedated inmates in a mental institute for the criminally insane.
Those who have made a complete shambles of their own lives somehow find it fit to give you advice on how to live yours. The mothers that failed their children at every turn pretend to tell their daughters how to parent. The fathers that failed completely at fatherhood will criticise their sons mercilessly no matter what they achieve.
It is always thus.
These human equivalent of sewer rats, will try to drag everyone down to their level. And this is true across cultures and nations. The ghettos of the Bronx are no different from the council estates of London, or the “case popolari” of Naples. Humans are generally, flawed, weak, greedy, petty-minded, envious creatures, and when one of their numbers tries, or succeeds, in elevating themselves from the surrounding rat-people, these will try to drag him or her back into the sewer.
Because, ultimately, if that man or woman does escape, does become happier, more successful at life, a better parent, a happier wife, a richer son, then it tells the rat-people what useless beings they are in a way that even their unconscious mind finds difficult to avoid. In fact, the usual response, if that happens and they totally fail at dragging the escapee back, is to then try to claim credit for their success.
If it were honest, it would be stated more like: “Oh yes, Johnny only became a successful man because of the alcoholic beatings he received from me, the cocaine fuelled orgies he saw me and his mother partake in during swingers parties, my constant adultery and taking my life’s frustrations out on him. I did all that for him. And the ungrateful little bastard won’t even buy me a new house! After all I did for him!”
So, when you get criticised by someone, look at their own life in that respect.
What kind of marriage did they have?
What kind of children did they raise?
What kind of achievements did they have?
How successful at their chosen life paths have they been?
What are their biggest failures and biggest achievements?
What’s their drug use been like throughout their life?
What has their business or careers achieved?
Did they provide well for their loved ones?
And if all of the above is one train smash after another, why would you care one little bit what they think, or what “advice” they are giving out under the guise of “helping” you?
2. Losers and NPCs
Not quite as toxic as the human wreckage, these are nevertheless people that while perhaps meaning well, (you might want to think so, but never assume it is the case) have an over-inflated sense of their own ability and/or importance. These are people that either have had some disappointment in life, tried and failed at something, or several somethings, or just plodded along without ever achieving too much and resent it. A bit, or a lot.
Please do not mistake these people for the genuine, middle-of-the-road people who simply did the best they could, without lamenting their lot too much and just got on with it, but are not by any means captains of industry, or particularly successful at anything specific. Few things are as under-appreciated as the steady, normal people, who nevertheless kept their family together, fed, and relatively happy. I am not talking about these people. I am talking about the father who was never a good enough football player so he tries to live vicariously through his son and makes him go to training daily when his son would much rather take up woodworking, say. It’s the “I could have been Miss County of Whocaresatall!” And by golly, she is going to dress her 5 year old daughter in the latest fashion accessories.
It’s the parents who, even though they did not divorce, when you announce that you are not going to university, because you really like electronics and have found a job as an apprentice in an electronics repair shop, immediately criticise your choice, because spending 100k on a nose picking degree in business economics gives you the prestige to be a Starbucks barista with a degree! And neither of them knows how to wire a plug, never mind solder a bit of an electronic components.
In RPG game parlance, if you are born into a family of zero-level NPCs whose life revolved around selling clothing made by hand to the local nobility, and you announce that you are off to be a ranger, learning how to hunt in the woods, even as you study magic in the evening, they will naturally tell you you are crazy; you will get eaten by werewolves, orcs will rape you, and giant wasps will paralyse you and lay eggs in your rectum that will eat you from the inside.
And some of that may indeed be a possible outcome. But while no one wants to be raped by orcs and become an incubator for giant wasps, the idea of spending your life as a tailor for the nobility makes being eaten by a werewolf more attractive. Besides, if you are only partially chewed you become a werewolf yourself and while not ideal, eh… at least it won’t be boring!
So, while they may even have your best interests at heart, they simply don’t have any relevant experience really. And, more importantly, they do not have your heart. And heart counts for a lot in life. In fact, as far as I am concerned, without heart, what’s the point?
So, what now young (or not so young) adventurer?
1. Generalities
Of course, the point is not to go off half cocked and oblivious of the dangers, obstacles or other things you may have to face.
By all means, study and research. Figure things out and have backup plan A, B and C. But also…
Don’t over-think it either.
Remember that as Von Clausewitz put it, no plan survives contact with the enemy.
And in life, that “enemy” is reality. And the ability of your plan to deal with it is a direct relationship with how distant the plan is from observable reality and the happenstances along the way. The more able you are to adapt, and yet continue along your chosen path, the more likely your eventual success.
Keep in mind that failure is part of life. Falling down happens. You didn’t learn to walk by not falling down. You learnt to walk by continually getting up again. And the advice you may have got at age 8 or 9 months, when you could not speak and did not understand most of language, was mostly just so much babbling. And so is the mouth noises most of your critics make today.
Notice also, that most of the people who do encourage you, who do say, “You know, I think this and that might be a problem, but man, I think you can do it. And maybe you can figure out how to even avoid this or that, or maybe they are not even things. After all, I didn’t do it that way, so you might be right.” Or who give you constructive criticism designed to help you stay on track and be inspired, are not the losers, not the NPCs and most certainly not the human wreckage. They are people that in whatever capacity have achieved a measure of success. Whether it is financial, emotional, familial, or whatever.
I never had criticism of me and my ways as I did from the losers at life, and I learnt early on to ignore them. There is also a specific type of critic that is externally successful (they may be rich, or apparently want for nothing) but in reality they absolutely resent your own personal freedom. This can be from your own parents too as well as strangers or even billionaires. I have no clue about Elon Musk’s life, and I am picking him as a random example, and possibly totally unfairly so, but let me put it this way, I would not be in the least surprised if Elon would be envious of my life-long freedom of always having been able to tell whoever I want, to fuck right off, if I felt like it. And I would assume that Elon has a lot more to lose than I do, and as a result, paradoxically, is perhaps a lot less free to do that to the extent I can and have done. So, beware of those critics too.
2. Specifics
Most men who grew up in the Western world had half-stunted or actively bad examples of male role models. The easy life made the necessities of manhood less of a requirement and more of a cultural option. One that carried increasingly high levels of discomfort and risk in many cases.
The changing “morality” (increasing degeneracy and destruction of wholesome ethics, honour, and traditions) also meant that your own fathers were under intellectual assault for most of their lives. My own upbringing, in the relatively savage African wilderness was rare for a Westerner to have. The realities of life and death are almost never impressed upon to Western men. Instead, a barrage of absolute nonsense is forced in their heads with a crowbar-like attachment to narratives intentionally designed to destroy the natural, healthy, heterosexual, European male. That is just an objective fact that becomes obvious if you merely pay attention and notice things as the are, and why they are being driven in that direction, and by whom.
So:
1. Study History. Indeed, learn about Rome. And Greece, and the Catholic Church as it really was, and what it really did, not what you have been told about it; look it up. Hundreds of volumes exist of writings by the people that were there in the first couple of hundred years after Jesus. And many more after that. Start at the beginning, not the fake end they tell you is the whole story. It isn’t.
2. Learn Logic, Mathematics, Statistics and Probability. “Oh it’s hard to study…” Suck it up buttercup. Life is hard. Being a man is hard. Being an educated man is even harder. It’s also a requirement. Stop being a pussy. Get on with it.
3. Understand the role of being a man and what it entails. Do NOT attempt to do this without having done one and two above first. You will be led astray by a lot of gay wolves in heterosexual sheep’s clothing. I will be making my subsequent blog post about this very topic. And you have plenty to get on with before then, so get on with it.
4. Understand the role of a woman and what it entails, but above all, understand how a man should relate to a woman and how she should relate to a man. Again, this is a complex topic that has been vilified in every way imaginable for at the very least 70 years. Do not attempt to begin this without first having done the three above points and having read my very next blog post after this one, which will cover this aspect in more detail. Hint: Women are not the enemy.
5. Understand that religion is pivotal. Not optional. This is a massive topic and of course, rivers of ink and blood have been spilt over it, so I am not going to bother doing more than I already have with my two books, the short one, BELIEVE! and the detailed one Reclaiming the Catholic Church. But be aware that atheism leads to mass murder, and so do many fake religions. Churchianity leads to fakeness and gayness (of the butt-sex kind, not the happy kind). False religions lead to dysfunctional societies, not functional, happy, safe ones that are able to deal with reality head on. Catholicism has been vilified and lied to from the start, and had bad men, in it and all around it, throughout it’s existence, and yet, in keeping with our Lord’s promise, it remains active, and has been the most successful method of creating loving, safe, humane societies full of beauty, humanity, justice and happiness. And this despite the constant lies, attacks and since 1958, total inversion of it by the Satanists currently residing in the Vatican. So, at a minimum, read a bit about it. My books of course save you a lot of time and give plenty of references you can verify by yourself, but it doesn’t need to be my books. Just learn the real history of Christianity from the very early days, as written about by the people that were physically there at the time. Then see if you can still refute catholicism as it really is, not as you have been told it is by pedophile Satanists pretending to be Catholic Clergy.
And last but also first: I don’t know about you, but personally, I have always believed it is better for me to make mistakes or bad choices as a result of my own bad decisions than by listening to someone else’s bad advice.
So, go forth man. And conquer life and do the hard things, and do the good things, and ignore the naysayers, the critics, the failures, the alcoholic, drug addled flotsam of life, the NPCs, the envious millionaires and jealous prisoners of their own failures. Build your life, your friends, your family, your community, based on solid foundations, leading a loving wife who respects and cares about you and looks after you as a woman that is happy to be a woman and act as one, even as you take care of her and love her, as a man that is happy to be a man, and acts as one.
Yes, they DO change your DNA
And it’s not like we didn’t know this YEARS before covid. In fact, I recall an online conversation with a guy that explained way back in 2018 I think, that the way to really get rid of all the Europeans was precisely to use the kind of genetic modification serum that was passed off as a “vaccine” for COVID. This was not a virologist or doctor. Just a guy with above average IQ who took an interest and read various medical papers for fun and shared his thoughts with a group of online friends I belonged to. So, contrary to the Scott Adams of this world, it was absolutely clear and possible to know what the vaxx would do to you long before anyone took it.
Aside from all that, there is also the graphite and other bugs, of course.
Read the whole thing.
A few of the previously fooled or sleeping doctors are awakening with a rude shock.
And let’s not talk of the turbo-cancers…
No related posts.
By G | 30 September 2023 | Posted in Social Commentary