Archive for March 2023

Jay Dyer Debate – The Vivisection

The Dyer debate, or as I referred to it, the Internet Hobo Fight, since that is more what it resembled, since little Jay is emotionally incontinent, duplicitous and dishonest, and can’t actually argue his way out of a paper bag, was taken off the internet I believe, as were many of Jay’s videos.

Anyway, someone had saved the entire video and they sent it to me.

I emailed Ralph in case he had any objections to my reposting the original debate but… with my replies plied in to prove the points I make about Jay above.

I had in any case already done this in writing, as I knew the “debate” would devolve into Jay acting like a screaming monkey on crack once I cornered him. So I had stated very clearly even before the debate that I would make a written after-report.

However, since the majority of people are fast becoming illiterate, and the orthobrautists that follow Jay are incapable of basic syllogisms, never mind reading, I thought it would make for entertaining video for those who are allergic to reading.

The whole thing is, of course, pretty autistic to begin with, and these are 3 hours and 40 minutes or so of glorified autism, pretty much, but if you just want the highlights, then, not to worry, when I post the video, in the next day or so, I will list the timestamps that are most entertaining, for the 3 autists out there who care.

Anyway, it’s coming so I just though I’d let you all know, so when the video is uploaded you can all rush to it. All 3 of you who care deeply.

The Stupids – And the Solution

Vox has posted something I can commiserate with very much, namely his attitude to the average human post covid.

one of the few benefits of being an elitist intellectual is that you assume the vast majority of the programmed quasi-minds that surround you will not only disagree with you, but are not even capable of understanding your position if it was explained to them very slowly and with small words.

But I was a little stunned to discover that I had somehow given the average individual too much benefit of the doubt. I did not see that coming. I’ve been told my entire life that I was too arrogant, too harsh, too dismissive of the intellectual capabilities of others, and yet, when push came to shove, it turned out that in the end, I had erred on the side of generosity! I truly did not see that coming.

I don’t see how it can be a good thing, but now I have absolutely no regard whatsoever for the opinions of others, unless and until they are observably proven worthy of consideration.

I have had exactly the same experience. While I have been often told I am an arrogant bastard, that I should have more compassion for my fellow man, and so on, as it turns out, I too had thoroughly erred on the side of generosity too. While I assumed the average human was a complete idiot, I had not realised at all, just how much more widespread the problem was. Even those people I thought merited some consideration, because they could grasp certain basic issues, as it turns out, in most cases, were no better than circus monkeys trained to do a trick for others’ entertainment, with no real grasp of the issue at all.

My reaction has been a little different, in that I generally did not have any consideration for the opinions of others to begin with. Although I did, for my own sanity, and at least entertainment, try to find something interesting, whenever possible, about said others. With many, it was merely enough to get me through a dinner or so without calling them retards to their face, but what can you do; noblesse oblige.

What I did note, probably by growing up mostly in deepest, darkest Africa, is that you can generally rely on genuinely low IQ people more, in many senses than you can in those supposedly educated and of at least nominal, or even “above average” intelligence. The genuine illiterate who imagines the operation of a car as some sort of magic, can generally be relied upon to be, if not always truthful, at least extremely predictable. It doesn’t make for good company, other than in the narrowest of senses, but it can be a relationship that has a certain level of respect and dignity. Admittedly it’s probably closer to having a smart pet you like than an equal with which you can discuss the finer points of philosophy, but there is no confusion as to the abilities and really stations in life in terms of those abilities. And having grown up a hunter, I certainly don’t begrudge such people their lives, any more than I do that of a wild lion or hyena, including if they were to maul me and eat me. Of course, one needs to take precautions and if required, blast a wild animal with a suitably powerful weapon so as to protect yourself and your loved ones. It’s true it’s a trickier thing when they have two legs and appear to be human, but the basic response is the same, you just have to be more careful.

The dangerous ones are the ones that fool you into thinking they may be your peer. Just like those “conservatives” that end up stabbing you in the back, when it counts. Or the vegan conscientious objector in your trench that throws all the bullets of everyone in the mud because “violence is not the answer”. Those guys need to be shot first and placed in front of the sandbags outside the trench to protect the sandbags from enemy fire.

The life of a really intelligent person, if often quite a lonely or at least loner-like existence. My own mother, in one of her rare times she even noticed anything, commented once when I was about 16 that although my own father fancied himself a loner, I was on another level, as I’d pass weeks of my vacation time simply reading books or doing things by myself. She asked if I didn’t get lonely. My reply was simply pragmatic.

“What choice do I have?” Was I to hang out with retards and that would somehow make my day better? It wouldn’t. As the old saying in Italian goes, “Better alone than badly accompanied.”

So, my reaction to discovering that even those I held out some hope for are, for the most part, just circus apes on this planet of the apes, has been a little different. I have noticed three things, that are relevant:

  1. Those of similar intellect are few and far between and in general are on their own path and unlikely to veer from it.
  2. Actual Catholics, Sedevacantists, are the most reliable human beings I have come across as a class, by far. It’s not even close.
  3. Possibly because being Catholic means utterly believing in hierarchy, there is little friction when a team of Catholics is put together and the roles are clearly explained beforehand.

This has led me to the conclusion that for the rest of my days on this Satanic Domain, it makes absolute sense to begin the process of creating what I believe will be the only hope in the future for my children or my children’s children: City States.

It is questionable what level of success I will have, but in the long term, meaning after I am gone, most likely, the only people who may retain some semblance of actual freedom are those who:

  1. Are able to defend their property, will, lives, property and so on.
  2. Have the numbers to do 1.
  3. Have the economy to do 1.
  4. Have the means to do 1.
  5. Have the conviction and an unchangeable set of rules to do 1.
  6. Have the will, the faith, the indomitable spirit of being to do 1.
  7. Have demonstrated this already by being Vaxx Free and having chosen to be Sedevacantists.

And as far as I can see, the only way that can happen is by creating a community of proper (Sedevacantist) Catholics.

To build it one man and one woman and one couple and many children at a time. To build a Church and get a proper priest on site, to have our children learn and train and practice and learn and grow together, to have our Catholic children grow up to marry the other Catholic children that they grew up with. To teach them above all to be, yes, as innocent as doves, but also to be as wise as serpents. And to be able protect from, and to strike back against, any enemies who try to infiltrate, weaken, destroy, or pervert those communities, in whatever way is required to secure those communities, those people, those values. To learn commerce and finance and all the subterfuge of the enemy and then to exclude them and their ways from our communities and exclude them forever.

Catholicism is the only religion that has succeeded at this for as long as it has. It is true that Shintoist Buddhism served to isolate Japan for a while, and perhaps Imperial China may have had their own ways, but you didn’t want to be a Chinese if you could help it. And while being Japanese would have been fine, they didn’t last nearly as long. And I don’t see a tradition of Zen-Samurai forming communities. It isn’t going to happen.

So yes. My reaction has been what some started calling The Kurganate, as a joke, and so we took on that name. And yes, it’s not a democracy. And everyone is free, yet everyone has their place too.

There may not be many people that use their brains well. There are some that are able to be faithful and loyal though, and that is a good thing.

I know several men are already preparing to move near me and actively saving, getting married, looking for property and building themselves up to do so. So it can happen and it will happen. I don’t know all the details of how fast, or how big, or any of that. But I know it will. Like with anything else, I just have to keep going. And I hope you will too.

The Beauty of Diversity

See this chart below?


It’a about criminality in Sweden.

It shows that out of 15 sexual assaults, 5 are committed by foreigners born outside of Sweden, 5 from people born in Sweden to parents that came to Sweden as foreigners, and 3 are from people born in Sweden who have one parent that was a foreigner.

So only 2 out of 15 are committed by actual Swedish people born in Sweden from Swedish parents.

Isn’t diversity grand?

The Dimond Brothers are simply wrong about Baptism of Desire

First, let me give credit where it is due, the Dimond brothers, at their website produce for the most part, outstanding works of proper Catholic teaching and correct Canon Law. I have directed many people to their websites and various of their articles on many topics, for they tend to be exhaustive in their research and details. So, let me not pretend otherwise.

Unfortunately, and it is very unfortunate, they commit a grave error, which is the (absurd) position of claiming that baptism of desire and baptism of blood are not valid concepts in Catholic Dogma.

They have written at length on the topic and it is quite astonishing to see their usually very logical and precise thinking on so many other topics, take the absurdist and intentionally contrarian position with respect to BOD and BOB, going so far as to literally misrepresent the written word of various encyclicals and so on.

But as I said repeatedly to Jay Dyer and many others, there is no need to go trolling through almost 2000 years of church documents to try and find one that if you squint just right, and you quote out of context, and ignore hundreds of other documents that clarify the situation unambiguously, might allow one to pretend that your absurd position is correct.

All we need is Canon Law. Specifically the one of 1917 because Canon Law is how you apply Church dogma, since it embodies ALL the Church documents and Papal encyclicals ever written prior to 1917. And if we do that we note that wit respect to baptism of desire we find the following canons (reproduced here in full – bold emphasis added).

TITLE 1

On baptism

Canon 737

§ 1. Baptism, the gateway and foundation of the Sacraments, actually or at least in desire is necessary for all for salvation and is not validly conferred except by washing with true and natural water along with the prescribed formula of words.

§ 2. When it is administered in accord with all of the rites and ceremonies that are prescribed in the ritual books, it is called solemn; otherwise, [it is called] non-solemn or private.

Canon 1239

§ 1. Those who die without baptism are not to be accorded ecclesiastical burial.

§ 2. Catechumens who through no fault of their own die without baptism are to be reckoned as baptized.

§ 3. All baptized are to be given ecclesiastical burial unless they are expressly deprived of same by law.

So that’s it. It’s pretty conclusive. Similarly, there exist dozens of documents from various eras and Popes supporting fully the concept of baptism of desire and of blood. But perhaps even more damning for the Dimond brothers are two last pieces of information:

Firstly, there are a number of Saints, recognised as Saints by the Catholic Church who decided there and then to become Catholic and did not have the chance to be baptised before they were put to death. Perhaps the most well knows in the very Saint whose Name I took at Baptism, Saint Adrian’s of Nicomedia.

Ss. Adrian and Natalia lived in Nicomedia during the time of Emperor Maximian in the early fourth century. The twenty-eight-year-old Adrian was head of the praetorium.It is said that while presiding over the torture of a band of Christians, he asked them what reward they expected to receive from God. They replied, “Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him” (1 Corinthians 2:9). He was so amazed at their courage that he publicly confessed his faith, though he had not himself yet been baptised. He was then immediately imprisoned himself. He was forbidden visitors, but accounts state that his wife Natalia came to visit him dressed as a boy to ask for his prayers when he entered Heaven. The executioners wanted to burn the bodies of the dead, but a storm arose and quenched the fire. Natalia recovered one of Adrian’s hands.

So unless the Dimond brothers also want to refute some of the earliest Saints of the Church, it clearly points out that they are in error.

Secondly, I wrote to them years ago and while I am told they reply to most people who write to them, I never received a reply, and as per Roman law: Silence is equivalent to assent. So I presume they know they are in error.

This was my email to them, sent on the 28th June 2020:

Dear Br. Dimond,
I have made very fruitful use of your very detailed writings in my own research and elucidation of the original Catholic doctrines. I have also verified for myself even before I was aware of your own clashes with them, the mendacity and lies spread by people such as John Salza and John Pontrello, Jay Dyer, etcetera.
I have, to date, not found error in the things on your site I have read so far, I do however have a question on baptism of desire. Although I have read what you have written on the subject I am unclear on a rather specific detail of this point of doctrine. I hope if you have the time you will indulge me with a short and direct reply. In order to save time I will also ask my question in the most direct and to the point way, and I hope you understand this is not to be disrespectful but merely to be clear.
My question is as follows:

1. I accept and believe that there is no salvation outside of the Catholic Church. This is dogmatic and I have no issue with it.
2. What I have also seen however is that in a very specific case (detailed below) although in foro externo the baptism has not taken place physically, if it has taken place in foro interno then, although no human being can know this for certain, and as such it is a somewhat moot point from an external, objective perspective, it is Church doctrine that in such a case the church believes the person can still be saved.
3. What is meant by this “baptism” by foro interno is very rare and unlikely but as I understand it would be as follows:
A person who has (relatively suddenly I suppose) become aware that the Catholic Church is the only one true Church and thus become truly desirous of being baptised in its name and doing his or her utmost to get this baptism done as immediately as possible, who however dies before it is factually completed physically, may, in God’s mercy, be accepted into purgatory and eventually heaven. The occurrence would necessarily be extremely rare given that even an atheist can validly baptise in an emergency as long as the correct formula and intent are present, however, this is my current understanding of the situation.
I would very much welcome your comments on this point and/or your view/corrections you feel are necessary to this perspective.
My current view on it is that the above seems congruent with God’s and the Church’s statement that no one goes to Hell through no fault of their own. So even the deceived have had ample opportunity to educate themselves and have not chosen it. However, in the instance of one suddenly awakened to the truth, who does not delay, but who dies prior to the actual baptism, they may in fact be saved. As I hope I explained this would be extremely rare and for all practical purposes unlikely to happen at all, but it seems to me to be in alignment with God’s mercy.
Thank you for your time and I look forward to your eventual response.

Giuseppe

I think that puts the matter to bed once and for all.

It is an important point, because as a result of this error, the Dimond brothers do not recognise ANY priests or Bishops as being valid. Meaning, they are not even Sedevacantists, truly, if there are no valid priests or Bishops left on Earth then the Catholic Church would have ceased to exist and Jesus’s promise would have been a lie. This, is ultimately the real crux of the matter and makes their position schismatic and heretical. I truly hope they repent and return to the fold, for their other work is otherwise excellent.

But it is necessary to ensure people are not deceived into believing this dangerous and absurd position, lest they lose their faith.

I have posted a few other canons concerning baptism below, as they may be of interest.

We also learn that in emergencies literally almost anyone can administer a baptism too.

Canon 742

§ 1. Non-solemn baptism, discussed in Canon 759, § 1, can be administered by anyone, preserving the required matter, form, and intention; when it can be done this way, two witnesses, or at least one, should be used, by which the conferral of the baptism can be proved.

§ 2. If there is a priest present, he is preferred to a deacon, a deacon to a subdeacon, a cleric to layman, and a man to a woman, unless for the sake of modesty it is more becoming that a woman baptize instead of a man, or unless a woman knows the form and manner of baptism better than does a man.

§ 3. It is not permitted that the father or mother baptize their own child, except in danger of death, when there is no one else who can baptize.

And in danger of a miscarriage, even a foetus in the womb can be baptised. This does give me some comfort as I did this when my wife was beginning to have what turned out to be a miscarriage.

Canon 746

§ 1. No one should be baptized in the mother’s womb so long as there is a hope that he can be baptized correctly outside of it.

§ 2. If the head of an infant is exposed and there is imminent danger of death, let him be baptized on the head; later, if he is delivered alive, he should be baptized again under condition.

§ 3. If another part of the body is exposed, and if danger [of death] is imminent, let him be baptized under condition thereupon, and then, if he survives birth, he should be once again baptized under condition.

§ 4. If a pregnant mother dies, and if the fetus is delivered by those who do such things, and if he is certainly alive, he should be baptized absolutely; if there is doubt, [he should be baptized] under condition.

§ 5. A fetus baptized in the womb should be baptized again under condition after [being born].

Canon 759 is reproduced here as it is mentioned in Canon 742, just to give a more complete picture.

Canon 759

§ 1. In case of danger of death, baptism is licitly conferred privately; and if it is conferred by a minister who is neither a priest nor a deacon, he should do only those things necessary for the validity of baptism; if a priest or deacon is available, they should apply, if time allows, the baptismal norms that follow.

§ 2. Outside of danger of death, the local Ordinary should not permit private baptism, unless it is a case of heretics who are being baptized under condition at an adult age.

§ 3. The ceremonies that were omitted in the conferral of the baptism, for whatever reason, should be supplied in a church as soon as possible, except in cases described in § 2.

Russia and China are firm partners. WW3 options…?

185 billion in trade between then in 2022 and expected to exceed 200 billion this year.

Of course, Iran and recently Hungary have also made it clear that despite pressure from the (((people))) running America, they are not on the EU/Nato/globohomo side.

Most of Africa had any Russian debt wiped to zero by Putin a few days ago; and having lived in Africa for more than a couple of decades, I’ll tell you that there is no love lost between Africans and Americans. By and large, they will side with Russia and China. As will a goodly chink of South America.

So… what are the worshipers of the god of this world to do? Oh, for their money (literally), they would be quite happy to see Europe burn in nuclear fire and flying a couple of B52 bombers close to the Russian border was yet more provocation towards that end, BUT… and it’s a big BUT, I cannot lie… the Arabic world seems to be coming together all around Israel. And well… if a new world war suddenly goes kinetic outside of Ukraine, involving maybe Poland and possibly a few coup d’etat in Georgia etcetera, especially the recent Armenian/Azerbajani disruptions… it might just end up that a coalition of Arab nations decide that it’s time to evict the Jews from somewhere (Israel this time) for the 111th time. And if America is busy fighting Russia it will shortly also become busy fighting China (or not, see below). And if America is distracted with such grabby and ill-fated adventurism, it might just not react fast enough to prevent Israel from becoming a very hot zone.

And right now at least some of the Israeli military is not happy at all with Bibi. That whole, changing of the judicial system is not going very much his way right now.

Talking with friends last night, I put the chances of a hot war in Europe spilling out of Ukraine at 25% or so. Probably involving the Poles and maybe some hangers-on like the Lithuanians or Estonians. But if that happens some level of conscription may happen across Europe.

My friends seem to think no one would show up to the draft, but given 90% of them self injected the euthanasing serum, I think a lot of them would. They would make abysmal soldiers, of course, but they would show up. They are all just terrified of not doing as they are told.

That’s my take anyway.

I would like to think that if there was a draft in Europe most would decide to overthrow their own government, by force if required, but I doubt that is what would happen. But who knows, perhaps a few principled commanders remain in the various European armies. And maybe some would overthrow their governments.

Only time will tell.

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks